Slashdot Mirror


Y2K Rollover - Post Your Experiences Here!

fredm8 writes "Since the Slashdot article, When Does Y2K Begin, New Zealand has experienced the Y2K rollover. Yes the power still works, the water still flows, my Windows98 PC still runs, my Linux box rocks, and my supported *nix boxes still run." We're getting lots of stories like this one submitted. We might as well have them all in one place, so please post yours below instead of sending it in as a story submission. This thread ought to make an interesting chronicle of Y2K events -- or non-events, as the case may be.

719 comments

  1. Computers still running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but it's not midnight GMT yet. Similarly, I don't expect anyone to be Raptured until then. 7PM EST! I'll be eating dinner when that happens.

  2. Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Y2k != millenium

    1. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have heard others say that this is not a new millenium. Can anyone explain to me why this is not going to be a new millenium. I have posted this anonymously to avoid showing my ignorance ;-)

    2. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y2K + 1 = new Millennium Basicly when they came up with the Christian Calender that most of the world follows, they didn't start with year 0. Instead it would have been Jan 1, Year 1. So a thousand years would have put the new millennium starting at Year 1001 and a thousand years after that would be 2001 or the start of the next millenium. So what most people are actually celebrating is the start of the last year of this millennium. Happy not the new Millennium!

    3. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • 2000 is not the new millennium because there was no year 0
      • 2001 is not the new millennium because christ was not born on 1/1/1
      • January 1st (any year) is not the millennium because days have been added and removed throughout time.
      I am sure there are more that I have forgotton. Anyway, I say celebrate 2000 cause it is a nice round figure or celebrate every possible date.
    4. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically yah, but was 1990 part of the eighties? hmmm?

    5. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who cares? this is about Y2K andthat will effect (most likely not effect) us this year not next.. so GET OVER IT

    7. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then Clinton can usually only count if there is a head bobbing up and down below his waste, so don't take what he says as the truth.

      eeks, I actually put the word truth and Clinton in the same post. That's not an easy thing to do.

    8. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was no year 0 so the millenia are 1-1000 1001-2000 2001-3000 Thus the new millenium begins on 1/1/2001

    9. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no word "millenium". But yes, the third millennium begins on 01/01/01.

    10. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that settles it then. The new millennium starts 1/1/2001.

    11. Re:Y2k != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUT y2k is not important. Figuring out when the apocalypse will come IS. We still have one year left to drink ourselves into a semi-conscious brain-dead state before we all meet our total destruction by fire. Get your priorities straight!

    12. Re:Y2k != millenium by aithien · · Score: 5

      When does the Millennium Begin?

      The answer is if you use the Gregorian Calendar and start the first
      millennium with the year 1 AD then the third millennium begins with the year
      2001 AD. But if you use the Common Era Calendar, in which years are numbered
      -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ..., and you begin the first millennium with the year 0 CE
      then the third millennium begins with the year 2000 CE. You have a choice. And
      if you opt for the Common Era Calendar you no longer have to put up with the
      smug assertion that "there was no year zero (so the new millennium begins in
      2001)". There was no year zero when Pope Gregory XIII introduced the Gregorian
      Calendar in the 16th Century but there certainly is one now, and the new
      millennium in the Common Era Calendar begins in 2000 CE.

      The number zero was introduced into westerm circles, along with the
      Arabic numerals we use to day, in the 13th century, but the church refused to
      allow them to be used, simply on the grounds that they were invented by Muslims.
      However, zero and the numbering system we use today did eventually make it into
      acceptance by the 16th century, and greatly simplified mathematics in Europe.
      We can't really blame the church for 2000/2001 issue, because the current year
      numbering system that we used (2 BC, 1 BC, 1 AD, ...) was originally designed by
      a monk in either the 7th or 8th century, before we even heard of the Arabic
      numbering system or zero.

      Roman numerals do not have a figure designating zero, and treating zero
      as a number on an equal footing with other numbers was not common in the 6th
      century when our present year reckoning was established by Dionysius Exiguus.
      Dionysius let the year AD 1 start one week after what he believed to be Jesus'
      birthday. Therefore, AD 1 follows immediately after 1 BC with no intervening
      year zero. So a person who was born in 10 BC and died in AD 10, would have died
      at the age of 19, not 20. Furthermore, Dionysius' calculations were wrong. The
      Gospel of Matthew tells us that Jesus was born under the reign of King Herod the
      Great, and he died in 4 BC. It is likely that Jesus was actually born around 7
      BC. The date of his birth is unknown; it may or may not be 25 December.

      Since the "Anno Domini" system did not come into effect until the 6th
      Century A.D. it is artificial to speak of the years 1 A.D., 100 A.D., etc.,
      because people living at that time knew nothing of this system of numbering
      years (since it had not then been invented yet). Furthermore the Romans in the
      reign of Augustus (27 B.C. to 14 A.D.) were somewhat lax in the proper
      observance of leap years. But we can project backwards (and forwards) from 525
      A.D. by representing the succession of years by the series of natural numbers:
      1, 2, 3, ..., 100, ..., 500, ... Then we can say that the period from 1 A.D.
      through 10 A.D. (including both years) was a period of ten years (since there
      are ten numbers in the series 1, 2, ..., 10). Similarly from 1 A.D. through 100
      A.D. is a period of 100 years, and from 1 A.D. to 1000 A.D. is a period of 1000
      years.

      The word "millennium" means "a period of 1000 years" so we can conclude
      that the period from 1 A.D. through 1000 A.D. (including both years) constituted
      one millennium, and in fact, the first millennium of the Christian era. So the
      second millennium of the Christian era begins with the year 1001 A.D., or more
      exactly, on 1st January 1001 A.D. And the third millennium of the Christian era
      begins on 1st January 2001 A.D. So for Christians - or at least, for all who
      adhere to the Christian system of numbering years - the answer is clear: The new
      millennium begins on 1st January 2001 A.D. However, this is not the end of the
      matter, because the "Anno Domini" system of year numbering has a major flaw,
      namely, it may be OK for years since 1 A.D., but what happens when we consider
      earlier years? As is well known, such years are numbered in reverse order, and
      designated as years "Before Christ". Thus the year immediately before 1 A.D. is
      designated 1 B.C., and the series extends backwards: 2 B.C., 3 B.C., etc.

      With the rise of modern scholarship, particularly astronomy, archaeology
      and chronological studies, this system was felt to be inadequate for scientific
      purposes. For one thing it does not lend itself to calculation using dates. For
      example (a very simple one), how many years elapsed between 1st January 6 B.C.
      and 1st January 6 A.D.? Twelve years? No. The answer is not obvious (and still
      less obvious if we consider longer periods such as that from 535 B.C. to 481
      A.D.). So astronomers and chronologists decided to number years by representing
      the succession of years by the doubly-infinite series of positive and negative
      numbers: ..., -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3 ... This is called the "astronomical"
      system of numbering years. In this system years from 1 onwards have the same
      numbers as years A.D. (year 1 = 1 A.D., and so on), but years B.C. are related
      as follows: The year 0 in the astronomical system is the year 1 B.C., and the
      year -n in the astronomical system is the year n+1 B.C. (for n = 1, 2, 3, ...).
      Conversely, the year n B.C. is the year -(n-1) in the astronomical system. Thus
      year -1 = 2 B.C., year -2 = 3 B.C., and so on.

      A millennium is, by definition, a period of 1000 years. But it is no
      part of the definition that a millennium must begin or end with a particular
      year number. If we adopt the astronomical year numbering system then we can
      begin the "first" millennium with year 0 just as well as with year 1. Strictly
      speaking, there is no first millennium in the astronomical system, since it
      simply numbers years by mapping them onto the sequence ..., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2,
      ..., and we are free to begin millennia where we think fit. It is thus clear
      that the answer to the question as to when the new millennium begins depends on
      which system of year-numbering one chooses to use. Christians may prefer to stay
      with the system of years "Anno Domini", in which case they must answer that the
      new millennium begins on 1st January 2001 A.D. Scientists and others who prefer
      a more rational and useful system of numbering years may prefer to adopt
      explicitly the astronomical system. In this case they are free to begin
      millennia from the years 1, 1001, 2001, and so on (in which case the third
      millennium begins on 1st January 2001), or from the years 0, 1000, 2000, and so
      on (in which case the third millennium begins on 1st January 2000). Thus anyone
      who wishes, for whatever reason, to celebrate the start of the new millennium on
      1st January 2000 has entirely good and rational grounds for doing so, namely,
      (i) the adoption of the astronomical system for numbering years, combined with
      (ii) the convention of beginning millennia with years whose numbers end in "000"
      (and beginning centuries with years whose numbers end in "00"). Note that this
      article does not show that those who hold (as those who adhere to the Christian
      calendar must hold) that the new millennium begins on 1st January 2001 are
      mistaken. Such people have reasons to justify their preference. But this does
      show that anyone who prefers to think of the year 2000 as the first year of the
      new millennium has perfectly sound reasons for doing so.

      I plagorized the SHIT out of this from postings on slashdot and on the internet... no offense to anyone.

    13. Re:Y2k != millenium by m3000 · · Score: 1

      But Bill Clinton says it's the millennium..........

      Sarcasm people, sarcasm.

    14. Re:Y2k != millenium by hellbunnie · · Score: 1
      Actually, you're wrong on that second point. The bloke who made the calendar for Pope Gregory actually left out the year 0, so Christ was technically born on 1/1/1. I am still in agreement with you on when to celebrate, however, my argument is simply that the first decade was nine years long...

      I think the point being made was that the date that the bloke came up with for the birth of christ (ie. 1/1/1) cannot actually be correct as Herod died four years before this (and you may recall he was around for the birth). Therefore, christ must have been born in 4BC or earlier.

      As for the choice of when to celebrate, in the past the end of the year xx01 has always been chosen. If you dig up any newspaper from 1st Jan 1901 you'll see that they herald it as the first day of the new century. The same holds for previous centuries.

      Of course, in times past it was considered to be primarily a religious celebration, so I suppose it mattered when it was celebrated (ignoring the fact that Jesus wasn't actually born in 1/1/1). Nowadays I think most people are just celebrating a big round number, so who gives a fsck that it's not strictly correct

      Personally, I'm not celebrating anything. Bah, humbug...

    15. Re:Y2k != millenium by gqgreg · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're wrong on that second point. The bloke who made the calendar for Pope Gregory actually left out the year 0, so Christ was technically born on 1/1/1. I am still in agreement with you on when to celebrate, however, my argument is simply that the first decade was nine years long...

      --
      Powerbook G4/1.5GHz 12", Toshiba Satellite 1135-S1554
    16. Re:Y2k != millenium by Muz · · Score: 1

      Um, have you considered here that we aren't really celebrating numbers here , and that really we are celebrating the impending destruction of humanity as we know it from the dreaded BUG !!
      REPENT !!! et cetera....

    17. Re:Y2k != millenium by BMIComp · · Score: 1

      Millennium n: a thousand years; the name given to the era mentioned in Rev. 20:1-7. Some maintain that Christ will personally appear on earth for the purpose of establishing his kingdom at the beginning of this millennium. Those holding this view are usually called "millenarians." On the other hand, it is maintained, more in accordance with the teaching of Scripture, we think, that Christ's second advent will not be premillennial, and that the right conception of the prospects and destiny of his kingdom is that which is taught, e.g., in the parables of the leaven and the mustard-seed. The triumph of the gospel, it is held, must be looked for by the wider and more efficient operation of the very forces that are now at work in extending the gospel; and that Christ will only come again at the close of this dispensation to judge the world at the "last day." The millennium will thus precede his coming.

      Hehe, FYI, the other meaning. =P

    18. Re:Y2k != millenium by Punto · · Score: 1
      But if you use the Common Era Calendar, in which years are numbered -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ...,

      So, they just added year 0 to the calendary? What did they do with all the years BC? 'moved one space'? When was this?
      Anyway, this is what I think of the way years are counted.

      --

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    19. Re:Y2k != millenium by mangu · · Score: 1

      of course, Y2k != millenium, but Y2k == millennium
      /* notice the extra "n"? */
      millennium == one thousand years (year == annum in latin)
      millenium == one thousand assholes (asshole == anus in latin)

  3. the NZ power outage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, according to the US ABC network, NZ *did* have an outage--but it was a temporary thing due to a strong wind :)

    Then again, ABC also talked about "welcoming in the second millenium"... I knew they couldn't count when they kept claiming that the new millenium starts in 2000, but I thought they could at least count to 3. Or wait, maybe they consider the first one the "0th" millenium, eh?

    1. Re:the NZ power outage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you think 20th Century Fox will be renamed to 21st Century Fox on 2000/1/1?
      Why? That's still the 20th Century. Give it a year.
    2. Re:the NZ power outage by whoop · · Score: 1

      Since these people are not capable of computing when centuries start/stop, it's not surprising. Sure we know there was no 0 AD, but that's not how these people operate. Take 2000, it ends with two zeroes, so it must be the next century/millennium. Then there's a 2 in the front, so by similar reasoning it must be the second millennium. It's about time 20th Century Fox was synced up with this reality.

    3. Re:the NZ power outage by drnomad · · Score: 1

      New Zealand does have this Swiss clock which now says 1-1-19100 Errr.... They can't help it, 3000 Swiss are now out of electric power..

    4. Re:the NZ power outage by mangu · · Score: 1

      Do you think 20th Century Fox will be renamed to 21st Century Fox on 2000/1/1? No way, they will accept reality at last, we are just now entering 20th century!

    5. Re:the NZ power outage by Tarkwyn · · Score: 1

      There was a teeny tiny water outage as well, but due to the same wind problems shutting off power. You can find out all about it at: http://onenews.co.nz/millennium/2000/01/01/0001443 6.htm In other news, THIS New Zealander suffered some real millennium problems - my vision got very blurry, voice got louder, artificial horizon broke down, love for everyone seemed to increase and an unknown singing algorhythm seemed to spark into life. These problems lasted several hours, but have since stopped. Be warned, rest of the world, these phenomena could happen to YOU! Have a great one!

      --
      Tarkwyn.
  4. Re:Server b0rked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehe. I am never buying a Swiss watch again.

  5. 19100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they are no Y2K bugs in New Zealand, according to http://www.s wissinfo.net/cgi/worldtime/clock.pl?Wellington,New =Zealand you are in 19100. :-)

  6. Damn daylight savings time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I live in Brisbane, and because Queensland doesn't have daylight savings time, Sydney celebrated it all first even though it's further east here!

    Humph! Always knew that daylight savings thing was evil... :-)

    1. Re:Damn daylight savings time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm amazed at the people that bust on storing up some food and water for your family. Obviously the people that do put the "y2k survivalists" down are not programmers. I'm a programmer and know how simple it is to miss one line of code that can crash a program and the one that relied on it and so on and so on. It has nothing to do with a conspiracy or being crazy, it has to do with that one programmer that missed that one date line at my electric company and there goes the power until they find it.

      It's funny how many people put down the y2k people, but then get in their cars and put their seatbelts on. So, the odds of you getting in a car accident are greater than every single critical line of code in the world working correctly. hmmmm, doesn't sound right to me.

    2. Re:Damn daylight savings time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No its morons like you and farmers that complain that they dont know how to set their vcrs if they have any, and they seam to think that the cows get confused and dont know when to wake up!

      Grow up, DayLIght savings is a good idea.

    3. Re:Damn daylight savings time! by PowerTool · · Score: 1

      You in Brissie eh?

      Come here often (cough... gasp... aaarrg)

      I'd like to talk to you as I don't meet many people from Brisbane on /.

      PowerTool lives in Rochedale South (southside)

    4. Re:Damn daylight savings time! by Negadecimal · · Score: 1

      In the northern hemisphere, daylight savings time is only observed during the spring, summer, and part of fall (roughly from March until October). Is it the opposite in the southern hemisphere?

    5. Re:Damn daylight savings time! by upstateguy · · Score: 1

      And if the phone and power stayed on out here in bush two hours west of Brisbane, than NOBODY has an excuse for losing power *anywhere* in the world. Guess the TV stations and Y2K survivalists will have to keep our attention someother way.

    6. Re:Damn daylight savings time! by mangu · · Score: 1

      Yes, we are kind of dumb people, south of the Equator! We do everything in reverse, we have summer from October until March!

  7. Re:Y2k == millenium damnit! (troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, on the OLD calendar yes, but on the CURRENT calendar (Common Era) 2000 is in the new millenium since on the CE calendar there is a year zero. So there! :-)

  8. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The southeast part of Australia is now about half an hour after midnight. No major obvious problems yet. But i haven't had a close look at the Windows boxes yet. Also there could be minor problems at 11am local time because a lot of stuff runs GMT. And i was here at 10pm local time to see if New Zealand disappeared off the map, just to get 2 hours early warning :-)

  9. Re: SURE they were! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2000 CE = NEW MILLENIUM!!!

  10. millenium != millennium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dink.

  11. bummer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean I cant loot the vending machines here at work tonight??? That was the only things I was looking foreward to... Bummer!! Sitting in a room with 16 server racks, and changing DLT tapes to get 4 backups of everything for NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh well, at least I get to set up the corperate overhead projector screen to watch the ball drop on a 20' screen :-) Who says you cant take advantage of technology in corperations!!!

  12. Help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Civilization.. Collapsing! Rioters.. everywhere! Wounded.. by.. rabid.. Hemos..!

    Light growing.. brighter.. Beam me up.. God..

  13. ISSUE: Posted AT the roll: ORACLE DBMS_JOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOTE: 93696.1
    Y2K: NEXT_DATE CHANGES TO 1900 AND REPLICATION STOPS
    LAST UPDATED: 31 DEC 1999 12.05 P.M. GMT

    see http://metalink.oracle.com (if you have access) Note the date and time of the note (5 minutes after GMT+12)


    [quote]
    When a dbms_job is submitted, the current nls environment (in particular
    nls_date_format) is bound to the job permanently. This is done by populating
    the nls_env column of dba_jobs. If an invalid date format was in place when
    the job was submitted then subsequent job executions may run into problems
    if the procedure being executed contains date logic.

    This will not effect the scheduling of jobs of when they are executed, but may
    cause problems during execution.
    [endquote]

    This may get people who have recurring jobs that have not been re-created since they moved to a Y2K compliant NLS_DATE_FORMAT. I suspect anyone who did a rollover test would have caught this already, but the (late) timing of this alert does worry me a little.

    I understand that this is not actually a bug in oracle's RDBMS. You do not need to explain that to me.

  14. New Zealand Y2k - Buhh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hit refresh and it's back down to 1... what was that all about?

  15. Uh-oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Melbourne, the Linux box on my desk at work appears to have died. No idea why at the moment -- I'll go in tomorrow to check it.

    All the other linux severs are fine, though (as I expected they would be).

  16. please, let me say it (rtsctsAThotmail.com) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I TOLD YA SO

    I'm in Sydney and it's: Sat Jan 1 00:49:51 EST 2000. Everything is still working just fi#$&%@#$!
    NO CARRIER

  17. Y10K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile no one is working on fixing the Y10K bug.

    1. Re:Y10K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no one? read rfc2550 =)

    2. Re:Y10K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was an attempt at a joke. You know, everyone is worrying about Y2K, watching CNN, reading /., getting sloshed...you know, noting important.

  18. HOLY FUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for major credit card company, and all of our Asian servers are fuckin crashing. HOLY SHIT! Some transactions are being recorded with 19100 dates. We're running out of time. THE WORLD IS GOING TO END. REPENT YOUR SINS!

  19. Vogon Constructor fleet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll need this fish in your ear ...

  20. http://www.swissinfo.net/cgi/worldtime/clock.pl?Au by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.swissinfo.net/cgi/worldtime/clock.pl?Au ckland,New=Zealand

  21. Wow, your Amiga has a clock?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn..mine still thinks its 1978. Well, it always did, so no problem there.

    1. Re:Wow, your Amiga has a clock?? by Colitis · · Score: 1

      Mine's an A2000, so it came from the manufacturer with a built-in clock. Although, A2000 backup batteries have a *bad* habit of leaking and corroding traces on the motherboard, so unfortunately being able to tell the time isn't a recipe for longevity. My main machine is fine so far, but the two spare-parts A2000s sitting in the cupboard have long since suffered from corrosion and hence there motherboards are rather useless when it comes to spares (can still pinch chips from them of course).

      Moral of the story? If you have an Amiga 2000, check and make sure your battery isn't leaking on your mobo.

  22. Re:It's not the millennium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow.

    Could you be a more cynical bastard?

    You sure told us, oh omnipowerful righteous boy.

    I fear thee.

    Really.

  23. Celebrations around the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a pretty cool link to what the rest of the world are doing. (cept for programmers who are celebrating in their offices)

    Seems Saudi Arabia isn't partying though:

    Saudi Arabia has banned all New Year's celebrations.

    "Celebrating the holidays of the infidels is not allowed, even if it's out of courtesy," said Sheik Abdullah bin Jabrain, a member of the Saudi Islamic legal committee.


    1. Re:Celebrations around the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't seem to mind us infidels and our customs in 1991 when we pulled their fat out of the fire with Iraq... I guess it's easier for them to be prideful now that we're a few years down the road.

  24. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God damn. You are so right. That's the best argument I've ever heard against the cynical, preaching, perfectionist, "it's not the new millennium; I'm smarter than you cause I know this," crap that people keep spitting out.

    Thank you.

  25. Re:As a matter of fact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait... the real computers use GMT, not localtime.

    The real Y2K starts at GMT, so that would be 19:00 SST (Slashdot Standard Time.) This is the real time to start popping the tops of those beer bottles.

  26. Y2k problems in NZ and Aus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I've been checking up on our 24 hour a day customers in and none of their servers are having any problems. Mainly Sco Openserver machines and HPUX 10.20's. I haven't installed any Y2K patches from SCO or HP on any of these machines and everything is sweet. All the Linux boxes we have are working fine (as expected). Most of these are 486 / early pentiums running redhat. I've had to fix one minor y2k bug in our software but that was expected. The real test will be Tuesday when the administration staff come back to work and start running reports! Good luck everyone.

  27. Some Problems at Wall St. firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've seen some "minor" problems at this Wall St. firm; minor in the scheme of things. Had these problems shown up on any other day, heads would have rolled. All-in-all, so far, nothing that wasn't fixed in a matter of hours.

    The big day for us is Monday when transactions take place and settle in 2000.

  28. Re:An observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point, that's just about when all the operating systems are going to stop working! (give or take a few years)

    Y2K all over again!

  29. CE year 0 == 1 B.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry. The Common Era year zero is simply the year before the year one, which is also noted as 1 B.C. Since the first century was the year 1 through the year one-hundred, the year zero was the last year of the zero century. That said, centuries end on December 31st of the one-hundredth year. The twentieth century ends on December 31st, 2000.

    So the year zero was the last year of the zero millenium, as the year 2000 is the last year of the second millenium.

    See you in a year.

    1. Re:CE year 0 == 1 B.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could someone tell me about this Common Era? I've never heard of it. When did it start? Who created it? I only know of B.C. and A.D. not C.E. Thanks Guys

    2. Re:CE year 0 == 1 B.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck political correctness.

    3. Re:CE year 0 == 1 B.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck political correctness.

      How predictable.

    4. Re:CE year 0 == 1 B.C. by wampus · · Score: 1

      CE is a PC way of saying AD, so as to not offend the non-Christians who have to use dates.
      ---

    5. Re:CE year 0 == 1 B.C. by Detritus · · Score: 2

      BCE and CE are used instead of BC and AD to avoid the religious connotations of Before Christ and Anno Domini. The year of our Lord is inappropriate/offensive if you are not a Christian. See http://www.radix.net/~dglenn/defs/ce.html for a discussion of the problem.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    6. Re:CE year 0 == 1 B.C. by dirty · · Score: 1

      From what I've heard it's pretty much a way for people who don't believe in christianity to express time with out paying hommage to the christian god. Ie, jews do not believe that jesus was the son of god, there for refering to the current year as the 1999th "year of our lord" (translation of A.D.) doesn't really make a lot of sense. Also refering to time as being "Before Christ" also makes very little sense. Also, IMHO it makes sense even if you are a christian because I think this is technically the year 2004 A.D. and there was a screw up during the middle ages that made us all think it is currently 1999.

      P.S. I learned about C.E. from a high school religion teacher, so take what I said with a shaker of salt.

      --

      -matt
    7. Re:CE year 0 == 1 B.C. by quonsar · · Score: 1

      Fuck political correctness.

      How predictable.

      Don't knock it until ya try it - I like the way it wiggles around and moans.

      ======
      "Rex unto my cleeb, and thou shalt have everlasting blort." - Zorp 3:16

  30. Re:People and Y2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I came into work this morning to see that we are still running on a DOS based server, and the most recent version of Windows that is running is 95. I sit alone with my Mac, and laugh laugh laugh. I tried to explain to my boss that installing Office 2000 isn't the same thing as OS 2000. Oh well, they will find out soon enough.

  31. Can't get them in the present... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    My place of employment is as backward as can be. We are still using a DOS based server with external hard drives 3.

    Our most recent version of Windows is good ole 95'.

    When Y2K comes, how am I to keep this place alive?

    I sit and cuddle my wonderful G3.

    At midnight I quit, and no more for me!

  32. First bug! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today Microsoft Finland wanted to hire an Enterprise Program Manager, job starting on 1.1.1900.

  33. a flaw in your story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can't very well ram people in reverse with your cuda if you are towing your trailer full of dog food. perhaps put all the dogfood in the passenger seat!


    now excuse me as i go back to playing i76 =)

  34. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Heh. I work at a newspaper.

    Believe me, it's been thought of.

  35. Foxtel.com.au by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like foxtel.com.au's program listing for today turns up devoid of any actual programs - other dates like 2/1/2000 and on work fine though.

  36. NAKED + PETRIFIED MILLENNIAL HAIKU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DEDICATED TO LACEY CHABERT AND NATALIE PORTMAN

    Natalie Portman
    First, she takes off her pants, then
    I turn her to stone!

    Natalie is stone! :)
    Now she is my statue friend. :)
    But the chaffing hurts. :(

    Lacey Chabert's hot
    Cripes, I've been arrested for
    Statuetory rape

    "Lacey, turn to stone!"
    That is what I said to her
    Now she is my rock

    Chabert and Portman
    As they kiss I transform them
    I have two statues

  37. mad max + ash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all you really need is a motorcycle, a mel gibson haircut, a mechanical hand / swappable chainsaw attachment, leather pants, and a shotgun.. hail to the kind, baby..

    1. Re:mad max + ash by nkwate · · Score: 1

      evil death rules

    2. Re:mad max + ash by KarMann · · Score: 1

      Read my .sig... 'nuff said!
      And BTW, I believe you mean to say... "BOOMstick!"

      Good... bad... I'm the one with the gun.

      --
      ProofReading Markup Language - and yes, I find typos.
  38. It's the new DUH-lennium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2001 = new Millenium

    2000 = new DUH-lennium, for those who can't do simple math.

    Actually I'm waiting for the press to pick up on the REAL millenium sometime in the next few months and start all this millenium hype all over again.

    I'm sure all the people who rent hotels and sell party supplies are hoping this will happen, then they get 2 chances to sell all this overpriced crap for both millenium celebrationss.

    BTW, last night a local TV station talked to a store owner who complained that he had stocked his store with extra bottled water and canned food in anticipation of Y2K hoarding (and probably raised prices, too) AND NOW HE'S STUCK WITH IT 'CAUSE NOONE CAME IN AND BOUGHT IT!

    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! I LOVE IT!!!!!

  39. Some one played too much I'76 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That the same car Groove Champion used, except his was orange.

  40. Re:It's not the millennium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Catch something of a clue, technically sure it is 2001, but I guess then the nineties began in 1991 also!!!!!!

  41. well telstra are up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry mr o&cw dude but mobilenet's been rockin on strong all night long dude

  42. Re:Well, all is sweet so far in NZ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will probably list the 2 digit date as "**". that's what ours did. Older version, tho. We didn't have the time or budget to do this one so we set the date back 28 years to keep the days of the week correct (it's a non critical system). It thinks today is 12/31/71 and will roll over to 1972 tonight.

  43. Happy 19100 Everyone in New Zealand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    © 1996 swissinfo.net
    Local time Chatham, New Zealand
    ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------

    Current time in Chatham, New Zealand is:
    Saturday, January 1, 19100 - 05:18:32


    ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------
    Happy 19100 Everyone in New Zealand!

    1. Re:Happy 19100 Everyone in New Zealand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. Enough of this. Let's find an fsck'n new bug.

  44. i got hit with y2k problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in all my computers, the date says its the year '2000', not the year 'Y2K'.. what the hell is going on?!!

  45. Re:No problems in Tokyo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean you don't have a UPS to handle power cleanup power to your machines ?

  46. Re:An end to stupidity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay if it's "A thousandth anniversary", millennium isn't 2000, it would be 2001. The first anniversary of 1BC is 2BC, 10th anniversary is 11BC,...

  47. userfriendly down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.userfriendly.org appears to be down. anyone have details? just overloaded perhaps, since I don't imagine Y2K has hit them yet.

    oh well.

    1. Re:userfriendly down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it's up and running.

    2. Re:userfriendly down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a92399: It worked fine when I looked at at userfriendly.org/static at about 8:30 AM, 12-31-99, PST. -I'm not anonymous, I just forgot my password.

  48. Re:Server b0rked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fixed now. As of 15:50 GMT But i still got to see it in 19100! Hurray

  49. Re:Oh My God!! Everything is WORKING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your cat works? Mine just sleeps.

  50. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How'd you manage that? The new Millennium doesn't start for a whole 'nother year.

  51. Re:Y2k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you test the condom on your friend?
    :-)

  52. Little vw diesel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diesel engines will run on damn near anything that will burn - And there's no ignition system to fail either. Yes - my 81 vw, I think, needs only a small amount of power to a solenoid on the fuel pump - push start - and plan to utilize above ground home heating fuel storage tanks while raping/pillaging across the post apocalyptic nuclear scarred wasteland, tomorrow after breakfast. Boojum

  53. Anno Domni ==... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The calender we use was put in place by Pope Gregory (thus the Gregorian calender). Today is 31 Dec 1999 A.D. A is for Anno, D is for Domni and does not mean and is not equivalent to AFTER DEATH. It is measured from the alleged birth of Jesus. Therefore, it does start from 0. Jesus was not, miraculous birth or not, a 1 year old at birth. He was, 1 minute old then 1 hour old then 1 day old, etc. Just trying to keep it real folks.

    1. Re:Anno Domni ==... by Glothar · · Score: 1

      Umm.

      False.

      1. Today is 31 Dec AD 1999.
      2. If, for instance, you were, oh say....Roman. How would you write year zero? Oh wait. You can't really do it very well. How bout you save yourself some trouble, and just start at 1.

      Check your facts next time.

    2. Re:Anno Domni ==... by sredding · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...

      Wouldn't that be 31 Dec 1999 CE?

      :-)

      cheers,

  54. 01/01/100 on www.worldtimezone.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's an interesting site to watch these days ... but in the upper right corner of the map it say the next day is 01/01/100

  55. y2k sydney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    counted it in, and the beer taps still flowed, the loud music still played... yeap, was quite..... normal. toilets still flushing (should know, i puked in it :))

  56. Far East Country Reporting In... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything fine and dandy so far. Ooh... what was that bright light...

  57. We'll party next year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on the official time-lord sanctioned rollover, but we'll let them have fun with the triple 0's this year. It's sooo much easier to understand! Be sure to type 'cal 9 1752' sometime. Boojum

  58. Re:Y2k != millenium && Y2k+1 != millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is mille_N_N_ium !!!

  59. M'sia reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half an hour into y2k and everythings dandy over here (Malaysia). Frankly, I'm a tad disappointed... where's the promised Big Bang(tm)?

  60. But what is it Running - Apache and Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apache and Linux - the choice of the U.K. Governemt. See one of my earlier posts for all the URLS. Seasons greetings from Glasgow, Scotland.

  61. Re:First Y2K issue, where no man has gone before.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ASP is not VBScript.

    ASP can execute (on the server OR the client) any registered scripting language. Perl, JavaScript (JSCript, whatever), and VBScript.

    I use Javascript on the server and the client.

  62. Re:Employment Opportunity: Warlords Wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Young lashious female... long blond hair, blue eyes.... long legs... intersting hobies... interseted in part-time work.... maybe full-time later... any openings? willing to work evenings and nights.

  63. Gee, I hope my IBM 370 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    COBOL database can still read the punched cards correctly after midnight. Guess I'd better log into the teletype machine and check a few things. Boojum

  64. Re:pretty boring really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN bad compared to BBC? You've got to be joking! But then again, you probably like BSkyB too.

  65. auckland airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  66. another Y2K twist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.countdown2000.com/worldtour/singaporeframe.htm l Below Webcam image note the following: Image was captured at 32/Dec/99 12:43 am (local) We have to come up with a new verse for the "30 day has September....."

    1. Re:another Y2K twist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never roll over to 2000, just keep adding more days to December!

  67. NISTIME32 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, now that you mention it, I use NISTIME32 TCP time client on our NT box, and just sync'd w/ time-a.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov and got a correct response at 12/31 11:59AM EST Boojum

  68. Re:An observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is true that 2K would equal 2000 in a metric system, but time is not metric! I guess Y2K really has no meaning other than some word made up for the media to use.

    It would be interesting to know who created the term "Y2K"! If it was someone trying to use computer terminology then Y2K does equal 2048!

  69. Re:Everything's down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be posting this with a laptop and an irdium phone, right?

  70. Re:19100?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard of a lot of people having DNS troubles, and wonder how much of this is because of automated perlscripts that change the serial in the bind conf files to a number beyond acceptable limits or to a number lower than the previous serial (1999123100 -> 19100123100) given the current convention of using year/mon/day/modified. (if the serial is lower, the nameserver will not necessarily notice changes made.)

  71. Re:Odd Sampling Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expect none of this type to be submitted ... but you can still reload this page (with newest messages first) to see if some of these "everything OK" posts are missing from a certain area ...

    anyway ... most errors will occur on UTC turnaround ...

  72. Yeah, the Armageddon would have been fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's nothing more fun than having the AntiChrist feed you your own eyeballs while dogs of Hell rip out your intestines.

    Personally, I'm disappointed, too. I wanted to blast Marilyn Manson while my stinking remains get incinerated in holy hellfire. It would have been cool.

    1. Re:Yeah, the Armageddon would have been fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big talk.

  73. Re:Y2K rror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    neat.. the most commonly used letter in the US isn't compliant :)

  74. Your HTML tags must have a Y2k problem :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try an Amersand followed by "lt" then a semicolon for left bracket and then the same thing with "gt" instead of "lt" for the right one. If you preveiw you'll gotta change them back again but usually works ok for me.

    </Anon>

    :-)

  75. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remember, we discussed this. If its spelled millenium, then its the end of 1999. If its spelled millennium, then its the end of the 20th century, which is next year

  76. Re:Y2k problem at this website... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Digital_Fiend writes:
    > www.eyeonbrisbane.citec.com.au. Notice the date on the pic from the webcame (1/1/9999)...

    I had just started laughing at that date when my eye caught on the URL... It's one of the web sites we host....

    Now *that* was an unexpected and disturbing moment. Fortunately I have since been told that we don't control or maintain the webcam software. [relieved grin]

    Black Alys
    (still waiting for my emailed password to arrive, dammit)

  77. Re:First Y2K issue, where no man has gone before.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yawn - more MS FUD. ASP can't magically fix idiot script/program writers.

  78. Re:Some notes on your car design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running a diesel on the used grease from a Burger King is not theory, it is actually done.

    Me, I'm all set with my '72 Mercedes 240D, which has almost as much carrying capacity of a Hummer, and a lot more class. Armaments are wanting though. I'll have to mount a custom potato cannon on the roof.

  79. Re:It's not the millennium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if you're going to be anal-retentive about it, the millennium started sometime in the mid 90s (Jesus Christ was actually born between 6 and 3 BC)

  80. More anal-retentiveness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares when your odometer rolls to 100001? Besides, the millennium actually started sometime in the mid-90s (as our calendar is based on the birth of Jesus Christ, who was actually born sometime between 6 and 3 BC)

  81. Y2k == new millennium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    int Millennium[2000]; int i = 1999; Millennium[i++]=NEW_MILLENNIUM; -> segfault So it is the new millennium... or is it *the* Y2K Bug ? --Benji2

  82. Re:mirror(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you. I have a "wall of shame" up where I work. Remember folks, don't let the webmasters of these sites know why there's the increased traffic-it's much more fun to see how long it goes unnoticed 8*)

  83. Re:An end to stupidity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOu don't have a girlfriend, do you?

  84. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The eighth decade of the twentieth century was not the 1980's. The eighth decade of the twentieth century was January 1, 1981 through December 31, 1990. The 1980's extended from January 1, 1980 through December 31, 1989.

    Let me know if you need more help with your counting.

    1. Re:No. by orcus · · Score: 1

      So by your reasoning 12/31/0009 is the end of the
      first decade which started with 1/1/0001.

      Now who needs help with their counting?

      --
      First they burn books, then they burn people.
  85. Re:http://www.swissinfo.net/cgi/worldtime/clock.pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already fixed.

  86. SILICON VALLEY IS BURNING!!!!!11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything is destroyed here! And it's not Y2K yet! Everybody is looting Fry's! Nothing works anymore! I'm sending this message via RFC 1149!

  87. Re:GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Tested their GPS?

    The GPS issue was back in August. Checking it would be, not a bad idea, but four months too late (you'd already know.)

  88. No it wasn't, "Hot Grits" is getting (c)old fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was funny for maybe a couple of posts, now it it's getting old and cold fast. Buddy, if you're going to troll why not be creative and post different garbage each time?

  89. Re:3th millenium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHat's a `millenium'?

  90. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what this `millenium' thing is. But it smells like a gathering of a thousand assholes.

  91. Re:Weather.com has minor bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even better than that, there is no number

    lo -
    hi 70

  92. Re:First Y2K issue, where no man has gone before.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm...ASP is server side, NOT client side.

  93. Re:You're drunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why's the above moderated redundant? it should be stupid.

    Xah
    xah@best.com
    http://www.best.com/~xah/PageTwo_dir/more.html

  94. Re:It Appears that, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fascinating. The grits thing has passed from trolling ACs to logged in normal users. Soon it'll probably be on CNN.


    Heck, wonder if anybody would be interested in a Hot Grits IPO?

  95. i got yer roll over right here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i woke to a nasty taste in my mouth and raspy breath.. i groaned alot and rolled over in my blanket. then i took a piss, drank some water, watched tv, and went back to sleep. woohoo

  96. Re:mirror(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks so much! Those are great!!

  97. Strange y2k bug .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am posting this as a an AC because until yesterday, I was just an ordinary kitty, and I did not have sufficient intelligence to use a computer. Then, midnight hit, and I saw a really bright light ... guess my cat brain was not y2k compliant. So much for all of my much vaunted self-superiority. Anyway, sometimes bugs do weird serendipitous things; I can use a computer now. Still cannot talk however; no changes to the voicebox. Oh, yeah, and my toy mice died. Damn computerized toys ....

  98. Re:Time Delay on Problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expect some problems to creep up when GMT switches over to next year (poor brits ... they may be struck hardest).

    Other problems will only be noticed (but be present before) when normal work resumes = on 2000/01/03

    And finally there are probably some problems that occur some time later ... just like there were some Y2K-related problems that happened earlier

  99. Those poor media .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is there the media can really report about after all their Y2K hype .... no reactors going wild, no planes crashed (so far ... time of writing = GMT 1999/12/31/ 18:05, 19:05 local time)

    the worst thing yet is some 19100 output errors...
    boring ...

    if yeltsin would not have resigned there would be nothing to report about

  100. USNO Down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone noticed that tick.usno.navy.mil is not responding? The web page isn't working either. This is the official time source for the US...it stopped responding last night I believe from my NTP stuff mailing me.... Does anyone one see this also?

    1. Re:USNO Down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, since last night. I thought it was an unusual time to lose such a central system.

      I'm getting the feeling that the govt will cover up any outages as best they can, and paint smileys on everything, as they usually do.

    2. Re:USNO Down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO!!!! I'm a dillusional conspiracy theroist!!!! Don't make me look at the facts or think through things logically!!!!!!

    3. Re:USNO Down? by nospoon · · Score: 1

      Quote:
      "Some military Web sites may be shut down for the Y2K weekend to minimize their vulnerability to attention-seeking attackers, the Pentagon says."

      see this link

      http://www.msnbc.com/news/351431.asp

  101. Linux, BSD, software failures and Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most slashdoters don't realize that 99 percent of the software in the world is written by companies for their own internal use. Publicly available software has been tested throughly. By this I mean software that is either open source or software that can be purchased at a retail outlet. My clients use a mixture of proprietary operating systems i.e. SCO, Solaris, Win NT, and open source i.e. Linux, BSD. All the off the shelf software is working without problems. The internally generated software is not. For example, one of my clients, provides heavy machinery to construction sites. This particular client uses their Linux system to schedule the delivery of equipment. This morning they discovered that for the past week they have delivered several million dollars worth of equipment to job sites that have not requested delivery to next year. This is the typical Y2K failure scenerio. Out of 85+ clients, I've got over 80 reports of this sort of problem. These aren't show stoppers but they are annoying. The sad thing is that when a problem occurs in an environment with both Microsoft and open source solutions, Microsoft is telling management that the fundamental problem is the open source.

  102. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All looks ok here: http://www.auckland-airport.co.nz/airport_newsflas h.html :)

  103. Re:Hmm -- wrong URL -- another date problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the correct link -- nuke the .html...it's just .htm

    http://www.auckland-airport.co.nz/airport_newsflas h.htm

    It's another "1 Jan 100" error

  104. Re:Millenium, schmillenium, it's the end of the 19 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Millenia" isn't a word--at least, not one for polite company. "annus" != "anus".

  105. Re:Y2k in Australia and what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no such thing as a `millenium'.

  106. Re:New Zealand Y2k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The space is there because the 'link text' has a space in it.

  107. Linux Gazette. :) Seems they're 11 months advanced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.linuxgazette.com/issue49/lg_mail49.html How come the letters are date 1 Dec 2000? Or can I borrow their time machine?

  108. Re:Of course it's the new millenium tonight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search your heart and find that "God-shaped hole" and fill it with the truth that comes only from a relationship with Jesus Christ. Only He can save you from the anger and insecurity you obviously feel as well as the hell that awaits you if you deny Him. Everyone will have eternal life after this one...the choice you have to make is whether you want to be in smoking or non- smoking. http://www.ccci.org/laws/index.html

  109. Re:Y2k != millenium [sic] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way tomorrow is the start of a new millennium is if it's the start of the second millennium, and of the twentieth century. If you're going to be zero-based, do so consistently.

  110. Re:Millennium in 2000, Millennium in 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember: the century is first two digits of the year, so next year is the start of the 20th century.

  111. Re:More Calendar bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is not a bug, it's a feature
    at the said month (september 1752), science people decided to remove about 12 days to the calendar. at the time, some extra days (from wrong cellestial calculations) had to be removed to synchronize the calendar with cosmic time...
    (any amateur astronomer knows this)

  112. Re:As an Andover shareholder, I believe that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a shareholder of Andover, I believe that Andover should observe the Millennium on both days, in order to reap the maximum number of page-views and advertising click-throughs from its readers.

  113. Wow, *I* bought 6 cans of baked beans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last night for my stocking-up. Just more of what I usually get. AND I was with a guy from Australia. But a dingo did not, regrettably, eat the baybay

  114. Re:Millennium in 2000, Millennium in 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be an idiot. The century is the first two digits of the year.

  115. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTFO?

  116. Re:Y2k in Australia and what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes there is, tonight at 12 midnight there will be a "millenium" celebration. Those of us with brain cells will simply know it as the year 200, and await the "millennium" around this time next year...

  117. y2k == Y-u-K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hey, I know what.

    Let's hear it for y-u-k!

    Cool. Barbara WahWah is in Paris. What else.

    BAh

  118. Duh! Re:New Zealand Y2k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Times shown on the maps are the times of the last received incidents (if any). "

  119. Re:Tables of four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that a North African or European...nevermind. Now that the "millenium" is almost over, Tom, I have a confession. I want some of your karma. I've wanted it for years. Say you'll be a donor for a karma-transplant operation...:)

  120. Re:Tables of four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a "millenium"?

  121. another sucky roblimo y2k hysteria article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the titles says it all.

  122. Re:Apocalypse Wow! Tips for the post-Armageddon Er by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Very nice article :)

    However, you realize that, in America, you are probably being placed under surveillance right this moment and have had an extensive FBI/CIA/NSA profile written about you and your "terrorist tendencies".

    Yes, it sounds like sarcasm, but....

  123. Re:Y2k != millenium [sic] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EXACTLY!!!

  124. Re:Y2K rror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone took all the Es? Party on dude :)

  125. Re:An observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in 1969 the univac system i worked on contained a 4 digit date. the last day of the year was 9365 and the first day of 1970 was 0001. trust me on this, it was a problem then also. for several weeks we solved the problem by making the sorter believe 9 was 0 . but of course, you could read the holes in the card by just looking at them too.

  126. Re:Apocalypse Wow! -- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never noticed a Score:6 before -- is there a limit on how high posts can go?

  127. Re:International Y2K Cooperation Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, it's 19:42 GMT (11.46PST) and the site is up.

  128. Re:riots...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in santa cruz for one of the precious new years riots at the town clock and it was lame. It was about as riot like as a high school foot ball game (a 1992 harbor football game even). Dave Ninja

  129. Re:Weather.com has minor bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not always (had the low for the day) .. ask anyone who lives in the Midwest about freaky storms and cold fronts.. we've had days that started in the 50's at 1am and by 6pm it was zero. :)

  130. Re:Millennium in 2000, Millennium in 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where did you learn that? The century has always been one digit larger than the first two numbers of the year, i.e. the 18th century is the 1700s, and the 1900s are the 20th century. It's a common fact. The year 100 AD was the second century because the time between 0 and 100 was considered the 1st century of the A.D. calendar. Therefore the time between 100 A.D. and 200 A.D. was the second century, making the time between 1900 and 2000 the 20th century, and 2000-2100 the 21st century.

  131. Re:An end to stupidity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why are you assuming the person you are talking to is a man or a lesbian? =P The truth is the truth and it is the truth.

  132. Working..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am trapped in the bunker at work, all managment thinks that hell is about to enter this reality, and all the engineers are deciding whether to watch another western (Eastwood or Wayne? Eastwood or Wayne?) or play another round of StarCraft. Hmmmm, wonder which group is correct in their assumptions about the impending "milliniem"?

  133. Re:Milk Expiration: 01-05-100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting how it's "hoarding" when you can't find what you want at the grocery store, but it's "prudent disaster preparedness" that I have the emergency candles I need... (BTW, they have already come in handy in the frequent and probably not Y2K related power outages we have here.)

  134. It depends on how granular you get.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say I owe you 3000 dollars, and I pay it to you one dollar at a time. When I've paid you 2000 dollars, 2001 starts the next 1000, right? But if I pay you a PENNY at a time, then it starts at 2000.01.... (I'm sure everyone will disagree with that, but I like to muddy the waters. And yeah, there was no 0, but this kind of argument fucks with people. :)

  135. Re:Millennium in 2000, Millennium in 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe there are still idiots left who can't fucking figure this out. Items 1-100 are from the first set of a hundred, 101-200 from the second set of a hundred, etc.

  136. Re:wow, a 6! the best comment *ever* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes..this is it folks, feest your eyes on the most mazing post ever posted to /.

    It's a 6

  137. Countdown-2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well everyone's doing their end-of-the-centry celebrations. You might want to check out public tv's (were available) countdown. Dare to be different.

    BTW I heard (rumour) that japan was having some problems with their cellular phone system due to y2k. Can anyone confirm?

    1. Re:Countdown-2000 by Pierce · · Score: 1

      I saw an article on CNN about NZ having cell phone problems, but it wasn't directly related to Y2K. There were so many people calling at once that the system was getting overloaded.

      Wayne

  138. Re:Microsoft Finland's website had problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here's mirrored page:

    http://www.sci.fi/~harriv/microsoftbug.htm

  139. Re:Date: Sat, 1 Jan 100 00:50:01 +73100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just logged into our servers in singapore and sent an email using elm back here to the states... our elm is compiled back in 1996 too - check it out: Date: Sat, 1 Jan 100 05:19:17 +72800 (SGT) From: Super-User You have to love it! Thanks for the tip! ;) (Though w/ the atachments and html mail and everything people use these days, I wonder if anybody even uses elm at our sites anymore?)

  140. Re:Server b0rked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In NZ, 10:40am. No problems as of yet (bar a few 486s that thought that Fri 1980-01-04 (yyyy-mm-dd) was a pleasant alternative to the truth). Squid 2.2 Stable 5 just returned Generated Fri, 31 Dec 1999 21:41:58 GMT so will post again after date ticks if Squid craps out.

  141. Re:PalmOS 3.0 Fails to Rollover in NZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mine rolled over properly. Both a standard Palm III and a Symbol SPT1500.

  142. Re:The 2038 overflow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know anything about unix time keeping, but if it is in signed integers, then wouldn't it be in 2's complement form?

    If it has been a while since a used 2's complement, but as I remember:
    1000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
    is not 0 but your most negative number (or in this case 1901, as some people have sugested) and
    1000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001
    is your second least most negative number. Therefore time won't be going backwards as sugested above.

  143. www.thebody.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    var year = today.getYear(); //year = 00; if (year >= 98){ document.write ('Last updated ' + thismonth + date + ', 19' + year); } else { document.write ('Last updated ' + thismonth + date + ', 20' + '0' + year); }

  144. Re:3 Missle Launches?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those were only SCUD-type launches in Chechnya -
    Just "theater events".

    Gotta say NORAD is pretty impressive.

  145. Re:Surprise! '95 barfed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm suprised, because mine will do it without any help at all!!!!

  146. Re:hotmail problems?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they close inactive accounts after a couple of months. You might not have a valid username anymore.

  147. Finland survived too.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rollover was an hour ago and .. well .. NOTHING happened. Even my old 486-box from 1994 survived :) Getting bored to death at work, though of course it's nice to get the extra salary from doing nothing.

  148. Happy newyear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a happy newyear from denmark!

  149. Happy New Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happy New Year to everybody from Switzerland as well!

    1. Re:Happy New Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy new year to all ACs out there!

      Xah
      xah@best.com
      http://www.best.com/~xah/PageTwo_dir/more.html

  150. Re:Starving expectations and Y2K crumbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may find it uninteresting, but when your
    bill comes w/ a due date of 1900 and you are
    charged 100 years of late fees because of that
    you won't be so noncomplacent.

  151. Re:New Zealand Power did go out... In part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like the newspapers said, the power will go cause of some crazy buggar in a car smashing in to a pole.

  152. Y2K Compatible software! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to report that Starcraft-Brood Wars is Y2K Compatible =o) Regards, Guy in Sweden

  153. The swedish frontline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There are riots out in the streets. People are seeking shelters. Military bandwagons rolling in. Cars with loudspeakers try to calm down people. There are icebears! Icebears are sitting on the groud and drinking coke!

    Uhmmm... Sorry... The last one was a commercial... Good movie though!

  154. 0:00:00 GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goddamit, am I sad or what?! Just rolled over to 0:00:00 2000 GMT. (in the UK, is where I am at) and feck all has happened. Power, phones (obviously - otherwise this wouldn#t be posted) work. And £100000 worth of fireworks have been burnt. And the much touted river of fire DIDNT WORK! hehehe! Happy New Millenium.

    1. Re:0:00:00 GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Happy New Millenium.
      What's a `millenium'?

      And please be patient. You've got another year to go for the millennium.

    2. Re:0:00:00 GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gah. Don't be so pedantic. Lighten up a bit! The millenium (I'll spell it how I goddam like it) may start next year - but then who gives a fuck? People were celebrating the change to 2000.

  155. Windows 2000: It Broke at 0:00:00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just kidding. It worked OK really ;-)

  156. millennium-centre.gov.uk down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? http://www.millennium-centre.gov.uk/bulletins.htm down? The page cannot be found The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.

  157. GMT 0:00 effect so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For anyone out there who might be interested, the EverQuest game servers had a packet loss spike at 5:40 and one just now at 5:59 (my watch). Sounds like a few routers weren't totally complaint, eh?

  158. Re:Server b0rked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Squid/2.2.STABLE5 Ticked over here in NZ without hickup. I think I shall have a coffee.

  159. Check out this pages !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this two pages http://www.telekom.com.my http://www.tmsol.com.my Do you notice some weird date? Year 202000 for http://www.telekom.com.my Year 192000 for http://www.tmsol.com.my

  160. Re:No armageddon... frankly i'm dissappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yup, fine here in Canberra as of the morning. All phones, power, Net etc worked fine as of midnight. We were at a party at a friend's place, and just for a giggle left on his 1995 vintage P120 running (early) Windows 95 and it went through to 2000 without a hitch.

    The only millennium glitch heard of in Australia so far was with some mobile ticket validation machines on the buses in Hobart and Adelaide, and that's already been fixed.

    There's going to be an awful lot of pissed off religious nuts, and it couldn't happen to a nicer lot.

    BTW - on TV here we have crosses to CNN, which seems to be obsessed still with the Y2K bug despite the fact that probably 3/4 of the world's population has seen in the new year. Wakey, wakey!!!!!

  161. So far so good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The year 2000 has arrived and so far things are looking as follows:

    OpenBSD 2.4/i686 box ok
    Dual boot win98/rh6.1 box ok
    Dual boot win3.11/freebsd 3.1 box ok
    FreeBSD 2.8 box ok
    HPUX 10.20 Series 9000/700, applied y2k core patch and running ok
    Solaris boxes on 2.5.1, 2.6 and 7 all ok
    My Palm V on Palm OS 3.1 rolled over ok
    So did my Nokia 6110 :-)

    If your timezone has already passed midnight, try visiting http://www.ugu.com/y2k to see an interesting glitch.

    Have a nice rest of the millennium!

  162. So far so good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The year 2000 has arrived and so far things are looking as follows:



    OpenBSD 2.4/i686 box ok

    Dual boot win98/rh6.1 box ok

    Dual boot win3.11/freebsd 3.1 box ok

    FreeBSD 2.8 box ok

    HPUX 10.20 Series 9000/700, applied y2k core patch and running ok

    Solaris boxes on 2.5.1, 2.6 and 7 all ok

    My Palm V on Palm OS 3.1 rolled over ok

    So did my Nokia 6110 :-)



    If your timezone has already passed midnight, try visiting http://www.ugu.com/y2k to see an interesting glitch.



    Have a nice rest of the millennium!

  163. Y2K virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Win98 machine is down! I wonder why? :-)

    http://www.cai.com/press/1999/12 /trojankill.htm

  164. Re:Server b0rked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dun't care. I'm fucxking stoned and i don't give a shirt about your whytookay probbbblem.
    Also i have trubblezsss tupping.

    Stijn.

    PS: whAt the h3ll is BURKING?

  165. C|Net is posting stories dated Jan. 4, 2000! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:C|Net is posting stories dated Jan. 4, 2000! by B.B.Wolf · · Score: 1

      The stories are listed but not posted. They
      probably will not get posted until the date listed.
      The page updater most likely just got a little
      rambuncious or pressed for time.
      Regardless this is not a Y2K issue. You will have
      to do better then this!

    2. Re:C|Net is posting stories dated Jan. 4, 2000! by B.B.Wolf · · Score: 1

      Of course I might be wrong :-)

  166. Re:Y2K != millennium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy who created our calander coded it in Pascal, and every Pascal weenie knows that in Pascal we start counting at 1.

  167. No phones in Tokyo?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just talked to a friend who called her brother in Tokyo at 1AM Tokyo time. He was surprised that she got through because nobody in his part of Tokyo had been able to make a phone call since midnight. Overloaded phone system or Y2K? Who else has called Japan today?

    1. Re:No phones in Tokyo?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everything is fine here in Tokyo as of 10 am. January 1. The first few hours after midnight on January 1 every year the phone system is congested but nothing related to Y2K as far as I can say. On TV they show some non-sense shows which means there is nothing else worth reporting.

      BTW, the government Y2K site in Japan is here .

      Happy New Year from Japan,

      Predrag

    2. Re:No phones in Tokyo?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I called the US from Japan at 12:05 am. On my first try it said the lines were busy. I got through on the second try. The problem was New Year's related, not Y2K related.

      Time for me to get back to dumping my water tanks. Oh well, at least if there's ever a major earthquake, my family is somewhat prepared. I'm glad I didn't go overboard.

  168. 2600 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out http://www.2600.com they didn't make it.

    1. Re:2600 by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      It's not thier machine down.. they are just making a funny.. try http://www.2600.com/kevin/ If it was that machine, it wouldnt work.. however it still forwards it to the free kevin site..

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
  169. another one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha 2600.com

  170. Re:Well, that was a little boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the difference between "thus" and "thusly"?

  171. Re:[OT] Happy New Millennium from Little Old Engla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only penalty would be from being a year early.

  172. Re:Y2k != millenium [sic] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ's birthyear is completely unrelated to the commoners' current inability to count in discrete sets.

  173. MS Money or Etrade???????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did an online update at 2:14am Central European Time from MS Money to my ETrade account... it updated the stock prices for the day with one small problem... ETTIX..an Etrade Tech mutal fund updated with a misplaced dot in teh number and apparently my 123 shares of that are now worth $1421.00 each!! They were worth $14.77 last night.. what a gain!!!!!!!! The quote is a correct $14.21 on their site, so don't know to blame it on MS or Etrade!!

    1. Re:MS Money or Etrade???????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same happen with bith Quicken 99 and Netcenter. All my mutual funds are hosed but the stocks are fine. Go figure?

    2. Re:MS Money or Etrade???????? by Nostafa · · Score: 0

      When in doubt, Blame Microsoft. Duh :)

  174. apparent y2k incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just walking down valencia street in san francisco and saw an accident - a small car rammed into the back of an suv stopped at a light, and lost. Looking into the back window of the car, I saw that it was loaded with those huge water cooler jugs and other y2k supplies. Clearly, preoccupied with the wrong potential disaster.

  175. Re:We've got Y2K problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also in Minnesota... No real problems to report but coincidences that are amusing. A certificate expired today of all days and needed renewal (fortunately they were staffed). Cel phones acting up, but thats probably traffic. Pretty much bored.

  176. Y2k: UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well good morning from the UK!

    It's now half one in the morning and my RH6.0 box is working as normal, phones are still here, TV and videos are on, life, goes on.

    The only glitch here is that the news server on my machine (serving only me) is giving me all the newsgroups regardless of whether they are new or not... A morning fix I think.

    I'm taping the New York celebrations - good luck USA, will wake up and find out how things are going.

    JG.

  177. probably not fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are several server-side methods of creating HTML. ASP, PHP, and (I think) Servlets, etc. This isn't necessarily a fake, although it might be.

    -Drane

    my y2k mirror page:
    http://www.x5ca.net/~drane/y2k/

  178. I hope you gave a 'sell' order!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And sort it out later ;) from a small island in the pacific.

  179. Greetings ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wanted to wish everyone that still is in 1999 a happy new year from germany ...
    everything working fine as always even after local time and UTC rollover so the only thing left to do is CELEBRATE ....

    1. Re:Greetings ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But all the bastards East of Germany should have a crummy year?

  180. Internet Relay Chat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All is fine here in Australia. I'm just trying to recover from last night right now :) Some IRC networks are having problems with their irc daemons, Austnet for example:
    *** ozemail.nsw.au.austnet.org 946690891 0 Saturday January 1 19100 -- 12:41 +11:00

    It should be adding 1900 to the year, not prepending '19' - more recent irc servers (ie. undernet) seem to not have this bug.

    Cheers, and happy new year to all!

  181. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you should read a book like _Gods of the New Millennium_ (by Alan Alford, www.eridu.co.uk) first before coming to such conclusions that the year 2000 is 'just another date'. In one aspect, you're right since the Gregorians just began counting from Christ's birth - but as it happens many religions talk about many different things happening around this era to humanity and it also so happens that the Earth's precessional cycle (which changes every 2160 years) is moving from the Age of Pisces to the Age of Aquarius... So who knows?

  182. Re:Y2k == millenium damnit! (troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.rog.nmm.ac.uk/leaflets/new_mill.html

  183. Error Win95 patch K2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the date has officiallk gone over to 2000 and mk Win95 skstem has gone and changed all the k's (rhkmes w/ pie) to k's Aaaargh Can ank of kou help me?

  184. Typical microsoft 'fix' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Compare the "fixed" site to the original

    "We can't fix the bug, so let's just move this one month earlier. At least we'll look good."

  185. We DID it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're from Germany and so far no nuclear powerplant and no computer has crashed.... So when does the apocalypse really start??? Lets see what happens, when New York celebrates the new year... The Millennium Hit of today is : Tom Jones and The Cardigans with "Burning down the House"

  186. Re:FAA reporting no problems - GMT/UTC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In descending order of preference, airlines (in the US, anyhow) seem to call it Zulu/Zee-time, GMT, and only UTC as a last choice.

    And they call weather "WX," passengers "PAX," and maintenance "MX." Go figure.

  187. HEHE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else noted the date on www.apple.com just below the image of a G4 ??
    And they really want to sell Gigaflops-computer in 20100 ??? what a pity ...
    ... or does this mean the bug that won't allow the G4 to reach >450 Mhz won't be fixed until then ?

    1. Re:HEHE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you give more detail?

    2. Re:HEHE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w00! That's great. I can think of a certain desktop publishing manager who will have a print out (maybe 3 or 4) of that screen shot on his desk Monday morning. Thanks for the good laugh, that's the best one yet.

  188. Re:New Zealand Y2k - Link Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the odd thing was that the link text DIDN'T have a space in it, according to IE- and retyping it didn't solve it. Of course, the moral of the story is to use Netscape, but you may have noticed that Win32 Netscape is even less stable than IE.

  189. Re:Some more notes on your car design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -You might want to reconsider the engine choice: The Hemi is a great engine for power, but a pain to keep running, while the 440 six-pack has almost as much power with the added advantage of being more reliable and easier to find parts for. Yeah and I bet synchronizing three carbs and all having to mantain an overly complicated fuel system would be a fun chore for those boring days

  190. Y2K in sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 03:59 in Sweden and everything works fine, sadly Sweden is so well organized that nothing seems to screw up, boring really. I suppose Y2K is about to reach the USA in a few hours and I hope you are as lucky (or unlucky) as we've been. -Andreas

  191. Sonic Cannons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your spuds will be shredded miles away with my air compressor and stainless steel whistle cannon.Very low tech (and deafening) but can drop just about anything on the ground or in the air. My schwinn bicycle and baby carrier modified to transport my whistle will make deliver a sonic shock at a range of about two miles around our suburban fortress. scared of nothin! in the post-Apocaplyse hot dog contests.

  192. Oh God NO!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have Kenny Rogers on! He looks just like the parody they do on Mad TV! And Lou Gramm and that other Foreigner guy. Is that Don McLean? There was the horrible horrible Kenny G y2k song thing, which he FAKED the playing of! And Bill and Hillary trying to act like "white soul brothers" who are down with the soul that Will Smith is belting out. This shit is happening on the steps of the Lincoln Monument? Is nothing sacred anymore? I hardly ever watch TV and this is having a very bad effect on me. I think I have suffered a fatal blow to the mind. I am trying to bend but I feel the structure breaking... Is that Trisha Yearwood and somebody singing "Abraham, Martin, and John"?!!?! PLEASE NO MORE! NO MORE! NO

  193. Last nights experences in Auckland. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in Central Auckland at work for Telecom Managed Services, and I had a most boring night... Spent most of it browsing the web and talking to some guys from work who stayed until 5am drinking.... So a most normal night... Back in again tonight from 11pm to 7am.. I'm on standard shift work, so there goes... Anyway HAPPY NEW YEAR....

  194. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actualy its about the year 3170 or so, ifyou go back to the original calander before it was reset to 1AD reference, they should have left it as it was from the first date.

    Its the damn Romans who took the calander system from the Egyptions and then the Christians re ferenced it from 1AD for some stupid reason, it was DENIS'S fault , thats his name

  195. Re:Starving expectations and Y2K crumbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cept he wouldn't really have to pay that cuz no one, except possibly you, would actually do that.

    still don't give a fuck .

  196. things are going bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my god! The machines at my work are falling apart like crazy! We're running all Win 3.1 boxes and none of them are working correctly anymore. We just passed midnight 45 minutes or so ago. We can't even leave the building because our doors are controlled by the security system which is running on a Win 3.1 box as well. I am trapped in here with the rest of the IT team. I can't beleive this is happening. The copiers are spewing paper as if they were possessed. Everything is a mess! Some of the junior IT staff is panicking and making matters worse by tearing apart the place. I never pictured it like this! Woah. What's this? Oh my god... I can't be.. no.. I won't believe it. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.........

  197. Westwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.westwood.com/newindex.html Year = 1900

    1. Re:Westwood by Achmed · · Score: 1

      Heheh... guess I'll have to set my clock for midnite to see it as it appears to be a client side calcultion as to what the date is... still 31st 1999 for me. =)

  198. first EST BUG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My JVC camcorder is going crazy.... cant take video, all the lights are on and going nuts..... cant change the date back..... im screwed. on a better note, all computers are working great

  199. Either I'm crazy or ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a Y2K Javascript bug: Missouri Mental Health Web Site

    1. Re:Either I'm crazy or ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you're not goin' crazy . . .

      document.write(monthNames[now.getMonth()] + " " + now.getDate() + ", 19" + now.getYear());

      19 + now.getYear(), huh?

      Freakin' Rocket Science.

  200. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a `milenium'? I don't see why you should expect other people to be able to count when you can't even spell.

  201. Everything [apparently] OK in Argentina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happy New Year to y'all from Buenos Aires!

  202. ABC can't count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else notice the countdown clock on ABC's coverage of New York? I'm in maryland, USA and the on-screen clock that was super-imposed on the new-york picture read: 15:02 15:01 14:00 14:59 14:58 ... It seems people were so enthused about the fireworks and y2k that no one bothered to check their own work!

  203. I'm getting paid to sit at home and get drunk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While nothing happens. Did I mention I'm drunk off my ass???? Cheers from Cali.

    1. Re:I'm getting paid to sit at home and get drunk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, This big Chip company gave me a rollin lil' laptop to play with while Rome burns. Oh yeah, I'm drunk and getting paid.

  204. Iowa passes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All is well in Des Moines, Iowa! No cows spewing spoiled milk from the 1900's or farmers chasing people with pitch forks. I think the capital of Iowa could of done a little better Y2K celebration though.

    Happy New Years! -Josh

  205. Re:Happy new year folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rediculous. How can you say everything is fine when you live in Canberra?

  206. Re:hmm...xdaliclock...bug or well planned joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my xdaliclock is backwards too, showing 12:10:51 (posting from silicon valley, where the lights, water, and dsl are all still working at the moment)

  207. Y2K OH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything still up and running in Los Angeles. My linux is running ok; win95 is ok and WINNT is up. Hey and guess what no pages from work to come in and fix anything. Hmmm. Maybe the paging service is done?

  208. Re:probably more a BIOS problem than a linux probl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My machine refused to boot from IDE-0, then when I boot from floppy, the serial port and network card are not recognized. After I changed/saved BIOS settings, Power off, changed BIOS date, reinstall chos boot loader, and all of a sudden everything works fine. Dare not to boot into my Windows 95 yet.

  209. Wrong date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My computer rolled over to January 4th 1980, but after manually changing the date to Jan 1 2000 everything seems okay! That's the only problem I've encountered to this point.

  210. Y2K bug here ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Local radiostation seems to have real mixed up playlist... We had year change about 11 hours aga, so don't if this actually Y2K bug... Anyway all the DJ pieces and actual songs playing are different... Quite funny actually. Station can heard all over the Finland and in Sweden too. They are in web; www.kiss.fi and also have RealAudio stream available : http://www.kiss.fi/ontheair/live.htm Yeah, live indeed :)

  211. Re:wow, a 6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it is a y2k bug :-)

  212. Y2K Bugs hit JC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.jc-news.com/pc

  213. Re:We've got Y2K problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Minnesota: Macalester College's network is unreachable. I wonder if the problem lies with the Mac network or with the SP (mrnet/onvoy). Anyway, I created a slashdot account to send this message but I can't get to the password which was sent to my macalester email account. :|

  214. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, in Scandinavia we have cell phones with email access, whereas in the US most people are still on analogue... :b

  215. Re:We've got Y2K problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the club, I created an account earlier to post and it hasn't come through in about 20 hours.

  216. Windows 98 Installation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The windows 98 installation program crashes soon after starting it where before(2000) it worked fine - seems like a bug in win98.

  217. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a `millenium'?

  218. New Zealand Power did go out... In part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I live in Auckland, New Zealand in a suburb called Remuera where the power went out at 9pm for a couple of hours - not y2K though, a car hit a power poll and took out the suburb's power until a new poll was installed. My GSM Digital mobile still works fine, and so does the TV and my home pc which is (for reasons that shall remain confidential) still running windows 95. However, due to the above mentioned power cut, it was powered down at the turn of midnight. Still, after the champagn breakfast in the morning I'll head to the office and see if the NT or Linux servers need re-booting.... Bets are that NT will... Still, NZ survived the turn of the Mil ok...

    1. Re:New Zealand Power did go out... In part... by sweet+reason · · Score: 1

      a car hit a power poll and took out the suburb's power until a new poll was installed

      those pollsters are garnering far too much power!

      --
      Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- A.E.
  219. New Zealand Y2k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.y2k.govt.nz/home/Navigati onpage.htm supposedly has relatively up-to-date info on Y2k troubles in New Zealand...
    Currently up to four incidents (up from the one water station a few hours ago)... and the map still thinks it's 9 seconds to midnight- wonder if that's a bug, or a precautionary measure?

    In the true spirit of procrastination, I head out in a few hours to install some compliant billing software... and the man in charge just told me he'd like to see that office network wired to the internet before the end of the day... Had to pick the worst day of the year to want it done, and I know jack about firewalling or IP masqing and don't intend to learn while doing something that actually has to stand up under fire.

    -FIRST GRIPE OF THE NEW YEAR - www.jerkcity.com HUAGHUAGHUAGH

    P.S. - Someone tell me why that space appears in the link text when it's not in the entry field- and why it DOESN'T appear in the actual HREF..?

  220. Why There's No Year Zero... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The number zero was introduced, along with the Arabic numerals we use today, in the 13th century, but the church refused to allow them to be used, simply on the grounds that they were invented by Muslims.

    However, zero and the numbering system we use today did eventually make it into acceptance by the 16th century, and greatly simplified mathematics in Europe.

    We can't really blame the church for 2000/2001 issue, because the current year numbering system that we used (2BC, 1BC, 1AD,...) was originally designed by a monk in either the 7th or 8th century, before we even heard of the Arabic numbering system or zero.

    1. Re:Why There's No Year Zero... by B.B.Wolf · · Score: 1

      Dating uses ordinal numbers not cardinal thus it
      is not 0 (an index) AD but, the First Year of the
      Lord or 1st AD.

  221. Re: You Moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The 20th century started January 1st, 1901, according to every document out there (See the NY Times Jan 1, 1901 edition). Unless we are about to finish a 99 year century, we will be in the twentieth century and the third millenium for the next year.

    Also, the reason Author C. Clark named his epic "2001, a Space Odyssey" is because way back in the late 1960's, the year 2001 represented the dawn of a new millenium.

    And if these "new" CE calendar people have added a year zero, then this must be 1998.

    This is a combination of stupid people and a media that is hype obsessed. Given the total flop that is this new years, with celebations cancelled, cruise ships half empty, and hotels begging for patrons, I fully expect the hype for the next new years to be "Celebrate the REAL Millenium".

  222. mirror(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Drane here. Mirrored the swissinfo site and whatever else I find at:

    http://www.x5ca.net/~drane/y2k/

    Feel free to mail me the HTML of any other sites that do stupid things. My mail address is on my site, or anyone with half a brain can figure it out from my URL above.

  223. Y2k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow! Y2k just hit here in Japan! There's hookers rioting and I think our television shows stopped causing seizures. Also, my friend and I have taken to burning the city with torches. Oh, and I found out condoms don't work after Y2k.

  224. Re:You're drunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    we really need another moderation choice:
    "Unimaginably stupid"

    It might be abused, but it is sorely needed.

  225. Re:GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not quite right. There was a "end of week roll over" a few months ago which is a seperate issue. Some units are 2000 complient and some not. Most have to be re-started at the changeover if they are up and running.

  226. Y2K rror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I'v found that for som r ason my comput r is no long r abl to print out th l tt r " ". And wh n I s t my syst m tim back to 12/31...
    it once again works! Unbelievable! Well, I'll just have to keep rolling back the date, I guess.

  227. Some notes on your car design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

    I drive and engineer race cars in my spare time, so I figure I'd share some observations with you before you start wandering in the desert:

    - The Car: The 'Cuda is a good choice as far as technology goes - no EMP-sensitive ECU to blow out in case of a nearby nuke, and all the engine sytems are mechanical. This means you have wear issues to worry about (on things like ignition points) but it's a whole lot easier to fabricate a set of points in a high school metal shop that it is to fab a transistorized ignition.

    However, your fuel system needs some thought. At roughly 7 lbs/gal, your fuel tanks will mass 770 lbs when full. And then a trunk full of concrete (huh?) is probably on the order of 500lbs - for a total weight addition of 1320 lbs.

    Now a 'Cuda is probably 3700 lbs, and has a weight distribution of 60/40 - so that means roughly 1480 lbs over the rear wheels. All your new mass is right over the rear end, so now you've got 2800 lbs over the rear end.

    This changes your weight distribution to 44/56.

    Now to handle the extra weight, you welded the rear suspension solid. Yow! With a rear-weight bias and a solid rear suspension, this is going to be one EVIL handling car. It's going to be undrivable loose - the back end in going to keep trying to pass the front end.

    But before you even get to that point, you're going to have to locate a set of rear tires with a load capacity of 1400 lbs each - nearly 3 times higher than the rating on the stock tires. Good luck!

    And then there's the questionable wisdom of placing large, fixed masses directly _behind_ the driver. The first big impact is probably going to tear those tanks and that concrete block loose from their mountings, and you'll be crushed against the engine block. Ouch!

    No, the well-equipped post-apocolyptic car gang member is going to be driving a diesel AM General Hummer:

    - Diesel engines will run on damn near anything that will burn. In theory, you could filter the grease pit behind your local Burger King and run on the used cooking oil. And there's no ignition system to fail either.

    - The Hummer is rated to carry large loads. In fact, you've got enough capacity for 3 of those drums, plus a barrel of engine oil too.

    - Many Hummers, if sourced creatively, come already equipped with weaponry of various sorts. I, personally, would recommend a Browning .50 cal - dirt simple, highly reliable, easy to maintain, and ammo is simple to fabricate.

    Although it's hard to pass up on the TOW-2 pintle mount version. :)

    - The Hummer has lots of ground clearence - good for climbing over spurious obstacles.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:Some notes on your car design by Greg+Merchan · · Score: 2

      Diesel engine on fast food grease pits has been done. Go to http://www.veggievan.org. The guy who did it is a friend of mine. It's a great story.

    2. Re:Some notes on your car design by taniwha · · Score: 2
      Me, I'm all set with my '72 Mercedes 240D, which has almost as much carrying capacity of a Hummer, and a lot more class. Armaments are wanting though. I'll have to mount a custom potato cannon on the roof.

      Hah - my solar powered electric motor scooter will keep running for years longer than your monstrosity .... and my spud gun will continue to defend me long after you run out of hairspray for your cannon ...... mind you potatos are going to be worth their weight in gold .... people will be lining up to be shot at ......

    3. Re:Some notes on your car design by RedFive · · Score: 1

      Everyone know the REAL car to survive a in a post-apocalyptic world is a black 1973 Ford Falcon coupe with supercharged 351 Cleveland. Worked for Mel Gibson...:-)

      --
      RedFive jedi_knight111@hotmail.com
    4. Re:Some notes on your car design by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      There's one thing both of you missed, what if you run into a large group of well armed people who decide that they want your car?

      In such a case you wouldn't have much chance of survival on your own.

      Therefor I would suggest gathering a large group of people and getting an 18 wheeler, and arm it with anything you can find! (Kinda like the infamous cocktail party in the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy =)


      Mikael Jacobson

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  228. The Netherlands by ESD · · Score: 1

    Over here in Breda, the Netherlands nothing bad happened.. just a lot of fun.. even the NT servers at work are functional (at least to pings)

    It's 1:11 AM right now (0:00 UTC) and still no problems.

    Sorry for any (spelling) mistakes: blame the beer and champagne!

    Happy New Year to Slashdotters everywhere!!

  229. Re:An observation by whoop · · Score: 1

    To be most specific, it is a first-century-turning-after-computers-are-invented bug. Any new invention will start out minimal, and slowly evolve larger/better. Computers were born this century, and naturally, back then memory was expensive so they cheated on dates. Were computers invented in 1850, or 2050, it would be the same situation. Heck, there probably was some programs that were made to operate only the year they were written, and would suffer a similar new-year bug.

  230. No RTFM by KMSelf · · Score: 2

    You've got it all wrong:

    cat man

    While you're at it:

    apropos 'What to wear to the party?'

    What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?

    --

    What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?

  231. geocities acting funny by khaladan · · Score: 2

    After seeing "Anna and the King" last night I wanted to know more about King Mongkut. I searched on "Mongkut" at Excite and tried the first reference:

    http://www.geocities.net/Athens/Aegean/7545/Mong kut.html

    IE took me to this disgusting site instead:

    http://www.youcansave.com/healthbeauty.html

    In fact, any attempt to access geocities seems to be routed to this site. Has geocities been hacked? Does my computer have a really sick URL reroute virus? I'd like to know!

  232. Re:An observation by mce · · Score: 2
    Today I read in a local paper (sorry, no link (besides it would be in Dutch)) that someone from the organisation "owning" the problem with the 20000 credit card terminals in the UK said: "This was not a Y2K related issue. It was more like a century problem, but now try to explain that to people out there." Amazing. As if relabeling the error makes it more excusable to have a rollover bug in a system that was supposed to have been fixed for Y2K.

    I do agree that the name millenium bug is silly (for more reason than one), but somehow I seriously doubt that that's the idea was what that spokesperson wanted to express. :-)

    --

  233. Re:An observation by mce · · Score: 2
    2k = 2048


    Not neccessarily. 2Km = 2 Kilo meter = 2000 meter. Only in computerland 2K equals 2048, and while The Bug mainly is a computer problem, counting years is not a computer concept. Besides, what to do with paper forms on which the 19 has been preprinted? It's the basically same problem even with no computer in sight.

    --

  234. Tokyo Y2K UPDATE by kir · · Score: 1

    It is now 00:05 here in Tokyo and the invasion has started. The grey aliens flying a huge purple and pink santa sley (being pulled by 200 orange penguins) have landed in the middle of Roppongi (huge party district in Tokyo) on top of the GasPanic Club 99. They exited the ship and began distributing Elvis key holders to the masses all the while screaming, "Akemashite Omedeto-gozaimasu!!"

    Power is on. Beer is flowing. I'm stuck at work!

    Actually, you can teach a donkey how to sing, but he will still sound like an ass...

    --
    Kir

    --
    3cx.org - A truly bad website.
  235. Report by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 2

    Everything ok here in Texas so far. Power, water, TV, Phone, Internet etc...

    Linux says:
    Sat Jan 1 01:31:54 CST 2000

    No problems there...

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  236. I'm at work.. by Special+J · · Score: 1

    Guess what happened? (go on...guess)

    Nothing!

    Happy New Year!!!

    --
    VENI! VIDI! VICI!
  237. Y2k Links by klasker · · Score: 1

    If you're interested in seeing the coming apocolypse for yourself, check out the chaos in every timezone.

    1. Re:Y2k Links by mcrandello · · Score: 1

      Looks like "Slashdot in every timezone", nothing but broken images...hehe.

      Happy New Year, and good luck with those webcams and HTTP servers >;)


      mcrandello@my-deja.com
      rschaar{at}pegasus.cc.ucf.edu if it's important.

  238. South Africa & Y2k by Estaga · · Score: 1

    Hi! Its been 2h30 of 2000 Now and everything is still as it was. Both our Cellphone and Landline providers were overloaded from just after 00:00.
    Otherwise, our Electricity is still here, our toilets are still flushing and hopefully the sun will come up in a few hours.
    Linux x86&Alpha, Digital Unix, Irix, etc. boxes are humming all happilly into the new millennium.

  239. wow, a 6! by crayz · · Score: 1

    how did that happen? I haven't seen a 6 in months, and there are none in the hof

    is this now officially the best comment ever?

    1. Re:wow, a 6! by jesser · · Score: 1
      i noticed that this post wasn't counted in the dropdown.. the "number of posts with a score of at least 5" was 2, but two posts had a score of exactly 5.

      i'm in light mode if it matters

      --

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    2. Re:wow, a 6! by mangu · · Score: 1

      what do you mean, 6? I see a 4! Perhaps someone else moderated this down, too bad. I think it was this problem about ramming someone backwards while towing a trailer full of puppy dog food...

  240. GPS? by zonker · · Score: 0
    anybody test their GPS systems yet?


    / k.d / earth trickle / Monkeys vs. Robots Films /

  241. The 2038 overflow by heroine · · Score: 2

    The real interesting effects won't happen until 2038 when all 32 bit time structures roll over to 1901. Unfortunately, since the average suit can't relate to a base 16 rollover in the same way they can relate to a base 10 rollover you can be sure the 2038 overflow won't make so much as a blip on the public consciousness. Just think about how many programs hard code their time structures in int32 to avoid debugging on 64 bit chips, how many solid state devices rely on 32 bit registers to cut costs.

    1. Re:The 2038 overflow by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2
      Oi! Why wouldn't they use an unsigned for the time? Seems like Ken Thomson and Dennis Ritchie were planning on negitive times ;)

      Or support for times prior to 1970, at least.

      However, the answer may be "what's an 'unsigned'?" According to the version of the C Reference Manual that came with 6th Edition UNIX, there was no unsigned data type - that was added later. That manual is online, but only in Postscript, and is linked to from Dennis Ritchie's home page; here's the document itself.

      Wait a sec (pun intended)
      0111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
      would incriment to
      1000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
      then
      1000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001
      which are -0 and -1 respectively, right?

      Right on machines using sign-magnitude representation, but not on machines using two's-complement representation, as most UNIX machines are (there existed, at least at one point, a UNIX port to the Univac 36-bit mainframes; those were, I think, one's complement).

      In two's complement, on a 32-bit machine,

      1000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000

      is -2147483648, and

      1000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001

      is -2147483647.

    2. Re:The 2038 overflow by Wolfgang · · Score: 2

      To prove that you can take a look at http ://www.pbs.org/whatson/stations/calendar.html?date =2038-01-19&station=KHET which works right and shows the calendar for January 2038. Now compare it with the next day at http ://www.pbs.org/whatson/stations/calendar.html?date =2038-01-20&station=KHET which as expected shows December 1901!

      But I do not care, in 2038 I will sure wear my wooden suit :-)

    3. Re:The 2038 overflow by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

      Actually, the clocks will roll over to 1970, not 1901. Unix and unix-like systems measure time in seconds since the "epoch," 12:00:00AM on 1/1/1970. 32 bit Unices, surprisingly enough, store this in a 32 bit register. A little math for a segue:
      2^31 = 2147483648 (we use 2^31 because we start counting at 0)
      2147483648 seconds = 35791394 minutes, 8 seconds
      = 596523 hours, 14 minutes, 8 seconds
      = 24855 days, 3 hours, 14 minutes, 8 seconds
      = 68 non-leap years, 35 days, 3 hours, 14 minutes, 8 seconds.
      Subtract 17 leap days (68/4) and we get a zeroing of the unix time every 68 years, 18 days, 3 hours, 14 minutes and 8 seconds.

      The next one should come along at 3:14:08AM on 1/19/2038, followed by another one at 6:28:16AM on 2/06/2106. Assuming my math (and windows calc.exe) is correct. Maybe I should have just copied and pasted from one of the many FAQs out there that explain this in better detail.
      --

      --
      Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
    4. Re:The 2038 overflow by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

      Oi! Why wouldn't they use an unsigned for the time? Seems like Ken Thomson and Dennis Ritchie were planning on negitive times ;)

      Wait a sec (pun intended)
      0111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
      would incriment to
      1000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
      then
      1000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001
      which are -0 and -1 respectively, right? -1 would be 12:59:59PM 12/31/69, right? So wouldn't it be counting backwards towards 1901?
      --

      --
      Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
    5. Re:The 2038 overflow by Duckie01 · · Score: 1


      I think this won't be as big as a problem because

      a> 32 bit machines won't be in use as much, as you already stated
      b> programmers are wary of it now and will check code they reuse, and fix it if necessary (at least, I will)

    6. Re:The 2038 overflow by Detritus · · Score: 2

      There was no "unsigned long" data type, just char, int, unsigned and long.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    7. Re:The 2038 overflow by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      Nice explanation, but this doesn't work how you think. The clock's not going to "run out of digits" and decide to set itself back to 0. It's going to keep on happily counting in binary, setting the most significant bit, which determines the sign of an integer. Thus it will roll back to -2^31, which is in 1901.
      --

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  242. Server b0rked by xpurple · · Score: 1

    Check this link
    http://swissinfo.net/cgi/worldtime/clock.pl? Chatham,New=zealand
    The server seems to have a small problem with the date change

    --
    http://www.xpurple.com
    1. Re:Server b0rked by Vivek · · Score: 2

      Not strictly true, actually it's the underlying C localtime (or gmtime call), or rather
      the definition of 'struct tm' in time.h [or equivalent], on which the return list from localtime/gmtime is based. It could be written in C, or Perl, or just about anything that uses struct tm or a data structure based on it.

      --
      -- fsck -f -b 8193 /dev/cortex
    2. Re:Server b0rked by Captain+Teflon · · Score: 1

      I'm in Sydney 9am ... Exchange and Proxy Server at work are still kicking, or you wouldn't be seeing this. Both my Win98 laptop and Linux desktop booted no probs (tried 'em all last night around 0145).

      The AUS government Y2K site (http://www.y2kaustralia.gov.au) reports all services working and no recorded events.

      Guess I won't have to make that end run for my bunker in the boonies after all.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
    3. Re:Server b0rked by Blitzkopf · · Score: 1

      This is perl, localtime gives years since 1900. So you have to add them to 1900 arithmetcaly (-is this a word or what) not prefix with 19.
      Just some last minute Y2K fix for you fixers out there.

    4. Re:Server b0rked by half+clued+aussie · · Score: 1

      http://www.swissinfo.net/cgi/worldtime/clock.pl?

      gives me;

      Location Not Found
      Timezone Lookup Failed For ,

      [Back to the Overview]

      btw it's 12:03AM here in Queensland.. and all's quite.. well almost MS Proxy Server seems to have died on our NT box.. squid still kicking but it's set to GMT..


  243. Tell him not to worry by marcus · · Score: 1

    All that bottled water and canned goods will last be OK until he can sell it all.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  244. International Y2K Cooperation Center by wampus · · Score: 1

    If you would like to know about other countries' Y2K preparedness, or whether or not they still exist, check out http://www.iy2kcc.org/.
    ---

    1. Re:International Y2K Cooperation Center by GossG · · Score: 1

      This site gave me good information an hour ago, but it appears to be down now (11:25 Pacific time).

      Are they equipped for the hit volumes? Who is IY2KCC?

  245. Re:The 19100 bug... here's why by Frank+Sullivan · · Score: 2

    You're right, Tom, i phrased that badly. strftime() exists in Perl, within the POSIX module. BUT... i'll still say that it's somewhat more understandable that programmers would make the Y1C error (how's that for a turn of phrase?) in Perl than in C. ctime() is part of Perl without loading any modules. strftime() is not... unless you're already an experienced C programmer (enough to know about strftime()), or read a LOT of documentation on Perl, you won't know about it. In C, on the other hand, the standard libraries are MUCH smaller and easier to study, and more importantly, strftime() is documented right alongside ctime()... on the same page, iirc.

    So Perl is no more prone to Y1C than C. However, Perl *programmers* are more prone to Y1C than C programmers. Is that better phrasing?

    As for the prevalence of the Cut and Paste Programming Antipattern with Perl... again, it's a lot easier in Perl than it is in C. When i found 150+ scripts with the bug, many of those scripts didn't even USE the timestamp string generated. And virtually all of those scripts dated to Perl 4, or stuck to Perl 4 conventions. Was there a POSIX module then?

    ---
    120
    chars is barely sufficient

    --
    Hand me that airplane glue and I'll tell you another story.
  246. The 19100 bug... here's why by Frank+Sullivan · · Score: 5

    I have now seen a few instances of the "19100" bug, sometimes as the 100 bug - 2000 gets displayed as either 100 or 19100. Several people have commented on this, but missed a crucial point. So i thought i'd explain this bug some.

    The 19100 bug comes from improper use of the header in the C standard library. It is much more common in Perl than C, but much more disappointing in C.

    To learn about this, get out your battered copy of K&R (you DO have K&R, don't you? _The C Programming Language_, by Kernigan and Richie. If you only have one book on C, it should be this one). Turn to the reference in the appendix. Look at the description of struct tm. You'll see that tm->tm_year is the years *since 1900*. So, to print years correctly, in either two-digit or four-digit form, we must add 1900 to tm->tm_year.

    Here's where naive, amateurish C programmers mess up. They do not learn their standard libraries, and thus reinvent them poorly. The strftime() function provides printf()-style formatting for struct tm. It will print the year correctly in either two-digit or four-digit form. Programmers who don't know their libraries just stick tm_year in a printf() somewhere, without accounting for the missing 1900, something like this:
    printf("19%d", tm->tm_year);
    which will print 1999, then 19100. The libraries are very good (with the glaring exception of some security holes!). Learn them and use them.

    Perl is where this bug comes into its own. For various reasons either obvious or opaque to you, strftime() does not exist in Perl. And the contents of struct tm are handed back from ctime() as an array. Therefore, more programmers are likely to not look deep enough to see how this SHOULD be handled, and do the 19100 bug, since they don't have a nice built-in library routine to do it for them.

    This is a tremendous problem. When doing Y2K checking for a previous job, i found this bug in over 150 Perl scripts, mostly due to cut-and-paste programming (Perl unfortunately encourages that approach). I also found it in the popular wwwboard online discussion script. I'll bet it's all over the place.

    Hopefully, someone finds this informative, and maybe moderates it up so it actually gets READ.

    ---
    120
    chars is barely sufficient

    --
    Hand me that airplane glue and I'll tell you another story.
    1. Re:The 19100 bug... here's why by Tom+Christiansen · · Score: 2
      For various reasons either obvious or opaque to you, strftime() does not exist in Perl.
      That's not true.
      % perl -MPOSIX -e 'print strftime("It is now %A the %d of %B in %Y here.\n", localtime())'

      It is now Saturday the 01 of January in 2000 here.

      As for your cut-and-paste remarks, that can be attributed to how many desperate nonprogrammers use perl who wouldn't dream of trying to use C++. They're doing the best they can, but nobody ever told them the "right" way.

      I see you've neglected to cover Java and Javascript, too.

      I don't see how people who don't know libraries in Perl are any different that people who don't know libraries in C. I already mentioned this code:

      #include <time.h>

      char *months[] = {
      "January", "February", "March", "April", "May ", "June",
      "July ", "August", "September", "October", "November", "December",
      };

      main() {
      time_t now = time(0);
      struct tm *t = localtime(&now);
      printf("Y2K will begin on %s %d, 19%02d\n",
      months[t->tm_mon], t->tm_mday, t->tm_year);
      exit(0);
      }

      It's easy to make the same screw up in Perl:
      use Time::localtime;

      @months = (
      "January", "February", "March", "April", "May ", "June",
      "July ", "August", "September", "October", "November", "December",
      );

      $t = localtime();

      printf("Y2K will begin on %s %d, 19%02d\n",
      $months[$t->mon], $t->mday, $t->year);

      In both those programs, the result is:
      Y2K will begin on January 1, 19100
      Sure, I could have used strftime() in both of them. Or, I could have learned about what localtime() returns. But both require one thing: RingTFM. People don't do that. It doesn't matter the language. So they suffer.

      I think you are mistaken to say that Perl is any more prone to this than C. Both have a year back from struct tm that is offset from 1900 making it easy to screw up, and both provide strftime if you know about it.

    2. Re:The 19100 bug... here's why by ptbrown · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, in their infinite ineptitude, "fixed" their JS implementation in IE by making getYear() start returning "2000", causing Netscape's home page to display the year as "3900", and making some poor NS tech to have to change the page. (Take a look at the source.) And so far, that's the only page I've seen that actually used it correctly.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
  247. Microsoft Finland's website had problems. by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    Yesterday Microsoft Finland's open jobs page reported some jobs beginning at 1900. It was fixed faster than whetever, but I heard from local Holy War newsgroup it was yesterday in evening TV news... =)

    They had let an "ASP Guru" loose at some point and, well, the results looked like it...

    As far as personal problems: Well, it's 20:01 here and everything is fine... so far. I doubt anything special happens.

  248. Re:Sampling Bias by psychophil.com · · Score: 1

    Very good point... Its like the television networks broadcasting when certain areas can expect to have their power restored after an outage. Um, if the powers out, how the hell are they going to get the broadcast?

  249. AAARRRRGGGGHHHH!!!!!! by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    THE END IS NIGH!!

    BANG FLASHES AND CRASHES EVERYWHERE - THE SKY IS FALLING!!!

    --
    Deleted
  250. Who cares? �250/hr for reading a book ain't bad! by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Hahahhahha!

    Hahhahaha!







    Hahahahahah!

    --
    Deleted
  251. AHAAA!!!! The Ultimate first post!!!! by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    And I say again!

    Hahahhahha!

    --
    Deleted
  252. Nope! - That be me. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid that according to slashdot you're at:

    12:09 PM December 31st, 1999 GMT

    Hahahaa.

    --
    Deleted
  253. No problems here by Jaeger · · Score: 1

    and we even had an evil Win98 box sitting next to my Linux notebook. My notebook ran my customized JBC, displaying both the date and the time. Minor amusement to watch it roll over... my mom insisted on stockpiling water in the bathtub in case the water stopped so we still could flush, even though the local paper ran a front-page story on how the water supply was safe unless Newton's law of universal gravitation was repealed. I dropped a cork just to prove that it hasn't. Good thing the laws of physics still hold.

  254. Milk Expiration: 01-05-100 by jjohn · · Score: 1

    Jesus, my milk is nineteen hundred years out of date!! I want a refund!

    I should be happy. At least the store still *had* milk to sell. I definitely see some hoarding here in Boston. All the candles in the supermarket were sold out.

    Of course, I have my Baygen radio with a light, so I'm ready for the Y2K food riots and rape gangs.

  255. Re:19100?? by bjb · · Score: 2
    Obviously a Perl script written by a programmer who didn't RTFM!

    For those who don't know, perl gives you back a year value which is the number of years SINCE 1900. Therefore, you calculate your year with $year = $perlYear + 1900; .. they probably just did "print '19$perlYear';"

    AGH

    --

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  256. Not to be insulting by Vermifax · · Score: 1

    But the century has never been the first two digits of the year. Nevermind the fact that it isn't even always the first two digits of the year plus one.

    Vermifax

    --

    Vermifax

    Logout
  257. Re:Fine in Melbourne, Australia. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2
    Optus Cable and Wireless is down now as far as I can tell and its 1:55am local time.

    Which doesn't necessarily mean it's down due to a Y2K bug; the San Jose, California, USA Mercury News had an article yesterday that began with:

    As New Year's Day 2000 rolls around, about all anyone can be certain of is that personal computers will crash, somewhere the power will fail, and airline flights will be canceled. You can bet that credit card billing statements will have mistakes and bank ATM machines will either refuse requests for money, keep your card, or both.

    In other words, it will be business as usual.

    Not all bugs that occur around the transition from 1999-12-31 to 2000-01-01 are Y2K bugs; there're plenty of bugs to go around....

    The Optus Y2K Site claims, as of when I last checked, that

    Saturday, January 01, 2000 at 7:33:07 AM
    We have no evidence of systems failure due to Y2K at this time.

    and, for what it's worth, the Optus home page says

    On the 31st December the analogue mobile network begins to close down. Find out how Optus will be keeping you covered into the new millenium in our updated mobile coverage section.
  258. Re:Y2k problem at this website... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2
    Notice the date on the pic from the webcame (1/1/9999)...

    It now, for what it's worth, says just "01 01 99".

    Of course, it also says "Fireworks New Years Eve", while displaying a picture that, if it's evening, is early evening (unless, just as it's summer this time of year in the Antipodes, it's "evening" at 7 AM :-)), and looks suspiciously as if it's morning, as per the "07:15:56" it was displaying when I checked it; there aren't any fireworks to be seen, either.

  259. Re:It Appears that, by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2
    Heck, wonder if anybody would be interested in a Hot Grits IPO?

    Hot Grits, Inc.'ll have to buy out the domain name first.

  260. No big surprise by Lurking+Grue · · Score: 1

    Tempe, Arizona is fine. Nothing to see here folks. Move along.

  261. Roll over? by morbid · · Score: 1

    I left the party before any of that happened.

    --
    I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
  262. Re:19100?? by thulldud · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I had a couple of scripts that did that. I had said something like:

    printf( "%s%02d", $cent, $year )

    The variable $cent contained either "19" or "20", depending on the value of $year. Looked fine, but when you get to y2k, that thing prints "19100". Ugh. RTFM time. Now it's like this:

    printf( "%d", ( $year + 1900 ) )

    Not the first time I have felt as stupid as a brick. But it made me feel a little better yesterday when the support team called me in a panic because they found the reference to "1900" in those scripts, "Oh, no! Hard-coded century! Fear! Fire! Foes! Awake!!"

    I should have told them I had had to change it because it infringed the "windowing" patent >:-P

  263. The german TV program of Samstag, 01.01.100 :-) by Wolfgang · · Score: 1

    Just take a look at TV TODAY - tv program and have a big smile.
    Until now I did not know that we germans had TV's since about 1900 years?

    This one is especially for all those who cannot wait until midnight!

  264. Re:19100?? by Wolfgang · · Score: 1

    It is fixed! Seems there are really some people who have to work.

  265. German magazine c't reports minor problems by Wolfgang · · Score: 1

    All fans of babelfish will be able to read this. They report some problems with nuclear power plants and some problem with earthquake detecting systems.

  266. Re:telstra are up - depends on your cell server by dustpuppy · · Score: 2

    All systems (Optus, Telstra, Vodafone etc) have been up all night. The only reason you wouldn't have been able to get through is congested cell servers - which is why somepeople could get through and some couldn't. It is also why if you are in a non-popular area, your mobile phone will still work but if you are in the CBD, it won't.

  267. Re:First Y2K issue, where no man has gone before.. by bcombee · · Score: 1

    Its getting its behavior from the way struct tm is defined in ANSI C. The year is 1900-based, but there isn't a Y2K problem since the year 2000 is just represented as 100. The tm structure can represent any year from (1900 + INT_MIN) to (1900 + INT_MAX).

  268. Re:date bug (could be my bad code) by httptech · · Score: 1

    Try this instead:

    #!/usr/bin/perl

    use Date::Calc qw(Add_Delta_Days Today);

    ($y,$m,$d) = Today(); #get today's date
    print "$y $m $d\n";

    ($y2,$m2,$d2) = Add_Delta_Days($y,$m,$d,-1); #get yesterday's date
    print "$y2 $m2 $d2\n";


  269. Re:date bug (could be my bad code) by httptech · · Score: 1

    Oh, and if you hadn't already guessed, your localtime routines failed because it returns the month as 0..11 instead of 1..12 like you were expecting. So you need to add 1 to the month variable when you use (localtime)[5,4,3]

    Date::Calc didn't like it when you asked it to calculate for November 31 1999 because it doesn't exist.

  270. Re:19100?? by hazeii · · Score: 1

    It's caused by poor coding...after you get the time structure in 'C', the years is the number of years since 1900...you should print this as:-

    printf("The year is %4u",year+1900);

    ...and not...

    printf("The year is 19%2u",year);

    ....as the latter rolls over to 19100.

    --
    All your ghosts are just false positives.
  271. I noticed this too by morven2 · · Score: 1

    Their clock momentarily went a minute early with each minute. Bad programming, I presume.

  272. Re:No problems in Tokyo! by dynamo · · Score: 1

    I have three words for you:
    jour nal ing
    i'm through

  273. Re:1980! by knuth · · Score: 1

    For your dad's machine, you might grab "Y2000" from Mega 16-Bit Freeware's DOS Utilities. Freeware, 31K. Prints out to the screen while testing. readme.txt explains in not-too-geekish terms about system clocks etc.

    If the BIOS or CMOS is the culprit, there's a freeware workaround at the top of the same page. With source. I didn't need it myself, but purports to get around the annoyance of setting the date every time Dad reboots.

  274. Re:Oh My God!! Everything is WORKING!!! by rew · · Score: 1

    EVERYTHING IS GOING TO WORK.

    Hmm. I don't think so. But still no reason to stockpile though. If there is something going wrong, it's going to be one type of shops say "A&P" being "down" (in the computer sense) in the next millennium. That however doesn't mean you can't get food, even if you normally buy all your food at A&P.

    9600 9599...

    Roger.


  275. Re:More Calendar bugs by rew · · Score: 1

    "cal 9 1752" is THE way to check if your "cal" program gets the difficult things right. The correct answer is the one you quoted.

    The "bug" was in the calendar, which had 365.2500 days/year instead of the 365.2425 that we use now. A guy named Gregorius (or something like that) in the 1750-ies figured it out and they decided to drop 11 days out of september 1752....

    Riots broke out because people felt robbed of 11 days of their life: They thought they were destined to die on say december fifth, and that this way they'd live 11 days shorter.....

    Different countries dropped the 11 (or 13 by the time everyone caught up) days at different times. Russia, I believe only joined the rest of the world after the october revolution (1917).

    So actually, calendars between september 1752 and 1917 need a country-of-validity. The switchover in september 1752 was probably "vatican".

    Roger.

  276. Re:More Calendar bugs by rew · · Score: 1

    Ok. Cal is English. Gregory was two centuries earlier.

  277. CET...we're alive.... by Mephisto · · Score: 1

    Well...it's 6:27 here (CET) and I'm still alive. We stockpiled a lot of booze, but it's alle gone now ;)

    We have still got: Water, electricicity, 'net-connection and the telephones are working....

    I hope you guys in the US make it....

    Happy new year!!!

    =Malthe
    --
    "No. No way, we Russians don't drink any more. We now work on computers, we use computers to send viruses to
    the West and then we poach your money."

    Vladimir Zhirinovsky 1999

  278. Haole Makahiki Hou! by craw · · Score: 1
    Your intrepid Hawaii /. reporter here (the last major urban center to enter Y2K). The lights are still on, and the air conditioners (hehehe) are still working. The fireworks are essentially over.

    Here in Hawaii, firecrackers and other kiddie stuff are legal (a 4 foot string costs about $2). Aerials and other more stout fireworks are illegal, but are very plentiful. This year was great. You can watch someone else put on a fireworks display (which is great if well done), but lighting the fuse yourself is not too shaby.

    So to my good friends out there. Peace on Earth, software for everyone, and a sincere wish that there will be a Y3K celebration.

    Aloha and haole makahiki hou!

  279. "Poor Coding"? by Bilbo · · Score: 1
    > It's caused by poor coding...

    Ummm... isn't that the definition of ANY Y2K bug? They are all "bad programming", or at least programming decisions based on assumptions that are no longer true.

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  280. No problems in Tokyo! by Jubal+Kessler · · Score: 2
    Just a quick note from Tokyo.

    I'm a systems administrator at a large ISP in Tokyo, and we completed our first few rounds of systems testing and nervous anxiety after the 2000 rollover.

    Nothing to report, which is good. One interesting note, perhaps: I was asked to power down the Linux systems a few minutes before midnight because if the power went out, the filesystems would take too long to fsck (we have a large RAID connected to a couple of them).

    No power outages, sewage overflows, or anything abnormal. I'm ready to pop this bottle of Möet champagne now!

    ----
    Jack of all trades, master of none: http://whole.net/~pup/

    1. Re:No problems in Tokyo! by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Just unmount the filesystem during the rollover or remount it read-only.

      --
      Q.
    2. Re:No problems in Tokyo! by Ricardo+Casals · · Score: 1

      There ARE ways to skip the fsck at boot. And if you didn't know that, why the hell are you (or anyone else there) a frikkin Sysadmin? HIRE ME!!! ;o)

      Egh

      --
      yeah ... i'm going to have to go ahead and not put a .sig here, alright?
  281. Re:Tables of four by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    Tom, you're blessed with being surrounded by
    intelligent people.

    I'm not convinced the average american can count to 8.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  282. Well, all is sweet so far in NZ... by Colitis · · Score: 3

    Coming up 3am and doubtless a few other countries now have had midnight come and go without the world collapsing in a chaotic heap of doom. Come 2000/01/01 12:00:01 the power was still on, TV still broadcasting (although after a few minutes of the moron they had doing the presentation I was starting to wish the TVNZ studios would have a localised Y2K power problem), just checked and water is still flowing from the taps (I don't need to go wee-wee or poo-poo just now so I'll take it on faith that the sewage system is still working). My main Linux box is running and knows what time it is, Internet connectivity is fine, ssh'ed to work and all the servers are up and know what time it is, the work web site is happy as Larry etc. Haven't turned on the other PC or the Amiga yet. Will be interesting to see what the SparcStation 2 running non-Y2K-compliant SunOS 4.1.3 does when I try booting it up...

    Oh, in other news, I might've been on track for the first road accident of the new millenium when I found myself going sideways on a *very* slippery corner on a wet and windy road coming home a couple of hours ago. Managed to straighten up safely though, would have been heaps of fun if I'd done it deliberately :-)

    1. Re:Well, all is sweet so far in NZ... by JacobO · · Score: 1

      Right on!

      Paul Holmes has driven me away from TVNZ. First the election coverage (the worst I've ever seen) and now this...

  283. Of course it's the new millenium tonight. by bbcat · · Score: 1

    Apparently the morons who started to count the
    years since christ didn't know about the number
    zero and started to count at one.
    Following their way the years would be from
    1-2000 to get 2000 complete years.
    On the other hand they also didn't know how to
    count as they screwed up by 4 or 5 years or even
    more.
    Considering that nowadays many of us know how
    to count we ignore this bullshit and count
    correctly and yes the new millenium starts
    tonight.

    1. Re:Of course it's the new millenium tonight. by B.B.Wolf · · Score: 1

      I use to have trials, now I have challenges.
      I use to have a stressfull life, now I have an
      exciting one. The change happened when I installed
      Jesus into my heart. Problems are now something
      that keeps me from getting bored. Y2K issues-
      bring them on!

      P.S. Jesus is not about religion, He is about
      relationship. Don't confuse the Christianity
      of the regligious nuts that the media likes
      to emphasis with the Christianity that is
      based on getting to knowing Jesus. The media
      confuses this issue like they do the
      cracker-hacker one for the same reason.
      unfortunatly the media is so influential that
      Christians buy into their definitions just
      like coders do.

    2. Re:Of course it's the new millenium tonight. by Velex · · Score: 1

      Funny... the same thing happened to me... after I started ignoring all that crap about man being evil and took control of my own life.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  284. Re: You Moron! by bbcat · · Score: 1

    We've actually been in the new millenium for
    at least 4 years but no one is asking to
    change the calendar to please the purists.
    It would be too much of a pain in the ass and
    the year is just a reference in time anyway.

    My advice is to get a life and stop looking
    at life in the eyes of an idiot.

    Your stupid argument is much like that of
    the discussions about the sex of angels
    in the middle ages.

  285. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by bbcat · · Score: 1

    >If we follow your logic and agree to begin a
    >millenium with the year 0, and not the year 1 as
    >it is in use in the Christian Era calendar, then
    >we must also apply this to months and days. And
    >tomorrow, we will be the 0 Jan of the next
    > millenium!

    Actually the months are like in a dozen
    1/12, 2/12, etc ...
    days are
    1/30 (28, 29 0r 31), 2/30, etc ...

    The year is a reference in time, in this
    case to a mythical birth of the god of
    christians which apparently is wrong anyway.

    The 20th century had a year 1900, we just missed
    the year 0 because people were too ignorant
    in those days. But then again they screwed up
    with the birth of their god (or messie). The
    millenium would have been passed 4 years ago.

    My message to all the fanatic "2001" morons.

    Get a life and wake up to the modern world, a
    world where some of us know how to count.

  286. Y2pranKs by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many Y2K related pranks are going to be pulled in the next 24 hours? I can see this happening over and over:

    A large group of friends and family gather together to celebrate the new year. The countdown commences.. 10..9..8..7..6..5..4..3..2..1.. HAPPY.. and the power goes out! Some prankster hanging around the circuit box had cut the power. A portable air raid siren could only help matters at this time.

    Can you imagine the reaction? I think that will prove irresistable to some people.

  287. Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to by F13 · · Score: 1

    to many fireworks sounds like a war zone

  288. I can't email from Netscape by Peale · · Score: 2

    Yes, I actually use Netscape for an email program. For me, it's more than adequate. However, after coming back from a lovely murder mystery party, I've tried to email several people. The error I recieve is 'cannot resolve name, please check address in preferences and try again' or something close. In Pine, however, I can email just fine. So I'm not sure what the problem is. Just my .02

    I'm sorry. What I meant to say was 'please excuse me.'
    what came out of my mouth was 'Move or I'll kill you!'

  289. y2k issues by Lando · · Score: 1

    Just finished cleaning up the "hopefully" last y2k issue. Nothing major, just a couple of minor programs, ie closed source, that decided not to work this morning. I've got open source replacements ready to go, but have to wait for Monday to implement.

    What really sucks is that I have to go into work Monday. Damn, was so looking forward to the world ending... Grin

    Lando

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  290. The power is down here in Oslo, Norway.. by vr · · Score: 1

    .. but it only affects the subway and trams, and the rumours say that it has nothing to do with Y2K. Anyway; we haven't crossed midnight here yet. ;-)

    1. Re:The power is down here in Oslo, Norway.. by fatdave · · Score: 1

      Nothing to do with Y2K (isn't that 2048?)

      A power failure in the sporveiers network between Majorstua and Tøyen.
      Heard about it at lunchtime (1200 GMT) as I was heading home and the T-bane stopped at Blindern.
      Didn't bother me, the bicycle is Y2K compliant (though I am not sure about the rider)

      ..d

      --
      --- Four bases should be enough for any genetic code
  291. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by vr · · Score: 1

    Ah.. yes, well. We already know this (most of us anyway). BUT! We do not care!

    Let us celebrate in peace. Don't bother us about small technicalities.

    Sorry.

  292. It's not the millennium! by TomG · · Score: 1

    No, you have not been the first person to ring in the new millennium.
    You have not been the first person to scream happy new millenium.
    You have not been the first person to send new millennium e-mail.
    You weren't the first to check your phone line and your computers for millennium downtime.
    You didn't make the millennium's first fart.
    You didn't crack the first joke of the new millennium.
    You did _not_ make the first slashdot post of the new millennium.
    You were not the first of the new millenium to turn off the main power switch as a practical joke.

    TomG

  293. Unimog is too retro. by Kris_J · · Score: 2


    Oka

  294. I'm concerned event reports are being ignored by Kris_J · · Score: 2
    or blocked.

    The main Australian site for Y2k event reports, http://www.y2kaustralia.gov.au/ clearly shows no events in any sector, in any state. Yet, the ABC breaking news site has a story of Y2k problems hitting a transport ticketing system in one or two states.

    This is just one I've spotted. How many other events aren't being reported on official Y2k event reporting sites?

    1. Re:I'm concerned event reports are being ignored by hohosforbreakfast · · Score: 1

      I found an article on this at the BBC's web site here. It lists several minor problems that have occured worldwide. And it's all minor stuff (or things that were easily worked around), for which I am thankful. Of course, we have a few more hours in which we could have problems, but it sure looks fine from here.

      BTW, I am in Iowa, and everything appears to be functioning properly.

      --
      Tony Jeffries
  295. spelling error by msouth · · Score: 1
    i have to go to a 4d holographic cybertechnotrendybuzzwordvideotelephonographic conference

    transposed the r and o, and replaced r with h. should have used dvhoak keyboard--no, wait, that doesn't seem to help...

    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  296. 1980! by RottenApple · · Score: 1

    Well..

    My recent machine is OK with the Y2K bug.
    I installed the Y2K patch for the Windows.

    But a 486 machine my father use is a DOS based
    one.

    It rolled back 1980!

    Well.. Not all computers ( IBM compatibles ) has its time origin as 1900. Some BIOS starts from 1980!

    And.. An application program that my father should use has reports its time "1980" although the developers said that it fixed the bug!

    Hmm..

    Anyway, I'm not sure that S/W on my recent machine is also Y2K bug free.

    Although it is solved on the OS/System level, it should also be solved on the application S/W level.

  297. Re:First Y2K issue, where no man has gone before.. by toriver · · Score: 1
    mm...ASP is server side, NOT client side.

    So? There are Javascript engines for the server side as well (Netscape's server products use them, for instance).

    Aside: Win-Python also registers itself so that it can be used for ASP.

  298. Y2K The Best Thing To Happen To Microsoft by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    Now everyone will blame those Blue Screens of Death and random system crashes they are so used to on the year 2000, rather than Microsoft's abject software engineering practices. This has to be the best PR move by Microsoft since their proclimation of Windows NT being the "most popular UNIX" in the world.

    As for your web page, yup, as of 8:40 AM CDT it is still down. Before blaming Y2K or the apacolypse, may I suggest a good, hard look at the underlying system. After all, you did say IE, right?

    :-)

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  299. 'Userfriendly' hit by y2k! by belbo · · Score: 1
    Watch this... ;-)

    Best wishes for xx00

    tom

    --

    --
    "Just believe everything I tell you, and it will all be very, very simple."

    1. Re:'Userfriendly' hit by y2k! by sidesh0w · · Score: 1


      AJ: Well, it looks like the Y2k bug didn't rear it's ugly head.

      Mike: Yep. The doomsayers have been proven wrong again.

      (Pause)

      AJ: Did you see that too?

      Mike: Houston, we have a problem.


      (I'm sure most of you already figured this out)


  300. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 1
    I'd just like to remind everyone that while it IS, obviously, the year 2000, with all the inherent problems that may/may not cause, it is NOT the new millenium. So can we, as supposedly intelligent people, stop with the propagation of all this "first * of the millennium" crud.

    Gee, that gives you a whole 'nother year to learn how to spell MILLENNIUM! :) Yay!

    /set trollmode off

    ;D

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  301. First Y2K issue, where no man has gone before.. by eshefer · · Score: 4

    according to
    this story on News.com, Startrek- voyeger's web site claims that the next episode will be aired.. 99 years and 364 days ago.

    check it out here.

    (and it's running a ASP script... why isn't this suprising?)


    --------------------------------

    1. Re:First Y2K issue, where no man has gone before.. by Quarters · · Score: 1

      Is ASP as date hobbled as JavaScript? JS gets the 4 digit date from your system clock and then automatically subtracts 1900 from it before it puts it into a variable for your use.

  302. Guatemala status by mjuarez · · Score: 1

    Well, so far, after three hours and 13 minutes, nothing has happened... at least, the water is still running, electricity is working without a hitch, I have two computers at home which rolled over during a Warcraft II and Alpha Centauri match... no problems there... and finally, my Linux and NT servers seem to work OK. So, at least so far, nothings happened... still have to go check my account balance on the ATM, though...

  303. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by Cadaver · · Score: 1

    We didn't drop off the map. Although if we had, I probably wouldn't have noticed at the time...
    --

    --
    I ate something that disagreed with me. Maybe I should have cooked him first.
  304. Attitude T-Shirt by ph43drus · · Score: 1
    I'm wearing my Complete Y2K attitude T-Shirt to the New Years party I'm going to.

    It makes the bold statement about the gullability (with relation to computers) of the computer illiterate, and how easily they might have been fooled by this bug. In essence, it is my statement that nothing will happen, and if you think otherwise, poo on you.

    Merry Apocalypse y'all.

    Jeff

  305. All well in Sweden. by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 1

    Well, it's half past two in Sweden and the government has reported that everything works. Apparently my laptop works, as indicated by MiTAC. The mobile phones and cordless phones work. So does the wooden stove. The desktop computer doesn't work though, but that was because I by mistake ripped out a few cords yesterday when I was going to install a second harddrive, so let's not blame Y2K. Live reports from Ericsson's main Y2K center reports that nothing at all has gone wrong. Everything has been going so well that it's almost boring. Well, well, at least there is a screendump of Microsoft's site we all can laugh at @ http://members.xoom.com/_wannabe/images/msy2k.jpg .

    Happy new year everyone, and I hope that the rollover will work as painlessly in USA as in the rest of the world.

  306. Did you see the Football Players on Leno? by just+someone · · Score: 1
    Is it the opposite in the southern hemisphere?
    Did you see the Football Players answering basic questions on Leno last night?

    Absolutley hillarious.
    What is the planet closest to the Sun? (one wrong answer: earth)
    At what Temperature does water Boil? (one wrong answer 32 degrees)
    Who is the Govenor of WI/CA?
    What country borders California? (wrong answer: Canada) (one response was is this a trick question?)

    If it's not mutliple choice like who wants to be a millionaire, americans can't answer it.

    Not Quite as difficult as why we have seasons, but some things should be basic knowledge.

  307. Darnit by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    I'm underground right now in the Graymalkompound. Topside it's raining and cold and the power has been poopie all day long. Luckily for those of us here underground our supply of Sweet Tarts and pepsi is going strong. I was kinda hoping I'd be one of the few people left to repopulate the planet. At least I get to be one of the last people to find out if I'm Y2K compliant. We love you Boris!!

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  308. 12:30am in San Francisco & all is well by machineryofJoy · · Score: 1
    Slightly after midnight + all is well. No problems seen or heard (lights, water, phone etc).

    Mac I am on gives date as 1/1/00.

    About to boot into LinuxPPC, which I'm sure will go smoothly.

    Happy New Year, everyone!


    =moJ
    - - - - - -
    swagmag.com

  309. Re:Y2K Bug: CNN/Headline News Says Not "Millennium by Skeezix · · Score: 2

    I don't see why people have such a hard time handling this. Most people can accept the fact that the 20th century is the 1900's. The same principle is at work. We start counting from 1, not zero when it comes to centuries and years. It wouldn't make much sense to talk about the zeroth century, or the zeroth year of our Lord.
    ----

  310. A useful resource... by Skeezix · · Score: 2

    check out http://www.iy2kcc.org/summary_chart_az.ht ml for an alphabetical list of countries and their status.
    ----

    1. Re:A useful resource... by jhittner · · Score: 1

      Sites down...... NO ITS Y2K!!!!

  311. Re:Y2K Bug: CNN/Headline News Says Not "Millennium by Skeezix · · Score: 2

    yes, that would work. I guess we could just declare today to be December 31st, 1998. :)
    ----

  312. Re:19100?? by EnderX · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's been a bit of a perl in-joke for some time since perl returns the current year as the number of years since 1900 -- in #perl there was talk of having YAPC 19100 next year :-)

    David

  313. On the other hand... by EnderX · · Score: 2

    What were we expecting, exactly? People writing in saying "The power's out, the phones are out, and I can't connect to the Internet"? One way or another, no one's gonna post comments like that ;-)

    David

  314. Well our vending machines have stopped working! by xneilj · · Score: 1

    Since the Y2k rollover the cashless vending machines at our workplace (in UK) have stopped working! We're here on site (it's now 2:10am)providing Y2K support and if you insert your smartcard they say 'General Error - Date not set'!

    --
    rm -rf / is the evil of all root
    1. Re:Well our vending machines have stopped working! by xneilj · · Score: 1

      FOr me it shows:

      "by xneilj on Saturday January 01, @02:08 BST (#583)"

      Yours is:

      "by notrocketscience on Saturday January 01, @02:22 BST (#588)"

      Dunno why Slashdot can't figure out that 00:00 BST = 00:00 GMT during the winter.......

      --
      rm -rf / is the evil of all root
    2. Re:Well our vending machines have stopped working! by notrocketscience · · Score: 1

      I'm on site at my workplace (our machines are working, but if you're on site at 0210 GMT, why does the header time on the post display as 0108 GMT? What time will this post get?

  315. C programmers by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Ever I switched from Fortran60 to C I've preferred zero based addressing. So I also advocate using a zero year. (Nobody who lives there is going to complain anyway, so why not!)

    If you feel that you really must, just insert a zero year in between 1 AD and 1 BC. Almost all dates that old are sufficiently uncertain anyway that nobody will notice the difference. (The season they might notice. Shepards watch their flocks by night during the summer, as I understand it.)

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  316. Re:We've got Y2K problems. by andyf · · Score: 2

    Here, also in Minnesota, we've had a couple more-than-minor Y2K problems, but they started December 10th. The contact management database, Telemagic v14.0, is not Y2K compliant. It hit a recall date (take the current date and add 3 weeks) of past 2000. Once that happened, the entire customer database got hosed. All 55,000 records. On the 21st, Telemagic came out with a patch, but it only fixes the program so it won't screw up any more databases. This one is already screwed up...

    Also, the launcher program KickOff (from WordPerfect 6.0), like Cron, reports the next launch date as 6am on 1/1/100. It is used to start this report printing software every morning. There is only one server here with the problem, but I know of another site with over 200 installations of KickOff...

    --

    Photos of bits of the past hiding in the present: afiler.com
  317. User Friendly by Redeemed · · Score: 1
    Just when it appeared as though that Y2K went without a hitch, it appears as though Illiad has stumbled upon some troubles with the bug. The User Friendly for January 1, 2000 seems to show signs of a quite serious Y2K bug...

    Those of you too lazy to figure it out (I had a friend to the work for me):

    Well, it looks like the Y2K bug didn't rear it's ugly head.
    Yep, the doomsayers have been proven wrong yet again.
    DId you see that too?
    Houston. We have a problem.

    Copyright (c) 1900 Iliad
    http://www.userfriendly.org/

    Not only that, but the link to the previous comic seems to be broken, sending you to 00jan/19991231.html instead of 99dec/19991231.html. Coincidence? I think not.

  318. Culture for the New Year: Watch each time zone by Jade · · Score: 1

    PBS is doing a 25-hour live broadcast showing things in each time zone. Throughout the day that's what we'll be watching to see not only what happens, but what different events people have going on to celebrate.

    PBS' website has information on their home page. Lots of neat things, sure looks more interesting that broadcast tv.

    They're already in hour 7, so far, no Y2K glitches. I think we're fine.

  319. Listening on the IOPS bridge by Uriel · · Score: 1

    This is a big conference call/telephone bridge. AT&T, Sprint, AOL, UUNet, Earthlink, Cisco, etc etc etc..

    Nothing actually happened in the call of technical import, but the following quotes were pretty funny:

    "But we really don't think that's Y2K-related, being as Germany is still in 1999, right?"
    "Not Germany, Jamaica."
    "What about that cable problem in Japan?"
    "No, it's not in JAPAN, it's in JAMAICA."


  320. Y2K bugs experenced by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    I woke up am 5pm [yes night owl I am] to my radio proclamming to provide Y2K covrage.. Keep up on all the Y2K news... blah...
    Called into work... directed someone to turn on my computer and radio modem.. modem dosn't want to work.. ok no biggy.. directed the person to shut down..
    By the time I got to work the modem was fine and the person was online checking up on her stocks. She says there was some news on one company in the early morning hours and she wanted to put in a buy order on-line... according to the information she could get nothing is happening in the stock market.. she might be able to get a good deal...
    When she was done and I got to set up for my day I switched over from her account to mine.. pulled up some Y2K music "It's all a conspericy man.. this is how the freemasons plan to take over the united states government..." kick on IRC... pull up some web sites and wait... Someone mentioned CNN and I rembered that I could watch CNN over real audio so I pulled it up over the RealPlayer G2 alpha for Linux [Looks like Realmedia dosn't plan to support Linux for very much longer... time to make our own format.. hint hint]
    I occasionally mentioned that my brain wasn't Y2K complient... other Y2K jokes went around... looking for the pissed off survivalists... they seem to be staying underground...

    Ok first Y2K bug.. accually this one is an oldly.... My XT at home [The Back up] is trapped in the 1980s.. I knew this allready.. but it works fine... so who cares...
    Next Y2K bug.. apparently someone on IRCs lighters arn't Y2K complient... they all died... oh well...
    Next a website PVP isn't pointed at the right location for the Y2K commic... still pointing at 1999 subdirection.. apparently the year is hardcoded and has to be changed manually every year...
    Next bug... My security camra works fine except for the fact that there is no 13/1/99 [13th month].. I have to fix this every year.. no biggy.. did it before... Unfortunatly it uses a 2 digit year but then that clock is a convence we can live without...
    Next annother website Giga-byte now for the fun part.. Mac and Linux report year 2100 but a test version of Windows gets 4000.. It's the website and I don't know why it malfunctions diffrently for Windows but I suspect being a test version is part of that... The website reports the wrong year eather way...

    In short the "Y2Kbugs" are related to disposable lighters.. website defects.. new year bugs and old 198X bugs.
    Power dosn't go off... my brains didn't explode all over my desk.. and where are those pissed off survivalists... I need to laff in there faces... dang it they must be in hinding...

    --
    I don't actually exist.
    1. Re:Y2K bugs experenced by zeedotcom · · Score: 1

      The biggest Y2K problem I have had is that I went online on New Year's Eve. I contacted a few people in Australia. They said all is well except for the phones in Spain don't seem to be working. I told my dad this and we assumed that it was just a coincidence. He told my grandfather what I had found out the next day. My grandfather didn't understand. He seemed to think that all the phones in Spain were not working and it was the only place. Tonight he told me this. After I found out I was the source of the info I got scared. My grandmother has probably told all my immediate relatives and all her sisters who have probably told everybody in the state. So in short: My grandmother isn't Y2K compliant. Be careful what grandparents find out.

      --

      If you want my respect, give it first...
      If you don't want my respect, expect mine before you give it.

  321. Yet Another Broken CGI Script (YABCS) by Fetch · · Score: 1

    Do people forget how to program when they
    have to start dealing with POST and GET???

    The guy works for Bindview too... great
    PR for them

    oh, the link:
    http://www.theknow.com/dave/cgi-bin/displaypage. pl?THOUGHTS

  322. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by Zugok · · Score: 1

    ha! I wonmder nhow many people actually get that joke?
    BTW, what date is in in Julian time?

    --
    "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
  323. Re:Ireland - ok so far by rde · · Score: 1

    Well, at least the cyber cafe that I'm stuck in seems to be fine
    Stuck? Well, that's fucking nice. I try to show you a good night out; a shit-fast connection to the world and the possiblity of seeing the world crash and burn, and what do I get? 'Suck in a cyber cafe'.

    You pick the venue next fucking millennnium.

  324. Re:"confirmed missile launchings in russia" by telematx · · Score: 1

    Apparently they were Scuds launched into Chechnya as part of the Russian offensive.

    See this BBC article.

  325. Re:19100?? by demi · · Score: 1

    Well, perl hands you whatever it got in its
    struct tm, which is the number of years since 1900
    (point being it isn't perl-specific, this is a
    feature of standard unix date-handling routines). So it's not necessarily a perl script.

    --
    demi
  326. pretty boring really... by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

    Well I'm in a hotel in Dusseldorf keeping an eye on CNN and wishing I could have a drink tonight. I'm supposed to be here in case of y2k problems with our systems but all that's happened so far is that I've realised just how bad CNN actually is... and I can't get BBC here!

  327. Re:19100?? by Gerund · · Score: 1

    I'd say the program is just prepending "19" to a date that starts from year 00 == 1900, but isn't limited to 2 date digits, so 2000 == year 100, and with "19" prepended, you get 19100. Someone really made a mess of the seconds-since-epoch date system here.

  328. Re:Auckland International Airport - convincing, NO by vik · · Score: 1

    Well, the Quantas plane took off and flew over my house pretty much on time - I live across the Manukau, opposite the airport. Unfortunately the passengers missed my Y2K welcoming fireworks show of 180 fireworks going off on my veranda by about 30 seconds. Probably for the best...

    Vik :v)

  329. PalmOS 3.0 Fails to Rollover in NZ by vik · · Score: 2

    Two out of two Symbol SPT1500 Palm devices running PalmOS 3.0 here failed to rollover to 2000.

    The devices remained set at 31st December 1999 but did move to an AM time. They accepted a manual date change with no problems.

    The SPT1500 is basically the same as a Palm III but has a Symbol laser barcode scanner built in to the top.

    Vik :v)

  330. University of Alabama unreachable by SpaFF · · Score: 1

    Well Its midnight central time here, but I can't check on my servers to see if they are ok because it seems the entire University of Alabama Network is unreachable. A traceroute shows the connection timing out in Auburn (I tried from my house in Mobile and a shell account I have in Michigan). I doubt this is Y2K related but its still an annoyance just the same. -Lee

    --
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d? s: a-- C++++ UL++++ P++ L+++ E- W++ N o-- K- w--- O- M+ V PS+ P
  331. A-OKAY in Kansas City by Randy+Rathbun · · Score: 2

    Everything is running smooth as silk here. The check engine light on my car kicked in about 10:15, but that is because I have a clogged fuel filter I think. Yuck.

    One funny thing did happen though... on our ham radio emergency net the guy up at the Independence, MO police station had a bit of a scare. At precisely 12:00am the circuit breaker he was on popped. Guess it could not handle the load from the coffee pot, a computer, and a mobile rig.

    I was hoping that the power would at least go out for an hour or so.. would be nice to see the stars without any light pollution.

  332. Re:Y2k != millenium [sic] by delysid-x · · Score: 1

    Actually, the star of bethlehem was an alien spacecraft and Jesus was an alien/human hybrid (and thus had the superpowers, water to wine, walk on water, all that crap). Mary was abducted and impregnated which gave rise to the whole 'virgin birth' bs. Like the song from the Mr. Hankey's Christmas Classics album goes... "You can suck all the dick that you want and still be a virgin, Mary" Kenny kicks ass.

  333. IE Homepage is down by GC · · Score: 2

    My IE homepage is currently down with ERROR 312.

    Perhaps this is a Y2K problem.

    Well done Micros~1 :)

    1. Re:IE Homepage is down by GC · · Score: 2

      It's been up and down all day...

      More down than up... of course...

    2. Re:IE Homepage is down by Plasmic · · Score: 2

      It's down for me (I get error 502 from my firewall)

    3. Re:IE Homepage is down by GnrcMan · · Score: 1

      Maybe they were hosted on CIHost. :)

      --GnrcMan--

    4. Re:IE Homepage is down by BrightSun · · Score: 1

      it appears to be up to me...

      --
      Computers save man alot of guesswork, but so does the bikini ;)
    5. Re:IE Homepage is down by KPU · · Score: 2

      Well, I checked at 3:25 PM GMT, and the page was up, however the page did show the find a new job section right under the Boris Yeltsin story.

  334. Re:Weather.com has minor bug by Per+Bothner · · Score: 1
    Even better than that, there is no number

    lo -
    hi 70

    Er, that is the way they always show it.
    I guess means "not applicable", since it's a "forecast" and Friday morning already happened.

  335. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by memoid · · Score: 1

    ... and since *everybody* misspells it -- then, there you go!

    --
    -- memoid
  336. Y2K office compliancy by GW+Hayduke · · Score: 1

    OK, got a fax from my dad in NZ this am, and he warned me about his Y2K problem... knocked over his Canterbury Draught...
    So in deference to Him, I've decided to Saran Wrap my workstation "You can never be too careful"

    --
    -- Life: Hate the Game... Love the cereal
  337. Re:More Calendar bugs by Mike+A. · · Score: 1

    Actually, the riots were because the peasants were being paid wages by the day but charged rent by the month. Bad enough in February, when you're a couple of days short, but 11 days...

    --

    --
    Do I look like I speak for my employer?
  338. Re:19100?? by mezzo · · Score: 1

    Hrm. *runs quickly to fix a perl script*

    I was just printing as yy/mm/dd for a program.
    I guess that would give me 100/1/1 tomorrow.
    oops.

    (Now who says browsing slashdot at work isn't productive?)

  339. [OT] Happy New Millennium from Little Old England by periscope · · Score: 1

    Hello World,
    Well, we survived the GMT rollover (so far)! I know this is off topic, but please moderators, just for once, can't I say "have a great new Millennium" to everyone on /. from those of us over the ocean in England without be penalised?

    Jonathan.

    --
    http://www.jonmasters.org/
  340. Re:19100?? by vitaflo · · Score: 2

    For those who don't know, perl gives you back a year value which is the number of years SINCE 1900. Therefore, you calculate your year with $year = $perlYear +1900; .. they probably just did "print '19$perlYear';"

    Same thing is true for Javascript date/time functions in web browsers. Though IE and Netscape handle it differently. I believe IE works like Perl does above, but netscape, once it gets to "2000" just jumps from 99 to 2000. I wrote a script to fix this over a year ago for all the dates we display on websites at work, but someone yesterday just meantioned that they rolled ahead to 2000 and were getting Jan 30, 192000 as the date. It's always nice when you have a code library for people to use, but they decide to go ahead and write there own code any way, and the wrong way. Ugh. Now I have to go in and fix 100 project sites because of some moron.

  341. Y2K - It went by without a glitch 'round here.. by David+at+Eeyore · · Score: 1

    it's about 2.30pm local (UTC+11). I went and looked at the Netware and NT boxes at work (Defence)at 9am; hardly a car on the roads. The servers were all just doing fine. Our boxes at home both Linux and Windows were good except for the power going off for 30 secs at midnight which reset everything!
    The TV coverage is really good!

    --
    "Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups" seen on someone's blog...
  342. UK Government Y2K-monitoring website by Stephen · · Score: 2
    This website: www.millennium-centre.gov.uk claims to be monitoring things around the world.

    <gripe>
    Although judging by the leaflet every home in the country got sent, they may be more into the business of reassurance than information. Choice extract from that leaflet (paraphrased from memory): Q. Will nuclear weapons go off because of the Y2K bug? A. Don't worry! All of the UK's nuclear missiles have been tested and found to be safe. Phew.
    </gripe>

    --
    11.00100100001111110110101010001000100001011010001 1000010001101001100010011
  343. An observation by Stephen · · Score: 3
    Why is the Y2K problem known as the millennium bug? Leaving aside the issue of when the millennium begins, it's still only a centenary bug!

    It's to do with the second digit of the year changing, not the first. It would only have been a millennium bug if programmers had used the last three digits to represent the year!

    --
    11.00100100001111110110101010001000100001011010001 1000010001101001100010011
    1. Re:An observation by johnburton · · Score: 1
      Yeah it's not a millennium bug because it happens a year before the change of millennium.

      And it's not a millennium bug because it was designed that way. The word bug usually describes a mistake in implementation not an inapropriate design decision.

      A small point, but it's important in softwar engineering to be precise.

      --
      Sig is taking a break!
    2. Re:An observation by jfunk · · Score: 2

      It is true that 2K would equal 2000 in a metric system, but time is not metric!

      SI prefixes (kilo, milli, deca, pico, et al) is not "metric only."

      look at kilovolt, microfarad, megohm, etc. Those are not metric units, yet they use SI prefixes.

      Note the MKS (metres, kilograms, seconds) and CGS (centimetres, grams, seconds) systems as well, for maintaining proper relationships in physics calculations.

      Finally, SI prefixes are used in time measurements. Ever hear of a millisecond?

      The SI system was designed to be ridiculously easy to use an can be applied to any unit, keeping consistency and simplicity. Imagine if we kept the imperial practise of making up new words for appropriate units? How about if a microfarad was called a flinker instead? Then change picofarad, nanofarad, millivolt... Life would be very painful for me.

    3. Re:An observation by jfunk · · Score: 2

      Kilovolt, microfarad, and megohm are used in the metric system as well as the imperial system. They are universal units.

    4. Re:An observation by Krollekop · · Score: 1


      So you'll be the only one to wake up tomorrow finding yourself back in Jan 1 1000.

      If it's not a millenium bug, not need to worry about the millenium's digit...

    5. Re:An observation by TPFH · · Score: 1

      but but but.....
      it must be true, it was on User Friendly

      --
      This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
    6. Re:An observation by mangu · · Score: 1

      kilovolt, microfarad, megohm ARE (AFAIK) metric units. They are, respectively, one thousand volts, one millionth farad, and one million ohms.

    7. Re:An observation by mairtin · · Score: 1

      For that matter, Y2K is also an inappropriate name, since 2k = 2048

  344. hotmail problems?? by SONET · · Score: 1

    For whatever reason, be it Y2K or whatever... I can't seem to access hotmail.com. I don't know what posessed me to check it in the first place, I haven't checked it in monhts.

    Anyone else having problems? I've been trying for about 5 minutes now.

    --
    Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do. --Benjamin Franklin
  345. Surprise! '95 barfed by Mowog · · Score: 1

    Well, just got back from the fireworks here in Melbourne (Aust), and guess what -- my '95 box had crashed and rebooted, something it doesn't usually do without my help. Anyone surprised? :o)

  346. Re:More Calendar bugs !!! NOT by angelo · · Score: 1

    We were there, but we weren't America yet. Hell, America was "discovered" in 1542 or 43, but it wasn't really "the americas" until amerrigo vespucci mapped it. Heck, It could have become "Leifland", "Columbia" or even "New Phonecia" depending on artifacts found.

  347. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    Leave the Judeo part out of this. The Gregorian calander is not based on the Jewish calander in any way, shape or form. According to the Jewish calander, it is 5760.

  348. Time Delay on Problems? by Vulpine · · Score: 2

    Here at the office -- yes, like many geeks I'm in the office today & tomorrow -- we're discussing with amusement how everything is going fine around the world.

    OTOH, we're wondering if some problems couldn't have a time delay, and only crop up several days later? What do others think.

    As an aside, I think the media frenzy around Y2K is interesting. When Y2K first surfaced in the media, everyone was discussing how it would cause problems in billing. Nowadays, the media has been predicting everything from nukes going off to terrorist attacks. Sheesh.

    --
    -- 'As it all washes away you know -- as it all is one, no one is alone.' -Cosmic Disorder
    1. Re:Time Delay on Problems? by BoogieChillum · · Score: 1

      Could be some...Periodic housekeeping runs could still bring out a few more an a week or amonth or even this time next year (Save all data older than, for instance)...Crash recoveries could have a little extra thrill, with getting the right backups (though this one will taper off as the most recent backups get past the hundred year old ones that you made yesterday)...There's still everybody going back to work Monday or Tuesday and the end of February to look forward to (all those secretaries opening their Outlook Express with preview to get everything broadcast from the hundred addresses in their automatic address books)...And the end of the financial year...

  349. People and Y2K by Blitzkopf · · Score: 1

    I have been thinking for the last days, about this Y2K thing. All power, water and whatnot services have been inspected and upgraded. But won't the real problem start when people start using 00 in forms and the computers have to interpret such things.

    The computers themselves are pretty accurate in keeping track of time, but they might have a harder time figuring out stupid users. So my fears comes from thing like ordering processes, you know when some wholesalers are unable to fullfill orders becouse they are fulfilling orders for 2000 but the retailers are placing orders to be fullfilled in 1900.

    As someone might have guessed I used to work for a retailer(I got out a year ago), a and it kind of scares me how random the EDI systems work, at least here in Iceland.

    So I guess the real fun begins when banks open and people start acting like people.

  350. ALL HYPE by serialk · · Score: 1

    NOTHING HAPPENED

    media hype !!!!

    using their greedy methods

    1. Re:ALL HYPE by BoogieChillum · · Score: 1


      Only because several (?)million hard-working geeks have spent the last 7 years rewriting umpteen gazillion lines of code.

      The lack of major problems is more indicative that the operation was a success.

  351. old Elm breaks in year 2000 by linux2000 · · Score: 1

    Elm 2.4 PL25 (November 11, 1995) used by RedHat 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 (the latest elm updates at RedHat site for these OS versions) has this year 100 bug too.

    Solution: download,build,install the latest Elm 2.5.2 from ftp://ftp.virginia.edu/pub/elm

    It builds on RH 5.x with no problems.

    Now-- if this was useful to you, shame on you! Upgrade to RH6.1! (pointing finger at self)

  352. Stating the obvious . . . by Greyjack · · Score: 1

    Of course, those who have significant outages and so forth will likely be unable to post, which sort of ensures this will be a chronicle of non-events :)

  353. Re:Looks like I missed the rollout! Fake? by arkham6 · · Score: 1

    I looked at the source code for this page, and it looks like it was hardcoded.
    CENTER> This site will be live in: -10957 days!

    What is this, free advertising by showing that you were not prepared? Like I'd buy software from people who didn't even patch their apps.

  354. Re:Weather.com has minor bug by Brento · · Score: 1

    As if. How would weather.com KNOW if we've already had our LOW temp for the day? That would be akin to saying we've already had our high temp for the day, which is also impossible. The temperature drops in the evenings, remember?

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  355. Weather.com has minor bug by Brento · · Score: 2

    If you look up your local weather on weather.com by using their zip code box on the main page, it says that your low temperature today will be zero. Doesn't matter where you live, your low will be zero. The high is correct, though. Can't say for certain that this is y2k-related, but you know how it goes. Us users are going to see everything with y2k written all over it.

    Here's a link for an example.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Weather.com has minor bug by grumling · · Score: 1
      It always look like that. It means you already had your low temp for the day.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  356. date bug (could be my bad code) by wiley+wimberly · · Score: 1

    I thought this was interesting.

    #!/usr/bin/perl
    ($y,$m,$d) = (localtime)[5,4,3]; #get todays date
    $y += 1900; #fix the years
    print "$y $m $d\n";

    this gives me: 1999 11 31

    date gives: Fri Dec 31 12:15:04 EST 1999

    Hmm, I could be doing something wrong, but I have
    never noticed this problem before.

    I noticed the problem with the following:

    #!/usr/bin/perl

    # evil broken code follows

    use Date::Calc qw(Add_Delta_Days);

    ($y,$m,$d) = (localtime)[5,4,3]; #get today's date
    $y += 1900; #fix the years
    print "$y $m $d\n";

    ($y2,$m2,$d2) = Add_Delta_Days($y,$m,$d,-1); #get yesterday's date
    $y2 += 1900;
    print "$y2 $m2 $d2\n";

    # end evil code

    This produces:

    [wiley@zig wiley]$ ./datetest2
    1999 11 31
    Date::Calc::Add_Delta_Days(): not a valid date at ./datetest2 line 11.

    I also tried it without the line

    $y += 1900; #fix the years

    but that still gives me

    99 11 31
    Date::Calc::Add_Delta_Days(): not a valid date at ./datetest2 line 10.

    I am almost positive that this code worked yesterday.

    I fixed the problem script with a different approach, but I thought this was worth pointing out. I will admit that I could be doing something wrong here. Any ideas?

    Wiley

    1. Re:date bug (could be my bad code) by wiley+wimberly · · Score: 1

      That seems to do the trick.
      I guess localtime has issues.

      Thanks

      Wiley

    2. Re:date bug (could be my bad code) by wiley+wimberly · · Score: 1

      oops, looks like I am the one with issues.

      Desert Raven pointed out that

      Months are returned as zero-based array indexes. (january == 0, december == 11)

      doh!

    3. Re:date bug (could be my bad code) by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong that I can see.

      Months are returned as zero-based array indexes. (january == 0, december == 11)

    4. Re:date bug (could be my bad code) by perlgnome · · Score: 1

      The month value you get runs from 0 .. 11, with 0 being January, so you need to add 1 to it to get your "real" month number.

      my($day, $month, $year) = (localtime())[3..5];
      $year += 1900;
      $month += 1;
      print "$year-$month-$day\n";

  357. Re:riots...? by Akeldama · · Score: 1
    btw, about the last part of your post. some guy in i think cali (?) stole 150 pounds of dynamite and c4 explosives from one of those bases where they store explosives used to detonate other explosives.

    as for me, after i party, me and and some friends are waiting out in front of best buy and compusa, unless the action's already started. then it's time for me to get the new cdrw i've wanted.. and half the rest of the store...that i've wanted

  358. Re:More Calendar bugs !!! NOT by loudici · · Score: 1

    It is NOT a bug, but this is only valid for england. Catholic countries switched from julian to gregorian in october 1582 (saint theresa died on the night between 4 and 15 october 1582),and russia only switched after the october revolution, which actually happened in november. anybody has a patch to cal to make it work in france?
    ---

    --
    Dev elpizw tipota, dev phoboumai tipota eimai lephteros http://euclidian.org
  359. Re:More Calendar bugs !!! NOT by loudici · · Score: 1

    >It wasn't really a "bug". Just an amusement. But >I'm sure it happened here in America, too, since >we were still English then. :-) well there was not much of america in 1752, was there?
    ---

    --
    Dev elpizw tipota, dev phoboumai tipota eimai lephteros http://euclidian.org
  360. The SysAdmin Speaks!! by RISCy+Business · · Score: 2

    You're about to hear it straight from the horses mouth, folks. Straight from a SysAdmin on the front lines!

    Uhm. Problems? What problems? Houston, we have a problem? Wait, no, yes, er, maybe?

    Well, save for probably 30-50 pieces of workstations and Axil hardware, everything's passed the preliminary tests.

    I can unofficially (IANACSP[1]) say that our network is 100% ready as far as the data side goes.

    We officially have 4 hours as of 4 minutes ago till the Trial By Fire, and we have an 'example' system - an Axil 320 - to see what actually happens - it's set to EST so it's one of the first to blow up - also about 5 minutes fast.

    From what I have heard from other locations and other companies, everything looks good to go. Some telcos, mostly cellphone companies and LD companies, are afraid of the load. But, all I can say is that it looks like a big NOTHING.

    That's right. Y2k is the big NOTHING.

    I hope everyone has a safe and happy new year, and remember to check your beer for Y2k compliance before drinking! ;)

    [1] I Am Not A Corporate SpokesPerson(tm).
    If you would like to quote me, please EMAIL ME FIRST. EMAIL ME HERE first, actually. ;)

    =RISCy Business

  361. Re:Battery-powered! by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

    Ah, yes, but if you have a portable generator, you are probably in the very small minority of those who may not care too much about when the power is restored. Catch 22

  362. NORTH-WEST SWITZERLAND and UUNET Zurich by Pengo · · Score: 1


    Just got on and checked the datacenter in Zurich, seems that there services are up without issues. All of the power and utilities are still functioning.

    Damn.. kind of a letdown. :)

  363. My Y2K brush with death by Jeff+Newbern · · Score: 2

    I had this Y2K problem with my Linux box: When I checked to see that my CMOS clock rolled over corectly, hwclock aborted with a message saying mktime(3) failed. If anyone else has the problem, the solution is to get the source to hwclock and compile against an up-to-date version of libc (glibc2.1.2 worked for me).

  364. Atomic clock is haywire by donarb · · Score: 1

    Currently (7:49 Pacific time, New Years' eve) the National Physical Laboratory in Middlesex shows the current time as the 26th hour of December 31. This is the readout from the atomic clock at Greenwich. We're all doomed! :-)

    1. Re:Atomic clock is haywire by donarb · · Score: 1

      Well, not exactly Greenwich, but close...

  365. Employment Opportunity: Warlords Wanted by R2-D2 · · Score: 2

    My organization is searching for highly motivated, individuals with the ability to work well independently and in groups. Strong people and martial arts skills are a must. You must be willing to relocate.

    Our organization will have a dominant role in the new era. The empire headquarters will be in Central America, though there are opportunities in ALL locations around the world.

  366. San Francisco by rjreb · · Score: 1

    Here's how we'll be celebrating in San Francisco...

    http://www.pabulum.com/images/y2k.jpg

    --
    Pork is not a verb
  367. Y2K Rollover... by LetterRip · · Score: 1

    Is there also some place to post our Y2K fetch and beg experiences?

    LetterRip

  368. Shaw Cable in Victoria... by Arwen · · Score: 1

    ...seems to be stuck at 8:50. Don't know if it's y2k or not, but seems likely, hmm? Seeing as the main office is most likely in Ontario -- 3 hours ahead...

    Oh well. I'm going to send taunting emails to them. :)

    -d

  369. Re:An end to stupidity. by Mickut · · Score: 1

    According to what I've been told, "millenium" is approximately latin. Millennium means a span of thousand years (year=annus in latin). I'll leave the supposed rest of this post for you as homework.

  370. Zdnet Y2K bug in Y2K page? by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    The Y2K Download Page lists "AllClear 2000 Pro v2.7e" as "new", yet it is dated 02-25-99. Possibly a mix-up in an auto-labelling of "new" based I date? Hmmmm...

  371. If Linux gets its "World Domination" by ItsBacon · · Score: 2

    I wonder if the media will make a huge deal about January 18th, 2038, 22:14:07 EST in the same way they did about Y2K...

  372. Re:Sampling Bias by RichardW · · Score: 1

    well, my electricity, phone and aged PC (P100) still work, but that doesn't mean that my friend's video wouldn't fail. Hardly apocalyptic, but still midly amusing as they rush into the kitchen shouting "the vidoe's failed; the millenium bug's worked!". She probably won't remember that I told her to set it to 1972....

    apologies for typos - that's the real y2k bug at work... ;-)

  373. I had a +6 comment the other day by cje · · Score: 1

    The way I figure it, it's a Slashdot bug. Here's what I think happened with my post:

    1. The post was moderated up to +5.
    2. Some other moderator read the post, thought it was overrated, and moderated it as such, bringing it down to +4.
    3. Another moderator moderated it back up to +5.
    4. Then, the Overrated moderator later posted a comment in the same thread, which of course undoes the moderation. Here's where my alleged Slashdot bug comes into play: Slashdot undid the moderation and gave back the point without first checking to see if the post was already at +5. Hence, the +6 post.
    That's my theory, anyway. Ahh, fuck it .. it's New Year's Eve .. I'm heading down to the bar to get liquored up.
    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
  374. Simple C -> SQL Errors by Gothland · · Score: 1
    Some small stuff with a couple of C applications designed to provide date calculations to a shell script that outputs SQL statements.

    >add_date +1
    Jan 1 100

    This would have been caught before, but there was no source code readily available, and no one thought to check it.

    I got my Y2K bug. That's all I expect to see.

    --

  375. It's not the new milennium... but you are an idiot by Halster · · Score: 1

    All this Y2K frenzy seems to have given the "It's not really the start of the new millenium, the new millenium doesn't start until 2001" people more of an excuse to raise their anally retentive voices. The fact is, that the calendar is made up, it's wrong (ie. due to a guess made on Jesus' birth the damn thing wasn't even started on the date it purports to be), and whichever way you look at it, it's symbolic, so there's not much point bitching about one year difference is there? If we were to take B.C. seriously, the new milennium would have started in 1997 (or somewhere thereabouts). So all the complaining is rather pointless eh?

    --

    "How much truth can advertising buy?" - iNsuRge - AK47
  376. Re:19100?? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 3

    http://www.swissinfo.net/cgi/worldtime/clock.pl?Au ckland,New=Zealand

    Current time in Auckland, New Zealand is: Saturday, January 1, 19100 - 00:34:31


    I dont think many people anticipated the 19100 problem, heheh.

    -- iCEBaLM

  377. I'm fine! by penguinboy · · Score: 1

    Well, here in the EST time zome. we just rolled over. My Linux boxes and I are just fine!

    My server:
    12:00am up 13 days, 11:22, 4 users, load average: 0.12, 0.12, 0.09
    48 processes: 47 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
    CPU states: 4.0% user, 9.8% system, 4.9% nice, 81.1% idle
    Mem: 22628K av, 20588K used, 2040K free, 16108K shrd, 1028K buff
    Swap: 68508K av, 3604K used, 64904K free 9104K cached

    PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
    26757 root 13 0 1044 1044 840 S 0 7.4 4.6 7:28 top
    27592 root 9 0 1044 1044 840 R 0 3.8 4.6 6:42 top
    25091 root 0 0 924 924 720 S 0 0.3 4.0 0:34 in.telnetd
    26143 root 10 5 1004 1004 860 S N 0 0.1 4.4 0:01 watchaustin.
    1 root 0 0 124 64 52 S 0 0.0 0.2 0:08 init
    2 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:08 kflushd
    3 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:03 kupdate
    4 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:00 kpiod
    5 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:08 kswapd
    236 bin 0 0 320 300 256 S 0 0.0 1.3 0:00 portmap
    288 root 0 0 288 224 184 S 0 0.0 0.9 0:16 syslogd
    298 root 0 0 440 164 132 S 0 0.0 0.7 0:01 klogd
    313 daemon 0 0 152 112 84 S 0 0.0 0.4 0:00 atd
    328 root 1 0 184 124 92 S 0 0.0 0.5 0:00 crond
    343 root 0 0 140 68 48 S 0 0.0 0.3 0:00 inetd
    358 root 0 0 1300 1008 480 S 0 0.0 4.4 0:17 named
    380 root 0 0 260 224 188 S 0 0.0 0.9 0:00 rpc.statd
    390 root 0 0 80 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:00 rpc.rquotad
    (etc..)
    [root@goats /root]#

    Glad to see /. is still up (wait - you're in a different TZ, guess I'll have to save that for another hour!)

  378. Re:First post maybe? by Foogle · · Score: 0
    Better luck next time cowboy.

    -----------

    "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

  379. TODAY ISN'T Y2K!!!!!!!!!!! by toaster13 · · Score: 1

    just read today's userfriendly: Daily Static
    as we all know, K stands for 1024 so Y2K doesn't start until 2048! what a relief. now i can put off fixing those russian missile computers for a few more decades...

  380. Re:end of millenium by 9th · · Score: 1

    Ok I for one am tiring of folks with these snide comments, er excuse me revelations... For one thing by the CE (Common Era) Calender this is indeed the start of the new millenium as there was a year 0 on this respective calender. And secondly you are exhibiting a very revealing characteristic about your personality, we've all heard this before and it can be debated all you want.. but there isn't a point to it, we just want to have some fun. Happy new years, happy new millenium, happy birthday, it doesn't make a difference, just enjoy life.

  381. y2k...and I'm still here by lightsout · · Score: 1

    Happy New Year!!!!! (Forgive me, I'm in Glasgow so might be celebrating an hour or five before most of the other /. punters) Well, my Suse box is fine so I don't care about much else really. Saying that, Solaris, NT and 'doze 98 all seem to be OK. I haven't tried BeOS yet. Most surprisingly of all, my old '286 seems to be y2k compliant!!! The CMOS thinks it's in 1st Jan 1900 (and not 4th Jan 1980, as I had predicted). All the best to you all Lightsout "If you were me then that's who you'd be"

  382. Auckland International Airport - convincing, NOT! by netpig · · Score: 1


    Check this out(date)!


    http://www.auckland-airport.co.nz/airport_newsfl ash.html

    --
    Black holes are where God divided by zero.
  383. Millenium bug animation (joke) by netpig · · Score: 2
    --
    Black holes are where God divided by zero.
  384. True, however... by Symbiosis · · Score: 1

    I think the large volume of posts speaks for itself. (I haven't read them all of course, so I know not what all of them actually contain, but they still have power, so that's something). I mean, if there was a total loss of functionality in an entire city and everyone had gone Lord of the Flies, I don't think most people would be sitting here posting to Slashdot.... well, maybe I would, after my refigerator stopped attacking me. :-)

    --

    -------------------------------------------
    I like nonsense, it wakes up the brain cells.
    -- Dr. Seuss
  385. Re:19100?? by NettRom · · Score: 2
    Same thing is true for Javascript date/time functions in web browsers. Though IE and Netscape handle it differently. I believe IE works like Perl does above, but netscape, once it gets to "2000" just jumps from 99 to 2000.
    That's not totally correct. My IE 4.0 on Windows NT behaves just like Netscape, provided it's the getYear() method we're talking about. Later versions of Netscape & IE support getFullYear() which returns the full four-digit year.

    The problem with getYear() is that in early implementations of JavaScript it returns a two-digit year for dates between 1900-01-01 and 1999-31-12, while for all other dates it returns a four-digit year. See Netscape's Client-Side JavaScript Reference getYear under "Backward Compatibility". Later implementations always return the year minus 1900, just like Perl does. Netscape's reference says the turnover came with JS v1.2, so Netscape 4.x, IE4 & IE5 should in theory all do it right.

  386. Re:end of millenium by El+Volio · · Score: 1

    Actually, there's no year 0 in the CE calendar. The year before 1 CE was 1 BCE.

    --

    "You can never have too many elephants on your team."

  387. Y2k problem at this website... by Digital_Fiend · · Score: 2

    www.eyeonbrisbane.citec.com.au. Notice the date on the pic from the webcame (1/1/9999)...

    Your Friendly Neighborhood New Years Curmudgeon,
    Warren

  388. Re:Y2k != millenium [sic] by hellish · · Score: 1

    You may have just been satirical with that post, but Jesus was born some time around 4-6 B.C. An earlier translation of the bible said the Star of Bethlehem was actually a 'planetary body' and the alignment of Jupiter and some other planet (maybe the moon, I don't remember) not only coincides with the year 4 B.C but they would have appeared in the sky in the direction that the wise man would have traveled to find Jesus' birthplace. Another similar alignment happened in 6 B.C. with the planet Saturn. I don't remember the url, but I think it was in a post in slashdot's xmastime poll.

  389. Re:Oh My God!! Everything is WORKING!!! by throx · · Score: 1

    That's not how its supposed to work? Bugger. Have to RTFM...

    --

    Fear: When you see B8 00 4C CD 21 and know what it means

  390. Oh My God!! Everything is WORKING!!! by throx · · Score: 2

    Here in Brisbane, Australia. 1am (UTC+10). Windows 2000 beta 2 survived the rollover (I left the computer on). MacOS9 survived the rollover. I still have power. I still have phone. I still have water. We still have civil order. The cat still works. You get the picture.

    All I can think of is the horrendous waste of food and water as our Premier (equivalent of State Governer in the US) went on TV last night and told everyone to fill up bathtubs, buckets and water bottles as well as stockpile food for a fortnight. Now everyone is simply going to tip it down the drain.

    We have enough problems in Oz with drought and water shortages without idiot politicians telling us how to waste resources. For those in the USA - EVERYTHING IS GOING TO WORK. DON'T WASTE WATER AND FOOD BY STOCKPILING.

    Now at last this idiocy can end. Let's make the best of the new year for all of us.

    John Wiltshire

    --

    Fear: When you see B8 00 4C CD 21 and know what it means

    1. Re:Oh My God!! Everything is WORKING!!! by Bob(TM) · · Score: 1

      Now at last this idiocy can end.

      I wish a date change could eliminate this kind of idiocy. However, it seems that the most sensational garners the most attention. As long as the irrational commands attention, we have little hope of a reprieve from this kind of lunacy.

      --

      The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
  391. Well! by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    I know it's a little early for me to be saying anything, considering the "magic" time hasn't passed me by (here in Phoenix, Arizona, USA) - but from what I am seeing here on /. and from CNN, etc - this has me at one time both disappointed and relieved.

    I mean, when I first started seriously thinking about this problem, I got pretty worked up over it (depression, etc - went through the whole multiple stage thing). Not anything too serious, I just got my butt to work and started planning.

    So now I am here with about a week's worth of supplies (hey, I figured if the crap fell, a week, while not being enough, was probably all I would need), dry food, water, fuel for cooking, two 12V solar panels to power/charge my laptop running Linux (and having set it up to be a coder's mini-station - full complement of C, C++, and Perl development tools), along with walkie-talkies, battery powered radio and TV, flashlights, candles, matches, a couple of crossbows (no reg needed, and bolts are easy to make in a pinch) - and bug-out bags for me and my GF.

    I am disappointed by the likelyhood that I will not be using this for it's intended purpose, however, at least I didn't buy anything that couldn't be used as normal food and such later. So it won't go to waste (only the water will - it was tap, sterilized with a few drops of bleach, so it smells bad and tastes worse).

    I guess one thing I am happy about is that, providing everything continues to go smoothly, there won't be a backlash against "the programmers" - it would be nice if we were celebrated as national heroes or such, but more than likely, in our 2-second sound bite world, everything will just fade off, and we will kick back in our cubes and offices, continuing to do our work as we always have. Hopefully, this will mean the end of talk of having us all get licensed to be programmers (I consider coding an art and a science - but I feel is should only be an art).

    Now, where to put all of this canned food...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  392. You know... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    I have always said one thing about my stockpiling and worrying:

    People may laugh at me come the rollover, how I prepared for the worse and hoped for the best - but now, it seems, the best is coming, and my stockpiling may have been for naught.

    But the one thing I know, is that if hard times had hit, I would have been prepared. It is never a bad thing to prepare and plan for a possible disaster - especially one where you have a large time frame of warning.

    It is better to be prepared, and for nothing to happen, than for something to happen, and not be prepared.

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  393. Re:Fine in Melbourne, Australia. by thogard · · Score: 2

    There is at least one problem in Melbourne Australia...
    Optus Cable and Wireless is down now as far as I can tell and its 1:55am local time. I can't get a connection to or from my mobile phone.
    Early in the night it did seem quite busy but now its just a mix between being dead and a noise recording. It even stoped sending out the message saying which tower the phone was reciving

    So if your counting on mobile as a backup...forget it.

  394. Date: Sat, 1 Jan 100 00:50:01 +73100 by thogard · · Score: 4

    So my old sparc is just a few years behind.... but what a timezone offset. Well, its not sunos's fault, its that damn copy of elm compiled back in 1996. I am wondering about the old copy of innd which could have a few of these kinds of problems as well. Is it too late to start y2k fixes? If it is, I'll be heading down to the local pub to have a brew to two...

    Everyone have a happy 19100!

  395. Science and Accuracy. by Delphinios · · Score: 1

    You know, You'd thnk a 'reputable' science magazine would be more accurate.
    www.sciencedaily.com reports: Geomagnetic Storms May Kick Off The New Millennium

  396. Re:Sampling Bias by Nigel+Bree · · Score: 1
    The point re: sampling bias is well taken, but then OTOH those of us posting from the South Pacific have plenty of alternative communications systems to draw on for reports. Circa 4am local time, the lead item on the news bulletin reported that *zero* Y2K computer outages had been reported anywhere in the country. Take that with a grain of salt just because it's mainstream media, but as it happens the NZ government had all the various regional civil defence and related bodies in contact with a central operations centre. And by Eris it's certainly noteworthy when the lead item in a mainstream TV news bulletin is "nothing happened"!!!


    Anyhow, as I write this dawn is almost about to break here @ 6:30AM, just let out the livestock and typing while listening to the morning birdsong. Ah, bliss.


    Stray thought: I've been watching the BBC Millenium coverage from around the globe and in spite of myself I've been very impressed by the kind of cultural experience that many countries have offered up in their feeds so far. Traditional dancing, awesome theatre, and the like from many countries; nice to see, and nice that the performing arts have done so well out of the hoopla (my fave so far was the Aboriginal stilt dancing).


    Second stray thought: part of the Y2K paranoia no doubt relates to the urban lifestyle, which the car has made possible. It's interesting to reflect on how the car has been, socially speaking, a key transforming technology of the 20th century. As someone who doesn't enjoy urban living, computer technology has given me the freedom to live rurally; somehow I doubt that that will be the *social* legacy of the computer age, however. For all of the power - and limitless potential - of computing, the social effects have been fairly limited so far.

  397. Y2K from the front line... by Nigel+Bree · · Score: 4
    Lessee, 2:48AM here in Kaiwaka, New Zealand and no Y2K-related outages of any kind yet reported... the Win98 and Win2K boxes here at home went through it all fine.


    Just talking about general Y2K readiness, it was amusing to watch on TV how people living in cities behaved, with stocking up on water, toilet paper and batteries on the 31st. I'm in a rural community where we can get by without technology anyhow - our water supply is rainwater collected from the roof into a 20,000 litre tank and even without electricity all we need is a siphon hose :-).


    Anyhow, on general Y2K readiness it's been amusing since I used to work for a company that made the point-of-sale systems for the local oil companies. 20 years ago, most of the staff could deal with not having power at all, manually pumping the stuff using hand cranks. 10 years ago after we had computerised everything, that knowledge of how to operate had basically vanished. It's amazing how quickly people forgot how to operate in a manual world.

  398. Cheers from Halifax by Assistant+Madman · · Score: 1

    Well,

    Out with the old and in with the new here in Halifax, NS. Nothing broken (well, nothing that wasn't broken before), no mobs rioting (dammit to hell), and my coffee maker is just fine (oh, and my box passed just fine. Thanks to Mr. Torvalds and the fine linux developers).

    Cheers, and have a great new year,
    GC


  399. See, that's pretty much what I'm worried about by fable2112 · · Score: 2


    Basically, especially in the US, when ANYthing goes wrong tonight (and something inevitably will), it will be blamed on the rollover, whether or not that is actually the case. Not good.

    Mother Nature might not be Y2K compliant, and some storm somewhere could very well knock power off. And in Rochester, the local telephone company has been telling people "Don't pick up your phone at 12:01 to see if it works; you might overload the circuits," which leads me to believe that people might not be Y2K compliant even if machinery is.

    --
    "Somebody exploded a letter-bomb today ... but it wasn't anybody I knew" -The Moody Blues, "Dear Diar
    1. Re:See, that's pretty much what I'm worried about by dsplat · · Score: 2

      And in Rochester, the local telephone company has been telling people "Don't pick up your phone at 12:01 to see if it works; you might overload the circuits," which leads me to believe that people might not be Y2K compliant even if machinery is.

      Okay, I have two comments on this. First, I'm familiar with the issue with getting dial tone. The dial tone is generated by the switch and it can only generate dial tone for a fraction of the total lines it is connected to. It makes sense when you think about the facts. Dialing only happens during a small fraction of the duration of the call and only one party to the call needs that dial tone.

      The second is for fable2112 herself. It's nice to see that I'm not the only person here from sunny Rochester.

      --
      The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  400. All ok in Tampa by m3000 · · Score: 2

    Just about everything is working fine in Tampa, FL. Water works, phone works, and I crossed over into the New Year chatting on IRC just fine. The IRC server also crossed over jsut fine a hour later. A couple of my friends computer are slightly messed up, one says it's 1984 (hmmm, 1984....interesting.....) and another said his computer got really slow after Y2K. The only real y2k bug I noticed myself was in a CGI script I copied somewhere that counted down the millinnium. It says it's the year 19100 and there is -17101 years until 2000. The full thing can be found here

    Also went looking for some of those "bunker" people who got parnoid and ran to the hills for Y2K. Here is one's admission of embarrasment.

  401. Two 386's hit, one down. Can anyone help? by Foehg · · Score: 1

    My two 386's were hit by Y2K, but the P300 (Win95) with the internet here is still fine.

    One of the miscreants seems to think it's 1980. Which is fine with me.

    The other one, unfortunately, does not. It has a thing that it did periodically before y2k, which is that the clock chip would lose power, and the date and BIOS settings would reset. (I have accidentally set the year for 2000 before, but I could change it back, so it was 1999.) It did so again upon booting up this morning. (It ran fine through midnight, and I played on it this morning, but now here's the problem.) When I was reminding it of the time and date, as soon as the date hit 2000, the keyboard ceased to respond. I could not tell it what type of hard drive it had, or specify the floppy disk type. Now, the boot sequence ("No boot device available." Some boot sequence.) forces me into the setup, and then will not accept input from the keyboard. Nor does it tick the seconds like it used to, although while the computer is off, the seconds and minutes advance as usual.

    Thus, I am stuck with no boot.

    Oh, and here's the scary part: I tried to cut clock power, and reset the clock to 1980 (like it does upon losing clock power.) Perhaps I don't know what I'm doing, but I took out the CMOS batteries, turned off the computer, and unplugged it. Then, I let it sit. When I reinserted the batteries and plugged it back in, it still knew that the year was 2000, and it was about 3:00am here. (Didn't manage to check exactly).

    Can anyone help out?

    1. Re:Two 386's hit, one down. Can anyone help? by CodeBreaker69 · · Score: 1

      Well If I were you I would buy a new computer. I can't stand the slow slow 386's. Go to pricewatch.com Computers are very cheep now. If you don't want to do that then try installing Linux or Windows 95. If that does not work then it is a hard ware problem.

      --
      AsKmE:D
  402. This morning by Hard_Code · · Score: 3

    This morning a phone call woke me up. It was a telemarketer. I gave her about 5 words before I tolder her "I don't need credit card protection, thank you, bye".

    Also, my waffles were burned today. So I think my toaster may not be y2k compliant.

    A few horsemen and guys with trumpets showed up at my door asking directions to New York. Man, I hope they're not late for their party.

    Jazilla.org - the Java Mozilla

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  403. ABC's countdown clock slightly odd by Xidus · · Score: 1
    Anyone else notice ABC's countdown clock saying, for example:

    3:03
    3:02
    3:01
    2:00
    2:59
    2:58

    They had this problem in all four US timezones, for the entire countdown. Seems like a REALLY stupid error to overlook.

    Not Y2K related of course, but still an interesting 'bug'.
    -
    $ more ~/.sig
    ******** .sig: Not a text file ********

    --
    $ more ~/.sig
    ******** .sig: Not a text file ********
  404. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by David+Byers · · Score: 1

    This year, next year, who cares?

    After all, it's only an error of one year in 2000. That's an 0.05% error. Not bad in this day and age!

    I must say, I'm pretty impressed with how ahead of the times The Times must have been. E-mail in 1799 indeed!

  405. British trains not working... or are they? by Uri · · Score: 1

    According to this BBC news article, hackers managed to break into UK rail company Railtrack's website, posting a message that due to Y2K all train services would be suspended. Unfortunately this was spotted and corrected quite quickly.

    1. Re:British trains not working... or are they? by Uri · · Score: 1

      Just found this link. Sweet.

  406. Re:end of millenium (it works both ways) by CraigMcPherson · · Score: 2

    What I'm really tiring of are these zealous self-righteous "the millennium begins in 2000" people. They're so fanatical about it. Their snide self-important comments are so annoying. For one thing by the Gregorian calender in which we live, 2000 is NOT the start of the milleNNium (most of the 2000-heads can't even spell it), and secondly you are exhibiting a very revealing characteristic about your personality, we've all heard it before, it's in every damn TV commercial, and it can be debated all you want... bu there isn't a point to it, we just want to have some fun, but the Cult of 2000 denies us the right to speak and threatens us with physical violence and social ostracism as they continue to paint their ignorance everywhere you care to look. Be careful not to show these people any shiny objects, they're easily distracted by them.

  407. First Y2K problems by Ainis · · Score: 1

    Check out http://www.swis sinfo.net/cgi/worldtime/clock.pl?Chatham,New=Zeala nd
    This site sais that:
    "Current time in Chatham, New Zealand is:
    Saturday, January 1, 19100 - 05:01:44"
    19100? :)
    Wow, I wish that could happen with my account in a bank, imagine interest accumulated in 17100 years?

  408. Y2K compliant ... by jalbinet · · Score: 1

    Can't be sure, but I am probably victim of the bug : I've got an horrible headache since I drank a few bottles of French Champagne.
    Take care of non-Y2K compliant food&drinks !!!

  409. Re:Everything's down by speek · · Score: 1

    Actually, I used an old telegraph machine and I punched out the morse code directly to Slashdot's servers. Betcha didn't know Slashdot supported direct telegraph connection.

    --
    First, make it work, then make it right, then make it fast, then, make it bloated!
  410. Everything's down by speek · · Score: 2

    Well, it just turned midnight 10 minutes ago, and the power went out. I'm using NT, and the BSOD took over just as my clock was ringing! I tried to reboot, but that failed too. I have no idea why. I'm writing this by candlelight.

    My phone isn't working either - no dial tone. Just dead. I guess all the Y2K stuff wasn't just hype. Oh well, guess I'll hop over to my brokerage account and sell some stock.

    --
    First, make it work, then make it right, then make it fast, then, make it bloated!
  411. Re:Millennium in 2000, Millennium in 2001 by GnrcMan · · Score: 1

    By that logic we should be just about to enter the second millennium.

    --GnrcMan--

  412. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by GnrcMan · · Score: 2

    The fact that people approximately 2000 years ago decided to start a new count does not seem to me to be particularly important

    (sigh) sorry to be pedantic, but the Gregorian calender wasn't invented until ~525A.D.

    See this for the real skinny.

    And incidentally, hen people refer to the next millennium, they are generally speaking of the third millennium, which, in fact, begins 2001. Sheesh, you're being more pedantic about this than I am. See this article by Douglas Adams to find out what happens to pedants.

    --GnrcMan--

  413. Good Point, but ... Re:Sampling Bias by johnhebert · · Score: 1

    we have /usr/sbin/traceroute and the DNS to tip us off when there are large service (connectivity, power) outages around the world, which would cause DNS servers to stop talking to the Internet.

    I haven't heard of any such major outages yet. What would be a good URL to use to monitor major network outages?

    I'm sure you will agree that the reason for this particular forum was not to a "scientific" survey or an authoritative Y2K problem reporting forum. It was proposed in the idea of "fun".

    Now go party yer ass off and quit moaning.

    --
    "Classic UFO's ... crafts for kids..." Interpretations from
    1. Re:Good Point, but ... Re:Sampling Bias by cnflctd · · Score: 1

      There's www.internettrafficreport.com, which tracks top level routers around the world.

      North America is cruising right along this morning, though core-fa5-0-0.ontario.canet.ca is dropping 20% of its packets for some reason, and out in Asia, a Phillippine machine seems to be having a heart attack.

      --
      I'm cool like a fool in a swimming p-p-pfft-pool
  414. Re:More Calendar bugs !!! NOT by Tom+Christiansen · · Score: 1

    It wasn't really a "bug". Just an amusement. But I'm sure it happened here in America, too, since we were still English then. :-)

  415. Re:It's 2:30AM in Melbourne... by Tom+Christiansen · · Score: 2
    nd I was in Bourke Street Mall (ie the centre of the city) watching a big LED screen count down to the year 2000. We didn't have a Y2K problem, but when the countdown rolled over, the following message appeared: Happy New Millenium That is exactly what the screen read... no typos here... just a small Y2K problem!
    No typos? Don't be to sure of yourself. I can plainly se a speling eror there on your scren. :-)

    ObHackery: perl -pe y/a-z//s

  416. More Calendar bugs by Tom+Christiansen · · Score: 2
    For a good time, type:
    % cal 9 1752
    September 1752
    Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    12 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
  417. Tables of four by Tom+Christiansen · · Score: 2
    You have a restaurant with tables that seat four people each. As folks file in, you seat them sequentially until each table fills up.

    The only important question is this: does the 8th person sit at the end of 2nd table or the start of the 3rd one?

    Once you figure that out, everything is clear. I suspect that even hamburger flipsters can handle this one.

    1. Re:Tables of four by dsplat · · Score: 2

      Now that the "millenium" is almost over, Tom, I have a confession. I want some of your karma. I've wanted it for years. Say you'll be a donor for a karma-transplant operation...:)

      Wow, a karma transplant to an anonymous coward. That's going to be a challenge. How will we know it's you? Will you be the one wearing a Slashdot T-shirt and running Linux? Seriously, if you want karma, you could try posting under your own name. It isn't like anything you said was controversial.

      --
      The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  418. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by Tom+Christiansen · · Score: 2
    several millenii == several thousand assholes
    Close, but not quite.

    The only way you could get a -ii plural in Latin is if there were a -ius singular. For example, from radius you get radii and from genius, genii. The more common situation, that of second declension masculines, is just -us going to -i, as in abacus becoming abaci, or focus becoming foci. (We shan't get into corpus becoming corpora.)

    Note also that Latin had more than one meaning for anus. One takes the meaning you're assuming here, and is a second declension masculine. However, another, which had a different meaning, was 4th not 2nd declension, so formed its plural the way status and apparatus did -- by converting the vowel in the -us from a short to a long u, which changed pronunciation but not spelling.

    Happy antemillennium. :-)

  419. Internet's Looking Fine.. by Phizzy · · Score: 2

    I work for a tier 1 ISP, and just spoke with a colleague in the Network Operations Center. He said that the rollover had gone flawlessly in Hong Kong and Australia, where we have POPs. This may not be too indicative, however, as the Hong Kong POP has only been used for customer traffic in the last year, and the Australia POP is mostly used for large accounts, which have been Y2K ready for a while now. It does show that nothing unexpected is happening. Lets hope the trend continues!

    //Phizzy

    --
    "Most European technology just isn't worth our stealing," -- Former CIA chief James Woolsey, referring to Echelon
  420. Re:Y2K Bug: CNN/Headline News Says Not "Millennium by Esjion · · Score: 1

    It wouldn't make much sense to talk about the zeroth century, or the zeroth year of our Lord.

    No, it wouldn't. However, when talking about the first year of a new baby's life, people are referring to the time between birth-11 months, not 12-23 months. Wouldn't it also possibly make sense that "the first year of our Lord" could be the year from Jan 00 - Dec 00? Just my $0.02, of course, but thought I would mention it.

  421. Dallas ok, Pegasus fully lit... by Esjion · · Score: 1

    The newly restored pegasus is up and running again in Dallas as of midnight(fyi - it is a rotating pegasus, so you may have to refresh to get a good view). All looks good, most everyone is happy...

    As for me, my computers are working, so no complaints here.

    Happy New Year, y'all...

  422. Here's a non-story: all my Macs survived :-] by imac.usr · · Score: 1

    Ten years ago I wrote a HyperCard stack to countdown to 1990. Tonight, I took the easy way out; I synched the Date & Time control panel and then watched it flip. Ten years from now, I'll just flip open the G10-powered Newton and watch the clock icon...

    Happy New Year!



    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  423. Uk is fine by JimmyGulp · · Score: 1

    The UK is fine, well Bradford W Yorks anyway. I'm not exactly sober just now, so might fall asleep any time soon, check back when I'm awake, mayeb 4th July...

    --
    Dirk stood in the Stanley
  424. Happy new year folks! by NtG · · Score: 1

    What better to do on new years than post to slashdot?? Happy new year from Canberra, Australia, where I'm happy to announce that everything is fine and dandy!

    Of course, I didnt update my clocks for daylight savings, so the real test is in 10 mins (1am)!

    Happy new year, century & millennium

  425. Re:Fine in Melbourne, Australia. by NtG · · Score: 1

    I'm getting disconnected constantly from optusnet, I'm not sure if that's related.. I was happy, I got a call through to Canada on 8th go with Vodafone, and everything seems to be running smoothly

  426. CNN reports Japanese monitoring system fails by jdg · · Score: 1

    http://www.cnn.com/1999/TECH/computing/12/31/japan .nukes.idg/

  427. 3 Missle Launches?! by edelbrp · · Score: 1

    So, what's up with the news conference from Chyenne Mountain reporting 3 missle launches? 8'o

  428. HELLO FROM FRANKFURT GERMANY!! by cansecofan22 · · Score: 1

    Hi,
    It is 12:47 AM 1 January 2000 and I just got home from work. Lets see, all utilities are fine. SCO Openserver 5 works fine, Win 95/98/NT 4, All runing fine. And of course, My Mandrake 6.1 box and Redhat 5.2 box are both fine also. I am connected to the internet on my Mandrake 6.1 box and the net right now, so..... HAPPY NEW YEAR FROM RHEIN MAIN U.S. AIR FORCE BASE, FRANKFURT, GERMANY!!!!

    --
    "If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people in the world?"
  429. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by sspiff · · Score: 1

    Yes, You are correct and I've heard all this before.

    No, I don't particularly care.

    Dating systems are completely arbitrary. Only because of the Judeo-Christian tradition are we hitting a year with three zeros this time.

    The reason for all the "millenium hype" is that most people are too stupid to handle anything other than nice round numbers.

    I'll be glad when its over because I'm sick to death of hearing about it.

    Time be time, man!!!

  430. Re:weather.com... by PurpleBob · · Score: 3

    Well, obviously they're just trying to get the computer to accept "plague of locusts" and "rain of frogs" as weather conditions.

    Or maybe their forecast is exactly right... hmm...
    --

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  431. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by kiifu · · Score: 1

    Happy 1972! I know it isn't 1972. But! I do not care...

    Don't bother me with technicalities...
    Don't bother me with the truth...
    Don't bother me with this whole counting crap...

    I like 1972 I'll stick with it thankyou very much.

  432. My Linux Alpha stopped working before noon PST by Beth+Leonard · · Score: 2
    My Linux Alpha from Microway stopped working sometime between 2am PST December 31st and noon December 31st when I woke up. I'm using a different machine to post this.

    When I got up this morning the power save on the monitor wouldn't go off, even after turning the monitor on and off again. We couldn't log in to it remotely. Ping returned nothing.

    As a last resort we tried turning it off and on again. The "Please select the operating system to start" screen gives Linux as its only choice. After choosing Linux it says, "The highlighted Operating System Selection is not valid. To modify an Operating System Selection enter Setup option."

    We've tried turning the date back on the bios, but that doesn't change anything. My husband suspects the hard drive. I'm not sure if there is a virus that does this. We've been attacked before, but it was the other machine (the one I'm writing this post from) that was compromised.

    If anyone has any ideas, I'd sure appreciate them. Normally I'd ask for e-mail, but Frost was our e-mail server and it is the one that is down... I just signed up for a yahoo mail account to take responses. Try mailing beth_leonard@yahoo.com.

    I tried calling Microway, but their number just rang until I got the operator's "If you'd like to make a call, please hang up and try again," message.

  433. Re:Fine in _Perth_, Australia. by muzza · · Score: 1

    My Linux box stayed up over the crossover... no surprises there :-) All other essential services seem OK too. My HP200LX palmtop seems to have survived as well.

  434. I'm OK by Greg+Merchan · · Score: 2

    # hwclock
    Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 2000 -0.000000
    #

    Whoo hooo!

    Happy New Year!

  435. Y2K BUG SCREEN SHOT PAGE! by 703 · · Score: 1

    I have started up a simple page to collect Y2K Bug Screen Shots

    http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~a-zero/y2kscrewup/

    Please contribute, comments welcome!

  436. Re:Sampling Bias by riot158 · · Score: 1

    Null data is a totally different thing than no data... We can start worrying when we *don't* see messages like "Everything's cool here in Fooland."

    --
    my karma ran over your dogma
  437. Battery-powered! by sumana · · Score: 2
    You can watch those lovely-useful TV bore-oadcasts using battery-powered televisions, and sometimes listen to their audio channels on battery-powered radios (as in a PBS station I once listened to). Also, don't forget portable generators.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Microsoftam esse delendam.
  438. No real problems? by jqs · · Score: 1
    Well, here I am stuck at work in Toronot, Canada watching the lack of problems happening... Don't get me wrong I don't want strife/death/end-o-the-world or anything but I'm due to be at work until at least 1am next century...

    In fact, even later then that! It seems the parking garage is closing at 3pm this afternoon and won't reopen until 6am next century... Why can't I get to my car? Are they afraid of a terrorist attack? I guess I'm glad I got my car in with the bomb in the trunk in before they closed the doors... [JOKE!]

    Oh well... At least I get to sit in the big boardroom with my N64, games, wind-up-radio (thnx sis!) waiting for my backups to finish running...

    --Space: It's deeper than you think...

  439. Re:Dilbert down? by jqs · · Score: 1
    Nah, its just swamped by too many sysadmins with nohting to do as the clock runs forward towards a big let down...


    I too, am guilty of helping to slow the Dilbert site down...

  440. probably more a BIOS problem than a linux problem by levendis · · Score: 1

    (nt)

    --
    ---- I made the Kessel Run in under 11 parsecs.
  441. No armageddon... frankly i'm dissappointed by froz · · Score: 1

    Everything seems to have passed smoothly in Australia; in the eastern states at least. Power, telephone services, water, etc, still work.
    I sincerely hope everyone else around the globe experiences a equally trouble-free rollover at midnight wherever you may be. I wish a very Happy New Year to everyone. See you all 2000!

    jesler

  442. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by BistroMath · · Score: 1

    Don't be so pedantic next time.

    The Gregorian calendar was implemented in 1582 by Pope Greorary XIII, who, by papal decree, ordered 10 days to be dropped from the end of October, to return the vernal equinox to its rightful place around March 20.

    Millennium has two n's in it.

    Diet Dr. Pepper really does taste more like regular Dr. Pepper.

    And so on...

    Happy New Year!

  443. All my preparations gone to waste. by Evil+Poot+Cat · · Score: 1

    A loaf of bread, a jar of peanut butter, 4 cans of Spam (can't eat PB sandwich every time), and a raincoat, all for naught. Maybe I'll just kill the circuit breaker and pretend.

    hehe.

  444. I got locked out of my apt. by Evil+Poot+Cat · · Score: 1

    I'm in the process of moving to a new apartment (same complex). Roommates threw a party last night in the old apartment, but I'm on the hook for troubleshooting anything that goes wrong for this weekend.

    After the festivites, I went to the new apartment to clean up dishes. While I was there, the roommates in the old apartment had just enough energy left to lock the door before passing out.

    So now, I'm on call, separated from my pager, computer (with modem), and keys, until someone wakes up. Barf. I'll give them another hour or two, then I'll page myself until they get out of bed. Instead of getting sleep, I found my extra car key and spent the night in the office, watching system diagnostics.

    We have just now attempted to actually do something productive with our systems, so I'll find out in a while if something was missed.

  445. ABC, too by Cebert · · Score: 1

    Since I don't have cable, I can't vouch for CBS nor
    NBC, but ABC is also doing an all day/night broadcast.
    They've had all sorts of nifty things. Most bizzare being Java. :o

    --
    -- www.bteg.com | bleh.n3.net | hac47.dhs.org
  446. Ireland - ok so far by hellbunnie · · Score: 1

    Well, you'll all be relieved to know that Ireland seems ok so far. Well, at least the cyber cafe that I'm stuck in seems to be fine, as are any other Irish sites I've visited.



    Of course, I did hear a couple of cop cars zooming by earlier, so maybe there's looting and pillaging going on in the rest of Dublin. But that's probably unrelated to any computer problems. Just another friday night, really...



    Oh, just got a phone call from someone who gets into the spirit of these things and was phoning everyone she knows to say happy new year. Apparently there's a lot of calls being rejected on one of our GSM services, but that's probably just due to the volume of calls since she managed to get through in the end.



    1. Re:Ireland - ok so far by hellbunnie · · Score: 1
      Stuck? Well, that's fucking nice. I try to show you a good night out; a shit-fast connection to the world and the possiblity of seeing the world crash and burn, and what do I get? 'Suck in a cyber cafe'.


      Oh, bugger, I didn't mean to say 'stuck', it just sort of came out.


      Don't worry, I had a great time installing bloody enlightenment on this poxy machine that didn't have any of the right libraries installed even though it kept lying to me about it and claiming that it did.


      I can see it now, people will ask "what did you do for the millennium Kathryn?" and I'll tell them I was installing bloody fnlib over and over again...


      Anyway, what the hell am I posting this to slashdot for? you're sitting at the next machine...


  447. new year? what new year? by swonkdog · · Score: 1

    yup, the est just rolled over not too long ago and the power still works. good for me. i'm pulling double duty at the hotel i work in here in orlando, fl. both as an audio/visual technician (keeping our drunk partier's as informed drunk partier's) and as the hotel mis guy making sure we don't lose all of our accounting records. yea! the joys of being a nerd never end! i don't mean to be a party pooper, but sitting here at work, reading slashdot and watching the computer clock roll over. the only difference i saw was the main slashdot page reload and ask if i had meta-moderated today. yes i had but apparently not. the power works (good thing in my professions) i'm still at work, and there are still drunk people in the ballroom chearing about the new millenium (remind me to take off for the new millenium next year, i don't want to waste it here 8^) . i've decided that celebrating the new year is as pointless as celebrating the litter under the no dumping sign down the road from my house. bah-humbug.

    have a day, year, millenia, whatever, everybody (i'm not saying have a good one as i don't want you to feel pressured into it).

    retal,
    rev. eric maultsby

  448. OH GODS! by swonkdog · · Score: 1

    the traffic lights down the road from my hotel are flashing! sweet linus! its the y2k bug!


    oh, wait, they always flash at midnight on small less busy roads... nevermind.

    retal,
    rev. eric maultsby

  449. Starving expectations and Y2K crumbs by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    Not that I joined into the buying of canned food shared neurosis, but spending the next month reading "news" about how this webpage or that MS product thinks its 1900 makes me wish the power was out.

    A 1900 web clock is about as interesting and noteworthy as a page defacement, CNET is gonna have a great month.

  450. Re:19100?? by KGBear · · Score: 1

    Probably a programmer error. Ansi C returns date - 1900. It's up to the programmer to add 1900 to the date. Apparently this guy made a typo and added 19000...

  451. Great Idea by KGBear · · Score: 2

    The executive officer of a bank here in Brazil had a great idea: he went to Australia to spend the weekend, all expenses payed by his employer, to "observe the Y2K onset and report back to headquarters". Why didn't I think of it??

  452. Oh man!!! by billr · · Score: 1

    I'm definitely going to have to reconsider my pinto!

    --
    I've finally found the off by one erro
  453. Y2k problems here. by Lerc · · Score: 5

    My system seems to be suffering from the Y2k bug. It's 3:58am and my monitor is all blurry. My keyboard is broken too. The keys seem to be swimming around and trying to escape my fingers.


    On the brighter side, my girlfriend is looking even cuter than usual.

    --
    -- That which does not kill us has made its last mistake.
  454. An end to stupidity. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm assuming we'll see a lot of pissed off survivalists and terrorists soonish.

    On a more useful (but pedantic) topic..
    Millennium and "Millenium"

    Two Ms, two Ls, two Ns, two Is, an e, and a U is the correct number of letters (if not spelling). So all single Ned "millenium" people can go on spouting about how this is the start of a new "millenium" as we can get the Webster people to add it:
    "Millenium (n):
    1. A thousandth anniversay of years, on the Gregorian calendar, since the time 1 BC."

    This would make it proper to say "01/01/2000 is the start of the third millenium." Of course, I'm still going to have to resist the urge to curse and/or attack the person who says/writes these things ;-)


    The other millennium has no such definition of a fixed window of time (from dictionary.com ):
    "1. A span of one thousand years."
    "4. A thousandth anniversary."

    So (im)proper spelling will count. I'm not sure how the pronunciation thing will work out, as we'll probably have to muddle through via context.
    ---

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:An end to stupidity. by Haarmann · · Score: 1

      Just wonder, what a terrorist is going to to when getting pissed?

      --
      "Wer einen tanzenden Stern gebären will..." F.N.
  455. All OK - Melbourne Australia - 3am local by grantdh · · Score: 2

    Yup - all systems go. Was too busy having fun to have the laptop turned on but it's fired up OK here (yes, Win95 - byte me :)

    Next major point will be some time this morning when we cross 00:00 UTC (airtraffic control, etc).

    Check out Australia's government Y2K update site for more info. You'll need to follow the link to the public site - they've password protected the main sections.

    --

    I left my body to science, but I'm afraid they've turned it down...
  456. Re:Fun with the media by dsplat · · Score: 2

    I work at Symantec, and CNN is shivering with anticipation waiting in our antivirus research lab to hear about juicy computer problems. Me and some friends were thinking it would be fun to pull a couple breakers at 4:00 Pacific (GMT midnight) after hyping it up to them to see if we could get them to broadcast live panic.

    I think, given the likely reactions of your employers, their customers, the government and the public, you should follow the example of a group of Iraqi soldiers from the beginning of the decade. Surrender to the CNN news crew when you are done. It is your only hope to avoid an early and unpleasant death. And it is a slim hope.

    --
    The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  457. Wall Street is expecting smooth sailing by dsplat · · Score: 2

    I turned on CNBC a little while ago. The US markets closed up. In fact, they were reporting that every major index closed at a record high today. Here's a story about it. That is a sure indication that there is very little Y2K panic going on.

    --
    The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  458. Re:Sampling Bias by dsplat · · Score: 2

    I made this point yesterday when I suggested that we should track Y2K non-events here. It is as valid now as it was then.

    --
    The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  459. FAA reporting no problems by dsplat · · Score: 2

    I haven't been able to find a story on this online yet, but CNN (on cable) did a live broadcast from the FAA command center in Herndon, Virginia a couple of minutes ago. They pointed out that all of the air traffic control and aviation systems are on GMT (I suspect they meant UTC, but I'm not sure about that). They reported that there were no planes reporting problems. I guess if we want to see planes falling out of the sky we have to head to a war zone. No thanks, I'll pass on that.

    --
    The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  460. It Appears that, by Spazmoid · · Score: 0
    New York New York


    It seems that as the Y2K line passes that important abilitites such as pouring hot grits down your pants requires full Y2K compliance. John Smith of Lexington, Kentucky reports, "I am a frequent AC at the popular 'geek site' slashdot and as the Date crossed over I found myself unable to pour hot grits down my pants anymore."
    John believes its because of a Nural Net upgrade he never received shortly after birth that is to blame for his lack of compliance. We also believe this is the problem that makes him pour hot grits down his pants anyway. "It just goes to show how important achieving 'personal' Y2K complienace is." Said Bruce Dickens, patent holding inventor of one of the most widely used Y2K fixes, windowing. "People asked for these type of problems." He added.

    In related news, both the Open Source Natalie Portman and Open Source Drew Barrymore projects seem to have come to a complete standstill. No word yet on wether this is a Y2K caused issue. Both the petrified Natalie Portman and petrified Drew Barrymore projects still seem to be fully operational.

    A computer without A Microsoft Operating System is like a dog without bricks tied to it's head.

    1. Re:It Appears that, by Spazmoid · · Score: 2

      A few things here... this was an attempt at humor. I am not the hot grits AC nor the open source (insert female here)AC. It was an attempt (aparrently lame) to get a few laughs out of y2k since it was blown so out of proportion.

      Geez... get a life people.

    2. Re:It Appears that, by evilphish · · Score: 1

      Oh come on moderators, This was funny
      Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the war room..

      --


      who sez death can't be funny....www.endlesssorrow.com
  461. Southeastern Massachusetts - Y2K ready? by awkwardone · · Score: 1

    The lights stayed on. The water kept running. The earth remained intact. Dick Clark kissed his wife. And I celebrated in my living room, alone (my brother was in the basement). He reported two minutes after the fateful instant that he had successfully connected with Slashdot. But he knew that his system was Y2K ready. I didn't.

    So, about eight minutes after the beginning of the new century, I nervously approached my Windows 98 PC and hit the "Power" button. I had done no BIOS tests and upgraded only a little software. Hell, everyone I knew that knew anything about computers was telling me that Win98 was going to shit the bed come January 1, 2000! My computer went through the Boot Sequence and... stalled. I began to worry. Did this mean my system had died on me? I waited two more seconds... and it continued booting into Windows. I logged onto my home LAN (connected by proxy server to the Internet), checked my e-mail, and visited Slashdot, where I am right now.

    Having put away my flashlight, booted my computer, and dashed off an e-mail, I'm sitting here typing this message while enjoying a can of Fresca (sugar free citrus drink, I'm diabetic) and being thankful to God for the past two thousand years.

    Happy New Year to all, and God bless!



    Only 366 days until the new millennium!

    awkwardone
    --
    www.tealeaves.org "All you need is love." -
  462. Sampling Bias by Sajma · · Score: 5

    Has anyone noticed that the "Y2K Experiences" posted here necessarily come from people who:
    1) Have electricity
    2) Have an OS that still works
    3) Have a browser that still works, and
    4) Have an ISP that still works

    With this sort of sampling bias, we really shouldn't be expecting too many "horror" stories... Most will be "yeah, my stuff still works, which is why I can post this..."

    :) awaiting "Smartass" moderation...

    1. Re:Sampling Bias by javamon · · Score: 1

      Backwoods redneck west virginian, its 00:07 and my sump pump still works. sall good.

      ----

      --
      "if there is any doubt, there is no doubt."
  463. Dilbert down? by Exorbitant+Stranger · · Score: 1

    The Dilbert web site seems to be down, or at least refuse to send any data.

    1. Re:Dilbert down? by shanec · · Score: 1

      Although I am unable to get to www.dilbert.com, The Dilbert Zone is up and operational. {shrug} Shane

  464. Re:Some more notes on your car design by Sand_Man · · Score: 1

    Just a couple of additional points on this thread.

    -You might want to reconsider the engine choice: The Hemi is a great engine for power, but a pain to keep running, while the 440 six-pack has almost as much power with the added advantage of being more reliable and easier to find parts for.

    -The weapon in question is, I believe, a three barrel version of the GE M61A2 20 m.m. gattling style cannon (a wonderful weapon FWIW). I think that weapon on a articulated mount comes in around 850 lbs, which will require recalculation of the weight bais ratios listed above. Also, the ammo drum for that weapon is the real weight pig (when fully loaded), depending on how much ammo you want to keep on board. You will want to mount the ammo drum centered on the front to back balance point, so your weight bias doesn't change as you expend rounds. I think we all know how unpleasant it can be to be cornering hard at high speed while firing on a target and suddenly have the driving characteristics of the vehicle change on ya. 'Nuff said.

    Have a happy new year, see ya on the roads.

  465. Re:Some more notes on your car design by Sand_Man · · Score: 1

    The six-pack was staged, no synched. And it wasn't overly complicated (for a Mopar).

    Well maybe a little.

    But I am glad you could get in the spirit of all of this and see that the carb setup was the one shortcoming in the design.

    Feel free to unclench at your conveinence

  466. It's 2:30AM in Melbourne... by StorminNorman · · Score: 1

    and I was in Bourke Street Mall (ie the centre of the city) watching a big LED screen count down to the year 2000.

    We didn't have a Y2K problem, but when the countdown rolled over, the following message appeared: Happy New Millenium

    That is exactly what the screen read... no typos here... just a small Y2K problem!

    --
    life is a canvas/and the paint is hope and promise/the world is ours/no one can ever take it from us.
  467. hmm...xdaliclock...bug or well planned joke? by trog9000 · · Score: 1

    xdaliclock currently reads '35:01', printed backwards...date is listed as '01- ', also backwards...if i start another copy, it works fine... gonna have to go hunt down some source and see if that was intentional :)

  468. looks like a bit of both :) by trog9000 · · Score: 1

    looks like it is supposed to completely reverse the time if it is running at 0:00:00 jan 1 2000, but gets the formatting wrong if seconds are turned off...
    does that mean jwz gets credit for first joke of 2000?

  469. Re:NL: Disaster strikes! Thousands impoverished. by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
    Now I only need to find a no-cure-no-pay lawyer and I'm rolling.

    Sorry, that's a Brit. Americans look for lawyers who work on contingency.

    Can't see dick for the smog, already.

    Now that's thick smog. I have always been able to see dick, even after I'd put on a few pounds!

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  470. California's Central Coast by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
    I live in the Santa Cruz Mountains, which are the mountains that border Silicon Valley to the south.

    The power's on.
    The phones work.
    The ISP's up.
    The toaster still gets my toast oh, so perfect.

    Happy New Year!

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  471. Die cars, die! by kimihia · · Score: 1
    Where I was in Auckland, (NZ), we had big traffic jams. Someone couldn't get their car restarted just near midnight. But they had stalled their car, and flooded the engine.

    And then another person's car lost all their electricals. But that was because their alternator died.

    Just to show how caring we are, we pushed their cars off the road. (Thump!)

  472. Australia boringly fine by Swordfish · · Score: 1
    90% of Australia has already come through fine at this point (UTC 15:02 Fri 31 Dec 1999 = Adelaide time 01:32 Sat 1 Jan 2000). We're just waiting on one last time zone to go through it. But not a single failure of any kind related to y2k has been reported by anyone anywhere in Australia yet, as far as I know.

    Considering how similar Australia is to the US in many ways, I think you're all going to be disappointed if you wanted to see things break down.

    Of course the real y2k as far as unix machines and much other gear is at UTC midnight, which is not for another 9 hours. If something will happen then, then there will be no warning from the East.

    By the way, best of luck to all you Americans who have nuclear missiles targetted on your cities.

    And just one last point, there was one little rush on the supermarkets here on the last day -- sales of baked beans doubled.

  473. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by Krollekop · · Score: 1


    If we follow your logic and agree to begin a millenium with the year 0, and not the year 1 as it is in use in the Christian Era calendar, then we must also apply this to months and days. And tomorrow, we will be the 0 Jan of the next millenium!

    And that's a spot in the espace-time continuum where we certainly don't want to be! But do we really care? We'll be drunk anyway.

    Happy new year!

  474. PERL year . . by Money__ · · Score: 2

    http://readplease.com/
    _________________________

  475. Re:19100?? by Keith+Higgins · · Score: 1
    Next time you hire coders,ask a few qualifying questions, like "what is 19 + 99". If they answer "1999", they probably went to school with the people who wrote the code that is on your IRC.

    I have seen this recently as well, from a genius who decided to return the current year by printing the characters 1 and 98 followed by the current year-since-1900 as a string. And they coded this some time in August 1999.

  476. typo by Keith+Higgins · · Score: 1

    oops. said "I have seen this recently as well, from a genius who decided to return the current year by printing the characters 1 and 98 followed by the current year-since-1900 as a string." meant "I have seen this recently as well, from a genius who decided to return the current year by printing the characters 1 and 9 followed by the current year-since-1900 as a string."

  477. Ok in Houston, TX by JHromadka · · Score: 1

    I am sitting here at my desk in Houston and everything is hunky-dory. Only bummer is that my building wasn't high enough to see the fireworks from downtown. We didn't even sit at our desks when the rollover happened. I think that once people saw that the ROW was ok, things became a big yawn.
    ---------
    James Hromadka

    --
    "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
  478. Fun with the media by Chairboy · · Score: 1

    I work at Symantec, and CNN is shivering with anticipation waiting in our antivirus research lab to hear about juicy computer problems. Me and some friends were thinking it would be fun to pull a couple breakers at 4:00 Pacific (GMT midnight) after hyping it up to them to see if we could get them to broadcast live panic.

    Tee-hee-hee....

    Of course, there's also the question: 'Would my career be worth the infamy of being the last person to streak naked during a live CNN broadcast in the 1900s?' It's a tough call, that'd be an awfully tempting title....

  479. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by AndyL · · Score: 1

    Not at all. A Millennium can mean ANY thousand year period. So from Jan 1 1000, to Jan 1 2000, is a millennium also. We can choose to celebrate the end of any millenium we choose. Personaly I think I'll celibrate the one ending at about noon tommorrow just to mess with people's minds.

  480. Yeah, but ... by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1
    we can also report from our functioning boxes about those that don't work for whatever reason (e.g. My Win98 box is trashed, but I can tell everyone about it on my Linux box!)

    Plus we can include all kinds of info about local events that people halfway around the world aren't hearing about on CNN.

  481. All's well in Taiwan by natek · · Score: 1

    Power, water, phone, internet, Win95 (ugh!), GNU/Linux, all working.... Watched the count-down on TV, that was fine... Will post more later.

  482. End of the World Bingo Cards. by mcrandello · · Score: 1

    Right HERE(refresh for a different one each time.) Those who haven't had the New Year hit already can pass them out at work for a good chuckle...


    mcrandello@my-deja.com
    rschaar{at}pegasus.cc.ucf.edu if it's important.

  483. Auckland's Undernet server had problems.. by Ikari+Gendou · · Score: 2
    !Run! one minute till auckland.nz.undernet.org (the machine) realizes it is 2000 (auckland.nz.undernet.org 946638231 255 : Friday December 31 1999 -- 23:59 +13:00(from auckland.nz.undernet.org))
    -
    !Run! Or did it just halt there?
    -
    !Run! BWWWHAHAHAH!!! A BUG!
    -
    !Run! *** auckland.nz.undernet.org 946638290 255 : Saturday January 1 2000 -- 00:00 -35:00(from auckland.nz.undernet.org)
    -
    !Run! ROFL!!! Note the -35:00 :))))

    --

    Call on God, but row AWAY from the rocks!

    1. Re:Auckland's Undernet server had problems.. by neoatmaweapon · · Score: 1

      Does this in fact prove that IRCD might not be Y2K compliant? :>

  484. starving hordes by debreuil · · Score: 1

    Wow! A bunch of starving hordes just came stampeding up my mountains side demanding that I share all my hoarded dog food - begging me to teach them how to reboot a 386. Good thing a stray nuke took them all out. Aren't all those cynics that laughed at me looking terrified now. Ha! My day has come!! Year 2000 and still no cure for moronism

  485. it's not a y2k bug, it's a y2k miracle! by neko+the+frog · · Score: 2

    well the year 2000 just hit here in korea, and i must say i have a different story than all the 'everything is the same' stories from the kiwis and aussies.

    see, it's the year 2000 now, and as we all know, 2000 is the future. for one thing, the silly boxes you call 'cars' have all been replaced by bubble cars from the jetsons. we all have robot maids, the wallpaper is metallic, and my wardrobe is now sharp and plasticy. we live in a utopian society under the care and guidance of the big brother, and there's no disease, hunger, or crime. because it's the future, you see; no need for bad things here. in fact, our genes have been altered to weed out such impure thoughts.

    anyway, i have to go to a 4d holographic cybertechnotrendybuzzword videotelephonographic conference now. just remember, the y2k rollover wasn't that bad. unless of course you start hearing the trumpets of gabriel, then you're going to hell.

    --
    -- the opinions stated above aren't those of my employer. in fact, they're probably not even my own. you know what, ju
  486. San Antonio is fine.... mostly by Scrybe · · Score: 1

    Well in San Antonio, TX there are still LOTS of fireworks going off at peoples houses (they have real fireworks not the "safe" ones I know from WA). Water, power, and phones are working. My ISP Flash.net is rejecting my password but I have a backup. The funniest thing though is that the local ABC afiliate KSAT had a Y2K bug in their "Spiffy Graphic" (tm) for the new year. I was supposed to read "1999" and then fade to "2000" but someone was smoking crack so it reads "2099" and fades into "2000"!!!! ROFL the really funny thing is that I don't think they caught it because they kept on using it. Oh Well Happy New Year Y'all! Enjoy 0000011111010000

    --

    <This .sig left intentionally blank>

  487. oh yea, first post of the millenium by MrDelSarto · · Score: 1

    i'm at work and lovin' it

    1. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by Punto · · Score: 1
      Hehehe.. Mine was to avoid and ignore everyone that says "see you on the new milenium" until 1/1/01 (and beyond)

      --

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    2. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by Katep · · Score: 1

      AH! Dammit. You want to know what my New Year's resolution was? To punch out every idiot who says "Happy New Millenium". Damn people...

    3. Re:oh yea, first post of the millenium by Katep · · Score: 1

      Social Darwinism, you see. If they haven't realized that it is not the new millenium, it is for the betterment of society that they be taken out...

  488. weather.com... by achbed · · Score: 1

    ...has lost all 5-day forecast data...

  489. Happy Y2K from Denver by Legion303 · · Score: 1
    I know I wouldnt have had a problem in linux, but I'm running Win2K at the moment (for Maya...woohoo), and it rolled over without a problem--as expected. Although someone was firing a pistol into the air at midnight...welcome to Colorado. :)

    We're still waiting for California to rollover to see if the power grid will be affected. If it is, we'll jus

  490. NL: Disaster strikes! Thousands impoverished. by mazur · · Score: 1
    As the new year rolls in all over the world nothing stubbornly continues to happen: no blackouts, no computers failing, just business as usual as the script kiddies are outside burning car tyres and anything else they can get their grubby hands on. Fireworks take the usual toll in autodarwinists, but hospitals and other public services sit with their thumbs up their ass, because of overstaffing for the supposed problems with computers, lifts and other imagined vulnerable systems everywhere. Computer staff around the world toast eachother with slurred voices, saying: "See, 's no prob... Prob... Nothing to it."

    However, out of the wood(works) bugeyed survivalists are creeping back towrds continued civilization, asking: "What the f*ck am I going to do with a two year supply of preserved foods, eh? Who's gonna pay for that? I left my job, divorced my wife, thinking there's be enough young chicks free after the men started to kill off eachother after the disaster, put all my money into stuff I thought I could barter with, but what do I do now? No job, no wife, no g*dd*m money! I'm gonna sue all those doom-prophets penniless, you mark my words. Now I only need to find a no-cure-no-pay lawyer and I'm rolling. I may be penniless, but I'm not stoopid!", said one true blooded American as he came out of his survival bunker after midnight. It's heart-warming to see how the American spirit cannot be beaten through even the most abhorrent setbacks.

    An another front, companies are starting to ask why they spent so many millions in what has started to be classified as the greatest hoax of the century, already. "We spent all that, for nothing? We want our money back, and we know who took it.", said one spokesman for a large, Redmond-based company.

    It's going to be a busy and profitful years for lawyers.

    Seriously, nothing much happening over here, apart from me getting sloshed, having succesfully tested the basics. Sipping champagne, now, putting up another CD on my linux box, as soon as the fireworks tone down, can't hear myself thinking for that: over here in the Netherlands, it's legal to fire fireworks for on hour each year: the first hour of the new year. Can't see dick for the smog, already.

    God bless you, everyone. (tm) Dickens.

    Stefan.
    --
    Ah, good, seeing the police going by just now, to keep an eye out for things going wrong. Happy new dear!

    --
    The truth shall make you fret. (Ankh-Morpork tImes motto)
  491. Fine in Melbourne, Australia. by Tamriel · · Score: 1

    Water, gas, phones lasted fine. Except the expected overload on the mobile network. And a mate's place on a farm in the country lost power and land-line phones. We're on daylight savings here, so the big moment for power was 1am. 5 minutes ago. And it's all still fine. Except I have a headache.


    -

    --


    -
    I rather like cows.
    1. Re:Fine in Melbourne, Australia. by Tamriel · · Score: 1

      C&W aren't down, just severely congested. At about midnight, no-one I knew on Telstra, Vodafone or Optus could get a call through, it was too busy. The power failure in the country I knew was a friend's mum's farm near Point Arlington (20 mins past Geelong).


      -

      --


      -
      I rather like cows.
  492. end of millenium by BrightSun · · Score: 0

    Ok, so everyone and their brother thinks that today is the end of the millenium. and that tomorrow is the dawn of the next. but it not, the entire year 2000 is the end of the millenium and the next does not begin until 2001 and if we want to get really technical it began in 1997 because our calendars are off by 4 years! where did our societies brains go to?

    --
    Computers save man alot of guesswork, but so does the bikini ;)
    1. Re:end of millenium by BrightSun · · Score: 1

      so are we all planning on having this much fun in a year from now? assuming that Jesus Christ son of GOD the creator does not come back and press the almighty ALT + CTRL + DEL ...

      --
      Computers save man alot of guesswork, but so does the bikini ;)
  493. 3th millenium! by wei_c_yin · · Score: 1

    Think about this, 1st Century is 1-100.. 20th Century is 1901-2000.. same logic: 1st millenium is 1-1000.. 3rd millenium is 2001-3000.. so Y2k != new millenium. We shouldn't call it new millenium yet.. but we should still celebrate. and.. 80s is from 80-89. it's nothing to be with anything I wrote before..

  494. But, according to _Time_ magazine ... by Vertex+Operator · · Score: 1

    the century is over, hence the millennium is de facto over as well. After all, they just announced Albert Einstein as the "person of the century".

    If anyone wants me, I'll be in my Y2K compliant bunker.
    --
    Chris Long, Departments of Mathematics & Statistics, Rutgers University

    --
    San Diego Padres, 100 Park Blvd, San Diego CA 92101

    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by
  495. Newsflash by pvthudson · · Score: 1
    Microsoft campus still here, sorry Linux zealots.

    --


    Its karma, Kramer.

  496. Four Unrelated Y2K thoughts by drfireman · · Score: 1

    1. My boss was told he should worry about our computers getting damaged by a Y2K-related power failure. So he unplugged them. If they should happen to have trashed filesystems or something, would this count as a Y2K bug?

    2. In the same way that politicians start lining up for the next election right after the last one ends, I think it's never too soon to start planting the seeds for the next Y2K-style bug. I'm sure there are lots of gems out there, but it would be worth thinking up something really artful to impress future generations and ensure a nice retirement package. I nominate the Y2K bug (not to be confused with the Y2k bug), although I'm sure others will have better ideas.

    3. My bank claims everything will work fine in the new year. Where were they last year? More seriously, has anyone yet written about an effect I will call the Y2K-backlash, the effect of Y2K-necessitated code cleanup causing broken things to start working?

    dan

  497. BBC broken. by tmuller · · Score: 1
    Here is one of the BBC's sites. Seems they are in the year 1900.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/

    Enjoy!

  498. We've got Y2K problems. by c+era · · Score: 3
    I live in Minnesota, US (CST), and when I came into work this morning I was told that some people can't login to the NT workstations. It turns out that last night the server team decided they needed better security (they should of switch to Solaris, we have very few problems with Solaris). Unfortunately they hosed the DNS for the domain controllers and now the part of the NT network is down (but the suns run just fine). Luckily only administrative assistants are on NT, all of our critical systems are on Solaris.

    I think the biggest Y2K problem will be quick changes that are not thought through.

  499. Happy 1900, and what to do with your stockpile by Laven · · Score: 1
    I hope everyone has a happy 1900! (I really gotta get a new computer...)

    As for all of you who stockpiled provisions of food, water and clothing for the encroaching end of civilization, thus far (most, not all) looks well. But the true test will be on Monday when everyone goes back to work, and the world's markets re-open.

    If riots, looting and general chaos do not ensue then please consider donating your stockpiles to your local Red Cross or charity agency, for there are many needy people who could use it.

    Lets make this new Millennia a time to consider to improve the world, and perhaps one day the homeless and, starving and needy will not exist.

    Warren Togami
    warren@togami.com

  500. Do NOT try this... by scotch · · Score: 1

    Yesterday, I thought I would proactively test my systems' Y2K compatibility. I set the date on all 4 machines to 2350, 31 Dec 1999, and waited to see what the results would be. At precisely midnight (machine time) all 4 systems crashed with an MS(tm) BSOD (even though they are all running *nix variants), the power went out, my roommates and the neighbors started rioting and looting my refrigerator, my car exploded, my wardrobe turned instantly fashionable, and an eddy in the space time continuum opened up in my living room and swallowed my couch. I am now living in an alternate reality that you will all shortly be joining. OTOH, slashdot seems to work OK.

    --
    XML causes global warming.
  501. All's quiet on the Japanese front by yannick · · Score: 2
    Well... 12:00 AM just rolled around and I am still alive and connected to the Net. No services seem to have been interrupted, and I doubt any will be.

    I don't know if it's just plain silly or oddly appropriate that I'm ushering in the new year/decade/century/millennium on the Internet (something which will likely have a profound influence on our future).

    A lot of people will be feeling very silly tomorrow morning. Happy New Year everyone!

    --
    He who laughs last thinks slowest.
  502. Everythin' fine and dandy here by Ricardo+Casals · · Score: 1

    We just hit Y2K an hour and a half ago here in Maryland (Bowie, to be exact) and everything seems to be fine and dandy. I am at a LAN party and (runnin Win98SE and Win2K) nothin is wrong yet ;o)

    No riots, no murders, no Jesus, no fun! :(

    heheheheh...

    --
    yeah ... i'm going to have to go ahead and not put a .sig here, alright?
  503. Y2K == millennium by dead+sun · · Score: 1

    Well, most people didn't start counting with zero but in every program I've ever written all my arrays seem to start with zero. So I guess a large portion of the computer crowd starts counting with zero, and it is after all the first non-negative integer. I say in light of these facts we should let the countless masses start counting like computer programmers. :)

    --
    If not now, when?
  504. Y2K event? by heymull · · Score: 1

    Ran WinNT all weekend. Today (Jan 3 2000) I came off screen-saver, looked at my Outlook 98 and Excel programs. Both looked OK. I attempted to re-boot the machine, and it was very slow about quitting Outlook, a bad sign, but it did release.

    After the reboot, Outlook failed to load. SHLWAPI.DLL was not found when LOADWC.EXE tried to load it. IE5 could not find SHLWAPI.DLL either. IE5 would not reload.

    We had to re-ghost the OS....

    --

    "Many have chosen to follow. They aren't the ones I'm worried about."
  505. Re:Fine in Cairns, Australia too by s8n · · Score: 1

    We have power and telcomms up at Cairns, Australia. Not sure about water (rainwater where I am ATM), but I'd say it's fine. The power did flicker a couple of hours ago, but it's been fine since. My Win98 box on a ZM6 motherboard rolled over fine. Apparently New Zealand is fine too, except for the phone system overloading =). Hey uh, not sure if it's been posted already; but incase not: the hostages from the hijacking have been released unharmed! Great news there. Ok, that's it....

    --
    s8n@planetquake.com / ICQ: 5089166 Riding the Rocket - Quake 2 Trickjump Competitions - http://www.planetquake.com/rtr/
  506. Happy new year by Deep+Thought · · Score: 1

    Woohoo, happy new year. I'm in Sydney at the moment and no the world has not come to an end, to many people's disapointment. The only prob we have had is mobile phone services being flooded with people trying to ring other people to wish them a happy new year. Well time to continue partying.

  507. its not biased by Deep+Thought · · Score: 1

    If there was a major problem with an OS, ISP, power company or whatever it would have been broadcasted by someone (telephone, radio, morse and long distance flag signals) So any problems could be posted.

  508. mobile phone outage by Deep+Thought · · Score: 1

    There is always a few minutes of mobile phone problems at new years because everyone triesd to call everyone else, it happens every year.

  509. Hummers are for wimps. by Myoot · · Score: 1
  510. Re:Y2K Bug: CNN/Headline News Says Not "Millennium by cburley · · Score: 1
    Most people can accept the fact that the 20th century is the 1900's.

    You just nailed it, highlighting (inadvertently?) the contradiction inherent in the two numbering systems (the older being origin-1-based, the newer origin-0-based).

    Specifically, while you're right that people (mostly) "get" that the 20th century consists mostly of years labeled 19xx...

    ...you're also right that people seem to think the century's last year is 1999, not 2000! ("...the 1900s" referring to 1900-1999.)

    Personally, I prefer origin-0-based numbering, and don't really mind when people refer to a decade as ending in an xxx9-numbered year, as long as they don't call it, say, the 199th Decade.

    The problem with this comes when the same people then want to talk about decades v. centuries v. millenia. It makes sense that the year the ends a given millenium also ends a given century and a given decade. But if you've been saying decades end in xxx9 all along, you're in trouble when the official (Western) millennium ends in xxx0 (ditto for the end of the century).

    I wonder if this is the problem The Weather Channel has run into, for example? They're running "storm of the century" shows, like most everyone else, but you'd think they'd honor the Naval Observatory more than hewing to common perceptions (well, maybe not), but if they've been treating decades as ending in xxx9, well, there's no really good solution. (I'd prefer they do end-of-decade shows now, end-of-century/millennium shows next year, but that is a bit strained.)

    Oh well. At any given moment, we're caught up in three millenial events: living in one millenium, ending another, and starting yet another. Live In The Now. Drink In The Light. Double-Click God's Button. ;-)

    --
    Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  511. Y2K Bug: CNN/Headline News Says Not "Millennium"! by cburley · · Score: 2
    Amazing! I was just watching Headline News, and the anchor, Linda Stouffer, explained (finally; though I predicted this would happen, I didn't think it'd start until after Y2K) that this isn't really the start of "the" Millennium, due to the way years are numbered. She said "but who's counting, right?", or something like that.

    (Yes, I was actually listening to her, not just watching her lips move. Maybe that's because she was wearing a bit too much makeup today, so looking less than totally supremely gorgeous. ;-)

    So, to those of you who, despite well-knowing that the official (according to e.g. the US Naval Observatory) start of the third millennium is 2001-01-01, not 2000-01-01, argue that we should just "accept" what the mass media (and ignorant masses) tell us what they think is the beginning of "the" Millennium, get ready to be made complete fools out of your chosen leaders, who'll happily spend much of 2000 claiming that, no, really, 1999 wasn't the last year of the century/millennium, 2000 is, so everybody pay attention as we run all these new shows about the end of the millennium again.

    Yes, it's an arbitrary date. Yes, it was the result of a (probably) failed attempt to base the origin date (0001-01-01) on the birth of Jesus. Yes, really, people shouldn't get so excited about mere number-based events.

    But, the one thing that should have been true about "the" Millennium we all get to transition into is that it happens only once in a lifetime. Now it'll happen at least twice, three times if you account for at least one "real" birth of Jesus. (Hardly important, since we've accepted the distinction between 01-01 and 12-25 for decades, at least, but there are those who believe the most important millennial numbering begins with the actual birth of Jesus. They probably care little for our artificial date numbering, or 12-25, anyway.)

    Personally, I don't care about such events. I don't really care about things like birthdays or such, except to the extent others wish to celebrate them. I'll go to some First Night (Boston) shows because I want to go to the shows, not because I want to "celebrate" New Year's per se. (A friend is part of a precision-skating group to skate on Frog Pond, for example.)

    Yes, perhaps the best thing to do to people who insist of having a single Millennium transition to celebrate is to add to the confusion by first saying "yes, go ahead, believe it's 2000-01-01" and then saying "hey, y'know, it's really 2001-01-01", but those of us who actually care about preserving some semblance of a useful international language, it would have been nice to have fewer supposedly informed, intelligent people advocating the complete elimination of the one aspect of the concept "ring in the Millennium" that everyone could have agreed upon: that it happens only once every thousand years.

    And, to Linda Stouffer and others in the media who say "but who's counting, right?": you are, you have been, and you've been representing yourselves as doing it for us so you can convince us to spend tons of hours watching all your end-of-the-second-Millennium shows. And now you want to pull an Emily Litella and say "Never mind!", as if you didn't know all along??

    Bah.

    --
    Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  512. Odd Sampling Method by the+Epopt · · Score: 1

    So how many "my computer melted down, the power has failed, there's rioting in the streets, and my family and I are fleeing the city -- but I took the time to write up this article for slashdot 'cause I believe that Geeks Have A Right To Know" posts do you expect to have submitted?


    --
    --
    I moderate at +3, Highest Scores, and I always mod down.
    If you don't like it, vote me off the island.
  513. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
    Interesting, but wrong. As they note, a millennium is an interval of 1000 years. Thus, every instant, a millenium is ending.

    We can choose any set of disjoint millenniums whose union covers all time we want to use for our millennium celebrations. All such choices are equally valid. Thus, the question boils down to what set should we choose and bestow the label of the millennium upon.

    The fact that people approximately 2000 years ago decided to start a new count does not seem to me to be particularly important, especially since they had no clear idea of when the event they were trying to sync to (birth of Jesus) actually took place, and so definitely missed by at least a few years.

    We might as well do our millennia so they end in x999 years.

  514. Sweden survived by mikael_j · · Score: 1

    or at least Mora.

    Mikael Jacobson

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  515. Re:Apocalypse Wow! Tips for the post-Armageddon Er by sredding · · Score: 1

    Shit!

    I just blew coffee all over my keyboard.

    cheers,

  516. Re:19100?? by darkspell · · Score: 2
    A couple weeks ago I corrected quite a few of these Perl "localtime()" bugs. Grabbing localtime (or gmtime) in a scalar context works OK, but when you dump the results into an array, the year comes up as an integer = thisyear - 1900.

    Plenty of Perl programmers abused the language's ability to treat integers and strings as the same and just did $year = '19' . $year. Wrong! Correct fix is $year += 1900.

    Even the mighty Lincoln Stein, author of the venerable CGI.pm, was susceptible. Old versions of CGI.pm simply used the raw year (i.e., 100 on 1/1/2000) in setting a cookie expire time. But Lincoln, bless him, caught the error way in advance of Y2K and corrected it a couple of releases ago. He employed the correct fix: $year += 1900.

  517. http://www.millennium321.com/ by laserone · · Score: 1

    People, stop name-calling and insulting. It's a common misconception. It's all explained at http://www.millennium321.com/. You don't start counting with zero, you start counting with one. ~Peace

  518. Re:make my day, M$ by quasimoto · · Score: 1

    My FreeBSD still says 2345, no doubt it will say 0000 010100. Happy Happy -d

  519. Y2K in Hong Kong by Fuhrer · · Score: 1

    Its 2:27am in Hong Kong 1/1/2000.

    No problems here at all. Both my computers (one Windows 2000 and one Windows 98) are running fine with no problems as well.

    Everything here is working just as before.

    ---
    Year 2000 is NOT the end of the Millennium, Century nor even Decade. We'll have to wait one more year for that.

  520. Posting to Slashdot by candlelight. by _outcat_ · · Score: 1

    {silly}
    It's terrible here. Get out while you can. IF anyone in South Dakota is reading this, I commend you for your bravery and fortitude, because there's so much catastrophe. It's terrible. Terrible.

    The sun went out entirely and it began to snow violently out here. Then the power went out. I'm posting to Slashdot by candlelight right now, with a magnet to edit the inodes and force the signal through the phone lines.

    Also, all the food somehow disintegrated. I guess it wasn't y2k compliant. People are killing each other out here for, as Stef from UF said, the calories in the ink of a ballpoint pen. I nearly got a bite taken out of me myself, but I fended them off with AOL CD's.

    Not sure how much longer I can keep up this message. It's so cold. Gget ouT while you ccan. 01001000ear me? oh, no, my mmagn01000101t isn't y2k compliant...
    *zzzt*

    {/silly}

    --
    Angry IT woman in big clompy boots. And talking lint!.
  521. WWVB Clock bug in California by Temkin · · Score: 1

    It's 8am Dec 31st here in California. I'm reading the early reports for NZ and AU. I'm sipping my first cup of coffee, and I look up at my good 'ol Oregon Scientific auto-set WWVB sync'd clock, and it thinks it's 10am. The minutes and seconds are perfectly sync'd, I've double checked it against WWV on my shortwave. It's almost like it thinks it's in the central US time zone. This is the clock they've been selling at Fry's Electronics for the last several months.

    If you have a WWVB reference clock feeding your NTP server, keep an eye on it.

    Temkin

  522. hears australias entry by ujuhh · · Score: 1

    well new years went fine here. linux booted, win98 booted, and they all said the right date/year. what did happen was some of the mobile phone networks wern't able to make outgoing calls for a few minuets, but all is fine now.(maybe it was just an overload of the phone network ?, and not Year 2000 bug. but anyway happy new years!!!! have fun.

    --
    Sig 404
  523. The people factor by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    While out at a club last night, a man sharing a table with my girlfriend had a terrified look on his face when he asked us if we had heard about the all the problems with credit cards in New England. Both my girlfriend and I busted out laughing, and the man was a bit embarrassed when he learned the the problem was with a few thousand credit cards in England, not New England. And then there is the Y2K version of "A Country Boy Can Survive", which reminds me of a post I saw somewhere, I think ZDNET, titled "Darwin". Some survivalist was encouraging people to horde food, guns and gas. Personally, I haven't bought any bottled water, but did stock up on beer. A person can't be too careful, can he/her? As far as the debate over when the new millenium actually starts? All it really means is we get to celebrate it twice. We can be sure that it will be hyped just as much when 2001 rolls around. Is there a point to this post? Probably not. Happy New Year everyone.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  524. Re: You Moron! by Scott+Ribordy · · Score: 1

    Sheesh! What a bunch of nit pickers!

    Calling the year 2000 the 'New Millennium' is 99.9% accurate, after all.


    --
    Scott

  525. You're just stupid... by nine9 · · Score: 0

    You are so stupid... I don't care if you live eleven and a half hours away from me... It is not yet Y2K in UTC so go shove you're head up your a***e where it belongs!

  526. Y2K in Edinburgh with a...286!? by nine9 · · Score: 1
    OK, OK. It's now the morning after all around the world...

    Here, the centre of Edinburgh was filled with one-and-a-half million people, and silly old me didn't get a ticket on time... grrrrr....

    So, I celebrated at home with the family. My 6x86 and old 486DX2 rolled over correctly... But I forgot to check the old 286... When I switched it on it said something like July 1998, but I realised a few moments later that that was the RTC battery failing (the box is about 10 years old). When I set the date manually to yesterday it rolled over perfectly... Another advantage of my 286 (maybe the only one) is that it can "low-level " format floppy disks. Quite useful for when some rubbish M$ product has defined fake bad sectors...

    The Government here has been careful to plpay down fears of the "Y2K bug"... They have even said on the news that there were no incidents, though there must have been some, surely?

    It's interesting what Frank said about the "19100" bug in Perl... I can't believe some people are so stupid as to concatenate 19 + tm->tm_year... I always do this [currdate.pl]:
    $myday{0}="Sunday"; $myday{1}="Monday"; $myday{2}="Tuesday"; $myday{3}="Wednesday"; $myday{4}="Thursday"; $myday{5}="Friday"; $myday{6}="Saturday"; $mymonth{0}="January"; $mymonth{1}="February"; $mymonth{2}="March"; $mymonth{3}="April"; $mymonth{4}="May"; $mymonth{5}="June"; $mymonth{6}="July"; $mymonth{7}="August"; $mymonth{8}="September"; $mymonth{9}="October"; $mymonth{10}="November"; $mymonth{11}="December"; ($sec,$min,$hour,$mday,$mon,$year,$wday,$yday,$isd st) = localtime(time); print "$myday{$wday}, $mday $mymonth{$mon}, ", $year+1900, " \@ "; printf ("%2.2d", $hour); print ":"; printf ("%2.2d", $min); print ":"; printf ("%2.2d", $sec); print " $ENV{'TZ'}";

  527. Everything normal here in Singapore by lythari · · Score: 1

    How boring. No lights going off or chaos breaking out. It's better this way, but it does seem like a very big anti-climax after all the hype. However, we'll have to wait till Europe and the America's rollover before we can say that everything's OK. If bombs start going off over the US or if some religious fanatic firebombs the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, then we're in big trouble.

  528. http://www.usno.navy.mil/ by JeffWRogers · · Score: 1

    America's official timekeeper says 2000 is *not* the beginning of a new Millenium.

  529. monitoring website lacks any monitoring by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    This information will be updated from the afternoon on 31st DecemberEr it's 15:00 uk time - is that afternoon enough yet?
    .oO0Oo.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  530. As a matter of fact... by neoatmaweapon · · Score: 1

    ùíù spirit.nsw.au.ircd.net Saturday January 1 2000 -- 01:24 -37:00(from spirit.nsw.au.ircd.net) There is a *real* problem with IRCD :>

  531. Re:Apocalypse Wow! Tips for the post-Armageddon Er by Triscuit · · Score: 1

    This one received a lot of laughs at work this morning. Keep it coming!

    A good way to start my day.

    Anyone else seen any "Comical" Y2K readiness posts
    like this one?

  532. Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by Scriven · · Score: 0
    I'd just like to remind everyone that while it IS, obviously, the year 2000, with all the inherent problems that may/may not cause, it is NOT the new millenium. So can we, as supposedly intelligent people, stop with the propagation of all this "first * of the millennium" crud.

    Here's an e-mail that I got that details out the reason why, for anyone who doesn't know, (or can't count):

    Produced by the Information Services Department of the Royal Greenwich Observatory
    Robin M Catchpole, December 1997, last revised December 1999 (Jim O'Donnell).


    When do the 3rd Millennium and the 21st Century start?

    A millennium is an interval of 1000 years and a century is an interval of 100 years. In the Gregorian Calendar, which we use, there is no year zero and the sequence of years near the start runs as follows; ..., 3BC, 2BC, 1BC, 1AD, 2AD, ...

    Because there is no year zero, the first year of the calendar ends at the end of the year named 1AD. By a similar argument 100 years will only have elapsed at the end of the year 100AD. Since 2000AD is the 2,000th year of the Christian calendar, it will be the last year of the Second Millennium. So the 3rd Millennium and the 21st Century will begin at the same moment, namely zero hours UTC (commonly known as GMT) on January 1st 2001.

    We have received a great deal of e-mail regarding the start of the 21st Century. It is interesting to note that this is not the first time that this controversy has arisen. The Times must have received many letters towards the end of 1799, since its editors felt moved to make the following comments about the beginning of the 19th Century:

    "We have uniformly rejected all letters and declined all discussion upon the question of when the present century ends, as it is one of the most absurd that can engage the public attention, and we are astonished to find it has been the subject of so much dispute, since it appears plain. The present century will not terminate till January 1, 1801, unless it can be made out that 99 are 100... It is a silly, childish discussion, and only exposes the want of brains of those who maintain a contrary opinion to that we have stated"
    The Times, 26 December 1799
    --
    This is my .sig. It isn't very big.
    --An Oldie, but a Goodie!
    1. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO by mangu · · Score: 1

      for one thousand pedantic assholes:
      one annum == one year
      several millennia == several thousand years
      one anus == one asshole
      several millenii == several thousand assholes
      millenium has NO meaning!

  533. "confirmed missile launchings in russia" by mojo_nixon · · Score: 1

    anyone see the c-span news briefing (app 5:30est)with an army official making statements about 3 y2k related missile launchings in russia? he proceeded to state that they were not considered "reportable" under criteria set forth in advance, and are not a concern because they traveled no further than 300km from their base. i've tried to find further info on this but have'nt suceeded yet.

  534. He prefers it that way by CCat · · Score: 1

    Well, I saw a segment on Cartoon Network where the 'Y2K Bug' was going to attack the ship that Godzilla's friends were having a party on -- after they say "oh no! the Y2K bug!" he stops making angry bug noises for a moment to say, "Actually I prefer Millennium Bug..."

    Then they try to summon Godzilla to deal with it, but there was a problem with the controller...

    tCC

  535. Apocalypse Wow! Tips for the post-Armageddon Era by arc.light · · Score: 5

    "Well, well, well. Less than twenty-four hours 'til Ragnarok and I haven't a stitch to wear."

    Billions of people around the globe are thinking this very thought. Don't be part of the mass of cannon fodder awaiting their fate on January 1st. I'd like to help others survive and prosper after the Y2K "situation" by describing the preparations I've made over the past year for tonight's Big Event.

    1. The Car
    Nothing says "I'm a survivor!" like a cool set of wheels, which is why I have a 1971 Plymouth HemiCuda with a 426ci/425hp V8.
    I took out the rear window and rear seats, and welded in two 55-gallon drums as reserve fuel tanks.
    I filled the trunk with cement so I could ram other vehicles in reverse during "Road Warrior"-type scenarios.
    Due to the weight of the cement in the trunk, I had to replace the rear shocks with solid steel bars, so the suspension is pretty stiff, but boy does it have some range!
    I've mounted a 20mm cannon (originally from a AH-1 Cobra helicopter) - that I bought on eBay for $35K - to the roof of the car so it faces forward.
    It fires when the left turn signal is activated.
    I use a Xybernaut wearable PC for aiming, and I adapted the anti-wobble feature of my camcorder to stabilize the cannon during vehicle movement and firing.
    There is a radiacmeter attached to the grill, so I'll know when I'm approaching former urban areas.
    I didn't have time to cut a hole in the hood to accommodate the huge intake of the supercharger attached to the engine, so I just left the hood off.
    The exhaust system has been removed as a vestigial performance-hindering remnant of a civilized era.

    2. The Duds
    I have a fire-resistant Nomex jumpsuit dyed to match desert terrain, as all terrain will soon be desert terrain.
    For formal occasions, black leather chaps are acceptable, but the buttless kind will make you the laughing-stock of Bartertown.
    Accessorize with low-slung pistol holster, gas mask, and black leather jackboots.
    Bandoleers are in this year, but only for survivors with crew-served weapons.
    Fine-grain leather driving gloves will assist you in controlling your vehicle when driving through fallout-blighted areas.

    3. Food
    Pound-for-pound, dry dog food has ten times the nutritional value of boiled potatoes, and it can be stored longer, too!
    Dog food for older dogs is often packed with fillers that you just don't need, but Puppy Chow is geared towards growing dogs, and has more than enough nutrition.
    I'm towing a U-Haul trailer full of it, with a few cases of surplus MREs from the Gulf War for special occasions.

    I hope I've provided some insight into the preparations necessary for surviving the coming hard times.
    I am interested in having a traveling companion to help with driving.
    Any fertile females interested in repopulating the planet should contact me at TheSurvivor@militia.mt.us

  536. Re:19100?? by sh · · Score: 1

    Ahhh, but if this is the case it wouldnt have been reporting something similar to the following before y2k:

    [t/v] [client.oz.org] 946644450 0 friday december 31 1999 -- 23:47 +11:00

    More likely they have just tacked the number of years since 1900 onto the end of the "19". It still seems to be reporting the number of seconds since epoch fine tho, obviously just a formatting error somewhere in the code, I dont see it bringing down the power grid =>. Then again the world does revolve around irc right? =>.

  537. 19100?? by sh · · Score: 4


    one interesting thing after a /date on my local irc network:

    [t/v] [client.oz.org] 946646223 0 saturday january 1 19100 -- 00:17 -37:00

    whoops!

  538. Crossing Over the Y2K by Jasa · · Score: 2
    Greetings from Perth Western Australia,
    We are 3hrs behind Sydney here and we're about to cross over the to Y2K

    My server Adama has been down for three days due to a bung network card

    But my work station Apollo is what I am using for to write this letter is going to hopefully stay up and connected to my ISP over the change over
    BTW this machine is Running Mandrake 6.1 and it rocks!!

    Video record date showing 01.01.00, but it still works. TV stations and electricity OK.

    Happy New Year Everyone @ /. from Jasa

    --
    -Jasa -- Linux - The SOURCE will be with you, ALWAYS
  539. 2 Mobile Phone Networks Down in Australia by sysop · · Score: 1

    Not an actual Y2K bug, but 2 of the Mobile Phone networks down here have been unusable since 11:30pm due to massive congestion by well wishers! An alternative Y2K rollover bug?

    During yesterday (the 31st) there were also a lot of bank outages, but nothing that really inconvenienced anyone I know.

  540. Re:Y2k != millenium [sic] by mangu · · Score: 1

    We are now starting century number 20, which is the 21st century, because the first century was century number zero. Anyway, what's the importance of all this? Even by the canonical interpretation Jesus was born before Christ, on December 25, 1 BC, to be exact. January 1, 1 AD was the date when he was circumsized.

  541. Two hours to go, and only three beers left... by mangu · · Score: 1

    I think I badly misjudged the situation, maybe the gas station still has some cold beer... I never thought Y2K would be as bad as this!

  542. Re:riots...? by mangu · · Score: 1

    Well, I wish I was there, I'm looking for a 20 Gb drive and a firewire camcorder...
    Happy Armageddon and Merry Looting to all!

  543. Pope Gregory was a fascist dictator! by mangu · · Score: 1

    The reason Pope Gregory started his calendar was just to have a bureaucratic reason to burn Lutherans at the stake. The catholic church should be treated with as much respect as the late Josif Djugashvili a.k.a. Stalin. Now, in 2000/1/1, we are starting the 21st century, century number 20 (since the first century was century number zero) and the third millennium, millennium number two.

  544. I once had a 1983 made-in-Brazil Chevette... by mangu · · Score: 1

    ...that was ethanol powered. With my bathtub still, I would be able to this car long after your diesel or gasoline/petrol powered cars stopped...

  545. Dam by jbarnett · · Score: 3

    OH MY GOD

    Everything is burning, my servers are all crashed and there are thousands of the undead on my door step. The HORROR the HORROR of it all. Please God save me from this world. There is massive amounts of radation leaking in though the vents, and the smell of Death is all around me. Most of my fellow brothers are dead, and those still living are praying and begging for the sweet grip of death to choke out their last breaths. Please death save me from this. Pleaes death, take it all away. The End is Here

    Oh, wait. Dam, sorry false alarm. I forgot I am in Central time zone and it is only 8:02AM on Dec 31/99 still. Sorry my bad. I still got 15-16 hours left.

    I will keep your posted.

    --

    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
  546. Y2k is people! by decefett · · Score: 1
    I'm at work in a tv station in Australia, we're 1.5 hours into 2000. The only errors we have had are due to people screwing up manual operations.

    The automation worked perfectly but management insisted that everything was done manually, even though all the tests came out ok.

    We're drinking chamapagne now and getting pissed :)

    --
    Australian? Join EFA
  547. River of Fire by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

    The only Y2K problem I'm hoping to see is them setting fire to the House of Commons when they have their River of Fire on the Thames; maybe even starting The Second Great Fire of London.

    Now that would make a memorable new year.

    --

    Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  548. Well, that was a little boring. by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

    Well, y2k is here and my network is doing thusly:-

    • Pandora (Linux) - Running
    • Monolith (Win98) - Running
    • Tortoise (Win98) - Running
    • Herculese (Win98) - Running
    • Beomoth (NT4) - amazingly Running

    All in all a pretty boring night, they didn't even manage to set lite to London or the Houses of Parliment - oh well.

    --

    Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    1. Re:Well, that was a little boring. by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      Buggered if I know.

      "Thusly" just sounded better than "thus".

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  549. Heeheee :).. by frogdip · · Score: 1

    I am very drunk :)... But my AIX box is still running... so it my Linux box and Solaris box...

  550. *grin* by Rei · · Score: 1

    That was pretty funny ;)

    - Rei

    --
    When was the last time you ran anywhere? I mean with your own legs, not by pressing 'X'?
  551. UTC 2000 just passed... by capritia · · Score: 1

    ...and the BIOS on my old MICRON machine rolled over just fine. Whoops -- it wasn't supposed to. The NSTL Y2K test program said I'd have to crank it over by hand, and so did the MICRON homepage. Guess it was the DOS date program that had the bug, not the BIOS at all.

  552. make my day, M$ by prog-guru · · Score: 1

    Ah, 20 min till midnight, with RH6.1 in hand, just waiting for this NT machine to pull any funny stuff.

    --

    chris@xanadu:~$ whatis /.
    /.: nothing appropriate.

  553. Slashdot articles numbers... by shanec · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I just noticed that the this artile number was 'article.pl?sid=99/12/31/0757254'.

    Slashdot, are you going to take a hit in less than a couple hours, with a Y2K (perl related) issue of your own, or are we just going to see artiles labled 100/01/01/...?

    Shane

  554. Well, the lights still work, and I am posting this by Mordaine · · Score: 1

    Y2K (aka Apocralypse)has passed here in Sydney with not a whisper of distress that I have been able to find. Water still works... And so does my toaster. No evil Y2K viruses or hackers have destroyed things either.

    Hope the trend continues around the globe.

  555. What about slashdot? by crlf · · Score: 2

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/12/31/075725 4&mode=thread&threshold=-1

  556. Pre-millenium Crash by mtfbwy · · Score: 1

    I work in a manufacturing environment and all of our level-2 systems run Compaq/Digital OpenVMS. Last night just one out of 7 of our systems (in my area of the plant) crashed at midnight on the transition between 12/30 and 12/31. Perhaps the OS uses the date of the next day when it rolls over? Who knows...the system came right back up.

  557. amazing how it all comes together... by astrix8 · · Score: 1

    well here's the deal.. i'm a web designer
    here in boston who just recently purchased
    a digital camera. i've already been taking
    pictures since early this morning, and wanted
    to publish some visual and commentary of the
    second techiest city for our pals here at
    slashdot to see...but my website,
    graphicsdesign.org, is still down due to the cihost issue.

    if anyone has a meg or two of web space and
    would be interested in seeing something like
    this on the web, i'd be happy to post to
    you as i go along.
    else, i will try and get one of those
    yucky free accounts at geocities or someplace
    and post a followup when i've completed
    the project, though i thought it would
    be interesting for people to see it in
    increments.

    thanks in advance;
    adam
    www.graphicsdesign.org

    --
    __________________________________________________ __ "there are two kinds of people in this world,
  558. All are OK at Hong Kong by Vincent+Tam · · Score: 1

    Hello, It is already 15 minutes passed the year 2000 in Hong Kong. Power, water, our Linux servers, the Win9x boxes are all ok. No problem found so far.

  559. Millennium in 2000, Millennium in 2001 by thefoobar · · Score: 1

    You know, who really cares. The fact that we are changing from a 1 to a 2, and a 19 to a 20 is pretty significant given the fact that most readers here have only seen things change from a 70 to an 80 or an 80 to a 90. This argument is never going to be solved so why don't you all stop bitching and moaning about it because I seriously doubt that you will be able to convince the world that they need to wait until 2001 for the "Big Party." 19xx changing to 20xx and 1xxx changing to 2xxx is significant enough for me. ...d

    --
    ------------------ D. A. Davenport: http://www.firebin.net
    1. Re:Millennium in 2000, Millennium in 2001 by thefoobar · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but 2000 is the 21st century...

      --
      ------------------ D. A. Davenport: http://www.firebin.net
    2. Re:Millennium in 2000, Millennium in 2001 by thefoobar · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but we're living in the 20th century, not the 19th.

      --
      ------------------ D. A. Davenport: http://www.firebin.net
  560. In Dubbo Australia and nothings gone wrong ... yet by Polemarch · · Score: 1

    I partyed the night away and counted down the seconds and to my dispaointment nothing happened. We still have about ten hours before grenice mean time so we'll see what happens. I did, however, get a reciept from an atm to make sure my bank did't tyr to rip me off. I'll still take my part in the big US Y2K Hack that is sure to happen tonite .. or is that this morning .. i am so confused .. or is that drunk from cheap scotch ....
    From the alliance of drunken hackerjs (Who can't spell)

  561. Y2k in Australia and what went wrong by Polemarch · · Score: 1

    While spending the Y2k celebarations in a local country pub .. celebrating the start of the "populatr milenium".... our dj happened to make several obvious mistakes ... US take note this could be prior warning for your Y2K problems ... PARTY HARD .... and dont pay attention to the DJ's after y2k the power should stay ... and remember to get a reciept from you r local ATM to make sure your bank does not rip you off .... Fromm your first on the block Y2K'ers .. Happy New Years ....!!!!!(not millenium read 2001 a space odesey and youll understand ...) From the australain aliiance of "Real" Drinkin Hicjkers(who can'r spell)!!!

  562. riots...? by dr4ma · · Score: 1

    i live in santa cruz ca. im waiting for all the fuckin crazy people to loot stores and try and kill everyone. on of my friends works for the fire department and his job this new years eve, is to sit up top a building, and hose people if they start getting to pipey. the cops have tear gas, its kinda scary, 50,000 people are gonna be in a 1/2 mile strech of road called "pacific ave." downtown outside mall type thing. another scary note, a few military and army bases are missing large quantitys of explosives, like c4 and dinamite. =x i hope we all even live past this new years, God bless you all and try to be safe. -matt

    --
    Privacy? Not in this lifetime.
  563. Millenium, schmillenium, it's the end of the 1900s by Dr.Frog · · Score: 1

    A millenium is a thousand years. There were millenia before the last two, the years from 22 AD to 1022 AD were a millenium, so were the years from 4750 to 5750 on the Jewish calendar... The point is, the 1900s end tonight and the 2000s begin. Grief, what an awkward-sounding phrase, the twenty-hundreds... the nineties also end tonight, and we start what, the naughties?

    --
    -- Double parked in a parallel universe
  564. Re:Millenium, schmillenium, it's the end of the 19 by Dr.Frog · · Score: 1

    My Webster's dictionary (made of 100% y2k compliant paper) gives millennia as the plural (admittedly, I did misspell it!), with millenniums listed as an acceptable alternative, and defines it as a period of 1000 years.

    --
    -- Double parked in a parallel universe
  565. Re:Looks like I missed the rollout! by Y2KScout · · Score: 1

    Looks like it wasn't a bug at iSold.com but their way of poking fun at Y2K worry warts. They updated their site today with a note "Our tribute to the Y2K bug." It turns out they're running PHP. Damn! Looks like the world is still in one piece. I guess I have to go to work on Monday.

  566. Looks like I missed the rollout! by Y2KScout · · Score: 2

    I've been waiting for iSold.com to go live for months now. These morons missed their own launch by almost a century!

  567. Y2K Rollover In Panama , City; Republic Of Panama by PsyMaster · · Score: 1

    Y2k rollover went fine down here in Panama where many people the country would go in the dark with no power light or any utility.
    My Windows is running fine also my redhat and open bsd are cool.
    Y2K a REAL treath to the world i don't think so!

    --
    Antonio Checa (antonio@antoniocheca.com) - It's a brave new digital world...
  568. Y2k Problems by kuzman · · Score: 1

    Well, sadly the Y2K bug DOES exhist [i know im shocked] yes, my wonderful Micron 90mhz computer interpreted the date as January 4th, 1980 it was the 4th cause that was the first saturday in 1980. why its 1980, ill never know. all i know is winamp still works, so i am good to go. Have a nice day...

  569. Y2K by CodeBreaker69 · · Score: 1

    Ok from what I understand about Y2K is the amout of memory which stros the year can only hold two digets. I do not understand why the programmer who designed the older operating systems did not think about this more. I might be because they figured they would be dead by the year 2000, so why sould they care. My watch only has two digets for storing the year also. I set it to the year two tousand and it just said 00. If the watch had to devide by the year, then there would be a devide by zero error. Now days we san store gigabytes on a hard drive. One would think we would alow more space then two digets for what year it is. It must have been a buisness plann so people would buy generators.

    --
    AsKmE:D
  570. Much Belated Y2K Experience by Sam-Criswell-Hart · · Score: 1
    Alright, here's one for you....

    Y2K hit our little computer crew without incident (we service the computers for the Physics Dept. here at the U of A). We watched the clocks roll over and nothing happenned. We knew it would be this way, since we had prepared for it.

    Then, two weeks later (now, 1/11/00) we go to reclone one of the Windows labs. On 7 of the 21 machines we get errors in Netscape saying our encryption keys have expired. A quick check of the date revealed the computer thinking it was 2094.

    Curious.

    Rebooting and fixing the date in BIOS made them recognize the correct date.... untill the system was rebooted again... when the date would promptly switch back to 2094.

    We updated the flash BIOS on one test machine... which fried the machine (now it wont even boot). So, we've had to hang our heads low and yank the 7 computers from the lab till we get replacement montherboards. Sigh....

    So, we did have one fairly bad Y2K glitch..... it just took a week to happen! ;)