What is this, a paid advertisement? How do I place my obscure product on Slashdot front page?
I don't know about obscure products, but books are pretty easy. Cut and paste the documentation from a product into Word, take a shitload of screen shots, paste those in too, then write the whole thing to a.pdf, and send it to Packt Publishing. Then do a book review on your own book. Spell and grammar check is optional.
http://books.slashdot.org/story/11/08/15/1342248/Book-Review-Getting-Started-With-Audacity-13
Who's fault it is isn't relevant. If you're concerned with fault, you must be a manager rather than something useful. The goal is to keep things private and secure, not make sure you get to point the finger somewhere else. If you're pointing the finger, you've already failed even if you're too stupid to realize it.
This kind of thinking is, in my opinion, exactly opposite of good security. Companies who take a "Security is everybody's responsiblity!" attitude are doomed to fail. Something that is everybody's responsibility is no-one's responsibility. Being able to identify whose fault it is is a side effect of knowing whose responsibility it is. My responsibility to secure the network. The receptionist's responsibility to vet the people coming into the building. The facilities/security person's responsibility to make sure there's no way for 3rd parties to get in except past the receptionist. If the network gets hacked, one of the three of us fucked up. Then you figure out how, and take corrective action in that area.
In that case, I'd like to ask if we could have your wife come in and do some testing at the mattress store where I work. Any time after closing would be fine.
Maybe this has something to do with fear of a DOJ antitrust suit. As we've said, there are lots of cooling solutions on the market, which are compatible with the chips. Yet intel "bundles" its own cooler with the chip. Is there a paralllel to Microsoft bundling IE with Windows?
Honestly, you gotta put your conspiracy hat on pretty tight to get this one to come into focus, but that was the first thing that popped into my mind, so I posted it.
Only good things. Remember, it's not about Android. It's not about phones. It's about ads. Everything google does is just a way to serve up ads, and to serve up search which serves up ads. Google will make Android stronger. And if other manufacturers want to help, google will help them. Because it lets them sell ads.
You don't have to bomb it. You just gotta hit a few of the sensitive coolant carrying parts with a claw hammer. Me and a few of my mates got drunk after our team lost a soccer match, and did it a couple of years ago.
Who cares? If they get to the point that they can show HD video over USB 3.0 without sending all the CPU cores to 100%, then that's a win. I use a USB 2.0 / VGA adapter to increase my Work Notebook from 2 screens to 3. The USB one is usually just showing a datasheet PDF, schematic, or some other static display. Fantastic increase in capability for $50. The USB adapters have have their place, just like mobo-integrated graphics and $300 discrete cards have their place. The exciting thing is the possiblity of integrating this directly into a monitor. Have a sudden need for 6 monitors to display different power point displays at a convention? Just plug all 6 into a USB 3.0 hub attached to your notebook. That's awesome stuff. It won't replace HDMI or display port, but again, great additional functionality.
Jingoism aside, I agree with you. And I think they were responsible for Stuxnet, which was a better option than a strike. But if Iran gets within a resonable timespan of developing a viable weapon, expect them to attack. They will percieve the risk associated with inaction as intollerable, and feel compelled to act.
I've seen a lot of General Motors commercials. And they were all better than Transformers 2.
digitize any brand in later for who ever pays the most .
George Lucas, is that you?
"Why would they put Captain America on a can of Canada Dry?"
unpolished for something supposedly shipping in just a few weeks.
Why not? It worked for RIM, right? Oh, wait...
Yes. You can see the kernal through it.
So they are actually running on the Linux kernel?
Probably only for very generous definitions of "running".
What is this, a paid advertisement? How do I place my obscure product on Slashdot front page?
I don't know about obscure products, but books are pretty easy. Cut and paste the documentation from a product into Word, take a shitload of screen shots, paste those in too, then write the whole thing to a .pdf, and send it to Packt Publishing. Then do a book review on your own book. Spell and grammar check is optional.
http://books.slashdot.org/story/11/08/15/1342248/Book-Review-Getting-Started-With-Audacity-13
Next? Come on, man. They're never gonna port that to a phone. I've seen a lot of Steve Jobs fanboys, but the Next zealots are the worst.
By hacking the network. :-)
Who's fault it is isn't relevant. If you're concerned with fault, you must be a manager rather than something useful. The goal is to keep things private and secure, not make sure you get to point the finger somewhere else. If you're pointing the finger, you've already failed even if you're too stupid to realize it.
This kind of thinking is, in my opinion, exactly opposite of good security. Companies who take a "Security is everybody's responsiblity!" attitude are doomed to fail. Something that is everybody's responsibility is no-one's responsibility. Being able to identify whose fault it is is a side effect of knowing whose responsibility it is. My responsibility to secure the network. The receptionist's responsibility to vet the people coming into the building. The facilities/security person's responsibility to make sure there's no way for 3rd parties to get in except past the receptionist. If the network gets hacked, one of the three of us fucked up. Then you figure out how, and take corrective action in that area.
In that case, I'd like to ask if we could have your wife come in and do some testing at the mattress store where I work. Any time after closing would be fine.
The other thing, is that if somebody hacks you from outside, it's your fault. If they hack you from inside, it's whoever let them in's fault.
Maybe this has something to do with fear of a DOJ antitrust suit. As we've said, there are lots of cooling solutions on the market, which are compatible with the chips. Yet intel "bundles" its own cooler with the chip. Is there a paralllel to Microsoft bundling IE with Windows?
Honestly, you gotta put your conspiracy hat on pretty tight to get this one to come into focus, but that was the first thing that popped into my mind, so I posted it.
Only good things. Remember, it's not about Android. It's not about phones. It's about ads. Everything google does is just a way to serve up ads, and to serve up search which serves up ads. Google will make Android stronger. And if other manufacturers want to help, google will help them. Because it lets them sell ads.
This might work out ok then. Because I think Google has some software guys.
You don't have to bomb it. You just gotta hit a few of the sensitive coolant carrying parts with a claw hammer. Me and a few of my mates got drunk after our team lost a soccer match, and did it a couple of years ago.
Who cares? If they get to the point that they can show HD video over USB 3.0 without sending all the CPU cores to 100%, then that's a win. I use a USB 2.0 / VGA adapter to increase my Work Notebook from 2 screens to 3. The USB one is usually just showing a datasheet PDF, schematic, or some other static display. Fantastic increase in capability for $50. The USB adapters have have their place, just like mobo-integrated graphics and $300 discrete cards have their place. The exciting thing is the possiblity of integrating this directly into a monitor. Have a sudden need for 6 monitors to display different power point displays at a convention? Just plug all 6 into a USB 3.0 hub attached to your notebook. That's awesome stuff. It won't replace HDMI or display port, but again, great additional functionality.
No, he just does that sometimes. Last week he was in the middle of shoveling a load of brimstone, and the same thing happened.
Yeah. What do you think we're gonna use to fill all those capacitors?
A battery electric-powered ultralight aircraft has been flying for the last year.
Flying FOR A YEAR? Crap. My Volt only goes 35 miles then I have to charge it or burn gas. I want one of those airplane batteries!
No, but I think it does a pretty good job putting a dent in the idea that we are good at keeping the lid on things...
Jingoism aside, I agree with you. And I think they were responsible for Stuxnet, which was a better option than a strike. But if Iran gets within a resonable timespan of developing a viable weapon, expect them to attack. They will percieve the risk associated with inaction as intollerable, and feel compelled to act.
Sometimes yes, regrettably. But usually it's just the drug dealer's new girlfriend.
I've heard that they're developing "Fuxnet". It'll hack into Iranian Government Phone Systems.
Man. Then that really sucks. Because Iran used to be a pro-US dictatorship. WTF do we do now?