With any descent server mobo supporting serial over Ethernet and ILOM or equivalent technologies, I fail to see the point in these devices. Along with kickstart installer images (RHEL family and Ubuntu) for repurposed boxes, deployment optins have really moved forward, don't you think?
Sorry for OT top-posting, but I must ask this. What is the standard procedure for proposing a protocol extension (DNS more specifically)? My idea is simple - it relates to IPv6 networks. When a DNS server supporting the protocol extension (and has it enabled) receives a query that resolves to a v6 address, transforms the address to a address mapping pushed to the NAT-ing edge router via IGDP, receives the internal v4 address, and returns it as a result to the original DNS query. I think the point is quite clear. What does/. think?
*ROFL* The Efficeon series from Transmeta from years ago wipes the floor with a modern Atom, when taking the chipset in consideration. People thought that Transmeta chips sucked because the prevailing mindset at the time was MOAR PAWUHR!!!!!!!!111eleventyone1!!!!1. There was no concept of netbook/thinclient style devices. Everybody wanted a mainframe in their home, for cheap.
Why do people smoke and inject heroin? Because concentration matters. A patch won't do. Snuff won't do. E-cigars won't do. Make it powerful, and they will come.
How about including proper arch-independent EFI drivers in the PCI option ROM, and export generic hardware interfaces via the mainboard firmware. That way the whole driver issue goes away. Also, there is the issue of maintainability, that anything with clout, like a corporation, can take care of as long as it wishes. Then what? New hardware? What's the point of running a FLOSS OS if hardware vendors tell you what to do? SCoN as a movement is there, because compromising would turn us into a crappier Windows, and nothing more. We need to be better than them, not just copy them.
And people wonder why much of the youth like Eminem. It's completely understandable, it's just that there a bunch of stupid cunts and fucking pussies that can't or won't.
If performance sucks, the implementation is bad, if the interface sucks, the concept is bad. A really good ORM would truly make SQL pointless. I don't think that is that hard. And who said it had to be mapped to objects? LINQ ain't OO, AFAIK. Afterwords, you can be concerned with implementation. VISCs were slow for VMs only until JIT improved, and we have a long way to go.
Subclass String to sql_query, add inheritance from a well constructed enum, and carry on generating dynamic queries. Any unsafe queries will result in a type error. Why handle it yourself if you can use the type system?
Slashdot Mirror
IE9 depends on DX10. Which runs on XP, Google is your friend. If I were MS, I'd release DX11 for $150 for XP.
And they should port their apps because?
Try running both... on a PII - 366 MHz - 512 MB RAM - XP SP2. Real fun.
$500 box + $1500 OS X = $2000 machine with OS X
Apple may as well close it's Mac division, there won't be any difference.
One word: Slipstreaming. Why torture yourself with IE even for a second?
With any descent server mobo supporting serial over Ethernet and ILOM or equivalent technologies, I fail to see the point in these devices. Along with kickstart installer images (RHEL family and Ubuntu) for repurposed boxes, deployment optins have really moved forward, don't you think?
Hmmm.. Would you mind listing a couple of examples about Apple?
Sorry for OT top-posting, but I must ask this. What is the standard procedure for proposing a protocol extension (DNS more specifically)? My idea is simple - it relates to IPv6 networks. When a DNS server supporting the protocol extension (and has it enabled) receives a query that resolves to a v6 address, transforms the address to a address mapping pushed to the NAT-ing edge router via IGDP, receives the internal v4 address, and returns it as a result to the original DNS query. I think the point is quite clear. What does /. think?
OT: Why can't I log in with a sf.net delegate of my google OpenID to /.?
I second the motion.
Guess who's back.
*ROFL*
The Efficeon series from Transmeta from years ago wipes the floor with a modern Atom, when taking the chipset in consideration. People thought that Transmeta chips sucked because the prevailing mindset at the time was MOAR PAWUHR!!!!!!!!111eleventyone1!!!!1. There was no concept of netbook/thinclient style devices. Everybody wanted a mainframe in their home, for cheap.
Two words: Prefix proxy.
Why do people smoke and inject heroin? Because concentration matters. A patch won't do. Snuff won't do. E-cigars won't do. Make it powerful, and they will come.
How about including proper arch-independent EFI drivers in the PCI option ROM, and export generic hardware interfaces via the mainboard firmware. That way the whole driver issue goes away. Also, there is the issue of maintainability, that anything with clout, like a corporation, can take care of as long as it wishes. Then what? New hardware? What's the point of running a FLOSS OS if hardware vendors tell you what to do? SCoN as a movement is there, because compromising would turn us into a crappier Windows, and nothing more. We need to be better than them, not just copy them.
Hello? WINE HQ? I have a job for you, it pays well...
Oblig.
Temperature is some measure of entropy right? Complexity, information, byte. That unit may actually have some real world use.
Chinga tú madre!
I'm talking to you CmdrTaco, fix your fscking UTF-8 before I 8==D---< in your mom.
</joke>
And people wonder why much of the youth like Eminem. It's completely understandable, it's just that there a bunch of stupid cunts and fucking pussies that can't or won't.
I suddenly feel obliged to post here.
Haven't been around potheads, have you?
Actually FBSD does have a very good I/O scheduler, and has dramatic scalability improvements on certain HW, AFAIR.
If performance sucks, the implementation is bad, if the interface sucks, the concept is bad. A really good ORM would truly make SQL pointless. I don't think that is that hard. And who said it had to be mapped to objects? LINQ ain't OO, AFAIK. Afterwords, you can be concerned with implementation. VISCs were slow for VMs only until JIT improved, and we have a long way to go.
Subclass String to sql_query, add inheritance from a well constructed enum, and carry on generating dynamic queries. Any unsafe queries will result in a type error. Why handle it yourself if you can use the type system?