did anyone else think the doctor was taken right from galaxy quest? his way of speaking is just like the aliens in that movie, and it is REALLY annoying... and what was up with the rubbing each other down scene, i thought i was watching baywatch not star trek...
also, how did the enterprise go from such a kick ass ship in this series, to the piece of crap it was in the origonal, i understand advancements in film, but that's just outrageous
I have a Mac, and I don't know if that was the reason the game worked, but it did.
I beat the game after about a day and a half without sleep, and it was well worth it.
The game play is far superior than previous Mysts with 360-degree views. The story was good as well. The only thing about it was that I found the puzzles easier than before, they were more obvious than those in Riven, but were still challenging.
I also purchased the Collectors edition which includes a soundtrack cd, a making of cd the strategy guide, and a pewter squee (an animal in the game).
While not as challenging as Riven, the gameplay makes up for it, all in all I found it quite good.
Re:Screw Katz ... I LIKED Antitrust!
on
Antitrust
·
· Score: 1
I totally agree, this movie was just a hollywood movie, and was meant to get geeks and normal people into the theater so that geeks could have a movie that pretty technically accurate, and normal people could just have another enjoyable movie.
Why do we care that "They then commit their perfidy to videotape, and leave the evidence in non-encrypted, accessible files."? IT'S JUST A MOVIE!!!!!
Of course a real corporation would have taken more precautions, but it's just a movie Jon.
I wouldn't have liked it either if I had picked apart every little detail of it.
We all know the wonderful job that Hollywood did with "Hackers," and I think that many people went to see antitrust with the attitude that it would just be another bad wanna-be geek movie. You have to see this movie with an open mind and realize that it's not just for geeks.
Sure this movie could have used a little work, but it had great actors (esp. Tim Robbins) and a decent plot, it wasn't GREAT, but enjoyable.
Reading the article, I think that everyone should have found the following lines disturbing:
In making his ruling Wednesday, the judge said it was necessary to send a message of deterrence to the Internet community to prevent future copyright infringements.
"They need to understand that the law's domain knows no such limits," said Rakoff.
What does that say about the current state of affairs in our legal system, not to mention DeCSS, (well, maybe it's not legal for me to do that anymore).
In my opinion this is just another judge who is ticked off at the younger generations cause they have the balls to change things, not to mention they don't need the manual to figure out point and click.
Just keep supporting EFF
Slashdot Mirror
did anyone else think the doctor was taken right from galaxy quest? his way of speaking is just like the aliens in that movie, and it is REALLY annoying... and what was up with the rubbing each other down scene, i thought i was watching baywatch not star trek...
also, how did the enterprise go from such a kick ass ship in this series, to the piece of crap it was in the origonal, i understand advancements in film, but that's just outrageous
I have a Mac, and I don't know if that was the reason the game worked, but it did.
I beat the game after about a day and a half without sleep, and it was well worth it.
The game play is far superior than previous Mysts with 360-degree views. The story was good as well. The only thing about it was that I found the puzzles easier than before, they were more obvious than those in Riven, but were still challenging.
I also purchased the Collectors edition which includes a soundtrack cd, a making of cd the strategy guide, and a pewter squee (an animal in the game).
While not as challenging as Riven, the gameplay makes up for it, all in all I found it quite good.
I totally agree, this movie was just a hollywood movie, and was meant to get geeks and normal people into the theater so that geeks could have a movie that pretty technically accurate, and normal people could just have another enjoyable movie. Why do we care that "They then commit their perfidy to videotape, and leave the evidence in non-encrypted, accessible files."? IT'S JUST A MOVIE!!!!! Of course a real corporation would have taken more precautions, but it's just a movie Jon. I wouldn't have liked it either if I had picked apart every little detail of it. We all know the wonderful job that Hollywood did with "Hackers," and I think that many people went to see antitrust with the attitude that it would just be another bad wanna-be geek movie. You have to see this movie with an open mind and realize that it's not just for geeks. Sure this movie could have used a little work, but it had great actors (esp. Tim Robbins) and a decent plot, it wasn't GREAT, but enjoyable.
Reading the article, I think that everyone should have found the following lines disturbing: In making his ruling Wednesday, the judge said it was necessary to send a message of deterrence to the Internet community to prevent future copyright infringements. "They need to understand that the law's domain knows no such limits," said Rakoff. What does that say about the current state of affairs in our legal system, not to mention DeCSS, (well, maybe it's not legal for me to do that anymore). In my opinion this is just another judge who is ticked off at the younger generations cause they have the balls to change things, not to mention they don't need the manual to figure out point and click. Just keep supporting EFF