Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek: Enterprise Reactions?

So, what did you think of it? The theme song has to go. Commander Tucker ("Kumanduh Tuckah") needs to get a personality other than "he'll be just like McCoy, only clumsy and stupid". Is it really necessary to rehash "cold emotionless Vulcans vs. thoughtless, reckless humans"? That plot device was old thirty years ago and it's physically painful to watch now. How can armor plating go "offline"? Electromagnetic shields maybe, but one of the virtues of a hunk of steel is that it doesn't go "offline". And what's with the soft porn? I was waiting for the bow-chicka-bow-wow music to kick in. CT: I didn't get to see it! I don't get UPN! Curses!

1,688 comments

  1. #Enterprise on EFNet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    For anyone lacking UPN affliliates.

    1. Re:#Enterprise on EFNet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good ol' #StarTrek on EFNet!

      Now featuring new and improved Kirk vs. Picard vs. Archer debates!

      :)

    2. Re:#Enterprise on EFNet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picard is still the best. By far =).

    3. Re:#Enterprise on EFNet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must first apologize for forgetting my password!
      I will begin by first saying that I am totally refreshed after viewing the first episode of Enterprise. My son and I watched the whooooolllleee thing from start to finish. We felt it should have been more substance but the plot was good. I also have faith with Enterprise as with Voyager and Second Generation that each program will get better and beyond. I do wish that Cochran had been the same "rock and roller" as in the movie but things happen. Yes, the vulcan was a dead knockout. I thought the vulcan was cockey but I did see where she did a great job keeping the Commander and the rest of the crew from dying or let me say make mistake(s). She reminds me of 7 of 9 in her strength and I think she will be a great character. My fellow Trekkies, it has been a blast and I look forward to any and all refreshing sci-fi to take me away from the killing and despair of todays tele and theater. We are going where no man/woman has gone before back to the beginning of what we have endured since the 60's. ENTERTAINMENT!!!!!!!.
      PJS

    4. Re:#Enterprise on EFNet by ncstockguy · · Score: 1

      Well I managed to watch the whole first show. The Vulcan babe is pretty interesting. Not decided about the rest of the cast yet. It seemed rather ham-handed and superficial. I will watch a few more shows before I decide.

    5. Re:#Enterprise on EFNet by Thatman311 · · Score: 1

      Er the Cochran they used was the same from the movie. He is just older now in real life AND he was aged 30years from in the movie.

      --
      Silly Rabbit...Sig's are for kids.
    6. Re:#Enterprise on EFNet by uninet · · Score: 1

      What about Sisko? -Tim

      --
      -------------
      "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
  2. Wasn't that... by HighJack · · Score: 3, Troll

    Quantuum Leap? Where was Al throughout the whole show. Kinda disappointed me. And he only did the leap thing once. Oh well.

    1. Re:Wasn't that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm suprised they didn't find out that ziggy the computer was offline.

  3. Just a tad early... by Jayde+Stargunner · · Score: 3, Redundant

    Maybe you should wait until everyone in the US has had a chance to watch it Mr. Eastern Standard Time. :-P

    -Jayde

    --
    What's a sig?
    1. Re:Just a tad early... by jiheison · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mr. Eastern Standard Time

      Damn him!

      First he rigs the election, and now this!

    2. Re:Just a tad early... by crimoid · · Score: 1

      Should I even watch it now? I'm afraid the show is now completely spoiled for me. Drat! Oh well, back to my Voyager reruns.

    3. Re:Just a tad early... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's "Eastern Daylight Time" until October 28. And yes, the name of the timezone does change as daylight saving time starts/ends.

    4. Re:Just a tad early... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sorry to be a time zone stickler, but it's eastern daylight time currently.

    5. Re:Just a tad early... by AcidDan · · Score: 1

      Mr Eastern Standard time!?

      Ok, try International date line and a commercial television station that won't run it for two years and THEN it will be on at midnight...

      Oh, we are talking that new-fangled "Star Trek: The Next Generation" series coming out right?

      -- Dan =)

    6. Re:Just a tad early... by crimoid · · Score: 1

      Ok so it wasn't that bad. The opening theme song DOES need to go. The soft porn can stay.... trekkies have sex right? Or at least hormones. The Vulcan vs. Human thing was played up too much, although these Vulcans exhibited more emotion than any I've seen before. The ship can stay, so can the dog. The officer that is the translator (I already forget her name/rank) is forgettable and should quit crying. Space travel is bumpy damnit! Overall is was a pretty good first show.

    7. Re:Just a tad early... by terpia · · Score: 1

      I am in full agreeance.

      --
      .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
    8. Re:Just a tad early... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everywhere in the eastern US time zone changes their clocks for daylight savings time- Indiana, my state, leaves the clocks as they are.

    9. Re:Just a tad early... by terpia · · Score: 1

      Wow... an AC made a correct observation.
      You Mr. AC are absolutely correct, there is no such word as: agreeance. It merely sounded correct so I typed it. My sincerest apologies go out ot all those offended and/or permanently scarred. In addition I will provide a new and hopefully acceptable re-phrasing of my previous comment: I fully concur.

      As for the making fun of my .sig, yes it may blow, but only because so much of my time goes toward seeking out the ultimate concise and funny .sig - oh yeah, it also must display my cleverness. I hope you understand the resources I have had to allocate to this search has detracted from the quality of .sig currently displayed.

      --
      .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
    10. Re:Just a tad early... by JMYoda · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If Trekkies had sex they wouldn't need soft-porn!
      heh

      --
      "The human mind's ability to rationalize its own shortcomings into virtues is unlimited." - Robert A. Heinlein
  4. FIRST POST!! by asklepius · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    t'pau has nice silicon t*ts -- i didn't know vulcans were allowed to get breast implants!

    1. Re:FIRST POST!! by candrade · · Score: 1

      Its nice to know that the Vulcans can go nipply.
      and what about the red and blue girls? WOW

      softcore is fine with me.

      but the music sucks

    2. Re:FIRST POST!! by ExRex · · Score: 1

      It's T'Pol. T'Pau was the elderly lady who conducted the marriage ritual in "Amok Time." Played by Celia Lovsky, T'Pau was, according to the script, "the only person to ever turn down a seat on the Federation Council."
      But at least theyseem to have returned to the convention of Vulcan female names starting with T and male names starting with S.

      --
      The closer you are to the code, the happier you are. - Ancient Geek Proverb
    3. Re:FIRST POST!! by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      > Vulcan female names starting with T and male names starting with S.

      I take it there was something we didn't know about Tuvok?

      Perhaps the sexual tension between him and Kleenex was hetero after all...

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    4. Re:FIRST POST!! by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      For those interested, you can find the summary of the old TOS episode with an elderly T'Pau here.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  5. It was interesting... by DragonPup · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am going to give it a few more weeks before I give it real judgement. The Enterprise's deisgn was pretty cool looking from the outside, imho.

    Oh, the Vulcan chick is hot :-)

    -Henry

    --
    "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    1. Re:It was interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Enterprise's deisgn was pretty cool looking from the outside, imho.


      I noticed that even with all that fancy tech, they are _still_ doing arc welding in the future!

    2. Re:It was interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://members.tripod.com/lisawebworld2/sounds/sha tner.wav

    3. Re:It was interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is amazing the fact that their tech is more advanced than kirks.

    4. Re:It was interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ship design is very similar to the Light Cruiser design in the later era.

    5. Re:It was interesting... by GunFodder · · Score: 1

      Looks like a beautiful woman with a skintight outfit is now an integral part of the DNA of the evolving Star Trek meme. Does anyone else get the idea that the original Star Trek series keeps getting remade in order to somehow develop the perfect hour-long TV show?

    6. Re:It was interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first posting for me:
      I liked the show. I thought Bakula (sp?) did a good job. I only have seen a few Quantum Leap shows. I liked the idea B.K. ( before kirk). Ship design was awesome. Vulcan chick is awesome.
      I look forward to this series.

  6. Bad Chemistry by Paul+Neubauer · · Score: 1

    Ok, the music needs an overhaul, and someone (at best) is mistaking sheilds for plating but...

    Methyl oxide?
    Nitrogen sulphide?

    Is Enterprise's chemisrty trying to out-bad the other Trek's particle du jour physics??

    --
    I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
    1. Re:Bad Chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, someone actually said "front plating just went offline"

    2. Re:Bad Chemistry by Obsequious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you never know. Maybe the front plating is an advanced form of the explosive armor they use on some tanks and armored vehicles these days; by actually exploding outward, it further reduces the force of an incoming round or warhead directed inward. Maybe going "offline" means it needs to be recharged or reloaded.

      Or, maybe this really IS a deflector shield, but not yet advanced enough to be projected out, so it's sort of a surface-effect thing still. Going offline means the same thing as losing shields.

      Or, maybe I need to quit doing the work of the writers and expect them to explain their own gaping plot holes.

    3. Re:Bad Chemistry by dragons_flight · · Score: 2

      Well a quick search (PDF) actually turns up Methyl Oxide AKA Dimethyl Ether on the US Hazardous Materials list. It's a a clear, sweet-smelling, toxic and highly flammable gas (at room temp).

      Nitrogen Sulfide isn't listed but I suspect that Nitrous sulfide might be a possible analog of nitrous oxide given the right conditions (S and O are both period 6 elements).

      As strange as it is, it does suggest that they are trying to come up with real compounds. Might they even have competent technical advisers on staff? Time will tell.

    4. Re:Bad Chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember Archer saying to "activate hull polorization" or some such. Some kind of electro-magnetic field running through the hull? To help disperse energy weapons? I suppose that could go offline...

    5. Re:Bad Chemistry by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      Yes the russians used this 'reactive armor' the the we armed our tank weapons with large sticks on the front, the idea is that the stick sets off the reactive charge thus leaving a clear and weaker surface for the shell to penetrate. This reactive armor has been sheleved. I mean how crazy do you have to be to think straping exlposives to the outside of your combat vehical is a good idea.

    6. Re:Bad Chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue Homer Simpson....

      I'll handle this....

      Why does someone who wears a Genius At Work T-Shirt spend his time watching a kids cartoon show?

      -I have the real quote, but am too drunk/stoned (!) to pull it out....

    7. Re:Bad Chemistry by novafire · · Score: 1

      The structural integrity field of the newer treks is pretty much a pumped up version of running electricity through the outer hull. I think this would be a similar technology.

    8. Re:Bad Chemistry by reverius · · Score: 1

      That should be "group 6 elements", not "period 6 elements", right?

      I thought groups were columns in the periodic table, and periods were rows...

      then again, maybe i'm just from a different country than you (you are from the U.S., right?)

    9. Re:Bad Chemistry by chenwah · · Score: 2, Informative

      I saw in a New Scientist recently a short article on a new type of armour plating for tanks.

      Armour piercing anti-tank shells work by using the kinetic energy released in the impact to compress and liquefy the copper core of the shell, which then ends up getting squirted through the point of the shell, through the armour and into the tank. I guess getting bathed in supersonic liquid copper can really put a kink in your day.

      The newer armour was covered by a mat of optic fibres. When the shell hit the armour systems detected the distortion of the fibres and released a heap stored charge into coils in the armour. This creates an electromagnetic field that retards the copper. Sounds like a long shot but the article said it worked in trials.

      So, there you have it, armour plating that has to be 'switched-on' and can go offline =)

      .flip.

    10. Re:Bad Chemistry by dragons_flight · · Score: 2

      Yeah, group. Oops.

    11. Re:Bad Chemistry by ctembreull · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can arm an energy beam with a large stick on the front.

      --

      Chris Tembreull
      "My karma just ran over your dogma."
    12. Re:Bad Chemistry by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 0, Troll
      I can't believe how many people are posting about this. While watching Star Trek, does anyone take the physics seriously? This is prime time entertainment, nothing more. Get a life, you slobbering geeks.

      &lt ducks &gt

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    13. Re:Bad Chemistry by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

      that would be HEAT ammo which is a good 20 years old,

      the armour approach is new though

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    14. Re:Bad Chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is no mistaking shields for plating. The primary weapon is a charged particle beam, the armor is plated with a superconductive film which is charged to a specific level in an attempt to deflect and or neutralize an incoming charged beam. Once the built up charge has been expended the "plates are offline."

    15. Re:Bad Chemistry by billn · · Score: 1, Informative

      At the risk of tipping my hand as a science fiction nut, something of a grounded take on the specific bits of science at hand here:
      The failed 'hull plating', as pointed out, is applied active polarization. My guess would be a hull structure configured in such a way as to have active channels that can be charged to induce and encourage energy distribution in a controlled manner, so as to facilitate the dispersion/disruption of focused beam attacks.

      In response to other chunks of this thread, a structural integrity field is an electromagnetic field designed to interact with various components of the super/infrastructure, to increase 'cohesion' of the whole by literally pulling them together all the time.\

      Both of these items are staples of science fiction, and have solid grounding in applied theory.

      --
      - billn
    16. Re:Bad Chemistry by billn · · Score: 1

      Slobbering geek or not, this incarnation of Gene Roddenberry's creation is going to have some close ties to modern space technology, in both historical snapshots to support the entire storyline, as well as 'sneak previews' of existing technologies taken to new theoretical heights. I'd thank you to stop trampling on what may prove to be, in time, a heatsink for creativity and something else to stimulate the minds of the generations that are in desperate need of it.

      Absolutely, we're going to discuss the physics, the application, the blunders, the holes, the brilliance, and, well, the cleavage. Why? Because this interests us. If it doesn't interest you, you go right ahead and flip back to Nascar.

      --
      - billn
    17. Re:Bad Chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try 50+ years. They used shaped charge warheads in WWII.

    18. Re:Bad Chemistry by lollipop17 · · Score: 1

      This is probably offtopic but....

      I absolutely hate the whole redneck=dumb thing. Seriously, someone who watches NASCAR probably has a better understanding of physics than someone who watches OPRAH or whatever. Besides, the original poster who was complaing about the physics in the show probably knows that Star Trek (in any incarnation) is where kids get most of their information about physics and thus annoyed that these poor deprived children will learn things that are horribly wrong...On the other hand, the interest is the important part, so that when these kids grow up, they'll become physicists.

      --

      Be a moderator, not a brick.
    19. Re:Bad Chemistry by Mynn · · Score: 1

      But what is the periodic table the rest of the time?

      --

      Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.
    20. Re:Bad Chemistry by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

      Slow down there. I wasn't knocking the show. In fact I probably liked it more than most of the other people here, judging by the criticism I've seen. I was only referring to the many posts about the heat shield thing, in case you didn't read the parent post. You know, the one I was replying to?

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    21. Re:Bad Chemistry by Asgard · · Score: 1

      I believe it was the polarization of the armor plating that went offline. Perhaps 'polarizing' it makes it withstand energy-weapon attacks better.

    22. Re:Bad Chemistry by Noer · · Score: 2

      Hehehe

      they did mention *ionizing* the hull plating, which might help disperse particle-beam weapons; basically, the impression I got was that it's metal armor that can be ionized for more protection from energy weapons; when it went off-line, it was the ionization going offline (de-ionizing).

      Maybe. :)

      --
      -- "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." -Joseph Stalin
    23. Re:Bad Chemistry by sopwath · · Score: 1

      I don't get it

    24. Re:Bad Chemistry by magnus+numerus · · Score: 1

      Actually...I thought the plating thing was kinda cool. If you listened, they said "polarize the plating." Apparently they polarize the magnetic field generated by the plating, thus repelling certain energies. It would make sense (at least in my fictional imagination) that the "polarizor" could be damaged, or that too much of the energy could be dispelled, thus rendering the plates no longer polarized....that's prolly (at least in my imagination) what they meant when they said that the plating was broke :).

    25. Re:Bad Chemistry by Paul+Neubauer · · Score: 1

      Ok, both do exist and the idea of the breathing of 'methyl oxide' isn't out of line - for an alien life form.

      The nitrogen sulfide (aka sulfur nitride) is still a bit of a problem. The stuff is solid and touchily explosive - not exactly the thing for an atmosphere. A nitrogen and somethingelse-sulfide (like hydrogen sulfide?) atmosphere is more believable.

      --
      I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
    26. Re:Bad Chemistry by funaho · · Score: 1

      Isn't the structural integrity field supposed to be a lower power subspace field? I remember reading it in some book or manual once; the idea is to actually lower the mass of the ship so that a large ship can actually do those impressive curved flight paths without tearing itself to pieces.

      How that works without disrupting the artificial gravity is anybody's guess. But then again, after nearly 20 years of "new" Star Trek we've learned that subspace fields can do just about anything, probably including cleaning the windows. :)

    27. Re:Bad Chemistry by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      Now if only they had a script integrity field! :^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    28. Re:Bad Chemistry by DarkrhaveN · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it might be prime time entertainment, but if someone is going to do something like this, they should at least have the decency to do it right the first time. These directors get paid millions and yet they can't seem to afford a good technical advisor ?

      BS!#! They should have worked all this stuff out during the writing of the script. Not wait till afterwards and say "oops" 10 million times over.

      Some physics of the warp and "armor plating" were unavoidably conflicting, but at least if a director is going to do something RESEARCH IT AND MAKE IT HALF WAY FACTUAL!#@

      --
      "He Who Laughs Last, Is Just A Hand In The Bush" - Ozzy Osbourne
    29. Re:Bad Chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They made a very specific comment about polarizing the hull plating, and they later commented about being hit by particle beams. Now the easiest particle beam to do is polarized, the Gamma Ray Beam (Graser for you Weber fans out there). Properly polarized plating would offer some protection from a particle beam in these pre-shield days.

      The Crazy Finn

    30. Re:Bad Chemistry by billn · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to imply that people who watch Nascar are stupid. I meant to imply that people who watch Nascar typically couldn't care less about the theoretical physics behind hull polarization, focused beam implementations, or discussions about FTL travel. All things considered, I'm a redneck. I come from a small (mostly farming, some military) town, I've cow tipped, and I can drink most people silly without feeling a thing.

      Again, I'm not making a stupid redneck joke. I'm differentiating between those interested in starcraft, as opposed to more common feats of engineering.

      If I was making a redneck joke, I'd have pointed out that none of the shuttles seem to have gunracks.

      --
      - billn
  7. FE released the preair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.isonews.com/release.php3?releaseid=3240 5

    So I suggest you try #FE on EFNet instead.

    Still waiting for a proper release tho...

  8. ... one in every crowd. by cookiej · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone remember the "Encounter at Space JellyfishLand (er, Farpoint)" that was the pilot of TNG?

    Personally, I thought it was EXCELLENT for a pilot. The show will get its legs--let it happen and enjoy what you can while it does. Or just watch Andromeda.

    Always looking to pick. Lighten up, dude.

    1. Re:... one in every crowd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur.

      Could have been better, but was totally workable for a pilot.

      Remember (anyone from 1966?) "The Cage", the original Star Trek pilot, sans JT Kirk? Pee-yew!

      I liked the sense that Terrans begin to look beyond our conditioning, I liked the visceral sense of untried technologies, and yes, I enjoyed pushing the network censors to their limits with the soft core. We as Americans have a lot to learn from the rest of the world, and shedding our Puritanical inhibitions might be a great place to begin.

      Loosen up, you'll live better. It sure beats otehr options.

    2. Re:... one in every crowd. by unitron · · Score: 2

      I had to hurriedly rig up an outdoor UHF antenna indoors in order to receive the premiere of ST:TNG over a station which doesn't seem to exist anymore. It was good, but I still maintain that the best part was DeForest Kelly's appearance.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:... one in every crowd. by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Excellent? It was corny as hell! Especially Counsellor Troi with her sickeningly sweet "Joy! From both of them!" line at the end. Right away, you knew it was going to be a very touchy-feely kind of show.

    4. Re:... one in every crowd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he was refering to the Enterprise pilot as being excellent, not TGN's.

      Just how I read it...

    5. Re:... one in every crowd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more. It made the "missing parts" of the star
      trek mythos interesting and exciting! A galaxy where humans
      are the NKOTB is much more interesting than where they
      are superpowers.

    6. Re:... one in every crowd. by IHateEverybody · · Score: 2


      Does anyone remember the "Encounter at Space JellyfishLand (er, Farpoint)" that was the pilot of TNG?

      Personally, I thought it was EXCELLENT for a pilot. The show will get its legs--let it happen and enjoy what you can while it does. Or just watch Andromeda.

      I agree, TNG's pilot was weak, "Broken Bow" was at least as good if not better then the DS9 and Voyager Pilot episodes. The truth is that the most worrisome part of this episode wasn't the episode itself but rather Brannon Braga's presence in the credits.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    7. Re:... one in every crowd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I thought it was a very nice pilot. I even liked the music.

      I think the thing this pilot did best was to distance itself from the other serieses (that's what TNG did with respect to ST:OS :-P ) So the music isn't orchestral... so what? I was sick of that anyway (so ponderous and serious).... So the vulcan-human interactions are tense and awkward... what would you expect for the time period? So the crew is Capt. Howdy and the Wahoo brigade... this is the original Enterprise crew... If they acted any differently, who'd buy it?

      Honestly, I loved TNG. I really enjoyed DS9. I got into Voyager in the beginning and the end (the middle was tepid at best). This is a real departure from the model, and I personally think it's a welcome change. (Granted, that's MHO ;-)

    8. Re:... one in every crowd. by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Could be.

    9. Re:... one in every crowd. by unikron · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the pilot, and since I live in Greece, I don't think that I am going to see it in the near future (heck! I was watching ds9 which the local channel used to put in each saturday, and then with the Alfred E. Newman crisis the channel officials decided to turn into a CNN clone... :( ).I don't know how the series will turnup, but then again, I thought that encounter at farpoint was ridiculous (comparing to the ST movies, cause I was ignorant then), but even STTNG became a loooooot better since those days!
      And however you can put it, Scott Bakula is surely one of the guys. (and don't mention Jolene Blalock)....

    10. Re:... one in every crowd. by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Encounter at Farpoint was pretty limp, but I've always thought Q was cool. Perhaps because in the touchy-feely, emotionally correct TNG universe he is the only character able to just take the piss.

      The first half of the pilot (Q's appearance and the trial with the peasants of Worksop looking on) was much better than the second half (Troi bleating about 'pain, terrible pain'). This is not an accident: the jellyfish plot was by D.C. Fontana with Q added afterwards by Roddenberry.

      I sat down to watch the first episode of Voyager when that came out, but I gave up when I saw that the ship looked like a shoehorn.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    11. Re:... one in every crowd. by treebeard72 · · Score: 1

      Oh God, when you watch TNG in its final season, then go back that first one, with Troi being overly sensitive to everyone, and then the never-to-return plot of evil bugs that live in you, it is amazing that the show became as well-written and acted as it did during its final four seasons.

    12. Re:... one in every crowd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always throught Voyager started off alright, then started to suffer in the folowing few seasons. It did have some episodes that I really liked though, like the Omega one, the first encounter with 8472, almost any episode involving time travel and the 29th century dude, and a number of shows from the last few seasons. The doctor was genius, the episode where he is transmitted back to the alpha quadrant and joins EMH mark 3 is hilarious and fun. A lot of Voyager's episodes pushed the limit and some of them were just a lot of "fun".
      DS9 is probably my favorite series though. Excellent characters, excellent story arc, excellent writing and a good pilot...
      I always really liked the opening DS9 theme, especially season 4 and later - when they added the defiant (the most kick-ass ship ever) to the show.
      I like Enterprise already... though the opening thing has to go... please please let them make a more "classic" ST intro. Show the ship leaving the dock for the first time, rounding saturn and jupiter... If they could sync the music with the intro as well as the DS9 guys did (it's perfect the instant the defiant undocks from the station), I'll be impressed. Otherwise, very good show... I liked it from the first scene.

    13. Re:... one in every crowd. by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

      Hey, Uni.

      I guess I missed that part. Where was Deforest Kelly in the pilot? Who was he, and what was he doing?

    14. Re:... one in every crowd. by bort13 · · Score: 1
      My friends & I used to say there were really only two ST:TNG plots:

      "Sir, the Klingon ship is firing!" (directed by Rick Berman)
      "We have to save the lifeform!" (directed by Gene Roddenberry)
      Encounter at Farpoint is certainly the former. UPN had their marathon here last Sunday, so I saw Farpoint recently. I have to admit I've become a bit of a softy for the show; neither Wesley nor Deanna bothered me that much, I remember wishing they'd get into a shuttle accident with Deanna's mom on board. Data's synonym strings made me giggle.
    15. Re:... one in every crowd. by bort13 · · Score: 1

      Encounter at Farpoint is certainly the former.
      errr...latter, sorry.

    16. Re:... one in every crowd. by operagost · · Score: 1

      He was an Admiral, don't know what his job was. You see him walking down a hall on the new Enterprise talking with Data. I forget how the subject comes up, but he asks Data how old he thinks he is, and Data of couse gives an exact answer (137, I think). McCoy replies that, despite his round ears, Data sounds like a Vulcan. Data says that he is an android. McCoy grunts, "Probably just as bad."

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:... one in every crowd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you got my vote too. The only objection I really agree to is the sappy theme song. Definately a thumbs up on the bad science, Vulcan-human relations cliches, (hell we can all see where that's going) and particularly the soft core porn. A much better pilot than TNG or the original Star Treck.

    18. Re:... one in every crowd. by rmgrotkierii · · Score: 1

      And McCoy STILL hadn't trusted transporters heh heh

      --
      Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.
    19. Re:... one in every crowd. by Occam's+Nailfile · · Score: 1
      I watched the first TNG episode from my college dorm. It remains one of the most stilted, lifeless pieces of television production I've ever witnessed. Even the TOS's third-season Roddenberry-written pieces of tripe were more lively than the near-interminable scenes of Deanna Troi moaning on and on about "loneliness" and "despair."

      Having said that, Roddenberry knew in spite of his awful writing skills, how to create a dynamic series. Starting around the middle of the first season I saw a definite improvement. By the time it all came to an end I was wishing it wouldn't. I couldn't say the same for the series' that have been launched without Roddenberry around. I can't quantify what it was he did, but he clearly wasn't there to do it for DS9 or Voyager. We shall see.

    20. Re:... one in every crowd. by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • I thought it was EXCELLENT for a pilot. The show will get its legs--let it happen and enjoy what you can while it does. Or just watch Andromeda

      Or Farscape, or Lexx, or DS9, Stargate SG1, or ST:TNG, or Babylon 5, or Space: Above and Beyond, or...

      There's a lot of good SF out there, new and reruns, and not that many hours in the day. Based on the clips and the behind the scenes stuff that I've managed to leech so far, I don't see anything to recommend it.

      In particular, if I want to jerk off to porn, I'll download the really filthy hard core stuff that I like. The awkward fumblings on Enterprise just made me embarrased for the poor actors. Jolene Blalock is way out of her depth. She's no more attractive or convincing than the "talent" in my favourite mpegs. She makes Jeri Ryan look like an Academy winning character actress. Shoddy, very shoddy.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    21. Re:... one in every crowd. by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      What was the one where Data cracks up hysterically for what felt like 5 minutes? Not the movie one.

    22. Re:... one in every crowd. by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      I think it was one of the early Q episodes.. the one where he loses his powers I think. If you have a reasonable connection you might look it up and watch it again.

    23. Re:... one in every crowd. by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      heh, you shant see much.. Roddenberry passed away in 1992..
      All TNG after 1992 was either old scripts that hadn't been produced yet, or stuff that the DS9 and VOY idiots made up to carry the torch until they could ruin trek with their own tripe. DS9 wasn't too awful, it was the bridge between the good and VOY.

      sad thing is that I still watched VOY just because it was the only trek playing on tv.. then even that was taken away from me when the damn local channel that carried UPN changed the time.
      Even now I can't get enterprise off of tv because it's only on upn, and I don't get that. It's not even an option on the cable, I have to download it.

    24. Re:... one in every crowd. by alicelinden · · Score: 1

      How do you watch it again on the 'net? What kind of streaming player is best?

      Thanks.

  9. Comandah Tuckah by kb3edk · · Score: 2, Redundant

    I dunno about the rest of you, but I was just thinking it was high time we had rednecks like Tuckah in space :-) yeeeeehaw!

    1. Re:Comandah Tuckah by caffeinated_bunsen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anything that results in fewer of 'em down here is a plus in my book! And send the the damn telephone sanitizers and hairdressers with them!

      --

      Bugrit! Millenium hand and shrimp!
    2. Re:Comandah Tuckah by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

      So it's going to be the Confederation now??

    3. Re:Comandah Tuckah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was George W. Bush in plain view -- that dumb, vacant look.

    4. Re:Comandah Tuckah by femur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ha! Yeah, Tuckah's Southern drawl sure gives him away as a redneck. He can't be too smart if he sounds like that, can he? And since he's Caucasian and Southern, he must be a Klansman, too, thus the reference to the Confederation in another response.

      It's a good thing that we still have the stereotypical bubba to make fun of, isn't it? I'm glad that political correctness hasn't ruined the opportunity to make fun of those people and their culture. So let's get all the trailer-trash, Foghorn Leghorn, Bigfoot truck, Mayberry RFD, tube top and stretch pants, and bigotry comments about Tucker going on /. full-steam.

      Jeez, guys. We're all geeky losers who watch Star Trek! That fatass, wig-wearing Shatner even told us to get a life! Remember "You, there. Have you ever even kissed a girl?" from the SNL skit? And we made him rich enough to sit around eating HoHos and drinking beer until somone calls him for a $25,000 convention gig. How about we just cut the crap about the stereotypical Foxworthy-style good ol' boy on Enterprise, huh? The jokes are really low-hanging fruit, anyway, too easy and cheap and socially acceptable to be worthy of us.

      BTW, yes, I am Southern-born and -bred, and I do have a small chip on my shoulder about how we've become the chosen funny minority on the screen. The university where I got my MBA has a course -- no, I'm not shitting you -- on how to get rid of the accent so that your job prospects would be greater.

      Ah told 'em ta blow it out they all's asses.

      --
      So whaddaya expect for nuttin'?
    5. Re:Comandah Tuckah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was, but due to budget cuts, they had to reduce it to 'Federation'.

      MRB

    6. Re:Comandah Tuckah by Pravada · · Score: 1

      Was I the ONLY person that thought Archer looked like Dubya?

      --
      --- On the other hand, you have five fingers.
    7. Re:Comandah Tuckah by Looge+Over+All! · · Score: 0

      Watch Babylon 5 sometime. You can tell if any given human is a bad guy or an imbecile because they'll have a southern accent. In Star Trek of course they're identified by their shockingly fake 'english' accents.

    8. Re:Comandah Tuckah by BinxBolling · · Score: 2
      BTW, yes, I am Southern-born and -bred, and I do have a small chip on my shoulder about how we've become the chosen funny minority on the screen.

      Looks like more than a small chip. Maybe you should lose it. I've got a southern accent, too. Living in Boston, I occasionally get a bit of teasing about it, but nothing I can't handle.



      Getting all bent out of shape about it just makes things worse: Guys like you just build a stereotype of southerners as insecure whiners. And people take the "southerners are insecure" stereotype far more seriously than the "southerners are stupid" one.

    9. Re:Comandah Tuckah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Trek Deliverance

      OK, now SQEEEAAAL for me.....

    10. Re:Comandah Tuckah by femur · · Score: 1

      Wow. You got all that about my personality out of one posting? I must laud you for your remarkable perceptivity. I hope you're a psychologist; otherwise the world is losing a valuable medical resource.

      Incredible.

      Okay, I'll put aside my insecurity -- and begin ignoring your inflammatory remarks -- to ask about this Southerner as insecure stereotype, because I haven't been exposed to that one. And since this is a thread about the premier of Enterprise, I have to wonder what any of this has to do with your initial response to Tucker's character.

      Now I'm going to go dry the tears from my eyes, you hurtful man!

      --
      So whaddaya expect for nuttin'?
    11. Re:Comandah Tuckah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you summed it up well. I definitely agree that many Southerners get way too defensive about their Southerness. And instead of the "stupid ignorant redneck" stereotype, it just perpetuates this insecure stereotype. I've always noticed that but wasn't able to figure out what it is until now.

  10. Theme music? by redactor · · Score: 1

    Hey, I got an idea... Hey don't we find somebody lame and washed out to SING the theme song! Yeah, that would be great!

    1. Re:Theme music? by Caez · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I mean John Williams? Hello? He "said" more with the theme music from Deep Space Nine than any guitar playing/singer ever could. Period.

      --
      http://www.mistersampo.com
    2. Re:Theme music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      William Shatner?

    3. Re:Theme music? by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure the DS9 music was written by someone like Dennis McCarthy, a composer they use for the background useless music during the episodes (he's writing the background music for the Enterprise series, too). Producers splurged a tad for Voyager, getting Oscar-winner Jerry Goldsmith to write the main theme (he did the theme for Star Trek, the Motion Picture, and the general "Next Gen" theme). I was hoping they'd get Goldsmith to write a nice theme for the new series. Instead, we got... crap. Well, it could have been a lot worse.

    4. Re:Theme music? by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      Well, it could have been a lot worse.

      I don't know how. The theme song is my number one complaint tonight. That singing! It's just wrong... That kind of music is bets kept on copy protected cd's, not on star trek.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    5. Re:Theme music? by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I guess I am the only one who liked the contrast from the older series. I thought it was pretty good.

      The closing credits are actully an 'orchestra' version of the opening. You can find the opening/close here

      It was daring to break with the past, and I think that it works, and carries well with the theme for the show.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    6. Re:Theme music? by ikioi · · Score: 1

      For anyone who hasn't realized it yet, the point of the older sounding theme music, like much of the pseudo-retro design, was to make us feel that this was in the "past" (at least compared with the Trek we usually watch). It was a bizarre but very clever and useful intentional misuse of time-period theming.

    7. Re:Theme music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said. I couldn't figure out why I liked it, but it had a very nostalgic feel to it. It almost sounded "American", which is not a word I normally use, but it's pretty appropriate given recent tragic events. I was wondering: "What if they changed the theme song to a more patriotic one in light of recent events?" but I doubt that conspiracy theory. I agree with ikioi that it was a clever, but intentional, anachronistic sound to bring us to a different feel for this new series.

  11. Not bad... by christurkel · · Score: 1

    Not great either. Theme music stinks. Old, rehash Vulcan "issues". It is nice that Scott Bakula is getting something out of Paramount after they screwed him over Quantum Leap but other than this, this series is garbage. And how does armor plating go "offline" anyway?

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    1. Re:Not bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course things seem rehashed. IT'S A PREQUEL SERIES!

    2. Re:Not bad... by rmull · · Score: 1

      I think they need to keep it polarized for it to work.

      --
      See you, space cowboy...
    3. Re:Not bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked it.

      and about this whole armor plating issue about it going offline, the hull plating is polarized, so I suppose it could go offline... its a computer controlling the polarization I imagine.

    4. Re:Not bad... by ttyRazor · · Score: 1

      and because of that, the sappy music gets to swell with emotion every time something that's done routinely in TOS onward gets done for the first time. Seeing it a thousand times before doesn't make it any more fun and exciting the "first" time.

    5. Re:Not bad... by be-fan · · Score: 2

      How the bloody hell to you polarize a metal?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    6. Re:Not bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The hull plating, a sandwich of carbotitanin, ferromagnetic silver-copper matrix and trisodium ceramic, is tied directly to ships electroplasma power grid. When activated, thousands of swirling edies of theta-meson particles are emitted by the armor. These edies "polarize" the plating and cause energy (beam, explosive, radiation) to be partially deflected. Duh.

    7. Re:Not bad... by mbrod · · Score: 1

      Good -
      Hot Vulcan

      Bad -
      Bunch of morons make up the crew of the most technologically advanced spacecraft mankind has ever created.

      (Found it tough to get over that one)

    8. Re:Not bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a guess, but I'd say the hull is electrostatically charged to deflect particles.

      As for how you do it, how to you generate artifical gravity? How do you travel faster than light? How do you transport matter? How do you travel though time?

    9. Re:Not bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They forgot to mention that it was Microsoft Armor Plating(tm)

    10. Re:Not bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..e.xcept for the part where theyt named a Klingon "Klang".

      Say it with me: Klang.

      Klang.

      Klang.

      Klang.

      Really, you can't tell me after going to all the trouble of stealing a "new" ship from "ST:FC", carefully adding just enough of the 7-of-9-T&A factor to stiffen up most naive 13-year olds and de-mothballing Scott Backula for the Hell that is Quantium Leap: Fond Fan Retrospectives, that the best name they could come up with for a Kilngon was "Klang".

      I'm not kidding when I say that my cat - who can't even speak English, let alone know what Star Trek is - could come up with a better sounding name while lolling around drunk. Trust me, I've heard him do it (though to e fair, it did take a pint and a half of 100 proof Smirnoff...)

    11. Re:Not bad... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      You've clearly never interacted with the US military. They seem like a complete bunch of morons (and a few of them have Southern accents.) But they get the job done well and thoroughly. Face it, these are the people that we'd probably put in space in that application.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    12. Re:Not bad... by markhb · · Score: 1

      Now that I think of it, I don't believe we were ever told whether he really comes from the South or not; he just has the accent. Many pilots affect the soft Texas twang of Chuck Yeager as a tribute-cum-wannabe thing; Tucker's accent may be an extension.

      - Mark
      from the city where the U.S.S. Enterprise fought one of her greatest battles

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    13. Re:Not bad... by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Brings new meaning to the Blue Screen of Death.

      This "Beowulf"-level comment brought to you by EverQuest: Please Come Back, Monte Haul Is On The Way expansion pack, in stores near you soon!

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    14. Re:Not bad... by sacherjj · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of a capacitor? It stores energy by polarizing metal. By the way: IT IS A TV SHOW!

    15. Re:Not Bad... by uncadonna · · Score: 1

      If you don't think the climate and the scenery's gonna change by 2150, think again.

      --
      mt
  12. Reaction to the vulcan lady... by drachen · · Score: 1
    Have you seen the October Maxim? Knowing that Jolene Blalock is that... vulcan lady (can you tell I wasn't paying that much attention to what was being said??!)... well I'll let you guess my reaction... :P

    boo yow!

    1. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about anyone else, but I'm waiting for the day when TV women actually gain some weight. So far all the stars are IMHO sickeningly thing...and I mean...thin enough to make me grimace, and have to fight to keep my lunch down. Eat something, ladies. For a little while, though, if I remember right, Deanna Troi did look alright...then she got skinny too. Ah well, what can I expect from MTV-obsessed pop-culture-zombies? Heh...well, we can all dream, can't we?

      sig
      sig
      sig

      A sig block.

    2. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad guys like you are around to fuck fat chicks so I don't have to. Thanks.

    3. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Araneas · · Score: 1

      Not fat chicks. Real women with real bodies not some anorexic half-starved model who eats so little she doesn't event mensturate (sp?). If Kate Moss and her ilk turn your crank just give in and go do a boy.

    4. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 2

      Good call. I liked Troi when she had some curves, and didn't look like some plastic barbie-doll. I don't know about losing my lunch over the vilvan chick, but I do prefer women who are shaped more like Xena than Ally McBeal.

      --

    5. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Seriously, folks, it's a sad day when the cultural ideal of "beauty" looks like a 12-year-old boy with a bad boob job. And, if you wish to know exactly what I'm talking about when it comes to real, attractive women, I've put together a link. Click here to find out what I'm talking about.

      Bill:All your box are belong to us.
      Take off all '.sig' for great justice.
      and, by the way, this space for rent.

    6. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, Xena could have stood to put on a few pounds too. Her hips, thighs, ass, etc. should have been bigger for breasts that size, and she could definately use to be curvier...a little bit bigger. Soft, rounded...you know...attractive.

      Someone deleted my .sig. Can I have yours?

    7. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      I have some Dr. Pulaski pr0n I can send you if you give me your e-mail addy.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    8. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Tom+Bombadill · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ.

      I don't see why being in shape (and that she is) is a bad thing today in America, except of course that it makes all the fat people feel better about themselves....

    9. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Look. I don't want to argue the finer points of this with anyone, because I know it will degenerate into a flame war. My point simply is that in this culture, if you are a perfectly healthy size 14-16, you are ostracized as being fat, which is often simply not true. I personally happen to abhor the current standards of beauty that, if were applied in a world other than modern day America, would quickly wipe out the human race.

      Shhhh! Be Vewwy vewwy kwiet.... I'm hunting bugs...

    10. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Tom+Bombadill · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I don't want to get in a flame war either, but 14-16 is obese. That is going to be in the high 30s % bodyfat.
      1/3 of your body as fat is not healthy, I don't care what Oprah says...

      This "culture" is the only one that cries for it's "victims" of over-eating.

    11. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you look at pics of Lucy Lawless outside the Xena context, she isn't that big. The costumers on a lot of shows do some major push-up work to make the women look like that. IIRC, Jeri Ryan's catsuit had built-in pads to enhance her natural bust.

    12. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by operagost · · Score: 1

      er... whatever works for ya, dude.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 1
      "Jeri Ryan's catsuit had built-in pads to enhance her natural bust."

      Except it wasn't natural. Jeri Ryan's admitted publicly she's had breast enhancement surgery. Kinda appropriate for a Borg: silicon, silicone, what's in a letter? :)

    14. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      And a bad lip job to boot.

      It's from the Julia Roberts school of lip jobs. Someone in the plastic surgery industry believes, evidently, that you'll get much more bang for your buck if you overplump the upper lip in relation to the bottom one.

      Yet the Emperor has no clothes, but no one wants to say that this just looks stupid.

      If you're going to do an enormous lip job that looks hot, see Jeri Ryan, Xenia Seeburg, or Angelina Jolie.

      And, T'Pow!, please stop adopting late 20th century earth makeup standards ala Pam Anderson. Putting on lipstick bigger than your lips is a stage trick, not something to be done on TV where there are closeups.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    15. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Although I'm partial to Jeri Lynn Ryan, the hottest women ever on any ST, piecewise-of-ass, was the "demon" charlatan claiming to come back to complete a thousand-year contract.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    16. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monica isn't exactly a toothpick either there dude. Cute though.

    17. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get a woody? Did you touch it? Did you rub it up and down against a pillow? Did you ejactulate? Did you eat it when you were done?

      I think I'll pass on guessing any more about your "reaction," you sick FUCK.

    18. Re:Reaction to the vulcan lady... by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      Yeah, she's a nice enough shape (I agree with your general opinions), but what a shame she has to wear that backwards baseball cap and a permanently goofy expression.And I think you're poser model's WAY off, especially in the thighs department.

      P.S. Does she KNOW that you're this weirdly obsessive about her? ;-)

  13. Continuity by belg4mit · · Score: 1

    It seemd to me to break the continutiy of the series:

    The theme song isn't an instrumental

    Who the hell is this species that we've never seen in the future, what do we exact some sort of xenocidal vengance upon them?

    Other than that, it was okay. I don;t think the premieres for any fo the series were really good. Give it some time to develop a stride.

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
    1. Re:Continuity by orakle · · Score: 1

      Well actually, the original series wasn't completely "instrumental" even if it didn't have lyrics. I dont think i know of an instrument that sounds like "oooo oooo oooo oooooo..."

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; grep; mount; fsck; yes; more; fsck; umount; make clean; sleep
    2. Re:Continuity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who the hell is this species that we've never seen in the future, what do we exact some sort of xenocidal vengance upon them?


      Can you say Borg?

    3. Re:Continuity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can! I can!

      Bork Bork Bork

      umm nope guess not

    4. Re:Continuity by heptapod · · Score: 1

      The primary enemy of this series is made up of humans from the Mirror Mirror universe's far future who are trying to guide this Earth to become the great empire they were back in their first appearance in TOS.

    5. Re:Continuity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the original series episode had purely instrumental music. The ones with the yellow text I believe (as opposed to blue).

    6. Re:Continuity by Bandman · · Score: 1

      Actually, it did have lyrics...they just sucked.
      Gene MoMoney Roddenberry felt that he needed more cash than he had., Alex Courage (who wrote the theme music) was set to recieve royalties every time the music played. Good ole Gene couldn't not have a part of that, so he penned the lyrics, thereby assuring 50 percent of the royalties. Gee, what a swell guy. Read about it here at snopes:

      http://www.snopes2.com/radiotv/tv/trek1.htm

    7. Re:Continuity by dasheiff · · Score: 1
      Actually, it did have lyrics...they just sucked.
      Gene MoMoney Roddenberry felt that he needed more cash than he had., Alex Courage (who wrote the theme music) was set to recieve royalties every time the music played. Good ole Gene couldn't not have a part of that, so he penned the lyrics, thereby assuring 50 percent of the royalties. Gee, what a swell guy. Read about it here at snopes:


      You mean the dead Gene Roddenberry?

    8. Re:Continuity by Link310 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the now dead Gene Roddenberry was in a perfect position to pen the lyrics to _TOS_.

    9. Re:Continuity by oldperson · · Score: 1

      The instrument used to generate the "oooo oooo oooo oooooo...." sound of ST:TOS was a then futuristic electronic instrument called a theremin which has an audio output which is controlled by the external capacitance. You play it by moving your hands around near it without actually touching it. There's an album of all theremin music called "Lothar and the Hand People", but I don't know how easy it would be to find or whether it's worth listening to.

    10. Re:Continuity by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      It's damn unlikely that the borg would wipe out a species that close to earth but not be seen by another soul in the alpha quadrant for 200 years.

    11. Re:Continuity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it really is singing in the original star trek theme song. It sounds a lot like a theremin, though.

    12. Re:Continuity by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Who the hell is this species that we've never seen in the future, what do we exact some sort of xenocidal vengance upon them?

      Think of it this way: 120 years ago, the Spanish were a major enemy of the US.

      Today, no one here cares about them.

      It's the same deal.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    13. Re:Continuity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is the Evil species that secretly plagues our heroic crew.... Hey I thought you guys where trekkies.. Its the Romulans DUH!!!!! to quote the red shirted ensign in Galaxy Quest "Dont you guys watch the show?!?"

    14. Re:Continuity by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to Guinan's warning that they will come in force, which also never happened?

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    15. Re:Continuity by Occam's+Nailfile · · Score: 1

      What I heard was not a theramin. It was a human voice. A theramin reaches well above the human vocal range. I've played with one (I can't say I played it because all I did was make awful squelching noises). But on Star Trek's original run, it's pretty clearly a soprano voice, no words. A theramin's sound is much more like a pure sine wave, with little or no overtones to color its timbre. Considering when it was devised, that's probably all it is.

    16. Re:Continuity by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Remember how long Guinan's people live. When Guinan says "they'll be coming soon" it means within the next few centuries...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    17. Re:Continuity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an album of all theremin music called "Lothar and the Hand People", but I don't know how easy it would be to find or whether it's worth listening to.

      They sound a bit like Devo.

  14. Huh? by Ghoser777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where are the links? I have never even heard about Star Trek:Enterprise. I use to love Star Trek: The Next Generation (in fact, in a TV song identification contest, I guessed it's theme song from the first couple seconds of rumbling). Since then I haven't been impressed by the Star Trek series. So does anyone have any information (aka links) that explain what Michael is talking about?

    F-bacher

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    1. Re:Huh? by McVeigh · · Score: 1
      --
      "I drank what?" - Socrates
    2. Re:Huh? by eFlashDash · · Score: 1

      Whoa?!? Speaking of space travel, what planet have you been on??? ;)

  15. What a piece of crap by shed · · Score: 1, Troll

    None of the "actors" could perform. The vulcan was a hissing bitch during the first half, I thought count bakula wanted to cry several time, the plot was mediocre even by the standards of the crew that brought us voyager.

    What amazes me is that no one seems to have gone back to the original ST series to see what made it great. It was daring culturally for its time and tried to present a complex cast of characters. Was it perfect? No. But the Berman vision of the future is a piece of plasticine crap undistinguished by any character motivation or deep emotion.

    Sigh. Back to Babylon 5 reruns for me.

    --
    My cat can eat a whole watermelon
    1. Re:What a piece of crap by Madmanz123 · · Score: 1

      Twas one damn episode man. Give it a few.

    2. Re:What a piece of crap by shed · · Score: 2, Funny

      In general I agree. But this literally is the same team that brought us umpteen seasons of voyager drivel. Bad science, bad acting, bad plots, good tits (7 of 9). I like tits, sure, but I hoped for much more. Although it was a daring episode - space porn in prime time.

      --
      My cat can eat a whole watermelon
    3. Re:What a piece of crap by bartok · · Score: 0

      the only thing that would make Star Trek "culturally daring" is if some important male character would be an homo. But that, compared Hohura (however it's spelled) the black crew member, would NEVER make it in there since the show would be labeled as a gay show and no geek would admit to watching it.

      I myself admit that I'd be a bit disturbed(although not offended) by a gay captain but that's about the last thing that could make a series like Star Trek daring.

    4. Re:What a piece of crap by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I said the same thing about "Saved by the Bell."

    5. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are you kidding? About 90% of the original Star Trek is crap. Perhaps it was decent American sci-fi for the time, but that doesn't mean it is great now. Dr. Who was buch better, and its FX were just as good as the original Star Trek's. I don't remember the titles of the episodes, but I though the stupidest were:
      1) The one were the Enterprise finds a guy on a planet who turned out to be Beethoven, Picaso, etc..
      2) The one with the Yanks and Comms, or whatever they were called.

      TNG was far better than the original in all ways. I'm not saying all the plots were good, but most were at least decent.

    6. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Twas one damn episode man. Give it a few.

      yeah, but we're only complaining about one damn episode. give us a break.

    7. Re:What a piece of crap by spectral · · Score: 1

      Uhura I believe it was, but I'm not an expert.

      What I believe he was referring to was the many times the series addressed social issues, such as color distinction, etc. in a roundabout method, cleverly disguised. For example, the planet where the people are jet black on one half, and pure white on the other. There's a huge war (or at least tensions, I don't remember the episode all that well) going on between the people who are black on the left and white on the right, and the people who are white on the left and black on the right. I.e. the issue with race and color here on Earth.

    8. Re:What a piece of crap by Boulder+Geek · · Score: 2, Funny
      good tits (7 of 9). I like tits, sure, but I hoped for much more.


      More tits, or more plot?

      --
      A well-crafted lie appears unquestionable - Dama Mahaleo
    9. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. Back to Babylon 5 reruns for me.

      Yep, don't give the new star trek a real try. Just give it up so fast. That's probably why you watch Babylon 5 you hapless loser.

    10. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe you complained about the quality of the acting, and then tried to contrast it with the original series. Bad actors are a Star Trek tradition dating back to William Shatner himself.

    11. Re:What a piece of crap by bartok · · Score: 0

      All right, then they should make an episo with Gay Planet VS Straight Planet :-)

    12. Re:What a piece of crap by prizog · · Score: 1

      Roddenberry had promised to do something about the complete absense of homosexuality on ST, but then he died. In B5, there was some clearly on the way, but then casting issues fucked it all up. Oh well.

    13. Re:What a piece of crap by Darkstorm · · Score: 1

      More tits, or more plot?

      I think he ment both....

      ...of course I didn't think it was too bad, but I'm easy to please.

      --
      If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    14. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too hell with the plot, if it's got good tits, I'll watch it!

    15. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      ...of course I didn't think it was too bad, but I'm easy to please.

      tits wise or plot wise?

    16. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's "dating back... to William...
      Shatner... himself."

    17. Re:What a piece of crap by SnicklesTheElf · · Score: 1

      hahaha. We all did, we all did.
      I thought Enterprise was alright...If they continue to use the 'medicinal gel' in that cold room they may have a loyal viewer.

    18. Re:What a piece of crap by skriefal · · Score: 1

      I'll agree that Doctor Who was better than Star Trek: TOS, but must disagree with the comment on the SFX. Doctor Who was produced on a shoestring budget compared to Star Trek, and the SFX were almost always of much lower quality. But it succeeded in spite of the low-quality SFX, as did other British sci-fi shows such as Blake's 7, early Red Dwarf, etc.

      Plus you missed the worst of all Trek TOS episodes... The two episodes you mentioned are masterpieces compared to the infamous "Spock's Brain"!

    19. Re:What a piece of crap by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > Bad science, bad acting, bad plots, good tits (7 of 9).

      It would be more customary to rate them as 7.777 out of 10.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    20. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd think a planet of people who were half gay and half straight would work much better in the context but deciding which half of them is gay and which half is straight would be a tricky issue =)

    21. Re:What a piece of crap by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      None of the "actors" could perform.

      Oh man, I hope you aren't using Babylon 5 as an example of a series with good acting...

    22. Re:What a piece of crap by roystgnr · · Score: 2

      would NEVER make it in there since the show would be labeled as a gay show and no geek would admit to watching it.

      They could go halfway, and make a female character homosexual - that would be almost as "culturally daring", and wouldn't lose them many viewers. Or, they could make an attractive female character bisexual, not lose any viewers, and attract hordes of additional love-starved geeks to the audience. Watch for a later introduction of such a character; this is too win-win an idea for the writers not to come to the same conclusion eventually.

    23. Re:What a piece of crap by wayne606 · · Score: 1

      Obviously the one where everybody is half white and half black and the different versions were fighting each other was a metaphor for this.

    24. Re:What a piece of crap by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

      The Next Generation had a lesbian on board, now I forget her character's name, she and Data got it on once while under the influence of some outer space strangeness. Of course, they killed her off later and replace her with Warf.

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    25. Re:What a piece of crap by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      All right, then they should make an episo with Gay Planet VS Straight Planet :-)

      They had that one already. Sortof. There was a Next Generation episode of a planet with essentially genderless people, where showing a gender identity (like heterosexuality) was a crime that was "corrected." Maybe a half-subtle jab at the community trying to "correct" homosexuality.

    26. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Janeway?

    27. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think that one was a metaphor for blacks and whites not getting along, not "gays and straights". HTH.

    28. Re:What a piece of crap by IronChef · · Score: 2


      B5 had a lot of dreadful acting, but it also had 2 of the best-acted characters in all of sci-fi TV: Londo and G'kar. In comparison to them, everyone else looked to be phoning it in.

    29. Re:What a piece of crap by IronChef · · Score: 2


      Lt. Yar wasn't a LESBIAN, she was just the head of security.

      Though if you do the wild thing with the ship's talking toaster, maybe there is some other label for you.

    30. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the stupidest Dr Who episode was:

      1) The one where he spent two hours running around endless dark tunnels with his female sidekick

      Oh, i forget, that was pretty much every episode.

    31. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    32. Re:What a piece of crap by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      If that doesn't precisely define pornography....

    33. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hang on there, you thopught Star trek was great? jeez, hilariously kitsch and mildly entertaining but great? Now, Voyager I like - Mulgrew is extremely sexy and that Cyborg girl's corseted body a wonder to behold. That Neelix character is a pain in the arse, but you got to have something for the after school crowd. and the very stupid

    34. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      More tits, or more plot?

      Tits ... 7 out of 9 ... I mean where's the symmetrie ?

    35. Re:What a piece of crap by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      And they didn't replace her with Worf. Worf was on the show from the first episode.

      There was some lesbian action on DS9, but it didn't really count because of the couple in question, the last time they had been together, one of them had been a guy.

    36. Re:What a piece of crap by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      She'd fall over!

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    37. Re:What a piece of crap by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      What about Ensign Kim on Voyager?

      There was an episode where the crew were all having bad dreams, and his bad dream was being trapped in a turbolift with 7of9 and she started coming on to him, just as she leaned in to kiss him, he woke up screaming.

      If that doesn't make him gay, I don't know what does...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    38. Re:What a piece of crap by Arcturax · · Score: 1

      Already been there, if you believe all the papers that have been written about Kirk's secret love for Spock. If you go back and watch some of those old Star Treks, some of the episodes you almost expect to see them holding hands down the turbolift or something.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    39. Re:What a piece of crap by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

      Well, the actress that played her clearly was, though there may have not been any explicit reference on the show to it. I also saw her later in a very B movie in which she was a cop and became partner with this typical hetero male who constantly hit on her. He was shocked halfway through the film to learn she was a lesbian.

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    40. Re:What a piece of crap by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      > I said the same thing about "Saved by the Bell."

      Which sucked, badly, until the "Showgirls" 3-hour multipart episode, released also in theaters as a movie!

      My goodness! How far Liz Berkely's character has come from the heady days of sophomoric high school, where she refused to parade about in a bikini in a beauty contest because that was treating women like sex objects.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    41. Re:What a piece of crap by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Well, Tuvok and Kleenex almost frenched on that one episode where Kleenex suddenly remembers he was an expert on space elevators attached to asteroids.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    42. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously missed the evil universe episode in the last season, where evil-Kira frenches evil-Ezri-Dax. Clearly they are, if not romantic lovers, then regular sex buddies. Another saliva-string great...

    43. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> They could go halfway, and make a female
      >> character homosexual - that would be almost as
      >> "culturally daring", and wouldn't lose them many
      >> viewers.

      It would gain quite a few, I dare say!

      >> Or, they could make an attractive female
      >> character bisexual...
      >>
      >
      > You mean Janeway?

      No, he said attractive. To steal a joke by Mad Magazine about Rue McClanahan, Janeway hasn't been cast in a sexy role since the "Broadway Follies of 1929".

      Actually, IMDB only goes back this far.

    44. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 'God Emporer of Dune', Frank Herbert made the statement that lesbians made the best soldiers. I wonder if that would have any bearing.

    45. Re:What a piece of crap by jafac · · Score: 2

      she fucked Data. I don't know if that qualifies as an heterosexual encounter - but he said he was "fully functional and programmed in multiple techniques" - so I'm sure it ran the gamut.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    46. Re:What a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kirk homosexual ? What about all the space bimboes he cavorted with ? What sort of gay bloke would go out with a fellow who only gets interested in sex every seven years ?

      Now Sulu and Chekhov, much more likely ! After all Sulu kept his cabin very neat, liked exercise and botany and there was an episode when Chekhov was revulsed by being hit on by a space amazon (i.e standard Russian female athlete).

    47. Re:What a piece of crap by Madmanz123 · · Score: 1

      I think a good piece of the audience have already decided, I'm just saying, give it time. :)

    48. Re:What a piece of crap by feronti · · Score: 1

      Just because she played a lesbian doesn't make her so. 'Cause I seem to recall a Red Shoe Diaries episode (where strangely enough she again played a cop... she seems to specialize in security roles, I guess) where she basically kidnaps her (male) squash partner and fucks his brains out all night then lets him go... And believe me, she sure seemed to be enjoying those scenes:)

  16. Reaction by ShishCoBob · · Score: 1

    I was only able to catch the second half of it. I like kinda the updated effects that show the older ship style they had in the original star trek (I can see it in the ship they have now). I kinda see it having a completely different look... Just in like the colors of things.. Stuff is less dull then some of the other start trek things.. Of course same with voyager over next gen. But I really think it comes down to it's a brand new series.. Stuff is different. I don't really think I could decide if I like it or not until I've seen a few episodes.

    --
    http://www.maximum-cars.com - My little hobbie.
    1. Re:Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Trek seems to be de-evolving into soft porn. From 7of9, we all know what the whole point of her character was, now to this. It doesn't really fit into the series about exploration and discovery.


      Maybe it was me, but I saw lots of opportunity for exploration and discovery in the shower scene! 8-)

      Seriously though, with a human in the chamber, the camera reacted perfectly naturally (in concert, with the male perspective). Hello, if it was shot clinically, everyone would be wondering what was wrong with the guy.

    2. Re:Reaction by scrytch · · Score: 2

      From 7of9, we all know what the whole point of her character was, now to this. It doesn't really fit into the series about exploration and discovery

      mmmmmm exploration .... oh i'm sorry were you saying something?

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    3. Re:Reaction by MarkCollette · · Score: 1

      Or did you ever think that 7 of 9's purpose was not to be a sex toy and it's just _you_geeks_ who think that the only purpose of a beautiful woman is to be a sex toy?

    4. Re:Reaction by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      It doesn't really fit into the series about exploration and discovery.

      Sure it does! I wouldn't mind doing some serious exploration and discovery of, say, B'Elanna's, Seven's and/or Troi's anatomies.

      Haven't seen Enterprise yet, being an alien type of person myself, but I have read the leaked script, saw the promos, trailers and interviews and it looks good to me.

      Just going into a knee-jerk reaction and condemning anything that moves (New Trek sux! The Amiga is dead! BSD is dying! Osama's been laid! RMS' genes are not GPL'd! Onion soup tastes like month-old fungi on cow droppings!) is utterly futile. I understand that no one cares what I say anyway so I'll just sit back and wait for the show to arrive via the airwaves, either via a P2P filesharing app over my wireless broadband connection or the regularly scheduled TV transmissions in my country. ... GIMME! NOW! *buhahaha*

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    5. Re:Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if she isn't a sex toy, why is she always wearing a cat suit and high heels? My SO says that she is most comfortable in jogging pants and birkenstocks (i know, i know)... do they not have those kinds of things in the future?

    6. Re:Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Or did you ever think that 7 of 9's purpose was not to be a sex toy and it's just _you_geeks_ who think that the only purpose of a beautiful woman is to be a sex toy?"

      ROTFLMA!!

      ..and now, back on Earth, YES, she didn't have to be dressed AND ENHANCED like that, except that SEX WAS the whole point.

    7. Re:Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you're wrong. The character was very popular among female viewers (who were fine with the catsuit because she wasn't a bimbo).

    8. Re:Reaction by madGenius · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really fit into the series about exploration and discovery.

      That statement is ASKING for a silly comment.

      --
      Physicists are said to stand on one another's shoulders while programmers stand on one another's toes.
    9. Re:Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could be mistaken, but TOS had more scantilly clad women in it than all the other series combined. Granted, most of them were dressed like belly-dancers (which to me is unappealing), but Kirk chased after every tight skirt in the Galaxy.

      While the decontamination scene was pleasant, I did think a few of the shots lingered more than was necessary. And the nipple action, which was good eyecandy in itself, shouldn't have been included.

    10. Re:Reaction by sopwath · · Score: 1
      So it's OK for a woman to wear some nice tight clothing as long as she's smart. Come on! She's there for the sex appeal and they make her smart because StarTrek != V.I.P. or one of the other lame ass UPN T&A shows. If they made her a dumb blond or something the show just goes down the toilet even more.

      sopwath

    11. Re:Reaction by spiro_killglance · · Score: 2
      Trek soft porn? What does that make Lexx then, German fetish porn.



      Come on guys, all TV shows are mostly populated
      by attractive actreses and actors, that does not make them porn, not even soft porn.



      I would not even describe Lexx as soft porn, despite nearly half the shows be themed around sex. For a work of media/act to be porn its primary purpose is to aid masturbation. Where as
      Trek and the other sci-fi shows primary purpose
      (not always achived) is to engage the viewer with compelling plots and characters.

    12. Re:Reaction by bughunter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Trek seems to be de-evolving into soft porn

      Gee - how come everyone seems to have forgotten how much T and A there was in TOS? There were silicone enhanced babes on every planet, and except for token episodes for the rest of the cast, Kirk all but fornicated with them every week.

      I remember reading The Making of Star Trek as a teen, and I am reminded of the part about how the TOS producers and NBC censors were continually arguing about how far they could go. In fact there was one particular passage about how NBC had a rule that you could not show the underside of a breast, as if they thought moss grew under there or something.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    13. Re:Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mistook a factual statement for a moral judgement.
      Fact: Star TreK Voyager was biased towards a female demographic.
      Fact: The 7of9 character was very popular among that demographic.
      Fact: The sex appeal angle (designed to center the demo bias back to male viewers) didn't hurt that popularity.

    14. Re:Reaction by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Latelatelate for a reaction - I'm pretty sure no one will ever read this (if they do, reply as an AC - just so I know :-) But there's a good point here. I always viewed 7 just as an obvious sexappeal thing, but now I'm rethinking. She *was* capable, and had a commanding presence. As the parent says, the sex appeal didn't hurt - and was probably planned - but perhaps it *wasn't* the only reason...She had something Janeway always lacked, and if she'd originally been cast as captain, I don't know that the first few seasons would have sucked as much (never liked Janeway that much)

    15. Re:Reaction by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      >>> Trek..soft core porn, etc.
      >>
      >> It doesn't really fit into the series about
      >> exploration and discovery.
      >
      > That statement is ASKING for a silly comment.

      In a land of "You there! You look 37. Have you kissed a girl, yet?" there are many things that need exploration and discovery.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    16. Re:Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lexx has neither compelling plots, nor compelling characters. That they moved Outer Limits to Saturday for Lexx just boggles the mind. It deserves a more fitting 2AM slot, where I'll be asleep and won't see it, except to wake up and turn the TV off.
      Sort of like all of Voyager, and the pilot of Enterprise, it's poop. That's ok, TOS was poop, and some of the movies were good. Just goes to show that something good can come from something mind-numbingly retarded as TOS. TNG is further evidence of that.

  17. Spoiler-tastic by signe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow, Michael. Could you post a few more spoilers on the top of the front page? I don't think there are enough.

    Seriously. Not everyone watched or even *could* watch Enterprise tonight. You could have at least had the courtesy to hide the spoilers "under the fold", so to speak.

    Now, for my opinion (some spoiler content).

    It looks good as far as a stand-alone show is concerned. But it seems to break from the "known" Star Trek history, as described by the other shows and movies (not books and fanfic). For instance, we're looking at the later appearance of the Klingons, when Worf told us that something happened to change their appearance that "we don't like to talk about". And Picard told us that the war with the Klingons was sparked by a botched first contact with them. But that contact didn't seem to be botched.

    I'm a little disappointed with how contrived the disinfectant scene was. And the way the camera paused during it was just silly. And Archer's whole thing with staying on the station after he set the maglock charge was pointless. First, it should have been longer than 5 seconds. Second, there was noone shooting at him, so there wasn't really a reason to set it and stand there, rather than setting it and running.

    I think I'll wait for a couple more episodes to reevaluate that and see if I really care about this series. As it is, I can take it or leave it.

    -Todd

    --
    "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    1. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Bonker · · Score: 5, Funny

      And Picard told us that the war with the Klingons was sparked by a botched first contact with them. But that contact didn't seem to be botched.

      You don't call being shot in the chest by a xenophobic Okie corn farmer a botched first contact? The only thing they coulda done to make a worst first impression was to put on white hoods and burn a cross in front of his spaceship.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:Spoiler-tastic by DigiBoi · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      Wow, Michael. Could you post a few more spoilers on the top of the front page? I don't think there are enough.

      First we complain about day old news. Now we complain about news before it happens. Will we ever be happy?

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat.
    3. Re:Spoiler-tastic by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

      Worf's comment in the DS9 tribble episode was intended as a non-explanation, and is meaningless. He did not actually say something happened to change the appearance of the Klingons. He merely said "we do not speak of it".

      As for the decontamination scene, it was one of two things. Either they are setting up for a long term arc where the Vulcan and the first officer beome romantically involved, or it was just a cheap grab for attention. If it was just a cheap grab for attention, then I say that it is disappointing, but not too suprising.

      END COMMUNICATION

    4. Re:Spoiler-tastic by eFlashDash · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, you could set it and stand there if you planned on staying on the ship, and knew it wasn't going to be a typical explosion that could harm you...

    5. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Partisan · · Score: 1

      You'd think that for Klingons this would be a perfect first contact. Remember, they *like* to fight.

      Of course a *real* Klingon would have shot (or knifed) the farmer before he said, 'Freeze'!

    6. Re:Spoiler-tastic by cheebie · · Score: 1

      These are Klingons. Shooting someone running through your field is considered a polite introduction. Now, the fact that we willingly eat corn (which rarely fights back at all) might cause them to hate us.

    7. Re:Spoiler-tastic by groke · · Score: 2, Interesting
      All I'm going to say about it was "okay for a pilot." Another poster mentioned that the Klingon appearance wasn't explained, merely brushed away for later. About the first contact though.. it has been hinted at that those bad guys are time travelish. Which would suggest they can play god with the ST universe, as this is different than what happened. Or something.

      Besides, there weren't any spoilers on the top page. Bad theme music, that somebody doesn't have a developed character, that they'd abuse the Vulcan/human relationship, that there was space combat, and they used a little skin to get their young male demographic to like the show. Are these things that you hadn't come to expect?

    8. Re:Spoiler-tastic by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Yeah, shooting someone who just blew up your silo and then heads towards you while you're pointing a weapon at them sure is 'xenophobic', isn't it? All farmers should let people blow up their stuff and then attack them.

      Did you even watch the show?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    9. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Blymie · · Score: 1

      I actually read a book (of course like any other, not authorized by paramount) that explained the change, with fairly good reasoning. It was about 15 years ago, but I do recall that it had something to do with the Klingons travelling back in time, and monkeying with their genetics in order to make themselves more agressive, and war like... because they were about to loose completely and totally in a war with the Federation. They also intended to take back some advanced technology at the same time, but Kirk, Spock and Bones (who else) managed to stop them before they pass on the technology, but after the genetic changes were done (I believe by a virus).

      In the new time line the war didn't happen, because the Klingons who travelled back in time were partially successful in introducing the genetic change some time after the original series, but before the movies in the time line. The new time line took effect, and after the virus was introduced, the Klingon's appearance changed. They were also aware of why it changed.

      Anyhow, the entire concept was rather entertaining, and if someone was up on Trek lore to an insane amount, Worf's explanation made sense in the context of that novel.

      Just a FYI.

    10. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Dr.+Tom · · Score: 2

      Good science fiction is usually logical and consistent, beyond violating a few physical laws here and there. But Star Trek is "SciFi". Star Trek has *always* been inconsistent. But people like it anyway, because it's shiny.

    11. Re:Spoiler-tastic by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 5, Informative

      For instance, we're looking at the later appearance of the Klingons

      Aside from all the time-travel theories here, I think there's another reasonable explanation. It may be a self-inflicted thing. Klingon physiology is pretty different from our own, of course (see the NextGen episode where Worf devolved into some spitting-reptile thing?) Maybe there's some vitamin/drug/hormone that can have such drastic effects on Klingon appearances - or perhaps it's more like piecings or tattoos.

      Anyway, that explains why now the Klingons aren't like that, and if it were considered an extreme social stigma or something like that later on, it explains why Worf didn't want to talk about it.

    12. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "And Archer's whole thing with staying on the station after he set the maglock charge was pointless. First, it should have been longer than 5 seconds. Second, there was noone shooting at him, so there wasn't really a reason to set it and stand there, rather than setting it and running."

      I doubt he would have been able to fit into that little pod with the huge Klingon and the other officer. This was possibly just an excuse to cover up a little production boo-boo (i.e. realising that three people should fit into the pod AFTER all the CG scenes with them are rendered and the set is built.)

    13. Re:Spoiler-tastic by BiggestPOS · · Score: 1

      Uhhhhh. No. Think Voyager, B'lana is HALF and her child is a FOUTH and we KNOW she didn't give her any "Drugs/vitamins/whatever" to give her the ridges. Hello!

      --
      What, me worry?
    14. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Watts+Martin · · Score: 4, Flamebait

      For instance, we're looking at the later appearance of the Klingons...

      Psst. Hey, fanboy, you wanna know what Worf didn't want to tell you in that episode about the Klingon appearance change?

      It's called "having a special effects budget."

    15. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they wanted to use the transporter and get a little quantum leap reference in

    16. Re:Spoiler-tastic by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have scoured the internet for weeks looking for the answer to the age old question "What really happened to the Klingons between TOS and TNG which changed their appearance from white looking guys with shoe polish on their face to the full decorated Worf that you see today?" I have finally found the answer all of us seek! Apparently, somewhere between 1950 and 1990, new prostetic latex make-up technology was invented that allowed more complex make-up than a pair of simple "spock ears" to be created. Apparently, this new technology was used to give the Klingons a better look. To tie it all together when Worf went back to the space station which "The Trouble With Tribbles" took place, the writers of DS9 decided to put in a little joke which was very funny at the time. Now, it's seen as some kind of huge conspiracy. Well, I'm here to tell you folks... there's nothing to see here, it's all a bunch of smoke and mirrors and you should think of the racist white Klingons of TOS to just be the Klingons you see today except with more make-up.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    17. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Corn doesn't need to fight back. It survives being eaten just fine.

      Okay, sorry. Potty humor. Couldn't resist...

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    18. Re:Spoiler-tastic by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      nonono - I mean that they took away the ridges, or suppressed them. It was a stupid fashion thing they did for whatever reason, and now they're all embarrassed about it.

    19. Re:Spoiler-tastic by thing12 · · Score: 2

      It's not even about having a special effects budget - it's about the difference in makeup technologies from the 60's to the 80's, and the need to make the Klingons more menacing to give movie goers a better sense of why they were the enemy. When they started making the movies they wanted to have a cool looking enemy - plain and simple - and the Klingons as they were done in th e 60's just didn't cut it. Back then it was enough to make them give them a ghoti and a bad hair cut... which apparently fit them to the stereotype that americans had of the Soviets.

    20. Re:Spoiler-tastic by jekk · · Score: 1

      > Not everyone watched or even *could* watch Enterprise tonight.

      Yep, that's me. I was called away suddenly for a family engagement and didn't even get a chance to set up my VCR. Is there any good soul out there who taped it and might be willing to dub me a copy or loan me yours briefly? Write to mike.chermside@destiny.com if you can help me!

      -- Michael Chermside

    21. Re:Spoiler-tastic by wurp · · Score: 1

      It fights me back. I'm allergic to corn. It took me years to figure out why I always had a cold for a week after I ate Mexican.

    22. Re:Spoiler-tastic by IHateEverybody · · Score: 2


      You'd think that for Klingons this would be a perfect first contact. Remember, they *like* to fight.

      Of course a *real* Klingon would have shot (or knifed) the farmer before he said, 'Freeze'!

      And that may have been part of the problem. They didn't allow the Klingon to die with honor. Maybe the Vulcans were right about wanting to just pull the plug and return the corpse to Quo'nos.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    23. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Jakyll · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly positive - if fact I'm 100% positive that the thing that Worf didn't want to talk about, was the fact the Trek Franchise is just going to pretend the Kingons didn't look like that in TOS - remember he said this during a very toungue in cheek episode ... let it go and enjoy Trek. The speech from Cochrane was a great touch

    24. Re:Spoiler-tastic by cmeans · · Score: 1
      Yes, but then there would have been no point in returning the corpse...Klingons consider it an empty shell...worth nothing.

      Oops, there goes the pilot's plot.

    25. Re:Spoiler-tastic by jx100 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, this guy is getting the idea right, but the facts wrong. The incident Bonker is referring to happened on the episode on TNG where another culture (the ones with the unseparated digits) were about to obtain warp capability, when one of the federation "spies" (Riker) is caught after an accident.

      In the episode, Picard refers to the first contact with Klingons as with the Federation making first contact(when the Klingons attained Warp drive) , and that the Fed. didn't know anything about their culture. He also says that if they had implanted spies like Riker, then first contact would've gone much smoother.

    26. Re:Spoiler-tastic by efuseekay · · Score: 2

      I'm a little disappointed with how contrived the disinfectant scene was. And the way the camera paused during it was just silly

      A LITTLE disappointed? Geeze, I can watch that scene 1001 times and still doesn't know what the heck the two were talking about!!!!

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    27. Re:Spoiler-tastic by GMontag451 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, but then there would have been no point in returning the corpse...Klingons consider it an empty shell...worth nothing.


      Except for the fact that this corpse happened to contain some very important information.

    28. Re:Spoiler-tastic by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2


      The only thing they coulda done to make a worst first impression was to put on white hoods and burn a cross in front of his spaceship.


      Well... they probably burnt his ship. ;)


      "He wants to know where his ship is."

      "Tell him it was destroyed."

    29. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Grue · · Score: 1

      And fleshy.. don't forget the fleshy. Shiny and fleshy gooooooood.

      Gruevy

    30. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wanted B'elana to give me head ... man, that would've felt sooooo good...those soft, full lips...man...

    31. Re:Spoiler-tastic by cthugha · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My own personal theory regarding the disappearing, reappearing Klingon forehead ridges is that it's some kind of ritual mutilation that became fashionable circa the 23rd century (think: circumcision with power tools) but in the "present time" (i.e. the 24th century) is considered disgusting and repulsive, hence Worf's embarrassment in that DS9 tribbles 'n' time travel episode.

    32. Re:Spoiler-tastic by colk99 · · Score: 1

      No the whole reason that archer didnt get in the pod was so we could see the nifty transporter which had never been tested on life before.

    33. Re:Spoiler-tastic by colk99 · · Score: 1

      Oh I am guessing the camera pause was when my local UPN affliate basically lost signal for 30 seconds or so

    34. Re:Spoiler-tastic by boboroshi · · Score: 1

      I thought the disinfectant scene was great. Of course, there's a bit of a preview in Maxim this month. Hot damn!

      --
      // john athayde
      # x@boboroshi.com
      # http://www.boboroshi.com/
    35. Re:Spoiler-tastic by fwc · · Score: 2
      Another poster mentioned that the Klingon appearance wasn't explained, merely brushed away for later. About the first contact though.. it has been hinted at that those bad guys are time travelish. Which would suggest they can play god with the ST universe, as this is different than what happened.

      There is a quote in there from the bad guys that the "Humans and the Vulcans weren't supposed to be involved yet". Perhaps this is *exactly* the story arc that is being used... We just don't know it yet.

    36. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Funny
      ...give them a ghoti...

      Am I the only one that read this as "...give them a fish..."

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    37. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Millennium · · Score: 2

      For instance, we're looking at the later appearance of the Klingons, when Worf told us that something happened to change their appearance that "we don't like to talk about".
      That's still possible. All Worf said was that "it is a long story; we do not discuss it with outsiders." For all we know, this appearance-changing thing could well have only been for a hundred years or so. I can't believe I'm actually dredging this up, but remember the episode where Kahless -an Klingon from thousands of years in the past- was cloned? And yet he looked very similar to "the modern Klingon." So it's possible what whatever this thing was that changed their appearance was only a temporary phenomenon of some kind.

      Of course, the writers could simply be casting "Summon Plot-Hole" again. I wouldn't be the first time.

      And Picard told us that the war with the Klingons was sparked by a botched first contact with them. But that contact didn't seem to be botched.
      Even that is still a possibility. Remember, we don't know what the High Council said to him in the end. It could still lead to war.

      I'm a little disappointed with how contrived the disinfectant scene was. And the way the camera paused during it was just silly.
      OK, you've got me there. Utterly gratuitous. I used to say that Seven of Nine was a great character, when she was actually being "7 of 9" and not "36 of DD." Seems we have that factor again in T'Pol.

    38. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

    39. Re:Spoiler-tastic by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Too bad last night's episode blew that out of the water, by showing pre-virus Klingons with the ridges.

      My theory: there are multiple ethnic groups of Klingons. During TOS time, one of the previously-oppressed groups takes control of the others, and that's who Kirk and Spock have to deal with. Later the head-ridge Klingons take things back over, but institute a bloody "ethnic cleansing" that basically gets rid of the smooth-headed guys. The reason that Worf won't talk about it is because he's hip to human culture enough to realize that humans wouldn't really want to know that the Klingons destoyed an entire race of their kin within the last couple centuries. Or maybe just because Klingons have become civilized enough to realize that their actions were a mistake.

      Not that my theory is borne out by any books or anything, but it does fit the series' pretty well.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    40. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Oplyd+Oleo · · Score: 1
      Oh, please. Don't you get it? Worf was all but WINKING at us through the TV screen! He was trying to tell you, without breaking character, that this is not

      a continuity error that must be resolved by obsessive fans. The "thing" that Klingons "don't want to talk about," was the actual real-world fact that the original makeup design was constrained by the low budgets of 1960s television production. Just put it out of your head and enjoy the show already!

    41. Re:Spoiler-tastic by BLAMM! · · Score: 1

      Heh. I always spelled it "photi". Must be one of those 80 dialects. :)

    42. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay for a pilot

      It was a Premier or the first of the series (or season) where a Pilot is the 'test episode' used to shop a conecpt of a show to the MBA-nuckleheads.

      Sheesh.. no one saw the PILOT the other night...
      Did they even make one?

    43. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Isao · · Score: 1
      ...Worf told us that something happened to change their appearance that "we don't like to talk about".

      What about the data carried in the Klingon's DNA? Mission successful, but if it causes an unpredictable mutation (and if THAT is for some reason horribly contagious) they could have a changed appearance.

      And Picard told us that the war with the Klingons was sparked by a botched first contact with them. But that contact didn't seem to be botched.

      Plot supposition (Paramount, you heard it here). The genetic data (mentioned above) causes the mutation, and the Klingons suspect Humans of a bio-engineered attack. They retaliate, and a small war ensues.

      War is eventually resolved, when the Klingons realize it was their own data-smuggling that caused it (=shame, =reluctance to talk about it). Humanity, because they were wrongly accused and suffered great losses, doesn't trust Klingons for a few hundred years.

      Did I just blow season one?

    44. Re:Spoiler-tastic by cmeans · · Score: 1
      Yes, but they didn't know that. (Unless they were being sneaky and read ahead in the script.)

    45. Re:Spoiler-tastic by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      That happened here too. It looked like they switched to another satellite feed or some such thing.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    46. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Picard told us that the war with the Klingons was sparked by a botched first contact with them. But that contact didn't seem to be botched

      This "first contact" could indeed be perceived as botched, since the Humans kept the Klingon alive instead of letting him die like a warrior. The Klingons would have even seen the Okie farmer as a brave and honorable warrior himself for using deadly force to defend himself in the face of such a formidable possible adversary in a confusing situation, and would not have considered the loss of their brother to be such a big deal in view of the circumstances of his death.

    47. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course we won't ever be happy - this is slashdot, no one is ever happy.

    48. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Reductionist · · Score: 1

      No doubt.

      The original series was made at the time when most effects makeup created aliens along the lines of the paper plate people. If anything, the original Klingons reminded me more of gringos from some Clint Eastwood spaghetti western of the 60s.

    49. Re:Spoiler-tastic by oconnorcjo · · Score: 2

      Everybody is going through too much thought over this! The reason why there is a discrepancy IS because in the original series ALL THE ALIENS LOOK HUMAN and in TNG, they decided to make aliens look alien and thus the Klingons "got ridges" but when DS9 decided to splice a TOS with DS9- they were comfronted with a HUGE difference in Klingon looks so the writers thought "We are going to need an explanation for this. You know how the fans are..." and another writer (or maybe even the same writer) said "Hey- I got it, we will have Whorf say 'we used to look like that but I would rather not talk about it'. That line should fix our problem and we can continue to have fun splicing footage.".
      No I have no IDEA what really "went down" but I believe MY conjecture is much more realistic than all the rationalizing done by fans to make all these shows a "cohesive whole".

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    50. Re:Spoiler-tastic by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 1

      OK, are you guys blind? The foiled first contact was the humans shooting the Klingon, then nursing him back to health. A HUGE no-no in the Klingon Empire.

      --
      Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
    51. Re:Spoiler-tastic by wankomatic2000 · · Score: 1
      And Picard told us that the war with the Klingons was sparked by a botched first contact with them. But that contact didn't seem to be botched.
      I think the point was that everyone wanted the klingon to die (including the klingon himself), because it would mean that the message would arrive safely to Chronos without intervention. By imposing human values onto the situation, the captain risked destroying their whole plan.

      Sounds like a botched first contact to me...

    52. Re:Spoiler-tastic by jgerman · · Score: 2
      Good science fiction does not violate physical laws. Science Fantasy does, which is essentially what Star Trek is. Science Fiction does not allow for things which cannot happen to happen. If you want to violate a scientific law (or more accurately what we believe is a law of nature) in science fiction you must explain how and why the event (or whatever) is possible. Not that I'm knocking Star Trek, but it's like Star Wars, call it Space Opera of Science Fantasy or whatever, but it is not really science fiction.


      On another not though, I'm kinda dissapointed I didn't watch Enterprise, (I was busy buying a DreamCast and putting homebrew software on it damn ./), I was never a big fan of Star Trek, haven't watched it since I was a kid, but even with the problems people have been pointing out, my curiosity has been piqued.


      According to the laws of science a thing must have mass and take up space in order to exist, the laws of science do not have mass, the loaws of science do not take up space, therefore by the laws of science the laws of science do not exist.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    53. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Fleshy as in carbon-based, or silicon-based?

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    54. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although I've been waiting for months for this, I missed it because my GF wanted to go out for dinner.

      For you see, I have kissed a girl.

    55. Re:Spoiler-tastic by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Hi Todd, just some inisghts..

      >>when Worf told us that something happened to change their appearance that "we don't like to talk about".
      I'm gonna use conspiracy theory here. From what we know in this first episode, genetic mutation is abundant in STE's time. My guess is that a group of the Klingon race will suffer from "Humanoid Envy" and will seek cosmetic surgery to make them appear more human/vulcan like.

      >>And Picard told us that the war with the Klingons was sparked by a botched first contact with them. But that contact didn't seem to be botched.

      Actually, we don't know that for sure unless we speak klingon. We did get bit's and peices (The downed Klingon was pissed he didn't die) So the humans saving his life might actually be comitting a "klingon social faux pau". My guess is the klingons now view humans as a race that does not have respect for the sanctity of their ways.

      Anyways thats what I think is going on. I thought the show was great. Then again i'm a second generation trekkie :P

      --toq

    56. Re:Spoiler-tastic by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      >appearance of the Klingons

      Here on Earth we have many different races that all look different. Some have all short black hair, some have all long blond hair, some are very short, some are very tall. Some have facial hair, some don't. Some have wide-set round eyes, some have close-set slanted eyes. Add different clothing styles and you have everything from robes and turbans to business suits.

      Why is it that given this diversity on our one real example of an inhabited planet, everybody gets all bent trying to explain how Klingon's could have different looks?

      Are *all* Klingons from the same racial group?
      Is *all* of Vulcan hot desert?
      Is *all* of every other minor planet sparse forest with large styrofoam boulders strewn about?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    57. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Yogger · · Score: 1

      That happened to someone else too??
      Mine cut out at least 3 times during the show, the longest was almost a minute.

      Do you live in South Florida too?

    58. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Head Ridges???

      you forgot about the "most important" thing....
      The Sparkly Golden Pants!!!!
      ...now there's something the klingons dont want to talk about... I think thats why they are such an agro race, I mean wouldn't you be totally agro if you were in a outfit like that?

    59. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well I'M happy!

      :o)

    60. Re:Spoiler-tastic by UUDDLRLRBASTRT · · Score: 1

      Things said in future series. Worf's comment about things that happened that they "don't like to talk about with outsiders." Perhaps something happened which took the bumps away for a brief period, and brought them back. We all sort of assumed the bumpy foreheads came AFTER the thing they "don't like to talk about" perhaps the lack of bumps was caused by the thing they "don't like to talk about." As for Captain Picards reference to first contact with the Klingons. Who knows what the future ramifications of the contact will be. Isn't that what the series is about?

    61. Re:Spoiler-tastic by angelo · · Score: 1

      They most certainly did know he had it in his blood. Did you miss the last five minutes of the episode? He comes into the council hall, announces he has FAILED, and the leader cuts his hand and the scan his blood. I think they had the general idea.

    62. Re:Spoiler-tastic by cmeans · · Score: 1
      Yes, the Klingons knew...the Vulcans (and the humans)...which is who we were talking about...did not.

      However, yes, I did miss some of the episode because my cable company RCN has such crappy service that my cable box went offline for 5 minutes during the "space station" scene.

    63. Re:Spoiler-tastic by thing12 · · Score: 1

      LOL!! Yeah, I've seen that play on english before... probably too many times or I would have spelled the word correctly ;-) Can't believe I typed that!

    64. Re:Spoiler-tastic by IHateEverybody · · Score: 2


      However, yes, I did miss some of the episode because my cable company RCN [rcn.com] has such crappy service that my cable box went offline for 5 minutes during the "space station" scene.

      That appears to have been a national problem. The Chicago UPN affiliate went out for a few minutes while I was watching and I have seen a few complaints on Usenet about the outage as well.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    65. Re:Spoiler-tastic by cmeans · · Score: 1
      Ooops, my mistake.

      I'm watching it again on my TiVo, and yes, the Vulcans did know that the Klingons wanted him back quickly (dead or alive).

    66. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the obvious explanation is that in tos, they didn't bother with much makeup, while in later series they decided the Klingons needed a less human appearance.

      Why you all have to go and make such a big deal of it is beyond me... I mean, this is a tv show!

    67. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must intervene with geek knowledge -- ..According to the Star Trek novel, Final Reflection by J. Ford, there are actual human/Klingon hybrid experiments. What the Klingons don't like talking about is the genetic experiments and the empire power shifts between the 'pure' Imperial Klingons and the hybrids.

      The novel is quite good since it focuses totally on the Klingons though it runs on the vein of a more subtle culture than portrayed in the original and following series.

    68. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon. Can't you all figure out this issue with the head ridges and what we don't talk about? A wounded Klingon on Earth needs a blood transfusion and Doctor Phlox uses the only thing at hand - HUMAN BLOOD - thus the other black marks in the DNA, Klang is already mutating into a closer to human being and his genetic material is spread throughout the homeworld (transfusions, propagations, transporter malfunctions....)

    69. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 2

      According to the laws of science a thing must have mass and take up space in order to exist,...

      So, there's no such thing as energy?

    70. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...in TNG, they decided to make aliens look alien and thus the Klingons "got ridges"...

      Since being a Trekkie is all about nit-picking, I'd like to point out that Klingons first got their ridges in Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979?). Otherwise, your theory works for me.

    71. Re:Spoiler-tastic by frogstomper · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      For you see, I have kissed a girl.
      Gosh. You must be very proud.
    72. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      Nope. Me too! :-)

    73. Re:Spoiler-tastic by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      Hey, if someone just walked on to your farm and blew up your grain silo for no apparant reason. (assuming the farmer didn't see any of the preceding action), I imagine you'd be a bit honked off! At least he did try to talk a bit before he shot the guy. Overall lack of communication didn't help either. Apparantly not everyone in the freaking universe has had translators implanted in them yet. (Ref: The Ferengi "Roswell" episode from DS9)

    74. Re:Spoiler-tastic by jgerman · · Score: 2
      Hey I didn't make the laws. Besides the whole point was that the entire statement was a paradox, not the bit that you chose to quote out of context.


      Pushing aside the fact that you so rudely mis-quoted me ;> let's look at energy (I'll play along regardless of my original point and contrary to my personal opinions being the DA is fun). Energy is a catch all term we use for the ability to do work. It doesn't exist in and of itself. Let's look at the particular form of energy otherwise known as heat. Heat does not exist as a discrete phenomenon it is soley a characteristic of things that do exist namely it is the measurement of the excitement of atoms in an object. A similar argument can be used for any form of energy you come up with. These things do not exist, they are attributes of objects that do. Energy is something we made up to explain the world around us.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  18. Interesting medical science by adaking · · Score: 1

    Rodent droppings and leech-type creatures - nice to see a regression to the 18th century medical practices.

    1. Re:Interesting medical science by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, leeches and maggots are proving to be among the best tools modern medicine has. Leeches are used in re-attachements of severed extremities to prevent clotting and maintain blood flow; and maggots are used for removing dead tissue. Both are better at those tasks than any artificial alternative yet devised. Still gross, though.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Interesting medical science by Partisan · · Score: 1

      marsupial (sp?) droppings...

    3. Re:Interesting medical science by terpia · · Score: 1

      I saw a minute of a show once on TLC/Discovery/PBS about leeches being used in psoriasis treatment...Anyone ever heard about this?

      --
      .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
    4. Re:Interesting medical science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the "rodent" was a tribble

      same sounds, about the same size etc...

      tivo rocks

    5. Re:Interesting medical science by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      C'mon! The doctor was delightful! Do you expect tricorders and healing-beams out of some quack who showed up from nowhere who happens to know a thing or two about Klingon anatomy? This guy isn't the tea-drinking oncological specialist from your local teching hospital, he's a guy who trades services for travel/etc., probably. Of course he'd use starfish!

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  19. URL filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go here for the above link.

    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal? Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal. Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal!

    1. Re:URL filter by quarmar · · Score: 1

      I watched the show on DirecTV and I noticed that same thing about the dialogue disappearing into the background noise. It was driving me nuts in a couple of the scenes!

    2. Re:URL filter by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      > I noticed that same thing about the dialogue
      > disappearing into the background noise.

      I only saw the last 10 or 15 minutes, but I noticed that, too. I went into the menu of my TV because I thought someone was playing around with it and had jammed bass all the way up. If I do that (and surround) on my computer, the voices of playing DVDs becomes muffled and unintelligible from the background.

      Between this, the reports of 1/2 to 1 second mismatch between voice and video, and the reported 30 second freeze in one scene, it's clear they've got some serious work to do to clean things up by episode 2. Other TV shows don't have this problem. Must be a bleeding edge thing.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  20. What have we learned so far? by Chas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    C'mon people.

    Star Trek: The Original: First season
    -Wooden acting, hokey stories, lotsa work to be done.

    Star Trek: TNG: First Season
    -Wooden acting, hokey stories, lotsa work to be done (just watch some of them fer chrissakes!).

    DS9: First Season:
    -Wooden acting, hokey stories, lotsa work to be done.

    Voyager: First season (and second, and third...)
    -Wooden acting, hokey stories, lotsa work to be done.

    Give the series a little time to put down some roots.

    Sheesh.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:What have we learned so far? by illaqueate · · Score: 2, Funny

      enterprise:
      wooden cock, almost bulging out of underwear

    2. Re:What have we learned so far? by davey23sol · · Score: 2

      Star Trek: The Animated Series: First season
      -- Wooden drawing
      (characters tended to phase through objects.)

      give it time...

      --


      "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    3. Re:What have we learned so far? by PD · · Score: 2

      If you look closer, you'll see that's the profile of his hand. My wife and I started laughing when we both saw what looked like a big old hardon when the dude was getting his back washed by the Vulcan.

    4. Re:What have we learned so far? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we went back over it a number of times on the TiVo: it is not his hand.

    5. Re:What have we learned so far? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Star Trek: TNG: First Season -Wooden acting, hokey stories, lotsa work to be done (just watch some of them fer chrissakes!)."

      But still ... in that episode where the Enterprise (D) and Ferengi ship are caught in that energy dampening field thingy and Riker suggests a jump to high warp, you can't help laughing at (the very young) Geordi:

      "I see where you're going Commander, we kick it into full throttle and high warp it outta here! WHOOWEE!!!"

    6. Re:What have we learned so far? by PD · · Score: 4, Funny

      What if we're both right??? His hand on a big hardon? I've got to check my TiVo again...

    7. Re:What have we learned so far? by blitzrage · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know this won't be moded up, but damnit, I liked Voyager! It was the only Star Trek that I enjoyed as much a TNG. I thought DS9 was stupid.

      --

      I have no signature
    8. Re:What have we learned so far? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and a severe case of nipplelitis...

    9. Re:What have we learned so far? by psychalgia · · Score: 1

      um, that wooden acting in the first series... that never really went away did it? I think thats half the camp appeal of that show, and the only reason I like priceline.com commercials.

      --

      ________________________________________________

    10. Re:What have we learned so far? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from Q, who had the excuse of evasiveness for pointless yet well delivered dialog, I try very hard to forget the first season of TNG. If or when they start coming out with dvd box sets I think I'll have to skip that one.

    11. Re:What have we learned so far? by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      Its Star Trek. By definition it's bollocks. That is the defining characteristic of the franchise.

      If you doubt consider what would happen if you got the peopl behind, for instance, B5 to produce a new ST series. They'd try and be consistant, they'd have a plot, they'd deal with big questions, in short they'd make science fiction. All very nice but it wouldn't be ST would it...

      The reason the first episodes are bad is that they haven't had time to set up all the running gags.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    12. Re:What have we learned so far? by Nick_Psyko · · Score: 1

      I agree, I don't understand why on DS9 it was always the same group of people. It got boring quite quickly.

      At least in Voyager you met the rest of the crew. In nearly every episode you met someone new in engineering :)

      TNG was entertaining, I liked Pickard, "Engage". He had a most powerful and wise ambiance. Unlike Ben Sisco, who would only be assertive if he was angry, or someone toughed his fkin baseball!!!

      --
      mountvol \\?\brain{dbe069b1-65ae-11d5-bab4-806d6172696f}\hu mor\
    13. Re:What have we learned so far? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would even have to admit...

      Babylon 5, first season: Wooden acting, hokey stories (e.g. Infection, TKO), lotsa work to be done.

  21. West coast? by Wonko42 · · Score: 2

    Christ almighty, can we at least wait until the damn thing has AIRED on the west coast? It doesn't start for twenty minutes over here.

    1. Re:West coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey look, at least you'll know to look for the tits.

      Clearasil, anyone?

    2. Re:West coast? by Cheezlbub · · Score: 1

      Than don't read it.

      Easy enough.

    3. Re:West coast? by unitron · · Score: 2

      At least it's airing in your market, unlike some of them here in the east. &@^%$#*! Time Warner Cable!

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    4. Re:West coast? by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1
      Christ almighty, can we at least wait until the damn thing has AIRED on the west coast? It doesn't start for twenty minutes over here.

      Heh, heh. That's what satellite TV is for. I watched an eastern time zone feed (City TV). I set the VCR before I left for work this morning and it was all ready to watch by the time I had supper ready.

      The show itself? It has potential. Being so much closer to today it had a certain, well, resonance.

      Now to see what they do with it. Get it right and they have a winner. Get it wrong and they have another Voyager.

      ...laura

    5. Re:West coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAAA-HAAAW!

    6. Re:West coast? by James+Lanfear · · Score: 1

      Heh, heh. That's what satellite TV is for.

      Well, DirecTV no longer feeds non-local basic cable, and barely feeds local basic if you're outside of a major metropolitan area. I used to like watching the afternoon New York news before school, but then Congress stepped in....

    7. Re:West coast? by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      StarChoice and ExpressVu will sell their wares to anybody. As long as you're in Canada, they don't care where you live.

      The cable companies are not amused by the profusion of little dishes, even in cities that have perfectly good cable, but they've been told they should try competing for a change...

      ...laura

  22. the same can be said for you michael by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your articles are rehashed, you have no personality and the only difference is that you refuse to go offline.

    And talk about cold and emotionless _and_ thoughtless. Wow. It's you to a t.

  23. No "Wow" by Zoop · · Score: 1

    Even in the first episode of Voyager, there was a "Wow," or at least a "Cool!" moment. This one, while it didn't suck as much as what I like to call a "Wesley Gets the Ick" story, had no real "cool!" moment.

    It wasn't bad, but man, given that premise, think what Roddenberry or Serling or Straczynski could have done with it.

    It's sad, Berman, really--just let it go gracefully into that good night, or at least wait until your stable of soap-opera hacks get some new ideas. Hey! Here's an idea--go to the writers of Analog magazine and then just film them.

    Sigh.

    1. Re:No "Wow" by arideout · · Score: 1

      Weren't you watching when they shot the grapplers?

      That was damn funny.

      So were the pink and blue frog dancers, for that matter.

    2. Re:No "Wow" by Zoop · · Score: 1

      Funny, yes.

      Impressive? Yeeawn.

      Would have liked an MST version to highlight the lack of dramatic tension too.

      "Hey, Mike, I'm on the edge of my seat. Guess I better scoot back a little."

    3. Re:No "Wow" by mskfisher · · Score: 1

      "Wesley Gets the Ick"?
      That got an honest laugh out of me. Well done. :)

      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    4. Re:No "Wow" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as the show went it was missing a bit of a wow, and had some things all to familiar. B&B pulled the old "temporal" chit out of the hat again. Don't they have anything else left in there?

    5. Re:No "Wow" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Wow moment? Two words: decontamination scene.

      Those creepy new mutants were the "cool" of the epsiode, I'd say. And that acid-trip room, I've been in one of those. WOW.

      I'll be hitting mute during the theme tho.
      Sheesh.

    6. Re:No "Wow" by reverius · · Score: 1

      what is that a reference to? It sounds funny... but I'm sure I'm missing the joke entirely...

    7. Re:No "Wow" by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

      Yes, there was a "cool" moment. That was when they grabbed that pod near the Helix and the pilot ejected out of it. Definitely very cool.

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    8. Re:No "Wow" by B-Nimble · · Score: 1

      The wow moment for me...

      ...was that people were shooting at one another... and hitting

      Wow - that beats the tar out of the marksmanship of ST:The Pajama Generation (ah, it wasn't bad in some respects ;) where folks couldn't hit one another standing five yards apart in an open corridor :)

      Then again, take Star Wars... hell, the guards have bloody ARMOR and a farm boy, gambler and princess with just their regular clothes on can shoot legions of them ;)

      -- Nimble

    9. Re:No "Wow" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the worst has to be the DS9 episode where a bunch of Feddies ambush a squad of Dominion soldiers at a range of 50 meters and only manage to tag one of them. Damn, give me an M60 and I would have wiped the whole squad by my lonesome. At 50 meters bowmen would have been more effective than those dorks.

    10. Re:No "Wow" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that funky pre-echo room and the phaser shot. That counts as a "wow".

    11. Re:No "Wow" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Even in the first episode of Voyager,
      > there was a "Wow," or at least a "Cool!"
      > moment.

      Maybe you missed it, or it's just me, but
      T'Pol in her shirt and panties definitely
      got a "wow" out of me - and after realizing
      UPN actually DID show pointy Vulcan nipples
      added a "cool" on top of that "wow"...

    12. Re:No "Wow" by mskfisher · · Score: 1

      Wesley Crusher, the adolescent prodigy/stupid kid from ST:The Next Generation that everyone loved to hate.
      Several episodes featured him getting into trouble... they could be nauseatingly cutesy at times.
      A fitting reference to Wesley's lame-o misadventures.

      (see news://alt.fan.wesley.crusher.die.die.die for more info. :) )

      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    13. Re:No "Wow" by spudnic · · Score: 2

      The armor was just a machismo thing. Sure, it made them look really cool to the ladies, but it also made it hard to react quickly when being fired upon.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
  24. Enyjoyable and promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually enjoed it! Something different than the same old dragging on Voyager trip. And Deep Space Nine, well, it sucked big time. Seriously, though, I think this has great potential with the Enterprise exploring the galaxy. I just hope there'll be more independent episodes and stories as the original series and 'Next Generation' had. I really hate to imagine this might go the route of another space saga soap route...

  25. Blatant Fanservice... Not that I mind by Bonker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looks like Paramount is still trying to grab viewwers by their gonads. I know that I was certainly paying close attention to the 'disinfection' scene where the guy got to rub gelatin all over the scantily-clad vulcan girl.

    Still, I was pleasantly surprised by the level of prejudice, intolerance and violence. This show definitely played a lot like an old TOS show. It was quite a refreshing change of pace from Voyager and TNG's 'moral issue of the week' approach.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Blatant Fanservice... Not that I mind by BasharTeg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Listen, I am a male nerd. You are a male nerd. We are all male nerds. We were all just bought out by the grease up the Vulcan girl. Is there something wrong with that ? HELLS NO. I was to see MUCH MORE disinfection. Maybe next time the Asian girl and the Vulcan are the only ones to get infected.

    2. Re:Blatant Fanservice... Not that I mind by jayhawk88 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh. I can just see Episode 340, Season 14:

      Lt. Mandrake: Damn, myself and the 4 female crew members I took over to examine that alien ship somehow managed to become infected with a clothes eating virus!

      Hottie Doctor: It's worse than that, sir; my readings indicate that this virus may trigger dangerous amounts of sexual hormone production in the body!

      Lt. Mandrake: I see....recommendations Hottie Vulcan Science Chick?

      Hottie Vulcan Science Chick: Sir, these scented oils, candles, and sensously-shaped plastic devices might help. Allow me to demonstrate on Ensign Youngbuck here.

      Ensign Youngbuck: Whoa! They didn't teach us anything like this at the academy!

      *Cue the Beastie Boys - Sabrosa*

    3. Re:Blatant Fanservice... Not that I mind by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      OK, THAT'S funny. Especially given the obscene number of times I've heard "they didn't teach us anything like this at the academy" in ALL The ST series. Kudos.

    4. Re:Blatant Fanservice... Not that I mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >*Cue the Beastie Boys - Sabrosa*


      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Oh hell yeah man, that was perfect. So's the tune for a scene like that.

    5. Re:Blatant Fanservice... Not that I mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a male nerd, and I actually preferred the guys... there is potential between the captain and his first officer :-)

    6. Re:Blatant Fanservice... Not that I mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She should have taken her shirt off like he did. What sexists those network execs. are..

    7. Re:Blatant Fanservice... Not that I mind by Snaller · · Score: 1
      Still, I was pleasantly surprised by the level of prejudice, intolerance and violence. This show definitely played a lot like an old TOS show. It was quite a refreshing change of pace from Voyager and TNG's 'moral issue of the week' approach.


      TOS was the immature child, TNG then grew up to be the full mature human who had put away the childish things of today... if Enterprise is back to TOS i guess we have come full cirlce, and Enterprise is the senil old goat.


      oh well,

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  26. Bloody time travel by Vinson+Massif · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They just _had_ to trot out the temporal crap in the pilot episode. Why couldn't they have waited 'til the 3rd season when the writers run out of new ideas.

    Not as gritty as I would have liked either.

    --
    "Remember, any tool can be the right tool." -- Red Green
    1. Re:Bloody time travel by DigiDarkCloud · · Score: 1

      Someone mod parent up. It seems that any SciFi writers drag out time travel when they can't be more creative. And this is just the pilot! It can only go downhill from here.

      I'll bet five bucks that there'll be an episode, in the first season, where T'pol and Archer get beamed back into the past, and a logical and moral dilemma ensues over who should or shouldn't kill whom.

      --
      SIG: 11
  27. Let the soft porn begin... by geekplus · · Score: 1

    She's in Maxim this month. Why won't this link work?

    1. Re:Let the soft porn begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.maximonline.com/girls_of_maxim/girl_780 .html

      Dunno

    2. Re:Let the soft porn begin... by Nutt · · Score: 1

      She looks cuter with short hair :)

    3. Re:Let the soft porn begin... by domc · · Score: 1

      ...and pointy ears! :>

    4. Re:Let the soft porn begin... by erc · · Score: 1

      You got that right!! Wow...what a hottie...

      --
      -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
    5. Re:Let the soft porn begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man now I don't have to steal playboy anymore off Dish! I can watch porn legally on UPN! YES!! There is a god!!!

      That had to be the hottest Trek scene I have ever seen!

      I can see the future of Enterprise now... Soon we'll be able to rent the NC-17 versions of the episodes at Blockbuster!

  28. Klingon anatomy changed again by EvilBuu · · Score: 1

    They have red blood now. In The Undiscovered Country, it was green and blue (or something close, I'm colorblind). Plus there's the time taken to get anywhere at a mere 30,000,000 KM/s...
    Eh, the depth charges were cool.

    --

    Green-voting, republican-registered, socialist-libertarian.
    1. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Informative
      In The Undiscovered Country, it was green and blue (or something close, I'm colorblind).
      It was Pepto-Bismol pink in STVI. Though I think they bled red enough in TNG and DS9. It's Vulcans who are supposed to have green blood.
      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by sopwath · · Score: 1
      Isn't it Vulcan blood that's supposed to be green?

      good luck,
      sopwath

    3. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by Pludodog · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the film would have been rated pg-13 if they showed human-like red blood, but by changing it to bubble-gummy blood, they managed to stay with a pg rating.

      Pludo

    4. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by heptapod · · Score: 1

      Vulcan blood is yellow, Spock's blood was green because he is a halfbreed.

    5. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      I can't believe I'm posting to this stupid nerdy thread, but...

      ...it makes sense. In The Undiscovered Country their blood was purple, but it was also floating around in a depressurized, gravity-free space craft, if I remember right. Human blood is also bluish purple when it doesn't contain oxygen (as when it's traveling through your veins back to your heart... just take a look at the underside of your forearm). So I imagine that's what it'd look like when it's floating around in a vacuum?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    6. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by wayne606 · · Score: 1

      If we're going to be picky, red blood cells don't have nuclei, and thus no DNA, in humans.

    7. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by ttyRazor · · Score: 1

      It was in zero gravity, not a vacuum. The ship didn't depressurize, and also at the conference at the end the klingon scotty shot didn't bleed pink, prompting a "this isn't klingon blood" from Worf's grandfather. In TNG it had been established to be red, somehow the movie writers hadn't checked with them, and came up with pink for some reason, but it's been ignored in the later shows.

    8. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by ttyRazor · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is green, with the explanation being that vulcan blood is copper based, instead of iron based. At least that was what I had heard some years ago, that factoid may have been revised like just about every other little detail that gets mangled whenever its convenient or impractical to look up the original explanation.

    9. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by wsdorsey · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. Vulcan blood is green because it is copper based. And Human blood is red because it's iron based.

      --

      -Dorsey

      If you can't beat them, exploit them. *Then* beat them... -Milk & Cheese

    10. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the original explaination was "Wouldn't it be cool if his blood was a funny color!?"

    11. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was light purple in ST:TUC
      it was dark purple on the screen that I saw last night...
      I thought it looked pretty close.
      And human blood varies from bright red outside the body to nearly purple-blue (to blue in veins) inside the body...

      Besides did they show DNA?
      It could just be a compterized blood typer (you know blood has types A,B,AB, O)

    12. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Pickier yet... =)
      Do they have mitochondrial DNA?

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    13. Re:Klingon anatomy changed again by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that Klingons, like humans, have red blood. Vulcans, Romulans, and Rigellians have green.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  29. 1950 by michaelmalak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's the original subject that Slashdot's "Lameness filter" censored:
    1950 meets 2001 meets 2150

    We knew it would be a problem, and it's interesting to see it play out on the screen. Humans have achieved world peace, yet captains and admirals are all white males. Computers have speech capability, yet voice-activation is not yet invented. And, of course what we all expected -- no gender-neutral language yet.

    1. Re:1950 by firewort · · Score: 2

      "pause log"
      "resume log"

      These commands seemed to work- other than that, you're pretty much on top of things.

      --

    2. Re:1950 by Stalcair · · Score: 1
      you answered your own problems:

      "Humans have achieved world peace, yet captains and admirals are all white males." Perhaps they have overcome racism and hypocritical bigotry and hate. Now they use the best qualified that happens in this case to be white males. Racism is racism is racism.

      "Computers have speech capability, yet voice activation is not yet invented." I assume you mean of complex computer controls, but that would be more a function of artificial intelligence than speech recognition. Unless it is speech for every simple little or even big command and tweak. The Captain seemed to use voice activated controls with his logs, which knew enough (some AI there mind you) to take the phrase 'computer pause/stop' and 'computer resume' to be commands not to be included. (Where was that audible escape character anyway?!)

      "And of course what we all expected -- no gender-neutral language yet." Well, it would seem that time has a way of neutering many things that we find through history to once have had added, altered or completely reversed meaning. Perhaps 'Sir' could have been agreed on as neutral... actually, I really didn't pay attention to that. Which brings me to a confusing, on my part, issue of your statement (the first half) I didn't expect much of anything except it to be about 100 or so years before the Kirk time. Then again, I don't generally go through life looking for trouble and trying to find problems and people coming after me... because I would then find them.

      --

      I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

    3. Re:1950 by michaelmalak · · Score: 2
      The Captain seemed to use voice activated controls with his logs

      True -- I forgot about that. I seem to remember the Captain or someone on the navigation console speaking to engineering using "push to talk".

      'Sir' could have been agreed on as neutral

      Indeed it is, but I was referring, of course, to "where no man has gone before," which, as we know, Kirk corrected for the record mid-sentence at the of Star Trek VI.

    4. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And, of course what we all expected -- no gender-neutral language yet.

      Why? Have they developed gender-neutral sexes yet?

    5. Re:1950 by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      "where no man has gone before,"

      Couldn't the years have neutered that word (man)? If everyone takes the sentence to mean "mankind (and takes "mankind" to mean "humanity" :-), then there is gender neutrality.

    6. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans have achieved world peace, yet captains and admirals are all white males.

      So? How else do you think world peace will be achieved? Group hugs and harmonic convergence? No. The european based societies will have to kill everyone else off.

    7. Re:1950 by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 2

      Is a gender neutral language to be the end goal of reaching 50 years into the future?....REALLY?...

      Is it such a world-wide problem, threatening the planet to it's core?...I personally don't think so, but perhaps other people disagree. So if the humans of 2150 got the whole world peace thing down, I think we should cut them a little slack for not having gotten around to gender neutrality in language yet. Yessh...

      And with regards to the "where no 'man' has gone before" line...Man in that sense is NOT referring to the male gender, but is instead a gender neatural description of the human race. There's a huge difference, and I think most people would agree that the version of "man" used there was decidedly gender netural.

      Just like manhole does not have to directly translate to womanhole as well if a woman is doing the street construction.

      In any case, I guess they could change "where no man has gone before" to "where no man or woman or tentically thing of the 76a gender or the not quite so tentically thing of the 398s gender or the non-gendered blobs of planet Gorprim or..."

      hehe

    8. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant to say: "Humans have achieved world peace, yet three people in a room happen to be all white males." I'm shocked! Shocked! (And I cite evidence of your bigotry in the fact that you didn't even mention that there were no black Vulcans in the room either! ;-)

      Voice-activation: You try going into battle, with a bridge full of people screaming and bulkheads failing, and try to get any computer algorithm to understand you! Talking is a lot easier than listening.

      No gender-neutral language: Ok, so for the sake of linguistic accuracy, next time we'll do the whole show in esperanto, since it is the official world common language and all... What? You don't speak esperanto? Well you'd better start studying if you want to watch!

    9. Re:1950 by Telek · · Score: 2

      In any case, I guess they could change "where no man has gone before" to "where no man or woman or tentically thing of the 76a gender or the not quite so tentically thing of the 398s gender or the non-gendered blobs of planet Gorprim or..."

      er, what's wrong with the "where no one has gone before"? Seems pretty slick to me.

      Is a gender neutral language to be the end goal of reaching 50 years into the future?....REALLY?...

      Er, isn't that 150 years? But in either case, mankind doesn't "decide" to make a gender neutral language. All it takes is for one person to coin a phrase and for people to use it to get around the him/her/their issue and the he/she/?it?/they issue, etc. Even today there are acceptable alternatives to most gender problems. And the term "guy" could have just become commonly accepted as gender inspecific (as it is mostly today), or even "man" could have become gender inspecific because everyone calls then "males" now. Just because a word means something today doesn't mean that it will mean the same thing 10 years from now, nevermind 50. Epistemology is really interesting.

      And I have learned, because it is impossible to do otherwise, that you must give all SF shows a certain amount of slack.

      For example, you must ignore the language issues to the most part. Yes, you will hear everything in english. Doesn't mean that they're speaking english, but we'll all hear it in that. And when interspecies communications takes effect with species that they just met for the first time, well, just let that one slide. It's cool if they attempt to compensate for this, but it's not a big deal.

      Secondly, take things in stride on a consistancy point of view. That is to say that if they're consistantly inconsistent (to current life) in predictable ways, then get used to it. Don't complain because of the "woah captain, the [insert tech here] just ruptured and the [insert tech here] just [insert tech here]'ed" when it doesn't make a lot of sense or contradicts what happened 5 episodes before in the show. However where you can complain is when they contradict themselves in largly obvious ways. But if the show has defined that a "heisenburg compensator" will allow you to determine both the position and velocity of a particle at the same time, fine, as long as they keep it consistant inside the show.

      Thirdly try to ignore things that can't really be helped without a great expense. If they're on Mars and gravity/the moon/some other planet looks about the same (obviously because it will be filmed the same!), go with it. If they say that one planet has a more orangish sun than yellow, but you see a yellow one in a later show, don't complain. However what you can complain about is things that could have easily been avoided. For example, on B5:Crusade there's one thing that stuck out in my mind like a sore thumb. There's a show where Gideon is in an encounter suit walking through a deck that has been depressurized, and not only is there papers all over the place, but as he walks by one it moves as if blown! If there's no air, you can't do that...

      And finally give shows at least a few episodes to get their feet on the ground. Almost all shows kinda suck for a while and take some getting used to, epsecially if you're picky. I got tired of turning off my brain to watch SF so I just learned to change my perspective instead =) You don't need to be picky and displeased about everything, it's your choice (the generic pleural you that is).

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    10. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the point. In the TOS, it was always "where no man has gone before". At the end of the sixth movie, Kirk says "where no man -- where no one -- has gone before". It was couched in terms of him getting past his own rascist view of Klingons, to mean all races instead of just mankind. But given the political climate of the day, it was obviously done to be PC for the audience. It stuck with people enough that fans wondered what they'd do with it on this series. Apparently they opted for sticking with plot continuity over the PC statement. Good for them.

    11. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like manhole does not have to directly translate to womanhole

      Of course it doesn't - unless you're some sick bisexual freak. A man's disgusting shit-encrusted rectum is not the same as a sweet delicious pussy.

    12. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "True -- I forgot about that. I seem to remember the Captain or someone on the navigation console speaking to engineering using "push to talk"."

      Captain used the p-t-t button on the wall comm several times. Just like in TOS..

    13. Re:1950 by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      no gender-neutral language yet

      And no gender ambiguity. No lesbians, no gay men, no transgendered.

      Is the future going to be so straight? Not if the present is any indication.

      Why the blinders, Paramount? Is the gay Star Trek audience really so insignificant that you still ignore us?

      Gay bashers cheerfully ignored.

    14. Re:1950 by GMontag451 · · Score: 1
      You're missing the point. In the TOS, it was always "where no man has gone before". At the end of the sixth movie, Kirk says "where no man -- where no one -- has gone before". It was couched in terms of him getting past his own rascist view of Klingons, to mean all races instead of just mankind.


      I always thought it was done as an homage to TNG, since that is how they say it in their credits.

    15. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No lesbians

      Actually, there was a DS9 episode with a lesbian affair in it. It was the one were the chick with the creature in her(Dax?) meets an old lover who was now in a female host.

    16. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disgusting shit-encrusted rectum? Sounds like you have some issues, the first of which is learning to wipe properly.

      Then again, trolls aren't known for their good hygiene.

    17. Re:1950 by Zerth · · Score: 1

      > er, what's wrong with the "where no one has gone
      > before"? Seems pretty slick to me

      Some of the less forgiving sapient colony organisms find that very offense. *sniff*

    18. Re:1950 by IronChef · · Score: 2

      er, what's wrong with the "where no one has gone before"? Seems pretty slick to me.

      Everything is wrong with it. It is not accurate. So the crew goes to Kronos... where no representative of mankind has gone before... but the Klingons sure as hell have been there, so "no one" doesn't work.

      Sure, there are places where they will go that no ONE has been to, but most of the series will revolve around conflicts with other intelligent beings, and we will be visiting the areas they hang out in. "...no man..." is better for that.

    19. Re:1950 by CKer · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. When I was watching the premier with a group of friends we all picked up on both the "whiteness" and the lack of gay/etc. in all the Treks. Granted there was that Dax thing on DS9, But you'd think that there would be at least a couple more. We haven't seen any real character development, but I hope that THIS Trek has the balls to put a couple gay folks in this one!

      Plus when you look at the bridge crew of the TOS you had: a white captain AND a Russian , an Asian, a black woman, and a alien. Common! Even in TNG you had a android, a black man, a woman security officer, and a klingon running around. Why not a gay guy or two??

      Just my two cents.

      --
      To err is human, but to really foul things up requires a computer. -anonymous
    20. Re:1950 by Telek · · Score: 2

      okokok, so "where no human has gone before" doesn't quite have the 'ring to it, but it works then.

      However I think that the purpose of the "no one" can still work, it can still be our mandate to explore unexplored space...

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    21. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you *know* there are no gays on-board? Are you saying that there is a specific character trait that instantly identifies people as homosexual simply by looking at them? It's quite possible that there are homosexual members of the crew, but the "enlightened future people" just don't seem to want to politicize it or make a big deal of it like people in the present.

      Of course, it's just as likely that the same "enlightened future people" have realized that there is no practical purpose for homosexuality and have virtually eliminated it along with war, poverty, hunger and (ironically) overpopulation.

      I'm not a homosexual, and I don't agree with the act of homosexuality, but at least I can see homosexuals as people and not stereotypes.

      Or maybe you WANT to see "Jack" from "Will and Grace" on the bridge of the Enterprise.

    22. Re:1950 by gregholt · · Score: 1

      For future reference, Esperanto is definitely not gender-neutral.

    23. Re:1950 by phreaklegion · · Score: 1

      The guy playing the doctor sets off my 'gaydar'. I don't know if the character is supposed to be, though.

    24. Re:1950 by afniv · · Score: 2

      I don't know how many times I've explained this, and people don't get it. This has bugged me since ST:TNG. "Where no one has gone before..." and the first thing they show are people at Enterprise's destination. It was and still is a lame attempt at political correctness.

      I think the new series does go back to ST roots and I'm looking forward to how it developes.

      --
      ~afniv
      "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"
      Richard von Weizs
    25. Re:1950 by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, the doors aren't automatic either - I think I saw T'Pol actually press a switch to open the door to the Captain's bridge-level ready room.

      Low tech, indeed. At least they made the comment about not having seat belts :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    26. Re:1950 by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Most probably, the computers not always in "voice activated" mode, only for for private areas such as the captains quarters. As for the escape character, I'd assume that "computer" is an escape character. Although, I confess I would have liked to see something like Larry Nivens "Smoke Ring", where officers used "Prikyzvat"(sp?), which is apparently Russian for "Command" to activate and speak to the AI.

    27. Re:1950 by Oloryn · · Score: 1
      Indeed it is, but I was referring, of course, to "where no man has gone before," which, as we know, Kirk corrected for the record mid-sentence at the of Star Trek VI.

      Technically, it's still incorrect, unless you're referring only to visiting uninhabited planets (if the planet is inhabited, obviously some one has gone there before). If you want to make it correct instead of merely PC, it should be "where no Federation entity has gone before".

    28. Re:1950 by Oloryn · · Score: 1
      I don't know how many times I've explained this, and people don't get it. This has bugged me since ST:TNG. "Where no one has gone before..." and the first thing they show are people at Enterprise's destination. It was and still is a lame attempt at political correctness.

      Yup. I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one this bugs. And at the risk of repeating myself, I'll note that by Kirk's time, this could have been concisely and accurately expressed as "where no Federation Entity has gone before".

    29. Re:1950 by Oloryn · · Score: 1
      Voice-activation: You try going into battle, with a bridge full of people screaming and bulkheads failing, and try to get any computer algorithm to understand you! Talking is a lot easier than listening.

      Exactly. You wonder what the suits will think when there's a serious pushing of voice-recognition in the office, and they realize that implementing it will probably require a return to real offices instead of cubicles, just due to the noise pollution that comes from everyone talking to their computers at once (not to mention the risk of someone running past your cubicle and shouting "File Run format c: /y").

    30. Re:1950 by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Sorta. VI was supposed to be the "bridge" (before they took too many drugs and decided on "Generations.") VI was the first one where they all acknowledged that they were really old (though the audience laughingly noticed that in V). The shift in "man"/"one" was to complete the turnabout done in the movie -- Klingons are our friends, Kirk is at least close to retiring/dying, Enterprise A is to be decomissioned. Next!

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    31. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too. If he is, I'm disappointed that they didn't have the balls (perhaps literally) to make him human.

    32. Re:1950 by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1
      Man in that sense is NOT referring to the male gender, but is instead a gender neatural description of the human race. There's a huge difference, and I think most people would agree that the version of "man" used there was decidedly gender netural.

      People do not agree.

      The last original work I know of to take this position was written in the 1920s. Everything since then has either quoted The Elements of Style, or taken the view that "man" isn't at all generic and shouldn't be used as such.

      I've long since quit grumbling over the fact that the mores of the supposedly-futuristic cultures depicted in Star Trek are pure late-20th-century Middle America. Exactly why is not clear: either the writers have no imagination, or (more probably, methinks) they are terrified of offending advertisers and/or political pressure groups.

      I dunno. Enterprise wasn't bad. A few rough edges, but, overall, not bad.

      ...laura

    33. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Federation's basic charter is indeed to go where no one has gone before. Meeting new races is great, but seeing things no one at all has seen is the epitome of their obsession with exploration.

    34. Re:1950 by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      That's nowhere near as bad as if two females on the bridge were talking about laundry. "So I put my sheet down" and the computer hears "Shields down"!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    35. Re:1950 by mateo650 · · Score: 1

      Actually the program was already running when the pause and resume subcommands were issued. No program was invoked that way.

    36. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enlightened people don't care about gender-neutral language. Only militant feminists do. Militant feminism has thankfully died out by the 22nd century.

    37. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite voice-rec situation would have to be when an accounting department drone is dictating a confidential memo about how they're tanking when a sales team walks by with a tour of customers...

      Or possibly a PHB dictating a "Jenkins, you're fired" memo just as Jenkins is walking past the door.

    38. Re:1950 by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      I'm afraid I missed the pilot, but I have to question this. Did every member of the crew declare himself or herself to be heterosexual at some point? If not, what makes you think they're all straight? The fact that you like to stereotype bisexuals and homosexuals and these people didn't fit your neat little stereotype?

      I have a lot of gay and bi friends (about half of my friends, in fact). Okay, one or two of them you could probably tell right off. Most of them you could know for years without knowing this if they didn't come out and say it...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    39. Re:1950 by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      If you were gay (I am), it is doubtful that you would be asking that question. I am not saying that gay behavior fits a stereotype (although some assuredy does), but I, nor any of my friends, have much difficulty recognizing a gay person when we meet them, whether they are in the closet or out.

      I don't understand the phenomenon, but it is real.

      Star Trek shows no same-gender loving couples, either in the continuing story, or acknowledged in flashback. This is what I miss, and what I rue that Star Trek omits.

    40. Re:1950 by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      There needn't be any specific traits that identify someone as gay. I am gay, and I can almost always identify others of my kind with few, if any, words being spoken, but that might be hard for a straight person to understand or believe, assuming you are straight.

      Star Trek portays no same-gender loving couples, either in the continuing storyline or in flashback. Star Trek does depict romantic relationships of a hetetosexual nature, so it seems remiss not to depict romantic relationships between same-gender loving partners.

      There is nothing likely at all that these enlighted future people have eliminated homosexuality because it serves no practical purpose; virtually all species in the animal kingdom practice homosexuality, so it seems to serve some purpose, even if it is not clear what that purpose is. I certainly don't see my gayness as a mistake of evolution, but merely as one more permutation to be riddled and appreciated.

    41. Re:1950 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans have achieved world peace, yet captains and admirals are all white males.

      There's more than one way to achieve peace. One way is to destroy all opposition.

  30. wow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    compared to all the other upn shows it fits right in kinda.

    Waiting for:
    Vulcan love slave

  31. Klingon foreheads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some theories:

    Roddenberry always claimed that TOS Klingons had wrinkly heads, but you couldn't see them because your TV was defective.

    My own personal theory is that, like the Trill, Klingons have a symbiont that makes them bigger, stronger, and generally cooler. It resembles a horseshoe crab. They just don't talk about it.

    For Berman and Braga on this subject, try this link: http://www.startrek.com/production/seriesv/article s/071901.html [startrek.com]. Look toward the bottom, where neither remembers when modern Klingon foreheads came into use.

    1. Re:Klingon foreheads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Klingons have funny shaped heads because the makeup artists have created these masks that they apply to the actors before filming. TOS didn't have much of a budget, so there wasn't quite the effort put into making those masks.

      Sheesh. Some people.

  32. Not bad, give it time by Feanor1 · · Score: 1

    I thought it was pretty good.. I agree that the song has gotta go, however rehashing the Cold hearted Vulcan issue is almost a must. If its going to be a show about growing into the federation and a new world view, they have to show the growing pains. Doc McCoy was an old fashion country doctor after all..

    And ship rocked

  33. Decent... by Athex · · Score: 1

    I thought that it was an interesting look at the whole star trek universe, although it seemed to have rehashed the same, we need a hot chick to attract viewers thing as the past series. I think that they also made some of the vulcans seem less cold then in the other series, good or bad? We will see if I watch the next episode....

  34. The Vulcan Chick by bajcsi · · Score: 1

    She is in Maxim this month. wow...

  35. Well... by Mag_Linnard · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't say it SUCKED, compared against the other sort of dribble the UPN runs. And yes, that includes VOYAGER. It's not perfect, but how could Star Trek without Roddenbury ever be perfect, huh? It smacks of The Phantom Menace--doubling back to establish background, and feeling awkward cuz we already KNOW where it's going.

    Of course, I liked BATTLEFIELD EARTH, so those of you with melons and tomatoes can feel free to reel back and let 'er rip.

    --
    It's not the voices in my head that annoy me. It's the psychosies they invite over for parties that annoy me.
    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to digress too much, but I like BE too. It was panned by the same people who are now attacking muslim-americans.

      Not a coward, just too lazy to make an account.

  36. different....a good different.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    One thing some sci-fi especially books has done is not sugar coat things. Sometimes you have to be almost naked when doing screwy things like decontamination. Star Trek has always stayed away from it until recently with 7 of 9 in Voyager and Enterprise. I believe that it's more realistic to show stuff like this. I don't mean pure soft core (fully naked), but stuff like in this scene. I don't believe it will be a weekly occurance in any event.

    The theme song....well, it's better then most other tv shows, but PALES when you compare it to DS9 or Voyager or any other Star Trek. Also, I feel there's too much past stuff being show in the opening sequence and not enough stuff from that 100 years since First Contact. Yeah the history is important, but not for this show. They need a different opening with more beauty shots of the NX-01.

    Flashbacks to Archer's childhood were cool. Anyone get a load of the antigrav remote control plane he built? Cool eh?

    I don't like to nitpick too much, but it's been added to my must see tv list! :)

    One last thing...let me say this.....T'pol = Tent Pole! (had to be done ;) ). I know, but man I didn't know Vulcans could look that good! ;)

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:different....a good different.... by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Flashbacks to Archer's childhood were cool. Anyone get a load of the antigrav remote control plane he built? Cool eh?


      Anyone see Titan A.E.? (Anyone? Anyone?)

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    2. Re:different....a good different.... by terpia · · Score: 1

      When I saw the childhood flashback scenes, I immediately thought of Titan AE. It's the same damn thing: Patient father idolized by child playing with a flying toy. Nonetheless, I think it did establish some history for Bakula'a character.

      --
      .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
    3. Re:different....a good different.... by uberdood · · Score: 1

      er, what's so wrong about that? my dad was a naval pilot. i grew up building model airplanes and idolizing him. it's not *gasp* fictional.

      let's recap - every bloody first episode in the ST world sucked. the first season of the sequel series sucked. earth final conflict sucks to this day. even b5 sucked _at first_, and andromeda and crusade suck(ed) through and through. about the only sf i've seen in a long time that didn't suck coming out of the gate was farscape.

      frelling get a life folks. sf - especially st - historically takes time to build a head of steam. enterprise is no exception, and it certainly was better out of the gate - partly due to bakula having a tv/sf background compared to shatner's whatever, cisco's hawk character, mulgrew's columbo character, and stewart's stage background - than the rest of the st tv world.

      --
      "Population 1,656"
    4. Re:different....a good different.... by terpia · · Score: 1

      I wasnt saying anything was wrong with it. It's just the way it was done resembled Titan AE so much that i got distracted for a minute or two thinking about it.

      --
      .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
    5. Re:different....a good different.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agreed with you, and then I saw 'frelling' and felt ashamed to do so. Jebus, take some medication for that Farscape addiction.

    6. Re:different....a good different.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contact.

  37. I'm pissed... damned local UPN affiliate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our local UPN affiliate, WBLU, sucks so much! Did anyone else miss over 35 minutes of it off and on because they had to dick with the satellites a few minutes before it stated? Probably not. I hope you all enjoyed the show. I have to watch the "Apology" rebroadcast on Saturday. Argh.

    1. Re:I'm pissed... damned local UPN affiliate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UPN here also had satellite problems during the show. Maybe the big solar flare that's supposed to be happening today?

    2. Re:I'm pissed... damned local UPN affiliate! by hound3000 · · Score: 1

      It got a little better thru the show, but the feed here stopped for a sec, blanked for a second and then continued every other minute.

    3. Re:I'm pissed... damned local UPN affiliate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, in Memphis there was a short screw up with the satellite too.

    4. Re:I'm pissed... damned local UPN affiliate! by DoomPlague · · Score: 1

      Got the same thing.

      Must've been a UPN thing and not an affiliate one.

    5. Re:I'm pissed... damned local UPN affiliate! by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      You shave his belly with a rusty razor, of course.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  38. I am T'Pol of Nine by digitalamish · · Score: 1

    Was it just me or do most of these characters look familiar. One good thing about the series is that it will definitely NOT be for hard core trekkers. I hope it doesn't devolve like Voyager did. It was a nice change of pace to see humans getting their asses handed to them.

    ---

    "If Kirk saw vulcan chicks like that, he would have never left!" - My friend watching Enterprise.

    1. Re:I am T'Pol of Nine by tifosi · · Score: 1

      I felt that too, specially that English guy
      and the other officer who couldn't rememmber
      alien ship's controls.

      They all had the same type of hair, and
      attitude

  39. Non-Trekkie by totallygeek · · Score: 1
    I never was a Star Trek fan until I saw some of the movies. Even then, I only cared for a select few of them.


    I watched Enterprise just to see what it was like. I really thought that it would dive into explaining how technology evolved to the point where Kirk was using starships. I was put off that the Vulcans seemed to be sheltering us from ourselves, and laughing inside that we are to be so primitive. I was expecting some trial and error with the transporter -- something akin to the remake of The Fly. I also did not care for the shower scene. I mean, that is one hot Vulcan, but I do not think we need this to be like every other sitcom. Honestly, most people have pay cable or satellite, and can flip over to something steamy.


    Overall, I liked the concept, and think that special effects work will look great. I like going back in time if done well (Phantom Menace?). This just did not stike a chord with me.

    1. Re:Non-Trekkie by uberdood · · Score: 1

      you mean even number ones, right? as all the odd-numbered ones sucked. :)

      --
      "Population 1,656"
  40. It's NOT over yet! by BrickM · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hey, the least you could do is wait for the show to be over in all the time zones before you post this to the front page.

    1. Re:It's NOT over yet! by FiNaLe · · Score: 1

      We all know no one on the west coast counts...

      --
      Earn cash in your spare time! Blackmail your friends!
    2. Re:It's NOT over yet! by BrickM · · Score: 1

      shit. I avoid reading the article/comments so I don't see spoilers, and for this I get modded down. Great.

    3. Re:It's NOT over yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this guys second post down too. Why? Let him know that sometimes his luck sucks, that sometimes the world is against him. That people think he's stupid, and his posts are a waste of time.

  41. Pretty decent by iso · · Score: 2

    I was expecting the worst, so I was pleasantly surprised. The effects were good, but not overpowering, the acting was decent, the storyline was better than I thought, and the soft-porn was great, but I'd prefer to have seem some XXX live girl-on-girl action ... uh .. yeah it was ok.

    They didn't completely screw up the time-travel angle (but I suppose there's lots of time for that), but it did strike me that it was awfully easy for them to accomplish their "mission" even though the "bad guys" had vastly superior technology and advanced genetics. I guess they forgot to advance their brians when they were going though their genetic engineering.

    Anyhow I haven't seen Star Trek in years so I wasn't really sure what to expect (I've hardly seen Voyager for instance), but I thought it showed some promise. I think the best part about it is that it's not overly Star Trekky--this might make it appeal to a larger audience. It's no masterpiece, but for TV, I say it's pretty good.

    - j

    1. Re:Pretty decent by flanker · · Score: 1

      I thought it was generally ok too, though I don't watch much TV. Voyager is a show that I didn't like much the first season or so but it became the one show on tv these days that I felt comfortable watching with my young (9 year old now) son. Some of the plots were a bit cheesey, but hey, its tv! I hope this show provides a similar generation-spanning opportunity in the future.

      --
      Left shift 1 for e-mail...
    2. Re:Pretty decent by hburch · · Score: 1

      ...but it did strike me that it was awfully easy for them to accomplish their "mission" even though the "bad guys" had vastly superior technology and advanced genetics

      The only reason I have hope about that is that the characters commented about that ("This is going to be easier than I thought" or something to that affect). My hope is that the aliens let them get easy. It's true that this is inconsistant with their 'Get Klang' mentality, but maybe the Mysterious Man changed the instructions why we weren't looking.

    3. Re:Pretty decent by stimpy · · Score: 1

      We Brians are quite advanced enough, thank you...Oh, typo? nevermind....

    4. Re:Pretty decent by scrytch · · Score: 2

      I guess they forgot to advance their brians when they were going though their genetic engineering.

      silly, everyone knows it's spelled brane

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    5. Re:Pretty decent by iso · · Score: 1

      you guys totally suck. :)

      B R A I N.

      (I'll preview next time; I promise)

      - j

    6. Re:Pretty decent by egerlach · · Score: 1

      No no, I think he really meant Brians. You know... how Brian was picked up by the aliens in "Monty Python's Life of Brian"? Well, they cloned him. They had a virtual army of them! But they didn't advance them with their genetic engineering, and _that's_ what got them screwed.

      --

      "Free beer tends to lead to free speech"
    7. Re:Pretty decent by odaiwai · · Score: 2

      "I'm Brian"
      "No, I'm Brian!"
      "I'm Brian and so's my wife!"

    8. Re:Pretty decent by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      I guess they forgot to advance their brians...



      "Brian and brian! What IS brian?...


      You mean the CONTROLLER!"

      TOS-Spock's Brian

      --
      That is all.
    9. Re:Pretty decent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brian? Brian? What is Brian?
      Not that anybody's gonna read this cheap "Spock's Brain" refrence after 1300 messages.

      "The monkey in the tutu? That just cracks me up."

  42. I'm holding out on final judgement. by hound3000 · · Score: 1

    The theme song doesn't work, I agree. There is no reason we can't have some nice orchestration here. The show may be geared towards 'Gen-Xers' as someone said in the previous thread, but geez. The soft porn angle is old too. That was the -only- thing that saved Voyager. Mind you, it worked, but if they are going to rely on showing breasts everytime the ratings get low, this show is eventually going to tank.

    Other than that, the Klingons will just allow some humans to walk into their chamber. In the early days, I thought they liked us no better than the Vulcans. And we saw how snobby they were. Although, when we finally do meet new species there will be a lot of interspecies bickering going on until humanity gets used to the idea that maybe we're not the big cheese anymore.

    On a local note, my broadcaster needs to get their antenna back into shape so they don't screw up the signal every other minute again.

    1. Re:I'm holding out on final judgement. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      In the early days, I thought they liked us no better than the Vulcans

      Erm...these weren't 'the early days', this was the first day. They don't have any reason to hate us yet, we returned one of their people.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:I'm holding out on final judgement. by FyreFiend · · Score: 1

      My broadcaster lost the feed once for about a minute and a half. I wonder if the solar flares have anything to do with it.

      --
      - Apple Computer......proudly going out of business for over twenty years.
    3. Re:I'm holding out on final judgement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My signal went out a lot. Toward the end it was more annoying, the sound would clip off, the picture would loose sound for a second or two, and the screen would go into a horizontal smear. It was really annoying. I thought it was due to our bad connection with the WB, by whom the show is broadcast to our cable company.

  43. Soft porn... yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The girl is not a "good vulcan" like Spock and Tuvok were. I don't know how to describe it. She is definitely a 10, and while I enjoyed the nipple shots and the oil rubdowns on one level, on another I feel this really doesn't honor Gene Roddenberry's legacy.

    Also I thought the ship looked too good. While I realize it had to look better than the 196x original series's Enterprise, it just looks too cool. And now how are they going to explain away the change in Klingons' appearance? For ~100 years the klingons looked like Genghis Khan, but then went back to looking like Klingons? At least they didn't forget to leave out the universal translator... that would have been retarded, hearing English from a Klingon.

    I didn't catch any of the plot really so I can't comment on it at all, but I'm sure UPN will be rebroadcasting it every day, so I'm not too worried.

    1. Re:Soft porn... yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For ~100 years the klingons looked like Genghis Khan, but then went back to looking like Klingons?

      The Klingons don't like to talk about it. And if you insist on asking, they will crush your skull...

  44. Pilot by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought it was best pilot of all the spin-offs - but no way does it compare to that great TOS pilot "The Cage"

    1. Re:Pilot by IHateEverybody · · Score: 4, Informative


      I thought it was best pilot of all the spin-offs - but no way does it compare to that great TOS pilot "The Cage"

      That's a good point but rememer that "The Cage" was rejected by NBC when it was first presented. Gene Roddenberry actually had to start over with "Where No Man Has Gone Before" in order to sell the series.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
  45. Answer by Ghoser777 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A quick google search led me to this site.

    F-bacher

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
  46. Klingon blood color... by Akardam · · Score: 1

    Klingon blood is reddish purple. And, I think it would be physiology, not anatomy, as anatomy indicates the general physical shape of the organism.

    1. Re:Klingon blood color... by LocutusCU · · Score: 1

      ::SIGH:: Its simple. Klingon blood was a different color in one case only: ST VI. Why? Its called the MPAA. ST VI would have received an "R" rating as opposed to the "PG-13" it got had they used red blood. Why didn't they use it later? Cause the pink blood cost significantly more than standard stage blood and simply wasn't worth the expense.

  47. Not so good. by nanci · · Score: 0

    The show was poor; the introduction was crappy and uneventful. An echoing conversation, obviously an attempt at setting a plot and justifying invisible bald people, was both tough to listen to and also lacked in relevance.

    Nothing about the show contained anything even remotely interresting. Star Trek is a dead horse; if all future episodes are directed like this, then I expect this to be the last star trek series.

    Pity.

  48. Eh. by ktakki · · Score: 2

    I did like how James Cromwell (Zephram Cochrane in "First Contact") had a cameo. Also, I liked how the sets were not lit as bright as the other series.

    I did not like the wooden characters and paper plot, though to be fair many shows are guilty of that during their first seasons.

    I got bored halfway through and ended up watching a West Wing repeat I had seen twice before. Maybe I'm getting old (I was six when TOS first aired) and I've grown out of the Trek demographic. The Vulcan was cute, but Janel Moloney (Donnatella Moss) rocks my happy world.

    I'll probably give it another chance next summer when it's in reruns.

    [OT] - I do not need a beer brewery or car company to tell me how to feel about 9/11/01, thankyouverymuch.

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    1. Re:Eh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are American, no? If you had less advertising, how would you know what to think or feel?

  49. Pink Blood? by OSSMKitty · · Score: 1

    Granted, we only had a few minutes of it in ST:VI, but isn't Klingon blood PINK? What is it with this red, strangly human looking (under a microscope) blood? Couldn't be that the effects budget was too small, because it would have taken less than half a travel-size Pepto Bismal to fake that blood.

    On the other hand, maybe the effects budget was blown on the cheesy computer generated ships. Don't get me wrong, I think CG has its place (those hand weapons were well done!, and the opening space scene in the transport when you could see reflections in the glass) but when the ships are obviously fake...give me a solid model any day.

    Oh, and the theme has to go.

    1. Re:Pink Blood? by Ghoser777 · · Score: 2

      I bet this has nothing to do with the effects budget, and everything to do with not scrutinizing the work for inconsistencies with prior works. I don't think the same people are doing Star Trek that were 30 years ago, so it's really easy for obvious details to be forgotten. It happens all the time in series, such as Transformers the cartoon. It's kind of frustrating, although it causes a lot of interesting discussions (such as how Optimus Primes' trailer can disappear and reappear magically: some think transformers have some "container" in subspace where they can store stuff).

      The blood is pink; just watch the opening few minutes of Star Trek 6 (I think it was 6; it's the one where Kirk get's framed for killing Klingons).

      F-bacher

      --
      James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    2. Re:Pink Blood? by profzoom · · Score: 1

      If anything, I think the Klingon blood we saw in Star Trek VI is the inconsistency. I can recall several times seeing Klingons bleed normal looking blood. One example is an episode of TNG--the Wild West holodeck one--when Worf got shot. Red blood.

    3. Re:Pink Blood? by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      It's my understanding that the pink Klingon blood in Star Trek VI was used to avoid an 'R' rating from the MPAA. I believe that Klingon blood had been shown in a TNG episode prior to the move and it was red in there.

      Of course, it's still confusing considering that 1) Their complexion should probably be different with blood of that colour and 2) McCoy specifically referred to their pink blood when he explained that he didn't know how to save the chancellor (or whatever his position was)

    4. Re:Pink Blood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worf wasn't a pure Klingon was he?

    5. Re:Pink Blood? by runslothrun · · Score: 1

      The color of Klingon blood in that particular shot was altered to a more pinkish color to satisfy ratings. However, it should be taken into consideration that in our own bodies blood is present in two distinct colorations: bright red arterial blood flooded with oxygen and dark red to purple blood depleted of oxygen. Also, in cases of traumatic injury, blood loss signifying death can occur in several ways. On of the most notable is pink foam from the ears after a sever head wound. Extremely bright red (think clown nose/every bad horror film you've ever seen) blood is common in sucking chest wounds. So given that this Klingon blood was floating in a zero-g environ, flooded with oxygen without any force to bring it to the surface or leech it from each globule, it is presumable to assume that the blood would have a brighter than normal appearance than the depleted blood shown in the episode. At least that's what went through my head when I saw it at the movies and tonite.

    6. Re:Pink Blood? by profzoom · · Score: 1

      Yeah he was, just raised by humans. B'elanna from Voyager was the half-Klingon.

    7. Re:Pink Blood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, all that went through your head? From ONE five second scene? Damn, there ARE aliens among us!

  50. enjoyed by bevoo · · Score: 1

    Im not going to analyze everything because its not worth it. Yeah, the opening theme pretty much sucked but when it comes down to it. Did I enjoy watching it? I did. I enjoy some of the worst movies because it entertained me. It took awhile for Futurama to get off and it became a really funny show. This is the first episide and it had to lay down some history/story. I think it would be better to judge the series after we've seen a couple of showings. vulcan is mighty fwine though!

  51. And what's with the soft porn? by e-gold · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparently, the Borg aren't the only alien species with implants...
    JMR

    Speaking only for myself, as always.

    --
    Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
    1. Re:And what's with the soft porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It appears that Vulcan nipples are as pointy as their ears...

    2. Re:And what's with the soft porn? by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Dude! That's what I said! No one was listening though ... Actually I think I said "Vulcans must be pointy all over"

      ~LoudMusic

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    3. Re:And what's with the soft porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vulcan is a very hot planet, for T'Pol, the Enterprise is a very chilly place indeed.

    4. Re:And what's with the soft porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really enjoy all the posts that people are complaining about this scene. Really, maybe they should all go watch re-runs of Matlock or something. Give me wet women and nipples.

    5. Re:And what's with the soft porn? by freaksta · · Score: 1

      Stop complaining about the pr0n! If you want to bitch, bitch about the theme song! I screemed "NOOO" When i heard it.. i said they had to change it! But that vulcan is ****ing HOT! Talk about some quality television.. i hope they put some in every episode.. I do agree with what was said earlier about the klingons.. they used to be humaniod looking... and this is set 150 years before that... so did they go from ugly, to humanoid, back to ugly?

      --


      Hrrm... I usually just sign my name.
  52. Dont judge it by one episode by bug1 · · Score: 1

    If the writers are any good it will take them a while to build up the characters (take a leason from babylon 5)

    1. Re:Dont judge it by one episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totatly agree. I hated Babalon 5 when it first came out. Then I was kicking myself as I watched it in re-runs.

  53. I LIKED it by E1ven · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think you need to lay off a little, Micheal.

    It was a good beginning for the series. I think there is a lot of potential for the characters, The Dr in particular.

    While I'm not sure where the 29th centure guy is going to go, or wht they'll do with him, it is a plot hook, and presumabily will develop into a story arch. Which is what everyone says they like.
    The Jello scene did perhaps go a bit over the line, it serverd a usefull purpose in allowing the chracters to intereact.
    Without it, you'd be asking "Why the hell didn't she take the ship and run. I thought Vulcans were logical."
    I think you may be slamming it because your expectations were too high. It was good television, and good startrek.

    There are some reviews of it at http://www.revolutionsf.com/article/441.html

    --
    Colin Davis
    1. Re:I LIKED it by jheinen · · Score: 2

      I'd have to agree. Over the past few days I've been watching episodes from the old series, and one thin that struck me is that Enterprise seems to capture much of the excitement of TOS. There's more of an emphasis on adventure and the personalities of the characters. I got the same feeling watching Enterprise as I did watching TOS.

      -Jeff

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    2. Re:I LIKED it by vulg4r_m0nk · · Score: 1

      What I liked:

      • The ship design, loosely modeled after the P-38 Lightening. Clunky but compelling. The submarine feel inside is great for a ship that is supposedly testing fundamentally new technologies, in which functionality takes precedence over, e.g., carpet.
      • Low tech solutions: I'm sick of every problem being solved by firing a purple beam of something.
      • The fact that the Vulcan chick, though yet another obvious geek masturbation fastasy (someone tell me again why Seven's skin tight clothes and two inch pumps are the ultimate in efficiency?), was not (contra Michael), as stale rehash of logic vs. emotion. She's actually a little soft compared to the likes of Tuvok and that painfully wooden younger Vulcan on Voyager.
      • Finally, and too bad this is gonna change now, I think a reliance on shuttlecraft would be nice change. Beaming is just too damn easy.
    3. Re:I LIKED it by jo42 · · Score: 1
      I think there is a lot of potential for the characters, The Dr in particular.

      At first, I thought it was Nelix. The next time, I thought it was still Nelix. The last time, I still thought, what the smeg is Nelix doing in the Med Bay when he should be in the Galley on Voyager?

    4. Re:I LIKED it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. The Dr. is a re-incarnated Neelix. Instead of cooking, he will be doing operations. Bet they will even re-use the same scripts.

    5. Re:I LIKED it by Snaller · · Score: 1
      While I'm not sure where the 29th centure guy is going to go, or wht they'll do with him, it is a plot hook, and presumabily will develop into a story arch. Which is what everyone says they like.


      If Berman believed that everybody liked it, we would have seen more of an arc, he doesn't so we won't - don't hold your breath, is is not likely to become B5

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  54. did we forget TOS? by 8bit · · Score: 1

    I know that the technology wasn't available to do some of the special effects during the original series, but KLINGONS WERE NOT WRINKLY AND ODD BACK THEN! I think the trouble w/ tribbles 2.0 episode settled that when they went back in time and whats her face said that there were biological experiments since then and it wasn't to be talked about. Blah blah blah. Other than that I liked it. Albeit a couple of contradictions, whatever. I think it should be interesting. and WTF, that guy from quantum leap doesn't look a day older since he did quantum leap.

    moo

    --

    --Roy
    1. Re:did we forget TOS? by shagoth · · Score: 2

      Like creating a starship named Enterprise prior to ToS and eliminating the United Earth Space Probe Authority of Captain Pike wasn't enough rewriting of Trek histroy, they give Klingon's lumpy heads as well... Figures...

    2. Re:did we forget TOS? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      In regards to wrinkly or non-wrinkly Klingons:

      "IT IS NOT SOMETHING WE TALK ABOUT!"
      - Worf, "Trials and Tribbilations"

    3. Re:did we forget TOS? by profzoom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Roddenberry wanted wrinkly foreheads all along. He finally had the resources to when TNG and the movies came out. Suspension of disbelief--shouldn't sci-fi fans be pretty good at this??

    4. Re:did we forget TOS? by TekneeX · · Score: 1

      Hah, so they have cranial ridges in this...

      I recall Kang having *almost* cranial ridges in Day of the Dove, very primitive makeup though.

      --
      It's all about tha rice!
    5. Re:did we forget TOS? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
      KLINGONS WERE NOT WRINKLY AND ODD BACK THEN!

      Hate to go into drooling fanboy mode, but...based on the available evidence, they were wrinkly, then some at least were smooth, then they were all wrinkly again. Consider:

      • In one TNG (IIRC, maybe DS9) episode, the Klingons clone the great emperor Kahless. He's wrinkley. If it was some one-way genetic mutation from TOS smooth to the movie/TNG wrinkly, he would have been smooth.
      • In several DS9 eps, we see Klingons (Kor, Kang, Koloth) who showed up in TOS. They were smooth in TOS, wrinkley in DS9; so whatever happened affected individual Klingons.
      • In the time-travel tribbles DS9 ep, Dax asks Worf why the TOS Klingons are smooth; he says "We don't discuss it with outsiders".

      My guess? Some weird fashion for body modification grips the Klingon Empire in the 23rd century. By the time of the movies, it's as embarassing to them as that Mohawk haircut from 1985 is to today's 30 year old stockbroker.

      Someone who's though about this much to much has a page here.

      Or better: it's just a show, I probably should relax. :-)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    6. Re:did we forget TOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the survivors of the planet A`ot Mie, destroyed by Klingon engineers to make way for a new hyper-spacial bypass, unleased a bio-mutagenic weapon on Qos' Nos'(sp). This caused Klingons to resemble the hated human Pa taq, and caused Targ meat to taste odd. Over time and with extremely painful genetic treatments (which the Klingons generally enjoyed) the effects of the attack receded. Duh.

    7. Re:did we forget TOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about one of the ST:TNG series.. The one with the virus that makes everything de-evolve. They just showed it here. Anyway, Wharf de-evolves into a massive armored humanoid thing with big hooks for hands. He looks even more klingon than the modern ones. Much more pointy, much more physical. And he wants to mate Troi. I guess my point is that Klingons looked like they do during their evolution, way before ST:TOS Klingons. Maybe, the klingons engineered themselves to look more human for some time, and decided that being more human wasn't the best thing. Remember, also, according to one ST:TNG series, most of the humanoids in the sector were genetic decendants of an ancient civilization that died out. Humans, Romulans, Vulcans, and Klingons are all of the same stuff (and possibly many others)

    8. Re:did we forget TOS? by Telek · · Score: 2

      My guess? Some weird fashion for body modification grips the Klingon Empire in the 23rd century.

      My Guess? Producers said "we have a budget now and technology that we didn't have in the 60s! Make them look better!"

      and besides, most people don't have the attention span to think like that. If non-wrinkly Klingons showed up the average viewer would be going "huh?"

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    9. Re:did we forget TOS? by runslothrun · · Score: 1

      It was explained to me by a Star Trek buff about twenty years ago that the Klingons from TOS were in fact a half-breed Klingon/Human species. This explained their pre-disposition to violence in that they had no place in "normal" Klingon society and could only achieve respect and position thru conquest. Also, they were forced to live on the outskirts of the Klingon planets and were, therefore, most likely to have initial contact with a Federation ship "exploring" the universe but never actually penetrating the heart of the Klingon Empire. Then again, maybe this guy just thought to much and maybe I just thought it sounded like a reasonable explanation to everything that has ever happened or been said about it since that time. Has anyone else ever heard an explanation like this?

    10. Re:did we forget TOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Jesus FREAKIN' Christ!


      The ep in DS9 was Trials and Tribble-ations... Jadzia wasn't even in that scene. They were in a bar on the station and someone makes a comment about Klingons. Bashir says, "Klingons? Where?"

      Worf: "There" (points)

      O'Brien: "_Those_ are _Klingons_?"

      Worf: "We do not discuss it with outsiders."


      End of story. No genetic manipulation talk... just an in-joke.


      If you want real information or discussion on this, head on over to www.trekbbs.com.

    11. Re:did we forget TOS? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Worf has already commented on the fact that there are differences, he just didn't want to talk about it. And that's probably the best way to handle it: unsaid.

    12. Re:did we forget TOS? by Nightpaw · · Score: 1

      Then how come the plot of The Trouble With Tribbles hinged on a Klingon looking like a human?

    13. Re:did we forget TOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying not to give too much away for those who haven't seen the pilot, there is discussion of radical gene manipulation of a group of aliens. It is entirely possible that the same fate could happen to a group of Klingons to make them more "human looking" (i.e Star Trek TOS), and acceptable to the universe at large. This genetic manipulation would be looked upon unfavoribly by future Klingons for offending what it is to "be" a Klingon. At some later point the changes are undone, and are never talked about among the Klingon race(i.e. DS9 Tribble episode). Thus there is no pollution of the time line that everyone is screaming about. It was also the first episode, who knows what the future holds.

    14. Re:did we forget TOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just bullshit. You can think about it all you want, and it doesn't change the fact that the ridges were the effect of mutation caused by pollution.
      THEY DON'T WANT TO PISS OFF THE FIVE YEAR OLD TREKKIE JRs WHO NEVER SAW THE POS THAT WAS TOS AND ARE NOT CONTENT WITH A BUNCH OF PAINTED HUMANS FOR KLINGONS. DEAL THAT IT'S INCONSISTENT AND THAT PEOPLE WILL BRING IT UP FOREVER, PARAMOUNT SURE HAS.

  55. Reaction by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I liked scott as the captain. The rehash of the standard trek technology into older, original types is interesting. My first reaction was that the theme song just plain sucked. The intro images fits in with the overall theme nicely. I think it has some problems, all mentioned in the story, but it has promise. When did kingons and humans start hating each other? I know they had to meet first, but throughout the original series, they were the above all enemies. I'm going to keep on watching it for a couple of weeks and see how it goes. It wasn't the series premiere that I'd hoped for. My fav premiere is still TNG one, great characters, great story, with a good twist.

    Trek seems to be de-evolving into soft porn. From 7of9, we all know what the whole point of her character was, now to this. It doesn't really fit into the series about exploration and discovery. I don't know, do we really need it? (after all, what's the internet here for anyway?)

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
  56. I thought it was good by tannhaus · · Score: 0

    ...and the vulcan chick rubbing herself with oil..that was my favorite part of the show *drool*

    1. Re:I thought it was good by JMYoda · · Score: 0

      You should try getting laid sometime. :)

      --
      "The human mind's ability to rationalize its own shortcomings into virtues is unlimited." - Robert A. Heinlein
  57. It had a good "human" feel by Eagle7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The sort of Indiana Jones/John Wayne/Han Solo attitude in the crew was refreshing - that's something that had been lost (and something that was fitting for the "maturity" of the human race at that point)

    As far as the soft core porn, I had no problem with seeing that side of a Vulcan, and my non-geek g/f had no problem seeing a starship captain in his briefs.

    I didn't like the science all that much. I got the sense that they had lost some of the knack for reality that we had gained during TNG, etc. For instance, the light of the phaser beam moved *much* slower in that communications room than the people in it. I didn't understand the whole shielding scheme either. It is very unlcear to me exactly what technologies they have and do not have. For instance, they have deflectors, transporters, anti-grav, and beam weapons - but don't yet have a tractor beam. I don't know if the physics of these are consistent or not. (What I mean is this: are any of these like having incadescent lights and not having figured out that you can use electricity for heaters)

    I did like some of the "primative" touches. I liked the human linguist. I liked the "sweet-spot" in the ships anti grav unit.

    once thing I'd like to know - do they have subspace communications? I assume that they do, but it was never mentioned, and on TNG they through around "subspace" the way people throw around "Action Item" in a corporation.

    --
    _sig_ is away
    1. Re:It had a good "human" feel by profzoom · · Score: 1

      I didn't have a problem with the speed of the phaser in the communications room. The laws of physics were so screwed up in there, who's to say what's gonna happen?

    2. Re:It had a good "human" feel by NickFusion · · Score: 1

      Well, it's safe to say that at least one human got a good feel...

      --
      What were you expecting?
    3. Re:It had a good "human" feel by FlyingDragon · · Score: 1
      I didn't understand the whole shielding scheme either.

      The outer hull is polarized to lessen the effect of energy weapons. Later starships use separate forcefields to counteract mines, ship ramming, transporters, etc.

      For instance, they have deflectors, transporters, anti-grav, and beam weapons

      Unless you like being Swiss cheese, deflectors are a must-have at warp speed. Artificial gravity and deflectors are, most likely, donations from the Vulcans. Transporters are new and experimental. The show also implied that phasers were new (although plasma weapons were common). We're playing with ion weapons today, so that's downright conservative.

    4. Re:It had a good "human" feel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " For instance, the light of the phaser beam moved *much* slower in that communications room than the people in it."

      That's because that particular comm room has some special properties not yet revealed on-air, that would affect the speed of a beam of light.

      ..or didn't you notice (as Captain did..) how oddly he was moving?..

    5. Re:It had a good "human" feel by Wonko42 · · Score: 2

      I seem to remember the concept of an anti-grav "sweet spot" being used in one of the Trek novels, or perhaps the old animated series. I can't quite remember where it was, though.

    6. Re:It had a good "human" feel by legoboy · · Score: 1

      We're playing with ion weapons today, so that's downright conservative.

      Are we? I'd be interested in any links you have on the topic. (I'll check google after posting, but am not too optimistic.)

      --
      If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    7. Re:It had a good "human" feel by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      The "sweet spot", or the nexus of the Enterprise NCC-1701's artificial gravity was a garden with a zero G spot in the center. Lilacs were grown there (among other things, I just remember them being mentioned specifically).

      Apparantly I'm far far more of a Trekker than the rest of Slashdot, I'm very surprised by that. I figured I'm a regular SF fan who has happened to collect and read all the books and magazines published. Hell, I haven't seen a good chunk of Voyager (although I've seen all eps. of TOS, TAS, TNG and DS9). It amazes me how "newbie" all these arguements are - bringing any of these up at a Trekcon would have the answer, with full reference and cross reference immediatly pulled out of a few people's memory. Hell - I keep the new Concordance in the bathroom so I can flip through it.

      Star Trek has very minor continuity holes - but only for a universe that has been though five decades of real history, several series spanning centuries (including ones like New Frontiers that most people don't know about) related in tv, movies, books, reference materials, magazines and fan built (and studio accepted) legend. It was created before we went to the moon, before desktop computers were even concieved of, and before genetic engineering was considered. It's a flexible enough universe to graft in many Speculative Fiction (hard SF with a focus on the reaction to the whatzit rather than focusing on the whatzit itself) plots. The characters are varied enough so you can bounce them around into odd situations, and get an interesting reaction.

      I think the best thing about Enterprise is that humans are on the short end of the stick. We don't know our neighbors, we are vastly outgunned and outmanned, and there's no federation to call on... hell, no other ships to call on. Technologically, we're way behind everyone else.

      But the character that grew up on cargo ships really interested me - shades of Heinlein peeked out there... real sweat and steel and death an inch away. Supply problems being bitched about by the Arms officer? Damn... they don't have infinite resources, and they complain about military burecracy. Shades of Pournelle. Sex? Hell - the sex *wasn't* just aimed at hetero male geeks... that southern boy was a chunk of beefcake oiling himself up too, and the captain walked around in briefs in his cabin, which felt right for a military guy out of uniform. True, I'd much rather see the comm officer with a bit less clothes, but that's my preference. The oil might be gratuitious, but sex exists - and the people bitching about the sex seem to have missed the sex show and pimp trying to sell off the prostitutes on stage. Starving, dirty creatures of a dozen species, pimps and merchants, people selling live animals to eat, squalor and sin in a metal structure thrown together on a backwater planet where deals are made and spies sell secrets?

      Yeah... that's good stuff. More, Paramount, more!

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:It had a good "human" feel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rofl, you have to be one of the most pathetic people I've had the misfortune to read comments from on Slashdot.

  58. The recent broadcast by Migelikor1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I kinda liked the show, keeping in mind that its a pilot. It had a bunch of good qualities:
    No universal translators-Hooray, a realistic look at meeting strangers...they're strange!
    No ridiculous premise-phew...they haven't been warped to a far off dimension, a la the worst trek of all. They're just explorers, trying to prove themselves.
    They aren't invincible-There doesn't need to be mind control or some wacky technology to disable the Enterprise ( like in STTNG) it gets pounded, because, frankly, it's not that good.
    There is potential for some ongoing plot lines, like the best of DS9. If the show is done right, there will be diplomatic issues w/ the Klingons. (the whole encoded information in genes, conspiracy thing)
    On the other hand, there are a few annoying bits:
    I didn't like the vulcan. She wasn't even hot enough to fill the 7/9 spot. The just bugged me, like a really dumb spock. At least the original pointy ears respected the humans.
    There wasn't a lot of character development, but hopefully that will come with time.

    Anyway, I'd tune in to the next few episodes to see if the problems go away.

    --
    My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
    1. Re:The recent broadcast by Telek · · Score: 2

      I respect your comments, but I would like to advocate for the devil anyways =)

      No universal translators-Hooray, a realistic look at meeting strangers...they're strange!

      Don't know if this is a good idea, as you can't expect all aliens to speak the same language, much less fluently. I thought that the univ translator was a good idea, especially for contact with species that you've never met before/etc. And on what basis do we have to judge what "realistic aliens" would look like? They might look exactly like us, or like rocks, so as long as you can somehow differenciate them I think that's "realistic" enough for me.

      There is potential for some ongoing plot lines, like the best of DS9.

      Yeah, but I wonder how well they will be explored. That's one of the problems of having multiple writers is that you don't get very complicated or deep story arcs. I loved B5 for that, since every show was either written directly by or given to someone else who was told what to do by JMS. That allowed for some things that came up in first season to resurface again in the 3rd season, I loved that. I haven't seen anything remotely close to that in ST to date, and I hope that they really improve that, but I'm quite doubtful.

      I didn't like the vulcan. She wasn't even hot enough to fill the 7/9 spot.

      I'm somehow glad of that. 7of9 was FAR FAR FAR too "outplaced" for that show. She didn't belong there, muchless in that outfit all the time. SF isn't about having babes with huge breasts and minimal acting skill. I'd rather have more moderately good looking people. I think that Kira/Dax filled those roles well, and Kez (?) from DS9 (didn't watch it much, Neelix's girl) was good for that role too.

      There wasn't a lot of character development

      How much do you expect in the first 42 minute show? =) I loved B5 again for that, all of 1st season was pure character development and setting up all of the arcs that were going to happen in the story. I think that getting to know your characters is a VERY good thing, but again I fear about how well this will be done due to the multitude of authors thing. Or will there be only a couple authors? I'm not really sure on that whole count.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    2. Re:The recent broadcast by 31: · · Score: 0

      Well, when looking at the vulcan, just think angelina jolie from hackers...

      Take off without the starboard thruster! (followed in my mind with 'we can get the gibson without it!')

      When they're talking about improving the technology, just thing 'yea, i wanna triple the sensor output.'

      It adds so much to the show... now they just need to change the opening music so it's a bad techno bit, and it'll be perfect :)

      --

      ---
      I'm not ashamed. It's the computer age, nerds are in.
      They're still in, aren't they?
    3. Re:The recent broadcast by neutralstone · · Score: 1

      > At least the original pointy ears respected the
      humans.

      (assuming you mean Spock)
      That's because Spock's *mamma* was human! You gonna dis your mamma's race? ;)

    4. Re:The recent broadcast by petepac · · Score: 1

      The Vulcan's eyebrows weren't slanted enough. That was my wife's observation. Just shave them off an get out the eye pencil.

      >>Practice Safe Sex

      --
      >> Practice Safe Hex
    5. Re:The recent broadcast by way2slo · · Score: 1
      (spoiler alert) I'd also like to add one annoying bit:
      • the transporter - I thought the whole reason to make it new and dangerous was so that it was NOT used to solve their problems.
      Other than that, I liked it alot. It was very refreshing. I think the human reaction to vulcan impedance is quite believable. I compare it to the feeling that you get as a child when you are tired of your parents trying to run your life. You want to go out on your own and do it yourself.
      Bakula is a good actor. As long as he gets good scripts he has the potential to give a good performance. Granted, I don't quite know why he stayed behind either, other than to squeeze in that last fight scene. I like what I see from the other characters too. I just hope I can remember to watch each week.
    6. Re:The recent broadcast by Yunzil · · Score: 1
      I didn't like the vulcan. She wasn't even hot enough to fill the 7/9 spot.


      You'll pardon me if I think you're insane. :)

      Mmmm, T'Pol.

    7. Re:The recent broadcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I didn't like how they made the Force a biological, rather than a mystical, power. Oh, wait. Wrong prequel.

    8. Re:The recent broadcast by Mynn · · Score: 1
      There wasn't a lot of character development


      How much do you expect in the first 42 minute show?


      Did you turn it off early? I sat through two hours and I know there weren't 78 minutes worth of commercials, though it may have seemed like it.
      --

      Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.
    9. Re:The recent broadcast by linzeal · · Score: 1
      They aren't invincible-There doesn't need to be mind control or some wacky technology to disable the Enterprise ( like in STTNG) it gets pounded, because, frankly, it's not that good

      this reminds me of a dead kennedy's song called winnebego warrior anyone want to adapt it to this premise ?

    10. Re:The recent broadcast by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1
      At least the original pointy ears respected the humans.

      Maybe cause he was half human. Remember nobodies perfect. :)

      --
      "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    11. Re:The recent broadcast by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

      I think the nobodies implies that :(

      Dammit should start using that preview button

      --
      "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    12. Re:The recent broadcast by Telek · · Score: 2

      no my bad, I forgot to mutiply by 2 and add a few, sorry =)

      There's roughly 42 minutes of actual footage per hour of a given show (~14-16 minutes of commercials, ~1-2 minutes for opening seq and ~1-2 for closing), so for a 2 hour show you can get about 86-88 minutes of footage out of it. My bad =) Brain running on autopilot, forgot to turn it back on after watching the show (j/k!) Need more sleep.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    13. Re:The recent broadcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, but I wonder how well they will be explored. That's one of the problems of having multiple writers is that you don't get very complicated or deep story arcs. I loved B5 for that, since every show was either written directly by or given to someone else who was told what to do by JMS. That allowed for some things that came up in first season to resurface again in the 3rd season, I loved that. I haven't seen anything remotely close to that in ST to date, and I hope that they really improve that, but I'm quite doubtful."

      The much hated voyager did that at least once.
      The design of voyager had to do with the high warp speed travel messing up space.
      In a 2nd or 3rd season episode they run into 2 ferengi who were from the TNG episode with the "stable" wormhole.
      There are probably some more in DS9 and maybe even TNG

    14. Re:The recent broadcast by Telek · · Score: 2

      I hardly qualify that as plot continuity. That's more like a "hey, didn't we send ferrengi over here some time? Cool, why don't we find'em? Yeah, so it's a whole 1/4 of the galaxy and the chances are slim-to-none that they'll run into them, but we never pay attention to facts anyways!" type of plot-continuity.

      I'm talking about the well thought out before hand, planned, lasting 3 years type of plot continuity.

      Hell, never mind that, I'd be happy if they just didn't contradict themselves.

      TNG didn't have **any** plot continuity until like the 5th season or so, they were all pretty much independant episodes. DS9 around their 2nd half finally started to get into long plots, which acted quite well, but they were too broad based and not intricate enough. They were of the "ok, we are getting into a war!" plot styles, not the down-to-every-last-character-plot-building style plots.

      Voyager was dealing with warp travel messing up space? Huh??

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    15. Re:The recent broadcast by hey! · · Score: 2

      I didn't like the vulcan. She wasn't even hot enough to fill the 7/9 spot. The just bugged me, like a really dumb spock. At least the original pointy ears respected the humans.

      She wasn't hot? Hmmm. Were do you live? I might want to pay a visit.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:The recent broadcast by camino_rah · · Score: 1

      Scot Bakula: loved him in Quantum Leap; in other shows he's been uneven-to-bad when he tries to play tough guys. I thought he got better in the episode as he started to listen to the Vulcan's advice. The gratuitous rubbing "biomemedic" gel scene between T'pal and Tucker was just so callous and low...I won't go any further except to say they captured all of Gene Rodenbury's sexism without also getting the full measure of his imagination, wit or ability to explore complex societal questions. Leonard Nemoy and Mark Leonard (who played Spock's dad) both set incredibly high bars for playing Vulcans...a bar which has bested every actor since. Shoe-box (Voyager) was just a dull, lifeless puppet who never became a real boy. The writers are trying to overcome this by loosening-up the Vulcans but now the V's sound prigish and school-marmish. At first I thought they were Romulans because they were so stuck up and abrasive. What was a Klingon doing on Earth? Why was he being chased by poly-morphing creatures? Why didn't the advanced weapons systems of the helix slice the "polarized" deck plating of the Enterprise to scrap metal? Why didn't the time-traveling cold-warriors want to take out the humans and Vulcans? Dr. Flock and the theme music must be killed early in the series, like in episode 2. Enough gripping. -I liked the linguist. -If there is going to be skimpy dressing, I like the fact that the men seem to get about equal time in their skivvies, even if they aren't subjected to the 7/9 lycra body suits. -I like how spare and "pre-cursorish" the ship is. -I liked the snow effects on Rigel. -I like no holodeck, no tractor beam, no reliable transporter. Finally, I have hopes (as all Trekkies do and must) for what lays ahead. ###

  59. Augh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is it with this show and the porn? I'm not interested in seeing Vulcan tits, and my girlfriend assures me she was not interested in seeing Kummanduh Tuckah's dick.

    Star Trek has always been an example of a show that did not need to rely on (mindless) violence and (senseless) sex to entertain and provoke thought. If this show is getting a new breed of Trekkers, it must be horny 14 year old boys.

    Other than that, it was a fairly decent show (ignoring the sci-babble).

    1. Re:Augh by unitron · · Score: 2
      "If this show is getting a new breed of Trekkers, it must be horny 14 year old boys."

      Which means they're aiming for an audience twice as old as the target demographic of Phantom Menace.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  60. I liked it by BravoXL · · Score: 0

    I thought it was good. although I will admit I was a biut confused when the softcore seen kicked in, what the hell was that? Anyway, i really enjoyed all the characters on the show, they all seemed to have a bit more personality than voyager or DS9 (where some of the characters made me want to hurt things). I thought it was pretty close to NG levels a far as quality. I'm looking foward to what the show has to offer. I really thought it was cool when they brought out the phasers and said that these are the new ones with to settings, it will be cool to see new technolgy come into play. I also like how the teleporter won't come into major play, I think it makes it better. On a whole I thought it was very good.

  61. Way too early, wait till Saturday please. by kjj · · Score: 2

    In my market it won't be on until Saturday evening. Check www.wfft.com and go to Saturday the 29th and you see it there on the schedule (yes UPN shows are actually run on the FOX network here). So to really be safe the article should not have any details about the commanders or anything. I want to find out about the characters for myself. I know movies don't come out the same time for everyone and Slashdot generally has kept the spoilers inside.

    1. Re:Way too early, wait till Saturday please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      So to really be safe the article should not have any details about the commanders or anything.

      or maybe you should just stop reading, moron.

    2. Re:Way too early, wait till Saturday please. by mgblst · · Score: 1

      maybe i can suggest that you dont read this then!

      Hey, i wont get to see it for months, quit complaining... Saturday, pshh.

    3. Re:Way too early, wait till Saturday please. by skotte · · Score: 0
      wait till when??


      you know, i didnt see it, because i was otherwise engaged... err, occupied.


      so by your logic this article should have waited till, oh, i dont know, next year sometime when it hits a re-run and i have a chance to see it. in fFact, by your logic, no articles reviewing movies should be available until ever human on earth has seen it. and the fForeign game-station (like the much heralded japanese PS2) could NEVER be given a story-headline here. cos afterall, not everyone has seen it.


      daft sods.

    4. Re:Way too early, wait till Saturday please. by bliss · · Score: 0

      "Hey, i wont get to see it for months, quit complaining... Saturday, pshh."

      what country is this Bulgaria?

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
  62. Doesn't it seem familiar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else seem to seem to think some things were a little similar to B5: Crusade?

  63. Hmmm... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
    ...we have a Kirk/Bones captain, a vulcan who looks amazingly like Seven of Nine, some hanger-on that reminds me of Neelix, a cute chick from an ethnic minority with a speaker in her ear, and an African-American guy who's a whiz at figuring out alien engineering...

    What will they think of next? A streamlined ship that looks more like the NCC-1701 E than a century-old precursor to the NCC-1701?

    To be fair, I like it more than Voyager and the last few seasons of Deep Space 90210, but Bakula's gotta lose some more hair and have a major debate as to whether he should go with a rug or shave...but there is great potential.

    Of course, it could be worse. The series could have revolved around Wesley Crusher.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how the Star Trek guys go out of their way to include the minorities and give her a name like "Hoshi Sato" to point out that she's not just your average american.

      ....

      Too bad her real name is "Linda Park".

      http://us.imdb.com/Name?Park,+Linda

  64. Theme music... by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 1
    OK, here's a test... What was the name or content of that theme? Can you hum the tune? Are you going to be cleaning the puke out of the carpet in front of your arm chair for weeks?

    The show itself was nice, not great, not a single "Wow... Cool!" in the thing, but nice.

    That theme, however, SUCKED. Jeesoos Fraggin Christo! Friends has a better theme. Sixty Minutes has a better theme!

    BLECH BLECH BARF RALPH PUKE RETCH PUKE

    Oh... And do ya think is was a little chilly in that decontamination room?

    1. Re:Theme music... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a bit of trivia, the only show on television without theme music is 60 minutes.

    2. Re:Theme music... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't agree more. That theme song sucked in a big way. I might have started watching with a little bit more of an open mind if that music hadn't started the whole thing off.

      It was the equivalent of having Donovan sing the OST theme (wait that would be cool . . .), or Frankie Goes to Hollywood sing the TNG theme.

    3. Re:Theme music... by unitron · · Score: 2

      He didn't say theme music, he just said theme. Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick....

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  65. Star Wars? by N3P1u5U17r4 · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else think that it had Star Wars overtones? For example, the space bar with all the different aliens and the taliban... i mean suliban pods... that looked like imperial fighters without the wings.

    --
    You're Just Jealous Because The Voices Are Talking To Me.
    1. Re:Star Wars? by Zeno_1 · · Score: 1

      Ya that scene reminded me of the Cantina in Star Wars.. Ah well, it was still a great episode.

  66. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by jiheison · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jolene Blalock.

    Zounds.

    Damn this compression filter!

  67. You fanboys suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who got tired of TNG towards the end of the series, the first few seasons of DS9 and the complete Voyager series, it's time for something a little different. Some history continuity has been broken, oh boo-hoo! Some leeway is needed or else the series will get bogged down trying to maintain continuity. I definitely like the fact that they're not the confident 24th century space adventurers. They're unsure of themselves and the technology they have. I liked the exchange with the vulcans near the beginning of the show. The only part I disliked was how friendly Archer and T'Pol got at the end.

    It's the first episode, give the show some slack and time.

  68. From those of us on the west coast.... by Tide · · Score: 1

    How about not posting spoliers like that on the front of Slashdot before everyone (at least in the US) has had a chance to watch the show. I'll rarely complain about spoilers but Ive been good to not read or even see any commercials on this series. I was looking forward to that ignorance.

    --

    People think Microsoft is the answer. Microsoft is just the question, "No" is the answer.
    1. Re:From those of us on the west coast.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the heck are you looking here then and can't you tear yourself away from a headline without delving down into it... I bet you cannot turn away from those pop-up porn ads either ..go watch tv..make some popcorn ..fix a drink... get off the net for 2 hours... geez

  69. What would have made you happy?? by billmaly · · Score: 0

    I didn't even watch it, don't want to watch it. No matter what was done, would anyone have been happy with it? Prob. not.

    I dread LOTR, no doubt there will be a holy flame war here when that is released!! "OH MY SWEET LORD....THE ELVES EARS ARE NOT POINTY ENOUGH/TOO POINTY!! HERESY!!!"

  70. Seeing the spirit of McCoy Ruled by dabblah · · Score: 1

    Come on now. It has honestly been too long since progressive intellectual southerners have had a decent character on TV to represent our finer virtues (I would say Carroll O'Connor as Sheriff what's his name would be the last I can think of). That commander guy needs some work, but he had some good insightful wileyness at various points throughout.

    My other reaction would be that it was not nearly as lame as either "Encounter at Farpoint" or whatever the hell the launch of Voyager was called. Maybe there is some hope? eeh. I'll probably watch it in any case.

    1. Re:Seeing the spirit of McCoy Ruled by Kizeh · · Score: 1

      Gillespie. Once you actually sit down and watch more than fifteen minutes of a In the Heat of the Night episode it starts to dawn on you that they had darn good writers. I think it was an amazingly underrated series, hiding underneath the hick-town crust.

      Oh. This was supposed to be about Enterprise? I liked the tits. And the lips. And the hips. And the eyes. And the short hair. Um. I didn't like the technology mumbo-jumbo and that they seem to already have all the conveniences of the later series. I didn't mind the opening. Most CG was good, some was horrendously bad, like the crash-landed Klingon ship. But who cares about what I thought anyways? I hope they can inject some content into the series, or at least sell nice posters of Ms. Blalock.

  71. Uhm, West Coast? by Primer · · Score: 1

    Some of us live on the West Coast...and haven't seen it yet...couldn't you have waited until we saw it before you bashed it?

    --
    This is necessary...life, feeds on life...
    1. Re:Uhm, West Coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do most things a few hours before you do.

      Seriously - if I see one more of you freaks bitching about spoilers I'm going to move to Cali and vote Republican.

    2. Re:Uhm, West Coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't you have waited until later to READ this?

  72. Back to my... by hound3000 · · Score: 1

    In order to save time, here is the end line to many of the posts here.

    Back to my...

    ...Voyager reruns for REAL soft porn
    ...Deep Space Nine reruns for REAL Klingons
    ...The Next Generation reruns for REAL acting
    ...The Original Series reruns for the REAL Humans and Vulcans bickering
    ...Babylon 5 reruns for REAL scripting
    ...Buffy the Vampire Slayer for REAL soft porn... er, Gen X,Y programming?

    1. Re:Back to my... by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1
      What do you do with a drunken sailor, earli in the morning?

      Well, according to Shanties from the Seven Seas, by Stan Hugill, you can:

      Put him in the long-boat till he gets sober
      Keep him there an' make him bale her
      Trice him up in a runnin' bowline
      Tie him to the taffrail when she's a yard-arm under
      Put him in the scuppers with a hose-pipe on him
      Take him and shake him and try and wake him

      etc...

    2. Re:Back to my... by hound3000 · · Score: 1

      Okay, straying offtopic, I know, but after this it stops. Please don't mod down.. :)

      Can you send the name of that particular poem/song to me? I've only heard of the song version before.

      To be back on topic to save myself, did anybody notice the old clipper ship in the background of what I presume was a cramped captian's quarters? Oh course you did? Oh, okay... :)

  73. Tucker? Sounded like Taco.. by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I swear, when that woman was on the radio it really really sounded like she said CmdrTaco.. /. reference?

    1. Re:Tucker? Sounded like Taco.. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You uncovered the new fad. Just as Kilroy was being forgotten, somebody else always comes in to fill in the buzzword-less society. Recently, it was the whole 'All your base are belog to us'. Now, perhaps we'll see giant "/." 's on Mars... "CmdrTaco was here."

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  74. Cream scene... by QwkHyenA · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Anyone tell me what was said during the cream treatment scene? I didn't catch the dialog...

    And then I had to run to the bathroom for..umm..tissue...

    --
    LFS. Have you built your system today?
    1. Re:Cream scene... by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      TOO MUCH INFORMATION

      Geez, there are legitimate reasons to use caps sometimes, but I guess Taco isn't aware of them...

  75. 42! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be the first one on the B-ark

  76. pretty cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll say one thing for Enterprise, it definetly has a different 'feeling' to it than any of the other Treks. Almost has that movie atmoshere. There's also a lot more petty dialog which really gives it a certain believable quality, IMHO.

  77. a question by howman · · Score: 1

    now that they are all wearing blue, how are we going to tell who is going to die each episode?

    --
    flinging poop since 1969
    1. Re:a question by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 2

      Yep. I'm a goon.

      The departmental colors (Red = Command, Blue = Medical, Gold = Engineering/Security) are present in the piping on the otherwise staid blue uniforms. In other words, the guys with the Gold piping are gonna get smoked. :-D

    2. Re:a question by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      I'm still gonna call 'em "redshirts" tho...

    3. Re:a question by urmensch · · Score: 0

      they _are_ red shirts again! note the red stripe for engineering and yellow for command

    4. Re:a question by AveryT · · Score: 1

      In TOS the mandatory expendable crewmember in every landing party was a security guy in a red shirt. In those days I think they actually attempted to follow the departmental color scheme as opposed to using whatever color looked best on a particular actor.

    5. Re:a question by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      The departmental colors (Red = Command, Blue = Medical, Gold = Engineering/Security) are present in the piping on the otherwise staid blue uniforms. In other words, the guys with the Gold piping are gonna get smoked.
      You're thinking of TNG/DS9/Voyager colors. Enterprise is using TOS colors, which means red and gold are swapped around.
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  78. Rerun air time ? by Urgoll · · Score: 1


    Will they rerun it soon ? We had a power failure here for the last half hour :-(

  79. bow-chicka-bow-wow music by RexRuther · · Score: 1

    bow-chicka-bow-wow music Now that what slashdot needs! Either that or the theme from sanford and son

    --
    -"The early bird catches the worm, but the late bird sleeps the most"
  80. Thank GAWD! by hal200 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I thought I might be the only one who thought it sucked ass. I even called a friend of mine (BIG ST fan) half way through, and he had the audacity to say, "It's good! I think you'll like it!" If I could have reached through the phone and beat him senseless, I would have...Here's an email I sent to another friend, detailing my initial reaction...I apologize for the obsenities.

    Oh, BTW, I'm mildly pissed off right now. Tom talked me into watching the premiere of Enterprise...now, it was against my better judgment, but in the end, I said, "What the fuck. If I don't watch it, I won't know."...So, I watched it. And it sucked ass. No, it sucked more than ass...it sucked fucking ass. And balls. And cock. And a fucking yak. Why did it suck a fucking yak? I don't know...but it sucked fucking yak cock! A DEAD fucking yak cock! It was that bad. The only part worth watching was the part at the beginning when farmer Joe takes a futuristic shotgun to Klingon Bob. And the credits were good...provided you turned the sound off....Fucking N'Sync. That was it. The rest of the 2 hours was Scott Bakula running around saying, "Vulcans suck! Yay Earth!", and the vulcan bitch, T'PMS running around being bitchy...

    And speaking of the characters, it was like they took all the old series, tossed them into a blender, and plastered up the pulsating grey pussy ooze on my television and called it 'Characterization'....First, the fucking doctor...Think Garek meets The Voyager Doctor meets fucking Neelix. I think he's Cardassian. I think. They probably just slapped some putty on his face and said, "Good enough."

    Then, the engineer. Think Bashir. Close your eyes when he's talking, and you won't be able to tell the difference. He's almost bearable....I say this because he got barely any air time. A drunk scottsman could kick his ass any day of the week.

    Their navigator. Think fucking annoying Wesley Crusher meets Tom Paris meets his ass getting kicked on a weekly basis by bullies who want his lunch money.

    Then, the communications officer. Here we have Barclay meets Troy meets every other woosy character that's ever made an appearance on any show.

    Rounding things out, they have what I THINK is their weapons officer. Maybe I have him and Bashir 2.0 confused...Fuck if I know. He's a fucking moron. The entire Voyager writing team combined. Heaven help them if he's in charge of anything that requires an IQ of more than 2 to operate. "Uh Captain. I pushed this buttony thingy, and my leg came off. What should I do?"
    (Watch this be his big line in next week's show...I know I won't!)

    I've already mentioned the science officer. T'Bitch. 'Nuff said.

    Then, we get to Mr. Bakula. I don't know about you, but he just doesn't strike me as a captain-y type. His big accomplishment in 2 hours of crappy video? Let's see...He managed to get shot...twice...sorta. (the second one was in 'The Room of Goofy Camera Effects', so it didn't count...and he only got the front part...the hurt-causing part came later.) He manage to get captured by crappy aliens. He managed to turn on the big flashy thing that makes the bad guy's base fall apart. And he managed to do it without saying 'Oh Boy'. But you know he was thinking it.

    As for the battle scenes? There was one sort of...The Enterprise managed to get it's ass kicked by interstellar tinker toys. I kid you not. It spent most of it's time hiding from them.

    The plot? What there was of it? Well, let's just say it involved 'Genetically engineered' aliens (who all happen to look the same...fuck, I hate clones!) taking orders from a shadowy figure from the future of an alternate reality! FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK!!

    --

    I just want to take over the world...Why does that automatically make me EVIL?

    1. Re:Thank GAWD! by Telek · · Score: 2

      Wow you tore a strip off it. Before I try to refute everything, is there any SF shows that you like? You do have to give them some leeway you know, and it is just a pilot.

      Did anyone else notice the whole "Neptune and back in 6 minutes" thing? I worked it out, that's 87 times the speed of light. Not very fast if you plan on going anywhere outside of the nearest couple dozen star systems in any reasonable (few days) period of time.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    2. Re:Thank GAWD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admit it, spock ears -- you decided you were going to hate the show 2 months ago, finally got your release, but you'll be back on your ass watching it every week.

    3. Re:Thank GAWD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that about fits with the OLD warp velocity chart out of the Original Star Fleet Tech Manual.

    4. Re:Thank GAWD! by janke · · Score: 1

      Yeah... if I remember correctly, warp is a base 10 logarithmic scale, similar to the richter scale.

    5. Re:Thank GAWD! by Telal · · Score: 1

      87 times the speed of light ought to be enough for anyone.

    6. Re:Thank GAWD! by Telek · · Score: 2

      Thank you Mr Gates!

      now can you please come and step over here?
      Yes, on that large yellow X.
      No, the hanging cow is just for decoration.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
  81. Ohhhh, right.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, that's right, I forgot, everything old is good and everything new is bad.

    And if I say anything POSITIVE about the series, I'll be a newbie lackwit who doesn't know what Trek really is.

    Please, save it. The pilot rocked. Harder than "Menagerie", better than "Farpoint".

    Bakula isn't as chop-chop-kiss-kiss as Kirk, definitely more human than I-Love-Jean-y, and not as whiny as Janeway. (Sisko kicks butt, once he shaved his head and grew the goatee, that is...)
    As for the rest of the cast, at least they didn't annoy me. I wish someone would have put Wesley and Harry Kim through the chipper-shredder.

    Also, the effects were VERY good. The ship, while it might be an Akira-class takeoff, is pretty darn cool.

    Remember people, this isn't supposed to be the Trek you remember and want it to be. It's 150 years before Kirk started dashing about the universe. The humans are a little more naive, our tech isn't as high, and we careen space acting like we know what we're doing. I think it's a fresh start for the Star Trek universe.

    And remember the Trek Rule of Three: No Trek series shall come into its own before Season 3. (Of course, TOS only _had_ three seasons and Voyager always sucked...)

  82. My thoughts by Ledfoot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, just got done with the viewing party I threw here at the house. Here's the general impressions of the group:

    1) Yes, theme music was LAME, but the intro video was pretty cool.
    2) Is it cold in that bio-decom room or something?
    3) There were some good laughs.
    4) The doctor is going to be a great character.
    5) The whole Enterprise going to Kronos is a bit of a stretch. Majorly F's with the whole timeline of the other series'.
    6) We all liked how they made it seem like this is the first time they've really gone away from Earth. Thing is, you'd think they had already been doing that with ships that could do less than Warp-5 and as a result would have at least met a FEW more species and learned stuff from them. It seems like the Vulcans hold a monopoly on information in this series.
    7) The Speech by Cochran was LAME!

    Now, in regards to what others have been posting...

    We HAVE to re-hash the whole Human vs Vulcan thing because at the time of this series, it HASN'T HAPPENED YET!

    The armor plating is polarized by an electromagnetic field to help repel particle weapons. As a result, yes, it CAN go down (ie, power failure). Then it's just plain old hunks of steel. So, this is basically the pre-cursor to shields.

    I personally would have prefered it if they would have kept things fairly primitive and then over time phased in the technologies that we all know and love (like transporters, phasers, etc.) They more or less introduce all of them in the first episode (though, as we saw, they're all pretty new and not very reliable.)

    Anyhow, just my $0.02

    1. Re:My thoughts by Telek · · Score: 2

      The Speech by Cochran was LAME!

      I'm sorry, but I thought that the whole idea of Cochran from the start was LAME^2000. Even giving them all the allowances that I could, the idea that some drunken loony converts an old missile into a warp vessel, and does this BEFORE any governmently funded operation did, that's FAR FAR FAR beyond any sort of credibility. And you'd assume that there was some sort of proof that a warp drive would work prior to him developing it, thus the governments would have poured a LOT of money into their space programs to develop this thing. And considering how even with 100s of professionals and weeks of checks on the launchpad we still have things go wrong, I find it VERY hard to even imagine that some drunk guy could do it. And to top it all off, the launch into space was far far far too unrealistic. You're being pushed back into your chair with many G's of force, you can't just lesurely move your hand out and flick some switches in chairs that look like they were ripped out of some old office. Actually I hated the entire plot of "First Contact", but watching troy get drunk was very funny. Aaahhhh

      Sorry, had to get that out of my system. =)

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    2. Re:My thoughts by Griim · · Score: 1

      6) We all liked how they made it seem like this is the first time they've really gone away from Earth.

      That reminds me, after all that's happened to them in just this episode...I'm hoping that in the next couple of episodes, they'll have some people wanting to head back, not realizing the isolation that space travel would cause...I mean, it's the first time most of them have been so so far away!

      Did they mention the crew compliment?

    3. Re:my thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      West Wing is on then (at least where I live). Do you think they want to schedule against against one of the highest rated shows on tv?

    4. Re:My thoughts by IronChef · · Score: 2


      In addition to all that, didn't they tamper with Trek history to make that movie? I though that Cochrane was a native of Alpha Centauri -- as in, a colony Earth built with slower-than-light ships -- and he invented that gadget there.

    5. Re:My thoughts by tb3 · · Score: 2

      7) The Speech by Cochran was LAME! Maybe, but it finally gave them a chance to fix that 35-year-old split-infinitive "to boldly go". That, and the seat belt line, were to two funniest things in the show.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    6. Re:My thoughts by jandrese · · Score: 2

      I thought of Cochran as sort of like "rocketguy" today. Probably the technology for warp travel was several years old by that point, but all of the worlds governments were too busy with their own problems to bother with scientific exploration.

      I also think warp drives are actually fairly simple devices fundimentally (almost all things are), but it gets more complicated as time goes on. Go to an old car show some day and look at the really old engines and compare it to a modern car engine.

      That said, I don't think it was completely unbelievable that a determined person (along with a few assistants and a metric buttload of money) couldn't get a warp drive retrofitted on a missile. At least it's no more unbelievable than a guy building something like a rocket in his backyard to shoot himself into the stratosphere.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:My thoughts by Telek · · Score: 2

      look at the really old engines and compare it to a modern car engine.

      Hell, I have a '68 Plymouth Valiant with 45,000mi on it, open the hood and I can climb in while the engine's running. There's literally a battery, the engine, the radiator, a few reservoirs and that's it.

      Even on my '85 Camaro I've taken that engine apart and it's not that complicated.

      I say not that complicated by concept, but implementation requires many many many details.

      However I'd assume that if Cochran had the $$$ to do it then it obviously can't cost much, and if that's the case then NASA would have beaten them to the punch. Plus is warp drive technology was around (in order to be around it must have been tested first, right? which of course implies some ground with a LOT of money), even if NASA didn't pick it up, there'd be a lot of other private interests that would have.

      And there's something fundamentally different than using century old rocket technology (well, almost) and using something that apparently hasn't even been tested yet, much less having it work.

      And next stupid question, take a look at the design of his vessel. How the hell did he get back to earth? Did he save any of the prototype?

      Anyways, kinda a moot point =)

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    8. Re:My thoughts by djocyko · · Score: 2

      7) The Speech by Cochran was LAME! Maybe, but it finally gave them a chance to fix that 35-year-old split-infinitive "to boldly go". That, and the seat belt line, were to two funniest things in the show.

      pardon?!? chance to fix?!? When I heard it I went nuts. Firstly, according to internation standards of english, split infinitives are now legal. (therefore, they never had a reason to change it) secondly, why mess with one of the most famous lines from TV?

      I was highly disappointed when I first recognized what he was saying, only for him to end with "to go boldly where no man has gone before."

      Perhaps my only issue with the entire episode.

    9. Re:My thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I liked the theme music... Well, I didn't think it was the greatest thing, but it fits the show. It's not the standard uptight orchestral stuff that we've come to know Star Trek for, it's more relaxed, adventurous. Which is what the show is about.


      I think it'll grow on people as the show grows. I hope they don't change it.

    10. Re:My thoughts by isomeme · · Score: 2

      6) We all liked how they made it seem like this is the first time they've really gone away from Earth. Thing is, you'd think they had already been doing that with ships that could do less than Warp-5 and as a result would have at least met a FEW more species and learned stuff from them. It seems like the Vulcans hold a monopoly on information in this series.

      Definitely a consistency problem there. They had a character who had grown up on human-operated interstellar freighters, so clearly we've been out among the stars for at least decades before the time of the Enterprise mission. But if this were so, you'd think Starfleet would be less "babes in the woods" about who and what lives nearby, what their habits are, and so forth.


      In a similar vein, putting the Klingon homeworld 4 days from Earth at warp 4.5 is just plain wrong. That puts the capitals of Klingon and Federation space about six hours apart by Kirk's era. Hard to see how one or the other world (or both) avoided obliteration during the rather long war between the two.


      Quibbles aside, though, I was pleasantly surprised by the pilot. I'll definitely be tuning in to see if they can grow the show into something great.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    11. Re:My thoughts by Scoria · · Score: 2

      Out of curiousity, they didn't somehow coax James Cromwell into playing Cochran again, did they?

      --
      Do you like German cars?
  83. Remeber how bad the first season of TNG was? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Enterprise might get better...As for that theme song, shit, Rodenberry must be rolling over in his grave.

    It sounded like Michael Bolton mated with John Denver.
    Also, I like the sexy characters on Star Trek to be subtle. T'pel almost got drilled in the decontamination chamber. And those nipples...I mean, how long before they just get it over and have her spread her legs on TV?

    I mean, I thought it was supposed to be Star Trek, not Forbidden Alien Poon-tang Quest.

    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:Remeber how bad the first season of TNG was? by LWolenczak · · Score: 1

      nah, he is not rolling in his grave, he is rolling in a satellite, targeting it so that we get some new writers for star trek.

      BTW, is it just me, or is it time for a DS9 movie? Or a TNG movie involving DS9?

    2. Re:Remeber how bad the first season of TNG was? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And those nipples...I mean, how long before they just get it over and have her spread her legs on TV?"

      oh soon I hope

  84. de-splitting the infinitive by flanker · · Score: 1

    I think the most important development was the 30 years-in-coming grammatical retraction in Scott Dracula's dad's speech:

    "...to go boldly..."

    --
    Left shift 1 for e-mail...
  85. I'm am 36 of D, resistance is futile! by Maul · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not even in the days of Kirk was the psuedo-pr0n as bad as it was in Voyager. Bet they'll follow suit with the Vulcan chick.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    1. Re:I'm am 36 of D, resistance is futile! by OverDrive33 · · Score: 1

      Let me be your alien bitch.

      "Hand me those binders chewie" :oD

  86. Pardon me... by OakLEE · · Score: 1

    But the fact that half the country still hasn't seen it might preclude people to wait on passing judgement until we have!!!!

    ________________

    --
    The sun beams down on a brand new day, No more welfare tax to pay, Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light...
  87. New Trekkie point of view by OverDrive33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Personally I've only been somewhat of a trek fan throughout voyager and SOME of the movies.
    And the captin struck me as a DUMBASS, I mean was anyone else feeling the urge to stand up and scream "NO DONT DO THAT! " or "Why are you going to do that, starfleet would be mega pissed!!!!"(which they weren't... that baffled me a bit)

    For everyone who was dissin' the softcore porn... ta hell with yas! Theres nothing that a geek like myself enjoys more than a DAMN FINE, nekked alien! :oD

    This was better than most of the bull on tv this season (see love cruise), and I'll probably continue to watch it... hoping it'll get better.

    1. Re:New Trekkie point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Why are you going to do that, starfleet would be mega pissed!!!!"(which they weren't... that baffled me a bit)

      You're Monday-morning QBing! Everyone seems to forget that we're supposed to be watching a crew that has no precepts or conventions to rely on. They are the first and the setup is that they _have_ to prove themselves, so chances are going to have to be taken. This will especially be necessary to get out from underneath the Vulkan thumb.

    2. Re:New Trekkie point of view by bonius_rex · · Score: 1
      And the captin struck me as a DUMBASS


      I'm wondering if maybe that's because there has never been a starship captain. So, he has no example to follow. He probably got the job because his dad designed the engine or whatever (instead of based on his qualifications)

      I think maybe the idea is that the Vulcans are right, Humans are not quite ready to venture out of thier own star system yet.

      Overall, It sucked less than the average Voyager episode, so maybe there's hope for this one.

      And I fully agree, I don't mind a half-naked vulcan every so often :-)

  88. Just between you and me, Ziggy.... by brocktune · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know who I would want to leap into next.

    "I'm sorry, that paper cut looks pretty nasty. Better safe than sorry - time to apply more full-body decontaminating gel."

  89. Theme song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe William Shatner should sing the new theme song... I hear he has a really swingin' CD out somewhere.
    [the sound of severe intestinal distress]

  90. It's a show gosh darn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Micheal

    Get off your high horse. It's a make-belief fictional story. It fills an hour or so and makes you wonder [perhaps]. If you expect real life science then you're diluting yourself and you need to see a doctor quickly!

    I thought it was a very keen show. Was much less of a "heres is an odion reduction matrix techy device thingy" type plot and more "hey we gotta finish a mission" type plot.

  91. Real treckers... by OSSMKitty · · Score: 4, Troll

    know when they are being hoodwinked.

    + "Phase pistols"? Stick with the laser pistol up till at least TOS, please.

    + A Vulcan, who has zero ties to Earth's Starfleet (no Federation) not only sits in the Captain's chair 15 minutes into the show, but takes command?

    + "Wading into space"? After WWIII and warp speed, we blasted off the planet. Most warp research was done on Alpha Centari (See TOS show with ZC and the Companion)

    + The last movie placed First Contact in circa 2063. This is 90 years later, 2153.
    According the ST Encyclopedia, the Federation was founded by several planets in 2161, after the Romulan wars. Better get busy in order to fight and win a war with allies and enemies you haven't met in less than ten years!

    + I won't even talk about warp 5.

    + IDIC. What happened to Vulcan respect and tolerance and non-judgementalism?

    If I got any of this wrong, say so. (Not that I have to worry...)

    1. Re:Real treckers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you pulled a bunch of things out of your ass. It doesn't matter if you are right, the show has just proved you wrong. You are watching Trek history unfold, it isn't like in the books or the movies, it's what's happening. In the words of someone "Get over it. Get a life."

      Sorry but who the hell really cares? As long as the series all alone does a good job at entertaining us for 45 mins or so a week it should be enough.

    2. Re:Real treckers... by Hollins · · Score: 1, Troll

      "The last movie placed First Contact in circa 2063. This is 90 years later, 2153. According the ST Encyclopedia, the Federation was founded by several planets in 2161, after the Romulan wars. Better get busy in order to fight and win a war with allies and enemies you haven't met in less than ten years!"

      Geeks who pour over ST minutia and compare consistency with stupid books sold at conventions are exactly the audience this series is NOT going after.

      Get ... a ... life

    3. Re:Real treckers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a thought...did it ever occure to you to just watch the show for what it was? Must it conform to every episode of every show over the past 20+ years?

      I know that anything new has to be picked appart and critisized every which way, but is there nothing that can have at least a glimmer of positive?

      I would like to know if you can enjoy anything new?

    4. Re:Real treckers... by scrytch · · Score: 2

      > The last movie placed First Contact in circa 2063. This is 90 years later, 2153.

      Perhaps you missed the part ... like the whole show, that showed vulcans in the opening scenes being referred to in a familiar fashion, i.e. not stepping out of their ship and saying "live long and prosper" to a crowd of amazed humans. Not to mention the captain's bitching about vulcans having lorded it over them for, guess what, 90 years.

      > What happened to Vulcan respect and tolerance and non-judgementalism

      Of course the vulcans are perfect -- according to the vulcans. They don't seem to have eliminated the illogical behavior of arrogance. You might recall Spock didn't really relish being around humans either.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    5. Re:Real treckers... by dragons_flight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We have a time traveling bad guy providing tech (some reports say 29th century alternate universe), and you expect time line consistency?

      Oh, come now.

    6. Re:Real treckers... by bay43270 · · Score: 3, Redundant

      So what? Kahn was the ruler of Asia and most of Europe in 1996... Its a TV show! just enjoy it!

    7. Re:Real treckers... by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      Who hasn't met them? Did you see the guy in the temporal communicator? A "real trecker" would also recognize Romulan architecture, voices, mannerisms, SILOUHETTES, etc.

    8. Re:Real treckers... by Schooby · · Score: 1

      In addition, i seem to recall something mentioned in TOS or the movies or perhaps in one of the many books of the fact that Vulcans distaste physical contact with other lifeforms because of the whole leaking of thoughts/feelings and what not associated with the mind meld related idea. I immediately thought of this during the !coughcough! completely necessary !coughcough! decontamination scene. Is my recollection a figment of my imagination or is there some basis for this?

    9. Re:Real treckers... by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1

      You're one of those guys who Homer takes to task at the press conference announcing the annoying dog in the Itchy and Scratchy show, right? Come on, admit it.

      --
      :wq
    10. Re:Real treckers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      + Real Trekkies are called "Trekkies" and not "Trekkers"

      + Real Trekkies know there's no "C" in "Trek".

    11. Re:Real treckers... by ethereal · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall from the original series that Warp 3 was supposed to be the limiting point, without refined dilithium or something like that. Does that ring a bell? So the "Warp 5" limit seems a little off.

      Also, what's up with the Klingon world being only 4 days away? So for years after this humans have edgy and sometimes warlike relations with a violent race that lives only 4 days away at Warp 4.5? Kirk would have had nothing to do but fly Earth patrols, it seems.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    12. Re:Real treckers... by elBart0 · · Score: 1

      On that note, is Romulus really only 4 days at warp 4 from Earth? I don't remember the warp to km/sec ratio (or rather, I never knew it,) but that just seems really close.

      One would think that if it only takes 4 days to get back and forth between the two planets, that the Klingons would have come to visit, long before this episode.

      Any one with the (pseudo-)facts want to set me straight?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    13. Re:Real treckers... by inc0gnito · · Score: 1


      Not getting UPN, i didn't get a chance to watch the pilot. But, how do I say this politely, you can't please everybody. Some of the stuff you're bringing up is nothing short of ridcoulous nitpicking, and I doubt that it's even possible to make a new series (based in ST's past) and have it be completely accurate. So sit back, relax, and enjoy the who for what it is, a different look at the ST universe.

    14. Re:Real treckers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When television show "facts" conflict with Real Life(TM) facts, I can deal with it.

      When a television show contradicts itself, that's when my suspension of disbelief comes crashing down.

    15. Re:Real treckers... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      I kinda thought it was a vulcan. (More interesting that way, IMO.)

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    16. Re:Real treckers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a life fag.

    17. Re:Real treckers... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      We have a time traveling bad guy providing tech (some reports say 29th century alternate universe), and you expect time line consistency?

      If I had been exec, yes - but since I'm not... no i guess we don't expect much in the way of consistency.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    18. Re:Real treckers... by RetsamYthgimla · · Score: 1

      Also, what's up with the Klingon world being only 4 days away? So for years after this humans have edgy and sometimes warlike relations with a violent race that lives only 4 days away at Warp 4.5? Kirk would have had nothing to do but fly Earth patrols, it seems.

      I agree. The show put the speed of warp 4.3-4.5 at about 100 times the speed of light (confirmed when someone said they were travelling about 30 million kilometers per second). Now, at 100c, if it took 4 days to get to Kronos (sp?), that's about 400 light-days, or about 1.1 light-years. Now timeline discontinuities aside (this could be the alternate timeline split off from the Borg-Enterprise influence), and "sci-fi physics" aside, I think we can safely assume that the Klingon homeworld is a lot further away than 1.1 light-years... Unless the whole star system is cloaked... Nahh...

      So all other issues aside--physics, timeline, soft porn--I think my only gripe with the story was that it took a whole whopping four days to get to the Klongon Homeworld, as if that makes it sound so far away. I mean, they go through all the work to make the ship slow ("only" warp 4.5), why make the trip so short. It's not like the show would lose its romantic appeal if it took a more realistic 1-2 months! Columbus's voyage across the Atlantic took what, 2-3 months? (the number 71 days pops in my head, but I'm a little rusty on my history.)

      I thinks there's something quite romantic about the long voyages. It gives a better impression, a better feeling for how long the trips between the stars would actually take, and a better impression of how much of an improvement warp 8 or 9 would be. Plus, if the show could place the 1-2 month trip in its proper perspective, as opposed to the 1-2 decade time of sublight travel, then the fantastic speeds acheived wouldn't seem so slow (spin it as amazing that the stars can be reached in just 1-2 months, as opposed to the attitude of "all this technology and it still takes 1-2 months. Damn that ship is slow!" that the producers probably had in mind when arbitrarily deciding that four days would make the plot work better.

  92. Aspest Ratio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked the aspect ratio. Letterboxed, it was.

  93. Are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's so many posts talking about how bad the show is - why is anyone watching it anyway? I know reality sucks and fantasy tv is a great escape but.. jesus.. nevermind..just pretend I didn't say anything..

  94. I think this series has a shot at being Good. by LordZardoz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The new series is quite different from the other Star Trek series in many ways. And I will say that it is a good thing. They did quite a few things right.

    First, the technology was appropriate to the timeframe. The ship has a maximum speed of about Warp 4. The warp core looks primitive. The medical techniques look primitive. There is no universal translater, just a linguist.

    Another element they got right was the distrust between the Vulcans and Humans. Some posters have already complained about the rehashing of the "Emotionless Vulcans vs Irrational Humans". That will be a factor, but the issue is larger then that. The distrust between the two races goes beyond the emotion vs logic debate. The humans see the Vulcans as being restrictive and patronizing. And the Vulcans are somewhat racist. The role of the Vulcans is very close to that of a colonizing authority as in the British of the 18th century. An intresting side effect is that the humans are currently in the role of one of the many background races that really does not matter in the greater scheme of things.

    They will have to be careful though if they wish to do better the Voyager did. They cannot fall back too often on "Sexy Exotic Alien Softcore" before they alienate too many long time fans. And the temporal villians are something else to be cautious with. It will allow the series to explain some deviations in continuity, but they must avoid breaking all continuity with the other series.

    This pilot was stronger then the TNG and DS9 pilots. And Trek shows tend to take a while to 'hit their stride'. It will be a few weeks before I come to a conclusion, but the series is off to a good start.

    END COMMUNICATION

  95. For all those bitching about spoilers by hayden · · Score: 1

    The rest of the world isn't going to get this for some time. I would have thought the subject "Star Trek: Enterprise Reactions?" would have been a bit of a give away it contained spoilers. So just deal with it.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  96. I guess that wasn't offical first contact by McQuaid · · Score: 1

    The one story line I'm looking forward to out of this series is the creation of the prime directive. In TNG, they have mentioned that first contact went horribly wrong and a war ensued for a century when first meeting the klingons. This is what initiated the creation of the prime directive for future first contacts.

    1. Re:I guess that wasn't offical first contact by TMANKA · · Score: 1

      I really did remember that from TNG! I was pissed I thought they were going to try to slash archers throat in the end....know I want to know...how do we piss off the klingons? We missed the opportunity the way it was SUPPOSED to happen. Good thing the producers decided to have time traveling villains to screw up the time line...this makes it a LITTLE easier to swallow....but now this means that all of the TNG, DS9, VOY, and even TOS might NOT happen like we all say....damn this is frustrating!!!!! I will have to say that I did like the opening episode BUT hated the opening song...I was so embarrassed!

  97. that gel scene... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    okay, i *know* this is sophomoric and stupid, but i gotta wonder if anyone else noticed this.

    one of my friends noticed the male actor during the 'gel antibiotic scene' had what appears to be an errection. i didn't believe him at first, but TiVo instant rewind proved otherwise... (it's the point where she's rubbing gel on his back and the camera pans down a bit)

    1. Re:that gel scene... by hAkron · · Score: 1

      I saw that...I am really surprised they didn't edit that better. The way the camera pans down and then cuts right away, I think they were either intending on editing that out, or making it a bit more subliminal.

      ....and I hate to beat a dead horse, but it must have been at least as cold in that isolation chamber as it is in the apartment on 'Friends'...unless its standard practice to put golf pencils in the bra cups of TV actresses ;)

  98. Speaking of Soft Porn by Hangtime · · Score: 1
    Click Here

    Link out to Maxim and Blalock's "interview" with full pictorial spread. Seems as though her experimentation with "chemicals" provided her with the necessary background to be science officer on Enterprise ROFL.

  99. star trek logic by Stalcair · · Score: 1

    I often laugh at the Star Trek definition of logic. In the case of taking the ship and running, you have to weigh both facts and from pattern recognition of past performance in similar situations weigh several hypothesis to find the 'best one'. While the end result could very well be 'take the ship and run', if the mission profile was to explore and except dangers that would be a 50/50 split then. If there was a large chance that allowing the Captain to be killed when a chance existed to save him, and furthermore that a dead captain would only serve to destroy the relations of Vulcans and Humans, not to mention the possibility of pissing off the very Honor driven Klingons... well you get the picture. Oh well...

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

  100. Hey guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a freaking show. Get a life! Ooh boo hoo it wasn't upto the normal star trek repeatness. It's called progress.

    Give the show a chance before you get dressed in your klingon convention costume and kill paramount employees!

  101. ...mmmm Softcore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they show some of those Triple Breasted Whores (the ones from Eroticon 6).

  102. Exploration by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was a completely different feel than the other series' I've liked (ie NextGen/DS9/Voyager). I thought on it, wondering what it was that made it so different than the others, and it came down to the exploration aspect. NextGen didn't really explore in the same way. They had the technology, they knew how to use it. There were few new concepts explored, only new ways of using the old concepts.

    Enterprise seemed to me to be on a whole new level of exploration. Humans really haven't penetrated much of the galaxy. The best warp they can achieve is warp 4.5, transporters are for cargo only, phasers (phase pistols) are a new technology, no Universal Translater!. I could feel the sense of accomplishment they showed when talking about the "incredible" speeds the new ship could achieve. Everything's new.

    My only disappointment was putting in a "temporal cold war" so early in the series. Time travel has been overused in the other series, and I had hoped that it would be used cautiously, if at all, in these archaic pre-Federation times. Ah well. All in all, I approve.

    1. Re:Exploration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Humans really haven't penetrated much of the galaxy.

      Give it time, I'm sure at least one human's gonna be doing some intergalactic penetrating.

  103. Get a Life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As far as Star Trek goes I thought it was pretty good and better than any of the few episodes of that crap called Voyager I saw ever was. The humans were more natural and contemporary and I could relate to them instead of in previous shows where they read poety and perform classical music to better themselves. The best thing was that they toned down the "nutrino emission tachyon particle warp shell anti-nutrino" techno BS.

    I liked the theme song! For the first time in Star Trek history there is music that is lively and doesn't put anyone to sleep. It'll be hard getting use to the lack of elevator music at the beginning of every show but I'll adapt


    The ship was cool but it sure doesn't look 150 years younger than Kirks'. They could have fired back at the bad guys a little bit more. And how does hull plating get disabled?


    Overall I'd give it a thumbs up.

  104. Rave Scene by Agilus · · Score: 0

    I thought the rave scene on the alien space-station thingie was especially cool. It was so realistic! There were strobe lights, and then the captain was on tripping out on LSD! The only thing missing was the mad techno beat!

    --
    hackshop.com - My tech hobby project hub
  105. bad klingon continuity by alienated · · Score: 1

    interesting that they opted for the 'turtle stapled to the forehead' school of klingons vs the old-school 'ming the merciless' variety of klingons ... even though this takes place before the first series. we'll probably NEVER figure that particular change out now (sigh).

    now, bring on the green chicks.

    --
    ----- Trapped in time. Surrounded by evil. Low on gas. --Army of Darkness
  106. just the kind of show Trek fans may hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's why I think I'm going to like it. This series has an unparalleled level of optimism and innocence...on the opposite end of the spectrum from DS9 which I found to be very forced. I don't know if it'll last, but it will get my attention for a while at least.

  107. baby got back to fundamentals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not quite the Orion Slave girls episode but I thought it was a valiant effort. Waiting for the next episode "Trouble with nipples." Where the Enterprise is over run with adorable silicon creatures. And the scene with the lotion. Wow if I had Tivo, click replay click replay.... -rtm

  108. Voyager minus a few things by p3d0 · · Score: 2

    <SPOILER>
    I was a bit disappointed at how they moved the Star Trek franchise into the past. To me it was indistinguishable from Voyager except that they didn't have certain pieces of technology or knowledge. You can't get from Voyager to the original series just by removing knowledge and technology; there's more to it than that. I can't put my finger on exactly what it is, and apparently neither could they.

    There seemed to be just as many alien races hanging around as ever. I was expecting a smaller, more limited universe. Imagine if it was only the Vulcans and the Humans, and this is the episode where they meet the Klingons. Without all those other aliens, they might have to write a story that actually has something to do with the characters.

    I liked the bit when they were trying to escape with the Klingon, and they couldn't understand each other. Nobody broke character, and yet you could tell they were all thoughtful, intelligent characters interacting in a genuine way. If only I could say that for the rest of the show.

    Yes, the Bon Jovioid theme has to go. And for that decontamination scene, I provided my own bow-chicka-bow-wow music.

    Normally I'd say give it some time, but the problem I see is that this premiere has already made the universe too big. That may be hard to fix.
    </SPOILER>

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Voyager minus a few things by Coryoth · · Score: 1
      I was a bit disappointed at how they moved the Star Trek franchise into the past. To me it was indistinguishable from Voyager except that they didn't have certain pieces of technology or knowledge. You can't get from Voyager to the original series just by removing knowledge and technology; there's more to it than that. I can't put my finger on exactly what it is, and apparently neither could they.

      My biggest fear is they'll do a Voyager and have this crew do all manner of revolutionary stuff. I could understand that happening in TOS, 'cause it was the Enterprise, the big, lets go and explore the universe ship, stocked with good people. In TNG it was acceptable because it was THE flagship. They legitimately had the BEST engineers in starfleet. With Voyager it was just a random ship - and yet they came up with more stunning Borg defeating technology from that miserable crew than any sane person could expect.

      This ship in the new series is NOT famous (the downside of going backward in tiem to cast the series), so they better not do a "and if we revrse the flow of the ... then we can accelerate up to warp 12!" sort of crap like they did on Voyager.

      Jedidiah

  109. Best Pilot Ever! by swordgeek · · Score: 2

    Well, the original (REAL!) series had a pretty cool pilot way back when.

    This show had cheesy foreshadowing of stuff we all naturally know (phase pistols, that transporter device, etc.), plot holes you could drive a truck through, and some big historical inaccuracies.

    But you know what? It was pretty damned good. Pilots always suck, and this one sucked less than most. It wasn't preachy, it wasn't deadly serious, and it has some great potential for ongoing subplots. (just why _do_ the humans and klingons become enemies?)

    It's got more promise than any other new show going, and more than any other new Trek had. Let's give it some time to find its legs.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  110. hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed no one mentioned the -- to me -- excessive usage of foul language.. now, I'm no prude but ... it just isn't Star Trek in my opinion. If I had a kid under 10 I wouldn't have wanted to have realized that he/she might not be up for listening to (of all things) Star Trek!

    Then what's up with the porn scene and Bakula in his Fruit-of-the-Looms?

    As for the plot itself, sounded good, but I'm confused on two things: (1) 150 years from the pilot (TOS time) kingons are going to look like brown people with fuzzy eyebrows then 100 years after that (or whatever) they're going to revert back to what they looked like in this series? I assume they'll cover that later, but it's weird.

    Also about the Klingons, in TNG they brought back Kaless (however you spell it) and his whole deal was how jolly and fun loving the Klingons were (while still being warriors, of course)... so... what era did that guy live in?? cause I haven't seen it yet!

    whaddaya think?

    OK, it's been a while since I watched TNG or DS9 but ... (1)

  111. DS9 by Chas · · Score: 1

    Jadzia Dax: That's a Klingon?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  112. I loved it. by CrazyJoel · · Score: 1

    It's great to know that all women in the future, alien or not, are so hooty-licious. I can't wait to see more.

    --

    Such is the infinite Grace of Popeye.
  113. The opening music..omg by pid0 · · Score: 1

    1) What was that crappy signing at the beginning, omfg that was annoying.
    2)What was that grin from the doctor?
    3)How nipply can one vulcan be?
    4)Did they _have_ to include bullet time?

    For someone that doesn't watch ST much I'd say it was ok.

    --
    --- "Just because you can....aw shit do it."
    1. Re:The opening music..omg by nexex · · Score: 1

      lol, man it must have been cold in that detox

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
  114. It was interesting by cokane · · Score: 1

    I actually kind of enjoyed it. I saw most of it, it got cut up at the final half hour by time warner not being able to maintain a clean connection. Time Warner has shown that AOL can make cable TV as unreliable as their so-called on-line service.

  115. One Important Fact.... by jgrumbles · · Score: 1

    Note how it is only being run on UPN...nuff said.

  116. needs to improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bakula's character seems to speak with a southern US accent in one part of the episode and a more northern one later on. He should decide whether he's from redneckville or the more respectable north.

    The spaceship exterior graphics are low-quality. On the other hand, the butterfly-eating display was tremendous. Obviously made by a different group.

    The vulcans aren't emotionless enough.

    1. Re:needs to improve by errxn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you have it all figured out, there, chief. Anyone from below the Mason-Dixon line is automatically a moron....

      ....PLEASE stop your mindless stereotyping and go get a life. Even if it's just rent-to-own.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    2. Re:needs to improve by Nuclear+Mothman · · Score: 1

      I just hate the fact that physical miniatures have been replaced by CGI. If you compare the "launch of the refurbished Enterprise" from ST:TMP, and the launch of Enterprise NX-01, there's a HUGE difference in quality. Of course, I know there is a HUGE difference between motion picture film resolution and TV resolution, but I would have still prefered to see a miniature of the new/old Enterprise, rather than yet another pixellized image.

    3. Re:needs to improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to get so hot under the collar, sir.

  117. A fundamental change in script-writing for ST by ThufirHawat · · Score: 1

    OK, folks, let's face it-what's happened is that after the dreadful political correctness of ST:V, what with the Native American, the female commander (she of the croaking voice), the black Vulcan etc. they finally got it that ST fans don't particularly like that. So, back to a swarthy, rather illiterate captain (who resembles Kirk in more than one way), a very attractive woman (though Vulcan, to pre-empt attacks of the rabid feminist armies), a back to basics science etc. Let's give the poor ST folks a chance and let's see how it develops. So far it's not bad at all.

    --
    Thufir Hawat
    Part-time Mentat
  118. Finally a reason to watch Star Trek by mrpull · · Score: 2, Funny

    Soft Porn? I finally have a reason to watch this schlock.

    BTW,
    Trekies was on Showtime yesterday. I laughed my ass off.

    mr.

    1. Re:Finally a reason to watch Star Trek by paulydavis · · Score: 1

      You should watch free enterprise...its even better.!

      I would love to her the characters in that movie talk about the pilot.

  119. Captain's Log... by NickFusion · · Score: 1

    ...in a blue speedo....who needs to see that?

    And without out a holodeck, I guess it's just Friday night's in the decontamination room...a little decon-gel, and, lord, who turned the thermostat down to 40 F?

    I think from now on we'll just call that the Vulcan Double Salute.

    --
    What were you expecting?
  120. Revealing my Trekkiehood by dbarron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By any chance did anyone catch the fact that the science officer (T'Pau) is (circa STOS) T'Pau of Vulcan (ie...basically the most important person on the planet at that time...leader of the the family that was Surak's (who was the prime leader in the Vulcan emotional detachment/peace movement)) I found it umm...most fascinating.
    Wonder what other famous ppl besides T'Pau and Zephram Cochran we might see ? (or at least famous species...like Orion slave girls?...actually when I saw those reptiloid ladies eating the butterflies...I thought of the Orions...but they weren't green of course! :)

    1. Re:Revealing my Trekkiehood by ThufirHawat · · Score: 1

      Hmm: I thought her name was T'Pol (at least that is what appeared in the subtitles), but if you got the spelling right then she is indeed the same T'Pau who supervises the ceremony on Vulcan with Spock and Kirk, so we'll finally know what happened BKA (Before Kirk Appeared).

      --
      Thufir Hawat
      Part-time Mentat
    2. Re:Revealing my Trekkiehood by dbarron · · Score: 1

      I could indeed be wrong..I didn't watch the credits/etc. However, early info in the summer had stated that it was T'Pau (maybe the executives changed their mind and dissolved a link)?

    3. Re:Revealing my Trekkiehood by wadetemp · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are right and wrong. Her name is T'Pol, but originally it was to be T'Pau. I remember noticing that in the casting call. Perhaps T'Pau was coincidence, and perhaps it was intentional, but at some point they changed it to T'Pol, and there we are.

      But perhaps T'Pol and T'Pau "know" each other... surely Vulcan females suffer from the same affliction that Spock did in the original series... and perhaps there's slime involved. :)

    4. Re:Revealing my Trekkiehood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out they would have had to pay the original screenwriter royalties for the T'Pau character, so they just changed the name.

    5. Re:Revealing my Trekkiehood by dbarron · · Score: 1

      What a copout! I'd have liked to have another link with the TOS Spock.

    6. Re:Revealing my Trekkiehood by al_d · · Score: 1

      If it's the same T'Pau who almost "presided at Spock's amost-wedding", she didn't age too well[sherylfranklin.com], shudder...

    7. Re:Revealing my Trekkiehood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, you can't hear well can you? Her name is T'Pol/pal, not t'pau! You idiot. They orriginally wanted to do t'pau, but it didn't fit withe the history(the one historical consistancy).

      I personally like the oppening credits and the fact that they have a dog ont eh ship. Nobody's taken up the dog!

  121. It's not perfect... but I like it by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There are some historical issues. But a little creative retconning takes care of them:

    - This is the later Klingon look, but in TNG Worf says "something happened" to change the Klingons' appearance that they don't discuss. However, if there were originally two Klingon races, one with the "old" look and one with the new, maybe the old-style ones were forcibly changed to look like the others. Thus they (the formerly-old-style Klingons) would not like to talk about being forced to change their cultural identity.

    - The first contact we have here might indeed be botched. We don't yet know. There might turn out to be something the Enterprise crew has done that the Klingons haven't found out about yet. Or maybe "first contact" is an ongoing event and this is just the first note of the movement.

    - This Enterprise doesn't appear in Picard's set of models. But is it specifically stated that Picard's models are all the Enterprises? (I don't remember what ships exactly were included -- the carrier? the Space Shuttle? the wooden frigate?) Maybe he just had all the NCC-1701x Enterprises.

    And I liked the theme. My favorite is still the Voyager intro (even though I never really liked the show) but this is a close second.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
    1. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

      This is the later Klingon look, but in TNG Worf says "something happened" to change the Klingons' appearance that they don't discuss.

      Actually, that was DS9. Not to pick nits or anything.

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

    2. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by BiggestPOS · · Score: 1
      The writers basically said in an interview "Uhh, yea, we fucked up. It IS a continuity error, the "new" ones just look cooler"

      Maybe explainable later, but hasn't been yet.

      --
      What, me worry?
    3. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by David+Price · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This is the later Klingon look, but in TNG Worf says "something happened" to change the Klingons' appearance that they don't discuss.


      If I recall correctly, this was in an episode that was an intentionally campy retrospective; Worf's comment was a joke on the part of the writers. Don't think of this as a continuity error; rather, think of it as the new series taking advantage of better makeup techniques in order to better represent the Klingons.


      Star Trek, despite its geeky appeal, does not have to have absolute internal consistency. :)

    4. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by madowl · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you care to get really technical in terms of Klingons. According to Trek history, in the early Kirk days, Klingons were experimenting in facial reconstruction to appear more like humans and infiltrate the Federation (i.e. Trouble with Tribbles). This resulted in most Klingons looking a lot like humans with minor differences.

      Using this was a very good way to keep the continuity of Trek history and explain the advances makeup and prosthesis.

    5. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Exactly. They're allowed to take advantage of better makeup and not be blamed. They should propogate it back to all "periods" in the show. It's not like it's a religion (where its in their best interest to promote continuity), it's a TV show.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    6. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by Mynn · · Score: 1
      Exactly. They're allowed to take advantage of better makeup and not be blamed. They should propogate it back to all "periods" in the show. It's not like it's a religion (where its in their best interest to promote continuity), it's a TV show.
      EWWWWWW... once you start, where does it stop? I mean, Lucas went in and did the same thing for the original StarWars Trilogy and changed the plot while he was at it. BAD LUCAS! NO SOUP FOR YOU! I Like the fact that originally Han Solo shot first.
      --

      Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.
    7. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      I believe the semiofficial, Monday-morning quarterback explanation involves Klingons altering themselves so as to not be so scary, which some factions didn't like because it is humiliating to a warrior race. Hence the "I don't like to talk about it."

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    8. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      >I Like the fact that originally Han Solo shot first.

      Certainly. Then you don't have to introduce the idiocy of Greedo missing just so Han doesn't die immediately, stranding Luke, and thus dooming the Rebellion.

      Shades of hero movies where the hero tries to save the bad guy who's about to fall in the vat of chemicals/off the edge of a mechanical spider/ etc. Shades of the bad guys' planes being shot down and all the bad guys parachute out in kids cartoons. Yeah, it's ok to kick someone in the head a dozen times. They'll pop right back up. In fact, instead of being stunned, they'll actually fight BETTER after a few kicks in the head.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    9. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by BiggestPOS · · Score: 1
      Or the better explanation, the TOS was old :)

      --
      What, me worry?
    10. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by Grit · · Score: 1

      I like it, too. But, I think that the biggest problem is how close the Klingon homeworld is. If it's 4 days (!) away at warp 4, then it's just hours away with "modern" (TNG) warp technology.

      This makes much of the future inconsistent. For example, why do no Klingon ships show up to battle the Borg? How come Earth never has anybody but the Enterprise to defend it from threat X--- isn't there any defensive fleet? (more of a problem with TOS.)

      I'm also kinda annoyed that the doctor has to be a brand-new species--- could have used one of the throwaways from earlier shows. (Or did they?)

    11. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      That's why it's called The Old Series, after all.

      No self-respecting Trekkie calls it The Original Series.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    12. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by Icar_Cryston · · Score: 2, Informative
      I remembered something about this that had made it's way around the net about the time the DS9 episode came out. It was a Q&A session with Ron Moore, who was one of the writers. So I went through and dug it out (I save way too much e-mails).

      Here is some Ron Moore postings (A DS9 writer) from America On-Line:
      Subj: Yet More Answers
      Date: 97-01-20 14:25:30 EST

      Q: What is the (unspoken to outsiders) reason that Klingon physiology has changed from TOS to DS9/TNG? Is it the oft-speculated "Tribble disease" which led to the Klingon war against the Tribbles?

      A: We do NOT have an explanation for this, even within the staff. All the possibilities sound ridiculous and we've decided to simply leave it a mystery that only Klingon hairdressers and makeup artists know.

      These are posts Ron Moore (a DS9 writer) that he posted on America On-Line:

      Subj: Answers
      Date: 96-11-11 19:54:44 EST

      Q: Really enjoyed the Tribble show, but was a little dissapointed in the Klingon appearance question--Worf acted rather embarassed by the change in appearance between then and now when asked about it. Will we ever get an explanation on how/why the klingons changed their appearance, or will be be kept forever in the dark?

      A: To me, you got the perfect explanation. It's a joke and it's a comment on the fact that there is no explanation because IT'S JUST A MAKEUP CHANGE. Any technobabble we came up with would be incredibly lame and unbelievable. "We do not discuss it with outsiders." You tell'em Worf.

    13. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by KahunaBurger · · Score: 1

      I like it, too. But, I think that the biggest problem is how close the Klingon homeworld is. If it's 4 days (!) away at warp 4, then it's just hours away with "modern" (TNG) warp technology.

      Is it REALLY their homeworld? I didn't see the show in question, so I don't know how readily it can be said that this was their homeworld in reality, rather than this being put forth to the crew.

      I'm also kinda annoyed that the doctor has to be a brand-new species--- could have used one of the throwaways from earlier shows. (Or did they?)

      If its a "brand new" species, its possible that by the end of the show it culd well be an "extinct" species. If they were planning an extinction storyline (ala the ?macaw? episode in B5) they couldn't very well use a known one.

      Its realisticly possible for species to show up in "earlier" episodes before the finalization of the federation who eventual die, who are represented only by explorers who go back home with negitive reports and never come back, or even whose race makes a decision to remove themselves from the federation and the greater interstellar community - voluntarily planet bound isolationism would not be interfered with once the prime directive was in place.

      Anyway, continuity will be fun to watch.

      kahuna burger

      --
      ...will work for Chick tracts...
    14. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um... does anyone recall that Worf was half-human?!? ah-hem!.... seems like it might expolain a bit... that and of course the wonderful strides in makeup vs budget.....

    15. Re:It's not perfect... but I like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... To clarify, Worf was ALL Klingon... Raised by humans for most of his life. HUGE distinction. That would justify his "ridges." I would like a continuity explanation for the makeup change, and maybe if someone is ingenious to come up with a really good one, it could be used. Until then, I say stick with a suspension of disbelief.

      Spock, on the other hand.... He was half-human. People have been complaining about T'Pol, and all the Vulcans, as being "too emotional." That is part of the curse of being a Vulcan - the emotions are SO overwhelmingly strong that the Vulcans get completely guided by them. Vulcans practice a form of austerity (denying emotion) not because it's their logical nature, but because it is counter to their highly illogical one. Maybe that's why Spock was more "in control" - he had less intense emotions to deal with. Then again, I might be completely wrong.

      Can't wait to see how we meet the Romulans... Romulan Wars will start around when series ends, methinks.

  122. Hull-plate [POLARIZATION] went offline by 1nt3lx · · Score: 1

    Obviously, michael, you are as attentive as you are a critic. At least if Katz would have done the review I wouldn't have seen it (because like 70,000 other slashdot readers, I have slashdot ignore Jon Katz posts).

    I am not saying this pilot was flawless, but the storyline is leaps and bounds ahead of Voyager.
    Voyager = Gilligan's Island in space.

  123. Dog based episodes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ok, overall, I liked it except for the red Klingon blood and the theme song(loved the visuals though), but at this point in the Star Trek franchise we should know better than to ask for continuity.
    Here is something nobody has mentioned yet because at this point your minds will not allow you to concieve of the sheer horror of it. How long do you think it will be till we have an episode where there is an alien presense that only the dog can see, or a diplomatic mission where the dog can tell the aliens are evil (as we all know dogs are perfect evil detecting devices), and a transporter accident merging the dog with..I dunno..the asian babe, and maybe an episode where the dog and the Vulcan team up and use their superior sense of smell to root out Alien Scheme X and they will communicate through mind melds, and of course an episode where antibodies from the dog's immune system saves the crew from a virus at the last minute, and an episode where the dog gets abducted and made ruler of a small planet.

    Yes, I can see into the minds of Bergman and Branna and it is a dark place filled with cute kids, robots, all signing showtunes and you can bet the dog will be the center of more than one episode.

    Now that I have put the fear of dog into you all, I shall leave you to your nightmares. :)

    1. Re:Dog based episodes... by Khan+Fused · · Score: 1

      ... as I've stated in another post buried SOMEWHERE in /. land ... I just wanna see the dog go berzerk in Archer's quarters when the grav cuts out and puppy suddenly finds himself in zero-g. for two minutes at a stretch.

      That, or trying to stuff a berzerk puppy into an escape crate during an abandon ship drill. Do they make pressure suits for dogs?

      And yes ... mind meld with a dog. Transporter accidents with the dog. Don't make me hurt you.

      --
      This mind intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Dog based episodes... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Clue alert: Red Klingon blood is continuity. We've seen plenty of Klingon blood in Trek, and it has already been red except for the one movie with the fucked up continuity...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  124. Overly Harsh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I just don't get it, but I thought it was great.

    It didn't make the same mistakes that DS9 and Voyager made. It was actually new and refreshing. The theme song seemed to set the stage this this wasn't another Star Trek clone, but a new show in the Star Trek universe.

    However, I must agree that Tucker needs to loosen up, I don't want to hear, 'logical' for the next 10 episodes, and I still don't know what's up with that rubdown scene. I came in during the middle of that and was completely confused.

  125. ooooh yeah a little to the left by Zeekamotay · · Score: 1

    Uh... heh heh... Vulcan pr0n rules... heh heh...

    1. Re:ooooh yeah a little to the left by Zeekamotay · · Score: 1
  126. I Loved It by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quite Simply,

    I loved it.

    I thought the Theme Song was touching.

    I liked the vague familiarity of the "Country Doctor" and the Vulcan Science Officer.

    I liked the spaceship that "felt" like a spaceship instead of a luxury hotel.

    I liked the feeling of an impatient humanity that was well conveyed.

    I liked the new translator chic who looks like she can scream better than Chekov could (and that says a lot).

    I do wonder why the exposed crew didn't have to decon their "private areas," or will they just be sick in a few weeks as a result of their modesty. (No, UPN didn't have to show it but I would have liked them to have implied it at least.)

    1. Re:I Loved It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I do wonder why the exposed crew didn't have to decon their "private areas,""

      Sure looked to me that the vulcan decon'd her upper "private areas".

  127. Re:Klingon appearance by wadetemp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm pretty sure they will get around to explaining this in the series. Worf's comment was clearly a "no comment" on the matter. I believe Roddenberry mentioned something about the Klingons seen on TOS being from a different part of Qo'nos... as they mentioned in this pilot the Klingons do have 80 dialects; it's conceivable that some of these dialects might be related to diverse "races" of Klingons. Some are wussy Klingons who wear chain mail, some are mean ones with big ridges and lots of sharp bladed weapons. And perhaps the "ridged" Klingons despise the "smooth" Klingons, which is why Worf didn't want to talk about it. Just wait for the episode when they say for certain, and then you'll know for sure. Until then even everything I said is speculation. :)

  128. Good series... comments on other comments posted by TekneeX · · Score: 1

    OK, I thought the series was good... But I just noticed what everyone was saying here.

    Everyone is using the future as a point of reference...

    First, lets talk about the polarized hull plating going offline... If the hull plating is polarized, that means that there is some kind of field acting on it, which is deflecting the energy from a beam or something, which could mean it can get de-polarized, which would mean it would go offline. So that isn't totally incorrect.

    Second, the aliens, everyone is using the newer star treks a as a point of reference... gimme a break, why does everything have to be repeated from the episodes from the future???? Why not look at something different for once!

    Take this series for what it's worth, it's new, and different and is trying to stray away from the Star Trek franchise (note:how you don't see the word Star Trek associated with Enterprise?), I have to say that the camerawork on the series was really well done, and hope it stays like that.

    --
    It's all about tha rice!
  129. Music by niccademous · · Score: 1

    Ok, this is from a classically trained musician's point of view, so you might disagree:

    The music for this show is at best mediocre in comparison to those of previous shows (those done in the past generation at least, no pun intended). Whose idea was it to rip off the Karate Kid 2 theme music? The images are great and inspiring (arguably one of the best Star Trek openers in the franchise's history), however the music just DOES not match. You have on one hand images that make us proud of what we've done and what we can do and on the other you have... the music. I do grant, however, that for the closing theme, the guitar/cello thing sounds good... until the Musak attacks. Then you might as well be watching "Baywatch, The Next Generation." At least if they had used a more interesting chord flow it MIGHT have sounded somewhat convincing. Heck, even the intrumentation lacked.

    Perhaps they're trying to go with the entire Roswell/Dawson's Creek/Friends thing where the music makes it to the radio? To that extent, I say that they've done a good job - there's really not much qualitative stuff on the radio (save for the amazing job done by sound engineers everywhere - that's an artform in itself), and this wouldn't spoil that. Mind you, it is generally good music, but not for this. Nevertheless, I'm not a great judge of that, but seeing as Bryan Adams sound-alikes are not all that popular.... you decide.

    At any rate, If anyone with the studio has any use for a Music Composition major who'd be interested in re-writting the theme to make it sound a bit more invigorating (this kind of stuff is supposed to inspire people to shoot for the stars, not sit in their cars), please reply to niccademous@hotmail.com (shameless plug, I know, but it's for the greater good, I promise).

    --
    This message will self destruct in 5...4...3...2...
    1. Re:Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The music is kinda corny but it implies a move from 20th/21th century culture to the culture of Star Trek's in the future. Remembering the roots of what Earth once was as they set out into new worlds..I think the theme fits it quite well.

    2. Re:Music by Mynn · · Score: 1
      this kind of stuff is supposed to inspire people to shoot for the stars, not sit in their cars


      They aren't looking for geeks, they are looking for anyone. I mean, after all don't all of us hackers watch Buffy anyway?

      Acutally if you tuned out some of the dialog and listened to the background music you got more of the space/inspiration type music.
      --

      Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.
  130. T�Pol (Jolene Blalock) Posed for Maxim this Month! by Jorell_Kovin · · Score: 0
    Thats right that hot vulcan posed for maxim mag this month. Snag a look here at these awsome pics!!

    http://www.maximonline.com/girls_of_maxim/girl_7 80 .html

    My favorite quote from the article is,
    "I was an acidhead and a pot smoker. There was this one time some friends and I were ditching off campus at lunch. We didn't make it back in time, and school officials found us smoking weed in a van around the corner. I was so stoned that when they started taking names I said mine was April June. It didn't even dawn on me that that was just two months put together."
  131. Where's the green Orion animal women! by Chas · · Score: 1

    C'mon! It wouldn't be EarlyTrek without those!

    GOAW: GRRRR!
    Scott: Oh boy!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  132. Speaking of Cameos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else notice the guy from Alien Nation as the Vulcan ambassador?? How cool is that?

  133. Actually he said POLAR-PLATING by 1nt3lx · · Score: 1

    I just heard it again. He said polar plating.

  134. BFD. by FFFish · · Score: 1

    It's network television. Yawn.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  135. The Klingons are too close by Erore · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen anyone comment on the fact that it was going to take them 4 days to travel from Earth to Kronos at Warp 4.5. That means at Warp 9.8 or so the Klingon homeworld, not even to mention Klingon outposts will be something like 2 hours away.

    So, if the part of the universe the Federation and the Klingons are fighting over is that small, then Earth would always be heavily defended and fortified because the Klingons could stop by for lunch and bring a 100 Birds of Prey with them.

    This means that all those episodes in which the Enterprise is the only ship close enough to help is patently ridiculous.

    I say at Warp 4 the Klingons should have been about 2 months away, and at Warp 9.8 something like 10 days.

    Anyway, they have the time/distance stuff screwed up.

    1. Re:The Klingons are too close by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      I wondered about that myself.
      Here's the math :
      Neptune : 4.2 light hours from the sun
      Earth : 8.3 light minutes
      "She can get to Neptune in 6 minutes"
      4 * 24 * 60 / 6 = 960
      So 4 days is 960 times the distance from earth to neptune. Assuming the greatest distance (earth is diametrically opposed to Neptune in the solar system),
      4.3 light hours * 960 = 4165 light hours =
      0.475 light years.

      From nasa

      Which stars are closest to the Sun? The closest is Proxima Centauri, one of three stars that orbit each other about 4 light-years away in the Alpha-Centauri system.

      So, ideally this trip should have taken 4/(0.475 / 4) days (light years / (distance in four days / 4)) = 33.65 days to get to the closest star

      So the Klingon homeworld should have been months and months away. Possibly years, according to the quote on their speed. From what I understand about warp (as much as one can understand something fictional), it's a lot harder to get from 8 to 9 than 7 to 8, and impossible to achieve warp 10. So I think that this series would have been better served starting at a higher warp - maybe 7. Otherwise these characters aren't even going to be able to have an adventure every few months, let alone every week - there's a lot of empty space out there.

    2. Re:The Klingons are too close by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, the warp system has changed somewhat over the years. By the time of TNG, warp 1 was the speed of light, and warp 10 represented infinite speed, and therefore unreachable. But in TOS, they managed to reach warp 14.1, so presumably there was a reevaluation of the scale at some point.

      The Neptune quote is a bit of a pain, but, hey, so they goofed :-)

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    3. Re:The Klingons are too close by Eric+E.+Coe · · Score: 1
      Isn't warp is supposed to be a log scale? Like: Warp 1 = C (speed of light) ~= 3x10^8 m/s, Warp 2 = 10C ~= 3x10^9 m/s, etc.
      Warp 4.5 would be 15000C ~= 5.5x10^12 m/s.

      If you are traveling at C, it would take a year to travel 1 light year (duh), so, since there are 31536000 seconds in a year, then at warp 4.5 it takes 31536000/15000 = 2102.4s (about 35 minutes) to travel 1 light year. A four day trip to the Klingon homeworld would imply a distance of ~164 light years.

      Earth to Neptune would be as follows: (4.2 x 60 + 8.3) * 60 = 15618 light seconds distance between Earth and Neptune at max distance. Travel time: a little more than a second at Warp 4.5.

      Yeah, the Neptune thing is a goof, but otherwise, it is workable.

      --
      An esoteric scratched itch:
      Homeworld Map Maker Tool
    4. Re:The Klingons are too close by Dfiant · · Score: 1

      The line was actually "Neptune and back in six minutes." so it's twice as fast...though I do agree, the travel time does appear to have been fudged.

    5. Re:The Klingons are too close by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work with a few facts from Voyager. They can go warp 9. If that means they move at 10^9C, then they'd have no trouble getting across the galaxy (100 000 light years). About 8 hours, actually.

      And, of course, the episode where they go Warp 10, which causes Tom Paris to be at all points in the universe at once. It's gotta be a more complex equation than just exponential, with the term 1/(10 - Warp). I think it's a measure of space compression or something like that, which would explain using the term "warp" in the first place. It would also explain warp values over 10. It's space expansion instead of compression at that point (of course, it doesn't explain it being any *faster* than warp :-)

    6. Re:The Klingons are too close by Tassach · · Score: 2
      The actual quote was "Neptune and back in 6 minutes". Important difference -- using your figures, that's a trip of 8.6 light hours. Since 6 minutes is .1 hour, this is 86 light-hours per hour, or 86*C. I seem to recall reading somewhere that v = c * warp^3, or (to phrase it differently) warp factor is the cube root of the multiple of the speed of light. Using this equasion, the quoted trip works out to a speed of Warp 4.414. This is completely consistent with the stated capabilities of the ship and the warp speed equasion from TOS. Looks like they actually got their math right, for once



      At this speed, you could cover .94 light years in a 4 day (96 hour) trip. That's obviously not even enough to get you to Alpha Centauri, let alone Qho'nos (or however you spell it). Four MONTHS might be more like it, but that kind of screws up the plot. Math takes the back seat to plot. A four month (120 day) trip at warp 4.4 would put the Klingon homeworld roughly 28.3 lightyears away. That seems a lot more realistic, and fits a whole lot better with what we know about the ST universe.



      Of course, this turns the widely-held assumption (on the part of both fans & writers) that ST episodes happen more-or-less in real time (IE about a week of time elapses between episodes). At the above speed, the E. could only travel about 1.65 light years per week, which would mean that the planets they visit are VERY close together. The Enterprise has to go a lot faster than that to get to another new planet every week. If we assume an average distance of roughly 10 LY between M-class planets, you'd need to be going over warp 8 (512*C) to get to a new planet every week. The math just doesn't work out, at least using the TOS warp formula.


      Of course, doing mathematical analysis of a TV show is kind of silly. It's fiction. Sit back, crack open a beer, eat some popcorn, and enjoy yourself.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    7. Re:The Klingons are too close by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      You're both forgetting to include acceleration and decleration time. You can't make a trip to Neptune AND BACK in six minutes at top speed the entire time without inertial nullifiers, which they probably haven't researched yet... (trying to remember how many research points you need to get inertial nullifiers -- it's been a while since I played MOO2 but I think it was pretty advanced tech... :)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:The Klingons are too close by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      If they have artificial gravity, I'm pretty sure they have inertial dampeners - it's the same technology, IIRC

    9. Re:The Klingons are too close by Tassach · · Score: 2
      Of course they have inertial dampeners. Otherwise the crew would be a thin red paste smeared over the bulkheads the first time they went to warp. Judging from the effects, it takes less than 2 seconds to go from orbital velocity to warp speed. Without doing any calculations, this is at least several thousand Gees of acceleration.



      Games are not canonical ST lore - what you see on screen always takes precedence, then officially sanctioned books. Fanfic and games don't enter into the equasion.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  136. Soft Core Porn by SirPsychoSexyMD · · Score: 1

    It wasn't enough. I hope the next people to need rub down detoxification are the asian translator and other girl. They should turn this show into baywatch. Okay boys, set phasers to stun.

    1. Re:Soft Core Porn by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "Okay boys, set teasers to fun."

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  137. You should stop posting news by Tularean · · Score: 1

    You post nothing but negativity towards everything. You couldn't post ONE positive thing? god...

  138. Spoiler: Question about Klingons by mikemacd · · Score: 1

    For anyone who understands Klingot... er Klingon, what was the last comment by the klingon in the council that the cute translator chick told Bakula he didn't want to know what he said?

    1. Re:Spoiler: Question about Klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't quote me on this.... but i'm pretty sure it was something along the lines of

      "if someone dies now, its on your shoulders."

      again.. i am not a linguist, so it could just as well be

      "you smell like fish"

      but i'd place bets on the former over the latter... and it certainly seems like more of a botched first contact...

  139. Opening sequence by jsldub · · Score: 0

    and what was with that opening sequence. im sorry, but it was a load of BS.

  140. technology too sophisticated, sex OK by Wansu · · Score: 2

    I hoped for technology that was a bit clunkier than this. The medical technology was interesting but the ship is too advanced. Is the captain the only one who gets to have a dog? and a basket hound at that ...
    Ok the science officer is hot. That's alright. I never minded Gates Mcfadden or the short skirts, hose and boots they wore on the first series.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    1. Re:technology too sophisticated, sex OK by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      It was a beagle, not a bassett hound. I have the latter and they're much longer than beagles...with cute floppy ears.

  141. Good, some problems, give it a chance. by gandalf_grey · · Score: 1

    Nice vulcan chick. Obvious, but nice.

    Theme song's horrible. IT's GOTTA GO.

    Interesting characters. Has potential.

    Technology correct for period.

    Really wish they would get a truly non-emotional vulcan. I've not seen one yet.

    --
    Mmmmmmm. Floor pie!
  142. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Loligo · · Score: 1, Funny


    Yeah, like a bunch of geeks need something ELSE to beat off to.

    Now they can get their Trek fix AND spank-o-matic. One stop shopping.

    -l

  143. Should it be called.... by Bartab · · Score: 1

    Star Trek: Deus Ex Machina
    or
    Deus Ex Machine: Enterprise

    Personally, I'm torn

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    1. Re:Should it be called.... by KidIcarus · · Score: 1

      Dude, complaining about a Deus Ex Machina in an episode of Star Trek is like complaining about a talking dog in an episode of Scooby-Doo. It goes with the territory.

  144. I have to agree with the intial reactions.... by jonnystiph · · Score: 1

    However, much like the first season of Next Gen. (Which I really ended up liking a lot). It takes a while for the actors to get aclumated with thier charaters.

    Besides isn't the whole point of Star Trek to find new life in old plot complications, to go where every man has gone before!?

    All in all, its got enough meat in the tense it stands to be a really cool show. however the soft core porn just has to go, that was a obvious plea for ratings.

    --

    If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

  145. Allegedly... by CdotZinger · · Score: 3, Informative

    These are the lyrics to the theme song from the original series:

    Beyond the rim of the starlight
    My love is wandering in starflight

    I know he'll find in star clustered reaches
    Love strange, love a star woman teaches

    I know his journey ends never
    His star trek will go on forever

    But tell him while he wanders his starry sea
    Remember me, remember me.

    Allegedly. (Sounds more like the Urusei Yatsura theme song to me. <--Proof I'm a dork.)

    --
    Your mouth is like Columbus Day.
    1. Re:Allegedly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Well, at least you can admit it. Unlike Michael.

    2. Re:Allegedly... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      And as we all know, star women are green.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    3. Re:Allegedly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You buying the UY DVD sets?
      I think a little LUM on enterprise would be a good thing.

    4. Re:Allegedly... by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 1

      Long live Tenacious D! They do a great cover of that. Search for Tenacious D - Star Trek in your favorite mp3 sharing proggy.

  146. it's good, but it wasn't Classic Trek by xah · · Score: 1

    No Trek will ever beat the original, the classic: Star Trek.

    The supporting cast is kind of interesting. At least there is no psychologist on board!

    Archer is a good captain, but he's no Kirk. Kirk wouldn't have waited until that alien chick kissed him. He would have just planted one right on her, whether she was ready or not. And he would have left those aliens with a torpedo for a goodbye present.

    As for the soft core porn, it's for the ratings. I guess Trek isn't going to be a family show anymore. Oh, how I long for the days of Bedtime for Bonzo and Green Acres!

    --
    I am not a lawyer. Do not take my words as legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney.
    1. Re:it's good, but it wasn't Classic Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, I'm put out about it not being a family show. I watch this with my two sons -- I mean, I used to watch it with my sons.

      I suppose I could use it as a starting point for the birds and bees discusssion. "Now, boys, be sure to use a full-body condom when rubbing goo on an alien nipple-babe!"

      Sigh.

  147. Good First Episode by Faramir · · Score: 1

    Got work to do, some hurried thoughts...

    • We may have seen Vulcan/human interaction. But if the story is to be true to itself, it must be played out, b/c that's how things would be at this time. Doesn't matter if we happened to see it in a "later" series.
    • Besides, I imagine they are hoping to grab more than just the standard geek audience. If not, why the cheesy intro music? And this audience just doesn't have the same background.
    • That intro just has to go, I'd rather hear the Friends theme song for the 10,000th time than that song one more time.
    • They were all certainly a bit clunky. Let's see, when is this supposed to be? Fairly near future, right? Like 100+ a few years? Well, not hard to imagine that we good old Americans would be acting fairly similar to the way we are now, and this was reflected in what looked like "clunkiness". Seems to me to be a decent projection of current viewpoints and attitudes into the future.
    • The ethnic diversity thing bugs me. There are no Hispanic characters that I noticed, and Hispanics by current projections will be maybe even the majority in the US by that time. I take for granted that the show's premise is that the US is the leader in things, as is now, so it is no surprise to me that the characters are mostly American. Just the largely white thing that bothers me. Though of course, it didn't really have that many humans in it overall...
    • The decontamination scene did a fine job of portraying some reasoning, setting up the non-logical side of Vulcans, and giving us some character development in general. But I do feel the lingering camera was a bit overboard. Save that for Scinemax, people!
    • The music throughout the episode was excellent
    • The directing was fairly good
    • I too was very confused as to why Archer stayed on the alien ship
    • Interesting to note that Rick Berman is no longer the sole Executive Producer -- Brannon Braga is up there too.

    Guess that's it. Overall, I found it to be an entertaining and convincing first episode. I definitely plan on watching next week. And I must say there aren't any other television shows on righ now that have convinced me of that (well, Dark Angel and Boston Public had me convinced of that last year, and of course the Simpsons go without saying! So I guess I kind of lied).

  148. Quick Observation on the intro... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2

    The theme song....well, it's better then most other tv shows, but PALES when you compare it to DS9 or Voyager or any other Star Trek. Also, I feel there's too much past stuff being show in the opening sequence and not enough stuff from that 100 years since First Contact. Yeah the history is important, but not for this show. They need a different opening with more beauty shots of the NX-01.

    I liked the theme song. I'm not a huge Rod Stewart fan, but, it's a song that I've liked from before the series. I do think it matches the situation perfectly. However, I do hope that after the first season or so, they ditch it for something else instead (else, I'm gonna get reallllly sick of it. ;-) Something like B5's evolving intro would be nice over the next couple of seasons.

    Anyway - the real point of my post. I did see where they were going with the intro, and it's pretty cool when you think about it. This series is supposed to be closer to where we are now, so, they show us a very very quick synopsis of how we got to where we are now, and showed something very pivitol from our currend day setting - the ISS being built, piece by piece. Then they show ISS being used as a launching platform for something that familiar to those of us who follow space development (and still familiar enough to those who don't, but have seen the shuttle.) From there, it's only three more images to the shot of the Enterprise flashing past the screen. They showed us how far we've come, and made it seem like that from this perspective, we've got a very short distance left to make it to where 'There' (the show) is. It's no longer deeply removed from us, like TNG or Voyager is.

    And for the record - I hated Voyager. But I think this show is gonna friggin' ROCK when it gets past the first season!

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  149. Ugh... by --daz-- · · Score: 1

    Yet again, I am disappointed by the lack of creativity and writing talent in Star Trek: *.* series.

    TNG was the pinnacle and it tappered off from there. DS9 started off poorly but picked up near the end, even if all it was was just blatant violence gimmicks rather than successful writing and dynamic character interaction. It's unfortunate that with such a large universe as the Star Trek one that these writers can't come up with anything decent. I was really hopeful of the prequel twist on plot, but it seems all they did was pick the most boring time in the ST universe: little technology, few other species to interact with, and no real war. It would've been far more interesting if they would've went back to the very beginning (shortly after the first flight). I would've like to have seen how Humanity went from being on the brink of destruction in a post-apocalyptic world to one of the most successful and far reaching races in the galaxy.

    Scott Backula (sp?) is a good actor, but this role doesn't seem right for him somehow. He was good in Quantum Leap, but he just doesn't "fit in" in this series. Perhaps it's because the writing is beneath him, or perhaps he's surrounded by half-rate actors who were hired apparently because of their sexual attractiveness rather than their acting ability.

    UPN, please spare us the gatuitous soft porn. The people watching this are mainly die-hard trekkies who watch for the Trek, not for the poorly written and even more poorly acted sexual innuendo. There are plenty of web sites for us to get our fix, we don't need cheap teases in our Trek. If you're attempting to attract a cross-over crowd with these thinly veiled attempts, you are doing a poor job, and you've apparently missed your market.

    I could go on, but what's the point? =)

  150. To Boldy Go ??? by McQualude · · Score: 1

    They stole Capt. Kirks words. Major lameness. What was Berman thinking, is he that desperate to make ST his own?

    1. Re:To Boldy Go ??? by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      Don't you think Kirk got them from somewhere? I'm sure the words spoken at the christening of Starfleets first vessel are in alot of history books, and Kirk was a walking library according to his friends at the Academy. A very nice touch, actually.

  151. Re:Kiss Me If Your Alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sure hope they're using the TOS warp scale.

  152. At least it's different by Tactical+Skyrider · · Score: 1

    It's been frustrating to watch all of the drivel they go on and on about in voyager. typical storylines:

    neelix gets ticked off at someone, but then he finds a way to get along.

    Janeway can't decide whether or not to upgrade voyager's technology because maybe it would be bad in some way to someone. so they cut back on holodeck rations. (holodecks sometimes were the entire storyline too. gee what fun.)

    i mean, come on! I think if the pilot of enterprise is any indication, we're in for some actual exploration and adventure. somehow i don't see archer spending all day deciding if a jellyfish somehow has rights that require that he doesn't move it off of his phaser.

    This is a time when everything is new and unbridled. i think if the writers can keep hold of this concept, we're in for a majorly better series.

    Skyrider, The Good Doctor
    http://www.tripnotik.com

    --
    In Soviet Redmond, software programs you!
  153. Laws of Star Trek by SValkyrie74 · · Score: 1

    1) All Star Trek series suck first season.
    2) Even numbered Trek films don't suck.

    Given these Star Trek laws, I'm going to hang in for season 2.

  154. Top 8 reasons why Enterprise SUCKED ASS. by captainboogerhead · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    1. What deodorant ad did they steal that theme song from?

    2. The climax consisted of two guys wrasslin over a laser pistol. I was on the edge of my seat, weren't you?

    3. I think Berman, when he named one of his characters "Seven of Nine", was making a secret reference to how he comes up with plotlines for episodes. This one was no different. "Uh, send them to that planet, and then they get shot at, and then one of them gets left behind, and then they have to risk the ship to save him. What shite! (Anybody who thinks I just did a spoiler is an idiot--every fucking Star Trek Episode since DS9 aired has been off the rack).

    4. You can tell how even the producers knew how lame this witless show would be. It took Voyager something like 3 seasons before they were forced to haul in the plastic tits to save a dead show from cancellation. Here, they're not even going to bother to wait.
    Studio Hack 1: "Hey Rick, nobody's going to watch this garbage."
    Studio Hack 2: "Well, shit, Brannon. Lets just throw tits at them."
    SH1: "OK, which astro-bimbo's sports bra are we going to fill with Play-Doh?"
    SH2: "Well , shit, Brannon, why just one? Give em all tits--big ones!"
    SH1: "Rick, I still don't think it's sexy enough."
    SH2: "Well, shit, Brannon, put em in a decompression tank, strip em and... grease em down! Oh, and make sure you tell the camera man to pan over her ass a few times--slowly."

    5. I'm sorry, but I don't watch Star Trek to see some himbo getting his hairy-ape legs greased down and then turning around so we get a profile of his Big Fat Boner.

    6. They had the chance to get some really cool retro looking tech, and be inventive with how lame everything would have been. Instead, the tech on the show looks more advanced than The Original Series! Even the communicators were smaller than Kirk's! Now, I know there are people with cell phones smaller than these things, but couldn't they have come up with some kind of aesthetic response to this? Nope. "Get out the cookie cutter, we're makin a show here!"

    7. No imagination, no initiative, no character, no invention. Mediocrity incarnate.

    8. People will say: "wait till it gets its stride". Horseshit. These are the same people that were working on The Next Generation. They should know by know how to do one of these. The reason it sucked so bad was because they *DID* hit their stride--8 years ago. They've been in Recycle Mode ever since. It's not going to get any better. Its going to continue to suck in exactly the same way Voyager sucked for 7 years. If they couldn't come up with original characters, an original premise, or even some fresh conflict for the pilot freaking episode, then I have no hope.

    Me, I refuse to give this pile of crap any more of my time.

    Che Puzzo! Quel Fromage! What Tripe!

    1. Re:Top 8 reasons why Enterprise SUCKED ASS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I agree mostly, but I think that the tech was done fairly well (primitive compared to Voyager, but far ahead of us).

      Also, why does everyone sya that Voyager sucked? Some of the episodes were vapid crap (like the Klingon underworld one and everyone with Kes). But there were also some good ones, and a few exceptional ones. And the acting was equal to, and sometimes better than TNG. And the effects were good too. And then there was Seven.

      So don't bash Voyager - it sure as hell was better than DS9, and was equal to TNG - not as original, but produced better.

    2. Re:Top 8 reasons why Enterprise SUCKED ASS. by icebeing · · Score: 2

      Promise? REALLY promise?

      Why did you bother watching at all? You think you could a better job writing Trek? Think of it this way, if you could, I could probably find 8 alternative reasons why your creation reeks just as bad.

      And you made such an effort to let us know how much stinky cheese there is in the FIRST show...too bad you can't eat it though.

      Peace, Ice.

    3. Re:Top 8 reasons why Enterprise SUCKED ASS. by azizlumiere · · Score: 1

      OMG
      Let me guess. You are overweight, have a Comic book shop and you have a T-shirt that says "Worst Episode Ever".
      I know you, you were in the Simpsons yesterday !

      --
      -Linux is SO fast it does an infinite loop in 5 seconds.
  155. It Thought it was Great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a fan of the Original and TNG (I hated the other 2 though), and I thought this series was great. I don't know why everyone is complaining about this or that (except for that horrible theme song)...get a life and just enjoy the show. Don't rip apart every little line and action and declare that The show sucks because the Klingon blood was the wrong color, blah, blah, blah.... I think Jolene Blolack (the Vulcan) is great (for obvious reasons) but the oil rubbing went a little too long. I really liked how they filled in little holes and let viewers know about some scientic stuff we may have been wondering about (ex: artificial gravity). That's what I think.

    Jim

    1. Re:It Thought it was Great.... by BiggestPOS · · Score: 1

      Uhh, the blood was pink is Star Trek VI to get under an R-rating, and get a PG-13 one. It was later explained that the "weightlessness" somehow made it lighter in color... Every other time we've seen Klingon blood its been dark red.

      --
      What, me worry?
    2. Re:It Thought it was Great.... by crayz · · Score: 1

      Then how come at the end the guy with the Klingon mask falls, and the real klingon is like "This is not klingon blood - look it's Admiral Cartright!"

      ?

    3. Re:It Thought it was Great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I really liked how they filled in little holes

      I would have liked it much better if I could have filled in her little hole...I mean come on! Who wants softcore??

    4. Re:It Thought it was Great.... by BiggestPOS · · Score: 1

      Because Star Trek VI was an abberration in that respect :)

      --
      What, me worry?
  156. Real trekkies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...need to learn how to shut the fuck up!

    1. Re:Real trekkies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I am with you 100% on all the things you said. Must I remind the other naysayers that without the people who buy the books of star trek or attend the cons, or nit pick apart every little farking detail, we probably wouldn't have seen voyager, let alone enterprise?

      This show was created because there was a market for it. Keep in mind how many years there were in between TOS and the first movie and then TNG! Now it's like there's a Star Trek flavor of the decade or so. Sure, Enterprise may be aimed at those who haven't gotten into trek before, but still, I don't think there would be as many folks who just happened to "tune in" to it if there weren't the die hard fans.

      In any event, the other big thing that sticks out in my mind wrong with the show was that there wasn't an Enterprise between the shuttle OV-101 and NCC-1701. Now, a canon source once alluded to a "declaration" class starliner named the IBS Enterprise, but, that's only an allusion :)

    2. Re:Real trekkies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with most of you trekkies that you entirely missed the point -- the original series was NOT about technology, but yet you guys spent 15 years making technical manuals and trying to explain every unexplained aspect of the show.

      Lo and behold, somebody at Paramont noticed and started playing to your crowd, and the show became entirely a story of the fobibles of machines and their nerdy masters and the self-preservation of it's own universe. Most of you didn't notice your own creation until Voyager's "Particle of the Week" plots and constrained characters got totally unbearable.

      It's nice to see Paramount push a stick in your eye and throw all that stuff away. Trekkies ruined Trek, and if the folks in charge say Fuck You, that's fine with the rest of us. You like to overstate your roll in preserving the show, but you're a nice secondary income stream, and that's it. The broader audience brought the franchise back from the dead and has carried ever since. and 5 years from now you'll be buying Enterprise books like a good little tool. Now go wash your uniform -- it stinks.

  157. Why was the Klingon on Earth by marcop · · Score: 2

    I don't recall why the Klingon was even on Earth. If he was trying to get his message back to his people, what was he doing on Earth? It seems that he would have had to go in the opposite direction to get to Earth.

    Oh wait, I get it... it's the only way Bragga could setup the Human-Klingon link. Gotcha.

  158. 29th Century Time Line Fix? by dragons_flight · · Score: 2

    It occurs to me that depending on how you apply the "temporal civil war" you could use this to patch up a lot of continuity errors by simply throwing this series into an alternate timeline.

    Personally I'd rather not see things go that way, but it does provide a solution to writers if they feel overburdened by the history of preceeding Treks.

  159. Waitaminute! by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 2

    Correct me if I'm wrong but... didn't Warp Drive come along as a result of contact with the Wyn from the Wyn Star Cluster? I read this in the old original Star Trek book series upon which alot of Star Trek the show was based. I believe it happened after the original NCC1701 was built in earth orbit and a few years before Captain Pike commanded the Enterprize.

    Also, at this early date, the starships *SHOULD* have armor plating but no shields, just impulse and reaction engines, and pulse lasers.

    I know that they had a wierd episode in ST-TNG where warp drive was supposedly created, we were recognised by the Vulcans and we narrowly escaped the BORG but... can't we keep a cohesive history and time line? I mean c'mon.

    Oh well, I guess I can forgive them... they do have this fantastic looking Vulcan Blalock chick.
    Codifex Maximus

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    1. Re:Waitaminute! by Telek · · Score: 2

      Actually no ship should have lasers, or any other beam weapon for that matter. At least not as their primary kick'n'ass weapon.

      They'd be pointless.

      Any battle will most likely be faught at several light-second distances, and missiles with laser cannons would be far more likely a choice. Send out missiles with a nuke that channels all of it's power into a laser and blasts the enemy ship rather than risk having your ship hit. That and you should have a lot more manned/automatic fighters, as the main ship can't protect itself, especially without shields. IT'd get pulverized in no time.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    2. Re:Waitaminute! by CaptSwifty · · Score: 1
      That wierd episode... actually a movie - Star Trek: First Contact. Zephram Cochran Invents warp drive sometime during World War III on Earth (about 2060ish) (He's also the one that they showed the video of during the launch ceremony of the ship saying the line "to boldy go...").

      Anyways, in First Contact, the crew of the Enterprise (the new E ship) followed the borg back through time, because they were going to try to destroy the humans at thier weakest point during history.

    3. Re:Waitaminute! by wayne606 · · Score: 1

      You may be thinking about the missles they have in the Honor Harrington books by David Weber. FTL missles that have fusion bombs which pump lasers - pretty powerful. (Then they also have something called "grasers" - gravity lasers?)

    4. Re:Waitaminute! by Osty · · Score: 1

      the line "to boldy go..."

      Actually, they finally got rid of that damn split infinitive, and used the phrase "let us go boldly ..." or something to that extent (maybe "let us boldly go", but the point being, it no longer splits an infinitive).

    5. Re:Waitaminute! by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Correct me if I'm wrong but... didn't Warp Drive come along as a result of contact with the Wyn from the Wyn Star Cluster?

      At first, I thought this was one of the funniest trolls I've seen, but then I looked at your posting history and signature.

      The Wyn are part of Star Fleet Battles, which isn't based on Star Trek directly, but rather on one particular piece of fanfic, the old Star Fleet Technical Manual. The SFB authors are the first to proclaim that their universe diverges utterly from Star Trek.

      I read this in the old original Star Trek book series upon which alot of Star Trek the show was based.

      This was the line that at first made me think you were hoaxing, it's rather much like a hoax we used to do on the old Fidonet TREK Echo.

      Star Trek the TV series was around before any books about it. It wasn't "based on" anything.

      I think the first episode that was "based on" a book was the Animated Series episode "The Slaver Weapon", and the production staff deliberately ignores the animated series for purposes of continuity. It's considered more of a "based on" Trek than a "part of" Trek.

      I know that they had a wierd episode in ST-TNG where warp drive was supposedly created, we were recognised by the Vulcans and we narrowly escaped the BORG

      It's amazing that you know something that didn't happen. There was a MOVIE where warp drive was created, and we narrowly escaped the Borg, but the Vulcans didn't see or recognize the Enterprise in it. This is 90 years after that, so it's appropriate for them to still have warp drive, not "just impulse and reaction engines".

    6. Re:Waitaminute! by lightPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Heh. Been reading Honor Harrington books lately? :)

      Yeah, I think you're right, but the world isn't good enough to give us essentially Honor Harrington in mini-series format.

      --
      http://www.somethingpositive.net Funny + bitter = comedy gold
    7. Re:Waitaminute! by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 2

      Ok, I *may* have my facts a bit jumbled. After all, it's been about 15 years since I read the books. The first Star Trek book I read had to do with the Enterprize getting stuck in a gravity well around what appeared to be a dead star. I orbit, they had found a gigantic alien ship made of honeycombed alloy and they had personal force fields or shields. The officer of the conn was a creature that had many arms - Mbata or something. There was a different alien intelligence that had taken over the alien ship yada yada yada... a very nice piece of work the book was... I couldn't put it down.

      Anyway, In these books, there was a race of beings that had immense technology but were largely pacifistic. I thought those were the Wyn. They had Warp drive, Phasers and Transporters and such... while the Klingons, who we were at war with, had none of these technologies. (We didn't have these tech either)

      Anyway, the Klingons captured one of the Wyn's ships and took the tech. They Wyn then gave us the tech to keep power balanced in the war.

      You are most likely right that the timelines and facts from the books, shows and toons are divergent. Too bad they couldn't try to resolve some of the differences with the books.

      I saw the race that we were fighting in the new show as a more interesting foe than the Wyn. Maybe a beefed up version of them for us to get our technology from.

      Heh, I see this as a reason for me to go to the garage and dig up those old Star Trek books again. Refresh m'self with the storyline.

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    8. Re:Waitaminute! by trongey · · Score: 1

      Actually no ship should have lasers, or any other beam weapon for that matter. At least not as their primary kick'n'ass weapon. They'd be pointless. Any battle will most likely be faught at several light-second distances, and missiles with laser cannons would be far more likely a choice.

      That same line of reasoning was applied to every generation of fighter planes till the middle of the Viet Nam conflict. The designers kept saying that the planes just needed lots of speed and missiles then they would never get close enough for guns.

      Every time they ended up sticking a gun on somewhere after the first few dogfights. There's no reason to expect that spaceship fights would turn out any different.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    9. Re:Waitaminute! by Telek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's no reason to expect that spaceship fights would turn out any different.

      There's a huge difference. The mass ratio between a missile and your plane is on the order of what, 1/100? On a spaceship you'll easily be 1000x that ratio. Moving a 3 ton missile vs a 300,000 ton spaceship is going to be a LOT easier to do, especially if you don't have scifi tech (or the ability to ignore physics) like inertial dampeners or omnidirectional phasers. But even in sci-fi you'd be much better off to launch a pile of missiles that can maneuver and travel 10x faster than you can to get there, and it's much more difficult to shoot them down. Plus you _can_ launch them from several light-second distances, which makes dogfights impossible anyways, even if you had omnidirectional lasers. Additionally space is much much bigger than what you can get in the air here, with no obligation to get close to your enemy.

      And if you don't have scifi abilities, then you're most likely going to be stuck with a laser (or something) cannon, which won't be omnidirectional, thus requiring you to either move your ship or the laser around, which won't be fast. Plus at several light second distances, you won't be able to target your enemies anyways.

      Modern day aircraft fights are
      a) sensors/radar detect enemy fighters on approach
      b) fighters scrambled
      c) fighters lock on and fire missiles far out of range of sight (5+km away)
      d) either your ECM works and you're ok, your missiles hit them and you win, or their missiles get you and you're dead. Either way the other party goes home, or mops up the mess.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    10. Re:Waitaminute! by trongey · · Score: 1

      you'd be much better off to launch a pile of missiles that can maneuver and travel 10x faster than you can to get there
      You'd be even better off to launch a pile of fighters armed with missiles and cannons. The Star Trek idea of starships fighting each other without fighter support is nuts.

      , and it's much more difficult to shoot them down.
      Not if you've got cannons on fast turrets. We've got those now on our ships.

      Plus you _can_ launch them from several light-second distances, which makes dogfights impossible anyways, even if you had omnidirectional lasers. Additionally space is much much bigger than what you can get in the air here, with no obligation to get close to your enemy.
      This is the same logic that caused the F4 Phantom to be initially built without close-range weapons. All it takes is one flight of highly maneuverable enemy craft to screw that theory. You might not be obligated to get close to your enemy, but they might choose to get close to you.

      Plus at several light second distances, you won't be able to target your enemies anyways.
      Why not. It's called leading your target. World War II naval battles were fought at several weapon-second distances all the time. And they weren't using guided missiles.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    11. Re:Waitaminute! by Telek · · Score: 2

      You'd be even better off to launch a pile of fighters armed with missiles and cannons. The Star Trek idea of starships fighting each other without fighter support is nuts.

      Yes, but even then you'd be a lot easier off to just use missiles. No crew needed to do that, and no advanced fighters needed either. Don't forget (at least if you're trying to be realistic) is that to pack any decent punch into a package as small as a fighter and keep it maneuverable and protected is far beyond their technology range, but then again when did ST ever pay attention to logic?

      In either case although a compliment of a few fighters/scouts is most likely mandatory, I think that the primary weapons would be nuke pumped missiles.

      Not if you've got cannons on fast turrets. We've got those now on our ships.

      I don't think that bullets are going to do the trick. Don't forget that we're talking about humungous laser/phaser/whatever cannons here, which will not only be huge but also not maneuverable. Add the fact that on earth your targets are moving at 500mi/h, in space they're moving at 50000mi/h and even a sensitive targeting turret will have a hard time to keep up with them.

      And finally add in the feasability that most combat will be computer driven and there's no point for manned interceptors anyways. People's reaction times will be FAR too slow for this type of combat, so this kinda excludes the use of a manned interceptor. Also the G-Forces would be wildly unbearable.

      But in any case, it's far easier to make a simple small missile that's just a nuke-fed laser cannon that doesn't require life support or large amounts of feul or crew capabilities or anything, just a small tiny package that can move like a bat out of hell and toast your opponent.

      This is the same logic that caused the F4 Phantom to be initially built without close-range weapons. All it takes is one flight of highly maneuverable enemy craft to screw that theory.

      Dude, we're talking about apples and oranges here. There's a large difference between being able to fly at 500mi/h and 50000mi/h, plus space is so much bigger and it's really easy to run away. But yes, you will need to have point defence weapons, yes, but they will be used for just that, defence. Not as a primary offensive weapon.

      Why not. It's called leading your target. World War II naval battles were fought at several weapon-second distances all the time. And they weren't using guided missiles

      You're missing the entire point here. Several light second distances means that by the time that you get the positional information and fire your cannon your opponent has 6 seconds to change their position. Plus over a distance of 1,000,000km away with a beam, firing at a target with a cross-section of, let's say, 1 square km (of course, they'd have his thin side towards you anyways), you're looking at firing a conventional laser and hoping to hit another bullet in midair from 8 miles away, except the bullet doesn't move predictably. The precision that you'd need is down to 1x10^-12th of a degree (that's 0.000000000001 degrees) of accuracy needed to hit your target. With that kind of accuracy needed, even a subtle inertia change on the target's part will throw your calculations off. Not only that, but it's highly unlikely that your gun itself can consistantly fire with that kind of accuracy, never mind having your targeting system be able to handle that, and add a 6 second latency and it will be (for all intensive purposes) impossible to hit.

      You can't compare space battle to naval/aero combat that we've seen around WWII. Even nowadays you fire your missiles at your target that's far out of visual range and either your missiles miss, they hit, your ecm works, or you die.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    12. Re:Waitaminute! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I thought IBM invented Warp drive, but Microsoft managed to kill it.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    13. Re:Waitaminute! by Spencerian · · Score: 1

      I loved the show. It felt more like TOS than any other show, and the RoT (Rate of Technobabble) was very low--they REALLY tried to keep the technology way behind the humanity needed to make the new characters real. They succeeded for a two-hour premiere.

      Now, let's get something really straight (aside from T'Pol's chest--ahhhh) about ST. NOTHING IS CANON. EVER. We'd like to think that the ST universe is consistent. We'd also like to see Usama bin Laden's head on a pike. Only one of these possibilities may come to pass.

      Although it tried initially, too many cooks put their hands in ST's pot, from the various series to the books and movies, and even games. NOTHING is consistent. Treat ST more like Mystery Science Theater and you'll breathe easier.

      ST's current writers and producers did rediscover a part of the goodness, and I hope it continues. If you need canons and continuity, go enjoy Farscape, B5, and Stargate. All good, with little of that ST "let's pretend we're DC Comics and reinvent the f***ing universe again" schtick.

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    14. Re:Waitaminute! by Life+Blood · · Score: 2

      You are both wrong.

      1. Star Trek is not real life. They know no real physics. Do not treat it like they do and say that Star Trek should be X. Especially when being X breaks continuity which is far more important for storytelling.

      2. Air combat is not "shoot missile from 5km out". Why? Because that is the way air liners are shot down. Dead civilians bad.

      3. Guns exist on current missile cruisers and aircraft for one simple reason. Economics. You should not pay a million dollars to kill someone if you can do it for a hundred. That is why fighters and naval ships have guns. Therefore it is reasonable to assume any military starship will have a gun equivalent for the same purpose of killing weak or unskilled things cheaply.

      4. Any discussion of combat techniques requires at least the establishment of ratios like combat range/projectile speed and more importantly vehicle speed/projectile speed. In star trek these ratios are roughly equivalent to WWII military combat so their combat tech follows.

      5. Missiles of the conventional phallic shape maneuver like bricks. Even worse in space because they are built entirely wrong. A good fighter pilot can easily outmaneuver a SAM provided he sees it coming. Just bring it over your wing and it will stall and crash into the ground. If the speed, etc. are as you describe getting the missile to hit the opposing ship would be just as difficult as shooting it accurately.

      6. Don't assume big "guns" must be swung about on heavy carriages to target them. It is equally possible that they may be directed highly accurately using electro-magnetic fields, etc. which can be altered to incredible precision instantaneously. Beam weapons could be used to sweep a designated area which may contain the ship, rather than simply targeting a ship. If their contact is sufficiently powerful in relation to the ships defenses this is just as good as shooting at them. Note that current shipboard anti-aircraft guns use this technique. They fill an area with lots of lead and the missile will simply run into it.

      Lastly, the future of combat is autonomous and unmanned. Very shortly people will not have the response times required even on earth let alone space so computers will have to do it. Whether this is in the form of unmanned turrets or unmanned combat vehicles is the issue. However it is unlikely combat will be big ship to big ship because big ships would be slower to maneuver and lack physical response time.

      What you will most likely see in space is something similar to fighter vs. intercepter vs. fighter bomber combat but thousands of times faster. Various defensive and offensive drones fighting each other at incredible speed with mothership based anti-drone weapons thrown in. The specifics will undoubtably be decided by the effective killing range of the various weapons weapons. Anything that gets to close will be killed by the motherships automated anti-drone turrets, anything too far away will not be able to damage the mothership with its attacks, anything in the kill region but outside of the turrets effective range will have to contend with the defensive drones first. So the real question is what is the anti-ship and anti-drone effective attack ranges.

      Of course we can't know that because they don't exist. Furthermore we can't know specific battle tactics of should you attack first etc. because these are determined by the previous ranges. If the antiship range is huge vs. the anti-drone range then attack first because your defensive drones won't be able to keep up. If not then its let your opponent attack you and then crush him after he has nothing left to throw.

      --

      So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

    15. Re:Waitaminute! by Telek · · Score: 2

      You are both wrong

      And so are you...

      1. Star Trek is not real life. They know no real physics. Do not treat it like they do and say that Star Trek should be X. Especially when being X breaks continuity which is far more important for storytelling

      I don't recall ever saying that it is. Actually, I recall several times stating that they do not follow physics or follow their own make believe physics. I NEVER said that "they do and therefore star trek should be like X" so please point that comment elsewhere. I also recall saying several times that in SF you must have concessions in order to tell a story (like language for example), however shows like Babylon 5 have shown that you can stick very very very close to known physics and realism while still having an amazing story.

      2. Air combat is not "shoot missile from 5km out". Why? Because that is the way air liners are shot down. Dead civilians bad.

      You've apparently never heard of BVRC or BVRAAM (Beyond Visual Range Combat / Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missiles). You can go here to get a good google search that will show you roughly 6,600 pages explaining what this is and where it's used and why.

      3. Guns exist on current missile cruisers and aircraft for one simple reason. Economics. You should not pay a million dollars to kill someone if you can do it for a hundred. That is why fighters and naval ships have guns. Therefore it is reasonable to assume any military starship will have a gun equivalent for the same purpose of killing weak or unskilled things cheaply.

      You're absolutely right. However I do recall that what I was talking about was ship-to-ship combat, debating that you will (probably) not have massive weapons on your ship as your primary weapons, and I do recall saying that you will (probably) have short range (point defense) weapons for taking out fighters/other small incoming things.

      4. Any discussion of combat techniques requires at least the establishment of ratios like combat range/projectile speed and more importantly vehicle speed/projectile speed. In star trek these ratios are roughly equivalent to WWII military combat so their combat tech follows.

      You're missing one very important variable: range. Space combat would be faught over much much much larger ranges, up to several light seconds (again you can go here for another google search explaining why space combat would be faught like this).

      5. Missiles of the conventional phallic shape maneuver like bricks. Even worse in space because they are built entirely wrong. A good fighter pilot can easily outmaneuver a SAM provided he sees it coming. Just bring it over your wing and it will stall and crash into the ground. If the speed, etc. are as you describe getting the missile to hit the opposing ship would be just as difficult as shooting it accurately.

      They maneuver like bricks in AIR, yes. And it IS hard to outmaneuver any missiles that are recent because they will explode in proximity if they miss their target, or they will be designed to be proximity explosive in the first place. In space things change considerably because you are not required to be aerodynamic or even have wings, and it's very easy (given sufficient drive technology of course) to change the velocity vector of something that small. IN ADDITION I was saying that they would be (for example) fusion bomb laser pumped missiles, which means that you don't need to change the velocity vector at all, you just need to change the orientation of the missile (which is very easy to do with rotational gyros) and then dump your load onto your target from a laser. You can't outrun or simply have one of these guys "skim off your wing".

      6. Don't assume big "guns" must be swung about on heavy carriages to target them. It is equally possible that they may be directed highly accurately using electro-magnetic fields, etc. which can be altered to incredible precision instantaneously. Beam weapons could be used to sweep a designated area which may contain the ship, rather than simply targeting a ship. If their contact is sufficiently powerful in relation to the ships defenses this is just as good as shooting at them. Note that current shipboard anti-aircraft guns use this technique. They fill an area with lots of lead and the missile will simply run into it.

      You're also forgetting one thing. Laser cannons are most likely going to be exactly that, a cannon. You will shoot one very large burst at a time, you will not have the ability to simply turn it on and swing it about to hit your target. The amount of energy that you need to pump into a laser to give it sufficient power is astronomical and your beam must be of a small size in order to concentrate the power. However you did raise a valid point, even if you can get your gun to stay on for a second, you can swing it around enough to hit a much wider area, as well good point about the electromagnetically aimed, however as I pointed out the level of accuracy is 10^-12th of a degree, and the fact that if you're three light seconds away, your perception is 3 seconds behind their current position and they have another 3 seconds to move after you fire your weapon.

      Lastly, the future of combat is autonomous and unmanned

      Yes, I do believe that was the point that I was trying to make!

      Very shortly people will not have the response times required even on earth let alone space so computers will have to do it.

      I also said that, so why are you arguing with me about it?

      However it is unlikely combat will be big ship to big ship because big ships would be slower to maneuver and lack physical response time

      Yes, exactly, that was my point. And add in the distance factor and ship-to-ship combat will be highly unlikely.

      What you will most likely see in space is something similar to fighter vs. intercepter vs. fighter bomber combat but thousands of times faster. Various defensive and offensive drones fighting each other at incredible speed with mothership based anti-drone weapons thrown in.

      Ok, sorry, so replace "missile" in my comments with "drones". Same thing. The problem is that if you're attacking a big ship the amount of power that your "drones" are going to need to do any damage to that ship will be far too high if you want to have your "drones" to be of any reasonable size. This is why the idea is to simply put a nuclear reactor on it, and have it destroy itself in the process of emptying out all of the energy that it can into one large laser blast to hit the target.

      And before you say that "well, you can just get interceptors to intercept them" or anything along that sort, keep in mind that these things will be moving very very fast, and you don't need to use all of the missiles that you launch. so you launch a lot of them over a wide angle of attack (i.e. they fly off on an angle before changing course) you will be hard pressed to intercept them. Once a few have fired the rest can return home. And even they don't need to get very close to the target to dump their load, a light second away would be close enough, and once their load is shot it will be impossible to block it. Don't forget, we're talking about weapons that are fired at the speed of light and thus detecting them is impossible, much less blocking them. If a missile detects something coming in, it can just blow it's load prior to being destroyed, or just use it's fusion bomb to explode rather than powering the laser, thus destroying the interceptor.

      Of course we can't know that because they don't exist.

      Of course, it's all just pure speculation right now :), however we can say certain things based on what we know of physics, and assuming that those laws aren't going to be horrably overturned (I'm speaking about horribly here, just discovering a minor inconsistancy or making a new law that refines current ones isn't considered overturning old laws) then we can make a pretty accurate judgement of what space combat could be like, given sufficient technologies.

      Or I could be horribly mistaken, but I'm taking things that well respected physicists and other people with lots of letters behind their name are saying, so I think they're much more qualified than I to give predictions. ;)

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    16. Re:Waitaminute! by Life+Blood · · Score: 2

      You are making fundamentally invalid assumptions. For there to be interstellar combat starships must be capable of achieving speeds close to light speed if not surpassing it. It is therefore illogical to assume (a) Newtonian physics models or (b) Relativistic physics models. Frankly in this sort of purely fictional environment anything could happen. Who is to say that sensor systems are limited to light speed? If ships can surpass it why shouldn't their comm and sensor systems? This is a meaningless debate unless you establish physical relationships for the quantities involved.

      The main variables here are anti-ship and anti-drone ranges; the relative speeds of the drones, ships, and weapons; and weapons sizes. None of which we know or have the physics to predict. At this point anyones theories could be true with the right values for these variables.

      In star trek the weapons required for anti-ship combat are so large that using drones is pointless. They'd have to be on the order of the size of a starship anyway. Sensors are basically instantaneous at combat distances. Also Star Trek lacks real AI so combat occurs at the speeds of human reaction. Oh well, but it is basically internally consistant. If you want to gripe, gripe about how ships don't move that way in space. Its just a TV show.

      As for the rest. In practical air combat you do not shoot something you cannot positively identify. That is how friends and civilians get killed. While aircraft are technically capable of killing something the pilot cannot see they do not because FOF is not that reliable in practice. Again, this is how air liners are shot down by accident.

      In short, the two of you are simply bullshitting each other. You will get nowhere.

      --

      So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

    17. Re:Waitaminute! by Telek · · Score: 2

      You are making fundamentally invalid assumptions.

      Any assumptions that I make are in tune with assumptions that professionals have made on this topic.

      For there to be interstellar combat starships must be capable of achieving speeds close to light speed

      You are, for the most part, correct. However what about in 2158 when the colony on Mars decides to rebel against home? (just a possibility)

      And one of the most plausable methods for FTL travel would be by using humungous drives or pieces of equiptment to bend space around the ship (I.e. if you can take a concentration of positive energy/mass and put it in front of your ship, and a concentration of negative energy behind your ship, it's possible that space will contract in front of your ship (this is the effect of gravity) and expand behind your ship, which could cause your ship to have appeared to have moved relative to a stationary observer without having undergone inertial change, thus bypassing the speed of light problem). In order to do this you require something active on behalf of the weapon, thus any sort of light (laser/phaser/whatever) beam itself can't exceed the speed of light.

      Who is to say that sensor systems are limited to light speed?

      Supposing that you send out drones and they can communicate back with your ship at FTL speeds, then the sensor drones themselves can be destroyed.

      the concept of "sensoring" implies using light and/or other radiation sources or something that's currently inside space, which by that definition then limits the speed of said sensors to the speed of light.

      At this point anyones theories could be true with the right values for these variables

      Yes, but doing so would require a major overturning of the current laws of the universe as we see them. But of course anything is possible. Extra dimensions, time travel, blah blah could play a role, who knows.

      But also in reality space is so goddamed big that why would you ever bother to fight someone? There's 10^15 stars in a galaxy alone, there's no need to do so for resource reasons or territorial reasons or for frankly any other reason that I can think of that a rational spacefaring race could require. Unless perhaps we find physical phenomena that cannot be reproduced and are worth protecting, but even then what would be? A wormhole? So who cares if there is one? Why would you want to protect it so much? I'm also assuming that any race that can acheive FTL travel will be a nonviolent race by nature because the violent races probably wouldn't have made it that far to begin with.

      Also Star Trek lacks real AI so combat occurs at the speeds of human reaction.

      Not at all. We've seen Data many many many times working the controls far faster than what we can, but it's not entertaining to NOT have violence in space that contains people at the controls. Who wants to see a bunch of computerized drones duking it out in under 30 seconds if you can have a dramatic 6 episode long war with real people?

      If you want to gripe, gripe about how ships don't move that way in space. Its just a TV show.


      Do you even bother to read anything that I write? I have stated many times that I don't care about startrek and I'm not arguing about science fiction. I'm arguing about plausable ways for space based weapons to work based on current knowledge of physics and an imagination.

      In practical air combat you do not shoot something you cannot positively identify

      Right, but you have sensors that can positively identify ships that are far out of sight due to the fact that the sensors can work at the speed of light which is several orders of magnitude faster than you can travel. There are many many ways to have positively identified a ship that is outside of visual range, check the links that I sent you if you don't believe me. This technology is used, you do fire at ships outside of your visual range. I don't know why you're trying to argue this.

      In short, the two of you are simply bullshitting each other. You will get nowhere.


      So what the hell do you care? I'm trying to point out things that are in line with what we know in physics and what is likely to be possible in the future. People seem to have this preconceived notion that because you can see it in Star Trek that will be what can happen. I'm saying no, it's not likely that is possible, however this stuff is. Christ. We didn't invite you in here to tear a strip off us, go away if you don't want to play nicely. If you want to have a serious arguement by all means, but don't go down to the level of telling us that we're just bullshitting each other. I've reasearched these things and read a lot about them, I don't think that I'm making fundamentally invalid assumptions, and I am quick to say that "provided there is no major overhaul in our understanding of the universe, this is what I think would happen". Key words: "I think" and "fundamental overhaul".

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
  160. Well, let's see here... by Pollux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The essentials of a good Star Trek:

    Theme Song: Sucked. Come on, I need the orchestra with the powerful brass about ready to blow my ear drums away. Something new. Not some recycled theme song written by a recycled band.

    Ship: Nice design, though I honestly want to just have someone on the show explain why they picked that design for Star Fleet (circular disk, engines in the rear). If this is their first big star-ship, then at least tell me why they built it the way they did.

    Crew: Interesting, but I was hoping for at least a little bit more of a clash between everyone's feelings toward each other. They all get along like compadres. Even the Vulcan science officer had little trouble getting along with the captain. Half of the storylines in Original Series/TNG/DS9 were about clashes between the crew. There's also little racial difference between them all. I mean, they're all Americanized people. At least Czechov had an accent.

    Crew Chemistry: Gee, am I detecting a resurected Kirk/McCoy relationship in the captain and his science officer? At least McCoy knew when to add "colorful metaphors" when they were needed. It seems like Bacula just doesn't get the timing right (perhaps he could use some guidance from the South Park writers...can you imagine him yelling out to his crew, "Kick Ass!", and "Respect my Authorita!" to the Klingons?).
    Storyline: Wait, there was a storyline I had to follow? Sorry...I had too many images of rubbing petroleum jelly all over some hot woman's back and behind. Ever since I saw some peculiar protrusions thrusting out of the Vulcan's undershirt I lost all sense of storyline.

    Hot chick: Well, at least they got one thing right. Ever since Councelor Troi, this has been an absolute must. Voyager got it right in the second half of their run with Seven. At least they were able to keep some of my attention off the storyline and on the Jolene Blalock.

    All in all: give me about a month to see if they can go somewhere with their setup. They've put in some good potential, and I'd like to see something come of it. But the key I would say is that Bacula has GOT to get an edge. Come on...Kirk, Sisqo, Picard, and Janeway all had veins popping out of their foreheads at one time or another in the show. Bacula's gotta do his part as well to continue the captain's legacy.

    1. Re:Well, let's see here... by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Crew: Interesting, but I was hoping for at least a little bit more of a clash between everyone's feelings toward each other.

      They've been together for four days, and they all had a Vulcan to get mad at. Give the humans time, they'll piss each other off; but anybody can get along for four days.

    2. Re:Well, let's see here... by Life+Blood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Come on, I need the orchestra with the powerful brass about ready to blow my ear drums away. Something new. Not some recycled theme song written by a recycled band.

      Yeah something original in big brass just like the big brass opening credits of DS9 or Voyager. I hate to tell you but putting rock, even if it is Rod *shudder* Stewart, in Star Trek is a new and original thing for the series. Big brass openings and "voyages of the starship *insert name here*" monologues are not.

      I also understand why they picked that particular song. Listen to the lyrics and remember what the show's main themes are. Notice that this crappy Rod Stewart song captures all the major introductory themes of the show i.e. exploration, being "held back" by the vulcans, and feeling your way forward into the unknown.

      The song is already somewhat dated now so don't worry about it dating the show. This isn't the eighties rock of Transformers or nineties rock of Titan AE. I hesitate to call any Rod Stewart song a classic, but this one is a least going to be around for a while on easy listening CDs.

      Someone else said that this opening will alienate the hardcore trekkies. Tough. They need to be alienated some. Trek needs to grow and change and evolve or it will collapse and die. Its time to stop trying to please everybody and make something worth while.

      What I want to know is whether they will repeat the mistakes of Voyager and destroy the internal conflict that fuels the series. Are they going to maintain the internal tension of Vulcans vs. Humans or not. If they choose not then the show will suck for several seasons. If so then they can use it provided it does not become cliche.

      --

      So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

    3. Re:Well, let's see here... by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1
      Hot chick: Well, at least they got one thing right. Ever since Councelor Troi, this has been an absolute must. Voyager got it right in the second half of their run with Seven. At least they were able to keep some of my attention off the storyline and on the Jolene Blalock.

      Ever since TROI???

      Uhura had it GOIN' ON, baby. All the way live. Plus she flashed her panties out from under that li'l ol' Starfleet microskirt all the damn time.

      Come to me, my luscious nubian princess...
      Tatsujin

    4. Re:Well, let's see here... by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2
      There's also little racial difference between them all. I mean, they're all Americanized people. At least Czechov had an accent.

      Hey, that's a great point. Dialects and accents should still exist for humans at this point in time, and should probably be more obvious than they were in the original series. They will need to fix this, I think. Perhaps the writers & producers are just so used to the newer Star Treks that they haven't realized that this prequel now more limits them with "real world" issues. And frankly, I think that would be good. It would be realistic.

    5. Re:Well, let's see here... by way2muchsense · · Score: 1

      At least McCoy knew when to add "colorful metaphors" when they were needed.

      Deforest Kelley's acting career prior to Star Trek was mainly playing black hats in Westerns. He had plenty of practice in "colorful metaphors" that Bakula lacks.

      OF COURSE, since this is my first Enterprise post, let me weigh in on the rubdown scene. (1) It was gratuitous in the extreme. (2) It did NOTHING for the story. (3) Gratuitous sex is a Trek tradition. Kirk probably laid more pipe in 79 episodes than Magic Johnson did in his career. (4) I must stress that 99% of Kirk's pipe was laid offscreen.

      Analysis: Do I object to cheesecake on Trek? Hell no, but at least have it be somehow pertinent to the story.

  161. too nerdy for me by robvasquez · · Score: 0

    Star Trek is all that's discussed here...about about TrekkieDot? SlashTrek? USS Slashdot?

  162. Going Hollywood? by hendridm · · Score: 1

    I hope Star Trek doesn't turn into a typical prime time show like Friends or Will & Grace. Why did they make Bakula the captain? To draw an audience that normally doesn't watch? If so, what else do they have planned? I thought Star Trek made stars - it didn't hire them...

  163. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Telek · · Score: 1

    what the hell did you call good ole Seven-Of-Nine then? Like that wasn't her whole purpose for being on the show... Or Dax&Kira (to a lesser extent), or Troy, or just about every woman on TOS with those super-mini skirts. yeaow.

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  164. Plating and Vulcans by Bilbo · · Score: 2
    There's one slight variation in the Vulcan vs. Human thing...

    Remember how it was supposedly the Vulcans that made First Contact with Earth after the first warp drive test? From the bit I saw (missed the first 1/2 hour :-/), it's the primitive race (Humans) chaifing under to tutalige of the advanced race (Vulcans). Not sure how much they'l be able to stretch out of that one, but it might make for some fresh material.

    Second, didn't anyone else hear them say, "Polarize the hull plates!"? It's not the steel that's offline, but the polarization (early shield technology?) that was breaking down.

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  165. Sign the petition to drop the stupid theme song! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign this petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/entintro/petition.ht ml

  166. Plating Offline by Hellraisr · · Score: 0

    If you guys had've paid attention instead of bashing the show, you would have heard them refer to "charging" the plating. That would shed a beam of light on the "offline" phrase used later on... wouldn't it.

    I bet it's hard core Trekkies that are disapointed in the show. Too bad.

  167. vulcan chick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    the vulcan chick is going to be a cocktease for the rest of the series. that's my guess.

  168. /. reference? by PD · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could be. I know definitely I heard a lot of people trying to get "first contact".

  169. Yet another plot hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember a next generation (or was it a ds9...?) when the crew went back in time to the original. They used video clips from the original, actually. Really freaky. The plot hole is simple - as we all can remember, the original klingon's foreheads were way different. And, since it was the episode with all those damned tribbles, which had about 500 klingons in it, they couldn't leave them out. So they made up the excuse of some sort of genetic change over.

    Since this series is before the original, that'd mean the klingons should have flat foreheads. Unless they changed it, then changed back.

    1. Re:Yet another plot hole by Lord_Vader · · Score: 1

      I don't know.I always assumed that since the Empire is so politically volitale that there be two different species fighting for control. One bone headed, and one not. ??

  170. "Beem me up" by slashzero · · Score: 1

    I just knew exactly how they were going to use the transporter, I was just waiting for the capt. to get stuck somewhere and the crew was going to be forced to use it on him despite his fear of it. It was so predictible. Thats my only grevience with it. I'm not a big star trek fan, I watch it when ever I see it on. So I wasn't disappointed because of reused concepts like most of you did. Overall I thought it was a pretty good show. Better then I expected, I'm always sceptical of people screwing up good things.

    1. Re:"Beem me up" by wadetemp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only thing more predicatable than that is that in the season cliffhanger we'll be finding out the guy in the temporal communication chamber was a Romulan. (Besides the fact that the architecture in the chamber was clearly Romulan, he had a Romulan siloutette, he talked like a Romulan, the Romulans and Klingons are generally known to not like each other, etc... etc... etc...)

    2. Re:"Beem me up" by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      Weren't the Romulans unknown until Kirk ran into them in TOS?

  171. The ship design... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else think it's just INCREDIBLY reminiscent of the old (new?) Akira-class?

  172. Nothing new yet, just copies of other shows by mttlg · · Score: 1

    Ok, great, we're at the beginning of Starfleet, picking up 100 years after where First Contact left off. We have a captain that has Kirk's Vulcan-frustrating illogical habits, John Crichton's cluelessness around aliens, and Sam Beckett's dialogue (just replace "Oh boy" with "Let's go"). Some of the opening scenes are almost straight out of Star Trek: The Motion Picture, the alien hangout scenes are straight out of Farscape, and the disinfecting scene is straight out of Pay-Per-View porn, bulging nipples and all. Add in some rather unsuccessful attempts to make it seem like standard Star Trek stuff is new and confusing ("Kling-ons," fear of transporters, "new weapons," etc.), and it is mildly amusing in a accident scene sort of way.

    Fine it's a new show, so of course it is going to borrow from what came before it. So what is it adding that's new? Well, there's that horrible pop-ish opening theme song. Ok, so that's not a good example. Um, there's a female in a bodysuit that prominently displays her breasts. Right, that's been done. How about a ship far away from home exploring new worlds? Time traveling bad guys and temporal nonsense? Shapeshifters? An unusual doctor with various pet projects?

    So none of the elements are really all that original, what about the character development and plot? I know it is a bit too early to tell, but you should at least be able to identify the characters and see how they will interact in the future, right? There's that T'Pau Vulcan chick, Captain Archer, Doctor, um, Flox, the linguist, the dimwit, the guy who brought out the guns, and the token black guy. There's probably a few more, but with identical uniforms and dim lighting, it's tough to tell people apart, especially since they all seem to have the same personality. Well, maybe they'll get to that later. There's at least some chemistry between the Vulcan and what's-his-name, but they kind of overdid that one scene and didn't put anything a little more subtle in to support it. There's the Human-Vulcan tension, but that was delivered with a sledgehammer too. And there's the Klingons, who didn't do much of anything yet. And of course we can't forget the shapeshifting temporal bad guys... So we've got a bunch of inexperienced, headstrong humans on a ship in the middle of nowhere, with some contrived time travelling plot mixed in (How long before a character from one of the other Trek shows travels back in time to help them?). And despite not having much technology to work with, they still manage to inject random technological solutions to their problems...

    There's some potential here, but this first episode really didn't do much. All of the other Trek pilots seemed to have more of an impact than this one. Maybe it was just the challenge of working from a "historical" reference point and moving to an original storyline, but I'm not impressed. I would really like to enjoy this show, but I don't have a good feeling about it so far.

    1. Re:Nothing new yet, just copies of other shows by Scoria · · Score: 2

      It sounds like they took everything for granted again as far as technology, a typical cliche in Star Trek (and all of those other futuristic sci-fi shows.)

      Perhaps they could explain some of the aspects of .. eh .. the transporter for example:

      If humans have 'souls', enter the transporter, and are regenerated at some other location, hasn't the original human been disposed of and the "instant clone" created, resulting in this being a different human and the other losing its life? If Star Trek explored the "spiritual ramifications" and beliefs (not all the time, it would get very boring) of the technology as it is coming into play...

      Exploring paradoxes = fun.

      --
      Do you like German cars?
  173. From weakness comes prosperity. by Drache+Kubisuro · · Score: 1

    There were a lot of problems with this first episode to be frank, but it was entertaining.

    I can't get over the fact that by updating its timeline with our current modern history, they throw out several things. Like the Eugenics War, which was suppose to have occured in the mid to late 90's -- thus arriving Khan Noonian Singh to dominate most of the world... San Francisco looked pretty much the same more than a hundred years from now. I mean -- the Eugenics Wars weren't exactly passive... Earth had to rebuild!

    There wasn't much to the script at all either. It was rather disinteresting and trite. They all used common catch phrases with no innovative dialogue whatsoever. And what was the overal point of this story anyway? A small piece to a large puzzel, perhaps. Hopefully the completed puzzel will not resemble the obfuscated rubble of a junkyard...

    It has potential. No doubt about it, but this story belongs in a parellel Trek universe.

    //RM

    --
    -Drache Kubisuro
    1. Re:From weakness comes prosperity. by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about the timeline displayed on the Star Trek website, yes, it's conveniently wrong, isn't it? "Official" Trek lore is that the Eugenics war did occur in the 90s, and that timeline is reflected in the Star Trek Encyclopedia, which was produced by Pocket Books and is "official" (all information in it was pulled directly from all series.) The Star Trek website is for advertising, not for Trekers. (After all, the site's "Library" contains less knowledge about Trek than I could write on the back of a paper napkin!)

  174. Sign the petition to drop the stupid theme song! by gavinsr · · Score: 1
  175. Anyone else notice? by Mofo_abc123 · · Score: 1

    The very close parallel between Six of Nine (err Seven) and the vulcan? Both are emotionless, logical characters, whom don't always fit in with the rest of the crew. Not to mention both are large breasted women in overly tight cloths. Let us hope this is where the parrellel ends, because if T'Pol (I think thats the name) becomes meaningless sex apeal to cover up for the lack of plot, like seven of nine was I'll have to stop watching the show (My apologies to anyone who likes voyeur, err voyager =)

    1. Re:Anyone else notice? by ThufirHawat · · Score: 1

      The parallel seems a bit thin: Seven of Nine is very removed from the human race-T'Pol less. What's wrong with having an attractive woman in a ST series? Are we condemned to have self-assured, executive-style uglies only, like the dreadful Janeway? "Meaningless sex-aPPeal"? Pal, let's vote and see how many here liked her and how many didn't-I have some idea as to the result... Thufir -WIndows ME does not run on mentats-

      --
      Thufir Hawat
      Part-time Mentat
    2. Re:Anyone else notice? by Mofo_abc123 · · Score: 1

      Read my comment again, I never said there was anything wrong with attractive women in an ST series. I said it's bad when you try to use them to cover up for lack of good writers. And for sex aPPeal what do you make of that whole decontamination bit? Wouldn't you consider them rubing each other down as needless? I liked the show, and it seriously didn't need that scene. Look at TNG, their are (IHMO) no attractive women on that show yet it doesn't need them because the plot is so good. As you can probably guess, I greatly disliked Voyeur and my bias's against it are quite obvious. (no offence to anyone who liked the show, this is only my opinion)

  176. Re:Theme music? - Richard M. Stallman I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.gnu.org/fun/humor.html#Music

  177. Consitency by Mandelbrute · · Score: 1
    And Picard told us that the war with the Klingons was sparked by a botched first contact with them. But that contact didn't seem to be botched.
    Why should this be consistent with STNG, when episodes of STNG weren't always consistent within the same episode? About the worst I can remember went along the lines of:
    The field is 200 metres in radius and is shrinking by two metres every second. That means we have exactly twenty-three minutes before it closes up
    Plus of course, things like the powers of Deanna Troy fluctuating depending upon who had written a particular episode, transporters making people younger (eternal youth), and all of the universe changing inventions that were never seen again.

    They should have had someone as highly trained as a checkout girl look over the STNG scripts before they went to air. Still, it was an entertaining show at times and this one looks like it may be better.

    We just need to judge it on it's own merits, instead of how it relates to all of the others.

    -------

    Quick! Someone stop him! He's got the plot device!

    1. Re:Consitency by GMontag451 · · Score: 1

      The worst inconsistency I can remember in TNG was in the first episode with Lore. They went through the entire episode emphasizing the fact that Data can't use contractions and Lore can. Then, at the end of the show, after they had just beamed Lore into the clutches of the crystalline entity, Picard asks Data if he is alright, and Data responds with "I'm fine." The only conclusion I can come to is that Lore somehow tricked everyone into thinking he was Data for the rest of the series.

    2. Re:Consitency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or that Brent Spiner goofed and no one cared enough to notice.

      Ever kissed a girl?

  178. Forget it, some of them weren't listening... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Second, didn't anyone else hear them say, "Polarize the hull plates!"? It's not the steel that's offline, but the polarization (early shield technology?) that was breaking down.

    Forget it. Yer wasting your breath - some of the first people to start slammin' it were people who didn't really care in the first place. Some just WANT to hate this Trek as much as they hated Voyager (And, can ya blame 'em after that damned show? It almost got decent in the last season. Almost.) I heard exactly the same thing you did. So did everyone else, but some just gotta have something to bitch about.

    Remember how it was supposedly the Vulcans that made First Contact with Earth after the first warp drive test? From the bit I saw (missed the first 1/2 hour :-/), it's the primitive race (Humans) chaifing under to tutalige of the advanced race (Vulcans). Not sure how much they'l be able to stretch out of that one, but it might make for some fresh material.

    I agree - it's a much different perspective on things than the normal Trek setting for the last 3 shows where Humans and Vulcans are considered 'equal'. Plus, I see something very cool about this - while the Vulcans seem to have tried to protect us from ourselves based on what we've seen so far, we aren't beyond going off half cocked, and really screwing things up. I really expect to see this happen a couple of times within the series.

    The other thing I see comming is how the Prime Directive finally gets created. So far, it doesn't exist. Humans can't really understand how come the Vulcans would hold back technology from us. We finally break free of the yoke somewhat, and go out on our own. Eventually, we're gonna find another species that is SO CLOSE to making it to warp technolgy, and we'll hand it to them. Then watch them have it blow up in thier face (yes, there was a Voyager a bit like that in the last season. One of the few almost likable episodes, but, it was too easily resolved for my tastes. Like most Voyager episodes. A hangnail is more of a problem than most of thier moral delimas.) After we see that happen, we'll probably start to understand the Vulcan mindset concerning the subject, and the Prime Directive will eventually created.

    If fact, that Humans CAN and WILL totally screw up from time to time in this show is going to be one of my favorite things about it. 'Bout time we show ourselves for what we really are - flawed beings, who learn to adapt and overcome our problems eventually. (Ok, that's the rose colored glasses version ;-)

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

    1. Re:Forget it, some of them weren't listening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I was rather unimpressed with the intro music, What was worse is the butchering of what they did to the startrek timeline, the Klingons at this time shouldnt even have warp technology, if I rember correctly it was the humans that gave them the warp drive, then later on in the TOS the klingons gave the warp drive to the romulans in exchange for the cloaking device.. I mean it wouldnt have been hard to keep the timeline that Gene Roddenberry made up, would it?
      and as to the prime dirctive it was somthing the humans did or gave to the Klingons, first contact with the Klingon empire was suppost to have been disastrous and that happened in about 2218 by Star Trek chronology.
      The technology errors? well rember it used to be lithum crystals they used instead of dilithum crystals, they have some stuff to iron out here too, but its not as bad as the tech nitpickers make it out to be..
      As for the Characters well I'm going to wait and see who knows how they will turn out, it was a great first epsode, they have to do alot of fine tuning to the series, most of which I expect to be done by season 3, with how they tape the eps..

    2. Re:Forget it, some of them weren't listening... by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      > then later on in the TOS the klingons gave the
      > warp drive to the romulans in exchange for the
      > cloaking device

      That really wouldn't make any sense since the Romulans ARE Vulcans who split off from Vulcan, and thus would already have warp drive, and for thousands of years, yet.

      If that's the case, how come Vulcan technology isn't way ahead of even Janeway's 26th century technology?

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    3. Re:Forget it, some of them weren't listening... by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      That really wouldn't make any sense since the Romulans ARE Vulcans who split off from Vulcan, and thus would already have warp drive, and for thousands of years, yet.

      Umm, no. There's nothing that prevents Romulans from splitting off from Vulcans without using warp drives. We've seen plenty of Trek episodes where cultures manage to cross interstellar space without using warp drives.

      But we do know from TNG that Romulan drive technology is actually quite different from Federation/Klingon technology...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:Forget it, some of them weren't listening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it didn't suck nearly as bad as I feared it would. That's about all I can say right now.

      The shower scene was a bit much for Star Trek IMO .. I mean if I want porn I'll go watch porn sheesh, you'll put an eye out with those things...

      The plot was standard Trek, neatly wrapped up at the end of the hour.. really lame. Thing I loved about Babylon 5 was he hit you with a WHAM where you're like "holy shit he didn't WIN in the end!". Well to be honest even B5 didn't do that until the 2nd or 3rd episode, so I'll give it some time.

      Let's face it with the "WB" bunch of young dorks cast they have, most people were expecting something like "Starship Troopers"... luckily managed to escape that fate.. so far.

  179. Let's see here... by Pollux · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The essentials of a good Star Trek:

    Theme Song: Sucked. Come on, I need the orchestra with the powerful brass about ready to blow my ear drums away. Something new. Not some recycled theme song written by a recycled band.

    Ship: Nice design, though I honestly want to just have someone on the show explain why they picked that design for Star Fleet (circular disk, engines in the rear). If this is their first big star-ship, then at least tell me why they built it the way they did.

    Crew: Interesting, but I was hoping for at least a little bit more of a clash between everyone's feelings toward each other. They all get along like compadres. Even the Vulcan science officer had little trouble getting along with the captain. Half of the storylines in Original Series/TNG/DS9 were about clashes between the crew. There's also little racial difference between them all. I mean, they're all Americanized people. At least Czechov had an accent.

    Crew Chemistry: Gee, am I detecting a resurected Kirk/McCoy relationship in the captain and his science officer? At least McCoy knew when to add "colorful metaphors" when they were needed. It seems like Bacula just doesn't get the timing right (perhaps he could use some guidance from the South Park writers...can you imagine him yelling out to his crew, "Kick Ass!", and "Respect my Authorita!" to the Klingons?).
    Storyline: Wait, there was a storyline I had to follow? Sorry...I had too many images of rubbing petroleum jelly all over some hot woman's back and behind. Ever since I saw some peculiar protrusions thrusting out of the Vulcan's undershirt I lost all sense of storyline.

    Hot chick: Well, at least they got one thing right. Ever since Councelor Troi, this has been an absolute must. Voyager got it right in the second half of their run with Seven. At least they were able to keep some of my attention off the storyline and on the Jolene Blalock.

    All in all: give me about a month to see if they can go somewhere with their setup. They've put in some good potential, and I'd like to see something come of it. But the key I would say is that Bacula has GOT to get an edge. Come on...Kirk, Sisqo, Picard, and Janeway all had veins popping out of their foreheads at one time or another in the show. Bacula's gotta do his part as well to continue the captain's legacy.

    1. Re:Let's see here... by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      The circular design of the saucer is for atmosphere reentry. I assume this ship's saucer can detach just in case they need to reenter. The warp nacelles are positioned as they are because of the strong subspace fields that are generated... large subspace field coils can't be close to the hull; smaller ones can (ala Voyager.) This is all from the Star Trek TNG Technical Manual.

    2. Re:Let's see here... by steveha · · Score: 2

      Theme Song: Sucked.

      Yup. I wanted something that makes you go "Yeah!" when you hear it. TOS and TNG both had cool and memorable theme songs; DS9 and VGR both bored me.

      What I would love to see is a Trek show with a rock soundtrack. The original Babylon 5 pilot, oh so many years back now, had a rock theme by Stewart Copeland that I liked very, very much. (When they recut the movie, they did improve it, but they lost the rock and went with the same classical the rest of B5 used.)

      Ship: Nice design, though I honestly want to just have someone on the show explain why they picked that design for Star Fleet

      There is a good book called The Making of Star Trek about TOS. That book described where the design of the Enterprise came from. Almost everyone figured a space ship should look like a flying cigar or a flying saucer, but Gene Roddenberry and a few other folks wanted something really different. They made a bunch of sketches and models and came up with something cool and different.

      Later they came up with reasons for the design: the warp engines have to be out on long poles because they are radioactive or otherwise unhealthy to be around, and the saucer was attached to the rest of the hull with explosive bolts so you could ditch the rest of the ship in a real emergency. (In TNG they of course showed us that the 1701-D could detach the saucer and reattach it whenever Picard felt a need to surrender or something.) The impulse engines are supposed to be on the saucer, so it wouldn't be just dead in space if it blew free from the warp engines.

      Crew: Interesting, but I was hoping for at least a little bit more of a clash between everyone's feelings toward each other. They all get along like compadres.

      Ehh. They are all happy to be there. Give them a few months on board the somewhat cramped NX-01, and then write stories about them clashing.

      Of course, the original show mostly had everyone getting along, but good-naturedly needling each other. You don't think Spock and McCoy actually hated each other, do you?

      Hot chick: Well, at least they got one thing right. Ever since Councelor Troi, this has been an absolute must.

      "Ever since Troi"? Uhura was a hot chick, and Yoeman Rand was pretty darn hot herself.

      Speaking of Uhura, the Hoshi character is sort of close to Roddenberry's original ideas for Uhura. Uhura was supposed to be a linguistic genius, and she was supposed to have a whole department working for her (communications and translations). They wound up just ignoring the language issue, and she got turned into a glorified telephone operator, alas.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  180. Nobody mentioned the dog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the first half it was very painful to watch the characters. Later they started to develop better and be less annoying (the captain, the vulcan science officer).
    I guess it is understandable that there was not enough time to really develop any other characters.

    Some parts felt tacked on, like when they originally thought of the ideas they thought they were neat (the first transporter, first phaser, first this, first that) but in the show they didn't come out nearly as interesting.

    This episode was almost an homage to the first Star Trek, hopefully future episodes will tone that down. The captain was even mimicking Captain Kirk's style of action (though thankfully not his style of dialogue).

    I'm happy to hear they wiped out war and disease in two generations, without even hinting at any way or philosophy they used to achieve that.

    Why were they so excited about the jump from 4.4 to 4.5 warp?
    How can they successfully use all those new things in one episode, but still don't have a communicator that works without static in a snow storm? Don't we already have better technology than that today?

  181. "bow-chicka-bow-wow music" by duckbutt · · Score: 1

    "I was waiting for the bow-chicka-bow-wow music to kick in."

    You'd need two things before that would happen:

    1) a stunt dick
    2) a clavinet

    --

    "No one's really gonna be free until nerd persecution ends" -- Gilbert, Revenge of the Nerds
  182. The Jury is Still out by lunadude · · Score: 1

    As long as we (people who grew up with the Trek incarnations) don't get too picky about the "time line" accuracy, it could develop into a nice little view of ourselves. Lets give it a year and see.

    I guess The Great Bird of The Galaxy isn't around for quality control.

  183. Sigh...you are putting WAY too much into this... by icebeing · · Score: 1

    You don't like the show? DON'T WATCH IT ~P
    I h8 whiny nitpickers...specially ST ones

    /ice

  184. Worst episode ever! by cwhicks · · Score: 2

    Except the soft porn. I agree, they should have gotten a Vulcan with real tits.

    I was reminded of several ST episodes as well as Aliens and other movies. I think we should give it time to find its feet. What series isn't weak the first season?

    If this is supposed to happen a century before the first ST, why is it more diverse?
    Isn't it amazing how many inventions and new people, procedures, etc. all happen in such a small period of time?

    --
    - I like pudding.
  185. In Defense Of The Title Music by WombatControl · · Score: 2

    While I have a mixed opinion of the title music, I do believe it's not nearly as bad as some are saying it is. Yes, its a dramatic change from what Trek (and SF in general has done), but I would argue that's not at all a bad thing. Much of Trek's rut can be attributed to the fact that Berman and Braga hadn't been willing to take risks when they should have.

    In fact, with each viewing, the song and the images that go with it are starting to grow on me. I think the orchestration could have been a little better in some spots, but that's more a point of personal preference.

    Don't whine that Star Trek never does anything new when the fanbase urinates itself every time they do something new and/or different. The song is a very upbeat piece that matches the visuals beautifully. Granted, it's not everyone's cup of tea, but some of the people I watched with thought it was something that makes the theme of exploration more accessible. The fact is, that's what Fast Forward was made for, but don't try to fault Berman and Braga for at least giving an attempt to change the nature of Trek for the new century.

    1. Re:In Defense Of The Title Music by urmensch · · Score: 0

      don't try to fault Berman and Braga for at least giving an attempt to change the nature of Trek for the new century

      I can only fault them for using recycled cheese instead of something really futuristic, like techno. And I really can't see what was so exploratory or experimental about it

  186. Re:The Vulcan Chick - THIN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could break her in half over the internet, she's so thin. With my mind.

  187. other's nitpicking aside.... by buffy · · Score: 1

    I won't repeat the comments that have been continually repeated (read beaten to death,) but will come up with two that I've not seen:

    1) use the right names, damnit. They're Transporters and Phasers. Etymological progression does change words as a language evolves, however, we're just talking a period of 150 years. I'm not saying it's totally out of the question that they'd become a linguistic commonality, changing their tense, etc... it just seems that they made a point of "unfamiliarizing" them with the technology to specifically unfamiliarize it. Well, duh. It just annoyed me, and I'll leave it at that.

    2) just a guess, but the fuzzy dude in the temporal communications pire is probably the talking vulcan guy from the beginning trying to convince the head-strong humans to just leave it to the vulcans. IMHO, they left the voice too intact. This is not a spoiler as it is just a guess. Also, that guy's name is Gary Graham, who played Det. Matthew Sikes on Alien Nation (TV not the movie.) Don't know why I know that.

    Now, I will repeat one common thread...all ST pilots have pretty much sucked. Chosing to judge an ST series by the pilot is obviously universally stupid, and you all know that.

    1. Re:other's nitpicking aside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually... if they hadn't had more 'primitive' names i would have been terribly dissapointed... Ever read mark twain? (samuel clemmens i know) *THAT* was par of course for the mid 1800's (about 150 years ago)... is that how *you* speak today? i doubt it

      this is especially true with technology terms.. which just about *ALWAYS* start out large and clunky as few people know about them, but get shortened drastically as they become part of everyday conversation.

      case(s) in point..

      When was the last time you called someone on your "Cellular Telephone"?

      Remember all those rebels on their "motorized bicycles"?

      How about a "fascillime machine"?

      the list could go on and on... as things become common place, in general they become 'assumed' and don't need to be stated... we say my 'watch' is broken because in modern times the 'wrist' is just assumed

      aah nevermind i don wanna really nitpick... i just always found how english 'simplifies' things kinda weird

      aah well.. back to looking up some globally interlinked network information on my electronic computational engine

  188. Give it a CHANCE! by Webmstr+FreaK · · Score: 1
    Come on, here you are bitching about how bad the acting is when there's only been ONE show! Enterpise has a whole lot more potential than Voyager ever did. Just so long as they keep from really screwing up, they'll be fine. The captian (who could use a lot more in the way of acting abilities) did pull a couple of Kirk moves which hasn't been done by a captian in a while!


    It's not as if there have been bad starting episodes on other sci-fi's. They have a lot of development to do, but look at how much they did in the very first episode. Unfortunatly, they tried to develop an empathetic attitude for the vulcan too early.


    But everything else aside, give the thing a chance! DS9 didn't get good until the last season, and Voyager never got good. Just watch this but don't compare it to TNG, it's a totally new series, watch it as you would any new show.


    That's enough of me on my little soap box there. Peace, Out!

  189. JTK is back in town by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's see...

    Getting kissed by alien hotties...

    Running, two-gun Western-style shoot-outs...

    Caution-be-damned attitude...

    Oh, yes -- Jim Kirk is back!

    (Now they just need to build a decent show around him...but I think they're on their way.)

    --
    - - - -
    The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
    1. Re:JTK is back in town by BravoXL · · Score: 0

      yes I really agree with you, this has many paralles with the original series. It's very good thanks to that. Most of the fans are way to wraped up in the later series. Come on let's kick old school again!

    2. Re:JTK is back in town by tycage · · Score: 2

      I pointed something like this out to my wife while we were watching.

      "Oh, yeah. They don't have that 'the captain has to stay on the ship' rule yet. He can leave the ship to go on every damn fool errand they come up with."

      --Ty

  190. so THAT's what I missed... by psxndc · · Score: 1
    I fell asleep for a half hour and missed all the good stuff. The guy from the future, the soft porn. Damn. I woke up and started watching again and it seemed to pick up right where I fell asleep. Crap.

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

  191. Offtopic joke by Mandelbrute · · Score: 1
    Just like manhole does not have to directly translate to womanhole as well if a woman is doing the street construction.
    It's still called a manhole because it usually leads to somewhere unpleasant.
    1. Re:Offtopic joke by linzeal · · Score: 1

      You've never got out the ky the whiskey and took your woman to brave new frontiers ?

  192. Yes it sucks, I had to shut it off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Star Trek franchise has been killed. Too bad, the "universe" of the TNG timeline (DS9, Voyager) was quite good, but this new series clearly sucks hard.

    1. Re:Yes it sucks, I had to shut it off by icebeing · · Score: 1

      Funny, people had similar reactions to DS9 and
      Voyager too...

      DS9: Babylon 5 knock-off!
      Voyager: 70,000 ly's from home..it'll never work!

      Well, here's a news flash...IIII like this episode! It's a pretty good assessment of how
      humans will be when/if we ever figure out to trick Einstein.

  193. Needs some polish... by GMC-jimmy · · Score: 1

    The soft-porn crap has to go.
    My 10 year old wasn't really ever into Star Trek.. Until tonight!

    However, I think it's going to take a few more episodes for the cast to find their characters.
    After that, it'll be alot easier to judge how the show will play out.

    --
    __________________________________
    Free your mind - Flush your toilet
  194. Jeez, Watch it without preconceptions by Faizdog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most of the people here would be saying the same things no matter what the episode was like. They had all these preconceptions and didn't even want to give the show a chance.

    In my opinion, it was a great show. Paramount is trying to reach out to a broader spectrum here, the Star Trek franchise has been faltering as of late. Unfortunately "Star Trek" is so synonomous with geekiness and nerdom, mainstream acceptance is unlikely. Anyone else notice that the show has no mention of "Star Trek" it's just called "Enterprise." Also no cheesy re hash of the same opening sequence (no offense to TNG, it's my fav series).

    This show looked really good. They are dealing with more human issues, and we are seeing the imperfectness and difficulty of space travel come out. There are some unrealistic things like I'd presume starfleet would have some trainings and protocol set for off ship expiditions, etc. I know it's only the beggining and picard's suggestion of the captain not leading away teams hasn't been implemented yet, but come on. This is Earth's first and only ship, the government and others should be watching it like a hawk and would probably have had very strict guidelines laid down.

    All in all though, it seems very promising. Action, plot, suspense, drama, female teasing, all the great ingredients. We'll see how it goes. Anyone else besides me waiting for an "oh Boy" everytime something bad happened?

    --
    -"Those who fought today will die tommorow."-
  195. Vulcan-Lickin' Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cosmic-babes.com/babes/joleneblalock/ga llery1.php

  196. Armor Plating by Dragonmaster+Lou · · Score: 1

    They mentioned towards the end that the plating needed repolarizing -- I interpreted this as meaning that the plating isn't just a hunk of metal, but perhaps a hunk of charged metal, and perhaps whatever devices charges them is what failed.

  197. Guinan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what would be cool to see? An apparence of Guinan. We've seen from previous TNG episodes that she was on earth as early as the 19th century, when she was supposidly hiding from her father.

    1. Re:Guinan by danwatt · · Score: 1

      Wrong: Watch ST: Generations (the 7th movie). This takes place about 15 years after the 6th movie, and about 70(?) years before TNG. Guinan is seen on a refugee ship headed for the Federation. She was not around before that (Enterprise takes place about 200 years before this).

    2. Re:Guinan by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      In TNG episode "Time's Arrow" Guinan was on Earth in the 19th century.

  198. The Show is still on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SOME of us havent seen it so try not to spoil it during the commercial break. Thanks.

  199. T'Pol and Tucker.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spocks parents to be revealed later???

    1. Re:T'Pol and Tucker.... by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      This isn't ST1 : The Phantom Menace here - I'm hoping they won't try to introduce every character from Kirk to Tom Paris in the first season.

      Darth made R2 - right...
      Sorry, slightly new here, and missed the bitchfest about that piece of crap.

  200. did nothing for me by kimodo · · Score: 1

    I thought the pilot sucked. The whole idea of the plot doesnt seem like it will allow good storylines. The actors and actresses played they're characters horribly. I think they should of done a series that takes place after voyager and continue with the theme.

    if it aint broke, dont fix it.

    i for one loved voyager, not as as tng or tos mind you, but the characters were really deep and complex. expecially the doctor and seven. this series seems like it will be the worst one yet.

    1. Re:did nothing for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, what were you smoking? The acting was much better here than in Voyager. The 'Southern Guy' didn't come off as ridiculous, as is usually the case. There was only one scene where I thought the acting was bad, and that was near the end with Archer (Bakula). He was loud and boisterous in a situation that didn't call for it, and it was somewhat jarring. Otherwise, the acting was fine; no Shakespeare, to be sure, but then the writing wasn't up to that mark either.

      Don't get me started on Voyager. Chakotay just sucked, and Janeway was stodgy (I guess she was supposed to be, but that doesn't mean I have to like it). Neelix was annoying and Tuvok was the worst Vulcan I've ever seen; I honestly think they concocted his 'illness' (final ep.) just to explain away his un-Vulcan behavior all those years. The doctor was interesting, but was basically a Cmdr.Data/Pinocchio 'finding his humanity' rehash; the same was true of Seven. All in all, a rotten show, with none of the freshness and 'loving-care' that the Enterprise premiere just exhibited. I'll take Bakula&Co. any day, thank you.

  201. Words of Wisdom by DCheesi · · Score: 1

    When you start worrying about offline plates, interferometric particles, and other 'science facts':

    'Just repeat to yourself "It's just a show; I should really just relax!"' --MST3K

  202. Not bad for a pilot, but I'm sure it will improve. by sprior · · Score: 1

    I kinda lost the thread of the story during the
    action stuff. I think that the cast and writers will settle into their groove later (early TNG episodes are just as painful to watch and that show turned out so well acted and written). As for the creative license with history from the other
    shows - I'll get over it. I think the ship got underway a little too easily from what I was expecting from the promos. I was looking forward to hearing more about the struggle to get around the solar system and hit warp 1, but by the time of this episode that had been accomplised, it was just a matter of what speed they could hit in doing it. As for the gratuitous sensual scene, yeah it was kinda "stuck in", but I say go for it. Have a Bochco style disclamer at the beginning of each episode and go for it, then show a directors cut version on skinimax :-)

  203. They should just make it like LEXX by royalall · · Score: 1

    If they make the Hot Vulcan wear less clothes and become a love slave then I'll watch it.

    No but seriously, if Al makes a cameo I'll throw up on my Tivo.

  204. Have to say, I liked it. by weslocke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    *Spoilers* (Just in case) :)

    The dislike/prejudice between the Vulcans and Humans was well explained, and made quite a lot of sense as far as I was concerned. Actually did a lot for me... think it's good for there to be a bit of distrust/tension on the bridge.

    Another thing I enjoyed was the Klingon, though mostly because it was the first. That's one of the nice things about this show... we get to see all the firsts. The first 'Phase Pistols' (read, phasers), the first time at Rigel-X, the first Klingon encounter, etc.

    Personally I'm looking forward to seeing what alienates the Klingons and Starfleet (Though is it just me or did it sound like the Vulcan ambassador talking to the just-introduced aliens? Possibly it was, his interaction is discovered, and the Klinzhai find fault with Starfleet also since they're allies of the Vulcans? Hmmm...)

    And people keep talking about the decon scene (Read: Shower scene). What purpose did it play? To show that the vulcan's stacked, that's why. Worked quite well too, as far as I was concerned.

    But there was one thing that just absolutely bugged the crap out of me. That's the transporter. Berman had said that they wouldn't have one in this series, mostly since it was too much of a plot safety-net. When the writers couldn't think of a plausible method to do something, out came the transporter. Then what does he go and do? He hands them back the safety net. (Though the 'Leap' effect was pretty neat)

    Which reminds me, wouldn't the transporter systems need to be newer than 300yrs for Bones to always be worked up about the 'newfangled gadgets'? If something's been around for that long, I don't think someone would have that sort of reaction.

    But overall I have to say that I'm looking forward to the coming episodes of 'Quantum Enterprise'.

    --

    'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    1. Re:Have to say, I liked it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well considering "Bones" came about 100 yrs after this series (not 300)...fairly new...i guess.

    2. Re:Have to say, I liked it. by ethereal · · Score: 1
      Which reminds me, wouldn't the transporter systems need to be newer than 300yrs for Bones to always be worked up about the 'newfangled gadgets'? If something's been around for that long, I don't think someone would have that sort of reaction.

      But even in ST:TMP they had a transporter accident, so the technology is apparently still not perfect. If I were a doctor, with full knowledge of exactly what can go wrong with the human body, I'd be more than a little nervous too.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    3. Re:Have to say, I liked it. by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Which reminds me, wouldn't the transporter systems need to be newer than 300yrs for Bones to always be worked up about the 'newfangled gadgets'? If something's been around for that long, I don't think someone would have that sort of reaction.

      Actually, 100 years past their inception, some old folks think that CARS are still a 'Newfangled Gadget'...

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    4. Re:Have to say, I liked it. by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      The Original Series took place in the 2280s. I do not know when Enterprise is taking place, but it cannot be three hundred years earlier.

  205. Polarized Hull by puppetman · · Score: 1

    At one point (that I just saw, being Mr. Western Time Zone), Archer orders the hull armour polarized. Thus it can go off-line.

    Your computer is just a hunk of silicon, plastic and copper until you have power. Their hull is just steel until it has been polarized. Perhaps it's time to upgrade your BSc to a PhD in StarTrekology.

    So far, not the greatest. Fine. TNG sucked for the first season (and was liberally sprinkled with strange, feel-good episodes), and Voyager was only good in the last season. Give it a chance.

    1. Re:Polarized Hull by icebeing · · Score: 1

      This technology seems like the one that the Excalibur ship was using in B5: Crusade. It could dissipate particle beam weapons if it's armor hull was powered...kewlest shielding method I've ever heard of (that's not based on energy fields)

      Or, the NX-01 could also use a low sub-space field just above the hull from the warp engine to dissipate particle beam weapons...I got this idea when reading the Independance War user's manual. Sorry, I tend to Trek'ify things ;-P

      /ice.

  206. Several question about post... by ZaBu911 · · Score: 1

    Questions! Sorry folks but... #1: What does bow chika wow wow mean? :/ #2: What's wrong with the new theme song? I like it. What do you guys think? I think we have a good season ahead of us, anyway.

  207. How can you watch Enterprise?! by Pope · · Score: 3, Informative
    Season premiere of Junkyard Wars was on tonight!

    I'm waiting til Sunday to watch Enterprise. Thanks, Space!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:How can you watch Enterprise?! by icebeing · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't have PiP on my cheezy 20" Sony ;-)

    2. Re:How can you watch Enterprise?! by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      I taped Enterprise to watch Junkyard Wars. After reviewing the tape...Junkyard Wars was much better, even though they did openly admit to seeding the junkyard with tires. (Seeding with unusual components like rocket motors, I can understand...but tires? Even if they were monster truck tires. Though they were a bit daring to have any components the crews would be messing with on "loan".)

  208. VULCAN THO!!!!! by StuffMaster · · Score: 0

    VULCAN THO!!

  209. evolution is a star trek trait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problems are numerous; I mean, armor "offline" aside, what the hell is with a new, UNTESTED ship going in on 14 highly advanced ships, taking 50 phaser hits without anything failing, etc. However, let's remember exactly how god-awful Next Gen, DSN, and SV were in their beginnings. Eventually these people figure out where their weaknesses are and "adapt"

    Funny that this show actually hit the chick on the head from the get go though. Took Next Gen, DSN, and Voyager a little while to get their ladies in order... Not that I was ever her fan, but do you remember how god-awful Troy looked in the first episode? Kinda like a little empathic lesbo tank.

    he question I do ask though, why the HELL would you WASTE the transporter on the first episode? Jeez, talk about using up your interesting untested devices early on. Bring on the Transporter Psychosis!

    -RT

  210. Hooray for nitpicking! by Monthenor · · Score: 2, Informative

    The comment in all the ads was "Neptune and back in 6 minutes"...referring supposedly to Warp 4.5.

    Neptune and back (from Earth) is 8 709 400 000 km.

    They then talk about bringing the Klingon back to Kronos...4 days there, 4 days back. 4 days, again assuming Warp 4.5, works out to 5760 minutes.

    Kronos, one-way: 8 361 024 000 000 km.

    1 light year is 9 460 800 000 000 km.

    Since we're less than a light year from the Klingon homeworld, doncha think we would have noticed the vast Klingon empire rolling over our Solar System???

    --
    Co-founder of GerbilMechs
    1. Re:Hooray for nitpicking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the rate the stars fly by, you'd think you'd be able to get to neptune in a few nanoseconds.

    2. Re:Hooray for nitpicking! by cthugha · · Score: 2
      The whole definition of warp speed is totally screwed, and people have come up with all sorts of explanations for a whole raft of inconsistencies (including: why the Enterprise-D can sail off to the far reaches of the Beta quadrant in a single episode, but it takes Voyager decades to get home using conventional warp; also, why the Federation is so damn big when it seems warp drive is so damn slow). The prevailing theory to reconcile these problems is the "warp highway" theoy, which basically says that there are jetstream-like regions of space that greatly increase your speed for the same energy output if you travel through them. See the Daystrom Technical Institute for more.

      Yeah, so I have a lot of time on my hands (but not as much as the guy who made that site ;p).

    3. Re:Hooray for nitpicking! by tyrfing · · Score: 1

      Another possibility is that most of the transit time to/from Neptune is speeding up/slowing down/making the U-turn...

    4. Re:Hooray for nitpicking! by sudog · · Score: 1

      Hey.. You missed the part where they said that they shouldn't (or couldn't?) engage warp until slightly after Jupiter. While the implication was that they'd be at Warp 4.5 for the entire trip, I think it's quite clear that they're just at impulse engines to Jupiter, then slam it to warp 4.5 to make the round-trip to Neptune, then impulse back again.

    5. Re:Hooray for nitpicking! by the+ed+menace · · Score: 1

      Well, to really nitpick:

      Archer claims you don't open up the engines until you get past Jupiter. So presumably you aren't going warp 4.5 the entire way.

      Cochrane claims the new "warp 5 engine" will allow speeds 100 times faster than before. The generally accepted definition of warp (from Gene Roddenberry) is warp cubed is the light speed factor. So warp 2 is 8x light speed, and warp 4.5 would be 91x light speed, which roughly corresponds to 100x Cochrane's warp 1 drive.

      Still, 4 days at 100x lightspeed is still only about 1 lightyear...

    6. Re:Hooray for nitpicking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey.. You missed the part where they said that they shouldn't (or couldn't?) engage warp until slightly after Jupiter. While the implication was that they'd be at Warp 4.5 for the entire trip, I think it's quite clear that they're just at impulse engines to Jupiter, then slam it to warp 4.5 to make the round-trip to Neptune, then impulse back again.

      Just going to Jupiter and back at sub-light speeds will take well over 6 minutes.

  211. michael's Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus man... by those standards, what tv shows do you like? This is fiction... it's fantasy... IT'S NOT REAL. Why worry about "How can armor plating go 'offline'?" Stupid man...

    --- On a different topic
    I really like slashdot for it's news postings, but most of the comments that follows by the slashdot team, especially from tim and micheal are so cynical, stupid, and obvious. Does anyone else agree with me?

    1. Re:michael's Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree...and i think you're post is the most intelligent one here.

    2. Re:michael's Standards by Buzzwang · · Score: 1

      Just a short correction: The armor plating can go offline if it is polarized armor plating, which this is since Archer specificly gave the command to polarize the armor. I assume them saying it's offline means it is no longer polarized and hence not as effective.

      --
      Things you can say to your dog that you can't say to a girl: "How about a nice bone?"
  212. Yeah, whatever. by J.C.B. · · Score: 1

    DS9s theme is just stock post Starwars SciFi theme music, I don't care who wrote it, it's nothing.

    1. Re:Yeah, whatever. by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 2

      You clearly haven't ever seen DS9-- it's a pretty good opening theme, especially coming from Dennis McCarthy. Dennis also did the music for Star Trek Generations (his first motion picture piece), as well as the background music for almost all of the modern Trek shows (TOS excluded, obviously, since it's less modern and more OLD).

      As for opening themes.. WHY GOD WHY didn't they get Jerry Goldsmith to do it?! Roddenberry is rolling around in his tomb right now, I assure you. (And before some dumbass shows up and says he was cremated, fine, his ashes are stirring into a tornado.) I hope to heaven above that they ditch the current opening theme for something more Trek-like (and less lame-like) in the next episode..

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    2. Re:Yeah, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the DS9 intro is the best of them all. The music is great, and fits very well with the panning around the station. The first time I saw the season four intro (when the added the Defiant and a full orchestra), I was very, very impressed.
      Voyager's theme was good.
      As for Enterprise - I woulda been happier if they'd just used some Steppenwulf (a la First Contact)

    3. Re:Yeah, whatever. by Mynn · · Score: 1

      Like other posters have said, DS9 sounds nothing like "stock StarWars".

      Besides, John Williams borrowed the Original StarWars theme rather heavily anyway.

      --

      Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.
  213. Trapped by the canon by maggard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Y'know, I kinda feel bad for the Enterprise writers. They've got 5 TV series, 9 movies, a cartoon, who knows how many books plus guides and manuals and even language dictionaries out there with every ST-fanatic just drooling to be the first to catch an error.

    Get over it. It's a TV show, not a coding textbook. Yes there will be inconsistencies and errors and who knows what else. Sometimes they're done for dramatic effect ("whoosh" sounds in space), sometimes they're done for convenience (ships always being shown upright 'cause it's too hard to explain to Uncle Vern why it's not *really* upside-down) and sometimes they just screw up. Or an author screwed up years ago. Or they're screwing with continuity on purpose and this will all make sense later.

    Whatever the case for a premier episode it wasn't half bad. As many others have pointed out it's no worse then most other TV shows premier episodes and certianly not worse then any other ST's premier episode.

    They've established the characters, given us a couple of directions for dramatic tension, showed off the fancy new (old) hardware and apparently started their first big plotline. Not bad for one show.

    Sure we can all wonder if this is going to rise up to the best of the past or suck out loud like Voyager. As many others have pointed out that all of the series and movies and books and whatnot have had good stuff sprinkled amongst a lot of clunkers. Now the question is how will this new team and cast and direction play out and it's really unfair to judge from just one episode, particularly the first.

    So enough nice-talk, my own opinions:

    • Loose the "Felicity" music. Get something that won't date *quite* so fast.
    • Enough with every race having weird ears and bad noses. CGI, puppetry and the popular imagination are good enough we can have a few more "Horta" races. There was a hint that the next destination will be non-humanoid, hoorah!
    • I like that the new Dr. is a bit bizarre. Aliens *should* be, well, at least a bit alien. I don't get the direction of thought of many SE Asians or E. Europeans right off; the thought processes of an alien should be a lot harder.
    • If they're going to go the morality play route then at least be bold about it, no more of these covert "the gay episode" where if there is any subtext it's so buried to be meaningless. Stand up for *something* - DS9 could've gone some interesting places with the issues of refugees and occupation and such but backed off and eventually just diluted it into oblivion.
    • Loose the softcore porn. I'm absolutely no prude but the jello-wrestling bit did nothing to move the story forward, the plot point could have happened anywhere else a lot more effectively. Play up the sexual tensions on the ship (close quarters, lots of stress, different cultures, different species, different cues & values etc.) if they want but make them part of something, not just there to get the boys all horny.
    • Finally, and this is something that Voyager finally did start to get right (if only out of desperation): Add some background characters. The person who always answers hails to Starfleet, the maintenance person usually polishing the decks late at night, the cranky supply depot supervisor who likes alien trinkets in return for good service, the flack from Starfleet PR constantly trying to hype & spin Enterprises missions, whatever. Give these folks a bit of a world to live in, not just the same faces doing *everything*.

    Anyway, I'll hold my judgement for a few more episodes. At least the premier wasn't awful even though it wasn't great either. Heres to hope...

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Trapped by the canon by weslocke · · Score: 2

      >They've got 5 TV series, 9 movies, a cartoon, who knows how many books plus guides and manuals and even language dictionaries out there with every ST-fanatic just drooling to be the first to catch an error

      Just as an FYI, the only things that are considered canon are the TV shows and movies. The guides, books, etc are all "unauthorized" as far as universe-building goes.

      For example in 'First Contact' (I believe), It's shown that Zefram Cochran was a native of Alpha Centauri whose first warp-flight was aboard a single person ship... essentially a cargo pod with a warp-drive hooked onto it. It was a six-week trip. Also the Vulcans had been watching humanity for several hundred of our years, and only made first contact due to a crash of one of their surveilance ships.

      You notice how well that's been followed. :^)

      But yep... the writers and the other PTB (Powers That Be) have said many a time that if it's not on your TV or movie screen, it doesn't count.

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    2. Re:Trapped by the canon by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 2
      Enough with every race having weird ears and bad noses. CGI, puppetry and the popular imagination are good enough we can have a few more "Horta" races. There was a hint that the next destination will be non-humanoid, hoorah!

      I recall hearing (can anyone corroborate?) that Roddenberry -- for TNG, at least -- established a rule for alien makeup that the audience should always be able to see the actor's eyes and expressions. I guess this leaves nose, ear and forehead appliances as the most likely ways of making aliens look clearly non-human.

      Either that, or Trek makeup artists are all They Might Be Giants fans. Aftrer all, "Everybody wants prosthetic foreheads on their real heads."

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
    3. Re:Trapped by the canon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm absolutely no prude but the jello-wrestling bit did nothing to move the story forward,"

      You weren't paying attention. The "It puts lotion on the skin" scene was cover for a long discussion of a key plot point. Previous trek's would have had a bunch of wooden characters sitting around a table drinking tea and weighing the options for 5 minutes. This was a nice change not only because of the tension involved but also some nice eye candy to cover for lots of talk.

      And if you wanna filter this, fine, but I suggest you'd have better luck at K5.

    4. Re:Trapped by the canon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Get over it. It's a TV show, not a coding textbook. Yes there will be inconsistencies and errors and who knows what else.

      Wouldn't that make the TV show exactly like a coding textbook? Errors, inconsistencies, and who knows what else sure describes some that i've had the misfortune of using...

    5. Re:Trapped by the canon by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Add some background characters.

      One word: Morn.

      (the funny looking alien with the huge mouth always sitting at Quark's bar on DS9, whose name suspiciously resembles Norm from Cheers)

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    6. Re:Trapped by the canon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to learn the difference between "loose" and "lose".

    7. Re:Trapped by the canon by mkelley · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points and could score you higher than a 5 I would.

      I think people always rate the new shows lower because of their initial love for the original show. Everyone said how much TNG sucked, then DS9, and Voyager. Well you know what, they did suck for the first year. Then they understood the cast chemistry and acting abilities better and could make the next seasons better. I didnt' think the new show was that bad, it started off a lot better than DS9 did.

      We have to remember that this isn't Roddenberry's universe, it's a hundred years way.

      --

      m.kelley
      life is like a freeway, if you don't look you could miss it.
    8. Re:Trapped by the canon by krasni_bor · · Score: 1

      Regarding the doctor, I particularly liked his big forced smile at the end of his conversation with the Captain (I think). It made him seem like a character from another civilization that doesn't actually use the same facial expresssions to communicate emotion that we do, and he is making a conscious attempt to send the culturally appropriate signals.

      Now, I'm sure there are plenty of other times he does smile naturally, but it was a nice touch.

    9. Re:Trapped by the canon by maggard · · Score: 2
      Regarding the doctor, I particularly liked his big forced smile at the end of his conversation with the Captain (I think). It made him seem like a character from another civilization that doesn't actually use the same facial expresssions to communicate emotion that we do, and he is making a conscious attempt to send the culturally appropriate signals.

      Exactly!

      That's a perfect example of what would make the show more interesting. In the ST-universe everyone is almost always conversant with human-history and human-culture (well, make that US-culture) and human social conventions. Sure there's a few exceptions but by and large there's less variety then one would get at any internationial gathering on Earth today.

      So the Dr. answers question in a way that don't seem entirely appropriate to the crew (completely misses the implications) or gives a response that's accurate but useless (Hmmm - must work for some tech. support staffs I've known.) GREAT.

      And yes being awkward at all other forms of communication is great too. Giving the "big smile to communicate confidence & reassurance" when it's not appropriate is a perfect thing.

      Hopefully we're not reading too much into this and they are going to be recurring elements used consistantly. If so then it bodes well for this series, show's that some thought has been put into this and it's not going to be the incessant "I want to be Human / What is it to be Human" sophmoric musings of Data & 7-of-9.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    10. Re:Trapped by the canon by plover · · Score: 2
      Loose the softcore porn. I'm absolutely no prude but the jello-wrestling bit did nothing to move the story forward, the plot point could have happened anywhere else a lot more effectively. Play up the sexual tensions on the ship (close quarters, lots of stress, different cultures, different species, different cues & values etc.) if they want but make them part of something, not just there to get the boys all horny.

      The jello-scene was clearly gratuitous. But it made me realize something else: this show wasn't filmed just for 40-year-old Trek fans. It was filmed to try to get 16-year-old boys interested, and frankly, this scene hit the one item that'll hold their interest the longest. My advice to you is to buy stock in Vaseline and get over it.

      And another thing: did anyone else check the clock? 65 minutes of action crammed into two hours! I watched the entire show on Replay TV and thought I would go through a fresh set of AA batteries just by hitting the "skip 30 sec" button. Whoa.

      --
      John
    11. Re:Trapped by the canon by Snaller · · Score: 1
      Y'know, I kinda feel bad for the Enterprise writers. They've got 5 TV series, 9 movies, a cartoon, who knows how many books plus guides and manuals and even language dictionaries out there with every ST-fanatic just drooling to be the first to catch an error.
      Get over it. It's a TV show, not a coding textbook. Yes there will be inconsistencies and errors and who knows what else.


      You get over it! If I see 'Gone with the wind' I don't expect Rhett Butler to be a giant in one scene, a midget in the next, a farm owner in one scene and german railroad worker in the next.


      And it is the same: Some people (perhaps the wast majority) have the attention spam of a gnat, and can't remember much more than what happened during an hour. But some of us remember more than that, without even trying. And we get annoyed when the powers that be simply signal "we don't give a damn about you: Freak!".


      I could maintain continuity - if they don't its because they can't be bothered. Nothing to feel sorry for, just sloppy work.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    12. Re:Trapped by the canon by maggard · · Score: 1
      I could maintain continuity - if they don't its because they can't be bothered.

      You are aware there's now an entire alternative timeline established for Enterprise? Check out whatever the official website is; it's all there and no it doesn't match up directly to anything before it.

      However I doubt everything ever could be made to match up perfectly. Over the past 30 years a vast amount of material has been created and much of it is already contradictory (apparently random dates, contradictory locations, elevators going to random floors, events out of sequence, the "Klingon makeover", etc.)

      Finally apparently you haven't been watching films too closely either. There are numerous continuity errors in GWTW as there are in any production. Watch Dorothy's braids (and bosom) in the Wizard of Oz if you want to really laugh!

      I guess we can't all be as perfect as you.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    13. Re:Trapped by the canon by Snaller · · Score: 1

      You are aware there's now an entire alternative timeline established for Enterprise? Check out whatever the official website is; it's all there and no it doesn't match up directly to anything before it.

      WHAT! No, I most certainly aren't aware that it is a new alternative timelime - if that's true my opinion of Berman has fallen even lower... but its so outrageous that I refuse to believe it, unless you can point to a specific OFFICIAL page which quotes that information.

      That there is a temporal element has been known for a while, it has prompted fans to speculate about "retconning" (retroactive continuity) running rampant, but i've seen no offical words to that effect.

      However I doubt everything ever could be made to match up perfectly. Over the past 30 years a vast amount of material has been created and much of it is already contradictory (apparently random dates, contradictory locations, elevators going to random floors, events out of sequence, the "Klingon makeover", etc.)

      Somethings probably can't be salvaged, (because of previous sloppy continuity), and there are things we shouldn't try to salvage - like the klingon makeover. Obviously that's just technical improvements and any explanation would probably be rather lame (I've never heard a sufficiently good retconning on that score, but it might come along one day... you never know). But this doesn't mean that there isn't a vast area of things which CAN be coordinated if you care (they should put Mike Okuda on the job, I suspect he would do a good job).

      Finally apparently you haven't been watching films too closely either. There are numerous continuity errors in GWTW as there are in any production. Watch Dorothy's braids (and bosom) in the Wizard of Oz if you want to really laugh!

      I fail to see any relevance.

      I guess we can't all be as perfect as you.

      That's your inferiority complex talking.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    14. Re:Trapped by the canon by maggard · · Score: 2
      The GWTW reference was yours, I just pointed out it's not perfect either.

      As to the timeline, check it out here.

      Frankly you come off as a know-it-all kid loudly boasting he can do something better - what have you done?

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    15. Re:Trapped by the canon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Closer to an hour and a half. I have the commercial-free download version.

    16. Re:Trapped by the canon by Snaller · · Score: 1

      The GWTW reference was yours, I just pointed out it's not perfect either.

      Ah yes so I did. But the point I was struggling to make was not related to GWTW as such, it was this: Large things that are noticable to people who pay even a little bit of attention should be payed attention to.


      As to the timeline, check it out here [startrek.com].


      And what were you thinking about when you say that is in a different timeline that the rest of the series?
      (This must have been what you ment, sice if it was a different timelime from OUR time, that hardly is an excuse for making continuity differences with regards to other series)

      Frankly you come off as a know-it-all kid loudly boasting he can do something better - what have you done?

      You see things as you are. I stated my belief that if I had been hired to keep continuity I would be able to master that job (unless obstructed by someone higher up the ladder).
      And since I assume the people actually working with the stuff would be, if not better qualified then at least much more experienced, and since there obviously isn't that high a regard for continuity, it must be by design rather than oversight.

      How you wish to intrepret that belief is entirely up to you.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  214. Enterprise has new bio-organic peeeenile implants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone other than my female friend notice that when the vulcan and the star trek guy were smothereing themselves with that goo when they had the spores...did anyone notice the guy had a big CHUBBY when she was rubbing his legs....Check when they pan down......jeezuz i would too...that vulcan is HOT!!!!

  215. Acting? Plotline? by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    None of the "actors" could perform.

    Yeah, let's look at the pilot for TOS. The very first one. Then the second one. Then we'll look at TNG's pilot.

    Them people damned near had broom handles where ther spines were. The acting was INCREDIBLY stiff. No one knew their characters yet. In TOS, there wasn't even a 'mold' for that type of character yet (yes, there was Sci-fi stuff done before that, but just LOOK at it. EEEKS! Most of it was so bad it wasn't even worth it.) TNG they had something they could look towards for a model, but, none of the characters were really easily translated (Picard, for instance, couldn't be a remodled Kirk.) It wasn't until the second Season that TNG got to be very good, and continued to improve. TOS managed to 'get it' a little quicker, IMHO (Why? Dunno.) Give it time... they will grow into thier rolls, and make the characters live (heck, even the Voyager group managed THAT MUCH eventually. It took them almost the entier series to do it ;-)

    The vulcan was a hissing bitch during the first half, I thought count bakula wanted to cry several time, the plot was mediocre even by the standards of the crew that brought us voyager.

    Well, considering that Archer already told her at thier first meeting he'd love to knock her on her ass, can you BLAME HER? ;-)

    On the Count Bakula comment, I've got no clue WTF you are talking about. Heck, he probably gave the best performance in the show. Which other actor showed much emotion on thier faces during the whole show? Not many, since they really don't know the character enough yet to really know what the character is thinking.

    As for the plot - Ok, I'll give you a point for it being 'mediocre'. Comparied to the V word, naw - they already set the standard for what mediocre episodes are, and for bad episodes. ('Cept possibly "Spock's Brain" from TOS ;-) It could have been better. I think alot of it was time spent trying to prove "Hey, this isn't the Trek Universe you are used to", and trying to set the stage for where the series is going to head in the future.

    What amazes me is that no one seems to have gone back to the original ST series to see what made it great. It was daring culturally for its time and tried to present a complex cast of characters. Was it perfect? No. But the Berman vision of the future is a piece of plasticine crap undistinguished by any character motivation or deep emotion.

    You say Scott Bakula looked like he was going to cry, but, then say there wasn't any emotion? Sheesh.

    TOS didn't have much of a complex cast. It had 3 primary characters, and 5 lesser characters. Heck, Friends has almost that many characters. So far, Enterprise hasn't even had much of a chance to explore these characters.

    And of course - when all else fails when flaming Trek, pull out the Berman card. Fine, I'll trump ya with a... shoot. Ok, I gotta admit - most of what Berman touches turns to shit. He's got the Septic Tank touch. But he's finally way from the V word - he's got the chance to break free. With ST:Borager, there was a trap - once it started a direction, it was DAMNED HARD (IMHO) to change that direction. Here he's got the chance at a clean slate to work from. Given the start here, it might actually work out. Personally, I think Enterprise is gonna ROCK starting about second season, once the writers, the actors, etc., finally get in tune with thier characters and the job at hand. But I could be wrong - it's too damned hard to tell just from one episode. Give it a season to work out the kinks, then check it out again if you don't like it so far.

    If nothing else, tune in for time to time just to check out the latest advances in Vulcan anatomy... ;-)

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  216. the "future enemy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its the friggin' vulcans. Those logical bastards just can't stand seeing an emotional redneck take to the skies!

    Am I the only one who picked up the voice and the emotional reaction from the ambassador in the beginning? He's a romulan punk stickin' it to the plucky earth dudes.

    I can just see the future lines already, "sometime logic just isn't enough, damn it!" Arghhh... *sigh*

  217. I liked the Theme Song! by Sp00nMan · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else out there like the theme song besides me? I thought it was rather refreshing to have a totally new, inspirational song, along with space advancement photos. Made you kinda proud.. Actually reminded me of the Buck Rogers opening credits, and a little bit of the Aerosmith song from Armageddon. My girlfriend (who is definately not a trekkie or a sci-fi person) actually liked the pilot, so I think the producers might have done something good in getting new viewers in. I actually didn't have to explain anything to her.. and she was happy cause she said "I hate it when they throw out all that techno-jargon that I don't understand". So now I can actually watch Enterprise with my girlfriend. woohoo :)
    But seriously, I think the pilot was great. Granted, there were some really stale scenes..but for a first run, it was cool.. and the little beagle dog just plain rocks. Really adds some character to Jonathan Archer. Gonna be great seeing that little puppy grow up for 7 years ;) Unless they replace it with a dupe..

    1. Re:I liked the Theme Song! by weslocke · · Score: 1

      I thought it was rather refreshing to have a totally new, inspirational song, along with space advancement photos

      Can't be too new... it's a Rod Stewart song. ;^)

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    2. Re:I liked the Theme Song! by Sp00nMan · · Score: 1

      What? Really? It's a canned, remade Rod Stewart song? Oh crap that really blew it for me :(

    3. Re:I liked the Theme Song! by weslocke · · Score: 1

      Aw hell... sorry I had to do that to ya, mon. (At least it wasn't Rod actually singing though, if that makes any difference) ;^)

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    4. Re:I liked the Theme Song! by icebeing · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I caught the Rod Stewart influence,there too...they coulda selected one of the Titan A.E. tracks (e.g. Fly), but that woulda peeved off some of the ./'ers here anyway. Tough crowd to please here.

      I coulda done w/o Roddie boy, but it's better than those orchestric themes which put me to sleep ;-)

    5. Re:I liked the Theme Song! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Our precious dead cry out for vengeance:
      1. Kill all Muslims.
      2. Kill all Mohammedans.
      3. Kill all Arabs.
      4. Kill all Towel Heads.
      5. Kill all Camel Jockeys.
      6. Kill all Dune Coons.
      7. Kill all Islam.
      8. Nuke their countries to hell.
      9. Nuke them again.
      10. Death to Islam.

      I piss on Mecca. I spit on the Koran. I shit on Mohammed.

  218. It get's blown off it's line, stupid. by J.C.B. · · Score: 1

    Don't you know all their armor is tethered to the hull with some good heavy duty rope? I mean, this isn't TNG, buddy. They have to have "primitive" "technology" to be "authentic."

  219. what a bunch of whiny bitches by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fer chrissakes. "Hi there, we're the /. crowd, and we have the patience of a mayfly..."

    "There wasn't any character development" : hey guys, this was a PILOT. Few pilots develop much characterwise, they have too much expositional ground to cover. Two hours is what, 80 pages of script? How much "development" can you cram into that without forcing it, AND still have time to show all the neato-whiz-bang special effects for which the series is famed? (And remember, they ARE trying to build a ~new~ audience, not just attract the old. The old will keep coming to con's and buying rubber vulcan ears forever.)

    "How does armor plate go offline?" SOMEbody wasn't listening when they said that the armor POLARIZATION had gone off line. 1) At least in the NCC1701 a great deal of the hull stability was imparted by gravitic and other (insert pseudo-physics handwaving) fields. Assuming something has to assist normal matter holding together at 4.5 times the speed of light, yeah, I guess that would make sense. 2) Alternately, (insert more pseudo-physics handwaving) one could postulate that the "armor" was an ultradense iron/coherent molecules/whatever the heck - something that required a charge and computer support to dynamically resist damage. Whatever, it's nit picking.

    I thought the pilot was decent. Bakula was (if I may mix genres) a physical Sean Connery-esque to Picard's Roger Moore-ish distance. I thought, yes, some of the supporting roles were pretty forced. But then again, I *remember* Encounter at Farpoint - a truly crappy pilot. Ship's Counsellor? What, a ship's prostitute in the future? And remember, Riker and Troi could communicate telpathically? That was dumped pretty quickly. And who can forget the Naked Now (episode 2) where writers (apparently already grasping at plot straws) reverted to the old saw of "everyone acting opposite" which would have been a lot better if we had more than caricature opinions of what their personalities WERE in the first place!
    ST:NG took FIVE SEASONS to come up with ep's like "The Inner Light" - DS:9 royally sucked the first 2 years (fortunate, since I preferred watching B5 anyway...which ALSO took at least a few episodes to find it's feet).

    The only two gripes I've seen that are valid IMO are the gratuitous slathering scene (not unappreciated, but pretty obvious. My god, no wonder we like the Vulcans!) and the points about putting spoiler comments on the front page before it aired. Rather provincial mistake, really.

    The rest of you, cripes, give it a season or two. Let some of the characters' personalities gell a little, and let some chemistry develop. They may even change the theme music. I think it was a fine pilot, given the circumstances, no matter how "disappointed" some /.'s are from over-pumped expectations.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:what a bunch of whiny bitches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny to note that 99% of "The Inner Light" used Patrick Stewart along with a group of actors separate from the usual cast. It is a pretty sad state of affairs when the only way you can get a critically acclaimed episode is by dumping all but one of you regulars :)

    2. Re:what a bunch of whiny bitches by DHartung · · Score: 2

      And who can forget the Naked Now (episode 2) where writers (apparently already grasping at plot straws) reverted to the old saw of "everyone acting opposite" which would have been a lot better if we had more than caricature opinions of what their personalities WERE in the first place!

      Actually, the reason they used The Naked Now is that they were rushing into production just as there was a writers' strike (1988). Since Paramount had already paid for the script for The Naked Time they simply dusted it off and rewrote it for the new characters. Really.

      Also, it provided a means for the actors to "loosen up" and explore their characters early on, which was probably a useful exercise.

      --
      lake effect weblog
      {Network engineer in Chicago--looking for work!}
    3. Re:what a bunch of whiny bitches by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      >Let some of the characters' personalities gell a little, and let some chemistry develop. They may even change the theme music.

      I appear to be in the minority of non-puerile males who didn't bitch about the chemistry developing while the personality gel was being applied in decon. I fully expected Rick Berman to have a babe scene.

      What I didn't expect was it to be equal-opportunity, with Trip joining Vulcan-babe for the jelly roll. It appears he enjoyed it in real life, as well.

      I just let the scene pass in the same manner as a sci-fi faux pas would pass during suspension of disbelief, but I didn't mind viewing it, gratuitous or not. In fact, I find it quite refreshing that they seem to be abandoning this ridiculous prudishness that festered on Voyager over the simplest, most innocent feelings.

      "Close the door, you're letting out the steam from this scene!"

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    4. Re:what a bunch of whiny bitches by Snaller · · Score: 1
      "There wasn't any character development" : hey guys, this was a PILOT. Few pilots develop much characterwise, they have too much expositional ground to cover. Two hours is what, 80 pages of script? How much "development" can you cram into that without forcing it, AND still have time to show all the neato-whiz-bang special effects for which the series is famed? (And remember, they ARE trying to build a ~new~ audience, not just attract the old. The old will keep coming to con's and buying rubber vulcan ears forever.)

      If its not there its because they chose not to put it there. According you your paragraphi s because they don't care about the exsisting fans, and just want to lure new dupes in by trying to make some action crap - but hey, Gene Roddenberry is dead- anything goes....

      what a bunch of whiny bitches (Score:5)
      by (arg!)Styopa (styopa@nospam.iname.com) on 5:37 27 September 2001 (#2356691)
      (User #232550 Info | http://www.strategy-gaming.com)
      Fer chrissakes. "Hi there, we're the /. crowd, and we have the patience of a mayfly..."

      "There wasn't any character development" : hey guys, this was a PILOT. Few pilots develop much characterwise, they have too much expositional ground to cover. Two hours is what, 80 pages of script? How much "development" can you cram into that without forcing it, AND still have time to show all the neato-whiz-bang special effects for which the series is famed? (And remember, they ARE trying to build a ~new~ audience, not just attract the old. The old will keep coming to con's and buying rubber vulcan ears forever.)

      "How does armor plate go offline?" SOMEbody wasn't listening when they said that the armor POLARIZATION had gone off line.


      Yeah you weren't listening - they didn't say that.

      ST:NG took FIVE SEASONS to come up with ep's like "The Inner Light"

      And one season to come up with "The Measure of a man


      The rest of you, cripes, give it a season or two.

      It should never take that long - the problem seems to be with the american tv making system: They don't WANT to make a choice, for fear of ratings loss, so they change a little bit in one direction, and check the ratings, then they change a little bit in another direction back and forth, until eventually they stick with something they think can't be improved or they daren't improve upon. Its not always plesant to watch.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  220. I missed it. by loraksus · · Score: 2

    Anybody have a divx so I can catch up (yeah, I said that I wouldn't watch it, but gave in)

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  221. STFAYFM by tcc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you don't want to get spoiling, why the heck do you continue reading after "tonight's enterprise episode, first reactions" ? I don't get it, why do people bitch about that, you KNOW what's comming.... I didn't see the episode *I* wanted to see people's reaction, so I am happy about it, if I wouldn't want to read anything about it, I'd just skip it.

    Bitching for bitching is lame, okay bitching against the people bitching isn't any better, but can someone actually explain in a Vulcan way (logic heh) what's the problem with that?

    sheesh :)

    oh and the letters in the topic are for your own imagination, you probably guessed the F right though :)

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  222. Pointy Vulcan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just love how now with T'Pol, when you call a Vulcan pointy, you're not just referring to their ears :).

    ()

  223. T'Pol (Jolene Blalock) half naked! by austad · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:T'Pol (Jolene Blalock) half naked! by Buzzwang · · Score: 1

      She's nice, but she aint that great. Besides, if people only watch a show or movie for the women, might I suggest selling your computer(s), subscribing to PlayboyTV and enjoying yourself?

      --
      Things you can say to your dog that you can't say to a girl: "How about a nice bone?"
    2. Re:T'Pol (Jolene Blalock) half naked! by tf23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's the main link to a seemingly pretty good fan site: http://www.time-scape.com/jolene/

      US Mirror or AUS Mirror

      It's got more pics than that maxim site referenced above, and it has info on her character, bio, etc.

      BTW, someone just posted an mpeg of the "coed-handshower" scene in alt.binaries.multimedia. If you weren't able to see the show, go download it for a preview.
    3. Re:T'Pol (Jolene Blalock) half naked! by Bistromat · · Score: 1

      selling your computer?! what, the greatest source of free porn ever created? what, are you nuts?

  224. About the tech by Griim · · Score: 1

    They have beam weapons, but hey, we have beam weapons nowadays. As for their shielding, what I gathered was they have armour plating, which they're running some type of charge through to strengthen it. And the transporter is still very experimental, they said it had just been cleared for organic matter, and the other person said,"You mean fruits and vegetables, right?" Did you see the look on the captain's face when they beamed him up?

    As far as gravity goes, they seemed to only be able to mimick gravity, and poorly at best, since there's a "sweet spot" in the ship. In all I'm happy with it, since they don't have any form of projected 'force' energy.

    Of course I'm talking out my sci-fi ass here. :)

  225. Too Bad ... by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    Too bad they decided to make a space pornoseries... I can't watch the show with my two and four year old kids in the room... Which means I can't watch the show at all.

    --
    -- $G
  226. Let me clarify by kjj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I am complaining about is the spoiler info on the Slashdot opening homepage. As I said with movies spoiler stuff is inside after you click the link and there are even warnings saying so. You know, little messages like "caution: spoilers ahead" Slashdot does this when reviewing movies for people who haven't seen the movie yet. I was only suggesting the same thing should be done for series premiers like this as well. In order to not see that "commander whatchamacallit has no personality" and some other stuff I tried to avoid reading I would have to avert my eyes before I scroll down or maybe just not visit Slashdot until after Saturday.

    1. Re:Let me clarify by TrickFred · · Score: 1

      ...Or how about not reading the blurb about the article after reading the title, which clearly indicates that the plot, characters, etc. will be discussed!

    2. Re:Let me clarify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Slashdot does this when reviewing movies for people who haven't seen the movie yet.

      Slashdot does this for irate readers who don't seem to have any idea what a movie review is.

  227. One minor bright point by el+borak · · Score: 1
    I did appreciate the "no man" line returning, even if just for a one-shot. Good to see at least a nod to excising the PC "no one" crap.

    --
    An imperfect plan executed violently is far superior to a perfect plan. -- George Patton
  228. I want some vulcan pussy. by cybermint · · Score: 0, Troll

    That vulcan chick has a nice ass. I'd hit that shit in a heartbeat. Vulcan's have a pussy, right?

    1. Re:I want some vulcan pussy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, but what color are they?

  229. Use (a href= please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I mean, I can figure it out, but Slashcode adds spaces so that the tables line up. Do it like this

    Thanks...

  230. Is there _any_ movie/tv show /. likes?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Seriously, other than Kevin Smith films, slashdot movie/tv reviews could be replace by a simple fill in the blank.

    "This (movie/show) is one of the worst we have ever seen, in fact, its even wose than the last (movie/show) we reviewed. The acting was (bad/flat/overdone/mediocre). The script was (bad/flat/overdone/mediocre). The only high point was (female leads name)'s (shirt/shorts/skirt/shower scene) but what is something like that doing in this movie. (Not that we minded ;) but really) Whoever (wrote/directed/acted/produced) this (movie/show) should be banned from (writing/directing/acting/producing) forever.

    Come on guys, get a new script for your reviews, the current one is getting old.

    HaveFun!
    WhiteRabbit

    1. Re:Is there _any_ movie/tv show /. likes?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding! I agree totally. If it were not for the tech news, I wouldn't even bother putting up with their cynicism.

    2. Re:Is there _any_ movie/tv show /. likes?? by icebeing · · Score: 1

      Yeah...I guess they're trying to show they actually know all there is know about Trek, and are not shy in expressing their so-called superior knowledge on the subject...

      As a famous Borg Queen has said...they have failed!

    3. Re:Is there _any_ movie/tv show /. likes?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmm. They liked the Matrix.
      (Talk about terrible, terrible films.
      Look! I can make religious references,
      stick in cyberspace and Keanu and lots
      of big, big guns and it kicks ass!)
      Feh, the plotline wasn't even fit for
      Don 'the dragon' Wilson, but it seems
      to be a perennial favorite.

  231. My problem. by Fixer · · Score: 1
    Okay, just one problem.

    I've seen this before.

    No, really. I'm quite familiar with a ship on an exploration mission solving problems in an episodic format.

    deep breath

    HOW ABOUT SOME CREATIVTY PLEASE?

    I'd like a premise I haven't seen before. I'd like a plotline that isn't so blaringly obvious. I'd like some genuine puzzles that can't be neatly solved in an hour. I'd like real conflict with real problems. A little philosophy maybe?

    We have seen good scifi on televsion. It does exist. Dr. Who. Babylon-5. The Prisoner. Red Dwarf. Space: Above and Beyond.

    Is it too much to ask? Is it really so hard to bring good writing to the small screen? Are there so few screenwriters interested in doing good SF?

    I want NEW.

    --
    "Avast! Prepare for the rodgering!" THWACK! "Arrr.. me nards.."
    1. Re:My problem. by daevt · · Score: 1

      you need to address two things before you continue to complain:

      one - the name of the series is STAR TREK, as in to TREK across the STARs. the very name implies exploration.

      two - the last time they tried getting creative, we ended up with voyager and DS9. i really hope that they can remain UNcreative, because it means that the writers will mature, and the series has a shot at not sucking a whole bunch...

  232. My thoughts. by Syn404 · · Score: 1

    I must say, the pilot wasn't nearly as much of a disappointment as I'd prepared for. The cast was decent, except that Ho Shi *sp* girl has the most irritating high pitched voice, the Vulcan seems a bit too irritable for a Vulcan, and no one was acting very military.

    However, a few technical inaccuracies were brought up by a friend of mine: First, it's a historical fact, as mentioned in some episode of Next Generation, that the first encounter between the humans and the Klingons resulted in the war between them. Second, the Vulcans supposedly did not know of the existence of Klingons until AFTER the humans ran into them [the Klingons]. Third, the humans encountered the Klingons *after* they were renamed to the United Federation of Planets, and unless I missed something in this episode, they have not yet been renamed. Especially since they were renamed on the same day they authorized the creation of the NCC starships.

    I'd like to hear comments on this, since I'm not entirely sure of the accuracy here. Much of this is secondhand knowledge, but I *do* recall hearing that the first encounter with the Klingons provoked hostility, and not gratitude.

    Besides that, the pilot was indeed interesting. Though I wonder why the Suliban are not mentioned in any of the other series. Many species don't come up more than once, but it seems like these should, it being a historical event and all as one of the first species encountered.

    This post probably sounds like more complaints than anything, but to be quite honest, my only real complaint with the show as of this point is the theme. What the hell? It sounds like some soap opera theme. It's the very first Star Trek without the captain's intro of Cochran's speech [which was an interesting little revelation]. And why widescreen?

    Ah well, overall it was better than I expected.

    1. Re:My thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh c'mon. The premise is pretty clear about the whole starfleet-as-military angle. They aren't boot camp. They're more like a boat at sea (As many brave Americans are right now) where structure is held but light bends of the rules are OK as long as everything gets done safely. Think about pioneering American ships like the Constitution ("Old Ironsides"), the Hunley, the Columbia. I'm sure they hadn't come out with some strict rulebook when they sailed too, but the Brits sure know that the Constitution took a heavy percentage of the British navy to the bottom of the sea, and that's what mattered. Also, remember that Cochran wasn't exactly one for being strict on a spaceship either. (Certainly compared to our current astronauts and engineers.)

  233. michael's Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus man... By those standards, what tv shows/movies/anything do you like? This tv series is fiction... it's fantasy... IT'S NOT REAL. Why care about "How can armor plating go 'offline'?" It's stupid man.

    ----- Off topic
    I really like slashdot for it's news reporting, but the comments by the slash staff, especially tim and michael are so cynical, stupid, and extremely obvious. Does anyone else agree?

  234. Rigel 10... by gatesh8r · · Score: 1

    At the bar... thinking about meeting a few of those women...

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  235. T'Pau... by J.C.B. · · Score: 1
    ...could have at least taken her top off. I mean, what's the point of disinfectant gel if you don't use it all over?

    "Yep doctor, our deadly bacteria problem is solved, I've disinfected my legs and back."

  236. Startrek Erections by RobFlynn · · Score: 2

    I'm surprised someone hasn't made a play on this topic called "Startrek Erections'

    --

    ---
    Rob Flynn
    Pidgin
  237. Warp Speed is a log scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The subject says it all

  238. Star Trek is still a focus of hope... by DarkVein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but it seems to be more for the show than for humanity.

    This premiere was better in any one spot than my new favorite show Farscape. However, this premiere also had a pace and resolution of my all time most disgusted show; Voyager.

    I swear to god, every last Voyager writer should be barred from ever writting for TV ever again.

    There is one virtue of commitee writing in this case, and that is that the Voyager writers didn't get their hands into everything. You can taste what they didn't contaminate, because it doesn't stink. The ending was not something that escaped them. That is probably the greatest failure of this episode, and the one that really sticks with everyone that saw the show. How many people recall how it really ended? The last thing I remember is Archer talking with T'Pau like Janeway talks to 7of9, and then Archer going on the bridge to say something encouraging. The ready-room scene is the part that sticks, not the bridge scene.

    Also, the theme song blows major ass. The video is rather disjointed from it, and while fitting, is pretty tacky. Overall, the intro says "one season, tops." Get rid of it. At the very least, do something I couldn't do in Flash 5.

    I've seen people questioning how "hull plating" could fail. The answer is that the plating itself doesn't fail. What they have for "shields" is effectively a primitive combination of TNG's structural integrity field and TOS' defence screens. It's more integrity field, though. It is supposed to increase the armor strength of the hull beyond that of its physical properties. From the technobabble, you can assume they do this by putting a lot of energy into the plating to somehow strengthen the electro-magnetic properties of it. Think about how much harder it is to disrupt a stack of little metal blocks over if you magnetize them.

    The blue girls on the planet seemed like something that could have been straight out of TOS. I didn't have a problem with the gel scenario itself - I doubt anyone sane did - but like most people I thought the camera work was extremely tacky.

    T'Pau's make-up makes her look very elfin. I like the look, and though it detracts from the typical Vulcan make-up I find it a nice addition to the Vulcan species. Her wardrobe is pathetically 7of9. I'd be willing to bet that Vulcans usually wear those heavy robes to feel more comfortable in lower gravity enviornments. T'Pau's character must be feeling even more naked than her actress does. T'Pau herself is a moody bitch instead of a coldly logical creature with an alien alure. Commander Savok was my favorite Vulcan female. How many people realized exactly what she did on Genesis for Spock? I sure didn't until years later. It wasn't a shock, because it was logical. I don't want T'Pau to be a copy of Spock. I do want her to be a little less insulting by grace of class and more insulting by grace of logic.

    While it was humorous, I was cringing badly at every Vulcan on the premiere. I think it was bad writing as much as bad editing as much as bad acting. Those were not Vulcans, those were people pretending to be Vulcans. They just didn't have ANY of the strength of will that comes from having found Kalimar. They were dirty little conspirators constatly feeling off guard with the irrational humans.

    Of course, everyone probably figured out that the Vulcans were making sure humanity could stand on its own two feet by not giving too much information. That was something that was a little painful to see... nobody got that?

    I like Hioshii. Nothing wrong there at all, just make sure she doesn't stay stagnant. Character development is vital to everyone.

    Captain Archer isn't as passionate as he is irrational. This is supposed to be part of his character development, so I'm not critisizing it quite yet.

    Enterprise NX-01 is a nice adaptation to the new ship we saw in First Contact in the battle against the Borg. It works. I know some people don't like it when old tech looks better than new tech, but the concept is more important to my mind, and that has remained intact.

    What REALLY bothers me about this episode is that the "new" enemies are almost exactly the same as the ones found in Insurrection. God, I hated that movie. I refuse to add it to my Star Trek library, ever. The one saving grace of that entire movie was the cool nebulas, but as we all know, pretty graphics do not make sales after opening weekend.

    The technobable was somewhere between TNG and Voyager. Technobable should not ever be technobable. In TNG it was always comprehendable. I had a bit of trouble trying to keep the technobable straight in my head. There was a lot of non-sense strewn about the few key words of realistic and theoretical science.

    The plot was similar to the technobable. It just didn't hold together all the time. In that sense, it was a lot like Voyager. This episode didn't have to be two hours for the content it had in it, but if it was only one hour it would have been just like a Voyager episode. If that was the case, the two words left in people's minds would be "suck" and "boobies" and they would try to connect them in some way to make up for the lack of connections in the episode.

    So far, I'm concerned that this series has taken bits and pieces from almost every single piece of Star Trek lore to create something new. The going line for this series has been "we've never done this before!" I hope they do go boldy go where no man has ever gone before, as TOS did. There is real promise here, but there is also the chance this will go the way of Voyager.

    This premeire seems to be a sampler, and it is up to us to decide where we want to go with our main course. I say we set course for the second star to the right.

    Lastly, I think Star Trek should once again get one or more advisors from NASA, MIT, maybe even slashdot (hah.) People with connections that can relay ideas back and forth between writers and experts in their fields.

    --

    I'm as mimsy as the next borogove but your mome raths are completely outgrabe.

    1. Re:Star Trek is still a focus of hope... by DarkVein · · Score: 1

      A few little changes to my above post.

      First, the next to last line that says "second star to the right" has a subtle meaning I don't like, aside from its silliness. What I mean is to set course to new things and especially fantasy. What I do not mean is to rehash old crap... if you're going to rehash something, rehash something good and do a bettr job. :)

      Second, I'd like to see Arther C. Clark or Steven Hawking in the credits for writing. :)

      --

      I'm as mimsy as the next borogove but your mome raths are completely outgrabe.

    2. Re:Star Trek is still a focus of hope... by cgleba · · Score: 0

      Good review. . .I agree that T'Pau is a 'moody bitch'. . .no one has yet to reproduce the stocism and pure logic of Spok, however I concede that Savok was damn good. I say drop this POA before her acting makes me puke and bring in Savok.

      I don't need soft-porn to be entertained.

      If they can get Archer's irrationality and stupidity to be balanced and interact smoothly with the vulcan's logic we could have a winner (like TOS). I think his stupidity and her bitchiness stood out because they did not work together well. . .which will either take time or kill the series.

  239. Warp factors by man_ls · · Score: 2, Informative

    I should point our (according to the Star Trek Encyclopedia, 2nd Edition) that the "warp factor" does not necessarely mean times the speed of light.

    The following is blatantly plagarized from page 373:
    Speed KPH x Light Speed
    Std Orbit 9600

    This is in reply to a comment lower down that talks about it being 4 days to Kronos and back.

    According to this, if Kronos is 1 light year away, we'll say exactly 1 light year for "educational" purposes, it would take 1 year at warp 1, 36 days at warp 2, 9 days at warp 3, and 3 days at warp 4. So the calculation was pretty close to correct, I've just added some other data to it.

    1. Re:Warp factors by man_ls · · Score: 2, Informative

      Warp Factor xLightSpeed

      Warp 1 becomes 1

      Warp 2 becomes 10

      Warp 3 becomes 39

      Warp 4 becomes 102

      Warp 5 becomes 214

      Warp 6 becomes 392

      Warp 7 becomes 656

      Warp 8 becomes 1024

      Warp 9 becomes 1516

    2. Re:Warp factors by Monthenor · · Score: 1

      I wasn't arguing with the speed. They can go a light year in 3 days if they want...the problem is with the proximity of Kronos. One light year seems mighty close to the "vast" Klingon empire, and even closer to its homeworld. Wouldn't you expect it to extend more than a light year in every direction??

      --
      Co-founder of GerbilMechs
    3. Re:Warp factors by mdwebster · · Score: 1

      The closest star to our own is 4.3 light-years away.

      From NASA, according to the Gliese star catalog, there are 63 stars within 5 parsecs (parsec = 3.26 ly's), 328 within 10, 1008 within 15, 2127 within 20 & 3496 within 25.

      16.3, 32.6, 48.9, 65.2 & 81.5 light-years, respectively.

  240. Re:Klingon appearance by roju · · Score: 1

    I always took his comment to be an offhand inside joke (ie. inside to the trek community), not some sort of statement about the Trek universe.

  241. Re:Spoiler-tastic - They dont grow Corn in OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its all wheat and crap

  242. where are the squirrels? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Kind of off-topic though I wouldn't know where to post such question elsewhere ...


    I wonder if the people do actually read the stories submitted? because the last month I have been submitting stories that where rejected in about 1hr later. The same storie(s) get posted by others or (for example) on kuroshin without problems


    Is a submission of a story depending on one person? or on a few people who vote yes/no? because it is certainly taking away my interest and motivation to even post another (interesting) story again.

    • 2001-05-28 15:49:34 3 letters in a domainname and being suid? (askslashdot,censorship) (rejected)
    • 2001-08-28 21:18:20 Internet banned in Afghanistan (articles,news) (rejected)
    • 2001-08-28 21:28:27 Mirror mirror on the wall ... (articles,news) (rejected)
    • 2001-09-22 06:53:32 Nickname and the appropriate website sued! (articles,censorship) (rejected)
    • 2001-09-27 04:40:50 mirroring pc's fast? (askslashdot,microsoft) (rejected)
    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    1. Re:where are the squirrels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The spelling and gramatical errors can't help.

  243. Don't worry.... by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

    That's what piracy is for!

    1. Re:Don't worry.... by unitron · · Score: 2

      So will you be sending it to me on VHS or what?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:Don't worry.... by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      Have you forgoten about digital video? I'm sure you could find a place that has encoded it and is offering it for download. I'd have done it myself (I've got a vedio capture card), but I forgot to record it.

  244. Dear Slashdot editors by rho · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Dear Slashdot editors,

    I read one of your stories today. It wasn't very good, I didn't find it interesting, and it was filled with grammatical errors.

    I don't think I'll be reading your little site anymore.

    Love,
    A Reader

    --
    Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    1. Re:Dear Slashdot editors by Buzzwang · · Score: 1

      I guess most readers don't understand that most readers submit the stories and info to the site, not a select team of reporters and editors...

      --
      Things you can say to your dog that you can't say to a girl: "How about a nice bone?"
    2. Re:Dear Slashdot editors by rho · · Score: 2

      I guess most people don't get sarcasm anymore, either....

      Casting pearls before swine...

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
  245. I thought it was fairly good... by kabocox · · Score: 1

    Considering I had a three year old screaming "I want to watch Iron Gaint" through the first half and the last quarter "Blues Clues Blues Clues". The show looked visually very good... audio I'm sorry I missed most of that.

    I didn't think those were Vulcans... Come on now Vulcans are far better at controlling their emotions... It would be much better if they were Romlans that would give Earth the excuse for a war.

    These new villians I'm not sure about. I think they'll have to be talking about genetic engineering alot. Wasn't their supposed to be an age that alot of people on earth got geneticly engineered. I think I remember that it was later made illegal. This could be a great time for that.

    1. Re:I thought it was fairly good... by Hassman · · Score: 1
      It would be much better if they were Romlans that would give Earth the excuse for a war.



      Without sound too much like a loser Humans won't meet the Romulans for quite some time in the Star Trek timeline.



      Mark

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    2. Re:I thought it was fairly good... by ttyRazor · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the year when that genetic engineering war thing was supposed to have occured was 1999.

  246. Hottie + Plagiarism = Continued Franchise by Max+Entropy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay...Jolene Blalock is pretty hot. Berman hit on the formula with 7of9 and found another nymphette to titillate frustrated teenage boys by juxtaposing a pointy-eared swimsuit model with a cold, emotionless demeanor.

    The whole thing with the DNA-encoded secret information. 1) It's unlikely that the Klingons would have such a technology. (In TNG, they hadn't the technical sophistication to fix Worf's broken spine, since they often favored euthanasia to advancing medical science.) 2) I won an award from HP and the ACM for a science fiction story I wrote in which the underground of a plutechnocratic Silicon Valley used the same biological transfer methods as their "underground newspaper." I'm pissed.

    1. Re:Hottie + Plagiarism = Continued Franchise by Buzzwang · · Score: 1

      It wasn't DNA encoded from the looks of it, it simply hid in the DNA of the carrier so it wouldn't be obviuos if he was scanned or checked in a general fashion.

      Personally, I thought it was pretty cool. I don't recall off-hand ever seeing something like that in any of the other shows. That could be because they stopped using it since handheld scanners had gotten good enough to pick it up even in a cursory scan.

      ack I'm getting a headache now trying to philosophize and generalize about the future/past and history/present. My tenses are going to get all screwy then...

      --
      Things you can say to your dog that you can't say to a girl: "How about a nice bone?"
    2. Re:Hottie + Plagiarism = Continued Franchise by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      The whole thing with the DNA-encoded secret information. 1) It's unlikely that the Klingons would have such a technology. (In TNG, they hadn't the technical sophistication to fix Worf's broken spine, since they often favored euthanasia to advancing medical science.) 2) I won an award from HP and the ACM for a science fiction story I wrote in which the underground of a plutechnocratic Silicon Valley used the same biological transfer methods as their "underground newspaper." I'm pissed.

      Why are you pissed? Unless you wrote that idea back in the 70s, it wasn't even a novel one; it has been used - for example - in Blood Music.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  247. The Tech Job Market Is Bad When... by denzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    you start seeing the Intel Blue Guys(TM) in a new Star Trek episode, cleverly disguised as a primitive morphing race.

  248. exit-poll dept.? by sulli · · Score: 2

    where's the poll dammit? You can add a poll to a story, do it here.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  249. reaction by thschmid · · Score: 1

    well, i agree that the theme song has to go. i have been a real fan of star trek theme music ever since ds9, and this theme was more fitting for dawsons creek than enterprise.
    i think its to early to tell if enterprise is going to flop or not. everyone said that with voyager after the first season, but i really enjoyed the show with the start of the second season. i am not sure however, with the cast of scott bacula (spelling?) as captain, but i wasnt to fond of janeway in voyager either, so again, i am going to wait and see!
    other than that, i really enjoyed the pilot. at least i have a cute vulcan science officer to look forward to, if everything else fails! :)

    --
    Thomas Schmid athschmid@gmail.com Skype: athschmid
  250. Re:Spoiler-tastic - They dont grow Corn in OK by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 2

    Maybe it is that future genetically engineered corn.

  251. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by antek9 · · Score: 1

    Don't forget about Ezri, my favourite...

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  252. "Stun seems to work" by bigmankelly1998 · · Score: 1
    Stun seems to work


    Best line of the show! And how about the Captain's face after he was beamed aboard. That was great. Overall could have been better. Time will tell though.

    --
    Its just a sig people.. geez...
    1. Re:"Stun seems to work" by Nutt · · Score: 1

      Personally I think it would've been funny if he came back and something was wrong/missing. Like if the transporter brought back pieces of the metal deck he was running on still attached to his shoes.

    2. Re:"Stun seems to work" by ttyRazor · · Score: 1

      But then he'd get transporter psychosis. Hmm, ten bucks says that will be a future plot thread.

  253. mmmm....Vulcan Nipples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're pointy.

  254. All I know is... by errxn · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Osmotic Eel" is a band name waiting to happen.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    1. Re:All I know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "What happens when pasta and antipasta collide?"

      You get an extremely pissed off Italian demanding dinner..

  255. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by AaronStJ · · Score: 2

    Jolene Blalock. [maximonline.com]

    Am I the only onwe that thinks it's kinda of sad that this got +5, iformative?

    --
    Stupid like a fox!
  256. Logrithmic Warp Scale by $beirdo · · Score: 2

    Actually the warp scale must be logrithmic, like the Richter Scale (where a 5.0 quake is 10 times as powerful as a 4.0 quake) - the captain's father mentioned that the Warp 5 engine would be 1,000 times faster than the previous.

    Thanks for the nice math, though.

    1. Re:Logrithmic Warp Scale by kreyg · · Score: 1

      The warp scale is irrelevant, this is simple distance divided by time... and it does seem a bit off.

      --
      sig fault
    2. Re:Logrithmic Warp Scale by cthugha · · Score: 2
      Actually the warp scale must be logrithmic, like the Richter Scale (where a 5.0 quake is 10 times as powerful as a 4.0 quake) - the captain's father mentioned that the Warp 5 engine would be 1,000 times faster than the previous.

      The old Cochrane-style warp scale is supposed to be cubic: v/c = w^3 (where v is velocity, c the speed of light and w the warp factor). They "accuratized" the scale for TNG time, though (see the Daystrom Technical Institute for more.

    3. Re:Logrithmic Warp Scale by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      The old Cochrane-style warp scale is supposed to be cubic: v/c = w^3 (where v is velocity, c the speed of light and w the warp factor).


      They never, ever mentioned how fast a Warp Factor was during the original series.

      However, they DID say how fast they were going in kps last night.

      Onscreen information trumps fanfic, period.

    4. Re:Logrithmic Warp Scale by Matt · · Score: 1
      IIRC one of the crewmen mentioned "30 million kilometers per second".

      That's 100 times the speed of light. As someone pointed out, at 4 days travel time, that puts Kronos 1.1 light years away. Impossible.

      In Voyager they seemed to be approximately 1000 times the speed of light. They estimated 70 years to cross the galaxy -- approximately 70000 light years.

      IIRC in the episode where they found Emelia Earhart, she asked how fast their ship went, and IIRC Perris told her a number. Anyone remember what it was?

  257. Re:Kiss Me If Your Alien Speaks English by Nuclear+Mothman · · Score: 1

    Nobody knows how to spell on the Internet. No wonder Vulcans have such barely veiled contempt for us. Oh, sorry...forgot it was only a tv show there for a second.

  258. Scott Backula.. multiple penis bones? by S.+Invicta · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if this is his real name? Wonder if he realizes that it makes biologists (especially mammologists) think of penis bones (also known as os penis)? The latin term baculum (little rod) refers to the bone that most mammals (excepting humans) have in their penis. Following my reader's knowledge of latin, bacula (bakula) sounds like an acceptable plural to my ears... thus Scott "penis bones"

    What to buy one? (Penis bones, not Scott)

    http://www.evolutionnyc.com/IBS/SimpleCat/Produc t/ asp/product-id/427177.html

    Invicta

  259. Enterprise by $beirdo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think I've finally put my finger on what it is that has always made the Star Trek series (plural) special.

    They are the only series that I can think of (except for M*A*S*H) that builds a thoughtful platform for discussing philosophy. Transmitting philosophy and encouraging rational thinking has always been the hallmark of ST, started by good old James T. Kirk/Bones and perfected by Picard and Riker.

    What else on television sets such a great example for the moral standards we should set, not only in the future but today as well?

  260. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

    what the hell did you call good ole Seven-Of-Nine then? Like that wasn't her whole purpose for being on the show... Or Dax&Kira (to a lesser extent), or Troy, or just about every woman on TOS with those super-mini skirts. yeaow.

    It's good you threw the mini-skirt bit on there, because we wouldn't want *shudder* Dr. Pulaski (st:tng replacement for crusher during season 3 iirc) ending up on that list.

    I think saying the female characters are there just for wankoff material is obviously wrong, though the people who do star trek casting certainly took the dick-in-hand factor into account on at least a couple occasions.

    --
    ___
    The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  261. Re:Klingon appearance by deusx · · Score: 2

    You know, I think Worf's comment was meant to be a joke.

    The explanation is that it's a TV show, and back then they had bad make-up. Let's just assume that how they look now is how they've always been meant to look, and be done with it.

    Hell, at one point, I think the Klingons were supposed to be modeled after the Russians, but that kinda drifted away...

  262. Re: gay captain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know Capt. Archer isn't gay?

  263. The return of "cowboy diplomacy" by Nitewing98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thank god. Gene R. would be proud. The TNG/Voyager/DS9 time was a little too antiseptic for my taste.

    I, for one, was glad to see them play up the tension between the humans and vulcans (gee, you mean we haven't always been best friends?). Just goes to show you what was achieved by Kirk's time. I was glad to see the humans buck them and take the bull by the horns and just do what we've always done...explore. For no logical reason other than that's what we want to do.

    Loved the ship, loved Bakkula, he's a "regular" guy who has a dog and a ball cap. I was beginning to think pets had been outlawed in the future and so had headgear (except for Guinan's dopey hats). Glad to see a smaller crew (instead of a cast of 1000's). This is what Trek was all about once upon a time--human beings taking risks and exploring, not managing crises. Picard was OK, but he was no captain in my book.

    Not sure about the temporal villans yet, time will tell (pun intended).

    As for the boney-headed Klingons, the story supposedly was that they adopted a "more human" look during the original ST years to more easily deal with humans, but that it was a dismal failure and a shameful episode in their history, that's why they don't discuss it.

    In all, the best Trek I've seen in a long, long time.

    --

    Nitewing '98

    Everything works...in theory.

  264. What about Hoshi? by rbruels · · Score: 1

    Okay,

    First off, the theme absolutely must go. Not the intro itself, I thought the video was perfect for the theme, but the song -- jeez, at least they could use that song from all the previews ("Wherever You Will Go", by the Calling). Preferably, orchestrated.

    Secondly, yeah, Jolene Blalock was hot, but um, NO KIDDING!! You don't even need to read (heh) the go-change-yer-pants Maxim article to know that. But didn't anyone else think Hoshi was gorgeous? Pretty smile, perky 'tude...

    On a related note, Hoshi and Phlox will have the most potential as characters, I think, I really liked 'em. The rest will have to prove themselves to me, their acting was mediocre, but I think this comes with the territory when you get a group of actors together on a new show for the first time.

    In any case...I think I'll watch this more than I did Voyager; much as I loved the characters on Voyager (and for them I'll miss the series), it turned into a soap opera. Even with Seven -- and by the way, I think I'm the only male that really didn't find her all that attractive. :P

    Cheers!

    Ryan

    --

    "All your base are belong to this file I send in order to have your advice."
  265. Re:Babylon 5: Legend of the Rangers will own j00 by icebeing · · Score: 1

    Well, I had hopes for Crusade...so I guess Rangers won't own m3 for t00 long ;-)

  266. Wow!!! by svzurich · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This show is GREAT!!! I love how their weapons need to be turned on (limited battery?), no one trusts the transporter, their sensors had trouble locking onto people, the crew is learning their equipment, and the crew bickers (realistic). The best part is that their engine room, stairs, and ladders all have railings very much like on US submarines! Oh my God, that is a very nice touch! Their uniforms are a lot like our poopysuits (jumpsuits we wear on the boats) and I love the flat profile of the ship! I also enjoyed seeing the crew crosstrain on positions, just like in real life! I also love the fact that their top end speed was only warp 4.5 (I assume they are using the ST:TOS warp scale of 4.5*4.5=times the speed of light). Also the ship was effectively depth charged! Oh I love so much about this show already! We even get to see humans screw up first contact with the Klingons, setting up the stage for a cold war with them in Kirk's time! Lastly I love the fact that they can't rely on super technology to solve their problems! No more ST:TNG technology conquers all crap! I love this show!

    1. Re:Wow!!! by icebeing · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they're using the old warp scale...before the Scotty adjustments took place. Of course, I could be wrong when they somehow boost their engine output to warp 10+ (old scale).

      I particularly liked Bakula's look on his face when he re-materializes, and makes sure all his body parts were in the right place. Yeehaw!

  267. You need to calibrate your expectations by epopt · · Score: 1
    They way I see it, any Star Trek premiere that doesn't have "Q" in it has to be regarded as a success.

    --
    -- Remember that we live in a world where all the really big decisions are made by people with short attention spans.
  268. Warp Core at Disneyland by Jayson · · Score: 2, Funny
    The warp core looks primitive
    The warp core, and engine room in general, looked like Space Mountain at Disneyland.
  269. Continuity wasn't in the budget by Wokan · · Score: 2, Funny

    They really screwed up with the Klingons. Now they're going to have to say the human-like appearance was the first thing to go wrong, and then a second one changed them back. (Why am I making excuses for such a blatant f-ck up?)

    I guess since Vulcans aren't emotional, they must always have hard nipples. That, or the shower was pretty cold.

    1. Re:Continuity wasn't in the budget by Buzzwang · · Score: 1

      My understanding of the whole klingon thing was that we had already met them (or why would we have humans that speak any klingon at all, or even recognize klingons) and did share some tech, etc. The last couple scenes from the show kinda confirmed that for me. So, on an essential level, the timeline might be a little curved, but not warped all over hell and back. As far as the look of the klingons, well, that's what people have come to expect. Besides, we could be far enough down the timeline that the klingons already did the gene engineering thing to themselves. I say that based on the very unfriendly attitude the old klingon gave to Archer towards the very end of the episode.

      It could be that the creators/producers/Paramount/whoever decided that 'this' point in human history was where they wanted to start. I recall reading a book a couple years back where George Kirk was the FirstO on a new, experimental ship. After a tangle with the Romulans and everything working out ok in the end, George named the ship Enterprise and she sailed off into history as the first ship in the fleet (by the way, the book-ship had shields which they tested by ramming themselves into an asteroid at warp1). I figured that this series would roughly fit into the timeline and theme of that book, turns out I was mostly right. Replace romulans with klingons, replace G. Kirk with J. Archer and then change the story background. Result; Same story, different setting, still played well enough to be watchable.

      --
      Things you can say to your dog that you can't say to a girl: "How about a nice bone?"
  270. Re:Klingon appearance by weinbrenner · · Score: 1

    it's conceivable that some of these dialects might be related to diverse "races" of Klingons. Some are wussy Klingons who wear chain mail, some are mean ones with big ridges and lots of sharp bladed weapons.

    Wasn't one of Jadzia Dax old "ridged" Klingon friends identical to one of Kirks "smooth" Klingon enemies? There had to be some kind of transformation then, instead of several races.

  271. gave it a "b" by psydad · · Score: 1

    Good pg-13 soft core tit shots, and the action seemed to be a bit contrived, but I guess with the action of the last few days it was acceptable. Pick apart the techno, and every sci-fi is schlock, I watched it for the entertainment, and gave it a "B". What the heck, only way to go is up?? hopefully??

  272. What I liked by pandaba · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's what I liked:

    Vulcan vs. Human interactions: The pilot had a nice twist by pitting the two races together on a governmental level where representatives of each could display their predjudice, mistrust, and fear of each other. This was perfectly believable. As insufferable as the rather pretentious and overprotective vulcans are and as impulsive and basically untrustworthy as humans are, I'm surprised the two never ended up in a war on opposite sides. Obviously the vulcan / human thing has been overdone in the past but it was always on a mano y mano level , never at the level of governments maneuvering for control of a situation.

    The tribute to green (and other coloured) Orion slave girls: Remembering Christopher Pike's Talos induced vision of a visit to Rigel's slave markets was a nice touch.

    I didn't think the disinfectant scene was too pr0nish... To me, it actually seemed as if the director had vague arty pretensions and thought the sensuality of the scene, mixed with the harsh dialogue, would create a lovely bit of dissonance. I think he almost succeeded in this effect.

    I really liked the joy these ship-board geeks found in their technology, such as "warp 4.5!" or the sweet spot. TOS had a similar love of technology but the later series seemed to lose their joy in what could be done and what the possibilities are.

    I like that the characters finally have a measure of humanity. They're occasionally noble, often shortsighted, easily amused and excited, sometimes brave, usually susceptible to blind predjudice, quarrelsome, hypocritical, and driven by baser instincts they usually dont try to understand. This is a return to the happier days of TOS when (wo)men were (wo)men and even when Kirk would give a sanctimonious speech about his / Federation ideals at the end of an episode, you could hardly forget that he spent the bulk of the episode violating almost every single one of the Federation's sacred beliefs and rules. That sort of willful inconsistency and hypocrisy is typical of almost every human who has held any sort of real power. That is how people would really act, not as the insufferable, always correct robot that was Picard / Janeway. Most leaders will always have more Shatner than Stewart in them. For example Bush's line: "We value our freedom and we value America. That's why we're going to ban any real encryption because freedom is a wonderful thing." could have just as easily been spoken by Kirk in some vague defense of the Prime Directive after he topples a planet's leader and sleeps with all the green and lavender women with iron brassieres he could grab.

    Ranting aside, its nice to see the Ugly American in space again.

    I think this was the best ST pilot since The Cage and the dark few first minutes of DS9. It wasn't great sci-fi but I think it'll have half a chance if the writers can resist the urge for preachiness.

    1. Re:What I liked by ttyRazor · · Score: 1

      yeah, making sure they go shots of them rubbing where the sun don't shine was really arty.

      I guess I can't complain too much, TOS definitely had a "healthy" attitude towards sex, and although some of it seems tame today I'm sure it was "pushing it" far more than the 7 of 9 type crap does. I just wish it was motivated more by 60's mindset of simply freer attitudes towards sex than the ratings grabbing soft porn of today.

    2. Re:What I liked by pandaba · · Score: 1

      The reason I said 'arty' was because the scene reminded me of some bad art house films and student projects I've seen, where the director thought she would be so very clever to have two characters sensually touching each other while verbally inserting skewers in the other wherever possible. Ya, its a cliche but the difference in tone between actions and words and the way it was shot with odd angles obviously suggested to me that the director was briefly reverting to his UCLA film school days and doing something which reminded him of an old french film he once loved before he became too much of a company hack. His effect may not have worked but I think he had intents beyond simply stimulating a few lonely fanboys.

    3. Re:What I liked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:

      11. Kill the sand niggers

    4. Re:What I liked by BinxBolling · · Score: 2
      I didn't think the disinfectant scene was too pr0nish... To me, it actually seemed as if the director had vague arty pretensions and thought the sensuality of the scene, mixed with the harsh dialogue, would create a lovely bit of dissonance.

      There was dialogue during that scene? I didn't notice any...

    5. Re:What I liked by Snaller · · Score: 1

      I like that the characters finally have a measure of humanity. They're occasionally noble, often shortsighted, easily amused and excited, sometimes brave, usually susceptible to blind predjudice, quarrelsome, hypocritical, and driven by baser instincts they usually dont try to understand. ... That is how people would really act, not as the insufferable, always correct robot that was Picard / Janeway.

      That's because that's the excuse you and people like you use for not improving yourself. "That's the way real humans are" - crap - We could and shuld improve and grow up - but in order to do some one must WANT to - Picard was a perfectly obtainable goal if those who came before him and had a wish to improve themselves - of course its always easier to say "that's just the way we are" and blow up buildings.

      Most leaders will always have more Shatner than Stewart in them.

      Because most of them are hypocritical fools who are satisfied with being a child instead of growing truly up.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    6. Re:What I liked by ttyRazor · · Score: 1

      I'd like to believe that theory, but in light of their efforts to appeal to a "broader audience", I think any "arty" ambitions were merely a shallow excuse to do something "interesting" with a bit of dialog where they'd otherwise just be standing around.

      The scene might have worked later in the series after such decntaminations had become routine and everyone had gotten over it (the human guy anyway, I doubt the T'Pol would have any problems with the situation), but this early I would expect some awkwardness.

  273. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by kilgore_47 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Am I the only onwe that thinks it's kinda of sad that this got +5, iformative?

    Quite possibly. I can't think why anyone else would find it sad that link to pictures of the hot chick from the new star trek serries got modded informative.

    I was informed. How is that sad? Surely pictures of Jolene Blalock aren't sad!

    --
    ___
    The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  274. Transporters by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

    Alot of stuff has been said already comparing this to the other series, where it should fit in between TOS and TNG. I don't think anyone's brought this one up yet, something I noticed was funny.
    Transporters are very new technology and they dealt with that very well (the look on Archer's face after having been beamed up was pretty good), however, the transporter beam seemed to me to be way ahead of TOS in look and speed, much more in line with TNG+. It's good and well to make the transporter look "neat", but in the other series, at least they can make each species transporter look distinctly different - why not make this one look more "primitive"?

    That, and, we've all seen transporter accidents before (a few fatalities, and plenty of close calls) - This one seemed to go off without a hitch! Strong sensor lock, no anomolies, etc.

    Nitpicking, yes. Dissappointed, kinda. Tired and rambling? yeah

    --
    "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
  275. my thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'm glad to see a more Kirk like captain. Nice to see some action scenes. "Teleport device" and "Phase guns" was funny. But why is it going to be on at 7? Why not 8 like voyager?

    Now if DirecTv would just carry UPN.

  276. Sorry I'm way OT again here by Pope · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Season Four of ReBoot in November on YTV.
    Non-Canucks, I can't help ya.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:Sorry I'm way OT again here by icebeing · · Score: 1

      That show still on?

      Awwww, man! Bit-swizzlin!

      I miss home ;-)

  277. Geez, michael... by A.S. · · Score: 1

    Everybody know porno music goes: bow-chicka-bow-chicka-wow.

    I'll bet you can't even do the Transformers sound right.

  278. Tits by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    It has potential. I'll give it that. I watched the whole thing... so that has to count for something. I guess.

    Spare me the power balad theme song. I laughed soooo hard.

    and, as for the tits. Wow. Those must have cost a lot. Honestly, those are some of TV's top ten. How far will cable TV go? hehe. I love it.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  279. Re:What a piece of crap -- TOS was different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    For me, "Star Trek" will always mean the original TV series. It was the 1960's for bleeps sake. In a time of pervasive and official racism, it had a mixed race crew. In a time of women viewed as weak, unskilled, and happy housewives, it had competent women (though the fight to have a female command officer was lost). In a time of "no open mouth kiss" prudishness, it aggressively pushed the envelope. In a time of sliderules, binoculars, and suitcase-sized reel-to-reel tape recorders, it had tricorders. In a time of punched cards, it had voice recognition and (albeit experimental and nasty) human-equivalent AI.

    It inspired people. It infuriated people. Diplomats complained and complemented. People cared. It mattered.

    "Enterprise" will be followed in my area by Chicago(?) police officers blowing up the local bad-guy aliens. If Voyager and the first episode are any guides, it will be a toss-up which will be more socially and technologically intriguing. The aliens will have less variety than one finds among humans in downtown LA. The technology... will look like an inspired 1960's vision of the future. This seems so very sad.

    Might one do another "Star Trek" today? The original required continuously fighting the network suits, and spending through the nose for the special effects needed just to make every-day surroundings work. So "the studio _is_ the network" doesn't help. I fuzzily recall the DS9 director(?) saying some of his interesting stuff was only possible because the suits were off focused on Voyager. Voyager. I could live with moralizing, but it would be nice to get at least "harassed at airport" level thought behind it, rather than say "drunk homeless person" rantings. Ah well. But imagine, what would a new ST look like? Assuming the same basic "socially-and-technically-inspired cowboys in space" telling somewhat thoughtful stories?

    Well, you need someone who can tell stories. West Wing has what's-his-name. TOS had several people. As for the social and technical...

    Start anywhere. Dynamic organization rather than rigid hierarchy. A tight team acting as one, rather than "we run our sub with 18-year olds, so everything is explicit and verbose". A cast of people with deep and varied skills, rather than a couple of "I can do everything"s. People with intelligence, insight and wisdom, who make you think "gosh, what a neat perspective", rather than "god, how mindlessly stupid". Communication, coordination, planning, politics.

    Walk the taboos - nudity, physical contact, backrubs, grooming, sex, social groupings, marriage, appearance. Religion - discussion of, high-profile belief in, disbelief. Push the envelope on race, class, caste, age young and old, pretty and ugly, fit and not, intelligence exceptional and impaired. Our changing humanness - delegating intelligence to the environment, genetic mods, non-biological component integration, symbiots.

    Technically, if it is already being prototyped now, it's pretty silly to ignore it. Pervasive computing. Intelligence augmentation. Pervasive robotics, varied and autonomous, and active environments. Wide-band user interfaces with gesture, voice, VR, holography, force feedback, face and tone interpretation, task understanding, etc. Walk though the MIT Media Lab, and grab everything interesting. Read DARPA's current request for proposals.

    Yes it would require work. Just doing zero-g in a shirt sleeve environment is a big pain. But it doesn't seem like ST is even trying any more. Perhaps that's ok, and Paramount is just mining out the last interest in a 1960's vision. I saw someone argue that the only problem with Voyager was that DS9 existed, which "divided the demographic". Perhaps. But that's not why I don't think of it as Star Trek. We can do better. Yes?

    (Hmm, Neptune in 10 minutes means a light-hour per minute, so about a light-year per week. I hope they brought board games.)

  280. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So, what did you think of it? The theme song has to go. Commander Tucker ("Kumanduh Tuckah") needs to get a personality other than "he'll be just like McCoy, only clumsy and stupid". Is it really necessary to rehash "cold emotionless Vulcans vs. thoughtless, reckless humans"? That plot device was old thirty years ago and it's physically painful to watch now. How can armor plating go "offline"? Electromagnetic shields maybe, but one of the virtues of a hunk of steel is that it doesn't go "offline". And what's with the soft porn? I was waiting for the bow-chicka-bow-wow music to kick in.

    I liked it too! :)

  281. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by GMontag451 · · Score: 1
    It's good you threw the mini-skirt bit on there, because we wouldn't want *shudder* Dr. Pulaski (st:tng replacement for crusher during season 3 iirc) ending up on that list.


    It was season 2, and you should have seen her when she guest starred in a TOS episode. I believe it was called "Is There No Truth In Beauty". Damn fine brunette in her younger days.

  282. Relationships, love -- always the end of Trek. by cgleba · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hmm. . .I agree with many of the people here. . .
    this has a lot of potential and they'll need to do some character development and re-orging like in the last few series before it is comfortable.

    The thing that I'm leary about is the vulcan chick. . .she fits the role well, however if she ever starts having 'human' feeling of affection (to boost ratings) we know that the series is going down. . .if she gets into a relationship we know it's toast. That 'rub down' scene was a little daring for the first show. Case and point:

    1) Original Trek there was alien ass but no "love".

    2) Next Gen ended when Wharf and Troy started their 'relationship'.

    3) Voyager added 9 for some T+A ratings which was good, however as soon as she started having 'human' feeling it ended.

    4) DS9 went severly down hill after the Kira and Odo thing.

    "Love" is always a sign that the Trek producers are hurting and attempting to appeal to a wider audience. Imagine if the original Trek got to the point that Ohura (sp?) and Kirk had a "relationsip"? That would have been plain ass lame.

    If they just keep her attractiveness at POA status and don't do anything with it we're cool. . .I have a feeling that they're going to try rating-boosting stuff too early, though :(.

    1. Re:Relationships, love -- always the end of Trek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it doesn't belong in Trek to boot. These people are supposed to be SO much more evolved than us (no poverty or war remember) yet they behave even worse in their work place than I do? Please.

  283. It was alright. by dkoyanagi · · Score: 1
    As with all ST series I thought the first episode was pretty good. Now we'll settle in for a season or two of mediocre episodes while the series finds its groove. That's to be expected.

    A few observations:

    Yeah, the opening theme's gotta go.

    The ship looked great. More like a real ship than the "Love Boat" that was Enterprise-D or Voyager.

    I really liked the low(er) tech approach, especially the "tractor beam". No magic particles or mysterious fields. Just good old fashioned hardware. However, I didn't like the fact that they could adjust the sensors so easily. Just looks like more magic. It would be better if they had limited technology so they have to find other ways to be resourceful.

    Soft core, I didn't mind too much. Did nothing for the plot, although I must admit I wasn't really paying attention to the dialog. Paramount just trying to hook the 12-24 male demographic.

    They should keep the the plasma "blasters". I thought they worked better visually than the "phase pistols".

    It was interesting to see the beginnings of the "Prime Directive" when T'Pol was cautioning Tucker to view alien cultures objectively. I always assumed that the Prime Directive was there to protect alien cultures from Federation interference or as an easy cop-out for the Feds when they don't want to get involved. The exchange between T'Pol and Tucker hinted that the Prime Directive is going to be there primarily to protect humans by keeping them out of trouble.

  284. Tribbles by vaxtor · · Score: 1

    I hope they don't run into any tribbles in this series.

  285. Other rehash plot ideas by qubezz · · Score: 1

    Or how long before one of the crew members becomes possessed/infected by some alien force...

    Or the computer gets taken over...

    Or the shields get blasted down to nothing and our heroes pull out just in time...

    Sheesh.

    1. Re:Other rehash plot ideas by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      "Or how long before one of the crew members becomes possessed/infected by some alien force... "
      Damn, you just ruined #2

      "Or the computer gets taken over... "

      and #3

      "Or the shields get blasted down to nothing and our heroes pull out just in time... "

      there went #4

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  286. It's been taken care of by Niscenus · · Score: 1

    A couple of thoughts are on the table about the Klingon evolution tract, especially now that there's a temporal cold war. There are two first contacts that have occurred; you only know about one. Wait a season, the latter will be fixed; the former, on the other hand, may be quite a bit down the road, if handled at all. My guess is it'll just remain alluded to, but I point out that this temporal cold war (originating five to eight hundred years in the future) will solve many of the currently perceived "conflicts."

    --
    "Yeah...it was the numbers that were irrational, not the murderous cult of vegetarians...." -- Hippasus of Metapontum
  287. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by kramerds · · Score: 1

    all i have to say about the cold chamber is damn, you could cut glass with those suckers!

  288. Is my information faulty? by qa'lth · · Score: 1

    Or did it say somewhere in TOS that Kirk's Enterprise was the first starship to have two warp nacells instead of the standard four..
    And if this is so, why is this primitive Enterprise driving around with two?

  289. Where the homeworlds are by TheMCP · · Score: 1

    Gene Roddenberry co-authored a paper with a couple of astrophysicists from the Harvard/Smithsonian Center For Astrophysics regarding where the homeworlds of the various Trek species are. They used what the show said about the characteristics of the homeworlds and selected stars which had appropriate characteristics. If you want to know where the homeworlds are, or whether they got the show right or not, go look it up.

    I know about the paper because one of my closest friends is one of the astrophysicists.

    However, you're right: they messed up bigtime when they said that, and it nagged me at the time too.

  290. so, uh by BeerHunter · · Score: 1

    Has anyone given any speculative thought to who, in the future, might be trying to pull apart the Klingon Empire before it gets too powerful?

    1. Re:so, uh by Genom · · Score: 2

      My first inclination was Romulans - and the light build and calm tone of "shady half-cloaked future villan" seems to support this. Weren't the Romulans also big into genetic engineering?

      The other obvious choice would be Dominion-related, as the Klingons were fairly instrumental in the DS9 wormhole conflict, and they also posess the genetic engineering tech.

      Cardassians? They never really liked the Klingons either, although they never factored into TOS, and as such probably aren't suspect.

      I'm sure by season-end, we'll have a fairly good idea ;P

  291. Re: Your Criticism by NeuroPulse · · Score: 1

    Is that a news post? Seems more like someone giving their cynical review of a show/movie. Damn, what a negative attitude. Wish you wouldn't infict it on everyone else. I thoroughly enjoyed the premiere of Enterprise, but knew their would be people on bulletine boards with attitude problems. I intended to avoid reading the whining posts simply by not going to Star Trek discussion groups. Well that didn't work. The opening sequence is awesome. The contemporary music brings the show so much closer to the present and inspires one to make these things happen. Starships are shown to be a clear result of and step in the progression of human achievements that have happened and are happening. Humans, including Charles Tucker and Johnathan Archer are much more like modern humans with attitude problems and much growth yet to happen. They are going to make mistakes. They are wrong about many things. And by the end of the show, we see the journey has already begun. There is some understanding. There is some enlightenment. People in the Enterprise era are exactly as I would expect them to be. By the time of Kirk, there are very few such as McCoy. And by the time of Picard, they are extinct. I'm not going to get into explaining about the polarized hull plating. If you suspended disbelief and realized you are viewing reality, you wouldn't even think things like that. Instead, you'd think there must be something you don't know or are misunderstanding which is exactly what has happend. And I liked watching T'Pol decontaminate. She is beautiful. I feel so elated and privelaged to be able to witness the historic events of the future. I have so many positive things to say, but I just felt the need to counteract the negative vibes from that post.

  292. Careful what you wish for... by roystgnr · · Score: 2

    I won't say that Clarke's gone completely senile, but honestly, did you read 3001? What the hell was that?

    I'd like to see a real SF writer consultant (didn't B5 have Harlan Ellison?), but someone who's writing good stuff currently. Michael Flynn, for example, is pretty good at plausible near-future settings.

    1. Re:Careful what you wish for... by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2

      How about Orson Scott Card? (Probably too good for Star Trek, admittedly, but a guy can dream..)

    2. Re:Careful what you wish for... by IAmTheGodYouHate · · Score: 0

      no SHIT
      I just got done reading Ender's Game and Speaker For The Dead for the first time
      FUCKIN A!
      soooo good
      I would love to see him do a couple of Star Trek episodes, but I think you're right-- he'd never lower himself to that :-)

      --

      ----
      Stop eyeball fucking me, asshole.
  293. Junkyard Wars Hosts by Cardinal · · Score: 2

    Well, they got rid of the idiot American host from last season, and replace him with.. another American host. (Only saw two minutes at the end, don't know if he's an idiot or not)

    I want the English host back, damnit. Junkyard Wars the Americanized Version just isn't as good as the original.

    1. Re:Junkyard Wars Hosts by tuffy · · Score: 2
      I haven't decided if the new American host is as painful as the last one. But if you want Robert back, just wait for a new season of the Brit edition of JW to air. I'm sure there'll be one, but it's all a matter of whether the shows are done yet are not.

      I'm really hoping they'll air the two series back-to-back.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:Junkyard Wars Hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a series being shown already . . . and make it Scrapheap Challenge, please ;)

      They've already had to make monster trucks and torpedos . . . next week it's street cleaning machines. Hmmm.

      See http://www.channel4.com/scrapheap/ for details

    3. Re:Junkyard Wars Hosts by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Woah. A three-way challenge with a *two day* build? And seeing the Megalomaniacs back is always fun. Can't wait.

      Tho the reason for the name switch still eludes me. Maybe "Scrapheap Challenge" wasn't American enough for some strange reason.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    4. Re:Junkyard Wars Hosts by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      If I recall correctly, "Scrapheap Challenge" came first. "Junkyard Wars" is the americanized version of that.

  294. Re:Klingon appearance by wadetemp · · Score: 1

    True, true... I had forgotten about that. But, also remember in Star Trek 5 there was a blending of both types... some of the guys on the warbird had pretty smooth heads, as did the woman. And the old man was as bumpy as normal. I've only seen that movie once though... so it's hard for me to remember. I think that's because I want to forget. :)

  295. Watch closer next time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She did use it all over. Oh, yeah...

    (yes, I know Paramount is playing me like a fish on a hook. they're good at it.)

  296. Re:Klingon appearance by gilmae · · Score: 1

    He said that one set of Klingons were Northern Klingons, a reference to Northern Italians who are more likely to have blond hair than Southern Italians due to their descent from wandering barbarian tribes as opposed to Latin tribes.
    It was a joke.

  297. the most tasteless comment ever: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its not like they flew 767's into their space ship.

  298. ho hum beginning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, that opening music has gotta go... And the opening sequence reminded me of a cross between Quantum Leap and The Wonder Years...

    But beyond that - this show has definate potential. It's nice to see how some things are already being tied into the original series. Like - why was the science officer a Vulcan? What did T'pau look like before she got scaggly and daggly...

    I kinda liked the pink and blue butterfly eatin' dancers, and oh yeah, did I mention T'pau has a really nice rack?

    Sure the show's goofy - but hey, the economy is in the doldrums, and Paramount's gotta save some money on all those SFX somehow ;-)

    I'll give it another 6 or so shows to see whether I need to deprogram it from the VCR and just skip to Special Unit 2 w/Alexondra Lee (that show sucks, but she's a total babe...)

  299. GalaxyQuest? by misuba · · Score: 2, Funny
    I can't be the only one to notice the similarities here - the boyish black guy on navigation, the transporter that everyone's afraid will turn them inside out...

    --

    If you don't pretend to be anyone, are you?

  300. Ok Michael I get the False Cynicism :P by t0qer · · Score: 1

    Ok Michael I get the False Cynicism :P

    Before people go and assume things about the show lets see what we got stacked up so far.
    Production Quality
    From the moment that klingon fired his phaser at the corn silo, you could see effects qualities on par with not so recent films such as twister. The letterbox Format was sweet on my non HDTV tv, I know UPN does broadcast digital so it was probably on par with a full theater production for those with the proper setup. The explosion was very nicely done with many particles flying everywhere. Question is, how did they do that? Set's actually pulled you into the storyline. You could tell attention to detail was the primary goal of the directors. Makeup was great as was the props. It was a completely new look that had no resemblance to ST STNG STDSN, well none of em.. Awesome!
    Storyline
    The story at this point seems to revolve around scott bakula's character, with his flashbacks to his childhood where his father is the inventor of the warp 4.5 engine. He holds a very visible (and at one point very vocal!) attitudes towards Vulcan's for not giving his father the equivalent of killing the goose. First episode, he got into fist fights, used the first phaser, got acid trails, got some nookie, AND on top of all this had badass space battle scenes. It was all glued together very well, the plot was not as predictable as I thought it was going to be.
    My Thoughts
    I'm amazed to see Scott Bakula playing such a physically demanding role. I hope the writers understand that this is his ticket, ACTION AND FIGHTING W00T. Kirk and Spock were best buddies, Vulcan's and humans had hung out for 200 years by then. Captain archers distain and Commander archer's relationship blended together well, but lacked the friendship aspect that Kirk and Spock had. You could tell that Sneaky Vulcan is going to have more secrets throughout the show. I predict he basic elements of the show (weekly focus change to different characters, new species, new planets) will remain the same. Star trek is about a voyage of discovery.
    And a question to paramount webserver admins.
    I went to the website and found myself asking. What was the server load?

    --Toq

    ~~~Moderators take note, I posted this with my real account. Unlike the karma whoring anonymous cowards I stand behind my opinions.

  301. Wrong. by JohnG · · Score: 2

    Your critique seems way overcritical michael, and lacking in some very basic common sense. If vulcans and humans didn't get along in Kirks time, or any other captians time, why would they get along when their relationship was just beginning? That would have been an absolutely unforgivable mistake. What you are proposing is similar to saying "Why don't buffy and the vampires get along, this whole fighting thing is getting old". Vulcans and Humans arguing over logic is part of the way thing ARE in the Star Trek universe. If you don't like it maybe you aren't as big a fan of the series as you claim. Secondly regarding the "soft porn", I too was kinda taken by surprise by it, but should we have been? Has anyone seen the original series recently. It comes on after Quantum Leap, and I swear every time I leave the TV on after QL and go into my room Kirk is making out with some half naked hottie hot hot of an alien superchick. The original series definetely didn't lack in the T&A department. As far as the rest goes, I think you need to realize what the word "fiction" in science fiction means. Overall I loved it, it looks like we are going to get a much more kirk-like captain, I liked the kinda sarcastic smartass commander, and most importantly it looks like we will actually see a show about seeking out new lifeforms, like the original series, not about what crew member is sleeping with what other crew member.

  302. Decontamination Scene by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

    Everybody is complaining about the "Jello scene". Don't you see, this is the most brilliant part of the pilot? Perhaps you don't realize it now but soon you'll be saying to yourself, at least subconciously, "maybe if I watch a few more episodes, there will be another Jello scene..."

    ;-)

    -Paul Komarek

    1. Re:Decontamination Scene by Nutt · · Score: 1

      Heck, I'm saying that out loud :) I liked the jello scene. Just because it didn't completally go with the ST "image" doesn't mean it was bad in some way.

  303. Is it just me... by toiletsalmon · · Score: 0

    ...or am I the only one that expected the Klingon to run out of the corn field, look at the farmer-redneck-guy and say "What you got on my forty, dog?" Of course, I guess he doesn't make a bad Klingon. He's sure as hell big enough...

  304. reactive armour by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2
    Reactive armour was a specific counter to High Explosive Soft Head (HESH) ammunition.

    The HESH ammo would conform to the outide of the armour and blow, resulting in little damage to the exterior of the armour but somewhere on the interior a large chunk would come loose and fly around at high speed, much like "newton's cradle" the toy on your doctors desk where u whack the balls at one end and they come loose at the other.

    Tank crews took a dim view to chunks of their armour shredding through the interior of the tank.

    HESH ammo meant there was little point in just making solid plate armour thicker.

    The Russian response was reactive armour which worked fine, but was VERY expesive to maintain properly, and dangerous when dealing with anything other than another Main Battle Tank.

    The allied response was laminated armour, where the different layers of composite absorbed the momentum imparted by HESH.

    Both approaches proved effective but laminate is easier to maintain and looks cooler, so thats the way they went.

    But if you had an older tank (and many do) then you wouldn't say no to a strap-on reactive shell if you were up against people using either HESH, or many of the other fancy shells & missiles out there these days.

    BTW the shell with the stick on the front was IIRC called "Probe" ammunition.

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    1. Re:reactive armour by ahde · · Score: 1

      I always wondered why those dudes with mohawks and spiked leather jackets who ran around shouting Oi! were called Hessians.

  305. You wouldn't be a SCIENTOLOGIST would you? by leereyno · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Do you have too much money? Scientology can help you with that.

    Do you have a tendency to think for yourself more than those around you? Scientology can help you with that too.

    Would you like to eat beans and rice and work for free for a billion years towards enslaving all mankind? Has scientology got a job for you!

    http://www.xenu.net

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  306. Plot Repetition by kfc · · Score: 1

    So aside from the acting which might get better and the Vulcans vs. Humans thing which looks like they intend to resolve - after all we become bosom buddies later on - I found the plot behind the episode just the same old crap.

    That temporal chamber reminds me too much of the worm hole and the new super aliens even have the ability to shape change. Sounds to me like they are trying to ressurect the DS9 plot. Toss in some Vulcan/Human problems, evil genetic engineering, a few Klingons and you've suddenly got something fresh.

    I personally would have thought just exploring the galaxy for the first time and encountering so many new and possibly hostile aliens would have been enough.

    In fact, since TOS represents a lot of the Cold War and NG feels like after the fall of the Berlin Wall, why not model this series on the events from the turn of the century (18th-19th) to early WWII. I would think those years contain a wealth of plot ideas.

    Anyways, it's Star Trek, it'll take them a bit to find their footing.

    --
    Greg Sanders - kfc@themes.org - ElCoronel
  307. Re:Klingon appearance by ttyRazor · · Score: 1

    Semi-officially the explanation is "better makeup effects". I think we should just leave it at that instead of trying to speculate on ridiculous plot threads. The DS9 episode should really be considered nothing more than a joke (the whole episode was really just a fun little inside joke on the inconsistencies between the new shows and TOS).

  308. Mmmkay... ktnx for the semi-spoilers. by ShadeEagle · · Score: 0

    This IS off topic, but ON topic.

    I was looking forward to watching this show, I really was. I thought "Hey, maybe this'll be better than Voyager!"

    But what do I get when I do my post-work-shift slashdot load? Right at the top of the page, semi-spoilers. Now I know what to expect in the first episode! Geeze. I work evenings, see... so I don't get to watch these things until they have aired a few times on reruns, when I can fire up the ole VCR... but the main thing is, I don't get UPN. From the comments I've read, some people are complaining that they're on the west coast, that they haven't even had the chance to watch it - but some /.ers don't even get UPN - we have to wait for OTHER networks to pick the show up and show it! Please keep that in mind for when you put up stuff about, oh, let's pick an example here - the Lord of the Rings movie. Not everyone is able to see it first-day-first-showtime... Check the poll - a lot of us have work. And that doesn't mean we all work from 9 to 5, either.

    ktnxbye.

  309. World Trade Center sighting? by owenferguson · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or did the establishing shot of futuristic downtown new york have one of the WTC towers still standing, but the other one missing?

    1. Re:World Trade Center sighting? by mcg1969 · · Score: 1

      The futuristic city was San Francisco, not New York. The Transamerica building was in full view, and they made mention of the nearby city of Sausalito.

    2. Re:World Trade Center sighting? by owenferguson · · Score: 1

      yeah, my bad. Don't drink and watch television.

  310. Absolutely Right... by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It was a better premiere episode than I expected. I mean, there's only *so much* you can do when you assemble a bunch of actors in an ensemble show like the ST series' and make them act before they fit with each other and their characters. No ST series has ever had a real all-encompassing central character--you have the captain as the "hub" but all the other characters are just as important to the feel of the series. That's something that always set ST apart from most other TV shows--that it's a true ensemble production.

    The same is true of the writers. The writers have to know the characters and know how the actors fit into their characters' shoes (or bodysuits, in the case of 7 and the Vulcan chick...hehe...). This means by definition that both the writing and the acting in the first season of a ST series are not going to be up to par. It takes time for the actors, the characters, and the writers to all "mesh" well.

    That's why I was pleasantly surprised by the passable story and acting. It's better than the first few episodes of any other ST series. It's promising.

    I especially like hearkening back to the old TOS rough-and-tumble attitudes. That's something a lot of people forget--that Roddenberry set out to write a "Wagon Train to the Stars," a sort of Western set in deep space. In that respect shows like Babylon 5 and even Andromeda (yuck--sorry, but--yuck) and of course Farscape have been far closer to the concept of TOS than any of the newer ST series have been. So despite the bitching thus far, I think Roddenberry would have been very happy with this episode and with the potential of this series.

    Not that there's anything wrong with the world of TNG and DS9 and even Voyager (80% of the episodes were "good enough" in the last 2 seasons, so wuite yer bitching)--as a geek I love the technobabble and the idea of having such an advanced technological framework. I love the wormholes and tachyon beams and especialy the episodes involving quantum mechanics. But there's also nothing wrong with returning to ST's shoot-from-the-hip roots. Especially since it got to a point where many average folks couldn't watch ST--my grandmother for instance was a smart woman, but she never understood half of the technical stuff they were saying and so after loyally watching TOS and then TNG for 30 years she gave up. This is a chance to recapture those people.

    That said, I agree with what so many have said--the opening music has to go. What the FUCK were they thinking? I didn't know whether to laugh or scream. What they should have done and what they can still do is have Scott Bakula read off the a variation of the old standard, "Space, the final frontier..." They could reasonably inster a few anachronisms, like calling it the "spaceship Enterprise" instead of the "starship Enterprise" and such. Because, that opening music alone is enough to alienate most or the current ST fanbase, who'll view it as a sign that the show is catering to a certain uneducated demographic alone.

    And finally, as for the tits--why complain? As long as the stories are good, the tits are just a bonus. How can any man woman or child with a pulse complain? I mean, did you SEE those things in the rubdown scene? Those nipples were like two stiff warp nacelles, boldly jutting out where every man would love to go... ;-)

    Now excuse me while I go jerk off to the thought of a borgalicious lesbian encounter between 7 of 9 and that Vulcan chick. Mmmm, now *where* did she just put that tricorder???

    --

    Chasing Amy
    (We all chase Amy...)
    "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
    1. Re:Absolutely Right... by pedro · · Score: 1

      That was...
      Beautiful, Man! Really!
      (Sniff!)
      My hat is off to any and all cold induced aureolar projectiles! Anytime! Anywhere!
      Oh gawd.. gotta go.. Bye!

      --
      Brak: What's THAT?
      Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
    2. Re:Absolutely Right... by armb · · Score: 1

      > my grandmother for instance was a smart woman, but she never understood half of the technical stuff they were saying

      What's to understand? They make it up as they go along.

      --
      rant
    3. Re:Absolutely Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      that opening music alone is enough to alienate most or the current ST fanbase
      Was the opening really any worse than the tired old standard of psuedo-classical music accompanied by the title ship wizzing by every few seconds?
    4. Re:Absolutely Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      word!

    5. Re:Absolutely Right... by siberian · · Score: 1

      Umm..

      ITS NOT REAL

      ITS A TV SHOW

      YOUR GRANDMOTHER IS SMART IF SHE DOESNT UNDERSTAND THINGS THAT DON'T EXIST.

      Back to your normally scheduled lunacy.

      my grandmother for instance was a smart woman, but she never understood half of the technical stuff they were saying and so after loyally watching TOS and then TNG for 30 years she gave up. This is a chance to recapture those people.

    6. Re:Absolutely Right... by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      It's half name-dropping of current theoretical physics, half jabberwocky.

      Given the macroscopic quantum entanglement experiment announced this week, expect that to make its way into transporter upgrades as the show progresses.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    7. Re:Absolutely Right... by Transcendent · · Score: 1

      And finally, as for the tits--why complain? As long as the stories are good, the tits are just a bonus. How can any man woman or child with a pulse complain? I mean, did you SEE those things in the rubdown scene? Those nipples were like two stiff warp nacelles, boldly jutting out where every man would love to go... ;-)

      Amen to that!! Damn... have you guys SEEN the maxum pics of her???!!? I say put her in a g-string bikini for her "uniform", heh...

    8. Re:Absolutely Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Absolutely Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Riiight, so the great unwashed masses want to hear a theme song, while the "educated" want to hear ... the exact same thing they've always had.


      Get over it. This ain't "Star Trek: Enterprise". This is "Enterprise (based on Star Trek)". It's different. Deal.

    10. Re:Absolutely Right... by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      That's something a lot of people forget--that Roddenberry set out to write a "Wagon Train to the Stars," a sort of Western set in deep space.

      No, Roddenberry pitched it as a 'Wagon Train to the Stars' so that the network execs at NBC would even consider putting any money into it. The resulting series showed a melange between what he wanted, what the NBC execs thought the people wanted, and a low budget.

      ST:TNG shows better what Roddenberry wanted, I think, though he did very well with TOS (I like that a lot of the stories made political points or had morals), and DS9/VOY showed exactly why he was the one with the vision, and not Berman and the rest.

      I especially like hearkening back to the old TOS rough-and-tumble attitudes.

      While I liked Voyager/DS9/tacyons/wormholes/quantum fissures/whatever, I have to sincerely agree with you here. Enterprise really seems to have that honest, down-home, relaxed feel to it (I'll refrain from mentioning 'American' anywhere since I'm a Canuck and still appreciate what I'm sure many regard as an 'American' feeling to the show).

      Which brings up another interesting point I've thought of. Patriotism. In the show, it's Humans against the universe, a coming-of-age sort of atmosphere, which I really like. It seems to me like the producers were trying to give it an 'American' feel, with 'down-home country boys' (which makes that British leutenant seem out of place), and, instead of spouting my usual anti-American rhetoric, I actually quite enjoyed it; perhaps some of that enjoyment was because of, and not despite, the flag-waving feel.

      I suppose taking those 'American' values and applying them to the whole species kind of helps me identify with the show, and thus with what I usually criticize as an annoying American trait - and really, isn't that what Star Trek was about? Bringing us together, and taking down borders?

      Bravo to the producers, for finally pulling off what they haven't done before without Roddenberry there: making the point he always wanted to make.

      --Dan

    11. Re:Absolutely Right... by wedgegeck · · Score: 1

      ok, except for the whole lesbian tangent there, I agree with you. The episode was a lot of fun, and the characters look promising. I look forward to some good things in the future.

    12. Re:Absolutely Right... by frogstomper · · Score: 1
      my grandmother for instance was a smart woman, but she never understood half of the technical stuff they were saying
      What's to understand? They make it up as they go along.
      ...

      Bugger. All that cognitive effort gone to waste.

    13. Re:Absolutely Right... by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      heh, while that may be entirely true for DS9 and VOY.. hell, pretty true for that voyager elite force game "lemme pull my helmut out of my transporter buffer" *cringe*

      Creative license my arse. The old series' at least tried to have some kind of plausability. The bridge on TOS was even designed so they push the exact same controls every time that they do a certain action. Fire the phasers - push that button there. Engage warp - flip that switch there. For TNG, they even wrote a technical manual. So the authors and the show writers could get it straight. Hell froze over every time our Voyager fanboys used it though.

      Make it up as they go, indeed.

      BTW, I wish people would shut the hell up about the TNG ships being slower than the TOS ships. They readjusted the warp scales for crying out loud. a TNG ship going warp 5 is going a hell of a lot faster than a TOS ship going warp 5. I'm not going to look it up for TOS, but the max speed for TNG was warp 10 (Impossible to achieve because that puts you everywhere in the universe at the same time..) Can you see how I hated VOY? they "broke" warp 10 by monkeying around with a shuttle, it wasn't even "hard", and then they de-evolved into some kind of lizard. WTF is the logic in that?! If VOY writers wrote the original "history" of trek, that would put Cochrane as de-evolving into a monkey or some shit after breaking warp speed. ARGH.
      No but seriously, under TNG warp scales.. you get alot faster the higher the number, like warp 9.99999999999995 is damn fast, but you will never reach warp 10.. unless some kind of sub-subspace or some BS is discovered. TOS warp scales, I bet a 13 rates at about warp 9 on TNG.
      As for the series fanale for TNG, The ships may have gotten faster, and rather than rerate the warp scale again, they rerated the old warp scale, maybe combined them.. Either that or we got a taste of just how bad Voyager was going to be on the tech.
      I swear, if it wasn't the point of that show to follow their voyage home, they'd have invented a transwarp engine or some BS to get home by the 3rd episode. Go warp 90 or some bullshit, or go home, then come back in time and rescue themselves before they left. Do the braga timetravel where nothing you do will affect the past.

      Hrm.. all I need is a one use timetravel device, and a portable EMH, then I'd go back and heal Mr Roddenberry so he could prevent this travesty of trek.

      As for enterprise, I'll see just how bad it gets by the end of the season. Maybe it's first season wont be the horrible 1 script first season voyager had.

      (as in, ep1+2 get pulled to delta quadrant, ep3 try to get home-fail, ep4 try to get home-fail, ep5 try to get home-fail, etc, etc, etc, where's the damn character development, where's the damn discovery and exploration?! Even in later seasons, I just watched two eps off of my tivo.. One was them talking about the past and rescuing a mars module from 2032 from an energy field, the other was something so similar to that, I can't remember, it's like watching the same damn thing twice)

    14. Re:Absolutely Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So said the AOL thumping, star wars fan, right before he returned to his pretty lights, magic powers and incest.

    15. Re:Absolutely Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, they actually still compose music with stringed instruments, brass, woodwinds, and percussion. You'll also notice the background music used in Enterprise is still orchestrated. (We tend not to call it classical music these days, though.)

      (When I heard the theme, I was afraid they'd try filling the rest of the show with the pop music they like using on most drama shows these days.)

  311. Re:Kiss Me If Your Alien Speaks English by kmcorbett · · Score: 1

    I doubt Vulcans are concerned about how Humans spell on the Internet.

    Apparently they don't like the way Humans smell in close quarters.

    /kmc

  312. Are you insane? by KiwiKing · · Score: 1

    None of the writing from any subsequent series has come close to the quality of writing on the first season of TOS. In fact with TOS it was opposite, the writing and plotlines degraded in quality each season and reached it's low point in season 3 (the final season).

  313. Exploration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trek seems to be de-evolving into soft porn. From 7of9, we all know what the whole point of her character was, now to this. It doesn't really fit into the series about exploration and discovery.

    I dunno... that scene made me think that the only space Tucker will be interested in discovering and exploring is the space between T'Pol's legs.

  314. Klingon history has been altered! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As established from TOS and TNG, the Klingons were a primative race at the time of contact with Earth. They were at the level of 13th century Japanese or Chinese in terms of technology.The original story is that the young federation made the mistake of giving the Klingons advance technology. The Klingons then took their tribal rivalry to the stars against the federation because of some misunderstanding. Thus the prime directive was born. In this first Enterprise episode, the Klingon had an advance interstellar empire with stealth ships? I think most geeks will agree that the Klingons are blend of acient Japanese culture and Islamic beliefs. Given their war like culture, the Klingons can't even put a bicycle together nevermind be able to develope warpdrive before the humans. It's like expecting the Talabans of Afganistan to develope controlled fusion and virtual reality before the United States. In this new universe, why will the federation and the Klingon be at war by Kirk's time?

    1. Re:Klingon history has been altered! by Dr.+JackAzone · · Score: 1

      without having seen the first Enterprise episode, I'll have to say that changing history is just wrong. It'll just be another reason to stick with TNG, DS9 and voyager

  315. Babelfish for Klingonese? by klausner · · Score: 1

    I know that at least one Klingonese-English dictionary has been published. Has anyone translated the comments from Kraang (or Klaang), or whatever his name was? Especially the parts the linguist refused to translate.

    And was it just me, or did this dialect sound noticeably different from waht gets used later (previously, whatever)?

  316. An important Start Treck issue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is the little known fact that Capitain Kirk, among his fellow boy-sex lovers also known as Capitain Jerk-off, is a porn-man. That's right, a porn man. How can I state such a thing? Well just look at how he, in each and every one of that SF TV-series, ScarTrack, walks around, softening, yes - mind you, softening every reasonably attractive woman in his path in his own very pornographic manner. And, I can assure you, that when he is not engaged in such perverted activities, he is either laying naked in his own cabin, spreading his legs and softening his very own reproductive organs, or is having boy-sex with his perverse collegues Mr. Spank and Dr. Boner McToy-Boy.

  317. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by isaac_akira · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, after he rescued the Klingon, and was wondering around the base I kept expecting this scene:

    "Al, why haven't I leaped yet? Ziggy said I was here to save that Klingon guy, right?"

    "Hmm... Ziggy says there's now a 73% chance that you need to set up a nemesis for future episodes first.... Or maybe you're supposed to do that Vulcan chick. It's a little hazy. (Do you see the set on her? Yowza!)"

  318. A better example of the theremin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would be "Good Vibrations" by the Beach Boys. Everybody knows and has heard that tune, I think.

    1. Re:A better example of the theremin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... "Good Vibrations" used a ribbon controller not a theremin. The ribbon controller is not inductive in that you actually have to touch it to get a sound.

  319. SFX by Buzzwang · · Score: 1

    For those of you who are complaining or providing somewhat negative comments on the special FX & the look and 'feel' of things, I have a simple comment myself:

    In interviews before the show was even scheduled to air (aka months ago) roughly half the main actors and a few behind the scenes people were interviewed concerning various parts of the show and series. Their comments concerning the SFX and such can be summed up as follows:

    The sfx and look seem to be better than TOS simply because they're using tech from the year 2000, not 1969, when filiming and editing and such. They're trying to keep the look and feel as simple and non-tech as they can get, but at the same time they want it to be visually appealing. So, no sham-icky models floating in front of a piece of black cardboard with holes in it and such. This is just the way the movie and tv industry is. I don't fault them at all for doing it either. I missed the first 40 minutes of the show due to a tuning glitch on behalf of my DVR (I'll watch the rebroadcast on Saturday), but I can say that I'm happy with what they have done for the series premiere. We all got to take some quick looks at a lot of stuff that's new to us, and I figure they'll expand on it all a whole bunch of it as time goes by since Trekkers are more-or-less geekish or geek-like by default. I liked it overall, but I'm reserving full judgement until I see 8 or 10 episodes. If it holds my interest for that long, then I can at least make an informed decision and more than likely say that I enjoy it enough to continue to watch however flawed the show, timeline, or sfx may be. If it doesn't, well then I'll know for sure to wait the generic 2 seasons for it to start getting good. Either way, don't judge a show buy it's initial episode, but do give it a little time to flesh out.

    --
    Things you can say to your dog that you can't say to a girl: "How about a nice bone?"
  320. Characters lack... well, characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez, none of the characters have any kind of personality. Besides Scott Bakula(I guess since we know him already maybe), everyone seems like everyone else and they blend in and don't really stand out. It's like a show with Kirk and just bunch of ensigns on the ship or something.
    I'd have to say very bad casting indeed.

    1. Re:Characters lack... well, characters by ChelleyBean · · Score: 1

      Since TNG I've noted that the Star Trek series all have that problem at first. It seems to take the actors a bit to take the parts and make them their own. Go back and view some tapes of TNG Season One. The acting is often clumsy and uncomfortable, but good story lines, fx and directing saved them in a lot of places. Give the kids a chance to grow into it, and the characters will emerge.

  321. Screw Continuity by Bugmaster · · Score: 1
    I think that Star Trek has so much baggage on it already (ToS, the movies, TnG, DS9, Voy, books, encyclopedia, computer games for pete's sake) that it has become a big load of cruft. It would be nice if "Enterprise" basically did a clean rewrite of the entire Star Trek codebase. Sure, they would fork the series, but then, who cares if their new script is better ?


    Now, that said, so far they are failing. They brought back the cheesy theme song from the ToS, with a vengeance. They stuck with the "the away team consists of all the senior crew members" protocol. They kept playing the "hick humans versus frigid vulcans" theme that has been overdone. They brough time travel, or whatever the hell that was, into the series in the PILOT - which means that you can kiss interesting plot lines goodbye - it's deux ex machina from now on. And, they played their trump card - soft core porn - way too early, which means the fans have nothing to look forward to :-)


    IMHO, the few things that they did right - weak ship, modular space stations, good CGI, soft core porn (wait... did I count that one already ?) - do not outweigh the things they missed (so far).

    --
    >|<*:=
    1. Re:Screw Continuity by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      Brought back the Original TOS Theme song? What the Fuck are you talking about?
      Maybe you need to look up the definition of the word "Pilot":

      pilot (plt)
      n.
      One who operates or is licensed to operate an aircraft in flight.

      ...
      uhhm.. that is, The Pilot is sortof a preview, not the actual show. That was not a pilot, but a first episode.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    2. Re:Screw Continuity by Bugmaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you have ever watched ToS, you'd probably notice the cheesy style of the theme song. The new Enterprise song is as cheesy, but in a New Age-ish kind of way.

      --
      >|<*:=
  322. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

    ...and ds9 had leela...

    --
    ___
    The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  323. NO!!! by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

    That split infinitive was completely acceptable. A few anal grammarians decided that infinitives were something to never split, just because you can't do it in Latin (where an infinitive is ONE WORD!). It doesn't make things harder to comfortably understand! Why should it be "illegal" in English?

    They DO say "let us go boldy ..." rather than "let us boldly go ..." (which IMO is unfortunate as it deemphasizes the Boldly relative to the Go). I feel certain that David Foster Wallace mentioned this specific instance of infinitive splitting in his excellent April 2001 article in Harpers Magazine "Tense Present" which everyone who is marginally interested in such things should read, but I, for the life of me, couldn't find it.

    --
    Trees can't go dancing
    So do them a big favor
    Pretend dancing stinks!
  324. Umm.. wha? by Kasreyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First off, scenes with any human rubbing ANYthing on ANY Vulcan's skin are totally ridiculous. Vulcans are TOUCH TELEPATHS. They are beings of calm reserve and inner discipline, and they can't tolerate being physically touched by emotional and uncontrolled beings like humans. It leads to telepathic overflow of human emotional garbage, thus Vulcans avoid ALL physical (skin to skin) contact with humans as if it were the PLAGUE. It is ungodly bad manners to shake hands with a Vulcan, or even offer to. Rubbing your hands over a Vulcan's naked body could only happen AFTER you overpowered or drugged them. Or during Pon Farr. Take your pick.

    Secondly, I don't see where you get off with that crack about "prejudice, intolerance, and violence" in TOS. I *assume* you meant to say "pleasantly surprised by the extremely low level of (etc., etc., etc.)", seeing as how THAT is the only possible analogy to TOS. Devil in the Dark? The Empath? The Corbomite Maneuver? Yep, all sorts of prejudice, intolerance, and violence there. Suuuuuure. Yeah. Riiiiiiight.

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.
    1. Re:Umm.. wha? by doob · · Score: 1

      It is ungodly bad manners to shake hands with a Vulcan, or even offer to.

      In which case, first contact with the Vulcans was 'botched'. Anyone remember ST: First Contact?

      Vulcan: Live Long and Prosper. <vulcan hand thing>

      ZC: <fails miserably at vulcan hand thing, and holds out hand>... Thanks <they shake hands>

      Cracks me up everytime.

      --
      In the spoon, there is no Soviet Russia!
    2. Re:Umm.. wha? by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      First off, scenes with any human rubbing ANYthing on ANY Vulcan's skin are totally ridiculous. Vulcans are TOUCH TELEPATHS. They are beings of calm reserve and inner discipline, and they can't tolerate being physically touched by emotional and uncontrolled beings like humans. It leads to telepathic overflow of human emotional garbage, thus Vulcans avoid ALL physical (skin to skin) contact with humans as if it were the PLAGUE.

      Please name one scene in ANY of the series or movies in which it is stated that they can't control their telepathy enough to withstand touching.

      It is ungodly bad manners to shake hands with a Vulcan, or even offer to.

      Yes, and we saw some evidence of another explanation for that last night; they don't touch their food, either. Is it because they're afraid the death screams of the carrots will overload their brains? No problem, Vulcan brains are evidently removable. :-)

    3. Re:Umm.. wha? by archen · · Score: 1

      If spock was half vulcan and half human, how did his father even bear touching his mother? I'm no star trek expert, but I don't think I've ever heard the touch telepath theory.

    4. Re:Umm.. wha? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Earthers don't let the Klingon die an honorable death. Earthers shake hands of Vulcans, or rub disinfectant on them.

      Why are we the only ones who have to worry about offending other cultures? Why don't they worry about offending us? Answer: Because that's nonsensical. Traders learn this very quickly or stop being traders.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    5. Re:Umm.. wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cochrane: Ummm, hold on a minute, Mr. Vulcan. We greet each other by grabbing hold of each other's (whips out....

      Ehh, I don't wanna finish this story.

    6. Re:Umm.. wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously the logical explanation is that she's a Romulan spy.

    7. Re:Umm.. wha? by remande · · Score: 2
      Spock's parents were married, and thus in an intimate relationship with each other. Certainly, there are forms of touch that one only feels comfortable about with their lover, no?


      My guess is that skin contact is to a Vulcan what running fingers through hair is to a Human. As for me, I feel comfortable with exactly three people running fingers through my hair. My wife is the first. The second is my year-old daughter who doesn't know any better. The third is my barber.

      --

      --The basis of all love is respect

    8. Re:Umm.. wha? by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      I think this was something from the books, but of course the books aren't canon.

      In the series they never said this, but they do frequently portray Vulcan's and being uncomfortable with physical contact. One of my favorite Trek moments is when Nelix beams aboard Voyager for the first time. Upon greeting Tuvok, he gives him a big hug! Tuvok clearly does not look comfortable with this...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    9. Re:Umm.. wha? by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      One of my favorite Trek moments is when Nelix beams aboard Voyager for the first time. Upon greeting Tuvok, he gives him a big hug! Tuvok clearly does not look comfortable with this...

      I wouldn't be either, and to the best of your knowledge, I'm not a telepath.

  325. Here's the biggest cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody hates the music - I think it sucks like all the rest of you... But, do you know what's intresting about it? It was composed by Diane Warren, who, as many of you have probaly figured out by now, has written several dozens, if not hundreds, of songs that have won her grammies and such throughout the past two decades... So, if you want to talk about low budget, here's the reason why - I mean, do you honestly believe that the woman who made Celine Dion and so many other pop female stars famous would come cheap? ;)

    Well, to give my honest opinion, watching it felt like two seperate teams had written this episode, and well, it went from something that I was fascinated with (I mean, a Klingon in Oklahoma? And then getting blown away by a guy with a shotgun in the middle of a corn field? You have to admit, that was a nice 'reality'-means-'the future' touch) and I felt had an extreme amount of potential, and then slowly degenerated into the second half where the plot totally sucked, and seemed like the ST:E staff had picked up those lame writers from the Lois and Clark Show that used to aire on ABC - the writers don't seem to understand that us Star Trek fanatics actually have brains and don't need to be constantly `stimulated' by the 'farm-boy makes it big and kicks ass at the same time while knowning there's a piece of Vulcan tail in the decontamination room who we viewers just can't wait to see how he scores" (Logically scoring?) (The logistics of how to score? Bad joke)

    Anyways, that's my two cents worth... Also, here where I live, for some odd reason, about the time that the decontamination scene was getting good, Charter Communications dropped the signal for about 30 seconds, so you lucky people who talk of this awesome scene of soft porn, well, I envy you... The signal was out across town - I called a firend up and had her rewind the tape she was making, and sure enough, the spot is missing there...

    Brian Wasner

  326. Unua posto esperanta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Esperanto estas bona! Vi estas stupida!

  327. ION weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure we are. Basically a non-visible laser (dont point at your eyes, REALLY) induces a field along its axis, along which a charge travels, paralyzing the target. Its currently functional and contructable at home/available for about $20,000 in a form factor of a ghostbusters proton pack.

    We've had rail guns for more than 20 years, 10 years at the high school level. Frankly, a rail gun is much more useful as a weapon/tool than a phaser/laser and sonic qweapons are more useful as stunners.

    1. Re:ION weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm simply surprised that I hadn't heard of such, since the technology behind them would have practical implications in a couple areas of personal interest...

  328. Re: Where to download it???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can some one video tape it capture it to DIVX 400kbps or something?

    People outside usa wont see it for 6-36months.

  329. Re: VCD sux , what lamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are these people so lame they cant even encode to SVCD? or even offer a smaller Divx?

  330. Importance of issues on slashdot by hwilker · · Score: 1

    At this time, 08:33 GMT, on Thursday, 2001-09-27, these are some of the top slashdot stories, along with the number of comments to each. The relative importance to the readership of different classes of issues seems obvious...

    • Your Rights Online: Browsing Privacy - Off With Your Headers! -- 102 comments
    • Star Trek: Enterprise Reactions? -- 736 comments
    • Brian West Update -- 212 comments
    • British Colleges Selling Screen Saver Ad Space -- 190 comments
    • Science: Macroscopic Quantum Entanglement -- 177 comments
    • Hackers: Uncle Sam Wants You! -- 504 comments
    • Sun Announces Passport Competitor -- 180 comments
    • Star Trek: Enterprise Premieres Tonight -- 669 comments
    • Ask Slashdot: What's Now State of the Art in Encryption Technology? -- 421 comments
    --
    -- H. Wilker
  331. Klingons by unikron · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there used to be some Egghead genetic engineered klingons on the TOS? Anyway, I hope that the writers will respect the story (unlike lucas's prequel with the techonlogical enchancements that the trilogy didn't had)... And yes... MORE TECHNOBABBLE NEEDED!!!

  332. Soft Porn by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was watching at a friend's house, and her parents came home at exactly the same moment they walked into the bar with the pole dancers. Bleh.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  333. Kaptain Kirk says: by rve · · Score: 2

    But it seems to break from the "known" Star Trek history, as described by the other shows and movies

    I believe it was on saturday night live, after being confronted by a trekkie with apparent historical inconsistensies between different episodes, that William Shatner immortalised the phrase: It's just a show, 'Get a life'

    ;-)

  334. It rocked!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really wasn't disappointed, though I thought I would be. In fact, I was pleasantly suprised to find that I enjoyed it immensely.

    I liked all of the characters personalities, even Tuckers. The outdoor scenes were great and the fighting scenes were the best I've ever seen. The plot flowed perfectly and I liked the intermittent comedy relief throughout the show.

    I'm very happy they have decided to shed the political correctness of Next Generation and Voyager shows and allow the characters to be more free in their sexuality and discussions. In this respect it is much more like the original Star Trek, with its proud captain and brave crew, and short skirts. And I'd like to thank Paramount. For this is truly the trimuph of human nature, that we are not robots without emotions or desires.

    The special effects were excellent, showing that they can pull off depicting a period of time older than the original ST and still provide a glamourous performance.

    I think the writers, directors, camera crews and actors are doing a fine job. And I was even sceptical of Scott Bakula, of Quantum Leap fame, but he gave a suprisingly amazing performance. I warmed to him, with his wisdom and courage in the face of cynicism and defeat, immediately.

    And there is no lack of action, drama, and intrigue. This series is going to be chock full with interesting characters, species, stories and adventures. I can't wait.

    I really don't see any reason to nay-say this series and I think the author of the Slashdot post just misses his politically correct Voyager, pity.

    Here we have the makings of a swashbuckling captain and his daring crew that may even top the bravado of the original. May they boldy go where no man has gone before, and then some.

    I'm really looking forward to more episodes. I can safely say I think this is going to be one of the best Star Trek series and I will cherish it as much as I have ST: NG and the original.

    Sincerely,
    Nelson Rush [palisade@users.sourceforge.net]

    p.s. I forgot my password, and I'm not at home ATM to check it. No big deal really, I just hope someone gets to read this post. Anonymous Cowards usually get shuffled to the bottom of the pack, I know.

    1. Re:It rocked!!! by T3chnomonk · · Score: 1

      I'm with you! Loved it. Gonna keep watching it. Screw all you negative hozers.

      Everyone feels soooo smart bashing stuff. Just enjoy it for the love of Star Trek and good SciFi entertainment.

      --
      -- 2 Powerful Words: Extra Gravy
  335. The ship is what bugs me by Phaid · · Score: 2

    Really, I liked the pilot. It's far and away the best pilot episode of any Trek yet. Nice sort of adventure story, promising characters, setting actually seems to have lots of potential. The whole "fledgeling steps into the interstellar neighborhood thing" reminded me of the Babylon Five movie where the Earth first meets the Minbari. But I liked all that.

    The thing I don't like is the ship. Its design is way too advanced -- other than the warp nacelles, it looks like a ship from the Voyager era. Worse, it's a ripoff of a design they've already used. Compare the ship from the new series with the Akira class from First Contact and Voyager (another set of views is here).

    I know I'm sort of nitpicking here, but really this is terribly inconsistent with the look and feel of later shows and movies. Yes, it does look really cool, but in the overall Trek context it really doesn't work for me. Oh well, I'll get used to it I guess.

    1. Re:The ship is what bugs me by ChelleyBean · · Score: 1
      Christopher and I noticed that as well. The ship was just a bit too smooth when you consider what the ship from the original series looked like. There were a few instruments that roughly resembled the old bridge, but that was about it.

      I did, however, like the medical bay. The use of a species of eel to treat an injury was a quaint addition, harping back to when physicians used leeches. I'm probably off base, but I likened it to the newbies in space taking their first stab at using what they find elsewhere to benifit themselves before they have time to find a technological substitute.

    2. Re:The ship is what bugs me by aksansai · · Score: 1

      Be mindful that Rick Berman himself said that he would much rather take an artistic license with regards to the series versus attempting to antiquate the technology. The original pilot had TV screens attached to lamp-like posts you'd find on a desk - this was the "best" of the 60's.

      A good interview article explains some of their intepretations of the beginning era of Starfleet and why things look the way they do (i.e. Klingons in the new style versus the old).

      http://www.startrek.com/production/seriesv/article s/071901.html

      --
      Ayup
    3. Re:The ship is what bugs me by jruschme · · Score: 1
      Firstly, the resemblance to the Akira class never bothered me- I chalked it up to form following function (i.e., an evolutionary design with similar mission profiles). Besides, the pictures on Shiporama make it look more like the Akira is an upside down Enterprise.


      The exterior hull appearance of the NX-01 makes sense compared to NCC-1701 when you keep it in context historically. Basically, NX-01 is a prototype so it does not have the "finish" of later ships, also it gets most of its defeneses from a thick, polarizable hull, so gleaming finishes become a detriment. OTOH, by the time of the NCC-1701, shields (and ship technology, in general) have evolved to the point where more emphasis can be placed on aesthetics and comfort. (Look at the size of Pike's quarters.)
      By the time of the Enterprise refit, however, TPTB realize that too much time is being spend repainting the hulls and so we have (again) the bare metal look seen in later Trek series.


      What bothers me about the NX-01 is the lack of the secondary hull. I understand why it's not there... it's just disorienting not seeing one.

    4. Re:The ship is what bugs me by Phaid · · Score: 2

      form following function (i.e., an evolutionary design with similar mission profiles)

      Uh? The Akira is a result of the Perimeter Defence Initiative, a ship built basically solely for war fighting purposes. It is as much a fighter/shuttle carrier as it is a warship in its own right. On the other hand, the Enterprise is a testbed for high warp technology (at the time) and an exploration vessel.

      The real reason they look the same is that the same person designed them both (he also designed the NCC-1701-E). This guy (whose name escapes me at the moment, sorry) goes for "cool" rather than "canonical". His ships look really neat, but don't really fit into the mythos very well.

  336. Re: VCD sux , what lamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people like watching TV shows...on a TV. VCDs are nice for burning and watching on a VCD player. Until the day I own a 32 inch monitor and have a nice comfortable couch in my office, muthafuck divx.

  337. Alien Psychology by lostguy · · Score: 1

    How does a purely logical race justify breast implants? Do Vulcan women have odd spinal configurations that require additional ballast hanging off the front?

  338. **SPOILER** temporal this and logical that by Fred+Millington · · Score: 0

    damnit, that man (the director/creator) couldnt stay away from temporal anomalies and plot for just one friggin episode, and now, it seems there is going to be a returning enemy based on it.

    and as far as vulcans go, Tuvok had more feelings than my grandmother, and this new one seems to me like a nympho just waiting to get out, which would not be a bad thing. Mm...she has a rack to kill Janeway for...who am I kidding, Id kill Janeway for the hell of it.

  339. So you'd like to download it. by Sarin · · Score: 1

    For all of ya non usa people who don't like to wait for a year to see it on tv (like me).

    It's being posted right now on usenet, 2 vcd's of the first episode:

    alt.binaries.multimedia.startrek or

    alt.binaries.startrek

  340. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Kruemelmo · · Score: 1

    No you aren't. While /. readers and moderators are ~90% male, it's probably ~100% in this discussion thread.

  341. Possible new opening music by Ed+Avis · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're feeling aargh
    Or you're kind of mwhahahahahaha
    Could be you've met up with BAKULA.
    If your crew goes moan, moan
    And your guns go pssewp pssewp
    Maybe you've bumped into BAKULA.

    He flies through the night
    In a costume that's too tight
    But there's always a moral insight
    BAKULA

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Possible new opening music by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      Count me too lazy to check on my own, but isn't that DangerMouse's Count Duckula song?

    2. Re:Possible new opening music by Mr.+Piccolo · · Score: 1

      No, you idjiot. That's Count Duckula's Count Duckula song. Dangermouse never had a Count Duckula song. Get them straight!

      --
      Glückwünsche, haben Sie Slashdot ermordet, indem Sie zum korporativen Druck beugten und Subskriptionen einlei
    3. Re:Possible new opening music by On+Lawn · · Score: 2

      A fortune to my green, pointy eared friend:

      I see there is never a lack of contraversy in your life.

    4. Re:Possible new opening music by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 1, Redundant

      HILARIOUS! :)

      -bill!
      (missing Blake's 7, thanks to Enterprise)

  342. and the captains voice.... ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what was with the Captain. Always talking slightly loud, and sounding like a cheap cowboy movie. I hope he doesnt deliver five seasons of that.

  343. it sucked even worse than I thought it would by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, it sucked even worse than Voyager's first episode. Christ, but it was *bad*. Just some of the highlights:

    - Bakula still can't act, and as a captain he's laughable in his attempts to be tough. Why in gods name didn't they pick some hungry nobody willing to bust his ass for this role?

    - The communications chick was a complete loser, the stereotypical pre-Xena "I'm a screaming bitch who needs to be rescued by a big strong man" kind of girl. I thought we'd put those days behind us in SF....

    - What the hell was up with Texas boy? Can you get any more wooden than that? He's even worse than Bakula.

    - The doctor could actually act, but for chrissakes - interstellar LEECHES? That's what we've come to??? Roddenberry has to be turning over in his grave.

    - more hackneyed Vulcan shit. On the brighter side, not only was the Vulcan one hell of a Hot Star Trek Babe(TM), but the best actor of the lot. That isn't saying much, but one can see how she might improve over time.

    - the entire Vulcan lot was openly emotional, even when they denied it. For a moment I wigged and thought they were Romulans.

    - the Enterprise was just plain ugly on the outside, and doubly ugly on the inside. I mean, it looked like a tramp steamer run by a bunch of lackwits. No wonder the Vulcans kept saying "um, maybe you should wait on this interstellar exploration thing". The graphics design team should be put up against a wall and shot.

    - hey, guess what? At warp 4 it's only FOUR DAYS from Earth to the Klingon homeworld! Wow! Completely contradicts anything ever said on the subject in previous series, but hell - who cares? This is Star Trek, birth place of TV paradoxes!

    - argh! Time travel in the pilot! Surely a sign of imminent doom if there ever was one.

    - "polarized plating" - and it 'goes down', like shields. Metal that disappears! And comes back once it repolarizes! Nifty.

    - the chemical composition of the gas giant just isn't possible. Chemistry 101 folks; or hell, spend a quarter, call a college astronomer, ask him what *real* gas giants are made of.

    - no actual plot. Maybe one will come clear in the future, but other than 'get the Klingon dude home' the rest was confused wandering.

    - the Enterprise certainly can't shoot for shit. Guess we're going to have more eps of "the Enterprise is badly outgunned by everyone they run into" or "power fails mysteriously once again" or "the computer's been possessed again".

    - Berman. 'nuff said. This guy turns everything he touches to shit.

    Man, I can go on and on. But I'd rather watch Farscape. At least it's internally consistent and the girls can kick as as well as, or better, than any man.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    1. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      The communications chick was a complete loser, the stereotypical pre-Xena "I'm a screaming bitch who needs to be rescued by a big strong man" kind of girl. I thought we'd put those days behind us in SF....

      Are you saying that, since Xena aired, there are no women like that left on the planet Earth? Not even one?

    2. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by sessamoid · · Score: 1

      >>- The doctor could actually act, but for chrissakes - interstellar LEECHES? That's what we've come to??? Roddenberry has to be turning over in his grave.

      Leeches are still used in some cases in modern medicine in America. Try to have an open (and informed) mind.

      >>- the entire Vulcan lot was openly emotional, even when they denied it. For a moment I wigged and thought they were Romulans.

      Vulcans are not perfect either. They all strive to achieve perfect logic, but under enough stress anybody can crack.
      "It's a just a show. Get a life!"

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    3. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      So if there are still screaming 'rescue me!' women in the future, where are the screaming 'rescue me!' men? They exist in abundance in the here and now, despite false bravado. Or would that be too much of an insult to frail male egos?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    4. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Look: the leeches were a stupid idea. Really stupid. No amount of justification of modern-day practices can save that scene.

      Vulcan behavior has been established over four series and many movies. Redefining it now is a serious mistake. Someone on the staff has a bit too much ego, I think.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    5. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      So if there are still screaming 'rescue me!' women in the future, where are the screaming 'rescue me!' men?

      Well, in the original Trek, it was Chekov. They have a woman in that role this time. Is that a problem? Must there be two? Or is it just that you object to a woman getting the role instead of a man this time? Maybe it'd be better if they fired her and replaced her with a man?

    6. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Precisely. I object specifically based upon the fact that the complete and utter wimp is a woman, and a stereotypical one at that. I grew up with this stereotype (I was around during the days of TOS, if that gives you a clue) and hate to see it played out for the ten-thousdandth time in any way, shape, or form.

      But a better solution would be to make the crew the stalwart SOBs they should be.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    7. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Precisely. I object specifically based upon the fact that the complete and utter wimp is a woman, and a stereotypical one at that.

      So, we aren't equal if 50% of the wimps are female and 50% are male; we're only equal if 100% of the wimps are male. Right, got it.

      But a better solution would be to make the crew the stalwart SOBs they should be.

      Yes, because that would be realistic; all humans are unflappable superheroes, there are no wimps. Why, if we implied that there could possibly be people who are less than superhuman, that'd be bad for people's self esteem, right?

    8. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Look: the leeches were a stupid idea. Really stupid. No amount of justification of modern-day practices can save that scene.

      You've got to be kidding me. Leeches are stupid because you say they're stupid, regardless of the fact that modern medical science has RETURNED to their use? Also, keep in mind that Earth doctors in Trek don't use them, and Archer thinks it's weird that Phlox does. You think it's impossible that there could be a race, or even a single doctor, who advocates their use? Who's got too much ego, here?

      Vulcan behavior has been established over four series and many movies.

      Behavior of ONE VULCAN, who was practically booted out of his family for acting that way. Look at the other Vulcans we've seen:

      Sarek: Prejudiced against Starfleet, as being a bad idea, precisely because humans (with very few exceptions) were too illogical to be out in space disturbing the natives. Also arrogant, and stubborn, and even in his first appearance let his anger affect his diplomacy.

      Valeris: Prejudiced against Klingons, to the point of being willing to murder to see them get wiped out as a species.

      Tuvok: Annoyed easily, stubbornly prideful. Has taken many decades around humans to become comfortable with them.

      Saavik: Very controlled, a lot like Spock.

      And Spock himself denigrates humans in nearly every episode.

      So we've got basically two Vulcans who don't denigrate humans, and one of them has been serving with humans for a century. The rest are arrogant and superior, just like these Vulcans. And these Vulcans are coming from a position of being technologically superior to the Humans, which isn't the case in any of the other series.

    9. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      But I'd rather watch Farscape. At least it's internally consistent and the girls can kick as as well as, or better, than any man.

      Which one would that be? The one that screams anytime there's anything dangerous, or icky, loud enough to melt metal? You know, the one that's always worried about clothes, and cries if she touches something disgusting?

    10. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Straw man, straw man, straw man. Didn't take debate in high school, eh?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    11. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Let me guess: ubergeek trekkie who has nothing better to do than spend time online as a trek apologist and can't *stand* the idea that someone, somewhere, might think that

      THE NEW TREK SUCKS!!!

      Well, it does, in my NSHO. If you don't like that then I suggest you troll elsewhere, or beat off more.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    12. Re:it sucked even worse than I thought it would by Cmarthen · · Score: 1

      Let me guess: ubergeek trekkie who has nothing better to do than spend time online as a trek apologist and can't *stand* the idea that someone, somewhere, might think that

      THE NEW TREK SUCKS!!!


      Let me guess: Bored middle-class white american male who tosses off a post trashing the premiere because he thinks he's being witty, then when someone actually decides to rebut his points one by one in a rational manner, reverts to insults and personal attacks.

      Who didn't take debate class again?

      --
      Popular Culture? Popular Culture wants a damn site that can handle some traffic. -- ska187
  344. Re:Trapped by the canon (Go watch Farscape) by theLunchLady · · Score: 1

    Read your critique of the new Enterprise and think you should stop wishing for things you're never going to get because the writers are either still living in the 30's where sexual suggestions were taboo and aliens were the guys with green facepaint (that didn't even show up in B&W).

    Instead, just check out Farscape (SCIFI Channel). It's got everything you've just asked for (except minor plot characters since there are only a hand full of people on the boat and a few thousand mini-machines. And DRDs don't inspire much in the way of juicy plot lines.

    -ll

  345. Soft Core? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am surprised at the number of people whining about the soft core angle to this show. How recently have any of you watched TOS? The costume designers took great pride and delight in reducing the amount of fabric in the fem's costumes and still cover the naughty bits. Soft core in the Star Trek series is nothing new.

  346. Small wonder geeks can't get laid. by teasea · · Score: 1

    I don't spend a lot of time worring about continuity, so if there were details that were out of sync with the previous history, I didn't notice 'em and couldn't give a shit.
    The only thing I didn't like was the theme song. ZZZZZzzzzz...
    But Geez! Soft porn?? I've seen more evocative soap commercials (never mind the bloody perfume ads). It was an uncomfortable situation for two people exposed to something on the planet. I saw nothing sexual in the scene at all. Unless one believes putting suntan lotion on at the beach is an invitation for sex. It could be, but it requires eye contact among other things that were not in the scene. And what's wrong with a Vulcan with a nice body? They can't all be skinny twirps like Spock (of course, Nimoy probably actually is an alien).

    1. Re:Small wonder geeks can't get laid. by Ranger+Rick · · Score: 1

      Nothing sexual??

      She was nippin', and he had a woody! (although they obviously tried to film around his... uh... "enthusiasm")

      --

      WWJD? JWRTFM!!!

  347. Re: Where to download it???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try #startrek-central on dalnet

  348. For those wondering about the theme song... by jingoro2 · · Score: 1

    The theme song is Rod Stewart's "Faith of the Heart"... which probably explains why so many of you don't like it :) This song was originally featured on the "Patch Adams" soundtrack.

  349. Can't resist... by GeoNerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    #!/bin/perl

    s/Star Trek: Enterprise/Star Wars Episode 1/g;
    s/Theme Music/Jar Jar Binks/g;

    if ($comments ne $starwarscomments) { $idbesurprised = 1; }

  350. Yes but the real question is by Rogain · · Score: 1

    Will this show become the Soap-Opera Weepfest that Deep Space Nine is?

    For a little while Deep space 9 was the best science fiction show on TV, ever. But trying to watch an episode now is fucking impossible. (even hard than watching blake 7) Has it been cancelled yet? I hate what it turned into, I don't even know if it is still in production.

    --
    The current Slashdot moderation system is made by gay communists!
    1. Re:Yes but the real question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lame Troll.
      DS9 ended like 2 years ago, maybe longer.

  351. Dorks by Rogain · · Score: 1

    See now this is where you lame trekkies take it too damn far!

    They didn't have head-ridges because they didn't think of them or couldn't afford them back in the 60's. When NG came around, they thought that maybe the klingons could be different in some interesting way. As opposed to the original show, where the evil klingons were just dusky-skinned humans. Culturally they seemed mostly the same as earth people. Pretty lame.

    Ie, they had a better idea. Decided, "to hell with consistency" and implemented it. It made the later series much more interesting. That ends it. Don't try to come up with a freaking disease or something to explain their foreheads.

    Hey maybe klingons are symbiants, like the trill, the head ridges are the parasite.

    --
    The current Slashdot moderation system is made by gay communists!
    1. Re:Dorks by Jburkholder · · Score: 1
      Really. It's a TV show. Get over it already.


      How did Tim Allen's character in Galaxy Quest put it?


      There's no warp drive, no phasers, no ion cannons.. no GOD DAMED SHIP!! It's just a TV show.

    2. Re:Dorks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, to lend creedence to your theory, the Klingons in Star Trek III had pronounced ridges, although not nearly as huge as Worf's half a decade later.

      Budget limitations are the same reason %99 of the civilized lifeforms encountered in Star Trek looked like humans with funky colorings, pointy ears or hairy faces. That Lizard Man Kirk fought is the only episode I can recall where they actually tossed in the dough for a full-body costume.

    3. Re:Dorks by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      No, what he said was "It's all real."

    4. Re:Dorks by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      yah - but that was near the _end_ of the movie. :-)

  352. When are they going to open a Hooters on Vulcan? by Ranger · · Score: 1

    The show had everything the adolescent geek male in all of us could want: A cool action hero, Captain Archer; a perky Vulcan babe science officer,Sub-Commander T'Pol; and multi-colored alien exotic dancers with twelve inch tongues. OK, the doctor reminded me too much of Neelix, yet having a cute dog is preferable to having a cute kid.

    I think Vulcan females are eminently logical. They wear push up bras. I think the producers learned their lesson from Six of Nine's hooters and high heels. The gel scene and prominent display of nipples was one of the best gratuitous sexual scenes I've seen on a television show. I would have timed how long T'Pol nipples were shown, but I didn't want to miss a second of it. It's possible they were fake, but who cares.

    Oh, and I agree the theme song sucked, but I can always tivo my way through it and the extra long commercial breaks.

    I did like the tacit nod to the 2nd Amendment, even if it was some farmer with a plasma rifle that looked suspiciously like a silver painted over and under twelve gauge shotgun. There really is a Broken Bow, Oklahoma. It's near Idabel in southeastern Oklahoma. Most of southeastern Oklahoma is hilly and covered with trees. Western Oklahoma is more likely to be flat and covered with cornfields.

    Finally, when are they going to have an episode with the famous Star Trek rock in it?

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  353. Re:Kiss Me If Your Alien Speaks English by motorhead · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's a variation of "all your bases are ..".

    bow-chicka-bow-wow
    bow-chicka-bow-wow
    bow-chicka-bow-wow

    Make it so...

    --
    Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
  354. The Porn- a Parralell? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    I remember this 'game' *cough* called "Runnaway City" in which all the major plot advancement came durring sex. I laughed my ass off at the parralell :)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  355. It's not a family show anymore by tinahdee · · Score: 1

    OK, I know this is going to sound ridiculous to anyone who doesn't have little kids... but I'm really pissed about the whole sex thing! It'd be one thing if they were subtle about it, but the way it stands, I can't let my five year old boy watch it. So how are we going to indoctrinate our young into the Star Trek culture if it's too R-rated for them to watch?

    Tina Gasperson
    editor
    Newsforge.com

    --
    tinahdee beautiful jewelry: silver, gold, gemstones tinahdee.etsy.com tinahdee.com facebook.com/beautifuljewelry
    1. Re:It's not a family show anymore by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your five year old boy can't watch two clothed beings applying bengay to each other?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  356. pollacks are never the solution by Rogain · · Score: 1

    pollacks are never the solution

    --
    The current Slashdot moderation system is made by gay communists!
  357. First season RULED!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek: The Original: First season
    -Wooden acting, hokey stories, lotsa work to be done.

    See? That's what happens when you kids watch Star Trek (the original series) in reruns. You have no notion as to when stuff was aired. ST:TOS ran for three years and it was the last year that was the dog. Indeed, the last episode "Turnabout Intruder" which had Shatner mincing throughout the show is fairly representative of the third season. "Spock's Brain"... geez, Spock as an RC zombie. Compare that to first season gems such as "The Doomsday Machine".

  358. FYI: Porthos .... by mikosullivan · · Score: 2

    ... was one of the Three Musketeers.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  359. The way Klingons look. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 'trouble with tribbles' ala DS9'ed version comment by Worf 'we don't talk about it'....why is it not seen as the human conditions of mongoild-ism, dwarfism, etc la? At one time "WE" put such people in freak-shows, not now. Perhaps the 'modern Klingon' is embarassed over how such ridge-less klingons are treated?

    Now why the Klingons would allow such 'non-klingons' to live has never been explained....or, what kind of treatment of fellow Klingons in the past is embarrasing.....

    But it IS just fiction, for entertainment.

  360. The Human/Vulcan tension worked by mikosullivan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The relationship between Humans and Vulcans in the new show is totally different from the rest of trek, and I find it effective and interesting.

    In the shows thus far, Vulcans have been friends of Earth, respected, and mostly liked. As Data said in ST:TNG "Vulcans are a highly respect race." The tension between Humans and Vulcans were the differences between two friends who respect each other but go about things in a very different way. Kirk and Spock were of significantly different temperaments, but they were brothers-in-arms.

    In Enterprise the relationship is quite different. Vulcans consider themselves superior. Humans, while resenting it, have unfortunately allowed themselves to slip into that role for several generations. Now the Human race is emerging from adolescence into adulthood and the Vulcans are having a hard time dealing with that.

    Overall, I thought that element of the story worked quite well.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  361. But by wiredog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bakula, doesn't have, the proper spacing between words, or emphasis to be JTK!

    1. Re:But by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Does he have the bare chest for it, or would that be considered over-the-top nowadays?

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    2. Re:But by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Quite frankly, Shatner didn't have the bare chest for it either, but I guess standards were different then.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    3. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bakula, doesn't have, the proper spacing between words, or emphasis to be JTK!

      A cheap jibe, so often repeated that it has effectively become "true" in the public consciousness. But the same people who parrot this rubbish usually proceed directly to slam Shatner for "wooden" acting. Well, what is it to be? Was he over-acting or under-acting? Make up your fucking minds for once.

      What's really disappointing is that you never get to hear anyone defend Shatner against these mutually contradictory but so-often-repeated slanders. This is a fairly good indicator that these statement have no basis in reality at all. After all, what true statement have you ever seen on Slashdot that *nobody* argued against?

      Since those of you who have participated in Shatner bashing are all apparently sheep that can't actually form your very own opinion, here is the surprising answer to the above paradox: Shatner was doing something called serious acting. He was in fact classically trained on the stage in his early career and cut his teeth on Shakespeare plays.

      One technique of acting that real live theater-goers may recognize is the use of variable cadence and emphasis to add texture to the lines being spoken, so that the sound of the words conveys a message as well as the words themselves. Sound familiar? Often this is the only way to liven up a script that is really dull.

      Of course we don't get to see very many proper actors on American TV, just handsome kids with nice teeth, perfect physique and immaculate hair. So your average TV watching zombie wouldn't recognize proper acting if it upped and bit him. Still, it's a very sad indictment of the rest of us that even after 35 years people still haven't "got it" about Shatner's performances as Kirk. The guy acted up a storm, even in the most difficult of circumstances: low budget, bad scripts, an unappreciative (at the time) audience. Despite all this his heart was truly in it, and Trek just wouldn't have been the same otherwise.

      P.S. Could some passing kind soul please mod this up so other people can see it. I lost my password months ago and the Slashdot crew never answered my emails asking for a new one for my account so, since I don't want to become someone else, I'm forever forced to post as AC :o(

      - ralphclark (11346)

  362. Wonder Years Meets Star Trek by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 1

    After watching the whole thing that was all I could think of... Mix the Wonder Years touchy feely in with the wonder of Star Trek and maybe through in a dash of Seaquest DSV to make the producers happy.

    Come on guys.. If you are going to make Sci-Fi... make Sci-Fi... Don't give in and try and make it a "family hour" type show.

    --
    Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
  363. Other 'sucky' 1st contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not forget in TOS, where they visit the 'ganster planet' (a race who is good at copying what they see/find) they mention how they had human exposure before the 1st contact rules were in place. My memory is foggy as to the exact wording tho.

  364. You've got a point there by mikosullivan · · Score: 2

    I had been admiring how nice looking the ship is, but now that you mention it, it might be a bit too pretty. It might have been more effective to have a spacecraft that seems ugly at first but we grow to love, like the The Millenium Falcon the Apollo LEM. That would have been more in keeping with the spirit of just getting going.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  365. I can not believe this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes the shields can go off line ,because what they are calling shields are a combination of
    Metal plating and electromatic fields so when the
    electromatic field starts to break down or fail they would weaken or go offline.
    As far as the vulcan emotion thing being rehased.
    there are tons of people out there that are not
    versed in this and this enlightens a whole new generation of viewers. besides this is prequel
    meaning before others.
    And by the way the vulcan is hot although I thought the rub down scene was alittle much for
    a show with the history it has.
    Brett

  366. Yes, real dates! by mikosullivan · · Score: 2

    It was refreshing to hear Archer do the captain's log using a real date. I've never been a fan of the stardate thing.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  367. Not quite but close. by Araneas · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Reactive armour was designed to counter HEAT (High Explosive Anti Tank) rounds. HEAT rounds used the shaped charge or Monroe effect to create a very high velocity, very hot jet of gas which then burns through the armour. A copper liner is usually added to increase the efficiency. This type of ammunition has been around since WWII (panzershreck, panzerfaust, bazooka, PIAT, various thrown and pole charges). HEAT is now usually found in support weapons such as TOW and HELLFIRE as well as Dragon and M72. It is still the best round for taking out light to medium armour and its concentrated punch is very useful in infantry support weapons.

    HESH has been primarily used as a combat engineering vehicle round for bunker busting and the like. Most obviously in the 165mm demolition howitzer used by the British and if I remember correctly on the M60 based engineering vehicles of the US. It was also used experimentally in a round launched from an M16 rifle. Imagine if you will a rocket propelled basketball. The problem with HESH is that if it is fired at too high a velocity, the charge will literally splatter onto the target dispersing the charge before it can detonate. This factor makes HESH less useful in high velocity guns and at long ranges (slower round, longer time of flight, less likely to hit).

    The primary tank killer is still the kinetic penetrator. Usually using a discarding sabot around a small dense projectile, these rounds punch through the armour of the opposing vehicle. The key to these rounds is cross sectional density, thus tungsten is popular as well as DU (depleted uranium), the stuff that everyone was worried about in Bosnia and Iraq.

    Reactive armour, by exploding, disrupts and de-focusses the gas jet of the HEAT round rendering it much less effective. It most certainly will interfere with the scabbing effect of HESH as well.

    Spaced and reactive armour is used on Canadian reconnaisance vehicles. It's attached by velcro........

    1. Re:Not quite but close. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Spaced and reactive armour is used on Canadian reconnaisance vehicles. It's attached by velcro........

      As a Canadian, I am torn between hoping that you're joking, and knowing that you're probably right.

    2. Re:Not quite but close. by Araneas · · Score: 1
      From Canadian Tracks

      The package essentially consists of a layer of very heavy gauge Velcro strips attached to the steel walls of the vehicle to which the composite panels are mounted. On top of this is a covering of rubberized canvas, again with strips of Velcro attached to the inner surface, which gives the vehicle the unkempt appearance. If damage occurs to the ceramic panels, they can be pried off and replaced on an individual basis

      ;)

  368. Just to be first to say it... by slow_flight · · Score: 1

    Worst Episode Ever!

    Actaully, I liked it. I watch very, very little television, and I doubt if I will watch this regularly, but I thought it was pretty good considering it was on UPN, the network that makes Fox look like Church TV.

    --

    Karma: Professionally Doomed (mostly affected by inability to keep opinions to self)
  369. Bad math or cloaked stars by skybird0 · · Score: 1

    4 days to Kronos, 4 days back. 30 million kilometers per second. That's 100c, so Kronos is a little more than one light year away. I know the Klingons can cloak a ship, but a star as well?

    1. Re:Bad math or cloaked stars by JSimmons · · Score: 1

      Bad math. Are you related to Lord Bitman? He's no better at spelling ("parralell") than you are at calculating light distances. :-)

    2. Re:Bad math or cloaked stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cmon man.... dont be THAT guy. Take the Shat's advice: Get a fucking life!

  370. Now it's 'Canon' by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Vulcans have tits.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    1. Re:Now it's 'Canon' by mikefoley · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for her to say "Hey! THAT'S not the medical gel!"

      --
      What's my Karma Mr. Burns? "Excellent"
  371. Looking forward... by sapphire42 · · Score: 1

    to seeing all of the reasons for the Prime Directive and the other Starfleet rules. ;-)
    Obviously, this show will probably end up showing us WHY we were constantly subjected to PD arguments in the other Trek series' (of course, they violated it alot anyway) As far as the Vulcan/human relationship, I think that they did a good job with it, it's been 100 years, humans resent the Vulcans a bit for 'holding back' humanity, so there is more tension than in the later series', or at least it was hinted at. They needed someone on the ship who had been in space before, but even at that, this ought to be interesting.

  372. What is up with the "doors"?!?! by sbg300 · · Score: 1

    In 2001 I can walk up to a grocery store and the doors will automatically open but in 2150 a "high tech" space craft doesn't have proximity sensors?? (The Vulcan has a smoking body!)

  373. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by funky49 · · Score: 1

    I'm very sorry. You watched entirely too many Quantum Leap episodes.

    Did you expect the rest of the A-Team to appear in Rocky III? Did you expect the cast of Cheers to appear in Star Trek III? No.

    steven

    --
    --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
  374. Stardates.... by wowbagger · · Score: 2
    There is a simple out the writers could use, that would not only resolve the speed issues, but allow them to introduce the "Stardate" system in a very sensible fashion. (care to lay odds that they actually figure this out?)

    Just state that there is still some residual relativistic effects even in warp. Have Cmdr. Tucker making a comment along these lines:

    Computer, begin log entry:
    Cmdr. Tucker, 9 Sept. 2153 (ship time)
    Computer, pause log.
    Y'know, this is weird. It'd Sept. 9th on the ship, but it is already New Years back home. We're going to have to have some way to have a calendar that is consistent between warp ships and home.
    Computer, resume log.


    (Question: why does the person recording a log have to give the date: doesn't the log entry get its own timestamp? What, the ship's computer isn't running NTP?)

    This would allow them to say that it took eighty hours to get to Khronos ship time, while having it be several weeks Earth time. That way, anytime the writers forget how really, really, amazingly, mind boggling huge space is, they can use this explaination to correct their mistake.

    1. Re:Stardates.... by mikosullivan · · Score: 1
      Question: why does the person recording a log have to give the date: doesn't the log entry get its own timestamp?

      I've wondered about this for years.

      --
      Miko O'Sullivan
  375. it sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it sucked. the worst part was when they were trying to figure out of the spacecraft worked. How's stupid. But maybe after a few weeks I'll like it. I remember not liking the first Voyager episodes but then I realy enjoyed them

  376. Better than the last three - &some thoughts by MSUWalt · · Score: 1

    (1) At least we don't have an intergalactic cheerleader always "feeling" something on the bridge.

    (2) I didn't realize Vulcan chicks had such large....assets...in proportion to their height.

    (3) To be fair to the southern engineering guy, nobody else knows what they're doing, either.

  377. I liked the Tractor Beam...... by Snowbeam · · Score: 1

    .....er I mean the grappler. Come on the show was great. It was closer to our time and quite frankly more believeable because there were things we recognized and believed in it.

    --
    I am Lord Snowbeam. Heed my call!
  378. It's cold! by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    Remember, to a Vulcan, any Terran normal environment would be COLD. Personally, I find it refreshing that the show's writer's paid such meticulous attention to detail in this matter.

  379. A great diversion from WTC fallout by bodland · · Score: 1

    For the first time since Sept. 11 I was able to site for nearly two hours and not think about the recent attacks and all the resulting nationalistic emotional vomiting.
    On to the show! The sexual tension between the crew as scene in the vulcan human rubbing/argument was actually rather good. I have always though the Vulcans has stuffy sexually repressed beings. The ear rubbing bit was cool because she slapped his hand away. If I remeber TOS when Spock's Mom stroked Sarac's ear. It was done in such a way as to make the ear thing a big erogenous zone.

    As for Tucker I like him. I think hes the right guy for time and we'll see his character develop as time goes one and become more dimensional.

    The special effects are good but not overdone. The look and feel of all the controls on the bridge remind me of actual panel and design in airplanes and other viechicles. Not overdone with colors and only the needed to make it useful.

    The bridge display was cool to have little text items floating on objects. It remded me of Lucas Arts X-Wing and other flight sim heads up diplays.

    WHen I was a kid my whole family would hunker down with TV trays and watch TOS. My then future wife and I watched NG together. We attempted to do DS9 but we lost interest. Voyager as okay to start but we lost interest quickly. Now with my daughter at 11 I think we will be sitting down each wednesday to watch as a family. Considering there is only one other show that my wife and I watch (X-Files) that says something.

    1. Re:A great diversion from WTC fallout by fortunatus · · Score: 1
      ACK!


      my UPN station broadcast from the WTC tower,
      and they are still off the air!


      so i didn't get to see the show BECAUSE of the
      damn Sept. 11th attack!


      (sleepy hollow, NY)

  380. Don't be too hard on it yet..... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    I have observed with these Star Trek based series that the characters tend to develop nicely as the show progresses. Even when ST:TNG, I remember people saying that Picard was a bad character for the captain, Data was too deadpan and contrived, etc. I mean, the writers appear to be just be playing out formulas they've used in the past right now, but give it time. Remember, it was almost Star Trek 90210 ;)

    ...On the other hand....don't believe I've ever seen a Vulcan go to high beams before...... ;)

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  381. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by markhb · · Score: 1

    Perhaps none of us expected those things because both movies mentioned predated the relevant TV shows, assuming you were actually referring to Kirstie Alley's appearance as Saavik in Star Trek II.

    This in no way is meant to imply that I dispute your contention that the prior poster watched too much Quantum "most nonsensical ending since St. Elsewhere" Leap.

    --
    Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
  382. S.T. Marathon by SonCorn · · Score: 1

    Looks like starting October 1st at7pm TNN is going to have nearly 24/7 Star Trek Next Generation Marathon running starting at episode 1. I'd say get the VCR's spinng if you want every episode or have never seen some of them (doubtful).

    Plus I believe that TNN is carried on more cable providers than UPN.

    --
    What good is a used up world, and how could it be worth having? --Sting
  383. How Much Gell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they didn't put the Gell Everywhere? What type of topical ointment works on only 1/2 your body..

  384. Re:Warp5? by Havokmon · · Score: 1

    Warp 4 with Service Pack 11 is the last version of OS/2 you'll ever need.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  385. FarScape anyone? by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    I'm not a regular viewer or FarScape - although i really like the show, i can never seem to remeber when it's on (SciFi isn't on my regular mad-clicker rotation). I happened to catch it on Tuesday night, and can't help but draw a comparison to what i saw (the last half hour) of Enterprise.

    The whole time-shift, while an elegant if overused theme, go old pretty quickly - also "oh goody, our brand new, um retro, phase pistols have just come in. They should come in handy!"

    I think the concept is a good one, but the delivery was a bit tired.

    Then again, when was the last time ou saw a show on network television (does UPN count) that rocked the house on the first episode. It'll have to prove itself, but i think folks should give it half a season before really judging it.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  386. quantium enterprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I kind of like the more "raw" nation of the show. No federation stuffyness.

    I was a bit supprised at the shower lub job. Boy Kirk missed the virual jelly years. Interesting scene, but didnt fit. I was interesting to see a "non-emotional" vulcan with rather perky nipples. Highly illogical.

    Plot was a little lame, but they can work on it.

  387. thank you by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    I was starting to wonder if everyone else in the world was too stupid to consider that it may have just been a joke. Glad that wasn't the case.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:thank you by Lonath · · Score: 1

      Wow, this whole thread kind of reminds me of this movie I saw a little while ago called Galaxy Quest, where there was this TV show about space, and people took it way too seriously, and debated and argued about every little inconsistency in the show to make up for their otherwise empty lives. Kind of ironic and funny when rl ends up following a movie script almost perfectly.

    2. Re:thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arguing on the 'net is like running in the special olymipcs - even if you win, you're still retarteded.

    3. Re:thank you by Alsee · · Score: 1

      int WoodChuck::howMuchChuckedWood(){int count = 0; while(couldChuckWood()){chuckWood(); count++;} return count;}

      may I suggest this tweak:

      int WoodChuck::howMuchChuckedWood(){int chuck = 0; while(couldChuckWood()){chuckWood(); chuck++;} return chuck;}

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  388. distance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did the klingon home world end up being right around the corner from earth? A three day cruse to get there? What gillians home world?

  389. Re:The Vulcan Chick - For the ladies too by bodland · · Score: 1

    Don't foget when the Vulcan rub the goo on his back he turned to the side and was able to display a rather extended unit bulge too....not that I was looking or anything...

  390. Not bad for the first shot.. by inicom · · Score: 1

    I agree with the writers who point out that many of the pilot episodes were of similar ilk - the actors have not had a lot of opportunity to flesh out their characters, the sets and props are still version one, and so on. I think this, like TNG, will come around and develop into one of the better ST properties.

    Personnel-wise, Commander whats-his-name is the weakest of the apparently planned-for-longevity characters, but so was Commander Riker - and he grew into a brief period of acting skill before his demise into obseity and caricature.

    Set/prop-wise, I would've been happier with a more 50's space-ship style. The ship they're on looks more futuristic than the original series. In one of the original episodes, wasn't there models of the previous iterations of the starship? They should have used the "oldest" of those as the model.

    As an viewer of the original series during its first season broadcasts with my grandfather, I thought it was very very cool to watch this premiere with my 4-mo old son!

    aem

    --
    -a.e.mossberg
  391. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by timbck2 · · Score: 1

    > /. readers and moderators are ~90% male, it's
    > probably ~100% in this discussion thread.

    You're probably right, but 100% of us aren't heterosexual! Of course, there are some mighty fine-looking cast members to suit my tastes as well! (Scott Bakula, mmmmmm)

    --
    Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  392. Soft Porn? by zarathustra93 · · Score: 0

    Hell, that didn't bother me at all. Kirk used to hook up all the time. My personal beef with voyager was that everything had become *way* too sanitized and PC. I think it's good to see some good ole sexuality in the new series. It's one of the things that gives me hope for Enterprise.

    I guess it just comes down to: If you show butts and boobies, people will watch it :-)

    moderators: Please browse at 0. I may have made some stupid comments in the past, but I frequently say things that have value.

  393. Opening VIDEO by msheppard · · Score: 2

    I thought the opening video, the shots of space travel etc... were very kewl. Especially the mars rover blip. I recognized almost all of it. Some of the test pilot guys were not familar to me.

    Let's hope this seris is still around on the 100th anniversary of flight.

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  394. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by Belatu-Cadros · · Score: 1

    Do you see the set on her? Yowza!

    You should check out October's Maxim then.... Hmmm, nice.

  395. stfu by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Oh no, they're more worried about trying to create a good show than trying to be PC to pander to all the whiny wacko liberals who think it's their right to force their views down everyone's throat.

    Can we please not bastardize everything in existence just to make a few whiners happy?

    Ok, mod me down, I'm not PC

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:stfu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preach it brutha!

    2. Re:stfu by llywrch · · Score: 2

      > Oh no, they're more worried about trying to create a good show than trying to be PC to pander to all the whiny wacko liberals
      > who think it's their right to force their views down everyone's throat.

      Yeah, right. And why is it every Libertarian/Cnservative/Right wing nut I talk to says this kind of thing right before THEY shove their opinion down *my* throat?

      > Ok, mod me down, I'm not PC

      About the only ``politically correct" people who exist are the guys who take pride in being called ``Dittoheads." And laugh about being told that their views are offensive; because they believe it is politically correct to be offensive & insulting.

      Geoff

      --
      I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
    3. Re:stfu by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2

      Oh no, they're more worried about trying to create a good show than trying to be PC to pander to all the whiny wacko liberals who think it's their right to force their views down everyone's throat.

      Ok, mod me down, I'm not PC

      Actually, I think this is a reason to mod your post up. Star Trek originally wasn't very PC at all -- yes, it had some "advanced" notions at the time, such as blacks and women serving on-deck and reporting directly to the captain -- but it also objectified alien women, was crude in many cases (and I don't just mean sexually crude, I mean the captain and others could often be curt or foul-mouthed as much as TV censors would allow), and was less restrained in general. Kirk flew by the seat of his pants a whole lot, and thought with the lap of his pants a whole lot. I want that back, and might even expect more of it, since this is a prequel that supposedly would be from a less evolved time.

  396. Freaking LAME! by Bilbo · · Score: 2
    I'm sorry, but while I don't object to "Soft porn" shots like once in a while, in the context of the show here, it was LAME, LAME, LAME! It did nothing to advance either the plot or characters, and in fact, I think it simply blurred the Vulcan characteristics. It was a simple ratings ploy, and just plain stank!

    (If it'd been Seven of Nine in Voyager, it might have even been appropriate, since she was supposed to be struggling with her human/sensual nature.)

    Other than that, it was passable for a first episode.

    (Ugh.....)

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  397. Weren't the klingons more human like back then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just having an ADD moment, pulling up random useless trivia (I'm no-where near as rabid a viewer of ST as some. I've missed entire seasons of some series) But weren't the Klingons in Kirk's day without the forehead ridges because they developed because of a disease sometime between Kirk and Picard? How come they're back.

    1. Re:Weren't the klingons more human like back then? by stefanjo · · Score: 1

      From what I have heard the klingons was going to have forehead ridges in TOS but they couldnt do it (or didnt have the resourses) back then.

  398. Bakula. by Count+Spatula · · Score: 2, Funny

    Count Bakula, if you're nasty.

    --
    -- Count Spatula: The Culinary Vampire "...because my cooking sucks."
  399. Good overall by MBCook · · Score: 1

    I agree that the themesong needs changing. I like the instrumentals that have been in every other series. I also questioned that soft-porn and think that the "armor plating going off line" was a little odd. But all in all I thought that it was great. I like Scott Bakula (I know that's spelled wrong, I'm terrible with that kind of thing). For me the series really captured that child-like wonderment of space travel. I liked the little "flashbacks" and I hope they do more of those and explain a little more back story. The only other think that I disliked was when the captain got shot the sound he made was a flat, emotionless "oooo", almost like a monotone. That really stood out as not fitting in (odd sentence, huh?). All and all, I hope the series has a good long run.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  400. Bleah! by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    I tought she was looking pretty sweet on the show but watching the Maxim photo shoot and reading some of the quotes attributed to her on that page I find her much LESS impressive now. I'd prefer to think she might have a brain between her ears but instead it seems she's into drugs. I'm not sure Maxim is doing her any favors with their article. I guess I'll have to look for it on the newstand and see if what was on the WEB was out of context. The video of her primping and having photos taken makes her look more like a street walker than a woman I could stand to be around. They ever do that with Jerry Rice?

    I DO think she did a pretty good job on the show and I actually think I'll watch the series - it's a good premise. The soft p0rn was a little out of place but I'm not 12 and can deal. Some of the techno babble mighthave been a bit weak, it was hard catching much of it, but I can ignore some that and enjoy the plot. I htink doing this as a prequal is a good idea. I was interested to see how they would make this jive with the theater movie too - I'm not sure I lined up real well at all. I guess a few more flashbacks and it'll make more sense? Sure didn't see the guy's Dad as a booze swilling rebel type looking to crank up Steppenwolf!

    We'll see, I'll watch it again on Saturday maybe.

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    1. Re:Bleah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's not at all like that article portrayed her. Trust me.

    2. Re:Bleah! by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      I don't think they meant to say that his dad was Z. Cochrane (note that his last name is Archer). His dad was one of the warp drive engineers. It takes a lot more than one person to build warp drive.

      (Thinking about that, why did the ship have two nacelles? We've seen that ships can get by with one. It seems silly/wasteful/unrealistic that the first ship would have two.)

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    3. Re:Bleah! by flagstone · · Score: 1
      I tought she was looking pretty sweet on the show but watching the Maxim photo shoot and reading some of the quotes attributed to her on that page I find her much LESS impressive now.
      Quotes? Maxim has text?
      --
      These people have looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    4. Re:Bleah! by Enigma2175 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Thinking about that, why did the ship have two nacelles?

      Redundancy

      *Sigh* Now I'll probably get modded down as "redundant"

      --

      Enigma

    5. Re:Bleah! by iforgotmyfirstlogon · · Score: 1

      Something tells me Jerry Rice would never consent to being dressed up like a streetwalker.

      - Freed

      --
      "Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love." -Turkish Proverb
    6. Re:Bleah! by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      I gues that's possible. But those must have been the most difficult part of the whole shebang. And the Federation has ships with one nacelle later (though that could be once they're more reliable). It just strikes me as the designers "reverse aging" the current ships and not thinking about how it would be done without preconceptions. (i.e., I think it'd be a hell of a lot uglier.)

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    7. Re:Bleah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tought she was looking pretty sweet on the show but watching the Maxim photo shoot and reading some of the quotes attributed to her on that page I find her much LESS impressive now. I'd prefer to think she might have a brain between her ears but instead it seems she's into drugs.
      Why would being into drugs indicate not having a brain? Not having read the article I can't tell if you're talking about dangerous drugs, or some of the more useful drugs many governments ban. I would agree someone is dumb if they use tobacco, alcohol, or opiates since they don't really offer anything useful and cause physical harm, but marijuana and the psychedelics are very useful and safe when used by smart people.

    8. Re:Bleah! by Lord_Byron · · Score: 1

      The original prototype warp ship had two nacelles...

    9. Re:Bleah! by sudog · · Score: 1

      Jerry Rice? That's Jerry Lynn Ryan you mook!

    10. Re:Bleah! by bliss · · Score: 0

      "Why would being into drugs indicate not having a brain?"

      doing something that is harmful deliberately and on a major level that has a endorphin fueled negative cycle is stupid

      "Not having read the article I can't tell if you're talking about dangerous drugs, or some of the more useful drugs many governments ban."

      Virtually all reacreational drugs are dangerous.

      "I would agree someone is dumb if they use tobacco, alcohol, or opiates since they don't really offer anything useful and cause physical harm, but marijuana and the psychedelics are very useful and safe when used by smart people."

      Yeah and all the completely, permanently brain damaged people are all just in your imagination. Yeah right.

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    11. Re:Bleah! by soonercooter · · Score: 1

      Please don't say alcohol doesn't offer anything useful. That's just ruins any sensible arguement you could have formulated.

    12. Re:Bleah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me someone who had their brain damaged by marijuana (NOT anecdotal, I want a scientific or medical journal). Can't find one? Maybe that should tell you something.

    13. Re:Bleah! by cramped+bowels · · Score: 1

      Its best two have a backup when the technology is new and unreliable and you are far away from home.

    14. Re:Bleah! by bliss · · Score: 0

      it's been very well documented via standardized tests that majuana damages the ability of the higher order brain functions over the long term. Not to mention the brain lesions.

      The fact of the matter is that drugs don't have miracle properties that allow them to magically give you anything you want for absolutely nothing. There are trade offs. These plants use these effects as toxins to prevent predators and other organisms that would like to sample them. It's an evolutionary defense mechanism.

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    15. Re:Bleah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I'm sure Rodenbury (sp?) didn't want to have a single blue throbbing nascel down the middle of his ship.

    16. Re:Bleah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still waiting for that scientific or medical journal entry... doesn't even have to be online... how about Scientific American? No? Maybe JAMA? No? Hmm... makes you think, doesn't it... or maybe not, in your case...

    17. Re:Bleah! by bliss · · Score: 0

      believe what you will even if it were perfectly safe I am not risking my ass in jail to get high and if I knew who you were and you did smoke pot I would just love to turn you in. Hell I knew people who went to jail for extremely small ammounts of marajuana.

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
  401. I liked it by Uttles · · Score: 1

    I think this show has potential. I'm definitely glad they used the idea of having a cold, logical, stern, EXTREMELY HOT woman on the show (like Voyager.) I especially like the position of that viewfinder she keeps using on the main deck... convenient height... Actually aside from looking at the Vulcan I thought the show was really interesting and I enjoyed watching, and look forward to the next episode.

    --

    ~ now you know
  402. Re:The Vulcan Chick - For the ladies too by rikkards · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Archer was packing a sock when he had the hole shot in his leg and was sitting in the doctor's office. ??

  403. Re:The Vulcan Chick - For the ladies too by Telek · · Score: 2

    apparently that was just a shadow of his hand,

    but even if it wasn't, could you keep it down in that situation? I doubt that I could.

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  404. How the hell did he get to earth without warp? by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    In the episode, Picard refers to the first contact with Klingons as with the Federation making first contact(when the Klingons attained Warp drive) , and that the Fed. didn't know anything about their culture. He also says that if they had implanted spies like Riker, then first contact would've gone much smoother.

    Uhhh...how did the Klingon get to earth then if they don't already have warp? How did they come to be on Rigel in numbers? Have an empire? I think there's already a break in continuity here. The TNG reference to a "first contact with Klingons newly discovering warp drive" apparently didn't happen.
    Of course this could simply be "revisionist" history in action. I mean we can't even get straight goods about shit we've done in the last 50 years on our own planet...

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:How the hell did he get to earth without warp? by cactopus · · Score: 1

      Yeah well there are a number of revisionist changes that have happened. If anyone remembers far enough back to around the time of Star Trek V or VI, there were some great books out including the Source Guide set in ST VI times and the Calon Riel's Ships of the Starfleet series. From these you learn that Klingons discovered warp drive in Earth's 1800's and that it was the Romulans who were warpless. Roms had cloak Klingons Warp... and they traded tech.

    2. Re:How the hell did he get to earth without warp? by nahdude812 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The difference here is between the United Federation of Planets (or whatever) and Starfleet. Starfleet is Earth, the UFP is a larger organization, to which Starfleet belongs (circa Piccard). The UFP had a bad first contact, long before Humans had warp, and in the pilot of "Enterprise," the humans are not yet associated with the UFP, and so the Klingons (whose only experience with humans to date has been their daring rescue of another klingon, and prevention of civil war). If they later joined the UFP, with which the Klingons were at war, then the humans, who've only proven themselves once, are now part of the enemy, and thus the war with humans, and bad first contact with the UFP.

      Wow, I'm such a nerd!

    3. Re:How the hell did he get to earth without warp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beautiful theory -- except for the minor fact that
      Earth is, was, and always shall be one of the
      founding members of the UFP. Makes it a little
      tough for the UFP to exist before Earth joins it.

    4. Re:How the hell did he get to earth without warp? by Tuzanor · · Score: 2
      they later joined the UFP, with which the Klingons were at war, then the humans, who've only proven themselves once, are now part of the enemy, and thus the war with humans, and bad first contact with the UFP.

      nonononono :-) The Humans are one of the founding members of the Federation, along with the Vulcans and a handful of other races (i believe the Andorians and i THINK the Bolians).
      Starfleet is the "navy" of the Federation. My guess is it was origionally Earth's "navy" and then later merged with the Federation when it formed.

    5. Re:How the hell did he get to earth without warp? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      And yet I could swear I heard another tale about how the Klingons were like Niven's Kzinti, in that a pacifist warp-capable civilization came to their home world, and they took over their ships, learned the technology (mildly) and started expanding from there.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    6. Re:How the hell did he get to earth without warp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you remember - in "Enterprise" the Vulcans state that if the situation wasn't handled properly that we'd have a "fleet of Klingon" ships at Earth in a few days - without warp that would be a bit hard.

    7. Re:How the hell did he get to earth without warp? by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 1
      Of course this could simply be "revisionist" history in action


      BIG BROTHER DID IT!!!! THEY REVISED IT!!!

      --
      We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
    8. Re:How the hell did he get to earth without warp? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Changes from what's in the books are not "revisionist" -- the books aren't canon. Anything that doesn't appear on screen might as well be "Trek: The Alternate Universe"

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    9. Re:How the hell did he get to earth without warp? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      No. Starfleet is the military/exploration arm of the UFP. That is why it recruits from every race of the UFP.

      That said, the show has potential. If they write it correctly, instead of "disaster of the week meets technology of the week," it COULD be the best Trek ever.

      --

      +++ATH0
  405. T'Pol = Nipple by Teun · · Score: 1

    Is there a Dutchman or Belgian in the crew?
    'cause for a Dutchman T'Pol sounds like 'Tepel' what means 'Nipple' in English...

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  406. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by CitizenjaQ · · Score: 1

    "Is There In Truth No Beauty?" actually. I only nitpick because I thought it was "Is There No Truth In Beauty" my whole life too, until a couple months ago when I actually saw the episode. The correct title makes a bunch more sense, ne?

  407. Starting off good by X-Nc · · Score: 1
    I do agree that that idiotic theme music has to go. It's to "Dawson's Creek". And the "soft porn", while being great eye candy, was unneeded. However, as others have mentioned, the Vulcan/Human thing works pretty well. The show is set many hundreds of years before TOS and the reactions of all the races seemed to fit well within the plot. This show has promise.

    And Scott Bakula kicks a$$.

    --
    --
    If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
  408. it was NOT a pilot it was a PREMIER by ebbv · · Score: 1


    the series has already been picked up and more than one episode created. a PILOT is a SINGLE show to test the reaction to a series before more episodes are made.

    idiot.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  409. Weapons issues, Porn, Theme, And Other Stuff by JSimmons · · Score: 1

    A) I was kind of hoping we would see the development of the phase pistols. It's like he pulled these "new weapons" out of his ass. Where did the technology come from? How was it developed and adapted for use? Why do they appear to only have two of them? B) The soft porn was a bad idea. I think it would have been a lot more entertaining if they were either sprayed (with some uncomfortably forceful jets of gas), or totally immersed in liquid, or maybe be subjected to a robotically controlled sponging off. C) The theme song was a waste of audio signal. They should have had something akin to STNG with a Bakula voice-over. D) Blalock needs to learn how to become a Vulcan - you could see the beginnings of a smile when the little dog started humping her leg. I suggest that she talk to Leonard Nimoy, or the guy that played Tuvoc on Voyager. Hell, even Kirstie Ally was a better Vulcan in the Wrath of Khan, and she only had one shot at it. E) Putting the log on hold to talk to yourself or your dog is a little bizarre, and an unneccessary quirk in the show.

    1. Re:Weapons issues, Porn, Theme, And Other Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The log bit makes sense... a ship's log is an /official/ record (ever heard of people looking in the ship's log to find out why X or Y happened?). You don't want extraneous comments to yourself or your pet in the log. The Captain's Log (unless noted as Captain's /personal/ log) is not a diary, contrary to popular belief. There will be personal observations in the log, but it's a record that Admirals and historians might just read, and some things you just don't want committed to history.

      Forget the PC quasi-military of TNG, et al, we've a return to a much more realistic setting on our hands.

  410. The Theme Music by Caraig · · Score: 1

    Okay, it was a surprise when I heard the kind of Mellencamp-esque twang... but you know, I think it wouldn't have worked nearly as well without the images during the opening credits and the words to it. This is probably gonna be flamed, but I think the theme music/opening titles was really well done and added a nice falvor to the show. Sure, it wasn't a monster orchestral piece, but it worked. It really did make me think of things like The Right Stuff, and From The Earth To The Moon, and Apollo 13. And that seems to be what this whole new series is all about.

    --
    "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
  411. Hot chicks before Troi by jtseng · · Score: 2, Informative

    What - you didn't consider Nurse Chapel or that red-shirted blonde chick with the mini and the pony tail to be hot? It would have been nice if the green-skinned lap dancer stayed for a few epis...

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

  412. Screw PC by OldCrasher · · Score: 1
    I liked this Pilot:
    • There was an effort to kick Political Correctness in the teeth - I rather liked that.
    • People and things had a real connection with where we are today - people wore ties, computer screens looked like a demented hackers X window fantasy. Screens were even partially readable to 21st Century eyes.
    • There was a grittiness through most of the sets: bare metal, dirt, and the look of people just surviving. A nice effort to get away from the plastic sets of, erm, yore - the future?.

    I still want to find out how we move from these strange beginnings, 100 yrs after first contact, to later images of this fictional world. The writers have a great continuity issue to address.
  413. 'Twas Excellentl, but... by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    It's very good... wow Star Trek characters with Emotions and Personalities. The theme music HAS TO GO but thank god it doesn't have us boldly...going...anywhere.

    It does need to get past the "Aren't those pesky Vulcans terrible, and aren't humans wonderful?" stuff. It got old in the first few minutes.

    (Oh, and Armour plating fails if it's blown off... :-))

  414. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No no no ... the commander. Mmmmm.

  415. Not bad, not great. by NulDevice · · Score: 1

    Well, lessee...on the upside, the show's look-n-feel is well done, and so far they haven't fscked with continuity too much (although if they screw with TOS continuity I won't be too upset, since much of TOS was self-contradictory and just dumb). The characters are a bit one-note right now, but they did give some room for development. The "space boomer" guy has some potential, as does the vulcan hottie. Dr. Phlox is interesting, although sort of weird. And for the first time in a very long time on trek we don't have a character who perpetually has to deal with trying to become human (Spock, Data, HoloDoc...).

    Cochrane unsplit the infinitive. That was surprising. Just having James Cromwell cameo was surprising.

    The theme song has got to go. I believe I can fly...

    Count Bakula needs to settle into his role. He seemed a bit wooden, in the same way that most of the former soap stars on B5 did in the first two seasons, or John Ritter did for the entire run of "Hooperman."

    The "lather up" scene was just gratuitous. But then again, this *is* UPN.

    So far - slightly better than "Encounter at Farpoint" (something actually *happened* in this show - E@F didn't do more than introduce Q). Better than "Caretaker" (breaking new ground in the use of the "reset button" ending. "The ship is now repaired..."). Not as cool as Emmisary, IMHO.

    --

    ----
    "I used to listen to Null Device before they sold out."

  416. Amen! by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    Who the heck wants to jump a pile of coat hangers anyway? Gimme' just a little bit of weight please! Who the heck wants these women who are so thin you could tie a string to that thing they call a bra and fly them like a kite?!

    Having said that this one didn't look like her ribs were sticking out as badly as some others. Giver her a Big Mac or two and she might pass :-)

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    1. Re:Amen! by Trinn · · Score: 1

      *just points to his other most recent post, the one containing a link describing something a little less than ultra-skinny...*

      Microserf:What are we going to do tonight, Bill?
      Bill:Same thing we do every night. Try to take over the world.
      Bill:Are you pondering what I'm pondering, Microserf?
      Microserf:I think so, Bill...But how are we going to eliminate open source without a pink weasel?
      Bill:Shut up, Microserf.

    2. Re:Amen! by masq · · Score: 1

      Like a comedian on HBO said:

      "BONES are for the dog,
      MEAT is for the man..."

      Of course, my wife is a finely-tuned 106 pounds, so this is all kinda irrelevant to me. My best advice? If you get a chance to get close to *any* woman, talking about weight is a short ride to hell.

  417. Re:Kiss Me If Your Alien Speaks English by hAkron · · Score: 1

    Also, I don't know if I was the only one who caught this, but when Capn' Scott's father was giving his speech, about Seeking out new life and new civilizations, he corrected Kirk's gramatical error from the orignal series...'to boldly go' is a dangling participle. It was spoken properly in the speech 'to go boldly'

  418. Shatner by mikosullivan · · Score: 2, Funny
    No ST series has ever had a real all-encompassing central character

    Shatner would probably disagree. Nichelle Nichols and Jimmy Doohan would probably agree that he would disagree.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  419. Star Trek is the Windows of TV shows by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

    Kinda funny how Slashdot readers consider themselves to have better taste than the average person because they use Linux over Windows. But then they have to go and ruin it by promoting Star Trek.

    1. Re:Star Trek is the Windows of TV shows by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 1

      I find it personally and professionally offensive that you would mention Star Trek and Windows in the same sentence.

      In your opinion, the tv series (franchise?) Star Trek, then, has a monopoly on television viewing? Is the content of Star Trek insecure? Are there issues with the Klingons beaming into local tv stations to catalog the tape library and report back to His High Holiness Chancellor Gates about what shows are available in each one?

      You don't have to like Star Trek. I don't like Baby-lon Vee. But it doesn't even come close, as a television show, to being in the same category as Windows does in the software world. Not by a long shot.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    2. Re:Star Trek is the Windows of TV shows by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 5, Funny

      I find it personally and professionally offensive that you would mention Star Trek and Windows in the same sentence.

      This sentence pretty much defines the term "geek."

    3. Re:Star Trek is the Windows of TV shows by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Troll, Flaimebait take your pick.

      Slashdot readers _do_ have better taste than the average person. The slash code should replace congress in america, everyone should watch startrek (if not just to see ezri and 7). Someone should set up a group to break into houses at night and replace windows installations with linux (and install replacement software/fix drivers/modules) and then leave before the owner wakes up.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  420. I pity the poor fool ... by SloppyElvis · · Score: 1

    ...who tries to write a new Star Trak series. It must be difficult to cater to the whiniest, nit-pickiest, most scrupulous bunch of critics in the known universe. Of course, I am affectionately referring to the Trekkies.

    I thought it was a very good pilot. Sure, it is hard to not think of Bacula as Mr. Quantum Leap. After all, I'd wager a good number Trekkies once viewed that show as well. Ok ok, the soft porn was gratuitous, but I like to watch that sort of thing (at least while my wife is away at some Tupperware party). Plus, just imagine what those chicks could do with their tongues! Yikes.

    I especially appreciated the rustic feel of the ship. I think the producers did a fine job in creating a vessel that fits into the expected technological evolution of the Enterprise. I also liked how Bacula was so gruff. He almost reminded me of the old Kirk, sporting an attitude at every chance.

    Anyway, be nice guys, I don't recall the Voyager pilot being such a masterpiece. In fact, I remember thinking it a setup for a real snoozer, but it turned out ok.

  421. "Out there" by mikosullivan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I agree. An aspect of this series I like is that they are "out there" exploring strange new worlds (and new civilisations, etc). My biggest complaint about ST:TNG was that they seemed to be flying a shopping mall around the neighborhood, not roughing it out there in unexplored space. Even Voyager, which should have been "out there" spent a huge part of the series in their own little world dealing with computer glitches taking over the ship.

    As for the soft porn, the original show wasn't exactly lacking that either. What straight male over thirty hasn't had fond thoughts of the green chick in The Menagerie? That was racy stuff back then. The difference is that Menagerie and the rest of the original series had some class. They didn't just say "OK, how are we gonna get them naked? How about a disinfectant scene where they 'have' to rub each other down?"

    Enterprise seems to have recaptured the spirit of the original show, if not the intelligence and class.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
    1. Re:"Out there" by cramped+bowels · · Score: 1

      Teri Garr in her mini - woohoo!

    2. Re:"Out there" by kd5biv · · Score: 1

      As for the soft porn, the original show wasn't exactly lacking that either. What straight male over thirty hasn't had fond thoughts of the green chick in The Menagerie? That was racy stuff back then. The difference is that Menagerie and the rest of the original series had some class. They didn't just say "OK, how are we gonna get them naked? How about a disinfectant scene where they 'have' to rub each other down?"

      Well, true. William Ware Theiss' costumes certainly did something for TOS (personal favorite is the one from "Gamesters of Triskelion" -- awful episode, truly awful, but that costume and the actress in it were worth putting up with the rest of it..) Anyone *not* familiar with his theory of costume design? ;-)

      But then again, Seven of Nine's lines didn't help the situation any on Voyager, with unmistakable implications of polyamory writ large .. still looking for a clock whose alarm is the words "You will awaken. Resistance is futile" ..

      --


      73 de N5VB (ex-KD5BIV) AR SK
  422. Enjoy it-it could be worse(i.e. Voyager) by Sherloch+Hemloch · · Score: 1

    Hey, back off, man. The show wasn't half bad. You have to give it for the ernest try on the part of the writers to actually give a character more than one dimension. For crying out loud, look at Deep sleep nine or Voyager- any one of the cast could be replaced with cardboard standies an no-one would know!
    I just love the fact that when thinds break they don't just fix it with a new word!
    Perhaps the best thing is that the crew exhibits a bit of wonder and awe because they actually haven't been there before!
    I realize Scott bakula is no Shatner, but I can do with the saccriney-sweet tast of the stand-in.

    --
    Never trust a bald barber; he has no respect for your hair
  423. i liked it by blah_master · · Score: 1

    not much tho D: i like andromeda, the andromeda chick is hot too, but shes starting to become a real bitch. i wish the would show the blond less, and the purple and andromeda girl more i only watch tv for the leg, i mean what kinna storyline are you gonna get from TV! cept for the simpsons. but that was HBO neways.

  424. Compare not Babylon 5 to any Drek series by Von+Rex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not use Babylon 5 as an example of good acting? With the exceptions of Picard and Spock, there's never been a character on any Star Trek "franchise" that was half as interesting as G'Kar, Londo, Sheridan, Ivanova, Delenn, or Garibaldi.

    The minor characters were great too. Lennier could get more across with one look than the typical Trek character could with an entire scene of their hand-wringing monologues. Even the recurring guest characters on B5 were far beyond the regulars on a Trek show. Who could forget Lord Reefa or Mr. Morden or the Emperor Cartagia?

    Sinclair was wooden in a cheesy fashion, but it seemed to work for him, the same way Kirk's cheesiness ultimately made for a more interesting character. The only actor on B5 that I found really bad was the the red-headed telepath. Can't remember he name off-hand. Lyta, maybe? Zack was pretty bad too, but still likable.

  425. Warp-distance problems by Millard+Fillmore · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Forgetting continuity problems with the timeline developed in the movies and other series, we have some serious technology problems here. Even within the episode, it is suggested that Earth-Neptune takes six minutes but Earth-Klingon Empire takes 80 hours. Not feasible. I know the warp scales are supposedly different, but under Next Generation warp considerations, warp 4.5 to the Klingon Homeworld would take over a year. 80 hours at warp 4.5 wouldn't even get the ship halfway to Alpha Centauri.

    Also, how the hell can they not have shields, when shields are basically the same technology as the warp drive and the anti-gravity system. I guess maybe they haven't encountered hostile forces yet, but then why would they have weapons? Very odd.

    Now, it's not going to impact my enjoyment of the show, which, for a ST pilot, was quite good. But, as someone who spent a lot of hours in high school being very interested in the technical aspects of the series, this is just annoying.

    1. Re:Warp-distance problems by jeff13 · · Score: 1



      You're right. The "Producers", ever more seeming like the insane people from the Mel Brooks movie, have obviously completely forgotten to use bsic math and common sense with any dangleing plot threads. It's called being a lazy writer... I believe.

  426. they should fire the sound engineer! by CrudPuppy · · Score: 1

    did anyone else notice that most ambient noise,
    sound effects, and background music were set to
    about the same level as the dialogue?

    I found at least half of the dialogue to be
    incomprehensible and drowned out!!

    I am hoping this is a provider glitch and just
    my market suffered... otherwise they really need
    to reprioritize.

    --
    A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.
    1. Re:they should fire the sound engineer! by Zeno_1 · · Score: 1

      I noticed that the sound was not matching the video a lot of the times.. it was only about a half second off, but it looked like they dubbed the voices for most of the time.

      (I know that they didn't, but it gave that appearance)

    2. Re:they should fire the sound engineer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am on the east coast and UPN's sound sucked. I don't know why they can't get it right, but its happened before.

      other than that I thought it was pretty good.

    3. Re:they should fire the sound engineer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they dubbed the voices. They always dub the voices.

    4. Re:they should fire the sound engineer! by xenyz · · Score: 1

      I watched it on CityTV in Toronto, and didn't notice anything strange about the audio.

      Dunno what it could be...

  427. The only nit that bugged me by Jbrecken · · Score: 1

    I was really enjoying the show until they got to the point where the Earthlings had no clue what "Rigel" meant, and had to ask the Vulcan, and then needed the Vulcan's star charts to get there. You'd think starfleet officers would be a little more familiar with astronomy.

    1. Re:The only nit that bugged me by riven1128 · · Score: 1

      This was their first voyage into deep space, how would they know about this stuff? they have to learn sometime .. and we got to see it :)

    2. Re:The only nit that bugged me by Jbrecken · · Score: 1

      This was their first voyage into deep space, how would they know about this stuff?

      Rigel's a star visible from Earth with the naked eye. It's in Orion.
      It was named centuries ago. It's not a name some Star Trek writer invented.

    3. Re:The only nit that bugged me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree, Rigel's a star humans named.

      Thing is, though, that we see Rigel as it was a couple hundred years ago. Light takes a while to travel, and things move in the meantime. You oculd head for where Rigel is from Earth and get there and find out it's moved 50 light years East (relatively speaking; I know they don't use N/S/E/W in space). So that bit made sense. But not knowing what Rigel is? Huh? Most of the names used on TOS were real star systems.

    4. Re:The only nit that bugged me by Khan+Fused · · Score: 1

      "We" see Rigel as it was a couple hundred years ago ... but we do know its velocity vectors, and where it *should* be in 'present day (--ok, 'present' meaning 22nd century plus a few days travel time.)

      However, they probably WOULD need Vulcan starmaps for more accurate accounting of the system's motion -- accurate vectors for the planets in the system (more accurate than Earth's telescopes could pick up) ... detailed data on the planet's surface conditions, cultural data, etc ... And then there's that brown dwarf that the Earth astronomers missed that just happened to be sitting right on their course plot.

      --
      This mind intentionally left blank.
    5. Re:The only nit that bugged me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, we *can* measure Rigel's proper motion (both radial and tangential) and distance to estimate where it would be *now*. Sure, consulting Vulcan star charts for an exact location would be prudent, but a crew of supposedly well-trained space-explorers who have never even heard of one the brightest stars in the night sky? What's next?

      "Captain Archer, the message we cracked indicates there's a enemy spy installation somewhere called 'the rings of Saturn'!"

      "Ask the Vulcans if they've ever heard of this Saturn!"

  428. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by guuyuk · · Score: 1

    Actually, I was hoping for Robert Guillaume to show up on DS9; even if it was only a cameo.

    --
    We're sorry, the phone number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try your call again
  429. Re:Trapped by the canon (Go watch Farscape) by maggard · · Score: 1
    Ben Browder on Farscape is my definition of softcore porn.

    (What I could do with those full, sensual lips...)

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  430. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Enigma2175 · · Score: 2
    .and ds9 had leela...

    I think you are thinking of Futurama... DS9 had Dax and Kira.

    --

    Enigma

  431. Resolving history by nick_burns · · Score: 0

    Maybe we can just ignore most of the events that supposedly took place according to TOS and TNG. This could possibly be the alternate universe that appeared in DS9. Then we can stop overanalyzing fictional history and try to enjoy it for entertainment value.

  432. We need to start a petition to change the theme! by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2

    That theme song must be changed and all copies of it must be destroyed. Can someone please start a petition to get paramount to change it?

  433. Re:TOS show with ZC and the Companion by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

    That timeline is clearly violated when they launch the Enterprise and play a 30 year old tape of a now elderly Cochran (played by James Cromwell of First Contact) made at the inauguration of the Warp4 facility.

    In fact just about any inconsistencies with previously established timelines can be written off as due to the influence of the TNG crew & the Borg when they went back in time in First Contact.

  434. Enterprise by Gunner88 · · Score: 1

    Man, why is everyone complaining about evertything on the show ?
    You all sound like 5 year olds!
    Take it from the point of view of having watched 4 years of crappy voyager. This one was much better than 90% of the STV episodes

    Having said that, i think the show was great !
    I had my doubts about Scott Bacula beign the captain but it was able to pull it off quite nicelly.

    When the show ended i called a friend and said 'seven of who ? ', i think the Vulcan officer did a great job as a science officer and as a TV Babe.

    I liked every character in that episode.
    Not so sure about the theme song tho.

    Soo to all of you who didn't like the show, i sure hope you're going to do us a favor and not watch it again so that we don't have to read your 'this and that sucked' all year !
    That's the problem with you guys, you will watch it just so that you can bitch and complain every week.

    enuff said.

  435. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by funky49 · · Score: 1

    Oops!

    thanks for providing timely and correct information.

    --
    --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
  436. On Enterprise by haz-mat · · Score: 1

    1st never really saw the Vulcans as a domineering and kinda harsh race, reminds me of the Telon (sp) on Earth Final conflict (yuk!).
    2nd Music sucks, 'nuff said.
    3rd What the fuck, in Trial's and Tribulations (DS9) the conversation with Warf about the early Klingon explorers was completly ignored by this episode.
    4th im just generally kinda disapointed in the show as a Star Trek, and the whole not being carried on a real network.

  437. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by iforgotmyfirstlogon · · Score: 1

    http://www.allaboutcelebs.com/galleries/blalock.ht m

    Both "Woo" and "Hoo".

    - Freed

    --
    "Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love." -Turkish Proverb
  438. Not Bad... by trongey · · Score: 1

    I like the opening scenes (hate the music). The characters seem to have some depth and kick butt/take names when needed.

    I was amazed by the technology that allows whole cities to be moved around. The last time I drove through Broken Bow, OK all I saw was pine trees and rocks since it's located in the Oachita Mountains. Moving it NW 300 miles to the Panhandle grain fields was a neat trick.

    The Vulcans seemed a bit edgy and antagonistic. They need some work, except for T'Pol who apparently has had lots of work done already ;)

    I think it can be a good show.

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  439. Here here! by steveo777 · · Score: 1

    Huzah!, horay, AMEN!

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  440. Good First Episode that harkens to The Original by Thaniel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really liked this first episode. Humans acting like humans again, instead of sanitized puritanical boring bastards that we've gotten used to in TNG and Voyager. I think Scott Bakula is a great actor and is perfect for this part. I loved seeing him tell those Vulcan assholes to piss off. It's about time someone did. The whole episode I was thinking "Yes! This is so like old-school Star Trek."

    I watched most of the episodes of TOS and TNG, some Voyager (everyone knows it sucked in the beginning but got a lot better in the end), and almost no DS9. DS9 was just pathetic.

    Anyway - my point is, some of you ultra trekkie people need to take a step back. Did you watch Galaxy Quest? Did you see the guys with the plans and how they were nit picking one little inconsistancy? I thought that was an exaggeration, I guess I was wrong. Drop the whole stupid-ass Klingon thing. THEY CHANGED THE MAKEUP. That's all. Warf's comment was a fucking inside joke! Get over it!

    The shower scene and the hottie vulcan part was stolen directly from 7 of 9 because it was so successful in making Voyager more liked. Deal with it. Why the fuck are you complaining that they're putting hot women in our Sci-Fi shows? And who was the idiot who said this would make Roddenbury flip over in his grave? Did you WATCH the original episode? Kirk did the nasty with every hot alien chick in the universe. They just couldn't show more back then because the censors were stricter.

    Personally, I think a little sexual/romantic tension is a GOOD thing. It gives the show dimension and a more realistic feel.

    This was the best pilot for a Star Trek show ever, and you're talking like it's total trash. You know it's not, so stop finding excuses to trash it and watch it or don't watch it.

    If you like Star Trek, you'll watch it and like it. If you don't, you won't. We all knew which camp we were in before we even saw the opening credits.

    Now, about the theme music.... was I deaf during that part? I totally don't remember the singing at all, but I recognize some of the images. Wierd. Anyway, the singing I heard off the version linked to online was terrible, and I agree that it should be thrown out for some old-school orchestra music.

    -Thaniel

    1. Re:Good First Episode that harkens to The Original by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      This happens with _every_ new series "oh no, you can't have a woman captin" "whats the point if the ship doesn't move" "how can you remake the originals", but in the end people settle down. I havn't seen enterprise yet (the studios have to finish selling it out in the US first to get every penny before they come to england lol:) Was the music non trek?!?! if so they should change it lol. ("omg! they hated the music, we have to change it before next weeks show, bob, i need you to write a fresh 2min intro for a full orchestra by tommorow so we can get it in rehersal and record it, you might want some caffine 2)

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  441. Re:Kiss Me If Your Alien Speaks English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    you want to see my dangling participle?

  442. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by jokrswild · · Score: 1

    It's Troi, not Troy.

  443. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

    Cheers == Star Trek II
    Taxi == Star Trek III

    So Kirk ... You won't give me the Genesis device? Okey-doke!

    --
    The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  444. Didn't like it--ignored some good Trek books by willith · · Score: 1

    If you'll excuse me, I'm going to sit over in the corner with my copies of _Strangers From the Sky_, _Final Frontier_, and _The Final Reflection_ and weep until the hurt goes away.

    1. Re:Didn't like it--ignored some good Trek books by chewbca · · Score: 1

      don't forget about My Enemy, My Ally :))
      btw. I LOVED all 3 of those you mentioned.. haven't read those in about 10 years.. heh hehe

      --
      -- "This is my sig... there are many like it but this one is mine"
    2. Re:Didn't like it--ignored some good Trek books by chewbca · · Score: 1

      but uhhh... i liked the Enterprise pilot last night..

      --
      -- "This is my sig... there are many like it but this one is mine"
    3. Re:Didn't like it--ignored some good Trek books by Khan+Fused · · Score: 1
      I'm going to add all the rest of the Duane books in with your stack of "Why can't the series be like THIS!!!", plus Janet Kagan's ... plus a couple of others ...

      __________________

      The Trek office has had a policy since they started with TNG that only certain things would be allowed into 'Series Canon':
      - Most of the TOS episodes
      - Any previous episode of the new stuff (TNG as canon for DS9, etc.)
      - All of the movies **EXCEPT** #5 (Okuda's 'history of the federation' mentions that certain legends and tall tales have grown up around the James Kirk stories -- any possibility of him going to the center of the galaxy and meeting a deity are probably apocryphal.)

      NONE of the books are allowed in Trek universe canon. I assume this includes Vonda McIntyre's novelizations of movies 2-4 ..which is a bitch 'cause they do some nice expansions, and they're the only place where Saavik's half-romulan (RIHANNSU!!!) heritage is mentioned ... and also the only place where it's confirmed that Sulu was supposed to be Captain of Excelsior back in Trek II (it was planned-but the scenes were never shot). And McIntyre's version of Trek III had a *great* explanation of what Uhura was doing while the rest of 'the guys' stole the Enterprise. (very creatively screwing up the entire Earth communications grid, so Starfleet couldn't dispatch pursuit ships after the Enterprise... then running for the Vulcan embassy.)

      Diane Duane (she who made the Vulcans and Romulans into mature, respectable cultures) *HAD* been on the writing staff of TNG ... but she had a bit of a falling out with one of the higher-ups, and got booted. (Check the acknowledgement in the front of "Dark Mirror" to find out who).

      But in the later TNG episodes, the other writers started leaking her ideas for the Romulans into episodes -- specifically the one where Troi wakes up aboard a Rom cruiser and has to bluff her way through a role as a Tal'Shiar officer. Specifically -- in the story they referred to the ship's driver as a "pilot" instead of "helmsman" (traditions in the Rihanna starfleet came from their air force, not their navy)... and the ship captain was a Veeeerrry Duane-like character -- and many Duane Rom characters have a *vast* dislike for the dishonorable tone that their government has taken over the past 2-4 generations.

      but DAMNIT the trek office won't let them in!!

      (taking a long look at the other posters)
      ... I'm probably preaching to the choir here. I'll just take my books and my "BIG OLE GEEK" button, and go sit down and read ...

      --
      This mind intentionally left blank.
  445. enterprise theme song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its got to go! pleeeze, give me the dark emptiness of space accented with the colourful dancing cosmic goodies and Picards stentorious voice! Jean-Luc we need thee.

  446. Remember Knight Rider by A+Swing+Dancing+Dork · · Score: 1

    In response to armour going offline. It helps to think back to the 80's and Knight Rider.

    I think everyone can except that in the future armour coud be polarized and kept together in a quasi-magnetic kinda way right?

    Well...If you remember the golieth episodes (the Mac Truck that kicked KITTS ass)they said that KITTS armour used electricity to keep it molecularly bonded together. While that is lame as a tachyon beam, it is an explination.

    1. Re:Remember Knight Rider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ship is equipped with retractable polarized hull plating. The plating has to be offline (retracted) in order to use the warp-drive.

  447. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Loligo · · Score: 1

    >what the hell did you call good ole Seven-Of-Nine then?

    I must have missed 2-of-38's shower scene...

    -l

  448. The Nipple Show was great ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah!

  449. What's with the theme song? by breon.halling · · Score: 1

    I thought the Scorpions broke up.


    --
    "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
  450. Re:Klingon appearance by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

    "Warrior race" has a lot more play to it than "commie bastards." Particularly after glastnost =)

    Bravo on the makeup comment. People get too involved trying to explain away real-world limitations that they forget to just enjoy the content. They seem to lose the message in the technology (now that sounds slightly familiar...)

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  451. A actually liked it by Angry_Dwarf · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is true. But I have to say that I am also a fan of the original series. Frankly, I say many elements that I could see as predecessors to that series (Like it should)without the Kirk-Speak. I thought is was a good link between the culture of today, and what Gene envisioned aboard NCC-1701. I do, however have to admit, that I'm not to sure about the theme song either. On another note: I liked the soft porn scene... But then, I'm a perv.

  452. Just what Trek needed! by nerdwarrior · · Score: 1

    This is just what Trek needed---a ship named Enterprise, a bold captain and no reservations about whoopin' ass. (They do need to ditch the theme music, though.)

  453. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by operagost · · Score: 1

    ... or on Voyager. (Neelix)

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  454. widescreen format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's with the letterboxing? i found it rather anoying. they're probably geting a big pay off by sony (or whoever make those things) so everyone will want to go out any get one of those wide screen tv in the commercials recently. anyway didn't like the episode maybe it'll get better down the road. sorry if this post doesn't make any sense i'm very tired...

  455. And you call yourselves geeks! Hmph by Umrick · · Score: 1
    As those of you who played the Star Trek role playing game, back when it was a licensed deal, would know. There are two types of Klingons. Imperial (Worf style), and Fusions.

    Fusions were created genetically when the Klingons encountered a race, by fusing Imperial with the encountered race's DNA. Those Fusions could then be used in all contacts (providing obfuscation as to who the real Klingons were) and as spies within the alien race.

    Wonder if I could still find that box up in the closet? Hmm...

  456. HEY! by Tim+Doran · · Score: 1

    Don't slam the soft porn! That Vulcan is hot ;)

    Of course, they could go for a 'Queer as Folk' slant and open up men's and women's decontamination chambers. The man-man action isn't my speed, but imagine the hot Vulcan-Human female scenes! Yowza!

    (And yes, I posted without the +1 bonus ;)

  457. Re:Absolutely Right... Or not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >That's something a lot of people forget--that
    >Roddenberry set out to write a "Wagon Train to
    >the Stars," a sort of Western set in deep space.

    That was not his intention; he had to do it that
    way in order to sell the show to the TV-company.
    He was too far ahead of time for them, so he had
    to sell his soul. Or sth...

  458. Re:Klingon appearance by TrickFred · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend asked me about that once, when the DS9 Tribble episode was on - I made up an answer on the spot - at the tome of TOS, the Klingon in control of the council was a Xenophobe, and had all Klingons serving in interstellar ships surgically altered to hide the true nature of the Knilgon race, or something like that. I thought that would be a good idea. Maybe I should send that to Paramount.

  459. Jeffries Lube by hedley · · Score: 1


    Later the guy invented a conduit.

    Hedley

    1. Re:Jeffries Lube by jeff13 · · Score: 1



      BWAHAHAHA. Tha's priceless. Good one. LMAO :)

  460. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that Pulaski was one of those mini-skirt women on TOS. So shudder away, but dick-in-hand did apply at one time.

  461. The best series pilot since TOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an old TOS head, for sure, and think this new series reminds me of the that. The PC BS in TNG, DS9, and VOY drove me nuts -- not that there weren't good episodes in those series (especially TNG).

    Its off to a good start in my view. I just hope the producers don't buckle and start handing out geek driven overly-techno-babble-laden garbage. If they continue to write this like its literature, and use situations and characters as metaphores with which to explore the human condition, they'll do well.

    I thought the acting was far better than any of the other pilots, and the editing and so forth was too. It was well paced, and the sound quality was fine (at least on my TV). The cheesy looping that ruined the sound quality of TNG, DS9, and VOY was pleasantly absent. And there was no "whispering for dramatic effect!" Yeah!

    Anyway, I liked it.

    rgr

  462. Pants! by Analog_Kid · · Score: 1

    Will need a few more show to be sure, but what i do know now is Bakula NEEDS TO WEAR PANTS WHEN MAKING LOGS.

    --
    If only Bill Gates had a nickel for every time a Microsoft program crashed.... oh wait .... HE DOES!!!
  463. Perhaps a reaction to losing a war with humans? by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting idea.

    Perhaps it was a social/religious reaction to losing a war with humans ... emulating the appearance of those who had bested them by a minority through plastic surgery or genetic manipulation. The majority of klingons would consider this a perversion of the highest order, but if that minority had been in a position of political power or influence that would explain their frequent contact with the federation during Kirk's tenure, only to be eradicated once more traditional klingons seized back control of the council at some later date.

    This would be similar to a religious group of Kzin (Ringworld, Ringworld Engineers, Throne of Ringworld, et al, by Larry Niven) who believed that humans were favored by the Gods, and so cloaked themselves in the skin of dead humans in an effort to decieve the Gods long enough to win a war and conquer earth. Said religion was of course ruthlessly suppressed by the establishment, but that didn't prevent some highly placed Kzin from practicing it and/or believing it at some deep level (e.g. Speaker-to-Animals, later Chmee).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Perhaps a reaction to losing a war with humans? by hardburn · · Score: 1

      One problem: In DS9, we actualy meet up with some of the same klingon commanders that we see in TOS (Klingons apperantly have very long natural lifespans, so these commanders are still going into battle when over 100 years old). These klingons had smooth foreheads in TOS, but bony foreheads in DS9.

      The writers could make quite an intresting episode out of the Klingon forehead situation. I hope they don't pass it off with some cockamemie techno babble (although even that would be more satisfying then "we don't like to talk about it").

      --
      Not a typewriter
    2. Re:Perhaps a reaction to losing a war with humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps it's because Star Trek is a TV series.

  464. They dont grow Corn in OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yes they do indeed grow corn in Okieland especially in southeast OK near Broken Bow.... just not in the massive quantities that you'd be more accustomed to seeing in the midwest states like Iowa. Oklahoma is, however, much more known for wheat farms, not corn.

  465. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by HappyHead · · Score: 1

    Did you expect the rest of the A-Team to appear in Rocky III? Did you expect the cast of Cheers to appear in Star Trek III? No.

    Actually, every time Barklay showed up, I couldn't shake the image of him running around in the holodeck yelling "Neeeewww trashbag!" But then, I freely admit that I watched way too much of the A-Team as a child.

  466. Its was kinda bad BUT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember how bad the forst year of STNG DS9 and Voyager were ? realy i think they did ok all thinks consitered . Yes it was heavy handed , yes there was cheese , but it is a good sign that they have some commic relefe in there. it's something that the others could have used.
    A little formulaic perhaps, but it could be a case of "dance with the one that brought you"
    I'll be happy to give it a chance.

  467. TNG its own worst enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    PC is its own worst enemy, and I know of no other uber PC Star Trek than TNG. They spend so much time drawing attention to little unnoticed nuinsas instead of focusing on a TRUE bigoted free environment, that the point is covered up in a load of PC crap.

    Just like at work when some incompetent is sacked, and then claims racism or other discrimination, I think it is important then to say, "Yes, we do indeed discriminate here... against incomptetence!" Then point out that if you create a multiple standard that it basically proves correct the statements that non white males are inferior thus requiring lower standards.

  468. Contract addendums by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

    Does Bakula have anything in his contract about "no blue backlight special effects permitted?"

  469. Real treckers... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    ...are total nerds with no life.

    Geez...what inspires you to 'know' so much about star trek time lines? It's ENTERTAINMENT. Get over it. How many of those Star Trek books you are so into were written by Gene anyway? That's right. Now shut up and go pester somebody else with your vast, superior trekkie knowledge, nerdboy.

    I'll mod myself: -1 rude, anti-nerd

  470. We've seen T'Pol before! by mad_ian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    think back... WAAAAAAY back...

    T'Pol, the most decorated Vulcan of all time. T'Pol, who helped her (son? relation of some sort) Sarek become an Ambassador to Earth, where he met and married a human, to the chagrine of his Vulcan brethren, who later gave birth to a son they named Spock.

    T'Pol is the head of Spock's family. Something tells me that Enterprise is going to be showing ALOT of backstory.

    And I liked the opening sequence visuals. Showing all the REAL Enterprise ships, and the timeline of human exploration was quite nice.

    ~Donald

    --
    ~Donald / Just RTFM
    1. Re:We've seen T'Pol before! by jeff13 · · Score: 1


      Yes the opening bit had great visuals, just didn't go for the Hollywood/ Rod Stewart music. What is it with this sort of crap music from Hollywood? PUT DOWN THE GUNS AND ROSES AND TRY SOME ACTUAL MUSIC. Bo Diddly knows Star Trek. ;p

    2. Re:We've seen T'Pol before! by Conor6 · · Score: 1

      The name is T'Pau.

      Sorry 'bout that.

      --
      Conor
      Programmer, Consultant, Geek, CTYer.
    3. Re:We've seen T'Pol before! by Khan+Fused · · Score: 1

      There HAD been rumors (or contempations from the writing staff) of actually making the Vulcan in question T'Pau ... but those were negated after the rumor mill turned over two or three times.

      I dunno if that would be a good thing, or a bad thing. It'd be great if we could see T'Pau's backstory & the backstory of Surak's family line ... but it'd have to be done *right* - and I don't know if I trust the new series enough yet to do it that way ...

      either that, or I've just read too many Dianne Duane Trek books.

      --
      This mind intentionally left blank.
    4. Re:We've seen T'Pol before! by abde · · Score: 2


      I think you are thinking of T'Pau :)

      yeah, I'm a geek ...

      --
      Don't blame me - I voted for Howard Dean. http://dean2004.blogspot.com
  471. Letterboxing -- HDTV version? by Clith · · Score: 1
    Since the whole show was letterboxed, it was either filmed or done in HDTV. Anyone care to hazard a guess? I'll go for HDTV. Perhaps it was broadcast in HDTV somewhere? Anyone?

    Is it just me or is there a simliarity between the "Enterprise" logo/position in the opening credits and that of "Earth: Final Conflict" -- the whole bottom-crescent-Earth shtick. I guess lots of shows have used it, but these two particular shows share that special Roddenberry [sp?] connection.

    --
    [ReidNews]
    1. Re:Letterboxing -- HDTV version? by JoeGee · · Score: 1

      As I recall reading from the first online review, (linked to from bureau42?) this was filmed in HD. According to the reviewer the "gala premier" was projected on a theater screen -- attendees raved about its "cinematic quality."

      I must be wierd, I thought a theme song with lyrics was a nice deviation from the Williams-esque Trek themes of the post-cinema series.

      --

      Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
    2. Re:Letterboxing -- HDTV version? by AveryT · · Score: 1

      Letterbox or no, *every* prime-time drama and comedy is filmed or shot in HDTV.

  472. Re:Theme music? - Nick Winters signing Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone see this old episode of Saturday Night Live in which Bill Murray plays some cheesy nightclub-type singer in at a ski resort? He sings the Star Wars theme. I almost pissed myself the first time I heard it. I think it was a 1978 episode.

  473. The good, the bad and the ugly by raindog2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good: Looked better than any other Trek, sometimes better than Farscape. The letterboxing was a nice touch. Probably the second best Trek pilot after DS9. The exposition didn't feel as awkward as I expected. The "unstuck in time" chamber is intriguing. The "nasty primitive aliens uplifted by their descendants" concept. The presence of a linguist, I don't know why but I like that.

    Bad: The THEME SONG. EWWWWW. What is this, Pax? The run of the mill plot. The now-mandatory forced tension between crewmembers. The now-mandatory treknobabble (bad in this case for even treknobabble.) I liked the part about the hull going offline. Sounds like Braga and Berman did s/shields/hull/g on some rejected Voyager battle script. Also, oh no, we're fighting the Dominion again only this time they're kinda scaly.

    Ugly: They need some new makeup artists to populate the "lots of different aliens" scenes, or maybe they should use Muppets ;) The flashbacks were awkward and seemed like non-sequiturs most of the time. Also, while the Klingons were handled fairly well overall, "I HEAR DOOR!" Did you? Most of all, the glowing jello room, especially the camera work. I predict that despite the apparent 3M:1F ratio among the crew, no matter how many years the show runs, there will always be just enough female red shirts along on away missions that we'll never, ever, ever see two guys in there. Berman would feel too threatened. Oh yeah, and their genitalia are going to rot off now because they forgot to gently and sensuously rub jello into them under the backroomesque black lights.

    Overall, not bad but I'm not sorry West Wing is coming back next Wednesday. Hope the new B5 pilot in January is a little more inspiring.

  474. A note on theme... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The theme for Enterprise is Rod Stewart's "Faith of the Heart." Rod Stewart, for those who don't know, is a sucessful pop singer. He got his start in the 70's, if I'm not mistaken, which puts him in the generation of those who grew up watching TOS. If they wanted to draw old viewers back in, it makes sense. They were, after all, the ones who propelled him to stardom.

    I didn't mind it much. I kind of liked it (but then I kind of like Rod Stewart). The old formula wasn't working, so they're trying something new. Frankly, I think everyone just wants to shout how awful the thing is. I remember people saying how bad DS9 was when it started, how Avery Brooks and Nana Visitor couldn't act... and now it's hailed as being great.

    Just because Voyager sucked most of its run doesn't mean Enterprise will. Give it more than one ep before you condemn and remember that these people have to film something the length of a feature film in a matter of weeks as opposed to months. Give them some credit.

  475. Re:Trapped by the canon (Go watch Farscape) by angelo · · Score: 1

    Was anybody else sad when DRD Pike died? I was. It was a great homage to Trek (which, along with "Outer Limits" and "Twilight Zone" lead to recognition of SciFi as a valid form of commentary on society.) and an unlikely character to sympathize with.

  476. Handheld Communicators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they were still large and flipped open and squeaked when activated. Yay!

  477. Galaxy Quest? by krazyglu · · Score: 1

    did anyone else think the doctor was taken right from galaxy quest? his way of speaking is just like the aliens in that movie, and it is REALLY annoying... and what was up with the rubbing each other down scene, i thought i was watching baywatch not star trek...
    also, how did the enterprise go from such a kick ass ship in this series, to the piece of crap it was in the origonal, i understand advancements in film, but that's just outrageous

  478. Re:Kiss Me If Your Alien Speaks English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not a dangling participle. An example of a dangling participle is "Where are you from?" "to boldly go" is a split infinitive.

  479. Re:XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XP? (Score:-1, Offtopic)

    What the FUCK!?!?!?!

    So we can't discuss the operating system the Enterprise uses on /.? This whole website is news for nerds. I'm fucking interested to know what kinda CPU hardware that thing's supposed to have. Quantum computing? 500Thz Processors? Come on!

  480. How to fix Enterprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get rid of Bakula (Or, better, reduce his rank, give him a comrade named Zombie, and change the theme music.. Heh heh heh.. BAK-U-LAAAAA!)..

    Find Bruce.

    Yes, Bruce.

    If anyone could make a pre-prime directive ST series work, it would be none other than Johnny "Nuke 'em" Sheridan.

    "Commander, they may come back and try to finish us off." "Do we have any tactical nukes?"

    "Commander, the aliens from Thirds.." "Tactical nukes?"

    "John, our son refuses to clean his room." "Tactical nukes."

    "Yeah, but it's the postal service." "It's either that, or Sheridan's gonna nuke us."

    Yes. Moderate me down to troll. Then, go find Bruce to nuke our friendly neighborhood journalist for posting FREAKING SPOILERS RIGHT ON THE FREAKIN' ARTICLE SUMMARY!

  481. Re:... What? ME Worry? by up2ng · · Score: 0

    Alfred E. Newman ?
    Wasn't he the mascot for MAD Magazine ?

    I hope he's OK.
    It would suck otherwise. Please tell us

    --
    Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  482. Time Travel has that kind of effect by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see. Several "watershed" events have been mucked with and subtly (or not so subtly) altered by time travelling Feds.

    Commander Cisco in the Mid 21st had to usurp the role of a historical figure after said figure was killed defending him in a random street brawl. While he got history back on track, clearly it wasn't perfectly back on track, something Star Fleet noticed (his picture in the history books) and had some pointed questions about.

    Captain Piccard and the Borg mucked with humans' first contact with vulcans, and while they were able to get out of the way (for the most part) and let history take its course once the Borg were defeated, it is likely some residue of the battle(s) would have been noticed by the vulcans' science sensors. This could well have led to vulcans being more cautious in their dealings with humans, delaying our exuberant expansion into space and perhaps preventing some of the historical mistakes in the original timeline, such as the Romulan Wars and the botched Klingon first contact (and resulting war).

    Of course, the new timeline would encounter all kinds of new mistakes not present in the original history.

    An interesting subject for late-night beer-soaked conversation fodder is the resiliance of the timeline, that despite historical changes (some significant) the timeline restores itself in large part. But, like any natural chaotic system, there are points where minor changes can have radical, irrevocable changes that completely alter the timeline, while other areas exhibit more stability and even major changes have relatively little long term effect on the historical outcome.

    Theories might include the futility of killing hitler because social inertia would have led to the holocaust in any event (perhaps even under a different historical figure named hitler, as the last name was very common in Germany at the time), versus the idea of bumping into hitler in a cafe in Vienna years earlier, causing him to miss a fateful confrontation with a Jewish merchant that would solidified his anti-semetic attitudes and preventing an entire world war through a simple change in timing.

    Extreme stability ("fate") vs. extreme instability. Of course, I think the most interesting theories of time travel involve a combination of the two, reflective of other chaotic systems known in nature where, under the right conditions and at the right time, a butterfly's wings can effect distant weather but under other conditions or times no amount of effort can have any effect on the advance of a storm. Some moments in history are as fragile as a soap bubble, while others as resiliant as bungie cord.

    Of course, the advantage of such a hybrid theory of temporal mechanics (semi-chaotic temporal systems) is that it gives radical poetic license to writers of shows like star trek, and allows numerous consistency errors to correct themselves. :-)

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  483. 9 and 10 and 11 and 12 and 13... by Thag · · Score: 2

    9. The Vulcan hottie mentions Rigel and none of the humans have ever heard of it. Hell, I'VE heard of Rigel! It's a well-known, neighborhood star, and anyone trained as an officer on a starship should have known roughly where it was, and where to lok up the exact coordinates.

    10. If the naturalistic "let's use leeches!" form of medicine is so effective, why does it never make an appearance on Trek ever again?

    11. Bad and inconsistant characterization of the Vulcans. Contempt is an emotion. Bitchiness is an emotion. Sympathy is an emotion. And at no point does any Vulcan attempt to actually explain themselves logically. (note: "Logically, you dirty apes could never understand us" doesn't count) Most of the actors also did a poor job. It makes you appreciate Tim Russ a lot more.

    12. I really wish the people who designed their sets had also been in charge of the CGI. The sets were nice: they looked functional, and believable, and communicated that they were on a ship. They really sold the setting. The CGI, on the other hand, could have come from any of the later treks, and didn't seem to have any personality or connection to reality. The motion was bad, and nothing looked simple and functional. See Babylon 5 for an example of CGI done right.

    13. I was BORED. I was tempted to wander off and do laundry.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    1. Re:9 and 10 and 11 and 12 and 13... by Life+Blood · · Score: 1

      9. Yes and of course it would be the same star we call Rigel. After all its not like this guys from another planet and speaks a completely different language... oh wait.

      10. There are any number of reasons why "use space-leeches" doesn't show up later. Foremost being that Dr. Phlox is not a starfleet doctor, he's essentially an outside contractor. Second being that a machine that can do the exact same thing as a leech doesn't get old and die or eat the wrong kind of kiddle and die or whatever. Just because its more advanced than what came before it does not mean it will not be superceded by something else later.

      11. Yup, not enough logic from the vulcans. Pretty underwhelmed by Jolene Blalock as an actress. Soft core decon camera work was stupid too. Liked the fact that they actually had a decon chamber though. Maybe we'll see some dialog in an actual starship bathroom too.

      12. Right again. Great sets and supposedly we haven't seen all of them yet. There is evidentally a torpedo room that "works" among other things. The CGI was more artistic than functional. I guess they are going for weird and alien not "look realistic starship designs" like B5 tried to do in places. If that was the case I doubt the Enterprise would look the way it does. It should be noted that B5 had lots of silly stylistic ships too, but they get praised for the few ships flown mostly by earth that weren't utter crap.

      13. Dunno. It was hit or miss and there were a fair share of misses but overall there was a lot of promise. Quite frankly that is all I expect from a first episode of any series.

      --

      So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

    2. Re:9 and 10 and 11 and 12 and 13... by Thag · · Score: 2
      9. Yes and of course it would be the same star we call Rigel. After all its not like this guys from another planet and speaks a completely different language... oh wait.


      This didn't glare nearly so much on the second run-through, but since she was speaking English, I'd assume she was using our nomenclature. "Rigel" doesn't sound Vulcan to me.

      10. There are any number of reasons why "use space-leeches" doesn't show up later. Foremost being that Dr. Phlox is not a starfleet doctor, he's essentially an outside contractor. Second being that a machine that can do the exact same thing as a leech doesn't get old and die or eat the wrong kind of kiddle and die or whatever. Just because its more advanced than what came before it does not mean it will not be superceded by something else later.

      Good points.
      11. Yup, not enough logic from the vulcans. Pretty underwhelmed by Jolene Blalock as an actress. Soft core decon camera work was stupid too. Liked the fact that they actually had a decon chamber though. Maybe we'll see some dialog in an actual starship bathroom too.

      "To boldly go where B5 has been before..."
      12. Right again. Great sets and supposedly we haven't seen all of them yet. There is evidentally a torpedo room that "works" among other things. The CGI was more artistic than functional. I guess they are going for weird and alien not "look realistic starship designs" like B5 tried to do in places. If that was the case I doubt the Enterprise would look the way it does. It should be noted that B5 had lots of silly stylistic ships too, but they get praised for the few ships flown mostly by earth that weren't utter crap.

      The wierd alien ships in B5 also used alien technologies. My beef with the CGI in Enterprise is that they're supposed to be going for a "low-tech" Starfleet, but they're still using swoopy movements for everything instead of following realistic physics.

      13. Dunno. It was hit or miss and there were a fair share of misses but overall there was a lot of promise. Quite frankly that is all I expect from a first episode of any series.


      I didn't get my hopes up for the premiere and still I was disappointed. Frankly, there were just too many points at which the script stopped making sense.

      Jon Acheson
      --
      All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    3. Re:9 and 10 and 11 and 12 and 13... by Life+Blood · · Score: 1

      Right Sato said "rigel" was one of the words the Klingon said and that it was probably a proper noun given its usage. T'Pol then said that "rigel" is the name of a system. Assuming that the terran rigel system and the Klingon "rigel" system are one and the same is an incorrect assumption.



      As for weird technologies, do we actually know how the impulse drive works? Basic trek piece of equipment in use in basically every show and we don't know the physics canonically. Maybe everybody manuevers that way because its how impulse works. Its a stretch of course but then again why do Centauri fighters make banked turns in space if they use reaction thrusters?

      --

      So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

  484. Borg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm...creepy bald guys, obesessed with perfection. They have temporal manipulation technology, and fly little round spaceships that can dock together to form a cohesive whole. They also seem to have primitive nanotechnology, judging by the Klingon's message and possibly the lie detector kiss. I sure hope these fellas are being set up to somehow migrate to the delta quadrant and evolve into the Borg instead of just being unoriginal.

  485. Potential Ad Campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guy1: "Hey, you got your pr0n in my Star Trek!"
    Guy2: "Well, you got your Star Trek in my pr0n!"

    Jingle: "Two great tastes that taste great together..."

  486. It was good but the plot was silly by Control-Z · · Score: 1
    As a space adventure story, I liked the premeire of Enterprise a lot, but the plot didn't make much sense from what I've seen of the Star Trek universe:

    Why does the ship look better than Voyager, which was built hundreds of years later? I realize that people don't want 1960's special effects, but how about a compromise? And why are they wearing Voyager-era uniforms? How about updating the old 60's style of uniforms? Well I guess it's too late for that.

    When they landed on that planet to find out who the Klingon had met, why weren't they amazed and standing around slack-jawed because of all the alien cultures?

    Why didn't we lose any red shirt guys? Wait a minute, where were the red shirt guys?

    Why did Archer have to stay behind when he set off that mag-bomb thing? That was just a cheap plot device to put the captain in close personal danger.

    Another ongoing logic vs. emotion conflict? Come on, that was already done to death with Spock, Data, and 7 of 9. Except now the logical person is hot and there's the possibility of sex? I can see they're going to drag that out forever. I sort of doubt Vulcans are a lot of fun to make love to. 7 of 9 was a much better prospect.

    Even though I did like Enterprise, how about giving us something different than we've seen before on the other series? I was hoping to see more wonder and discovery instead of Enterprise jumping right away into a routine life-or-death mission ala TNG or Voyager. At least there is the promise of more action than we saw on those shows.

    1. Re:It was good but the plot was silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I sort of doubt Vulcans are a lot of fun to make love to.

      I don't know. They gotta let all those barely-repressed emotions out some time.

    2. Re:It was good but the plot was silly by TheABomb · · Score: 1

      They [Vulcans] gotta let all those barely-repressed emotions out some time.

      Every seven years. Which, if the series lasts long enough, will happen eventually.

      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
  487. Current Events by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody else notice that "Suliban" sounds like "Taliban" and the the Suliban's leadership is the "Kabal" (sp?) sounds too much like Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan. This is coincidence?

    1. Re:Current Events by Heywood+Yabuzof · · Score: 1


      Well, considering that the pilot was written quite some time ago (and yes, I have a copy of the script that was downloaded well before 9/11), and I'm sure that they mean "cabal" --

      (from m-w.com)

      Main Entry: cabal

      Pronunciation: k&-'bäl, -'bal

      Function: noun

      Etymology: French cabale cabala, intrigue, cabal, from Medieval Latin cabbala cabala, from Late Hebrew qabbAlAh, literally, received (lore)

      Date: 1614

      : the artifices and intrigues of a group of persons secretly united to bring about an overturn or usurpation especially in public affairs; also
      : a group engaged in such artifices and intrigues

      then, yes, it's just a coincidence :-)

  488. Theme Music Writte By...... Diane Warren by szyzyg · · Score: 2

    Diane Warren best known for writing songs for the likes of Whitney Houston, Michael Bolton, Toni Braxton and Even Mecha-Streisand

    This theme tune is more of her usual Schtick... all written by the numbers.

    Personally, I'd have liked to see Orbital write the Music, they're trek fans and great writers....

  489. typical ./ reaction by Atilla · · Score: 1
    you know, if the sci-fi script writers listened to the slashdot crowd, there would never be another (decent) sci-fi show.


    jeez, cut down on the bitching! --- the vulcan ears are not the right pointiness, too much soft porn (and that's coming from a crowd of which i'm sure 90% have the fake nudie jpeg of Aki Ross stashed somewhere in the depths of their hard drives), silly names for weapons, the Enterprise doesn't look right (who are you to judge?), the theme song sucks (compose a better one, fsckers)....
    Some are bitching about the plot... pardon the cliche - but you're judging a book by it's cover..

    Would you rather watch Buffy or SU2?.. come on, show some enthusiasm!

    When the classic Star Trek came out, everyone shit their pants, even though the plot and the visuals left a bit more to be desired (from a modern point of view)...

    Give this one a chance without ripping it apart frame by frame. I have to admit the fact that there are not that many interesting sci-fi shows on TV anymore. DS9, B5 and the like seem to revolve around silly space politics, kind of resembling our modern life.

    if you don't like the show, then go back to watching your Hello Kitty vs. Power Rangers bullshit on the cartoon network.

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  490. Where No Man Has Gone Before by jeff13 · · Score: 1



    Still can't hold candle to the original Star Trek Pilot "Where No Man Has Gone Before". Shatner was young, guest stars were Sally Kellerman and Gary Lockwood. Things covered in just one hour: Man as God, Humans evolving into superior being, life in deep space, absolute power and corruption, killing a loved friend, sacrificing oneself for another.

    They don't write 'em like the used to.

    1. Re:Where No Man Has Gone Before by JCMay · · Score: 2

      The original ST pilot was "The Cage," was shot in black and white, and featured Captian Pike and a woman as "Number One."

    2. Re:Where No Man Has Gone Before by jeff13 · · Score: 1

      Fanboy geek! the first show that was actually aired was "The Man Trap". (8th of September, 1966). These kids today...

      Where No Man Has Gone Before was the first show MADE (with Shatner, after the first two hour pilot was rejected by NBC). It was the third show aired on TV. However, in proper chronology, it is considered the first, official, Star Trek EP.

      No get back down into that basement boy!

    3. Re:Where No Man Has Gone Before by glenmark · · Score: 1

      Actually, "The Cage" was filmed in color, and snippets of it were used in the two-part episode "The Menagerie". For the longest time, the only known copy of "The Cage" was a B&W work print, but a full color copy was discovered several years back.

      BTW, the woman who played Number One was Majel Barrett, who later played Nurse Chapel, Counselor Troi's mother, and the voice of the ship's computer, not to mention being the wife of Gene Roddenberry.

      --
      *** Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made ***
  491. The Vulcans aren't cold and emotionless... by Lance+Fuckhoff · · Score: 1
    They're cold and bitchy. I can't put this down to bad acting, because they all behave exactly the same, so I assume it's bad direction and/or writing.

    The guy with the southern drawl has to go. His personality is identical to the captain's, so he serves zero purpose.

    The music sucks.

    Did anyone else notice that Rigel is a name that we on Earth invented in real life?

    They've got some work to do. Still, a lot more promising than the first episode of TNG, I think. I was encouraged by the fact that there were no snotty kids, only a cute dog who stayed out of the way.

    1. Re:The Vulcans aren't cold and emotionless... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Supposedly the unemotionality is a state they try attain; the average Vulcan citizen trys to not act based on emotions, where as the hardcore Kohlinar students get pretty self-flagellent.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  492. Music ? by jeff13 · · Score: 1



    About the Rod Stewart theme to Enterprise. Yuck! I miss the original theme. What other Sci-Fi show had bongos! BONGOS !!! :) :)

  493. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by funky49 · · Score: 1

    No.

    No no.

    You're wrong.

    You can't possibly watch too much A-Team while growing up!

    steve

    --
    --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
  494. Not a bad start by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1
    I dunno. Call me crazy for being one of maybe 6 people on the planet who actually enjoyed this series, but here's why I liked it:

    1. Cool Rock n' Rollish theme song. Enough of that classical shit. Rock n' Roll's long been our adventuring, road-tripping, coming-of-age music. That it was kind of mellow, contemplative rock seemed to really fit. The imagery during the title sequence really sets a mood, too. One of risk, accomplishment, venturing into the unknown. It fits. Very well. 2. I don't care about Trek "history." So what if Worf is going to say something hundreds of years in the future about how the Klingons changed appearance or that the war with the Klingons was due to botched first contact? I hope they don't stick to it too rigidly. I like that there isn't yet a Prime Directive (but how much do you want to make a bet that we see it before the end of the series?) I also like the fact that they didn't try to create props that would have had to look like they predated the first series. (My God, what a disaster that would have been.) I'll take this series and judge it mostly on it's own merits, thank you.

    3. I can't recall hearing one computer sound like Ms. Roddenbarret. Maybe I just missed it, but I hope not.

    My only nitpicky thing: Using the transporter to save major ass in the pilot. That could have waited a few episodes. But that was the only cheese moment, as far as I'm concerned.

    If I had to rate it, I'd give it 4.5 out of 5. A damned good start. Good luck, folks, and let's hope it's a long, interesting voyage.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

    1. Re:Not a bad start by JoeGee · · Score: 1

      I liked the theme song too. I think this series has a LOT of potential, and other than Tucker's character I think the there's some good story potential.

      Actually if you look at the equipment, although it has more blinkies than the resin props used in the original series it DID seem to me like quite a lot of Enterprise's props seemed to be halfway between our current time and the original series in appearance.

      I liked T'Pol's telescoping viewer, although the skintight costume showing T'Pol's bodacious Vulcan ta-tas was a bit more sensual than one might expect from creatures who focus on logic. Notice please the ambassador's flowing robes. Where is the logic in making sexually dimorphic clothing? It seems terribly inefficient.

      The communicators were halfway between a cell phone and Kirk's "device."

      There were a lot of slider bars and knobs on NX-01, they were just more clearly labeled than those of Kirk's time (probably because by Kirk's time everyone has their positions and functions memorized ... :) )

      I LIKE the submarine look of Enterprise. I love engineering. I noticed the hexagonal grillwork of the original series used quite a bit in engineering. I also really like sick bay, although in an odd way I almost expected Lieutenant Riply to walk through the door straight off the Nostromo.

      The "these new phase pistols" line was a bit hokey for me, and if anyone had said "warp 4.5, WOW" one more time, well, they DID say that an awful lot didn't they? I realize that Berman and Company were playing to the least common denominator ("hey folks, this is Trek prehistory you're watching now" wink wink.) I would beg and plead from the writers, please, don't have someone outrun Enterprise at warp 7 and add the commentary "he must be moving at warp 7. How is he doing it? Our physicists thought warp 7 was impossible. We'll never get to warp 7, not in two hundred years."

      If we didn't get the prehistory point in the first five minutes of the show then maybe we should be held back a few seasons and forced to watch Survivor reruns.

      --

      Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
    2. Re:Not a bad start by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      Notice please the ambassador's flowing robes. Where is the logic in making sexually dimorphic clothing? It seems terribly inefficient.
      Seems logical to me that you'd want to wear a costume, whilst on a starship, that has no flowing lengths, or jewlery or other decorations to get caught on things, require readjustment, or any of that jazz.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Not a bad start by JoeGee · · Score: 1

      I still must ask, why aren't all the other females, and the men for that matter in clingy tight-fitting clothing?

      I guess the answer would be that T'Pol only completely logical being on board. Humans still have to learn about the finer points of space travel. (On an aside I would note that none of the other actors seem built to satisfy the target audience of males, ages 18-35. ;) Linda Park's ta-tas must not be quite as bodacious as Jolene Blalock's.)

      Did anyone else notice how incredibly cold it must have been in the decontamination chamber? I haven't seen anything that perky on TV since Kathie Lee left Regis for her solo career. :)

      --

      Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
  495. Debbie Does Klingons by funky49 · · Score: 1

    Come on guys.. If you are going to make Sci-Fi... make Sci-Fi... Don't give in and try and make it a "family hour" type show.

    or, if you're going to make pr0n, make pr0n. Don't give in and try to make it a Skinimax type show.

    steve

    --
    --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
  496. All the character development they'll ever have. by Thag · · Score: 2
    "There wasn't any character development" : hey guys, this was a PILOT. Few pilots develop much characterwise, they have too much expositional ground to cover. Two hours is what, 80 pages of script? How much "development" can you cram into that without forcing it, AND still have time to show all the neato-whiz-bang special effects for which the series is famed?


    I beg to differ. Judging from what I know of Trek writing, the pilot contained all of the character development these characters will ever get (Vulcan goes from antagonistic to sympathetic: done. Crew goes from distrusting Vulcan to accepting her as one of the crew: done.). The actors will get more comfortable with their roles, and the writers will pick up on how to write the characters more sharply, but nothing will change.

    I hope to be proven wrong, but I doubt I will.

    Jon Acheson
    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  497. and that rule is? by bliss · · Score: 0

    "Also, I don't know if I was the only one who caught this, but when Capn' Scott's father was giving his speech, about Seeking out new life and new civilizations, he corrected Kirk's gramatical error from the orignal series...'to boldly go' is a dangling participle. It was spoken properly in the speech 'to go boldly'"

    Any real links to that one?

    --
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
  498. Vulcans Have Implants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...When did this happen?

  499. Boobs and Brains by huckda · · Score: 1

    What more could you ask for in a woman?
    Lil Ms. Vulcan lady might get nicknamed
    "lil Ms. Vulva lady"
    *drool*
    As for the pointy ears...
    "My Ms Vulva, What nice handles you have..."

    As for the other personages...
    The 'medical development' is going to be GREAT!
    I can just see now, mutant starfish cauterizing wounds...that was fabulous! And marsupial dung for something else...the possibilities are endless! And the clumsy, slow learning pilot dude...Hahaha bumped into 2 ships in the first episode...you KNOW this will continue...

    For a NON-Trekkie(taped the show for my trekkie roommate), it was quite enjoyable and didn't seem like 2hrs at all.

    Oh and the 'first klingon impression' remember..
    translator lady(kind cute too!) saying "You don't want to know" to Quantum Leap boy...so it MIGHT have been a bad impression eh?

    CmdrTaco, if ya wanna copy lemme know.

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  500. Everything Star Trek Should Have Been by Frobozz0 · · Score: 1

    Finally, Star Trek doesn't suck.

    We have characters with actual personality. They develop and react as real people. There's sex, thank god, even if the really hot girl will never "do it" with anyone on the ship. There's fight scenes, exciting aliens, and a human factor that has never been present before. Quite honestly, the only other Star Treak I would watch was Voyager because it had personality. I loved Voyager, especially 7 of 9 and Janeway, but seeing this new format in Enterprise makes me wish it was done this way! DS9 was atrocious, and the only reason to watch the original series is for nostalgia.

    I applaud the new changes. If people were looking for ST:NG for the 3rd time they'll be dissapointed. Good. That's been done to death. Dispite some of the corny cliche's Enterprise is a great series. It's something that can compete with X-Files and Farscape ...

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
  501. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Kruemelmo · · Score: 1

    So please post a link to pictures of him, it will definitively get a +5 score, informative, too...

  502. Voyager by operagost · · Score: 1

    It reminded me of a squid for some reason.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  503. No ridiculous premise? by Thag · · Score: 2

    You mean, apart from the "shadowy nemesis from the future?"

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  504. Vulcan women by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    > I didn't know Vulcans could look that good! ;)

    what?! Don't you remember Spock's wife, T'Pring (I think that was her name) from TOS? Yikes! She makes T'Pol look like dogmeat.

  505. Primary Hottie/Secondary Hottie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever notice on Star Trek there is always a Primary Hottie and a Secondary (back up) hottie?

    TOS

    Primary-Troi
    Secondary-Beverly

    DS9

    Primary-Dax
    Secondary-Kira

    Voyager

    Primary-Kes (replaced by seven)
    Secondary-B'Elanna

    whats up with that? do they need the other in case the original cant fulfil her hottie duties?

    Enterprise

    Primary-T'Pol
    Secondary-Hoshi

    1. Re:Primary Hottie/Secondary Hottie by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      The primaries usually have bigger chests and make for more suitable whacking material while the secondaries are use for plot devices for the male characters more often. I think it's one of those Rick Berman things.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  506. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by Kingfox · · Score: 1

    Good lord, I had managed to completely forget that episode.... But just reading that line, now all I can picture is him flying with the helium-filled trashbags over the security wall. Ghaaa.

  507. Essentially... by szero · · Score: 1

    ... I'm thinking of this as an alternate timeline from the Trek continuum. The original timline, I bet, didn't have aliens from the future futzing around.

    I bet the series finale will somehow bounce back to the premiere where things will fall in place normally... I bet in the original timeline there weren't aliens chasing the Klingon down to Earth... and the farmer never dusted him either. Heck... I bet in the original timeline he wasn't even involved since these aliens were unevolved nobodies.

    --
    "The more you know, the less you understand."
  508. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    http://www.allaboutanorexicwomenwithrediculouslipi mplants.com

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  509. Re: VCD sux , what lamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "muthafuck divx" what are you 12?

    Ever heard of TV-out?

  510. Vulcans and Prejudice by Shimatta1 · · Score: 1

    A lot of comments I've seen about the Vulcans question (or slam) the tension between them and the humans.

    From what I understand about the ST timeline, until Spock came along, Vulcans and Terrans were traditionally segregated. Vulcans served on Vulcan ships, Terrans served on Terran ships. Spock was apparently something of a maverick amongst Vulcans for choosing to go to Starfleet Acadamy instead of a Vulcan school, and then serving on a Terran ship.

    As for Vulcans getting irked by humans, well, how long can _anybody_ withstand complete irrationality? I'd wager five bucks that a Vulcan taking Terran tech support calls would go postal within a month. ^_^

    Baxter

  511. Mating by whosit · · Score: 1

    All I got to say is it sucks Vulcan only let themselves get horny 1 time in 7 years.

    1. Re:Mating by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Those are just the males. It looks like the female on board is a disaster waiting to happen.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  512. Re:And you call yourselves geeks! Hmph by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I remember a reference to an "Imperial" race in a Trek book, and I interpreted Imperials to be Worf-like Klingons.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  513. RE: Enterprise reaction by blackice68 · · Score: 1

    I thought that the show was a nice change of pace from the previous spin-offs. I wasn't cheesy like the first episode of TNG. And if someone who had never watched a Star Trek episode/movie the vulcan thingy *was* necessary. The opening theme was also a nice change. It gives you a feeling that its taking place closer to present day. I'm sorry to here 'michael' didn't feel it was all that good. I thought it was *the* best Star Trek pilot to date. I think it will probably be a very successful show. I have but one problem. I keep expecting to see Dean Stockwell popup out of no where and start talking to Capt. Archer!

  514. Looking too cool? by janke · · Score: 1

    What an optimist. The aesthetics of vehicle design don't necessarily get _better_ over time. In fact, if you look at cars over the past thirty years, the overall trend has been to get blander and less-distinctive looking. Compare a '70s Grand Turino to today's Ford Taurus. Or a '79 Vette to the blobby, blah 1997 Firebird. So it makes complete sense that the chunky, cool-looking NX-01 could evolve into the smoother, more advanced-but-less-cool-looking NCC-1701.

    1. Re:Looking too cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you have to be old or brain dead to think that cars are less aesthetically pleasing now, than they were historically.

      To that I say, "Hah!"

      Automobiles have been for decades becoming more smooth, round, and their interiors less obtrusive.
      From dash meters to window operation mechanisms to stereo appearance to color differential, it's all focused on becoming more seamless and integrated into a "smooth feeling" environment, which is the most pleasing to the human psyche.

      The NX-01 is all of this when compared to the NCC-1701.

      The NX-01 is a smoothly detailed flying saucer with two planks attached to nacelles.
      The NCC-1701 is a cylinder attached to a saucer and to two nacelles in a distinctively non-seamless, non-reductionist manner. It is the pointy light covers that only fly for Homer Simpson in this era.

      That said, I don't really care that it's better looking. Trekkies are either stupid or in need of medication if they expect anyone to make something dumber looking than TOS, or expect TOS to more closely resemble future human space exploration than say Enterprise.
      It's fucking fiction, get over it.

  515. I'll watch...here's why by jpellino · · Score: 1

    OK - Shorten the opening -maybe half the heroes, punch up the theme.

    Remember, this is the first step of what developed into Kirk/Picard/Sisko/Janeway's world.

    The tension between us and the Vulcans / Klingons, etc. is to be expected and explored here - yes, we know how Spock etc. got on with the "A" crew - this is how it got to that point.

    OK - the physics is sloppy. So are the principles behind most movie chase / fight scenes and we don't stop watching them.

    But ya gotta love a captain who says he'll "knock you on your ass" within the first fifteen minutes.

    And has a dog on board.

    Filming actual life on board a spacecraft would be so monumentally boring that they have to make shortcuts, add tension, use cliches... Keep it far enough away from Plan 9 and Madison County and I'll watch it develop.

    I grew up on the foam rubber sets of TOS, saw/suffered thru all the movies, and quite honestly never gave STNG much credit until The Best of Both Worlds aired. So ya never know. Plenty of promise, and on the high end of production and watchability.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  516. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    Ok, then think of it as +5 in-firm-ative, then.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  517. How I think of Star Trek Series... by Dijital · · Score: 1

    I tend to think about Star Trek series the same way I think about Final Fantasy games...

    Everyone who's played Final Fantasy (pick one, any one) knows that the games are (A) non linear, and (B) they always throw in references to earlier games, just to tease hangers-on. Trek is the same way... none of the series really agree with each other a whole hell of a lot, just a bunch of refernces to the last series to make us laugh a bit and keep watching..

    You get less headaches that way.

    --
    Diji
    "I came, I saw, I WTF'd!"
  518. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 1

    No, DS9 also had a character named Leela. She was Rom's girlfriend and a dabo girl.

  519. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2
    .and ds9 had leela...

    I think you are thinking of Futurama... DS9 had Dax and Kira.

    I was actually thinking of Leta, the Bajoran 'dabbo girl' on ds9, but it somehow (probably due to futurama influence) got remembered wrong.

    It's been a while since i've seen ds9 ;-)
    --
    ___
    The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  520. Re:The Vulcan Chick - For the ladies too by sopwath · · Score: 1
    My GF just about fell over when she saw his package. I was like, "that's a sock," but she said it wasn't. I tend to believe her. (mostly because I'm not gonna look any closer)

    good luck,
    sopwath

  521. Speaking of Babylon Five by BaronCarlos · · Score: 2

    Try these comparisons:

    Minbari: A Conservative race, sceptical of the Humans expanding into the galaxy

    Humans: An overly optomistic, shoot from the hip race, who tends to walk right into a trap in every episode.

    A secret race wanting to incur chaos, lead by an equally dark, even mytical SHADOW.

    Hey, it worked for one 5 year series, maybe it could work for two?

    --
    *Carlos: Exit Stage Right*

    "Geeks, Where would you be without them?"
    "Got Linux?"

  522. Am I the only one who caught. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Star'fleet'? With ONE ship?

    2. Doesn't the heart of the Klingon Empire seem a little close to home at less than 4 days travel from the heart of Star'fleet'? At warp 4? (But then I am told the Universe is expanding. . .)

    3. I thought humans hadn't left Earth yet. So what's with the guy with all the cargo ship experience? And WHAT cargo, exactly? I thought the Vulcans were restricting trade. No WAY would Earth not have ALL the cool tech within about 10 years if people were allowed to travel in cargo ships.

    4. Leave the locker room scenes in the locker room, please. This is Trek. If I want to watch crap like that, I'll watch LEXX.

    (Brr! Did I actually say that?)

    5. For later ships in later years, I see no problem with non-perfect crew compliments. But for the VERY first crew representing Earth? No way. They would be super-trained, super-perfect, super-men. Just like the first crews of real astronauts. And all chosen at the last second? Yeah. Right. The audition lines of ultra trained super people would stretch WAAAY back. And where's the televised link to the ravenous public? Of course, this would make the show very boring, much like the real space program. So I forgive.

    6. Why were none of the Russian space accomplishments, (First satelite. First manned orbit), included with that country music? Typical American revisionism-through-ignorance.


    HOWEVER. . .

    I DID like:

    1. The letterboxing.

    2. The planets and general effects FINALLY look right.

    3. The shoot-em-up scene, while obviously Quake inspired, was nonetheless fun. One of the more engaging I've seen in film or television, in fact.

    4. I LOVE the interior design of the ship. Inspired by elements of our current space craft and space stations. Bravo! Too bad the exterior has too much borrowed from ship designs which came centuries later. That's just stupid. Oh well. . .

    5. None of the actors pissed me off. Wooden and uncertain, yes, but I can see the makings of a fine crew. Give them time.

    6. Plenty of great raw material for future episodes. It doesn't look or feel anything like the cartoon TNG, DS9 and Voyager Trek universe. There's lots of room to grow!

    7. I love the shuttle craft deployment. Looks great!

    8. I like the new take on space medicine. Better health through dung ingestion!

    9. The two idiot producers, (responsible for such atrocities as Generations and First Trek Episodes everywhere), rarely grace the world with their insipid writing. This means the REAL writers will soon get their teeth into this rich bed of possibilities. Plus, everybody already hates the show, which means the hot young execs will not want to be anywhere near such a potential bomb, which will allow the actual creative staff some room to do their jobs.

    I have a good feeling about this show. I think in a year, Enterprise may well rank up there among the best sci-fi ever produced on TV.

    Here's to hoping!


    -Fantastic Lad

    1. Re:Am I the only one who caught. . . by Khan+Fused · · Score: 1
      1) Star"fleet" is probably quite busy doing Coast Guard duties ... customs inspections on inter-colony trade between the various colonies in the Sol system (luna, mars, europa, ganymede, Titan) ... rescue work ... patrolling for another Dinosaur-Killing rock about to cross Earth's orbit and thwak the planet across the teeth... stuff like that. And they're probably thinking very optimistically.

      2) Yeah... I thought so too ...

      3)Had they stated that the helmguy's dad OWNED the ship? Cause he could have worked his way up the ranks to crew/command an alien-owned freighter that was based in the Sol system ... or - the vulcans were being stingy about the Warp 4 engine technology, but I assume that Cochrane's equipment could at least make W1 - W2. The warp scale is suposed to be a geometric/logarithmic scale ... so that jump from 2 to 4 would open up a significant amount of space. But the range btw. 1-9 times lightspeed still lets you get to several local systems (including the Centauris) in a decent amount of time. (Decent when compared to sublight travel)


      ... I'd comment more, but the boss is coming ...

      --
      This mind intentionally left blank.
  523. its a west virginia "twang" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeager was from west virginia. not texas.

  524. Bred out of existence? by Galvatron · · Score: 1

    What about this: if homosexuality is accepted as perfectly normal, then there will no longer be any social pressure for gays to get together with members of the opposite sex. No intercourse means no biological kids. No biological kids means those with the gay gene (assuming that there actually is one, but I SO do not want to get into nature vs. nurture) get bred out of the genome within a couple of generations, and the incidence of mutations is probably not going to be very high.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    1. Re:Bred out of existence? by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      There isn't any social pressure now for gays to get together with members of the opposite sex. Gay men and women tend to have a lot of gay friends, and straight parents. The tendency towards gayness propogates just fine without any bisexual intermingling. And you don't need to hedge your bets as far as nuture-nature: with some exceptions, gays are born, not made, and this really isn't open to dispute.

      Of course, it is disputed, but not by anyone who had studied the matter and who also has any sense. Yes, these few paragraphs have been written by a gay man, but I don't think that fact has colored my rationality.

    2. Re:Bred out of existence? by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Two points: First of all, I'd dispute your statement that there's no social pressure for gays couple with those of the opposite sex. Maybe in the heart of the Castro, San Francisco, kids are brought up to believe that it's perfectly normal to have sex with whoever they feel attracted to, and to keep an open mind. In the rest of the world, you're indoctrinated from birth: you will grow up, get married, and have kids. Many people dismiss or supress homo- or bi-sexual urges simply because it conflicts with the way they're expected to live their lives. Furthermore, I was mainly referring to the last few centuries. Up until maybe, what? 20 years ago? homosexuality was considered a psychological disease, and ruthlessly hunted down. The last decade or two hasn't been enough time for the gene to work itself out of the pool.


      As for nature vs. nurture, there are countless influences in the development of a person, from the time of conception through early childhood that go beyond what we can remember later on. Influences ranging from a mother's diet while pregnant to the color of the baby's nursury, the effects of each are impossible to predict. This is why nature vs. nurture is such a sticky issue. A recent study claimed that those people whose mothers used painkillers during birth were three times as likely to become addicted to narcotics in their teens. This stuff can be crazy.


      Yes, these few paragraphs have been written by a straight man (albeit, one who lives in San Francisco, and is dating a bisexual girl), but I don't think that fact has colored my rationality :)

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    3. Re:Bred out of existence? by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      I don't know that we are actually disagreeing. You say:

      First of all, I'd dispute your statement that there's no social pressure for gays [to] couple with those of the opposite sex.

      I wasn't referring to kids who may or may not have sorted out their sexuality. I was referring to adults or late teens (yes, I know that the two are not _necessarily_ mutually exclusive) who are certain of their gayness, and have self-identified as such. Your original statement implied, to me, that adult gays - and by adult I mean those of acceptable child-bearing age, not children fathering or giving birth to children - felt compelled to couple with those of the opposite sex. Proto or closeted gays might feel this social pressure, but I don't think that lifestyle gays do.

      As for nuture-nature and gayness, I really believe that the jury is in, but that society is not ready to accept the vote. I am the only gay member of my family. However, my wife is gay, her middle brother is gay, and her sister is gay. Most of the rest of our siblings are almost agressively heterosexual.

      Maybe our mothers were talking the same drugs or experiencing similar traumatic events. I doubt it. I also find it largely irrelevant. I am gay, and I can't imagine being any other way. I wouldn't want to be any other way. I don't steal, cheat, lie, murder - heck, I don't even smoke or drink alcohol excessively.

      Note that I use the word gay in its most generic sense - not differentiating between homosexual men, women, or bisexuals.

      If I knew that gayness was triggered environmentally, I would be opposed to eliminating that trigger. I like diversity. I like Chinese food, Indian food, Korean food, and, well, just about any edible substance. I find things to admire in Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, and virtually every other religion. All races and colors and shapes and sizes can be beautiful to me. Every day that the world is made more homogenized it becomes a less interesting place.

      Anyway, thanks for the chat, and keep dating that bisexual girlfriend. I kept dating mine, and we've been married 21 years this next July. :-)

  525. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by CameronGary · · Score: 1

    So, none of us are heterosexual? 100% aren't heterosexual = 0% are heterosexual.

    So there ;-)

  526. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by jasonbw · · Score: 1

    Speaking of STIII, dont forget the one surviving klingon was Dan from 'Night Court'

  527. Beh by Etriaph · · Score: 1
    I'm not entirely sure why they had a Rod Stewart song for the theme, but I thought the show was pretty good. And I wouldn't trash character development so early in the story, things haven't even slightly evolved yet. It's the first episode. :)

    I bet if you ever met a Vulcan, you'd keep questioning their decisions and trying to figure out how to work with an emotionless being too. :P

    --
    "It's here, but no one wants it." - The Sugar Speaker
  528. Why this was the best ST since the first by WillSeattle · · Score: 2

    I've seen and watched almost every episode, from my first days in black and white as a kid.

    And I have to say, minor technicalities aside, this is the best pilot in terms of creating a good series since then.

    Yes, the biodecon scene was too obvious, but it was better in its entirety than the promo teasers led one to believe.

    And the Vulcans being a little more emotional than they liked to admit was a very nice touch. The whole power shift between everyone is quite nice.

    So long as they cut back on the transporter use, and let a few transporter accidents slip through, I can live with it.

    And even though I loved Captain Proton, I'm very glad the Holodeck is gone.

    Let the discovery begin!

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  529. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was supposed to kiss the Klingon before the leap.

    This show might turn out better because of the lack of the annoying techno babbles. On the other hand they are going down the path of using babes for the target market shares.

  530. Re:Theme music? - Nick Winters signing Star Wars by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    I'm in my mid 30's and I remember that. My dad hated that character.

    He spawned a tradition of lame lounge singers on SNL that continues up to this day with the high school music instructors by &lt mispelling&gt Will Farrel and Ana Gasteyer &lt/misspelling&gt.

    Star Wars!

    It is just Star Wars!

    Something something Star Wars!

    da da da duh

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  531. Then theres Klingons! (was Re:Real treckers...) by criswell4096 · · Score: 1

    Then, of course, there's the fact that "First Contact between the Klingon Empire and the Federation took place in 2218 ("Day of the Dove" [TOS])" (from page 158 of the "Star Trek Ency.", I know, I know, I'm a geek, get over it ;-)

    While you could argue the Federation does not yet exist... they could hardly have First Contact with the Klingons in 2218, when members of the Federation-to-be already met them (and even saved their empire) in 2153!

    (And don't even get me started on the whole prostetic fore-head issue!! ;-)

    (Oh, and in spite of all these issues... I still liked the pilot... it was a marked departure from previous ST incarnations, which was welcome in my book ;-)

  532. Re:The recent broadcast - spoiler warning by Pitawg · · Score: 1

    SPOILER WARNING!!!

    "I didn't like the vulcan. She wasn't even hot enough to fill the 7/9 spot. The just bugged me, like a really dumb spock. At least the original pointy ears respected the humans.
    "

    Oh please. You missed the memory flash back of the captain? Childhood with the vulcan chick. (they live 200 years...) That did not appear to be an insert of the chick into a prior memory. That was evidence of her knowing more about the captain's past than he realizes. I know she is only reflecting the feelings for captain that I formed after so many Quantum Leap episodes...

    And for the mis-matched links to all the old Star Trek storylines, THERE IS A TEMPORAL COLD WAR GOING ON!!! This base of a history could change long before TOS or TNG!!!!!!!

    I LIKED IT!
    (and my opinion is the only one that counts)

  533. Personal Nit by mdwebster · · Score: 1

    Did you see how much data was packed away into the volume of a single nucleotide of that Klingon's DNA? That was probably my biggest 'ummmm....' moment of the entire show ...

    1. Re:Personal Nit by mozkill · · Score: 1

      yeah... they could have just had him pull the small flash memory card out of his pocket... it would have been much easier, more surpising to the audience, and more believable.

      --

      -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
    2. Re:Personal Nit by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      There had to be a pretty nerdy Klingon out there to think that up. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  534. Watch it over the air on UHF by MacBoy · · Score: 1
    If you are amoung the UPN-challenged (and that includes directTV customers, dammit!), you may be able to pick up a Canadian station City TV on UHF, if you are close enough to the Canadian border.

    Find the closest Canadian city using Mapquest, then use TVGrid or Canada.com to find the TV listings there, so that you know what channel number to look for.

  535. Theme Music ARRGHH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first, couldn't think what it reminded me of. Then I got it: "Growing Pains" in space. Crap...

  536. I see a chance for drama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Nothing I have seen has come even close to Babylon 5, but this series has a decent shot. Babylon 5 was so great because there weren't any tidy endings; each resolution had consequences that spawned the next crisis, just like in the real world. And the characters were engaging because they were not caricatures. They evolved. The character you initially liked became pathetic because they fell from grace through their flaws (Garibaldi), while those you didn't particularly care for transcended their flaws and became exemplars (G'Kar).

    So Bakula's character admitting at the end of the episode that he needs to lose his prejudice and preconceptions if he's going to succeed gave me hope that we are going to see quite a bit of interesting evolution in the characters. And the uncertain diplomatic situation they're facing promises excellent space battles, unholy alliances, unmitigated catastrophies, and dogged perseverance resulting in triumph.

    And for all the nitpickers out there, hey, at least they explained where that "to boldly go where no man has gone before" bit came from, which I thought an especially nice touch. And for all the prudes complaining about disinfectant gel scenes, hey, it's a damn sight better than listening to a superfluous ship's counselor screaming, "Pain! Terrible terrible pain!"

    Mmmm, disinfectant gel. Think I'm gonna like this series.

  537. Shut up about that damn wagon train already! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Why the hell is there always one in every crowd who drags that out???

    NO!

    Roddenberry did not setup to write "Wagon Train to the Stars"! That's what he TOLD the suits at the network, because he knew they just wouldn't get it, if he told them he wanted to make a show about the human condition.

    Enough already.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  538. bad physics (SPOILER) by savoystyle · · Score: 1

    So there's the scene where they have to throw the magnetic polarity switching suitcase inside of the big ship that's made out of a bunch of little ships. Well, the magnets hold on to each other because they have opposite polarities. If you switch 'em all, they'll still have opposite polarities and they'd still hold on to each other...

    And the 5 sec delay was laaame...

  539. Er, guys? Go rewatch TOS... by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
    Somebody, go out and rent a few episodes of the original Star Trek, then come back and answer me this:

    If they'd been able to sneak it past the censors and if they'd been able to hire a real hottie to do it (aka, one who didn't need to be shot through a gauze screen), do you think that TOS would have had a rubdown scene in it as well?

    Think a minute. The answer, of course, is YES!

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  540. EFFEMINATE MALES, LOUSY DICTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    About what I expected - a smidgen of PC blather, and a crew of wimpy, effeminate, whining males.

    The guys who are producing this, Rick Berman & Brannon Braga, are the same pair who ruined Voyager. (Jeri Lynn Zimmermann Ryan, aka 7 of 9, ditched her husband, Jack Ryan, for Brannon Braga).

    Maybe s/p 9-11-2001, the scripts will get a little more edge to them, but I imagine that the first half season's worth of episodes are already in the can.

    Minor details:

    1) The Vulcan Science Officer has lousy diction. Diction, or enunciation, is the lifeblood of acting (or singing, for that matter), and is especially important for an actor or actress playing a Vulcan.

    2) There was a lot of foul language; I seem to recall both "bitch" and "hell" being uttered in the family hour.


    1. Re:EFFEMINATE MALES, LOUSY DICTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bitch and hell? since when is "hell" considered foul language? are you some kind of rifle owning Bible basher?

    2. Re:EFFEMINATE MALES, LOUSY DICTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      bitch and hell? since when is "hell" considered foul language? are you some kind of rifle owning Bible basher?

      Foul language is not necessary (and belies an absence of creative talent). If you want to go that route, then use a pay channel, the way Time Warner does with The Sopranos. In fact, a really steamy Star Trek (R to NC-17) is not such a bad idea. It just doesn't have any business on broadcast TV.

      PS: I thought the decontamination scene was great, or would have been great, if the human male weren't such a whining, effeminate wimp.

    3. Re:EFFEMINATE MALES, LOUSY DICTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      are you some kind of rifle owning Bible basher?

      I think you mean shotgun toting ; as for bashing the bible, I'll leave that to you.


    4. Re:EFFEMINATE MALES, LOUSY DICTION by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      I still maintain that "hell" could not be construed as foul language, as it could hardly cause offence. What the HELL are you people afraid of? one of the major reasons that TV land is so divorced from reality is the almost totally unrealistic way people are forced to speak. If a person isn't allowed to curse, how on Earth are you going to convincingly portray anger? hell just ISN'T a curse in this universe.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:EFFEMINATE MALES, LOUSY DICTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I still maintain that "hell" could not be construed as foul language, as it could hardly cause offence. What the HELL are you people afraid of? one of the major reasons that TV land is so divorced from reality is the almost totally unrealistic way people are forced to speak. If a person isn't allowed to curse, how on Earth are you going to convincingly portray anger? hell just ISN'T a curse in this universe.

      A lot of it has to do with the context. If a skanky ho screams at her ex-boyfriend, "Get the HELL out of my apartment, and never come back," then it's, well, skanky. OTOH, if a Starship Captain, on his bridge, were to murmur, almost inaudibly, "Gentlemen, let's send them all to hell," right before his crew engages the bad guys in combat, then I don't think anyone would have a problem with it.


    6. Re:EFFEMINATE MALES, LOUSY DICTION by cramped+bowels · · Score: 1

      As an ex military type, I can assure you that the *normal* everyday converse was full of choice expletives, of which hell and damn were , by comparison, mild.

  541. Re:We need to start a petition to change the theme by gavinsr · · Score: 1
  542. You misunderstand. by J.C.B. · · Score: 1

    I said stock post Star Wars. Which means that it's the same kind of boring old theme scifi song that we've been hearing since starwars (ie not cliched spacy sounding music).

  543. TwoMook by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > Jerry Rice? That's Jerry Lynn Ryan you mook!

    Jerry Lynn Ryan? That's Jeri Lynn Ryan, you mook!

    Virg

  544. Down with the music! Hooray for the nipples! by OuiPapa · · Score: 1

    And what the hell is with all the people complaining about 'soft porn'?! How repressed can a person get!!

  545. My initial thoughts by gregw51 · · Score: 1

    Characters - looking good so far. The Vulcan can be annoying at times, but so was Troi, Seven of Nine and Janeway. Well, OK, Janeway still is, but the others grew on you as their characters evolved over time.

    Plot - cool beans. It's interesting to think that the show takes place in a time when the Enterprise is the only ship of its kind. There's no cavalry waiting over in the next sector that can be there in a few minutes!

    Klingons - Yes, I know, they don't look like they did in TOS, and there was Worf's comment about how the Klingons 'changed'. I didn't buy that then, and I don't buy it now. Frankly, I'm glad the Klingons are presented the way they are in TNG onward - their look is much more in line with their reputation.

    Ship - Again, good stuff. Just the right combination of form and function. The lack of teakwood paneling and carpets is refreshing. Can't wait to get a set of the blueprints for this one . . . :)

    Gadgets - Well done. "These are the new 'phase pistols', Captain". Heh. The 'tricorder' seemed a little of, though. A unit with a color flatscreen, smaller than the ones in TOS? A bit of a stretch, I guess, but this is where the production crew takes some license. The tricorder in TOS, like many gadgets, was based on what people knew about technology then, and projecting it in to the future. The little TV screen on that represented technology that was pretty old hat to them then, and small, color flat screens are pretty old hat to us now.

    Human/Vulcan relations - A lot of noise has been made here about how the vulcan stoicism/human emotions conflict is so done, hashed out, etc. True, to us, it is, sort of. To the Humans and Vulcans of the mid-22nd century, though, this is still new. Humans are still chomping at the bit to get out there, and are tired of being held back by the Vulcans. I think that's the whole point of having T'Pal on the show, to work out those tensions by rubbing gel all over each other's strong, ripped, bodies, smoothing the gel up, and down and . . . Um, where was I? Oh yes, tensions. Like I said, this is new to the characters during this time period, and it will be intersting to see how the Vulcans become less of our 'teachers' (and, I suppose, nervous parents) and more like our partners.

    I'll be back for more, that's for sure.

  546. a dog and a soliloquy by mrsmalkav · · Score: 1

    I really hope that we don't have to hear the "Computer, pause recording. Yap yap yap yap yap. Computer, resume recording." shit, because man, I could NOT stop laughing. What a contrived load of bull. Look at me! I'm the captain and I can't think to myself in my own head! YAY!

    Granted, you *could* say he was talking to the dog, but still...

    Which brings me to the dog... This is our first ST pet huh? I'm curious as to when the dog saves the ship or when it becomes a pivotal plot figure :D

    1. Re:a dog and a soliloquy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Data had a cat, Janeway had a dog (left behind on earth).

    2. Re:a dog and a soliloquy by mrsmalkav · · Score: 1

      Oh that's right! I forgot about Data's cat. Janeway's dog doesn't count... ;) Apologies!

  547. Armor Plating was polorized... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats how it was able to go "offline"

  548. How The Enterprise Theme Was Chosen... by The+Spie · · Score: 1

    (FADE IN on an office corridor at the Paramount lot. The shot resolves on a door; a sign on the door says Rick Berman, Trek God And You Know It. The camera enters the office, and we see Rick Berman and Brannon Braga seated at a table, hard at work...)

    RB: I like the meta-plot, Brannon. Time-traveling aliens trying to change history and all that. Really reminds me of what Gene used to do.

    BB: Gene never did anything like that, Rick.

    RB: Well, it reminds me of what me and Mike Piller used to do, and that's perfectly fine for today's Trek!

    (Braga begins to wander around the room a bit. Berman is in tight concentration.)

    RB: Hmmm, Brannon, my sweet little Peter Principled Co-Creator...

    BB: Yes, my lord and master?

    RB: That time-travel stuff. Kinda reminds me of that one song by Cher.

    BB: "Believe"?

    RB: No, the one with the video that you love because of all the sailors in it.

    BB: Oh, "If I Could Turn Back Time". I can see why it would remind you of what we're doing. That ship, and those sailors in those tight-fitting uniforms...

    RB: No, Brannon, the time-travel stuff.

    BB: How do you keep track of all the time things, anyway?

    RB: I don't. No, I think I might have had an inspiration.

    BB: Gene would be so proud.

    RB: Who wrote that song, Brannon?

    (Braga goes over to his computer, opens up his browser, and does a Google search.)

    BB: It was someone named Diane Warren. Thank goodness that Okuda told me about Google, huh?

    RB: Tell Okuda to get out another tech book pronto. We need something to sell at Christmas.

    BB: Will do. So why did you want to know that?

    RB: What else did she write?

    BB: Why do you want to know?

    RB: Well, we still need a theme song.

    BB: I thought we'd just get Dennis McCarthy to knock off something at the last moment, like he did for Voyager.

    RB: No. Since we have a time-travel plot, I want to pay tribute to the genius who wrote "If I Could Turn Back Time"

    (Braga goes back to his Google search and starts scribbling down titles of songs.)

    BB: Okay, I've got some titles here. I'm going to give them to Jeri Taylor to see if she can download these. She's not doing anything right now.

    RB: Good idea. She's been a little depressed ever since Voyager wrapped. This'll keep her mind off that. (He grabs the list from Braga's hand) "Shape Of The Heart". Didn't Rod Stewart sing that?

    BB: I know he sang "Hot Legs". And speaking of that, I'm going to go down to the set to make sure that yummy Texan doesn't shave his when we do the decontamination scene!

    RB: You do that, Brannon...

    (FADE OUT)

    --
    If using Linux is about choice, how come people complain when I choose to use Windows?
  549. PETITION AGAINST ENTERPRISE THEME SONG HERE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't like the song? Sign up!

    http://www.PetitionOnline.com/STETheme/

  550. ANTI-ENTERPRISE THEME SONG PETITION HERE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't like the song? Sign the petition!

    http://www.petitiononline.com/entintro/

    1. Re:ANTI-ENTERPRISE THEME SONG PETITION HERE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  551. Picard was not an emotionless robot by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I forget the name of the episode, but it was the one after "Best of Both Worlds", when Picard gets shore leave after being assimilated and de-assimilated? He just breaks down and cries to his brother about how he was resposible for the destuction of so many ships, so many lives.

    I also recall the cardassian special ops episode, where Picard gets captured and tortured 1984-style. (Why does he keep getting tortured anyway? Poor bastard.) He does get pretty broken down.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  552. And he calls us whiners... by then,+it+was+nigh · · Score: 1

    Oh no, they're more worried about trying to create a good show than trying to be PC to pander to all the whiny wacko liberals who think it's their right to force their views down everyone's throat.

    You misspelled "who think it's their right not to have my views forced down their throats" in the preceding. HTH.

    Ok, mod me down, I'm not PC

    I'm reminded of a quote:

    We have now reached the point where every goon with a grievance, every bitter bigot, merely has to place the prefix, 'I know this is not politically correct, but...' in front of the usual string of insults in order to be not just safe from criticism, but actually a card, a lad, even a hero. Conversely, to talk about poverty and inequality, to draw attention to the reality that discrimination and injustice are still facts of life, is to commit the sin of political correctness. Anti-PC has become the latest cover for creeps. It is a godsend for every curmudgeon and crank, from fascists to the merely smug. -- Finian O'Toole, The Irish Times, 5 May 1994

    --
    sed 's/In Soviet Russia/In NSA America/g' < yakov-smirnoff-jokes.txt
  553. Re:We need to start a petition to change the theme by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

    The only thing worse would be if they change the theme to another piece of pseudo-Williams garbage like every other ST series in the last fifteen years. If that happens I may have to hunt you down and slap you silly. What they have now ain't great but it beats the "Drone of the French Horn Sadists" and "Boring Brass Fanfare".

    And the opening sequence during the theme is much better than the standard ship...ship...ship from a different angle...ship doing a flyby...ship rolling over like a dying whale...ship...

  554. What to do if no UPN? by Andrey · · Score: 1

    So, how the heck can I watch this if I don't have UPN??

    -Andrei

    --
    -Andrei
  555. Re:When are they going to open a Hooters on Vulcan by metachimp · · Score: 1

    The shotgun wasn't painted over, it's just a stainless steel OU shotgun.

    --
    The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  556. Re:Kiss Me If Your Alien Speaks English by hAkron · · Score: 1

    oh yeah...my mistake..split infinative...thank you for the correction.

  557. Enterprise is a fresh look on the ST universe by dfn5 · · Score: 1

    I, for one, feel that Paramount has beat Star Trek to death. However, it seems to me that they are trying a fresh new look on the same old universe. I did like the new theme music and I thought that Scott Bacula did an excelent job as the new Captain. If they can resist the urge to link this series with the others through familiar characters I think it will do all right. At least the Trek-no-babble is still there. I love how it makes no sense. :-) p.s. They could've done without that weirdo scene in the De-Con chamber, however.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  558. If you liked the "disinfectant rubbing" scene... by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    Then you will love this Maxim pictorial where Jolene Blalock shows us some Vulcan anatomy.

    Some interesting quotes as well:
    Captain Archer: Tell me something about yourself, T'Pol.
    T'Pol: "I love when I sort of come to and I'm on the other side of the room, sweaty and breathing heavy, with bottles and ashtrays tipped over everywhere. I'm like, 'What just happened? Oh yeah, I got laid. Gotcha.'"

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  559. Re:Spoiler-tastic - They dont grow Corn in OK by glenmark · · Score: 1

    An odd claim. According to USDA statistics, Oklahoma produced 37.8 million bushels of corn in 2000. That's almost $72 million worth of corn.

    --
    *** Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made ***
  560. The theme song and opening scenes by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    > The theme song has to go

    agreed. The theme song is about as exciting and topical as the theme song from "The Greatest American Hero"... 'Believe it or not I'm walking on air...'

    But I really liked the opening scenes. The "Right Stuff" historical walkthrough connected Star Trek with our very real present day attempts at space flight. It made me feel like this show could happen in the near future if we just tried hard enough. None of the other Star Treks have evoked that sense of hope since the original series (corny as it was). I think people forget one of the reasons the original became such a phenomina was because at that time anything seemed possible and people thought the show could be a blueprint for a better world. The other series were so far in the future and so removed from the real world they didn't have any of that feeling.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  561. Military Government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The nipple scene almost made me forget my suprise at a Starfleet Admiral making the decision to send the Enterprise off on its mission. Call me a crazy American, but isn't that the sort of high-level, fate-of-your-nation/planet call that a President (or PM for you Europeans) is supposed to make? There was no mention at any time in the show about an Earth government besides Starfleet. So is Earth in the 22nd century run by a military dictatorship supported by their alien "friends", who give the humans protection and technology in exchange for stunting their growth?

    I can see the plotlines now...flashbacks to the late-20th century where the original military-Vulcan conspiracy was formed...the mid-21st century nuclear war that was precipitated by Vulcan secret agents out to keep humanity in chains...and finally, the glorious people's revolution that overthrows the evil dictatorship and establishes the United Federation of Planets!

  562. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by ministerofsickeningr · · Score: 1

    they are sooo fake t*ts. lame lame lame lame..

  563. Not a bad start by inkless1 · · Score: 1

    A scifi pilot is never an easy thing, even one with an established backdrop like Trek. You have to create something interesting, explain all of it's nuances and throw a plot in there to keep people's attention.

    In fact, I haven't liked a lot of pilots for shows I ended up liking. I thought B5's was just clunky, NG's just hokey, and DS9's just weird. But they still presented enough that I kept watching the shows and certainly in some cases (B5) the shows were phenom.

    Some spoilers may follow.

    If anything, I'll have to give Enterprise bonus points for putting some real thought into the show. There are lots of great details which prove that this is the pre-trek star trek mode. Not just the "phase guns", wires hanging out of walls, or little model spaceships, but in the character design, their backgrounds and interactions. Bakula or no Bakula, this Trek will succeed or fail depending on if it makes good on it's premise. Voyager failed it's premise horribly, and we saw the results.

    Enterprise seems to want to make good on it's premise.

    On some of the other notes -

    the soft core porn scene was completely uncalled for and visibly broke from the rest of the episode. It was just fan service and if ST is going to steal some anime ideas, let's not steal that one....it works better in anime :).

    I don't care what color of blood the Klingons had, I want to know what was said at the end of the episode. It might explain a "botched" first contact with the Klingons.

    Old Tripp still has time to grow, but god he better do it fast. I kinda like him because he reminds me of a character out of an old Irwin Allen show. I kinda hate him because he reminds me of a character out of an old Irwin Allen show.

  564. Casual viewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but, I seem to recall a DS9 episode where they timeshift onto the "Trouble with Tribbles" episode, and there was some question about why the Klingons looked different. Call the continuity editor!

    1. Re:Casual viewer by inkless1 · · Score: 1

      If I recall, it's just mentioned that they looked different because of something the klingons "dont like to talk about"...it doesnt say all klingons looked like that for all time. Perhaps they had a brush with a bad plastic surgeon for a generation.

  565. The Vulcan channel meld is called for by snStarter · · Score: 2, Funny

    I kept imagining that, perhaps, I'd get the great channel meld and somehow "The West Wing" and "Wolf Lake" would be morphed with "Enterprise".

    Command Deck of ENTERPRISE

    Captain: Has anyone seen Ruby?

    Vulcan (eyes glowing): No. (wiggles ears) I think she was written out in an earlier episode.

    Engineer: Polls are in. Mammet-speak required.

    Teenager runs in

    Teeniebooper: I'm SOOOO fed up with you Daddy. (pushes up glasses) you won't let me do ANYTHING. The drug dealer down at the Transporter just wants me So BAD!

    Captain, morphs into Donner:

    Donner: Go take orders in the crews mess - and stop piddling on the floor while you're at it.

    Vulcan morphs into Ruby whose eyes glow as the view of the bridge does funny colored transitions.

    RUBY: I'm glad you mentioned that!

    RUBY transforms into wolf, piddles on DONNERS feet and flees the room in herky-jerk motions of hyper-color.

    ENGINEER: Offers wise Native American saying.

    Secret Service appears: Mr President you're standing in dog piddle.

    POTIS: Why yes, it was forseen in Revelations (cites chapter/verse in Greek). Now get me some Klingons, I'm gonna do something....

    ----------
    "The past isn't dead. It's not even past!"
    Quentin Compson

    1. Re:The Vulcan channel meld is called for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times have I told you?!? Stay OFF the crack!

  566. It may not have appealed to your sappy PCedness... by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    ... but it was profoundly contiguous with the show and various movies.

    1) Cochran was a womanizing drunk, and probably about as un-PC as you can get, who was a world hero despite these character flaws because of his tremendous technical contribution to humanity (inventing warp drive) as well as his social contribution (making first contact). It was a direct quote from his speech, which reflected his character (with all of its flaws).

    2) Humans had done some backsliding, as a result of various wars and conflicts. Cochran may or may not have been representative of his time 50 years hence.

    3) It is entirely possible that, in 150 years, language nazi's will have been the first against the wall when the revolution came (viva la revolution!)

    4) It also provides continuity to the TOS phrase "where no man has gone before"

    5) As another noted, it is more accurate ("man" in the generic sense, cf mankind, human, etc.), as they are going where no humans have gone before (but where just about every second rate species in the quadrant has been going for some time).

    6) Human progress tends to come in fits and starts and not be uniform across all areas. It is entirely plausible that world peace has been achieved, yet gender neutrality in language (and perhaps even in custom) hasn't yet fully occurred for any number of reasons

    (a) world peace includes peace with cultures much more "sexist" by western definitinos than our own, with their influence having perhaps held up perfect gender equality for longer than other forms of equality or justice (e.g. racial and ethnic equality)

    (b) those involved in Star Fleet come from a subculture more akin to computer geeks or engineering geeks than MBAs or politicians, and even though the women in that subculture are equal, perhaps they detest PCedness more than most (having proven themselves in the technical field, they could see the use of gender-neutral linquistic contortions as downright insulting or patronizing, for example).

    (c) perhaps local ethnicity/culture is playing a role (e.g. the mostly white cowboy "west" vs. the more cosmopolitan regions of the world -- Cochran was in Montana after all).

    (7) As to the "white male" thing, perhaps wealth is not yet equally distributed throughout the world, so while peace and social equality have been achieved, economic equality is still being worked on and, in the meantime, the areas of the Earth most able to afford luxuries like a space program tend to be mostly white western nations such as the United States, Europe, or Australia.

    (8) (And this is the most likely explanaition) they are trying to depict a more primitive, rough and tumble Federation and so have used audio and visual queues specific to our culture to do so (older, more dated words such as "man" for gender neutral pronouns, a mostly white crew reminiscent of TOS, etc.) It's called artistic license, and I think in this particular episode it worked very well -- I did have the feeling of seeing an early precursor to the UFP, one which still has numerous flaws to iron out before becoming the perfect ST:TNG utopia.

    You get the idea. The use of the phrase is perhaps not PC-compliant language, but it is only offensive to a radical few who give the rest of us liberals a really bad name (now I can really relate to Muslim's feelings of frustration in having people like the Taliban being the most vocal examples of their culture/religion), a small cost gladly paid for the continuity it creates and the potential for some interesting cultural and social exploration within humanity, something generally lacking in the other Star Trek series.

    What is next: people being offended because they still have the death penalty (the Federation of Kirk's time did, while that of Piccard's time did not, so it makes sense they will. Then there's the whole meat eating thing vs. replicated food in later centuries, etc. Shall we start spray-painting animal rights slogans on the Enterprise set?)

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  567. Enterprise OK but by mvester · · Score: 1

    Babylon 5 is still the greatest television show ever. Looking forward to The Crusades or whatever JMS calls his new series.

    1. Re:Enterprise OK but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, if you like shit.

    2. Re:Enterprise OK but by Khan+Fused · · Score: 1

      Crusade is the series that ran 13 episodes on TNT before J. Michael Strazcynski pulled the plug on it -- on account of TNT wanted a T & A & guns & explosives show -- and while JMS sees the value in this (after all--he fragged multiple planets in the original B5 run) ... he wanted to do things HIS way.

      "Legend of the Rangers" is the show that'll be pilot-movie'ing on Scifi some time soon.

      --
      This mind intentionally left blank.
  568. Neptune in 10 minutes by havoc · · Score: 1
    (Hmm, Neptune in 10 minutes means a light-hour per minute, so about a light-year per week. I hope they brought board games.)

    Forgive me but I haven't seen the show yet (it is waiting on my TiVO;) so my comment may be off. But wouldn't your calculations depend on the current orbit of Neptune and where the ship traveling to Neptune was located? I'm assuming we are talking about the Enterprise traveling from Earth passing Neptune. If this is the case then it is conceivable that Neptune is on the far side of the Sun from the Earth which would mean the Enterprise would have to travel the entire diamiter of the Earth's orbit farther than if Neptune was on the same side of the Sun. I believe the Earth is about 8 light minutes away from the sun which would throw your calculations off by 16 light minutes! OK, so maybe it isn't that big of a deal when you take into account just how much further Neptune is away from the Sun than Earth;)

  569. Everybody got that? by Rand+Race · · Score: 2

    All this dog was missing was Rick Moranis turning to the camera and saying "Did you get that?". The expositional dialouge was truly horrid... worse than the rest of the bad dialouge.

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  570. velocity descprencies by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Warp 4.5 = 4.5^3c = 91.c OK
    30,000,000 miles per second = 100.c OK

    1 light year = 88 hours at 100.c

    Rigel is 15 light years (1000 in reality)
    15 light years = almost 8 weeks.

    Eta Erdani (Vulcan) is 8 light years = 4 weeks.

    1. Re:velocity descprencies by mozkill · · Score: 1

      You got that incorrect.

      "Trans-Warp" drive is cubed.

      The star trek warp drive from the 60's is only squared.

      --

      -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
  571. yes, whiners by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    When someone complains when there isn't more ethnic diversity or gay people on a television show, I consider that to be whiny, especially in light of the fact that ST has always been very ethnically diverse.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:yes, whiners by then,+it+was+nigh · · Score: 1

      When someone complains when there isn't more ethnic diversity or gay people on a television show, I consider that to be whiny, [...]

      Yes, I imagine you do. For reference, do you also consider the complaints in other threads of redneck stereotyping (Cmdr. Tucker, the shotgun-toting Oklahoma farmer) to be "whiny"? Or is it only "whining" if you disagree with the complaint (or dislike the complainers)?

      [...] especially in light of the fact that ST has always been very ethnically diverse.

      Um, yes, that was rather the original petitioner's point, as I understood it -- that, so far at least, this latest outing in the Trek universe seems markedly less so.

      --
      sed 's/In Soviet Russia/In NSA America/g' < yakov-smirnoff-jokes.txt
  572. The Good Stuff by extrasolar · · Score: 2

    While I agree with a lot of the negative comments seen here, there is some good original stuff in the pilot episode that I haven't seen before.

    • Did you guys notice when that one doctor guy smiled that he smiled just slightly more than is humanly possible? It was obviously a computer effect but I would like to see what other impossible facial expressions he can perform in upcoming episodes.
    • In that one room notice how there was a ghost that actually moved like a half-second before the captain did. That is how the captain was able to get out of the way of the phaser pistol! Its actually a completely different version of the matrix thing, very original!
    • I definitely like the doctor and he is likely to become my favorite character---with his attitude and his original brand of medicine.
    • Notice the British guy there. I don't think I've seen a brit in a star trek series before.

    I think this show has potential but I'm not giving my hopes up.

    1. Re:The Good Stuff by Ethnic+Cheese! · · Score: 0

      We kill off all the brits later on down the road in exchange for a barrel of Romulan ale. That is the reason you don't see them in later episodes.

    2. Re:The Good Stuff by ecampbel · · Score: 1

      Dr. Julian Bashir, Alexander Siddig from DS9, was British. He had a thing for Dax.

      --

      Sig goes here
    3. Re:The Good Stuff by AveryT · · Score: 1

      He had a British accent but surely Bashir was of Arabic descent. For that matter, Picard had a British accent despite the fact that he was supposed to be French.

      Of course the original Brit on Star Trek was John Winston's Lieutenant Kyle.

      Satan oscillate my metallic sonatas.

    4. Re:The Good Stuff by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 1
      Did you guys notice when that one doctor guy smiled that he smiled just slightly more than is humanly possible? It was obviously a computer effect but I would like to see what other impossible facial expressions he can perform in upcoming episodes.


      Slightly?!? Egads, I haven't seen such a horrifying misuse of computer graphics since around 1995 when the advertising companies "discovered" "morphing" and gave us smiling dogs and whatnot. Yuck-o
      --
      All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  573. Wahtever by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    You got the point. I've not got her pin-up over my bed. I enjoyed her role and even though she knew exactly why they had chosen her she still did a good job. We'll see how the new one works out, so far I've liked the show but the Maxim shoot made her out to be a bit trashy IMO.

    Oh, and to the AC who says she's not really like that - how the heck would ya' know?! Do tell.... :-)

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  574. Good point! by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I guess his Dad could've been an engineer on the project and that now makes much more sense, thanks. Was buggin' me! I'll watch it a second time anyway just to try and get it all straight and I enjoyed it the first time. Besides, I didn't get the "shower scene" on tape (lol)! Sure was jarring and weird the way they did that but what the heck - it sets up some nice tension for later episodes...

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  575. SORTA REMINDS ME OF BUCK ROGERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did the buck rogers theme song keep going through my head. I felt like I was 5 again living in the 70's hehe. I like the new show. Its not so rediculas. The vulcan theme may have been over played. Nothing is perfect, so lets give them time to work out the kinks. A differnt theme may work... I know they changed the theme music to Tour of Duty on TNT it was fade to black by the stones... They should serious consider using something from one of the popular groups like that.... just my thoughts

    Great show Al, haha All

    1. Re:SORTA REMINDS ME OF BUCK ROGERS by buddhaunderthetree · · Score: 1

      No way. Remember the first thing Lucky Buck did on arriving in the 25th century was to reintroduce disco.

      --
      "Technology.....the knack of so arranging the world that we don't have to experience it." Max Firsch
  576. Uhhhm how can I say this... by Morocco+Mole · · Score: 1

    I have been seriousely, SERIOUSELY, thinking about writing a Trek Episode. But, uhhmm, the only plot line I can think of for Enterprise is that the experimental warp drive detonates and the show ends!



    --Richard


    Bring back Picard!

  577. Law & Order by simetra · · Score: 1

    We watched Law & Order, because we wanted to see something we knew would be entertaining, and someone intellectual. Star Trek shows typically suck.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  578. Human V.S. Vulcans by DarkrhaveN · · Score: 1
    Okay yes, its cliche` they brought that subject back into the mix again, but if they didnt put that in that would screw up the entire story line, deliberately negating the rest of the series' that take place afterwards in the timeline. Would you honestly expect it, to see the humans and vulcans and or humans and klingons getting along in harmony and flower power.


    If you honestly don't want to see story lines from this series being built off of old story lines don't watch it and complain.

    --
    "He Who Laughs Last, Is Just A Hand In The Bush" - Ozzy Osbourne
  579. Even vs. Odd by totallygeek · · Score: 1
    .

    ou mean even number ones, right? as all the odd-numbered ones sucked.


    That is actually pretty funny -- and true! I never thought of it before, but I did enjoy the even-numbered ones over the odd.

  580. Re:Bleah!--2 nacelles by Khan+Fused · · Score: 1
    I think that's a piece of OkudaTechnoBabble(tm) from a looooong ways back

    /Technobabble=ON

    ... something about 2 nacelles are 'necessary for balance of the warpfield' or some such. Scientists in the trek'verse had tried 3 nacelle and 4 nacelle designs - and there was no increase in efficiency -- and often a decrease ...

    At least that's what I remember from my old TrekTNG tech manual (that's probably shredded in some box deep in my closets by now.)


    /technobabble = OFF

    --
    This mind intentionally left blank.
  581. Nothing could live up to the hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Halfway down in a deeply buried article at chronicle.com is this quote: "Television is a boon to anti-intellectualism, with its encouragement of emotional chords and comfort". Many Slashdotters are intellectuals in the best sense of the word. Because of this, can we ever truly be satisfied by anything we see on TV? Is not our imagination superior to the limitations of 20th century special effects and makeup? You don't want Enterprise, you want your own personal Holodeck.

    I am Anonymous Coward. I am silenced, ignored, modded down without being read. I write to organize my thoughts. Sharing them with you is but a side effect.

    1. Re:Nothing could live up to the hype by philipm · · Score: 0

      Much weeping and gnashing of teeth accompanied the bonfire. Some cheered, some booed, but most threw rotten tomatoes. There was a beautiful lady at the front watching with stoic determination.

      The flames leapt up. There was a smell of frying bacon, and so was the true nature of the slashbot wilderbeast revealed.

      The anonymous coward was no more.

      Would another one ever emerge?

  582. They [Maxim] ever do that with Jerry Rice? by Ruger · · Score: 1

    No, I don't think he ever posed in Maxim. In fact, I think Maxim only has women in it's "Girls of Maxim" section...but I could be wrong. Now Jeri Ryan would be great to see in the magazine, but I don't think she's ever been a Maxim babe...pity.

    Ruger

  583. LOL! My first thought! by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    As soon as I saw that I wondered how they were going to do that. Topical gel on what - half of their bodies tops? And notice that the guy does his legs and whatnot and that she ends up doing it over? Going to have to watch it again just to get a laugh...

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  584. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did he expect his joke to be taken seriously? No.

  585. hull polarized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They activated and deactivated hull polarization, an apparent defense against direct energy weapons.

  586. The only thing missing... by C_Mattie · · Score: 1

    ... is an evil twin! Kirk got split in two in one episode, one good and one evil. Data had Lore, an evil brother. DS9 had the recurring alternate universe thing going on. Voyager had a duplicate crew created on the class Y planet... I personally can't wait to see what they do here!

    --
    "If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign you're not doing anything very innovative." -- Woody Allen
  587. How 'bout a little consistancy. by gaijin_baka · · Score: 1

    This show has a slight case of Episode I syndrome. The series just doesn't appear to remain consistant with the later shows. Not to mention, the technology looks better too. My only real question is what happens to the Klingon race, how do they go from fearsome looking to just human looking between the time Enterprise and the original series and then back again before Next Generation?

  588. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blech! So the actress playing the Vulcan is a complete ho. Guess we'll be seeing lots more of her titties in future episodes. I can just see the writers sitting around thinking up ways to get the Vulcan to take her clothes off - or even better, engage in... intimate contact with alien species. (But the censors probably wouldn't stand for that.)

    A few things bothered me about the rubdown scene. 1) What parts of their bodies were they supposed to cover with the goop? Obviously not all, just enough to get the actors to show a little skin.
    2) Why have the characters wear clothes at all in the glowing room? I think it'd be much more interesting to have them go in with towels and then drop trou'. They could have done the standard - logical, alien culture is enlightened and doesn't mind being naked around others; puny, immature humans get all freaked out. (See Farscape, B5, ST:TNG, etc.)

    IMHO, the scene was designed to get 15 year old boys all hot and bothered, but not so sexy their moms would make them turn it off.

  589. uh, wow (head shaking) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think the show was staring Captain Jar Jar. It seems that most people forgot that the viewing of Star Trek still requires a good, solid, joint smoking session before the show starts. I mean c'mon, would there be this much hostility if you were all stoned out of your minds???

  590. If you don't like the theme song, sign here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Online petition to get Paramount to drop the current HORRIBLE theme song:

    http://www.PetitionOnline.com/STETheme/

  591. It was good by thejake316 · · Score: 1

    A little long but good. Stop whining about the "how is it possible for dilithium which has a half-life of 44.82 years to give off radiation 100 years after the Botany Bay crashed" bullshit and get a life, too.

    --
    AC's cheerfully ignored
  592. Real People? by PicoTera · · Score: 1

    Silly as it is to expect fiction to mirror reality, although more frequent with science-fiction than other genres, somehow I just can't see these personalities on a shuttle mission.

    The other side, the military part, is even more strained. Those who reach the higher ranks in the military -- just like their counterparts in business -- know when to keep their mouths shut, rarely tell you what they are thinking, are not confrontational and tend toward the political: think Colin Powell, not John Wayne.

    But as entertainment, it is off to a good start with unlimited opportunity for nit-pickers, voyeurs and SiFi buffs.

    --
    Carbon Unit # 149-34-xxxx
  593. enterprise petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.petitiononline.com/entintro/petition.ht ml

  594. Petition to change intro to "Enterprise". by FrankieBoy · · Score: 1

    You can sign the petition to change the intro to "Enterprise" at this address.

  595. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Did you expect the rest of the A-Team to appear in Rocky III? Did you expect the cast of Cheers to appear in Star Trek III? No.

    Speak for yourself, primate. I for one was vastly disappointed when these appearances did not occur.
  596. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Pooua · · Score: 1

    I've noticed, in my wanderings around Usenet binary groups, that many of the "Star Trek" actresses have previously appeared in various nude scenes. It almost seems like a job requirement for getting on "Star Trek." Could this have something to do with the particular life philosophy of the people who coordinate the show? Sometimes, it seems as if the directors belong to "American Atheist," or something.

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  597. Vulcan was too emotional by Hugh+Kir · · Score: 1

    I thought overall it was pretty good, but for a "totally logical" being, the Vulcan on the ship sure showed a whole lot of emotions. Much of it was her feelings of superiority, and also her distaste for the assignment. A true Vulcan would have simply stated that chasing after a Klingon was not the most logical thing to do; they wouldn't have harped on how unevolved humans were, and kept rubbing their faces in it. Oh, and the opening music was awful. But, all in all, I was pleasently surprised. It definately has potential.

  598. 'demented hackers' X Window Fantasy' by Khan+Fused · · Score: 1
    ... and since the trek effects office (last time I heard) DOES use Apple gear -- they very well COULD arrange some display advertising & pick up a little extra production funding. And that would mean that Enterprise NX-01 would run Darwin/MacOS 22.11.

    Which means that (assuming there are more scenes scripted like the 'decontamination room' scene...) there will be shipwide contests among the junior crewmembers, seeing who can successfully 00wn T'pol's box ...

    ...and when audio controls go down, Commander Tucker'll just ssh into HELM.BRIDGE.ENTERPRISE.STARFLEET.MIL, enter the root password, cd to /etc, and change a couple of settings in MAJEL.CONF

    (... looking at a dead-silent room ...) Ok ... I'll go away now ...

    --
    This mind intentionally left blank.
  599. Re: Klingon's old and new by Indomitus · · Score: 1

    The one idea I had was that some renegade Klingons had a colony where they bred with some Romulans (maybe were forced by the Romulans?) and the guys from TOS were the half-breeds. There are a lot of similarities between those TOS-Klingons and the Romulans so it wouldn't be too unbelievable for them to have something like that be the answer. Plus I would imagine that most Klingons wouldn't want anything to do with half-breed Romulan/Klingons so that explains why Worf didn't want to talk about it in the tribbles episode of DS9.

    Of course they could just ignore it and we'd all just have to chalk it up to having modern special effects budget (take a look at Worf in season 1 of TNG versus Worf from DS9 for more evidence of that theory). That's not very fun though. :)

  600. reception problems by Lovejoy · · Score: 1

    On a more irritating point. Did anyone have problems with the transmission? We got some terrible digital "static" The screen would freeze and we'd get a field of colors. This happened a lot in the first hour, then cleared up.

    I thought maybe it was a field of reversed polarizing tachyons, so I adjusted my TV's deflector and it cleared up.

  601. wrong side of the bed? it was good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boy, some article writer woke up on the wrong side of bed this morning.

    i thought it was pretty good.

    though the person the captian addressed only as "Crewman!" didn't die. That was a weakness. ;)

  602. Reply to all: by Kasreyn · · Score: 2

    "In which case, first contact with the Vulcans was 'botched'. Anyone remember ST: First Contact?

    Vulcan: Live Long and Prosper.

    ZC: ... Thanks

    Cracks me up everytime. "

    Zefram didn't know, and I'm assuming the Vulcans also didn't know that the humans' minds would be so emotional and unsavory to Vulcans. Perhaps the Vulcans on the team assumed that by offering skin-to-skin contact, Zefram was a member of a touch-telepathic race and wanted to communicate. They probably saw it as a unique opportunity to communicate with another telepathic race, and were no doubt greatly disappointed with the result. This is all conjecture; maybe they just wore gloves! ;-)

    "Please name one scene in ANY of the series or movies in which it is stated that they can't control their telepathy enough to withstand touching."

    Ummm, if you can't find such a scene, you're not looking very hard. Just watch the Vulcans and how they act - hands clasped behind back, maintaining a "warning space" around their bodies. You should also check the novels. Regardless of what many say, they ARE established fan canon and include much that is not explained in the movies. Vulcans CAN touch humans, but they prefer a moment to raise their psychic shields to blot out human emotional overflow. And it is not the VULCANS who can't control their telepathy, it is the HUMANS. Spock's life on the Enterprise is full of the background noise of the emotions and thoughts of the humans around him, who don't know how to stop sending, because they can't receive.

    "If spock was half vulcan and half human, how did his father even bear touching his mother? I'm no star trek expert, but I don't think I've ever heard the touch telepath theory"

    Well, Sarek and Amanda were in love, silly! Well, Amanda was in love and Sarek was experiencing the closest thing he could allow himself to. Amanda was also trained for many, many years in Vulcan mental disciplines, thus resulting in an orderly, controlled mind that Sarek wouldn't mind touching. Additionally, when they were mated they were of course bound by the Kah (kind of a permanent telepathic connection between mates). This "Kah" is how T'Pring drew Spock home to Pon Farr, by the way. Spock himself was born by genetic manipulation, and then implanted in Amanda (there was also much technological effort involved in merely bringing him to term!). His genes are half Sarek and half Amanda, however.

    The touch telepathy is certainly fact in the ST universe, and was decided upon by Gene and Nimoy working together when they fleshed out the character of Spock. Fans are divided over whether the Neck Pinch uses telepathic powers, physical adeptness, or a combination of the two to render its victim unconscious. However, it is certain that the Mind-Meld is evidence of touch-telepathy. Remember, Spock did not like to do the Mind Meld and found it distasteful, since human and other alien minds were a bit unsavory to him. He did it more often than any other known Vulcan, however, possibly because of his half-breed nature and the many years he lived among humans. He melded most, of course, with his best friend Kirk, which wasn't as hard.

    Finally, when the episode Journey to Babel was being written, Gene (I think) came up with the idea that instead of holding hands, Sarek and Amanda would simply touch their first two fingers together. This delicate yet sensuous move showcases what Vulcan marriage is like: calm, reserved, physically aloof, and with an undercurrent of psychic unity and love.

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.
    1. Re:Reply to all: by 11223 · · Score: 2
      Fans are divided over whether the Neck Pinch uses telepathic powers, physical adeptness, or a combination of the two to render its victim unconscious.

      In "Unification, Pt. II", Data uses a Neck Pinch to take out Denise Crosby's "I wanna get back on the show so recast me as a Romulan" character.

  603. Plot Twist by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Try this: the humans feel that it's necessary to return the Klingon alive. The Vulcans want to pull the plug and send the corpse back. Perhaps the botch in first contact is that the Vulcans were right, and the fact that the humans felt the need to return Klang alive was just Earth-centric thinking. Therefore, the pilot plot is covered, but the insult of the return of a live, disgraced Klingon is enough to precipitate the war in the future.

    Or maybe the Klingons were pissed because the Klingon with such a dorky name still lives.

    Virg

  604. Whoa there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were you castrated while going to home school? Good looking chicks can be into anything for all I care.

  605. Trek Physics!!! by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Distance from Earth to Neptune (shortest)
    Minimum (10^6 km) 4305.9

    Time at Warp 4.5 = 6 minutes round trip = 3 minutes one way

    4,305,900,000km /3 minutes = 1,435,300,000 km/min = 23,921,700 km/sec

    therefore, Warp 4.5 = 23.9217 * 10^6 km/sec

    Now, Earth to Kronos was given at 80 hours at Warp 4.5 so

    80 hours = 4800 Minutes = 288,000 seconds

    288,000 sec * 23,921,700 km/sec = 6,889,449,600,000 km to Kronos (6.8894496 * 10^12) (6 Trillion KM)

    Light travels at 300,000 km/sec

    6,889,449,600,000 km / 300,000 = 22,964,832 LightSeconds

    Light seconds to light years:

    60 seconds in 1 minute
    60 minutes in 1 hour
    24 hours in 1 day
    365 days in 1 year

    60 * 60 * 24 * 365 = 31,536,000 seconds/year

    THEREFORE:

    22,964,832 / 31,536,000 = 0.728210045662100456621005 light years

    Since the closest star to Earth is some 4 light years away, the Klingons are SURE some CLOSE neighbors!

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
    1. Re:Trek Physics!!! by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      By the time I got to the end of the post I wanted to cry. Both because you forgot that it was mentioned a long time ago that the warp scale had changed between the old series and the TNG ones and that I knew that in the first place and then yet again when I realized someone took the time to calculate it out as if in some way it matters at all how accurate Star Trek is.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    2. Re:Trek Physics!!! by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      I am aware that there is a LOT of documentation on the physics of Star Trek, I realize it doesn't matter on the scale of things, but hey, they used numbers in their dialog and I thought it would be fun to see for myself what they worked out to.

      My guess is that they didn't bother to check their own consistancy - maybe the makers of Star Trek figure that anyone who bothers to do the numbers is just far too geeky to bother trying to please... maybe they have something there *blush*

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    3. Re:Trek Physics!!! by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      What's even worse than people checking numbers and all that there's also people in support groups for people who check numbers. Trekkie bean counters have infrastructure now. *shakes head* We're doomed.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  606. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

    Sometimes, it seems as if the directors belong to "American Atheist," or something.

    I don't see the athiest connection here at all.

    Is posing nude considered 'Athiest'?

    --
    ___
    The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  607. Re:Bloody time travel - are we really surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting to see Kirk and Spock / Bashere and Sisko / Picard and Data / Tuvok and Paris /etc make a cameo appearance babbling about some time-flux problem in the future and maybe handing an "aint it cool" gadget to the crew to help them succeed at some critical mission.

    *sigh* On a sarcastic/bitter note, it woulda been nice to see a starship materialize above the WTC and lock tractor beams on a certain two jetliners a few weeks ago...

  608. Overall, not bad by PowerPuffGirl · · Score: 1
    This post is probably hugely redundant, but I haven't had time to read many of the posts, and I just have to get my 2 cents in.

    Overall, I thought it was OK. I thought Scott Bakula did a good job. I especially liked the scene at the end after they transported him when he had that "what the heck just happened" look on his face. They have a real opportunity to take things like transporters which we have come to "take for granted" and make them seem cool again. That requires some good writing/acting however, and how well they are able to accomplish that remains to be seen. They can also still show cool "new" (to us) technology so long as they are careful not to show a civilization more advanced than in the later shows... (actually, they could do that, too, if they did it right). I thought the whole thing with the magnetized compartments forming a large structure was pretty cool, for example. I didn't hear the music (missed the whole first 15 min. or so of the show), so I can't comment on it in particular, but I think powerful instrumentals are more appropriate for ST than songs with lyrics... just doesn't seem right to do it any other way.

    I think the Vulcan, being a FULL Vulcan, unlike Spock, should have been much more logical and much less emotional. That's something they need to work on. And I could've done without the gel scene...

    I know it was just a coincidence, but I like how the bad guys have a name very similar to "Taliban", hehe. ;-)

    And lastly, I want to speak up for the 2% of the /. community that thinks the most attractive individual on the show is not the Vulcan lady, but Scott Bakula! mmmmm. :-)

  609. "Enterprise" is GREAT by alucneat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was very Pleasantly surprised, I have many comments: 1) I like the opening credits and new theme song! All of you who don't like it need to chill out, it's a great change. It gets back to the exploration and destiny of man's quest for exploration and search for knowledge. At first I was shocked by the theme song, how it wasn't orchestral, but I liked it after hearing it 2-3 times. 2) I like that they put an edge onto the show, no more quib comments, like "Oh Mr. Bad Guy, I guess you're out of business now, ha ha ha..." Instead its been replaced by "I'm gonna knock you on your ass..." Much more Babylon 5'ish there. 3) I like the risque stuff they added, although blatant, they were trying to get the point across that this show is no longer for 3 year olds, its got babes and even fondling...no more Mary Poppins crap!!! It's about freaking time they joined prime time TV!!! 4) I like the special effects, very well done, they got a bigger budget. Remains to be seen if they blew their wad on the first episode. 5) I like the acting, for the most part it was good, no glaringly bad stuff, a few bad lines here and there, but that will be worked out as it goes along. 6) I like the attention to detail, how they brought back the actor who played Zephram Cochran (did you notice Cochran's statue on the top shelf of the captain's quarters?), and how they have pictures of all ships in human history named "Enterprise" on the captain's walls, and how the ship is obvviously less advanced (they had to walk through rooms over a bulkhead, just like they do on nuclear subs), and how the people wear jackets and more contemporary attire (I saw a suit and tie in one scene).

  610. Big error in continuity. 7 ships bear name, not 6. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See the dedication plaque for NCC-1701-E and you'll see it claims the Enterprise "E" was the 6th starship to bear the name "Enterprise", let's see here:

    NX-01 - 1st ?

    NCC-1701 - 2nd ?

    NCC-1701-A - 3nd ?

    NCC-1701-B - 4th ?

    NCC-1701-C - 5th ?

    NCC-1701-D - 6th ?

    NCC-1701-E - 7th ?

    Unless there was never an Enterprise "B", the numbers just don't add up. I don't recall ever seeing a reference to an Enterprise "B" in any of the shows or movies, so maybe "E" was the 6th, or is this just still another example of poor continuity?

  611. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by ahde · · Score: 1

    was barklay murdoch?

  612. "You don't want to know"... what did he say? by Foresto · · Score: 1

    Near the end, the Klingon high council member said something to the captain. When asked what he said, the translator replied, "you don't want to know." Does anyone here know Klingon? What did he say?

  613. my reaction (spoilers, yada, yada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of devoting 100% of my time to study for my CCNA yesterday evening, I time-shared between the desk, feeding the cats and watching a lof of bits of the premiere.

    I knew that this was a premiere, that the characters & relationships would be forces and strained, that the actors would not have wrapped their brains around these characters, etc.

    Still:

    * why _POP_ for a sci-fi theme song? Now that's not going to age gracefully, like the sfx... And, anyway, it's Trek, it needs something more orchestral, no? I do hope they'll change the theme for something better. Please.

    * there was a lot of pornish stuff, the kind Gene R. would have _never_ had on his show. The quasi-naked, insect eating dancers, the shower/desinfecting/whatever scene, etc. I don't know, smelt like a cheap way to catch the attention of male viewers. It did not feel right -- for Trek.

    * I'm not sure about the transporter, about them beaming capt. Archer, _NEAR A TEMPORAL DISTORTION_ away to safety. Wasn't the Transporter something not to be used in this series because it was supposed to be this new-fangled, untested contraption? That was the biggest nit for me, kinda semi-spoiled the pilot for me.

    * For a disastrous first contact with the Klingons, despite mr. Redneck Farmer, it looks like if it went rather well. OK, how do we get into war with the Klingons, then? Or is it YATI?

    * Despite the surprising soft-porn, the transporter-that-wasn't-supposed-to-be-used-but-wa s, the theme song and the no-so-disastrous First Contact, the show does show some possibilities. I'm curious to know how we'll react by the end of the year. Let's hope TPTB don't f*ck it up.

  614. Enterprise B was in ST:Generations movie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't you see Generations? That's the Enterprise upon which Kirk "died" -- actually he was caught up in the Nexus thread (kinda like a bad Slashdot thread), where he actually died. Anyway that's the starship upon which Kirk disappeared and presumably died until he met Picard in the Nexus and battled the evil Dr. Soren or whatever the bad guy's name was.

  615. assumptions by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    You're assuming I am a Libertarian/Conservative, while I am not. I find most right wing nuts equally offensive, as they tend to try to force their beliefs upon others just like extreme liberals.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  616. They also forgot to by Whatever+Fits · · Score: 1

    disinfect their hair! One of the biggest trapping points for particulate matter such as spores.

    --
    My name fits again.
  617. SIGN THIS PETITION - TAKES 30 SECS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  618. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by yonnage · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, you've watched too many movies!

    QL owns!

  619. ::smile:: by Scoria · · Score: 1

    I suppose the next one could be titled "Star Trek: The Former Generation".

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  620. Top 5 Surprises by blowmeetheclown · · Score: 0

    The Top 12 Surprises in "Enterprise," the New Star Trek Series

    12> Klingons are *major* pussies.

    11> "You're right, crewman Jeffries, somebody *should* build some access tubes around here!"

    10> As a result of some earlier 21st century joint ventures with a certain car company, this enterprise comes equipped with dent-resistant polymer side panels.

    9> Early attempts at encrypting transmissions to the Vulcans: Pig Latin.

    8> Dilithium crystals not discovered yet, so starships get their power from hamsters hopped up on andro.

    7> It turns out the Federation was originally an Amway distributorship.

    6> Before each episode, the entertainment industry officially apologizes for being out of ideas.

    5> Lt. Kirk sporting one nasty 'fro.

    4> Prototype transporter can only beam things ten feet at a time.

    3> That "Klingons around Uranus" joke? Still funny.

    2> Enterprise's first five-year mission? Touring with the Dead, dude!

    and Topfive.com's Number 1 Surprise in
    "Enterprise," the New Star Trek Series...

    1> The Vulcan Buttmeld.

    [ The Top 5 List www.topfive.com ]
    [ Copyright 2001 by Chris White ]

  621. Time Zones/Spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, I may be an EST guy, but I taped it and watched later, and if I saw a topic called "Enterprise Reactions?" I would ASSUME it has spoilers and NOT READ IT until I had seen the episode! Really, no-one forced you to click the link or read the posts. Geez people, are we REALLY that stupid?

  622. If You Paid Attension by avgbowler · · Score: 1

    The hull armor was a very primitive electo magnetic armor. They had to "CHARGE" it to activate it. Maybe you need to pay a little bit more attention to the details.

  623. You loosers dare call yourselves Geeks? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
    Jesus, back in my day, it was a geek's patriotic duty to bitch about plotholes and stupid, stupid, idiotic, moronic, ridiculous scripts.

    What's so awful about this isn't the wooden acting, the gratuitous sexual tension with an unreceptive hot chick and the crappy crew...

    It's instead the signal from the producers that they are prepared to dumb down Gene Rodenberry's baby by about two orders of magnitude. The real geeks among you surely saw the Simpsons episode with Poochie the dog. Here too, we see a boardroom-scripted "market-tested" series of "themes" that certain surveys revealed to be engaging to today's viewers (like Poochie was supposed to be).

    The last thing we geeks need is a sci-fi show for the lowest common denominator. Looks like we got one anyway. Enjoy your death trap, ladies!

    spork

  624. Theme Music HAS TO GO by dannyweb · · Score: 1

    That theme music was just horrible. I like the opening video, but not the audio. They need a new music guy

  625. Illogical Vulcans by remande · · Score: 2
    Zefram didn't know, and I'm assuming the Vulcans also didn't know that the humans' minds would be so emotional and unsavory to Vulcans. Perhaps the Vulcans on the team assumed that by offering skin-to-skin contact, Zefram was a member of a touch-telepathic race and wanted to communicate.


    One thing I find so...fascinating...is Vulcans' continal disappointment and surprise of Human (and only Human) emotionalism. As of Enterprise, the Vulcans have shown themselves to already be a well-traveled spacefaring race. By now they should have noticed that the other species they meet are all emotional. They certainly know how emotional they were, until their race's own savior (Surak) started preaching logic.


    Think about this. They don't understand Human psychology because it is so illogical, but they deign to tell humans about what will and will not offend the Klingons. Do they understand the Klingons better (consider: they have put a team on Earth for 90 years, and show no sign of permanent relations with the Klingon Empire) than they understand us? Are Klingons more logical than humans?


    All in all, it seems that Vulcans are friendlier towards other emotional races than they are towards humans. It seems that there is something particularly disturbing to Vulcans about Humans, and I can't see it as being our emotion. I have a suspicion that the Vulcan attitude towards Humans in Enterprise is completely illogical. Remember that Vulcans have emotions, but hold them in strict check.


    I hope that this is something Berman, et. al. have planned, rather than being some sort of mental dropout. If they have this planned, I look forward to seeing what it is about Humans that makes us particularly infuriating.

    --

    --The basis of all love is respect

  626. I'm posting too late & I'm no trekker, but... by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2

    I started watching Star Trek, the original series, in reruns around 1979-1981 (somewhere in there). I was about 8 at the time. I watched The Next Generation pretty loyally, then got bored. To keep the interest of people such as myself, I think they need to resolve the following issues.

    • As another poster mentioned, there is little "ramp up" for technology here -- transporters, which broke a few times on the original series, are already working in this prequel. Odd.
    • Humans get into a firefight, and their laser guns appear to be just as effective as the alien enemies? Huh? We're the weaker race here, and the Vulcans are witholding technology -- this should be like tanks overpowering men on horses.
    • While the original series had lots of knobs and buttons and limited computer technology, we don't have to just dump computers in this series and live with the inconsistency! There are ways to make things switch-driven and manual without having them appear to be "1960s sci-fi".
    • I loved intro images from our real-life space program. And I loved the ties to Earth at the beginning of the show, such as the "Klingot" coming from "Oklahoma". But then they're out in space and poof, we're back to generic Star Trek. I want more of Earth, more of Mars, more of our solar system.

    I think the following things were done well, and I hope they do not lose these things.

    • Raw sexuality. This is Captain Kirk being "normal" -- aliens come on to him, manipulate him, and arouse him. I liked the Jello, like the aliens with "three" and want more of it, not so much for porn as for being true to what Star Trek was about.
    • Less technobabble. When the doctor is explaining the Klingon's situation, he gets cut off: "just tell me, is he dead?" I want more tough talk. It feels accurate to the original series.
    • Tension. FINALLY. Things were too easy in the later series. Here people get excited ("tell him to be quiet" -- "SHUT UP!"). Now if we could just get them to be scared of some alien life, and intimidated a little too, there might be enough tension to be entertaining.
    • Fighting. Captain Kirk fought lizard-men. He made enemies. He killed people. It was great to see laser fights in this new show. But there also needs to be hand-to-hand combat, and anger. This is the tension (again) that made the original.

    Again, I think this is promising. I will watch next week's show. But they really need to build on the things they got right, and kill off the things they got wrong. I really think the technology issue is the biggest problem, and I really think they can get around it. Look at a modern cockpit -- half of the homes in the USA have a computer, but a cockpit is still a mess of buttons and panels. We must encourage them to be more realistic with the tech on this show.

  627. Star Trek: DSV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just waiting for Darwin the dolphin to show up.....

  628. What you liked I hated by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
    I like that the characters finally have a measure of humanity. They're occasionally noble, often shortsighted, easily amused and excited, sometimes brave, usually susceptible to blind predjudice, quarrelsome, hypocritical, and driven by baser instincts they usually dont try to understand. This is a return to the happier days of TOS when (wo)men were (wo)men and even when Kirk would give a sanctimonious speech about his / Federation ideals at the end of an episode, you could hardly forget that he spent the bulk of the episode violating almost every single one of the Federation's sacred beliefs and rules. That sort of willful inconsistency and hypocrisy is typical of almost every human who has held any sort of real power. That is how people would really act, not as the insufferable, always correct robot that was Picard / Janeway.

    Umm, fool, did you stop to consider these people weren't in a van doing bonghits? They were in the first freaking starship ever built by humans, quite possibly the most expensive device terrestrial taxpayers ever funded.

    Do you really think this is how they should have been behaving? Do you think this should go on in the bridge of an aricraft carrier? Capitain says: I know what my mission was, but I've got issues, you know, so I'll just violate orders and go chasing after something against the better judgement of experts, yes, into uncharted and probably hostile waters, but things might turn out OK and dammit, we have to try.

    I hope episode two begins with a dishonorable discharge for the whole crew, and then maybe we can start again.

  629. Re:Acting? Plotline? by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2
    The vulcan was a hissing bitch during the first half, I thought count bakula wanted to cry several time, the plot was mediocre even by the standards of the crew that brought us voyager.
    Well, considering that Archer already told her at thier first meeting he'd love to knock her on her ass, can you BLAME HER? ;-)

    And may I say that what you both just talked about is exactly what would keep people talking -- conflict that is a little more "from the gut". These people don't necessarily all like each other, although they have redeeming... uh... qualities that keep you from hating them too much. But this really does seem to be something that has been long lost in the Star Trek world, and it would be nice to have the prequel continue to rediscover what it was about the original series that turned it into a successful franchise.

  630. Re:puppies on prototype starships by Khan+Fused · · Score: 1
    I'm just curious how Archer's going to deal with having his ship come down around his ears, order his crew into P-suits to abandon ship ... then realize ... 'I left the dog!' (remembered as he's flying away, just before the warp core breaches)

    Ok, ok, I know ... easy answer. He can either be a heartless s.o.b., and write the dog off in favor of saving the rest of his crew. Or maybe ... how hard would it be to train a puppy to climb into a rescue ball? 'If you hear this noise ... climb into this ball (or hardshell case), pull the lid closed ... and wait.'

    This of course raises the next question. How do you train a dog to do this? Which ensign to you detail for this job, when shipboard duties are weighing on the captain too heavily? Which Ensign Expendable gets the joy of dealing with a panicked dog whizzing in his escape case during a zero-G drill? "Um ... Captain ... sir ... Porthos sprayed in his escape bag again ... Yes sir, the inner bag is pretty saturated. So is the hallway to escape hatch 7 -- I'm sorry sir, but he got loose from the bag and floated down the corridor ... no sir, I don't think we can find any more volunteers."

    --
    This mind intentionally left blank.
  631. Every post I've read so far . . . by Ayatollah · · Score: 1
    Goes a little something like this:

    Bitch, bitch, bitch.

    Moan, moan, moan.

    Whine, whine, whine.

    I guess I'll keep watching it.

    So, I think they have a winner. Maybe it will improve in time. I sure hope so.

  632. Re:We need to start a petition to change the theme by Sleen · · Score: 1

    There are two petitions there...its confusing.

    I think they should just have Jerry Goldsmith do the theme.

  633. Shatner singing EJ's "Rocket Man". by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    That's the one ;-D

  634. theme song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KILL THE FUCKING THEME SONG... NOW.. give me something more nextgen like, and while you're at it.. put Picard back on dammit.. :)

    Engage!
    Make it so #1.

    :(

    *awash in mixed emotions*

  635. Re:XP? by Khan+Fused · · Score: 1
    Last I heard (back in TNG days) the special effects office uses Apple gear for some of the set design/graphic design/etc... and all the Okudagrams (display screens) going back years were generated on Apple stuff

    so ... the answer ... Enterprise NX-01 uses Darwin/OS22.1!

    (Hope the Captain & Commander Tucker keeps the root password hidden.)

    --
    This mind intentionally left blank.
  636. Re:Big error in continuity. 7 ships bear name, not by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    It's just a furthur example of poor continuity.

    Someone should mod the parent up to "Insightful".

  637. Re:Big error in continuity. 7 ships bear name, not by nurightshu · · Score: 1

    If you notice the UFP registration number of Enterprise NX-01, that's the designator for an experimental naval contract. It's not considered a legitimate member of the fleet until it has a valid Naval Construction Contract (hence the NCC). So, technically, NCC-1701E is the sixth starship to bear the name.

    --
    They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
  638. Re:We need to start a petition to change the theme by compuslave · · Score: 1

    I liked it. It's better than the standard orchestral themes. It's not something I would buy, and it isn't going to make the top ten, but it's not meant to do that. It's just meant to describe and open the show, and it does a very good job of describing the mood. What isn't appropriate is the vulcan chick in the seven-of-nine costume. She's supposed to be wearing robes, but I guess the producers needed some flesh...

  639. paying it's respects to those who came before... by ledbetter · · Score: 1
    or should I say after.

    One of the things I found particularly encouraging was the use of some quirky bits of technology that haven't shown up since the original series.

    • That binocular like thing the Vulcan looks into.. just like Spock
    • The ear piece that Ensign Hoshi Sato uses, just like Uhura...
    • and my favorite, the com-link on the headboard of the bed. cause we all know how much time Kirk spent in bed!!

    I'm hoping this is indicative of a return to the simpler formula that made the original series and TNG so much better than those that followed them.

  640. Re:Pink Blood?-Holodeck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...TNG--the Wild West holodeck one--when Worf got shot. Red blood."

    Because this was a simulated enviroment. That could have been part of the programming for that episode.

  641. Re:Soft porn... yeah-admiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " For ~100 years the klingons looked like Genghis Khan, but then went back to looking like Klingons?"

    Maybe they admire him enough to emulate his apperance.

  642. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by norculf · · Score: 1

    No, but most religions would frown on that. So his thinking is that the directors are atheists. I think this is wrong, however, because not believing in a religion is not the same as atheism. (Right?)

  643. Go back and watch that episode agian. by Ruger · · Score: 1

    He started screaming when she went borg on his ass in the middle of the kiss. Hot babe or not...no one wants to get assimilated.

    Ruger

  644. they probably burnt his ship. ;) ...No way! by Ruger · · Score: 1

    I happen to know for a fact that it's safe stored in Area51.

    Ruger

  645. Bakula, Like Norris, Should Sing The Song by Kazuo · · Score: 1

    Scott Bakula should sing the opening song like Chuck Norris does with Walker Texas Ranger.

    Why don't they get Norris as a captain who'll kick some Andorian butt?

  646. Geesekind by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 2

    So when Armstrong said "one giant leap for mankind" you think he just meant us guys and that he was excluding women by not saying humankind or persons?

    Just because Strunk and White says something doesn't make it so. My copy of Webster's still defines man as "an individual human" and "the human race." That is just as authoritative as The Elements of Style is. The fact is that, like it or not, "man" still does double duty and both male gender specific AND gender neutral. Is it confusing? Yes, that is one of the many unfortunate irregularities of English. Just like "geese" does double duty as female gender specific and gender neutral for... well... geese. "Man" will probably stay that way for another hundered years or more, maybe for as long as we speak "modern" English. There has been just too much literature written that way for "personkind" to sound normal. Language experts trying to change it to be PC is even tougher than when they tried to convince American's not to say "ain't." (I was on their side, but that was a losing battle.) Or when the Soviets tried to eliminate the word for "mine" from the Russian language because it wasn't proper socialist grammer. Be grateful our language at least doesn't go around trying to give gender to inanimate objects.

    BTW, I thought one of the points of Star Trek was that it wasn't supposed to be what people of the future were like, it was about people from the present with futuristic window dressing. You know, the Romulan's were the Chicoms, the Klingon's were the Ruskies, the Federation was NATO. That was most obvious in Undiscovered Country when the Soviet Union... oh, I mean Klingons... collapsed economically and were reborn as our allies.

  647. Late but happy by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    I missed the first half hour so I'll have to wait for the rerun to even hear the theme song but I noticed it had more commercials than when NBC broadcast both Alice in Wonderland and that little people show. You didn't even get a chance to get into the plot before it faded to black and ruined your hardon thinking about rubbing gel all over Jolene. I think I may go buy a Tivo now.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  648. I like it by BlueCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I liked the theme song but breaks continuity with later treks and it doesn't really show any technological development after Cockrane's test ship and as the characters pointed out numerous times that's almost a hundred years. They have implied slow warp capable vehicles as they have been to a few other close systems.


    The DS9 tribble episode establishes that the klingons really did look the way they did so it's something that must be adressed and I honestly don't think it's that hard to come up with something though most people probably won't like it. The klingon skull is somewhat bigger so they might require a preop if they are to pose as other species in the field. It's hard not to notice a klingon. Also the new species, the Suluban, are trying to speed up evolution, why couldn't the klingons head down the same path? They are not exactly a cautious people.

    The way the Valcan's directly patronize humans is overacted. To be in character and follow the story they should be subdued like the Talons in EFC. They seem overly preoccupied with keeping humans restrained yet are quiet and unjudgemental conserning all other species.


    This was definetly a successful first contact. Unless they plan on time travel that drasticly changes history ala Dallas(old drama show in the 80's) which I doubt it is inconsistent with the few references to first contact with the Klingons.


    I'm looking forward to ten years from now when this series dies and TOS will be revamped to update the effects, makeup, and ships. The sets were all neutral colored so it should be quite possible to update the TOS enterprise to better match the ST Movies. They might even be able to repair some trivial ST history that they are bound to mess up with this series. It would certainly be neat to see TOS with a ship and sets like this series. They could ironically update the tribble episode so that we get to see the tribble episode such that we see glimpses of the DS9 cast.

  649. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

    No, but most religions would frown on that. So his thinking is that the directors are atheists. I think this is wrong, however, because not believing in a religion is not the same as atheism. (Right?)

    Ragardless, lots 'adult' film stars conder themselves to be religious and lots of productions are backed by religious people.

    Us Athiests have enough problems as it is, with the president claiming we're not real citizens and all, so I just don't like porn getting blamed on us too.

    --
    ___
    The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  650. Re:We need to start a petition to change the theme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the current theme is on the right track with contemporary music, but chose a really bad song. If a petition works, I'll sign it.

    Well, in order to start a revolution, you need more than a critique of a bad idea. You need a good idea, and proof it would work.

    I took the song "Wherever You Will Go," by The Calling - the rock song used in the promos - and spliced it to fit over the opening credits (which I found online).

    I think it works. It flows better, has a better theme and fits the show's message (though, admittedly, less than the current theme).

    Here's the link...

    http://community.middlebury.edu/~vrengana/Open.m pg

    Enjoy.

  651. Re:... What? ME Worry? by unikron · · Score: 1

    No, I am refferring to a very particular clone of Alfred who is also referred (for _political_ correct reasons) Alfred E. Newman (didn't you do the maths already?)

    - Panos

  652. If Rod Stewart's going to be there, I'm not. by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 1

    God that is the worst theme song of any TV series ever. Worse than "Alf". Worse than "Diffr'nt Strokes". Worse than "Oprah".

    --
    All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  653. In defence of Ms. Blalock by Niscenus · · Score: 1

    First off, Maxim can hardly be considered a good magazine. Personally, I figure any magazine that has over 20% of its general use space dedicated to advertisements is a rather questionable as a source of useful information.

    Secondly, Maxim is selling Ms. Blalock as a "midrif." Midrif's are unreal media-formed identities of young females who are obsessed with their appearance and how people think of them, use their sexuality as a tool and are constantly attempting to establish their individual identity while remaining in the mainstream. Her willingness to pose for the pictures is just part of getting herself out there; an unknown actress or actor, even one that has a set of projects, has an insecure future. By willingly posing for the pictures and doing the interview, she gets knowledge of herself out there, as well as knowledge of anything she's involved in, from Enterprise to Green Peace.

    Considering this, you might ask what it is you can tell? Well, she's willing to cater to the popular market, hence the photos. She's not that verbose, but she is very candid, so much so, she tells us the she once previously used drugs. She likes active outdoor activities, especially water-related sports. Now, it's too easy to be presumptious about "She's a whirlwind;" however, if nothing else, she is once again being candid.

    Try to keep an open mind and read between the lines, or else you may end up yelling at a mother who's just trying ween her child off of methane dioxide gas.

    --
    "Yeah...it was the numbers that were irrational, not the murderous cult of vegetarians...." -- Hippasus of Metapontum
  654. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by timbck2 · · Score: 1

    >So, none of us are heterosexual? 100% aren't heterosexual = 0% are heterosexual.

    Your logic is flawed. ;-)

    --
    Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  655. Star Dreck: The First Degeneration by JMYoda · · Score: 1, Informative

    It was WEAK. VERY WEAK. 7of... I mean T'Pol sucks. She doesn't even lick the shoes of Spock, Sarek and both Savek's. She's another actress cast for her looks and T&A factor to please the undersexed fanboys. I found her acting phony...

    In fact I just find everything about her phony, just as I did with Jeri Ryan. The scene with her and Tucker in their undies bordered on soft porn with all those close-ups and her hard nipples poking through the t-shirt.. And Tucker was as hard as a sailor on sore leave. Not that there's anything wrong with soft porn, just seems a tasteless attempt to boost ratings to me.

    Archer is a Kirk wannabe. He has the double-fisted action hero quality but I saw no signs of Kirk's intelligence or cleverness. Have to wait and see on that.

    Tucker is a Bones wannabe. A down home guy who's best buds with the Captain and is ready to shoot of his mouth with an extreme opinion in any given situation. Oh but he's the Chief Engineer not a Doctor. Wow Now THATS innovation! :p

    Mayweather and Reed seemed generic. Nothing (yet) to distinguish either.

    The "second hand, third hand" joke is almost as old as Star Trek itself. Heck it was done VISUALLY in Total Recall....

    Now I know it's been said but the ship just looks way too 24th Century. They turned a Akira class upside down and gave it TOS narcells... And that makes it retro?

    The Good stuff: I like the other ships such as the shuttles and all, the costumes are OK and the sets are outstanding. The FX are excellent for the most part.

    I liked Hoshi and Phlox.

    Hoshi seems cute and intelligent and I liked how Linda Park played her. Having her be very paranoid about space travel is fun.

    I had worried Phlox would be "Dr. Neelix" but he's not annoying, in fact I found him quite funny and disarming.

    However that put aside its basically Generic TV sci-fi, so generic it feels spit out by a computer. It also doesn't feel very Trek either, less so then Ds9 or Voyager.

    The crummy pop song as the theme doesn't help that either. I had hoped for a stirring theme. A new theme by Goldsmith or perhaps the theme from Generations by Dennis McCarthy would have been much better. Instead we get a generic pop tune for a generic show...

    Basically the show reminds me of some women I've dated, nice to look at but not an original thought in its head. Just the fact that they decided not to do a sequel series shows they had no fresh ideas. It also detracts from the feeling of adventure. Sure Archer and co. don't know where they're going but WE the audience do.

    Basically I think it's an attempt to appeal to today's audience to save the franchise. Heck the first season of Voyager was much better. Of course I'm only going on the pilot (which I actually liked on paper.) So I do plan to watch it a few times more to see if it improves, but it doesn't look good to me right now. First the X-Files falls apart, now this...

    --
    "The human mind's ability to rationalize its own shortcomings into virtues is unlimited." - Robert A. Heinlein
  656. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by ncstockguy · · Score: 1

    The Vulcan chick has possibilities. The configuration of her hull reminds me of a recent favorite..can we say Seven of Nine?
    Hmmm as a matter of fact maybe Seven of Nine could do a guest shot via time travel..ya know...a glimpse of the future both good and bad?

  657. yes by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    "For reference, do you also consider the complaints in other threads of redneck stereotyping"

    Yes, I do consider that to be whining. There are plenty of shotgun toting redneck farmers, just as there are plenty of cases where there are mostly white people (and no gays) in any given place...

    Perhaps the creators of the show just picked the best people for the job and were unconcerned with "affirmative action"-type bullshit.

    FWIW, I am no bigot and have absolutely no tolerance for bigotry. However, I also have absolutely no tolerance for people who actively look for bigotry in every little thing forcing people to be wary of who they choose for a job, etc for fear of presenting the appearance of the slightest miniscule possibility of being a bigot.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:yes by then,+it+was+nigh · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the creators of the show just picked the best people for the job and were unconcerned with "affirmative action"-type bullshit.

      Mm. Note the implicit assumptions being smuggled in here: that it is reasonable to expect that "the best people for the job" will be mostly white males (rather than being uncorrelated with race and sex, as a non-racist, non-sexist person would expect), and thereby reasonable to assume that if the cast actually does bear some passing resemblance to the actual make-up of the population, it's probably the result of "'affirmative action'-type bullshit".

      No, you're certainly not a bigot. What could I have been thinking?

      --
      sed 's/In Soviet Russia/In NSA America/g' < yakov-smirnoff-jokes.txt
  658. Pon Far! by Astart� · · Score: 1

    I am totally looking forward to the Pon Far episode!

  659. NX-01 not a legitimate starship. I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you notice the UFP registration number of Enterprise NX-01, that's the designator for an experimental naval contract. It's not considered a legitimate member of the fleet until it has a valid Naval Construction Contract (hence the NCC). So, technically, NCC-1701E is the sixth starship to bear the name.
    Ahhh, so the NX-01 ain't even a bona-fide starship, eh? Everything else about the show is a ripoff of the true spirit of the Star Trek saga, so even this travesty shouldn't come as a surprise.

  660. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by cramped+bowels · · Score: 1

    And I was waiting for Robert Urich :-}

  661. Klingon Ridges by damien+champagne · · Score: 1
    I thought that the official explanation was that each "clan" had different types of ridges and some just don't have any. I think I read that in an official Trek book, wish I could remember what it was. It's possible that it created a caste system where some clans are lower than others because of the pattern (or lack thereof)...

    Am I the only one who's read this or is it my imagination? It's the best explanation out there, IMO

  662. Re:Wasn't that... (SPOILER!) by cramped+bowels · · Score: 1

    Yep, he's also the voice of Eddie the Squirell on "CatDog"

  663. Re:We need to start a petition to change the theme by way2muchsense · · Score: 1

    The theme should be pared down to about half it's current length. Perhaps a SHORTER montage of former ships named Enterprise with the NX-01 leaving spacedock at the end. The music has to go. I nominate Fire On High by the Electric Light Orchestra (New World Record - 1975).

  664. You're one season off. by zestymonkey · · Score: 1
    showing off my Trek-geekiness...

    While I can't explain why "The Naked Now" was produced, I do recall that the first season of TNG was largely written in 1997, several months before the writer's strike.

    The second season of TNG was hamstrung by the writer's strike. It contains four less episodes (hours) than any other TNG season, which always ran with 26 and it started in late October. The first episode of this season, "The Child" was taken directly from an episode written years before for the failed Star Trek: Phase II sequel series. I believe a few more episodes in that season were rehashes from Phase II scripts. And we all cringe as we remember the miserable "Shades of Grey" re-hash episode that capped off this phenomenally marginal second season.

    Fortunately, TNG finally started to find its footing in the following third season.

    --

    return;
  665. Star Trek Movies by OtayButtWeet · · Score: 1

    Are they ever going to make any more Star Trek Movies?

  666. Some theremin notes by divbyzero · · Score: 1
    • The theremin was only arguably "futuristic" in the 1970s, considering the instrument was invented in the 1930s.
    • A theremin can vary in frequency from subsonic to supersonic range.
    • Although the simplest theremins produce a pure sine wave, the originals by Termin himself had a more complex timbre with multiple overtones. Modern ones, such as those from Big Briar (Robert Moog's current company) are adjustable.
    • A theremin was indeed the instrument used on Good Vibrations, but I can't vouch for the ST:TOS theme.
    • I agree, the buggers are very difficult to play!
    --
    But my grandest creation, as history will tell,
    Was Firefrorefiddle, the Fiend of the Fell.
  667. A few comparisons... by MrRoarke · · Score: 1

    Listen, I just want to make a comment to people who keep saying "get a life" and "don't nitpick the show". Let's take a look at a few series on TV, both currently, and in the recent past:

    Seinfeld: The continuity episode to episode was critical to the humor, much of which came from in-jokes about previous episodes. George purchases inexpensive wedding invitation envelopes and the seal poisons his fiancee to death. He then is put on the board to distribute the foundation put in her name, and the majority of the humor in those scenes is funny because the audience knows what has happened. Ignoring First Contact continuity is equivalent of in the final episode of Seinfeld, having the police dredge the local sewer and find the wreckage of George's fiancee's car and her body.

    Frasier: Quite similar - a sequel series to Cheers. The viewers know that during the run of Cheers, Frasier was married to Lilith. Casually mentioning Frasier's carefree bachelor days of the same time period he was married to Lilith on Cheers would be the same thing, and I'm SURE viewers would be pissed.

    ER: One of the nurses on ER who is no longer on the series had HIV, which she got from her ex-husband. I would say this is a pretty major thing for anyone, which of course is why it was on the show. If she was brought back onto the show and was telling everyone about how her HIV was contracted when she shared her drug needles, people would be confused, and would probably be pissed off.

    So here we have Star Trek. Picard is abducted by the Borg and turned into Locutus, then transformed back into Picard by the crew. Yes, he has problems with it, and they spend a good amount of time of two episodes dealing with this fact. Picard visits his brother and has quite an emotional time of things. Yet, during all this time, nothing is mentioned of a Borg Queen, and whomp we go through 4 more seasons of TNG. Two movies later, we only then find out about this Borg Queen?

    When you watch a series and actually use your BRAIN, you remember things. I remember things in life, but life generally doesn't contradict itself. A few months ago, I watched the episode of TOS, the one where the Romulans come back to the federation after 100 years of self-imposed exile behind the Neutral Zone. A good amount of exposition is spent on discussing the Earth-Romulan war, and how it was fought with nuclear weapons.

    This places the war right smack in the middle of Star Trek: Enterprise. This could NOT have been an accident, and I expect full well to see it come to pass... just like the Clone Wars in the Star Wars universe. If they ignore it, we will all be pissed.

    Am I an idiot because I remember there's supposed to be a war? Football fans remember the statistics of all their players and even play fantasy football leagues using the stats. I don't fully understand THAT, but I don't make fun of it. We all have our things we enjoy doing.

    That's my say. Flame me if you wish.

    Greg Chance

  668. Re:Big error in continuity. 7 ships bear name, not by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
    Not only that, but last week here in the U.K. they had a 35th Anniversary Star Trek Night, which included a reshowing of "Trials and Tribble-ations", which included roughly the following - now very amusing - dialogue, taking place in Sisko's office at the start of the show:

    Time cop guy:"WHICH Enterprise?"
    Sisko: "The first - Constitution class."
    Time cop guy:(disgustedly)"Kirk's ship!"

    Oh well, talk about shooting yourself in the foot...

  669. Re:Big error in continuity. 7 ships bear name, not by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
    Actually, I suppose ONE way out of the problem would be for the final episode of this new show (probably seven years hence, our time) to have some classic Braga-esque time-anomaly wank happen that erases it completely out of Star Fleet history, thus making Kirk's ship the first one after all...

    Trouble is, I think that would be even worse...

  670. Re:We need to start a petition to change the theme by dprust · · Score: 1

    I remember cringing when I first heard it. Then the second time, it was okay. It was the initial shock; the expectation of the orchestral snore-music that got me. I thought, "Here they are, blowing it right away." Then, I watched it again because the episode was so fantastic, and I thought, "Ya know what, that isn't bad!"

  671. re: And what's with the hard body parts? by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

    I volunteer to be T'Pol's (that looks funny with the possesive, doesn't it?) personal decon gel applicator-guy for the run of the series. You think they'd go for it??

    --
    slashdot: A failed experiment.
  672. Pertinent, real sex scenes by FrankHaynes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Boy! I found only one other poster at score: 2 or above who didn't act like a preacher about this non-sex scene.

    You want pertinent? I'll give you pertinent: Humans love to have sex and do warm, fun, fuzzy things with each other. It would have been *very* pertinent if Tucker had taken some gel in his hands, gotten all hot and bothered and grabbed Vulcan-babe for a good old-fashioned Kirk-style throat examination with his tongue.

    Her reaction would have been interesting to watch, and would have instantly developed a tense sub-plot in the midst of the greater tension of the Captain's absence.

    The surprise when she suddenly was swayed by her erstwhile lover's insistence to press on to Kronos instead of returning to Earth would have brought the house down under these more tense circumstances and raised questions about her ability to suppress those base emotions that Vulcans hate--er, eschew--so much.

    --
    slashdot: A failed experiment.
  673. lunacy by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    I made no such claims at all! Where the fuck did you get that? Just like I said, YOU are looking as hard as possible for anything that might even have the remote possibility of maybe perhaps in some small way be a sign of bigotry. Sir, you need to embrace reality.

    Perhaps, just maybe, there were mostly white people who tried out for the parts on the show. Who knows, you certainly don't, so maybe you should just STFU for now.

    The original series had a diverse cast on purpose, to further a good cause. In the shows that followed, the best people were chosen for the job, except Voyager where perhaps Janeway was specifically cast because they wanted a female captain.

    I'm not a bigot, I was raised without even realizing there was tension among races in this country. You probably don't believe that though, because I don't personally go looking for bigotry in ever detail of everything.

    "Mm. Note the implicit assumptions being smuggled in here: that it is reasonable to expect that "the best people for the job" will be mostly white males (rather than being uncorrelated with race and sex"

    Wow, you're really, really trying hard to label me a bigot for disagreeing with you on this, but you've ended up just pulling stupid shit out of your ass.

    This conversation, is over.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:lunacy by then,+it+was+nigh · · Score: 1

      I made no such claims at all!

      Not out loud, no, but it was hard to miss. It could be a "forest for the trees" sort of thing; these assumptions may well be so deeply ingrained that you don't even see them anymore.

      Where the fuck did you get that?

      From your own words, sir. Why else, for instance, offer "maybe they just picked the best people for the job" as an explanation for "mostly white males" unless you believed that "best people for the job" did explain "mostly white males" --- in other words, that the "best people for the job" would be mostly white males? The statement makes no sense any other way.

      Perhaps, just maybe, there were mostly white people who tried out for the parts on the show.

      Again, why would there be a correlation between race/gender and interest in the parts? Now, it's plausible that there was a correlation between race/gender and people available for the parts; that would be just another symptom of the problem you so strenuously deny exists.

      [...] except Voyager where perhaps Janeway was specifically cast because they wanted a female captain.

      Case in point again. You didn't even consider the possibility that Mulgrew was hired because she was the best person for the job. No, it must have been "'affirmative action'-type bullshit".

      I'm not a bigot, I was raised without even realizing there was tension among races in this country.

      Exactly. You were raised with the assumption that there was no problem, so when the problem is pointed out to you, you can't see it.

      Sir, you need to embrace reality.

      The words "pot", "kettle" and "black" spring to mind for no obvious reason.

      --
      sed 's/In Soviet Russia/In NSA America/g' < yakov-smirnoff-jokes.txt
  674. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by norculf · · Score: 1

    Us Athiests have enough problems as it is, with the president claiming we're not real citizens and all...

    Are you serious? He said that? That reminded me of Catch-22 (teh book by Joseph Heller). Quote (Chapter 19, Page 203 in my copy):

    Colonel Cathcart stopped in his tracks. "What atheists?" he bellowed defensively, his whole manner changing in a flash to one of virtuous and belligerent denial. "There are no atheists in my outfit! Atheism is against the law, isn't it?"
    "No sir."
    "Isn't it?" The colonel was suprised. "Then it's un-American, isn't it??"
    "I'm not sure, sir," answered the chaplain.
    "Well, I am!" the colonel declared. "I'm not going to disrupt our religious services just to accommodate a bunch of lousy atheists. They're getting no special privileges from me. They can stay right where they are and pray with the rest of us. And what's all this about enlistd men? Just how the hell do they get into this act?"
    The chaplain felt his face flush. "I'm sorry sir. I just assumed you would want the enlisted men to be present, since they would be going along on the same mission."
    "Well, I don't. They've got a God and a chaplain of their own, haven't they?"
    "No sir."
    "What are you talking about? You mean they pray to the same God we do?"
    "Yes, sir."
    "And He listens?"
    "I think so sir."
    "Well, I'll be damned," remarked the colonel, and he snorted to himself in quizzical amusement.


    I don't think he needs people drawing parallels between him and Colonel Cathcart. If you read the book, you know what I mean. If you haven't, you probably have an idea from reading all of that. You should also go read it...

  675. Curses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gimme a break. The VT52 is long gone. It's time to stop using Curses and target a GUI.

  676. Re:We need to start a petition to change the theme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we could get Paramount to hire Lalo Schifrin ?
    This would be something diffrent plus he is a
    real maestro !!!!

    Bring on some cool jazzy Big-Band sounds for a change .

    Or, at least cut the guy singin the song.
    maybe use the same song as a guitar-instrumental Version instead !

  677. Oh come on! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Everybody knows this (unless they are very silly), but its amusing to try and se IF we can come up with a retcon that would actually make sense given the context. Of course I've yet to see such an explanation, but who knows, perhaps one day :o)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  678. Jupp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought so to..no really, I did, I swear. Tomtar på loftet.

  679. This will go into the hof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if I so have to post 3 more comments goddammit

    1. Re:This will go into the hof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe..good idea :)

    2. Re:This will go into the hof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly people...

  680. My reaction to Enterprise by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    The missing scene from episode 1 of Enterprise.

    Scene: After the Archer and Tucker watch the new Vulcan science officer leave the room in disgust of the dog. Al appears.

    Al: SAM! SAM! Ziggy says there's a 50% of improving your relationship with her and having dinner and a night cap!

    Archer: Hows that Al?

    Al: Ziggy says that in order for you to have (hand jesture)"Breakfast" with her the next morning. You need to beam the dog off the ship.

    Archer: Well the transporters arn't 100%, but that will improve my relationship?

    Al: Yeah, you improve the relationship and then you leap out!

    Archer: Is that before or after breakfast when I leap out?

    Al: I dunno.

    Archer: DAMN! Do I chance it? (Eye's up the dog)

    Al: Ziggy says there is a 0.1x10^(-30 billion)% chance if the dog stays.

    Tucker (Concerned about why Captain Archer appears to be talking to a bulkhead): You ok Captain?

    Dog (Eyes up Al's leg): Woof!

    Somebody clone Gene Roddenberry so we can have Star Trek with more meaning to go with the T&A.
    The Vulcan reminds me of 7 of 9 w/out the implants. The ship looks good, but too Next Generation'ish and needs to be set to atleast ST original or earlier from the artwork thats been out there, to late for that now though.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  681. I haven't seen it yet... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    ... I hope to catch it when it's run tomorrow.

    IMO, ST:TNG was the best show in the entire franchise, but not until about the third season. Most of the first season sucked on toast, in retrospect (though at the time it was just cool to have new Star Trek to watch).

    Any show that's worth it will take a while to develop. You can tell a complete stinker pretty easily, but the difference between a watchable show and a great show isn't immediately obvious (i.e., you can judge episodes obviously, but if the premiere is "OK" or "pretty good" or "so-so", then it's still quite possible that the show will turn out to be excellent).

    I just hope that the folks behind this show realize that there have been around five hundred episodes of Star Trek and they pretty much ran out of new ideas after about 150-200. I personally got bored with Voyager and punted the last few seasons.

    I'd like to what "Enterprise", but I sure don't want to see the same "aliens have taken over the ship in some ludicrously easy way" or "Officer X has been kidnapped" or "Regardless of how dramatic the plot tries to be you always know it will end exactly back at the status quo ante."

    I do know one thing from the pictures I've seen... they definitely are sticking to the "Seven of Nine" formula. Let's hope that character is more than just eye-candy (Seven of Nine _was_ a very interesting character, for a while...).

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  682. Romulan/Vulcan tech questions by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    In the "Rihannsu" way, The Travelers who left Vulcan suffered so much and had so many losses, by the time they settled on the twin worlds of Romulus, they were down to so few that they had to make hard choices on how to set up their new home and what to keep. Ultimately like many SF colonists on hard times, they lost the bulk of their technology, and had to rebuild from scratch. That's a plausible scenario, especially if you consider that the forebears of the Romulans might have been the headstrong types who leaped before they looked and were too proud to ask their Vulcan relatives for help when things got tough.

    As for apparant lack of Vulcan progress that's easy. They're long-lived and hew straight to a logical line, that means above all, compared to humans they're careful and deliberate, less prone to go into the wild tangents that are the frequent source of those "Eureka!" moments. So it's not surprising that their pace of technological change is much slower than that of humans or that humans would catch up and surpass quickly once given the chance.

    I'm not even going to try to figure out how the TOS Romulans got around without the Klingon star drive technology.

    Personal semi-rant. I was half-hoping that Archer would use Pike's term "Hyper-drive" instead of warp, but I guess that would have created a "branding" issue. :)

  683. Re:Big error in continuity. 7 ships bear name, not by Shadowmist · · Score: 1


    This one is a no-brainer. The NCC-1701 was the first FEDERATION Starship commissioned as Enterprise, a Federation ship as opposed to be strictly an Earth ship like the NX-01. The NX-01 wasn't counted for the same reason that the US Navy ships or the non-flying space shuttle aren't on the list, none of the above were ships of the Federation unlike April/Pike/Kirk's ship.

  684. Nice try but.... by Shadowmist · · Score: 1


    We had all three Klingon baddies from the original series show up in DS9 episodes brow-ridged and all. For those of you wondering about Worf's comment about the differing appearance of the Klingons on K-7, wonder more about what he called Kor's great victory on Organia.

    As to the ridges vs. the non-ridges, either deal with it, or better yet, ignore it. If it had continuity it wouldn't be Trek!

  685. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Rix · · Score: 1

    not believing in a religion is not the same as atheism. (Right?)

    Wrong, basically. A (lack of) theism (belief in the existence of a god or gods).

  686. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by Pooua · · Score: 1
    I don't see the athiest connection here at all. Is posing nude considered 'Athiest'?

    I wasn't referring *only* to nude movie scenes, though my wording probably didn't make that clear. With Star Trek, I wouldn't have thought that I would need to make it clear. The franchise repeatedly does questionable things (from a religious perspective). That would not mean so much, if not for the knowledge that Roddenbury was, if not atheistic, at least humanistic. It would be a simple matter to make a long list of Star Trek episodes that cast religion in a questionable light, beginning with some of the first episodes, until the most recent. Why, just tonight, I watched Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, whose plot centered around a Vulcan who attempts to find God, only to find that the entity claiming to be God (and identified by Spock's brother--and by the credits list--as God) is really an imprisoned, vengeful, cruel being who zaps anyone who doubts him. However, what called all this to mind in this instance was recalling the specific films in which the actresses had appeared nude. It wasn't just that they had appeared nude that tipped me off as to their atheistic leanings; it was the films, themselves, in which they had appeared. None of these people are angels.

    I suspect that one reason that Star Trek scripts are so lackluster and contrived is the sufficating atmosphere inherent to secular humanism. It obviously isn't very difficult to put all kinds of fancy gizmos into a film; what is difficult is having a message worth delivering.

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  687. Alien finds Earth food normal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the things that surprised me was the Doctor saying that Earth is very interesting and different, especially Chinese food. Does anyone else find that strange? To an alien, all of Earth's foods should be change. Like Joey of Friends said once about Chinese food: "In China, it's just called 'food'!"

    I just thought it was very weird for an alien to find Chinese food weirder than all the other foods on a planet that is alien to him.

  688. Enterprise reactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More Trek less Drek!
    A thought occurred to me while watching Enterprise, no human could have written this. Enterprise must have been written by computer! Some secret monolithic supercomputer like HAL 9000 must be churning out script after script based on everything that has come before in the Star Trek universe sort of mashed together with plots from General Hospital. Or perhaps some of his less sophisticated brethren say, a cluster of X86 PCs or something. But no, it must have been the stable of "I wanna write a cool SCI-FI novel but I'm stuck writing schlock for Paramount at 60 cents a word!" gang. HAL's characters would have been MUCH more imaginative and polite! "I'm sorry Captain Archer, this series serves no useful purpose. The engines must explode in 5 seconds, 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - (BOOM)."

    OK, neat Idea! Lets show the early days of Starfleet and the creation of the Federation. How does "Enterprise" fulfill this? Frankly it doesn't. Enterprise is just a Voyager clone which was a meld of Lost in Space set to Deep Space 9 which was a less mobile clone of Next-Gen which is a late 80s port of a bunch of Star Trek movies which were themselves based on Star Trek of the late 1960s- get the idea kiddies? You cannot echo something endlessly and keep it fresh and original. Star Trek itself was based on the Hornblower stories of CS Forrester with a little bit of Rawhide tossed in for good measure. Star Trek was fresh and original for it's time, especially since it's only competition was the excrusiatingly-bad-unless-you-are-under-the-age-of -4- Lost in Space, well into it's 2nd season and just about to get into it's talking carrot period.

    The point is that the military ship discovering exotic and alien settings has been done, and done and done.. just by Paramount alone. It's not interesting any more - leave it alone. Good grief did anyone over in that Star Drek boiler-room even SEE Babylon 5? Are any of those folks aware of Buffy? Does Earth Two ring a bell? How about Earth Final Conflict? OK, so not all of these are exactly memorable but they were original in the same that Star Trek was for it's time and exactly the way Enterprise is not.

    On this new Good-Ship-Loly- pop we find. A rather cheeky Captain who doesn't seem to be too interested in taking orders. If'n I were some admiral in Star Fleet I would have this bloke doing nothing more risky than counting cans of non-skid. But, interstellar diplomat to a bunch of knobby headed aliens with their own STAR EMPIRE??? Are you high? Or, how about the surly Vulcan who just happens to be holding the "babe" spot on the ship. Or what about the "screamer-translator" who is keeping Uhura's role alive? ("Captain, I'm frightened AHH do you think this ship is safe? EEEEK that's a mouse!"). Add to this a bunch of wussy collage boys and a dog...A DOG for gosh sake! And the cap TALKS TO THE DOG for plot exposition (AGGGGGG!) "Hey Fido, do you think I should blow those aliens away or be nice to them?.....pee on their leg? Hmmmm..."

    And, what's this? The Earth contacted the Klingons right off the bat? Anyone remember that the Klingons were the bad guys in the original Star Trek? "Think of the Mongol Horde with spaceships and ray guns" wrote David Gerald in one of his books. I guess Archer and his buds better high-tail it home and start building weapons because the Klingons have a huge head-start in the space warfare department and THEY aren't going to think twice about blasting old Earth, just four days away at warp 4. Spain did this job in the new world with a boatload of out of work solders and it took them almost a year to get there- ONE WAY!

    How about this "Neptune and back in six minutes!" comment or the "I can get the Klingon back home in 4.5 days". Now, Neptune is something like 4,312,000,000,000 KM from Earth or 32-29 Astronomical Units. Lets see, a light year is about 63240 AUs, a trip to Neptune takes 3 minutes at warp 4.5 or so - (OK I'm implying that they were talking about the ships top speed). The Klingon home world was said to be 4.5 days away which strangely enough is exactly the time it would take the Enterprise, at (I'm assuming) warp 4.5 to get to uh, .Proxima Centauri!!!! This means that the Klingons whom we are told have this honker of a star empire are in fact right around the corner! Surprise! Bet this is a surprise to the writers as well. Actually, the ship should get to Proxima much faster as warp 4.5 should be something like 18 times the speed of light according to classic Star Trek cannon. That would make the Klingon world about 5,122,440 AUs away or 81 light years. Little better me-thinks. But why be impressed with a little puddle jump like Neptune? (OK so I'm a big fat geek -SHUT UP!)

    This brings me to bad writing and the single reason why I pretty much stopped watching Star Trek about half way through DS9. Very simply, the writing is just awful! The plots tend to plod along, suspended only by incessant techno-babble. It's also full of people having sex with aliens, (about as likely as someone having sex with a dolphin and don't tell me, I know that some people do! (yick)). I'm sorry but, a species that evolved on a different planet would probubly find it very difficult to communicate easy concepts like "food go here!" Deep personal relationships between aliens are unlikely and would probably be pretty messy ("you eat WHAT after intercourse?). Remember the Centauri on Babylon 5? Look like humans, act like humans, (sort of) but have 6 set of genitalia each. Make love to one? Flipper would be preferable! And on B5 those folks were the CLOSEST race to the humans. The BO of some of the aliens on that station could kill. Makes one wonder why they had them around at all and oh ya, they have ray guns and spacecraft too.

    "But, deep personal relationships are what the viewing public wants" intones the moguls at Paramount. No, what the public wants is novelty, pure and simple. Interspecies relationships were explored in that other Star Trek TV show, you know back in the 1960s! If they wanted deep personal relationships than they would tune into endless reruns of Little House on the Prairie or 30-Something which would be 50-something by now. The people who grew up on Star Trek in the 1960s also grew up on the works of Clark, Asimov Heinlein, Herbert, and a host of others. HEY! many of the original Star Trek scripts were written by PUBLISHED SCIENCE FICTION WRITERS!!! Well-known people like Larry Niven wrote several of the animated shows even!

    Might this be clue to Paramount? Star Trek is still fun to watch even 30 years later. Can anyone say that about Voyager? I bet no one will say this about Enterprise in 2032! Perhaps it's time to ditch the Star Trek writers stable or take the Star Trek Insta-plot program (tm) off line and seek some talented writers for a change.

    Is that too much to ask boys and girls? I guess it is!

    Gee_Pee

    September 27 2001

  689. Voyager devolved? by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, but to me it seemed to s#ck from the word "engage".

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  690. Bite your tongue! by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    "The series could have revolved around Wesley Crusher."

    Jesus Christ, man, are you daft?! What if a network exec sees that post and thinks "hmm...". I'm all for free speech, but I'd have been happier if you'd indulged you love of pain by yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.

    Chalk it up to experience, and don't do that again!

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  691. err...not in this context, no by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    You have to admit that in context with the camera angles and pauses and whatnot, the overall effect was not entirely platonic. There is a reason, you know, that Tucker and T'Pol were arguing while scantily clad in a very cold decon room, as opposed to in the corridor or a briefing room.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:err...not in this context, no by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      What does a five year old know about context? Mommy, what are they doing?
      They're putting medicine on each other. Oh. What are those bumps on that lady's boobs?
      They're her nipples. She's probably cold. Or is your kid too insulated from the world to know what bodyparts are what and what effect weather has on them?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  692. Touche by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    You're right. I retract my earlier comment. Can you tell I have no actual parenting experience?

    Thank you for correcting my ignorance.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:Touche by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      I'll assume you're being serious. I've got two daughters, a third due in 16 days. The first thing you lose, when you have a child, is modesty. Your kids will only learn what you teach them. If you teach them that vaginas and breasts are naughty and dirty, they'll grow up ashamed and scared of them. If you teach them that vaginas are body parts that pee comes out of, and breasts are squishy bits that girls have, and that mommy uses to feed the new baby, that's what they'll grow up thinking. They'll figure out the sexual parts when the time comes; puberty or whenever they're ready. Now, obviously I'm not advocating showing them hard core porn; but they're more than capable of understanding that kissing is something mommies and daddies who love each other do, and so on. Any sexual content they'll see on a day to day basis will go right over their heads. And that which doesn't, explain to them.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  693. Re:We need to start a petition to change the theme by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

    Wow, that worked really well...excellent job. Send that to Paramount!

  694. Re:The Vulcan Chick - Link by FordPrfct · · Score: 1

    Hm. This late in the discussion, I doubt anybody will ever see this, but he was right. Belief in the the existence of god(s) or goddess(es) is not the same as a belief in a religion. A religion is typically a collection of beliefs and practices, to which a particular group adheres. It is certainly possible to believe in dieties and spirituality, without subscribing to a pre-formed set of ideas.

    This is something like saying that if you are not part of a bowling league, then you aren't actually bowling.

    --
    This signature carefully hand-crafted from recycled electrons.
  695. 1689 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    comments that is.

    certainly not the year, if that is what you thought i may have been talking about.