Who? who goes to Jail? the shareholders? the majority shareholder? the CEO? the Lawyer? The Engineer?
It's a corporation, they understand money. Fine them 250 pounds per impacted TV. Give them 30 days to enable preexisting feature or fine them again. It will solve this problem, and it will mean other competitors won't do it.
Putting people in jail for this is a waste of time, money, jail space ad will accomplish very little.
to break feature the preexisted the new firmware update should not be allowed. Maybe a fine off 200 dollars per TV they disabled. They should put the policy up front, and if people decline they just don't get any new features, just bug(manufacture defects) fixes.
"The English language is fluid and ever changing." Stop and ask yourself why that is? IT's because there was little communication, no standards, libraries where not widely available or well stocked. So changes happened. We are no longer isolated. We have the internet. SO there is no need for language to change due to ignorance.
"who are you or I to say that it is wrong?" smart people who don't want ignorance to dictate how we speak.
no. It's not the stupid ages when each city and community had little communication with each other, so changes happened. We live in the age of the internet. Their is no longer a reason to let ignorance dictate changes in meaning.
You can NOT have competition without regulation. What you have is a single monopoly. This isn't selling 10 dollar t-shirts, it's infrastructure. How do you propose the market would solve thins? how would you want to ahve everyone who want to compete to have to dig up your yard and street?
You idea is foolish and naive at best. It flies in the face of history. There has NEVER been a similar situation that when unregulated goes well fore the consumer. Read more history and less Fox.
TO anyone who has read the history of the markets, you statement look stupid.. no not stupid, fucking stupid.
I know far too many adults who saw it when it came out, in 77's, and still disliked the prequals. They where boring, and the parts that weren't boring where poorly done.
There are many. many reason they are bad movies AND bad SW prequels. Manly he made everyone so damn stupid. Jar - Jar was close to being a great character. if he toned it down a little, and if has accident that save the day were intentionally done. That would have made him the smart outsider, instead of the Trix Rabbit.
"Star Wars movies were great because we saw them when we were 13 years old, and they were filmed to appeal to 13 year olds."
they where great for all ages because thy where ground breaking. They won academy awards, the first run was months, adults where lining up and waiting hours.
In 1970s, no one spent millions making a movie for 13 year olds.
I've seen picture of Chinese floating lanterns which are clearly 50 feet away(reference point: trees) and people say it' a UFO miles away. At least they stopped when I pointed out the hard to see marking on the lantern oh, no they didn't they called me names and went out about the 'truth'.
"According to eyewitness testimonial, sighting was with clear, blue, cloudless skies, no aircraft in sight, altitude unknown but definitely above airliner cruising altitude."
So no reference but thew new the altitude? The testimony is worth exactly nothing. This is a common problem with 'UFO seekers' they have no idea that they can't actual give a distance with any accuracy without reference.. So the 'distance' they see something is set at whatever the bias of the viewer wants it to be.
The person who took the video refuses to believe it's acutally a Balloon and thinks Google is lying. So idiocy abounds.
It's important when selling things as chemical free, and trying to use 'chemicals' to sound like that are sciency and thus bad, unlike the natural organic stuff that contain no chemicals.
Slashdot Mirror
Who? who goes to Jail? the shareholders? the majority shareholder? the CEO? the Lawyer? The Engineer?
It's a corporation, they understand money. Fine them 250 pounds per impacted TV. Give them 30 days to enable preexisting feature or fine them again.
It will solve this problem, and it will mean other competitors won't do it.
Putting people in jail for this is a waste of time, money, jail space ad will accomplish very little.
to break feature the preexisted the new firmware update should not be allowed. Maybe a fine off 200 dollars per TV they disabled.
They should put the policy up front, and if people decline they just don't get any new features, just bug(manufacture defects) fixes.
Saying 'period' in no way strengthen's your point.
I'm glad you like it more as a social game, but you don't speak for everyone.
Now, if I had said period after my sentence, would that have changed you mind? made me right?
stop doing it, it's condescending and makes you look like a non-thinking ass.
"The English language is fluid and ever changing."
Stop and ask yourself why that is? IT's because there was little communication, no standards, libraries where not widely available or well stocked.
So changes happened.
We are no longer isolated. We have the internet. SO there is no need for language to change due to ignorance.
"who are you or I to say that it is wrong?"
smart people who don't want ignorance to dictate how we speak.
no. It's not the stupid ages when each city and community had little communication with each other, so changes happened.
We live in the age of the internet. Their is no longer a reason to let ignorance dictate changes in meaning.
You can NOT have competition without regulation. What you have is a single monopoly.
This isn't selling 10 dollar t-shirts, it's infrastructure. How do you propose the market would solve thins? how would you want to ahve everyone who want to compete to have to dig up your yard and street?
You idea is foolish and naive at best. It flies in the face of history. There has NEVER been a similar situation that when unregulated goes well fore the consumer.
Read more history and less Fox.
TO anyone who has read the history of the markets, you statement look stupid.. no not stupid, fucking stupid.
send your comment to your elected officials in congress.
God forbid the cast of a SW movie be young~
If the prequels ruined the movies that happen after the center 3, then that is on you. You are carrying that baggage.
Grow up.
I can't not think of a worse SW then one done by Stanely Kubrick.
His style would just make it... boring.
And Disney has been taking chances, you might want to pay attention if you are going to comment on them.
I know far too many adults who saw it when it came out, in 77's, and still disliked the prequals. They where boring, and the parts that weren't boring where poorly done.
There are many. many reason they are bad movies AND bad SW prequels.
Manly he made everyone so damn stupid.
Jar - Jar was close to being a great character. if he toned it down a little, and if has accident that save the day were intentionally done. That would have made him the smart outsider, instead of the Trix Rabbit.
Did I mention everyone was so stupid?
No, it's hos style. He knows how cameras work.
I don't like it, but lets be accurate.
Star Trek movie where fantastic Sci-Fi movies...sadly they where horrible Star Trek movies.
Speaking of shit, you should probably look at this:
http://www.grammarbook.com/pun...
"Star Wars movies were great because we saw them when we were 13 years old, and they were filmed to appeal to 13 year olds."
they where great for all ages because thy where ground breaking. They won academy awards, the first run was months, adults where lining up and waiting hours.
In 1970s, no one spent millions making a movie for 13 year olds.
I've seen picture of Chinese floating lanterns which are clearly 50 feet away(reference point: trees) and people say it' a UFO miles away.
At least they stopped when I pointed out the hard to see marking on the lantern oh, no they didn't they called me names and went out about the 'truth'.
Since the fact majority of uses is for that, it's a decent assumption. If you don't like it, blame the UFO(alien) community that co-opted it.
"According to eyewitness testimonial, sighting was with clear, blue, cloudless skies, no aircraft in sight, altitude unknown but definitely above airliner cruising altitude."
So no reference but thew new the altitude?
The testimony is worth exactly nothing. This is a common problem with 'UFO seekers' they have no idea that they can't actual give a distance with any accuracy without reference.. So the 'distance' they see something is set at whatever the bias of the viewer wants it to be.
The person who took the video refuses to believe it's acutally a Balloon and thinks Google is lying. So idiocy abounds.
I welcome our new leader, El Cid.
Submit it here:
http://www.theasylum.cc/
For the people with kidneys issues this was developed for, yes, yes it does have an advantage.
Everyone is ignorant of most things.
Very few people are actually stupid.
The sun is dangerous. Who told you it isn't?
The problem is that in order to escape stupidity, you must leave the planet entirely and not take a mirror.
Everyone does stupid things, and most things the seem stupid aren't, you are just missing information,
It's important when selling things as chemical free, and trying to use 'chemicals' to sound like that are sciency and thus bad, unlike the natural organic stuff that contain no chemicals.
herp, derp.