You can't hide secrets of the future with math. The path of technology history is littered with the bones form 'unbreakable/unhackable/uncrackable' products.
I wonder how you update the phone? Or prevent someone from installing a keylogger?
Smith actually new we would need regulation. What people quote from him was about a economic based society that could only exist inside the head of an economic philosopher, and he knew that.
So don't blame Smith, blame the jack asses that either don't read him, or don't understand them.
These people cherry pick his quotes out of context... just like they do with the bible..hmm I see a pattern.
That's bullshit. Public education in the US used to be the best in the world, right up to about 1969, when all the taxes got slashed. It took a decade to start to see the results, and here we are.,
So you just repeat what the media tells you? well done.
in 1969, the average spending was $4,221 per student, per year. the $27,176.91 in today's dollars. We spend about 40% of that.
Spending on kids has gone down.
Why? becasue the tax decrease since then. Look at all the data, the only reason not to go back to 1968 tax rates(adj. for inflation) is pure and simple greed for the top 1%.
teachers aren't the problem, and the goals and achievement I am talking about are about improving the school and teaching process. Objective measurement about the tools, use and progress. Not replace the manager and everything will be fine. Something the cheaply measure progress, and allow the teacher to set progression goals with the plan as aggressive at any specific student can handle.
Based on what I read, he set thew wrong goals and had little oversight once the match was made.
If there is something I missed, please let me know.
That said, I can come up with a plan that would help every child in that school today, and every day. Well, I already have one, so 'come up with' isn't quite correct.
"His life at this point is to serve as a warning for others." Does. Not. Work.
For fuck sake, we learned a,lot about incarceration from 1900 to 1980. We know what works, but people like you have become the bitch of the prison unions and parrot their nonsense.
"He will never escape/pay off the civil judgements against him so he will likely not try." thus pushing him into more crime.
You cutting some of fin traffic is more likely to get someone killed; therefor you should be charged with murder.
"A good prosecutor could stuff this little turd in a very dark cell for a couple of decades, and the world would be much better off as a result." worse off, actually. There is the cost of jail, then there is the cost of not having someone in society, then you are creating someone who is likely to be a criminal after they get out, then you have the issue where you are looked at as uncivilized and stupid by the rest of the world, then there is another tools for the police state.
It's far, far better for society to correct the behavior and have a tax paying member of society.
You are a short sighted bully, who is clueless about society and long term benefits. Also, you should take some economics course so maybe you might be able to understand the world is far larger and moire complex then you seem to think.
No one who isn't expect the police to show up is going to shoot the police. Stop being so fucking stupid, you can be better then that.
Who was killed? Why would a response team just start killing people who weren't an immediate threat? If people are killed ebcause of a called in swatting, then there needs to be some really hard looks at the response team.
Stop going to some stupid and unrealistic extreme to make you point.
How about we do whats best for society in the long term? There are other punishments besides jail.
Corrective action is better for everyone in society.
First off, that petition is stupid. you don't put 3 things in one petition. No one will pay attention
Secondly, Tom WHeeler is the best person to get to those goals.
" headed by Chairman and former cable lobbyist Tom Wheeler" logical fallacy.
"announced rules that will completely destroy Net Neutrality" speculation
"Mr. Wheeler's proposed rules " ask your self, who they are proposed to. Those are the people you need to contact. Wheeler can not to more or less then congress wants. Going after him just makes it easier for the people actually at the heart of this decision to deflect blame. You are creating a scape goat for the very people who make this decision.
" and be proficient in it in less than a day, very skilled in under a week. no, you can't. I have no doubt you believe you can. Unless it's the most trivial and well documented language ever written.
To me, too be proficient you need to answer how many level of redirection can it use well? How is it manipulating memory, knowing where the flaws are. It simply snt possible to determine that with any accuracy in a day. And this isn't even getting into how it deals with threading, mulit-cores, multi-processors, network latency and so on.
In order to he what I would call 'very skilled' you would be able to use the language to write a compiler. Preferable a better one then the in house one.
Devs are seldom qualified to judge is done is a good employee, or even a good programmer. They general get caught up in how they would do it as opposed to how it can be done.
Slashdot Mirror
You can't hide secrets of the future with math. The path of technology history is littered with the bones form 'unbreakable/unhackable/uncrackable' products.
I wonder how you update the phone? Or prevent someone from installing a keylogger?
Of course, what is the most used pieces of informaiton gathered from a phone? location and history of location.
Security.
well, one depend on the other, so not moved on so much as just about solved and now dealing with the next advancement.
But hey, people like you have no grasp of technology and society, so you just belittle the terms.
Smith actually new we would need regulation. What people quote from him was about a economic based society that could only exist inside the head of an economic philosopher, and he knew that.
So don't blame Smith, blame the jack asses that either don't read him, or don't understand them.
These people cherry pick his quotes out of context... just like they do with the bible..hmm I see a pattern.
yep.
Link? no? yeah, thought so.
That's bullshit. Public education in the US used to be the best in the world, right up to about 1969, when all the taxes got slashed. It took a decade to start to see the results, and here we are.,
So you just repeat what the media tells you? well done.
in 1969, the average spending was $4,221 per student, per year.
the $27,176.91 in today's dollars. We spend about 40% of that.
Spending on kids has gone down.
Why? becasue the tax decrease since then. Look at all the data, the only reason not to go back to 1968 tax rates(adj. for inflation) is pure and simple greed for the top 1%.
teachers aren't the problem, and the goals and achievement I am talking about are about improving the school and teaching process. Objective measurement about the tools, use and progress. Not replace the manager and everything will be fine.
Something the cheaply measure progress, and allow the teacher to set progression goals with the plan as aggressive at any specific student can handle.
Based on what I read, he set thew wrong goals and had little oversight once the match was made.
If there is something I missed, please let me know.
That said, I can come up with a plan that would help every child in that school today, and every day.
Well, I already have one, so 'come up with' isn't quite correct.
Thanks for calling me out if I missed something!
Thank you for your attempt. Next time hire me to handle it and come up with a plan based on set goals and achievements.
ALl that will do is create more cirme.
"His life at this point is to serve as a warning for others."
Does. Not. Work.
For fuck sake, we learned a ,lot about incarceration from 1900 to 1980.
We know what works, but people like you have become the bitch of the prison unions and parrot their nonsense.
"He will never escape/pay off the civil judgements against him so he will likely not try."
thus pushing him into more crime.
He put people's lives at risk.
please, you will put more people lives at risk when you drive home from work then this kid every did.
Wild speculation leading to an unsubstantiated conclusion.
Well done genius.
" 2-4%"
err. no.
It's like 0%.01%
You cutting some of fin traffic is more likely to get someone killed; therefor you should be charged with murder.
"A good prosecutor could stuff this little turd in a very dark cell for a couple of decades, and the world would be much better off as a result."
worse off, actually. There is the cost of jail, then there is the cost of not having someone in society, then you are creating someone who is likely to be a criminal after they get out, then you have the issue where you are looked at as uncivilized and stupid by the rest of the world, then there is another tools for the police state.
It's far, far better for society to correct the behavior and have a tax paying member of society.
You are a short sighted bully, who is clueless about society and long term benefits. Also, you should take some economics course so maybe you might be able to understand the world is far larger and moire complex then you seem to think.
No one who isn't expect the police to show up is going to shoot the police. Stop being so fucking stupid, you can be better then that.
Who was killed? Why would a response team just start killing people who weren't an immediate threat? If people are killed ebcause of a called in swatting, then there needs to be some really hard looks at the response team.
Stop going to some stupid and unrealistic extreme to make you point.
How about we do whats best for society in the long term? There are other punishments besides jail.
Corrective action is better for everyone in society.
Define cost effective.'
Now can we build up our space launch infrastructure?
"They FCC used to classify the internet as a common carrier. "
No they didn't.
First off, that petition is stupid. you don't put 3 things in one petition. No one will pay attention
Secondly, Tom WHeeler is the best person to get to those goals.
" headed by Chairman and former cable lobbyist Tom Wheeler"
logical fallacy.
"announced rules that will completely destroy Net Neutrality"
speculation
"Mr. Wheeler's proposed rules "
ask your self, who they are proposed to. Those are the people you need to contact. Wheeler can not to more or less then congress wants. Going after him just makes it easier for the people actually at the heart of this decision to deflect blame. You are creating a scape goat for the very people who make this decision.
"The Obama Administration promised a free and open Internet. "
You should read this:
http://www.politifact.com/trut...
stop blaming a president for what congress does.
For things like MRI, people can use leased lines; which is a different ball of wax.
It's not puzzling. It's just that you don't understand what they are talking about.
You could literally replace your entire post with the sentence:
"I don't know what I'm talking about." and it would have the same meaning.
" and be proficient in it in less than a day, very skilled in under a week.
no, you can't. I have no doubt you believe you can. Unless it's the most trivial and well documented language ever written.
To me, too be proficient you need to answer how many level of redirection can it use well? How is it manipulating memory, knowing where the flaws are. It simply snt possible to determine that with any accuracy in a day. And this isn't even getting into how it deals with threading, mulit-cores, multi-processors, network latency and so on.
In order to he what I would call 'very skilled' you would be able to use the language to write a compiler. Preferable a better one then the in house one.
Devs are seldom qualified to judge is done is a good employee, or even a good programmer. They general get caught up in how they would do it as opposed to how it can be done.
"you need to stay current in tech if you want the big bugs"
truer words have never been spoken. Although probably not what you intended.
Stop listing iOS as a computer language, moron.