Slashdot Mirror


Russia Bans US Use of Its Rocket Engines For Military Launches

schwit1 sends word that Russia will now ban U.S. military satellite launches using Russian-made rockets. According to Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, this is retaliation for U.S. sanctions on high-tech items, put in place because of the dispute in the Ukraine. Rogozin also threatened to block U.S. plans to keep using the International Space Station beyond its 2020 mission end date. That's not all: 'Rogozin also said Russia will suspend the operation of GPS satellite navigation system sites in Russia from June and seek talks with Washington on opening similar sites in the United States for Russia's own system, Glonass. He threatened the permanent closure of the GPS sites in Russia if that is not agreed by September.'

522 comments

  1. Duck and cover by DougOtto · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok kids, everyone under your desk.

    --
    Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    1. Re:Duck and cover by Stele · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shouldn't we lie down, put a paper bag over our head or something?

    2. Re:Duck and cover by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      "quack quack"

    3. Re:Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes we should.

    4. Re:Duck and cover by oodaloop · · Score: 2

      If you like.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    5. Re:Duck and cover by retchdog · · Score: 0

      Yes, if you like.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    6. Re:Duck and cover by TWX · · Score: 5, Informative

      I used to make fun of duck-and-cover too. Then I looked at what it's actually designed to accomplish.

      You don't duck-and-cover to survive being within the atomic fireball, that would be stupid. You duck and cover because you may be close enough to the blast that debris may hit you. Obviously if the roof caves in then you're probably dead, but if the ceiling breaks free from the structural roof or the structural floor above you, having a physical barrier between you and the ceiling grid, or the light fixtures, or the sheetrock panels, or other building infrastructure may well save your life or reduce the injury that you'd sustain. Same logic holds true for blown-in glass from windows, blown-in nonstructural building facades, and anything else thrown by a blast. Look at the videos from that asteroid strike in Russia, where thousands of people were hurt by flying debris. Same principle would have applied. Also holds true for earthquake mitigation, put something solid and relatively unyielding between you and the loose stuff that will rain down on you.

      If you try to explain to the average person that there's a difference between ducking-and-covering right at ground-zero for a nuclear blast and five miles out, you're going to get no practical improvement in what people do. Just tell everyone to do it, and those that happen to be far enough to not be incinerated or irradiated might survive.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    7. Re:Duck and cover by jythie · · Score: 1

      Will it help?

    8. Re:Duck and cover by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think we'd better learn the words to Waltzing Matilda and maybe keep the cyanide pills handy.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:Duck and cover by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A large part of this is that people's instinct when they see the flash is to go to the window to see what it was. The flash and the shockwave can arrive anywhere from seconds to minutes apart, and people all gather round the windows to see what's going on.

    10. Re:Duck and cover by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      No. :-)

    11. Re:Duck and cover by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Not at all.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    12. Re:Duck and cover by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      Just tell everyone to do it, and those that happen to be far enough to not be incinerated or irradiated might survive.

      (And to those that aren't, it won't matter either way.)

    13. Re:Duck and cover by Stele · · Score: 1

      Last orders please!

    14. Re:Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they were rehashing a Douglas Adams reference... While it is based off of what you said. That was the conversation with the bartender when the Vogons were about to destroy the earth.

    15. Re:Duck and cover by Sir+Realist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I grew up in the middle of Silicon Valley - a major techno-industrial center wedged between a fairly major military base and two major population centers. As part of my Boy Scouts Disaster Preparedness merit badge, we had to explain our plan in case of a nuclear war being declared. I told them "kick back on the roof in a lounge chair and watch the mushroom clouds go up."

      There was a brief pause, and the instructor said "Fair enough."

    16. Re:Duck and cover by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Blinding yourself is "fair enough"?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    17. Re:Duck and cover by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! You aren't a child anymore.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    18. Re:Duck and cover by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      After learning how to walk and talk, I haven't learned anything that complicated, and that includes quantum physics.

      I am not a nuclear scientist, but I can easily understand; "Ground Zero -- doesn't matter what you do" and "duck and cover for debris." I'm fairly certain that most people in this country can. Those that can't have given up on live anyway -- so do big deal.

      The shocking thing I've found as I've grown up and met people not in a workplace, is that most people are fairly smart about what they need to understand and they are only stupid in large groups. We explained the exact same nuance in surviving tornadoes -- it's condescending military and government planners who think "you can't handle the truth" -- really, only liars think other people can't handle the truth.

      OK, and then there are some people actively avoiding truth and they call that a religion -- but your tossing dice on any public announcement with them. They'll immunize and not believe in evolution -- so you never know how they react even when they are perfectly intelligent but illogical.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    19. Re:Duck and cover by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      No more than the desk would...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    20. Re:Duck and cover by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Not even a poncho? There's some ionizing radiation that can be stopped by a sheet of paper. Sure the hard stuff is bad - but most of it is going to be carried in physics dust. From what I've read, if you aren't getting too many neutrinos a few miles from the blast, you have to avoid the dust. Wait a few weeks and use a bulldozer to scrape off the top layer and you can use that earth for crops.

      Things may suck for a while, but it's not like Newt Gingrich or Bush is President again -- so we've got that going for us.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    21. Re:Duck and cover by jhumkey · · Score: 2

      Exactly the same reasoning I used to wear a helmet riding a Motorcycle. I know I can't survive the 70+ mile per hour head on with a one ton car . . . but that bump from behind at 5 mph at a stop-light, that tosses me head-first into the curb, that one I could walk away from unharmed with a helmet.

      --
      No, I don't remember your name. But the memory mapped screen on a TRS80 from 1977 is from 15360 to 16383 if that helps.
    22. Re:Duck and cover by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That certainly doesn't explain this phrase:
      "You know how bad sunburn can feel."

    23. Re:Duck and cover by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      More importantly from the government's point of view, any training that reduces injuries, even non-life-threatening injuries like cuts from broken glass, also reduces load on responders.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    24. Re:Duck and cover by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's one way to look at it. Personally, when the grim reaper comes for me, he'll have a fight on his hands. My family has a plan, and there are emergency supplies including medical, and food and water for three days in each vehicle, we have a direction, (away from city center) and a meeting place already arranged. In the case of an EMP we likely won't have transportation, but you can't plan for everything. I admit the plan works best in the case of a dirty nuclear device detonated in the heaviest populated area, and coincidentally that seems to be the most likely scenario these days.

      It may all be for naught, but maybe it'll be the difference between surviving a near miss, or not.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    25. Re:Duck and cover by russotto · · Score: 1

      The way I learned it was "In case of nuclear war, put your head between your legs... and kiss your ass goodbye."

    26. Re:Duck and cover by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Funny

      What they told us to do in the event of a nearby nuclear strike was to hold our AK in front of us in outstretched arms.

      When asked what that was supposed to accomplish, our "initial military training" (yes, it's a real thing that they teach in schools) teacher told us that it is so that melting steel won't drip on the government-issued boots, increasing the chances that they might serve another recruit in defense of the Motherland.

    27. Re:Duck and cover by rasmusbr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course, in any realistic WW3 scenario all that this would accomplish in the end is a slightly larger food riot once the food runs out.

      Now in this day and age with slimmed down just in time delivery, the food would run out in less than 72 hours in all major metropolitan areas. The food you see on the shelves in your local food store is pretty much what's in store, plus whatever is in any trucks that manage to make it to the store.

      Come to think of it, I bet it would take less than a hundred nukes aimed at a carefully selected list of choke points in the transport infrastructure to doom everyone in North America to starvation. The same thing goes for Europe and (to some extent) Russia. Even a very limited nuclear war could probably be incredibly lethal if both sides were aiming to kill/incapacitate the other side's population.

    28. Re:Duck and cover by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

      In the case of anything but the most limited of exchanges, my house wasn't going to be worrying about ionizing radiation, it was going to _be_ physics dust settling in a glassy crater. The "watching the mushroom clouds" line was purely for show; there wasn't going to be anyone around to watch.

      I'm not sure that a poncho would help.

    29. Re: Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to continue to isolate themselves let them .means more jobs for US citizens.

    30. Re:Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      In the case of an EMP we likely won't have transportation, but you can't plan for everything.

      Sure you can, just buy a 30-year old turbo diesel with mechanical fuel injection.
      Here's a really nice one on eBay. Bonus - fast food restaurants double as fuel stations in a pinch.

      You want something with the OM617 engine - 400k miles and running perfectly is doable.

    31. Re:Duck and cover by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Heh, if I learned anything from reading On The Beach it's that one should always have a significant stock of good booze to hand.

      Oh, and if you watched the movie you may agree that Waltzing Matilda was the real tragedy by its use as the only soundtrack throughout the film. Gah!

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    32. Re:Duck and cover by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      That's...... actually, not a bad idea.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    33. Re: Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until someone or some armed gang takes it from you.

      The problem won't just be lack of food, water, and transportation; it will be your fellow citizens turning on you to survive at all cost.

    34. Re:Duck and cover by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have a plan to. Make damn fucking sure the politician I vote for is far fucking more interested in diplomacy than war. My plan seems like a far better idea for survival.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    35. Re: Duck and cover by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Until someone or some armed gang takes it from you.

      The problem won't just be lack of food, water, and transportation; it will be your fellow citizens turning on you to survive at all cost.

      I have taken that into account.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    36. Re:Duck and cover by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      A good example of this was the recent meteor incident in Russia, where most people were in fact hurt by glass from shattered windows. People went to look at "what was that flash?"

    37. Re:Duck and cover by tragedy · · Score: 1

      if you aren't getting too many neutrinos

      Neutrinos? Surely you mean neutrons. Has anyone on Earth ever even conceived of a realistic man-made device that could produce enough neutrinos that be dangerous to a human being?

    38. Re:Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also by not covering and say instead looking at the blast you are exposing yourself to potential blindness. Even if you suffer a lethal dose, it might take a few weeks for u 2 die. During these 2 weeks you could mount an effective resistance, but not if you are blind. people were tougher back in the days b4 we knew everything and developed our smug sense of superiority. Our fathers would never have put up with russias bullshit. today the land of the free is run by oligarchs who take bribes from foreign nations. funny we used to support the courageous freedom fighters in the mujhudeen and cheknia (sp). Today we are very much like the society we used 2 oppose (ussr). e.g the breaking up of families by cps because the patents are teaching doctrine at odds with the state. Ms Clinton may label me a terrorist 4 my thought crimes, but I know what is right and I use my own mind and not cable tv to form my beliefs about where the USA is heading.

    39. Re:Duck and cover by Saffaya · · Score: 1

      Not saying there isn't merit to your viewpoint but ... I wish european leaders of the 1930' had done something more than just diplomacy when Hitler was invading/annexing neihbouring countries.
      Kinda like I wish current european leaders would do something more affirmative than "dialogue" with Putin.
      We know how effective diplomacy and dialogue are when dealing with a bully, right ?

    40. Re:Duck and cover by blackanvil · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, I bet it would take less than a hundred nukes aimed at a carefully selected list of choke points in the transport infrastructure to doom everyone in North America to starvation. The same thing goes for Europe and (to some extent) Russia. Even a very limited nuclear war could probably be incredibly lethal if both sides were aiming to kill/incapacitate the other side's population.

      Nonsense, all it would take is 4 or 5 EMP (200 - 400 miles up) bursts, each taking out a large chunk of the electrical grid and killing anything with a microprocessor for a radius of 500 to 1000 miles (depends on size of nuke, strength of the Earth's magnetic field, height, and probably stuff still considered Top Secret to avoid civilian panic.) One on each coast of the US, a couple to fill in the gaps and take out Alaska and Hawaii, and the US is done -- no food, no fuel, no electricity, famine virtually guaranteed unless the government is a lot more prepared than it seems to be. And, yes, such EMP bursts are in every first-strike plan, as it's the quickest way to disrupt enemy communications.

    41. Re:Duck and cover by davester666 · · Score: 1

      to bad the other couple hundred politicians elected to the federal gov't are more of a 'shoot-first' variety...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    42. Re:Duck and cover by Draugo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Duck and cover is actually very sound advice in the situation it's meant for i.e. protecting you from the blast wave caused debris and shrapnel (just like in earthquake). It won't save you if you're close enough to be vaporized by the flash or the blast wave demolishes the whole building but that's not the situation where it's supposed to matter anyway.

    43. Re:Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you want to end up on Manus Island !

    44. Re:Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let us know how that's working out for you in Ukraine.

    45. Re:Duck and cover by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Lots of them did, remember? Just because America was late to the party...

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    46. Re:Duck and cover by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      There is a world of difference between being politically active and just voting. That "damn fucking sure" is all about being politically active. Joining an opposing political party, contributing on the internet with discussion and participating in protests when required. I am a paying member of the Australian Greens because they seem like the most actual in reality conservative party, rather than an exploiters party just abusing that word, conservative. The Australian Greens are actually actively opposed to war and to the military industrial complex. So just do the same, at the very least in pushing opposition parties that actual oppose the current military industrial complex and of course get others to join in and get them to get others. If the majority pitch in, my survival plan works pretty damn easy.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    47. Re: Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If either were pres now, we would not be in this mess.

    48. Re:Duck and cover by alexo · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't we lie down, put a paper bag over our head or something?

      Only if you're ugly.

    49. Re:Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, that often means staying home on voting day.

    50. Re:Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sticky tape on the windows, surely..;-)

    51. Re:Duck and cover by rjgill · · Score: 1

      Would that be the line about the Jolly Jumbuck, or when he references his Tucker Bag that will be our death song?

    52. Re:Duck and cover by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You don't duck-and-cover to survive being within the atomic fireball, that would be stupid. You duck and cover because you may be close enough to the blast that debris may hit you.

      If you are in a zone that is destroyed by blast effects, well, you'll get a nice yummy dose of radiation. That'll be fun.

      If you try to explain to the average person that there's a difference between ducking-and-covering right at ground-zero for a nuclear blast and five miles out, you're going to get no practical improvement in what people do. Just tell everyone to do it, and those that happen to be far enough to not be incinerated or irradiated might survive.

      And the Government will have a better idea of where the LD50 zone is.

      If I know it's coming, and I'm in the blast zone, my plan is to face it and enjoy the show as it kills me. I'd just as soon be burnt to a crisp or killed by debris than take a couple weeks to die.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    53. Re:Duck and cover by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Blinding yourself is "fair enough"?

      Sure, why not? You'll be dead in a few more seconds anyhow.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    54. Re:Duck and cover by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If the nuke drops here and the EMP takes everything out, I'm getting on a carburated motorbike (no electronics, once I push-start it), and collecting the family (yes, too many on the bike to be legal, but I don't think anyone would stop me). The hardest part about a blast is transportation to get everyone from work/school back home.

    55. Re: Duck and cover by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      In a Mercedes Diesel, you just start driving away, and the smoke screen will cover your escape.

    56. Re:Duck and cover by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      A single nuke, at 500 miles above Kansas would EMP almost all of North America. That'd kill most of the US. And all you need is a single nuke. That's doable for a non-nuclear rogue state. How are those North Korean missile launches going?

    57. Re: Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you guys start making your rifles from the same material as boots are done. Then both survive the Flash.

    58. Re:Duck and cover by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      So you wish the German people had been paying more attention to their democracy and did not get sucked in by a bunch of lies. "Kinda like I wish current european leaders would do something more affirmative than "dialogue" with *CORRECTION*, The US Military Industrial Complex and the $5 billion dollar coup in the Ukraine. No coup no 'SUCCESSFUL' annexure of the Crimea (A US fuckup because Russia knew exactly what was going on all along and basically used the opportunity provided by the US to get exactly what they wanted and are letting the mess continue just to further embarrass the clumsy and stupid US State Department and force the EU to fix it at their expense, so they will learn why not to trust the US).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    59. Re:Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will it help?

    60. Re:Duck and cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

      A.) Nobody is going to waste a nuke on "EMP bursts," when they can achieve the same EMP output by just nuking the area in question. Besides....

      B.) ... a vast majority of the US electrical grid would be wholly unaffected by simple EMP -- it deals with far more energy absorption than a typical air-burst 10-20MT during an average NA thunderstorm. The most effective way to disrupt the electrical grid is through physical damage, which that same nuke is fully capable of doing at lower altitudes.

      Stop reading so much into conspiracy websites. If somebody pulls the trigger on a nuclear launch, they aren't going to stop with five nukes; they're going to launch everything they have. Refer to MAD for more information on why.

    61. Re:Duck and cover by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd avoided the vicious "reparations" which set things up for a continuation of WW1 in the first place. It wouldn't have mattered who was in charge and various key military figures said in 1918-19 that the terms of armistice didn't end the war but merely gave a 20-year ceasefire.

      Better diplomacy in 1918 would have avoided the need for better diplomacy in 1938.

    62. Re:Duck and cover by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      +1 for referring to the "On The Beach".

    63. Re:Duck and cover by walter_f · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't we lie down, put a paper bag over our head or something?

      Originally, any one out of a selection of a few certified newspapers was recommended.

      Such as the National Inquirer, I believe.

    64. Re:Duck and cover by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      In this particular scenario, it looks like the Russian politician is the one who's waging war. And you don't get to vote for Russian presidents.

  2. SpaceX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This might be one of the best things to happen for SpaceX.

    1. Re:SpaceX by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

      Exactly what I was thinking... Even though the courts just vacated his case, this is the best next thing... Ultimately, Russia is completely fucked in this situation. Read my older posts regarding my position on this...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    2. Re:SpaceX by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure they're all popping champagne bottles in the office right now.

      Also a good thing if you don't want to help fund Putin's wars of conquest.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:SpaceX by Megane · · Score: 1

      Oh crap, I just re-read TFS. They want to ban us from using their rockets? At first I thought they wanted to stop Russians from using US rockets. This is basically a reverse embargo!

      Yes, this is the best possible outcome for SpaceX, since they've been wanting to launch those very same military payloads that ULA was monopolizing.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:SpaceX by fox171171 · · Score: 1

      This might be one of the best things to happen for SpaceX.

      Time for SpaceX to jack up the price!

    5. Re:SpaceX by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      Can SpaceX carry humans when Russia decides not to let Americans ride on their rockets anymore ?

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    6. Re:SpaceX by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not necessarily. It will just score Aerojet $5b in emergency USAF funding to copy the RD-180 engines. And, hmmm, what can we cut to help pay for it... oh, this "commercial crew" isn't necessary compared to Issues Of National Security Importance, so let's just kill that. Hey it's a crisis, we've all got to make sacrifices. Plus another $3b "Guaranteed Access Payment" for Boeing for more Delta cores. Oh, and special legislation to ban lawsuits over National Security Payload contracts.

      You're suggesting they'll be sensible and actually do something to ensure launches for USAF/etc payloads. I'm saying that history says they'll use any crisis to fuck over their rivals and reward their friends, regardless of the actual cost to the country.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    7. Re: SpaceX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google SpaceX Falcon 9/27 Heavy booster.

    8. Re:SpaceX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope SpaceX guards against sabotage. Russia manages that and they're not so screwed.

    9. Re:SpaceX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also the worst thing that could happen to human space program.
      Because of some hawks in congress want Ukraine in NATO.

    10. Re:SpaceX by Megane · · Score: 1

      ...except maybe for the little detail of commercial crew replacing something we're currently dependent on the Russians for, and dependent on for three more years than we should already, because Congress is the opposite of progress and underfunded it. I'm sure it's possible to generate a push against that, especially if Obama decided to personally make it an issue.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    11. Re:SpaceX by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Yes. The capsules are already capable of it, but haven't been fully tested to verify man-rating.

  3. Space programs as a crowbar? by AaronLS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wasn't it nice when at least space programs still worked together and were kind of outside the scope of international quarrels. Astronauts working together, at least to me, were a symbol of how we were still all civilized people who had a lot of common interests and could work together peacefully.

    1. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And then market economic reality kicked in, and it's nuclear WW3 for resources again. D'oh, as it were.

    2. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that was when you had sane Presidents in the White House, like Nixon, who actually wanted good relations with the rest of the world.

    3. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      http://www.spacenews.com/artic...

      Seems NASA started this over the month ago.

      If there is anything to know about Russians, is they do not like getting bullied. And before you say "OMG, Russian are bulling Ukraine!", this is not the first time east Ukraine and majority were told to take a hike by the so-called "westerners".

      Quick note: East Ukraine was Russia. West Ukraine was Poland. Borders were redrawn and now you have populations with different leanings. Imagine that!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

    4. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And then market economic reality kicked in, and it's nuclear WW3 for resources again.

      Market economics are the alternative to fighting for resources. Instead of grabbing what you want by force, you just buy it. The market based world order of the Pax Americana is far more peaceful than the age of imperialism and mercantilism that preceded it.

    5. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well the Snowden leaks messed up American Credibility.
      For the most part he leaked stuff that everyone knew that we were doing it anyways. But because of the leak it gave government politicians something tangible to grab on and scold the US for, and pressure public opinion away from the US.

      Russia is doing this too, with its citizens having proof of American bad guys, they can play to the paranoia that was already there, and use this to push their own objective. As America doesn't have a moral stance of their argument.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You do realize the space program(s) started out as competitors, right? The whole thing started as a result of this little "international quarrel" called the Cold War.

    7. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Except this latest spat is specifically about Crimea.

    8. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      75 years ago it was Ukraine. Last year it was Ukraine. Today its a seaport, a oil pipeline, and free stuff for the taking after failed political corruption didn't work.

      Those pesky people, they want more honest government. That is crazy talk.

      Well since we can no longer syphon off the money lets just do wholesale theft.

    9. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both were the Mongol Empire, and before that the Kievan Rus. Your point?

    10. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't it nice when at least space programs still worked together and were kind of outside the scope of international quarrels. Astronauts working together, at least to me, were a symbol of how we were still all civilized people who had a lot of common interests and could work together peacefully.

      What planet do you live on? That has *never* been true on this planet, at least not for the past 2000 years or more.

    11. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by losfromla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, like other countries like to get bullied?
      98 lb guy doesn't like getting bullied? Tough shit, schedule him for a 2:45 wedgie.
      275 lb football player doesn't like getting bullied? ok, fine, take him off the schedule.
      Same with countries, that's why they all want the nukes, it's the nukes that make all the difference.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    12. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Wookact · · Score: 5, Informative
      Your quick note left out quite a bit of information that is relevant. Mainly that the russian speaking ukranians were imported to Ukraine, and the originally ethnic groups were cleared out.

      Sure the majority of the people in eastern Ukraine might want to belong to Russia, but those people have only lived there since the 40s through the 70s for the most part. In which case I propose they just move back to Russia, and leave Ukraine to the ethnic groups that were cleared out.

      See : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

      See Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

      In fact the Russians that moved in were hell bent on stamping out Ukranian cultrue.

      The first wave of purges between 1929 and 1934 targeted the revolutionary generation of the party that in Ukraine included many supporters of Ukrainization. Soviet authorities specifically targeted the commissar of education in Ukraine, Mykola Skrypnyk, for promoting Ukrainian language reforms that were seen as dangerous and counterrevolutionary; Skrypnyk committed suicide in 1933. The next 1936–1938 wave of political purges eliminated much of the new political generation that replaced those who perished in the first wave. Being accused of using the "Skrypnyk alphabet" – in other words, using Ukrainian Cyrillic letters instead of Russian ones – could lead to arrest or death

    13. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      75 years ago it was Ukraine. Last year it was Ukraine.

      The thing is, what you call Ukraine today was in different place 75 years ago. The part of Ukraine that is the most for European integration wasn't part of Ukraine 75 years ago.

      Anyway, the issue is deeper than this.

      Those pesky people, they want more honest government. That is crazy talk.

      Well since we can no longer syphon off the money lets just do wholesale theft.

      Honest government. Yes. Everyone wants that. Too bad that *both* the "west backed" and the "east backed" governments did the same thing - rob national coffers for their own gains. Both are completely incompetent.

      So now you have 2 sides - one that wants integration with Europe in hope to fix the political issues. Kind of backward thinking.

      The other side, wants closer integration with Russia because many of them are Russian. They want Russia to impose stability and they view Putin as some sort of a hero despite his faults.

      One side had 2 revolutions already that seemed to have worked for their end. Why can't the other side have their own revolution too? And to be very frank, when people *vote* and their vote is then called "illegal" by the so-called "democracies", all it does is harden their stance.

    14. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Shoten · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it nice when at least space programs still worked together and were kind of outside the scope of international quarrels. Astronauts working together, at least to me, were a symbol of how we were still all civilized people who had a lot of common interests and could work together peacefully.

      When was this? The whole space program of both countries started as a competition between each other, for christ's sake. Yeah, they both did a rendezvous in mid-space and shook hands at one point, but it's also worth pointing out that our astronauts are military personnel, and that the USAF has a space-borne unmanned craft that has been busy at work for a few years now (if not longer). Any "outside the scope of international quarrels" activity is a thin veneer of neutrality, indeed.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    15. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the space program was never about showing how big our ICBMs were. No no, it was a hippy-dippy high-tech love-in.

    16. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that was when you had sane Presidents in the White House, like Nixon, who actually wanted good relations with the rest of the world.

      People always make the same error.
      Look at what the administration DOES, not what it SAYS.
      Nixon's adiminstration was one of the most pro-interventionist in history. Look for starters at South and Central America. Yeah good old Tricky Dicky visited the cinese communists. That's the facade. The real face was waging an illegal war in South and Central America propping up US "indoctrinated" dictators. These men were trained in torture techniques in the US. Then sent back to their home countries.

    17. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't space exploration going faster and better when they were competing?

    18. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Market economics are the alternative to fighting for resources" - Unless you control the market and use that as your weapon.

      "The market based world order of the Pax Americana is far more peaceful than..." - You haven't studied American history seriously. Ask a Native.

      " Instead of grabbing what you want by force " - Eminent domain, divine provenance, westward expansion, imperialism, slavery, regime change... keep studying.

    19. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Tell that to Iraq which was a war over oil. Indeed, America only got involved in Libya because they have oil.

    20. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, for completeness, you should mention when Crimea went to the Ukraine ...
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_transfer_of_Crimea

    21. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by erikkemperman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Market economics are the alternative to fighting for resources. Instead of grabbing what you want by force, you just buy it. The market based world order of the Pax Americana is far more peaceful than the age of imperialism and mercantilism that preceded it.

      What is this peace you speak of? Imperialism is far from over, the current situation is hardly different from the Spanish, British, or even the Ronan empires in any interesting way. It always amounts to wielding an overwhelming asymmetry in military might to maintain a steady flow of wealth from the rest if the world to the homeland.

      The amazing thing is that so few there seem to have any idea what kind of dick they are being as a nation, or to what extent their comfort (often even a luxury that ought to be embarrassing, frankly) is underwritten by misery and poverty in lesser places.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    22. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Honest government. Yes. Everyone wants that. Too bad that *both* the "west backed" and the "east backed" governments did the same thing - rob national coffers for their own gains. Both are completely incompetent.

      This can't be said enough. Both sides are the same. Each wants to influence the government using processes other than democracy. Their methods wouldn't matter even if you could distinguish one from another, and you only just barely can.

      Two sides of the same coin. Heads Ukraine loses, tails Ukraine loses.

      Anyone who sees the anti-Russian side as some kind of benefactor is either stupid or drinking the Kool Aid.

    23. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep looking at your bellybutton and and chewing the same old piece of manure. What you describe as a peaceful era isn't such when you leave USA and take a look at how people is dying of starvation and fighting for a job position. Market economics are the new form of feudalism. The barons aren't visible though, since they cover their asses with bug corporations.

    24. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it nice when at least space programs still worked together and were kind of outside the scope of international quarrels.

      Maybe they are. They only said their rockets couldn't be used to launch military satellites. That leaves unhindered space program / non-military civillian satellites.

    25. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You seem to be forgetting a lot of actual history.

      Both space programs were born from military ICBM research, and the need to put satellites in orbit. It just so happened that there were propaganda opportunities of having the first $thing in [space | orbit | spacewalk | rendezvous | docking | trans-lunar flight | moon]. Only after all that was over, and extra parts were used for space labs (Skylab) did NASA and their Soviet counterparts decide to have an orbital handshake, and to do so, the Soviets had to outfit their capsule with the proper docking hardware to accommodate an Apollo capsule.

      Even then, there were far more launches of military spy satellites than human-occupied flights.

      No, the "working together" aspect of space exploration is a very new trend. The overall trend is a nationalistic chest thumping exercise, and has been since Sputnik launched.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    26. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it nice when at least space programs still worked together and were kind of outside the scope of international quarrels.

      When was that? I don't ever recall a time when the programs ever really worked together without a bunch of resentment and political bullshit. Certainly not during the Cold War (the U.S. would barely even acknowledge the EXISTENCE of the USSR's space program, and vice-versa). And not after the Cold War either. Even the littlest thing would cause NASA or the Russians to thrown a goddamned temper tantrum even after the USSR ended. Remember when Russia dared to accomplish another space first by launching the first space tourist? NASA threw a shit-fit on that one worthy of a 4-year-old in a grocery store. And that was long before Putin ever invaded anything.

      The programs have never really cooperated or gotten along. That's just PR.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    27. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      u r fucking kidding, right ?
      that is sarcasm, right ?
      'cause you think it is all based on the fact we PAY people for their shit ? ? ?
      yeah, the half we spend on the military is not related to extracting the rest of the world's resources at all...
      nimrod...
      its not 'speak softly and carry a big stick'...
      its 'beat the shit out of them -or threaten to do so- and take all their stuff'...
      THAT is how it works, there's NO 'free market' horseshit about it...

    28. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except this latest spat is specifically about Crimea.

      Now, now, let's be clear. This 'spat' is about Syria.

      1) US wants Syria taken down, appeals to world to do so.
      2) Russia blocks at every turn.
      3) US attempts end-run, attracting only France in the process, then backs out
      4) US deploys PsyOp to destabilize Ukraine, and 'spontaneous' protests break out.
      5) Now Russia has more pressing shit to deal with than Syria...

    29. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What is this peace you speak of?

      Both the number and severity of wars has decreased dramatically in the last few decades. There are zero nation-vs-nation wars going on. There are some civil wars and insurrections, but few of these involve standing armies attempting to hold territory, and even fewer involve a high level of violence by historical standards. Less than 10% of violent deaths in the world are caused by armed conflict, far lower than at any other time in human history.

      an overwhelming asymmetry in military might to maintain a steady flow of wealth from the rest if the world to the homeland.

      The USA exercises military coercion against none of its trading partners. War and imperialism are negative-sum, since they involve the destruction of resources, and the cost of maintaining armies. Markets are positive-sum, because they allow both people and nations to specialize in what they are good at, and trade for everything else. America certainly benefits from the current world order, but so does everyone else that doesn't intentionally shut themselves out.

      underwritten by misery and poverty in lesser places

      The countries with the most misery and poverty are those where markets are banned, or have collapsed due to chaos. It is silly to blame America for problems in North Korea or Somalia.

    30. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. And this is why we do things without force, with negotiations, because one day those who were stamped on in Ukraine will do the stamping. If you used force for gain and you champion the results, then do not complain when it is done to you.

      See the end result of 'Sudetenland.' Hitler invaded to 'protect' the Germans living there. Today there are no Germans living there.

    31. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by QuantumPion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Iraq was a war for oil only in the sense that Saddam invaded our ally, Kuwait, whom we agreed to protect, to annex their oil fields.

    32. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we see crucifixes lining the roads to Baghdad, you can tell me how the situation is hardly different.

      Last time I checked, the US was assuming ever escalating debt to the rest of the world, so I'm not sure what this wealth is to which you refer. If this is imperialism, we are doing a horrid job of it.

    33. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 2

      It's a myth that the Romans were unstoppable murdering machines. It's also myth that the Spanish were unstoppable heathen-burning machines. During the height of the inquisition, how many people were burned at the stake every year, on average, in the whole empire? 25. You can look it up.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    34. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Pax Americana? What are you talking about? The US hasn't closed the gates since 1950!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    35. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except this latest spat is specifically about Crimea.

      Now, now, let's be clear. This 'spat' is about Syria.

      1) US wants Syria taken down, appeals to world to do so.
      2) Russia blocks at every turn.
      3) US attempts end-run, attracting only France in the process, then backs out
      4) US deploys PsyOp to destabilize Ukraine, and 'spontaneous' protests break out.
      5) Now Russia has more pressing shit to deal with than Syria...

      You left out a piece of the puzzle
        US wants Syria taken down, appeals to world to do so.
      1) Israel says through back-channel: Back off of Syria, we're fine with Bashar al-Assad running Syria
      2) Russia blocks at every turn. US remembers what Israel says and does nothing
      3) US pretends to attempt end-run, attracting only France in the process, then backs out
      4) US deploys PsyOp to destabilize Ukraine, and 'spontaneous' protests break out.
      5) Now Russia has more pressing shit to deal with than Syria...
      6) Russians are gone from Syria, but US remembers what Israel said and does nothing about

    36. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by donscarletti · · Score: 2

      Sure the majority of the people in eastern Ukraine might want to belong to Russia, but those people have only lived there since the 40s through the 70s for the most part. In which case I propose they just move back to Russia, and leave Ukraine to the ethnic groups that were cleared out.

      The median age in the Ukraine is 40, meaning half of people were born during or after 1974 and thus have no home on the Russian side of the border. So you would have them pack up and find a new city for the convenience of certain people (Crimean Tatars I think you mean) that have been living outside the area for 60 years? I can't think of how that could possibly make you any better than Josef Stalin that kicked the Tatars out of their homes in WWII, maybe worse, since he at least had the excuse of alleged Nazi collaboration.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    37. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by saynt · · Score: 1

      During the cold war, the Soyuz capsules were equipped with a special pistol that could fire in a vacuum. I don't think it was for defending against the random alien that might wander by.

    38. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by professionalfurryele · · Score: 5, Informative

      You do realise that the Pax Americana is typically held to have started in 1945 right, with a few (but not many) historians arguing for 1918. And it isn't a statement about freedom but about the comparative absence of violence.

    39. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 0

      That sure is some crazy you got in that pot, there.

    40. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by BobMcD · · Score: 2

      So do you believe that the February 'uprising' was spontaneous, but the Crimean version was not?

      If so, why?

    41. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by IgShaman81 · · Score: 1

      One side had 2 revolutions already that seemed to have worked for their end. Why can't the other side have their own revolution too? And to be very frank, when people *vote* and their vote is then called "illegal" by the so-called "democracies", all it does is harden their stance.

      When did this "vote" took place, exactly? Would you also call what happened in Crimea in March a "vote" as well ?

      I call both a typical exercise in Russia-style "democracy" - which is a comedy for observers, and a tragedy for the ones whose lives are altered by predetermined outcomes. Remind me if you please, when was the last time Russia had it's opposition gain powers as a result of a democratic elections?

    42. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Wookact · · Score: 1

      You will note that I suggest they move to the country they wish to be a part of, I never said they should be kicked out.
      It would be like all of the Hispanics in Texas voting to secede and asking to rejoin Mexico. If you want to live in Mexico, then you should just move back.

      Equating my view that people should move to where they want to live does not in any way shape or form liken me to Stalin. Even suggesting that is akin to goodwinning the thread.

    43. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by IgShaman81 · · Score: 1

      The median age in the Ukraine is 40, meaning half of people were born during or after 1974 and thus have no home on the Russian side of the border. So you would have them pack up and find a new city for the convenience of certain people (Crimean Tatars I think you mean) that have been living outside the area for 60 years? I can't think of how that could possibly make you any better than Josef Stalin that kicked the Tatars out of their homes in WWII, maybe worse, since he at least had the excuse of alleged Nazi collaboration.

      True dat.. Physical relocation is not the way for us to get rid of those ethnic russians lobotimized by russian TV propaganda. One would think that a proper way to resolve our issues would be to perform series of democratic elections, e.g. - presidential on 25/May, then some sort of referendum regarding new constitution, and then parliament reelections sometime by the end of 2014. Too bad it's rather hard for us to persuade these people while they're holding us, majority of local ethnic ukrainians, at a gun point with kalashnikovs.

    44. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Jmc23 · · Score: 0
      Ah, a Kool-aid drinker.

      There may be less wars and deaths but you do know that is only because the powers that be have found easier ways to rape neighbouring countries and enslaving their citizens?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    45. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      The majority of people were born much more recently than 40s. I gather your solution to the middle east is to move all the Israelis back to the countries their grandparents lived in 70 years ago, too... no more humane than Stalin.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    46. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by erikkemperman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually I was in disagreement with your assertion that Pax Americana was somehow not a kind of empire in how it operates in the world the last couple decades, I didn't mention all out war.

      But you're not wrong in that, since the end if the Cold War, there have been fewer "nation-vs-nation" wars, as you put it (which were not really that, even during the Cold War, but mostly proxy wars between both superpowers). "Standing armies" does not mean what it used to, before there was a single superpower.

      But notice that military spending has not diminished as one might have expected, rather it has risen since the early 90s. It is as much as the rest of the planet combined, to the extent that their budgets are accountable at all, that is. Find a world map of US military installations. The reason that actual, explicit coercion is rare is simply that lesser nations can't afford to let it come that far. That makes the coercion more efficient, yes, but not less "empire" like.

      That doesn't make the present situation peaceful in any meaningful way though, for great numbers of people. That there were no formal war declarations and massive infantry battles doesn't actually make the history of, say, Haiti, Colombia, Chile, Argentina, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Guatemala, all that much less bloody. That is what imperial enforcement looks like, not Waterloo.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    47. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      It's a little funny hearing USians speak.

      Do you never watch media from outside your country? If you think the US had credibility and confidence of opinion before and Snowden well, um, shit, there's just nothing to say to something so incredulous.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    48. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both the number and severity of wars has decreased dramatically in the last few decades.

      Do you seriously believe that "knowing what happened over a few decades" is equivalent to "understanding the world and its history"?

      When World War 3 comes and your city is bombed to ashes, how will your "well it's been peaceful for decades!" idiocy look then?

    49. Re: Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any pistol can fire in a vacuum. In fact, any cartridge based firearm can fire in a vacuum. Russian space vehicles carried either Makarov PMs or TP-82 combination firearms. No specialized weapon needed, unless you count that failed laser pistol that was never fielded. You fail it.

    50. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      peaceful? only if you don't live in a place where the US/EU have economic interests, just look what they did to Ukraine.

    51. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Let's put this in personal terms.

      I have a gun.

      You just bought the ENTIRE cake, not leaving me a single slice to eat.

      You are so happy you won economically.

      How do you think this is going to turn out?

      Peace flows from the barrel of a gun- not from money.
      Peace is based on violence and the threat of violence.

      Words only have power until the wordmeister goes too far and the primitive brute has enough of it and kills the wordmeister.

      Pax Americana really only worked because America was ridiculously strong compared to the rest of the world for a few decades. As military strengths equalize- we are likely to see a return to war. And we have developed so many terrible tools since the last war, that nukes are going to seem like well-behaved fluffy kittens.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    52. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      No, it's that you think the US is responsible for Russian soldiers appearing out of nowhere in Ukraine. I don't doubt that the state department and CIA love to meddle, just not in ways that are purely crazy.

    53. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      War and imperialism are negative-sum, since they involve the destruction of resources, and the cost of maintaining armies.

      True, in the case of war, but irrelevant. It is positive for those who matter, the companies involved in supplying the army and rebuilding the target afterwards, and is advantageous for the aggressor as well. War was never meant to benefit the people getting shot at, but to benefit those who order them around.

      America certainly benefits from the current world order, but so does everyone else that doesn't intentionally shut themselves out.

      How exactly the hundreds of thousands who die in imperialistic wars benefit from being shot and bombed? Don't you dare say Freedom TM and Democracy TM, as almost nobody cares about either (most recent example: East Ukranians votes are worthless since the wrong side won, but would be a fine example of Democracy TM at work if the results were different; there way too many examples of not caring about freedom).

    54. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fifty years ago, maybe. Today, not a chance. All of the bullshit wars going on currently are due to the removal of regulations that are required for any economic system to function in addition to the greed of a select few. The fall of Mercantilism was not due to wars, it was due to the fact that it was not regulated. This caused huge disparities in wealth and income and people started revolting and stealing. Imperialism is different because it's not a system of economics but a system of border expansion.

      Adam Smith repeatedly warns that regulation is required or _any_ economic system put into play will fail. Control by the few ends up with false scarcity, reduced wages for 'common' workers, and bribes and incentives to politicians to expand the wealth and power of that same few. Up until the 1970s we had countless regulations and taxes to keep society balanced in terms of wealth disparity. LBJ and Nixon tossed the personal income tax regulations in the shitter, and started the deregulation which was massively expanded under the following presidents. Reagan, as much as he is touted this great "conservative" destroyed countless regulations and increased the wealth of the few by claiming "trickle down" would be some great savior (He never read a history book?). The Dole Pineapple wars and another great area to study.

      Consider that 2 decades ago it was illegal for a bank to have influence outside of one State. These regulations were meant to maintain stability. Today, a couple massive banks own nearly everything in the country, and the collapse of any of these would cause the end of the US as we know it because 1/3rd of everyone's money would vanish in the blink of an eye. Imagine if 2 banks collapsed.

      For anyone trying to justify the US doing so well by waging wars (or paying for 'revolutions') in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Ukraine, Georgia, Egypt, Syria, etc.. etc.. please tell me how much the average American's wealth has increased in the last 20 years as opposed to say GW Bush. How much have _you_ been making from these wars compared to Dick Chaney or David Rockefeller. You have probably lost wealth, because as George Carlin said long ago "It's a club, and _you_ are not in it."

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    55. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If by war, you mean two organized military camps going at it, you'll find there plenty of other peaceful periods.
      But if you look at war as just an aspect of conflict, you'll find things livelier today, more than ever. Covering an greater geographical area, and many times larger population, we have plenty of conflict right now.

      Don't focus on just what you see on TV right now. Remember that, in some African country 200 girls were kidnapped (still missing), in some other countries, bombs go off killing people, frequently enough, they don't even make headlines anymore etc etc.

      And ... USA has full prisons ...

      Conflict is alive and well.

    56. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Same with countries, that's why they all want the nukes, it's the nukes that make all the difference.

      And that's why I'm concerned about this conflict. Even though Ukraine voluntarily gave up their nuclear arsenal after the USSR collapse, the thing is, they still have a nice supply of dirty bomb materials courtesy of the Soviets, all conveniently located inside a collapsing sarcophagus and on the surrounding countryside. If Ukraine wanted to use a scorched%H%H%Hirradiated earth policy, they still supply most if not all water to Crimea. It wouldn't take much.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    57. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now repeat after me children, whenever your weenie feels threatened because somebody doesn't like the USA, or because you got caught doing something you shouldn't just remember to shout long and loud:

      "The other guy was worse, the other guy was worse, the other guy was worse..."

      It doesn't seem to matter how educated, you all seem to do it.

    58. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by hugetoon · · Score: 1

      No problem, they do move to the country where they want to stay. They are just taking the land with them :P

    59. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Russia has tens of thousands of military personnel already available in their only warm water port and have previously pulled the "we're protecting our ethnic minority" twice with Georgia as well as having armed paratroopers take over a lighthouse in Ukraine a few years back. They're desperately afraid that a pro-western government would deny them their port and furious that it's only an issue because a Ukrainian changed the border in the 50s.

      The US tried to destabilize the Ukraine so what? They could not let them into NATO like Georgia? Or the Ukraine for that matter?

      One has an incredibly clear, incredibly motivated, incredibly well documented history of X. One has none of those things.

    60. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a rather US-centric perspective. The EU got Russia angry earlier by talking free trade zones. Both were looking for economic expansion, and the EU just outbid Russia. Not with outright cash, but EU market access is worth a lot. So this invasion is just Russia's way of getting back at the EU. Angering the US is just an added bonus.

      As for the destabilization, EU politicians have been campaigning in the open in Kiev. No stealthy PsyOps there. Some Ukrainian business tycoons do have conflicting interests; if anything stealthily happened they'd be the main suspects.

    61. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by hugetoon · · Score: 2

      Hm, that's an interesting suggestion.

      Then what about people in US move back wherever they came from and leave the continent to the ethnic groups that were cleared out ?

    62. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by m00sh · · Score: 1

      And then market economic reality kicked in, and it's nuclear WW3 for resources again.

      Market economics are the alternative to fighting for resources. Instead of grabbing what you want by force, you just buy it. The market based world order of the Pax Americana is far more peaceful than the age of imperialism and mercantilism that preceded it.

      Market economics is what happens when everyone has nukes. You can't grab what you want by force because nuking makes nothing worth it.

    63. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      During the cold war, the Soyuz capsules were equipped with a special pistol that could fire in a vacuum. I don't think it was for defending against the random alien that might wander by.

      Ummm, no. It was life insurance in the case of an off-target landing.

      Unlike us, the Russians recovered their spacecraft on land, usually in remote areas, and like us, they didn't always hit the target area, and there could be a few days of searching involved. When you're lost on the ocean, you need shark repellent. When you're lost in the back country of Siberia, you need bear repellent.

      Also, what AC said. Read a book on guns.

    64. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but those people have only lived there since the 40s through the 70s for the most part. In which case I propose they just move back .....

      Perhaps you should also tell that to those imported into Palestine

    65. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      You're reading it out of order.

      The CIA used their "Arab Spring" playbook in Ukraine, ousting the (legally elected) president. This all happened well before the Russian troops moved even a toe.

    66. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by mi · · Score: 1

      There may be less wars and deaths but you do know that is only because the powers that be have found easier ways to rape neighbouring countries and enslaving their citizens?

      And yet, there being fewer wars and deaths really is a welcome improvement ...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    67. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thankyou for mentioning those countries.

      We had been shat on by the US for decades. Then they went away to the ME and China, and things here began to improve.

    68. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Not that one.

    69. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      None of that explains why CIA Director John Brennan was summoned to meet with the puppet government face to face.

      On the other hand a "what the hell do we do now?" meeting would explain this odd occurrence quite readily.

    70. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by sageres · · Score: 1

      Please don't forget the enormous ethnic cleansing program of Holodomyr -- an artificial famine brought by the Soviet government in order to ethnically cleanse Ukrainian population out of the Central and Eastern Ukraine. Estimates varies on the number of dead, from 2.4 to 7.5 million people. The affected areas (Kyiv, Dnipropetrivsk, Odessa, Kharkiv, Donesk ) were later settled in the newly "open" houses and spaces by ethnic Russians.

    71. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by sageres · · Score: 1

      They don't have to move, but live in Ukraine as Ukrainian citizens.

    72. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You have this quaint notion that Ukrainians and Russians are two completely unrelated people with clearly defined territorial boundaries between them. They're not - the two nations originate from a single root (both ethnically and in terms of nationhood), and the border was always fluid to say the least. It's very hard to find a pure Ukrainian in along the eastern border of Ukraine, just as it is hard to find a pure Russian along the southern border of Russia with Ukraine - the language spoken in the countryside is a mix of both in varying proportions ("surzhyk"), family lines go back and forth and back again, and ethnic self-identification is essentially random.

      Consequently, the majority of people in eastern Ukraine aren't Russian. They're Russian-speaking Ukrainians, and as such, they have as much claim to the lands they live on as anyone else in that country.

      (The question of whether the majority of them actually wants to "belong to Russia" is a different one - and if you took the recent referendum seriously, then I have a couple of bridges to sell to you.)

    73. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by sageres · · Score: 1

      Physical relocation is indeed not the way, although it was done successfully before (India - Pakistan partition) The problem is not ethnic in general. The problem is that the South Eastern Ukraine is a kleptocracy -- a state within a state powered by the oligarchs controlling the local government, markets, people, coal mines, factories, banks, shops, markets, etc.,etc.,etc.) These oligarchs (such as the ethnic Tatar Rinat Akhmetov) are fighting to preserve their former way of life. They know full well that they can not maintain this state in a fully-democratic country powered by the technocrats who are bend-over EU memberships and reforms. (BTW, the fact that he is a Tatar has nothing to do with what he is doing. He could care less about the suffering of his ethnic brothers -- Tatars, his religious brothers -- Muslims or his civic brothers -- Ukrainians. All this man cares about is money and he is willing to kill and torture an entire state to achieve that.)

    74. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by mi · · Score: 1

      Pax Americana really only worked because America was ridiculously strong compared to the rest of the world for a few decades. As military strengths equalize- we are likely to see a return to war.

      Yeah. Keep electing obamas and America will get the punishment it so richly deserves for those decades.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    75. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      For whom? The rich?

      Great, more time to live while being oppressed. Maybe we should make a holiday?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    76. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by mi · · Score: 1

      One side had 2 revolutions already that seemed to have worked for their end. Why can't the other side have their own revolution too?

      You could've asked your question before — but on February 27th, when Russia invaded Crimea, it became an obvious enemy. An armed invader. No ifs or buts about it.

      Waving the enemy's flag, replacing your country's flag with that of the enemy on official buildings, arguing for joining the enemy — these are not expressions of legitimate political disagreements. These are acts of treason.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    77. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that one too.

    78. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Wookact · · Score: 1

      I did not go further into this as I am unaware of all of the details, but yes this plays into the issue significantly.

    79. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iraq was a war for oil only in the sense that Saddam invaded our ally, Kuwait, whom we agreed to protect, to annex their oil fields.

      Why did 'we' agree to protect them, do you think?

    80. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Wookact · · Score: 1

      Sure, I have always thought that creating a new state there was a ridiculous idea. It was a poor idea that has led to many of the problems in the middle east today. To bad thats not what this story was about.

    81. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Wookact · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but I think the analogy fails. No one is currently trying to take any more land from the indigenous people and calling it New Ireland, or New Germany. There are also no ties left to the parent countries as the immigrants left those countries in many cases over a hundred years ago. Even if the analogy was spot on it doesn't mean the Russians should have the right to land grab.

    82. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Wookact · · Score: 1

      I think there is no easy solution to the middle east problems. Frankly in that situation both sides have a lot of blood on their hands.

    83. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by mi · · Score: 1

      For whom? The rich?

      For those — rich and poor alike — who'd get killed in earlier times.

      Great, more time to live while being oppressed.

      That was funny.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    84. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Keep electing republicans and america will end up with so many starving and jobless people with no social safety net that the french revolution will look like a 5 year old's birthday party.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    85. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >That makes the coercion more efficient, yes, but not less "empire" like.

      So completely wrong. The word you're looking for is hegemony.

      And I pretty much fail to see a problem with it, relative to the first and second world wars.

    86. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by zedaroca · · Score: 2

      The USA exercises military coercion against none of its trading partners.

      They finance and give tactical support to the military coercion against the people of it's trading partners. Did you forget about Latin America a few years ago and about Pakistan nowadays?

      Both the number and severity of wars has decreased dramatically in the last few decades.

      Even though this is true, it's still very disrespectful to the over 100k Syrians killed thanks to the US (Leaked Stratfor email) and to the 60k Iraqis that were killed because of weapons that didn't exist (and making up new justifications to why that war happened is bs).
      Talking about how humanity was worst in the past is a way of distracting and making little of very serious current issues.

      It is silly to blame America for problems in North Korea or Somalia.

      I didn't see him mentioning NK or Somalia.

    87. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1, Informative

      Pax Americana as a theory might hold water, if it weren't for the fact that the USA has spent most of the latter half of the 20th century fighting wars that it started itself. How many active wars did the USA decisively stop by itself? None? Bosnia might have been an example, except that would be better described as being ended by NATO, in fact Operation Deliberate Force had 15 nations take part. It would probably have worked out the same even if the USA did not take part.

      It's deeply unclear that the USA is single handedly responsible for a net drop in state-on-state violence. Certainly just looking at surface facts would suggest it's the opposite: the world would have been even more peaceful if the USA had a less aggressive foreign policy.

    88. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by mi · · Score: 1

      Keep electing republicans and america will end up with so many starving and jobless people

      Both the number of food-stamp recipients (starving) and unemployment (jobless) increased under Obama. Why, when the unemployment was 6% under Bush, he was blamed for "jobless recovery" by some. Worse, as his figure went further down to 5%, he was still blamed by others.

      Obama's figure today — six years later — is still above 6% (despite millions leaving the workforce for good and thus not figuring into the count) — but you are blaming Republicans? Wow...

      And, no, the mortgage-crisis was not Bush's fault. The do-gooding Democrats are to blame.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    89. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by TWX · · Score: 1

      Same with countries, that's why they all want the nukes, it's the nukes that make all the difference.

      I donno, India and Pakistan have been going at it conventionally off-and-on since they both started manufacturing nukes...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    90. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by TWX · · Score: 1

      The Soviets expelled or killed just about all of the ethnic Germans from Koenigsberg when they were awarded it and turned it into Kaliningrad after WWII. Makes me think that in hindsight, if it might not have made some sense for Ukraine and the other post-Soviet SSRs to have expelled those Russians that had less than four generations of family history in their countries.

      I'm sure that we all would have looked on at this as a terrible thing, but maybe it would have been less violent and less harmful than what ultimately has happened. Russia certainly was in no position to do anything about it in the first couple of years after the fall of the Soviet Union, and given their own history of pogroms and violence against denizens of Russia and states under its control it would be difficult for them to claim the moral high-ground.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    91. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Iraq, a war for oil. No american companies operating in Iraq extracting oil. They're european, russian and chinese. Logic, not exactly strong here.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    92. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) US deploys PsyOp to destabilize Ukraine

      How do you destabilize an already unstable region?

    93. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Honest government. Yes. Everyone wants that. Too bad that *both* the "west backed" and the "east backed" governments did the same thing - rob national coffers for their own gains. Both are completely incompetent.

      So now you have 2 sides - one that wants integration with Europe in hope to fix the political issues. Kind of backward thinking.

      The other side, wants closer integration with Russia because many of them are Russian. They want Russia to impose stability and they view Putin as some sort of a hero despite his faults.

      One side had 2 revolutions already that seemed to have worked for their end. Why can't the other side have their own revolution too? And to be very frank, when people *vote* and their vote is then called "illegal" by the so-called "democracies", all it does is harden their stance.

      The west backed was bad, but the east backed was worse.

      As for elections while the east was in charge they stole a Presidential election in '04. After massive protests they agreed to hold a new election but with a new constitution that limited the power of the president, which the west won. The west did a poor job of governing and had a free election which they lost, Yanokovych got in and pressured judges to toss out the new constitution giving him a ton more power. After a bunch more power plays using a mandate that wasn't really his massive numbers of western protesters threw him out. (making a couple boneheaded moves in the process)

      Russia then invades and seizes Crimea with a fake referendum with fake results then encourages the east to do the same. They also have fake referendums and fake results and people in charge only because they have guns and fists and a willingness to use them.

      I won't claim the west is innocent and perfect, but the actions of the people running the east are absolutely injustifiable.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    94. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Honest government. Yes. Everyone wants that. Too bad that *both* the "west backed" and the "east backed" governments did the same thing - rob national coffers for their own gains. Both are completely incompetent.

      This can't be said enough. Both sides are the same. Each wants to influence the government using processes other than democracy. Their methods wouldn't matter even if you could distinguish one from another, and you only just barely can.

      Two sides of the same coin. Heads Ukraine loses, tails Ukraine loses.

      Anyone who sees the anti-Russian side as some kind of benefactor is either stupid or drinking the Kool Aid.

      Yeah, one side overthrew a President who after attempting to steal a previous election, won a legitimate election but then forced judges to throw out the constitution so he'd get more power.

      The other side invaded a sovereign nation, held a referendum at gunpoint, then used the made up results to seize part of that nation. They then started stirring up a civil war in another part of the nation, took over several cities with armed thugs, and held another fake referendum with fake results.

      As long as you ignore all the details the sides are virtually identical.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    95. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      If by war, you mean two organized military camps going at it, you'll find there plenty of other peaceful periods.

      Really? Then name one time, prior to 1991, when no where in the entire world, two organized armies, both capable of holding and defending territory, were fighting. Go ahead. I'll wait.

    96. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with your summary, I'd say the comparative peace of the C20th and C21st are a result of nuclear weapons and perhaps the comparatively large number of democratic states which are not in the habit of going to war with one another. The US is more like the old greek democracies than the Romans in their later imperial days, the Mongols or the British. But the AC I replied to is still wrong in their use of dates and in their interpretation of the idea of the Pax Americana.

    97. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by jelizondo · · Score: 1

      By your comment I gather you are an American and so, I'm happy to hear you support returning their land to the Dakotas and Lakotas, which was taken forcefully by the U.S. government despite a treaty to the contrary.

      Perhaps instead of criticizing other countries, you should get your country to honor their agreements with other nations.

      Tell me, how is Ukraine different from the Lakiota/Dakota land? How is the U.S. position different from that of Russia?

      I think we should be looking into our own eye for the beam instead of looking at the mote in our brother's eye.

      --
      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
    98. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      So you're another of those who believes that the first party was spontaneous and the latter actions were concerted by the evil foe.

      How does this not even seem slightly suspicious to you?

    99. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Spoken like one of the elite.

      Yes master, we appreciate all the compassion you grant us to live out our meaningless lives.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    100. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Do I believe that the Maidan protests were fundamentally a genuine expression of Ukrainian outrage with Yanokovych? Yes.

      I don't deny that the protests and organizations involved had some Western support, a few Western politicians stopping by to give speeches, and had official contact with Western groups and governments. But that doesn't mean that over 100,000 protesters in Kiev weren't representative of the population of Kiev.

      In contrast do I think that the protests in Crimea and Donetsk were a genuine expression of East Ukrainian outrage with the Euromaidan? Yes. And they did have cause to be angry because despite his power grab Yanokovych had still won an election.

      That being said Russia is also driving the protests, if not through intelligence agents (for which there's some evidence) then through propaganda and the implication that they're willing to invade to make sure the separatists stay in charge. Just look at the number of people here who think Kiev is run by neo-Nazis, imagine how bad it must be when all your news sources are controlled by the Kremlin.

      Another difference is that the focus of the Maidan was massive numbers of people peacefully protesting and expressing outrage, the small amount of violence was an unavoidable consequence of the numbers involved and the eventual overthrow was a result of the fact they had so much power they couldn't really restrain themselves.

      In contrast the focus of the Eastern protests was violence, intimidation, and seizing power from the beginning. So a mob of hundreds in a city of 2 million can easily take over if they're willing to use force.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    101. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by mirix · · Score: 1

      The Yugoslav wars were greatly extended by US/NATO actions, I'd say. The only difference would be Bosnia would be split (and likely annexed) as opposed to being de-facto split and broke anyway.

      Without western meddling there would probably never have been a war in the first place, at least not to the extent that there was.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    102. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      If you take the position you've already conceded and add to it weight enough to offset a reasonable amount of media bias, you're already well within 'equal' bad acts from outside forces.

      Unless you feel you're getting the whole, truthful story from the Western press?

    103. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      You are looking at it the wrong way around. You are looking for money being made based on extracting oil. Look at it instead as money spent on expensive oil. If the Iraqi oil fields stopped producing the world wide cost of oil will rise. The US being the biggest consumer of oil is the MOST negatively effected by higher oil prices.

      The amount of money that a US company could have made out of extracting oil in Iraq pales into insignificance when offset against the losses incurred through higher prices overall. The US doesn't care who is sucking it out of the ground as long as SOMEONE is.

    104. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      If you take the position you've already conceded and add to it weight enough to offset a reasonable amount of media bias, you're already well within 'equal' bad acts from outside forces.

      Unless you feel you're getting the whole, truthful story from the Western press?

      I'm already factoring in western media bias, what reasonable amount of media do you think I'm missing that would make them equal?

      Did Russia not invade Crimea? Were all those Maidan snipers really XE/Blackwater contractors? If anything the Western media has been effectively biased towards Russia.

      For example in their obsession with appearing objective by showing both sides of every story they're presenting the referendums as a case of he said/she said. It's blatantly obvious to anyone paying attention that the referendum results are wholesale fabrications. But because the media is reluctant to flat out contradict one side people end up thinking that the truth is somewhere inbetween. Similarly with the fascists in Kiev. They're a tiny fraction less influential than most other European countries, but Russia keeps saying Fascist, the western media repeats, and readers end up thinking "ok, they're probably not all fascists but there's enough for the Russians to be legitimately scared".

      That's the brilliance of Putin's propaganda. Take advantage of the Western media's obsession with being unbiased by shifting the Overton window so you look defensible.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    105. Re: Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any evidence of Iraaq seeking to limit exports pre 2003 with your theory?

    106. Re: Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A true humanitarian, who wishes to sleight the rich at every opportunity. Jmc23 believes lives are worthless especially if they aren't ostensibly sacrificed on the altar of dying for your country.

      Yet it is not the children of the rich who fight, and it is rarely due to the influence of the common man that politicians open the gates to wars.

    107. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EU doesn't imprison national icons for disagreeing with the reigning autocrat, Russia does.

    108. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do you believe that the February 'uprising' was spontaneous, but the Crimean version was not?

      If so, why?

      The lack of American soldiers running around "liberating" western Ukraine, while Crimea was invaded by the Red Army?

    109. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      We went to the moon when space programs were about proving how accurate your missile guidance systems were and gentle on the payload.

      All of the threats and proof to back them without actually blowing up something and sparking off round after round of retaliatory fire.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    110. Re: Space programs as a crowbar? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Any pistol can fire in a vacuum. In fact, any cartridge based firearm can fire in a vacuum. Russian space vehicles carried either Makarov PMs or TP-82 combination firearms. No specialized weapon needed, unless you count that failed laser pistol that was never fielded. You fail it.

      Until all the oils boil off in the vacuum and the metals become vacuum welded together. Besides I heard it was a shotgun that they were equipped with for wolf and bear repellent.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    111. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by euroq · · Score: 1

      I don't agree that it's drinking the Kool-aid. It's definitely better than the situation in 1944. Less wars and deaths is good.

      --
      Just because the U.S. is a republic does not mean it is not a democracy. Democracy/republic are not mutually exclusive.
    112. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got your point about feudalism. But it is the price you pay, except for prisoners and vagrants, to be counted as the richest 5% in the world. Americans live inside the castle walls. There is no way to explain to foreigners how much we don't give a crap. Do you really think i care whether bush OR obama is in office? Real people just don't care about anything. Oh, except climate change and homos. (But mostly that is just a reflex action) Most people die within 30 miles of where they were born. It's not even that we don't like you. You just don't exist. Besides, Russian invading Ukraine again? Count me out DILLIGAF.

    113. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong war with Iraq. That was the first war, which Bush senior wisely ended at the border with Iraq. Shrub, much the disgrace to his much more intelligent daddy, took us in to invade Baghdad and then *wasted it all* by failing to stay to actually finish conquering the place. He did make a lot of money for his oil businesses in Texes by leaving Iraq so fscked up they won't be able to reliably produce oil for another decade.

      I think of it as the Republican contribution to climate control.

    114. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you bring up something so stupid in this conversation?

      Are you trying to start a flame war? You're a moron.

      If you have a problem that is big enough that you want out, yeah.. Move out.

      I don't even really have words for the degree if irrelevance your post has to this topic. You really fucked up in your logic here.

      Jesus Christ. You probably thought you were being intelligent. Please step in front of a bus, or eat shattered glass or something.

    115. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Not really. You know why no one (including the Ukrainians) really did much about Crimea? Because it was actually part of Russia until 1954. While Russia's numbers for the "vote" were obviously highly exaggerated (especially the turnout), it would not be surprising if the majority voted to secede. Russia almost had a plausible argument that they were just "fixing" a bad bureaucratic decision form the 50's (by invading a now sovereign country and lying about it, of course).

      The BIG issue now is Eastern Ukraine. Russia saw how easy it was to grab a whole chunk of another country while Europe and the US protested impotently, and now they figure "hey, let's see how far we can go, why not?" It's like a more covert-Putin-KGB version of the Nazi expansion in the 30's. Really hope Obama's legacy isn't as the the modern Chamberlain...

    116. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      More *pressing shit*? Russia LOVES what's going on, they are likely to gain major new territory while the rest of the world stands around with their dicks in their hands pretending that "freezing" 10% of a bunch of billionaires' assets is going to somehow "hurt" them.

    117. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Maybe because the unrest in the Ukraine against Yanukovych's government had been building ever since he became president and promptly threw his main opponent into prison for "embezzlement" while living in his giant mansion surrounded by a fleet of cars, boats, and his own personal zoo...

    118. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by hugetoon · · Score: 1

      Agreed, in order for the analogy to be complete, Ukrainian Russians should further oppress local populations with the military support from their country of origin to the point where locals are can no longer be of any treat to them.

    119. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by hugetoon · · Score: 1

      By all means feel free to ignore my posts, I'm certainly not interested to have a flame war or any other sort of interaction with the likes of You.

    120. Re: Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the TP-82 combination carbine/shotgun/flare launcher. As for the oil, use a graphite-based lubricant that's water-free, available at most gun shops. The only real issue with guns in space is heat buildup but a couple of shots are not a problem.

    121. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like having two bullies at school. One entitlist spoiled brat, and one from a broken home. Both want your lunch money for "protection", give it to one of them and the other will beat you up for not paying.

      They do provide protection from the other normal kids at school, which you never were in danger from anyway, so they believe they do you a favour.
      Neither dare stop the other bully though, because at heart, they are both chicken shit.

    122. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you also think the same of Israelis?

    123. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The timing of this current dust-up with Russia is clear. The mole aka "useful idiot" Edward Snowden immediately flew to Russia and China with his treasure of intelligence.. Shortly after that event all hell has broken out as Russia has been able to use these secrets to create trouble in the Ukraine. As the Snowden supporters say: Thank you Edward Snowden

    124. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Wookact · · Score: 1

      Sure the land was stolen from them, and I find that to be abhorrent. If I had been around when it happened, I would have voiced that opinion. I was not. I am around as we watch Russia try to steal the land. I am doing nothing but speaking out against that.

      Frankly I believe we should bend over backwards to make amends on the land that was stolen from the Native Americans. Be this returning the land, or paying the tribe fair market value, with how ever many years of interest. I am not sure what else you expect me to do about it though.

    125. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Sciath · · Score: 1

      Guess it matters what is meant by "imperialism". The market can also be imperialistic in the sense that it replicates the "snatch and grab" of militarism. One major difference is that the market tends to concentrate wealth into a select group of hands whereas militarism more often than not benefits a nation overall. So... which is worse?

      --
      "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
    126. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Sciath · · Score: 1

      Representative Democracy [supposedly] is technically what the U.S. is. But I believe that is merely a ruse to make people feel like they make a difference. For example; it is not the popular vote that elects Presidents, it's the Electoral College [elite if you will] because the "Founding Fathers" didn't completely trust the common person to be educated [or interested] enough to know how to run a country. In fact, it wasn't even until the beginning of the twentieth century that Senators were elected by "popular vote". As long as you can keep the people ignorant and in the dark as to their actual "power", the longer such a ruse can be perpetrated. America the land of the free and home of the ignorant. ;}

      --
      "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
    127. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Sciath · · Score: 1

      What! Nixon was delusional and preoccupied with his own power. He had wanted the Presidency for so long that once he got into office he was willing to brake the law in any fashion to keep it. In fact, no U.S. President has fully complied with established law in their day. There is no such thing as an honest politician.

      --
      "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
    128. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just say, that USA did not have their ass kicked by Soviets in Korea?

    129. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russians say - "don't tell me what I should do, and I won't tell you where you should go". Obviously you are not smart enough to give advice to nations. I wouldn't trust you a hamster.

    130. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? You can't do anything, your opinion doesn't matter. Wake up.

    131. Re: Space programs as a crowbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop saying bullshit when you obviously know nothing at all. It's true, they had special guns. Extremely noisy, but able to fire in space. It's not a secret.

    132. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Tell me, how is Ukraine different from the Lakiota/Dakota land? How is the U.S. position different from that of Russia?

      When was Lakiota/Dakota independence recognized by the USA? Then occupied by the USA, then returned to independence, then "invaded" again, while still officially recognizing independence? Then they aren't the same.

    133. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Pax Americana as a theory might hold water, if it weren't for the fact that the USA has spent most of the latter half of the 20th century fighting wars that it started itself.

      Many of the wars were started by Europe. The USA just went in to clean up. Israel (and thus, much of the middle east instability) was a British invention, Yugoslavia was created by the European powers, sort of an "other" category. If WWI hadn't ended so poorly, we wouldn't have had WWII. And the end of WWII was so screwed up that we made WWIII, but we (global, not US) managed to not link every bad decision made in th 1940s into a single war, but it was a war that spanned the globe, just in isolated skirmishes, rather than a coordinated effort.

      It's deeply unclear that the USA is single handedly responsible for a net drop in state-on-state violence. Certainly just looking at surface facts would suggest it's the opposite: the world would have been even more peaceful if the USA had a less aggressive foreign policy

      Yes, like the less aggressive foreign policies in the 1930s prevented WWII.

    134. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If the stable supply of oil decreases, what happens to the price?

    135. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by jelizondo · · Score: 1

      The U.S. government, sanctioned by Congress, declared the Black Hills, and other land, to be owned by the Lakota; then when gold was found there, not only refused to stop miners from exploiting it, the goverment started building a trail and forts on land it expressely had recognized as foreign (treaty of 1851); eventually leading to war between the tribes and the U.S. Army, to be followed by the 1868 treaty.

      The 1868 treaty was quickly thrown aside and a new war erupted between the tribes and the U.S.

      Please read the Treaty of Ft. Laramie, 1851 and 1868.

      Finally, the U.N. passed the Resolution on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples which was not signed by the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zeland; four countries that have, ahem, problems with their indigenous population.

      Yes, your proud country went back on its word twice and to this day, it refuses to honor the treaties it signed and were approved by Congress.

      --
      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
    136. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Finally, the U.N. passed the Resolution on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples which was not signed by the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zeland; four countries that have, ahem, problems with their indigenous population.

      New Zealand wouldn't have signed because they already signed a treaty with the indigenous people. Why sign two conflicting treaties? What problems does New Zealand have with the indigenous?

      The USA would be hard to deal with in that manner. There were separate treaties and treatment for different groups. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A... being the largest and one of the most recent. The UN resolution you linked to didn't indicate who signed it (being a resolution, is it "signed"?). It looks to be basic human rights, all of which are granted by every industrialized country except Russia and China (both who exterminate/relocate undesireable indigenous, whether Tibetans or Ukrainians in their way). Oz, NZ, USA, and Ca all grant more than the minimum outlined in that document. As it didn't indicate any reparations (that I saw in a skim of it), nothing you mention with the resolution indicated payment for inhabiting previously inhabited land. Oh, and the treaties didn't carve out sovereignity for the indigenous, but instead promised non-immigration to US lands covered in the treaty. If the USSR had re-drawn the Crimea to be Russian while the USSR included the Ukraine, would that have been such an issue? Because that's closer to what happened in the USA.

      Yes, your proud country went back on its word twice and to this day, it refuses to honor the treaties it signed and were approved by Congress.

      Only twice? What country are you in/from?

    137. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      That analogy is more apt than you think.

      The old greek democracies voted to go to war with their neighbours _every single year_

    138. Re:Space programs as a crowbar? by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      That would be the Saddamn,
      who was put in place by american interests (knocking over a relatively democratic govt),
      who was used to go to war against the Iranians,
      whose current state of affairs stems largely from the USA knocking over a democraticv govt and installing a dictator (the Shah)

      American activities in foreign countries since the end of WW2 have been _at least_ as destabilising as those of the old USSR

      Let's not forget who trained Bin Laden and his friends in the first place....

  4. suspend GPS? by mojo-raisin · · Score: 1, Funny

    How does one suspend GPS? Russia doesn't control outer space above their country.

    ps - Elon Musk must be chuckling.

    1. Re:suspend GPS? by bigpat · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe they are talking about ground stations that are physically located in Russia. My understanding is that since they are fixed points on the earth that they can be used to calibrate the GPS signals/clocks to be more accurate when they are passing over that area of the world.

    2. Re:suspend GPS? by guacamole · · Score: 1

      It's not about suspending GPS. It's about land based sites. Some kind of signal boosters I suppose.

    3. Re:suspend GPS? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Then Russia would just be hurting itself as the satellites around the rest of world will continue to function.

    4. Re:suspend GPS? by jklovanc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So suspending the GPS sites in Russia will make GPS less accurate in Russia. It will still be accurate enough to place a bomb so what does the US care?

    5. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are ground stations used to orient the GPS satellites. Some of them are in Russia.

    6. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. GPS (or any other GNSS) needs ground stations all over the world to keep the system `calibrated'. Loss of a few of these ground stations will diminish its precision, although will not completely destroy its functionality.

      It does not look like a well though out response, though, since Russian space industry needs money.

    7. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they are talking about WAAS and or perhaps even jamming GPS (of course this would only be possible in limited areas), but they could also distord the WAAS signals, so anyone with WAAS enabled would be effected (they could disable WAAS then, but not everyone with GPS even knows what it is).

    8. Re:suspend GPS? by ChadL · · Score: 2

      They are talking about the GPS ground stations that monitors the GPS signals (and is programed with its exact position and altitude) and determine what corrections, if any, need to be made to the GPS signals (so that what it knows to be its correct position is the same as what its GPS receiver is telling it)
      Russia wants similar ground stations set up in the US for their GLONASS system, which I think is fair (and good for users of navigation systems, if not for the US military which would like to be able to turn off Russia's navigation systems).

    9. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Probably not a constructive comment.

    10. Re:suspend GPS? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Russia has its own system called Glonass. Most modern navigation devices support it because all the GPS modules implemented it when Russia decided to impose massive import duty on GPS only devices. They probably wouldn't be hurt by GPS because Glonass is adequate for civilian use and the military would never trust GPS to begin with.

      It won't just affect Russia either, it will affect nearby countries. If the GPS system can't be maintained with new satellites it will eventually degrade and fail, but presumably the US has a backup plan to keep it going with different launch vehicles. I imagine there will be some considerable cost involved though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:suspend GPS? by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      Then Russia would just be hurting itself as the satellites around the rest of world will continue to function.

      IIRC, Russia has a law requiring all domestically produced/sold GPS devices to support GLONASS.
      Turning off the GPS ground stations wouldn't anything to limit Russian's use of GPS/GLONASS devices.
      Worst case scenario, it could limit precision for devices that actively use both satellites to derive the location.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    12. Re:suspend GPS? by dmgxmichael · · Score: 4, Informative

      GPS is normally only accurate to within a few yards, and when the system was opened up to civilian use in the late 90's the military put in a discrepancy to the civilian signals so that they'd be off by a few dozen yards.

      Then someone hit upon the idea of checking GPS against a known good reading.

      GPS base stations do this. They know where they are, exactly. They listen to the GPS satellites report of where the satellites think they are, then broadcast the margin of error out to nearby GPS receivers. As a result, the accuracy of the readings can be gotten exact down to a few feet.

      So successful was this that the military eventually discarded the idea of putting in an intentional margin of error for civilian signals.

    13. Re:suspend GPS? by guacamole · · Score: 2

      I think the intent is to get more Russians to use Russia's GPS equivalent.

    14. Re:suspend GPS? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      And every Russian with a phone made by anyone other than a Russian phone-maker would be SOL.

    15. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How sure are you that russia doesn't control outer space above its country? I could easily see them removing the gps satellites physically if they found them annoying.

    16. Re:suspend GPS? by AMDinator · · Score: 2

      Not just feet anymore. I work with a product that is accurate within a few centimeters. Civilians have access to it.

    17. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      A GNSS primer:

      GPS will still function fine. It's a cold war technology: it was designed with the understanding that Russia would try to thwart it, not maintain it. There is zero danger that it will "degrade and fail" without Russian support. Ground stations are useful because they are known positions which should be very constant moment-to-moment (though there can be inches of movement in the long term). That makes it good for calibrating out error. The sort of errors it's good for calibrating out are pretty much only notable at the cm level, if you are actually in Russia. Russians with GPS systems won't notice.

      GLONASS is the Russian program. It pretty much JUST covers Russia. It covers it well, making it good enough for civilian use. But then again, so is GPS, even without Russian ground stations. The notion of adding GLONASS ground sites in the U.S. is kind of meaningless. They could put up satellites that actually provide good coverage of the U.S., but I can't imagine any real tactical or economic advantage. It's saber-rattling aimed at people who don't know what they're talking about.

      Meanwhile GPS is long in the tooth. Planned errors are inserted into the signal to degrade performance if you don't have the "key" to correct for them... but any government who cared to have military-grade GPS has it, either through the black market in Israel, or basic reverse engineering and intelligence. As such, the U.S. actually offered the proverbial keys to it's allies (read: everyone, especially Europe), but Europeans decided that they could not stand to ride the U.S.'s coat tails. They want an independent, European-controlled GNSS system. (This is not imprudent, as the current NSA- and Ukraine-related tensions show.) This is when they started pouring more money into Galileo. This was originally envisaged as a 50/50 joint public/private venture, but no companies actually stepped up to take part in the expensive R&D effort of re-building something that already exists. It is now a (very underfunded and behind schedule) 80% public venture.

      Meanwhile, governments that may become unfriendly in the future -- like China, which always speaks of "when we invade Taiwan", never "IF we invade Taiwan" -- can't trust anything that the U.S. might shut off. Hence, they are building out their own system, BeiDou. The main focus of their "limited" version of the system was obviously South China Sea, but they supposedly plan a global build-out.

    18. Re:suspend GPS? by ChromaticDragon · · Score: 1

      Ah crud.

      Posting to remove a mistaken moderation.

    19. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of phones support GLONASS. Once you're adding GPS support, adding GLONASS isn't a big extra step.

      Besides, that would just discourage anyone from buying foreign phones.

    20. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really don't get this do you? GPS ground stations are dotted around the globe and are required for an accurate reading. If you start taking out the base stations which are found in Russia then it becomes less effective as a navigational tool

    21. Re:suspend GPS? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that basically all phones on the market have been dual-constellation (or more, some support Galileo too) since early 2012 or so.

      Russia put MASSIVE import taxes on navigation devices that didn't support GLONASS, so all phone manufacturers switched to dual-constellation chips as it was FAR cheaper than the tax penalty.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    22. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      Civilian GPS is accurate to within 10s of feet; with filtering this is good enough for navigation. Military GPS within _feet_; that's good enough for pretty much anything. Differential GPS (which uses a nearby ground station to almost perfectly eliminate all transmission errors) is accurate within centimeters; that's good enough for highly precise positioning applications, such as munitions scoring, but usually requires post-processing. The last is what Russians are threatening to cut off, and it would affect no one except Russians who rely on GPS for such (incredibly niche) work. It's a token gesture of defiance at best.

    23. Re:suspend GPS? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      It's called Differential GPS. I used to work with this back in the days of Selective Availability.

      And it was way more accurate than "a few feet". Try "a few inches", given a base station nearby.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    24. Re:suspend GPS? by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

      Any payload launched with Atlas V can be launched with one of the Delta IV rockets. That was the whole purpose of the EELV program to begin with. The problem is a lot of payloads are dimensioned to fit in a Lockheed Martin Atlas V with Russian RD-180 engines and won't fit into anything smaller than the Boeing Delta IV Heavy with US RS-68 engines and the Delta IV Heavy costs... a lot.

    25. Re:suspend GPS? by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 5, Informative

      As one of about 3 operators who turned it off in early 1990s, your information is a bit dated. The signal isn't degraded, but the mathmatical solution WAS. However, after the Russians shot down a civilian airliner (aren't Russians AWESOME!) President Reagan made the decision to turn it off, and it was implmented a few years later. We sent the "SA/AS = 0" (or turned it off) and "Bias=0" (or turned any bias amount to zero) commands around 1993. SA is Selective Availability. AS is Anti-Spoofing. Spoofing is the process where someone pretends to be GPS to throw your solution off, or they might jam to just outright deny usage. Your keys comment might also confuse as we (the US) can also encrypt GPS signals. Meaning AS turns on keys, SA turns on bias. They are mutually exclusive, as AS denies usage (aka, encryption) and SA denies precision (aka, dilution of precision).

    26. Re:suspend GPS? by dmgxmichael · · Score: 1

      I was experimenting with these things at the University of Kentucky back in 97 or so, and the professor at that time said a few feet. That accuracy has improved since then doesn't surprise me. It would surprise me to find a unit from '97 or so that was accurate to the inch, but I could believe it. I am not an expert in the technology though - just giving the general reason why ground stations are important.

    27. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Negative. There are no GPS Ground Stations (they are Colorado Springs, Ascn, Diego Garcia, Kwaj, and other other I'm forgetting) in Russia. There are no Monitoring Stations there (all GAs plus about 2-3) in Russia either. - GPS Satellite Operator (SSO) 1991-1998, AETC Schoolhouse Instructor- GPS Satellite Ops 1995-1998

    28. Re:suspend GPS? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      The article did not say that Russia would deny engine parts for the Atlas V and Delta IV rockets that deliver GPS satellites into orbit; only that they would stop for "military applications" and also discontinue "GPS ground sites" which provide extra accuracy via ground transmitters.

      But logically they could consider a GPS launch as a "military application", the GPS satellites are less than 2000kg, which a Falcon 9 or Antares could chuk up there with no problem at all.

      As far as navigation goes, I thought it was already trivial to make a GPS/Glonass combined receiver.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    29. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GPS does have ground control stations, as well as a ground signal to improve accuracy. Don't know what kind of ground stations are in Russian territory, but it's not just satellites.

    30. Re:suspend GPS? by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 2

      Yes, but the link you provide also shows there are NO GPS monitoring stations in Russia. Ascension and Kwaj Islands, Diego Garcia, Colorado Springs, Hawaii, and Cape Canaveral. Ground Antennas are about 5 of those (drop Hawaii, Cape, and Colo Sprngs). Hence, none of the sites that affect GPS are Eastern Europe or Russia. Remember, GPS was originally built during Reagan's years, before the Cold War ended.

    31. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonder how long it will be before China or Russia start threatening to shoot down Galileo or GPS satellites. China already got us a hair's width near a Kessler Syndrome type of disaster by showing they can shoot down a satellite while it was still in orbit.

      Actually, I wonder how long it will be until some country just starts throwing sand into space, not like it will benefit them, but to deny every nation the ability to launch anything for the next several hundred years. It wouldn't be China, the US, Russia, or the other powers, but a nation like North Korea that benefits little from existing satellites.

    32. Re:suspend GPS? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Because you do not understand how space works. All satellites not in geosync go over every country eventually.

      Also the Outer Space Treaty specifically prohibits that sort of action.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    33. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stating that GLONASS only covers Russia is false. Like GPS, it has global coverage -- roughy speaking, somewhat worse near the equator, somewhat better near the poles, although GPS is getting better by putting more satellites in orbit than originally specified. It took a long time for GLONASS to become fully operational because the whole fall of the USSR got in the way, but it is fully populated now.

    34. Re:suspend GPS? by nogginthenog · · Score: 2, Informative

      GLONASS is the Russian program. It pretty much JUST covers Russia

      My Nexus 4 in the UK regularly picks up Glonass GPS satellites. I guess I'm not that far from Russia...

    35. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe they are talking about ground stations that are physically located in Russia. My understanding is that since they are fixed points on the earth that they can be used to calibrate the GPS signals/clocks to be more accurate when they are passing over that area of the world.

      WAAS. Wide Area Augmentation System. Aids accuracy, integrity, and availability for GPS users. My hand held Garmin displays accuracy to 200 feet, then 20 feet when wass makes the correction. I live 10 miles from SAN (San Diego Airport) so, wass up? Ground stations receive and add a correction factor to the Satt signals.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_Area_Augmentation_System

    36. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad western stooges put the lives of civillians as less important than testing the soviet union, as that's how the plane got into soviet airspace.

    37. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All satellites will at least pass over countries near the equator, but whether they pass over any other countries depends on the inclination.

    38. Re:suspend GPS? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      However, after the Russians shot down a civilian airliner (aren't Russians AWESOME!)

      Umm, we did that once upon a time too, and in our case the airliner was in a known civil air traffic corridor, rather than miles off course like KAL 007. Of course, the incident did happen in a tense combat zone, so the mistakes made need to be viewed in that context..... It's actually a good case study for scenario fulfillment.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    39. Re:suspend GPS? by dnavid · · Score: 1

      They are talking about the GPS ground stations that monitors the GPS signals (and is programed with its exact position and altitude) and determine what corrections, if any, need to be made to the GPS signals (so that what it knows to be its correct position is the same as what its GPS receiver is telling it)

      Actually, there are no such receiver stations for US GPS systems anywhere within the Russian Federation. I believe the GPS stations they are talking about are differential GPS stations, which are used to increase the accuracy of GPS positioning from satellites from about a couple meters to a few centimeters. A list of DGPS stations is here. Of the stations listed as associated with Russia, most show as either planned or currently on trial, which could explain where there are discrepancies in reporting about how many there are. Its possible that the reporting talks about eleven because of the nineteen stations showing as "on trial" eleven are actually on-line and delivering commercial signals.

    40. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia is building out the GLONASS network. As it does so coverage will improve globally. Same story for the other systems.

      I'm not sure what the current constellation looks like. I do know they lost three satellites during a launch failure of a Proton rocket about a year ago, which probably set things back a bit.

    41. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OT
      sure, when US shoot an airliner it's totally fine:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...

    42. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes Russians are awesome. Better than Yanks - you know why I say that? See, Americans just can't stop badmouthing others. You just proved it - a nice interseting piece on GPS tech and you just HAD to put in a "fuck the USAs current enemy" in there.

    43. Re:suspend GPS? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Russia already effectively mandates GLONASS for navigation devices sold in the country, which is why most navigation chips sold anywhere these days do both GPS and GLONASS (it's easy to support both, and it's cheaper to mass-produce chips with such support uniformly than to make two separate lines for Russia and for everywhere else).

    44. Re:suspend GPS? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Not sure how you can make a low orbit satellite system that only covers one non-equatorial country.

    45. Re:suspend GPS? by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      GLONASS is the Russian program. It pretty much JUST covers Russia

      My Nexus 4 in the UK regularly picks up Glonass GPS satellites. I guess I'm not that far from Russia...

      Well we might be quite a lot closer to Russia soon...

    46. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glonass is not GPS.

    47. Re:suspend GPS? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a tax but originally a penalty. It only became a tax after it went to the Russian Supreme Court where Putin said it was a tax.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    48. Re:suspend GPS? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Antares also uses Russian engines (NK-33), so if GPS satellites are deemed military by Russia, Antares will lose access to Russian engines if it agrees to launch them.

      Only Delta IV and F9 & FH seem untouchable for US launches.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    49. Re:suspend GPS? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      GPS was designed by and for the US military during the Cold War. If it isn't designed to work without Russian ground stations, someone should probably be shot.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    50. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that was designed and implemented by Ronald Reagan, who was out of office in 1989 and even his successor, Bush 41, was gone by '93. No, I'm blame the final implementation of that order on one President William J. Clinton.

      AC

    51. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All satellites not in geosync go over every country eventually.

      Uhm, apparently you don't understand how space works. In addition to what my colleague says about inclination, you can also extend the concept of Molniya orbits to non-1:1 trajectories.

    52. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can routinely see 8 GLONASS satellites from the continental US.

    53. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a result, the accuracy of the readings can be gotten exact down to a few feet.

      You misspelled "millimetres". Things do get quite interesting at that level, though.

    54. Re:suspend GPS? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Umm, we did that once upon a time [wikipedia.org] too, and in our case the airliner was in a known civil air traffic corridor, rather than miles off course like KAL 007. Of course, the incident did happen in a tense combat zone, so the mistakes made need to be viewed in that context..... It's actually a good case study for scenario fulfillment.

      Oh, there's a wee bit more difference than just that. The American shoot-down was during a time of crisis, when the people responsible believed themselves to be under attack, yet even then they tried to get positive ID and warn the aircraft away before firing in self-defence. The Russian shoot-down occurred out of the blue, when the people responsible had no reason to feel threatened, yet they didn't bother to try and identify the aircraft nor did they try to warn it. The pilot who fired the missiles stated on record that he knew it was a civilian airliner, though he suspected it "may have been converted" for "spying purposes".

      Both situations were deplorable, of course, but making a mistake during a crisis situation is a hell of a lot more understandable than blindly killing anything that crosses your border without even trying to talk to it first.

      Also, the Russians actually shot down two airliners - one in 1978 and one in 1983. The first one isn't well known because it managed to land after being hit, and only resulted in the deaths of 2 passengers. It's memorable to me only because the Soviets had the balls to send South Korea a $100,000 bill to cover the expense of shooting down their airliner and then rescuing the passengers.

    55. Re:suspend GPS? by elwinc · · Score: 1

      There are enough errors in the parent that I think a few corrections are necessary.

      (1) The USA GPS system was designed from Reagan's 1983 directive onwards to be used by both civilians and the military, and to provide better accuracy to the military. The first GPS satellites were launched in 1989. So it's not really accurate to say "when the system was opened up to civilian use in the late 90's."

      (2) The "discrepancy" in civilian signals was known as "Selective Availability" (SA) by "dithering" the clock, and it was designed in from the start so that if an enemy tried to use civilian GPS, civilian GPS could be degraded worldwide without disturbing military GPS. That doesn't mean SA was always enabled. In fact, during the Gulf War, there was a shortage of military GPS units, so the military handed out civilian GPSs and turned off SA.

      (3) The " idea of checking GPS against a known good reading" has three forms: differential GPS; only useful locally for work like surveying; WAAS, designed and implemented by the Federal Aviation Administration; and NDGPS, which is still being implemented on US land by Dept of Transportation (it's fully for US waterways thanks to the Coast Guard). WAAS is what you're using now unless you're a ship captain. The point is that except for local surveying equipment, the "someone" who made GPS better is your federal government. This is not a case of clever entrepreneurs outsmarting the government, this is another case of the government providing a new infrastructure that enabled new industries and widespread benefits.

      (4) The reason President Clinton turned of the global selective availability dithering is because by then the GPS constellation had a new ability to deny civilian GPS regionally. So it's not accurate to say, as you did, " that the military eventually discarded the idea of putting in an intentional margin of error for civilian signals." In fact, the military has a better method than ever for putting error into some regional civilian signals. http://archive.wired.com/polit...

      --
      --- Often in error; never in doubt!
    56. Re:suspend GPS? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      The American shoot-down still wasn't in the American airspace. Not even in the international airspace. USA had no right to shoot the airplane down.
      USSR has shot down an airplane that was flying over their airspace - and in fact over military installations - without any authorisation.

      Crisis situation my fat arse, the American captain was just trigger happy.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    57. Re:suspend GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, after the Russians shot down a civilian airliner (aren't Russians AWESOME!)

      Iran Air 655

    58. Re:suspend GPS? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      USSR has shot down an airplane that was flying over their airspace - and in fact over military installations - without any authorisation.

      Correction: that had been flying over their airspace. There's good evidence that the actual shoot-down occurred after the aircraft had already left Russian airspace. But this is also irrelevant - nobody is saying the Russians didn't have the right to shoot it down, only that they were trigger-happy assholes for not bothering to verify its identity or communicate with it.

      Crisis situation my fat arse, the American captain was just trigger happy.

      I know that believing this would make you happy. However, unless your ass is so fat that it can warp time and allow you to change the past, no amount of wishful thinking can change the facts of the situation.

    59. Re:suspend GPS? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      I do not own a donkey.
      And, if I may cite Wikipedia

      Commander David Carlson, commanding officer of the USS Sides, the warship stationed near to the Vincennes at the time of the incident, is reported (Fisk, 2005) to have said that the destruction of the aircraft "marked the horrifying climax to Captain Rogers' aggressiveness, first seen four weeks ago."

      No wishful thinking on my side. Bloody merkins shot down an airplane that did nothing wrong and was in its home airspace all the time. The Russians, on the other hand, shot down an intruder.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    60. Re:suspend GPS? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      The American shoot-down was during a time of crisis

      You did see where I said that, right? "the incident did happen in a tense combat zone"

      when the people responsible believed themselves to be under attack

      Which they shouldn't have, if they had actually listened to what their instruments where telling them. As I said, it's a good case study for scenario fulfillment. Sensors report the aircraft is ascending, crew reports that it's descending on an attack vector. IIRC they had just run a drill days before using the exact same attack scenario they believed they were under, which explains why they ignored what was clearly displayed on the screens in front of them.

      I'm not trying to play the moral equivalency game, I'm just pointing out the facts of a sad truth. We fucked up and several hundred people died that shouldn't have. The other poster strikes me as the blame America first sort, and is not really worth engaging, but he is right about one part: Captain Rogers was a hothead. Did he purposefully order the shoot down? Of course not. But he was using a $3,000,000,000 air defense cruiser to engage gunboats, stretching his rules of engagement to the absolute limit, even breaking them at times. His actions left the Commanding Officer of another ship in his task force baffled, which was noted in the public literature available on the subject.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    61. Re:suspend GPS? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Oh, good point. Also, I forgot that the RS-68 on the Delta IV is from Rocketdyne, not Russia.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    62. Re:suspend GPS? by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

      You read the article you link? I was unaware of this specific incident, however, the US Navy was within a war zone (Iraq - Iran 7 Year war), the Navy ship was squawking warnings, the ship's assets had been fired upon, there'd been a case earlier of a US Navy ship directly attack (yes by Iraq), and the Navy ship mis-identified the airliner as an F-14 (which Iran possessed). Not really the same context, albeit the US side made many mistakes.

      The Russians, in the case of Korean Air Lines Flight 007 sent up an interceptor. An interceptor normally would make a visual as they are way out over the ocean and are not (yet a threat). Here is the excerpted radio transmissions:

      The Commander of the Soviet Far East District Air Defense Forces, General Valery Kamensky,[32] was adamant that KAL 007 was to be destroyed even over neutral waters but only after positive identification showed it not to be a passenger plane. His subordinate, General Anatoly Kornukov, commander of Sokol Air base (later to become commander of the Russian Air Force), was adamant that there was no need to make positive identification as "the intruder" had already flown over the Kamchatka Peninsula.
      General Kornukov (to Military District Headquarters-Gen. Kamensky): (5:47) "...simply destroy [it] even if it is over neutral waters? Are the orders to destroy it over neutral waters? Oh, well."
      Kamensky: We must find out, maybe it is some civilian craft or God knows who."
      Kornukov: "What civilian? [It] has flown over Kamchatka! It [came] from the ocean without identification. I am giving the order to attack if it crosses the State border."

      So, US Navy ship warns incoming flight while under fire in war zone in a spot previously attacked, on one hand. On the other hand, just shoot it down and no bother trying to identify.. t I can't make the stretch these are equal.

    63. Re:suspend GPS? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      And, if I may cite Wikipedia

      You may, but I'm not sure how exactly that quote helps you. Carlson's assessment of Rogers' personality has zero bearing on the situation. Rogers' was informed by his officers that his ship was being targeted by an Iranian F-14. As he was already engaged in hostilities with Iranian gunships (which had attacked him) at the time, that assessment certainly wouldn't have seemed unbelievable. Under the circumstances, he had 2 options:

      1. Surrender, and hope they don't sink him anyway.
      2. Fire in self defence.

      I know people like you would like to pretend that there was a third option - sticking his fingers in his ears and hoping it would all go away - but that's why you're a keyboard warrior and not a ships commander. The shootdown order was the only reasonable action under the circumstances. If you can't understand that, you are not a reasonable person.

      No wishful thinking on my side. Bloody merkins shot down an airplane that did nothing wrong and was in its home airspace all the time. The Russians, on the other hand, shot down an intruder.

      Honestly, I'm not going to continue arguing with someone who thinks that shooting an intruder at first sight is easier to justify than shooting someone you believe to be a threat after having tried to warn them away. You can continue pretending that "airspace" is some magical space-time shifting force-field, if you like, but you're only fooling yourself.

    64. Re:suspend GPS? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      This was originally envisaged as a 50/50 joint public/private venture, but no companies actually stepped up to take part in the expensive R&D effort of re-building something that already exists.

      R&D for something that exists (presuming you don't have to work around patents) should be much cheaper.

      like China, which always speaks of "when we invade Taiwan", never "IF we invade Taiwan"

      China claims it does now, and always has, owned Taiwan. The USA hasn't disagreed, but has said "regardless of who owns the land, will you respect the local government?" And China says "for now." *Never* has China indicated anything other than 100% ownership of Taiwan. And have indicated that "invasion" of Taiwan would be like calling the US naval base in Hawaii an "invasion of sovereign Hawaii."

    65. Re:suspend GPS? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You schedule the system to turn on and off for hours at a time. The satellites *must* cover all of the Earth at a lower latitude than the covered area, but nobody can keep them from cycling the service on and off over specific areas. The satellites must cover the area, but the service doesn't have to.

  5. Well, that sucks. by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 1

    I was hoping that despite our political issues, Russia would still partner with us in exploration/science endeavors. I guess I was a little too optimistic.

    1. Re:Well, that sucks. by CheshireDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      you should know by now that mother Russia has multiple personality disorder.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    2. Re:Well, that sucks. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      I do not understand why Russia is so surprised by the condemnation?

      It is not like the real eastern Ukrainians actually favor Russia or Independence? All the pro Russian protesters are really Russian pretending to be Ukrainians taking over TV stations and trying to whip up the Russian minority. They know this and everything is fake and is doctored by the media including hte western media when they call the special forces protesters??

      Unless they actually believe the crap they see on state sponsored TV and really think they are the good guys stopping an evil Nazi regime sponsored the US and A to bully innocent Ukrainians and Russia? At least the demonstrators in Kiev who over threw the government were real Ukrainians and not American CIA agents. Idiots.

      So Russia is angry it is being perceived as bully as result. Well the mirror doesn't lie and Russia deservers all its sanctions.

    3. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was hoping that despite our political issues, Russia would still partner with us in exploration/science endeavors. I guess I was a little too optimistic.

      Well, they were hoping that despite our political issues, the US would still sell high-tech items to them.
      I guess they were a little too optimistic.

    4. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does every other nation on the face of the planet.
       
      Not to talk anyone down but you're acting like the US has been forthcoming and respectful of other nations in any of our lifetimes. The question here is which son of a bitch do you feel is least likely to disrupt your day to day lifestyle.

    5. Re:Well, that sucks. by mar.kolya · · Score: 1

      Well, it's kind of hard to 'partner' with a country that doesn't know the meaning of word 'equal'.

      US manages to show double standards in everything it does, so this seems like a reasonable response.

    6. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you know nothing, try reading something other than your state controlled news, or better come and visit.

    7. Re:Well, that sucks. by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I think saying that all the protestors are Russians is probably an exaggeration. I would imagine that some Russians are rallying a larger group of Ukrainians. Namely, it would be those who were happy with Yanukovych and his plan of being independent but closer to Russia than to NATO and the EU. I imagine most of the Ukrainians even in the supposedly breakaway areas prefer to remain Ukrainian, though. Maybe they'd like to have a little more local influence, but independence is not necessary for that. Joining another, larger nation is counter to it.

    8. Re:Well, that sucks. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      I do not understand why the USA is so surprised by the condemnation?

      It is not like the real eastern Ukrainians actually favor Russia or Independence. All the 'pro Russian separatist' labeling is really Russian-Ukrainians being spun into to be 'Russian forces' taking over TV stations and trying to whip up the so-called 'Russian' minority. They know this and everything is fake and is doctored by the media including hte western media when they call the protesters special forces!

      Unless they actually believe the crap they see on corporate sponsored TV and really think they are the good guys stopping an evil Nazi regime sponsored by Putin to bully innocent Ukrainians and EU? At least the demonstrators in Kiev who over threw the government were real American CIA agents and not Ukrainians. Idiots.

      So USA is angry it is being perceived as bully as result. Well the mirror doesn't lie and USA deservers all its sanctions.

      The difference is we did not send in marines dressed as Ukrainian protesters to overthrow the government in Kiev or try to carve a sovereign nation because they might vote for something we do not like.

      Russia is clearly the bully here and I do not see how anyone can even look at the other side objectively.

    9. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right, because that poll simply cannot be wrong. Also, what about the protesters being Russian? They do live there, do they not? How come every medial outlet calls these guys `pro-Russian separatists' while the Maidan neo-nazis are called simply `protesters'? I do not think the facts are as straight as you might believe and Russia does have plenty of reasons to be upset (the NATO expansion in Eastern Europe is a very legitimate reason to be outraged).

    10. Re:Well, that sucks. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. But even in eastern Ukraine that poll showed only 18% wanted to join Russia. I would say it is like the Tea party in the US. A vocal group for sure but do not represent the majority in anyway.

      Ukraine suffered greatly under the Soviet Union and welcomed the Nazi's as liberators since 4 million starved to death in WW II. Which is why Putin is calling them neo nazi's. The question not brought up is why? It is because of the past and as a result even if they are ethnically Slavic and an ancestor of modern Russians they do not want anything to do with them.

    11. Re:Well, that sucks. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Right, because that poll simply cannot be wrong. Also, what about the protesters being Russian? They do live there, do they not? How come every medial outlet calls these guys `pro-Russian separatists' while the Maidan neo-nazis are called simply `protesters'? I do not think the facts are as straight as you might believe and Russia does have plenty of reasons to be upset (the NATO expansion in Eastern Europe is a very legitimate reason to be outraged).

      They are actually special forces from Russia and not Ukrainian.

    12. Re:Well, that sucks. by some+old+guy · · Score: 0

      Correct. In such cases, the US sends in SEALS and the CIA, not Marines.

      --
      Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    13. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have proof that the Kiev government was installed by the USA?

    14. Re:Well, that sucks. by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I do not see how anyone can even look at the other side objectively.

      I guess you don't see how anyone can look at either view objectively then....

      Objective is different from "agree with". But you're right; it's all subjective.

      Personally, it looks to me as if
      a) Russia is fed up with being pressured by the US to use the "Made in America" solutions when Russia has its own and
      b) the situation in the Ukraine is extremely complex and the only people with everything to lose are those who actually live there.

      The US has successfully aided an overthrow of the previous government that was backed by Russia, and Russia is seeing that their seaport might be taken away, as well as their influence in that area, which is right on their border (think US and Mexico, or US and Canada). Both the US and Russia have dirty hands, and yes, there are Russian and US sympathizers living in Ukraine, with the Russian ones predominantly in the west, and the US ones predominantly in the east. Most of the citizens just want to get on with life. There are also US operatives working with the current government, and Russian operatives working inside west Ukraine to try and set up another government.

      The Russians are getting heavily into the newspeak to try and get internal and external support, and guess what? So is the US. I have yet to see one objective news article about the whole thing, as everyone seems to have turned it into a bipartisan-style issue (even outside Russia and the US).

      One thing I'm certain of: the Ukraine doesn't want to go back to being part Russia (west) and part Poland (east), even if there are some who might make some noise about who they'd prefer as their allies.

    15. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a troll, you're not doing very well. No-one could really believe what you post here.

      Try something more believable next time, like claiming that the so-called 'Ukraine' is actually just a sound stage in Area 51.

    16. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poll shows something different.

      56% want to be part of the EU and this east and west. Most though want to be part of an independent country and even in the east do want to be part of Russia nor be threatened any time Russia does not like what the country does. The seaport is err was in Ukraine Russia has no say what someone does with their own country.

    17. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not understand why Russia is so surprised by the condemnation?

      It is not like the real eastern Ukrainians actually favor Russia or Independence? All the pro Russian protesters are really Russian pretending to be Ukrainians taking over TV stations and trying to whip up the Russian minority. They know this and everything is fake and is doctored by the media including hte western media when they call the special forces protesters??

      Unless they actually believe the crap they see on state sponsored TV and really think they are the good guys stopping an evil Nazi regime sponsored the US and A to bully innocent Ukrainians and Russia? At least the demonstrators in Kiev who over threw the government were real Ukrainians and not American CIA agents. Idiots.

      So Russia is angry it is being perceived as bully as result. Well the mirror doesn't lie and Russia deservers all its sanctions.

      Where did you get all that? Wait, let me guess, on corporate (state) sponsored US/UK mainstream media?

      Phew, good thing... had me worried you might actually be thinking for yourself, taking in US/UK/EU media, Russian media, Chinese media, even AlJazeera and other media that might go against what the US corporate media machine puts out, and at least weight it for yourself and not buy into any one side. As we all know, in any "recognized democracy" like the US, UK, etc, thinking for yourself cannot be allowed... in fact, laws are being passed to gradually ensure that 'terrorists' that think for themselves can be locked up without benefit of pesky things like trials and the like.

    18. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Whoo-hoo! Fuck You, Oh, wait, congratulate to you! You've proved that you are the most fucking stupid idiot in the world!

      This's a "so-called-report" from NYT, which "proofs" actually photoshoped from un-authorized photo, taken by journalism photographer Maxim Dondyuk from Ukraine.
      The original photo was BLURRED, SCALED down.

      If you can read, read yourself:

      http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/25/1294569/-NY-Times-photos-prove-masked-men-work-for-Putin-made-those-anti-semitic-fliers-Uh-no

      Why the photo must to be BLURRED, World Socialist have some photos to explain:
      http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/24/nytu-a24.html

      False-flag NYT article:
      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/21/world/europe/photos-link-masked-men-in-east-ukraine-to-russia.html

      'Retracted' article:
      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/world/europe/scrutiny-over-photos-said-to-tie-russia-units-to-ukraine.html?ref=world&_r=0

      Best description about yourself you've stated above:

      Unless they actually believe the crap they see on state sponsored TV

    19. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment getting up-rated! OMG, Slashdot really has idiots!

    20. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, they do:
      http://www.globalresearch.ca/western-mercenaries-in-ukraine/5374815

    21. Re: Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was any landgrab in history legally resolved ?
      Forcefull intimadation of parliament and killing to submission are however rightfully matters of injustice

    22. Re: Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether you value a landgrab more than killing into submission is a matter of opinion

    23. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they, now?
      Well, it seems they are not alone:
      http://www.globalresearch.ca/western-mercenaries-in-ukraine/5374815
      Then there is a quastion of the US's $5bn `investment in Ukrainian democracy' (google 'f*ck EU Ukraine' on this subject). The propaganda war is raging on both sides, I am not sure the facts are as straightforward as everybody pretends.

    24. Re:Well, that sucks. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That nice Mr Putin said so. You know, the one who calls everyone fascists while implementing anti-homosexual policies.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re: Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hooray for King Billy and his Bloodless revolution !
        Booh for "enlightened" Napoleon and "corporate" Hitler entering Russia from the West !

    26. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theguardian's article actually questioned on some very interesting 'fact' provided by Kerry (which were first published on NYT).

      And you use this article to support your claim. Clearly, you are actually have reading disability problem.

    27. Re:Well, that sucks. by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

      The only state sponsored news in the US is PBS. Ironically it's also the best quality news versus any "mainstream" media we have.

    28. Re:Well, that sucks. by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

      Please list for me ONE country that doesn't have double standards. I think most refer to this as a "domestic" versus international agenda. States do the same, hence why we had to invent "interstate commerce" federal protection laws. You couldn't buy a car in Nevada and drive it into California (and register it) without economic hurdles (number of miles driven, $300 "environmental impact fee") as little as 2 decades ago.

    29. Re:Well, that sucks. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Think for yourself. Immerse yourself in conspiracy theory

    30. Re:Well, that sucks. by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm confused; that poll appears to back up what I said (although re-reading, I see I swapped my east and west for Russia/Poland).

      the Ukraine doesn't want to go back to being part Russia (west) and part Poland (east), even if there are some who might make some noise about who they'd prefer as their allies.

      Seems to line up with that poll. ALTHOUGH, that poll seems to imply that 44% don't want to be part of the EU, which is too bad.

      However, I'd say that it's *possible* that

      I have yet to see one objective news article about the whole thing

      now appears to be at least partially wrong, even if there's some subjective spin. They at least present decent poll questions and results prior to the spin. Kudos for that :)

    31. Re:Well, that sucks. by mar.kolya · · Score: 1

      Everybody lies (c) dr House.

      In this case it's just not part of US plans to partner with Russia on space/science. And it's not Russia's fault.

    32. Re:Well, that sucks. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Unless they actually believe the crap they see on state sponsored TV and really think they are the good guys stopping an evil Nazi regime sponsored the US and A to bully innocent Ukrainians and Russia?

      The short answer is: they do.

    33. Re:Well, that sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Love how everyone "knows" the vote was rigged and therefore doesn't count, and the numbers are bullshit. Yet if some other numbers are shoved in their face that paint a different picture, they "know" those numbers are spot on, couldn't be fudged, and are definitely the truth.

      Both sets of numbers are coming from massive propaganda houses. Don't believe either of them.

  6. Well, opportunity missed. by stewsters · · Score: 1

    And I should have bought SpaceX stock last week.

    1. Re:Well, opportunity missed. by demontechie · · Score: 1

      Don't you wish you could...

    2. Re:Well, opportunity missed. by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      One of the primary reasons given is that space exploration (in particular the highly speculative Mars mission SpaceX continues to look into) are high risk long term ventures and they don't want to be beholden to investors to meet quarterly numbers. To which I say put it in the company bylaws, mission statement, and investment prospectus and let the investors decide. I would love the chance to invest in a high risk, high reward, long term thinking company. There are so incredibly few of them out there, it would be a refreshing change of pace to force investors to look 10 years a head instead of 10 weeks.

    3. Re:Well, opportunity missed. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Presumably Elon wants to build rockets, not have another company owned by Wall Street where profit is all that matters. You can put it in the bylaws all you want, but the first time the CEO makes a decision for the long term health of the company rather than short term profits, the major shareholder will get together and sue him out of existence.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Well, opportunity missed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the primary reasons given is that space exploration (in particular the highly speculative Mars mission SpaceX continues to look into) are high risk long term ventures and they don't want to be beholden to investors to meet quarterly numbers. To which I say put it in the company bylaws, mission statement, and investment prospectus and let the investors decide. I would love the chance to invest in a high risk, high reward, long term thinking company. There are so incredibly few of them out there, it would be a refreshing change of pace to force investors to look 10 years a head instead of 10 weeks.

      It would not matter what you put in the bylaws.
      Once the stock is sold, you no longer have sole ownership. A shareholder suit can be filed, and lawyers and courts can change anything they feel like.

    5. Re:Well, opportunity missed. by PRMan · · Score: 1

      The SEC stops you from investing in technology like this at the behest of rich bankers, so they can get richer. If you want a 10-year investment where you can get very high rewards, try Bitcoin.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    6. Re:Well, opportunity missed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wants to go to the moon. The rocket business is just a piece of what he needs to get there.

  7. The best way to stop bullying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    is to stand up to the bully.

    1. Re:The best way to stop bullying by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what will happen to the US economy if everybody starts doing that?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    2. Re:The best way to stop bullying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is to stand up to the bully.

      Only if there are witnesses. Trust me on this.

  8. Club and balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We dont need fighting. Lets take this "club and balls" contest to the American and Russian Women! Let them decide which set of leadership tackle should rule the day.

    I'm thinking the Americans will lead.. Our guys drink less Vodka and we got those BGH drugs in all our food. Russian nights are a lot colder, they might be better at fishing with their tackle.

    1. Re:Club and balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  9. ISS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keeping the US-Russia diplomatic ties strong was a founding reason for the joint civilian space missions, amongst its many scientific missions. What, if anything is insulating the ISS from becoming a $100 billion dollar political football?

    1. Re:ISS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a founding reason for the joint civilian space missions

      In other words, it was a political football right from the beginning. That only becomes a problem once people stop playing and can't agree on who gets to take it home...

  10. Not only that... by ilsaloving · · Score: 4, Funny

    All HTTP connections to US websites will be redirected to a youtube video of Putin striking manly poses while riding on top of a grizzly bear.

    1. Re:Not only that... by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean this type of bear.

    2. Re:Not only that... by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      That reminds me somehow of the bear fucker scene from "Super Troopers"

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    3. Re:Not only that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might actually be an improvement?

    4. Re:Not only that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Obama stuffing a burger and fries into his face.

      Russia 1, Mehca 0

  11. Re:Dogs are barking, cars are going anyways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The man looks good with his shirt off, that's for sure.

  12. Conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who, upon hearing such things, immediately considers the possibility that these two governments are cooperating to manufacture a "threat" which will justify the next expansion of government (in terms of both power and revenue)? Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I'd certainly leave open the possibility.

    1. Re:Conspiracy theory by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

      I definately thought that. NATO was losing relevence. Also, it's on the surface completely counter to Putin's apparent goal: reduce NATO and West influence. So what's happening? A few stragglers no one wants jump on the Russian train, but a majority who had put NATO plans on hold are now seriously reconsidering. This will in effect bring NATO closer and from more directions. Actually, not just in effect, it's already happening: US troops are now rotating through Eastern Europe to appease allies. This also might long term strengthen ties to US missile defense systems. Keep in mind the Russians signed a treaty with Ukraine saying they would respect soverign rights of the Ukraine in return for their former nuclear missiles. You have to think any future countries who bargain with Russia will take this into account...meaning, any agreement is barely worth the paper it's written on as long as Russia has a standing army.

      However, I'm NOT drinking the looney Cool-Aid to the point I'd actually believe some similar plot as the idi0ts who think Bush/Israel/BoogeyManInc planned 9/11.

  13. & Weak-kneed leaders in the West will ... by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    Do a quick bunch of mealy mouthed video bites proclaiming solidarity and further cooperation to, well, study the situation.

    I have no faith in our leaders here in the US or in the EU to stop Putin.

    1. Re:& Weak-kneed leaders in the West will ... by pla · · Score: 2

      I have no faith in our leaders here in the US or in the EU to stop Putin.

      Stop him from doing what, exactly?

      So far, we have a bunch of former Soviet satellites holding referendums on independence. Pooty hasn't actually "done" anything yet.

      This makes the US and EU situation particularly laughable - Whether or not Crimea really wants to join Russia or not, we have imposed sanctions against private individuals because unrelated third parties held protest-votes that make the UN look bad. And the closest we can come to even calling those votes/referendums illegal, they violate the will of a group of thugs who overthrew the legitimate, democratically elected Ukraine government a few months ago.

      We need to stay the fuck out of this debacle before we start WW3 over literally nothing.

    2. Re:& Weak-kneed leaders in the West will ... by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      And the closest we can come to even calling those votes/referendums illegal, they violate the will of a group of thugs who overthrew the legitimate, democratically elected Ukraine government a few months ago.

      Ukraine's "democratically elected" government was hardly overthrown: the composition of the Rada remains the same as it was before the trouble started. Svoboda, for example, was already in parliament under Yanukovych. All that changed was that Yanukovych fled, and then most of the the members of his Party of Regions in parliament said that they no longer wanted to further his platform. An acting president was voted in, in a parliamentary vote that met the quorum, and it is extremely obvious that he doesn't particularly want to be there.

      Whether or not Crimea really wants to join Russia or not, we have imposed sanctions against private individuals because unrelated third parties held protest-votes that make the UN look bad.

      Strange that you think that, since most commentary on the sanctions is that they have been overly cautious, applied only to a handful of officials who were patently involved in the separatist campaign, and they leave out many people close to Putin who Western intelligence sources hint are covertly involved.

      Pooty hasn't actually "done" anything yet.

      Putin has in fact already admitted that he covertly moved thousands extra troops into Crimea to ensure control well before the referendum: the "green men" were not simply Russian forces already stationed in the peninsula under treaty. Sure, he could have done much, much more in the region, but he's hardly impassive.

      It's a complex situation and it's hard to tell which side is subjectively "right", but could I ask you to read a larger amount of news and commentary on this in both Russian and English?

    3. Re:& Weak-kneed leaders in the West will ... by horza · · Score: 1

      The US needs to stop Putin, and the space front rather than Ukraine is the perfect place to start. The EU is hopelessly hooked on Russian gas and scared silly of Putin, so don't expect any help there. The first space race took us (using 'us' in the human race sense) to the moon, and very little since. Maybe the next one will take us to Mars?

      As an aside, 'our leaders' needs to include the people. Shifting off Russian oil and gas will be painful financially, and economies that are only just getting back on their feet financially are going to be hesitant to deal a blow to the economy already suffering from unemployment and austerity measures. They do need to get a spine, but they need to sell why to the people.

      Phillip.

    4. Re:& Weak-kneed leaders in the West will ... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do a quick bunch of mealy mouthed video bites proclaiming solidarity and further cooperation to, well, study the situation.

      I have no faith in our leaders here in the US or in the EU to stop Putin.

      We orchestrated a coup in a country bordering Russia. Imagine if Mexico overthrew their government, kicked out their president all while Russian advisers were in Mexico city giving them tips...

      Then Russia stirred up unrest to prevent us from installing the government of our choice. The losers here are the Ukrainian people who are suffering because they just so happen to live on the newest battlefield of the 100 year old proxy war the US and Russia have been fighting.

    5. Re:& Weak-kneed leaders in the West will ... by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

      Somehow I think a few Admirals and part of the Ukraine Navy would disagree with your statement, "Pooty hasn't actually 'done' anything." He has radically repositioned his forces all around the Ukraine, now overflies the country to the point of violating normally observed sovereign airspace, and "stolen" a number of Navy ships. Most countries would take exception to this. You have to keep in mind that in Russia, private individuals are not treated much differently from the state-ran institutions. If you have a couple hours to burn, read a number of articles on the fraud, contracting, and money trail during the Sochi build up for the recent Winter Olympics. It might start to make sense to you why.

    6. Re:& Weak-kneed leaders in the West will ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really should stop watching RT

    7. Re:& Weak-kneed leaders in the West will ... by X.25 · · Score: 1

      I have no faith in our leaders here in the US or in the EU to stop Putin.

      US finances a coup in Ukraine and stirs incredible shit, and you want someone to stop Putin?

      I hope Vogon fleet comes soon, human race has really turned into complete retards.

  14. This should be a wake up call... by ArcadeNut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We need to bring back the NASA programs and other things that are vital to national security in house rather then outsourcing to the lowest bidders...

    --
    Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    1. Re:This should be a wake up call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lowest bidders? In a capitalist society with limited regulation where greed reigns supreme this will /never/ stop. Pay as little as you can keep the rest for yourself regardless of the quality or performance for said product or program. 'Merica.

    2. Re:This should be a wake up call... by rolias · · Score: 1

      Except that the Atlas V with its outsourced RD-180 engines isn't the lowest bidder.

  15. "Looks like I picked the wrong day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to stop sniffing rocket fuel. We're back in business baby!!!" -NASA

  16. Comparative advantage is BS by areusche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is exactly why comparative advantage is complete BS. When you let another foreign entity control your means of whatever it may be (rocketd, iPhones, car parts, tools, etc etc) you lose that ability to utilize it when the political poo hits the fan.

    Watch the space shuttle program make a dramatic re-appearance. This is a massive national security issue that I bet no one brought up when they decided, "Gee, lets go and outsource our rockets and launches to a foreign power we've had cold relations with since the early 20th century."

    This is what happens when people look solely at the bottom line. It gets a little hard to project your power into a region when that same region makes most of your equipment (I'm looking at you China!).

    1. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by jader3rd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is exactly why comparative advantage is complete BS. When you let another foreign entity control your means of whatever it may be (rocketd, iPhones, car parts, tools, etc etc) you lose that ability to utilize it when the political poo hits the fan.

      I disagree. It's quite possible that this decision wasn't made lightly. I'm sure there are some Russian businesses which are being hurt by this. When countries trade with each other, and become dependent upon each other, there's a higher motivation not to go to war with each other or let political poo hit fans. While trade dependency is a strategy that kind of hurts when war breaks out, it decreases the likelihood of that war actually breaking out.

      I think that policies should be optimized for day to day living during peacetime, not war.

    2. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      The Shuttle program was ended because the shuttles were no longer safe to fly. They are not coming back.

    3. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by areusche · · Score: 1

      Good point, I should have included that the US needs to stop antagonizing Russia and China. If our leaders want to play global bully then they need to understand that there's two sides of this coin. You can't project hegemonic power without a solid base to stand on. Putin said it best, "Everything in the world is interdependent and once you try to punish someone, in the end you will cut off your nose to spite your face.

    4. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Delwin · · Score: 1

      Not the shuttle but the SLS. It's already being tested. Also SpaceX will likely get its human rating a lot faster than it would have otherwise.

    5. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      Why space shuttles?

      They were a magnificent achievement for the '70s, but they were never a cost-effective means of delivering payloads into orbit.

    6. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Define cost effective.'

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by deadweight · · Score: 1

      You may want to look into WW I. Apparently in constant-dollar terms the world has NEVER regained pre-WW I prosperity and all the warring countries were as linked as could be.

    8. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is true that you can't rely on foreign governments at all times, which is why _critical_ (read: military) programs never rely on foreign sourcing. The space program is very deliberately NOT military (mainly for reasons of Cold War espionage...).

      There is a strong belief that this will secure funding not for a new shuttle program, but for public/private ventures like SpaceX to secure domestic space transport.

      I will also remind you that relation with Russia in the 90s and some of the 2000s (read: not the era of Putin) were quite good. Not as good as our relations with post-WWII Germany and Japan, engines of industry that they were. The best way to know if you can trust someone is to trust them. It's a critical piece of American philosophy and policy that at some point we have to get over old grudges and trust our former enemies. Failure to do so costs everyone. (The flip side of this, of course, is that Americans are willing to turn on a dime against old allies, like France, once philosophies no longer align. But that's a different matter.)

    9. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      Watch the space shuttle program make a dramatic re-appearance. This is a massive national security issue that I bet no one brought up when they decided, "Gee, lets go and outsource our rockets and launches to a foreign power we've had cold relations with since the early 20th century."

      Good post, but you're wrong about the shuttle. It's gone - forever. It's been proven to be a non-starter. I doubt that anybody anywhere will ever try it again and here is why. The shuttle requires massive booster rockets to be strapped to it to get it into orbit. This is its truly fatal flaw. The shuttle Columbia disaster was caused when part of the foam that attached the boosters to the shuttle fell off and fatally damaged the shuttle so that it burned up on re-entry. There is no way to prevent this from happening again with a shuttle. The risk may be low, but it's not zero, as the Columbia proved. The current Orion technology that is NASA's future has nothing to do with the shuttle and is what I would call a "back to the future" design that's inspired by the old Apollo modules. Orion and the old school Russian rockets may not be sexy, but the astronauts don't have to worry about burning up on re-entry because foam fell away and struck the vehicle.

    10. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      "I think that policies should be optimized for day to day living during peacetime, not war."

      Giving your rivals leverage, as we have done here and with China for lots of our manufacturing, works just fine if everyone is altruistic in the relationship. Sadly the real world isn't one where peace is the norm, nor will it anytime soon. We are finding ourselves so dependent upon our rivals that we cannot respond to big power grabs in a believable fashion. They have lots of leverage over us and can get away with crap like the Crimean annexation and they know we are too neutered to intervene.

      Work for peace, but watch your flank.

    11. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      $ per ton into orbit.

      Deaths per hundred launches.

      The shuttle was a crap vision that never came to be. It was supposed to be re-usable, but had to be torn down and rebuilt between flights. The design precludes rescue for near ground malfunctions. By any sane metric you would have been better off with an Apollo, or Soyuz style system over the shuttle. USSR dumped their shuttle attempt, it is a poor design in general.

    12. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As in, it would probably be cheaper to design a new launch system from scratch than go back to shuttles.

    13. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 1

      >

      Watch the space shuttle program make a dramatic re-appearance. This is a massive national security issue that I bet no one brought up when they decided, "Gee, lets go and outsource our rockets and launches to a foreign power we've had cold relations with since the early 20th century."

      The US has a working, currently available space shuttle. it's called X-37B. Works great. You just don't hear much about it; it's not manned. We also have a pretty good and improving disposable launch capability, though we do use russian rockets for the Atlas V. what we don't have is a manned program.

      It would make sense to rapidly (well, as rapidly as possible) develop a manned launch capability.

      --
      The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
    14. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by chihowa · · Score: 1

      The foam fell off of the tank, not one of the boosters. The boosters were solid fuel and didn't need to be cooled. Even without boosters, this would be a possible failure mode for any engines-on-shuttle design that can't hold all of its own fuel inside.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    15. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why comparative advantage is complete BS. When you let another foreign entity control your means of whatever it may be (rocketd, iPhones, car parts, tools, etc etc) you lose that ability to utilize it when the political poo hits the fan.

      One way to ameliorate that problem is to stop throwing poo at the fan.

    16. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Megane · · Score: 1

      The boosters were solid fuel and didn't need to be cooled.

      Whaaaaat? The problem had nothing to do with how the boosters or ET were made or what they were made of; it had everything to do with where they were mounted, as in to the side of the crew vehicle.

      Sierra Nevada is working on the closest thing to Shuttle aside from the X37B. It will be mounted above the first stage.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    17. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by the+gnat · · Score: 2

      the US needs to stop antagonizing Russia and China. If our leaders want to play global bully

      It's worth pointing out that many of the countries bordering Russia and China desperately want to be our friends right now, because they're worried about their local bullies. Many of these countries have been on the receiving end of Russian or Chinese imperialism in the past, and are anxious not to be come satellite states. Even Vietnam, which as as much reason to hate the US as just about anyone, is on increasingly good terms with us.

      This hardly justifies anything else the US does, but it's not like Russia and China aren't doing plenty to antagonize the world without our help.

    18. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, Congress has required that any new NASA rocket still use the Shuttle's Solid Rocket Boosters.

    19. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Pre-WWI prosperity... where even the richest countries had massive child labor and 15 hour work days in squalid conditions that make a modern Chinese factory look like a worker's paradise? Right.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    20. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by hey! · · Score: 1

      When dragons belch and hippos flee
      My thoughts, Ankh-Morpork, are of thee
      Let others boast of martial dash
      For we have boldly fought with cash
      We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes
      We own all your generals - touch us and you'll lose.

      Morporkia! Morporkia!
      Morporkia owns the day!
      We can rule you wholesale
      Touch us and you'll pay.

      Fortuntely, Russia is run by humorless, dead-eyed authoritarians who are about as likely to have read the Discworld novels as the average American is to have read Russel and Whitehead's Principia Mathematica

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    21. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by chihowa · · Score: 1

      That's my point. As long as the final stage has lifting engines mounted on it (and isn't big enough to be the only stage), stuff will have to be mounted next to it instead of beneath it and stuff will be more likely to fall off and cause it damage.

      The solid fuel booster pedantry was just pointing out that foam wasn't encasing the boosters because they weren't cryogenically cooled. The ET was, and that's where the foam came from. The GP said that the foam came from the booster and I was correcting that.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    22. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      The X-37B launches on the Atlas V, which uses Russian engines.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    23. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Define cost effective.'

      What 20 tonne payload for $1.5b per launch is not.

      [$203b / 135 launches. Theoretical payload was 24 tonnes, practical payload limit was 18 tonnes to allow for RTLS abort.]

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    24. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      They were a magnificent achievement for the '70s

      No. Bad design, bad development program and non-existent development path, bad operations, etc. It was astonishing that they got such monstrosities to fly at all (let alone for over 20 years), but they were not "magnificent".

      They were more like the Spruce Goose, or Concord, or Russian K-7, or Caproni Ca60, or other ridiculous aircraft.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    25. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem with that is you're not the only one who has poo. That's why sharing a fan is so problematic.

    26. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by tengu1sd · · Score: 1

      >>>The shuttle was a crap vision that never came to be

      The vision of the shuttle never came to be. Originally, the booster was planned as a rocket plan, capable of returning to KSC for refueling. The mass of the wings deployed were dictated by having to meet USAF requirements that the shuttle could return to Vandenberg. Because you know we had so many shuttle launches from California. That mass required pushing the space shuttle main engine beyond original design capacity. And that meant a full rebuild after every mission.

      The original vision was possible and could still be flying if scope creep had been shut down in the 70's.

    27. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Russian businesses which are being hurt by this" would be, specifically, ones that *don't* have Putin's cronies on their boards. The ones that do, will be positioned to make out like the bandits they are, from the losses of the former.

    28. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also SpaceX will likely kill its first human rating a lot faster than it would have otherwise."

      There, fixed it for you

    29. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      While many like to blame the USAF for this, there were no "USAF requirements". It was NASA who wanted to bring USAF into the shuttle development, believing it would increase funding. It backfired on them.

      But the problem with the shuttle wasn't just scope-creep, it was the fact that they threw away everything they'd done up to that point (both Apollo/Gemini/Mercury and the USAF's X-plane program) and tried to develop a 100 ton to LEO space plane in a single step. No precursors, no incremental development. Specifically ignoring the very process that they used for Apollo development. There weren't even unmanned test launches before they flew humans in 1981. All in the false belief that it would somehow save money.

      The whole design process was broken.

      And they repeated the same stupidity with VentureStar, where even the sub-scale demonstrator required a dozen brand new technologies (one of which wasn't successfully developed until a decade after X-33 had been cancelled.) As did the USAF with NASP. Trying to jump ten steps in one. Trying to shoe-horn every new idea into a single program, in a single step.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    30. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      You may want to look into WW I. Apparently in constant-dollar terms the world has NEVER regained pre-WW I prosperity and all the warring countries were as linked as could be.

      I still think that how deeply they were linked prevented smaller skirmishes from breaking out. Unfortunately the different issues climaxed in WWI, but it's quite possible that it got that bad because so many leaders were willing to work at preventing out and out conflict for so long. I never claimed that being trading partners would completely prevent war, I just think that it prevents it most of the time.

    31. Re:Comparative advantage is BS by Megane · · Score: 1

      Ah, now I think I see your point. The boosters on the side were a problem, but the ET on the side was also a problem. Basically, they put two different things to the side of a crew vehicle with no escape system, and each failed with a vehicle loss.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  17. Where will this end? by guacamole · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The sanctions and bans clearly will not work to defuse the Ukraine crisis. The Russian public has bought into Putin's nationalist rhetoric. Putin completely controls the political discourse in the mass media within Russia. This year, Kremlin increased pressure even on web based news, social networks, and blogs. Every Western sanction is met with a counter-sanction from the Russian side. The Russian economy and standards of living may suffer (some have serious doubts about the effectiveness of these sanctions), but I don't think they will make Russia back away.

    Moreover, it's not clear what is the goal of the western sanctions as their goal is often amorphously described as "deescalate the situation in Ukraine". What does this mean? Russians think that annexation of Crimea is a done deal. Not just Putin, average Russians too. They certainly won't back away from that. As for the instability in east Ukraine, it's not clear how you prove who is escalating what right now? The locals in East Ukraine are certainly as pissed off at Kiev as it gets, specially after deadly Odesa clashes and the coup in Kiev. I don't think they need a lot of encouragement from Putin at this point.

    The best way to defuse the crisis in Ukraine, is to help this country rebuild its democratic institutions and economy. While Ukraine is viewed as the victim in this dispute, its government must do more to accommodate the concerns of its Russian-speaking citizens in the East regions. For one, they should be allowed to elect their local government officials.

    1. Re:Where will this end? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      Rebuild it and Putin will then say LOOK! THE CIA REALLY SUPPORTS THE NEO NAZIS OUT TO GET RUSSIANS.

      Support can be twisted to mean lots of things.

      There is only one way to fix this and it will be war. I can predict the news. Within days the eastern regions will petition Putin to join Russia. Russia will send in forces to secure its terrority (in Russia's mind Ukraine is no part of Russia) and Ukraine will fight them. War will break out.

      Just like the civil war Lincoln stated a house divided agaisn't itself can not stand. Same with Ukraine. It is time for a showdown or a shut up and those who do not like Russia according to recent polls in the east will surely put up a fight once it invades.

       

    2. Re:Where will this end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Putin isn't stopping at Crimea. He is taking East Ukraine now.

    3. Re:Where will this end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russian public has bought into Putin's nationalist rhetoric.

      And have not Americans bought into Obama's imperialistic rhethoric? USA has kept expanding military bases near Russia since the cold war threatening Russia at each move. The USA don't have Russia military bases near its borders, yet that should be acceptable for Russia? You can now reap your reward for being so imperialistic.

    4. Re:Where will this end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ukrainians have lost trust in democracy because their democratically elected leaders get ousted in US-funded coups. This is why many in the east want autonomy.

    5. Re:Where will this end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that is generally how I see it. Under Putin's direction, Russia has been shutting down civil liberty work claiming it is a front to destroy Russia.

      At this point, Russia has drawn a gun on everyone else, but we are facing back at it with a knife. If that gun ever fires, I don't know if it would fire a second time.

      I would be interested in seeing Ukraine declaring that any armed groups will not be considered protesters, but instead rebels. Then have them ask for equal military assistance from the UN Peace Keeping forces (because Russia is a member) to follow under Ukraine's command while they purge out the rebels and see how the nations respond. Also requiring any succession votes be watched by a more neutral third party (might be hard to do, China or India?) after the rebels have been removed.

      Having this drag out is only going to make the situation worse.

      I honestly can't see any good reason for all of this.
      Is Russia just trying to relive the Soviet glory days?
      Do they just want more landmass when they are already the largest nation?
      Does Putin want to ease into a Hitler role, with the creeping anti-civil rights agenda?
      If Russia or Putin isn't at fault for the situation, is it the EU or the USA?
      Are we trying to annex Russia so Palin can't say she can see it from her porch?
      Are we after their fuel?
      Are our terms previous to this situation unfair, and if so, why did they agree (buying rockets as an example)?
      Is Putin upset he hasn't figured out how Tom Cruise stays so young?
      Isn't the Ukraine issue solely suppose to be between the EU (not USA) and Russia? They are forcing our hands by an old treaty.
      The removal of the previous administration in Ukraine certainly was not the best method for the cause, but was there even adequate time for the international community to decide what to do about it before the Pro-Russian troops caused this trouble?
      Why would Russia accept Crimea as part of itself with the additional hassles that come with it, when there is already so much political trouble around the landmass, unless they were already ready to accept it with the troubles (taking responsibility for their actions?)?
      Why wouldn't Crimea just want to break off and form its own nation?

      Can come up with questions for hours.

    6. Re:Where will this end? by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      Stop believing what you see on the news. The US and Russia both have agents on the ground in Ukraine stirring this whole thing up. Pretty much everything you see on TV was setup by one side or the other. I've no idea what's really going on other than that it's not whats on TV. Almost every time you read about something over there, you can go to youtube and watch video from people that were actually there and completely debunk what you just read.

      Reporters are lazy, accept what the government feeds them, don't fact check, and don't retract their mistakes when they happen. Do some youtube searches on the Odessa government building fire. Pretty much everything I heard on the news about that was a lie... on both sides. You can read a fact on routers, go to youtube and clearly see it's not true with just a few minutes of research. I've pretty much resigned myself to knowing that I can't do anything about that situation, everything I'm hearing is a lie.

    7. Re:Where will this end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as Putin or any Putin ally is in charge, Russia should be returned to Cold War status. Though China is still our most dangerous enemy.

    8. Re:Where will this end? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      While Ukraine is viewed as the victim in this dispute, its government must do more to accommodate the concerns of its Russian-speaking citizens in the East regions. For one, they should be allowed to elect their local government officials.

      The new government has been talking about exactly that for some time now, and they are drafting a law that will make sweeping changes towards that goal.

    9. Re:Where will this end? by Tom · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The Russian public has bought into Putin's nationalist rhetoric.

      And you think they are the only ones being manipulated?

      Back at a certain time during the Cold War, the government was afraid that the maniac in charge of the other side would launch WW3 for no reason but being an idiot and wanting to appear all macho in internal politics. The government of the USSR. The madman in question was called Reagan.

      Both sides here are telling their story, from their perspective. In the west it may be easier to find dissenting media, but to be honest, the mainstream media is largely telling the same story and does precious little investigation or fact-checking.

      If you want to get a different perspective, it is really easy: Hop on Skype and talk to a few russians. Don't trust the media.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    10. Re:Where will this end? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Moreover, it's not clear what is the goal of the western sanctions as their goal is often amorphously described as "deescalate the situation in Ukraine". What does this mean? Russians think that annexation of Crimea is a done deal. Not just Putin, average Russians too. They certainly won't back away from that. As for the instability in east Ukraine, it's not clear how you prove who is escalating what right now? The locals in East Ukraine are certainly as pissed off at Kiev as it gets, specially after deadly Odesa clashes and the coup in Kiev. I don't think they need a lot of encouragement from Putin at this point.

      I don't think anybody believes that Russia is giving Crimea back. I suspect that's why the sanctions are targeted at individuals, an economic sanction means you have to take it off at some point, and if at that point Russia still has Crimea then you've lost. But if you're targeting individuals you can leave those sanctions in place until they die.

      My hope is that the US and EU have told Russia that an invasion of East Ukraine will trigger massive Iran level sanctions. They won't say it publicly since they don't want Putin to feel pressure to respond, but that is something that would be effective. Even if Putin did invade it would take a while to establish control and major sanctions could pressure him to declare victory and go home.

      If that's the case then the Russian army is still there to intimidate but they won't enter. It's mainly a question of whether Ukrainian troops can reenter the cities and establish order without killing too many protesters and escalating the situation.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    11. Re:Where will this end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the CIA looks into who pays you.

    12. Re: Where will this end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will end when the Russian dictatorship implodes. Like its soviet predecessor did in the last go around. This is a dead cat bounce.

  18. Exports for a struggling economy by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

    This might really hurt Russia. The Soviet Union struggled to stay apace with technology, and Russia has too since the collapse of the USSR. Space technology was one area where Russia could make money and truly claim to be among the best. If they're not careful this might kill off one of their few chances for profitable exports in the world economy.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:Exports for a struggling economy by guacamole · · Score: 1

      I suspect the ban on using Russian engines to launch the US military satellites is more of a posturing. Russian rockets and rocket engines are used mostly to launch civilian satellites.

    2. Re:Exports for a struggling economy by biodata · · Score: 1

      I think they will probably struggle on with the gas revenues they earn for keeping the lights on in Europe.

      --
      Korma: Good
    3. Re:Exports for a struggling economy by EmperorArthur · · Score: 1

      I suspect the ban on using Russian engines to launch the US military satellites is more of a posturing. Russian rockets and rocket engines are used mostly to launch civilian satellites.

      Except the number one thing in the news lately about those engines has been the massive US military block buy of rockets that use them. When the judge ordered a preliminary injunction to keep ULA from buying them a bunch of US businessmen, bureaucrats, politicians, and military types freaked out. Which was practically a sign to the Russians saying, "You can hurt us."

      The GPS thing is partly posturing, but mostly about limiting military accuracy in the off chance we try something stupid. It's not likely, but still an important military concern, and it goes perfectly with everything else that's going on.

      The space station thing is probably all posturing, especially since the US is expected to start testing manned launches again by next year. What I can see them doing is raising prices to an outrageous degree. Get every cent they can to build their new launch complex. After all, Russia currently rents the Baikonur Cosmodrome from Kazakhstan.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    4. Re:Exports for a struggling economy by Delwin · · Score: 2

      The RD-180 is used by ULA for all their heavy lift rockets.

      ULA has a stockpile of them that will last at least a few years but until the SLS with the F1-B or the Falcon Heavy with the Merlin fly the RD-180 is the only heavy lift engine we have.

      The closest second is the Falcon 9 which is already using Merlin engines but it is running about 40% of the lift capiability of the largest ULA rockets. If the Falcon Heavy is ever launched then SpaceX will have a launch vehicle that can finally put the RD-180 to rest. Likewise when the SLS launches it could replace the heavy lift rockets from ULA but it's not being designed for LEO operations.

    5. Re:Exports for a struggling economy by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      No man. RD-180 is used by Lockheed Martin Atlas V. Boeing Delta IV uses US RS-68 engines. ULA = Lockheed Martin + Boeing.

      The other engine they mentioned is sold by Aerojet and used in the Orbital Antares/Taurus II rocket.

      This seems like good news for SpaceX to me. The ones most screwed in this deal will actually be a Russian company. i.e. Energomash.

    6. Re:Exports for a struggling economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't been paying attention over the last decade or two. Russia has plenty of money because it exports so much natural gas, and other resources. Much of Europe depends on Russian gas, which is why the EU is so reluctant to do anything to really punish Russia. The paltry millions that their Russia's rocket tech brings them is a mere drop of water compared to the bucket of billions that their gas exports do.

  19. Time for SpaceX... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to really kick it in to high gear.

  20. We've been budget cut to death by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kill shuttles, kill the DC-X, kill spaceplanes, kill research, find the cheapest possible source of launchers. Make a business out of manned spaceflight. So now we're hostage to Russia, because they were cheaper than building a reusable launch system. SpaceX ain't ready yet. So, we're screwed. May Elon Musk get what he wishes for, and may he be able to deliver. Next month.

    1. Re:We've been budget cut to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice you left off Ares and the Constellation program. That program would be up and running with regular Area I launches now and Ares V heavy test launches underway; a launcher larger than a Saturn V. But we fucked up and elected Obama instead. He killed Constellation and replaced it with a paper "Space Launch System" program that will never produce flight hardware.

      So forget about rockets in the US. Look to the Chinese for rockets. They have a way to go before they decide to self-inflict decline as we have.

    2. Re:We've been budget cut to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. We're perfectly capable of launching our own military satellites. We don't currently have a reusable orbital vehicle that can reach the space station, no, but in a pinch, we can copy the Russian module.... or does anyone really believe that we can't build reentry vehicles that we replaced thirty years ago?

    3. Re:We've been budget cut to death by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Ares was a boondoggle. It was a POS that was behind schedule. Over cost. They did not fix the issues. It wouldn't be flying now. Constellation seemed good on paper but what Mike Griffin pushed i.e. Ares was a disaster. Obama did not push SLS. He wanted to speed up Commercial Crew (also from W's time) with extra funding. The fault lies squarely with the Senate. They defunded Commercial Crew including SpaceX Dragon capsule, which could have been flying this year, and piled the money on SLS.

    4. Re:We've been budget cut to death by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      No need to do it. SpaceX Dragon capsule can reenter perfectly well.

    5. Re:We've been budget cut to death by Megane · · Score: 1

      That program would be up and running with regular Area I launches now and Ares V heavy test launches underway

      Yep... at the cost of shutting down ISS first to pay for it. So it would have nowhere to go.

      Support of "NewSpace" is the only thing Obama has done that I agree with. It started at the end of Bush's presidency, but Obama's support for it seems to be all his own. The real problem NASA has is being underfunded by Congress, and a space subcommittee that wants to keep Shuttle-era "OldSpace" around.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    6. Re:We've been budget cut to death by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Obama [...] wanted to speed up Commercial Crew (also from W's time

      Minor quibble, only COTS (cargo) was from W's time. While CC was advocated by O'Keefe as part of his "Spiral" proposal, it wasn't actually started until Obama/Bolden in 2010.

      [Spiral was actually a good plan; COTS, CC, commercial stations, fuel depots, modular BEO ships, etc. Even W's VSE was okay, if enabled through Spiral. Then Griffin killed any hope of progress by dragging in his own Ares plans from LM and making them the centrepiece of VSE. And we've lost a decade so far due.]

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    7. Re:We've been budget cut to death by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Ares and the Constellation program. That program would be up and running

      When it was cancelled, Ares I's schedule was slipping to the right slightly more than one year per year.

      That way lies only madness.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    8. Re:We've been budget cut to death by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      We don't currently have a reusable orbital vehicle that can reach the space station, no, but in a pinch, we can copy the Russian module....

      The Russians don't have a "reusable orbital vehicle".

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    9. Re:We've been budget cut to death by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Budget cuts would have happened regardless, unless the President, like Bush, didn't give a damn about the debt. Cut taxes, increase spending, like he did (and Reagan did) and the debt shoots from 3 trillion to 16 trillion - and then, after all that money floats down on the wealthy and warriors, demand spending cuts. Space dies. The democratic presidents get to clean up the spilled booze after the republicans party.

      I left off a LOT. I've been watching for something like forty years. The space program has always been at risk from a citizenry that believes the world is ending soon, is six thousand years old and was flooded a few thousand years ago. We're anti-reality; most people think we go to "space", rather than low earth orbit. The US is not a space-faring nation. We don't have the mindspace for it, and I think that the flags-and-boots on the moon pretty much ruined what space travel means to both the country and NASA. Stunts, science exploration and national prestige aren't nearly enough. We needed to open it up to travel, mining, solar power sats and the terraria settlements needed to really pull off migration off-planet. Mars? It's a international wilderness park, not a business opportunity. O'Neill et al nailed the real purpose: get off this rock and into zero g to make places to live and pots of money and transmit enormous amounts of power to the home base. Anything else is just a stunt.

    10. Re:We've been budget cut to death by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we need a manned launcher next week. We're dead out. We've no manned spacecraft launchers, reusable or otherwise, because we're cheap. Three trillion dollars for Iraq and its aftermath, but tossing NASA 20 billion to build a real launch system is politically impossible. One may cry "politics", but "politics" only means "people". Americans don't want to do it, and their elected politicians thus will not. We should be building a electromagnetic launch rail for first-stage emulation, a spaceplane, a cargo rocket, a reusable SSTO prototype AND funding an elevator project simultaneously. Private enterprise is too slow and really never will have a business model to do all that. The only real customer is the government and its deep pockets if you're talking about manned space flight. To get a place-to-go, you need to spend government cash. Then private enterprise can build the transports for its own use.

    11. Re:We've been budget cut to death by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      We know. And we kinda are copying their module.

  21. saw this coming by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Gee, maybe we should have kept our space program going. Then instead of placing it in the hands of moronic dictatorships like Russia (true if you live in reality) or private industries trying to make a profit, they would be the one collecting money for licensing, part sales, and commercial launches. It was one of the few things at NASA that made money!

    1. Re:saw this coming by EngineeringStudent · · Score: 1

      Our leadership has no vision for anything more than lining their pockets. Long term success of the nation - nah.

      Let the people learn to speak chinese ... or russian.

    2. Re:saw this coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so who does that make the morons, you or russia?

    3. Re:saw this coming by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      It was one of the few things at NASA that made money!

      WTF are you on about? NASA never sold engines or rockets. Nothing at NASA ever "made money" from commercial launches or engine sales.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    4. Re:saw this coming by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Yeeeeeeeeeah, we have something coming up called an election and everyone's more pissed than ever. So the next candidate damn better be anti-everything we hate or he won't even get nominated. A bad president can only fool everyone for 4 years. Or 8 if the opposing party picks an idiot with a mental patient for a vice president. Then that ends in a damn big hurry. I can't wait to either see the democrat candidate melt down into a pile of unelectable something or other OR run against Obamacare. Either will be entertaining.

    5. Re:saw this coming by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      WTF are you on about? NASA launched plenty of corporate satellites for money!

  22. Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, GPS operates you!

    1. Re:Soviet Russia by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

      Well played!

  23. Throws like a girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what we get electing and re-electing a President so wimpy, he throws a baseball like a five-year-old girl. We've become like a 98-pound weakling at the beach. Every little bully in the world is now kicking sand in our face.
    I can remember presidents back to Eisenhower, and I never remember this happening before.

    1. Re:Throws like a girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elsewhere in this thread, you clowns blame him for his "imperialist rhetoric". You need to make up your minds which memes you're going to use.

  24. Re:Dogs are barking, cars are going anyways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you miss those decades where we all had nukes pointing at one another?

    Did you miss all those years where tensions kept ratcheting up and there was a fear people shoot the damned things?

    This kind of stuff has far broader implications than you seem to realize.

  25. That's what you get when you atrophy your industry by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    Outsource everything, cut investments in high tech, cut investments in infrastructure and science.Spend more on giant military. That's what it gets us.

  26. I'm confused by jcopper · · Score: 1

    Space X lost in court but won anyways?

  27. THE Ukraine , THE Canada , THE Japan ,THE Thailand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf not because THE United States starts with a THE you got to add it on front of every country name.

  28. About time by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

    Ever since the Cold War ended, the US has really gone to shit.  It's like an old boxer who goes out of shape because there's no one left to fight.

    1. Re:About time by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      What about the "War on Terror"?
      Were you not paying attention to the last 13 years?

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    2. Re:About time by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is watching it trying to relive it's glory days by picking on wimps.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    3. Re:About time by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

      That's done nothing to spur the US to innovation.  Only to clamp down on freedom.

  29. what utter fucking bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    what utter, fucking, historically ignorant bullshit.

    if your theory were in any way true, it would not have required the forced de-ukrainization of eastern ukraine in the 1930s, which stalin did.

    your simplistic rewriting of history for the now twice invader of ukraine, is deplorable.

    fuck you you fucking fascist.

  30. Good. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Now can we build up our space launch infrastructure?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  31. Obama's Laughing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the secret space plane that has no name

  32. We will just reverse engineer them.... by marcgvky · · Score: 1

    The Russian already delivered several and we have tested them on our rack. We should be able to reverse engineer them, without help from the Russians. Pound sand, Ruskies.

    1. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by benjfowler · · Score: 5, Informative

      Last thing I read about this, the secret sauce in these engines, is the metallurgy -- the Russians have developed alloys that allow them to run them oxidiser-rich without everything getting destroyed by the extremely corrosive preburner exhaust. You can build as many engines as you want, if you don't have the recipe and process, you're literally going to go nowhere.

    2. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much for respect for someone's IP. I am sure Holliwood will like it when in response Russia gives their pirates (already active, admittedly) the green light ... Double standards again.

    3. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incriminate a Russian scientist that know the process, so that Puting state machinery goes after him or her, then offer political asilum. I should be working for the CIA :P

    4. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Impossible! Our Germans are smarter than their Germans! They just gota be...

    5. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last thing I read about this, the secret sauce in these engines, is the metallurgy.

      I know some materials science people. They would absolutely be salivating to do the research to make the metals needed. The only thing needed is $ and the political will to do it. I will watch with interest to see if the US government pursues this.

      Gordon

    6. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I would be incredibly surprised if the "secret recipe" hasn't been, ah, "acquired" by the US intelligence services a long time ago.

      In fact, it's quite likely that some of the people who developed it are now US citizens. A lot of scientists emigrated from Russia in 90s, and space industry was significantly affected by that.

    7. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by marcgvky · · Score: 1

      Well, anonymous coward, Russia never enforced our IP rights to any of the tech they "procured" during the Cold War. So, game on. Putin is being a douche by annexing Ukraine, because he knows that President Obama doesn't have the sack to take it to the next level.... so again I say, game on.

    8. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russians have no secrets from the us. None

    9. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the secret sauce - silicon

    10. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by mirix · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the American military industrial complex oughtta be able to duplicate it at a mere ten times the price.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    11. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Citation needed. US metallurgy has always been ahead of the Russians ... it would be VERY unusual for the Russians to have developed an alloy which the US doesn't already have and can't copy.

    12. Re:We will just reverse engineer them.... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      If only there were an invention which can be used to determine the elements in a compound. I suspect that might want to vaporize the material and shoot a light source through it to a prism, which will split the light and the resultant spectum analyzed and compare the spectrum to that of known elements, thereby revealing what is in the alloy. Crazy, I know, but it just might work!

      The better solution is getting citizens of both countries to STOP VOTING FOR WARMONGERS.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  33. but we only seem to learn the hard way by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    man, Americans are learning a lot of geography lately...

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:but we only seem to learn the hard way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet you obviously aren't learning proper punctuation.

  34. Let Rogozin harm russian interests by SergeyKurdakov6434 · · Score: 1

    the news should be read with few facts in mind. first of all, it was Musk who sought the ban of russian engines ( earlier slashdot story http://science.slashdot.org/st... ), so it hurts some companies, but not US, SpaceX will benefit from this 'ban', Musk is happy. then look at gps facilities http://www.gps.gov/multimedia/... - there is no one GPS facility in Russia. So this are not about GPS, but about those businesses, which provided more correct positioning information for Russian customers. If Rogozin wants to harm russian customers, let it be, but it hardly will have any effect anywhere else. And take Japan with a project http://www.qzs.jp/en/ - currently much of what provide ground stations could be transferred to satellites. So, it is quite possible, that even won't harm russian customers, they will be offered to use more satellites. as for threats to block International Space station beyond 2020, this might bite, but still not much. Though there are reports, that currently there are a lot of customers for international space station services, still unmanned satellites could perform almost all of these services, and more cheap and that was true for almost all time when astronautics existed - piloted stations added quite few actual results except for public attention to space research. So combined: if russian go the way of sanctions the biggest harm will be for russian space program and russian customers of space services. For US any announced threats are of very minor importance. So let this Rogozin hit russian interests with his own hands.

  35. Ah, the Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly why the Federation won't have Earth as a member,

  36. News for Russion consumption only by pesho · · Score: 2
    This is aimed for internal consumption in Russia only. Bolstering patriotism and such.

    In terms of economic impact on US it is pretty toothless. ULA has already stated that they have two year supply of RD-180 engines and that they are perfectly capable of manufacturing the engines themselves. The reasons for buying these engines from Russia are mostly political - US supports Russian engineers so they don't go and build rockets in Iran. On the other hand Elon Musk must be laughing out loud. The Russians just created the perfect political environment for the congress to act and allow SpaceX to compete with ULA for military satellite launches, something that only few days back was made impossible by a court decision. Good job Ruskies, you just open the door for your most aggressive competitor.

    As far as the shutting down GPS ground stations in Russia goes, this will only impact the accuracy of the system on Russian territory. So the only way somebody in US may feel pain is if they fall off their chairs laughing.

    1. Re:News for Russion consumption only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not meant for an economic impact anyways. It's like when school children find out that being hit in the balls hurts. Your dick of a friend then likes to sneak up on you and flick you in the balls to get a laugh. Hurts like hell but not fatal; and he's still a dick.

    2. Re:News for Russion consumption only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must read different thing.

      ULA stated that they must spend 1 billion $ and at least 5 years to build equivalent RD-180, base on the license with Russia.

      The reason for buying engines from Russia was because of the advantage of Soviet LOX/kerosene engine. That cheaper to buy instead of design from the scratch.
      In 90s, when struggle economy of Russia, the deal to use Russian Proton to launch U.S.A satellites to prevent Russia transfer rocket technology to India, not Iran.

      SpaceX Merlin 1D achieves one of the records made by NK-33 engines made in 60s, thrust-to-weight ratio, but still behind in term of efficient.

      Recommend:
      Brian Harvey - The Rebirth of the Russian Space Program. 50 Years After Sputnik, New Frontiers 2007, ISBN: 0387713549
      Wilfried Ley, et al. Handbook of Space Technology 2009, ISBN: 0470697393

    3. Re:News for Russion consumption only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job Ruskies, you just open the door for your most aggressive competitor.

      News flash: Russia does not give one slightest fuck.

      As far as the shutting down GPS ground stations in Russia goes, this will only impact the accuracy of the system on Russian territory. So the only way somebody in US may feel pain is if they fall off their chairs laughing.

      Yeah...and they will laugh their asses off incessantly, up until the moment China takes out the entire GPS constellation in one swift move, and every US military system in existence either stops working or is severely degraded.

      Stop being an arrogant fucktard.

    4. Re:News for Russion consumption only by EmperorArthur · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, ULA has stated that it would cost one Billion dollars to set up their own engine production here in the US. Sure that's nine tenths congressional/military bribes and lining shareholders pockets but expect the US to be paying for the factory any day now.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
  37. So, about that "Reset" button... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Jimmy Carter may not prove to be the most gullible US president after ll.

  38. Negotiate by jeti · · Score: 1

    Russia will probably be willing to lift the ban if the US lifts its own ITAR restrictions. They disallow the export defense-related technology, including rocketry, to Russia.

  39. Am I missing something? by jzatopa · · Score: 1

    SpaceX tries to prevent the US from buying rockets from Russia and unfortunately looses. After that the US goes to Russia to buy rockets and gets refused. It looks to me like SpaceX has all the cards now, I wonder how much the price just went up to buy one of their rockets?

    1. Re:Am I missing something? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      HAHAHA. Its cute how you think that this will end with SpaceX getting what they wanted all along simply because its the most logical course of action and it benefits the US the most.

    2. Re:Am I missing something? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      (Yes, you're obviously missing something and its the same thing we're all missing: Why weren't they just using the SpaceX rockets all along? Its clear now that the publicly implied reasoning was farcical.)

  40. Re: Elon Musk's Spaceship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fail copypasta. Musk is not even involved with paypal any longer. You should check your spelling before you submit, you're embarrassing yourself.

  41. It is a small response, hopefully more will follow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The United States needs to learn that its bullying tactics will not be tolerated.
    What a mess the Americans have made in Ukraine. Eastward expansion of NATO, and the European Union obviously will make the Russians very uneasy, particularly given the American history of economic terrorism that has always been used to achieve its foreign policy aims. Remember how many people Russia lost during WW2. The wish never to repeat such a tragedy is deeply ingrained on the Russian psyche. The west has boxed Russia into a corner. The reaction is hardly surprising. Obama lacks a proper grasp of international politics, and is completely ignorant of the history of the region. Like every previous instance of American interference, it will only result in disaster.
    Personally, I think Russia should ban the sale of Boeing aircraft within Russia, and pass laws, stripping diplomatic immunity from those convicted of economic terrorism. This would make it risky for those in the United States, who are guilty of imposing unilateral sanctions to aid US foreign policy, since the Russians could hopefully capture and imprison such individuals. I doubt the Russians would resort to CIA like kidnapping tactics, or indefinitely imprisonment without trial, US style, but I'd actually welcome it if America got a taste of its own medicine.
    A stable world is based on consensus, not unilateral actions. The United States has a dismal history of foreign policy failures, many with a monumental human cost.
    Support for the violent coup in Ukraine, with its significant neo-nazi contingent, is dangerous, and has destroyed the already fragile democracy in Ukraine.
    Ukraine is endemically corrupt. Replacing one corrupt regime, with an unelected neo-fascist variety, is hardly a smart move. It will undoubtedly divide and destabilise Ukraine, probably resulting in total economic collapse, and perhaps even division into two countries. I think the best we can now hope for, is the secession of the eastern Ukraine, since that is clearly the will of the people there, irrespective of any western propaganda on the issue.

  42. And this is why.... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ....we don't depend on political rivals for critical services.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  43. Some would disagree about the Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Spanish burned at most 25 people in any given year? The Mayan written language was eradicated, the non-Trinitarian Christian branches, were all exterminated - just because they did not have individual records doesn't mean it didn't happen. You are confusing the Spanish with the Nazis. The Romans were not unstoppable murdering machines? Ask the defenders at Masada or any other nations that were lined up on crossed to die in the sun after daring to resist.

    1. Re:Some would disagree about the Spanish by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      The Romans were not unstoppable murdering machines?

      The Germans and Persians seemed to hold them off fairly effectively over the generations....

      Of course the Gauls were whipped, but that's about what you'd expect from the forerunners of the French. ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Some would disagree about the Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the Gauls were whipped

      Well, not ALL the Gauls.

      but that's about what you'd expect from the forerunners of the French

      Your father was a hamster and your mother smelt of elderberries. Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time.

    3. Re:Some would disagree about the Spanish by mi · · Score: 1

      Ask the defenders at Masada or any other nations that were lined up on crossed to die in the sun after daring to resist.

      Defenders of Masada killed themselves. If they didn't resist at all, they would've been residents of a Roman Province — hardly a horrible fate (see "Life of Brian" for humorous take on it). They — a sect, which in today's America would've been laughed at as "Right-wing religious nuts" — chose to fight, which is admirable, but even then losing didn't mean dying — they were in for enslavement, but not death.

      The Mayans, on the other hand, whom somebody else mentioned here with regret, were killing all their prisoners-of-war. Visit Chichen Itza or any other Mayan site in Yukatan — you'll be shown walls made of human sculls — centuries before the "horrible" Spanish showed up.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:Some would disagree about the Spanish by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, that also applies to the Greek resistance against Persian control. The Persian emperor really only wanted to levy taxes on the Greeks, not to send them off to the mines. A bunch of other countries were also paying taxes to the persians. Sparta was actually considering complying with them at first - until a bunch of historical accidents occurred which caused Athens to declare war against Persia, and the proud Spartans couldn't be seen as being weak, so they had to go along. It was of course admirable the way they defended themselves against tyranny, but it was very unpragmatic of them.

      And about the Mayans, you're absolutely right, but I'm not going to take sides. In the Spanish-Mayan conflict, both sides committed atrocities at about the same level of barbarity, in my opinion.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    5. Re:Some would disagree about the Spanish by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      In the Spanish-Mayan conflict, both sides committed atrocities at about the same level of barbarity, in my opinion.

      There was one significant difference: The Mayans never invaded and conquered Spain.

    6. Re:Some would disagree about the Spanish by mi · · Score: 1

      There was one significant difference: The Mayans never invaded and conquered Spain.

      Only for lack of the sea-faring technology. And if they had the technology, their code of ethics and religion would've caused them to kill all the Spanish. Not convert, not even enslave, but kill. And that's why I consider them much more barbaric, than the Spanish were at the time.

      Because the oft-denounced "Western culture" has developed by those times not just the ocean-crossing ships and muskets, but also a monotheistic religion, which did away with idols, who could only be appeased by blood.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    7. Re:Some would disagree about the Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they didn't invent trans-atlantic navigation.

  44. this may turn well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perhaps this may return US financing of space programme to decent (cold-war) level?

  45. West vs East by kmlhzr · · Score: 1

    Same old story between two super powers...

    --
    http://www.newspapirus.com
  46. The downside of the military industrial complex by werepants · · Score: 1

    So, turns out that funneling cash to huge defense contractors only works for national security as long as those involved care more about defense than cash.

    Lockheed and Boeing got a bunch of money (and get a bunch of money every year, assured access) to deal with this and develop capability for building this engine domestically, but turns out they just pocketed the money, never built the rocket engine factory, and nobody blinked an eye. Thankfully they have the Delta IV, but who knows if they can scale up production like they need to, and you can guarantee it's going to be a hell of a lot more expensive.

    1. Re:The downside of the military industrial complex by CWCheese · · Score: 1

      Actually, the company responsible for rocket engines is Aerojet, which chose to purchase RD-180's from Russia rather than accelerate development of domestic rocket engines. Recently they have absorbed what remains of Rocketdyne, so maybe they will begin building domestic engines again since Rocketdyne has been reviving research into the F1 engines that powered Saturn V launches in the Apollo program. Imagine the thrust an updated F1 could generate using modern materials and state of the art manufacturing.

      --
      Have a Day!
    2. Re:The downside of the military industrial complex by werepants · · Score: 1

      That's the main upside I see to all this - we might actually get some cool rocket development coming out of this, if we're lucky.

  47. Ariane by CBravo · · Score: 1

    It is not like they have issues hauling things into space (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariane_%28rocket_family%29). Or am I missing something?

    --
    nosig today
  48. Should help Space X out quite nicely by Latinhypercube · · Score: 1

    Should help Space X out quite nicely

  49. about time by slugstone · · Score: 0

    We should be launching our military stuff with US rockets.

  50. Oops by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    bet you wish you didn't gut NASA now huh?

  51. Don't buy this anonymous shit please by Kartu · · Score: 1

    Case studies show otherwise, majority of easter Ukrainian population does not want to be part of Russia (take pretty much any non-Russian case study), don't buy this anonymous shit please.

    Eastern Ukrain is predominantly Russian speaking, but so is the capital.

    1. Re:Don't buy this anonymous shit please by Wookact · · Score: 1

      I agree that the Russian "studies" and "polls" are fragrantly biased.

  52. Mod up by Kartu · · Score: 1

    Parent post is clearly underrated.

  53. SpaceX to the rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ULA has a 2 year supply of Russian rockets I believe. This move by Russian should hasten the US military to use the cheaper space rockets.

  54. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US Military was using Russian Rockets to get their junk into space? I find that very very odd. The US Military is sooo anal retentive about making absolute certain that all parts to any weapon system used by the US Military is manufactured in the US. They never ever have to rely on other countries for military hardware, regardless of whether its cheaper or not (in hindsight, its not a bad strategy: expensive, but allows complete independence). As for the satellite systems: alternative sites could be established although with less accuracy. Instead of hitting the ball bearing factory, you hit the school beside the ball bearing factory. Why oh why would the US want to do precision bombing in that part of the world anyway?

  55. I have a gun. I bake my own cake. by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I have a gun. I bake my own cake. Brownies too. Today I baked cinnamon rolls. You're welcome to come have one.

    Or you can sit there and complain that you're hungry.

  56. Pop! Pop! Pop-pop-pop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's that sound?

    Why that's the sound of thousands of MBA and economists heads exploding! Not to mention stock traders and investment analysts.

    "Everyone knows" that you cannot run a company in any other way than quarter to quarter. Or so you'd think after looking after the typical state of the modern public company.

  57. Re:THE Ukraine , THE Canada , THE Japan ,THE Thail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf not because

    I assume that made sense in your head.

  58. Re:It is a small response, hopefully more will fol by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

    Putin apologists remind me of battered wives. If only you could stop making him mad, everything would be okay.

    There's a reason why Eastern Europe was rushing to try to join NATO. And they were right. They're going to be rushing even harder now.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  59. Re: GPS problems? by storkus · · Score: 1

    Your GNSS primer has quite a few errors--except for calling them GNSS instead of using GPS like Kleenex, like most reporters do. :)

    1a. GPS long in the tooth: not at all. From the Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gps#Timeline_and_modernizationGPS article, the next phase (III-A) is already approved and just needs to be built; 7 more from the previous phase still need to be completed and launched as the older birds die. And the math doesn't change over 30 years, only the corrections.

    1b. Didn't notice this until after I wrote the above: Wikipedia has an entire article on the next GPS generation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

    2. GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, and the newer Chinese Beidou expansion that's apparently been renamed Compass are all worldwide systems. The former three use medium earth orbit (MEO), but not polar so there's reduced or eliminated polar coverage (mainly above the (ant)arctic circles; Compass/Beidou uses both GEO and MEO. Also, I know first-hand that GLONASS works just fine here in Arizona as my Samsung Galaxy Note II with its SIRF dual-system chip receives it with no flags for inaccuracy compared to GPS.

    3. "Planned Errors": This is Selective Availability and hasn't been used since the 90's.

    4. Beidou/Compass' build-out vs GALILEO's: China's is happening, according to Wikipedia, unlike GALILEO, where the latest announcement is a pair of birds delivered to the Guyana spaceport and STILL no ETA to full deployment...

  60. sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everyone works together peacefully when everyone is getting what they want.

    the crux of conflict is want.

  61. Good precedent by John+Da'+Baddest · · Score: 1

    Nice idea - a license agreement which bans military applications. More products should do this.

  62. Quit playing tit for tat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring down the banhammer on Russia with a total embargo on Russia and any country who breaks the embargo.. Russia would last a week. When you have an annoying toothless bully in your face, best response is to give them a beating they will never forget.

  63. Original ethnics groups ... by advid.net · · Score: 1

    ... russian speaking ukranians were imported to Ukraine, and the originally ethnic groups were cleared out.
    ... I propose they just move back to Russia, and leave Ukraine to the ethnic groups that were cleared out.

    Then what about people in US move back wherever they came from and leave the continent to the ethnic groups that were cleared out ?

    I guess there's a duration threshold somewhere, after that people living somewhere can claim the land.

    Maybe 50 years is a bit short, a few hundreds start to be interesting, and thousands year long occupation seems fair.

    Anyway, there might have been some other original ethnic group there before any of both today, they should focus on something else than their ancestors' culture and learn to live together.

    1. Re:Original ethnics groups ... by hugetoon · · Score: 1

      Then You might be interested in investigating the history of this region : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

      My point is: Russian speaking people of east Ukraine have graves of their grand-parents on this land.
      Abolishing their language and telling them to leave if they are not happy about that seem a tad excessive so there is no surprise that they decided to fight for their independence from Kiev.

  64. cold war mentality must go off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are people in power both sides that are bold, raised and educated in the times of cold war. they somehow will never manage to think differently. it is a matter of time until generations born after that time will be in power - lets hope people of new generations will not care about this crap, and will see only one one big interconnected world to work, and to sell and buy goods

  65. Why not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, why not ban Russia use of US chips for military hardware? Not that many country can build DSPs and FPGAs are there?

  66. Returning Russians to Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could we do that in Israel? Wouldn't that solve about 3/4th the world's problems?

  67. Conversely... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Kuwait is only an ally because of its oil reserves...

    Wrap it up however you like, it was a war over the availability of resources, and in this case, oil.

    1. Re:Conversely... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But Bush said we went in to restore the democracy of Kuwait, because we defend democracy.

    2. Re:Conversely... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Insomuch:
      1) That democracy is friendly towards the US
      2) They have vast reserves of oil
      3) They give access to region for US military
      4) They "stabilize" a region that has vast reserves of oil

      Pretty sure if no oil was involved in any way, not a single fuck would be given.

    3. Re:Conversely... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That, and Bush restored the monarchy, not any democracy.

  68. Tom = multiple /. sockpuppet using scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's let TOM speak shall we:

    "I'm having great conversations on this site with one of my alias accounts" - by Tom (822) on Monday April 07, 2014 @02:29PM (#46686259) Homepage FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    APK

    P.S.=> Tom *tried* to libel me & failed after I destroyed him in a technical debate on hosts files... result?

    Tom ended up "eating his words" here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... spiced with "the bitter taste of SELF-defeat" + HIS FOOT IN HIS MOUTH

    ... apk

  69. Re:It is a small response, hopefully more will fol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no Eastern European countries left that are in a hurry to join. The former Yugoslavia was bombed by NATO and even though maybe slightly more than half the population in Bosnia-Herzegovina might really support it (since they benefit from the NATO involvement), the other half would be so much against it that it's just a pipe dream for those who want it. Moldova on the other hand has a problem, which is in some ways similar to the Ukrainian crisis but has been going on for much longer. A civil war similar to what might soon happen in Ukraine ended in a cease fire with the Eastern half of the country declaring itself independent (with some leaning towards joining Russia) but are not recognized as a state by anyone (not even Russia - for now - IIRC). The Western half (whose government de jure of course is the government of the entire country) would probably want to join NATO but with the population almost as divided on the issue as in Bosnia-Herzegovina, it's just not possible for them to even consider it. Unless they agree to let the Eastern half be independent or part of Russia.

  70. Cleaning our clock by billd10 · · Score: 0

    Looks like Putin is preparing to clean our clock. After he's through, it will be 1960 all over again.

  71. I say, I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear me, you seem to be rather fascist in your denunciation of fascism........

  72. Who Cares by savagefamily · · Score: 1

    News Flash, we can get survey grade GPS from modern day equipment, subinch vertical and horizontal using proprietary technology. New GPS networks are coming online and as of last month if you use dual frequency GPS can get submeter horizontal (decrypted signal; used to be encrypted). So what's the fuss? In my opinion, we need to stop being the global police and worry about our own issues. Doesn't anyone read and understand lessens from history anymore? Maybe, it's the corrupt politicians with hidden agendas. I say let the change in cultures happen organically rather than synthetically. We certainly don't have our stuff together so why do we impose our moral rights on others outside of our boundaries. Unless it infringes on our rights, who cares what they do! Evil will always exist and going to search for it depletes resources and security.

  73. Space X -Manned Missions Soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We currently can't get men into low Earth orbit. Space X says they'll be able to do it by 2017. If we can't do it, by 2020, then we are truly screwed as far as space travel is concerned.

              This Slashdot article doesn't talk about Putin putting a ban on ferrying our asses up to the space station by the year 2020. He will do it if our sanctions (a joke) aren't lifted.

                We just had 2 astronauts return back to Earth from the station last night, after being up there for 6 months. Could this situation get any more pathetic ?

  74. Re:It is a small response, hopefully more will fol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I assume that they would be Russian as quickly as possible.

  75. Re:It is a small response, hopefully more will fol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only thing worse than Putin apologists are oligarch bootlickers. Like you.

  76. Dutch famine of 1944; my mother survived... by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    an elderly relative they took in did not: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D...
    "The Dutch famine of 1944, known as the Hongerwinter ("Hunger winter") in Dutch, was a famine that took place in the German-occupied part of the Netherlands, especially in the densely populated western provinces above the great rivers, during the winter of 1944-1945, near the end of World War II. A German blockade cut off food and fuel shipments from farm areas. Some 4.5 million were affected and survived because of soup kitchens. About 22,000 died because of the famine. Most vulnerable according to the death reports were elderly men. ... After the national railways complied with the exiled Dutch government's appeal for a railway strike starting September 1944 to further the Allied liberation efforts, the German administration retaliated by placing an embargo on all food transports to the western Netherlands. By the time the embargo was partially lifted in early November 1944, allowing restricted food transports over water, the unusually early and harsh winter had already set in. The canals froze over and became impassable for barges. ..."

    So yes, it is the height of foolishness that the USA has reduced its food stocks to bare minimums for "just in time" delivery. I read somewhere a few years ago that the USA was divesting itself of its government reserve grain supplies too. It is even more insanity to convert grain to fuel. A trillion dollars a year or more for security spending in the USA, and the government can't even get the basics right...

    See also:
    http://articles.latimes.com/20...
    "But when it comes to food prices, our country cannot even threaten to bolster the national supply because the United States does not possess a national grain reserve. Such was not always the case. The modern concept of a strategic grain reserve was first proposed in the 1930s by Wall Street legend Benjamin Graham. ... In the inflationary 1970s, the USDA revamped FDR's program into the Farmer-Owned Grain Reserve, which encouraged farmers to store grain in government facilities by offering low-cost and even no-interest loans and reimbursement to cover the storage costs. But over the next quarter of a century the dogma of deregulated global markets came to dominate American politics, and the 1996 Freedom to Farm Act abolished our national system of holding grain in reserve. As for all that wheat held in storage, it became part of the Bill Emerson Humanitarian Trust, a food bank and global charity under the authority of the secretary of Agriculture. The stores were gradually depleted until 2008, when the USDA decided to convert all of what was left into its dollar equivalent. And so the grain that once stabilized prices for farmers, bakers and American consumers ended up as a number on a spreadsheet in the Department of Agriculture. Now, as the United States must confront climate change, commodity markets riddled by speculation, increased import costs, hosts of regional conflicts and the return of international grain tariffs and export bans, we have put our faith entirely in transnational agribusiness and the global grain market. ..."

    More neoliberal neocon madness... But most people in the USA did not have a parent who saw a relative starve to death during wartime... You always think the basic services will be there -- until you test them in a crisis and they are not...
    "Neoliberalism as a Water Balloon"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Or also:
    http://www.taobackup.com/testi...
    "No matter how sophisticated or comprehensive your backup system is, you will never know if it works unless you actually test it. Without testing, you can have no confidence at all. Here are

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  77. Piece if advice. by locke.th · · Score: 1

    If you're far enough away from the nuclear blast to survive it, drop to the ground, face down, with your hands over your eyes. When the bright flash from the detonation occurs, you will be blinded. However by doing as I just instructed, your vision will return...rather than being 'burnt out'

  78. Where will this end? by Urkki · · Score: 1

    The sanctions and bans clearly will not work to defuse the Ukraine crisis.

    Without something concrete, consequences such as those sanctions and bans and threat of them becoming more and more severe, Russian tanks would most likely have already rolled to Eastern Ukraine. Whether that's helping to eventually defuse the crisis, or just helping to prolong it by preventing Russia from ending it in SU style, that's matter of opinion.