no. You have no reasonable expectation to privacy when running down the road. His analogy was apt..hyperbolic, but apt. Your's just shows everyone you don't know what you are talking about.
It's like walking in you house naked, with the curtains closed, and picture of you junk show up online.
No, they are not reasonable. Not at all. A reasonable remark is "What are we going to do about all these criminals and murders? Why aren't we holding our elected officials feet to the fire? Those are reasonable remarks.
No, every time we give in on a word, the bullies, the ignorant, and the stupid win. I'm done. Oh, and so you know, The term "cracker" was in use during Elizabethan times to describe braggarts.
"In most cases a hacker is nothing more than a thief and criminal" nope. Far more hacking goes on that is in no way illegal, then people who use hacking skills to commit crimes.
Also, for using NCIS is a horrid, horrid example of computer skills. It's a bad example, and you should feel bad for using it.
"So very little music you hear out today can be considered "musical" at all." bullshit. I could go on and on with current music that is, be any definition musical.
There where people in your day(mine to from the sound of it) That thought the previous generation was real music, and so on.
" And music splintered, and money took over" says everyone who doesn't like a shift in music for all time.
"and while there have always been one hit wonders, that is now the norm." No, it's always mostly been one hit wonders. The 60s, 70s, 90s where FULL of one hit wonders. Look at the charts at the time. You have forgotten the crap of you generation and only remember the greats. and since no one plays the one hit wonders(seldom, anyways) from that generation, kids will where the good music from the time.
Tell me, are you amazed the the pinnacle of music coincidentally coincides with the music you liked when you where in your teens?
Be careful of quickly passed bills. That almost always means no one read them. n this case, the punishment is too much. 5 years in prison? how about lust a large fine and not spend money housing them?
Maybe, but should Apple say "In accordance to the blah law, you must get a judge to order us to do this." That would seem like the rational and less expensive, and better PR approach.
But that's not the issue.Apple isn't saying they can't, they are saying they don't want to.
"But also if there is a simple and convenient way for the legal owner to ask Apple to unlock a device" So having a will, a death certificate, a solicitor, and willing to personally meet with Apple is now simple and convenient?
Nope. Soros does it out of necessity to try and stop the Koch brothers from destroying the country. Soros want's the amount of control that comes from donating money removed. However how do you do that in the current system? If you don't play while your trying to fix it, you lose.
You should probably look at what they do and their reasons.
Does change a damn thing,. You are STILL THE VICTIM.
no. You have no reasonable expectation to privacy when running down the road.
His analogy was apt..hyperbolic, but apt. Your's just shows everyone you don't know what you are talking about.
It's like walking in you house naked, with the curtains closed, and picture of you junk show up online.
No, they are not reasonable. Not at all. A reasonable remark is
"What are we going to do about all these criminals and murders? Why aren't we holding our elected officials feet to the fire?
Those are reasonable remarks.
It's victim blaming when you say it's the victims fault, or that the 'deserve it'
Not for advising them to use stronger passwords and tools.
Nice looser attitude. Just becasue it changed doesn't mean it can't change back.
Sadly, lazy, weak willed, and boring people like you just give up.
Have you called Nabisco to let them know?
No, every time we give in on a word, the bullies, the ignorant, and the stupid win.
I'm done.
Oh, and so you know, The term "cracker" was in use during Elizabethan times to describe braggarts.
"are two-legged doesn't change the basic reality."
Yes. It. Does.
I look forward to your paper on how wearing short skirts means it the woman's fault for being raped.
You attack ME and you are at fault regardless of the fact I was in the woods at night.
You are a horrid, uncivilized human being and should be shunned for society.
block gmail? well the they will sue sone other stupid way to move their passwords around.
Gmail ins't the issue.
fallacy.
I use a password the is based on my personal life. Good luck finding out which part of my personal life.
The MORE personal info about me, the harder it becomes to to guess my password becasue you are inundated with info.
And you can use person info as a base to derive from.
You can train people to sue strong but easy to remember passwords.
Maybe you should use an actual dictionary?
Originally, it was used to describe someone breaking the law:
http://duartes.org/gustavo/blo...
Saying 'hackers' committed the a crime is the same as saying 'Gun owners' committed a crime.
"In most cases a hacker is nothing more than a thief and criminal"
nope. Far more hacking goes on that is in no way illegal, then people who use hacking skills to commit crimes.
Also, for using NCIS is a horrid, horrid example of computer skills.
It's a bad example, and you should feel bad for using it.
"So very little music you hear out today can be considered "musical" at all."
bullshit. I could go on and on with current music that is, be any definition musical.
There where people in your day(mine to from the sound of it) That thought the previous generation was real music, and so on.
" And music splintered, and money took over"
says everyone who doesn't like a shift in music for all time.
"and while there have always been one hit wonders, that is now the norm."
No, it's always mostly been one hit wonders. The 60s, 70s, 90s where FULL of one hit wonders. Look at the charts at the time. You have forgotten the crap of you generation and only remember the greats. and since no one plays the one hit wonders(seldom, anyways) from that generation, kids will where the good music from the time.
Tell me, are you amazed the the pinnacle of music coincidentally coincides with the music you liked when you where in your teens?
Think about that a bit.
Your post was five words.
There friends have seen it coming for weeks.
heh
Be careful of quickly passed bills. That almost always means no one read them.
n this case, the punishment is too much. 5 years in prison? how about lust a large fine and not spend money housing them?
Now tell us how it's women's fault they get raped for dressing 'sexy'.
A bill has been sent to the governors office and he is expected to sigh.
It's Pub sponsored, so, you know, excessive prison time, but there you go.
Maybe, but should Apple say "In accordance to the blah law, you must get a judge to order us to do this."
That would seem like the rational and less expensive, and better PR approach.
Apple an reset the password is nothing else.
But that's not the issue.Apple isn't saying they can't, they are saying they don't want to.
"But also if there is a simple and convenient way for the legal owner to ask Apple to unlock a device"
So having a will, a death certificate, a solicitor, and willing to personally meet with Apple is now simple and convenient?
Animal on the outside infected the birds at the research facility, according to the article.
Nope.
Soros does it out of necessity to try and stop the Koch brothers from destroying the country.
Soros want's the amount of control that comes from donating money removed. However how do you do that in the current system? If you don't play while your trying to fix it, you lose.
You should probably look at what they do and their reasons.
Because if he dies and didn't leave an error, that mean those bitcoins are off the market making the other bitcoins worth more.
How does that compare to other years? Over the last 2 decades?
What do you mean this year? since January?