Simple: Most people read it when they are young tweens, early teens. SO that book they read was great becasue they don't have cliche or experience reading good stories. Then they grow up and the still have their impression of the book from their 13 year old self.
" it's a shame so many people will reject this movie because the author doesn't share their views or beliefs." He wants gay people to be stripped of their rights, We wants the US military to attack and kill Muslims. He want to dictate how you can have sex.
Those are pretty important views and worth talking a stand. It's not like people aren't going to see it because OSC likes to play Civ II
"Why not let the families of the people on the ships talk to them?" That was explained. You should have been paying attention.
"Why not let the families of the people on the ships talk to them?" because they are dead. The ship travel near Light Speed, and time dilation means most of those peoples family should be dead. This is a major problem in the movie when they return home. Years should have gone by.
I don't want Christopher's money grabbing bastardization. I wanted the Hobbit. A fun story with Epic bits about a hobbit./ Not Oakenshield's really, really, really serious adventures about really really serious stuff with serious people who seriously want to be serious.
Plus the movie had bits that were outright stupid.
The Ending of Enders is pretty lame to anyone with a lot of reading experience. It's great for kids; which then remember it with overly found memories of their past.
According to a government-industry bird strike committee, there were 2,200 bird strikes involving civil aircraft at altitudes of more than 5,000ft above the ground between 1990 and 2008, with the highest altitude incident reported as a collision between an aircraft and a Griffon vulture at 37,000ft off the coast of Africa.
The types of drone he is talking about is a specific type. Many of his issues aren't issue for drones, they are issues for that type of drone. Most of them go away when you are talking about an automated modern jet. And the lag is only an issue you you have less then a few seconds to fighter; which is seldom the case for drone.
the answer is simple. The cockpit is all one pieces that you use a crane to put into the aircraft. So the pilot gets in, it's life into place. This way you can eject the whole section.
"Don't discount satellite based kinetic energy weapons" don't discount physics. So you have an object orbiting the planet at 17,000+ MPH. And you want to fire a kinetic weapon*. So you need to be able to compensate for your existing momentum, and continually accelerate through the atmosphere and hit a precise target? do you realize how much fuel that would take? You are assuming that the target would always by in the direction of the satellite. What if the target is 30 degrees north? 60?
*for the sake of easy, I will assume you already realized that it would have to be dropped, and then be self propelled. Otherwise it would push the satellite around. Even dropping something will require flight adjustments.
"Latency" Not enough to matter with modern craft. Meaning innate programmed response systems are faster and or accurate them humans. This mitigate latency.
"Technology isn't anywhere near advanced as a human pilot in the seat." False. We have aircraft that can fly in formation, to attack location, take in far more data, and out maneuver any pilot.
He wasn't talking about any beam weapon. He was talking about target acquisition and then sending in a specific small military group, or a ninja. Maybe you should comprehend what is written and not make some knee jerk autorepsonse to something that was never asked?
The only reason the Air Force want's to keep pilots is that they need Heroes to put in front of the public.
Slashdot Mirror
Because a gay teen experience different pressure then a straight teen and visa versa.
At the heart of you question is clearly a kindness in that it shouldn't matter. Which is correct, but not true.
They are afraid homosexuals will destroy their view of marriage based on no evidence. Hence, homophobic.
Plus phobia doesn't mane 'scared' or 'fear' it's a type of anxiety disorder
If you see to men kissing does that create an anxiety* ?
*Which is fine, it's not a judgment nor an implication on any action you may, or may not, take due to the anxiety.
"I agree with limited Government"
So does pretty much every one. It's a false issue manufactured to appeal to simpletons while not giving any real answers.
The question is, what is limited?
"Christ taught that we should love our neighbours as ourselves,"
which is logically flawed to the point of nonsense.
His words on these issue sure are hateful.
Simple:
Most people read it when they are young tweens, early teens. SO that book they read was great becasue they don't have cliche or experience reading good stories.
Then they grow up and the still have their impression of the book from their 13 year old self.
" it's a shame so many people will reject this movie because the author doesn't share their views or beliefs."
He wants gay people to be stripped of their rights, We wants the US military to attack and kill Muslims. He want to dictate how you can have sex.
Those are pretty important views and worth talking a stand. It's not like people aren't going to see it because OSC likes to play Civ II
"Why not let the families of the people on the ships talk to them?"
That was explained. You should have been paying attention.
"Why not let the families of the people on the ships talk to them?"
because they are dead. The ship travel near Light Speed, and time dilation means most of those peoples family should be dead.
This is a major problem in the movie when they return home. Years should have gone by.
I don't want Christopher's money grabbing bastardization. I wanted the Hobbit. A fun story with Epic bits about a hobbit./
Not Oakenshield's really, really, really serious adventures about really really serious stuff with serious people who seriously want to be serious.
Plus the movie had bits that were outright stupid.
The Ending of Enders is pretty lame to anyone with a lot of reading experience. It's great for kids; which then remember it with overly found memories of their past.
Or you could try to ACTUALLY understand the situation.
They need a canopy that the pilot can eject through.
190 MPH isn't high speed.
or not.
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/ntsb-faa-investigate-high-altitude-bird-strikes-near-phoenix-334523/
According to a government-industry bird strike committee, there were 2,200 bird strikes involving civil aircraft at altitudes of more than 5,000ft above the ground between 1990 and 2008, with the highest altitude incident reported as a collision between an aircraft and a Griffon vulture at 37,000ft off the coast of Africa.
There is very little current AI bogies do that a pilot can not.
Air to air dog fights don't actually happen anymore.
The types of drone he is talking about is a specific type.
Many of his issues aren't issue for drones, they are issues for that type of drone.
Most of them go away when you are talking about an automated modern jet.
And the lag is only an issue you you have less then a few seconds to fighter; which is seldom the case for drone.
the answer is simple.
The cockpit is all one pieces that you use a crane to put into the aircraft. So the pilot gets in, it's life into place.
This way you can eject the whole section.
"Don't discount satellite based kinetic energy weapons"
don't discount physics.
So you have an object orbiting the planet at 17,000+ MPH. And you want to fire a kinetic weapon*. So you need to be able to compensate for your existing momentum, and continually accelerate through the atmosphere and hit a precise target? do you realize how much fuel that would take? You are assuming that the target would always by in the direction of the satellite. What if the target is 30 degrees north? 60?
*for the sake of easy, I will assume you already realized that it would have to be dropped, and then be self propelled. Otherwise it would push the satellite around. Even dropping something will require flight adjustments.
"Latency"
Not enough to matter with modern craft. Meaning innate programmed response systems are faster and or accurate them humans. This mitigate latency.
"Technology isn't anywhere near advanced as a human pilot in the seat."
False. We have aircraft that can fly in formation, to attack location, take in far more data, and out maneuver any pilot.
He wasn't talking about any beam weapon. He was talking about target acquisition and then sending in a specific small military group, or a ninja.
Maybe you should comprehend what is written and not make some knee jerk autorepsonse to something that was never asked?
The only reason the Air Force want's to keep pilots is that they need Heroes to put in front of the public.
" They keep reworking them,"
hence, refined.
I doubt he would be any good. The skills needed to lead a manufacturing company are completely. different then a software company, and visa versa.
I guarantee a doubling of stock price in 2 years.
You have a weird definition of flexible.
It flexes from a curve to flat.
That didn't days folding, or origami phone.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/flex
" there are creeps on the net and you should not let ten-year-olds out there unsupervised. (Duh.)"
yeah, it's the victims fault! They shouldn't have been there.
Technically you are wrong.
You should actually study up.
It's no different then an officer logging in with a profile of a 10 year old to see if he gets random solicitations.
" Posting "sex for cash" on Craigslist is entrapment. ""
nope.
It has to be done in a way where the person is enticed to do something they otherwise wouldn't do.
Don't underestimated the bears ability to get pissed at you no mater who else is around.
If you know it contains the password, then that ALSO means it's not being encrypted properly.