We just put the legal original on glass and sent out copies. Worked fine, and this was pretty big financial stuff. 50+million dollar deals... and it was 1998. Reduced staffing needs by about 400 people nation wide.
He sure it's easy, and don't give them a choice. They learned faxing, and they can learn not walking to the fax machine and pushing a button on their screen to send a fax.
I have heard your complaint, and seen it proven false over and over again, when people aren't given the choice. Changes takes energy, so natural the brain rebels against it.
If they still don't get it? give them warning, write them up and fire them.
" No doubt Apple will be paying per chip and not per wafer," I wouldn't be so sure.
And when ever their is a change like this there is ALWAYS problems. I would like to think TSMC is aware of this and is spending money on QA specifically for the initial test and production runs of this chip.
" Establishing even the smallest of colonies out there will take orders of magnitude more resources than it will take to solve even the worst problems here." no it wont, and , of course being able to do that means you need the tech that would also solve a lot of problems here
"There is no escape. "
I look forward to reading you published paper that ties all physics together and definitive proves chemical fuels are the only way we will ever be able to travel.
Yes, but when you have a large enough plank, cutting a 2x4 down to 1.5x3.5 means you get an extra plank to sell. Lumber isn't harvest in 2x4 pieces. You can finish a 2x4 to 1.8 x 3.8. But that means selling a smaller number of units.
Metric is better whn you are steeping out side becasue you cna easily do the math to make conversion of wind shill.
" why many meteorologists are including a "feel" scale" no, the include a feel scale to try to stay relevant and excuse there high paychecks by trying to be friendly; when in reality there isn't really a need for one on the vast majority of news shows.
No one who lie in an area for more then a year needs a 'feels' indicator'.
IT's not about good and useful it's about getting better. Metric is better becasue its cheaper, easier, and a standard. Stone knives and bear skin cloths were good and useful.
Yes, but id we were on a standard, then it wouldn't even have been an issue at all. Maintaining two measurement system cost them money and is another point of failure.
Hey, why don't we all wear bear skins and use stone knives. Those worked perfectly fine for our parent and their parents! That is what you sound like.
A) It's easier to work with. B) It's a global standard. C) It's cheaper. D) It's more accurate in everyday use. E) The US has a mix of units used in engineering and science. This cost money and causes confusion.
They reason have been gone of ad nausium. I am a middle aged American.
When a no republican was going to become the president, the price dropped, dramatically. And even after the incredibly steep drop, it was still higher then when bush took office.
You can trend OPEC response to presidents mid east policy for decades.
No it isn't. In fact, he addresses the big reason at the start of his post. People have anxiety about range, even range that have never needed.
Creating a reasonable way to swap batteries and a replacement center is a reasonable approach. If I could afford it I would get an EV car for daily use. I rarely travel more then 20 miles in a day.
"And please, please, before you reply, please at least try using google and a calculator." you first.
I have been hearing that since 1970's. Still not in sight.
Just in time is bad in general for a lot of industries that have moved to it. At least the drive to make everything Just in time has diminished in the last 12 years or so.
Adam Smith is irrelevant. In an era where the butcher, brewer, and baker wer elcal, got all their stuff local and klived among the towns fold, he was right. Once peopel started running businesw, his central idea of the invissible hand having a positive impact on society becasue ti's in their best interests no longer matter.
"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest."
When doing things 'right' costs more then not doing them then they will stop. The farther away someone is the less they wil care.
In 1750, if the butcher cheated every one there would be a direct impact against the person making the decision to cheat. If the dumped slop in the street, there was a direct impact. When they person is in new york making decision about a company in Virginia that will get them more money in the next 3 months. They won't bother considering any long term personal harm when looking at the quarterly profit and bonuses.
oh, and he wasn't a capitalist. Find better news sources.
"If we didn't have these services provided by government with all the associated graft that makes them more expensive than they need to be HAHAHAHAHahaha. wow.. simple stupid.
The Graft is US government is tiny, tiny, tiny amount, and the risk for doing so is huge.
Graft in private corporation? it's huge. The penalty for doing so is nearly non existent.
I hope those Facebook fire dept travel on Facebook roads, over Facebook gas lines, and Facebook water lines, and Facebook sewer lines and got contact from the Facebook phone. and be prepared to pay for anyone time the inhibit and that the chemicals and smoke never leave Facebooks property.
" then that is exactly what Facebook would have done before a fire started. " maybe, maybe not. I have seen a lot of companies skimp on needed servidces to save a buck today. Server backups? naw too expensive right now(i.e. will impact bonus). Redundant power maintenance? naw it will be fine for now.
"Its when they turn around and say that the rich aren't paying their "fair share" that it goes into the absurd." no, it isn't. You just don't know what fair share means.
Hint: the more lopsided that holding of money is, the more the the people with the most wealth have to pay to be fair. SO when 10% if the people hold the most wealth, their percentage will go up to maintain the same level of services. It's not a direct numbers game.
Slashdot Mirror
Who would have thought?
We just put the legal original on glass and sent out copies.
Worked fine, and this was pretty big financial stuff. 50+million dollar deals... and it was 1998. Reduced staffing needs by about 400 people nation wide.
He sure it's easy, and don't give them a choice.
They learned faxing, and they can learn not walking to the fax machine and pushing a button on their screen to send a fax.
I have heard your complaint, and seen it proven false over and over again, when people aren't given the choice. Changes takes energy, so natural the brain rebels against it.
If they still don't get it? give them warning, write them up and fire them.
so she straps one on for your turn as the bottom?
Since it said each other, it's a natural assumption.
" No doubt Apple will be paying per chip and not per wafer,"
I wouldn't be so sure.
And when ever their is a change like this there is ALWAYS problems.
I would like to think TSMC is aware of this and is spending money on QA specifically for the initial test and production runs of this chip.
And every one of them should be fired.
Sadly, drug tests and background checks means cheaper insurance.
People will grow up. Society will realize that everyone does stupid shit and recognize it as part of life.
If you can't party well, how are you going to land advertising clients?
It's the fall the determines the death.
I feel out of my bed, and the sudden stop didn't kill me.
By definition terraforming will do exactly that.
" Establishing even the smallest of colonies out there will take orders of magnitude more resources than it will take to solve even the worst problems here."
no it wont, and , of course being able to do that means you need the tech that would also solve a lot of problems here
"There is no escape. "
I look forward to reading you published paper that ties all physics together and definitive proves chemical fuels are the only way we will ever be able to travel.
What's that? you don't have one? well then, STFU.
Yes, but when you have a large enough plank, cutting a 2x4 down to 1.5x3.5 means you get an extra plank to sell.
Lumber isn't harvest in 2x4 pieces.
You can finish a 2x4 to 1.8 x 3.8. But that means selling a smaller number of units.
Metric is better whn you are steeping out side becasue you cna easily do the math to make conversion of wind shill.
" why many meteorologists are including a "feel" scale"
no, the include a feel scale to try to stay relevant and excuse there high paychecks by trying to be friendly; when in reality there isn't really a need for one on the vast majority of news shows.
No one who lie in an area for more then a year needs a 'feels' indicator'.
IT's not about good and useful it's about getting better. Metric is better becasue its cheaper, easier, and a standard.
Stone knives and bear skin cloths were good and useful.
It will take you about 1 cold day to converted to what number you associate with being cold.
", I don't care when the water boils; who measures it?"
people at higher elevation?
He isn't saying they are the same thing. Bit the kilogram is a perfectly good weigh to measure both.
And you example depend on the items being the same shape and size.
Shape and Size is not mass or weight.
Yes, but id we were on a standard, then it wouldn't even have been an issue at all.
Maintaining two measurement system cost them money and is another point of failure.
Hey, why don't we all wear bear skins and use stone knives. Those worked perfectly fine for our parent and their parents!
That is what you sound like.
A) It's easier to work with.
B) It's a global standard.
C) It's cheaper.
D) It's more accurate in everyday use.
E) The US has a mix of units used in engineering and science. This cost money and causes confusion.
They reason have been gone of ad nausium.
I am a middle aged American.
the OPEC party controls oil prices. The us mid-east policy has a huge impact to gas prices.
And don't lump all petroleum into on bucket.
OPEC prefer presidents that aren't mid-east warmongers.
http://www.gaspricewatch.com/web_us_average_gas_price_chart.php?period=10year
When a no republican was going to become the president, the price dropped, dramatically.
And even after the incredibly steep drop, it was still higher then when bush took office.
You can trend OPEC response to presidents mid east policy for decades.
No it isn't.
In fact, he addresses the big reason at the start of his post.
People have anxiety about range, even range that have never needed.
Creating a reasonable way to swap batteries and a replacement center is a reasonable approach.
If I could afford it I would get an EV car for daily use. I rarely travel more then 20 miles in a day.
"And please, please, before you reply, please at least try using google and a calculator."
you first.
I have been hearing that since 1970's. Still not in sight.
Just in time is bad in general for a lot of industries that have moved to it.
At least the drive to make everything Just in time has diminished in the last 12 years or so.
It's almost like you are in a different country, with different taxes, distribution, standards and population...
And its barley worth more. On the plus side, you have camels.
http://www.gaspricewatch.com/web_us_average_gas_price_chart.php?period=15year
http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate/Gasoline_Inflation.asp
http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/2012/02/27/how-high-have-gas-prices-risen-over-the-years/
Adam Smith is irrelevant. In an era where the butcher, brewer, and baker wer elcal, got all their stuff local and klived among the towns fold, he was right.
Once peopel started running businesw, his central idea of the invissible hand having a positive impact on society becasue ti's in their best interests no longer matter.
"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest."
When doing things 'right' costs more then not doing them then they will stop. The farther away someone is the less they wil care.
In 1750, if the butcher cheated every one there would be a direct impact against the person making the decision to cheat. If the dumped slop in the street, there was a direct impact. When they person is in new york making decision about a company in Virginia that will get them more money in the next 3 months. They won't bother considering any long term personal harm when looking at the quarterly profit and bonuses.
oh, and he wasn't a capitalist. Find better news sources.
"If we didn't have these services provided by government with all the associated graft that makes them more expensive than they need to be
HAHAHAHAHahaha. wow.. simple stupid.
The Graft is US government is tiny, tiny, tiny amount, and the risk for doing so is huge.
Graft in private corporation? it's huge. The penalty for doing so is nearly non existent.
I hope those Facebook fire dept travel on Facebook roads, over Facebook gas lines, and Facebook water lines, and Facebook sewer lines and got contact from the Facebook phone. and be prepared to pay for anyone time the inhibit and that the chemicals and smoke never leave Facebooks property.
" then that is exactly what Facebook would have done before a fire started. "
maybe, maybe not. I have seen a lot of companies skimp on needed servidces to save a buck today.
Server backups? naw too expensive right now(i.e. will impact bonus). Redundant power maintenance? naw it will be fine for now.
And many more.
No one is an island.
"Its when they turn around and say that the rich aren't paying their "fair share" that it goes into the absurd."
no, it isn't. You just don't know what fair share means.
Hint: the more lopsided that holding of money is, the more the the people with the most wealth have to pay to be fair.
SO when 10% if the people hold the most wealth, their percentage will go up to maintain the same level of services.
It's not a direct numbers game.