Both those devices where better over all then the competitor. the iPhone, while a Prada copy, almost no one had heard of the Prada, and the iPhone was smaller and better integrated. The iPod, once it cane to windows, was far superior to other devices becasue ti was so easy to organize your music with iTunes and simply get it onto the device in a logical way.
Of course, it was the best GUI based computer, and they had the first PC.
And the first successful tablet.
I don't even own an Apple computer, but to claim they haven't built better devices is simple ignorant, or flamebait.
Byuckyballs says: "Now, after more than two years, they're saying our extensive measures aren't enough and we should be put out of business. I can't find any doc the confirms that on cpsc.gov
And the company keeps using the logical fallacy we sold lots, so protect us; which has nothing to do with the safety concern. "We are fighting the CPSC action because we believe responsible adults should have the right to choose to purchase adult products like ours." History shows you are wrong.
"We are fighting the CPSC action because we have been betrayed by a government organization that switched overnight from being an ally, helpful in ensuring our products would be marketed correctly, to being an enemy trying to shut us down." Nice scared words. The steps you took did not work. You refused to take more, the CPSC took the next logical step.
Projects are starting to show the it won't CRUSH it in Q4.
There just projects, so grain of salt. However, Apple is have supply issues, Samsung is not becasue Samsung has stronger tries to component and material supplies then Foxconn has.
And The difference between 4s and 5 isn't exactly that great. A trivial amount lighter, and slightly longer, and the requirement to buy all new device that physically connect to the device are all issues as well.
Enabling ‘Do Not Track’ means that a request will be included with your browsing traffic. Any effect depends on whether a website responds to the request, and how the request is interpreted. For example, some websites may respond to this request by showing you ads that aren't based on other websites you've visited. Many websites will still collect and use your browsing data - for example to improve security, to provide content, services, ads and recommendations on their websites, and to generate reporting statistics. Learn more
I never get spammed from Google, and I have been using there services since their inception. Not a single piece of spam form them, SO I don't really believe your post.
"address book showing up under my YouTube profile pages and I'm sure that eventually they'll start seeing mine." And? Change the damn setting. Another case of someone who doesn't know how to use something bitching about the systems. It says this: " Let people find my channel on YouTube if they have my email address"
You are making VAST ASSUMPTION about what 'Do Not Track' is. Have you read anything about it. Here:
Enabling ‘Do Not Track’ means that a request will be included with your browsing traffic. Any effect depends on whether a website responds to the request, and how the request is interpreted. For example, some websites may respond to this request by showing you ads that aren't based on other websites you've visited. Many websites will still collect and use your browsing data - for example to improve security, to provide content, services, ads and recommendations on their websites, and to generate reporting statistics.
So they still gather everything, they just don't show you ads based on what the gathered. They will still show you ads, just random ones.
Do Not Track doe snot stop them form gathering information. Just stops targeted ads. It's useless in any privacy way of thinking.
Enabling ‘Do Not Track’ means that a request will be included with your browsing traffic. Any effect depends on whether a website responds to the request, and how the request is interpreted. For example, some websites may respond to this request by showing you ads that aren't based on other websites you've visited. Many websites will still collect and use your browsing data - for example to improve security, to provide content, services, ads and recommendations on their websites, and to generate reporting statistics.
IE is correct to go against industry standards in this case. Not that it matters, becasue everyone will turn it on and industry will ignore it becasue they have exactly ZERO reason to do what it says.
"Almost certainly 95% of anything really important exists on paper - primarily minutes and budget docs." HAHAHAHAHAhahhaha.. oh shut up. You've clearly never been in that situation.
"some things are just better in a permanent, uneditable form." which can be done better digitally, or with glass should regulation require it.
Bobs experience is with an outdated system. Is there a real market for his skills?
In any case, go forward and remind everyone that Bob is the result of not spending the money to ensure there are more then ONE person who know the system Include what needs to be done to reduce the chances another Bob emerges.
If Bob leaves, you're going to have to suck it up and realize the transition is going to be longer then you would like and there is nothing you can do about it. remind others that it will only get worse with time.
You can also offer Bob a bonus for staying until a certain date. 50K if you stay for the next two years and meets certain goals. 50k is a lot, but is it more then if you had to do the transition without him? I hate to reward people who hoard information,. but from a practically business side, it may be the best decision.
Space X is not "paradigm-shifting industry disruption. " Not by any stretch of the imagination. It's certainly awesome and cool, but lets not get carried away.
Depends on the Sequel, some are quite creative. Of course I judge things based on evidence, and not because it has the word 'sequel' associated with it. I'm not that small minded.
Skyfall is very creative.
Plus, there are many, many original movies put out. Nothing has changed, some movies are good, most aren't. just like it's always been. By the way, I have heard your complaint my entire adult life, but just substitute the year for 1980, 1984, 1990, 2000, 2005,
First iPhone, First iPod.
Both those devices where better over all then the competitor.
the iPhone, while a Prada copy, almost no one had heard of the Prada, and the iPhone was smaller and better integrated.
The iPod, once it cane to windows, was far superior to other devices becasue ti was so easy to organize your music with iTunes and simply get it onto the device in a logical way.
Of course, it was the best GUI based computer, and they had the first PC.
And the first successful tablet.
I don't even own an Apple computer, but to claim they haven't built better devices is simple ignorant, or flamebait.
The president influence impacts the economy. I was around during Reagan, and his bad decisions hurt the economy, badly and for years after he left.
Yeah, Nate predicted it, exactly. Maybe depending on Florida, but everything else was perfect.
You just guessed.
See the difference?
Cisco firing and downsizing whenever they see fit? how does that fit into your dumbass view of:
"committed corporate treason and violated a 'family' trust. "?
Also, look up treason.
With the amount of evidences that shows it hurt productivity, I'm not sure why anyone thinks thins is a controversy.
Have these people ever worked with stoned people?
That's a really good idea. You should submit it.
responding to many, many consumer complaints about a products. Many children requiring surgery.
http://www.cpsc.gov/CPSCPUB/PREREL/prhtml12/12234.pdf
Byuckyballs says:
"Now, after more than two years, they're saying our extensive measures aren't enough and we should be put out of business.
I can't find any doc the confirms that on cpsc.gov
And the company keeps using the logical fallacy we sold lots, so protect us; which has nothing to do with the safety concern.
"We are fighting the CPSC action because we believe responsible adults should have the right to choose to purchase adult products like ours."
History shows you are wrong.
"We are fighting the CPSC action because we have been betrayed by a government organization that switched overnight from being an ally, helpful in ensuring our products would be marketed correctly, to being an enemy trying to shut us down."
Nice scared words. The steps you took did not work. You refused to take more, the CPSC took the next logical step.
I would argue there biggest mistake was getting rid of the keyboard.
Becasue normally you compare versions with versions. Not 'all of every version.
If you are going to compare every version of iPhone sold in Q3, then you need to compare every version of android phone Samsung sold in Q3.
Projects are starting to show the it won't CRUSH it in Q4.
There just projects, so grain of salt. However, Apple is have supply issues, Samsung is not becasue Samsung has stronger tries to component and material supplies then Foxconn has.
And The difference between 4s and 5 isn't exactly that great. A trivial amount lighter, and slightly longer, and the requirement to buy all new device that physically connect to the device are all issues as well.
We will see.
Becasue Q3 2012 is the last completed set of data available.
Gold gets you ads as well.
Slackware .9 ~
If they had self respect, the wouldn't be falsely called 'Whales'. The would be confident enough to be comfortable with being a specie of Dolphin.
DNT doesn't mean they won't track you.
Enabling ‘Do Not Track’ means that a request will be included with your browsing traffic. Any effect depends on whether a website responds to the request, and how the request is interpreted. For example, some websites may respond to this request by showing you ads that aren't based on other websites you've visited. Many websites will still collect and use your browsing data - for example to improve security, to provide content, services, ads and recommendations on their websites, and to generate reporting statistics. Learn more
I never get spammed from Google, and I have been using there services since their inception. Not a single piece of spam form them, SO I don't really believe your post.
"address book showing up under my YouTube profile pages and I'm sure that eventually they'll start seeing mine."
And? Change the damn setting. Another case of someone who doesn't know how to use something bitching about the systems.
It says this:
" Let people find my channel on YouTube if they have my email address"
You are making VAST ASSUMPTION about what 'Do Not Track' is. Have you read anything about it. Here:
Enabling ‘Do Not Track’ means that a request will be included with your browsing traffic. Any effect depends on whether a website responds to the request, and how the request is interpreted. For example, some websites may respond to this request by showing you ads that aren't based on other websites you've visited. Many websites will still collect and use your browsing data - for example to improve security, to provide content, services, ads and recommendations on their websites, and to generate reporting statistics.
So they still gather everything, they just don't show you ads based on what the gathered. They will still show you ads, just random ones.
Do Not Track doe snot stop them form gathering information. Just stops targeted ads. It's useless in any privacy way of thinking.
Enabling ‘Do Not Track’ means that a request will be included with your browsing traffic. Any effect depends on whether a website responds to the request, and how the request is interpreted. For example, some websites may respond to this request by showing you ads that aren't based on other websites you've visited. Many websites will still collect and use your browsing data - for example to improve security, to provide content, services, ads and recommendations on their websites, and to generate reporting statistics.
IE is correct to go against industry standards in this case.
Not that it matters, becasue everyone will turn it on and industry will ignore it becasue they have exactly ZERO reason to do what it says.
"Almost certainly 95% of anything really important exists on paper - primarily minutes and budget docs."
HAHAHAHAHAhahhaha.. oh shut up. You've clearly never been in that situation.
"some things are just better in a permanent, uneditable form."
which can be done better digitally, or with glass should regulation require it.
I've said it many times, BOFH are always short sighted.
5) Send Bobs resume to all you competitor, give him a glow recommendation.
Now you got rid of Bob, and made life harder and more expensive for your competitor.
Bobs experience is with an outdated system. Is there a real market for his skills?
In any case, go forward and remind everyone that Bob is the result of not spending the money to ensure there are more then ONE person who know the system Include what needs to be done to reduce the chances another Bob emerges.
If Bob leaves, you're going to have to suck it up and realize the transition is going to be longer then you would like and there is nothing you can do about it.
remind others that it will only get worse with time.
You can also offer Bob a bonus for staying until a certain date. 50K if you stay for the next two years and meets certain goals. 50k is a lot, but is it more then if you had to do the transition without him?
I hate to reward people who hoard information,. but from a practically business side, it may be the best decision.
Space X is not "paradigm-shifting industry disruption. "
Not by any stretch of the imagination. It's certainly awesome and cool, but lets not get carried away.
Depends on the Sequel, some are quite creative. Of course I judge things based on evidence, and not because it has the word 'sequel' associated with it. I'm not that small minded.
Skyfall is very creative.
Plus, there are many, many original movies put out. Nothing has changed, some movies are good, most aren't. just like it's always been. By the way, I have heard your complaint my entire adult life, but just substitute the year for 1980, 1984, 1990, 2000, 2005,
Accountants.
At least, if it's like any other large conversion I have been through.