You really don't understand religion, do you? They will say the same thing they say whenever natives are found that have a different belief system: "God has talked to me and said we must spread the word to these Aliens. Even thought there are different, and have ways that are wrong in the eyes of god, we must go their and show them the error of their ways."
Finding Alien on Mars would never have thrown us into Chaos. IT's like saying find native on another land mass who didn't have the same religion would have thrown pre-Columbus Europe into a panic.
Stop being stupid, that's just an excuse made up by people who need some sort of crutch to prop there crazy theories on.
Yes, becasue NASA wouldn't want the huge amount of money that would poor into the project to get there before anyone else, and the military sure wouldn't be interested.
It's in the governments, the military, and NASAs best interests to find an alien artifact, you moron.
I look forward to hearing about the as a conspiracy for the next 20 years~
"but I'm happy to take PETA's word for it - their hearts are in the right place." Who caress where there 'heart' is? They lie, cheat, organize terrorist groups, and are extremely hypocritical.
IN fact, there heart is in getting money and attention while spreading misinformation and ignorance.
Based on the animal they have 'recovered' there is NO WAY 95% of then are so fucked up they must die.
Josef Mengele's heart was in the right place as well. I don't think that excuses his actions. .
Well, Fox news* has only fear to use as an AGW denialist organization. SO, you know point and claim it will cost jobs. Ignore that the best ways to deal with it involve getting industry here. It does hurt whomever wants to sell energy to China.
*Note: A study of fox new found that they are wrong in 93% o Scientific 'news' they spew out. And no, a little wrong. Or a misquote. GBut wildly factually wrong. Only slightly worse then the Wall Street Journal, now. I wonder what they have in common?
gosh, you had more money at the end of a boom period? I'm shocked I tell you, shocked. What if you want back to 2004? Do you have more or less. I make less money then I did in 2001(100k+), and substantially more then I did in 2002.(60K). It's almost like a tech bubble burst or something.
" The truth is poverty not affluence leads to environmental crisis." Stupid. really really stupid. the Affluence gain off people in poverty. The effluent buy expensive things that take a lot of pollution to make and run. It's not as simple as you make it seem.
" Affluence is why the USA has more forest now than it did 100 years ago." no, environmental movement did that. BTW it's trees not forests. Yes, there are more forests, but it is't not just forest, it's green belts , parks, as well.
"so-called 'greenhouse gases they are greenhouse gases, no 'so-called green house gases. The economy hasn't change any of my habits at all. It's not really as bad as people think. I remember the 80s. Try finding a job in 1982. I mean, almost every place had 'DO not apply here' signs in their windows.
"An unscientific and unproven theory really isn't something that should be guiding people's actions anyway"
um,. it is proven. Do you even know the 'scientific theory' even means?
" what might happen, maybe, someday, possibly. " is happening, right now. WE have tons of proof, we have predictions, we have eliminated every other possible source. Do you have a testable hypothesis? Anything? Is it normal cycle? no the Earths orbit is wrong. See we know what cause the cycles.
Is it the sun? Nope, the consistent rising temperature don't correlate to sun activity. If it did, the temp would go back down when the sun 'cooled'. Also, it would heat a different layer of the atmosphere, also, about a dozen other reason you wouldn't understand.
Is it Cosmic ray no, there hasn't been any evidences to support that.
Only 60% of the CO2 we put into the atmosphere is absorbed through the cycle. So we have CO2 not being absorbed. The properties of CO2 are understood. Every. Single. piece. of. data. point to man made. Yes, even when idiots like you claim some of the sensor are no good, becasue you have no clue how they work or the process, removing those data points still verifies greenhouse warming is happening. And frankly, not turning the mid-west into a dessert is a far, far more important then the current economy; which is improving, BTW.
" he executes people without trial. " you know who else executes without a trial? A police officer that kills someone in the line of duty. Don't fall into the" OMG! the president kills citizen whenever he wants" scaremonger poised by For et. al.
There was a huge legal issue leading up to that.
If you are helping the enemy and hiding with the enemy, then you will die with the enemy. They wanted to capture him, but that wasn't feasible.
". He has been very slow to pull us out of Bush's wars " I disagree. I think it's been reasonable. You want everyone out, but you want a stable government when you leave. We know what happens if you just leave a power vacuum behind.
literally correct, practically it doesn't matter. we are talking many, many decades of use. 80+ years instead of 100+ years. And that assume completely filling the drive almost every 10 days, then erasing it.
Assumption Min 3000 complete write/erase cycles and intelligent software. Not really that big of an assumption any more.
Stop it, you're just looking stupid now. Thing go down in price and quality can go up. Manufacturing techniques, volume, shipping. All those thing go down as production ramp up.
What does that have to do with SSD technology? Also, a modern DVD player will last for many years, and cost 20 bucks. One bought today is likely to last past the point it's even used.
"Now I am expected to be happy with anything that lasts over 5-6 years." ah, I'm old and things are worse now, even tho' I have no evidence to back it up..whine.
"over what private space can do for a FRACTION of the money." no, private industry can not do that for a fraction of the money. Assuming you were being figuratively. If you where being literal, then bear in mind 2/1 is a fraction.
And no private industry is biling anything that they can do. And, frankly, I don't think they ever will. while there are great technologies, and a lot of money finding secondary uses for that technology, but no money in the actual goal. And skimming the atmosphere is not the same thing.
Why would a private company go to mars? or to a moon to see if there is life in thee water? Any mining attempts will loose value becasue the increase is metals would lower the prices too much to make it worthless.
Maybe some company would spend billion to do a great space mission in hopes of capitalizing on all the spin off technology. Tat would take a 30 year outlook. Not a lot of companies will take that kind of outlook and a mulit-billion dollar investment.
The constellation cold be used with more then just the Ares.
Slashdot Mirror
RED not red.
Capitalization use to mean something. OF course he could have linked.
http://www.red.com/
The implication is that he is going through a lot of data. A reasonable assumption, or else he is an idiot with too much money.
You really don't understand religion, do you? They will say the same thing they say whenever natives are found that have a different belief system:
"God has talked to me and said we must spread the word to these Aliens. Even thought there are different, and have ways that are wrong in the eyes of god, we must go their and show them the error of their ways."
Really, don't underestimate loons.
Finding Alien on Mars would never have thrown us into Chaos. IT's like saying find native on another land mass who didn't have the same religion would have thrown pre-Columbus Europe into a panic.
Stop being stupid, that's just an excuse made up by people who need some sort of crutch to prop there crazy theories on.
Dear NASA,
'Thank you for finding it for me! Please arrange a two way mission to Mars for me so I can pick it up.
Thanks.
drinking and breathing..oh wait.
Unless the asteroids also magically starts the core of the planet spinning, you won't have much atmosphere.
Then you bury it.
Volunteer anyways, it will never happen through Mars One.
I like how the gloss over the hard bits of getting and staying on Mars.
Yes, becasue NASA wouldn't want the huge amount of money that would poor into the project to get there before anyone else, and the military sure wouldn't be interested.
It's in the governments, the military, and NASAs best interests to find an alien artifact, you moron.
I look forward to hearing about the as a conspiracy for the next 20 years~
"but I'm happy to take PETA's word for it - their hearts are in the right place."
Who caress where there 'heart' is? They lie, cheat, organize terrorist groups, and are extremely hypocritical.
IN fact, there heart is in getting money and attention while spreading misinformation and ignorance.
Based on the animal they have 'recovered' there is NO WAY 95% of then are so fucked up they must die.
Josef Mengele's heart was in the right place as well. I don't think that excuses his actions.
.
is full of brain dead idiots and hypocrites. Stop giving them headlines.
Well, Fox news* has only fear to use as an AGW denialist organization. SO, you know point and claim it will cost jobs. Ignore that the best ways to deal with it involve getting industry here. It does hurt whomever wants to sell energy to China.
*Note: A study of fox new found that they are wrong in 93% o Scientific 'news' they spew out. And no, a little wrong. Or a misquote. GBut wildly factually wrong. Only slightly worse then the Wall Street Journal, now. I wonder what they have in common?
"correlation is not causation."
WRONG, DUMB ASS.
correlation does not imply causation.
gosh, you had more money at the end of a boom period? I'm shocked I tell you, shocked. What if you want back to 2004? Do you have more or less.
I make less money then I did in 2001(100k+), and substantially more then I did in 2002.(60K). It's almost like a tech bubble burst or something.
" The truth is poverty not affluence leads to environmental crisis."
Stupid. really really stupid. the Affluence gain off people in poverty. The effluent buy expensive things that take a lot of pollution to make and run.
It's not as simple as you make it seem.
" Affluence is why the USA has more forest now than it did 100 years ago."
no, environmental movement did that. BTW it's trees not forests. Yes, there are more forests, but it is't not just forest, it's green belts , parks, as well.
Assuming no change in coal and diesel(ships mostly) usage, globally.
"so-called 'greenhouse gases
they are greenhouse gases, no 'so-called green house gases.
The economy hasn't change any of my habits at all. It's not really as bad as people think. I remember the 80s. Try finding a job in 1982. I mean, almost every place had 'DO not apply here' signs in their windows.
"An unscientific and unproven theory really isn't something that should be guiding people's actions anyway"
um,. it is proven. Do you even know the 'scientific theory' even means?
" what might happen, maybe, someday, possibly. "
is happening, right now. WE have tons of proof, we have predictions, we have eliminated every other possible source. Do you have a testable hypothesis? Anything?
Is it normal cycle? no the Earths orbit is wrong. See we know what cause the cycles.
Is it the sun? Nope, the consistent rising temperature don't correlate to sun activity. If it did, the temp would go back down when the sun 'cooled'. Also, it would heat a different layer of the atmosphere, also, about a dozen other reason you wouldn't understand.
Is it Cosmic ray no, there hasn't been any evidences to support that.
Only 60% of the CO2 we put into the atmosphere is absorbed through the cycle. So we have CO2 not being absorbed.
The properties of CO2 are understood.
Every. Single. piece. of. data. point to man made.
Yes, even when idiots like you claim some of the sensor are no good, becasue you have no clue how they work or the process, removing those data points still verifies greenhouse warming is happening. And frankly, not turning the mid-west into a dessert is a far, far more important then the current economy; which is improving, BTW.
" he executes people without trial. "
you know who else executes without a trial? A police officer that kills someone in the line of duty. Don't fall into the" OMG! the president kills citizen whenever he wants" scaremonger poised by For et. al.
There was a huge legal issue leading up to that.
If you are helping the enemy and hiding with the enemy, then you will die with the enemy. They wanted to capture him, but that wasn't feasible.
". He has been very slow to pull us out of Bush's wars "
I disagree. I think it's been reasonable. You want everyone out, but you want a stable government when you leave. We know what happens if you just leave a power vacuum behind.
Maybe you should stop guessing and look up the numbers. Cause you look like an idiot.
She gets money back becasue she is having them hold to much.
Getting money back doesn't mean they pay nothing, dimwit.
"That part isn't clear"
no, it's pretty clear,a nd its about 20% less life time. So over 80 years.
literally correct, practically it doesn't matter. we are talking many, many decades of use. 80+ years instead of 100+ years. And that assume completely filling the drive almost every 10 days, then erasing it.
Assumption Min 3000 complete write/erase cycles and intelligent software. Not really that big of an assumption any more.
Stop it, you're just looking stupid now. Thing go down in price and quality can go up. Manufacturing techniques, volume, shipping. All those thing go down as production ramp up.
What does that have to do with SSD technology?
Also, a modern DVD player will last for many years, and cost 20 bucks. One bought today is likely to last past the point it's even used.
"Now I am expected to be happy with anything that lasts over 5-6 years."
ah, I'm old and things are worse now, even tho' I have no evidence to back it up..whine.
"over what private space can do for a FRACTION of the money."
no, private industry can not do that for a fraction of the money. Assuming you were being figuratively. If you where being literal, then bear in mind 2/1 is a fraction.
And no private industry is biling anything that they can do. And, frankly, I don't think they ever will. while there are great technologies, and a lot of money finding secondary uses for that technology, but no money in the actual goal. And skimming the atmosphere is not the same thing.
Why would a private company go to mars? or to a moon to see if there is life in thee water?
Any mining attempts will loose value becasue the increase is metals would lower the prices too much to make it worthless.
Maybe some company would spend billion to do a great space mission in hopes of capitalizing on all the spin off technology. Tat would take a 30 year outlook. Not a lot of companies will take that kind of outlook and a mulit-billion dollar investment.
The constellation cold be used with more then just the Ares.