Yes, the moved away from water. we didn't stop using water, but we know longer had to live right on the bank. The contexts should have made that clear.
Children raised vegan have serious issues. You need to be extremely knowledgeable in child physiology, and recognize there aren't small adults. There dietary needs are different. Its not like you ca add one thing to the vegetarian diet and 'fix' it. Parents who do now do scientific research on this issue screw up their kids, and even kill them.
then they are probably eating very carefully, and supplementing. They probably aren't healthier then some eating a balanced diet of reasonable calories.
"giving evidence that contradicted someone's beliefs had the effect of reinforcing their beliefs" which is why people should be taught critical thinking skills and the ability to apply it to a topic. You can divorces the facts from you emotional beliefs.
Antarctica is losing land ice at an accelerating rate. Sea ice around Antarctica is increasing.
All of this is, of course, a non sequitor. The temperature is still going up, regardless of normal cycles. This is due to an increase in, primarily, CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 trapping energy is a fact. Hell, if the ice started piling up on the poles, so what? the temperature is still going up, and eventually it will al melt. SO, how about we work to reduces, and eventually stop, man made CO2. Actually 60% of what we emit isn't absorbed back into the CO2 cycles, so we just need to get below that point.
Because at o degree it will stay melted almost the entire year? I'm not sure how cold you think it gets in the antarctic. HInt: Wind Chill won't matter.
no one here is against personal responsibility. YOU just think every person live on an island unto themselves, and that everyone has an equal chance.
How funny that you have that post, and a Quote from DDE. It really shows how you can only look at the immediate surface of any situation. Anything deep or complex and you get confused and nonsensical. Anyone look at the history of your posts can see that.
Are you ok with paying another $10 on an smartphone or waiting another week to get it because the container ship was wind powered?
yes. 10 dollars AND a week would be fine. Of souse, in most cases the wait would be hidden becasue it would be reflected in the release date. So you wouldn't order it and then wait. While it's technically longer, no one would even notice it.
"Or just keeping your "old" phone 1 year longer?" I do that was well. If I don't keep it, it gets passed to someone who needs a phone.
Everyone lining up to get a phone just to get a new phone irritate me..a lot. It's like the hexagon in THX 1138
YOu aren't being 'bamed'. It's a problem we all have a stake in. all of us. You, me, everyoine. we all did our bit.
YOU can make changes to your lifestyle to reduce CO2. YOU can be a voice for greener alternatives.
" change to the current situation." and there you go showing you can't think long term. Every time someone does something to help, even a little bit, it influences the people are round you.
Yes, cargo ships are a problem. Yes, that should be addressed. But that's not the ONLY thing.
Conservatives are pushing back becasue the oil industry gives them a shit town of money, horse a shit ton of lobbyists, and has even gone so far as t apply pressure to have science books changed.
Hell, just stop letting ship use low grade fuel would help a lot. We aren't using the oil we have because the oil companies in the US make more money selling it to China. DO you think that pipeline they want to build down from Canada is for US oil use? no, it's to eventually sell the oil to China.
Frankly, we should not allow petroleum energy exports. Our gas would be cheaper and other countries would need to put more money into alternative solutions. Of course that would never happen because conservatives don't want any regulation on business becasue, apparently, they will all play super nice, and all the dumping, burning killing, and stealing that happened throughout all of history wold stop if there just weren't regulation in place to try and make it stop.
Again, we all had are stake in this. it' snot all equal. Do address original comment: YOU can change buy not guying one of those cars that come across on a boat.
Non of which show AGW to be wrong. You take a piece of data* and then claim AGW is a scam? no it isn't, and you sound like an idiot.
"what scares me about the sheer audacity of the sea level rising doomsayers is that any "hard" science they have is based on measurements taken at the edge of the Pacific Rim" Which is a lie. They take the data from MANY places. Liars like you are hurting the conversation. Here is a clue: There is no scientific debate on this matter. Just like there is no real scientific debate around whether or not the Earth revolves around the sun. IN both case, there are people who don't believe the science, but that doesn't make either issue controversial.
"There will undoubtedly be areas that benefit from global warming".. ug.. wrong.
Or maybe instead of wrong I should say 'briefly, maybe' Because if we don't stop spewing all the CO2 really soon, there is no reason to think the atmosphere will stop warming during our life time. Once the earth gets to a place where there is a strong enough cycle to absorb the extra CO2. Of course the situation has to get bad enough where the cause of the problem is removed.
Lets be clear, this isn't about destroying the earth. We would be hard pressed to do that. It's about keeping it habitable for humans.
I do. I know exzaclt how big it is. I know home many cubim meters of atmostphere we have.
In one can find that out.
Here is some stuff you should know: Humans emit 29 gigatons of CO2 per year. ONly 40% of which is absorbed into the CO2 cycle. So around 17 gigaton of CO2 remains in the atmostphere.
Do you know how slow geologic change is? It's SLOW, and the massive change we are seeing has happened in about 100 years. Screaming fast geologically speaking.
AGW is real, provable, and solid science.
You sound like a goldfish in a 100 gallon take think this place is huge, our shit could never cause a chemical change in our atmosphere.
This isn't an event that will go way on it sown. We must start discussing how to deal with it, and start ignoring anyone who doesn't have a testable alternative reason for the current climate change.
Why do you think it will stop in 50-100 years? It will be accelerating.
" Earth does have natural mechanisms to adapt to climate changes." yes, but it has certain bounds, and we are starting to exceed them. One of those bounds is glaciers and artic ice; which are melting. When that's gone, we loose all the advantage they had provided.
Also, salt water and fresh water(ice) have different densities, so ice melting on the ocean will cause the ocean to rise. Not much, but we are talking about a lot of ice.
Looking at the history of the companies, can you present a alternative that would allow Google to compete against Apple when Apple keeps stifling innovation through abusing the patent system? The last 5 years have been full of Apple abusing patents to stifle other companies.
Any in case, there motivation doesn't matter because this is win-win long term for the consumer. The are successful, and a lot of people start looking at the patent system. They loose, and future similar suits will be weaker.
HAHAHHA. That's a great retort to Apples actions. IT's what Apple has asked for in theitr lawsuit(to shut down everyone else), and as a side note, I suspect this would change patent law.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, the moved away from water. we didn't stop using water, but we know longer had to live right on the bank.
The contexts should have made that clear.
"According to modern evolutionary theory, mutations create ALL change"
false.
He is welcome to try. Bring it on.
Children raised vegan have serious issues. You need to be extremely knowledgeable in child physiology, and recognize there aren't small adults. There dietary needs are different. Its not like you ca add one thing to the vegetarian diet and 'fix' it. Parents who do now do scientific research on this issue screw up their kids, and even kill them.
then they are probably eating very carefully, and supplementing. They probably aren't healthier then some eating a balanced diet of reasonable calories.
People going to Target or Wal-Mart? I know, crazy huh.
Lets see:
People back to school shopping, people buying clothes, people buying groceries, people looking at things there going to buy online.
They should have used their influence to work out a good online books store, and paired it with sales. Make money from value add.
Free eBook copy with every book purchase. Maybe a kiosk. People who go to wal-mart do so regulae, have a eBook of the week deal.
"giving evidence that contradicted someone's beliefs had the effect of reinforcing their beliefs"
which is why people should be taught critical thinking skills and the ability to apply it to a topic. You can divorces the facts from you emotional beliefs.
Antarctica is losing land ice at an accelerating rate. Sea ice around Antarctica is increasing.
All of this is, of course, a non sequitor. The temperature is still going up, regardless of normal cycles. This is due to an increase in, primarily, CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 trapping energy is a fact.
Hell, if the ice started piling up on the poles, so what? the temperature is still going up, and eventually it will al melt. SO, how about we work to reduces, and eventually stop, man made CO2. Actually 60% of what we emit isn't absorbed back into the CO2 cycles, so we just need to get below that point.
Because at o degree it will stay melted almost the entire year?
I'm not sure how cold you think it gets in the antarctic. HInt: Wind Chill won't matter.
no one here is against personal responsibility. YOU just think every person live on an island unto themselves, and that everyone has an equal chance.
How funny that you have that post, and a Quote from DDE. It really shows how you can only look at the immediate surface of any situation. Anything deep or complex and you get confused and nonsensical. Anyone look at the history of your posts can see that.
Are you ok with paying another $10 on an smartphone or waiting another week to get it because the container ship was wind powered?
yes. 10 dollars AND a week would be fine. Of souse, in most cases the wait would be hidden becasue it would be reflected in the release date. So you wouldn't order it and then wait. While it's technically longer, no one would even notice it.
"Or just keeping your "old" phone 1 year longer?"
I do that was well. If I don't keep it, it gets passed to someone who needs a phone.
Everyone lining up to get a phone just to get a new phone irritate me..a lot. It's like the hexagon in THX 1138
wrong.
YOu aren't being 'bamed'. It's a problem we all have a stake in. all of us. You, me, everyoine. we all did our bit.
YOU can make changes to your lifestyle to reduce CO2.
YOU can be a voice for greener alternatives.
" change to the current situation."
and there you go showing you can't think long term. Every time someone does something to help, even a little bit, it influences the people are round you.
Yes, cargo ships are a problem. Yes, that should be addressed. But that's not the ONLY thing.
Conservatives are pushing back becasue the oil industry gives them a shit town of money, horse a shit ton of lobbyists, and has even gone so far as t apply pressure to have science books changed.
Hell, just stop letting ship use low grade fuel would help a lot.
We aren't using the oil we have because the oil companies in the US make more money selling it to China. DO you think that pipeline they want to build down from Canada is for US oil use? no, it's to eventually sell the oil to China.
Frankly, we should not allow petroleum energy exports. Our gas would be cheaper and other countries would need to put more money into alternative solutions. Of course that would never happen because conservatives don't want any regulation on business becasue, apparently, they will all play super nice, and all the dumping, burning killing, and stealing that happened throughout all of history wold stop if there just weren't regulation in place to try and make it stop.
Again, we all had are stake in this. it' snot all equal. Do address original comment: YOU can change buy not guying one of those cars that come across on a boat.
Stop spreading incorrect information.
While there is more antarctic ice, the increase is over water, not on the land.
more water means more extreme tides.
Non of which show AGW to be wrong. You take a piece of data* and then claim AGW is a scam? no it isn't, and you sound like an idiot.
"what scares me about the sheer audacity of the sea level rising doomsayers is that any "hard" science they have is based on measurements taken at the edge of the Pacific Rim"
Which is a lie. They take the data from MANY places. Liars like you are hurting the conversation. Here is a clue: There is no scientific debate on this matter. Just like there is no real scientific debate around whether or not the Earth revolves around the sun. IN both case, there are people who don't believe the science, but that doesn't make either issue controversial.
*which you don't seem to understand
"There will undoubtedly be areas that benefit from global warming".. ug.. wrong.
Or maybe instead of wrong I should say 'briefly, maybe' Because if we don't stop spewing all the CO2 really soon, there is no reason to think the atmosphere will stop warming during our life time. Once the earth gets to a place where there is a strong enough cycle to absorb the extra CO2. Of course the situation has to get bad enough where the cause of the problem is removed.
Lets be clear, this isn't about destroying the earth. We would be hard pressed to do that. It's about keeping it habitable for humans.
I do. I know exzaclt how big it is. I know home many cubim meters of atmostphere we have.
In one can find that out.
Here is some stuff you should know:
Humans emit 29 gigatons of CO2 per year. ONly 40% of which is absorbed into the CO2 cycle. So around 17 gigaton of CO2 remains in the atmostphere.
Do you know how slow geologic change is? It's SLOW, and the massive change we are seeing has happened in about 100 years. Screaming fast geologically speaking.
AGW is real, provable, and solid science.
You sound like a goldfish in a 100 gallon take think this place is huge, our shit could never cause a chemical change in our atmosphere.
You're mind, it's small.
This isn't an event that will go way on it sown. We must start discussing how to deal with it, and start ignoring anyone who doesn't have a testable alternative reason for the current climate change.
Why do you think it will stop in 50-100 years? It will be accelerating.
" Earth does have natural mechanisms to adapt to climate changes."
yes, but it has certain bounds, and we are starting to exceed them. One of those bounds is glaciers and artic ice; which are melting. When that's gone, we loose all the advantage they had provided.
Are you stupid? Seriously, do you think they are talking about Cyclic event, or melting and temp rise ABOVE normal cyclic events?
Also, salt water and fresh water(ice) have different densities, so ice melting on the ocean will cause the ocean to rise. Not much, but we are talking about a lot of ice.
Karma can only be portioned out by the universe - Home Simpson.
Looking at the history of the companies, can you present a alternative that would allow Google to compete against Apple when Apple keeps stifling innovation through abusing the patent system? The last 5 years have been full of Apple abusing patents to stifle other companies.
Any in case, there motivation doesn't matter because this is win-win long term for the consumer.
The are successful, and a lot of people start looking at the patent system.
They loose, and future similar suits will be weaker.
HAHAHHA.
That's a great retort to Apples actions. IT's what Apple has asked for in theitr lawsuit(to shut down everyone else), and as a side note, I suspect this would change patent law.