Evolve? You do understand that has no connection at all with good or bad, right?
If you don't see how an edit button can make things worse, then you aren't really trying. For example I could change my original post and make you look like a troll.
If some having an opinion about you religion, ad you don't like it? grow the fuck up. The only people that should be thrown into prison are the people KILLING other people becasue they don't like what someone else said.
Do Not Want. An edit button is bad and easily abused. Here is a clue, how about you slow down and carefully read before posting? Shocking, I know , not having technology that allows you to be lazy.
" it's the four-legged "real cow" version which is chock full of antibiotics and feed additives." a) Depnds B) You probably should take some time to understand the antibiotic issue before spouting off. There is no evidence that current use of antibiotic in animals has any effect on the consumer at all. HINT: it's used upp or peed out. Why do people think antibiotics are some magic creature that survives forever?
Lots of strawmen there, presumably form your ignorance.
But hey, lt's not lets science, data and facts inform you. You would have to spend all the fort throwing around more fallacious argument, cause you certainly wouldn't think about it.
Of course, the fact that it interferes with your lively has no bearing on your opinion, I'm sure~
the rules of your club to people who aren't in your club.
This just in: My belief states I always get to play the ship piece in monopoly. Anyone who says otherwise should be arrested for blasphemy. If Parker Brothers stop putting the piece in the game, then they are committing blasphemy.
" radioactive waste that has half-lives measured in thousands of years. " depends on the waste. We can build nuclear systems that generator electricity using waste and it's byproduct is 200-500 years to background radiation, depending on the material used. That's background radiation, not half life.
"NASA has a history of interfering to the detriment of US commercial space activities." no they don't.
You show a complete ignorance of what happens. NASA helps commercial launch systems. Who do you think actually build those vehicles? The problem is, getting to space is hard. People through the worl commercial at something and seem to think it will magically fix things. Right now, space is about science and figuring out how to get of this rock. Getting Satellite in space is really the only launch based item that might make money.
No, it wouldn't be further along, becasue commercial interesting have no desire to put things on other planets.
1) NASA drive people to want to become engineers and scientists, and astronauts. It impacts almost all states.
2) Industries don't use satellites? Industries don't develop the new technologies needed for space exploration? Industry don't benefit form secondary markets?
3) You example is counter to pretty much everything we have done in space.
Becasue ti wasn't always that way. That's a product of post Reagan neo cons in short, step 2 is pretty new, especially at the level of 'block all the things!' perspective.
None of that is intro computing, and hasn't been for 20 years. Intro to computer systems, or intro to computer electronics. This is an AA course design for people right out of high school who may have no experiences with the basic fundamental they will need through out there entire college career.
Read the titles again. Intro to computing, not intro into computers.
Maybe you should learn to read at a college level?
YOU are taking a Course for AA. YOU are unique in that you have 20 years of experience. That's course is for people coming out of high school that may not have much experience using the most used Office application in the world. So stop and think about other people for a moment.
IYt would literally be a waste of time from 99.99% of there students,. Add to that if you can use Office well, you can use everything else. BTW, I know a lot of people who have been using computer for decades and still are only aware of 10% of the features.
"Every month it is more crap to blow out to the masses every time your fundamental evolutionary rules change" no they don't.
"e. It's like watching a liar on trial and seeing him change his story as the judge rolls out the evidence. " Since there is, literally, warehouse and file cabinets full of evidence, and sine we use evolutionary theory to make predicts, you are incorrect.
" Until someone can show me how to make atoms out of dead empty space, " done...but you probably can't understand the math. Sorry. No m,y fault you are ignorant. as a side note: I find it interesting you don't apply the same level of proof to the existence of god)
" you need to just accept the fact that there is a Creator," SO I can show you that all your arguments are wrong, but you won't bother to learn why evolution is real, but you want me to accept what you are saying just...cause? Double standard much?
" and you owe Him the decency to not insult Him by claiming we just popped out of thin air, " no one claims that, please try to learn.
". I cannot wait to see the looks on your faces when Judgement Day arrives" ah, yes, another person ignorant of his own theology: A) Jesus said it would happen during the life time of his then disciples. Oops. B) Even if it did happen, it would only be 144,000 people raptures. Hell, the world might not even know it happened.
". Now go love thy brother as yourselves and forgive." You don't need a god for that.
". If any Life WAS out there and it was only even 10 minutes earlier in its (evolutionary)life stage, then we would have found it and/or it found us since we have been sending out hardware for 60 years. " Wow, you really have been poorly educated, have you? hint: the universe is big, species existence is short. Sending hard ware for 60 year. You think that's a long time? Assuming a single comes in a way we are looking for it, it would only be a signal that happened to be from 6 light years. It would be like rowing a mile away from shore, seeing no lane, and then declare Europe doesn't have anyone there.
"THE FUCKING MONKEYS ARE STILL HERE THAT WE SUPPOSEDLY EVOLVED FROM" false. The animals we evolved from died 10's of thousands of year ago.
We share a common ancestor with some primates.
Yuu, literally, have no understanding of evolution. How about you try to understand it before making yourself look stupid?
Protip: evolution doesn't mean there is no God. completely different discussion. What it means is Bible literalism is incorrect. Something people who put the Bible together recognized, and there is plenty of evidence of it's editing. Genesis is an allegory. the people who wrote it knew that, the people who interpreted understood that, and anyone who actually studies it knows that. I could do an in depth reason and examples, but I won't. I will simply leave you with a couple of points: 1) Adam and Eve had sons. 2) They where marked before they went out among the 'others'. If Adam and eve were first, how where there other? 3) There are contrary origin myths in the Bible.
Slashdot Mirror
He knew perfectly well it would be leaked.
Ah yes, it's the iPads fault, or /.'s fault. Otherwise it would be your fault, and that can't be right~
Way to total take out of context, and then use completely different words as a "quote"
Let me guess, Romney fan.
I mean, you are trolling without an edit button, I can imagine the amount of damage you would do as a troll with an edit button.
Evolve? You do understand that has no connection at all with good or bad, right?
If you don't see how an edit button can make things worse, then you aren't really trying.
For example I could change my original post and make you look like a troll.
OU might want to look at the top sold beers in the world before making stupid statements.
1) SNow Beer - China
2) Bud Light - 47.38 million barrels world wide.
3)Budweiser 36.98 million barrels also sold globally.
interesting note, Ireland most popular beer is Coors light.
SO, what I ma saying is: Shut. Up.
False, but you go on being ignorant.
I don't think that's correct. Link?
If some having an opinion about you religion, ad you don't like it? grow the fuck up. The only people that should be thrown into prison are the people KILLING other people becasue they don't like what someone else said.
Do Not Want.
An edit button is bad and easily abused. Here is a clue, how about you slow down and carefully read before posting? Shocking, I know , not having technology that allows you to be lazy.
" it's the four-legged "real cow" version which is chock full of antibiotics and feed additives."
a) Depnds
B) You probably should take some time to understand the antibiotic issue before spouting off. There is no evidence that current use of antibiotic in animals has any effect on the consumer at all. HINT: it's used upp or peed out. Why do people think antibiotics are some magic creature that survives forever?
Lots of strawmen there, presumably form your ignorance.
But hey, lt's not lets science, data and facts inform you. You would have to spend all the fort throwing around more fallacious argument, cause you certainly wouldn't think about it.
Of course, the fact that it interferes with your lively has no bearing on your opinion, I'm sure~
vat grown steaks. I/ for one, can not wait for that day.
the rules of your club to people who aren't in your club.
This just in:
My belief states I always get to play the ship piece in monopoly. Anyone who says otherwise should be arrested for blasphemy. If Parker Brothers stop putting the piece in the game, then they are committing blasphemy.
" radioactive waste that has half-lives measured in thousands of years. "
depends on the waste.
We can build nuclear systems that generator electricity using waste and it's byproduct is 200-500 years to background radiation, depending on the material used. That's background radiation, not half life.
" is hypocrisy for Mitt Romney."
Everything he has said has be hypocrisy
"NASA has a history of interfering to the detriment of US commercial space activities."
no they don't.
You show a complete ignorance of what happens.
NASA helps commercial launch systems. Who do you think actually build those vehicles? The problem is, getting to space is hard. People through the worl commercial at something and seem to think it will magically fix things.
Right now, space is about science and figuring out how to get of this rock. Getting Satellite in space is really the only launch based item that might make money.
No, it wouldn't be further along, becasue commercial interesting have no desire to put things on other planets.
1) NASA drive people to want to become engineers and scientists, and astronauts. It impacts almost all states.
2) Industries don't use satellites? Industries don't develop the new technologies needed for space exploration? Industry don't benefit form secondary markets?
3) You example is counter to pretty much everything we have done in space.
4) nonsense and flamebait.
Becasue ti wasn't always that way. That's a product of post Reagan neo cons
in short, step 2 is pretty new, especially at the level of 'block all the things!' perspective.
None of that is intro computing, and hasn't been for 20 years. Intro to computer systems, or intro to computer electronics.
This is an AA course design for people right out of high school who may have no experiences with the basic fundamental they will need through out there entire college career.
Read the titles again. Intro to computing, not intro into computers.
Maybe you should learn to read at a college level?
But I'm biased.
YOU are taking a Course for AA. YOU are unique in that you have 20 years of experience.
That's course is for people coming out of high school that may not have much experience using the most used Office application in the world.
So stop and think about other people for a moment.
IYt would literally be a waste of time from 99.99% of there students,. Add to that if you can use Office well, you can use everything else. BTW, I know a lot of people who have been using computer for decades and still are only aware of 10% of the features.
"Commercial spaceflight is really the only hope.
no it isn't. Stop being stupid.
It's just .. turtles all the way down!
"Every month it is more crap to blow out to the masses every time your fundamental evolutionary rules change"
no they don't.
"e. It's like watching a liar on trial and seeing him change his story as the judge rolls out the evidence. "
Since there is, literally, warehouse and file cabinets full of evidence, and sine we use evolutionary theory to make predicts, you are incorrect.
" Until someone can show me how to make atoms out of dead empty space, "
done...but you probably can't understand the math. Sorry. No m,y fault you are ignorant. as a side note: I find it interesting you don't apply the same level of proof to the existence of god)
" you need to just accept the fact that there is a Creator," ...cause? Double standard much?
SO I can show you that all your arguments are wrong, but you won't bother to learn why evolution is real, but you want me to accept what you are saying just
" and you owe Him the decency to not insult Him by claiming we just popped out of thin air, "
no one claims that, please try to learn.
". I cannot wait to see the looks on your faces when Judgement Day arrives"
ah, yes, another person ignorant of his own theology:
A) Jesus said it would happen during the life time of his then disciples. Oops.
B) Even if it did happen, it would only be 144,000 people raptures. Hell, the world might not even know it happened.
". Now go love thy brother as yourselves and forgive."
You don't need a god for that.
". If any Life WAS out there and it was only even 10 minutes earlier in its (evolutionary)life stage, then we would have found it and/or it found us since we have been sending out hardware for 60 years. "
Wow, you really have been poorly educated, have you? hint: the universe is big, species existence is short. Sending hard ware for 60 year. You think that's a long time? Assuming a single comes in a way we are looking for it, it would only be a signal that happened to be from 6 light years. It would be like rowing a mile away from shore, seeing no lane, and then declare Europe doesn't have anyone there.
"THE FUCKING MONKEYS ARE STILL HERE THAT WE SUPPOSEDLY EVOLVED FROM"
false. The animals we evolved from died 10's of thousands of year ago.
We share a common ancestor with some primates.
Yuu, literally, have no understanding of evolution. How about you try to understand it before making yourself look stupid?
Protip: evolution doesn't mean there is no God. completely different discussion. What it means is Bible literalism is incorrect. Something people who put the Bible together recognized, and there is plenty of evidence of it's editing. Genesis is an allegory. the people who wrote it knew that, the people who interpreted understood that, and anyone who actually studies it knows that. I could do an in depth reason and examples, but I won't. I will simply leave you with a couple of points:
1) Adam and Eve had sons.
2) They where marked before they went out among the 'others'. If Adam and eve were first, how where there other?
3) There are contrary origin myths in the Bible.
Lease try to learn how to think and do research.
Have a nice day.
close. this is more accurate:
"I cannot wait to see the looks on your faces when Judgement Day arrives. Now go love thy brother as yourselves and forgive, or ELSE!"
" we could survive solely on plant life."
that's not what it says.