Are they stupid thing as in funny anecdotes, or stupid things as in making people angry?
I do the occasional stupid thing, and I'm sure my wife tells people about them. But no different then my friends telling the stores of the time my BBQ burst into flames.
I know a lot of happily married men. The trick? marry someone you can do thing with without becoming annoyed.
Of course, there are people who aren't happy, but they need to get out of the relationship. Unless kids are involved. The they need to suck it up* and create a happy and stable home life.
* Meaning general annoyances. Clearly if abuse is going on, they need to get themselves and their kids out of that situation.
I've been married to my wife for 22 years. I am very happy.
I suggest living with someone for a year, then if you get married don't have kids for about 7 years.
Any time during that period you find your self excessively complaining about your spouse,I recommend that you calmly end the relationship. You aren't happy, and you aren't doing anyone any favors by being miserable.
I hate the stupid pop culture idea that marriage is supposed to be misery and pain. IT's a crock. I blame dumb ass shows like "Everyone loves Raymond", "Home improvement", etc...
Why do any of those men stay with the horribly screeching wives? And why do those women stay with horribly insensitive, and often abusive, men?
You know what? there has been nation wide internet service for 20 years, so it's really time for people like you to grow the fuck up and stop making shit up like some 13 year old girl desperate for attention.
That's a great example of how smart she is, and how great Google is. They tried something, it didn't work, they pulled it. Much better then the 'it doesn't work, so lets keep beating on it".
Since that hasn't worked every year for the last 5 years, maybe they just need to try someone who knows what kinds of changes need to make instead of just axing a bunch a people and telling every one to 'just fix it'?
It's a management issue, not a food issue. Cut the population in half, and it won't change a thing because it's a management issue. People where starving when we had 4 billion. Care to guess why? management issue.
And Green Peace turned into an 'ANTI-anything from corporations and shit we don't understand' group in the 80. AS a former member, it's saddens me to have seen the go from "How can we do thins safely" to "Don't do anything new".
A) he was pointing out you're;logical fallacy. B) You're reason are made up crap and don't reflect the real world at all. C) Ah, another ad hom by you. That's what? 3? Plus your strawman. Not going well for you, is it? D) You have eaten GM foods. Just so you know.
BY opinion is based on the evidences I have read in studies and talking to people in the field. Could new data change things? yes. Is it likely at this point? no.
You know why people like you irritate me? Because in the 70's there was a new pesticide developed. IT had a half life of 3 days. No tests showed any ill effects for people. So we have a pesticide that will be completely gone before product gets to market. Saves money, and helps return larger yields. IT was killed by a bunch of people who only used FUD pulled from their own echo chamber. People who try to influences things without evidence piss me off.
I can list a lot of shit removed based on FUD. DDT is another one. One opinion in one book based on correlation in the field. Meaning no controls, was why it got pulled.
"If you think people are against GMO food because they're luddites" well, what else do you call people who don't understand the technology, don't understand the testing, haven't read any actual good study, but still don't want it done? It seems Luddites is accurate.
"People are against it because there's no evidence it's safe either," you mean besides millions and million of people eating every day without problem? besides the testing?
So what if genetically modified pigs ended up in the food supply? DId you read the artical? someone stole it, and the used it. Genetic modification isn't the concern there this is: "with enough barbiturates and chemicals to kill a 500-pound pig, "
Oh, and the genetic changes weren't about feed, they are about diabetes research.
You're argument is so weak, you had to stoop to using a pig stolen from a lab, genetically changes fro diabetes as some sort of argument baout GM feed stock.
Seriously, detach you're emotional position and think. Or at least use relevant examples.
"I'm far from a luddite" Are you? have you read any good studies? or just what you echo chamber has spewed out? Have you tlaked to researched in the field? Have you read any comparative studies of safety vs. the current methods? Nothing in you post or opinion at all represent what is actually going on in the field, so I really thing you are, in fact, a Luddite regarding this technology.
Military trained, I have study survival events. Wrote a couple iof manuals, and trained pilot how to survive in enemy territory Clue: You wouldn't last, you are completely under prepared. A) Thousands of people will show up. DO you know how to navigate that and not get burned out of your home? Do you think waving a gun around will stopped a scared panicking crowd? B) Fires will emerge. Are you prepared to deal with the suddenly increase in hazardous particulate matter they will be in the air? C) Sickness? What will happen when the flu moves through a much lower vaccinated population? D) How is your water supply? is anything up stream?
I could go on, and on if you chose a location and time of the year. "I used to actively enjoy "disappearing" for weeks and months on end as a child." irrelevant. Also, you're parents are idiots.
You will not be alone in the woods.
Pretty much every 'survivalist' over looks the key to long term survival.
Why? If they can't support themselves, why isn't population control part of a solution? He isn't saying go shoot people, just create a dramatic drop in birth rate for a limited time.
No it was not stolen. Using your corporate influence to get the police to do you're bidding without due cause isn't better, btw. Also, APPLE already HAD THE PHONE BACK when the sent in the police so apple could sift through private computers. Did you even read the article you linked to? REACT is a government enforcement arm of apple. The let apple employees run the show on the raid, and search a private residence.
All this after Apple initially refused to take the phone back.
Slashdot Mirror
Why would you think anyone using honey would want a less sticky alternative? clearly they use it because it's sticky.
"Tough on crime" was directly created from the privatizations of prisons their security.
Another thing where privatization of a social program turned it into a nightmare of waste, incompetence, and destruction of society.
Are they stupid thing as in funny anecdotes, or stupid things as in making people angry?
I do the occasional stupid thing, and I'm sure my wife tells people about them. But no different then my friends telling the stores of the time my BBQ burst into flames.
I know a lot of happily married men. The trick? marry someone you can do thing with without becoming annoyed.
Of course, there are people who aren't happy, but they need to get out of the relationship. Unless kids are involved. The they need to suck it up* and create a happy and stable home life.
* Meaning general annoyances. Clearly if abuse is going on, they need to get themselves and their kids out of that situation.
I've been married to my wife for 22 years. I am very happy.
I suggest living with someone for a year, then if you get married don't have kids for about 7 years.
Any time during that period you find your self excessively complaining about your spouse,I recommend that you calmly end the relationship. You aren't happy, and you aren't doing anyone any favors by being miserable.
I hate the stupid pop culture idea that marriage is supposed to be misery and pain. IT's a crock. I blame dumb ass shows like "Everyone loves Raymond", "Home improvement", etc...
Why do any of those men stay with the horribly screeching wives?
And why do those women stay with horribly insensitive, and often abusive, men?
Yes, but I'm sure they new she was leaving. Wait? why do we think she didn't give any notice?
contractors make 12 figures?
You know what? there has been nation wide internet service for 20 years, so it's really time for people like you to grow the fuck up and stop making shit up like some 13 year old girl desperate for attention.
That's a great example of how smart she is, and how great Google is.
They tried something, it didn't work, they pulled it. Much better then the 'it doesn't work, so lets keep beating on it".
Since that hasn't worked every year for the last 5 years, maybe they just need to try someone who knows what kinds of changes need to make instead of just axing a bunch a people and telling every one to 'just fix it'?
No, but that will get most people not to sue.
And quite frankly, I doubt she will fix yahoo!
It's a management issue, not a food issue. Cut the population in half, and it won't change a thing because it's a management issue.
People where starving when we had 4 billion. Care to guess why? management issue.
You owe the poster an apology:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100301091552.htm
And Green Peace turned into an 'ANTI-anything from corporations and shit we don't understand' group in the 80. AS a former member, it's saddens me to have seen the go from "How can we do thins safely" to "Don't do anything new".
A) he was pointing out you're ;logical fallacy.
B) You're reason are made up crap and don't reflect the real world at all.
C) Ah, another ad hom by you. That's what? 3? Plus your strawman. Not going well for you, is it?
D) You have eaten GM foods. Just so you know.
BY opinion is based on the evidences I have read in studies and talking to people in the field. Could new data change things? yes. Is it likely at this point? no.
You know why people like you irritate me? Because in the 70's there was a new pesticide developed. IT had a half life of 3 days. No tests showed any ill effects for people. So we have a pesticide that will be completely gone before product gets to market. Saves money, and helps return larger yields.
IT was killed by a bunch of people who only used FUD pulled from their own echo chamber. People who try to influences things without evidence piss me off.
I can list a lot of shit removed based on FUD. DDT is another one. One opinion in one book based on correlation in the field. Meaning no controls, was why it got pulled.
GM crops are tested for safety, no other crop is.
"If you think people are against GMO food because they're luddites"
well, what else do you call people who don't understand the technology, don't understand the testing, haven't read any actual good study, but still don't want it done? It seems Luddites is accurate.
"People are against it because there's no evidence it's safe either,"
you mean besides millions and million of people eating every day without problem? besides the testing?
So what if genetically modified pigs ended up in the food supply? DId you read the artical? someone stole it, and the used it. Genetic modification isn't the concern there this is:
"with enough barbiturates and chemicals to kill a 500-pound pig, "
Oh, and the genetic changes weren't about feed, they are about diabetes research.
You're argument is so weak, you had to stoop to using a pig stolen from a lab, genetically changes fro diabetes as some sort of argument baout GM feed stock.
Seriously, detach you're emotional position and think. Or at least use relevant examples.
"I'm far from a luddite"
Are you? have you read any good studies? or just what you echo chamber has spewed out? Have you tlaked to researched in the field? Have you read any comparative studies of safety vs. the current methods?
Nothing in you post or opinion at all represent what is actually going on in the field, so I really thing you are, in fact, a Luddite regarding this technology.
Military trained, I have study survival events. Wrote a couple iof manuals, and trained pilot how to survive in enemy territory
Clue: You wouldn't last, you are completely under prepared.
A) Thousands of people will show up. DO you know how to navigate that and not get burned out of your home? Do you think waving a gun around will stopped a scared panicking crowd?
B) Fires will emerge. Are you prepared to deal with the suddenly increase in hazardous particulate matter they will be in the air?
C) Sickness? What will happen when the flu moves through a much lower vaccinated population?
D) How is your water supply? is anything up stream?
I could go on, and on if you chose a location and time of the year.
"I used to actively enjoy "disappearing" for weeks and months on end as a child."
irrelevant. Also, you're parents are idiots.
You will not be alone in the woods.
Pretty much every 'survivalist' over looks the key to long term survival.
Ah, yes that will be really handy when 100,000 people show up at your door.
People who think they will hide in the woods and fend for themselves are deluded.
"And I'm a geek that earns a living as a programmer."
yes, all the skills that are completely useless in that event.
" all progress came to a screeching halt "
that's not even close to correct.
Pretty much every field is improving, and pretty quick. In some fields innovation is only being stifled by manufacturing,
Maybe you should study up on the grid a bit before saying stupid things?
Quick, whats the power loss of 4000 miles?
Sociopath desire, not engineer desires.
Why? If they can't support themselves, why isn't population control part of a solution? He isn't saying go shoot people, just create a dramatic drop in birth rate for a limited time.
Maybe you should understand why faster(GHz) isn't relevant to power?
If SJ was still around, they never would have left EPEAT.
yeah a fix to cover up the stylish iPhone people bought.
People are angry because Apple insulted everyone who reported it. The insulted pretty much every Apple users intelligence.
The should have taken it back or replaced it with a properly working phone.
No it was not stolen.
Using your corporate influence to get the police to do you're bidding without due cause isn't better, btw.
Also, APPLE already HAD THE PHONE BACK when the sent in the police so apple could sift through private computers.
Did you even read the article you linked to?
REACT is a government enforcement arm of apple. The let apple employees run the show on the raid, and search a private residence.
All this after Apple initially refused to take the phone back.