We have buildings of steel and glass we have put men on the moon We have a machine on the cusp of leaving the solar system we have mapped millions of other planets We can travel faster the sound We can talk across the globe in an instant
1) on a planet with water, life can rise up. 2) There is a lot more water out the in the universe then we every imagined. 3) There are billions of planet that can have liquid water.
So the existence that life is in the universe is a fact.
You overlooked the fact that it's useless for a gamer.... still.
"It'll run on that old 486 that your neighbor put next to his garbage can, and is powerful enough that a significant portion of the Internet depends on it." Now you are stretching it. The latest versions will not run on a 486. Can you get a version that does? certain, but I can get a MS OS that does as well. IT's not current, or usefull to 99.99% or the population.
OSX is design fro security as well. And not because some guy in a turtle neck said so, but because of it's underlying architecture.
Linux is great, but it doesn't really do what I need it to do.
Because he was smart when it comes to knowing peoples behavior. If you interfere with peoples work, it would fail. Put it on the background, and a screen saver, it's not in anyone's way.
I mean, you could be right, but watching stave jobs for 30+ years, I don't think it's likely.
what if it's just a box with a list of links relative you what you are doing on the side and it didn't interrupt what you are doing? Like an active desktop. Maybe a screen saver as well.
good news is, we are becoming better received on the international stage. Funny how once you stopped calling people Evil in the same context as invading countries you get better received on the international stage.
Then repeat themselves all the time. Don't thing the person flying the plane is the only terrorist. The people running the organization do repeat themselves.
"if we have something like 9/11 and do nothing to prevent it again, then of course they will try it again." see, that pisses me off. You, and many others, use the example as an excuse for BAD SECURITY.
Airplane control of any type is solvable. Good flight deck doors, automated systems problem solved. We should not be discussing if searching a 4 year old is too much, because it is. We should be discussing whether or not the cost of a Marshall on every plane is worth it.
Stop physically touching people. Use a metal detector and a bomb dog. If you can get it past those two things, your getting it past a TSA agent.
The currently policy of the TSA is more harmful to this nation then any terrorist.
I disagree. The TSA provides a valuable service..it's just that they have gone too far.
I have no problem with post 9/11 security measures at the airport, and the new cockpit security. Hell, put a marshal on every plane. not one is plain cloths, but a Mean looking person with a wide brim hat, sunglasses and a shotgun with bean bag round.
Here's the thing: No one's saying small children should be excluded from screening" If by screening you mean being physically touched in any way, then I am saying they should not be screened in that manner. None of us should.
Do you have a link to either of those groups turning kids into suicide bombers? Specifically suicide bomber outside of the immediate threat of their nation?
Slashdot Mirror
Science starts with a single example.
It's hard to come to a conclusion with one sample. Other then life can exist.
We have buildings of steel and glass
we have put men on the moon
We have a machine on the cusp of leaving the solar system
we have mapped millions of other planets
We can travel faster the sound
We can talk across the globe in an instant
Don't tell me we aren't intelligent.
1) on a planet with water, life can rise up.
2) There is a lot more water out the in the universe then we every imagined.
3) There are billions of planet that can have liquid water.
So the existence that life is in the universe is a fact.
The idea that it can only happen once is a guess.
" foregone conclusion."
hmm. probability approaching one.
Common is a poor choice of words. You could have a million thrives space faring species in the universe, and it would still be rare.
Statistician: probably yes, but on the other hand...
heh.
However it's not premature to ask the question. You must ask the question before you begin to find out.
Can man \harness electricity needs to be asked before we could have cell phones.
earth like as in "wet and 'warm'."
You overlooked the fact that it's useless for a gamer.... still.
"It'll run on that old 486 that your neighbor put next to his garbage can, and is powerful enough that a significant portion of the Internet depends on it."
Now you are stretching it. The latest versions will not run on a 486.
Can you get a version that does? certain, but I can get a MS OS that does as well. IT's not current, or usefull to 99.99% or the population.
OSX is design fro security as well. And not because some guy in a turtle neck said so, but because of it's underlying architecture.
Linux is great, but it doesn't really do what I need it to do.
To bad no one would admit to it back then.
Because he was smart when it comes to knowing peoples behavior.
If you interfere with peoples work, it would fail.
Put it on the background, and a screen saver, it's not in anyone's way.
I mean, you could be right, but watching stave jobs for 30+ years, I don't think it's likely.
If it makes you feel nauseated, then see a dr. There is something wrong with you. It's a picture of a credit card.
I suspect slashtarditis.
frankly, you can turn off the kindle .
Charging for cable is for the service, not the show.
Why you people think otherwise is beyond me.
except it would be 3 cents a website, min. Probably closer to 50 cents if current successful pay model are any indication.
1 penny per 100 sites. Ha!
Pyus it's bandwidth, not site, so it's more like to be a charge per KB.
your post is like saying "I wouldn't mind commercials if the where 1 second long.
Of course you wouldn't, but that won't make any money.
We went throgh all this 15 years ago. Nothing new has changed the operating cost significantly.
IT depends on how ti's done.,
what if it's just a box with a list of links relative you what you are doing on the side and it didn't interrupt what you are doing?
Like an active desktop. Maybe a screen saver as well.
It's the technology to do that that would be patent.
You can have two pieces of software, both as support but they way it's done is completely different. Their could be two patents.
what a genius!
That experiment was heavily flawed.
I have children. Also, I am civilized person, and I have enough intelligence to know I can not fight the hole airport.
I care enough about my children to actually think about repercussions of my action. I suggest you start caring enough to think.
In your scenario you either end up in prison or dead. Even if you actually manage to kill the TSA person. So, now what about your child?
Rest assure I am outraged by these actions. I would take action, but it would be smart action.
good news is, we are becoming better received on the international stage. Funny how once you stopped calling people Evil in the same context as invading countries you get better received on the international stage.
Then repeat themselves all the time. Don't thing the person flying the plane is the only terrorist. The people running the organization do repeat themselves.
"if we have something like 9/11 and do nothing to prevent it again, then of course they will try it again."
see, that pisses me off. You, and many others, use the example as an excuse for BAD SECURITY.
Airplane control of any type is solvable.
Good flight deck doors, automated systems problem solved.
We should not be discussing if searching a 4 year old is too much, because it is. We should be discussing whether or not the cost of a Marshall on every plane is worth it.
Stop physically touching people. Use a metal detector and a bomb dog. If you can get it past those two things, your getting it past a TSA agent.
The currently policy of the TSA is more harmful to this nation then any terrorist.
gee, that's just like putting it on a 4 year old.. not.
I disagree. The TSA provides a valuable service..it's just that they have gone too far.
I have no problem with post 9/11 security measures at the airport, and the new cockpit security. Hell, put a marshal on every plane. not one is plain cloths, but a Mean looking person with a wide brim hat, sunglasses and a shotgun with bean bag round.
Problem solved.
Here's the thing: No one's saying small children should be excluded from screening"
If by screening you mean being physically touched in any way, then I am saying they should not be screened in that manner. None of us should.
Just to let you know.
Can't help but point out it was stopped without a pat down.
Do you have a link to either of those groups turning kids into suicide bombers?
Specifically suicide bomber outside of the immediate threat of their nation?
no? didn't think so.