So what? We have bomb detecting technology, and metal detectors. No need for a pat down. Fucking secure the door properly, have there automated system take control of the craft in an emergency and we are fucling done.
Pat down are not needed.
And you know what? If I had a choice between going there a security process from 15 years ago, or going through one now, I would take the airline that used the older process.
And you scenarios is exceptionally rare.
Lets put everyone against the while and cavity search them because hey, we need to plug those holes.
Well, it should be obvious to even the most dim-witted individual who holds an advanced degree in hyperbolic topology, ng-bwui, that Homer Simpson has stumbled into....the third dimension.
Now it can sit in the back ground until a research who is a bad actor decides to whip some up. Better to release the info, and make it a priority on vaccine research.
You can't control it from the people who would use it because they have researchers as well.
And if we study it now, if Mother nature tosses it at us, or something similar, we will be prepared.
I came to the conclusion in the 80's that it's either a Hoax, or they has decided no one gets any no matter what. Since his reasons for not selling it or licensing it changes, I strongly suspect hoax. Patent it, sell the patent. Even if a company sits on it, 20 years latter everyone will be able to get it. So instead we have had decades with out it?
Hell, go on 'Shark' and get an investor. There are tones of investors that he could get for less then 51% and then manufacture it himself.
It makes no sense at all. He could produce it in his garage, so produce some more and start selling it.
Well, he's dead, so that won't happen.
The whole thing reeks of delusional behavior we see with people who demonstration free energy.
Becasue ti's theior stander ToS; which includes Youtube, etc.
of course, there is this: "The rights that you grant in this licence are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting and improving our Services, and to develop new ones. This licence continues even if you stop using our Services (for example, for a business listing that you have added to Google Maps).”"
no. He didn't quote the whole license. He left out the bit wher eit says it's only to improve services:
"The rights that you grant in this licence are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting and improving our Services, and to develop new ones. This licence continues even if you stop using our Services (for example, for a business listing that you have added to Google Maps).”"
Cause he is either stupid or a hater. haha I kid, he's both.
Maybe you shoudl be a,little more honest? IO notice you left out:
"The rights that you grant in this licence are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting and improving our Services, and to develop new ones. This licence continues even if you stop using our Services (for example, for a business listing that you have added to Google Maps).”
All that is true, but I feel the need to point out:
The Bush administration slaughtered the inspectors budget. So while we have outlawed feed ground up cow parts, it's hard to be sure ranchers are following the laws.
"But if it is it ain't happening at anything like the rate that would justify dismantling civilization over," something NO CLIMATOLOGIST WANTS TO DO. This guy is a chemist, not an expert in this field. Climatologist have derided this guys prediction for years.
"too many politicians with a preexisting anti-civilization" nonsense.
" glommed onto AGW " You really have no clue of the history of Climate Change. NO one glommed on to it. it took time and evidences.
".. glommed onto AGW " the media did that be pretend individual studies as a complete picture and not reminding people that it's one study and more is needed.
", as it brings in tons of research money, " no it doesn't. Please STFU about shit you have no clue about.
You have the actual experts vs the oil companys PR arm. Which INCLUDES proved effort to discredit science in the class room.
You fuck heads talk about the mythical pile of money for scientists and ignore the 100 billion dollar industry it impacts. Why the FUCK do you think the the government piddle sum to scientists causes the scientist to lie when there are many magnitudes more money in saying it doesn't exist?
DO you even know how to think? You poor excuse for limp wristed cum stains are helping the oil industry destroy the habitability of the planet by humans.
If money corrupts the science, then we would never heard of AGW.
Of course, the science backs AGW, so all you dick heads have is ad homs, lies and ignorance.
"Evacuation to the arctic is pointless is the goal was control and power here." It's not about power. That is a lie designed to create fear. It was created by people who mkae a lot of money selling products that spew crap into the air.
"Somehow linking that to humans, that's the REALLY controversial part and it's MUCH harder to provide fact in that case. Almost impossible." No, it isn't. CO2 is causing it, we spew billions of tons of CO2 in the air. No other mechanism for the increase in the temperature has every panned out.
Lovelock is a chemist, not a climatologist, and his hypothesis is clearly a chemists view. Also, no living organism supports Lovelocks theory; which shoots it in the foot. In other words: Natural selection would need a means of cross species reproductive communication.
Consensus of actual experts in the field did no agree with the pace of his predictions. Media loved it "FEAR NOW!" and Hollywood used is to spawn another round disaster movies.
Slashdot Mirror
So what? We have bomb detecting technology, and metal detectors. No need for a pat down. Fucking secure the door properly, have there automated system take control of the craft in an emergency and we are fucling done.
Pat down are not needed.
And you know what? If I had a choice between going there a security process from 15 years ago, or going through one now, I would take the airline that used the older process.
And you scenarios is exceptionally rare.
Lets put everyone against the while and cavity search them because hey, we need to plug those holes.
Don't be an idiot. All you would do is get shot and leave your child fatherless.
There are far better avenues to take.
It's you.
No tit's not. It nothing like Omni, not even in the horrible post Bova phase when it was mostly fringe science.
Well, it should be obvious to even the most dim-witted individual who holds an advanced degree in hyperbolic topology, ng-bwui, that Homer Simpson has stumbled into....the third dimension.
And that's why we can't have nice things.
Yes, its Microsoft's fault.
It should allow more then 3 attempts before using the alternative contact method.
My MSDOS 3.1 was never hacked or crashed, clearly that was the most stable and secure
It should have demanded alternative authentication after three attempts., and sent a text to the person phone saying someone attempted it.
Now it can sit in the back ground until a research who is a bad actor decides to whip some up.
Better to release the info, and make it a priority on vaccine research.
You can't control it from the people who would use it because they have researchers as well.
And if we study it now, if Mother nature tosses it at us, or something similar, we will be prepared.
I came to the conclusion in the 80's that it's either a Hoax, or they has decided no one gets any no matter what. Since his reasons for not selling it or licensing it changes, I strongly suspect hoax.
Patent it, sell the patent. Even if a company sits on it, 20 years latter everyone will be able to get it.
So instead we have had decades with out it?
Hell, go on 'Shark' and get an investor. There are tones of investors that he could get for less then 51% and then manufacture it himself.
It makes no sense at all. He could produce it in his garage, so produce some more and start selling it.
Well, he's dead, so that won't happen.
The whole thing reeks of delusional behavior we see with people who demonstration free energy.
You are stupid and alarmist. Exactly what I have come to expect from a 'web developer'.
Becasue ti's theior stander ToS; which includes Youtube, etc.
of course, there is this:
"The rights that you grant in this licence are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting and improving our Services, and to develop new ones. This licence continues even if you stop using our Services (for example, for a business listing that you have added to Google Maps).”"
so, not a big deal.
no. He didn't quote the whole license.
He left out the bit wher eit says it's only to improve services:
"The rights that you grant in this licence are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting and improving our Services, and to develop new ones. This licence continues even if you stop using our Services (for example, for a business listing that you have added to Google Maps).”"
Cause he is either stupid or a hater. haha I kid, he's both.
Maybe you shoudl be a,little more honest? IO notice you left out:
"The rights that you grant in this licence are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting and improving our Services, and to develop new ones. This licence continues even if you stop using our Services (for example, for a business listing that you have added to Google Maps).”
Apple sold 35.1 million iPhones into channels last quarter, along with 11.8 million iPads, 7.7 million iPods and 4 million Mac computers.
In order to maintain the growth, they would need to see:
55 million iPhones into channels , along with 18 million iPads, 13 million iPods and 6.5 million Mac computers.
approx.
So, the question is, can then do that? can the sell 55 million new iPhone in the first quarter of next year?
All that is true, but I feel the need to point out:
The Bush administration slaughtered the inspectors budget. So while we have outlawed feed ground up cow parts, it's hard to be sure ranchers are following the laws.
Don't allow herbivorous to eat there own' species.
That's the problem.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/bse/
Except it will increase. The less the food is regulated, the less we know about hos it spreads, them more that will die.
IT's far cheaper dealing with it now then when a million die.
Constant low level vigilance it the cheapest way to deal with these sorts of issues.
butchered cattle, slaughter and meat regulation. Cut funding for inspectors and now we see this.
I'm not really surprised.
And yes, Bush is gone, be you can't ignore what he did.
And of course every time Obama wants to get money into things the protect citizens, it is a monumental fight.
But hey, keep voting for libertarian policies.
"But if it is it ain't happening at anything like the rate that would justify dismantling civilization over,"
something NO CLIMATOLOGIST WANTS TO DO. This guy is a chemist, not an expert in this field. Climatologist have derided this guys prediction for years.
"too many politicians with a preexisting anti-civilization"
nonsense.
" glommed onto AGW "
You really have no clue of the history of Climate Change. NO one glommed on to it. it took time and evidences.
".. glommed onto AGW "
the media did that be pretend individual studies as a complete picture and not reminding people that it's one study and more is needed.
", as it brings in tons of research money, "
no it doesn't. Please STFU about shit you have no clue about.
You have the actual experts vs the oil companys PR arm. Which INCLUDES proved effort to discredit science in the class room.
You fuck heads talk about the mythical pile of money for scientists and ignore the 100 billion dollar industry it impacts.
Why the FUCK do you think the the government piddle sum to scientists causes the scientist to lie when there are many magnitudes more money in saying it doesn't exist?
DO you even know how to think? You poor excuse for limp wristed cum stains are helping the oil industry destroy the habitability of the planet by humans.
If money corrupts the science, then we would never heard of AGW.
Of course, the science backs AGW, so all you dick heads have is ad homs, lies and ignorance.
"Evacuation to the arctic is pointless is the goal was control and power here."
It's not about power. That is a lie designed to create fear. It was created by people who mkae a lot of money selling products that spew crap into the air.
"Somehow linking that to humans, that's the REALLY controversial part and it's MUCH harder to provide fact in that case. Almost impossible."
No, it isn't. CO2 is causing it, we spew billions of tons of CO2 in the air.
No other mechanism for the increase in the temperature has every panned out.
Lovelock is a chemist, not a climatologist, and his hypothesis is clearly a chemists view. Also, no living organism supports Lovelocks theory; which shoots it in the foot. In other words: Natural selection would need a means of cross species reproductive communication.
Consensus of actual experts in the field did no agree with the pace of his predictions. Media loved it "FEAR NOW!" and Hollywood used is to spawn another round disaster movies.