Ron Paul is a horrid person to vote for. He espouse policy that have been shown t be harmful to people and the economy.
Give me a 3rd party candidate that's worth voting for. Voting 3rd party just to vote 3rd party is no better then voting for R just because it's R, or D.
Incorrect. He campaigned on moving away from coal. One implies just shutting them down, the other implies a long term replacement. Wanting to be fairly paid and have a min. level of safety is a good thing to vote for.
" Party of Goldman Sachs" I'm not sure what you mean? Are you referring to the bailout(Bush)?
He tried. Did you miss the Rep BS? saying "We can't house them anywhere" How did you miss that fight? They shutdown all activity? Sop blaming Obama when the Pubs keep stopping what he wants to do. Obama has done crap I am not happy with, but that doesn't mean I'm going to vote for another person jsut because they are a different person.
" I'll put money down that in the end pharmaceutical companies and anyone else that backed his plan gets rich " How? show me how? what section of the bill would allow that to happen? I am assuming you have read it because otherwise you are just being an ass. I read it, and have a copy, so just reference the section I"ll be happy to discuss it with you.
The government is NOT GETTING BIGGER EVERY YEAR. This is a demonstrable FACT. why do people keep saying it?
federal spending as a percent is estimated to reach 25 percent for 2010. It was over 40% in 1943.
Every republican spout the 'the government is bigger' bullet point, and people like you take it at face value.
Government worker get paid less then the private sector.
"government union bosses in the lifestyle they would like." HAHAHahaha. Yeah, right.
"However, I see many laws that claim to be for a particular purpose are extermely ineffective at actually doing so (or are actually counterproductive) and/or cost more than the value of the improvement they are designed to create."
So tired of hearing the crap. Listen You poor excuse for a limp wristed cum stain, read some fucking history and look at the world BEFORE they had these industrial regulation. Companies chaining people to tables, locking exit door, dumping toxic waste into the drinking water, throwing you out of you home.
Look at countries that don't have regulation, or very few. It's hell for everyone except a tiny percentage. Look what the bankers did as we started loosening up their regulations.
Dumb fuckers like you are causing us to go backwards YOU are the problem.
One party wants us to move away from coal, but recognizes it will be at least 100 years, another one wants his company to take decide on worker safety, and pay and not allow the workers to have any recourse.
"I'm a Libertarian and I don't like either party." also, apparently you don't like history. Or you hate people.
So what if the richest men are dems or pubs? the question is how the vote, not if they are rich. You CAN be rich and NOT support trickle done economics. So it's either a strawman, or another example of your ignorance.
Allow people to have a choice who to marry is not forcing anything. Having a plan the balances hiring is not a bad thing. I mean, people like you who can't seem to understand recent history can't seem to get their mind around the fact that people will discriminate; which is not to say the current implementation in some places are perfect.
and its 88% not 98%.
We will be using coal for at least 100 years. Voting for a party that wants you to be safe and fairly compensated is not voting against your best interest.
You don't understand what is happening. It isn't gridlock as in a decent debate over complex issues. It's gridlock as in 'Do what ever is possible to stop all aspects of government and then blame Obama.'
The have held up even the most minor appointed posts. Of course the media likes to ignores his any success and blindly accept when the rep say he is responsible for something.
Of curse, people like you just buy the media hook line and sinker, and don't look at actual events and facts.
I mean, even when something works, people like you refuse to believe it.
read your own sig next time you think to pound out some ill conceive notion that qualifies as thinking.
Ron Paul is a loon who wants corporation to be able to poison who ever they want, and lock us back into the gilded cage.
People who support Ron Paul are people who want something different be can't be bothered to actual research the issues is spouts off.
The most reasonable Rep. Candidate is huntsman. How most reasonable it a pretty low bar compared to the other candidates. Of course he understand Evolution and man made Global Warming are facts* so he religious loons running the damn rep. circus wont' have it.
No they aren't. "Family-values" has become central to the republicans. The religious right has cause the republican party to become crazy as a mad hatter.
The literally want to force you through law to have to believe the way they believe, and how you and I behave.
This is what the republican party stands for: 1) Enforce their belief through law 2) Remove all regulations, regardless of facts 3) Use economic policy that have been proven through history not to work.
They are a complete belief system on all sides. They do NOT look at history or facts.
This is a party that tried to ostracize a potential candidate because he wants to use science to make decisions.
Look at the party, read what there previous own are writing. The republican party today is not even close to what it was in 1984.
Idiots are idiots because they aren't paying attention. Adding spikes does not mean they would suddenly be paying attention.
The larger percentage of people who run read lights do it because they weren't paying attention. Getting hit by one of these yahoos will kill you in a pre-safety regulation car.
You know what? I just realized why old people are grumpy. We have the history of why things happens during our lives, and young idiots who don't read up on why something exist come along and say its wrong, and give complete boneheaded examples.
You you where sitting in a 1970 era boat of a car, and were reaerend by a prius doing 60, you would be seriously hour, and possible killed, as would your passengers. You are talking out of your ass and no nothing of this topic; which wold be fine, but some poor shmuck will read your post and not know why you are wrong.
due to regulation, you pay less for fuel. Why do you think cars no longer get 8mpg?
The are designed to protect people, not just you. You're passengers, any Innocent bystanders that get killed because you're out of control car careened into them.
You also assume only YOU can cause accident to YOU. You are not an island, you are in a civilization and society. Behave as such.
OTOH, your an idiot and want the 17th amendment repeal. Which tell me you don't take history into account when ever a random neuron fires and gives you an idea. An idea you think is good imply because it occurred to you.
Of course they would. It would be stupid of them not to.
I will set altruistic reasons a side.
Lets see: A) You can control people who a afraid. B) You will get a whole new defence arm - So it's advantageous to the military to let it be known. C) Money - Someone has to build all the new toys the military will need - SO it's in the best interest to corporation to let it be known. D) Someone has to launch all these new toys - It's in NASAs best interest to let it be known.
The more cynical you are the more reason there is for them to let us know.
This is why a Roswell* cover up is a stupid idea. The military budget would have gone through the roof if it had actually been aliens.
* Besides all the other facts, like children's tape, documents and witness that create the balloon.
Slashdot Mirror
does out number you. Seriously.
I almost believe we evolved to carry bacteria around~
Ron Paul is a horrid person to vote for. He espouse policy that have been shown t be harmful to people and the economy.
Give me a 3rd party candidate that's worth voting for. Voting 3rd party just to vote 3rd party is no better then voting for R just because it's R, or D.
Incorrect. He campaigned on moving away from coal.
One implies just shutting them down, the other implies a long term replacement.
Wanting to be fairly paid and have a min. level of safety is a good thing to vote for.
" Party of Goldman Sachs"
I'm not sure what you mean? Are you referring to the bailout(Bush)?
He tried. Did you miss the Rep BS? saying "We can't house them anywhere"
How did you miss that fight? They shutdown all activity?
Sop blaming Obama when the Pubs keep stopping what he wants to do.
Obama has done crap I am not happy with, but that doesn't mean I'm going to vote for another person jsut because they are a different person.
" I'll put money down that in the end pharmaceutical companies and anyone else that backed his plan gets rich "
How? show me how? what section of the bill would allow that to happen? I am assuming you have read it because otherwise you are just being an ass. I read it, and have a copy, so just reference the section I"ll be happy to discuss it with you.
The government is NOT GETTING BIGGER EVERY YEAR. This is a demonstrable FACT. why do people keep saying it?
federal spending as a percent is estimated to reach 25 percent for 2010.
It was over 40% in 1943.
Every republican spout the 'the government is bigger' bullet point, and people like you take it at face value.
Shame on you.
Government worker get paid less then the private sector.
"government union bosses in the lifestyle they would like."
HAHAHahaha. Yeah, right.
"However, I see many laws that claim to be for a particular purpose are extermely ineffective at actually doing so (or are actually counterproductive) and/or cost more than the value of the improvement they are designed to create."
So tired of hearing the crap. Listen You poor excuse for a limp wristed cum stain, read some fucking history and look at the world BEFORE they had these industrial regulation. Companies chaining people to tables, locking exit door, dumping toxic waste into the drinking water, throwing you out of you home.
Look at countries that don't have regulation, or very few. It's hell for everyone except a tiny percentage.
Look what the bankers did as we started loosening up their regulations.
Dumb fuckers like you are causing us to go backwards YOU are the problem.
More accuratly.
One party wants us to move away from coal, but recognizes it will be at least 100 years, another one wants his company to take decide on worker safety, and pay and not allow the workers to have any recourse.
"I'm a Libertarian and I don't like either party."
also, apparently you don't like history. Or you hate people.
So what if the richest men are dems or pubs? the question is how the vote, not if they are rich. You CAN be rich and NOT support trickle done economics. So it's either a strawman, or another example of your ignorance.
Allow people to have a choice who to marry is not forcing anything.
Having a plan the balances hiring is not a bad thing. I mean, people like you who can't seem to understand recent history can't seem to get their mind around the fact that people will discriminate; which is not to say the current implementation in some places are perfect.
and its 88% not 98%.
We will be using coal for at least 100 years. Voting for a party that wants you to be safe and fairly compensated is not voting against your best interest.
"I don't know what is."
Clearly.
You don't understand what is happening. It isn't gridlock as in a decent debate over complex issues. It's gridlock as in 'Do what ever is possible to stop all aspects of government and then blame Obama.'
The have held up even the most minor appointed posts.
Of course the media likes to ignores his any success and blindly accept when the rep say he is responsible for something.
Of curse, people like you just buy the media hook line and sinker, and don't look at actual events and facts.
I mean, even when something works, people like you refuse to believe it.
read your own sig next time you think to pound out some ill conceive notion that qualifies as thinking.
Ron Paul is a loon who wants corporation to be able to poison who ever they want, and lock us back into the gilded cage.
People who support Ron Paul are people who want something different be can't be bothered to actual research the issues is spouts off.
The most reasonable Rep. Candidate is huntsman. How most reasonable it a pretty low bar compared to the other candidates. Of course he understand Evolution and man made Global Warming are facts* so he religious loons running the damn rep. circus wont' have it.
*Scientific theory; i.e. fact.
No they aren't. "Family-values" has become central to the republicans. The religious right has cause the republican party to become crazy as a mad hatter.
The literally want to force you through law to have to believe the way they believe, and how you and I behave.
This is what the republican party stands for:
1) Enforce their belief through law
2) Remove all regulations, regardless of facts
3) Use economic policy that have been proven through history not to work.
They are a complete belief system on all sides. They do NOT look at history or facts.
This is a party that tried to ostracize a potential candidate because he wants to use science to make decisions.
Look at the party, read what there previous own are writing. The republican party today is not even close to what it was in 1984.
Depends. the faster you go the harder it becomes to push through the air.
Idiots are idiots because they aren't paying attention. Adding spikes does not mean they would suddenly be paying attention.
The larger percentage of people who run read lights do it because they weren't paying attention. Getting hit by one of these yahoos will kill you in a pre-safety regulation car.
You know what? I just realized why old people are grumpy. We have the history of why things happens during our lives, and young idiots who don't read up on why something exist come along and say its wrong, and give complete boneheaded examples.
less damage then what?
You you where sitting in a 1970 era boat of a car, and were reaerend by a prius doing 60, you would be seriously hour, and possible killed, as would your passengers.
You are talking out of your ass and no nothing of this topic; which wold be fine, but some poor shmuck will read your post and not know why you are wrong.
due to regulation, you pay less for fuel. Why do you think cars no longer get 8mpg?
The are designed to protect people, not just you. You're passengers, any Innocent bystanders that get killed because you're out of control car careened into them.
You also assume only YOU can cause accident to YOU. You are not an island, you are in a civilization and society. Behave as such.
OTOH, your an idiot and want the 17th amendment repeal. Which tell me you don't take history into account when ever a random neuron fires and gives you an idea. An idea you think is good imply because it occurred to you.
haha, no.
The stiff car frame explodes while the engine is dumped onto the front seat.
There are some videos of older cars impacting with new cars. The 'stiff' metal just disintegrates.
So.. you argument is that parent who don't properly stow the strap means seatbelts aren't safe?
Or the second link where they specifically say it was not because of the seat belt.
When she reclined, feet on the dash, and her seat belt loose.
She was an idiot, and payed the price.
You know what? riding on top of the car isn't safe, but there is no sticker on the roof saying not to ride there.
yes, there was no accident before seatbelts.
Everyone else should suffer because you choose a low visibility mode of transportation.
Simple Solution:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbXvBeL8-YY
Of course there a better belts. OTOH, you aren't supposed to be racing during normal driving.
The risk is higher at racing speeds, as well as the risk from loosing control.
FTR: Many people wanted seat belt initially either.
Of course they would. It would be stupid of them not to.
I will set altruistic reasons a side.
Lets see:
A) You can control people who a afraid.
B) You will get a whole new defence arm - So it's advantageous to the military to let it be known.
C) Money - Someone has to build all the new toys the military will need - SO it's in the best interest to corporation to let it be known.
D) Someone has to launch all these new toys - It's in NASAs best interest to let it be known.
The more cynical you are the more reason there is for them to let us know.
This is why a Roswell* cover up is a stupid idea. The military budget would have gone through the roof if it had actually been aliens.
* Besides all the other facts, like children's tape, documents and witness that create the balloon.
Yes, scared of a civilization that can't do anything to them.
Now, some global cult hiding are existence because it would be against the religious doctrine..THAT'S plausible.
Actually, if we are alone, then Yes we ARE the "pinnacle of civilization".
From those of is with speech issues, "Fuck You"
I'm not saying it's aliens, but, It's aliens.
to do an interview on slashdot.
Also, get their podcast. It's lame puns and excellent science
http://radio.seti.org/