The statement you quote could very well be correct. Pretty much everyone will be dead at 65MPH, so at 85 you can't get deader.,
It's like the falling cat question. How com cats the fall 13 floors seem to live as much as cats that fall out of the 6th floor? Because almost no one takes a dead cat to the vet.
"I read an article recently about scientists saying the speed of light is not constant. " scientist selling a book. Not scientists, and certainly not consensus.
"Unless *all* datafiles on your client's system are encrypted," haha. If I can get into your system(I can) then I can install a number of tools to find you keys. Or install keyboard sniffers and have everything sent to me.
I hate these crappy 3rd party vendors who don't know how to write software. I just dealt with this with some 3rd party products here. We were finally 'Get it to work with the firewall or we'll send you your crap back'
Magically, the "impossible to do" was done in a week.
Do you know why they want to get promoted in missile command? to get out of missile command. Look, I was in Missile Command(F.E. Warren*). You're whole view on this is wrong. Your view is based on a school math like grading system. That in no way applies here.
You're wrong. It's a specific set of procedures. You know them and can preform them or you can not. They aren't doing calculations.
They aren't composing a sonnet, they aren't reciting history dates.
"because their jobs are basically so damn simple it's going to be very hard to realistically rate one crew as being notably better than another. " I was SAC, and that statement is laughable.
In randomly given test to check exactly what you describe scores were into the 90%
The issue is about 1 or 2 percent difference in the 90 percentile. While you test would work, it is much simpler to grab everyone you suspect of cheating, and give them a test under controlled conditions and see how they fair.
Slashdot Mirror
IF it's due to improper maintenance? then it's your fault.
Manufacture defect? Manufacturers fault.
This is no different then if a hand brake fails and a car careened down and his some one.
Did you tell him you were surprised Australians need so much hand holding to get around? :)
" after which the crew reacted incorrectly and ultimately led the aircraft to an aerodynamic stall from which they did not recover.["
It was the crew.
The rage comes from fear they will mist the ride. Once there, no need to rage. Baring unusual circumstance.
People will get used to it in a hurry. Too mach gain.
The statement you quote could very well be correct. Pretty much everyone will be dead at 65MPH, so at 85 you can't get deader.,
It's like the falling cat question.
How com cats the fall 13 floors seem to live as much as cats that fall out of the 6th floor? Because almost no one takes a dead cat to the vet.
America is not actually litigation happy. Stop using the news and pundits as is they are accurate.
The insurance is not that big of a deal.
The same person whose at fault when there is a issue with current cars.
If it was improperly maintained? the owner.
Manufacturer defect? The manufacturer.
Was it a random unforeseeable event? No one.
Really people, this has been solved.
"(which would be an extremely odd, and frankly, a not very believable aspect of cosmology"
says someone, every time something new is found.
"Pass me that last piece of pie, would you?"
No. Lose some weight.
OTOH, Quark's garbage route will be shorter.
I saw your bad SCI-F, and raised you :)
Since E=mc2, have a negative mass would mean negative energy.
How do you have negative energy content?
"I read an article recently about scientists saying the speed of light is not constant. "
scientist selling a book. Not scientists, and certainly not consensus.
And what do you mean so fundamental?
Reading both your post is like watching dogs try to explain airplanes.
"but it's the way the universe really works. "
at the quantum level. The macro universe is also how the universe really works.
"Unless *all* datafiles on your client's system are encrypted,"
haha.
If I can get into your system(I can) then I can install a number of tools to find you keys. Or install keyboard sniffers and have everything sent to me.
"Security through obscurity is not secure at all."
false.
It's one of many layers of security.
Here is the code for my car:
7261
Good luck finding out where my car is located.
A) the MS firewall works well.
B) There are more then on vector into a network.
You are taking a risk. The issue you have are dealt with by being a professional and documenting them.
I'm not saying they other guy did it right, only that I would fire you for incompetence.
PCI compliance.
I hate these crappy 3rd party vendors who don't know how to write software. I just dealt with this with some 3rd party products here. We were finally 'Get it to work with the firewall or we'll send you your crap back'
Magically, the "impossible to do" was done in a week.
It's has a tremendous surface area. For more then you fins.
For comparison, then on the surface area of a brick cs the surface area of a sponge.
Do you know why they want to get promoted in missile command? to get out of missile command.
Look, I was in Missile Command(F.E. Warren*). You're whole view on this is wrong. Your view is based on a school math like grading system. That in no way applies here.
*Fuck Everybody Warren.
You're wrong.
It's a specific set of procedures. You know them and can preform them or you can not.
They aren't doing calculations.
They aren't composing a sonnet, they aren't reciting history dates.
But I've been there, and you just an ass on /.
That begs the question. Why do you assume they are currently secure?
That said, these system are typically engineered, that alone will make them have a high level of security.
"because their jobs are basically so damn simple it's going to be very hard to realistically rate one crew as being notably better than another. "
I was SAC, and that statement is laughable.
In randomly given test to check exactly what you describe scores were into the 90%
The issue is about 1 or 2 percent difference in the 90 percentile.
While you test would work, it is much simpler to grab everyone you suspect of cheating, and give them a test under controlled conditions and see how they fair.