Yes, becasue that would ahve been the whole movie~
It's suppose to be a tie ti breath after a lot of action and tension in morder. So, film wise they should have been sealed in the barrels, plopped into the river, a couple of shouting elves, and then off a small water fall into the river. 10 seconds off the dwarf's complaining. Next seen, getting picked up.
I disagree. It could easily be three good 90 minute movies. As opposed to the nonsensical turds that actually are. well the first 2. Since I love the work, I continue to hold out hope that the last one will be good.
No, it isn't reasonable to include it. If when wanted to to : "Middle Earth - An adventurers guide", that would have been fine. The inclusion of the work in The Hobbit breaks story.
"It's fantasy with wizards, elves and dragons, and you're talking about suspension of disbelief?" yes. Because it goes outside the contest of the film. THAT is what suspension of disbelief is. You set expectation and context. When you break that you break the suspension of disbelief. It doesn't matter if its LotR, 2001, or Die Hard.
" Anything goes, " No, it doesn't.
SPOILER!!!!!!
The evil in LotR is immortal. It's never killed. There's kind of a point there.
A good version could do 90 minutes JUST on Mirkwood. It could be an Alien like suspense thriller. So I would have likes to see: 1) outsider / buddy film - up to Mirkwood. 2) suspense thriller - Mirkwood 3) suspense/action - The dragon and 5 armies
Well, it's put together poorly. We're in a field, we're in a forest, now a field, back to the forest! Lets run around in circles while the Orcs run around us in circles for no apparent reason. Radgast? Bird poop?
It's LESS of a person story then the book. There should be no material from the Silimarian.
Dwarves were made as comic relief. It was about Thorin more then Bilbo.
And I could go on about the nonsense story changes that added nothing. Remember, when you add cow poop to chocolate, you do not get better chocolate.
The movies were written for a Dora the Explorer level child, as opposed to children who new people dying in war, other children dying from diseases, etc.
I've always disagreed with it being called a children's book. The fact that he wrote it for his children does not make it a children book. There was no age 8-13 category of books in 1937.
I'll let you in on a secret. Just having the code stopped the problem they created the code to fix. Since it fixed the problem, it makes sense for it to be an easy number. I suspect the rpesident will be under a little stress if he had to actually use it, so you want to minimize mistakes.
The security guy makes a classic security review mistake. Ignoring why and the practicality and the impact.
So that actual number is irrelevant, and no, you don't punch the code and then missiles launch.
See, it doesn't apply here because the express intent of the device n the car is to record music.
However, this part may apply: "Because no additional copies can be made from the Rio, the Rio makes less copies than the SCMS would permit." Can you copy music from the Cars device? If not, they got nothing. If you can, then you may have an issue.
"You speak as though insanity isn't a predictable outcome of decades of speed use and abuse." It isn't, and his speed abuse in no way caused his schizophrenia.
Apples server hardware is horrible. This isn't a secret. They've never been able to do it well, it has never been their primary focus. i.e. core compeanct.
They have finally come to grips with that and partnered with IBM.
No, it isn't. I actual priced this out. Lock at the new 6 core maC. 4 grand for 6 cores and 16GB of Ram? crazy. If I bump up the specs to be a useful animation/artist box it was over 12,000 dollars. Obscene. Maybe with the IBM partnering they will get real servers at a reasonable price running OSX
wrong.
Other people are allowed to have informed opinions that differ from yours and that's fine.
What are we going to do now? the same thing you should have been doing, reading the book to your kids.
Yes, becasue that would ahve been the whole movie~
It's suppose to be a tie ti breath after a lot of action and tension in morder.
So, film wise they should have been sealed in the barrels, plopped into the river, a couple of shouting elves, and then off a small water fall into the river.
10 seconds off the dwarf's complaining.
Next seen, getting picked up.
I disagree. It could easily be three good 90 minute movies. As opposed to the nonsensical turds that actually are. well the first 2. Since I love the work, I continue to hold out hope that the last one will be good.
In the book the Barrel scene is very important. It's the moment all the Dwarves go from not really trusting him yet, to completely trusting them.
He seals them in the barrels so they are water tight.
No, it isn't reasonable to include it.
If when wanted to to : "Middle Earth - An adventurers guide", that would have been fine. The inclusion of the work in The Hobbit breaks story.
That move was so bad, I want to dig up JRR and apologies for it on Bakshi's behalf.
http://giphy.com/gifs/37Ez5CZ8...
"It's fantasy with wizards, elves and dragons, and you're talking about suspension of disbelief?"
yes. Because it goes outside the contest of the film. THAT is what suspension of disbelief is. You set expectation and context. When you break that you break the suspension of disbelief.
It doesn't matter if its LotR, 2001, or Die Hard.
" Anything goes, "
No, it doesn't.
SPOILER!!!!!!
The evil in LotR is immortal. It's never killed. There's kind of a point there.
Run time isn't a fair comparison.
A good version could do 90 minutes JUST on Mirkwood. It could be an Alien like suspense thriller.
So I would have likes to see:
1) outsider / buddy film - up to Mirkwood.
2) suspense thriller - Mirkwood
3) suspense/action - The dragon and 5 armies
It had more then one director.
http://goo.gl/SmqcDs
Well, it's put together poorly. We're in a field, we're in a forest, now a field, back to the forest!
Lets run around in circles while the Orcs run around us in circles for no apparent reason.
Radgast? Bird poop?
It's LESS of a person story then the book.
There should be no material from the Silimarian.
Dwarves were made as comic relief.
It was about Thorin more then Bilbo.
And I could go on about the nonsense story changes that added nothing. Remember, when you add cow poop to chocolate, you do not get better chocolate.
The movies were written for a Dora the Explorer level child, as opposed to children who new people dying in war, other children dying from diseases, etc.
I've always disagreed with it being called a children's book. The fact that he wrote it for his children does not make it a children book. There was no age 8-13 category of books in 1937.
No. the difference between 93 and 95 percent is irrelevant. This isn't someone getting 80% and someone else getting 95%.
You're looking hard for an issue that isn't hear. I was in SAC. You, OTOH, should probably read my sig.
I'll let you in on a secret.
Just having the code stopped the problem they created the code to fix. Since it fixed the problem, it makes sense for it to be an easy number. I suspect the rpesident will be under a little stress if he had to actually use it, so you want to minimize mistakes.
The security guy makes a classic security review mistake. Ignoring why and the practicality and the impact.
So that actual number is irrelevant, and no, you don't punch the code and then missiles launch.
You should probably read that a little closer. In fact, read this:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/p...
See, it doesn't apply here because the express intent of the device n the car is to record music.
However, this part may apply:
"Because no additional copies can be made from the Rio, the Rio makes less copies than the SCMS would permit."
Can you copy music from the Cars device? If not, they got nothing. If you can, then you may have an issue.
"You speak as though insanity isn't a predictable outcome of decades of speed use and abuse."
It isn't, and his speed abuse in no way caused his schizophrenia.
Yet the alternative history in the new Wallenstein games is awesome.
He's never done a western.
Post Civil war in space? yes.
Much of the hardware design is done by apple. Don't confuse using off the shelf components with using off the shelf design.
"since it is the primary cause of RSI. "
False.
Don't replay to AC that are using an anecdote. You're better then that ;)
Apples server hardware is horrible. This isn't a secret. They've never been able to do it well, it has never been their primary focus. i.e. core compeanct.
They have finally come to grips with that and partnered with IBM.
No, it isn't.
I actual priced this out. Lock at the new 6 core maC. 4 grand for 6 cores and 16GB of Ram? crazy. If I bump up the specs to be a useful animation/artist box it was over 12,000 dollars. Obscene. Maybe with the IBM partnering they will get real servers at a reasonable price running OSX
Couple of these plus tax:
http://store.apple.com/us_smb_...