" sees cracks in accepted theory." you don't understand science, do you? That statement makes no sense at all. It's a theory, are there unknowns? of course, just like every theory. Does the current data support the theory? yes. You can not be scientifically literate and not know the theory of evolution is based on facts. The idea the the theory of evolution means there isn't a god is wrong. The idea that atheist 'have to believe' in the current theory of evolution no matter what is also wrong. Give another reason that explains the current data, as well as make predictions. Yes, evolution makes predictions and yes they have panned out.
" But hardline atheists have no choice but to resist any alternatives to evolution"
False and backwards. Bible literalist have no choice then to deny the theory of evolution regardless of evidence.
You supply a better interpretation of the data that can be falsified? then Athiest will drop the modern version of evolution.
And it's not Darwinism, it's the theory of evolution. Only people who are unable to accept the fact that new data can chanfg a theory understand that. ANYONE who calls the theory of evolution 'darwinism' does so solely to create an ad hom attack and show they are unable to look at data.,
You sir, are ignorant of this subject and as such should shut up.
Another idiot talking outside his expertise. He has no clue about evolution, thinks darwin wrote everything about it, and can not understand new data.
Lets me clue you in: If we found out, right now, Darwin made the whole thing up, it wouldn't matter because of the amount of other data we have collected, the number of accurate predictions that have been done, and a completely lack of understanding of the second law of thermodynamics.
This guy doesn't belong in any science magazine.
"But I am unaware of how naturally random processes could have led to the first life forms, much less the information encoded within them." so that means it's not real? Are you aware of how mas bends space? no? well I guess gravity isn't real either.
Darwin escape clause? I guess top someone who is a clueless dolt bent on reading something and not impacting their narrative it would seem that way. IN reality it's nonsense.
Just because you only find depreciated women and choking a child the height of humor doesn't mean the rest of us don't enjoy the subtle humor and story change that the Simpsons have grown up to become.
" that make Al-Qaeda seem a bunch of amateurs." no. The Mob has nothing on Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda is a global organization bent on destruction. Maybe person AB is a banker laundering money who has contacts into several cells and they want to track where that money goes to the specific person? Maybe some of that money moves through a well connected political corporation? Maybe if people know who they are it will spark a series of attacks?
My point is I can see a place for them. How do we be sure it isn't abused? A law that says the records are opened in 3 years?
I can think of several real world situation where this is needed. For example revealing identities indicate a breach has been done and postoperative at risk. I could go on and on. I could also go on and on about abuse.
I wish the data would be come public in 3 years after the trial.
Now you saw no matter how bog the attack, but have you really thought about it? 100K people dead? eastern seaboard?
No, it is not a deterrent. Nor should it be a punishment. It should be focused on rehabilitation. It is much cheaper and far more effective, and far better for society.
A TINY amount of people can't be rehabilitated, but they can be medicated.
Slashdot Mirror
They are experts, so I fail to see the connection.
no, he isn't.
Here is what it means to be open minded:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
billions a day for a billion years.
Of course it's just a new way of using the junkyard example.
Example of their ignorance to be precise.
Thanks for responding.
Now red my sig and apply it to your incorrect view on evolution.
They're exactly like mims.
They know 1 thing, apply it to things outside of their field and make nonsense statements.
What Jenny McCarthy is to vaccines he is to the theory of evolution.
" sees cracks in accepted theory."
you don't understand science, do you?
That statement makes no sense at all.
It's a theory, are there unknowns? of course, just like every theory.
Does the current data support the theory? yes.
You can not be scientifically literate and not know the theory of evolution is based on facts.
The idea the the theory of evolution means there isn't a god is wrong.
The idea that atheist 'have to believe' in the current theory of evolution no matter what is also wrong. Give another reason that explains the current data, as well as make predictions.
Yes, evolution makes predictions and yes they have panned out.
" But hardline atheists have no choice but to resist any alternatives to evolution"
False and backwards.
Bible literalist have no choice then to deny the theory of evolution regardless of evidence.
You supply a better interpretation of the data that can be falsified? then Athiest will drop the modern version of evolution.
And it's not Darwinism, it's the theory of evolution. Only people who are unable to accept the fact that new data can chanfg a theory understand that. ANYONE who calls the theory of evolution 'darwinism' does so solely to create an ad hom attack and show they are unable to look at data.,
You sir, are ignorant of this subject and as such should shut up.
Another idiot talking outside his expertise.
He has no clue about evolution, thinks darwin wrote everything about it, and can not understand new data.
Lets me clue you in:
If we found out, right now, Darwin made the whole thing up, it wouldn't matter because of the amount of other data we have collected, the number of accurate predictions that have been done, and a completely lack of understanding of the second law of thermodynamics.
This guy doesn't belong in any science magazine.
"But I am unaware of how naturally random processes could have led to the first life forms, much less the information encoded within them."
so that means it's not real? Are you aware of how mas bends space? no? well I guess gravity isn't real either.
Darwin escape clause? I guess top someone who is a clueless dolt bent on reading something and not impacting their narrative it would seem that way. IN reality it's nonsense.
Just because you only find depreciated women and choking a child the height of humor doesn't mean the rest of us don't enjoy the subtle humor and story change that the Simpsons have grown up to become.
The post I replied to was claiming 1400km a charge from L-Ion and an additional 1600 from this new system.
Then why did you say they are largely self maintain?
Stop using your 'gut' and start educating yourself and using your brain.
" that make Al-Qaeda seem a bunch of amateurs."
no. The Mob has nothing on Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda is a global organization bent on destruction. Maybe person AB is a banker laundering money who has contacts into several cells and they want to track where that money goes to the specific person? Maybe some of that money moves through a well connected political corporation? Maybe if people know who they are it will spark a series of attacks?
My point is I can see a place for them. How do we be sure it isn't abused? A law that says the records are opened in 3 years?
Then the word 'art' is meaningless.
I don't know, is she a fat bottomed girl?
I can think of several real world situation where this is needed.
For example revealing identities indicate a breach has been done and postoperative at risk.
I could go on and on. I could also go on and on about abuse.
I wish the data would be come public in 3 years after the trial.
Now you saw no matter how bog the attack, but have you really thought about it? 100K people dead? eastern seaboard?
No, it is not a deterrent. Nor should it be a punishment. It should be focused on rehabilitation.
It is much cheaper and far more effective, and far better for society.
A TINY amount of people can't be rehabilitated, but they can be medicated.
It would be cheaper to have some one constantly monitor them and not allow them to own their own computer, then putting them in prison.
Reform is always better then punishment.
FYI psychopath does not equal violent.
To bad it uses more then it traps.
Socially, we are in the information age.
Economically, we are moving into the service age,
Geologically possible the plastic age.
Rock is a aggregate of materials. This could lead to a new classifications of rock; which will be interesting for out petrology friends.
"...unlikely to do well on solar panels on the roof."
based on..what?
when did the Tesla start getting 1400 km from it's lithium batters? Seems to me that would be kind of a big deal on it's own.
If we only knew how to recycle aluminum.
Yes, but they would have less range and be heavier.