up at the isp where i work we rarely have a really bad problem with one of the raq2 or 3's we rent out. I very rarely have to reboot one of them. What the main problem is with them is the web interface they have. see, we rent em out to idiots. they work fine for a while, but everyoncee in a while something a customer puts into the web interface will not be whats accually going on with the server. overall, i think they are pretty cool, except for the configuration issues through the web interface. web interfaces suck anyway. heh
accually i see this as a sign of things to come. remember how there were problems with the dreamcast when it was first released about 6 months or so ago? if i remember correctly, some of the games wouuld not work on the dreamcast. there were about 3 or 4 of them and it only affected about 10 - 20% of each effected title. if i remember correctly, sonic was one of these.
i think as long as you have been using this domain in the past for a legitmate purpose, i see nothing wrong in selling the domain for any amount. if someone out there is willing to pay the money for it, sell it. there is nothing wrong with that because you did not purchase the domain with the purpose of making some sort of profit out of it.
see thats what they do, they give some funky name like philablahsieindnblahtobin but the manufactuer gives it a catchy houshold name. like tylenol is really acetaminophen.
I can pretty much understand where yahoo is coming from on this one. Usually when a parody is done they always alter the brand name a little so that you still know who the joke is on but no copywrites are infringed. roche
Slashdot Mirror
i seriously doubt that. maybse some pirate vcd on the street, but not the dvd. remember, most dvd players will play vcds
Hes a idiot man. What makes you think he can rationalize it? Ignoring them is the only thing to do
up at the isp where i work we rarely have a really bad problem with one of the raq2 or 3's we rent out. I very rarely have to reboot one of them. What the main problem is with them is the web interface they have. see, we rent em out to idiots. they work fine for a while, but everyoncee in a while something a customer puts into the web interface will not be whats accually going on with the server. overall, i think they are pretty cool, except for the configuration issues through the web interface. web interfaces suck anyway. heh
accually i see this as a sign of things to come. remember how there were problems with the dreamcast when it was first released about 6 months or so ago? if i remember correctly, some of the games wouuld not work on the dreamcast. there were about 3 or 4 of them and it only affected about 10 - 20% of each effected title. if i remember correctly, sonic was one of these.
all i have to say is sweet
i think as long as you have been using this domain in the past for a legitmate purpose, i see nothing wrong in selling the domain for any amount. if someone out there is willing to pay the money for it, sell it. there is nothing wrong with that because you did not purchase the domain with the purpose of making some sort of profit out of it.
As Long as their is porn, usenet will never die
too bad nanotech doesnt make those nanoites like on star trek tng. that would be sweet
see thats what they do, they give some funky name like philablahsieindnblahtobin but the manufactuer gives it a catchy houshold name. like tylenol is really acetaminophen.
I can pretty much understand where yahoo is coming from on this one. Usually when a parody is done they always alter the brand name a little so that you still know who the joke is on but no copywrites are infringed. roche
as far as i am concerned relaxed crypto laws are much needed. roche