When they took Robert schiffreen to court in the early 80s they tried to prove he'd counterfieted passwords.
If memory serves, they failed because copying! = copying.
if I add in a random amount of time delay, but you average them out, you don't find out the time to my system, but the average amount of delay I have added PLUS the time to find my system. I'll end up looking further away than you think whatever happens.
The only time when averaging out would sum to zero is if I sometimes add a negative delay, and sometimes a positive delay.
The C128 did have extra text/graphics modes. It supported 80 columns in c128 mode
Just don't use that device anywhere public. Or on a public network because they can snoop on you that way.
Oops... typo... Counterfeiting! =copying.
When they took Robert schiffreen to court in the early 80s they tried to prove he'd counterfieted passwords. If memory serves, they failed because copying! = copying.
one of these... http://neil.fraser.name/news/2008/09/13/
negative delay == sarcasm. clearly never gonna happen- that was my point.
negative delay == sarcasm. I guess that didn't come across
if I add in a random amount of time delay, but you average them out, you don't find out the time to my system, but the average amount of delay I have added PLUS the time to find my system. I'll end up looking further away than you think whatever happens. The only time when averaging out would sum to zero is if I sometimes add a negative delay, and sometimes a positive delay.