Plastic surgery. Terrorists with Tits. Big ones. Their counterfeit travel documents will say they work for Ringling Bros. Barnum & Baily as the "Bearded Lady".
(If people already routinely defecated on your doorstep, would you be apathetic about a government proposal to defecate on your doorstep? The government already defecated all over my doorstep. Like it or not, we're stuck with this "sort" of shit)
You don't have to be stuck with their "sort" of shit. Usually, if you get a big, mean dog. Your doorstep will be his defecating territory and he won't allow any other to defecate there. You'll still be stuck with shit, but at least its your best friends shit. Think of it kind of like "gay love". Perhaps it will be the "sort" of shit which you find more preferable.
(We'll suck it up, grumble but get in line for the man with the rubber glove like everyone else, because it's just the cost of doing business)
Well, don't count me within that everyone else. But if you feel that strongly about returning the favor and having them end up stuck with some of your shit. Thats your business, but I don't see why it should cost you anything more than what your already giving up?
X-Ray will help, because sometimes its just too difficult to recognize a Terrorist from Abu Graib with their clothes on.
There are certain people, like them and most guy's mothers-in-law, whom your just so used to always seeing without clothes. Sometimes you can be slow dancing with them, and not even recognize them until your at the hotel room naked. Then its like, "Oh mother-in-law, its you"............again!
(They were wearing run-of-the-mill business-casual clothing, which is why they were so successful)
Maybe if people on welfare wore business-casual clothing. They too can be so successful? Thats what they call "dress for success".
Personally, I've never liked even the concept of Transvestite. If one must wear a "dress for success" Then thats why I'm just a poor boy, and the fags have all the money.
(Then, at security, the screeners can ask anyone in the right mode of dress. "Are you a terrorist?" The ones that say "Yes" are then arrested)
Well shit, I didn't know Terrorists were that honest. I should have guessed, being that they're so pious and all. You know, they even go out of their way to chop heads for their Head Lover. In that case, why go through all that trouble of your plan. They should just make a T.V. commercial that says:
"Hello, this is Ed McMahon, if your a killer male who's always with a bath towel on your head like my wife, between the ages of 6 and 82. And are able bodied enough, or still have enough of your body, to blow up again. And if you make your wife wear a gash-griller, gorilla costume in 135 degree weather. Then please accept our invitation to a VIP treatment, all-inclusive, 4 decades and 5 lifetimes stay, at our tropical "don't let em" getaway, "last" resort at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba"
Boy am I glad to hear that about the scars. It really had me worried. Since I bear the marks of having once brought home, what I didn't know until it was too late. A lieutenant in a county wide, militant, Femma-Nazi, man-hater, ball-buster organization. I was just going to eat a little Pink Snapper. But needless to say, that thing was a Damn Great White Shark. Well, it was more like, it ate my face. Left me looking like just a plain, glazed donut.
Anyway, since this face recognition thing has surfaced. I've been worried that its going to misidentify me as Tony Montana. I'm not that kind of guy. I didn't want to have to AK the fuck out of them. Tony would want to.
(The Federal government has my: photo from my passport my DNA my fingerprints FBI background checks)
I was about to say, its a good thing the list stopped there. Because when a list like that gets any bigger, the next thing is usually that they got your ass too.
But then, sadly, you ended up saying;
"I got screwed".
I'm sorry to hear that, sounds like it couldn't have happened to a finer man. Army, teacher. Well, though they screwed you, I thank you for your service.
You merely got screwed, I got totally "FUCKED" by these bastards. Not in the ass though!
(The Federal government has my: photo from my passport my DNA my fingerprints FBI background checks)
I was about to say, its a good thing the list stopped there. Because when a list like that gets any bigger, the next thing is usually that they got your ass too.
But then, sadly, you ended up saying;
"I got screwed".
I'm sorry to hear that, sounds like it couldn't have happened to a finer man. Army, teacher. Well, though they screwed you, I thank you for your service.
You merely got screwed, I got totally "FUCKED" by these bastards. Not in the ass though!
Exactly which database MEMBERS are these compatible with?
With all who's appearance attractiveness is anywhere in between Rosie O'Donnell at 5:00 A.M. after a night of too many fruity Martinis and too much face fisting. And Wonder Woman, when still a virgin and after spinning all the clothes off her body.
Sorry, that pretty much includes everybody. Since there exists no one, who is either uglier, or prettier.
What, you think they won't be able to identify you in Wikipedia, Oregon? Huh! Yeah right, Wikipedia sounds like one of those militia towns. Big Brother probably has a whole satellite just for them alone.
Nose: "Red Alert", "Red Alert", we have a semi-positive identification. At a monumental code 1 security status. Conduct a human visual analysis. Positively identify suspect as either Malak Al Raheem or Barbara Streisand.
Come in central command, Analysis complete, its Streisand. Immobilize immediately! Thats the Hardcore Leftist, excuse me, the Terrorist Threat!
Come in central command, how do we know for sure which nose is more Terrible? They're both immensely similar in megalithic proportions. But Malak's has a stick of dynamite hidden in each nostril.
(I always thought that Orwell was an optimist.)
Well, he wasn't an eye doctor, but he certainly could see well. He always liked to look on the bright side of things. Like looking forward to a good, swift, boot kick to the head.
Of course, in such an oppressive totalitarian world. I doubt there would be any more Starbucks to get you going in the morning. "How do you take your coffee"? "Black please". O.K. who's wearing the black boots? "Would you like a few lumps of sugar also"? "NO PLEASE" "NO, NO", "I swear I'm Diabetic" "NOOOOOOOO PLEEEEAAASE"!
Face recognition won't weed out the terrorists. They'll just pretend to be a kitchen table moving company. They will all pull the red & white checkered table cloths down from their heads, until it covers then entirely. They can already have two white guys hired to carry all the tables through. Thats why you've seen that video where they're all full of blood from hitting their heads with a knife. They're just cutting the steak dinner on the table, thats all.
All I want to know, is if you had one of those funny hair cuts like the "Dutch Boy" paints boy?
(This is the kind of question only a child can and will ask)
You better rethink that shit, Mr. Van Conversion
I'm not from South Africa, I'm in Southern California. Around here, if they don't ask, then they just take it anyway. "How can you tell other African people apart"? Well, first, you can tell which ones are from Jamaica, because their eye's are always bloodshot red. Then, you can tell which ones are from Brazil, at least the female ones. Because they're always dancing.....Naked! You can really tell those apart from the ones in the gospel choir down in the deep south. Though very musical also, you'll never see them naked. Finally, you can tell which ones are rappers, because they all work in department stores at Christmas time. p.s. if you see one with a big afro, he's the one that invented the time machine.
What the fuck does the UK need to have all that high tech. security at their borders for? Or any security at all, for that matter? London's and the UK's governments have already invited every Muslim Terrorist group in the entire middle east to be Honorary, Knighted Citizens of perpetual privileges. "Sir Ladenelot".
What, are they worried that their special guests might miss the dunes of doom?
If your going to go through all that trouble. Why not just chop your legs off, pull your pants down, and go through walking on your hands with a Cigar sticking out of your ass. Then tell them your name is Danny DeVito. Or any other butt-ugly, cigar smoking guy thats under 4'10".
That would be easier!
As for the Chinese, since the Chinese do everything; sleep, bathroom, travel in containers etc.... in groups of at least 15 or 20. Then the systems recognition accuracy rate only has to be at about 1 in 15-20, when used in China, and thats cool. If 1 is going to do a crime, 14-19 others will be doing it with him also.
Mutton Chop? No! It needs to be bigger than just a chop, and with hair on it. If you walk through with your pants tucked inside your boots and a sheep's back legs inside of there also. The only thing that the face recognition will see, is a familiar sight that it became used to seeing. From when it was being secretly developed within the CIA or NSA or FBI maybe even the ACLU? NBC: Rainbow-Butt-Bird Faggot Network? Clinton's Oval Office? Some place like that.
If eye location or placement is that critical, then you can probably just wear a Marty Feldman mask. That ought to throw those Totalitarian faggots way the fuck off.
You say they probably won't even recognize your face as a face. If you use a skin colored eye patch?
In that case, if you couldn't get a hold of an eye patch, with no time left. You can probably just drop your boxers and Moon the Mother Fuckers. Between your natural, skin colored brown eye and they assuming that your just butt-ugly. I think it will work. Either way, patch or brown eye, your still going through as a Cycloptic Optic Monster.
This report is light years behind. Those bunch of degenerate fagott, Marxist Jackass Communists have long had the ability to look up everyones butt holes. Even when your in the supposed privacy of your own home. For which you pay a monthly arm and a leg. Since you supposedly own it, and you determine who can and who can't be in that home. For what is their need to be physically present, when a criminal intruder's remote, long sticky fingers of the lawless are just as effective/destructive/criminal.
Not to mention, it was way back in the 70's when Kentucky Fried Movie showed how the perverted, stalker, looky loo, Homofuxuals in the indoctro-news room see couch fucking.
You all thought it was a joke.
As long as ignorance of it remains, it is a joke.
But the dummy-you-down faggots are the only ones laughing.
The way my comment was written, was a bit confusing. Since my reply was to a comment regarding the probability of other life. But the writer of the comment, concluded by saying that earth may have hit the lotto and got lucky to have life occur by random chance. He said its probability would be quite likely. Therefor, my comment mentioned the rarity of other stars of the type like ours(alludes to prob. of other life). But everything else was regarding the finely tuned, highly ordered conditions enabling life on earth.
My having spoken of the math probability, I was referring to spontaneous generation of a living organism. You said, calculations which only consider our particular type of life. Science knows not of any other composition of life, but earth life.
Therefor, to have a view of that the possibility of other, merely speculated, unknown life. Somehow trumps, or should displace any subscription to the validity of mathematically calculated to be an improbable occurrence of the spontaneous generation of the only type of life which science does know. Is not sound reasoning. I'm not saying that speculating of that life may exist elsewhere, is not sound. But that since its merely speculation, therefor lays outside of anything produced by the processes of science. To attribute a higher value to that, then to the existence of things known and their calculated probabilities, is unsound.
By doing that, you'd be doing exactly what evolutionists claim of that Creationists do. That the unscientifically supported view is being valued greater than that which science can be applied to.
Your words - ("Even on earth, there are organisms that thrive in conditions that we would consider completely unsuitable for life") - I dont know of anyone that considers "Earth" as unsuitable for life. Certainly, there are places with extreme conditions. But those are generally regarded as unsuitable for higher life forms. When speaking of microbial organisms, I dont think anyone is much surprised when they're discovered in places of extreme conditions. They've even been found in tar pits. Feeding on the tar, they can feed on the asphalt in the streets.
Your over simplifying the matter. Life on earth is dependent on many, many more fine tunings, than just the position of the earth within our solar system. Also, our sun is a very particular type of star. Only its particular type, is capable of being the kind of energy source, star. Which is required for having a planetary system in which life can exist. Those many other solar systems which you speak about that are throughout the universe. The vast majority of them don't have the correct type of star.
With all of the lacking of the correct for life, type of solar systems. Added to the incredible multitude of factors, both in outer space and within our atmosphere. Which are finely tuned and their detuning would make life impossible. Makes non intelligent processes of "random chance" the already mathematically calculated, to be an implausible hypothesis. DNA contains so much ordered, sequenced information, that the probability of the spontaneous generation of life has been "conservatively" calculated. To have the odds of X:1, X being a number so large that its more than the amount of particles that scientists have calculated to exist in the universe. "Particles"! Those are sub-atomic.
First of all, the ID scientists don't engage in referring to any "designer" with their scientific work. Therefor, there they don't present a theory regarding a "designer", which requires the attribution of being "falsifiable". Since they've never developed such a theory. They simply demonstrate that the world and universe contain much evidence of the presence of "design". Thats where the facts lead to. The rest is not their business, or line of work, regarding who or what, people may credit the designing to.
I have "observed" your defective explanation.
("See the problem? There are plenty of reasons why ID is not science")
The problem is that you and most evoists believe that the attribution of ID is itself, claimed to be the actual science. Or usually, its spoken of by evoists as if somebody has claimed that its the theory developed to explain the workings or characteristics of a subject of inquiry. ID scientists conduct research, applying the processes of science. Sometimes working from, or testing a theory, which sometimes leads to the discovery of factual data. The data itself, often strongly suggests, or leaves no other reasonable explanation other than that the subject of their inquiry was designed.
Your pink elephants and elves "theory", is no such thing. At least it would never be a theory of science. Since a true scientific theory is developed by being based on known facts. When at first its a hypothesis, its heavily scrutinized in light of known facts. To determine whether or not its even plausible. If plausible, then it may be considered a theory. No existing data of "pink" elephants or "elves"!
What they are really saying is that after the flood, "micro-evolution" took place. Thus, it was not necessary for Noah to take a Black bear, a brown one and a Polar bear also. But rather, just one type of bear. Same went for the other animals of which there are many variations of the species. Take only relatively recently born animals since they take less space and will be needed to reproduce later. Of course, fish wouldn't need a boat ride. So you can subtract them and the variations from your count.
Variation, "micro-evo", later took care of causing the different types of bears seen today. Millions of years are not required. This is known, since you can take a pair of dogs and within your own lifetime, you can change the lines physical form and coloration considerably.
Its funny how you get things all backwards. You attribute macro-evolution to the occurrence of micro-evo. Claiming that Macro-evo is what falsifies the claims. Then you once again attribute the incorrect Macro-evolution to variegated, antibiotic resistant bacteria. Only this time, you claim that the same reversal is what proves your view. Macro-evo has never had proof of its existence. Which is exactly why you have to resort to extrapolating the mere variation of bacteria as if it were proof of it.
Slashdot Mirror
Plastic surgery.
Terrorists with Tits. Big ones.
Their counterfeit travel documents will say they work for
Ringling Bros. Barnum & Baily as the "Bearded Lady".
What a lovely "Terro-Doll"!
(If people already routinely defecated on your doorstep, would you be apathetic about a government proposal to defecate on your doorstep? The government already defecated all over my doorstep. Like it or not, we're stuck with this "sort" of shit)
You don't have to be stuck with their "sort" of shit. Usually, if you get a big, mean dog. Your doorstep will be his defecating territory and he won't allow any other to defecate there. You'll still be stuck with shit, but at least its your best friends shit. Think of it kind of like "gay love". Perhaps it will be the "sort" of shit which you find more preferable.
(We'll suck it up, grumble but get in line for the man with the rubber glove like everyone else, because it's just the cost of doing business)
Well, don't count me within that everyone else. But if you feel that strongly about returning the favor and having them end up stuck with some of your shit. Thats your business, but I don't see why it should cost you anything more than what your already giving up?
X-Ray will help, because sometimes its just too difficult to recognize a Terrorist from Abu Graib with their clothes on.
There are certain people, like them and most guy's mothers-in-law, whom your just so used to always seeing without clothes. Sometimes you can be slow dancing with them, and not even recognize them until your at the hotel room naked.
Then its like, "Oh mother-in-law, its you"............again!
(They were wearing run-of-the-mill business-casual clothing, which is why they were so successful)
Maybe if people on welfare wore business-casual clothing. They too can be so successful? Thats what they call "dress for success".
Personally, I've never liked even the concept of Transvestite.
If one must wear a "dress for success"
Then thats why I'm just a poor boy, and the fags have all the money.
(Then, at security, the screeners can ask anyone in the right mode of dress. "Are you a terrorist?" The ones that say "Yes" are then arrested)
Well shit, I didn't know Terrorists were that honest. I should have guessed, being that they're so pious and all. You know, they even go out of their way to chop heads for their Head Lover. In that case, why go through all that trouble of your plan. They should just make a T.V. commercial that says:
"Hello, this is Ed McMahon, if your a killer male who's always with a bath towel on your head like my wife, between the ages of 6 and 82. And are able bodied enough, or still have enough of your body, to blow up again. And if you make your wife wear a gash-griller, gorilla costume in 135 degree weather. Then please accept our invitation to a VIP treatment, all-inclusive, 4 decades and 5 lifetimes stay, at our tropical "don't let em" getaway, "last" resort at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba"
Just call: 1-976-LUV-2DIE
Thank you.
How many times have you been mauled by a bear in the past 10 years?
Only mauled by "bear"?
Or does that also include,
mauled by "bare" naked butt cheeks?
Boy am I glad to hear that about the scars. It really had me worried. Since I bear the marks of having once brought home, what I didn't know until it was too late. A lieutenant in a county wide, militant, Femma-Nazi, man-hater, ball-buster organization. I was just going to eat a little Pink Snapper. But needless to say, that thing was a Damn Great White Shark. Well, it was more like, it ate my face. Left me looking like just a plain, glazed donut.
Anyway, since this face recognition thing has surfaced. I've been worried that its going to misidentify me as Tony Montana. I'm not that kind of guy. I didn't want to have to AK the fuck out of them. Tony would want to.
(The Federal government has my:
photo from my passport
my DNA
my fingerprints
FBI background checks)
I was about to say, its a good thing the list stopped there. Because when a list like that gets any bigger, the next thing is usually that they got your ass too.
But then, sadly, you ended up saying;
"I got screwed".
I'm sorry to hear that, sounds like it couldn't have happened to a finer man. Army, teacher. Well, though they screwed you, I thank you for your service.
You merely got screwed,
I got totally "FUCKED" by these bastards.
Not in the ass though!
(The Federal government has my:
photo from my passport
my DNA
my fingerprints
FBI background checks)
I was about to say, its a good thing the list stopped there. Because when a list like that gets any bigger, the next thing is usually that they got your ass too.
But then, sadly, you ended up saying;
"I got screwed".
I'm sorry to hear that, sounds like it couldn't have happened to a finer man. Army, teacher. Well, though they screwed you, I thank you for your service.
You merely got screwed, I got totally "FUCKED" by these bastards. Not in the ass though!
Exactly which database MEMBERS are these compatible with?
With all who's appearance attractiveness is anywhere in between Rosie O'Donnell at 5:00 A.M. after a night of too many fruity Martinis and too much face fisting. And Wonder Woman, when still a virgin and after spinning all the clothes off her body.
Sorry, that pretty much includes everybody. Since there exists no one, who is either uglier, or prettier.
aaaargh.
Fuck it. I'm moving to Lovely.
What, you think they won't be able to identify you in Wikipedia, Oregon?
Huh! Yeah right, Wikipedia sounds like one of those militia towns. Big Brother probably has a whole satellite just for them alone.
Beard: False
Next();
Beard: False
Next();
Beard: True
CheckOsamaBinLaden();
Nose: False
Next >
Nose: False
Next >
Nose: "Red Alert", "Red Alert", we have a semi-positive identification. At a monumental code 1 security status. Conduct a human visual analysis. Positively identify suspect as either Malak Al Raheem or Barbara Streisand.
Come in central command, Analysis complete, its Streisand.
Immobilize immediately! Thats the Hardcore Leftist, excuse me, the Terrorist Threat!
Come in central command, how do we know for sure which nose is more Terrible? They're both immensely similar in megalithic proportions. But Malak's has a stick of dynamite hidden in each nostril.
"Aaaah", "Just bring em both in"
(I always thought that Orwell was an optimist.) Well, he wasn't an eye doctor, but he certainly could see well. He always liked to look on the bright side of things. Like looking forward to a good, swift, boot kick to the head. Of course, in such an oppressive totalitarian world. I doubt there would be any more Starbucks to get you going in the morning. "How do you take your coffee"? "Black please". O.K. who's wearing the black boots? "Would you like a few lumps of sugar also"? "NO PLEASE" "NO, NO", "I swear I'm Diabetic" "NOOOOOOOO PLEEEEAAASE"!
Face recognition won't weed out the terrorists. They'll just pretend to be a kitchen table moving company. They will all pull the red & white checkered table cloths down from their heads, until it covers then entirely. They can already have two white guys hired to carry all the tables through. Thats why you've seen that video where they're all full of blood from hitting their heads with a knife. They're just cutting the steak dinner on the table, thats all.
All I want to know, is if you had one of those funny hair cuts like the "Dutch Boy" paints boy? (This is the kind of question only a child can and will ask) You better rethink that shit, Mr. Van Conversion I'm not from South Africa, I'm in Southern California. Around here, if they don't ask, then they just take it anyway. "How can you tell other African people apart"? Well, first, you can tell which ones are from Jamaica, because their eye's are always bloodshot red. Then, you can tell which ones are from Brazil, at least the female ones. Because they're always dancing.....Naked! You can really tell those apart from the ones in the gospel choir down in the deep south. Though very musical also, you'll never see them naked. Finally, you can tell which ones are rappers, because they all work in department stores at Christmas time. p.s. if you see one with a big afro, he's the one that invented the time machine.
What the fuck does the UK need to have all that high tech. security at their borders for? Or any security at all, for that matter? London's and the UK's governments have already invited every Muslim Terrorist group in the entire middle east to be Honorary, Knighted Citizens of perpetual privileges. "Sir Ladenelot". What, are they worried that their special guests might miss the dunes of doom?
If your going to go through all that trouble. Why not just chop your legs off, pull your pants down, and go through walking on your hands with a Cigar sticking out of your ass. Then tell them your name is Danny DeVito. Or any other butt-ugly, cigar smoking guy thats under 4'10". That would be easier! As for the Chinese, since the Chinese do everything; sleep, bathroom, travel in containers etc.... in groups of at least 15 or 20. Then the systems recognition accuracy rate only has to be at about 1 in 15-20, when used in China, and thats cool. If 1 is going to do a crime, 14-19 others will be doing it with him also.
Mutton Chop? No! It needs to be bigger than just a chop, and with hair on it. If you walk through with your pants tucked inside your boots and a sheep's back legs inside of there also. The only thing that the face recognition will see, is a familiar sight that it became used to seeing. From when it was being secretly developed within the CIA or NSA or FBI maybe even the ACLU? NBC: Rainbow-Butt-Bird Faggot Network? Clinton's Oval Office? Some place like that.
If eye location or placement is that critical, then you can probably just wear a Marty Feldman mask. That ought to throw those Totalitarian faggots way the fuck off. You say they probably won't even recognize your face as a face. If you use a skin colored eye patch? In that case, if you couldn't get a hold of an eye patch, with no time left. You can probably just drop your boxers and Moon the Mother Fuckers. Between your natural, skin colored brown eye and they assuming that your just butt-ugly. I think it will work. Either way, patch or brown eye, your still going through as a Cycloptic Optic Monster.
This report is light years behind. Those bunch of degenerate fagott, Marxist Jackass Communists have long had the ability to look up everyones butt holes. Even when your in the supposed privacy of your own home. For which you pay a monthly arm and a leg. Since you supposedly own it, and you determine who can and who can't be in that home. For what is their need to be physically present, when a criminal intruder's remote, long sticky fingers of the lawless are just as effective/destructive/criminal. Not to mention, it was way back in the 70's when Kentucky Fried Movie showed how the perverted, stalker, looky loo, Homofuxuals in the indoctro-news room see couch fucking. You all thought it was a joke. As long as ignorance of it remains, it is a joke. But the dummy-you-down faggots are the only ones laughing.
Thats right, when sitting on the designer throne, everybody creates something that wasn't there prior to sitting. Then, you wipe the Democrap.
The way my comment was written, was a bit confusing. Since my reply was to a comment regarding the probability of other life. But the writer of the comment, concluded by saying that earth may have hit the lotto and got lucky to have life occur by random chance. He said its probability would be quite likely. Therefor, my comment mentioned the rarity of other stars of the type like ours(alludes to prob. of other life). But everything else was regarding the finely tuned, highly ordered conditions enabling life on earth. My having spoken of the math probability, I was referring to spontaneous generation of a living organism. You said, calculations which only consider our particular type of life. Science knows not of any other composition of life, but earth life. Therefor, to have a view of that the possibility of other, merely speculated, unknown life. Somehow trumps, or should displace any subscription to the validity of mathematically calculated to be an improbable occurrence of the spontaneous generation of the only type of life which science does know. Is not sound reasoning. I'm not saying that speculating of that life may exist elsewhere, is not sound. But that since its merely speculation, therefor lays outside of anything produced by the processes of science. To attribute a higher value to that, then to the existence of things known and their calculated probabilities, is unsound. By doing that, you'd be doing exactly what evolutionists claim of that Creationists do. That the unscientifically supported view is being valued greater than that which science can be applied to. Your words - ("Even on earth, there are organisms that thrive in conditions that we would consider completely unsuitable for life") - I dont know of anyone that considers "Earth" as unsuitable for life. Certainly, there are places with extreme conditions. But those are generally regarded as unsuitable for higher life forms. When speaking of microbial organisms, I dont think anyone is much surprised when they're discovered in places of extreme conditions. They've even been found in tar pits. Feeding on the tar, they can feed on the asphalt in the streets.
Your over simplifying the matter. Life on earth is dependent on many, many more fine tunings, than just the position of the earth within our solar system. Also, our sun is a very particular type of star. Only its particular type, is capable of being the kind of energy source, star. Which is required for having a planetary system in which life can exist. Those many other solar systems which you speak about that are throughout the universe. The vast majority of them don't have the correct type of star. With all of the lacking of the correct for life, type of solar systems. Added to the incredible multitude of factors, both in outer space and within our atmosphere. Which are finely tuned and their detuning would make life impossible. Makes non intelligent processes of "random chance" the already mathematically calculated, to be an implausible hypothesis. DNA contains so much ordered, sequenced information, that the probability of the spontaneous generation of life has been "conservatively" calculated. To have the odds of X:1, X being a number so large that its more than the amount of particles that scientists have calculated to exist in the universe. "Particles"! Those are sub-atomic.
First of all, the ID scientists don't engage in referring to any "designer" with their scientific work. Therefor, there they don't present a theory regarding a "designer", which requires the attribution of being "falsifiable". Since they've never developed such a theory. They simply demonstrate that the world and universe contain much evidence of the presence of "design". Thats where the facts lead to. The rest is not their business, or line of work, regarding who or what, people may credit the designing to. I have "observed" your defective explanation. ("See the problem? There are plenty of reasons why ID is not science") The problem is that you and most evoists believe that the attribution of ID is itself, claimed to be the actual science. Or usually, its spoken of by evoists as if somebody has claimed that its the theory developed to explain the workings or characteristics of a subject of inquiry. ID scientists conduct research, applying the processes of science. Sometimes working from, or testing a theory, which sometimes leads to the discovery of factual data. The data itself, often strongly suggests, or leaves no other reasonable explanation other than that the subject of their inquiry was designed. Your pink elephants and elves "theory", is no such thing. At least it would never be a theory of science. Since a true scientific theory is developed by being based on known facts. When at first its a hypothesis, its heavily scrutinized in light of known facts. To determine whether or not its even plausible. If plausible, then it may be considered a theory. No existing data of "pink" elephants or "elves"!
What they are really saying is that after the flood, "micro-evolution" took place. Thus, it was not necessary for Noah to take a Black bear, a brown one and a Polar bear also. But rather, just one type of bear. Same went for the other animals of which there are many variations of the species. Take only relatively recently born animals since they take less space and will be needed to reproduce later. Of course, fish wouldn't need a boat ride. So you can subtract them and the variations from your count. Variation, "micro-evo", later took care of causing the different types of bears seen today. Millions of years are not required. This is known, since you can take a pair of dogs and within your own lifetime, you can change the lines physical form and coloration considerably. Its funny how you get things all backwards. You attribute macro-evolution to the occurrence of micro-evo. Claiming that Macro-evo is what falsifies the claims. Then you once again attribute the incorrect Macro-evolution to variegated, antibiotic resistant bacteria. Only this time, you claim that the same reversal is what proves your view. Macro-evo has never had proof of its existence. Which is exactly why you have to resort to extrapolating the mere variation of bacteria as if it were proof of it.