I was not aware that DNA samples were necessary for forum logins these days.
This would, in fact, make it impossible to open a new account and link the game to that.
Forgive a poor ignorant american, but the only reference to humans with that is from urban dictionary: Someone who has sex outdoors, particularly anonymous gay male sex.
I thought you called those "poofs", though. And those who have anonymous outdoor sex with sheep "kiwis"
So what you're saying is we need to expand the US, slightly?
I'm sure the copyright tzar will be comfortable with this answer, and work hard to make it reality.
IANAL, but I thought "not guilty" was a very different thing from "I didn't do it".
"Not guilty", AFAIK, can refer to someone that did a deed, but is not responsible for their actions for some reason.
A plea might also not be considered sworn testimony. Lying without being sworn in is no different than lying outside to reporters. Ethically questionable, but not a matter of law.
Slashdot Mirror
I was not aware that DNA samples were necessary for forum logins these days. This would, in fact, make it impossible to open a new account and link the game to that.
Bush bunnies?
Forgive a poor ignorant american, but the only reference to humans with that is from urban dictionary:
Someone who has sex outdoors, particularly anonymous gay male sex.
I thought you called those "poofs", though. And those who have anonymous outdoor sex with sheep "kiwis"
Not according to TFA, but there was AFA http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/15/mccain_campaign_wants_youtube_dmca_special_treatment/ which held that everyone was suffering from this. And yeah, it would be nice if the rules that John Mccain voted for were different, right?
So what you're saying is we need to expand the US, slightly? I'm sure the copyright tzar will be comfortable with this answer, and work hard to make it reality.
IANAL, but I thought "not guilty" was a very different thing from "I didn't do it". "Not guilty", AFAIK, can refer to someone that did a deed, but is not responsible for their actions for some reason. A plea might also not be considered sworn testimony. Lying without being sworn in is no different than lying outside to reporters. Ethically questionable, but not a matter of law.
I was sure Rule #1 was "There are no women on the internet"
Clearly you aren't getting the same pop-ups I am.