Slashdot Mirror


User: ghouston

ghouston's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
8
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 8

  1. Re:I'm confused... on Domain-Name Protest Is Protected Speech · · Score: 1

    > Since she did not sell or offer to sell the site so cyber-squating was out.

    Yes, but I would have thought WIPO would be happy to have the domain confiscated on grounds of "bad faith", as has been done in so many other cases.

  2. Re:"blindingly obvious" Still needs to be proved. on Weighing the Value of Privacy · · Score: 1

    Yes, I would have thought people would lie about their "deviant" personal information instead of giving it away for a bit more money.

  3. Re:New Zealand prices on Broadband Pricing Across The World? · · Score: 1

    The bandwidth limits on these services are amazingly low, typically 500MB - 2000MB/month. Not much point in subscribing to a service that can only be used for one or two days a month, eh.

  4. They will both lose on Which DVD Recordable Format Will Win? · · Score: 1

    Every storage format becomes obsolete in the end. Just use whatever works for you now and be prepared to move your data to something else when the time comes.

  5. Re:Do you really want to work on this? on Oxford Dictionary Does Science Fiction · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see a Wikipedia-like effort devoted to this.

  6. Egypt 2200BC on Meteor May Have Wiped Out Middle East Civilization · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This reminds me of article from a few months ago on bad weather wiping out the Old Kingdom of Egypt.

  7. The wrong hands on The Dangers of Nanotech · · Score: 1

    The "wrong hands":

    1) Programmers. Imagine a 200 story building that looks fine
    from the outside, but go down to the basement and you see that one
    corner is wobbling on a pile of bricks. There's a sign attached
    saying

    FIXME: we need something better before building anything over two stories.

  8. UK law on TV licences on CCTV - The Fifth Utility · · Score: 1

    From what I can figure out (see the quote below),

    1. you do need a licence to receive TV broadcasts on a computer.
    2. you don't need a licence if you have a broken TV in the attic.
    3. you don't need a licence if you have a TV that's not installed to receive television program services, i.e., no aerial connected. This would cover the case of a TV used only as a terminal for a games console.
    4. in practice you are guilty until proven innocent.

    from http://www.hmso.gov.uk

    Statutory Instrument 1991 No. 436

    The Wireless Telegraphy (Television Licence Fees) Regulations 1991

    2. The following class or description of television receiving apparatus is hereby specified for the purposes of the definition of "television receiver" in the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949[5], namely such apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving television programme services, as defined by section 2(4) of the Broadcasting Act 1990, whether or not the apparatus is installed or used for other purposes.