That doesn't work either, because NaCl makes the code and data segments disjoint so that the code cannot modify itself or generate new code. Since the code never changes, it's sufficient to scan it once.
When it comes to privacy, noise may be a solution rather than a problem. Vernor Vinge suggested that if the Net remembers everything about you, you should flood it with contradictory noise that provides plausible deniability about things that are actually true. Either that, or they'll have more evidence against you.
Usenet probably counts as a cache under section 512(b) of the DMCA; as long as ISPs process takedown notices correctly they have no liability. Also see ALS Scan v. Remarq. IANAL.
If you buy a PC with Vista pre-installed after July 2009, you'll get a free upgrade to 7. Everyone else will still have to buy the upgrade. This is a common practice for software (I think they did the same thing for XP -> Vista); there's really not much to see here.
Those other OSes can fend for themselves. Why should Linux, which has most of the users and developers in the Unix market, subsidize minority OSes? Making Linux work better is a net benefit, regardless of what happens to *BSD/Solaris.
When it comes to IPv6, Comcast appears to be ahead of other broadband ISPs; Comcast is leading development of Dual Stack Lite while other ISPs are basically saying nothing.
That's why "open Flash" is a scam. Adobe gives you the specs but not the patent licenses (since they don't own many of the patents anyway) and tells you that you're all set to write your own open source Flash player.
Spark is just another name for H.263; you can get the spec from ITU. The undocumented proprietary codec is VP6, but ffmpeg has a reverse-engineered decoder.
The problem with electricity is that how much a device actually uses is pretty well hidden from the user, so most people just don't know it and don't factor it into their buying decisions, so good old free market can't really work.
The solution to that is labeling (Energy Star), not outright bans.
Re:Google was just trying to save money
on
Google Router Rumors
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
When you buy thousands of routers you get them customized to your exact needs and you get whatever support arrangement you desire including complete drawings and source code.
Evidence? I've never heard of Cisco/Juniper/etc. offering this.
You can also get 2^80 addresses from the 6to4 fairy with no tunnel broker required. And since the whole point of IPv6 is that it won't run out, there's really no need to stock up in advance.
What's to prevent someone from buying them all and charging more later?
You can only get addresses if you can demonstrate a legitimate use for them. To get millions of addresses, you'd have to show that you have millions of devices that need them. Also, technically you can't resell addresses.
Slashdot Mirror
A program that doesn't halt is not considered hostile; it's just annoying.
That doesn't work either, because NaCl makes the code and data segments disjoint so that the code cannot modify itself or generate new code. Since the code never changes, it's sufficient to scan it once.
When it comes to privacy, noise may be a solution rather than a problem. Vernor Vinge suggested that if the Net remembers everything about you, you should flood it with contradictory noise that provides plausible deniability about things that are actually true. Either that, or they'll have more evidence against you.
The real question is whether the hypervisor implements proper looback so that one VM can call the other one. :-)
This was never true; I'm not sure where you heard it.
L2ARC is interesting for servers, but on a desktop or laptop you can just put all your data on flash.
Usenet probably counts as a cache under section 512(b) of the DMCA; as long as ISPs process takedown notices correctly they have no liability. Also see ALS Scan v. Remarq. IANAL.
If you buy a PC with Vista pre-installed after July 2009, you'll get a free upgrade to 7. Everyone else will still have to buy the upgrade. This is a common practice for software (I think they did the same thing for XP -> Vista); there's really not much to see here.
If each app has a repository, apt or yum will notify the user of updates.
Those other OSes can fend for themselves. Why should Linux, which has most of the users and developers in the Unix market, subsidize minority OSes? Making Linux work better is a net benefit, regardless of what happens to *BSD/Solaris.
When it comes to IPv6, Comcast appears to be ahead of other broadband ISPs; Comcast is leading development of Dual Stack Lite while other ISPs are basically saying nothing.
That's why "open Flash" is a scam. Adobe gives you the specs but not the patent licenses (since they don't own many of the patents anyway) and tells you that you're all set to write your own open source Flash player.
Spark is just another name for H.263; you can get the spec from ITU. The undocumented proprietary codec is VP6, but ffmpeg has a reverse-engineered decoder.
Most viewers are on cable/satellite and thus don't need to switch at all.
The problem with electricity is that how much a device actually uses is pretty well hidden from the user, so most people just don't know it and don't factor it into their buying decisions, so good old free market can't really work.
The solution to that is labeling (Energy Star), not outright bans.
When you buy thousands of routers you get them customized to your exact needs and you get whatever support arrangement you desire including complete drawings and source code.
Evidence? I've never heard of Cisco/Juniper/etc. offering this.
And I suppose if everyone uses tunnel brokers instead of 6to4, it'll never be fixed.
You can also get 2^80 addresses from the 6to4 fairy with no tunnel broker required. And since the whole point of IPv6 is that it won't run out, there's really no need to stock up in advance.
What's to prevent someone from buying them all and charging more later?
You can only get addresses if you can demonstrate a legitimate use for them. To get millions of addresses, you'd have to show that you have millions of devices that need them. Also, technically you can't resell addresses.
Interesting. So it's in the regular flash storage and not in a separate special place?
Yes. It's cheaper to use ~1% of the flash capacity for the FTL mapping table than to store it in a separate chip.
I think the idea is that you'd pay your ISP more to cover their costs of carrying iPlayer traffic. Cue proxy servers in 3, 2, 1...
None? Why would it have any impact?
This is the enterprise we're talking about. It'll be RHEL and SLES, preferably on ESX. Of course, you can install whatever you want.
so how do you know what order the wear levelling has put everything in?
There is a mapping table stored in the flash; it's in a proprietary format so as I said you'd have to reverse-engineer it.
Yeah, if a flash chip goes bad you're going to lose data.