Here we go again. Your freedom trumps everything - anyone else has the "freedom" to not venture where your divine feet tread the earth. In other words - "freedom" is for you, fuck everyone else. You are a pathetic little sociopath. It'd be funny if not for the sadness of observing such a wretched mind.
Forget Mars - go for Venus for your CO2 and heat driven tropical paradise. Don't forget the Teflon-umbrella - slight chance of sulfuric acid drizzle today.
Anyone up for founding a non-profit by the name "Plants Follow Liebig's Law of the Minimum, And You Are Paid Shills and Liars"? Sign here. We should be able to tap into the unlimited funding of the Global Conspiracy of Climate Scientists Out For More Cash (TM) in a heartbeat. Come on guys, get out of those cubicles - the GCCSOFM(TM) has your personal Ferrari with a nubile babe thrown in for free waiting for you!
On the other hand, the seminal works on the principles of the greenhouse effect and global warming are out for about 130 years now and no one has offered the slightest bit of scientific evidence to the contrary.
No vaccine works for 100%. So even vaccinated, my kid is put at additional risk by your uninformed decision. Another risk factor lies in the fact that many vaccines can only be administered safely after a certain age. Below that age, my kid depends on herd immunity. But, well, scientific facts obviously are for unintelligent paranoid pussified slaves. You know what, roman, if I'd really wanted to curse you, I'd wish your libertardian paradise upon you. But I am a humanist, so you can rest assured that I, together with the reasonable majority of people, will keep on saving you and the likes of you from themselves.
Principles are worth shit. Pol Pot had principles. Stalin had principles. Torquemada was a very principled man. Principles neither shield you from being an idiot nor from being downright evil.
In your place, I would start to think about why exactly my opinions are basically indistinguishable from trolling every time I post them. The result might enlighten you.
That, in the end, is the dream of guys like roman - down with civilization, give us a survival of the strongest libertarian paradise. Of course, guys like roman think they'd end up as the strongest, getting fellated by their subjects on an hourly basis, when in reality, the local warlord would pull them out of their basements within days and render them into objectivist jerky for the occasional snack.
Very well, since lack of vaccination in a person is a public health issue due to weakening herd immunity, you get the choice between being vaccinated or preventively quarantined until you get vaccinated. Your individual freedom pretty much ends when it endangers the health of others.
So, Mr. White Guy gets the right to follow around people with a gun, harrass them and finally shoot them for the deadly threat of walking around while black and carrying skittles, while the black boy should have called the police. I get it, "standing your ground" is only for your fellow Stormfront members, you racist fucker. You are so full of it, one day you gonna explode in a quite dramatic crapageddon.
I think they reached the point, where, in their zeal to ban the trolls, they accidentally banned most of the serious contributors, so that only trolls are left there. Not like it is distinguishable in any way - the place is really Poe central.
And, of course, righteous purposes are purposes for the profit of said conservatives, while unrighteous purposes profit "those people". And we know who "they" are. Same as any government action for the profit of "those people" is "big government", and any government action for the profit of conservative cronies is "small government". A group that wants to deny homosexuals their identity IS a hate group, just for existing. American conservatism has done away with anything resembling morale or a spine by now.
Once again, how this relates to climatology has been explained over and over to you. You still keep on posting your same old bullshit. Now, I do not think that you are actually that stupid, you are able to form semi-coherent sentences and all that, so that leaves us with one conclusion only - you are an intellectually bankrupt dishonest liar. And you know it. And, to preempt your usual reply - no, this is not an ad hominem. This is an insult.
Well, that is a nice example of "proof by anal extraction". Care to actually cite the thousands of not-useful ones? I mean, like, doing science and stuff? Or do you just create your reality by decree ex cathedra?
Ah, so you discovered that CO2 is not the only possible forcing? Well, At this speed, you better hope for the singularity, so you can upload your brain to a 2 megabyte stick, because any other way, you will have no chance to develop a rudimentary understanding of what science is before your death.
So, Brownian motion is not modeled correctly, you say? The theoretical physical chemistry guys will be thrilled. That's Nobel material there, smart ass. How about you read about statistical thermodynamics first before you spout nonsensical similes?
And the fact that there might have been one outside of climate science (which is spurious at best) has exactly what bearing on the discussion of climate science?
here is an overview. It used to be a conservative, market based approach. Now, maybe the definition of "market" has shifted beyond recognition today, or the definition of "conservative". For some reason, these days, it gets associated with the evil world government conspiracy taking over. In my opinion, basic reality has not changed within 20 years. Which leaves the only conclusion that conservative perception has changed. For the worse.
Sad, isn't it. Reagan, whom I consider to be the beginning of the downfall of honest conservatism in the US, started a cap and trade program in order to actually conserve the environment from a scientifically shown threat. Today, a similar program is decried as "socialist" by his successors. Isn't it indeed sad to see a party and their followers slip beyond understanding, beyond understandability into a gibbering madness of toxic hate? What chance is there to even communicate with the Tea Party, with people who try to enact legislation against Agenda 21 programs to conserve a little piece of the environment, on grounds of fear of a "world government"? What rational basis can be reached with people like that? Believe me, I try to understand, but I fail, and the other side does not help. Not a little bit.
Well, since you made amply clear that discussing with you is a pointless exercise (e.g. your constant wankery on the falsifiability of climate models, for which you got heaps of facts you never bothered to even remotely consider, because you rejected objective reality ages ago and replaced it with your own), I do not see any sense in arguing with you. Therefore, this is not an ad hominem, it is simply an insult. You can't even get that distinction right, though. Who would have thunk.
True, I think the sulfur dioxide effect was discussed more under the label of "global dimming", together with particulate emissions, though. What never happened, no matter how often it is quoted within the denialist circlejerk, was a significant prediction of an impeding ice age. That's what I wanted to show by means of the graph above.
The original theory was formulate by Svante Arrhenius in the late 19th century - I take it that around 1900 it filtered into public perception for the first time and got some press coverage. It would indeed be interesting to go to the original sources for that spike. I found it remarkable, too.
Slashdot Mirror
Here we go again. Your freedom trumps everything - anyone else has the "freedom" to not venture where your divine feet tread the earth. In other words - "freedom" is for you, fuck everyone else. You are a pathetic little sociopath. It'd be funny if not for the sadness of observing such a wretched mind.
Forget Mars - go for Venus for your CO2 and heat driven tropical paradise. Don't forget the Teflon-umbrella - slight chance of sulfuric acid drizzle today.
Anyone up for founding a non-profit by the name "Plants Follow Liebig's Law of the Minimum, And You Are Paid Shills and Liars"? Sign here. We should be able to tap into the unlimited funding of the Global Conspiracy of Climate Scientists Out For More Cash (TM) in a heartbeat. Come on guys, get out of those cubicles - the GCCSOFM(TM) has your personal Ferrari with a nubile babe thrown in for free waiting for you!
On the other hand, the seminal works on the principles of the greenhouse effect and global warming are out for about 130 years now and no one has offered the slightest bit of scientific evidence to the contrary.
No vaccine works for 100%. So even vaccinated, my kid is put at additional risk by your uninformed decision. Another risk factor lies in the fact that many vaccines can only be administered safely after a certain age. Below that age, my kid depends on herd immunity. But, well, scientific facts obviously are for unintelligent paranoid pussified slaves. You know what, roman, if I'd really wanted to curse you, I'd wish your libertardian paradise upon you. But I am a humanist, so you can rest assured that I, together with the reasonable majority of people, will keep on saving you and the likes of you from themselves.
Principles are worth shit. Pol Pot had principles. Stalin had principles. Torquemada was a very principled man. Principles neither shield you from being an idiot nor from being downright evil.
In your place, I would start to think about why exactly my opinions are basically indistinguishable from trolling every time I post them. The result might enlighten you.
That, in the end, is the dream of guys like roman - down with civilization, give us a survival of the strongest libertarian paradise. Of course, guys like roman think they'd end up as the strongest, getting fellated by their subjects on an hourly basis, when in reality, the local warlord would pull them out of their basements within days and render them into objectivist jerky for the occasional snack.
Very well, since lack of vaccination in a person is a public health issue due to weakening herd immunity, you get the choice between being vaccinated or preventively quarantined until you get vaccinated. Your individual freedom pretty much ends when it endangers the health of others.
So, Mr. White Guy gets the right to follow around people with a gun, harrass them and finally shoot them for the deadly threat of walking around while black and carrying skittles, while the black boy should have called the police. I get it, "standing your ground" is only for your fellow Stormfront members, you racist fucker. You are so full of it, one day you gonna explode in a quite dramatic crapageddon.
I think they reached the point, where, in their zeal to ban the trolls, they accidentally banned most of the serious contributors, so that only trolls are left there. Not like it is distinguishable in any way - the place is really Poe central.
And, of course, righteous purposes are purposes for the profit of said conservatives, while unrighteous purposes profit "those people". And we know who "they" are. Same as any government action for the profit of "those people" is "big government", and any government action for the profit of conservative cronies is "small government". A group that wants to deny homosexuals their identity IS a hate group, just for existing. American conservatism has done away with anything resembling morale or a spine by now.
Once again, how this relates to climatology has been explained over and over to you. You still keep on posting your same old bullshit. Now, I do not think that you are actually that stupid, you are able to form semi-coherent sentences and all that, so that leaves us with one conclusion only - you are an intellectually bankrupt dishonest liar. And you know it. And, to preempt your usual reply - no, this is not an ad hominem. This is an insult.
Well, that is a nice example of "proof by anal extraction". Care to actually cite the thousands of not-useful ones? I mean, like, doing science and stuff? Or do you just create your reality by decree ex cathedra?
Ah, so you discovered that CO2 is not the only possible forcing? Well, At this speed, you better hope for the singularity, so you can upload your brain to a 2 megabyte stick, because any other way, you will have no chance to develop a rudimentary understanding of what science is before your death.
So, Brownian motion is not modeled correctly, you say? The theoretical physical chemistry guys will be thrilled. That's Nobel material there, smart ass. How about you read about statistical thermodynamics first before you spout nonsensical similes?
Required, yes. Limiting, no. Have a look at . The minimum outside of well-tended greenhouses is not CO2, however.
If that is your position, you have left reality a couple of light years behind and substituted your own.
And the fact that there might have been one outside of climate science (which is spurious at best) has exactly what bearing on the discussion of climate science?
So, where are those 499 wrong predictions? Ah, right, they do not exist. Consensus and all that.
here is an overview. It used to be a conservative, market based approach. Now, maybe the definition of "market" has shifted beyond recognition today, or the definition of "conservative". For some reason, these days, it gets associated with the evil world government conspiracy taking over. In my opinion, basic reality has not changed within 20 years. Which leaves the only conclusion that conservative perception has changed. For the worse.
Sad, isn't it. Reagan, whom I consider to be the beginning of the downfall of honest conservatism in the US, started a cap and trade program in order to actually conserve the environment from a scientifically shown threat. Today, a similar program is decried as "socialist" by his successors. Isn't it indeed sad to see a party and their followers slip beyond understanding, beyond understandability into a gibbering madness of toxic hate? What chance is there to even communicate with the Tea Party, with people who try to enact legislation against Agenda 21 programs to conserve a little piece of the environment, on grounds of fear of a "world government"? What rational basis can be reached with people like that? Believe me, I try to understand, but I fail, and the other side does not help. Not a little bit.
Well, since you made amply clear that discussing with you is a pointless exercise (e.g. your constant wankery on the falsifiability of climate models, for which you got heaps of facts you never bothered to even remotely consider, because you rejected objective reality ages ago and replaced it with your own), I do not see any sense in arguing with you. Therefore, this is not an ad hominem, it is simply an insult. You can't even get that distinction right, though. Who would have thunk.
True, I think the sulfur dioxide effect was discussed more under the label of "global dimming", together with particulate emissions, though. What never happened, no matter how often it is quoted within the denialist circlejerk, was a significant prediction of an impeding ice age. That's what I wanted to show by means of the graph above.
The original theory was formulate by Svante Arrhenius in the late 19th century - I take it that around 1900 it filtered into public perception for the first time and got some press coverage. It would indeed be interesting to go to the original sources for that spike. I found it remarkable, too.