You know, mate, you seriously suck at straw man burning. Drop a few more mentions of "taxes" in there, and you might get some cheers from the teabaggers for your exceedingly sharp wit.
Nah, no way. You are not scaling imperial units by SI suffixes. You gotta define something more creative, like 36 toes in a foot, 17 toenails in a toe, 366,69 toenail clippings in a toenail and so on, until you arrive at nano scale.
He's claiming persecution from a position of privilege, at least that's how I read it. This has nothing to do with women being in average not as strong as men.
How high is the energy required to keep the tubes evacuated, though? I am not attacking you there, but I am seriously interested in the energy budget for running a vacuum maglev train - it might just not save enough compared to a conventional subway to be worthwhile. Especially on short hauls like a subway. Perhaps on long distance runs?
Spencer himself is a ID proponent, which pretty much rules him out of the science camp. That's the whole point here. The lies are to be found solidly in the other camp.
Oh, well. I am just insulting you because it has proven to be pointless to argue with slime molds. They lack the intellect. Your posting history of lies, distortion of facts and corporate cocksucking says it all. I am just calling you what you are.
You are perfectly aware that all major hypotheses about AGW are indeed falsifiable. You, scumbag that you are, just decide to lie about it. As for the shill you quote, come one, seriously? The Spencer arsewipe paper has been so thoroughly refuted that your muppet should shut up before damaging himself further.
Your bullshitting about falsifiability says it all. You wouldn't know your arse from a hole in a ground, even with a map. That stuff is not even a statement, it is a bold faced lie. And that's all we get from you. Scum.
Could you please strike the "nerd" from you screen name? You are besmirching a whole subculture. Just replace it with "lying scumbag". "Less than nothing" would work also.
Stating the obvious fact that you are a lying sack of shit is not an ad hominem. I never attacked your "argument" from that perspective, which would be a true ad hominem. I am just insulting you for being an uneducated imbecile. Not that I expected you to get the rhetorical fallacies right just because you once heard a latin name and thought it would be nice to throw around to give more credence to you bullshit.
Seriously, how do you do it? No, I mean, really - if I would lie and distort facts to the amount you do, I would have to vomit each time I see my own reflection. And I am a bloody patent lawyer...
No further evidence would convince them. Spencer and he other shills he represents are the intellectual equivalent of $10 crack whores. I have not a shred of respect left for the lying, denying, intellectually and morally crippled scumbags of his sort. Actually, I have to apologize to the $10 crack whores. They play on a wholly different field, ethically speaking.
Ah master, thompson. We did, however, have a lot of intellectual scientists in the historical record. This, in contrast to lying scumbag denier assholes, is what brought us forward. You, on the other hand, are just less than nothing.
Being a strong believer in Christianity and being a scientist can, in fact, be compartmentalized. Being a shill for the ID movement, however, makes you an intellectual $10 whore giving blowjobs in the back alley for the next dose of crack. That's where Spencer is at.
It's not particularly Rushdoony style dominionism than enabled the prosperity gospel - that's just the continuation of Calvin by other means. Apart from that, I completely agree. This sort of christian talibanization is to be feared.
Not necessarily, at least in theory. The German constitution has the beautiful article "Eigentum verpflichtet." - roughly "property obligates". But I guess even that counts as ebil socialism these days.
"...or they gonna leave us here when the bomb blows up."
And, besides, one of the better movies? Nothing against Terminator, but True Lies is the best one he ever made - not the least for Jamie Lee Curtis' brilliance.
No, seriously, thanks for the explanation. Regarding the H and He lines - as a (bio)chemist, who admittedly hasn't done much optical spectroscopy lately, I still think that you should at least see the absorption lines regardless of temperature. Not sure how that would figure into temperature determination, but hey, I used to work with single molecules. Stars are way to big for me;)
Slashdot Mirror
Moose-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization? Sorry, one for the biochem geeks...
You know, mate, you seriously suck at straw man burning. Drop a few more mentions of "taxes" in there, and you might get some cheers from the teabaggers for your exceedingly sharp wit.
Nah, no way. You are not scaling imperial units by SI suffixes. You gotta define something more creative, like 36 toes in a foot, 17 toenails in a toe, 366,69 toenail clippings in a toenail and so on, until you arrive at nano scale.
He's claiming persecution from a position of privilege, at least that's how I read it. This has nothing to do with women being in average not as strong as men.
Refreshing. We get a sexist arsehole today. Nice change from the usual rabble of racists and homophobes. Good job, coward.
Also, point-shaped ones. In a frictionless vacuum. Emitting and attracting passengers isotropically...
How high is the energy required to keep the tubes evacuated, though? I am not attacking you there, but I am seriously interested in the energy budget for running a vacuum maglev train - it might just not save enough compared to a conventional subway to be worthwhile. Especially on short hauls like a subway. Perhaps on long distance runs?
Spencer himself is a ID proponent, which pretty much rules him out of the science camp. That's the whole point here. The lies are to be found solidly in the other camp.
Oh, well. I am just insulting you because it has proven to be pointless to argue with slime molds. They lack the intellect. Your posting history of lies, distortion of facts and corporate cocksucking says it all. I am just calling you what you are.
You are perfectly aware that all major hypotheses about AGW are indeed falsifiable. You, scumbag that you are, just decide to lie about it. As for the shill you quote, come one, seriously? The Spencer arsewipe paper has been so thoroughly refuted that your muppet should shut up before damaging himself further.
Your bullshitting about falsifiability says it all. You wouldn't know your arse from a hole in a ground, even with a map. That stuff is not even a statement, it is a bold faced lie. And that's all we get from you. Scum.
Could you please strike the "nerd" from you screen name? You are besmirching a whole subculture. Just replace it with "lying scumbag". "Less than nothing" would work also.
How do you manage to face yourself in the mirror, liar, scumbag, dirt that you are?
Stating the obvious fact that you are a lying sack of shit is not an ad hominem. I never attacked your "argument" from that perspective, which would be a true ad hominem. I am just insulting you for being an uneducated imbecile. Not that I expected you to get the rhetorical fallacies right just because you once heard a latin name and thought it would be nice to throw around to give more credence to you bullshit.
Seriously, how do you do it? No, I mean, really - if I would lie and distort facts to the amount you do, I would have to vomit each time I see my own reflection. And I am a bloody patent lawyer...
No further evidence would convince them. Spencer and he other shills he represents are the intellectual equivalent of $10 crack whores. I have not a shred of respect left for the lying, denying, intellectually and morally crippled scumbags of his sort. Actually, I have to apologize to the $10 crack whores. They play on a wholly different field, ethically speaking.
Ah master, thompson. We did, however, have a lot of intellectual scientists in the historical record. This, in contrast to lying scumbag denier assholes, is what brought us forward. You, on the other hand, are just less than nothing.
Being a strong believer in Christianity and being a scientist can, in fact, be compartmentalized. Being a shill for the ID movement, however, makes you an intellectual $10 whore giving blowjobs in the back alley for the next dose of crack. That's where Spencer is at.
It's not particularly Rushdoony style dominionism than enabled the prosperity gospel - that's just the continuation of Calvin by other means. Apart from that, I completely agree. This sort of christian talibanization is to be feared.
Which professional climatologist is also an intellectual whore for the ID crowd like Spencer? Name one, please.
So, Spencer is now the second person after Ron Paul, who always gets to be named with his full "Dr" title by his acolytes. Interesting.
Not necessarily, at least in theory. The German constitution has the beautiful article "Eigentum verpflichtet." - roughly "property obligates". But I guess even that counts as ebil socialism these days.
"...or they gonna leave us here when the bomb blows up."
And, besides, one of the better movies? Nothing against Terminator, but True Lies is the best one he ever made - not the least for Jamie Lee Curtis' brilliance.
I even heard the Austrian accent when reading this. Kudos, good anonymous Sir.
IAAFA? I am a fucking astronomer? ;)
No, seriously, thanks for the explanation. Regarding the H and He lines - as a (bio)chemist, who admittedly hasn't done much optical spectroscopy lately, I still think that you should at least see the absorption lines regardless of temperature. Not sure how that would figure into temperature determination, but hey, I used to work with single molecules. Stars are way to big for me ;)