My fault, I guess. I read the article before reading all 500-some comments on the original post and was surprised to find it at odds with the rather inflammatory title ("RIAA Wants Right to Hack").
When Wired updated their story on the RIAA's proposed amendment, they didn't change the URL; therefore the update is, for all intents and purposes, the same page as the original story. Anyone who checks the article from either post (timothy's or Taco's) will see the same story, because of this.
Slashdot Mirror
**shrugs**
My fault, I guess. I read the article before reading all 500-some comments on the original post and was surprised to find it at odds with the rather inflammatory title ("RIAA Wants Right to Hack").
Hence, a new submission.
When Wired updated their story on the RIAA's proposed amendment, they didn't change the URL; therefore the update is, for all intents and purposes, the same page as the original story. Anyone who checks the article from either post (timothy's or Taco's) will see the same story, because of this.