while you personally probably got along fine without it, the rest of the infrastructure that supports you, from maintenance, shipping to food supplies and water, were all not without it. While you may not have had a light or a phone for X time frame. Unless you were hunting wild animals with a hand sharpened rock then you were still indirectly using the infrastructure.
You are reading it as if it were written "conduct exploration of them as To avoid causing harmful contamination of the place explored."
that is not what is written or what you bolded. What was written is that the exploration was to "conduct exploration of them as to avoid their harmful contamination."
As in we don't wish to transport their harmful contamination back to earth.
Just like furthering religion through government as always been a bad idea, so is the forcing of science. I know most people here think of science as some sort of incorruptible pursuit of truth, but so do many that wish for the push of religious doctrine. In the choice of what government should be, often is is choosing a side that is the greatest evil.
The shuttle was reinventing the wheel in the first place, and poorly so. They decided a square wheel would look so much better then spent as much money as it took to make a square wheel roll. Now someone says lets go back to a round wheel and it's considered lunacy and archaic...
That's nice that Obama is this altruistic benevolent godlike leader, but he's only there for at most 8 years. Will the next president be so charitable with this tie in?
Doing it right is always nice, The way we hacked it together:
Create a double ended plug cable for the 220 out on your generator and a 220 outlet such as a dryer (ours was the welder outlet in the shop)
When power goes out, 1) IMPORTANT: Turn of main power. 2) Plug in your cable to generator and wall while generator is off. 3) Start generator.
DISCLAIMER: This is a hack and having a cable with two plugs on each side with exposed hot terminals is dangerous. This will likely not meet code in any area. YMMV. IANAGE (generator expert). Works For Me.
Sure, we don't want every person on the planet to have their own personal Wikipedia entry,
Why not? Just curious. Especially if Wikipedia develops into something everlasting it will be a way to document that you were here. I may not give a damn about you, but why not have the information there in an autobiography type layout.
And I see the incoming one as being the ones that are going to do it. They'll probably start it off as Socialized health care. Which will expand to tracking illnesses.
If you were applying peanut butter liberally would you not consider that applying a lot of peanut butter? Why would I want to apply government liberally? Unless you're some kind of Big Brother advocate. Also please don't confuse Republicans or religious nut jobs with Conservatives.
Every single vote ever is a vote to take money from one and give it to another.
I regularly vote against such regulation. What do you call my vote?
How do you vote against electing an official?
Your anarchy attempt
Who is an anarchist here? The government is necessary to uphold and protect the rights of individuals. And that's it.
Every right given to one takes away from another. Some are obviously good like protecting your right to not be beaten vs. a persons right to beat others. While others are not so obvious like a persons right to property vs another right to free travel. Is a ban on smoking protect the rights of people to breath clean air or a removal of the rights of people to smoke where they want?
It's nice to claim not to be a Libertarian when you do seem to fit the mold exactly. Although as do I.
I think we agree more than disagree though. I find myself questioning my belief far more than blindly following it. I will mark you as a friend.
the left is the ones promoting as much invasion of privacy as possible. I think you mean the libertarians and conservatives. not the liberals, democrats and republicans.
Every single vote ever is a vote to take money from one and give it to another. Whether that vote is for some fancy new welfare or a new seat in the senate. Your anarchy attempt at being a Libertarian is the reason Libertarians will never be taken seriously. The idea of Libertarianism should be "Just enough government." People like you skew that as being "No government."
And exactly what you are saying is why Democracy is doomed to fail. When everyone has a right to vote for what they may or may not get they'll eventually vote themselves benefits for which the economy cannot sustain. Why not just have a vote to make everyone a millionaire? Too much money?...how about $500k?....$1k?...$500? If handing out money some how makes everything better why is the economic stimulus so low? why not make everyone a millionaire?
The fight from the personal rights advocates are afraid of this eventual collapse, while the government support people look at the poor and seemingly neglected people and wish for them to have more. Both think they are right and both have a basis in a moral "good." Neither will function wholly in any kind of pure form. Between pure Free Market and pure Communism we have socialism. Socialism can be scaled in either direction closer to Free Market or pure Communism. finding the sweet spot is the difficult part and will be very dependent on culture.
Its like a camping trip. Your first one you pack everything you can think of and forget toilet paper. You're later ones you bring what you need + some emergency supplies. Eventually you want a full on RV with all home essentials in it.
by profit you really mean motive. Profit is just one type of motive although the most powerful one. Others may be pure good will, betterment of mankind or because it is there. Although in the end profit really covers good will and the betterment of mankind as well. Perhaps not monetary initially though. So you're really left with either do it for profit or do it just because it is there and/or nobody else has done it.
Slashdot Mirror
while you personally probably got along fine without it, the rest of the infrastructure that supports you, from maintenance, shipping to food supplies and water, were all not without it. While you may not have had a light or a phone for X time frame. Unless you were hunting wild animals with a hand sharpened rock then you were still indirectly using the infrastructure.
Does the slashdot effect push the server over or pull it down?
You miss quoted. Here's an update to your points worded more like the treaty:
If by comprehension skills you mean, "reading what I want out of it" then yes. As with almost any written text, clear it is not.
I just hope they don't crash into the Moon on their way to Mars and just call the inhabitant Martians anyway.
Yes.
You are reading it as if it were written "conduct exploration of them as To avoid causing harmful contamination of the place explored."
that is not what is written or what you bolded. What was written is that the exploration was to "conduct exploration of them as to avoid their harmful contamination."
As in we don't wish to transport their harmful contamination back to earth.
Mine strategy is even easier, keep every one you have blank. Use them as a transport method only.
except for the one in my cell phone everyone I have is either blank or considered blank and I can recreate any that I would want again from my laptop.
Just like furthering religion through government as always been a bad idea, so is the forcing of science. I know most people here think of science as some sort of incorruptible pursuit of truth, but so do many that wish for the push of religious doctrine. In the choice of what government should be, often is is choosing a side that is the greatest evil.
The shuttle was reinventing the wheel in the first place, and poorly so. They decided a square wheel would look so much better then spent as much money as it took to make a square wheel roll. Now someone says lets go back to a round wheel and it's considered lunacy and archaic...
That's nice that Obama is this altruistic benevolent godlike leader, but he's only there for at most 8 years. Will the next president be so charitable with this tie in?
WHAT??? Now you tell me?
Doing it right is always nice, The way we hacked it together:
Create a double ended plug cable for the 220 out on your generator and a 220 outlet such as a dryer (ours was the welder outlet in the shop)
When power goes out,
1) IMPORTANT: Turn of main power.
2) Plug in your cable to generator and wall while generator is off.
3) Start generator.
DISCLAIMER: This is a hack and having a cable with two plugs on each side with exposed hot terminals is dangerous. This will likely not meet code in any area. YMMV. IANAGE (generator expert). Works For Me.
because it can still be linked to.
Perhaps instead of deleting non-noteworth pages they could be marked as unsearched.
Why not? Just curious. Especially if Wikipedia develops into something everlasting it will be a way to document that you were here. I may not give a damn about you, but why not have the information there in an autobiography type layout.
Funny thing about tracking http://www.leg.state.or.us/senate/senateset.htm Check the state house, and the governor. They seem to be mostly Democrats 7-to-2.
And I see the incoming one as being the ones that are going to do it. They'll probably start it off as Socialized health care. Which will expand to tracking illnesses.
If you were applying peanut butter liberally would you not consider that applying a lot of peanut butter? Why would I want to apply government liberally? Unless you're some kind of Big Brother advocate. Also please don't confuse Republicans or religious nut jobs with Conservatives.
How do you vote against electing an official?
Every right given to one takes away from another. Some are obviously good like protecting your right to not be beaten vs. a persons right to beat others. While others are not so obvious like a persons right to property vs another right to free travel. Is a ban on smoking protect the rights of people to breath clean air or a removal of the rights of people to smoke where they want?
It's nice to claim not to be a Libertarian when you do seem to fit the mold exactly. Although as do I.
I think we agree more than disagree though. I find myself questioning my belief far more than blindly following it. I will mark you as a friend.
the left is the ones promoting as much invasion of privacy as possible. I think you mean the libertarians and conservatives. not the liberals, democrats and republicans.
Or they could cut spending???
Every single vote ever is a vote to take money from one and give it to another. Whether that vote is for some fancy new welfare or a new seat in the senate. Your anarchy attempt at being a Libertarian is the reason Libertarians will never be taken seriously. The idea of Libertarianism should be "Just enough government." People like you skew that as being "No government."
And exactly what you are saying is why Democracy is doomed to fail. When everyone has a right to vote for what they may or may not get they'll eventually vote themselves benefits for which the economy cannot sustain. Why not just have a vote to make everyone a millionaire? Too much money?...how about $500k?....$1k?...$500? If handing out money some how makes everything better why is the economic stimulus so low? why not make everyone a millionaire?
The fight from the personal rights advocates are afraid of this eventual collapse, while the government support people look at the poor and seemingly neglected people and wish for them to have more. Both think they are right and both have a basis in a moral "good." Neither will function wholly in any kind of pure form. Between pure Free Market and pure Communism we have socialism. Socialism can be scaled in either direction closer to Free Market or pure Communism. finding the sweet spot is the difficult part and will be very dependent on culture.
Its like a camping trip. Your first one you pack everything you can think of and forget toilet paper. You're later ones you bring what you need + some emergency supplies. Eventually you want a full on RV with all home essentials in it.
by profit you really mean motive. Profit is just one type of motive although the most powerful one. Others may be pure good will, betterment of mankind or because it is there. Although in the end profit really covers good will and the betterment of mankind as well. Perhaps not monetary initially though. So you're really left with either do it for profit or do it just because it is there and/or nobody else has done it.