It can't be that large if you're using scons. SCons is known for being inefficient and scaling badly. It is however fairly powerful at scripting your build rules.
The USA generates a significant portion of trash and pollution (and it refuses to reduce this amount because it would affect the economy), but AFAIK it is still behind China.
You seem to live under the assumption that it is easy for a powerful armed force to coerce any country. Need I remind you that the US lost several wars in the past half century, Vietnam being the one most well known? And that was despite fighting uneducated people armed with sticks in the jungle or caves and using banned weapons or torture techniques.
Now imagine attacking France, which has its own elite forces, fighter jets, submarines, intercontinental missiles and nuclear weapons. And that's just one country. There would be a lot to lose and very little to gain from warring with any European country.
When a company in country A sells a product or service to a person in country B, it has to comply by country B's rules. That's how international sales work.
Most of the needs for encryption actually come from the various departments of the government. A lot of software introduces encryption just to be able to be compliant to government regulations and sell on the federal market.
I never said it was. Java is supposed to be a programming language for general-purpose programming, with the goal of being more accessible than C. I personally don't practice it much, since I'm only interested in high-performance parallel low-level system stuff, but my understanding is that Java is heavily used for most applications that don't require actual programming skill.
Even in metric countries, people still use pint to refer to beer. In a metric country, a pint is 50cl though. (a pint is actuallly between 47 and 56.8cl in the US or UK)
In any case, two pints is not a couple of bottles. A normal-sized bottle of water is 1.5l. So you'd need 3 pints to make a single bottle.
Alternatively, you could also attend conferences that are not over-sponsored by Microsoft and that despite having an all-star cast manage to be behind the times.
From my experience with both the latest GCC and Clang, Clang is about two times faster and uses 25% less memory (40% less than GCC 4.8 which somehow uses much more memory than its predecessors).
Optimization with clang is also slightly better. It depends what sort of optimization you're looking for, but Clang is quite good at getting rid of the abstraction penalty, which is the only thing I really care about.
Slashdot Mirror
Because tup is experimental software.
It's similar to ninja, except ninja is production quality and actually even more efficient.
Autotools are obsolete technology.
If you want something similar, but truly multi-platform and modern, try CMake.
It can't be that large if you're using scons.
SCons is known for being inefficient and scaling badly. It is however fairly powerful at scripting your build rules.
Hasn't everyone moved to Ninja yet?
Crap no I got it confused with the other Internet guy, too bad I can't delete this.
Tim Berners-Lee works for Google.
Need anything else be said?
A number of people also use Linux Mint and Debian, especially since 2011/2012 when Ubuntu fucked up pretty badly with Unity.
The USA generates a significant portion of trash and pollution (and it refuses to reduce this amount because it would affect the economy), but AFAIK it is still behind China.
Like anything else made out of wonder materials.
You seem to live under the assumption that it is easy for a powerful armed force to coerce any country.
Need I remind you that the US lost several wars in the past half century, Vietnam being the one most well known? And that was despite fighting uneducated people armed with sticks in the jungle or caves and using banned weapons or torture techniques.
Now imagine attacking France, which has its own elite forces, fighter jets, submarines, intercontinental missiles and nuclear weapons. And that's just one country. There would be a lot to lose and very little to gain from warring with any European country.
When a company in country A sells a product or service to a person in country B, it has to comply by country B's rules.
That's how international sales work.
Most of the needs for encryption actually come from the various departments of the government. A lot of software introduces encryption just to be able to be compliant to government regulations and sell on the federal market.
Surely you mean "misread" not "miss read".
Detecting a red light is probably the easiest thing in the whole system.
The haptic feedback option on my phone must be a fake then.
This is a terrible mistake. As has been demonstrated with smartphones, touch devices are unusable.
People want sticks and directional pads.
The placement of most of the buttons is also terribly awkward.
I never said it was. Java is supposed to be a programming language for general-purpose programming, with the goal of being more accessible than C.
I personally don't practice it much, since I'm only interested in high-performance parallel low-level system stuff, but my understanding is that Java is heavily used for most applications that don't require actual programming skill.
Even in metric countries, people still use pint to refer to beer.
In a metric country, a pint is 50cl though. (a pint is actuallly between 47 and 56.8cl in the US or UK)
In any case, two pints is not a couple of bottles. A normal-sized bottle of water is 1.5l. So you'd need 3 pints to make a single bottle.
Most significant software is open-source.
This will therefore entirely kill Java, and not just for "casuals".
You had a class dedicated to Role Playing Games?
Alternatively, you could also attend conferences that are not over-sponsored by Microsoft and that despite having an all-star cast manage to be behind the times.
As of this writing, the reference toolchain for android is GCC 4.7.
The only people that think this is a good idea are the people who don't understand how a processor actually works.
The correct way to use SIMD is to use intrinsics.
There are also libraries that wrap the functionality portably.
Using inline assembly is about the worst thing you can do, unless you don't care about composability at all.
From my experience with both the latest GCC and Clang, Clang is about two times faster and uses 25% less memory (40% less than GCC 4.8 which somehow uses much more memory than its predecessors).
Optimization with clang is also slightly better. It depends what sort of optimization you're looking for, but Clang is quite good at getting rid of the abstraction penalty, which is the only thing I really care about.