Rockstar developers are the one you use to build an A-Team to create an innovative piece of software from fairly abstract requirements. Once the proof of concept is done, you then move it to average developers for polishing and maintenance.
Your ideal OS isn't my ideal OS. Everyone's needs are different.
Just set up your work environment to be what you need to be the most productive. It's the same for all other fields of work, including those that do not include interaction with a computer.
Yes, it is stupid. The best OS for creative editing is the OS that supports all of the software that you plan to use. Typically, it would be Windows, since some critical software only runs on that operating system. More and more software gets ported to Mac and Linux though, so it's mostly a matter of what you need to use in your workflow.
The technology to establish a connection between two peers for voice or video communication is standardized, in particular by the IETF, and implemented by many vendors. If there is a patent on that technology, that would put into question hundreds if not thousands of products worldwide.
What is the patent involved here? Establishing a connection between two entities on an IP network? NAT traversal techniques? Usage of Interactive Connectivity Establishment protocols?
They can sort different types of trash. Differentiating trash and non-trash is subjective. Not even a human can reliably do it. Assuming you instruct a machine what is trash and what isn't, with a clear and non-ambiguous definition, then there should be no problem making an algorithm that identifies which is which.
More importantly, Visual C++ doesn't fully include C++98 and is extremely slow and riddled with bugs.
What sort of programmer doesn't know the name of a function?
Calling an API is not the part that actually takes time...
You really are a noob. Visual Studio is inferior technology from the last century.
Linux has way superior development tools and APIs.
You'd know if you weren't a script kiddie.
Benjamin Millepied probably doesn't go on Slashdot.
A Ferrari is useless.
Most people who buy ones usually sell them not too long after.
Rockstar developers are the one you use to build an A-Team to create an innovative piece of software from fairly abstract requirements.
Once the proof of concept is done, you then move it to average developers for polishing and maintenance.
That's how R&D works in most companies.
Github and Launchpad aren't really comparable.
He failed at that when he launched 11.04 (or was it 11.10?)
At that point Linux on the desktop lost all the hope that it had.
APNG is reasonably well supported.
The main scheduler is for servers. Want a more desktop-centric scheduler? Just change the scheduler setting.
Report to the project manager that the interaction with your colleagues is inefficient, and ask him to set standards for the team.
Your ideal OS isn't my ideal OS.
Everyone's needs are different.
Just set up your work environment to be what you need to be the most productive. It's the same for all other fields of work, including those that do not include interaction with a computer.
Yes, it is stupid.
The best OS for creative editing is the OS that supports all of the software that you plan to use. Typically, it would be Windows, since some critical software only runs on that operating system.
More and more software gets ported to Mac and Linux though, so it's mostly a matter of what you need to use in your workflow.
So basically, since you're incompetent and can't set up the right software and subsystems for your workflow, you need the OS to mandate it for you?
The Linux kernel is not responsible for lousy device drivers.
If you want a good kernel and good file management, then you want Linux.
PNG is already a replacement for GIF.
The technology to establish a connection between two peers for voice or video communication is standardized, in particular by the IETF, and implemented by many vendors.
If there is a patent on that technology, that would put into question hundreds if not thousands of products worldwide.
What is the patent involved here? Establishing a connection between two entities on an IP network? NAT traversal techniques? Usage of Interactive Connectivity Establishment protocols?
Looks like the developers you work with haven't discovered asynchronous operation and the principle of overlapping communication and computation.
The most surprising thing I found on the website is that Ling's a woman.
How do you know the machine building your CPU will not inject a backdoor in it?
That only works reliably for C-like code though.
The problem is that of definition.
You can't solve a problem whose definition is not well-formed.
They can sort different types of trash.
Differentiating trash and non-trash is subjective. Not even a human can reliably do it. Assuming you instruct a machine what is trash and what isn't, with a clear and non-ambiguous definition, then there should be no problem making an algorithm that identifies which is which.