I haven't seen any evidence, except the reporters story that would suggest that microsoft is behind this blaming linux. I do know one thing, that when you accuse microsoft of such dealings (without proof), you are stepping as low as M$ can go.
I agree. I CraveTV simply is stealing copyright information and redistributing it with the goal of collecting their own advertising dollars. With the internet not being regulated, it does not make actions like iCraveTV, Napster, etc. legal. If business cannot make money and prevent blatent copyright infringement they will continue to lobby goverments for regulations. And we all know how that system works!!!!
Slashdot Mirror
I wonder if Google indexes this site. Think of the ramifications on finding the revellent inforation. Paradoxs galore!!
looking to get turtled, eh!
I haven't seen any evidence, except the reporters story that would suggest that microsoft is behind this blaming linux. I do know one thing, that when you accuse microsoft of such dealings (without proof), you are stepping as low as M$ can go.
I agree. I CraveTV simply is stealing copyright information and redistributing it with the goal of collecting their own advertising dollars. With the internet not being regulated, it does not make actions like iCraveTV, Napster, etc. legal. If business cannot make money and prevent blatent copyright infringement they will continue to lobby goverments for regulations. And we all know how that system works!!!!