Good answers. I personally knew all that already, as well as the answers to my other questions. The person above me on the other hand didn't have a f*cking clue. I really should stop expecting rationality out of the regular/. point system. Not to mention avoiding sarcasm. I would like to add just one more point to the above post.
If one has armed enemy combatants that are hiding among civilians. One is legally, morally and tactically allowed to destroy said enemy with what ever force one deems appropriate and proportional. And any responsibility for civilian deaths, again legally as well as morally, is placed squarely on the combatants who have hidden among them.
How far away were the apaches from the armed individuals? How far away were the ground troops the apaches were providing close air support for? Why should the apaches not fire on non uniformed, unidentified, ARMED individuals within line-of-sight of active combat involving friendly troops? What is the effective range of the 7.62x39 round? or the 5.45x45 round? What is the effective range of an RPG7? Informative my fluffy white ass.
The largest political party in sweden (The Social Democrats) reported having just north of 100'000 members on december 31 2008. The Pirate Party as of writing has over 20'000 members.
Handheld communication devices had been around for many years when Star Trek was first aired. Just look at the backpack radios of vietnam or the handheld military radios of WWII. The first patent for a wireless phone is from 1908. All star trek did was postulate that a communications device could be miniaturized.
I doubt you would make the statement about TNG if you really knew how many principles of Physics, Security, Engineering and a whole host of other subjects the writers for that show regularly raped out of sheer ignorance and disintrest. Star Wars is far more correct in any scientific sense than Star Trek. And Star Wars is probably one of the "softest" science fiction out there.
Not to mention the fact that while it is prohibitively expensive and technically difficult, it is possible to change lead into gold using nuclear transmutation.
Your analogy is flawed. If the bulb was created by aliens and contained millions upon millions of cooperating devices that where influenced by yet more millions of possible conditions then perhaps you would have a point. We simply do not know enough to say with any accuracy what would happen to said bulb if we where to change a certain condition.
No...they are spending millions on "experiments" that look good to those who are already predisposed to belive in creationism. It says so in the titel of the page: Answers in Genesis. Where the scientific method requires that one attempt to disprove a hypothesis. They are attempting to prove that genesis is correct. It is simplicity itself to prove just about anything. It is increadibly more difficult to create a hypothesis that cannot be disproven. Therefore they fail before they even begin. PR and religion are not science no matter how pretty or proffesional the packaging.
I know the Bush administration can be rather heartless; but sending pregnant teenagers into space? I just pray the first mission isn't scheduled until after January 20th.
The Vice President is the chairman of the board for NASA. The current VP is our old friend Dick Cheney. I think that may be a slight clue.
Slashdot Mirror
Ahhh, trolls. Sometimes they're just so stupid it's cute.
Good answers. I personally knew all that already, as well as the answers to my other questions. The person above me on the other hand didn't have a f*cking clue. I really should stop expecting rationality out of the regular /. point system. Not to mention avoiding sarcasm.
I would like to add just one more point to the above post.
If one has armed enemy combatants that are hiding among civilians. One is legally, morally and tactically allowed to destroy said enemy with what ever force one deems appropriate and proportional. And any responsibility for civilian deaths, again legally as well as morally, is placed squarely on the combatants who have hidden among them.
How far away were the apaches from the armed individuals? How far away were the ground troops the apaches were providing close air support for? Why should the apaches not fire on non uniformed, unidentified, ARMED individuals within line-of-sight of active combat involving friendly troops? What is the effective range of the 7.62x39 round? or the 5.45x45 round? What is the effective range of an RPG7? Informative my fluffy white ass.
DIgiShaman, are you claiming that ALL Muslims are akin to Westboro Baptist Church and Scientologists?
I kinda doubt it. But they do seem to be really sensitive to criticism.
The largest political party in sweden (The Social Democrats) reported having just north of 100'000 members on december 31 2008. The Pirate Party as of writing has over 20'000 members.
Which is still not illegal. You still have to pull the trigger.
Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it.
Handheld communication devices had been around for many years when Star Trek was first aired. Just look at the backpack radios of vietnam or the handheld military radios of WWII. The first patent for a wireless phone is from 1908. All star trek did was postulate that a communications device could be miniaturized. I doubt you would make the statement about TNG if you really knew how many principles of Physics, Security, Engineering and a whole host of other subjects the writers for that show regularly raped out of sheer ignorance and disintrest. Star Wars is far more correct in any scientific sense than Star Trek. And Star Wars is probably one of the "softest" science fiction out there.
Not to mention the fact that while it is prohibitively expensive and technically difficult, it is possible to change lead into gold using nuclear transmutation.
Your analogy is flawed. If the bulb was created by aliens and contained millions upon millions of cooperating devices that where influenced by yet more millions of possible conditions then perhaps you would have a point. We simply do not know enough to say with any accuracy what would happen to said bulb if we where to change a certain condition.
This is the absolutly best use of a tesla coil ever devised by mans ingenuity. Totaly awesome!.
No...they are spending millions on "experiments" that look good to those who are already predisposed to belive in creationism. It says so in the titel of the page: Answers in Genesis. Where the scientific method requires that one attempt to disprove a hypothesis. They are attempting to prove that genesis is correct. It is simplicity itself to prove just about anything. It is increadibly more difficult to create a hypothesis that cannot be disproven. Therefore they fail before they even begin. PR and religion are not science no matter how pretty or proffesional the packaging.
They may not have laws against it, but they tend to be just as anal about censoring the "naughty bits" as any southern baptist preacher.
I know the Bush administration can be rather heartless; but sending pregnant teenagers into space? I just pray the first mission isn't scheduled until after January 20th.
The Vice President is the chairman of the board for NASA. The current VP is our old friend Dick Cheney. I think that may be a slight clue.