From my previous reading on this, I recall the issue wasn't the timeframe, but that they wouldn't release the source for the version of the binary they were distributing.
They insisted that they needed/wanted to do more work on the source before making it publicly available.
So where is the e2 node ?
From my previous reading on this, I recall the issue wasn't the timeframe, but that they wouldn't release the source for the version of the binary they were distributing.
They insisted that they needed/wanted to do more work on the source before making it publicly available.
To my mind, this clearly goes against the GPL.
I suspect we wouldn't be impressed!
And would be talking about what backdoors they may be installing on our machines...