Anyhow, I think rationality is wasted on companies that use the DMCA to squelch criticism and security research. Now the TOW-22 anti-tank missle, OTOH...
Ok, it's got non-volatile storage now, and a MIPS CPU. If we could get an easy homebrew ethernet interface, this would make a sweet little router/firewall box.
Hollywood render farms are mostly Linux and can sell a lot of 3-d hardware. It will go to the best price/performance ratio for a given app, every time.
This is a pet peeve of mine. It's just not true. In order for it to be true, reality has to be a finite-state machine. There's no conclusive evidence of this, and in fact almost all of physics assumes the opposite.
I'm not going to just lay here and take this. Hey, if you don't like the affect of English spelling history, you can just immigrate to some place where they speak Canadian. Your allusions of superiority try to make capitol of the principals of colloquial language, but in doing so they create a climactic change which I find frankly unseasoned.
Its open source, not Open Source. Some people get their knickers in a knot about such petty distinctions. It's free software, but its not Free Software, likewise.
I think the poster meant that if you are going to waste several years of your life being tortured in operant conditioning until you are forced to master encoding and decoding ideas scratched onto mashed tree pulp with a soft rock using an incredibly redundant and perversely obscure encoding mechanism, then you've got a lot of subjective motivation to claim that others who haven't endured the same pointless agony are somehow inferior to yourself.
Actually, that won't help. Those prissy IM programs probably don't support IPv6 anyhow. What you really need is an IPv4 implementation that makes NAT transparent. Then stuff would just work.
There was an idiosyncratic fellow who tried to push his personal "IPv8" on various open source network stacks about 5 years ago. It met your stated requirements, so you could save 2 years by adopting his work.
(Google break)
Ah yes, 1996, Jim Fleming. A visionary before his time.
Regardless of the adoption or non-adoption of IPv6 there will ALWAYS be vast segments of the Internet which are only accessible via NAT. Therefore, the problems of NAT *must* be solved in order to give applications p2p connectivity, regardless of the adoption or non-adoption of IPv6.
Thing is, my OS X code will run on OS X *or* NetBSD (speaking hypothetically, assuming a completed portability layer), while my NetBSD code will *only* run on NetBSD.
Okay, so it's not a VM, but I won't be running post-stack migrations on.NET or JRE any time soon.
For "one of the oldest" I read, "one of the most obsolete". Nat has rendered those old protocols, like h.323, obsolete. They could not adapt to the new environment, so they lost the evolutionary competition for selection.
What makes network balkanization evil? Unroutability is what. The solution is to make Nat 2 nat routable by encapsulation. Not a raw tunnel, which leads to address space collisions, but a Nat'd tunnel.
Slashdot Mirror
> YOU sir, can burn in Hell.
Is that, technically, irony? Or just self-parody?
Anyhow, I think rationality is wasted on companies that use the DMCA to squelch criticism and security research. Now the TOW-22 anti-tank missle, OTOH...
Ok, it's got non-volatile storage now,
and a MIPS CPU. If we could get an easy
homebrew ethernet interface, this would make
a sweet little router/firewall box.
Use something like T-mobile with a Sierra
Wireless 750 PCMCIA card, for $39.99/mo
unlimited traffic. Employ a standard VPN.
Paying an all-you-can eat price really
demotivates opportunistic 802.11x leeching.
The fact that someone posted it to slashdot
IS news.
I couldn't used to spell libral, but then
I voted for Bush, and now I are one!
Hollywood render farms are mostly Linux and
can sell a lot of 3-d hardware. It will go
to the best price/performance ratio for a
given app, every time.
> ...anything that can happen...
This is a pet peeve of mine. It's just not true.
In order for it to be true, reality has to be a
finite-state machine. There's no conclusive
evidence of this, and in fact almost all of physics
assumes the opposite.
> 5%
I just don't believe that. Where do you get it?
If XGI *only* sold to IBM, they'd be in the black.
How many Linux graphic heads does IBM own?
I'm not going to just lay here and take this.
Hey, if you don't like the affect of English
spelling history, you can just immigrate to
some place where they speak Canadian. Your
allusions of superiority try to make capitol
of the principals of colloquial language, but
in doing so they create a climactic change
which I find frankly unseasoned.
> Minus User-Agent spoofers thouhg, but really thats a statstically insignificant number of people.
I see no evidence for that statement. Certainly it's a significant proportion of
those responding to your article, at the
very least.
> agent-based computing is P2P used in a positive way
Ah yes, that's why DARPA funded this, to
KILL PEOPLE in a POSITIVE way.
As opposed to NEGATIVE uses like SHARING
ENTERTAINMENT.
Its open source, not Open Source. Some people
get their knickers in a knot about such
petty distinctions. It's free software, but
its not Free Software, likewise.
It half referenfe to Cu vapor deposition
processes for fabricating CPUs.
The matrix was originally conceived as a trilogy, but this is the second half of part 2.
The power referred to in the film is computational power, not electrical power.
The humans are nodes in a big beowulf cluster.
I think the poster meant that if you are
going to waste several years of your life
being tortured in operant conditioning until
you are forced to master encoding and
decoding ideas scratched onto mashed tree
pulp with a soft rock using an incredibly
redundant and perversely obscure encoding
mechanism, then you've got a lot of
subjective motivation to claim that others
who haven't endured the same pointless agony
are somehow inferior to yourself.
Or keeping one bird alive with two stones.
They were going to move to avian carriers,
but then it turned out that the pigeons were
all muslims.
Actually, that won't help. Those prissy IM
programs probably don't support IPv6 anyhow.
What you really need is an IPv4 implementation
that makes NAT transparent. Then stuff would
just work.
There was an idiosyncratic fellow who tried
to push his personal "IPv8" on various open
source network stacks about 5 years ago.
It met your stated requirements, so you could
save 2 years by adopting his work.
(Google break)
Ah yes, 1996, Jim Fleming. A visionary
before his time.
End-to-end connectivity is all that matters.
IPv6 partisans miss this point, so it's
important to drive it home.
Regardless of the adoption or non-adoption of
IPv6 there will ALWAYS be vast segments of the
Internet which are only accessible via NAT.
Therefore, the problems of NAT *must* be
solved in order to give applications p2p
connectivity, regardless of the adoption or
non-adoption of IPv6.
Case in point: China.
Thing is, my OS X code will run on OS X *or*
.NET or JRE
NetBSD (speaking hypothetically, assuming a
completed portability layer), while my NetBSD
code will *only* run on NetBSD.
Okay, so it's not a VM, but I won't be
running post-stack migrations on
any time soon.
For "one of the oldest" I read, "one of the
most obsolete". Nat has rendered those old
protocols, like h.323, obsolete. They could
not adapt to the new environment, so they lost
the evolutionary competition for selection.
What makes network balkanization evil?
Unroutability is what. The solution is to
make Nat 2 nat routable by encapsulation.
Not a raw tunnel, which leads to address space
collisions, but a Nat'd tunnel.
Voila, no IPv6 required.
It's inevitable.