On your website, you mention that HTML tags should always be in uppercase. Not only is this stylistically wrong, but according to the xhtml specification, it is now technically wrong as well. In other words, HTML with uppercase tags, is no longer HTML
I would disagree. If the action that is demanded by law is wrong, then it is the duty of a citizen to have no part of the law.
They did do this. With Microsoft. when M$ asked them to take down the spec to their Kerberos extensions, they didn't, even though Microsoft threatened to shut them down in 48 hours if they didn't. But this is different, this is the COS. Those people will stop at nothing to get what they want, even breaking the law. It would have been a lot more then legal fees for the Andover boys.
Well, maybe not by the time I get this up. Actually, win98 and ME don't support dual processors at all, so you're second one will just be sitting on the motherboard turned off.
As far as SMT goes, I think it's a good idea (well, obviously, why wouldn't it be). You really can only get so much out of Instruction level parallelism, and I've always thought that splitting CPU time up by thread rather then by instruction parallelism would be a lot more effective.
I mean, the click-through rate on banner advertizing is less then 1% right now, a lot less. so, if 1% of the people who view/download fonts is 1% I'd say you're doing pretty good.
I mean, it just looks like a port of the DMOZ open directory with some paid links, and annoying popups. Why the hell would anyone want to use that page?
It wasn't until I read the article itself that I realized you guys were talking about more then one person, it seemed like you were referring to 'Sue Wilcox' as the author, and as both 'she' and 'he' interchangeably.
Re:eFront sends out Cease and Desist letters....
on
eFront From Inside
·
· Score: 2
Actualy... * It's not signed by a person (but was sent by email? what was the email address in the relevant headers?) A lawyer would sign his/her name. or perhaps the current efront legal dept. consists of Sam in his boxers and a google search for cease and desist letters.
I've read some of the excerpted logs, and that actualy isn't to far from the truth. One of the guys on ICQ, I think it was bryant or tim actualy did a search and found a sample C&D to send to the PA guys "fill in the relevent details, and put out lawers name on it."
Maybe in the UK, but not here in the US, in order to be gulty of libel, you need to know that what you are saying false. In order to be convicted, it needs to be proven that you knew it. If slashot dosn't already know wether or not these are valid, they arn't betting anything
As far as getting porn from them, well I wouldn't know. I doubt that it was really that good, though.
On the other hand, getting money from them, well that was a different story. A few years back me and my friends wrote some http client emulators and raped that company for a lot of money, a lot. More then he got for ousting this patent, anyway. (Almost as bad as he raped his 'customers') Hey, the agreement was based on unique IPs not people, and I was a crusader against bad porn and unethical companies, um, yeh.
sigh if only the money was as free now as it was thing,
No it dosn't, but a bit-for-bit copy of a DVD would be nothing more then white noise, completly useless. I wish you people would actualy learn how CSS worked before flapping your jaws like idiots.
The decryption keys are on a physicaly seperate part of the disk, if you do a 'bit-for-bit' copy, you simply won't ever be able to decrypt the signal. So go ahead, I doubt the MPAA would care.
In fairness, this is moderately useful, I could run Apache/PHP locally for development work on my standard desktop,
Hrm, I've been running Apache on my windows desktop for years, it wasn't really hard, seening as how they've had a windows port available. You can getphp for windows as well.
Those databases used two bytes to store a value from 0 to 99, or one hundred values. But, two bytes are capable of holding 2^16, or 65,536. In other words, there is no techical reason that the dates needed to end 2000, rather then 67536AD, other then short-signtedness.
Slashdot Mirror
I think you're confusing the hollywood left with the hollywood right.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
On your website, you mention that HTML tags should always be in uppercase. Not only is this stylistically wrong, but according to the xhtml specification, it is now technically wrong as well. In other words, HTML with uppercase tags, is no longer HTML
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
I would disagree. If the action that is demanded by law is wrong, then it is the duty of a citizen to have no part of the law.
They did do this. With Microsoft. when M$ asked them to take down the spec to their Kerberos extensions, they didn't, even though Microsoft threatened to shut them down in 48 hours if they didn't. But this is different, this is the COS. Those people will stop at nothing to get what they want, even breaking the law. It would have been a lot more then legal fees for the Andover boys.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
actualy, every pic on there is 'default' Right now, my pic is at http://picture-rate.com:8080/hello/viewpic.jsp?sys tem=happy&owner=default&picture=i170, although, that could cange. I would link directly to it, but chad hasn't put in the ablity to select which picture to rate, otherwise I owuld put that link in my sig.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
Sorry. If I could type traditional in on this keyboard, I would. but I can't, so deal.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
Well, maybe not by the time I get this up. Actually, win98 and ME don't support dual processors at all, so you're second one will just be sitting on the motherboard turned off.
As far as SMT goes, I think it's a good idea (well, obviously, why wouldn't it be). You really can only get so much out of Instruction level parallelism, and I've always thought that splitting CPU time up by thread rather then by instruction parallelism would be a lot more effective.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
I mean, the click-through rate on banner advertizing is less then 1% right now, a lot less. so, if 1% of the people who view/download fonts is 1% I'd say you're doing pretty good.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
presumably, you could get the graphic down to just 3 or 4k, and you could always hotlink to somone elses copy of the graphic :P
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
What the fuck is bomis.com?
I mean, it just looks like a port of the DMOZ open directory with some paid links, and annoying popups. Why the hell would anyone want to use that page?
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
Who is the other guy you pasted on?
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
The prime reason this will fail utterly is that Windows was not designed as a multiuser system.
That may be true for windows 95 and 98, but not for NT or 2000, it's a true multiuser system, but almost every home user uses the 'root' account.
I still don't think it would be posible to make this totaly secure, though.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
It wasn't until I read the article itself that I realized you guys were talking about more then one person, it seemed like you were referring to 'Sue Wilcox' as the author, and as both 'she' and 'he' interchangeably.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
good point...
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
Actualy... * It's not signed by a person (but was sent by email? what was the email address in the relevant headers?) A lawyer would sign his/her name. or perhaps the current efront legal dept. consists of Sam in his boxers and a google search for cease and desist letters.
I've read some of the excerpted logs, and that actualy isn't to far from the truth. One of the guys on ICQ, I think it was bryant or tim actualy did a search and found a sample C&D to send to the PA guys "fill in the relevent details, and put out lawers name on it."
These guys acted like children.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
Maybe in the UK, but not here in the US, in order to be gulty of libel, you need to know that what you are saying false. In order to be convicted, it needs to be proven that you knew it. If slashot dosn't already know wether or not these are valid, they arn't betting anything
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
Libel
/. not a party to libel if the allegations prove untrue?
How is
You can't be liable for libel unless it can be proven that you knew what you were saying was false.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
Free long distance :) If you're paying $700 in phone bills you could probably get one of those 'super-biz-rate' plans for a $100/month or something
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
As far as getting porn from them, well I wouldn't know. I doubt that it was really that good, though.
On the other hand, getting money from them, well that was a different story. A few years back me and my friends wrote some http client emulators and raped that company for a lot of money, a lot. More then he got for ousting this patent, anyway. (Almost as bad as he raped his 'customers') Hey, the agreement was based on unique IPs not people, and I was a crusader against bad porn and unethical companies, um, yeh.
sigh if only the money was as free now as it was thing,
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
No it dosn't, but a bit-for-bit copy of a DVD would be nothing more then white noise, completly useless. I wish you people would actualy learn how CSS worked before flapping your jaws like idiots.
The decryption keys are on a physicaly seperate part of the disk, if you do a 'bit-for-bit' copy, you simply won't ever be able to decrypt the signal. So go ahead, I doubt the MPAA would care.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
If the people are giving the tool away for free, then the RIAA dosn't even need to reverse enginer it, they just have to download it.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
In fairness, this is moderately useful, I could run Apache/PHP locally for development work on my standard desktop,
Hrm, I've been running Apache on my windows desktop for years, it wasn't really hard, seening as how they've had a windows port available. You can getphp for windows as well.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
Is she his daughter then?
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
Those databases used two bytes to store a value from 0 to 99, or one hundred values. But, two bytes are capable of holding 2^16, or 65,536. In other words, there is no techical reason that the dates needed to end 2000, rather then 67536AD, other then short-signtedness.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
appears to be in Larry wall's family
Rate me on Picture-rate.com
CIS, as far as I know stands for "Computer Information Systems" wheeas CS is computer sciance. There's a pretty big diffrence.
Rate me on Picture-rate.com