Why would you want to hide anything from the government? Why would you not want them to keep all your personal information indefinitely?
What do you have to hide? You must be a communist^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h criminal^h^h^h^h^h^h^h terrorist since you want to have privacy from the government.
Reading the decision, it is clear that the appeals court was biased.
On the issue of the Washington law preemption, the Court referred to the complaint regarding subject lines and from lines as being "vanity domain names" that were not deceptive. The use of From lines of "Free IPOD" or "Free 50 inch Plasma TV" is deceptive. Just because, after opening the e-mail, and doing whois lookups, that you can determine that it is from Virtumundo, does not mean that the from is deceptive.
The appeals court refused to rule who is an IAS, but said that a well known IAS (ie. Hotmail) does not have to show harm from spam because it is obvious, but a little guy does. The Court went further and said that harm under can-spam can't be the ordinary business expense of carrying e-mail, but one can argue that any mail provider must filter spam and carry spam, therefore there can never be harm from spam, illegal or legal. Any good IAS must provide extra capacity so that if there is spam, they will not crash.
Do you feel sorry for the professional spammers that get harmed by the professional anti-spam litigation service? Of course, if Virtumundo itself in the from line, their spam would have been deleted by most filters.
There are laws that make what Amazon did illegal! In California it is penal code 502. Under Federal Law it is the Computer Fraud and Trespass Act. They accessed a computing device and destroyed data.
With this cable, the e-mails about my unknown dead relatives leaving me money will get to me faster. I am very trustworthy, that is why I get so much money from helping to recover money.
Goody, I can make more money helping the people who desperately need my help in recovery money.
Maybe. I didn't think of the amount thrust to get out of orbit towards the sun. Just throw it at New Jersey so that nobody will notice the shit raining down on them.
I know its hard to aim that well, and you'd have to avoid all the other junk. Send up a politician, they are good at throwing shit around.
Not FTP, but any -- especially on IpowerWeb
on
R.I.P. FTP
·
· Score: 1
Any credentials being stolen is a security Risk. I had some sites on Ipowerweb, which the credentials were stolen. They deny all knowledge of it, but it was the only source of the leak. I tracked this when I moved a site to my own server, but used the same credentials.
I had an interesting experience in China. In 1996, when I received treatment, I kept my own records (they gave me a little paper booklet). This eliminates all the record keeping costs of the doctors and hospitals.
It might be an interesting model to look into here.
As with everything, there is always a trade-off. I run OS/2 on my laptop inside of a virtual machine. The reason I do that is to be able to run Windows apps and not have to deal with some of the lack of OS/2 device drivers for some hardware.
You ask that the OS be put into a virtual machine, would you not expect a big performance hit??? It is only common sense to anyone with any basic computer knowledge. You are adding another layer between the hardware and the program, what do you think would happen?
Hey, when I am lost in space, that 1 meter difference is a big deal. I'll end up in the water instead of the beach when I travel 18,000,000,000,000 for my long weekend trip.
It is impossible to do a lawsuit for something like this, or at least in the USA. To win a lawsuit, you have to show Proximiate cause, meaning it is program X, not program Y. That is the problem with many of the tobacco lawsuits, it was not smoking brand X, but the lung cancer was caused by the air pollution, genetics, etc.
Even if you sued Microsoft for security holes in Windows, they will argue, "we are not liable for illegal acts of others."
What might be a solution is not permit software companies to charge for upgrades, where you run into the problem. Software Back in the 80s and 90s, software companies used to give me free upgrades when I found their bugs. Now, like for Act! 2005, they said, "We added performance upgrades, like freeing resources that we don't use anymore."
A friend of mine took a bar exam in California in 2001 using software. The software corrupted her machine and the "technicians" could not fix it. It took me 1 minute with a dos boot floppy.
Using exam software by people who can't write good code depending on an operating system that is written by people who can't write good code will always be a disaster.
When you don't have the facts on your side, pound on the law. When you don't have the law on your side, pound on the facts. When you have neither on your side, pound on the table.
When an opposing party start attacking people on their beliefs, you know they are in bad shape.
Relational DB? People forget Network Model Databases (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_model) and flat databases.
Network model databases will outperform relational all the time. You just don't have the same flexibility.
Newer models are not based on the design or performance issue, but the distribution of the data. These are not invalid reasons, but the old issues still apply.
I have had arguments with people who consider PC programming different from mainframe. The same rules apply. The difference is that many PC programmers are just sloppier. When you have cheap CPU and memory, people don't analyze and optimize as much.
They differentiate this based on a per program ACL that allows programs accessing what resources. If I remember correctly (it has since 1994), there was options to limit programs and control programs access to the internet.
Why would you want to hide anything from the government? Why would you not want them to keep all your personal information indefinitely?
What do you have to hide? You must be a communist^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h criminal^h^h^h^h^h^h^h terrorist since you want to have privacy from the government.
Reading the decision, it is clear that the appeals court was biased.
On the issue of the Washington law preemption, the Court referred to the complaint regarding subject lines and from lines as being "vanity domain names" that were not deceptive. The use of From lines of "Free IPOD" or "Free 50 inch Plasma TV" is deceptive. Just because, after opening the e-mail, and doing whois lookups, that you can determine that it is from Virtumundo, does not mean that the from is deceptive.
The appeals court refused to rule who is an IAS, but said that a well known IAS (ie. Hotmail) does not have to show harm from spam because it is obvious, but a little guy does. The Court went further and said that harm under can-spam can't be the ordinary business expense of carrying e-mail, but one can argue that any mail provider must filter spam and carry spam, therefore there can never be harm from spam, illegal or legal. Any good IAS must provide extra capacity so that if there is spam, they will not crash.
Do you feel sorry for the professional spammers that get harmed by the professional anti-spam litigation service? Of course, if Virtumundo itself in the from line, their spam would have been deleted by most filters.
Instead of being nuked blue when you smoke at LSC, you also get nuked blue when you get a spinal injury.
Cool.
There are laws that make what Amazon did illegal! In California it is penal code 502. Under Federal Law it is the Computer Fraud and Trespass Act. They accessed a computing device and destroyed data.
With this cable, the e-mails about my unknown dead relatives leaving me money will get to me faster. I am very trustworthy, that is why I get so much money from helping to recover money.
Goody, I can make more money helping the people who desperately need my help in recovery money.
Maybe. I didn't think of the amount thrust to get out of orbit towards the sun. Just throw it at New Jersey so that nobody will notice the shit raining down on them.
I know its hard to aim that well, and you'd have to avoid all the other junk. Send up a politician, they are good at throwing shit around.
Why not empty it into a bad, and drop it outside?
Put it in a hefty bag, then put it toward earth or the sun, it will burn up.
Most problems can be fixed for $99.
Any credentials being stolen is a security Risk. I had some sites on Ipowerweb, which the credentials were stolen. They deny all knowledge of it, but it was the only source of the leak. I tracked this when I moved a site to my own server, but used the same credentials.
I had an interesting experience in China. In 1996, when I received treatment, I kept my own records (they gave me a little paper booklet). This eliminates all the record keeping costs of the doctors and hospitals.
It might be an interesting model to look into here.
As with everything, there is always a trade-off. I run OS/2 on my laptop inside of a virtual machine. The reason I do that is to be able to run Windows apps and not have to deal with some of the lack of OS/2 device drivers for some hardware.
You ask that the OS be put into a virtual machine, would you not expect a big performance hit??? It is only common sense to anyone with any basic computer knowledge. You are adding another layer between the hardware and the program, what do you think would happen?
Hey, when I am lost in space, that 1 meter difference is a big deal. I'll end up in the water instead of the beach when I travel 18,000,000,000,000 for my long weekend trip.
It is impossible to do a lawsuit for something like this, or at least in the USA. To win a lawsuit, you have to show Proximiate cause, meaning it is program X, not program Y. That is the problem with many of the tobacco lawsuits, it was not smoking brand X, but the lung cancer was caused by the air pollution, genetics, etc.
Even if you sued Microsoft for security holes in Windows, they will argue, "we are not liable for illegal acts of others."
What might be a solution is not permit software companies to charge for upgrades, where you run into the problem. Software Back in the 80s and 90s, software companies used to give me free upgrades when I found their bugs. Now, like for Act! 2005, they said, "We added performance upgrades, like freeing resources that we don't use anymore."
A friend of mine took a bar exam in California in 2001 using software. The software corrupted her machine and the "technicians" could not fix it. It took me 1 minute with a dos boot floppy.
Using exam software by people who can't write good code depending on an operating system that is written by people who can't write good code will always be a disaster.
When you don't have the facts on your side, pound on the law.
When you don't have the law on your side, pound on the facts.
When you have neither on your side, pound on the table.
When an opposing party start attacking people on their beliefs, you know they are in bad shape.
No, Install Vista.
If the bar was already open, that would explain Visa, MS DOS 4.0, Windows ME, and BOB.
It is available, but they are not free. See http://www.mdbs.com/prod_tde.htm and http://www.raima.com/
Relational DB? People forget Network Model Databases (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_model) and flat databases.
Network model databases will outperform relational all the time. You just don't have the same flexibility.
Newer models are not based on the design or performance issue, but the distribution of the data. These are not invalid reasons, but the old issues still apply.
I have had arguments with people who consider PC programming different from mainframe. The same rules apply. The difference is that many PC programmers are just sloppier. When you have cheap CPU and memory, people don't analyze and optimize as much.
In one Dr. Who episode, the Daleks moved the entire planet.
That will take care of the crocs.
How soon until homeland security shows up accusing him of terrorism?
Leave the WIFI on, fix the channel to the one you don't you. They won't replace it then. But then for the finishing touch:
Shart using it to share movies and music and let the MPAA and RIAA go sue them into bankruptcy.
They differentiate this based on a per program ACL that allows programs accessing what resources. If I remember correctly (it has since 1994), there was options to limit programs and control programs access to the internet.
These features were advertised.
Minimum wage her is lots for the phishing schools in Nigeria.