The cycle of life is a beautiful thing, just keep that shit behind closed doors.
You know what's even better? In my home state, my wife has the right to do that "shit" right in front of you. If you'd like to object, please let me show you the door. See you around (or not), you sexual deviant.
What makes men really uncomfortable it the idea that some milking mom is going to freak out on them for glancing over and get all postal because she thinks he's leering in a sexual way.
Woman are leered at sexually regardless of whether they are breast feeding. If a mere glance from you elicits a defensive reaction from a female, then that female needs to learn how to deal with public places. Some men will glance and then look away. That's a fairly normal sort of "What's going on? Oh..." sort of reaction. If somebody stares, that person has a problem -- that's just the way things are in public. I'm sorry you feel intimidated by the presence of breast feeding women, but in most states these women have a legal right to do so, and honestly, they don't really give a crap about your presence, much less your looking in their direction.
* Posting the pictures might stoke the desires of the viewer.
Interesting. So you think that the scene of a mother feeding her infant is arousing and should be banned? There are also deviants who get off on pics of cute little girls. Obviously, the problem is the existence of such pictures. Little girls should be hidden in the basement, lest somebody get a boner.
You're pretty sick, and you need help. And please stay the fuck away from my kids.
Have you ever seen a mom breastfeeding in public? I sit in front of my wife at least once a week in restaurants while she breastfeeding. I can't see skin even if I try to!
yes,
breasts are the SUPERIOR food for babies. According to the WHO (World Health Organization) there is a clear directive on what is best for baby.
1. Breastfeeding from mom's breast
2. Breastfeeding by a wet nurse
3. Breast milk from a milk bank
4. Formula
Sure, go ahead, feed your child fourth best, laced with melamine and BPA. Have fun with that.
Have you tried putting a blanket over yourself in 90 degree heat? With a squirming baby who wants to see the world and not be covered up. My wife has tried the blanket thing and our poor child was dripping sweat because it was so hot under there. Plus using a blanket only draws MORE attention to you, everyone starts looking wondering what the heck is going on under there.
As a private enterprise, they have the right to restrict what they want.
Untrue. I'd like to see you open a store, post a "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" sign, then kick out every black person who walks in. Good luck with that. Sometimes the law makes a difference. And in most states, a breastfeeding mother is immune. Don't like it? Good. I like to see you prudes writhe.
She's forcing her morality on everyone there. It wouldn't bother me but it may greatly offend others. If she was asked to stop and refused, at that time they can ask her to leave. If she refuses, SHE is breaking the law - likely several laws.
Thank God you're completely fucking wrong, and there have been hundreds of lawsuits to prove it. In states where public breastfeeding is protected by law, if you are a proprietor and try to stop it, you WILL lose. Go ahead, try it. You sick mother fucker.
Absolutely. I love the "Could you please do that in the restroom?" line. My wife and I were in a restaurant and she discreetly began nursing our son. I mean, she tried to turn away from the rest of the restaurant. It's not the sort of thing you'd even notice unless you were staring at the other patrons. Anyway, some woman gets all bitchy and demands that she go to the bathroom to nurse. My wife turned and said, "Why don't you eat YOUR meal in the bathroom, bitch?"
We're not militant. It was just the last straw, of sorts. The lady called the manager. The manager informed her that under state law, we were allowed to feed our baby in public. She got up and left without paying her bill. The manager called the police. Some people have issues. I really don't care.
Maybe because you're a sick mother fucker who automatically associates a breast with sex? It's a baby eating, for Christ's sake. You see an infant suckling on a teat and you think inappropriate thoughts? You have some serious psychological issues to work through., It's fucking natural, and in most states, protected by law. So why don't you go fuck off and die?
The code creates a bash shell function called ':'. This function, when executed, invokes two copies of itself in the background. The final ':' invokes the function which has been so defined. The result is an exponentially growing number of processes, all cloning themselves as quickly as possible. In other words, a "fork bomb."
Well, that's interesting. It's as if our brains spend more effort when the task is to determine how valuable something is to us, as opposed to determining how worthless it is. It seems obvious, and probably is, but still, it shows that we treat "value" as more important to precisely define, as "lack of value."
If something is junk, it makes no sense to waste time thinking about just how devoid of value is actually is.
So, you're looking for a technical solution to the problem of evil behavior in humans. Good luck.
The beginning of enlightenment in data security is the notion that a breach could always occur. The question is not how to prevent all breaches, the question is how to organize the data, allocate it to individuals, and protect its transmission to minimize the effect of the inevitable breach when it DOES occur.
Anecdotal: I took Paxil for about 6 months. I eventually stopped because of strange physical sensations, a desire to constantly move, twitch, and an overall sense of extreme unease. It's called "akathesia," it is a known symptom of SSRIs as well as various antipsychotics, and it was so severely uncomfortable that at times I wanted to just die. Not because it caused a "suicidal ideation" but because it made me feel so physically ill that unconsciousness was preferable to those effects. I'm not at all surprised that some people, who are unstable to begin with, might choose death over those symptoms.
At WinHEC 2008 the Intel speakers continued to hint at the fact that they had operating, packaged cores at this size. On track for manufacturing? More like they've been making it for 9-12 months already. At any rate, it's cool, though not surprising.
Or (and this is hard, I know) you could consider the similarity while disregarding the glasses. What if you've grown a beard since the time the photo was taken? Are they going to ask you to shave while sitting on the side of the road? Use half a brain cell and ignore the glasses.
Because the best reason to choose a particular language is how properly one can paste the code into some random website?
A tab is no less "explicit" than a brace. Both provide a visual cue in the code. Just admit it: you want the freedom to be sloppy in your indentation, and you don't want to have anything to do with a language that enforces proper indentation.
There's nothing really wrong with that, but you're really dredging with this particular argument.
So most people would seem to be ok with bullets flying in order to stop people committing dangerous felonies. So, I understand your opinion, but assert it's the minority opinion.
That's really not what we're talking about though. Somebody who refuses to pull over MAY be a dangerous felon, or they might be a felon only by virtue of not pulling over. That's nowhere near as clear a threat as somebody who has already shot at the police. I'm not in any way trying to say that police shouldn't fire their weapons when necessary.
Can you name a single time where a stray bullet fired during a high speed chase ever hit anyone? I've never heard of it happening. I think it may have never happened.
I think the reason it has never happened is because the police typically don't shoot at moving vehicles, nor are they supposed to. Again, I think the idea of cops firing at an escaping suspect or shooting out the tires is a fantasy from the movies, precisely because it's so unsafe.
Also, fleeing from cops is usually a felony, and as such, I believe cops should be free to use deadly force to stop a dangerous felony in progress.
Not if it involves flinging bullets through my neighborhood. I'd rather the cops simply abort chase and deal with it some other way. Of course this depends on the circumstances. There's a reason you don't hear of many police chases ending with the cops firing at a moving vehicle -- it's ridiculously dangerous to bystanders.
The cycle of life is a beautiful thing, just keep that shit behind closed doors.
You know what's even better? In my home state, my wife has the right to do that "shit" right in front of you. If you'd like to object, please let me show you the door. See you around (or not), you sexual deviant.
What makes men really uncomfortable it the idea that some milking mom is going to freak out on them for glancing over and get all postal because she thinks he's leering in a sexual way.
Woman are leered at sexually regardless of whether they are breast feeding. If a mere glance from you elicits a defensive reaction from a female, then that female needs to learn how to deal with public places. Some men will glance and then look away. That's a fairly normal sort of "What's going on? Oh..." sort of reaction. If somebody stares, that person has a problem -- that's just the way things are in public. I'm sorry you feel intimidated by the presence of breast feeding women, but in most states these women have a legal right to do so, and honestly, they don't really give a crap about your presence, much less your looking in their direction.
Or maybe I was trying to make a fucking point instead of railing about "fat" women? Moron.
* Posting the pictures might stoke the desires of the viewer.
Interesting. So you think that the scene of a mother feeding her infant is arousing and should be banned? There are also deviants who get off on pics of cute little girls. Obviously, the problem is the existence of such pictures. Little girls should be hidden in the basement, lest somebody get a boner.
You're pretty sick, and you need help. And please stay the fuck away from my kids.
Have you ever seen a mom breastfeeding in public? I sit in front of my wife at least once a week in restaurants while she breastfeeding. I can't see skin even if I try to!
yes, breasts are the SUPERIOR food for babies. According to the WHO (World Health Organization) there is a clear directive on what is best for baby. 1. Breastfeeding from mom's breast 2. Breastfeeding by a wet nurse 3. Breast milk from a milk bank 4. Formula Sure, go ahead, feed your child fourth best, laced with melamine and BPA. Have fun with that.
I'd be all for having designated "kid" and "no kid" areas in public places, just like they used to have with "smoking" and "no smoking" areas.
Well, isn't it great that that would never possibly happen? Awesome. Please get on your knees and suck my dick.
Its pretty sick that your first thought about breastfeeding is sex.
Have you tried putting a blanket over yourself in 90 degree heat? With a squirming baby who wants to see the world and not be covered up. My wife has tried the blanket thing and our poor child was dripping sweat because it was so hot under there. Plus using a blanket only draws MORE attention to you, everyone starts looking wondering what the heck is going on under there.
Besides, EVERYONE wants to have sex... not everyone wants to watch milk get sucked out of a fat womans nipple.
Not everyone wants to see a fat woman, period. Let's ban the bitches. Once you tip the 250 pound mark, you're executed.
I am a woman
Who the fuck cares? Are you a MOTHER? No? Shut your fucking mouth, bitch.
As a private enterprise, they have the right to restrict what they want.
Untrue. I'd like to see you open a store, post a "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" sign, then kick out every black person who walks in. Good luck with that. Sometimes the law makes a difference. And in most states, a breastfeeding mother is immune. Don't like it? Good. I like to see you prudes writhe.
She's forcing her morality on everyone there. It wouldn't bother me but it may greatly offend others. If she was asked to stop and refused, at that time they can ask her to leave. If she refuses, SHE is breaking the law - likely several laws.
Thank God you're completely fucking wrong, and there have been hundreds of lawsuits to prove it. In states where public breastfeeding is protected by law, if you are a proprietor and try to stop it, you WILL lose. Go ahead, try it. You sick mother fucker.
Telling me I must use a restroom is ridiculous.
Absolutely. I love the "Could you please do that in the restroom?" line. My wife and I were in a restaurant and she discreetly began nursing our son. I mean, she tried to turn away from the rest of the restaurant. It's not the sort of thing you'd even notice unless you were staring at the other patrons. Anyway, some woman gets all bitchy and demands that she go to the bathroom to nurse. My wife turned and said, "Why don't you eat YOUR meal in the bathroom, bitch?"
We're not militant. It was just the last straw, of sorts. The lady called the manager. The manager informed her that under state law, we were allowed to feed our baby in public. She got up and left without paying her bill. The manager called the police. Some people have issues. I really don't care.
Maybe because you're a sick mother fucker who automatically associates a breast with sex? It's a baby eating, for Christ's sake. You see an infant suckling on a teat and you think inappropriate thoughts? You have some serious psychological issues to work through., It's fucking natural, and in most states, protected by law. So why don't you go fuck off and die?
The code creates a bash shell function called ':'. This function, when executed, invokes two copies of itself in the background. The final ':' invokes the function which has been so defined. The result is an exponentially growing number of processes, all cloning themselves as quickly as possible. In other words, a "fork bomb."
Well, that's interesting. It's as if our brains spend more effort when the task is to determine how valuable something is to us, as opposed to determining how worthless it is. It seems obvious, and probably is, but still, it shows that we treat "value" as more important to precisely define, as "lack of value."
If something is junk, it makes no sense to waste time thinking about just how devoid of value is actually is.
So, you're looking for a technical solution to the problem of evil behavior in humans. Good luck.
The beginning of enlightenment in data security is the notion that a breach could always occur. The question is not how to prevent all breaches, the question is how to organize the data, allocate it to individuals, and protect its transmission to minimize the effect of the inevitable breach when it DOES occur.
Anecdotal: I took Paxil for about 6 months. I eventually stopped because of strange physical sensations, a desire to constantly move, twitch, and an overall sense of extreme unease. It's called "akathesia," it is a known symptom of SSRIs as well as various antipsychotics, and it was so severely uncomfortable that at times I wanted to just die. Not because it caused a "suicidal ideation" but because it made me feel so physically ill that unconsciousness was preferable to those effects. I'm not at all surprised that some people, who are unstable to begin with, might choose death over those symptoms.
I don't know about where you come from, but around here glasses are made of a transparent material.
At WinHEC 2008 the Intel speakers continued to hint at the fact that they had operating, packaged cores at this size. On track for manufacturing? More like they've been making it for 9-12 months already. At any rate, it's cool, though not surprising.
Or (and this is hard, I know) you could consider the similarity while disregarding the glasses. What if you've grown a beard since the time the photo was taken? Are they going to ask you to shave while sitting on the side of the road? Use half a brain cell and ignore the glasses.
Because the best reason to choose a particular language is how properly one can paste the code into some random website?
A tab is no less "explicit" than a brace. Both provide a visual cue in the code. Just admit it: you want the freedom to be sloppy in your indentation, and you don't want to have anything to do with a language that enforces proper indentation.
There's nothing really wrong with that, but you're really dredging with this particular argument.
So most people would seem to be ok with bullets flying in order to stop people committing dangerous felonies. So, I understand your opinion, but assert it's the minority opinion.
That's really not what we're talking about though. Somebody who refuses to pull over MAY be a dangerous felon, or they might be a felon only by virtue of not pulling over. That's nowhere near as clear a threat as somebody who has already shot at the police. I'm not in any way trying to say that police shouldn't fire their weapons when necessary.
Can you name a single time where a stray bullet fired during a high speed chase ever hit anyone? I've never heard of it happening. I think it may have never happened.
I think the reason it has never happened is because the police typically don't shoot at moving vehicles, nor are they supposed to. Again, I think the idea of cops firing at an escaping suspect or shooting out the tires is a fantasy from the movies, precisely because it's so unsafe.
Also, fleeing from cops is usually a felony, and as such, I believe cops should be free to use deadly force to stop a dangerous felony in progress.
Not if it involves flinging bullets through my neighborhood. I'd rather the cops simply abort chase and deal with it some other way. Of course this depends on the circumstances. There's a reason you don't hear of many police chases ending with the cops firing at a moving vehicle -- it's ridiculously dangerous to bystanders.