One of the reasons some people now believe (and I tend in that direction) that this law is not about protecting children at all.
Well yeah obviously. The general rule is, if you want a law passed immediately and without complaint, you somehow relate to child porn of "protecting the children". People who want to download child porn are such a minority that it doesn't make sense to censor the internet for the other 99.9% of the country who aren't pedo-bears. However, by saying this internet filter is up there to save those precious children's souls they are pretty much guaranteed a free ride to put up whatever they want. After all, if anyone objects you just slander them as proponents of child porn, and no politician would risk being the target of those red scare tactics.
I'm pretty sure radical conservatives could get a wall erected on the US-Mexico border in like two weeks if they said that it was there to keep child porn-smuggling gang leaders out of our country.
Agreed.
Except I can't help but feel they conflict themselves when they say "less invasive" and "applied directly to the surface of your brain". Is there any non-invasive way to touch your brain?
Slashdot Mirror
One of the reasons some people now believe (and I tend in that direction) that this law is not about protecting children at all.
Well yeah obviously. The general rule is, if you want a law passed immediately and without complaint, you somehow relate to child porn of "protecting the children". People who want to download child porn are such a minority that it doesn't make sense to censor the internet for the other 99.9% of the country who aren't pedo-bears. However, by saying this internet filter is up there to save those precious children's souls they are pretty much guaranteed a free ride to put up whatever they want. After all, if anyone objects you just slander them as proponents of child porn, and no politician would risk being the target of those red scare tactics. I'm pretty sure radical conservatives could get a wall erected on the US-Mexico border in like two weeks if they said that it was there to keep child porn-smuggling gang leaders out of our country.
Agreed. Except I can't help but feel they conflict themselves when they say "less invasive" and "applied directly to the surface of your brain". Is there any non-invasive way to touch your brain?
So if Jesus=Sqrt(-1), then Jesus = i. Which could only mean...i am Jesus!