It not about what a single individual (you) thinks he can get away with by passing the costs onto another. Its about what removes inefficiencies from the system in general, and avoids the tragedy of the commons that we have now - which is that individuals acting under rational self interest reduce the general welfare of society as a whole.
Seems pretty clear to me that this means I can put a religious symbol anywhere I want. Whether its a nativity, an upside down cross, a statue of Buddha, or the that Six Armed Hindu one. We just have to have equal rights for all.
By your logic I can put a 10 foot tall dildo on an elementary school's front lawn.
Other advantage of gmail is it actually groups "conversations" so you don't end up with 100 emails for a long running converstation. Email becomes like a thread that you are subscribed to (with reply all) instead of a cluster fuck of messages all over the place. If people are smart about it you can easily take people in and out of the thread (we usually start emails with -Somebody or +Somebody when we do that).
Actually the web/html is the analogy of English. Sending doc files around is antiquated, and if someone wants to send me one they better send it in a standard format.
I see it as someone sending me a garbage document. If you want to communicate with me, communicate in a known and accepted way. ie if you and Microsoft make up your own version of English, don't expect the rest of the world to cow-tow to you.
Windows is no longer the 800 lb gorilla - Apple iOS is.
iOS is 2nd in market share in mobile just like Apple is 2nd in market share on desktop. How does coming in 2nd in every market they touch make them the "800 lb gorilla"?
It's called ad hominem. The fact that it is Florian writing this does not necessarily make the facts wrong, but it makes it such that you must use a different source.
For the purposes of photography the law treats shopping malls as public space - ie you have no privacy. The owner can still have rules regarding photography, but the only way to enforce them is to ask the person to leave - which this teen was attempting to do when the guard assaulted him.
1. It was in a public space. He was legally allowed to take that picture.
2. Media credentials do not have anything to do with legality. The state need not recognize you as a journalistic institution for you to have freedom of the press.
3. I applaud him photographing the takedown. Clearly we have different opinions there.
It was not a police officer that he was resisting, it was a security guard - who is a citizen. That guard should be the one who was arrested (for assault), not the teen.
You cannot arrest someone for "resisting arrest". He was resisting a false arrest by a citizen, therefore if they had actually assessed the situation, their legal duty would have been to arrest the security guard for assault, which in my mind should still happen - by all rights and by law, that guard should be behind bars at this very moment.
Visit a spy shop and pick up something less obvious. Sunglasses maybe?
You're missing the point. Modern technology (smartphones) is now allowing every citizen to keep "watch the watchers". Apparently this makes them uneasy as they've generally been able to get away with a lot of extra-legal actions for a very long time.
Do not seek special gear to hide your surveillance. Publicize it. Advertise it. Challenge authority. Fuck the Police.
Slashdot Mirror
It not about what a single individual (you) thinks he can get away with by passing the costs onto another. Its about what removes inefficiencies from the system in general, and avoids the tragedy of the commons that we have now - which is that individuals acting under rational self interest reduce the general welfare of society as a whole.
It looks like my adblock plus in Chrome is blocking this already
Seems pretty clear to me that this means I can put a religious symbol anywhere I want. Whether its a nativity, an upside down cross, a statue of Buddha, or the that Six Armed Hindu one. We just have to have equal rights for all.
By your logic I can put a 10 foot tall dildo on an elementary school's front lawn.
Seems pretty clear to me that the Supreme Court disagrees with you.
So atheists asking for equal rights makes them have more rights? No, you self-entitled religious crybaby.
Vendor Lock-in.
...or is that three
I can attest to this also. Recently got my gf into Zombicide, Catan, Munchkin and others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_top-level_domain
other than stuff befalling jailbroken devices
This is the important part. Walled gardens are inherently more secure, it has nothing to do with Apple's competence.
anyone been able to crack the admin pwd yet?
Adblock+Ghostery+Downloading all my movies/tv. I don't get any advertising, let alone that which "follows" me.
Other advantage of gmail is it actually groups "conversations" so you don't end up with 100 emails for a long running converstation. Email becomes like a thread that you are subscribed to (with reply all) instead of a cluster fuck of messages all over the place. If people are smart about it you can easily take people in and out of the thread (we usually start emails with -Somebody or +Somebody when we do that).
I believe cyanogenmod allows you to fine-tune application permissions.
Actually the web/html is the analogy of English. Sending doc files around is antiquated, and if someone wants to send me one they better send it in a standard format.
AND they were pillaged by a pair of VC firms to the tune of somewhere around $700 Million
Can you provide a citation for this? I would like to rebut a friend of mine who is blaming this all on the union.
I see it as someone sending me a garbage document. If you want to communicate with me, communicate in a known and accepted way. ie if you and Microsoft make up your own version of English, don't expect the rest of the world to cow-tow to you.
Its about time... we might actually be able to start using it.
Windows is no longer the 800 lb gorilla - Apple iOS is.
iOS is 2nd in market share in mobile just like Apple is 2nd in market share on desktop. How does coming in 2nd in every market they touch make them the "800 lb gorilla"?
It's called ad hominem. The fact that it is Florian writing this does not necessarily make the facts wrong, but it makes it such that you must use a different source.
For the purposes of photography the law treats shopping malls as public space - ie you have no privacy. The owner can still have rules regarding photography, but the only way to enforce them is to ask the person to leave - which this teen was attempting to do when the guard assaulted him.
Maybe you didn't read the story, but the teen was attempting to leave when the guard assaulted him.
1. It was in a public space. He was legally allowed to take that picture.
2. Media credentials do not have anything to do with legality. The state need not recognize you as a journalistic institution for you to have freedom of the press.
3. I applaud him photographing the takedown. Clearly we have different opinions there.
It was not a police officer that he was resisting, it was a security guard - who is a citizen. That guard should be the one who was arrested (for assault), not the teen.
You cannot arrest someone for "resisting arrest". He was resisting a false arrest by a citizen, therefore if they had actually assessed the situation, their legal duty would have been to arrest the security guard for assault, which in my mind should still happen - by all rights and by law, that guard should be behind bars at this very moment.
Visit a spy shop and pick up something less obvious. Sunglasses maybe?
You're missing the point. Modern technology (smartphones) is now allowing every citizen to keep "watch the watchers". Apparently this makes them uneasy as they've generally been able to get away with a lot of extra-legal actions for a very long time.
Do not seek special gear to hide your surveillance. Publicize it. Advertise it. Challenge authority. Fuck the Police.