not always, but generally i dont find a phone conducive to performing that many tasks at once. usually ifi'm doing more than two things, i'd rather be in front of a KVM, preferably with dual display outputs. of course this is all personal preference and thats why there is no such thing as one 'best' its all about finding what meets your specific set of needs most efficiently.
The fact is MS didnt want to at all, its Samsung who is including the SD slot. MS told the OEMs they advised agains SD storage, Samsung forced the issue.
btw, Samsung is one of the largest makers of SD cards.
odd, as i have one in my hot sweaty palm as we speak. seems to work pretty good too.
regarding the SD thing, i've seen reports that the Samsung Focus (currently the only phone with SD storage, and the one i own) is very picky about the cards being used, it doesnt seem to matter which class of card you use or what size, though it can allocate up to 32GB. from what i understand, WP7 will append it on to the existing partition, and the fault occurs when the card is removed and reinserted, the device will only recognize 15MB free space and then both the phone and card must be reformatted. but again its not been identified publicly as to what causes this issue. the original notion was that the SD card quality may be a key factor, WP7 may not like seeing a bunch of unusable blocks on a card. i know many cards have some sketchy reliability.
i guess my point is that it all depends on the application. every modern engine that runs on the street needs an ECU so really the article has implications for all vehicles. not trying to be pedantic or anything but i try to look at the largest practical scope possible, in this case it would include motorcycles, semi trucks and everything in between.
while i agree you shouldnt need ABS to be a safe driver, the fact is pretty much all new cars come with it, so lets go with the assumption that its equipped that way. in this case, i certainly want to know that the ABS is functioning because lets face it, the uncertainty of whether or not the ABS will fire is of huge importance when trying to avoid an accident. if i know i have ABS i'm ok, if i know i dont, i'm ok, if i'm unsure, thats dangerous.
what i meant was "kids" as in this generation of leaders. the founding fathers would be pretty saddened by the mess their children have made of their inheritance.
yeah.... i hear thats what all the kids are saying these days... unprotected whatnot.... but listen, the Document says:
Congress shall make no law... prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech... seems to me the way they wrote it didnt make that distinction.
the idea that was America, failed a long time ago. We're just here to witness the aftermath.
i think its still an "if". as you said they are a for profit company and just because they're for profit doesnt make them necessarily stupid. i doubt they'd shoot them selves in the foot like that. its symbolic. they recognize that they are the unparalleled champions of search and that drives the hits which drives the ad revenue. if their all encompassing page-rank system were to be subverted by The Google itself it would draw into question Googles credibility for search (regardless of their credibility as a company, their credibility for search is undeniable). it could seriously damage the brand. thats why Google was in that fiasco with China, they were afraid of damaging the brand by diluting searches. Fortunately for them the Chinese voice little concern over being censored.
theres backlash with that too though. If Google excluded them from search they'd be defeating them selves by providing inferior service. Customers would soon notice. If they did something like that i'd start buying shares in MSFT, Bing would hit a whole new level of acceptability.
its even more important than any perceived financial losses. he suppressed free speech... sorry, but thats sacred ground in the US and you dont fuck with it.
what many are failing to realize is that, more important than network pwnage, or even monetary loss, the man abridged other peoples right to free speech, maliciously. the right to free speech was the very first thing the founders of the US felt needed to be added to their constitution, its something held sacred in America. if you want to know if the punishment is fair, look at other 1st amendment cases with criminal proceedings. i'll bet you anything this is either average or light sentencing. in this instance a DDoS suppressed other peoples right to communicate. i mean... thats a pretty big deal. the whole net neutrality thing is wrapped up in ISPs imposing limits on free speech over the internet.
rather than balking at the sentence, look at the most important issue here, not DDoS, not politics, not his record.
right but the whole point of making open source drivers (or more accurately in this case open source firmware) is to bypass the need for the software license and therefore gain the ability to operate it with other electronics, to do this the product is reverse engineered and thats a perfectly legal process.
FUD. the whole letter is FUD. they use terms like "tamper-protection" because its the strongest thing they can say, they know they cant do anything about it... tis all posturing.
welcome to software. you do not *buy* software from Microsoft (or from most other vendors for that matter) you license it. Thats why the EULA stands for End User *License* Agreement. These are the sets of rules you agree to abide by if you wish to retain license of their product.
OTOH, hardware cannot be licensed, only sold or leased, and no such terms can be placed on something that is sold.
listen, i'm all for bashing MS when its merited, but calling Bill Gates 'sterile and clueless' is just all kinds of inaccurate, hes got kids and pretty remarkable business sense.
its more than just people, its businesses, and you frankly arent understanding just how big those cogs are. there are also "unknown unknowns" here. even on a small scale (under 1000 users, say) an IP migration can be a *very* complicated and especially when you get to the level of 2nd or 3rd tier providers the amount of preparation that needs to be done just to THINK about what would be required to PLAN such a move is staggering. this doesnt even get into the application layer. most applications dont currently support IPv6 and many corporations dont upgrade main line of business applications regularly. some of the companies i work with use software that is from the mid 90's and a few have stuff thats copyright 1988. For many of these businesses the cost of upgrading the hardware and/or software is prohibitive. But cost is a whole other can of worms, you try convincing a small business owner or CFO or CEO that they need to spend money they dont have on something they know they need but isnt killing them now. beyond that theres yet other issues as well.
i'm not saying you're wrong, people DO need more education on the matter and we do need to start making these changes ASAP but the going is not as easy as "RTFA and make a change"
The problem is that half of your grievances are a result of you being a tech-hipster. LCD's *are* in fact flat screens. DVD's *are* Compact Discs, granted they are a specific type of disc, and Hard Disk space *is* memory, its not RAM, but it is memory.
look, i understand these are pet peeves because they dont conform to the vernacular you're used to, but being frustrated about the way people say things when they're technically accurate... well thats a sign of deeper issues.
not to add too thick of another layer on to it, but sadly there are many corporate interests involved in Africa as well that undeniably play a large role in the unstable governments in many countries. Oil, Diamonds and other natural resources are extracted from that continent at a blistering pace with very little regard for the environment or who they're paying off to get their goods. inasmuch as providing food, healthcare, education etc. a key fundamental in my mind for stable governance requires that we (and by 'we' i mean the first world in general) change the way we do business in Africa. the problem with that is that it requires that our societies accept changes as well and i dont think that as nations we are ready to accept the implications of those changes.
at least... thats the impression i have right now. but i think that the "Africa Issue" is one the whole world is trying to figure out. At least China seems to have some sort of notion of what they're doing, and as a Communist society are in many ways better suited to act as one large group than the US or the UN.
Slashdot Mirror
not always, but generally i dont find a phone conducive to performing that many tasks at once. usually ifi'm doing more than two things, i'd rather be in front of a KVM, preferably with dual display outputs. of course this is all personal preference and thats why there is no such thing as one 'best' its all about finding what meets your specific set of needs most efficiently.
The fact is MS didnt want to at all, its Samsung who is including the SD slot. MS told the OEMs they advised agains SD storage, Samsung forced the issue.
btw, Samsung is one of the largest makers of SD cards.
odd, as i have one in my hot sweaty palm as we speak. seems to work pretty good too.
regarding the SD thing, i've seen reports that the Samsung Focus (currently the only phone with SD storage, and the one i own) is very picky about the cards being used, it doesnt seem to matter which class of card you use or what size, though it can allocate up to 32GB. from what i understand, WP7 will append it on to the existing partition, and the fault occurs when the card is removed and reinserted, the device will only recognize 15MB free space and then both the phone and card must be reformatted. but again its not been identified publicly as to what causes this issue. the original notion was that the SD card quality may be a key factor, WP7 may not like seeing a bunch of unusable blocks on a card. i know many cards have some sketchy reliability.
i guess my point is that it all depends on the application. every modern engine that runs on the street needs an ECU so really the article has implications for all vehicles. not trying to be pedantic or anything but i try to look at the largest practical scope possible, in this case it would include motorcycles, semi trucks and everything in between.
while i agree you shouldnt need ABS to be a safe driver, the fact is pretty much all new cars come with it, so lets go with the assumption that its equipped that way. in this case, i certainly want to know that the ABS is functioning because lets face it, the uncertainty of whether or not the ABS will fire is of huge importance when trying to avoid an accident. if i know i have ABS i'm ok, if i know i dont, i'm ok, if i'm unsure, thats dangerous.
those people like Honda and and every motorcycle maker besides harley davidson?
yeah i hate that my Triumph Daytona has to hit 12600 rpm to make peak hp /sarcasm
why you gotta always play the race card?
what i meant was "kids" as in this generation of leaders. the founding fathers would be pretty saddened by the mess their children have made of their inheritance.
yeah.... i hear thats what all the kids are saying these days... unprotected whatnot.... but listen, the Document says:
Congress shall make no law... prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech... seems to me the way they wrote it didnt make that distinction.
the idea that was America, failed a long time ago. We're just here to witness the aftermath.
wall thats just all kinds of retarded and heres why... on second thought... thats actually not a bad idea and it feels very... Google-esque.
i think its still an "if". as you said they are a for profit company and just because they're for profit doesnt make them necessarily stupid. i doubt they'd shoot them selves in the foot like that. its symbolic. they recognize that they are the unparalleled champions of search and that drives the hits which drives the ad revenue. if their all encompassing page-rank system were to be subverted by The Google itself it would draw into question Googles credibility for search (regardless of their credibility as a company, their credibility for search is undeniable). it could seriously damage the brand. thats why Google was in that fiasco with China, they were afraid of damaging the brand by diluting searches. Fortunately for them the Chinese voice little concern over being censored.
theres backlash with that too though. If Google excluded them from search they'd be defeating them selves by providing inferior service. Customers would soon notice. If they did something like that i'd start buying shares in MSFT, Bing would hit a whole new level of acceptability.
its even more important than any perceived financial losses. he suppressed free speech... sorry, but thats sacred ground in the US and you dont fuck with it.
what many are failing to realize is that, more important than network pwnage, or even monetary loss, the man abridged other peoples right to free speech, maliciously. the right to free speech was the very first thing the founders of the US felt needed to be added to their constitution, its something held sacred in America. if you want to know if the punishment is fair, look at other 1st amendment cases with criminal proceedings. i'll bet you anything this is either average or light sentencing. in this instance a DDoS suppressed other peoples right to communicate. i mean... thats a pretty big deal. the whole net neutrality thing is wrapped up in ISPs imposing limits on free speech over the internet.
rather than balking at the sentence, look at the most important issue here, not DDoS, not politics, not his record.
right but the whole point of making open source drivers (or more accurately in this case open source firmware) is to bypass the need for the software license and therefore gain the ability to operate it with other electronics, to do this the product is reverse engineered and thats a perfectly legal process.
FUD. the whole letter is FUD. they use terms like "tamper-protection" because its the strongest thing they can say, they know they cant do anything about it... tis all posturing.
the EULA only applys to software, not hardware.
welcome to software. you do not *buy* software from Microsoft (or from most other vendors for that matter) you license it. Thats why the EULA stands for End User *License* Agreement. These are the sets of rules you agree to abide by if you wish to retain license of their product.
OTOH, hardware cannot be licensed, only sold or leased, and no such terms can be placed on something that is sold.
listen, i'm all for bashing MS when its merited, but calling Bill Gates 'sterile and clueless' is just all kinds of inaccurate, hes got kids and pretty remarkable business sense.
oblig
snarky pedantic comment about the meaning of irony, you're doing it wrong, etc even though irony is an incredibly flexible word.
sounds like a solid case for IT depts. to keep Exchange. i'm all about smooth operation but i'm also about still having a job.
its more like requiring that it run on Gasoline (Windows) rather than Diesel (UNIX)
its more than just people, its businesses, and you frankly arent understanding just how big those cogs are. there are also "unknown unknowns" here. even on a small scale (under 1000 users, say) an IP migration can be a *very* complicated and especially when you get to the level of 2nd or 3rd tier providers the amount of preparation that needs to be done just to THINK about what would be required to PLAN such a move is staggering. this doesnt even get into the application layer. most applications dont currently support IPv6 and many corporations dont upgrade main line of business applications regularly. some of the companies i work with use software that is from the mid 90's and a few have stuff thats copyright 1988. For many of these businesses the cost of upgrading the hardware and/or software is prohibitive. But cost is a whole other can of worms, you try convincing a small business owner or CFO or CEO that they need to spend money they dont have on something they know they need but isnt killing them now. beyond that theres yet other issues as well.
i'm not saying you're wrong, people DO need more education on the matter and we do need to start making these changes ASAP but the going is not as easy as "RTFA and make a change"
The problem is that half of your grievances are a result of you being a tech-hipster. LCD's *are* in fact flat screens. DVD's *are* Compact Discs, granted they are a specific type of disc, and Hard Disk space *is* memory, its not RAM, but it is memory.
look, i understand these are pet peeves because they dont conform to the vernacular you're used to, but being frustrated about the way people say things when they're technically accurate... well thats a sign of deeper issues.
not to add too thick of another layer on to it, but sadly there are many corporate interests involved in Africa as well that undeniably play a large role in the unstable governments in many countries. Oil, Diamonds and other natural resources are extracted from that continent at a blistering pace with very little regard for the environment or who they're paying off to get their goods. inasmuch as providing food, healthcare, education etc. a key fundamental in my mind for stable governance requires that we (and by 'we' i mean the first world in general) change the way we do business in Africa. the problem with that is that it requires that our societies accept changes as well and i dont think that as nations we are ready to accept the implications of those changes.
at least... thats the impression i have right now. but i think that the "Africa Issue" is one the whole world is trying to figure out. At least China seems to have some sort of notion of what they're doing, and as a Communist society are in many ways better suited to act as one large group than the US or the UN.