A short look at the html of the site along with a small guess yields:
http://www.doom3.com/play_large.html
The default trailer is entirely to small to make out details.
Another (free) resource is the very readable, very thorough Advanced Bash-Scripting Guide [http://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/]. Mendel Cooper has done an excellent job with this project. If a person wished to learn more about Bash, I would direct them here *first*.
The LEAF distribution of Linux (leaf.sourceforge.net has performed excellently over the years. Various sub-distributions have tackled different things, and I've happily been using Bering at my company for years now. Smoothwall and Bering sound similar: Bering offers a 2.4 kernel, one floppy default running size, easy setup, good documentation, an active and helpful mailing list, and Shorewall for those of who don't want to muck around with iptables scripts. (I'm guilty of using iptables by itself for some time. Shorewall's thorough implementation is sobering to this do-it-yourself-er).
It's an exciting idea. I'd be very interested in working with somebody on something like this, either an existing website or a new one. Email me (ryan@l-s.com) if you'd like to know what I could do to contribute.
I took a 5 minute gander over at opendesk.com and saw a few interesting features. It's open-source, so perhaps you could use it as a springboard for rolling your own.
Speaking of rolling your own... (I see a number of people have already mentioned this route... it's too bad there isn't a full-blown package out there to give some alternatives to IBM's Lotus... but I digress) you could check out the resources at linuxdev.net. An application server, like Enhydra, combined with an LDAP server could fit the bill. There's plenty of other application servers out there; I work with ColdFusion on daily basis. Allaire (maker of ColdFusion) has released a CF server stub for linux and a full port is on its way.
Intranet wants/needs can differ greatly from company to company. Whatever solution you end up with, it'd be nice to have the flexibility to customize. *flex coding fingers*
"Mitchell purposefully arrived on July 1st -- Canada's Day -- and won the title in time for the Fourth of July. He even wore a red, white and blue, Star-Star Spangled Banner tie to emphasize the patriotic sentiments behind his efforts."
I'm working on finishing up a web (pseudo-)programming project this evening to meet a deadline, getting all stressed out knowing I'm not going to make it, and when I read that, I just laughed my ass off!
I wish it were that simple. If Micro$oft "extends and embraces" something, and I don't like what they turn it into, I may very well have no choice but to use it. If my language choices were governed by language quality alone, I don't think any of us would have a problem with what Micro$oft is doing. The unfortunate reality is, due to politically pressures in the job-world, the programmer rarely (in my experience) can choose to program in something based on language quality alone (or at all)!
Slashdot Mirror
Clojure has excellent language design and parallelism and the team recently released ClojureScript. A video introduction can be found here.
I, for one, welcome our new heavy-gravity overlords.
---
Q. "What do you do?"
A. "Oh
Q. "In what languages?"
A. "Oh
Fast forward to the interesting portion of this riveting presentation.
I was going to post something similar, but you beat me too it.
Why abuse something like Wikipedia? Only an asshole would.
And, actually, you can abuse my bandwidth if you'd like until Monday 8:00am ( 14:00 GMT Jan. 12)
http://66.231.10.5/doom3/trailer_large.mov
A short look at the html of the site along with a small guess yields: http://www.doom3.com/play_large.html The default trailer is entirely to small to make out details.
Another (free) resource is the very readable, very thorough Advanced Bash-Scripting Guide [http://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/]. Mendel Cooper has done an excellent job with this project. If a person wished to learn more about Bash, I would direct them here *first*.
The LEAF distribution of Linux (leaf.sourceforge.net has performed excellently over the years. Various sub-distributions have tackled different things, and I've happily been using Bering at my company for years now. Smoothwall and Bering sound similar: Bering offers a 2.4 kernel, one floppy default running size, easy setup, good documentation, an active and helpful mailing list, and Shorewall for those of who don't want to muck around with iptables scripts. (I'm guilty of using iptables by itself for some time. Shorewall's thorough implementation is sobering to this do-it-yourself-er).
It's an exciting idea. I'd be very interested in working with somebody on something like this, either an existing website or a new one. Email me (ryan@l-s.com) if you'd like to know what I could do to contribute.
Ryan
I took a 5 minute gander over at opendesk.com and saw a few interesting features. It's open-source, so perhaps you could use it as a springboard for rolling your own.
... (I see a number of people have already mentioned this route ... it's too bad there isn't a full-blown package out there to give some alternatives to IBM's Lotus ... but I digress) you could check out the resources at linuxdev.net. An application server, like Enhydra, combined with an LDAP server could fit the bill. There's plenty of other application servers out there; I work with ColdFusion on daily basis. Allaire (maker of ColdFusion) has released a CF server stub for linux and a full port is on its way.
Speaking of rolling your own
Intranet wants/needs can differ greatly from company to company. Whatever solution you end up with, it'd be nice to have the flexibility to customize. *flex coding fingers*
"Mitchell purposefully arrived on July 1st -- Canada's Day -- and won the title in time for the Fourth of July. He even wore a red, white and blue, Star-Star Spangled Banner tie to emphasize the patriotic sentiments behind his efforts."
I'm working on finishing up a web (pseudo-)programming project this evening to meet a deadline, getting all stressed out knowing I'm not going to make it, and when I read that, I just laughed my ass off!
Right on, fellow American! Do us Proud!
*cackle*
I wish it were that simple. If Micro$oft "extends and embraces" something, and I don't like what they turn it into, I may very well have no choice but to use it. If my language choices were governed by language quality alone, I don't think any of us would have a problem with what Micro$oft is doing. The unfortunate reality is, due to politically pressures in the job-world, the programmer rarely (in my experience) can choose to program in something based on language quality alone (or at all)!
So...I go to linux.com and that's what I see. Someone should put a watch on it and tell /. when it goes live. *** Enter /. effect ***