it's attempt at the laptop-style format. As such, I think it tended to hide the features of the Newton OS.
I doubt, however, that your watch can surf the web, telnet to a server, read a newsgroup, attach to an external keyboard, control entertainment devices via infrared, take notes in class, record & play sounds & lectures, send faxes, compose and receive email, do drawings, or have a built-in assistant (IMHO the coolest feature that really highlighted the Newt's capabilities).
that you'll hopefully eventually be able to run the (brilliant) Newton OS on more modern & portable hardware.
Also, if your entire exposure to the Newton OS was on a 1.0 device, IMHO, you've missed out on what the real draw is vis-a-vis the capabilities of the later MessagePads & eMate.
The "real" Sal goes on to explain towards the end that Justin will know he's the "real" one because he'll send all his emails in italics.
I would agree that it could be worded better, but
on
WiFi Woes With .11g
·
· Score: 0
all that quote/footnote is really saying is that if one uses an 802.11b card with the APE, then the APE will communicate with it using 802.11b.
I know you don't know me from Adam, and I would not feel comfortable revealing on/. how it is that I know this. But, trust that the only difference between running a 'pure'.11g network and a mixed.11g/.11b network is the use of RTS/CTS packets..11g clients will get a 54Mbps connection and.11b clients will get a 11Mbps connection.
Make no mistake: This has nothing to do w/802.11g
on
WiFi Woes With .11g
·
· Score: 1, Informative
being ratified or anything like that. Regardless of the fact that 802.11g is in Final Draft status and will likely have very few, if any, changes... the issue is entirely whether or not 802.11b vendors completely implemented the 802.11b standard.
802.11b / 802.11g compatibility relies on implementation of RTS/CTS in the respective stacks. Many 802.11b vendors failed to implement this (for whatever reason).
Further, the idea that 802.11g access points revert to 802.11b when as little as one 802.11b client is present is a myth! What happens is that when an 802.11g access point is run in compatibility mode, it is forced to use RTS/CTS. The data rate is not slowed down. Rather, it experiences slightly greater overhead as RTS/CTS packets must be used.
Let us take the time to stop all this FUD now and educate ourselves.
The point here is that Office v. X is not written in Cocoa (the evolution of NeXT), it is written in Carbon (the reduced set of APIs that grew from the Mac OS Toolkit)
Therefore, any port of Office to any *nix would not have a head start in the form of BSD compatibility.
Slashdot Mirror
in the 2003 miniseries (now available on DVD). Did you see that? It covers the blonde-in-head thing, for example.
Also, they obviously waited the full 33 minutes hoping that each time, no Cylons would arrive and it would be unnecessary to FTL jump again.
it's attempt at the laptop-style format. As such, I think it tended to hide the features of the Newton OS.
I doubt, however, that your watch can surf the web, telnet to a server, read a newsgroup, attach to an external keyboard, control entertainment devices via infrared, take notes in class, record & play sounds & lectures, send faxes, compose and receive email, do drawings, or have a built-in assistant (IMHO the coolest feature that really highlighted the Newt's capabilities).
that you'll hopefully eventually be able to run the (brilliant) Newton OS on more modern & portable hardware.
Also, if your entire exposure to the Newton OS was on a 1.0 device, IMHO, you've missed out on what the real draw is vis-a-vis the capabilities of the later MessagePads & eMate.
The "real" Sal goes on to explain towards the end that Justin will know he's the "real" one because he'll send all his emails in italics.
all that quote/footnote is really saying is that if one uses an 802.11b card with the APE, then the APE will communicate with it using 802.11b.
/. how it is that I know this. But, trust that the only difference between running a 'pure' .11g network and a mixed .11g/.11b network is the use of RTS/CTS packets. .11g clients will get a 54Mbps connection and .11b clients will get a 11Mbps connection.
I know you don't know me from Adam, and I would not feel comfortable revealing on
being ratified or anything like that. Regardless of the fact that 802.11g is in Final Draft status and will likely have very few, if any, changes... the issue is entirely whether or not 802.11b vendors completely implemented the 802.11b standard.
802.11b / 802.11g compatibility relies on implementation of RTS/CTS in the respective stacks. Many 802.11b vendors failed to implement this (for whatever reason).
Further, the idea that 802.11g access points revert to 802.11b when as little as one 802.11b client is present is a myth! What happens is that when an 802.11g access point is run in compatibility mode, it is forced to use RTS/CTS. The data rate is not slowed down. Rather, it experiences slightly greater overhead as RTS/CTS packets must be used.
Let us take the time to stop all this FUD now and educate ourselves.
of these lower-end laptops? That could be cool.
supported statement!
NewtonScript was interpreted. Even the HWR routines were.
The Compaq runs compiled programs.
"Oh My God."?
The point here is that Office v. X is not written in Cocoa (the evolution of NeXT), it is written in Carbon (the reduced set of APIs that grew from the Mac OS Toolkit)
Therefore, any port of Office to any *nix would not have a head start in the form of BSD compatibility.
And it's the desktop to my TiBook.
Found it on resexcellence on Friday.
Star Wars: Episode II: The Clone Wars ??!
Airport, DVD