Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars II: Return of the Name

Mutant was among the onslaught of readers who submitted that the final name has been chosen for Star Wars Episode II. It is... Attack of the Clones. Let the sarcasm commence. I'll pass judgement after I see it.

947 comments

  1. Re:Wish List for Scenes in Episode II by Genom · · Score: 2

    Nah - unless they trade sabres during the fight, you'll know if it's the "good clone" or the "bad clone" by the color of the sabre -- red = "evil" anything else = "good".

    Or by the goatee - everyone knows the evil version always has a goatee ;P

  2. Re:Probably a fake by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 2

    They changed it from "Revenge of the Jedi" because as Lucas's wife pointed out, JEDI'S DONT GET REVENGE!

    --


    "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
  3. Re:Episode III leak... by Scurrilous+Knave · · Score: 1

    I second the emotion. I laughed so hard I almost shit myself. Unlike Lucas, I'd have had to use plain old bog paper.

    StaticEngine, you da man!

  4. Re:Okay... by mcolin · · Score: 1

    >One thing I will admit is that I never caught on to how stupid and obvious the name Darth (in)Vader was

    Ha, now imagine being in Germany, where the name Vader is suspiciously close to the word "Vater",
    which incidentally means... Father.

  5. But it is possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    However, I never expected Episode I to magically return me to twelve years of age. I never expected it to erase my capacity for critical thought and open a world of childlike wonder in my head for one simple reason: I'm no longer a child.

    Agreed, and certainly Ep. I didn't do it for me as much as I hoped.

    On The Other Hand, X-Men pretty much did. You can ask my friends who were there with me - I spent practically the whole movie curled up in my chair, mouthing 'Rock On' at ever cool bit of niftiness they didn't screw up too badly. It was sooo much better than it could have been in almost all of the ways that mattered. It was great, and I have hopes for the new Spider Man movie coming out sometime before Duke Nukem Forever. And Ep. I could have done that. I liked it a fair bit, enjoyed it even, and got a kick out of the action stuff. It's nice to see that Jedi were really impressive. Palpitine rocked, although I doubt I would have appreciated it as much if I didn't know he was Emperor Palpitine. And so on.

    But it could have been better. Lets hope he gets back the guy who directed Empire to direct Clone Attack.

  6. Re:You can never go home. by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    • It's for your kids. Stop complaining and let them enjoy it.

    Circa 1977:

    • L'il Rogerborg: Gosh, father, what a splendid cinematic experience. Did you also enjoy it?
    • L'il Rogerborg's daddy: Why, yes son, it was both invigorating and diverting. On balance, I would judge it a most excellent film and would be pleased to take you to see it again.

    Circa 1999:

    • L'il Nephew Neddy: Woo! Yeah! Now this is pod racing! Yee ha! Take me to see it again, Uncle Rogerborg! Again! Again!
    • Uncle Rogerborg: Aaargh! No! I can't sit through that again. I'm going to watch South Park: BLU and nurse my violated childhood memories.
    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  7. Not only is he a bad director... by BassMonkey · · Score: 1

    George's number two at Lucasfilm and favoured second unit director is Roger Christian. The genius who brought us 'Battlefield Earth'.

  8. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Vip · · Score: 1

    I think the best comment about this issue was from Mark Hamill, when he was on "Politcially Incorrect".

    He was asked, just before TPM came out, "Why after all these years, is Star Wars such a huge movie? It had lousy acting, story line isn't great..."

    His reply was, "It's a fairy tale in space. You have an evil wizard, good wizard, magic, naive farm boy, pirates, monsters, the princess in distress..." You wrap it up in some amazing sfx and you've got a great and fun movie.

    Vip

  9. Re:George Lucas is slowly losing his mind by sethg · · Score: 2

    Who said he ever could write a decent script? In an introduction to one of the recent SW books (which had the shooting script for one of the original movies -- I forget which), Lucas mentions that another writer gave him a lot of help with the dialogue.

    --
    send all spam to theotherwhitemeat@ropine.com
  10. Re:you still hoping for the Zahn novels too? by flewp · · Score: 1

    I like enjoying myself too, through means of pleasuring myself.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  11. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Sam+Williams · · Score: 1


    I saw Ep. IV in the theaters when I was seven. Don't remember much about the experience except the trash compactor scene and the final mission. Still, I do remember my Dad's take:

    "I'm sitting in the theater and the film opens with this lame title sequence rolling off into space. The title fades to black and suddenly a spaceship comes in from the top of the screen. I'm thinking, 'OK, I've seen this before.' Five seconds later, a second ship slowly emerges . . . and keeps emerging, and keeps emerging until finally the whole screen is filled and the whole theater is shaking from the sound of it.

    "I'm thinking, "OK, I haven't seen that before.'"

    Frankly, that's all I wanted from Ep. I. It didn't have to be Shakespearean drama, but you at least expected a quantum leap in special effects/action similar to what James Cameron pulled off with Terminator II. IIRC, the first scene in Ep. I is a ship flying toward some donut-shaped space station with a lot of weak dialogue about treaties, embargoes and whatnot. Right then and there, you knew it was going to be lame. Jar Jar or no Jar Jar.

  12. Re:Okay... by Silver222 · · Score: 1
    tried to make us believe that an 8-year-old boy can have romantic chemistry with a space-queen.

    You know, since I feel asleep watching TPM, I never noticed that. I'm surprised people weren't protesting it as kiddie porn.

    You're right about picking the worst child actor in the world. Although, with the lines they gave him, I'm not sure how well Sir Lawrence Olivier would have done.

    --
    "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." Bill Hicks
  13. you don't have the karma to get noticed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject. why bother putting content here, it'll just get modded down anyway.

  14. Re:Appropriate by kubrick · · Score: 1

    I've been watching the fifth season of B5 and it's total crap.

    Wasn't most of the fifth season filler? JMS had to speed up the main story arc and end it by the end of the fourth season (thinking they wouldn't be renewed). It's been a while since I've seen B5, but the first and last seasons were weaker than the rest, IMHO. When it was good, it was very good indeed :)

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  15. you still hoping for the Zahn novels too? by unitrcn · · Score: 2

    I know I'd like to see them as 7,8, and 9. They were my childhood; I read them long before I ever saw any of the movies.

    --

    The real unitron has Slashdot ID 5733, and needs to change his sig.
    1. Re:you still hoping for the Zahn novels too? by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      I think people are more concerned about effects of midiclorians (the spontaneous impregnation of Anakin's mother) than about the fact that they exist. As a concept, it's fine. As an excuse to make weak biblical references, it's lame.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  16. Re:Bummer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reminds me of an old Azimov short story... 'trapped! trapped! on a world full of giant aunts!'

  17. Re:More than half way. by Vladinator · · Score: 1

    I don't agree. Alien was a better suspense move than Aliens was. Aliens was a better action move than Alien was. Same universe, but a bit like comparing Apples to Oranges. I'd call them equal in that regard.

    --

    "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

  18. Re:That wasn't my point by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Ewoks do not bother any of my non-geek friends. Why do all geeks hate them with a passion, then?

    Ewoks aren't hated because they are cute, they are hated because they are cute teddy bears who took out a legion of Star Wars. That was bullshit, and what you seem to have been missing.

    WHY? A lot of people here seem to think that "if it's dark, it's good" or even "if it's not dark, it sucks". Again, WHY?

    Nobody has ever said that. If the Ewoks were just peacefull forest dwellers, nobody would have cared.

    Think about it.

  19. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just LOVE vladinator's site! Especially the "fash" section, where I learned to cut the bottom off of an old shirt to use as a hair enhancement! Oh, and the "dance party" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read vladinator's emails! Here you will discover how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have a pizza party? A fash party? Go to the mall with all of your friends? Have a sleepover and call boys on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't checked out vladinator's site, you don't know what you're missing!

  20. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by beynos · · Score: 1
    I would think that Star Wars as it has become wouldn't be of any more interest than Pokemon here.

    HEY! Pokemon rocks man... Gotta catch 'em all man...

  21. Re:what's under the helmets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Don't you mean Kaleds?

    I thought they were cybermen.

    So, do you think Spielberg will throw in time travel in the last movie just so he can use some of the original cast and make the plots even more stupid than they already are...oh wait, that's Rick Berman...

  22. Re:Bring Irvin Kershner out of retirement! by BassMonkey · · Score: 1

    Aw bugger! Sorry to hear that.

  23. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 2
    First, it's weird that you chose a Le Guin book as your first example.
    Why? The Earthsea trilogy are kids' classics where I come from. Tehanu is vastly different to the earlier trilogy, and looks weirdly out of place when they're bound together as a four-book set. (Fortunately, the new short-story collection, Tales from Earthsea, is much more "in tune" with the original books).

    Man, if you're only getting the Christian alegory of the Narnia books, you did read them young.
    A book, written for children, in which the child leads are all killed off -- and that's presented as a "happy ending"? Stuff Christianity, that's un-Christian!

    Ultimately, it's the author's right to do or say anything with the world he imagines... it's impossible for the author to "intrude." His is the authoritative word, as it were.
    I agree completely. But additions by the author can have an unpleasant effect on the audience, who may have been expecting something different. With "Star Wars" (bringing us belatedly back on topic), it looks like many fans-from-childhood were disappointed that the new film appealed to current children, not to thirtysomething original audience members. The examples I suggested take other paths:

    • Earthsea - a "mature" sequel to a kids' trilogy;
    • Narnia - a pretty shocking ending to a series intended for kids;
    • Middle-Earth - progressively more "complex" add-ons to a kids' book
    The thing is, if you enjoyed the "originals" as kids' stuff, you don't necessarily want the add-ons to be more complex. Do we really want to see "dark", "edgy", "adult" themes in kiddie-lit sequels? I doubt it. I want my kids to be able to enjoy the same simple pleasures as me. Including films and books that are aimed at kids, not aging nerds like us.
  24. I know you'll all see Star Wars 2 by arielb · · Score: 1

    know why? This is why http://www.blueharvest.net/images/prequel/episode2 /natalie.jpg

    --
    ---
  25. Re:Ugh by rosewood · · Score: 1

    How can the 4th post be redundent?

  26. A question for self reflection by limey_reader · · Score: 1
    No matter what Episode One's content. A large group of people would find fault with it.

    This probably has something to do with the grand and varied explications people had for it. Let me ask a question:

    Would you have enjoyed Episode I more if you didn't read the articles, watch the endless news reports/ads, avoided the commercials and stayed away from person/website that contained speculation about Episode I content?

    In short if you ignored the hype about Episode One. Would you have found it to be a better movie? (I admit it would impossible to ignore all the hype for the average human considering the ad campaign)

  27. Re:Appropriate by IronChef · · Score: 2


    I would NOT put Joss Whedon on that list. I think he does a great job at being The Man and putting together a good show... but his dialogue is weak. Well, it's GOOD, actually... but I was noticing the other day that all the characters in his shows sound the same. The actors/acresses give some life and variation, of course, but imagine reading all the lines in a typical episode... everyone sounds the same. The same wisecracks, the same modes of speech...

    YMMV, but man, I just can't put JW in the same league as KS and QT. The latter 2 have a serious gift for dialogue.

  28. Star Wars isn't supposed to be deep by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 2
    Yes, it's paint by numbers. Yes, the characters are predictable. Yes, there are clear good guys and bad guys (save Vader, who goes from good guy to bad guy and is then redeemed). Yes, there are plush toys in staring roles. And you know what? That's exactly why people like it so much!

    Was The Odyssey deep? Of course not. It was half blood and gore and half hot, sexy sea nymphs. Was Beowulf deep? Of course not, it was a super-human hero killing evil critters left and right.

    There are, in Western culture at least, certain common images and settings that we have come to expect. They're an unwritten cultural and artistic language. "White" is the good guy, "Black" is the bad guy. Good guys have blond hair, bad guys have deep voices. The good guy doesn't kill the bad guy when he's down. Forests are places of mysticism. In American culture, the freedom-loving underdog rebels are always the good guys over the evil imperial military hegemony. (See also: American Revolution. Why do you think all Imperial officers have British accents?)

    Star Wars very deliberately and openly plays into every single one of those. It is the "classic" and "quintessential" epic good vs. evil saga, because it pulls in every one of the things that we have come to expect in good vs. evil sagas over the past 2500 years. All good classics have things that you can anchor yourself on and use as a springboard into the plot. If Luke wasn't a goody two-shoes, no one would have liked him. If Han wasn't a "lovable rogue" but was really a nasty guy through and through, everyone would have hated him and Leah hooking up.

    We're expecting too much from a saga that was intended not to break new plot ground, but to be a damn fun watch. And it was, because we like seeing the underdog good guys win by being good guys and the evil controlling imperial bad guys go down because they're the bad guys. Accept Star Wars for what it is: A hot damn fun adventure story in the style of classic adventure stories throughout the ages.

    Do that, and you can even live with the Ewoks and Jar Jar. (I happen to like the Ewoks, they're cute!)

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  29. Re:To be fair... by Sarcastic+nerd · · Score: 1

    Attack of the Munchies!

  30. Re:Appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no level of flamage to adequately expess my my dislike of Kevin Smith as a director even when I like his work. Or rather, what is good in his work snuck past his obsessive deathgrip. Granted his lines are sometimes good, but I definately think he lost a lot of prime material for having a god complex about his scripts.

  31. Re:Attack of the..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I usLVE adinatr's st! Epeily he"h" ecti wheI rn ut ebto offf lshirt o a ienhanemnt! Oh, ad te acepry" ht

    orse, n' oge to advldto&#11 4;'emi! re yo wl dsove hw rulydficl tistoecdewh& #97;t ooon& #32;ekend.. hav izza pat?Af at? Go the althll fyor eds Hve leepovrandcal ys on the hn?

    In short, iyaven'&#3 2;chekd vlaiar'ss ,ount nwwh ou'e missig!

  32. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jutOV vinatos te!Epecily as"ection,h r laned to ct tboto fff old stoe a a ai eanement O, and "dance prt" oos

    O cure, don'tforgto rea aditorse&#9 7;ils!Hry wll dicoer how truly dffcu itdec ht to d o t eee... haea pza pty? ashparty Goo the all wthal ofur rends? Ha eepv a snte pone

    In sort, yu en'thec&#10 0; ot vadatr'ssite&#32 ;o 't knwat ouressin

  33. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ut LOVE vadiatorste! speially h "fah" ect, re rn to utt botom of f ol shrttos asa hai eaemet h, the "dancepty"otos!

    Of ore,dn'&#10 2;oet o rea adnators emailHer&#1 17; ill corow&#32 ;truy ifft ti to ecide wh tod othewekds&# 46;.ha izparty A ashpartGto&# 32;themll witall f you freds Hae slepo cal boy ntone

    I or, if you havntcke&#3 2;o ladinatr's site, o do't kow hat yu'e sng

  34. Re:Might this not be a ploy by inDica · · Score: 1

    shakes the clone...

  35. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers." (Leia to Tarkin. How many times has the plucky revolutionary said something similar to the dictator in numerous other settings?)

    Matt Groenig (simpsons and futurama) said that the secret of great sci-fi is that it isn't really about the future or the past (or another dimension, etc.). It's about the present.

    Putting modern day situations into a sci-fi setting is what good sci-fi story telling is all about. For example watch Star Trek 6 The Undiscovered Country (arguably the the third best trek movie, although it does get very cheesy at the end) and see how many references to the cold war you can spot (the film tried to mirror recent events with the soviet union in the early 90's). The film starts with the explosion of the Klingon energy production moon of Praxis, this represents the chernobly disaster, and this is just the first of many references in the film.

  36. The problem by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    The trouble with what's happening to Star Wars is this: Star Wars is meant to be space opera.

    Space opera isn't necessarily kid fare. It needs to be done as if it is a _masterpiece_. Yes, everything is overblown and exaggerated- that's the point. But it can't be the slightest bit tongue-in-cheek- and the merchandising machine increasingly makes it tough to do that.

    "Defeats the big evil villain who turns out to be his father, and, dying, reforms and looks upon his son with his own eyes" is an opera.

    "Wins the big race" is an Elvis movie (and a video game).

    Lucas has the _chance_ at great space opera, still. To show the corruption of Anakin is potentially great space opera. But there is definitely a risk that he'll completely blow it- too many computerized extras, too many merchandising tie-ins affecting the scanty plot of the movies, which won't stand much of that treatment. Space opera plot is _cheesey_. Hijack a bit of it for use as a video game or something, and you risk losing all of it by losing the thread and not being able to pick it up again.

    At least it ought to wind up an absolutely great issue of 'Cinefex' ;)

  37. Re:You can never go home. by Apotsy · · Score: 1
    Being the age you are, and a former projectionist, you ought to be one of the few people on this board who actually knows what 70mm 6-track is. I have to ask: doesn't it just kill you that it's gone now? Man, that was the shit. I love 70mm. I saw all the SW movies and all the Indiana Jones movies as 70mm blow-ups when they were first released. I used to think movies would always look and sound that good. Then it died out.

    A couple of years ago, before the Northpark #1 in Dallas closed down (and was subsequently torn down -- f**k you Mr. Nasher!), they used to dig up old 70mm 6-track prints of 80s movies and show them at midnight shows. The last one I saw was a pretty nice print of "Aliens". After years of watching 35mm-only, it was a breath of fresh air to see just how good movies used to look and sound (today's digital sound formats are so heavily compressed, they actually sound worse than 6-track SR!). I pine for the days of 70mm.

    Now we have to put up with people telling us that digital video projection will be better. It could be; it has the potential to be ... but so far every demo I've seen just sucks ass. DLP is only 1280x1024. Every time I see it, my first reaction is, "hey, that looks like TV!" No joke. If they could somehow throw 4000x3000 video up on the screen with the full contrast and color range of film, I'd say go for it. But nobody seems interested in actually doing it right anymore. Hell, Lucas "filmed" Episode II with a freakin' HDTV camera! Ugh.

  38. Star Wars comments in general... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This started as a reply to someone who remarked that A New Hope was a cheesy title, too. Actually, A New Hope was appended later - it was not part of the original title.

    Unfortunately, in writing the response, it became more of a general rant, so I moved it into the general comments...

    While I agree with the sentiment that the title Attack of the Clones works as a 50's SF serial genre, it is still somewhat cheesy.

    Having read a fair sampling of the remarks here, I can see an interesting theory materializing: George Lucas's writing abilities did not mature while the audience did. I was in High School when the first film came out and in College when the second and third ones came out. Perhaps there is some validity to this argument. But, based on what I saw in stores after both Return and Phantom, Lucas misjudged his market - an awful lot of unsold Ewok and Jar-Jar toys wound up in bargain bins.

    My major problem with the films has been the decreasing story quality level. The original film featured cardboard cutouts for characters, but had a pretty good story. Empire built on the first film, had some character development and a good story. There was character development in Return and the underlying story was good, but the choices in pacing and what elements of the story were focussed on was so messed up that they obscured matters (not to mention the #$@*& Ewoks!). Return also saw the marketing gone amuck that we now have to endure with every major motion picture these days. If nothing else, Lucas has much to answer for in this respect. Phantom Menace had some of the same handicaps that the original film had (trying to introduce a set of totally new characters), but suffered from a much weaker story (and Jar-Jar).

    As for the remarks to the effect that "all of us will see the film" - count me out. I went, grudgingly, to a matinee a couple of months after the last one came out and felt that I had wasted a couple of hours and some hard-earned money (a feeling that came back to me when I saw Pearl Harbor earlier this summer). I did not really want to go, as I had been so distressed by the lack of quality in Return (which I have never seen again), that I did not trust Lucas to deliver a quality product. I will not be at the theaters for episode 2. I'm also not in any hurry to have a copy of Episode 1 (or Return, for that matter) on DVD. I have Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back on LaserDisk and would consider buying both on DVD should they ever come out, but have no interest in any other Star Wars titles, thank you.

    An interesting analogy can be seen in Lucas' other series of films - the Indiana Jones films. Again, we have a set of cut-out characters in a genre that is full of them. The first and third films worked, but the second (Temple of Doom, for those who don't remember it), is horrible. A bad story can sink a film. Poor characterization can be overcome by a good story. Raiders had a good story, Last Crusade had a good one, Star Wars and Empire had good stories, too. Temple of Doom, Return, and Phantom Menace all had lousy stories. I'm betting that Attack of the Clones won't have a good story, either.

  39. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by SilentChris · · Score: 2
    Ah, the sub 100,000 user ID's open their mouths and shit comes out. :)

    Empire was a kid movie too, my friend. Just because a guy gets his hands cut off doesn't mean the movie is not for children. Many "child movies" do attempt to explore great themes. Look at recent Disney films: Beauty and the Beast (tired cliche that beauty is only skin deep, but still questioned by adults) and The Lion King (the struggles in trying to pass down your values).

    In contrast, Star Wars had a lot of stuff blowing up. Lucas goes into how they're "myth-based" and feature deeper stories, but the truth is the more vague he and his writers were about the "force", the better. When they started going into detail (midi-chlorians (sp) anyone?) it became even more laughable.

    Face it, people always love what they grew up with as kids. That's why marketers love the 12-18 market: these people will not only buy they're goods then, but continue to buy their goods for years beyond to "reminisce". Meanwhile, Lucas is sitting quietly, as always, laughing all the way to the bank.

  40. 1950's here we come by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

    Attack of the killer tomato's
    Aliens attack
    ATTACK OF PUPPET PEOPLE
    Attack of the 50 Foot Woman

    Attack of the Clones

    Dam, this title makes the movie sound like a 1950's horrer flick. >:)=

    just hope that the graphics are a lot better the the 50's flicks
    >:)=

    my 2 cents plus 2 more

  41. Re:Probably a fake by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    No, remember, this is a Fox production:

    When Clones Attack.

  42. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Lucas *trying* to turn his legacy into a cheese-fest? What is he smoking? What part of his brain could possibly be running at the moment he said, "How about 'Attack of the Clones'? Yeah, that sounds great!"? I think the man has lost it. I think this is one of the signs of the apocalypse: "and the angel broke the seventh seal, and the epic myths of the last generation were turned into the b-movies of the next."

    I know, it's possible it's a fake title, but remember, everybody said that about... "The Phantom Menace" [queue Theremin] and then, there it was, larger than life, onscreen at theaters nationwide.

    The first prequel was a good movie. Not nearly as good as any of the originals, but still a very good movie. The one thing everyone was counting on for the second was a sharp decline in goofy crap. See: Jar-jar. Also see: 10-year old saving the universe with battle cries like "woohoo!" Now the outlook has dimmed.

    I know some are going to be poised on the defense, since everybody's gonna jump all over this, and yeah, I'm ranting a little for fun, but COME ON! He could do sooooo much better! And we deserve better, too! True the title doesn't determine the whole movie, but a simple change could make all the difference: even "The Clones Attack" is better. Or "The Clones Revolt", "The Clone Wars", "Clones On Strike", "Battle Clones", "Hangin' With Mr. Cooper". Basically, any other combination of two to four words of the English language would prove inestimably better than the four Mr. Lucas's two synapses came up with. And yes, "Return of the Jedi" and "The Empire Strikes Back" are successful for their simplicity, but somehow escape the goofy intonations of the two prequel titles. Now I find myself anticipating the third prequel. Perhaps "Anakin Does a Baddy No-no". Hey, that's pretty good...

  43. Star Wars tidbits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just hope that in the future any Star Wars tidbits that come up will not be sitting on the main page. I am attempting to isolate myself from all information about the moive. Episode I was ruined for me - not just because the plot was kind of awkward, or because of Jar-Jar. But because I already knew what was going to happen. I knew (usually specifically) what was going to happen. The previews gave everything away. The biggest shock in the movie could have been the double-bladed lightsaber - but no - that was in the previews several weeks before hand. I want to be able to walk into the movie theater and know absolutely nothing about the movie - no generalities, no specifics.

  44. where' the atomic screwdriver when you need it? by bt · · Score: 1

    All we need is a flying phone box and we'd be ready to revive the good doctor:

    Doctor Who: Attack of the Clones

    To be released in a seriese of real-audio episodes starting in 2002

    1. Re:where' the atomic screwdriver when you need it? by Scooter · · Score: 1

      which is similar to a hydro spanner but er.. less wet.

    2. Re:where' the atomic screwdriver when you need it? by mattsking · · Score: 1

      errmm, I believe that's sonic screwdriver. fnord

      --
      Fnord!
  45. Re:what's in a name ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let's not forget ISHTAR !

  46. You forgot: by danger42 · · Score: 1

    Episode II: Insane Clone Posse

    --
    -nd
  47. Re:Bummer... by wishus · · Score: 2
    to build not one but TWO Death Stars with the same flaw?

    The first Death Star was destroyed by sending a torpedo down an exaust port that triggered a chain reaction that eventually blew up the main reactor.

    The second Death Star, if complete, would presumably be without this flaw - at the time of the attack, however, it was incomplete, so the rebels just flew through the infrastructure and blew up the reactor directly.

    So only the first Death Star had the flaw - the only problem with the second was that it wasn't finished yet.

  48. Re:The real problem... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

    Wow, I like your sig.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
  49. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Episode II: Sith are from Mars, Jedi are from Venus

  50. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by wanderingwalrus · · Score: 1

    I think you're missing the point a bit there by attacking the quality of Starwars as a serious film. I think the general, if you tried to look at the old Starwars movies is a complex, interwoven piece of art, you'll find that there is a bit of a void.

    Despite what George might try to have you believe after the movies came out, Starwars ain't a deep and complex film. It's a neat Good VS Evil, shoot them up, cut them down popcorn movie. I think all the comments on the plot and acting are very valid but I don't think the old series really pretend to be either.

    The problem with trying to redo this for the 90s and 00s is that the audience expectations have changed. Watching old chessy 70s and 80s movies, you can really have a good laugh at the cheesy lines and crummy plot. What episode I did that really failed was that it recapture the chessy taciness in plot, but really took itself way too seriously. There was no real send-ups of itself - just more of the cheese, without any recognition of its own chessiness. Audiences are must more critical and in many ways, cynical. Episode I was a pretty ordinary movie and given all the hype, it was almost always going to fall well short of expectations.

    Basically, yeah, Starwars is chessy. It's tacky but hey, we still love it.

  51. Re:What I think is sad..... by 72beetle · · Score: 1

    If Jar Jar had been in the first movie, he would have been loved and had figures of him sold on the black market and been incorporated as a real character in fan fiction, while Ewoks would be universally hated and have fanfiction written about 1001 ways to kill them.

    Um, you must have forgotten since it was so long ago, but the Ewoks WERE universally hated, and there was plenty of fanfiction about their messy and untimely demise. Hell, my dad had a bumpersticker on his company car that said 'Eat An Ewok'.

    That being said, Jar Jar (as well as all the other cutesy kid-appeal characters) are just the product of Lucas trying to find a lock on a target audience, ANY target audience, that will continue to support his tenure with the story that made his name.

    -72

    --
    -Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music.
  52. Re:ENOUGH already! by Scooter · · Score: 1

    They were just clones of the original posts....

  53. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by delong · · Score: 4, Flamebait

    Have you actually *watched* the first three films without the rosy glasses lately? Star Wars was a B-grade space opera flick (no doubt only justified by the then cutting edge FX and Alec Guiness) and the followups weren't much better. Sir Alec turned his nose up at the films ("that Force rubbage"). They're BAD man. I mean, "Star Wars?" How much cheesier of a title can you get? You only think they're wonderful because, like me, you saw them as a kid. There are NO adult themes or elements in ANY of the films, these are aimed at children, Lucas has said they always were and always will.

    Now, I didn't expect much from Phantom Menace, and I actually got more than I expected. I saw kids leaving the theater with wide eyes and full of excitement. No doubt the same way I looked when I saw Star Wars in the theater more than 20 years ago.

    Get over it, man. Star Wars is a children's franchise. It was never good to begin with, so why expect it to be the pinnacle of film now?

    Derek

  54. Lucas is mad at us... by sonnik · · Score: 1

    ...for waiting for the DVD release and not buying VHS. This is his revenge.

  55. Re:Preach on Brother! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you start directing - let me know how many more awards you get than Lucas... We'll set up a 'Giggles Of Doom Vs George Lucas Awards Count-off' site so we can gasp in wonder as you rocket to the top.


    If a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush and a tree falls, does Carmen Sangiego find Waldo?

  56. Re:More than half way. by asmussen · · Score: 1

    Well, I wasn't even counting the TNG movies, but if you include those, I think the worst ones are Insurrection, Star Trek V, Star Trek I, and then Generations, in that order. If Insurrection hadn't been a Trek movie, I think I would have walked out in the middle. Probably still should have...

    --
    Shawn Asmussen
  57. Re:Might this not be a ploy by beynos · · Score: 1
    My favorite rumor about RotJ was that it was supposed to involve the Wookies: set on Kasshykk

    Yeah! That's true. Lucas mentions it in those interviews at the start of the special editions... But then again, if the rebels had of had a legion of Wookies on their side, they would have kicked ass long ago.

  58. Star Wars R.I. P. by Bohemoth2 · · Score: 1

    The mighty Lucas has faltered! The lord of The Rings smells victory, smiles, and takes the head that belongs him!

    1. Re:Star Wars R.I. P. by Count+Fecal · · Score: 1
      The mighty Lucas has faltered!

      The mighty Lucas faltered a long time ago. Remember Howard the Duck?
      If the next Star Wars installment is the same quality as the last two, perhaps it should be called Star Wars II: Revenge of Montezuma.

  59. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by WinDoze · · Score: 2

    Have you actually *watched* the first three films without the rosy glasses lately?

    Personally I'd love to, but LUCAS WON'T LET ME! I have to buy the stupid "Special Editions". Damn I wish I had bought them years ago before the painful-to-watch Han and Jabba scene in Episode IV.

  60. Dolly says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a Baaaaaaaaaad feeling about this!

  61. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

    Sure, I meant no disrespect to you, and I agree in substance with your points. My only bone of contention is that while Star Wars 4, 5 and the first half of 6 (pre re-master) are superficial, they don't necessarily become irritating with age. For me, at least, the magic is still there. It's remembered childhood magic, but it doesn't have Jar Jar screwing it up for me, like he'll do for the kiddies who squealed and giggled at him in Phantom Menace.

    Incidentally, I didn't mean to imply that modern blockbusters are in any way worthy pieces of film making. Perish the thought. ;)

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  62. Natalie portman... by frunch · · Score: 1

    is still hot as HELL.

    I'm going to see Episode II for Natalie only. I know I won't be let down in that respect. Then, if the movie doesn't suck, I'll be pleasantly surprised!

    1. Re:Natalie portman... by KajiCo · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna go see episode II to see if they kill off Jar Jar or not. Ok and maybe also catch a few images of Natalie.

  63. Re:here's another: by zombieking · · Score: 3, Funny

    Star Wars Two: STAR HARDER

    --

    -----
    "The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." - Salvador Dali (1904-1989)
  64. Re:Concerning blind spots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clever dialog? Are you fucking insane?

  65. Pfsh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a lame name, obviously Lucas as lost his edge. I once saw this movie called Attack of the Killer Tomatoes. Is the third movie going to be called Return of the Clones?

  66. Re:We are right to be disappointed by SlippyToad · · Score: 2
    But I also had a lot of tolerence for what they, in my mind, where allowed to do in the story. I think they just went too far for most people.

    All throughout the movie, I kept asking Lucas, silently, "was that really necessary?

    On the whole, Episode I could have been a really fantastic film. Even now, with just a couple of edits, it could still be saved. Cut 1: take Threepio out of the film. He adds absolutely nothing to the advancement of the plot, and it stretches the suspension of disbelief to the breaking point that he was built (or rebuilt) by the dorky little kid that Anakin Skywalker is portrayed as. He's little more than a victim-bot throughout, and his lines are meaningless. Cut 2: most of Jar Jar's scenes could be removed. He could just be digitized out of about half of his scenes, and no one would notice. The actors don't really react to him anyway, since he doesn't exist on the soundstage while they're filming. He could be brought in only where he advances the plot, such as in the scene where he brings Amidala to the Gungans.

    There's nothing to be done about the kid. His acting can't be improved by digitizing it, and I suspect any attempt to do so would just make it worse. But taking those two irritating elements out of the story would vastly improve its belivability. The rest of the plot is fair-to-middling, and I really didn't have any problems with it.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  67. Re:Might this not be a ploy by dark_panda · · Score: 2

    But the "revenge" part was dropped because it wasn't very Jedi-like -- they're supposed to be all Zenned out and stuff and not prone to taking revenge, because that's a Dark Side trait. The name wouldn't have made sense.

    J

  68. Re:That wasn't my point by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    Hrmmm, I find this viewpoint odd, I liked the Ewoks, I thought they were kickass, fuzzy little bears. They beat up stormtroopers and ATATs with rocks and logs, how much more badass can you get? JarJar on the otherhand has a voice that grates on my nerves the same why hearing any other human being completely mangle the english language does. His mannerisms are over exaggerated, his lines are blatantly supposed to be funny but they only come off as stupid. Han Solo and Chewbacca had some great interactions with Leia in the first trilogy, the were funny, they were subtle, they were usually moderately clever. Some of them were of course simply insult hurling, but come on! You gotta give props to 'Scruffy Looking Nerf Herder' as an insult over 'Weeza Gonna Die!!' as a rallying cry. Hell, 'I have a bad feeling about this' is just classic... There were so many more memorable lines from the original trilogy yet about all I remember from TPM is JarJars annoying ass going 'Weeza Gonna Die!' over and over again.
    And for the record, I like Pokemon, Ewoks, Smurgfs, the Gummi Bears, and Koalas. I also like Cowboy Bebop, Fist of the North Star, Iguanas, and Spawn.
    I think my tastes probably run closer to the average section of slashdot than your projection. I believe we're all pretty eclectic people...

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  69. On a completely unrelated note... by synth7 · · Score: 1

    Just exactly what was "the phantom menace" anyhow? Exactly what was the menace and how was it phantasmal? Really... I never felt menaced during the whole movie.

    1. Re:On a completely unrelated note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Queen thought that her planet was invaded by people killing her people. It wasn't, nobody died except for a handful of Gungans. Thus, the "phantom" (illusory) menace.

    2. Re:On a completely unrelated note... by SEE · · Score: 1

      The invasion was a gambit. After Palpatine/Sidious gained his political objectives in the Senate, Sidious/Palpatine would have had to order a retreat anyway, to consolidate his political position. Nobody was really in danger from the Trade Federation; it was merely a "phantom menace" used to pave Palpatine/Sidious's path to power.

  70. MOD THIS UP by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    Mod this up

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    1. Re:MOD THIS UP by Paolomania · · Score: 1

      Good to know that a relevant comment gets attention, while all the silly CmdrTaco jokes are ignored.

  71. Re:I can see it now... by beynos · · Score: 1
    probably meant "killer" blue heeler.

    Nah... he probably meant Keeler blue Heeler... We Australians like rhyming about there bitches too! :)

  72. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by beynos · · Score: 1
    I mean hell even Jar Jar aint so bad when you figure the Ewoks paved the way for him.

    Now now, the Ewoks weren't that bad.

    They spoke in a language that sounded nothing like English... Actually, when they talked... they just made those little clicking noises. See, Jar Jar should have spoken like the Ewoks, then people wouldn't have been so pissed off by him.

    Don't mess with the Ewoks!

  73. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to grudgingly go see it because it was Star Wars, but if they're going to call it "Attack of the Clones", I think I'll wait and rent it. If they can't even come up with a title that doesn't suck, I don't think I wanna spend $9 on the rest of the movie.

  74. Re:do you think... by ozbon · · Score: 1

    Star Wars 9: Evil Marketing Droids Fight Back

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  75. alt. title by kob43 · · Score: 1

    "Episode II: Get over it nerds, it's just a freakin movie"

    o+

    --


    Kiss my bass.
  76. Re:Attack of the..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ijst LVEvladinat's e! secay the ash"ton&#44 ; hr Ieane o cth btoff of noldshr tus s hir eneent& #79;h, and he "nc pry" oto!

    course, on orget rd vdiatr's mails! reyu will dsco houly ifiultit oecidewat t do e eekds.. hae pizza pry? A s pat?G to thal thalofour frnds? Hae a lepoer ndc boysonhe pone?

    shor, i yo h' checed o vlaor's ie, you do'ko t o'e msing!

  77. Re:Revenge of the Jedi by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    "The Attack of the Clones" is better then "Clones Attack!" Yeah, we all know The Emperor got his start during the "Clone Wars", but golly, can't they call it "Clone Wars"?

    And what are they clones of? Great fighters? People loaded with mitochondria, sorry, midiclorians?

    Imagine 40,000 Yodi coming over the hill at you...shudder.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  78. Alternate titles for Episode Deux by tenzig_112 · · Score: 2
    This proves it: Lucas is a fan of the Jim Rome Show.

    Rejected titles for Episode 2:

    • Star Wars Episode II: Jar Jar Gets Lucky
    • Star Wars Episode II: Attack Of The Stem Cells
    • Star Wars Episode II: We Promise This One Won't Suck
    • Star Wars Episode II: Attack Of The Killer Tomatoes VI
    • Star Wars Episode II: Electric Boogaloo

    Lucas hopes the 2nd film will make people forget the recent study alleging that the creator of Star Wars is a pedophile.

  79. Re:Might this not be a ploy by John+F.+Ketamine · · Score: 1

    Right on! Anybody who knows Dante Hicks & Randall Graves is OK with me.

    --
    "Upgrade your grey matter, 'cause one day it may matter." --Deltron Zero
  80. Re:I've got a better title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no, no. It should be Anni the Jedi Slayer. That fits in with the characters name and is closer to "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"

    (just saying the title brings visions of Sarah Michelle Gellars heaving clevage and firm young... But wait! This movie has Natalie Portman in it! And at some point Leia and Luke will have to be concieved! Oh yea baby, I'm there.)

  81. An even better name: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars: The Clonus Horror

  82. Re:The CBG said it best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search on LimeWire. It's there.

  83. Re:Why wasn't this posted earlier? by loraksus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, It was probably something like this.
    Microsoft Balmer dis'es linux! cool!, accept, next, "attack of the clones", wtf? reject, next...

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  84. Re:When Jedi Attack by Coryoth · · Score: 1

    You could in fact make the first three:

    A New Threat
    The Republic Strikes Back
    Return of the Sith

    and have equally pathetic titling for the first three as the second three. Hoorah.

    Jedidiah

  85. Re:Gonna happen by Greg_D · · Score: 1

    Socialists? Socialists are the real sheep. "But we have such good intentions!" Good intentions get you immolated, starved to death, and hung on a cross (not necessarily in that order). Selfish intentions are what make the world go round. That's why they still rule mankind. Sure, you can create a utopia for maybe a generation, but after that, some really mean bastard will come along and screw your paradise up, and you will take it right up the ass because you don't have the power to do anything about it. You gave it all to the really mean bastard via inheritance through the nice guy everyone loves when you created your little paradise.

  86. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by 10.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

    Please pass the Ketchup.

    --
    forth ?love if honk then
  87. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by mav[LAG] · · Score: 2
    (or did he? In the end that guy in III turned out to be an android as well - remember the ear).

    I've looked closely and the Bishop at the end bleeds red blood when tolchocked. Add to that his reaction to Ripley's impending suicide and the conclusion is pretty clear - he's a human working for the company.

    --
    --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  88. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just LOVE vladinator's site! Especially the "fash" section, where I learned to cut the bottom off of an old shirt to use as a hair enhancement! Oh, and the "dance party" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read vladinator's emails! Here you will discover how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have a pizza party? A fash party? Go to the mall with all of your friends? Have a sleepover and call boys on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't checked out vladinator's site, you don't know what you're missing!

  89. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Transwarp+Conduit · · Score: 1

    Which is why I am keeping my big, clunky 12" laserdisc player and my black-box "Star Wars Trilogy" CAV laserdisc set. :)

    Actually, I didn't mind the Jabba scene so much, but the re-jiggered scene between Greedo and Han completely screws up Han Solo's character arc. Sure, the "heroic" Han Solo we see at the end of ROTJ wouldn't have shot first - but that's the whole damn point! One of the major themes of the original Star Wars trilogy, IMO, is redemption. The most obvious example, of course, is Darth Vader's eventual salvation from the Dark Side, but this theme is echoed in any number of other characters throughout the trilogy who, by becoming part of something greater than themselves, become better people - sometimes in spite of themselves. The fact that Han Solo started out as a disreputable, self-centered never-do-well, and became something better, is what made him interesting.

  90. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Milalwi · · Score: 1
    By my count, only two actors were "stars" (Guinness and Ford, and Ford not until later). What were you expecting?
    Umm, if you think the only good acting comes from "stars" you really need to see more movies. Many of the "stars" are competent, but not outstanding. See many of the independent films out there these days. Of course, Sturgeon's Law applies here as well.

    Milalwi

  91. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just LOVE vladinator's site! Especially the "fash" section, where I learned to cut the bottom off of an old shirt to use as a hair enhancement! Oh, and the "dance party" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read vladinator's emails! Here you will discover how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have a pizza party? A fash party? Go to the mall with all of your friends? Have a sleepover and call boys on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't checked out vladinator's site, you don't know what you're missing!

  92. Re:The CBG said it best... by ocie · · Score: 1

    Posts like these make me think that the limit of 5 points for a post is too low.

    More on-topic, has anyone heard anything about "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back"?

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  93. Re:You'll never see it. SW2 violates the DMCA! by Scooter · · Score: 1

    Throw in the Ewoks and he'll get probation...

  94. Re:When Jedi Attack by KyleDogg · · Score: 1

    I think in order to make the first 3 fit better in series with the latter 3, the film names should be the following:

    The Jedi
    The Empire Strikes
    Hope

    A New Hope
    The Empire Strikes Back
    Return of the Jedi

    This would definately make titles fit together and avoid silliness like B-grade horror from the 50's 'Attack of the Clones'.

  95. I can't wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... until I read another friggin' idiot with a stupid "send in the clones" remark. Wait that was me... it's already here... what the... AHHHHHH!!!

  96. You'll pass many things... by philovivero · · Score: 1

    Cmdrtaco says he'll pass judgement until after he sees it.

    I assure you, taco, that's not all you'll pass after you see it.

    Let the lameness commence.

  97. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yup, I collected Spiderman over 20 years and quit because that clone crap.

  98. Re:first logged in sarcasm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think maybe he saw Revenge of the Nerds the other day on TBS and got a little confused.

  99. Re:cloned army of jar jar by Fishstick · · Score: 2

    That would tend to explain a lot. I had originally wondered how the Empire managed to recruit and train an army of 100% incompetent stormtroopers.

    Then I was told they were all clones. "Who did they clone, Bozo the clown?", I replied.

    I guess I wasn't that far off. ;-)

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  100. Re:Clone Wars? by ShinGouki · · Score: 1

    i'm sorta assuming that anikin goes thru a bunch of jedi training before the clone wars and that, unless lucas is a total moron, we'd get some sort of direct or indirect explanation of how the principal chars spent the time. altho i'm not really expecting much from the man who brought us jar-jar.

    --
    -dk
    Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
  101. Re:Thats funny.... by zeppelin71 · · Score: 1

    No - there are plenty of clones in the second movie.

  102. Concerning blind spots... by Elmindreda+Farshaw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    all the arguments I hear go along the lines of:

    "I saw episode IV-VI when I was a kid, and they were great! and now I went to see episode I, and I was shocked to find that it was made for kids!"

    well... have you ever considered the fact that the first three were, too? and that you like them now because you saw them when you were kids?

    I saw episode one on the premier night here in Sweden. never in my life have I witnessed such excitement. the one boo! I heard was when we saw that they had translated (!) the magical three paragraphs to Swedish!

    then it was all cheers, every time a reference to the old movies were made, or a familiar character was presented.

    most of my male friends thought it was great, with the exception of Jar-Jar. and I see the same consensus here. I have yet to find a single gyu that likes him, or even stands to watch him. and I would like to offer another view of that.

    me and some of my female friends have discussed this phenomena. we all think he's cute. the one bone we have with him is that he's the only one in all the movies that succeeds not by doing his best, but by being chronically clumsy and equally lucky.

    but he is a caricature of a lot of negative male characteristics. and maybe you guys don't like to be reminded of those.

    it's the only way we could explain the extreme, one-sided hate we have witnessed. and maybe there is some truth in it...

    now, flame all you like... I have mail filters, and I know how to use them.

    1. Re:Concerning blind spots... by freq · · Score: 1

      the fateful paragraphs translated is nothing!

      i saw empire strikes back a few weeks ago dubbed into italian (a language i don't speak) and it was surprisingly easier to ignore the bad acting.

      plus, have you ever heard c3po speak italian? good gawd that was a hoot!

      --
      "Tension is the great integrity" -- R. Buckminster Fuller
    2. Re:Concerning blind spots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but he is a caricature of a lot of negative male characteristics. and maybe you guys don?t like to be reminded of those.

      Uhh, what the hell?! Maybe its because he is so darn stupid and has a really annoying voice that grates against the inside of your skull? Just like Luke, and C3P0.

    3. Re:Concerning blind spots... by jbarnett · · Score: 2


      I know I'm going to get grief for this, but all of the SW franchise appears to be based on Buddhism/Taoism

      Could you please expand on this? I am not famlair with Taoism, but I fail to see how Star Wars is related to Buddhism...

      First time I seen The Matrix, I realized it came "close" to the teachings of Buddha... but Star Wars ?

      Not a flame, just curious.

      --

      "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
    4. Re:Concerning blind spots... by ozbon · · Score: 1

      I know I'm going to get grief for this, but all of the SW franchise appears to be based on Buddhism/Taoism anyway, and (Oh God, hate myself for saying this - I hated Jar Jar too, OK?) Jar Jar was actually quite a major facet of the entire Buddhist/Taoist thing of "doing by not doing", i.e finding that sometimes the path to the completion of a task is found by accident.

      Just my thoughts on it, anyway...

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    5. Re:Concerning blind spots... by Kvan · · Score: 1

      Compare the spunky Princess Leia to the boring Padme -- where Princess Leia had to show a lot of fire and guts in facing Vader then escaping the Death Star, Padme was just kinda "there" [...]

      I have to disagree. While Padme's actions (and, indeed, all of Ep1) are much more internalized and less action-oriented, she makes some very tough decisions. She also behaves as an actual queen, as opposed to a certain princess.

      While ANH was a great action romp, TPM painted a much more interesting political behind-the-scenes picture, especially considering the larger context (Palpatine's rise to power).

      --

      "A *person* is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."
      - 'K' in Men in Black.

    6. Re:Concerning blind spots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the one bone we have with him is that he's the only one in all the movies that succeeds not by doing his best, but by being chronically clumsy and equally lucky

      Hmm, methinks they cut the role of Anakin in the Swedish version. Talk about being succeeding through dumb luck. (Think Trade Federation control ship)

      Steven

    7. Re:Concerning blind spots... by bero-rh · · Score: 2

      I have yet to find a single guy that likes him, or even stands to watch him

      Ok, here's one.
      I'm not a big fan of Jar-Jar (or anything else in this movie), but I do like the idea of having someone succeeding by doing the wrong thing all the time and being lucky at the same time - sort of like real life (anyone else thinking of Microsoft? ;) )

      --
      This message is provided under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html
    8. Re:Concerning blind spots... by ozbon · · Score: 1

      It's more Taoist than Buddhist (for more/better explanation of Taoism, read "The Tao Te Ching" by Lao Tsu/Tzu (spelling depends on publisher of book).

      With regard to Buddhist/Taoist stuff in Star Wars, the entire Jedi Knight theme is _very_ Buddhist (as is the entire concept of "The Force" as the universal life energy). Jedi Knights supposedly use a form of Aikido/Tai Chi (the entire positioning of the body, completion of the circle of aggression), etc.

      These are only my initial ideas on it, but having seen the films several times, the more I see them, the more I think about this subject.

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    9. Re:Concerning blind spots... by osgeek · · Score: 2
      well... have you ever considered the fact that the first three were, too? and that you like them now because you saw them when you were kids?

      I've considered it, but it doesn't stand up to reason:

      I saw Return of the Jedi when I was a kid too, and that yucky sappy Ewok theme that was pointed at 10-year-olds was a big disappointment even then. George Lucas' expansion on that theme through the embodiment of Jar Jar marks a clear dilineation between the good of the originals versus the lackluster quality of Episode I.

      There are quantifiable differences between the original couple of Star Wars movies and the latter couple.
      • Think of the use of slapstick comedy in the former ones versus the latter ones. R2D2 may have gotten fried or fallen over, but that was pretty much it. Jar Jar and the other computer animated characters were used incessantly for slapstick humor.
      • Think of the use of clever dialog in the first trilogy, then name just one piece of clever dialog to come out of Episode I. Episode I in general had very little dialog. It was too packed with computer animations to have much dialog, and when it was used, it was just bland filler.
      • Finally, take a close look at the characters. Compare the spunky Princess Leia to the boring Padme -- where Princess Leia had to show a lot of fire and guts in facing Vader then escaping the Death Star, Padme was just kinda "there" (a very cute "there", but still just "there"). Compare the informative wise Obi Wan Kenobe played by Alec Guiness to the dreadfully predictable and uninteresting Qui-Gon. Where oh where in Episode I was there anyone even half as interesting as Han Solo?
      Granted, if I were seeing A New Hope for the first time today, it wouldn't be the awe-inspiring film that it was when I was much younger. It would, however be far more entertaining than The Phantom Menace.
    10. Re:Concerning blind spots... by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1
      Padme was just kinda "there" (a very cute "there", but still just "there")

      This was due to the tragic cutting of the scene where she wins the final battle by pouring hot grits down the pants of the entire robot army.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    11. Re:Concerning blind spots... by ansible · · Score: 2

      TPM painted a much more interesting political behind-the-scenes picture, especially considering the larger context (Palpatine's rise to power).

      That, in my opinion was the only thing (aside from some of the action sequences) that they got right in Episode I.

      Palpatine is the pinnacle of lawful evil (to use a D&D concept). He is cold, ruthless, and very, very clever. In Ep1, he arranges events so that no matter what happens, he wins. Classic.

  103. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont know what you're talking about the "frank herbert estate atrocities", because if you're referring to dune: house atreides and dune:house harkonnen i think they're great.

    So you're the intended audience?! They're your fault, are they?! Bastard!!

  104. Re:I'm trying.... by jmccay · · Score: 1

    Can you come up with a better title for the movie covering part (or all) of the Clone Wars? If so, let's here it.

    --
    At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  105. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by Head+Lice · · Score: 0

    I'll pass water in the aisles after I see it if its anything like the last one...

  106. Re:Probably a fake by ratguy · · Score: 2, Funny
    So, what you're saying is...

    The title really might be "Send in the Clones"?

    Ratguy

  107. Title for Episode III by Spider+Man · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jar Jar and friends

    --
    Be nice to everyone, they out number you 6 billion to 1.
  108. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course this must be a secret message. The film is really about Napster.

    Episode I - The phantom menace - RIAA strikes against the rebel planet with droideka lawyers.
    Episode II - Attack of the clones - 101 Napster lookalikes are spawned when Napster is killed.
    Episode III? - The dark alliance - MPAA and RIAA join forces, the Death Star looks like a baseball compared to their new building, the Law Office.

  109. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by TheKAVH · · Score: 1

    The name was changed because it was coming out around the same time as Wrath of Kahn. The two titles were too similar and thus we got Return of the Jedi

  110. Well, no. by Gona+1977 · · Score: 1
    I didn't say that I think most Slashdot posters are "sad computer geeks and stupid sci-fi nerds". That is not my opinion. However, that is what a lot of "ordinary" people seem to think.

    Bashing Return of the Jedi and The Phantom Menace because they are "made for children" isn't going to change that image. Consider the Trench Coat Mafia. The Columbine killers and their friends were bullied at school, so they started wearing these black trench coats to look "tough" or "cool". (This is what I remember one of these kids telling in a newspaper interview.) But, predictably, the trench coats didn't help: they just made them look stupid in the eyes of their peers.

    It's the same with "geek culture" in general. Thou Shalt Criticize Ewoks And Other "Just For Kids" Crap And Praise "The Matrix" And Other Amazingly Cool Movies. Sorry, but it won't help. Of course, a lot of people will say that they don't care what others think about them, but I don't buy that.

    Why does your subculture despise any and all forms of "offensive cuteness", as the Jargon File puts it? There are two main groups of people who actively hate everything that seems childish. Group 1 consists of teenagers - because they want to show that they are no longer children. Group 2 is the "geek" or "hacker" or "Slashdot" crowd - because...?

    If you aren't happy with Ewoks or Jar Jar or whatever, why don't you just ignore them? If you don't like ROTJ, don't watch it. I don't understand this hate towards things that are "not dark". Why is happiness so universally reviled here? If you don't accept my explanations, let me know what you think. I'd be happy to hear your own opinions.

  111. Re:here's another: by Spire · · Score: 1

    Star Wars 2: Electric Boogaloo

    --
    begin 644 .sig22&%I;"P@9F5L;&]W(&=E96 LA`end
  112. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by Capt.+Mubbers · · Score: 1

    To merge Douglas Adams AND Star Wars ..

    "Oh, what a dull name!"

    --
    "Watch the skies, keep watching the skies"
  113. He's a bad director. by BassMonkey · · Score: 1

    He should fire himself as director. He's got a good eye but is terrible with actors and dialogue. Why not hand over the films to some decent directors? David Fincher directs "The Clone Wars" anyone? Fincher was at one point interested in directing an episode. Even the obscure Irvin Kershner, who did a great job with Empire (easily the best of the films), would be a vast improvment.

  114. Re:The real face of scifi fandom & the geek commun by riven1128 · · Score: 1

    I loved RTOJ, I loved the entire original trilogy, and I still do.. It was epic and very involved. It had an excellent story.

    Episode 1 had excellent potential, there were moments in the movie where it seemed like it was going to work, but all in all it seemed TOO childish. If RTOJ was a kids movie, then Episode 1 could be likened to an episode of Barney :) Jar Jar was a joke .. and a bad mistake..

    I have a feeling, or is it more of a hope? that they won't repeat this mistake in the new one.. but by the sound of the title, they just might.

  115. Re:Might this not be a ploy by stripes · · Score: 2
    Then we can also see Robocop 3 with the original Frank Miller script - rated X for violence.

    The Criterion edition has all (many?) of the cut/edited scenes. Plus directors commentary on why the MPAA said to cut it, and why he thinks it makes the movie worse (in many cases seeming more violent). It is one of the first DVDs I bought.

  116. The real title... by Neumsy · · Score: 1

    Star Wars II: Attack of Windows XP. Windows XP is just a clone of the Mandrake/X/KDE GUI after all, isn't it?

    --
    %blow
    %blow: No such job

    ^how did the sex change go?
    Modifier failed
  117. 'I'm too old for this . . . ' by louzerr · · Score: 1

    A long time ago, in a city not that far away, six months of begging my parents finally got me in to see Star Wars. I had never seen a movie like it, and have yet to see another movie that could get me as excited as this one did (save 'Empire Strikes Back'). Lucas offered special effects like no one had seen before, mostly due to time-intesive work on the part of Lucas and Crew. So the plot was a little weak - I didn't catch half of the lines anyway, I was so busy being amazed at the ships and dogfights.

    I, too, am disappointed in the title for Epi2, but no more than I was at 'The Phantom Menace', or even 'Revenge of the Jedi' (the title I originally heard). 'Empire Strikes Back' is really pretty stupid, but I certainly didn't care when the film was released. Let's face it, titles for sequels suck, and I'm sure it sucks trying to come up with one. And even if Lucas named the movie 'Anakin contemplates his navel', it would still break records in the box office.

    I'm not too worried about disapointment in the new movie. Lucas usually puts on a dazzling show at least. It's cinema, not deeply philisophical sci-fi. In my opinion, good cinema can be a lot more fun. 'Good' sci fi usually leaves me just a little bit unnerved (I like it to!). Star Wars movies are just plain fun. And if it's that bad, I'll just rent 'Star Trek: Insurrection' to put things into perspective.

    --
    "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -- "Step Right Up", Tom Waits
  118. Revenge of the Jedi by Blue+Aardvark+House · · Score: 1

    Actually, the Jedi Knights were not vengeful, so "Revenge" of the Jedi made no sense.

    Actually, the name sounds better, just poor in context.

    1. Re:Revenge of the Jedi by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Oh, no! Not more Duncan Idahoes!

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    2. Re:Revenge of the Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you write "Clones Attack!" it looks like "Mars Attacks!", and we're back to cheese. I think "The Clones Attack" is still better than "Attack of the Clones", it's more direct, and doesn't remind anyone of tomatoes. Maybe we should bring some to the premiere... Anyway, thanks for reminding me of the most powerful and fundamental heresy Lucas committed against his own creation, reducing The Force to some oversimplified biological process.

  119. Re:Very sad ... by infinite9 · · Score: 2

    To eliminate the hope of these people is a crime against humanity.

    I guess they need A New Hope.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  120. Documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought "attack of the clones" was a documentary about the George Bush Jr. Administration.

  121. A majority of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars ANH viewers were not kids or even teens. When I saw it back when I was a kid, most of the people in the theater were adults. Most adults who were at all sci-fi fans saw episode IV? Is it that people posting here are all too young to know this or that they latch onto one small ida and troll for all it's worth? If episode IV was only entertaining and good because people were young at the time it dosnt explain all the adults that thought it was good.

  122. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So damn what if it's just backstory! Does that make it ok to fill the film up with bad acting, a few "filler" scenes, and enough special effects to give one a headache from the too-blasted-loud-THX-kick-my-ass theatre system? You knw what they say: if it's too loud, you're too old.

    yeah.

  123. Attackof the clones ? Euh ha ha ha! by CaptIronfist · · Score: 0
    MOUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HHHAHAHA HAHAH AH, in other words: LALALOL!!!!

    Now, I'm going to laugh about this for a long time, thank you George for this wonderful moment of joy.

    .... Karma!

  124. Preach on Brother! by Giggles+Of+Doom · · Score: 1

    Good word! I still have yet to understand why everyone thinks Lucas is such a god, the guy positivly sucks as a director, or a writer, or a producer... And you're right, the orignal movies really weren't all that good, but I think even with the low end FX they were better writen then Phantom.

    --
    "A coward dies a thousand deaths, the brave but one."
  125. A pun by cubitalSyndrome · · Score: 1

    Sherbet is an ice cream clone.

  126. I wish the title would be ... by thud2000 · · Score: 1

    Star Wars: Han and Chewie Come Back and Put a Stop to All This Nonsense Once and For All.

  127. Ropey Monkey Toss by Arricc · · Score: 1

    All the other titles of StarWars Episodes so far have been slightly menacing (except perhaps episove IV)

    The Phantom Menace - points to something dark and forbodeing overshadowning the whole affair, but doesn't give anything away.

    A New Hope - Something good is going to happen that makes something bad a bit less horrid

    The Empire Strikes Back - Things get shit again

    Return Of The Jedi - The Jedi comes and makes things better, but thats OK, cause its the last episode and everyone expects that anyway.

    Now lets see... Attack of The Clones.... Hmm, they didn't have enough money to hire a big cast cause they spent most of their money on special effects so they're going to use blue screen technology to make this guy appear to be most of the cast and have him try and shoot everone.

    Whoever came up with that title should be shot, by an army of almost exaclty the same soldiers. (Unless it actually happens to be the title of the 2nd book written by Lucas, which I doubt).

  128. The sad thing.... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Politicians will rally around this:

    * They can justify their ban on cloning
    * They think they can prevent clones from "attacking"
    * They can "take back our children" from the evil clutches of Hollywood
    * They can remove the scourge of Jar-Jar Bink--- you know, they might be on to something.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  129. Re:*sigh* by danger42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I was a kid, I thought they were saying "The Cologne Wars". I really assumed there was some sort of fracas over fragrances. I am just glad it turned out to be "clones".

    --
    -nd
  130. Re:What I think is sad..... by Paolomania · · Score: 1
    The problem is most of the people bitching, IMO, were children when they saw the movie. They saw with a child's eyes and a child's viewpoint on life.

    Enough of this "Star Wars was really a child's movie" BS. Star Wars was a very violent movie. It portrayed acts of violence and the results of violence in a much more adult-oriented manner than the bloodless droid destruction fest and impotent darth-boogeymanning that was Episode 1. How, you ask? Let me count the ways ...

    1. as the movie begins we find ourselves in the midst of a heated battle on a captured ship where there are heavy human casualties and bodies littering the hallways
    2. follow the battle, Vader brutally kills a man he is interrogating by crushing his throaght (lets not forget we are just moments past the opening credits)
    3. fast forward a bit and we find Luke being beaten by sand people as he searches for R2
    4. Luke & Co. come across a devastated Jawa caravan - corpses of the little creatures litter the ground. They creamate the bodies
    5. Luke returns home to find the very-visible charred skeletons of his aunt and uncle still smoldering in the ashes of their house.
    6. Luke is roughed up at a seedy pub in Mos Eisley - Obi Wan comes to his aid and a scuffle ensues where the instigator's bloody, severed arm ends up on the floor.
    7. Han Solo, a shady smuggler, shoots from the hip to kill a bounty hunter that has come to capture him (none of this revisionist Greedo-shot-first bullcrap)

    I could go on, but I think I've made my point and and there are at least two whole acts left to the movie.
  131. We are right to be disappointed by Mof-Tan · · Score: 1
    Many of us here where young boys (and some girls?) when the first three episodes came out. Because they where so much more and better than anything we had seen before in sci-fi action we all loved them. With the not-so-critical eyes of a child we all overlooked the cheesy parts of the story (I could give you a truck-load of exampels), and instead enjoyed the grand drama, specialfx end epic scale.

    When I saw the special-ed. versions a couple of years ago I had a great time. That time around I didn't mind the corny parts of the story since the movies had a special place in my heart.

    There was extra room in my heart for Episode I.

    The reason I and many others were disappointed I think is because EpI is such a lousy movie. There is no excitement, no epic scale, no magic!

    Granted, I had huge expectations. But I also had a lot of tolerence for what they, in my mind, where allowed to do in the story. I think they just went too far for most people.

    EpI is for kids, the original three are for all ages. That is what has changed, and that is what is bad.

    --
    Die dulci fruere. Have a nice day.
    1. Re:We are right to be disappointed by dachshund · · Score: 1

      It's been said before, and I'll say it again. There's no excuse for giving 20 minutes to the silly pod-race scene, while Anakin leaving his mother lasted less than 2.

    2. Re:We are right to be disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the first trilogy, C3P0 performed a important narrative function by explaining what what was going on to the younger members of the audience: (Stormtroopers shooting, lots of noise) C3P0: "Oh no! They're trying to board the ship!" (Luke's dialog with R2D2 had much of the same purpose.)

      In Ep1, this function was wholely satisfied by JarJar (who also had lots of stupid gags to perform). Hense, agreed, C3P0 was completely pointless.

  132. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 1
    Episode II- Amidala Gets Laid

    I'd pay to see that.

    --

  133. Re:Bring Irvin Kershner out of retirement! by Hassman · · Score: 1

    Too bad he's dead.

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  134. What are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are not going to clone Jar-Jar... they are going to clone Darth Maul (just like Luuke in the later books.) Maul is the only one that has proven he can take out the Jedi. Skywalker will not go to the dark side until after his mom dies and he is seriously injured by Obi-Wan in a duel. Oh yeah, and titles are not set in stone... the original screenplay was called "The Adventures of Luke Starkiller" remember?

  135. Re:Really..... by ahde · · Score: 1

    one out of two doesn't sound that bad anymore

  136. Re:The real face of scifi fandom & the geek commun by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1
    Well, I've got news for you: the same applies to the original trilogy as well. You just don't realize it because you were so young when the movies first came out.

    No. It was less 'IN YOUR FACE'. I saw the first triology at 14.

    Do you know why almost everybody here hates the Ewoks in ROTJ?

    Wrong again, don't assume generallity that fast my friend. I really liked the Ewoks and the Ewoks movies, in fact they are better than the first prequel.

    Like most of the Anime amateurs in here, I really enjoy watching the saturday cartoons. Don't project your self interests into other's life.

    the average Joe sees all Star Wars movies as children's movies, regardless of whether they have Ewoks or Jar-Jar in them or not.

    I'm not interrested in average Joe's opinion We are talking about targetting movies to kids and making money out of this.

    The main fact is that "I" hate "IN YOUR FACE" targetting. Old movies NEVER NEVER had this obvious form of stupid marketing. Your happy with it, fine by me. All i have to say is get ready for worst, and worst. Once these corporate wimps find a good money making scheme they exploit it and exploit it until they find a better one. And it's the better one that I'm afraid of.

    One last thing, these people are after Average Joe's money. And this is what we are trying to prevent. Cause if they get it all, then it might be the last time we see good movies around here. Seen Planet of The Apes latelly? It sucked? I'm not surprised at all.

    A moment of thinking...

  137. That wasn't my point by Gona+1977 · · Score: 1
    There's truth to what you said, but you kind of missed my point. "Lame ass cutesy characters" do not make all adults nauseous. Ewoks do not bother any of my non-geek friends. Why do all geeks hate them with a passion, then?

    As I pointed out previously, even the Jargon File says that "hackers detest and avoid all forms of offensive cuteness". WHY? A lot of people here seem to think that "if it's dark, it's good" or even "if it's not dark, it sucks". Again, WHY?

    Think about it.

    (I don't think that the question of who's a hacker and who's a geek is relevant here. And, for the record, I do not classify myself as a geek or a hacker.)

    PS. I may change my nick to "FlowerBoy" or "BarneyFan" in the future.

    1. Re:That wasn't my point by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      legion of Storm Troopers, rather.

  138. Re:More than half way. by well_jung · · Score: 1
    My younger brother considers himself better than the original, but I disagree.

    --
    Carl G. Jung
    --
    "With one breath, with one flow, You will know Synchronicity" -La Policia
  139. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gernerations was the only Star Trek that wasn't better the TOMP! Inserection was almost as bad!

    produser 1 'i have an idea! lets crash the enterprise into a planet and have it take up 20 minutes!'

    produser 2 'yeah then we can have Data say "aw shit!"'

  140. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I jsOV vntos siEpi& #97;lly t fa seciher larned tou te otooffofa&#3 2;ol hir t ue s har enancement h,and the "ane arty hs

    cren't forget torad adiaose&#1 09;is Heyo wl disor wruly dificult st dcidewha ooon the wekend.. hae apzparty? A ashrt o to the malwit all o our rids? Hav a seepovr nd cll bo onh h?

    In or,fyo&#32 ;haven' checkedout lats st, odn't know wt ou'remssing!

  141. Dam thats romantic by Alistair+Graham · · Score: 0

    Star wars and romancing the old lady Schweet dude !

  142. Not a thing of childhood by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Insightful
    My parents saw Star Wars and it's 2 sequels when they came out in the theatre. They loved them - great story, great characters, great effects, excellent soundtrack. They were well staged, and the people in the theatre - even in "Star Wars" were going crazy over the film. Being that I'm nearly 20 myself, and these are my parents we're talking about, logic would dictate that my parents were at least 18 or so themselves. They were 24 and 25, respectively.

    Now, many people are ranting about how "Attack of the Clones" is a retarded movie title. I'd have to agree. Granted, I'm one of those 'saw it when I was young, fell in love with it, altered reality,' types. My parents, on the other hand, are not.

    My parents recently saw Episode I. They were appauled at the horrid commericialization of the franchise and the apparent lack of effort that went into the actual film, the story, and the plot. Granted, Luca always triedmake money, but Star Wars was art when Lucas started making it. He said so himself - his opt-outs about how it's simply a childrens film and such are just that - opt outs. I mean, for crying out loud, Episode I didn't even have new music composed for it to fit the film - it simply had a compiled version done by someone else, so they could slap John William's name on it. They spent all their budget on special effects. Bastards.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  143. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by beynos · · Score: 1
    To be honest, what's disenchanted me more than anything about Star Wars is all the Lucas-bashing and vitriol that seems to characterize the "fans".

    Don't like it when your friend dis your daddy? :)

  144. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Lunastorm · · Score: 1

    Oh so would I! If it had some lesbianism, I'd pay to see it twice!

    --
    You die too easily.
  145. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 3, Insightful
    THAT's exactly how episode one made me feel.
    This is always going to happen when your childhood favourites are extended, even when it's done by the original author (I won't go into the treacheries committed by the estate of Frank Herbert).

    Remember finding out about child abuse on Gont, and why wizards from Roke avoided girls, in Ursula Le Guin's Tehanu?

    Remember when all the kids got killed, and Aslan turned into Jesus, in C.S. Lewis's The Last Battle?

    Remember when Bilbo Baggins turned into an old, evil monster (if only for a moment) in J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings -- and then the "sequel" to that had no hobbits, only elf genealogy and linguistics?

    If it's not what you expected -- that is, what you extrapolated from the first movie(s) or book(s) -- you're not going to like it. We build cosy little worlds from the "original" stories, then hate it when the author intrudes.

    No, I don't think there's a solution. But the problem isn't unique to George Lucas. Sequels to creative works you unconditionally love will tend to suck.

    Especially with speculative / escapist fiction -- part of the appeal of which is (I assume) that the "world" presented is self-contained, and the (usually young) reader can comprehend it in its totality. Unlike the all-too-confusing real world.
  146. Re:first logged in sarcasm! by matrix29 · · Score: 1

    Could be worse Revenge of the Jedi Nerds

    --
    "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  147. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You weren't surprised that the "happy ending" to the last Narnia book involved the child protagonists turning out to be dead?

    Agreed, Lewis's day job as Christian Apologist is visibly present (to those with eyes to see) throughout the books. But killing off the child cast at the finish was -- to say the least -- kinda disturbing. And rather in-yer-face for a young fan.

    Dontcha think?

  148. Re:Bummer... by wishus · · Score: 2
    I'm afraid that this ship is FULLY OPERATIONAL!

    Did you see the movie, or just listen to it? The death star had huge chunks missing from it. Sure, it was habitable, and they could fire the laser and blow stuff up, but the thing was unfinished. That's how the rebel fleet was able to fly ships inside of it to get to the reactor - they flew through the part that wasn't completed yet.

    Don't argue. Go watch the movie.

  149. Re:More than half way. by Pxtl · · Score: 2

    Mad max and its sequel, Mad Max: The Road Warrior. The first was a little low-budget rinky-dink effort. The second is the one everybody knows as wicked-cool.

  150. Jar-Jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does everyone say they hate jar jar? He was the only thing keeping me from walking out of episode one. Long ass racing scenes and double sided lightsabers were causing me to nod-off.

  151. Re:ENOUGH already! by assclown · · Score: 1

    Oh No!!! Red Code II Attack of the Clones

  152. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

    As a matter of fact, geeks are the most indiscriminate bunch of moviegoers (possibly surpassed by junior high kids). As long as it as computer graphics and a futuristic plot, they will see it.

    I am still debating whether it is ironic or typical that the smart people are the ones watching the movies the most devoid of acting, consistent logic and lessons to be learned.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  153. get over it by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    I like it because it fully admits its nothing more than a B-movie. Granted a B-movie on an A-movie budget.

  154. Re:I bet it will air on Fox First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Five men, all conceived in the back seat of a Ford (different Fords, different fathers) all alone on this deserted island with ten clones of a very attractive woman.

    What man will be the last victim of mad clone blood lust, thereby winning the $50,000!

    This fall, the most controversial reality show to hit the networks, or Fox!

  155. Re:here's mine: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's too busy marketing her grits to notice any of you drooling fanboys. Maybe if you buy a few boxes of these, she'll pay more attention to you.

  156. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by DThorne · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I really think you're wrong about the original audience. I distinctly remember when it was released in 1977, getting on the cover of Time magazine labelled as a "Fable for the 70's". I think that we get jaded nowadays because we've been Indiana Jonesd and Matrix'ed to death - been there done that. Back then, however, Star Wars was new inasmuch as it showed a science fiction world that was "dirtier" and more used than ever had been shown in films before. It created a world that had never been experienced before - it crossed the age boundary. Now don't get me wrong - I screened it again the other day and am embarrassed by the big hair and poor acting - it's not a "great film", but I think you're wrong in dismissing it as for children only. It was intended, and succeeded, to capture the sense of wonder we had as children, regardless of age.
    For the record, I *loathed* the latest. Odd about the wide-eyed kids you saw - in my screening the little kid next to me constantly yawned. When asked by his father "did you like it?", he answered "well, the racing scene was cool." I agreed with him - that's all I got out of it!

    DT

  157. Re:More than half way. by Vladinator · · Score: 1

    Wow. While I agree that GF II was an Excellent movie, I have a hard time saying it was better than the first one.

    Superman II and St:2,3 and 5 I'll concede however were better.

    Still, it's few and far between that sequels don't disapoint. Can we agree on that? :-)

    --

    "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

  158. Joel?! by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    When did you stop watching? After the first season?

  159. utter crap by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    It is perfectly possible to make a movie that appeals to kids WITHOUT making adults naseous, and vice versa. Just as you can leave sex, swearing, and extreme violence out of a movie, it is possible to leave out lame ass cutsy charachters like Jar Jar Binks that offend the intelligence of anyone older than 8.

    The first Star Wars movie did this just fine. ROTJ and PM did not.

  160. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wrath" is an infinitely better word than "Revenge," anyway.

  161. Re:waste of time by antek9 · · Score: 1

    I am hoping that there are very few responses to the this world shaking news.

    Well, a look at this comment's # will tell you your hope has proven fruitless, I'm sorry. May this article hit the comment #1000 mark! It may not be worth all of that time, but then what is?

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  162. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just LOVE vladinator's site! Especially the "fash" section, where I learned to cut the bottom off of an old shirt to use as a hair enhancement! Oh, and the "dance party" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read vladinator's emails! Here you will discover how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have a pizza party? A fash party? Go to the mall with all of your friends? Have a sleepover and call boys on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't checked out vladinator's site, you don't know what you're missing!

  163. Re:When Jedi Attack by haplo21112 · · Score: 2

    But seriously, and I know its been said, WHY NOT CLONE WARS

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  164. Re:Might this not be a ploy by hivolt · · Score: 1

    You forgot Invasion of the Clone Snatchers.

  165. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by hajibaba · · Score: 1

    ... and my personal favorite, Ben, the hero in Full Throttle!

  166. How about Killer Klones from Outer Space by Adambomb · · Score: 1

    Don't make then zap you into blood'n'guts filled cotton candy!

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
  167. So many wheelbarrows.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    filled with cahjones, and all of them so big! Why is it that the guys holding onto the handles are so poor?

  168. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

    Interesting points, but I have to nit pick over a few of them.

    • And Luke's starting out as a teenager, when even Anakin at 8 (or is it 10? I forget) is thought by Yoda to be too old to begin.

    Maybe Luke's midichlorian count is way over 20,000. (BTW, saying that makes me feel like a two bit whore. Thanks for raping my childhood memories, George).

    • Cliched Dialog:"I can't believe he's gone." (Luke about Obi-Wan. He'd known him, what, a week or less?)

    And yet, strangely, we believe him. We feel it. Same for all the other cheesy dialogue, which fits the archetypes that you berate above so well that we can suspend our disbelief.

    • Shoddy acting

    Uh, OK, wait a second. Have you been to see a Hollywood blockbuster recently? George showed us how to make a great films by just shooting scenes over and over and editing our the really bad bits, a tradition that's still going strong today.

    • There just isn't any enthusiasm left any more

    Which is where we agree completely. All your points about episodes 4 through 6 are valid, but (apart from the latter parts of RotJ) the sheer verve makes up for the technical flaws. Episode 1 is just a cynical flashy quota piece, the cinematic equivelant of those 8 bit computer demos that were great technical showcases but ultimately uninvolving. In contrast, Episode 4 was Pong - only as good as it needed to be, but made with flair and gusto, and enjoyed as such.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  169. Re:The real face of scifi fandom & the geek commun by jaiteend · · Score: 1

    damn skippy. i loved return of the jedi partially because of the ewoks. but then again, i also collect tele-tubby and pokemon stuff.

    give me saturday morning cartoons and a bowl of cocoa-puffs any day.

    --
    and the Irishman took the fly in his hands and yelled, "spit it out!"
  170. To Paraphrase Crow T. Robot by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    "Oh no! Now their doing it *clone* style!"

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  171. What was wrong with "The Clone Conflict", anyhow? by mbourgon · · Score: 2

    Hasn't that one been rumored for years? What's so bad about that title. Attack of the 50 kay clones. Great.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  172. Just remember.... by mattsking · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is Georgie boy going a wee bit nuts again? Anyone remember the Battlestar Galactica episode? Probably not. If you view ANH as it was intended, as a love letter to Akira Korosawa, (Watch the Hidden Fortress.) then you will see the many parallels between the two films, (and Willow too for that matter.)This includes characters and scenes. As to the naming thing, just rememeber that if you go by statements in ANH, (e.g., "General Kenobi, hero of the Clone Wars",) you will see the next two movies are the clone wars period. The second movie is the beginning, the third the end of the wars and the fall of the Jedi. Aside from that, who cares about the title when there are supposed to be scenes of up to 30-40 Jedi fighting? Fnord

    --
    Fnord!
  173. Re:What I think is sad..... by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    "The problem is most of the people bitching, IMO, were children when they saw the movie. They saw with a child's eyes and a child's viewpoint on life. The people complaining have lost the ability to view the series through that childish viewpoint and have attached a sense of reverance towards it that will certainly get me modded down for saying this."

    What I would note is that through the rereleases, Lucas did make the movies even more child oriented with the whole Han SoloBlaster deal, a lot of the extra CG etc.

    What I am hoping, and doubt that I will ever see,is to be able to find a copy of the older releases of Starwars on dvd, vhs etc. I doubt you can get a copy anymore which isn't a "special edition."

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  174. Re:sounds like an old song... by D3 · · Score: 2

    This was done by my friend Kevin.

    >
    > Isn't it rich?
    >We're a matched pair.
    >Waving our lightsabers
    >Around in the air.
    >Attack of the clones.
    >
    >Lucas gone mad
    >We've all been had
    >After the first one was so
    >Incredibly bad.
    >Attack of the clones?
    >Does he think that we're drones?
    >
    >Just when I'd stopped
    >Trashing Jar-Jar
    >Lucas is going
    >Even further afar.
    >Making a loser again
    >With his usual flair
    >Expecting big lines...
    >They'll probably be there.
    >
    >Oh, what a farce.
    >Our fault, we hear.
    >We're supposed to like what he shows
    >Year after year.
    >And where are the clones?
    >("Attack of the Clones"???)
    >It's too late, they're here.
    >
    >Isn't it bad?
    >Isn't it dull?
    >And the worst part of all is that
    >The theater'll be full.
    >And so it's the clones...
    >"Attack of the Clones"
    >Will open next year.
    ><<<<
    >

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
  175. you missed a couple by JackRandom · · Score: 1

    The Jar-Jar Horror Picture Show
    Star Wars: Titanic Star Wars: I think I'm a clone again...
    Episode II: Not Quite Human
    Episode II: More Human Than Human
    Star Wars: Temple of Clone

    Seriously, what's wrong with the new title? It IS about the Clone Wars. Ya know? Clones. Attacking. Ummm. Yeah....

  176. Re:FINALLY by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    Destination Void is a little bit more on the "what is life / what is conciousness" kick. They start with human brains, but the ultimate resolution of the novel lies in a machine that is greater than its human creators. A machine that is alive and self-concious.
    Perhaps Herbert was implying slavery by the conclusion of the novel (if you haven't read it, check it out - its a quick read) - but he has depicted slavery by other means in his novels. Not just machines. Such as the slavery of addiction to a drug (Dune series). The result of the Butlerian jihad seems in his books only to have made life cheaper and more abused as a tool rather than anything possessed of a certain degree of sanctity. See the Face Dancers of Tleilax and the uncountable Duncan Idaho Ghola "clones".
    Mankind's relationships to his tools is one of the centerpieces of sci-fi. The tool out of control and turning on its master is a common play. From Frankenstein to Christine to Blade Runner. The time may soon be on us when our machines give better conversation than many of our fellow man. Hell, I'd argue that time is already here.
    So, as P.K. Dick would say, who is the "android" and who is the "human"? Who is the master, who is the slave?

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  177. Re:When Jedi Attack by ocie · · Score: 1

    The third movie will be called "Gettin' it on with Natalie Portman"

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  178. IRC by zdzichu · · Score: 1

    It seems that SW2 will take action on IRC

    --
    :wq
  179. Re:Clone Wars? by Andux · · Score: 1

    Actually, according to the timeline at the beginning of the new books, Empire Strikes Back was set 3 years after A New Hope, and Return of the Jedi a year after that. Episode I is set 32 years before ANH, Episode II is 22 years (so Anakin will be 20), and Episode III is 2 years after that, leaving a gap you could stuff a Hutt through.

    --
    (Do not sign anything.) -- Fell, Planescape: Torment
  180. Re:ENOUGH already! by Robert+Link · · Score: 2
    So, I first remember seeing the "Send in the Clones" joke in a Mad Magazine, years and years ago. Sure enough, somebody has reposted the text from the article, although in my opinion it loses a little without the illustrations. Whatever. Anyhow, having reread it after all these years, I want to call your attention to this passage (the emphasis is mine):

    This ties in neatly with our fifth film (No. 1 in the series), "A Matter of Life and Darth", in which Luke, who has unraveled the secrets of time travel (in "Makin' Wookie", learns that Darth Vader is a half-droid and may be the real father of both Han Solo and See-Threepio.

    Mmm hmm, check. Those Mad Magazine guys were onto something, I tell you. The future of Star Wars is right there for anyone not too blind to see it.


    Ok, I have to go buy some more tinfoil and rewrite my pamphlet debunking the Clone Gunman theory. More later, if Lucas' minions don't catch up to me first.


    -rpl

  181. Re:what's under the helmets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So, do you think Spielberg will throw in time travel in the last movie just so he can use some of the original cast and make the plots even more stupid than they already are...oh wait, that's Rick Berman...

    OK, so that was supposed to be Lucas, not Spielberg...

  182. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be happy. At least in the same Announcement says that Leonardo DiCaprio won't be Anakin, and in fact won't even be in the movie at all according to the current cast. Phew.

  183. Actually I was under the impression... by Major · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...that they changed it from "Revenge of the Jedi" because the upcoming Star Trek movie had the working title "The Vengeance of Khan" (Trek 2 - one of the even #'s, yay!)... The Trek people changed it to the ever cheesy "Wrath of Khan" and the Star Wars folks decided at the last minute that "Revenge" wasn't a suitable business for a Jedi to be getting mixed up in.

    Or at least that's what I read in one of Shatner's "memoir" books... god only knows why I voluntarily READ that trash, one never knows how much is true and how much is 110% "Billshit"...


    --=Major

    --
    One useless man is called a disgrace; two are called a law firm; and three or more become a Congress. -John Adams, 1776
    1. Re:Actually I was under the impression... by prator · · Score: 1

      How is "The Wrath of Kahn" cheesy? That title has always sounded perfect to me. I still get chills when I think of the scene when they put those worm-things in their ears. That always scared the hell out of me when I was a kid.

      -prator

  184. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by Pxtl · · Score: 2

    Well, Jedi was originally "Revenge of the Jedi"... movie posters with that name are now quite valuable. Then somebody realized how retarded that sounded and they changed the name before the big promos began.

  185. It's Code red!! :P by _GNU_ · · Score: 1

    Yep, it would seem as if Code red is cloning into Star Wars too...

    Good thing I'm a trekkie ;)

  186. Lord of the Rings...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is gonna kick George's sorry ass. "Your time has been and gone my friend" The Matrix films will also give him a wuppin'.

  187. cash in by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 1

    Lucas is trying to cash in on the b-movie sci-fi revival that is sure to follow Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes (which is the only true sci-fi film to come out of Hollywood in many a decade). I mean, at least Attack of the Clones will have good company, name-wise anyway: Attack of the Killer Tomatoes, Night of the Living Dead, Return of the Jedi.

  188. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1
    I won't see it. I haven't seen Phantom Mayonnaise, and I won't see this. There's plenty of small, independent films that deserve my money a hell of a lot more than this crap does. You want to see a good movie? Go see Ghost World, or Sexy Beast, or Memento. There's even that new Silent Bob and Jay movie coming out soon. I am pretty certain that on any given night you can find a form of entertainment for you $9 that you'll get more out of than the Star Wars schlock. (Including other, better schlock). Go to a club and see an up and coming band. Go to a jazz club. Take a dance class. Do anything but give George Lucas more cocaine money!

    It's ridiculous that people can be so wed to a franchise that they lose the power to opt out. So much for the free market. And you complain about people using Microsoft products!

  189. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by ansible · · Score: 2

    That's a very good point. I had never thought of it that way, but you're right. Han is supposed to be a lying, cheating, stealing, arrogant braggart. But he starts to see the bigger picture, and he learns what is really important.

  190. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    I can survive the ewoks. But the special edition crap...greedo shooting first, that abysmally horrible jabba scene in ANH, and above all, ROTJ, the new band. Oh my god. Fast forward...every time.

    I suppose THAT should have been the real cue that something was dreadfully wrong.

  191. Star Wars Episode II by Zed+Randall · · Score: 1

    Star Wars Episode II: The attack of the invisible clones who are in your closet, in space! Star Wars Episode II: Another new hope, that doesn't float. Star Wars Episode II: The attack of the cloned Star Wars lunchboxes. Star Wars Episode II: Burt Reynolds strikes back!

    --
    I spilled spot remover on my dog. He's gone now. -Steven Wright
  192. no kidding by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1

    Lucas is about the worst director to make such big films. No other director in the world could make Liam Neeson and Ewan McGregor sound so cheesey.

    That, my friend, take some seriously anti-talent.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  193. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by matrix29 · · Score: 1

    And Triplets are inherently good, evil, and ambivalent? Are Quadruplets good, evil, good, and evil then?

    I want to see the spreadsheet on this graph.

    --
    "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  194. No, no, no... by Faw · · Score: 1

    ... Natalie Portman had nothing to do with the 'hot grits' troll. It should be:
    Natalie Portman stars in "Attack of the Petrified Clones"

  195. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Apotsy · · Score: 1
    "I can't believe he's gone." (Luke about Obi-Wan. He'd known him, what, a week or less?)

    No, it was clear he had known him a lot longer than that. They recognized each other when they met up after the Sand People's attack.

  196. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by rcade · · Score: 2

    He should have been thinking of the people who'd been waiting almost 20 years for that film, not the 10 year olds the promotional tie-ins were designed for.

    Big-budget thrillers like The Phantom Menace are made for kids, teens, and young adults, because those people spend a ridiculous amount of money on films and related products.

    Producing a big-budget movie for us fossils who worshipped Star Wars as kids would be incredibly foolish. We can't be relied on to spend our money on pop-culture crap any more. Instead, we piss too much of it away on things like mortgages, SUVs, college funds, and children.

    When I saw Phantom Menace, the saddest part was the disappointed reaction of 30-year-olds who expected to leave the theater with the same wide-eyed excitement they had at age 10. It's like going back to your childhood home and lamenting the fact that all the trees in your yard are a lot smaller than they used to be.

    Face it -- the torch has been passed. If it's too dumb, you're too old.

    --
    Rogers Cadenhead (Web: http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench)
  197. How many action figures.... by jwo7777777 · · Score: 1

    ...would I have to buy to prevent George from releasing the film?

    1. Re:How many action figures.... by radja · · Score: 1

      734 figures of JarJar.

      //rdj

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  198. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    big furry Wookies fighting the stormtroopers

    Maybe Lucas thought we'd seen enough Wookie culture in the Star Wars Christmas Special

  199. Nancy Sinatra/Grace Jones by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

    I saw the title, wiped my fevered brow and said, "But Hayden Christensen looks and sounds cool."

    Then I heard Nancy Sinatra and thought of Austin Powers. I heard a voice: "I love to see girls of that calibre!"

    Then suddenly the Grace Jones video of her version of "Demolition Man" floated through my mind. If you've seen it, ya know what I mean. If ya don't yer just a pup.

    --
    The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  200. Re:Excerpt from leaked screenplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    screw this - I just want to see the cloned anidalas geting it on...

    hadmacker & aurel

  201. Cheesy Ass Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obi-Wan: Bring on the clones!!

  202. Re:The best part? Even CNN readers think it sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I jtLOVE vladinr's sie!Epecillt hefah secio,whe I arnet cut bott offan oldsir touseas hair nhet Oh,ad the dncet hoto!

    furs, dt etto realadiator's emais! Hee yuwliscoer how l dfil it is todcide whato doo the wekeds.. ae a pzapay fas at?G thl wth l of yorfinds Have sleepr andll oys ntehe?

    nhrtf&# 121;ou han' checked ouadnaors i ou nt no ht yuemissin

  203. Re:Karma Suicide! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of the merchandise spinoffs!

  204. Re:Excerpt from leaked screenplay by drudd · · Score: 1

    It's "Killer Klones from Outer Space!"

    --
    Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
  205. Re:Horrible. Just horrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you camp out just to get tickets for a fucking movie, you've got bigger problems than a lame title.

  206. You'll watch it, fanboy... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    ...if only to complain. So will I. So will almost everyone else in this forum. But that's OK. I don't think it makes anyone into a hypocrite if he or she wants to spend $7 for some cool CGI eye-candy.

    Just repeat to yourself, it's just a movie, I should really just relax.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  207. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by R.Caley · · Score: 1, Informative
    Remember when all the kids got killed, and Aslan turned into Jesus, in C.S. Lewis's The Last Battle?

    Er, this came as a suprise to you? He was sacrificed and came back from the dead to redeem Narnia in the first book. Lewis was not subtle about these things.

    --
    _O_
    .|<
    The named which can be named is not the true named
  208. Thoughts by jsin · · Score: 1

    Here's what me and the kob think about all this:



    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Matt Cribben
    To: mr@jasongullickson.com
    Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:04 AM
    Subject: man

    did you hear about the next star wars title?

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Jason J. Gullickson
    To: Matt Cribben
    Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:36 PM
    Subject: Re: man

    yeah, what do you think?

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Matt Cribben
    To: Jason J. Gullickson
    Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:43 PM
    Subject: Re: man

    I'm a little torn.

    1- it sounds stupid
    but
    2- it's hindering these dorks from saying "it's the greatest films ever" and acting like idiots, so that's good.

    dunno.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Jason J. Gullickson
    To: Matt Cribben
    Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:53 PM
    Subject: Re: man

    It should be "attack of Jar-Jar"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Matt Cribben
    To: Jason J. Gullickson
    Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:43 PM
    Subject: Re: man

    or "Episode II: Get over it nerds, it's just a freakin movie"
  209. Lucas leads to... by KajiCo · · Score: 1

    Lucas been smokin doobies, doobies lead to muncies, munchies lead to cheesy poofs cheesy poofs lead to cheesy titles. Btw have you seen the size of lucas latley. http://64.78.24.207/yota.jpg

  210. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by bonius_rex · · Score: 1

    According to some interrviews I've seen with Mr. Lucas, the original ROTJ story was that ewoks were supposed to be Wookies (Chewie was not originally intended for Episode III) But Kucas didn't know if there wouild ever be an ep. IV, so he recast Han's sidekick as a wookie. Then, when ROTJ rolled around, he couldn't use wookies anymore so he 'cut them in half' (his words) and created Ewoks.

  211. This Isnt the title your looking for, move along by Alistair+Graham · · Score: 0

    This Isnt the title your looking for, move along now .. damit i said move along , NEXT clown i mean clone

  212. Oh bummer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..it seems Weird Al Yankovic can't make a living out of this episode, since he's already got a clone song!

    "I think I'm a clone now.."

  213. All your Jedi are belong to us by Alistair+Graham · · Score: 0

    Star Wars Episode II : all your Jedi are belong to us hahaha maybe they will make up for it by having a clone army of skimpy dressed natalie portman evil slut clones hmmmmmm candy, candy , CANDY !!

  214. Re:All he has to do is .. by Binestar · · Score: 1

    Actually, i think a better song would be:

    "I think I'm a clone now" By Wierd Al

    I think I'm a clone now

    There always seems to be 2 of me just a hanging around.


    It goes more aptly, I mean Lucas can't think seriously about his franchise with the names he is giving it right?

    --
    Do you Gentoo!?
  215. "American Graffiti" is still his best film by Malcs · · Score: 1

    Line 'em all up, all the Star Wars films, and no matter how much I loved the first three (still can't bring myself to see Episode One), all combined I still think that "American Graffiti" is far and away a much better film.

    --
    My name is Carlos Montoya. You share files of my music. Prepare to die.
  216. The real face of scifi fandom & the geek community by Gona+1977 · · Score: 4, Flamebait

    I have been reading Slashdot for several years. I created an account just to post this. And here is what I have to say:

    This is getting silly. Half of the comments here seem to be lamenting the fact that the prequel trilogy appears to be geared towards children. Well, I've got news for you: the same applies to the original trilogy as well. You just don't realize it because you were so young when the movies first came out.

    Do you know why almost everybody here hates the Ewoks in ROTJ? Because they make you feel insecure. You're afraid that people will laugh at you for watching a children's movie with talking teddy-bears in it. And they will. You should just shrug it off, but you can't because of your low self-esteem. And, for some reason, you can't realize that the average Joe sees all Star Wars movies as children's movies, regardless of whether they have Ewoks or Jar-Jar in them or not.

    The Jargon File has a section called "A Portrait of J. Random Hacker". I'm sure most of you here have read it. The section has a list of "Things Hackers Detest and Avoid", and here is how it begins:

    "IBM mainframes. All the works of Microsoft. Smurfs, Ewoks, and other forms of offensive cuteness."

    "Offensive cuteness" seems to rank very high on the list, right after Microsoft. Why is this? I believe that the reason is the same as stated above: you fear that being associated with any sort of "cuteness" (such as the Ewoks in ROTJ) will make you look ridiculous and childish in the eyes of others. And a lot of people seem to think that enjoying "dark" movies such as The Empire Strikes Back or The Matrix will somehow help you gain acceptance and credibility.

    Sorry to rain on your parade, but it doesn't work that way. Nobody cares if you prefer The Empire Strikes Back to Return of the Jedi, or The Matrix to The Phantom Menace, or Babylon 5 to Star Trek. Again, to the proverbial average Joe, it's just "stupid sci-fi for geeks and nerds". That's what people think.

    And here's another explanation: many of you are depressed and therefore can't stand the thought of "offensive cuteness" such as talking teddy bears or Jar Jar. You'd rather wear all black, watch splatter movies and listen to German industrial rock while fantasizing about killing your classmates or coworkers. Sorry about being a bit over the top, but this is how "regular people" see you. They don't see you as intelligent persons who appreciate a good sci-fi movie. Instead, they see you as sad computer geeks.

    Somebody here wrote something along the lines of "well, Star Wars sucks, but fortunately we'll still have The Matrix and Lord of the Rings".

    Huh? Are sci-fi and fantasy movies all you have? If you get mad because the title of the new Star Wars movie did not live up to your expectations, I think you should seriously re-examine the priorities in your life.

  217. Re:Sadly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, of course we have to see it but consider these options:

    Plan A: Pay for another movie and then sneak into the Episode II theater, thereby depriving Lucas of the money.

    Plan B: DO NOT see it on opening weekend! Wait at least a week or 2, thereby depriving Lucas of those all important opening weekend numbers!

    MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

  218. Space opera is hurting lately by Retsil+Evad · · Score: 1

    Sadly as the special effects get better the acting and already weak plots get worse in SF spectaculars. Oh well atleast there's still the Red Dwarf movie next year...

    1. Re:Space opera is hurting lately by ahde · · Score: 1
      Special Effects?

      Oh, you mean computer animation.

      Have you ever seen Star Wars? Or The Empire Strikes Back? Okay, the ewoks were just midgets in pajamas, but even that many midgets is cooler than blue-screened floppy ears. Sorry, but a blue screen is still a blue screen (even if it's green) and most movies haven't gotten any better at it than Superman. If you can't tell the difference, I've got a collection of high fidelity MP3s I'll sell you, too.

  219. Re:What I think is sad..... by Ethan · · Score: 1

    ... Dragon?

  220. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
    Seen Mark Hamill in anything lately? There's a reason for that. He was bad enough in ANH, but he really showed he didn't have it in RoJ.
    Do you have any idea how much voice work he does? Perhaps the most notable being The Joker in Batman: The Animated Series and associated spinoffs.
    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  221. Re:Bummer... by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but what villian would be stupid enough to clone Jar-Jars???

    What villain would be stupid enough, after having destroyed an entire enemy invasion force by flying into the ship and blowing up the reactor, to build not one but TWO Death Stars with the same flaw?

  222. Re:Might this not be a ploy by well_jung · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I prefer:

    Star Wars Episode II: A Darkened Heart.

    Would be a good title given the primary story line in this edition (Anakin->Vader), and would be a good-natured poke at El Presidente.

    --
    Carl G. Jung
    --
    "With one breath, with one flow, You will know Synchronicity" -La Policia
  223. Send in the clones by Fromeo · · Score: 1

    (sings)
    There should be clones.... send in the clones....
    (... and they ate Sir Robin's minstrels, and there was much rejoicing -- yaay)

  224. Could this mean... by Herbmaster · · Score: 2

    500,000 Natalie Portmans, all naked and petrified?

    --
    I'm not a smorgasbord.
  225. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I (somehow) managed not to see Star Wars as a kid. When Phantom Menace was coming out, I rented the original trilogy, and thought it was great. I went to see Phantom Menace, and ten minutes into it I knew it was not on the same level as the other movies. So I don't buy that everyone just thinks it's worse because they saw the originals as kids.

  226. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by mikeee · · Score: 2

    And Luke's starting out as a teenager, when even Anakin at 8 (or is it 10? I forget) is thought by Yoda to be too old to begin.


    And Yoda was right, too.

    Just look how Anakin turned out; and Luke was a second-rater who wouldn't have lasted 5 seconds against Darth Maul.

  227. Re:The CBG said it best... by babbage · · Score: 2
    No, actually, it would be
    "Star Wars Episode II: Worse Episode Yet"

    We're not allowed to hit rock bottom until Ep3 comes out, unfortunately.

    Anyone know where one could get a copy of "Phantom Edit"? I was pleasantly shocked to find out that Amazon has "George Lucas In Love", so why not this too?

    On the same note, will someone be ambitious enough to produce an "Edit of the Clones" in advance so we can skip seeing Lucas' take on the story? I think it would save us all a precious 2 hours from our lives...

  228. Sounds familliar... by shippo · · Score: 1
    It sounds to me like the name of a dodgy 8-bit video game from the mid-1980's - the sort of thing that would be hand-duplicated onto cassette tape by some spotty herbert in his bedroom. There were a lot of bad games around at this time; I even recall one names "3D Sieddab Attack" (reverse the second work)

    Wait a minute....

    Back in around 1983, Parker Brothers released a cartridge for the Atari VCS based upon the At-At Walker portions of "The Empire Strikes Back". The legendary UK Commodore games author Jeff Minter released a virtual clone of the game called "Attack of the Mutant Camels". There was a later sequel called "Revenge of the Mutant Camels", which was simillar to the title of the third film.

    Are the clones Mutant Camels? Has George Lucas ever played "Hover Bover"? Are Jeff Minter and Euan McGregor Related? I think we should be told.

  229. Re:Excerpt from leaked screenplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was sooooooooo friggin funny. Probably the most obscure Simpsons reference EVER, nice work!

  230. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
    • if she wants to see episode 2 she's going by herself. Life's too short to watch two more hours of this kind of excrement

    We need a support group. Come the advertising blitz, it's going to be damn hard to tough it out.

    As a complete aside, there's an insanely slick British sitcom called "Spaced" in which the protagonist is sacked from a comic book store for refusing to sell a Jar Jar doll. Priceless.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  231. Star Trek: The Picture Motion? by bidule · · Score: 1

    Imagine Jar-Jar in the Enterprise...

    --
    ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
  232. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Vader' is also suspiciously close to 'wader' which in English means someone who walks in shallow water. The parallels are uncanny.

    It also resembles 'Vadem' which makes a line of Windows CE products. Windows == Bad == Darth Vader? Hmm... Now there's one for you to think about.

  233. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by ChadM · · Score: 1

    just a note, i dont know what you're talking about the "frank herbert estate atrocities", because if you're referring to dune: house atreides and dune:house harkonnen i think they're great. just because they weren't written by frank herbert himself doesn't mean they aren't worth reading. in fact i like how they provide a story that leads directly into where the original dune started and i, simply put, will cream when they complete dune 7 and i get to read it and figure out what happens with all the honored matres crap. i guess it's just a matter of opinion =]

  234. Technology... by drc500free · · Score: 1

    The real problem I see is that Lucas waited too long before making his prequels. Compare the robots in TPM to the ones in the second trilogy - the weapons too. Unless he comes up with a plausible reason in Episode 3 ("Me and my Wookie") for the technology to have devolved...

  235. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    IMO, what hurt Phantom Menace was first, the long gap between the first trilogy and it and second, the fact that it was a prequel. JarJar was annoying, but I'm sure he was SUPPOSED to be. Given those limitations, I think it was a good movie and I'm still looking forward to the next 2.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  236. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by dickens · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, 30 or 40 years from now, if you view the first six in numerical order, it will probably look like a natural maturing.

    Depends on who picks up at 7, I guess.

  237. Re:More than half way. by ozbon · · Score: 1

    Aliens vs. Alien
    Another "sequel better than original"

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  238. Light Sabre by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

    I wonder if there's a french guy that's going to replace the original light sabre's with the medical instruments he's suing for because he claims they are so much alike. The french guy would say, "Sir, do you realize you are not using the regular light saber's, but you are using Minrad's special Light Sabre' syringes?" (Said in the form of Folger's coffee commercials)

  239. Re:I guess the ironic thing is... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1
    "Super Mario Brothers" is a pretty crap title, but it's one of the best ..."

    Ohhh, the further I got through that sentence, the more I thought you were gonna say "movie". I'm SO glad you actually said "games". =o)

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  240. Re:When Jedi Attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So just to be clear about this, you actually regard "Star Wars" as a good name?

  241. Re:do you think... by envisionary · · Score: 1

    Episode I he mentioned that he no longer wants to continue the series after finishing the two remaining prequels. Of course, his mind my have changed by now...

    Never underestimate the power of greed!!! [greenbacks]

  242. The plot by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 2

    I can see it now...

    Empiror asks his not so bright Sith to "Clone the the dolly" (referring to Natalie whom he secretly desires). Instead of lots Princess to play with, he gets a docking bay full of genetically malformed sheep with big sharp nasty teeth and nasty wool coats.

    Enter Obiwan with his double edge light sheers to save the day while Anakin knits a sweater (no wonder the kid turned out bad). Amidst the carnage, sits the Emperor mumbling something about the stupid Sith and mint jelly.

  243. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jst OV vdinato'sste! Espc he "fs" ei, here Ileaned tct eboom offof nol shir to se asa namt Oh, ah dac artypho

    Of ouse,dnforg& #101;ored&#1 08;adno's emal!Heyu& #32;wi disco tuly dfcult tito cidehatt nhe wends...hve piaparty A fash par t te mall wthlo oufrins? Hav se nd lls n hone

    nshrt, if ou 'cec ked oladina'& #115; sit, udo't now whtyouemising!

  244. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 2
    Basically, yeah, Starwars is chessy. It's tacky but hey, we still love it.
    How right you are: here's the Star Wars Chess Set.
  245. Re:Appropriate by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

    > YMMV, but man, I just can't put JW in the same league as
    > KS and QT. The latter 2 have a serious gift for dialogue.

    Hrmm...I'll try to pay more attention to this--You may be right, but Whedon's dialogue still flows infinitely better than anything that JMS wrote on B5.

    One thing I have noticed on both Buffy and Angel is that some of the writers try way too hard to write dialogue like Joss, usually resulting in Willow speaking like a babytalking simpleton or Spike being a little too self-consciously "cool."

    --
    "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
  246. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by lordpixel · · Score: 1

    uh huh. Good troll in the first sentence there. I take my hat off to someone who can stereotype 99,999 people based solely on an ID number. I love the binary distinction people like you are trying to make between "kids movies" and "adult movies". You really must sit down and draw me a picture sometime, I'm sure it'd be fascinating. >Many "child movies" do attempt to explore > great themes. Right. Which makes them "child movies" which incororate elements designed to engage adults and children on different levels. You just blew away your own argument. But then its fundamentally a troll: >Face it, people always love what they grew >up with as kids. Classic tactics. If anyone attempts to disagree with you, you can just go "hah hah, look who never grew up and doesn't realise it. I'm the adult who knows exactly what an *adult* movie is." Yawn. Move along please.

    --

    Lord Pixel - The cat who walks through walls
    A little bigger on the inside than out

  247. Yoda speaks... by effer · · Score: 1

    Bad feeling on this I have!

  248. Re:Might this not be a ploy by antek9 · · Score: 1

    No sorry, Episode 3 has already been named, where have you been:

    Star Wars Episode III: For Great Justice

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  249. probably about the clone wars?? by jgilbert · · Score: 1

    Have any people who have actually seen Star Wars post here? Chronologically they are going to have to fit in the clone wars which Anakin and Obi Wan both fought in. My guess is that's what the movie's about. In which case, the name would make since.

  250. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by dswensen · · Score: 1

    True, there is a massive contrast between ESB and TPM, but they're also very different movies telling very different kinds of stories.

    TPM is essentially prologue. It's setting the stage for what will happen in the rest of the series. The atmosphere (one I think Lucas didn't do that good a job of portraying) is that of an idyllic Republic that's soon to fall apart. It makes no sense for such a movie to be dark, especially considering Anakin's just a kid -- and one has to portray his innocence for his descent into corruption to have any meaning whatsoever.

    ESB, on the other hand, is the middle act of the classic trilogy. It's is the moment in the story when all seems lost, before the final victory of the good guys in ROTJ. So, of course it's going to be light on the cutesy-poo.

    I like ESB a lot and wouldn't have it any other way. But to have all the movies resemble it wouldn't make any dramatic sense to me. There'd be no story arc of corruption and redemption to speak of. It'd just be corruption all the way around, and if I want to see that, I'll go watch Blade Runner again or something.

    Of course, Episode III is the middle act of the whole series, and Lucas has said it will most likely be the darkest of all the movies, with the wholesale slaughter of the Jedi and the triumph of the Empire -- before the upswing of Episode IV. So you'll have that to look forward to, if that's your thing.

  251. Re:More than half way. by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

    I think "Aliens" falls into the category of being better than the original. "Terminator 2" is also pretty good. "Star Trek 2" was also markedly better than the original. You're right, though, there aren't many examples.

    --

    - Spryguy
    There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  252. Just don't clone Jar-Jar!!!!! by Morocco+Mole · · Score: 1

    --Richard

  253. Re:Might this not be a ploy by antek9 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, I'm late of course, but...

    Episode II: Raiders of The Lost Clone
    Episode II: Who Clones Last Clones Best
    Episode II: Three Men and a Clone
    Episode II: Clones in Toyland
    Episode II: Some Clones Like it Hot
    Episode II: The Cloned Suspects
    Episode II: Clone and Dagger
    Episode II: Clone as Clone Can
    Episode II: Clone this!
    Episode II: Clon-o Trigger
    Episode II: Clonebusters
    Episode II: Jar-Jar Rastafari
    Episode II: May The Clones Not Be With You
    Episode II: Clones Galore!
    Episode II: A Clone! A Clone! My Kingdom for a Clone!
    Episode II: Citizen Clone

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  254. Re:Plot summary [spoiler warning] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the cut shot to Bob Dole as the emporer, saying 'Down Boy'......

  255. Re:first logged in sarcasm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't bother, they've got enough janitors.

    -- chdz

  256. IMDB doesn't think much of it either by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

    From the IMDB

    • George Lucas has officially announced the title of Star Wars II, the much-anticipated follow-up to Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace, and they've named it Attack of the Clones. Yup, you read that correctly: Attack of the Clones. The announcement was made on Monday on the official Star Wars site. One of the rumored titles that was passed along this time last year was "The Rise of the Empire" though that was quickly proved false. Our fans clearly favored "The Clone Wars" as the new name in a poll taken at the time, and it isn't too far from where it ended up. Discuss this new development and much, much more on our [snicker] Attack of the Clones [chortle] message boards.

    The [commentary] is theirs, not mine.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  257. Re:Probably a fake by Saib0t · · Score: 1
    &lt sarcasm&gt
    The good thing with 'The attack of the Clones' is that every clone will have a distinctive number on the shoulder. That way, Lucacs can make big money on Merchandising because kids will need to have the whole collection to play the passage of the movie where Clone 16 and 42 were fighting. Nice move...
    &lt/sarcasm&gt

    Other than that, although TFM was somewhat bad, nothing tells me episode II will suck. If Lucas spent even half an hour checking websites about his movie on the net, he'll know what people thought of Jar-Jar and &lt emphasis&gt**MIGHT**&lt/emphasis&gt not do the same mistake again...

    I personally hope so and will anyway go see the episode II when it's out.

    Just my e.02

    --

    One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
  258. Re:Don't quit your day job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sort of armchair psychoanalysis may impress some people (like a few moderators), but if you try to use it in any serious context you'll be mocked and ridiculed.

  259. i don't get it... by DigitalDrug · · Score: 1

    The clone wars? What does CK1 and Coolwater have to do with star wars?

  260. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I jutLOVvladintor's sie! spialhe "fash sectn her Ierned to t th btom f f dshrt to s ahai enhncmn! anhe "ance party"pt!

    Ofur, do't fgt to radldiator's ema re ou ildisove ho ldfic&#11 7;lt t io dei wtto doon wekeds...ave pza arty? A fshpar?Go theall th f your rien? Havealeepoerand caloys onth oe?

    hor, ifyu hant heutvl ainat'ssie,&#121 ;ou dont no wh youemisng

  261. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Star Wars Episode II: The Search for More Money

    Nah, Mel Brooks was gonna use that for Spaceballs II.

  262. Really..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why does anyone care about the title. That is completely superficial and has NO effect on the movie. What? Would you rather have some one-in-a-million title but a shitty movie? Which would you change, the title of Episode 1 or the actual shitty movie? Lets petition for real plots, complex themes and adult character interaction. No that has NOTHING to do with anything sexual, cussing or other crap. It means something that is insightful, thought provoking and lasting. Something that looks like it was a story being told, not 'plot-lets' wrapped around some money making scheme as an afterthought. How about getting some of the good book writers to do the script. They seem (well, before the latest load of crap came out... pre 2000) to have a grasp on how to use the existing universe, its history and the underlying themes already in place to tell a great story. Not being cute and cuddly in order to make small children laugh and subsequently demand their foolish parents buy them the latest assortment of StarWars Action figures, underwear, rain jackets, lunch bags, book bags, caps, pencils and notebooks. (not to mention the later cerial and poptarts with various Star Wars themes thrown on the wrapping.)

  263. Re:The real face of scifi fandom & the geek commun by magic · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Thank you-- you hit the nail on the head. Serious geeks spend a lot of time trying to be geeks (wearing black, having the best techno-toys, seeing the right movies, glowering over their monitors at happy co-workers). But this just substitutes one social ladder for another.

    It is lame to bash or even look down on other geeks because you think their tastes aren't hardcore enough-- isn't it enough that half the world already looks down on us? Do we need to add to the persecution?

    -m

  264. Lucas' main problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is that he had a full decade to come up with a prequel, and he couldn't even make it consistent with his previous movies!

    I mean, come on. I got to enjoy ROTJ when it came out precisely because I wasn't some hard-core SW geek. I got to see the 3 originals ONCE each when they came out. I didn't obsess over each and every detail and who said what.
    In fact, the only movies I got to see more than once when I was a kid were Raiders Of The Lost Ark and Back To The Future.

    So even I got to see the crap that Lucas tried to pull with TPM, it's quite clear that he lost it long ago.

  265. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's only what he said. This was a continuing news item. First Revenge of the Jedi is announced, then Vengeance of Kahn is announce in early '82. Then the Lucas Law-Troopers made the trekkies change their title. Vengeance of Khan (which had several working titles including The Undiscovered Country) gets released as the Wrath of Khan. Lucas then abandons Revenge for Return claiming some nonsense about Jedi Revenge not being appropriate, when in reality we all know that just wanted the Trekkies to know that he was in control.

  266. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Nyarly · · Score: 1
    Hang on, back that truck up...

    Remember finding out about child abuse on Gont, and why wizards from Roke avoided girls, in Ursula Le Guin's Tehanu?

    First, it's weird that you chose a Le Guin book as your first example. The Wizard of Earthsea wasn't exactly one of my childhood favorites, and besides, Le Guin gets odder with every book.

    Remember when all the kids got killed, and Aslan turned into Jesus, in C.S. Lewis's The Last Battle?

    Man, if you're only getting the Christian alegory of the Narnia books, you did read them young. Frankly, that was the bigger betrayal by Lewis, in my opinion. I'd always loved the Narnia books, especially everyone's introduction: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. But when I re-read them at 18, Aslan as Christ drips so thickly that it's just sickening. Now I can't read any of them. Pah.

    Remember when Bilbo Baggins turned into an old, evil monster (if only for a moment) in J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings -- and then the "sequel" to that had no hobbits, only elf genealogy and linguistics?

    This example is getting better. The Hobbit is much more of a kid's book. There's enough there for an adult to enjoy, but there's nothing tricky going on. Part of the evil of the One Ring is that just wanting it taints you, and kindly, good natured burglar that he is, it's the more tragic that Bilbo has been tainted. And face it, the Silmarilion details events leading up to the beginning of the Age that Rings describes the end of. So, first, it's not a "sequel," or even a prequel, really, but more like a history, or a mythic lay, which is how it reads.

    If it's not what you expected -- that is, what you extrapolated from the first movie(s) or book(s) -- you're not going to like it. We build cosy little worlds from the "original" stories, then hate it when the author intrudes.

    Ultimately, it's the author's right to do or say anything with the world he imagines. As as audience we can comment, criticize, or even extrapolate. But ultimately it's impossible for the author to "intrude." His is the authoritative word, as it were.

    Regarding Star Wars, the first trilogy began simply, even shallowly (and the lead was similarly poorly acted - forget Jar Jar, Jake Lloyd sucks balls), but built into a much more complex and satisfying story over the course of the trilogy. Empire used to be my least favorite of the three, but it improves the most with age.

    I've been hoping this first trilogy would turn out about the same, and it certainly has started out about the same point. Clones will be where the trilogy stands or falls, in that it can make up for Jar Jar and Lil' Anakin, Wunderkind, or it can leave Episode III with nowhere left to go.

    And, I for one would stand by the title. It's a space opera for cryin' out loud. The first one is called The Phantom Menace, you know? Eesh.

    --
    IP is just rude.
    Is there any torture so subl
  267. TPM stayed the same, this will too by Scorchmon · · Score: 1

    I remember when I first heard that Epidose 1 would be called "The Phantom Menace". I thought it was a rather stupid B movie title, and no movie could take itself seriously with such a name. I wasn't very emotional about it though. This was when I still had faith in George Lucas. I waited with confidence that it would be changed to something more dramatic and fitting with Star Wars as everyone knows there were two other names for RotJ before the final name was chosen. Eventually, the release date for TPM arrived around the same time I realized that the title wasn't going to change after all. Now, I find myself in the same situation, minus the confidence in George Lucas. It's now obvious to me that The Attack of the Clones will remain as the official title when Ep 2 is released, and there's nothing anyone can do about it. I shall heed the warning that I received when I first heard "The Phantom Menace" and now "Attack of the Clones" and avoid this movie at all cost.

  268. Re:clones...senolc by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it was all mentioned, in such a way that it had to have been something important, in the original movies, way before any of this human cloning stuff. Just bad timing.

  269. Re:When Jedi Attack by HeelBiter · · Score: 1

    "Now with 'Super Memoir-Writing Action'"

    --
    ------------------------------
    ...harder than Chinese Algebra.
  270. Re:Attack of the..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just LOVE vladinator's site! Especially the "fash" section, where I learned to cut the bottom off of an old shirt to use as a hair enhancement! Oh, and the "dance party" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read vladinator's emails! Here you will discover how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have a pizza party? A fash party? Go to the mall with all of your friends? Have a sleepover and call boys on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't checked out vladinator's site, you don't know what you're missing!

  271. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    Nope, he doesn't do the voice of Ben. Ben is some 60 year old radio guy. He does, however, do the voice of the trucker. Emmett, his name is, if I recall correctly. The guy with the Imperial symbol tattoo.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  272. But its not april first... by azephrahel · · Score: 1

    I'm confused, its not april first, slashdot didn't get compromised did it? I mean this HAS to be a joke? Right? Right?

    OHH GOD TELL ME ITS A JOKE!!!

    --
    You are only young once, but you can stay immature indefinitely.
  273. Re:*sigh* by 4thAce · · Score: 1
    When I was a kid, I thought they were saying "The Cologne Wars". I really assumed there was some sort of fracas over fragrances.

    Just you wait. The war is going to be led by the evil Prince Matchabelli...and you'll be able to purchase "Jar-Jar in a jar" at finer retailers everywhere.

    (back on topic) You know, the disadvantage of having clones in a war is that you won't be able to use DNA identify the remains.

    --
    Inventor of the LOLbalrog meme.
  274. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can cruise at sea level and still be way over the moderators heads.

  275. Re:This must be a big joke... by Gimp+Gimpson · · Score: 1

    That's not a bad idea, though... I think I'll see it drunk.

    My obligatory title suggestion: Star Wars: Everything You Always Wanted To Know About Clones* (But Were Afraid To Ask)

  276. Re:Clone Wars? by jmccay · · Score: 1

    You knew it had to covered somewhere. Aside from Anakin and Ben, Boba Fet(sp?) is a veteran of the Clone Wars.

    --
    At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  277. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Refrag · · Score: 2

    I'm sure your wife would have said the same thing had you taken her to a re-showing of Star Wars: A New Hope. The acting was always horrible and hokey, and so was the plot. Get over it!

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  278. Re:The best part? Even CNN readers think it sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just LOVE vladinator's site! Especially the "fash" section, where I learned to cut the bottom off of an old shirt to use as a hair enhancement! Oh, and the "dance party" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read vladinator's emails! Here you will discover how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have a pizza party? A fash party? Go to the mall with all of your friends? Have a sleepover and call boys on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't checked out vladinator's site, you don't know what you're missing!

  279. Re:Media smoke and mirrors by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

    But uhhh... most of us already knew the basic plot of Episode II, long before Episode I was released. It doesn't make sense. True, it goes along with the other cheesy titles ("A New Hope", "The Empire Strikes Back", etc.), but "The Clone Wars" would have been SO much better...

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  280. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Remember when Bilbo Baggins turned into an old, evil monster (if only for a moment) in J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings -- and then the "sequel" to that had no hobbits, only elf genealogy and linguistics? "

    Hummm.
    Well lets see.
    The hobbit was a kids book IMO.
    The Lord of the Rings was not, it was far more adult in content, and had none of the cutesey kids stuff the hobbit did have.
    The Silmirillian (sp)is what you are thinking of as a sequil? I thought it was a pre-hystory of the elves.

    I think you dont know what you are talking about and taking liberties with the facts in your examples.

  281. Re:Possible money saver... by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed you can still hear anything after sitting close to the brass section :). We just play as loud as we can to make up for the boredom of counting yet another 250 bars rest...

  282. Re:Probably a fake by grondu · · Score: 1
    So, what might they change it do? "Attack of the Clowns"?

    Yes. And have the clowns from "Killer Clowns from Outer Space". (They deserve a better movie.) And a theme song by the Dickies. Then we'll have something worth hearing at least.

    --

    I'm the urban spaceman babe, but here comes the twist... I don't exist

  283. Re:When Jedi Attack by kreyg · · Score: 2
    Some others that might work:

    Fall of the Jedi
    Fall of the Republic
    Return of the Sith

    They all tie in nicely to "Return of the Jedi."

    --
    sig fault
  284. Re:I can wait to download it off the web.... by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    Hot damn your behind, I get stuff off the internet a week BEFORE ITS MADE!

    Hehe

    Well it sure as hell that way at times!

  285. Re:here's mine: by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    Star Wars Episode II: Natalie Portman Copulates With A Badboy

    Maybe you should get busy mass-murdering people so you can catch her attention...

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  286. Re:I'm trying.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who do you think the clones are going to be of? Sheesh I saw this coming when they killed Darth Maul. It's pretty damned obvious.

  287. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Harlan Ellison's was the sole, lonely critical voice to be raised against it, and even in his case his point wasn't so much that it sucked, but just that it wasn't quite as good as everyone else was saying.

    I saw it at college age. I was disappointed because it was space opera rather than "hard" scifi of the 2001 variety. But at least it was fun. I've rented it several times, and I'll rent it again someday.

    That Pathetic Movie wasn't fun, and I certainly won't be renting it.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  288. Re:I can see it now... by AnarchoFreak_00 · · Score: 1
    ...Filmed in New Zealand. Annakin shows up with Jar Jar Binks on a 4 wheel motorbike.

    Annakin starts to whistle to Jar Jar, and yell phrases like "get in behind ya mungrle!" "steady! steady!" "good boy!", as Jar Jar runs around, hearding the sheep into a spaceship.

  289. A word for all the naysayers by Mtgman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Beware all ye who would criticize the genius of Lucas, for is it not written in the revised, updated and George (dubya) Bush approved version of The Constitution of the United States of the Multinational Corporations (now available as an Adobe(R)(TM)(C)All Rights Reserved E-book for $19.99 per view, order today! Operators are standing by!) In article I section 1 that George Lucas is hereby declared the greatest storyteller of all time and all law abiding and Bill Gates fearing citizens are required to pay homage to him by seeing any and all movies with the name Star Wars multiple times and by further paying homage by standing in ridiculously long lines at the local Wal-Mart to purchase dozens of non-biodegradable plastic toys for the betterment of our young(isn't it grand of us to think of the children?).

    Yea and those who dare not to venerate the name of Lucas and pay the required homage shall be stricken from the rolls of the nation. They will be outcasts in their own land of birth. Denied bland conversation with their fellow citizens about the masterworks of Lucas, they will wallow in their anguish. They shall be stricken from the lists of people to be protected in time of war and their names will be added to the lists of those who will not recieve the bounty of this great land in the form of Blue Light specials and the occasional Buy one Get one FREE sales at the local Piggly Wiggly. They shall be stricken from the rolls of every good and beneficient policy this great conglomerate bestows upon it's consumers. Moreover their name shall be dupliated in all databases related to taxation and if they ever contest this clause, they are subject to auditing by the BSA, RIAA, MPAA and Rectal-Probers-R-Us.

    So let it be written(in tiny print behind an encryption scheme which may not be broken under article two of this constitution, formerly known as the DMCA) so let it be done.

    Now if you missed this update to the supreme law of our land, that isn't my fault. I suggest you rush right out to your computer and fully enable all the update packages you can and register any and all software you have. I got this preview of our new constitution as a bonus when I downloaded the latest version of Minsweeper, the official game of the land. Baseball isn't bringing in enough money it seems.

    Steven

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
  290. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terminator 2 was way better than the original. Even the sex scene in the sequel was better, and there wasn't a sex scene in the sequel.

  291. Re:The best part? Even CNN readers think it sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I utLOE adinaos st! Espiy te "fs"etion whee leard to ut te bottom off of ol s t se s a harenhcement! h ndte nce par"hto!

    O os,on'&#32 ;foret t vlir'se&#10 9;ai He ul disehowtrl& #121;dfficul&#32 ;itecide at dn weekens...hae aizzapary? A fash ayGoto the al wih l o you d? a a seeovendcall on e pho?

    In short i you hn'ceced o ldinar's sit,o do't knowhat y'e sn!

  292. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alternate titles you say? Why not try:

    1. Angry, Angry, Clones
    2. Bring Me The Head Of Jar Jar Binks
    3. The Real Sequel

    Oni the Anonymous Oxymoron strikes again

  293. Re:ENOUGH already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like us?

  294. Re:marching clones. by vinnythenose · · Score: 1
    He already did, remember,

    "I think I'm a clone now, 'cause everywhere I go I'm always hanging around" and other such lyrics from I think I'm a clone now.

    --
    --- I used to moderate, then I read the -1 articles and decided having to filter through them was not worth it.
  295. Natalie Portman by epyx · · Score: 1

    Wow, a topic that would actually warrant a Natalie Portman troll, and I haven't seen one yet. You guys are weird.

  296. obviously not true by boarder · · Score: 2

    I saw them as a kid so I can't say anything, but if you read some of the posts here on /. you'll notice that a lot of the people saw them when they were in their 20's in 1977 (remember, people stood in lines for days to watch the movie repeatedly back then, when you were 8 would your mom let you stand outside in the city for days to watch a movie?). My parents liked the movie when they saw it originally (as adults). There were plenty of 45+ year olds at the theatre both times I saw TPM (I went openning day by myself on vacation, then again with my friends, not because I actually liked the movie).

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  297. Re:You can never go home. by Majik+Sznak · · Score: 1

    Thanks for teaching me something... I had no idea they used to show movies from 70mm film. That's awesome. I saw a short movie in one of those science theme park type things in France (Futuroscope) that was 70mm and something like 72fps. The detail was amazing, and the motion was fantastic. Dumb film, though. :)

    --
    Karma: Chameleon (Mostly affected by the 1980s)
  298. Disco Wars by VonSnaggle · · Score: 1

    It should have been Disco Wars -Have you ever noticed what Han Solo was wearing?

    --
    if common sense was common, wouldn't everyone have it?
  299. Re:Bummer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm afraid that this ship is FULLY OPERATIONAL!

  300. Re:The REAL trilogy is that everybody is waiting f by Hassman · · Score: 1
    Eh...

    Now if "Wheel Of Time" was made into a 20 movie series...DAMN!

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  301. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 1

    True, but you can't really argue that those books are on the same level, cause they're not even close. I was tremendously disappointed after I read Dune:House Atreides, but when I went back and read it again, not expecting a work like the original, I enjoyed it much more. I would say the same thing about Star Wars: Episode I.

  302. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just LOE vladinatorsite Eeially te fh"secin,wh& #101;e Ilane tocuthe botomoff f anld ir o use asaaienhacem&#101 ;! Oh ndhe"dance arty" poos

    Of couse do' forge to ed laiaor mal! Heyo ill discov ow tuy difficu stdeide wat odoon tweekns.. haiza party? Afsh ? G the al withll ou friend? He aseepove ndcall boys th hon?

    Ishor, iyo avnt checkedoutvladintor's site,udo' knw ha yu're missn

  303. Re:None of the names were really that good. by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

    Hell, when you get right down to it, "Star Wars" is pretty damn corny itself. *shrug*

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  304. maybe Lucas could expand his empire by Savatte · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see Star Wars: The Erotic Adventures of Jar-Jar

  305. Re:We're all clones! by NeoTomba · · Score: 1
    God I hope so.

    -NeoTomba

  306. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ijust LOVE vladatr's st Espcialy th "fash" secionwhee rnt&#1 11; cut ebotom o of an odshir to se as a har anemt! O ad ac art"pot!

    f core, n frgtored vaiaor's emals! ere wl di hwruif&#10 2;ict it is o deidewhatoo onthe weekens.ave a pzapr A fasparty o tallwt a o yurfriends a a slepov and cll bo o thpoe

    Inhrifyou&#3 2;havn'teckdou&#1 16; adno st, you don' nw wt you're misig!

  307. I don't care what the title is... by Derek · · Score: 1

    ...as long as it still has Natalie Portman in it! :-)

    -Derek

  308. 50s B-Movie? Here's what it'll be like: ;-) by mooniejohnson · · Score: 1

    My parody from the MacAddict Forums:

    *Scene From Star Wars 2: Attack Of The Clones*
    [scene: Anakin and the Queen are sitting in a building that looks like a modern warehouse]
    Anakin: Look! A clone! They are attacking!
    [a cardboard standup of Anakin is lowered to the floor using rope]
    Standup: RAR!!!!!
    Anakin: I will.... (line?)
    Offstage: I will kill him!
    Anakin: I will kill him!
    [Anakin takes out a plastic lightsaber (purchased at Amazon.com) and pokes a hole in the standup]
    Standup: Gah! You have... uh.... KILLED ME!!!!!!!
    [a stagehand runs in front of the camera and lights the standup on fire]
    Anakin: Ha ha! Look at him burn!
    Queen: All this killing is a real turn-on, Anakin!
    Anakin: It is?
    [they conceive Leia]

    --

    Elmo knows where you live!

  309. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by hajibaba · · Score: 1

    Whoops! I have no idea what I was smoking when I posted that.

  310. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2
    Seen Mark Hamill in anything lately?
    Yeah, allegedly he has some Star Wars parody action going on in what we all know will be the best movie this summer: Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back!
    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  311. Re:Speak for yourself by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Cojones? Cojones? We doan need no steeking cojones!
    Oh, wait. Nevermind.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  312. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Stormie · · Score: 2

    Acting: You're forgetting Christopher Lee.

    Do you maybe mean Peter Cushing? Christopher Lee wasn't in Star Wars, he was too busy in 1977 making quality films like "Dracula and Son" and "Meatcleaver Massacre". Although I notice with some interest that he is in SW episode 2 as the ludicrously named "Darth Tyranus".

    Anyway, my wife dragged me along to see Phantom Menace despite my complete disinterest (how's that for a reversal of the usual Slashdot story?), and frankly, Christopher Lee or no Christopher Lee, if she wants to see episode 2 she's going by herself. Life's too short to watch two more hours of this kind of excrement.

  313. Legally Cloned by T1girl · · Score: 1

    Let's see, Anakin gets accepted into a Jedi school on another planet, and then Amidala gathers up all her costume changes and her fur-upholstered knickknacks and droids, and ... oh forget it.

    there are always bigger fish.

  314. Re:*sigh* by antek9 · · Score: 1

    (back on topic) You know, the disadvantage of having clones in a war is that you won't be able to use DNA identify the remains.

    Ahem, just out of curiosity: why would you want or need to?

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  315. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by NathanL · · Score: 1

    Well, I first thought the title was too similar to "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes." I suppose we could suggest "Attack of the Killer Tacos."

  316. Re:When Jedi Attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except if we follow Lucas' logic, Episode II has nothing to do with "The Republic Strikes Back". It'll be about putting the main characters in a really crappy situation. EII follows the continued decay of the Republic, it's not "striking" anything. Oh yeah, and the Sith returned in Episode I.

  317. Re:Clones, War, Trauma, etc. by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    Yes, a planetary queen and her court would continue to drag a ne'er-do-well slacker with them through the galaxy.

    Although, his ability to defy the laws of physics when moving, seeming like a cartoon character rather than something with mass and momentum, certainly requires further scientific study...

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  318. Star Wars 3, the conspiracy is out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps in 2 or three you will be introduced to some team of Force Wielding writers who have a knack for producing childish and simplistic plots and stories simply to rake in money instead of telling a story.

  319. Reversed Expectations by Private+Essayist · · Score: 2
    This is good. The first time a new Star Wars film was discussed on /., it was hyped to the moon. Every detail was discussed breathlessly, evey rumor was treated with exaggerated importance, people were lining up a month in advance and writing their experiences.....and then the movie came out and was lame.

    This time, every thing to do with the second movie is denigrated. Rumors are treated with rolling of eyes. News is ridiculed. This movie is going to suck, we say...and then the movie will come out and...

    --
    ________________
    Private Essayist
  320. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    > Do people who enjoyed George Lucas' original trilogy (well, minus the last half of RotJ) really care about the George Lucas' current focus on ten-year-olds?

    Perhaps I overestimate the mental prowess of ten-year-olds, but don't you think TPM was targeted more at the six-year-old crowd?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  321. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

    "True; it was changed to prevent confusion with Star Trek II: The Revenge of Khan, "

    What really would have been funny if they changed the name to "Return of Khan" thus adding to the confusion. Hilarity ensues! Zany, madcap hijinx!

    -J5K

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  322. Re:Suddenly, Jar Jar doesn't seem all that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Good Fantasy Turns Bad

  323. Re:Thats funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... gasp! Your assumed script may very well be....... WRONG! Imagine that.

  324. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill him off? How about Episode 1 Special Edition where all scenes are remastered not to include any trace of Jar Jar.

  325. Re:Might this not be a ploy by flewp · · Score: 1

    Or, how about: Episode II: Star Whores starring Natalie Portman... Disclaimer: I'm not implying she's a whore, but I'd pay to see a movie where she is one.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  326. Re:cloned army of jar jar by itarget · · Score: 1

    Well, at least that explains why they can never hit what they're aiming at.

    --

    "Where shall the word be found, where will the word resound? Not here, there is not enough silence." -T.S. Eliot
  327. Re:Probably a fake by An+Ominous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or "Clones Gone Wild".

  328. Star WARS: Clone WARS by jamesbernsen · · Score: 1

    Does nobody else think that Star Wars: Clone Wars just sounds redundant? I mean, the title Star Wars wasn't exactly brilliant to begin with.

    Thank goodness they didn't give us "Space Swords" or the "Star Empire" a decade ago. It could have been worse!

  329. dark and epic my behind! by jejoenje · · Score: 1

    'The Empire Strikes Back' dark and epic??? Geez, take it at face value and see what kind of a title THAT really is.. 'Attack of the Clones' isn't all that bad, if you come to think of it..

  330. Re:cloned army of jar jar by cluthu · · Score: 1

    >I hate Lisp. Legions of emacs and Sawfish users would beg to differ, I'm sure.

  331. Re:*sigh* by ozbon · · Score: 1

    Will George Cloney be doing any parts?

    Ok, Ok, I'm going to go quietly now....

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  332. Re:When Jedi Attack by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Star Wars: Episode 3: Your Childhood Memories are Raped For Two Solid Hours, then the Orchestral Score and Mood Lighting in the Last Thirty Seconds Tricks You into Thinking that this is a Worthy Prequel to Episode 4.

    A little unwieldy, I grant you, but it's only a working title.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  333. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being an identical twin (i.e. a clone), I can tell you this, one twin is always inherently evil. BTW, I'm the good twin. ;)

  334. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by tanpiover2 · · Score: 1
    For what it's worth, Star Wars has become modern mythology. Damn near everybody on this planet could identify 3 things: A coke bottle, a VW Beetle, and Darth Vader. Everyone in the US, and I'd bet in Europe too, could tell you the difference between the dark and light sides of the force, and how you get to the dark side, if you're not careful. This isn't unexpected (the Joseph Campbell connection is well-known), but likely unintentional and has the unintended consequence of raising everyone's expectations. Star Wars was great, for a good deal of reasons: Simple archetypal characters, stirring soundtrack, amazing special effects (however if you want to get blown away by a movie that predates SW by about 6 years, go rent "Silent Running"), etc..
    Although I personally feel that Empire is the better film, I also feel that things start to fall apart about half way through. Darth Vader is Luke's father? Come on. "From a certain point of view" is the biggest cop-out in the history of cinema. By the time we get to Jedi, we've got those damn ewoks. The mythology has run out. I'm sure that "Beowulf II" or "Gilgamesh Takes Manhattan" would have similar problems.

    When it comes to Episode I, a great many of us had grown up with the Star Wars mythos, and had developed inflated expectations, espeically after 20 years. But really, all it was, and maybe all we should have expected, was a passable good sci-fi flick, complete with cutesey alien ripe for his own Taco Bell cup. In brief defense of Jar-Jar, if you're going to do the FIRST fully CGI main character in a motion picture that's going to be a MAJOR release, it's going to go a hell of a lot easier on you if he's more of a characature than anything else.

    And as an example of how ingrained Star Wars really is, how many of you, no matter what movie it is, when you hear the full 20th Century Fox fanfare, expect the first chord of the Star Wars them to immediately follow?

    BTW in 1977, I was 9, and I thought that Close Encounters blew Star Wars away.

    --

    But masters, remember that I am an ass: though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass.
  335. Re:Excerpt from leaked screenplay by thesteveco · · Score: 1

    NO ONE expects the Spanish Inquisition!

  336. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2
    Lucas has said many times that it's just a Flash Gordon serial with a budget.
    Umm... Flash Gordon serial + Budget - Sex.

    I mean, let's face it, the only way Star Wars will ever catch up to Flash Gordon is to show actual penetration (and not with lightsabers). This may make parents slightly less willing to drag their kids through Lucas's money-sucking machine (but what the hell do I know, I remember seeing parents with kids at Basic Instinct). Anyway, it would make for some... interesting... action figures.
    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  337. Re:Might this not be a ploy by evilMoogle · · Score: 1

    MST3K Presents: Star Wars: The Clonus Horror

    Yoda: Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to... SUFFERING.
    Crow T Robot: No, this movie leads to suffering.
    Joel: Now that's not nice. It's accurate, but it's not nice.
    Tom Servo: Wouldn't it be "Suffering, hate leads to."? heh heh heh.
    Joel: "It ain't easy being green and wrinkled and 850 years old."

    --
    Erik
    "You," Bite me.
    "Each and every one of you." Bite me.
  338. So when does it come out. by krujos · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing that the movie was suppose to come out this summer. I guess I was wrong seeing how I dont live under a rock or anything. Anyone know when its comming out?

  339. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ustLVE ldintor' sie! specallyt "fsh ecto,where lerdto uthe ottom ff anl hio& #101; as ahairenhacment! O, andthe"ancparty"ph otos

    Of ors, o' orett readinaor's email!e yilldisove ho truydifficut ti o dcde wa td n t wends.. h aza arty? fsh arty? Go the allita ofyour fries?Hava&# 115;eperandca&#1 08;l boyonte phne

    Inotifyo&#11 7;v' chked olaito&#11 4;s ite, u do' now what you're misng

  340. Petition by Verteiron · · Score: 2

    There's a petition. Hopefully it can get Lucas's attention.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  341. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by lucyfersam · · Score: 1

    Your right, Episode I was a children's movie, and it was intended to be, I didn't like everhting Lucas did with it, but it served it's purpouse: it got a new generation fired up about Star Wars. Episode II is designed to be an action/adventure movie, and Episode III is high tragedy, Anikin becoming Vader. Star Wars has always been a family series, so it is reasonable for Episode I to have been a kids movie.

    That being said this title sucks, and we do care because this movie is supposed to be aimed at a somewhat older crowd (everyone who wants to see the Jedi kicking ass). On the bright side, I was at a Star Wars seminar at GenCon, and they told us we could expect to see Yoda and Mace, along with the rest of the Jedi, truly demonstrating why they are Jedi Masters, i.e. kicking some major ass. So all is not lost, it can still be a good movie even if it has a crappy name, and with luck they'll change the name.

  342. Re:We're all clones! by jparp · · Score: 1

    maybe alice cooper will replace jar jar in the next movie?

  343. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by lordpixel · · Score: 1

    [yeah, and this monkey should have hit preview. Damn stupid defaults]

    uh huh. Good troll in the first sentence there. I take my hat off to someone who can stereotype 99,999 people based solely on an ID number.

    I love the binary distinction people like you are trying to make between "kids movies" and "adult movies". You really must sit down and draw me a picture sometime, I'm sure it'd be fascinating.

    >Many "child movies" do attempt to explore
    > great themes.

    Right. Which makes them "child movies" which incororate elements designed to engage adults and children on different levels. You just blew away your own argument.

    But then its fundamentally a troll:

    >Face it, people always love what they grew
    >up with as kids.

    Classic tactics. If anyone attempts to disagree with you, you can just go "hah hah, look who never grew up and doesn't realise it. I'm the adult who knows exactly what an *adult* movie is." Yawn.

    Move along please.

    --

    Lord Pixel - The cat who walks through walls
    A little bigger on the inside than out

  344. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I jst LOV vadinatr Espec al t fa"set&#110 ;,where Ieed tocuthe botoff o an d hr to u sa har ehacement!Oh, and th"nparty" ps!

    fours, don't forget toad vldinto's s Hyowill dior hwtruly difficul it is todcide what t do the weekd. a a iza prty? A fas aty? o t e mall haf ou find Hae asepoe an alboysont pho?

    I short, iu hn' ccdoutla&# 100;nator's t,youon' know what you'remisg!

  345. Attack of the Clones....... by jparp · · Score: 2, Funny
    ATTACK OF THE CLONES.

    What the hell kind of name is that?! This has to be a joke. CowboyNeal, say it isn't so! I can't handle this. I want an explanation.

    He might as well have called it "A New Hope 2", starring Christopher Walken as Obi Wan, and featuring the cast of American Pie.

    Someone needs to shoot George Lucas before he does anything else...But wait...Maybe he's already dead...MAYBE He REALLY died in the mid eighties, but he was CLONED!!!!Thats it! His clone is now wrecking havoc on the world, tricking them into watching hour upon hour of JarJars and annoying little Anakin Skywalkers!!! AHHHHHHHHH!!!!!Meanwhile, George Lucas writhes in his grave, awaiting the day when he will rise again, to save the world from His evil Clone!!!!! Sounds like a good movie to me.

    YUB YUB!

  346. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go-go by Sarah+Thustra · · Score: 1



    I led a suffocatingly sheltered life, and I didn't see Star Wars until I was ten thanks to my $#@!in' parents. I didn't have rosy glasses. I knew it was cheesy, and I loved it anyway. The components of it may be B-grade, but they're put together so damn well that most adults will /still/ get sucked into it if they start watching it. The point of a movie, yes?

    I ran out and saw Episode I in the theatres when it came out, too. Twice. I knew it was cheesy too, but again, I loved it. The story, all four (now five, I guess) parts of it, is still excellent, the dialog is well written and the characters are superbly developed (yeah, except for Jar-Jar, but didn't *your* parents roll their eyes over the inane beeping of R2-D2?).

    I will go see Episode II when it comes out, even though I don't really like seeing movies in theatres anymore. I know it will be cheesy. I wish it wasn't so over-hyped, but that's more a result of *our* way of handling famous things than it is of Star Wars--Star Wars kicks ass, and it just happens to be famous because of it, so we treat it like our own media specimen-whore. It doesn't matter; I'm betting pretty hard that I'll love it anyway. It's Star Wars, man.

    ST

  347. Attack of The Clowns by Espen+Skoglund · · Score: 1

    First time I heard this mentioned I interpreted the title as ``Attack of The Clowns''. Needless to say, I was pretty much stunned by the choice of title. I figured that the episode would feature loads of evil annoying people with colorful splashes of paint in their faces (we all know clowns are evil, right) and decided to see what the Slashdot crowd would make of it. I must say I was a tad disappointed when I discovered that the whole story merely was about some meek clones.

    1. Re:Attack of the Clowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention Six of One and that little maintenance droid, Karl(?). Both would be better sidekicks than Jar Jar or the Ewoks. Darth Bobo turns to his stormtrooper and says: "If he starts to win, shoot him." "Never underestimate the power of a Dark Clown"

  348. Re:er, no by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

    And when you really think about it, you realize that "the Force" is a pretty dumb name too. but who cares? I saw the first three when I was in elementary school. I loved them. Saw TPM in high school, and I thought it wasn't very good. It had lost the seemingly "epic" proportions, a stuggle of good vs. evil to become a movie that has no inherent link to the rest of the series

  349. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IustLOE ldnr's&#115 ;it! Especiallhe "as"stion, whr Ileare to the botto ff an old hirto useas hair enncem! Oh, adthe "dac pay" phos!

    fcouse dont orgeoead&#1 18;anaor's mails!Hreo wildsovero tuly fcul s todee t t do o twekeds... ae apizz ay? fh prty?G he all whl of our fnd e a eepve n call os nth n

    In so, if o hven't chekd outvadior' site n ow hat you'ising!

  350. Hey you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watched Eps 4, 5 & 6 and loved them. Then I watched Ep 1 too, and liked it a lot. Choke on that. People watch the movies to be entertained. Especially sci-fi. Some movies can be stereotype/non-original. Good always wins. Villains always die. You can take it at face value or start killing the secret agent as soon as you capture him, with a bullet through his head, no matter what he says. The point is, we went there to be entertained, so drop the whole idea about the plot/references. Go back a couple of decades in brain power. Gasp at all the Force stuff. Wow at the big Star Destroyers. Cheer when the Jedis start fighting. You find that most enjoyable. For those who must analyse every line to see what it actually references or how it is a variation of "cliche" lines, stop crowding the cinemas. Personally MY movie experience will be better without you. Anonymous Coward

  351. Re:All he has to do is .. by ozbon · · Score: 1

    The theme song for the film will be a remakes of Heart's "A Clone"

    'Til now, I always got by on my clone
    And now I want to be with you
    How do I get you a clone?
    A Clone

    Ok, I feel better now.

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  352. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "losing", not "loosing".

  353. Re:*sigh* by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

    But "Episode Two: The Clone Wars" scans quite nicely.

    But why not something more general anyway: "Episode Two: Darkness Falls" (followed by Episode Three: Rise of the Empire).

    "Attack of the Clones" just scans as a cheesey 50's monster movie, eithe Attack of the Killer Tomatoes, or Attack of the 50-foot woman, or something like that. It's just WRONG...

    --

    - Spryguy
    There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  354. Re:Clone Wars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, it all depends on whether said clones are killer tomatoes or not, doesn't it? I admit, it was the first thing that sprang to MY mind.

    And the last movie would be Episode III: Revenge of the Killer Clones.

    Maybe they can cast a hot tomato in Episode III? :)

  355. The Official Word by theEd · · Score: 1
    Here is the URL for the official news from starwars.com. Someone should add to the original posting.

    http://www.starwars.com/episode-ii/news/2001/08/ne ws20010806.html

    Also we need to be politically correct. "Clone" is too derogatory. The preferred term is temporally disjointed identical twins. ;P

    --
    "And now you shall learn the secret of boot to the head"
  356. Re:do you think... by cluthu · · Score: 1

    Though I no longer have bibliographic information to back it up, when Newsweek featured an article about Episode I he mentioned that he no longer wants to continue the series after finishing the two remaining prequels. Of course, his mind my have changed by now...

  357. Re:The best part? Even CNN readers think it sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I justLOVE lainator' site Especll he "fh" etin,where earnd cu bt& #32;of o ao st o s a h ehancment! Oh, ndt danc partpotos!

    Ofos,d&#110 ; rgt red vladinaor's es!Here owl& #115;coverw rul difultit is o ce wh todo o thekn... haveapizza arty? fashartoto hall with ll of or fied? Hve alepvr nd cas ehone

    n sho,i yu en't checdo vladins si, yo don' ow whayo'em&# 115;ing

  358. Re:Attack of the..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ust LOVE lnto' se Epeciythe"a sh"sctin, wher learn oc th bottooff of a od si to us s haireneme&#11 0;t hnd c&#10 1;t" photos!

    f ouse dn'tfoget t read vladinar'semas! He youwlldiscoer o truydfcu it so ece at to do oh wekends... hve izzaart? A fahprtyG tall wih all of yourfrieds? ase&#1 12;ver alb&#1 21;sot pho?

    hot i yu haven't hckd t vldatrsi&#1 16;e,yn't knhayo're isg!

  359. Re:The best part? Even CNN readers think it sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ius LOE vadaors&#1 05;e!c&#105 ;llyth shec&# 111;, re eane to t te otomf adshrtto use as ahairenncet ! Oh adte"dane arty" poos

    O coue, ont forgto ea vladinto's emais!He yuwill discove ow tu dificut iis o dec wht do n theeekeds.. ave a piza par? h arty Gt&#1 09;al wth all oforrinds a sepoer adalloyso&#32 ;th hone

    I sr f you vent eke utvldor'&#1 15; sit,you n' kwwhat you'r miing!

  360. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I jstOV ladiars site spciallyt "ah" cti, hee Ilrd u he tom off of n od r use asirn&# 97;cemet! h ad th ance ar" photos!

    use t frg t rad vitor'email s ere youl dscr hw dfclt it iso dcie wat to te weekes... hae a piza ar? As ty? Gotothl it lf ur frend? a slepoern llboy ote on?

    In srifyou aven't ck ut vladiators st,youot know wa o're missing

  361. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just LOVE vladinator's site! Especially the "fash" section, where I learned to cut the bottom off of an old shirt to use as a hair enhancement! Oh, and the "dance party" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read vladinator's emails! Here you will discover how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have a pizza party? A fash party? Go to the mall with all of your friends? Have a sleepover and call boys on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't checked out vladinator's site, you don't know what you're missing!

  362. A name is but a name... by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 2

    ...unless it has bad associations. Every time I head "Attack of the Clones", I think of "Killer Clowns from Outer Space." ;) Ah well, Star Wars ran its course and is now on a gravy run. I'm looking forward to Lord of the Rings...

  363. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

    It was damn near impossible to find copies of the original trilogy that were not the "Special Editions" (why are they special? is it cause they ride the little yellow bus to school?) But I got my set piece-meal via presents and ebay. =) But I have the feeling the DVD version will be "Special Edition" only. :'-(

  364. Mythic themes by DickieRay · · Score: 1
    >>You only think they're wonderful because, like me, you saw them as a kid. There are NO adult themes or elements in ANY of the films, these are aimed at children, Lucas has said they always were and always will.
    1. Joseph Campbell was very impressed with the mythic base for the Star Wars story. Campbell was honored that his books helped inspire Lucas' story. The story entertains more than just the generation that grew up with A New Hope.
  365. Marketing Fondue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Gag me. Worse than merely being cheesy, it's an evil blend of marketing and cheese.

    It's marketing fondue. It's evil, cheesy, it burns and yet it sticks to you, all the while reminding you of something that was thought cool in the 70's.

  366. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by N0Nick · · Score: 1

    To me, the movies weren't about romance. First and foremost they were action movies...

    I guess that when you take the movies as action movies and nothing more, the shallow characterization and the cliched dialog is nothing to complain about. But when lots of other people consider Star Wars a way of life, CaptainCarrot here got a pretty good point.

  367. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by evilpete · · Score: 1

    Come on, whatever far, far away galaxy you live in, you'll have to admit there is a massive contrast between "The Empire Strikes Back" and the by the book kiddy movies you're talking about.

    Empire is dark! The rebels get their asses kicked repeatedly, Luke gets his hand cut off and discovers Vader is his father and Han gets frozen. SW was cheesy fun. ROTJ was an ewok merchandising exercise. Empire kicked ass.

    --
    +++++
    The harder you look the less you see. That's what we're up against.
  368. Re:do you think... by Grab · · Score: 1

    Well that's going to suck then. Please god, someone else take the helm! Unfortunately, corporations can't use the same rules that ships use, like relieving the captain of command when he goes stark raving mad.

    I think "Star Wars 7: The Search for Plot" would be a start. To be followed by "Star Wars 8: I Can't Believe It's Not Bantha".

    Grab.

  369. Re:What I think is sad..... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    > TPM was nothing but a marketing device aimed straight at children.

    I misread that as "aimed at straight children".

    The question that immediately came to mind was, what kind of children will AotC's marketing be aimed at?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  370. Re:Okay... by unitron · · Score: 2
    With TPM I was disoriented until I left the theater because of all those out of focus computer generated backgrounds. I guess it was an attempt to imitate the inability of a film camera to focus near and far at the same time, but I've never seen a film of real foreground and background where it was so distracting and dizzying. I kept wanting to reach for some sort of adjustment knob.

    And don't even get me started on the sound.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  371. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
    Luke's eligibility: There was always his sister. And didn't Yoda have to be talked into training him? My point was really about how quickly Luke learned what he did (from ESB: "But I've learned so much!"), picking up in days or hours what was supposed to take years. If he was an extrordinary genius it's not remarked on except in a general way, and not by anyone who was actually teaching him.

    Dialog: It need not be about romance, but it would be nice if you could repeat any of the lines without wincing, or if there weren't so many situations where you knew what a character was going to say before he opened his mouth.

    Acting: You're forgetting Christopher Lee. But you're also confusing star power with quality acting. A "star" might be a comptetent actor, but that need not be so if he or she has other appealing qualities. And there are plenty of extremely fine actors who will never be stars, relegated to "character" roles precisely because they're so good at portraying various types. I consider Mark Hamill the worst thing about Star Wars because, with the central role in the series, he had neither acting skill nor (ultimately) star quality. I remember when Hamill was the celebrity guest on the Muppet Show. He had absolutely no talent that could entertain in a variety show setting. They wound up making that the main point of most of the jokes in the episode. Hamill does a lot of voice work now, and that seems to be his niche. Luke Skywalker was more than he could handle.

    I cut Lucas no slack for going where the money is. Surely he, if anyone, could afford art for art's sake. The movie was going to be hugely profitable with or without merchandizing. He might as well have made it a good one.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  372. new title: Star Wars Two - No Refunds by ejzardus · · Score: 1

    nm

  373. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same here. Cologne wars. Alec Guiness was British so I assumed he was talking about Germany...

  374. Ewan McGregor's Response by alnya · · Score: 1

    Check out this article His comments: "a terrible, terrible title" and "nobody tells me anything relating to the Star Wars films." hmmm alnya

  375. Re:Gonna happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And those of us with IQ's over 140 will realize that the one's between 130 and 139 have become the sheep of the corporate empire, and become Socialists! Please, if you have an IQ over 140, join the Socialist part. please. The sheep have been fooled by the corporations for too long.

  376. Re:*sigh* by ChiefCrazyTalk · · Score: 0

    And the disadvantage of vaporizing people is, there are no remains to identify.

  377. Re:ENOUGH already! by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Has ANYONE even thought out what Cloning (as by that Doctor in Italy)
    may actually lead to?

    Concider- A married couple have a 'cloned' version of the wife as a
    daughter! The child is a younger version of the mother, with none of
    the father's genetic material.

    What may happen? As the girl-child ages she becomes a 'younger'
    replica of the wife, who has grown older! Are you following me?

    Or - conversely - a married couple have a 'cloned' version of the husband
    as a son! The child is a younger version of the father, with none of the mother's
    genetic material.

    As the boy-child ages he becomes a 'younger' replica of the husband,
    who has grown older! The wife looks at her 'aged' husband - then at
    the version of him that is youthful!!!!!

    THE RESULT - do I really have to tell you?

    Regards,
    JK

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  378. Re:Possible money saver... by the+gnat · · Score: 1

    Hell yeah!

    The symphony I'm in right now (Yale's, so it's not a "real" orchestra, but good anyway) did The Planets my freshman year. The director decided to do the whole projector thing. Almost ruined the experience for me. Like, shit, it's an allegory... astrology, not astronomy.

    Quite a few people notice the similarity- sort of surprising. My mom heard Mars for the first time and immediately said "Wow, John Williams owes Holst quite a bit." It's not so much the tunes as the textures, and chord structures. A friend once pointed out that the chords in the prelude to the third act of Wagner's Parsifal are used in the Imperial March- which, I think, is still Williams' best work. Unfortunately, this familiarity really is at the expense of Holst- everyone loves The Planets, but I think few would consider it as a true masterpiece because it's so associated with movie music (not necessarily SW) and with hymns, if you're British. I think it's one of the greatest pieces of music of the century- up there with "Rite of Spring", "Elektra", Shostakovich's 7th Symphony and 8th string quartet, and others that I can't think of because it's 1am. God, I'm such a nerd.

    Other music that comes to mind is R. Strauss, Bruckner, and especially Stravinsky. Listen to "Rite of Spring" and then listen to any of the Tatooine music in ep. IV. Shostakovich, perhaps. The problem is, when you've played a lot of big romantic and modern symphonic works (and I'm in the bassoon section, so I get the full power of the brass in my ear), every movie soundtrack sounds like an older orchestral piece. Or vice-versa.

    Pardon me if I blather. I've been in front of a computer for 16 hours and it's nice to be a different kind of geek for a while.

    -Nat

  379. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There are NO adult themes or elements in ANY of the films, these are aimed at children"

    Actually, SW:ANH is full of "adult themes." Have you seen "The Hidden Fortress" by Kurosawa? Have you read "The Hero With a Thousand Faces" by Campbell?

    ANH is based on Kurosawa's film, and I would never say his movies are childish. Lucas incorporated Campbell's interperative mythology just about everywhere he could.

    Granted, were not talking subtlety here. But the themes expoused by ANH and the other films are not subtle... boy against the universe, ultimate good against evil, the fall of the light. These are all themes that go back to ancient cultures.

  380. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Follow the money.

    So did your Dad run around the house flying his B-wing and making laser noises? Did your Mom slide across the shag carpet exploding the landspeeder just as it hit the coffee table leg?

    These movies were and are about merchandising. And you thought it was a reality-bending sci-fi series?

  381. Re:When Jedi Attack by trongey · · Score: 1

    But, when I first saw E3: A New Hope it was called STAR WARS. No episode number, no subtitle, just STAR WARS. The silly names didn't show up until Empire.

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  382. Re:here's another: by ozbon · · Score: 1

    Star Wars Two : Anakin Skywalker and the Planet of Doom

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  383. Re:I guess the ironic thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, ROTJ was directed by Richard Marquand. Kasdan was/is a producer.

  384. That's what I said about "The Phantom Menace" by vaxer · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...but I'm willing to have another run at the football and hope it's not yanked away.

    Say it ain't so, George!

  385. Re:Top Ten Rejected Titles for Ep 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL Thank god someone has a sense of humour about this!

  386. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by hearingaid · · Score: 2

    chewie's not in episode III. at least not yet.

    for the record, Return of the Jedi is episode VI. Empire is V. and A New Hope is IV.

    star wars was originally planned as a nine-movie trilogy of trilogies. the first trilogy is what is currently being released. the second trilogy was released first. and the third trilogy, Lucas has said he's not gonna make anymore.

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  387. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by jburroug · · Score: 1

    and Lucas would hemorage even more money.

    Not to pick nits or anything but hemorage typically refers to a great loss of something, usually blood but also used to describe loosing money. Lucas will be gorging himself on cash if anything ;->

    --
    "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
  388. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by natasha42 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I saw Episode I twice just to make sure the first time wasn't some kind of nightmare. No luck - the nightmare was real. I had listened to the radio drama which my dad taped for me CONSTANTLY during all those years as I waited in vain for the next movie. And I've had people say to me,"well, its just that you saw the first one's when you were little, so that skews your memory, they're really kids movies anyway" BULL. the beauty of the originals is that they grew with me - what I liked as a kid was different from what I like now - my appreciation of the politics, the romance, etc. George Lucas can do what he bloody pleases, but he left too many hints as to his grand vision to muck it up so badly now.

  389. The Clone War has been a long time coming.. by PiEquals3 · · Score: 1
    I don't remember if the movies made specific mention of this, but their novelizations (written by Lucas himself, IIRC) blamed the 'clone wars' for the extreme rarity of Jedi at the time episodes IV-VI took place. It's a story I've been waiting to hear for a long, long time, and if Episode II was about anything else, I and (I'm sure) many others would be gravely dissapointed.

    I found Episode I to be more of a dud than an outright disaster (as has been often opined). I felt a little sick and a lot dissapointed after seeing it, but the fact that the Jedi then were so prevalent seemed a tacit promise to tell what happened to them before Ep V. I suppose the only thing I got from Ep I was a confirmed desire to see Ep II, which is, one assumes, Lucas' purpose.

    Funny, I never thought of myself as a Star Wars geek..

    --

    --
    Pay no attention to the errors in my post. I am the great and powerful Oz.

  390. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Hoarke42 · · Score: 1

    And come on.. who didn't enjoy The Guyver?

    .. well.. ok.. but at least it's better than Rabid Grannies and Redneck Zombies... barely...

  391. Alternate name for SW2 by arfito · · Score: 1

    Star Wars II: Revenge of the Missing DVD Set

  392. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by SilentChris · · Score: 2

    Regardless of hitting preview or not, I still can't understand a word you're saying.

  393. Re:cloned army of jar jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's probably an ignorant C/C++/Java/Perl
    type. They think that their hacked together
    language is somehow "better" than everything
    else.

    They also tend not to understand most Computer
    Science topics; no big surprise.

    Code hackers, plain and simple.

  394. We're all clones! by NeoTomba · · Score: 1

    Clones (We're All) -Alice Cooper I'm a clone I know I'm fine I'm one of more on the way I'm two, doctor Three's on the line He'll take incubation another day I'm all alone, so are we all We're all clones All are one and one are all All are one and one are all Destroy the government We're destroying time No more problems on the way I'm through doctor We don't need your kind We are the ones Ugly ones Stupid boys Wrong ones I'm all alone, so are we all We're all clones All are one and one are all All are one and one are all Six is having problems Adjusting to his clone status Have to put him on a shelf All day long we hear him crying so loud I just wanna be myself I just wanna be myself I just wanna be myself Be myself Be myself I'm a clone I know I'm fine I'm one of more on the way I'm two, doctor Three's on the line He'll take incubation another day I'm all alone, so are we all We're all clones All are one and one are all All are one and one are all I'm all alone, so are we all We're all clones All are one and one are all All are one and one are all I'm all alone, so are we all We're all clones All are one and one are all All are one and one are all

  395. new title... by daanger0us · · Score: 1

    Amazon clones on the moon...

    --
    Aliens? Magnetic Rings?! Bah! Who needs that when we have
  396. Re:The real face of scifi fandom & the geek commun by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 1
    I have been reading Slashdot for several years. I created a new troll account just to post this, because all my other troll accounts are too well known. And here is what I have to say to all you sad computer geeks and stupid sci-fi nerds:

    YHBT!

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  397. Which brings up a question... by Kulock · · Score: 1

    If you create a franchise, and let it pretty much sit for 15-20 years, when you come back to it, should it still be considered a kid franchise? Your original audience has grown up, so should the franchise have grown up with them, or should it ignore it's previous fans and try a "fresh start".

    I mean, if Episode 1 hadn't depended on the fact it was a Star Wars movie, the power behind the franchise, if they had just called it "Anakin's Adventure 1", would it have really done that well as a kid's movie?

  398. Re:To be fair... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
    Actually, LucasArts has nothing to do with the movies. You're thinking Lucasfilm. LucasArts makes the games.

    I personally think the vast majority of people on here have no clue what they're saying when it comes to the movies. I don't have a problem falling back into the mindset of a four-year-old (when I first saw ANH in 1977) when I watch the movies. That allows me to remember that these movies are fantasies and are just a story being told by Lucas - and let's me look past the problems other people have. I also keep in mind that there has been only one (1) of the SW movies that can stand on its own - ANH. Lucas took ESB, ROTJ and TPM and made them rely on one another (we all know that TPM wouldn't work at all if we didn't have episodes IV - VI). Now, keeping that in mind, Lucas decides to create a new trilogy. The public complains that there is no real plot, no character development, that it's only crass commercialism and that Jar Jar sucks.

    My response is this: maybe people are right - but you can't make that judgement until 2005, once III is out. Why? Because Lucas knows he has three parts to flesh out the story - very unlike the situation he found himself in with ANH, when it could have bombed (Kenner actually thought it would, but that the toys would take off ) - therefore he can take his time with development. Think of episodes I - III as one large, six-seven hour movie. We've only seen Act I, which begs the question: how much do you know about the characters in the first act of anything (unless it's a one-act play)? I don't see much character development in Act I of Hamlet, because Shakespeare knows there's five or so more acts to follow. This isn't to compare Lucas to Shakespeare, or Hamlet to Star Wars, but it is to say that one cannot judge a work until that work is complete.

    Why do I think people judge TPM the way they do? Most people are disappointed because Lucas didn't do the story they've created in their own heads.

    We all know what happens in these first three episodes. It's like going to see Titanic or Full Metal Jacket - we know the boat sinks, we know the US loses the war. In this case, we've all had 20+ years of coming up with our own ideas of what the backstory is that nothing could compare with what we've collectively created with our friends and schoolmates and, later, correspondents on the net - because we created it. Even Lucas can't live up to what we've dreamed up in those 20+ years.

    In the end, ladies and gents, the new movies won't copy or live up to thre mystique of the first ones - ever - because we've lived through the first ones when they were new and wonderful and ours. Maybe for our future kids, maybe even for our current ones, will experience the same awe once all six episodes exist. Maybe not.

    All I know is that this hobbit is going to sit down with his popcorn and Coke and enjoy AOTC - like I've enjoyed all the others - by watching it through the eyes of a four-year-old. No cheesy names or jaded geeks are going to change that. And then, in 2005 when I walk out of the theater from Episode III, I'll pass final judgment.

  399. Australian Jedi's by kimbokennedy · · Score: 1

    Just a reminder for all the Australian SW fans.
    Tonight (Tuesday 7th 2001) is the night that the census is being held. There has been an email circulating regarding the religion entry. If anyone saw Going Home last night there were a couple of good reasons for listing your religion as "Jedi". I heard that if there is enough Jedi converts in the country then it becomes a recognized religion. Can anyone confirm this? The results will be interesting.

    May the force be with you.

  400. You'll laugh, you'll cry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you'll wish you were never born.

  401. A Sexual Journey by nexex · · Score: 1
    Episode II: Attack of the Clones

    A story about romance. The tale of two clones on a sexual journey to Minsk. But things get a little "hairy" on the way when they have a strange "encounter" after they find themselves in the form of other clones. Pretty soon, all of the clones find themselves in front of a being of unlimited sexual powers, known only as, "the emperor". Needless to say, things get a little TIEd up from there. The opposers to the sex empire, composed mostly of clones, the abstendi, launch a last ditch effort to destroy the largest swingers club ever: the SexStar. The SexStar is capable of having sex with every living thing a planet all at the same time. Will sex be free for all? Or will the valiant abstendi prevail and sex banned forever? See "Episode II: Attack of the Clones" in theaters everywhere August 69th

    --
    Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
  402. Re:Probably a fake by pbarker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So, what might they change it do? "Attack of the Clowns"?

  403. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by R.Caley · · Score: 1
    You weren't surprised that the "happy ending" to the last Narnia book involved the child protagonists turning out to be dead?

    Have tyou read Revalations? :-)

    Christianity is all about what a great thing it is to be dead (assuming you've sacrificed the right kinds of chickens).

    So, I don't think Narnia its into the list of dissapointing extensions which was posted. Like it or not, the ending of the Narnia stories isn't an extension, I'm sure it was planned in right from the start.

    BTW, The Screwtape Letters is a better read.

    --
    _O_
    .|<
    The named which can be named is not the true named
  404. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, Star Wars is a cheesy title, and maybe it's aimed at kids. When I first saw A New Hope, I was maybe six or seven, so for me it was both scary and exciting. Those feelings I got then, are the feelings that come in my mind when I hear "Star Wars". So when I see Star Wars now, I will always be dissapointed, why? Because nothing can compare to my amazment then. I just hope some of my kids will feel the same way as I did, when I first saw it. I had my doze of Star Wars twenty years ago, now it is theres turn to experience this great fantasy we call Star Wars. Nuff said

  405. Re:here's mine: by ozbon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Star Wars : Clone Ranger

    With Jar-Jar as Tonto???

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  406. Re:Might this not be a ploy by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Funny

    So would it be possible that these Wookies were independent contractors?

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  407. Re:Why on Earth wasn't in named by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

    shock value?

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  408. Re:The REAL trilogy is that everybody is waiting f by Stormie · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is of course Lord of the Rings.

    Peter Jackson! Ian McKellen! Christopher Lee! Hugo Weaving! Cate Blanchett! John Rhys-Davies! How could anyone not be waiting for this?

    Assuming that Natalie Portman will be neither naked nor petrified, the only trump card that When Clones Attack has is Samuel L. Damn, they should have cast him in LotR, maybe as a badass orc or something. "Does Sauron look like a bitch?"

  409. Re:The real problem... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    > Do you troll newsgroups and spout "Worst Episode Ever" alot?

    Yes. And the Jedi pay me to do it; I make my living that way.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  410. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by beynos · · Score: 1

    Hey I thought attack of the killer tomatoes was a very cool film... I wouldn't mess with those fruits :)

  411. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The good/bad polarity of light/dark sides of the force was absolute, easy enough for all us 4 year olds to understand at the time.

    Or even us 13 year olds. But it wasn't just the kids who were taken in. Sober, serious, adult critics were almost uniform in their praise. Harlan Ellison's was the sole, lonely critical voice to be raised against it, and even in his case his point wasn't so much that it sucked, but just that it wasn't quite as good as everyone else was saying. I suspect that even Lucas was surprised at the critics' reaction, but he knew good luck when he saw it and ran with it. Can't blame him for that, but I can blame him for pretending to have made something profound.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  412. Re:More than half way. by Copperhead · · Score: 1
    I don't know, man...

    See Superman II and The Godfather, Part II

    Both are considered better than the original...

    --
    Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
  413. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by way2slo · · Score: 1
    "He should have been thinking of the people who'd been waiting almost 20 years for that film, not the 10 year olds the promotional tie-ins were designed for."

    Why? Sure, it would have been nice if he had. I wish he could have made it more of a well thought out series, but when you are spending hundreds of millions of dollars of the studio's money making a movie you had better make a profit if you expect to do it again. If he had made the series for grown-ups all he and the studio could really make the cut of the ticket sales. Even if it set a new world record and passed Titanic in sales, ticket sales alone would not even get close to the profits that the merchandising brings in.

    Action Figures, Bed Sheets, Video Games, Pez Dispensers, and the list keeps going. One adult will buy a ticket and maybe the video or DVD when it comes out. $30. One child will have the ticket and video bought for him AND an army of action figures at several dollars a pop, the AT-AT's or Millenium Falcons that cost $50 or more, the posters, the bed sheets...we're easily talking 3 times the sales for the child when compaired to an adult.

    Without that extra revenue, studios are reluctant to spend the money up front to make those grand special effects that we so love in our movies. So instead of a "B" movie with "A" special effects we would just have an "B" movie with cheezy effects, which will eventually end up on MST3K. That's not what we want either. It's a trade off. We want visually stunning movies, we have to bow to merchandising. Which means the plot and script has to be simple enough for a kid to follow and enjoy if you want to sell them T-shirts and action figures. *shrug* What can you do?

    "Merchandising! Merchandising! Where the REAL money from the movie is made." - Yogert, Spaceballs

  414. Attack of the clowns by Alistair+Graham · · Score: 0

    i would preffer " attack of helmut " even though it sounds porno

  415. Re:To be fair... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

    Agreed - I actually meant in real life. It would be nice to be able to live in a world where we didn't have to be analytical...

  416. Give me a break by Nevrar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    People should stop complaining about the title. I mean, come on... It's Lucas's movie so he has every right to call it whatever he likes. He invented Star Wars!!!

    Just because you consider yourself to be a member of the S.W. cult, doesn't make you more qualified than Lucas to decide on a title. It's a movie - not an open source software project that is named through a democratic process.

    --
    Nevrar
    1. Re:Give me a break by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother!

  417. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There was always his sister. And didn't Yoda have to be talked into training him? My point was really about how quickly Luke learned what he did (from ESB: "But I've learned so much!"), picking up in days or hours what was supposed to take years. If he was an extrordinary genius it's not remarked on except in a general way, and not by anyone who was actually teaching him."
    step back, dude. step, fucking back.

    Not to be personal or anything, I'm the same way, but there's a reason you hear the phrase "only you would be interested..."

    It's a hard life, this nerdship.




    "Worshipfulness". Gotta love it though.

  418. Re:*sigh* by Scooter · · Score: 1

    LOL - StarWars II:Attack of the Fifty Foot Clone

    Will it be shot in black and white with an orange filter over the "desert" bits?

    Lucas! Nooooooooooooo

    You spend all this time money and effort making the damm things - for fecks sake man - think of a better title. As the above post says - if its about the clone wars - er.. well hmm what springs to mind?

  419. Bring Irvin Kershner out of retirement! by BassMonkey · · Score: 1

    He directed 'The Empire Strikes Back'(a great film even if you hate Star Wars). He's a far better director than Lucas.

  420. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

    The Shoddy Acting hit an all-time high in TPM, from the opening scene where the Jedi's ship captain can't say her lines, to the trade federation lackey who made me laugh out loud at "they've gone up the ventilation shaft" or whatever he said, to the kid ("Are you an Angel?" is bad dialogue made unbearable by bad performance), even including the CG chars - why was Watto a mafia stereotype? Jar-Jar a Jamaican clown? Why oh why? People say it's a kid's movie, what do you expect? The thing is, it's barely on par with a children's TV show if you remove the special effects. Why would Star Wars, with a budget near infinity, hire some of the worst actors the film world has ever known? It's like Lucas was channeling Ed Wood or something.

  421. Re:When Jedi Attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will the final three be called?

  422. Re:Why not... by naasking · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That does sound better, but as someone else pointed out, the title would then become:

    Star Wars: The Clone Wars

    That sounds dumb.

  423. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by -=OmegaMan=- · · Score: 1
    "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers." (Leia to Tarkin)

    The best thing about that line is that she suddenly acquires a British accent. Who the hell does she think she is, Madonna? :p

    --

    This sig is xenon coated, and will glow red when in the presence of aliens

  424. Re:Jar-Jar's Role by Copperhead · · Score: 1

    What is this? Is that Jar Jar wearing a red shirt, and joining the away team?!?

    --
    Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
  425. How to beat the evil empire... by NavelFozz · · Score: 1

    ... clone jar-jar

  426. I wonder... by quintessent · · Score: 2

    if the clones will all have Italian accents.

  427. Re:Horrible. Just horrible. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    > How am I supposed to camp out for something with this lame of a title?!

    I'll be extremely surprised if this really is the final title. It just doesn't have any "ring" to it. Expect it to morph into something like Attack of the $ADJECTIVE Clones, or maybe substitute some other noun for Attack. Or maybe throw this title out altogether; it is surely just a working title.

    BTW, does anyone know what the working titles of the other episodes were?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  428. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
    I think in the case of TPM it simply became evident how unoriginal a filmmaker George Lucas really is. I believe him when he says he didn't intentionally put any racial stereotypes in there. He just ripped off a host of other movies tht did use racial stereotypes. Yes, there's Watto, although most people seem to see him as a stereotypical Jew. There's the Trade Federation representatives, who could be Japanese out of a WWII era movie. There's what's-his-name: the Latino-type pod racer whom Anakin beats, who could have been out of a '70's era detective TV show like Baretta. And let's not forget the wise, old martial arts masters of the Jedi Council, from any one of a number of Hong Kong action movies.

    There's nary an original feature in the entire movie.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  429. Petition to stop the name by FlyveHest · · Score: 1
  430. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars: Clone Wars

    yeah, that's a good title. Better than the "real" one at least, but still stupid

  431. Re:Might this not be a ploy by thesteveco · · Score: 4, Funny

    Episode II: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Force

  432. It could still be changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To- Remo Williams: The Adventure Continues --- Remo Lives!

  433. Re:Might this not be a ploy by ozbon · · Score: 1

    Star Wars : Clone Wookies from the Forbidden Zone?

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  434. Re:When Jedi Attack by haystor · · Score: 1

    Or you could make the first three: The New Dork Buy More Toys JarJar's Trip to Town it started with the Ewoks. But they were isolated on one planet. It got worse with the insertion of extra stuff into the originals and the accompanying branded toys. JarJar was just too much for me and I won't even bother with the next movie. The next movie will be about clone wars. This is where kids will be encouraged to buy multiples of the same action figure so they can have full squads/platoons/armies. Then finally the last movie will be some utter piece of crap that everyone will have to go see just because it claims to be star wars. I refuse to recognize it as Star Wars (which IS the title of the first movie).

    --
    t
  435. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    That has got to be the funniest Slashdot post EVER.

  436. Re:Excerpt from leaked screenplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +4? Guess there are at least 3 * (inverse of percentage of users who get to mod * number of people reading this thread) simpsons diehards out there....

  437. Re:Clone wars - read Frank Herbert by legoboy · · Score: 1
    Oh, kinda like stem cell research.

    Except that the sources for stem cell research exist already, and we may as well try to get some potentially earthshaking research out of them rather than simply throwing them out.

    --
    If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
  438. Re:The real problem... by NineNine · · Score: 1

    So does that mean that my Empire Strikes Back poster signed by Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher, Harrison Ford, and George Lucas is worthless?

  439. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Episode II: You sucked 37 dicks??

  440. Oops! by dfuller · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it should be titled "Oops, George Did it Again."

  441. Attack of the Clones by Overt+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Attack Of The Clones
    (To the tune of "Send In The Clowns")

    Isn't it rich?
    We're a matched pair.
    Waving our lightsabers
    Around in the air.
    Attack of the clones.

    Lucas gone mad
    We've all been had
    After the first one was so
    Incredibly bad.
    Attack of the clones?
    Does he think that we're drones?

    Just when I'd stopped
    Trashing Jar-Jar
    Lucas is going
    Even further afar.
    Making a loser again
    With his usual flair
    Expecting big lines...
    They'll probably be there.

    Oh, what a farce.
    Our fault, we hear.
    We're supposed to like what he shows
    Year after year.
    And where are the clones?
    ("Attack of the Clones"???)
    It's too late, they're here.

    Isn't it bad?
    Isn't it dull?
    And the worst part of all is that
    The theater'll be full.
    And so it's the clones...
    "Attack of the Clones"
    Will open next year.

  442. ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a bad feelng about this...

  443. like the other titles were so great... by erik_fredricks · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I mean, c'mon..."The Empire Strikes Back," "Return of the Jedi?" They ALL sound like cliched Saturday morning serials, which is exactly what Star Wars always has been. It's just that now we're (trumpets please) adults, and we expect, "Episode II-the Grapes of Sith," or "The Midichlorian Candidate."

    Go back and watch the asteroid scenes in ESB. What was that? I'll tell you: it was every hackneyed car chase scene ever filmed, except this time with space ships. It didn't have to be deep, it just had to be incredibly cool. And it is.

    Not to give anything away, but from what I've heard, we get to see Anakin learn the long-distance choke thing, which he spends the last fifteen minutes of the movie practising on Jar Jar...

    --

    --

    THE GOOD HUMOR MAN CAN ONLY BE PUSHED SO FAR
    Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 2F18

  444. Shhhh! by invenustus · · Score: 1

    Dude! We've almost got the trolls under control! Don't mention Natalie Portman's sexuality!

    --
    grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
  445. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shazbot, my hair is on fire

  446. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just LOVE vladinator's site! Especially the "fash" section, where I learned to cut the bottom off of an old shirt to use as a hair enhancement! Oh, and the "dance party" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read vladinator's emails! Here you will discover how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have a pizza party? A fash party? Go to the mall with all of your friends? Have a sleepover and call boys on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't checked out vladinator's site, you don't know what you're missing!

  447. episode 2: the final solution by wobblie · · Score: 1

    Well, I've seen a pre screening of this movies trailer and all I can say is "Wow." Lucas' intellect is like a single, solitary star, twinkling into a howling universe of unending blackness and despair that is modern America. Bravo, Lucas!

    I knew that the inclusion of Colt 45 megastar and part time ladies man Billy Dee Williams in episode 6 portended the inclusion of more adult themes, but who could've expected this?

    Lucas is growing up, and America is growing up with him. Or rather I should say his kids, who wrote over 25 lines (90% of the script) to the screenplay to Episode 1, have written this one in it's entirety. Well, for the final judgement, wait for the movie, but as for me, it's obvious that making the same movie over and over since 1975 hasn't dulled Lucas' intellect one bit.

  448. Re:Might this not be a ploy by TimboJones · · Score: 1

    Some of my favorites from Enweirdment:

    • Star Wars Episode II: Natalie Portman's Boat Payment
    • Star Wars II: In Which We Make Fun Of Several More Ethnic Groups
    • Star Wars Episode II: We're So Very Very Sorry
    • Star Wars Episode II: You Know It's Crap, But Still You Gave Us $8.
    • Star Wars Episode II: Electric Boogaloo
    • Star Wars Episode II: Samuel L. Jackson Gets Some Screen Time
    • Star Wars Episode II: And Now For Something Completely Derivative
    • Star Wars Episode II: They Shoot Stormtroopers, Don't They?
    • Star Wars Episode II: Senator Palpatine is Elected Emperor by Just a Few Hundred Votes in an Irregularity-Filled Contest on the Distant Backwater Planet of Florida
  449. Re:Clone Wars? by rockwoodcomic · · Score: 1

    True, but Star Wars movies ARE '50s B-grade flicks, just with a 21st-century budget. Frankly, I'm relieved that Lucas seems to be reaching for the slam-bang-action feel of an "Attack of the..." movie than some kind political statement of "The Phantom Menace." At least we won't have to put up with tax federations, embargos, etc. That makes it feel less like a Star Wars movie and more like a high school social studies class.

  450. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by WinDoze · · Score: 1

    I'm really dreading the day I'm torn between getting the "Special Edition DVD" or no DVD at all. I'm pretty sure you're right though.

    You know, one of these days I'm going to have to steal my dad's original VHS trilogy...

  451. I felt menaced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i felt deeply menaced.. and violated in the most mentally anguishing way...

  452. Whats under those stormtrooper helmets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just what it looks like. big phallic objects.

  453. Re:ENOUGH already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about "Return of the Jar-Jar"?

  454. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    justLOEla&#100 ;ior's ie Epecialythfash"&# 32;sctio wer Ileand tcut th otom ofn old shto useas a hi enhncent! h, nd the"nc paty hotos!

    Ofcure, don'tfret oread vlantors ls He yo wil scer tly ifflt t dcde ha t oohee end.. hae ia ay fashparty? oo the mal withall o urfrien Haeaeov&#1 01; and calboyont phone

    hot, ifyou ven't chckdotvlainat&# 111;r's e, oudn' knw hayoure misi!

  455. Re:Attack of the..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ius LOE vadntr's site Esecalt "f section,were lenedto cute btoo ofan o hirt ous s hir nhaceent! Oh,d th"nce aryphot!

    Ofcours, d forgetreala itor'emails!Here& #32;ywi soer hw trulydiffclt ti toeie wt o on e ekens.. hea pizzart Afah prty? Gotte mlwal fyoriens&# 63; Hava sepove and cll boys n the phone?

    Irt, fyo have hecd ut vladiaosite, oud' owat ou'r mising!

  456. Re:OT: Why Real Clone Wars Aren't Gonna Happen by sillyputty · · Score: 1

    Except that, popular perceptions aside, cloning someone isn't like running them through a copier. Identical genetic code does not necessarily create identical organisms. You can only be sure of certain vague traits, such as predisposition to catch/resist certain diseases. But there are no guarantees. It isn't that exact a science, and never will be, although perhaps one day cloning along with other yet-to-be-invented techniques will enable one to produce a Xerox Strike Force.

  457. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 2

    Well damnit, if murdering entire planetsfull of people, and enslaving an entire galaxy doesn't demand revenge, what does? Has everyone forgotten the outrage at ROTJ with the last-second "redemption" of this mass-murdering thug?

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  458. CmdrTaco strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll pass judgement after I see it.

    This will be a first.

    1. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, someone should tell him it runs Linux...

    2. Re:CmdrTaco strikes again by Arjuna+Theban · · Score: 1


      What's funny is that the parent post must have been (Score: 3, Insightful), not (Score: 3, Funny).

      ---

  459. Might this not be a ploy by -douggy · · Score: 2

    Like revenge of the jedi -> return of the jedi

    1. Re:Might this not be a ploy by yellowstone · · Score: 3, Funny
      Like revenge of the jedi -> return of the jedi
      What, so the real title is going to be Send In The Clones?

      (ducking)

      --
      150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    2. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Rimbo · · Score: 2

      Except that "Revenge of the Jedi" was a GREAT title! This one sucks!

    3. Re:Might this not be a ploy by xx01dk · · Score: 0, Funny

      OR...."Send In the CLOWNS"??? Sorry, couldn't resist *snicker*

      --
      There is simply too much glass..
    4. Re:Might this not be a ploy by kreyg · · Score: 2

      Everybody was howling that about "The Phantom Menace" as well. I'd say the odds are low. Non-zero, but low.

      --
      sig fault
    5. Re:Might this not be a ploy by TWR · · Score: 5, Informative
      "Revenge of the Jedi" wasn't a ploy; the name was changed at the last minute. There are extant movie posters which read "Revenge". Highly valuable among those who have too much extra money and a love of Ewoks...

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    6. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's some of Fark.com's user suggestions:

      Attack of the Killer Human Stem Cells.
      Killer Klones from Outer Space
      Episode II: Hype
      Episode II: Luke's Dad Was a Whiner, Too
      Episode II: Reporting is Pravda the Clone Attacking
      Episode II: Bloodsucking Clones from Pittsburgh
      Episode II: Plan Clone From Outer Space
      Episode II: Clones Are EEEEEEVIL
      Episode II: Lucas Must Die
      Star Wars Episode 2: All your clone are belong to..
      Send in the Clones!
      Tears of a Clone
      Jar-Jar's Big Adventure
      Star Wars Episode II: The Second Episode
      Star Wars II - Just like 83/84, only more missle based...
      Star Wars II 1/2 - The smell of Lucas
      Episode II, JarJar Binks, Return of The Kingfish

      -= rei =-

      --
      *Kid Rock runs for Senate* Democrats: We must run Kid Scissors.
    7. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Rei · · Score: 2

      Oh, and I forgot:

      Star Wars Episode II: The Search for More Money

      -= rei =-

      --
      *Kid Rock runs for Senate* Democrats: We must run Kid Scissors.
    8. Re:Might this not be a ploy by spruch · · Score: 1

      I think the difference was that the change from I Revenge to Return involved consideration for the plot and story (revenge not being a very jedi like aspiration) but unless there is big departure from Episode I, the plot is the last thing to be considered.

    9. Re:Might this not be a ploy by hucke · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "Revenge of the Jedi" wasn't a ploy; the name was changed at the last minute.

      True; it was changed to prevent confusion with Star Trek II: The Revenge of Khan, which was in production at the same time. Upon discovering the similarity, both movie studios agreed to change their titles.

    10. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Quietust · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was Vengeance, not Revenge, in the original title of Star Trek II.

      But I believe the two names were changed independently, though for the same reason...

      --
      * Q
      P.S. If you don't get this note, let me know and I'll write you another.
    11. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it was revenge. I have a T-shirt with the original title on it.

    12. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the final title will probably be " clone wars" or something else that is derivative and halfway cool there is no way in hell "attack of the clones" is the real title unless Lucas has been smoking crack of course...

    13. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      it was changed to prevent confusion with Star Trek II: The Revenge of Khan, which was in production at the same time.

      Not at all. Lucas has said that he decided to change it because "revenge" was not something a proper Jedi would pursue.

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    14. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Lunastorm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's not forget: Episode II: Queen Amidala Does the Empire

      --
      You die too easily.
    15. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Maserati · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "raw, searing hate of Ewoks." My favorite rumor about RotJ was that it was supposed to involve the Wookies: set on Kasshykk (sp?), big furry Wookies fighting the stormtroopers instead of cute furry Ewoks (yeah, that was a plausible battle sequence), and a connection to an existing character instead of being something pulled from the same spot in Lucas' ass that later yielded Jar Jar.

      I'm not bitter. But to hell with The Phantom Edit, I don't care what parallel universe they have to dredge for it, I want to see Revenge of the Jedi just once. But it'll probably be on DVD - region coded to 42529. Then we can also see Robocop 3 with the original Frank Miller script - rated X for violence.

      Ahem. I'll also note that some of the background material mentions Wookies being used as labor on the Death Stars (some of the RPG material from West End iirc).

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    16. Re:Might this not be a ploy by unitron · · Score: 3, Informative

      Return of the Jedi implies a renaissance of the Jedi in general, not just one of them, so, assuming a large Jedi presence in episode 7, it's a better title.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    17. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case, both movies were for the better to have changed the name.

    18. Re:Might this not be a ploy by JBowz15 · · Score: 2

      Please tell me that George Lucas is trying to win a bet by actually coming up with a worse title than the "Phantom Menace."

      My suggested bad title:
      "Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Anakin Skywalker but were Afraid to Ask."

    19. Re:Might this not be a ploy by TresTresMondoMod · · Score: 0

      Nope the Original title of STII was to be The Vengeance of Kahn. Lucas Lawyers convinced them to change it. Your t-shirt is bogus.

    20. Re:Might this not be a ploy by TresTresMondoMod · · Score: 0

      oops, I meant to say Khan

    21. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw this one...James Kahn reprises his role from the God-fodder and comes back as Rufus Tomas, the "real" crowd pleaser.

    22. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      That's what I wanted! And then they could follow it up with Episode III: Some Damn Fool Idealistic Crusade.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    23. Re:Might this not be a ploy by spruch · · Score: 1

      That's the dark side talking. Let go of your anger...

    24. Re:Might this not be a ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or if you just happened to be a 20 year old who knew a dis-interested theatre owner when the "Revenge" posters were pulled out of the lobby displays. The word "Revenge" was pulled because the Jedi code does not allow a Jedi to take revenge. So I guess if you're a Jedi who wants revenge you have to fake that you're "just" returning? Anyway, none of these movies are necessarily "grade A", but they've got a lifetime lease on a little corner of the heart of every adult who was a wide-eyed child who saw Star Wars (the ORIGINAL release) for the first time in a movie theatre. Like CmdrTaco, I would like to reserve judgement until I see the film. Unfortunately, I choose to follow my first instinct to agree with Ewan McGregor who, when asked about the new title during an interview today, chuckled and then said "It's a terrible, terrible title!"

  460. first logged in sarcasm! by MOMOCROME · · Score: 3, Interesting

    omfg! 'a new hope' 'empire strikes back' and 'revenge of the jedi' are all dark and epic titles....

    Lucas has lost it.

    I was about to apply for a job at Lucasarts, now I just might be too embarrased!~

    1. Re:first logged in sarcasm! by XarsonX · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ha ha ha hoo boy weee i dont believe it.

    2. Re:first logged in sarcasm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you mean '*RETURN* of the Jedi' "_

    3. Re:first logged in sarcasm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe not. Blah.

    4. Re:first logged in sarcasm! by warrior · · Score: 0, Redundant

      fwiw, it was originally slated to be "revenge of the jedi"

      --
      Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
    5. Re:first logged in sarcasm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went and interviewed @ ILM. I had just goy my C.S degree. I thought it would be a great place to work. I was going to do some Perl coding etc. they were going to pay me $25K, it was a graveyard shift and tou get a 2% raise every year. I found this out when I got there. They could tell by the look in my eye I didn't want the job. I was 30 at the time. If I was really young it might have been cool, but that job didn't make sense. It was in Marin county, one of the most expensive places in the U.S, there was no way I could make it on that pay. I'm sure there are people doing very well there. But the entry level programming job I was looking at was lame. It was cool to tour ILM and see all the cool shit. I would have had to get another jhob to survive up there.

    6. Re:first logged in sarcasm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a CS grad, aren't you a little overqualified for Perl coding? :-)

  461. Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or are the titles getting worse?

  462. omg....how sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Omg, please tell me its a joke!

  463. *sigh* by Ignatius_Gunnarsson · · Score: 5, Funny

    And now, a moment for America to shake its head and sob softly to itself... What the hell is wrong with the "clone wars"? Are the traditional starships we have grown accustomed to now to be replaced with flying saucers? When will George Lucas learn not to make important decisions when drunk?

    --
    -Ignatius Gunnarsson
    1. Re:*sigh* by Rimbo · · Score: 2

      Well, after the "Ewoks," and "Howard The Duck," I'm beginning to believe that with Star Wars (which is actually a pretty lame movie title too, if you think about it) Lucas just got lucky.

    2. Re:*sigh* by bhosp · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with the Clone Wars, is you've already got "Star Wars" in the title. "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" doesn't scan. Attack of the Clones is a fair alternative.

    3. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone remember the Clone Series that hit Spiderman comics in the 90s? It was probably the biggest mistake Marvel ever made, and they paid for it in more ways than one. It made me quit reading Spiderman. What a pile of crap!

    4. Re:*sigh* by Your+Login+Here · · Score: 1
      You know, the disadvantage of having clones in a war is that you won't be able to use DNA identify the remains.

      Assuming anyone cared, it would be simple to replace some junk DNA with a serial number.

  464. clones...senolc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bah just shoulda named it 'The Clone Wars' sounds exceptional stupid since the announcement of the human cloning came today...that's another story though...

  465. I can see it now... by G-funk · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Millions of sheep named dolly attack tatooine. All is feared lost, until annakin decides to release his keeler blue heeler to save the day.

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    1. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His what? I don't get it.

    2. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably meant "killer" blue heeler.

      It's an australian cattle dog.

      woof :-)

    3. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Babe will make an appearance ...

      "'At'll do peg, 'at'll do."

      Brings a tear to my eye everytime.

  466. bring in... by jobber-d · · Score: 2, Funny

    bring in, the clones!

    1. Re:bring in... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Offtopic
      "bring in, the clones!"

      I can just imagine Weird Al Yankovic now... lost in uncontrollable glee as he sees at least 20 albums beating this theme to oblivion.... He probably makes the most money off of StarWars for any people actually unaffiliated with Lucasfilm.

    2. Re:bring in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean .... send in the CLONES!!!! (must be said with a german accent!)

    3. Re:bring in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, when I first read it, I thought of the same line, "Bring in the clones", which Dexter said (from Dexter's Laboratory), after DeeDee and her girlfriends siege his laboratory. mmmkay? ;-)

  467. Title for a Bad Review by martyb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I hope the movie gets good reviews from the critics. Otherwise, it may become known as:

    Attack of the Clowns
  468. do you think... by moby · · Score: 1

    they'll make it all the way to #9...
    and maybe beyond

    1. Re:do you think... by Ignatius_Gunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Lucas has said that He would not allow anyone else to take the helm of the third and final trilogy, presumably about the reconstruction of the republic and the New generation of Jedi... Of course, if Lucas continues down this path, he might indeed make the third trilogy...
      Starting off with Star Wars Episode Seven: The Search for More Money
      Mel Brooks once lampooned Star Wars... Perhaps this is a case of, er, art imitating art imitating art?

      --
      -Ignatius Gunnarsson
    2. Re:do you think... by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Considering that he's let various authors write about it in novels, I'm not sure he can do the epilogue story without trampling on those other works. Kind of the same corner that Star Trek painted itself into a long time ago. The Timothy Zahn(??) books, in particular, read like a third trilogy in themselves, and LucasArts has at least halfway embraced the characters from those books in its products.

    3. Re:do you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only wish Zahn had written a prequel trilogy as well, before George got the chance to do it...

    4. Re:do you think... by Andux · · Score: 1
      I doubt he'd have much freedom to make a trilogy set after the original one. The books are way ahead of him. Although Lucasfilm does own the copyright on all of them. The newest ones are even set far enough after the original trilogy that he could use the original actors. Might be a bit of a jump for the fans who've only seen the movies, though.

      Whatever he does, I hope he at least quits being cutesy long enough to wipe out those damned teddy-bears.

      --
      (Do not sign anything.) -- Fell, Planescape: Torment
    5. Re:do you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well.. in the first 3 we see the Rise and Fall of anakin, and the fall of the Jedi.

      In the Second 3, we see the Redemption of Anakin, and the rise of the Jedi again.

      in the third three, we're supposed to see the re-building. but not all the Sith are dead.. Thre's a Dark Jedi Preist seen in Return of the Jedi with the Emporor.. he's the guy in the furry hat.

      The entire trilogy of trilogys is supposed to be an epic Shakesperean Tradgedy... Luke goes into the last fight with the new Sith Lord, knowing he will die, and that ALL Jedi, and ALL the Sith are dead... Thus, the Force comes BACK into Balance (ala Episode 1 problem) because there is no one around to manipulate it.. and Light and Dark are equal.

      Lucas won't do the last 3 tho.. I want him to Do Indiana jones 4...

      -Marchie

  469. Clone Wars? by B.D.Mills · · Score: 2

    Attack of the clones? Sounds like the Clone Wars mentioned in New Hope, but I think this title can be improved a bit. Sounds too much like a 50's B-grade title - Attack of the

    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Clone Wars? by ShinGouki · · Score: 3, Informative

      yes, for all you who didn't know, this movie should be set in the time of the clone wars. so the title makes sense, even tho it's a bit wimpy ;)

      --
      -dk
      Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
    2. Re:Clone Wars? by biohazard99 · · Score: 1

      Which makes a big 8-year gap in the 1-3 trillogy, when TPM ended, anakin was ~10, Obi-Wan mentions flying with him during the clone wars in ANH, so he would be 18 or older during the clone wars. That should be interesting, the longest time gap in the original flicks couldn't have been more than 6 months.

    3. Re:Clone Wars? by dogmac · · Score: 1

      Well, it all depends on whether said clones are killer tomatoes or not, doesn't it? I admit, it was the first thing that sprang to MY mind.

  470. Bummer... by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was hoping for "Jar Jar's fiery death" or something similar. "Attack of the Clones" only makes me fear the creation of an entire army of Jar Jars.

    Dancin Santa

    1. Re:Bummer... by ivan37 · · Score: 2

      That is exactly what Lucasarts wants to do. They got more publicity from "Jar Jar sucks" web sites and news reports than just about anything else. Heck, there are a lot of people who would go see it just so that they can complain about him.

    2. Re:Bummer... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      That would explain why the clones in 4-6 were so stupid.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    3. Re:Bummer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shall call him, miniJar.

    4. Re:Bummer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is exactly what Lucasarts wants to do. They got more publicity from "Jar Jar sucks" web sites and news reports than just about anything else. Heck, there are a lot of people who would go see it just so that they can complain about him.

      He might be able to get someone elses hard earned cash for putting up with that crap, but I'll wait till it comes to video... Oh, I guess I'll hafta wait a few years until Lucas is ready to release it on video so he can maximize profits.

      Sorry, there's profit to be had!

    5. Re:Bummer... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but what villian would be stupid enough to clone Jar-Jars???

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    6. Re:Bummer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. Evil will always triumph over Good, because Good is dumb.

    7. Re:Bummer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Attack of the Clones" only makes me fear the
      > creation of an entire army of Jar Jars.

      Precisely! Lucas is getting into the horror genre. Just picture being surrounded by an army of Jar Jars. Nowhere to run, there's no escape....

      Personally I think that "The night of the living Jar Jar clones" would be a better title.

    8. Re:Bummer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same shitbag who named his movie "Attack of the Clones".

      I swear to God, he musta let his kid name it, and the kid must be a mental defective. "Attack of the Clones" my left nut!

    9. Re:Bummer... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Attack of the Clones" only makes me fear the creation of an entire army of Jar Jars.

      Without a doubt, that's the title's subliminal message: "How can they be clones, if you only buy one of each action figure?"

      Expect the action figures for this one to be sold in sets of twelve.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    10. Re:Bummer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, when I lived in DC a few years back, they had the original half-completed Death Star on display at Planet Hollywood. It measured about a meter across, and you realize up close that movie special effects teams can turn the cheesiest piece of modelling into some pretty neat on-screen scenes.

    11. Re:Bummer... by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Don't argue. Go watch the movie.

      No, better idea; stop watching the movie, and get out of the house.

  471. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can the clones run Linux?

  472. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The book wasn't based on clones, was it?

  473. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of a name is that??? Sounds like some republican propoganda film.... or 50's sci fi flick..either way.....

  474. FRIST PROST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FRIST PROST!

  475. Possible money saver... by Loligo · · Score: 2, Funny


    Yaknow, if they just call it "Send in the Clones" they can fire John Williams and use pre-existing music...

    -l
    ...imagining a full orchestra with Krusty singing...

    1. Re:Possible money saver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like John Williams isn't a music-stealing hack already. Almost everything from ep4/5/6 is lifted from some other classical piece. His actual original pieces are few and far between.

      -adam

    2. Re:Possible money saver... by Loligo · · Score: 1

      >Almost everything from ep4/5/6 is lifted from
      >some other classical piece

      In particular, Holst's "The Planets".

      Once in a while they'll do a projection screen show with the local symphony and various plane arium style shots and stuff around here, it's kinda cool, and you'll sometimes hear kids talking about the Star Wars music afterwards.

      -l

    3. Re:Possible money saver... by Antipop · · Score: 1

      Yes, I noticed this too. My highschool band played a few of the pieces from Holst's "The Planets" (which I love) and about a year later we played the Star Wars music for a show in marching band. Everybody immediately recognized the SW music as very similiar to "The Planets".

  476. I'm trying.... by Mr.+Bubbles712 · · Score: 1

    but WHAT!!?!?!?!?!?! Attack of the clones? you got to be kidding me. Please god, let this be a fake title, and not the real one, like Blue Harvest. Has George gone of the deep end. Maybe, wait, I've got it... George has been cloned, and this is a way for his kind to get the recognision they deserve. Oh well, atleast we wont have an actor have his face placed on everything episode II related, and give him only 10 min. of screen time. Now it's going to be 1,000,000 actor(would that be an "s" at the end) with their face(once again, is it a multiple roll?) on everything II related.

    **rant off, Sarcasim factory default**

    --
    Alas, poor clippy, I loath him so.
    1. Re:I'm trying.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue Harvest was a ruse designed to keep away nosy fans and the press during the shooting of ROTJ in the American Southwest. If anything "Attack of the Clones" sounds more like a working title along the lines of "Revenge of the Jedi". Like other fans on here I think Episode II: The Clones Wars sounds best. Possible alternatives: The Clone Conspiracy The Clone Invasion

  477. fp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fp?

  478. Obligatory Brunching Link by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 1

    Looks like Brunching missed the ball on this one.

    (I'm not a karma whore; i'm already at 50.)

    P.S. I would have called it Send in the Clones

  479. damn the /. database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is an Nth post for arsixsixwy, because the fucking story didn't show up on the main page fast enough.

    not a frost pist.

    oh well.

    jbridge21

  480. Great for the kiddies, but... by osgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not that I'm ragging on the choice of topic here, but I'm genuinely curious: Do adults (>=16 yrs) really care about the Star Wars franchise? I would think that Star Wars as it has become wouldn't be of any more interest than Pokemon here.

    Do people who enjoyed George Lucas' original trilogy (well, minus the last half of RotJ) really care about the George Lucas' current focus on ten-year-olds?

    1. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by debrain · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, actually, yes - I would like to think that the "new and improved" Star Wars would live up to the generationally agnostic originals, that I've come to enjoy and appreciate on levels now that I certainly wouldn't have gotten before 16 years of age.

      I can only speculate why there has been a sacrifice of the genuine quality and depth of the sextet; there is a prolific desire for these to be the universal fantasy of princesses and demons, and yet I personally find the new version of Star Wars providing answers where it is better to leave mystery, showing special effects where there should be simplicity, and employing the enactment of great plot to show power where there should be implication of power through character.

      I personally had hoped for the artistic appreciation I now have of the original trilogy, but was disappointed. True power is restraint, something that lacks in the making of Episode I of the Star Wars series, contrasting its predecessors.

      Of course, it is not my call to make, but I do wish George Lucas had shown the discretion to appeal to many levels of appreciation.

    2. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All is not lost, young(or old) osgreek. I'm sure the evil Park Wars clan will come up with something to entertain us.

    3. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by dswensen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was a big fan of Star Wars as a kid, because it was a science fiction movie with starships, lasers, and weird monsters. I still enjoy it for those reasons today.

      Like many others, I was heavily influenced as a child by Star Wars, and Star Wars played a huge part, I think, in the shaping of my personality. To this day, I still enjoy movies with starships, lasers, and weird monsters. And I still enjoy Star Wars.

      However, I never expected Episode I to magically return me to twelve years of age. I never expected it to erase my capacity for critical thought and open a world of childlike wonder in my head for one simple reason: I'm no longer a child. Neither did I expect the Messiah to come down and fellate me, as so many who were disappointed by Episode I seem to have expected.

      So, while I wasn't all that crazy about Jar Jar, I had relatively few other complaints with the movie. It didn't blow me away, but then, I didn't really expect it to. Especially being an expository prequel such as it is. I feel its biggest weakness as a movie is that it's essentially all backstory. A computer-generated Gungan... not that big a deal.

      To be honest, what's disenchanted me more than anything about Star Wars is all the Lucas-bashing and vitriol that seems to characterize the "fans".

      I get tired of "Kill Jar Jar" humor that's neither clever nor funny. I get tired of seeing Lucas demonized and slandered by people who won't put their money where their mouth is and just refuse to see the movie they supposedly hate -- instead of demanding it be put on DVD immediately. I get tired of people pretending that someone's putting a gun to their head and forcing them to buy merchandise they don't want. I get tired of people attacking Lucas and his movies for not living up to their "mythical hype" when Lucas has said many times that it's just a Flash Gordon serial with a budget.

      That, more than anything, has sapped my enjoyment of the Star Wars universe, far more than any annoying CGI character ever could. But I still enjoy the movies. I just wish others could do the same, or at least move on with their lives if they no longer find the movie enjoyable.

    4. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to give a really well-thought out and reasoned reply, but then I saw your sig.

    5. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      when the first star wars movie came out, I was alive, albeit very young. I liked them. mostly I liked Harrison Ford. which is why I still have a hard time with Empire Strikes Back. as a little kid, I was really upset when he got frozen. it aggravated me greatly. so I liked Return mostly because it was, well, the return of han. :)

      anyway, all that said. I went to see the special ed re-release. I liked them again. I saw Episode I. it was fun.

      I know the Ewoks are a ripoff. actually, I'm a fan of the Piper Fuzzy books. I dislike Jar-Jar.

      but I do like the Star Wars films.

      I never was a real fan though. I am a Trek fan, I suppose. (Well, I was crazy about Trek about ten years ago. Now I'm more normal. But I still have the incredible collection from when I was crazy.)

      but I like 'em. they're fun.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    6. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it was great. '77. lets see what you europeans could've done in '77 in regard to special effects. II was great too. then lucas started into getting what i call "spielbergish". which means "lets have a common denominator of a 5 year old". then the last one just reinforced that flawed concept. I heard some of the "higher-up" writers were completely against Lucas's childish bullshit, but of course Lucas won out. What happened? a stupid-ass anime parody, but worse than an anime!

    7. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by snilloc · · Score: 1
      Neither did I expect the Messiah to come down and fellate me, as so many who were disappointed by Episode I seem to have expected.

      This should be modded up, if only for that particular line...

      But seriously, I may have expected a little too much from Episode 1, but it did disappoint in key areas.

      Ep.1 had the worst child actor I can think of in a movie of that proportion and hype. It almost made the kid in the 6th Sense look like he might have been the messiah. Lucas seriously botched there... ("Whoopieeee!")

      Darth Maul - the cover-for-the-real-villian villian, and apparent center of the Ep 1 marketing universe, was very very poorly developed. He had, what, like one line in the flick??? Not even a good one (or two) at that!

      Mythical hype was actually pretty good w.r.t. Yoda and the council, and respectable with the Obi-Wan/Qui-Gon relationship development. The hype was way too much for any film to live up to, but these areas were at least good enough to make me want to see the rest of the movies.

      As for being for the kiddies, it appears that Ep 1 was indeed a kiddie flick. I expected the prequels to be, not necessarily mature or deep, but at least approaching the level of the original trilogy - the trilogy that I can still watch today with minimal discomfort from the cheesiness inherent in such a film (with the exception of the ewoks. God they sucked.)

      (Nit-picking a little here, it would have been nice to have seen a little evil in young Anakin...)

      So damn what if it's just backstory! Does that make it ok to fill the film up with bad acting, a few "filler" scenes, and enough special effects to give one a headache from the too-blasted-loud-THX-kick-my-ass theatre system?

    8. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by nevets · · Score: 1

      I've come to the conclusion that those that expected Episode I to be a mind alternating experience, really hated the movie, and those like myself, not expecting much, actually enjoyed it.

      I grew up with star wars. I loved the trilogy. But when Episode I came out, I was married and had kids. I thought "about time" but didn't expect more than an over special effects movie to fill in the gaps of the first movies. And I received what I expected. It's like the first Batman. It couldn't live up to the hype, and I saw it after it was criticized, and didn't expect much of it. I ended up enjoying it, since it went over my expectations.

      --
      Steven Rostedt
      -- Nevermind
    9. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm 16 and I don't care

    10. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by Majestix · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...well i'm 33 and...well yeah i still care. If i didn't like (love) Sci Fi, i probably wouldn't give a rats ass...probably wouldn't even know about this. THen again, you don't have to be an SF fan to get a kick out of that title.(Clones indeed....[snicker]) And yes i was one of those folks that saw Epi I at 12am on the first day it came out. Why, you ask? Why not, i say.

      --
      --- I was far from home, and the spell of the Eastern sea was upon me. -Lovecraft-
    11. Re:Great for the kiddies, but... by DarkKnight · · Score: 1

      Its true the Star Wars movies are throwbacks to old movie serials and B grade science fiction.

      Its fine to say that something is targetted for kids but pandering especially to kids is a sure sign of putting them off. Kids are quite sophisticated and aware. I just have to look at my son to see that and he's only a toddler.

      Its this all consuming pandering that urks me. Star Wars and Empire Strikes Back have next to none of it. The stories and characters stood by themselves and delivered greatly.

      On this count, Pixar are batting a thousand. Toy Story 1 and 2, Bug's Life. Good children's stories are universal.

      Return of the Jedi and the new trilogy changed when they were designed to appeal. How else do we get characters like the ewoks and Jar Jar ?

      True George Lucas is in the unenviable position of pleasing no one, no matter what he does. He is however in the position to do what he pleases. He's certainly pioneering new film techniques and production. I somehow think that Star Wars has become a convenient cover to do this.

      Star Wars has become a part of world mythology and the fans have expectations. I didn't expect all that much from Episode 1 but was still disappointed.

      For me, Star Wars has gone from a cherished memory to just another franchise. Its this that upsets me.

      Boy I'm glad I splurged on the deluxe boxed laserdisc set of the original movies.

      Andrew.

      --
      /* Andrew Fong - rogue programmer */
  481. The only thing worse than the name. by angst7 · · Score: 2, Funny


    The clone wars are fought by thousands upon thousands of copies of Jar Jar. *shiver*

    --
    StrategyTalk.com, PC Game Forums
    1. Re:The only thing worse than the name. by LogicalRealism · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least this would mean we get to see Jar Jar die thousands of times, hundreds of ways.

    2. Re:The only thing worse than the name. by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      There is a computer game/mod there somewhere. JarCraft anyone?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  482. Suddenly, Jar Jar doesn't seem all that bad... by Kinetic+Kit · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a feeling this is some kind of cross-promotion with Fox's reality television.

    --


    Can what is formed say to that who formed it, "Why have you made me thus?"
  483. Hey... maybe there's a political agenda... by rosta · · Score: 1

    Hmm... does this have any relevance to any politcally touchy biomedical ethics debates we've been seeing recently?

  484. Stupid title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I love how amidala didn't manage to age in ten years.
    Further proof that lucas is now a total and complete sell out, and the Grand Admiral of Insulters of Intelligence.

    1. Re:Stupid title by demaria · · Score: 1

      She's from a different planet and possibly a different species. She ages differently. Or they have really good plastic surgery technology. Which would be a better explanation.

    2. Re:Stupid title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the dude that says "A communications interruption can mean only one thing - Invasion" (or something like that) must be pushing a thousand years old.

      Seriously tho, what can we expect from a series that has degenerated to:
      "Egads!, whata meesa sayin!"
      "Excueese me"
      "How wude!"
      "Oooh maxi big da force"
      "Peeyoosa"
      and my personal favorite spoken by the gungan general: "you in big doo-doo dis time jar-jar"

      The movies now even include toilet humor(the camel-looking thing farting in jarfuck's face). That ranks the Starwars movies up there with likes of Cats and Dogs and Spykids
      And WTF is up with those bad-stereotype-japanese-accent trade federation guys? "They've gone up the ven-til-a-tion shaft"

      I can honeslty say that I despise Lucasfilms now. That dickhead Lucas forgot that that the kids that didn't find the ewoks cute are now adults that still want to see the prequels but are thoroughly disappointed

  485. FINALLY by drix · · Score: 1, Redundant

    At least we'll have some authoritative info on what, exactly, the Clone Wars were. This one has been bugging me for a long time.

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  486. Sadly... by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    We are all going to plunk down the money to go and see it. We even know that Jar Jar will be in it, for chrissakes!

    Dancin Santa

  487. Do the studio execs not realize... by devphil · · Score: 2


    ...that when this marketing-ploy-disguised-as-a-movie is revealed to suck, it will forever be remembered as Episode II: Send In The Clones??

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Do the studio execs not realize... by Kinetic+Kit · · Score: 1

      Did you read that Pepsi's restaurants (Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, KFC) will not be promoting Ep II. I have a feeling there will be a lot less marketing than the first.

      --


      Can what is formed say to that who formed it, "Why have you made me thus?"
  488. Plot summary [spoiler warning] by jcarley · · Score: 1

    [Camera pans into death star and a flight of x-wing fighters led by Britney Spears and Christine Aguilera skillfully evade the converging tie-fighters]

  489. I bet it will air on Fox First by ShaggusMacHaggis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Star Wars Episode II : When Clones Go Bad

    1. Re:I bet it will air on Fox First by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      Star Wars Episode II: The World's Most Dangerous Clone Battles

    2. Re:I bet it will air on Fox First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was Worlds Deadliest Clone Attacks

  490. Sure it's bad.... by soulsteal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but Blue Harvest was already used....

  491. This must be a big joke... by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 2

    These things have been getting progressively worse it seems. Ewoks, Jar Jar Binks, and now "Attack of the Clones"? Part of me thinks that Lucas has a bet with another Hollywood Millionaire that says "I can put out any crap I want, and I'll outsell any film you put out, as long as I put "Star Wars" in the title.

    "Attack of the Clones." That's horrible. If it was anything else, people would never consider watching it while sober.

    I've got a better idea. Why don't we have a discussion here on Slashdot where you throw up potential other titles, and hopefully Lucas will change it before the film is released.

  492. To be fair... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Lucas has always come up with some cheesy names. I mean, think about "A New Hope." That title really doesn't instill awe. I think, and the titles seem to prove this out, that Lucas is still very much in the 'space opera' mindset. Can't you see a '50's pulp or sci-fi flick called Anakin Skywalker and the Atttack of the Clones? You could apply that logic to the first episode, too: Anakin Skywalker and the Phantom Menace.

    Most importantly is that we all have to remember that the new movies will never live up to our ideas of the old movies. Most of us were 10 or under when we first saw and we didn't question the motivations in the movies or their titles. I'm sure that most kids are going to take "Attack of the Clones" in stride and not question it...

    In one regard, I wish I could still think like that, and not have the need to think like an adult. The price we pay for growing up, I guess.

    Now, after typing about this, I'm really starting to like the name...guess we'll just have to wait till May...

    1. Re:To be fair... by Nightpaw · · Score: 1

      No way, bro; Episode I is worse. I'm sure kids today see right through all the plot holes. They only buy the toys because LucasArts is so good at playing the nostagia card to make us buy in to the hype. George Lucas' muse left him a long time ago.

    2. Re:To be fair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You could apply that logic to the first episode,
      > too: Anakin Skywalker and the Phantom Menace.

      Yes, you could, and coincidentally that movie sucked.

      > Most importantly is that we all have to
      > remember that the new movies will never live up
      > to our ideas of the old movies. Most of us were > 10 or under when we first saw and we didn't
      > question the motivations in the movies or their > titles.

      Sorry, but no. The Empire Strikes Back, for
      instance, was simply a much better movie than
      episode 1. Surely you'll admit that?

    3. Re:To be fair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree i think Attack of the Clones is a very star warsesque name. I think it's kinda silly how these people that claim to love star wars so much immediatly bash any new offerings. Sorry i liked episode one. It's just as good as the other movies, just theres no cloud of nostalgia. Either the old movies werent really that good, or the new movies are really that good but people can't see it. I think it's a mixture of both. You're absolutly right, people still view the old ones with the awe of a young child but look at the wnew ones with the skeptical mind of a grown up. They are all equal quality, they just appear different to these people.

    4. Re:To be fair... by h0rus · · Score: 0

      "In one regard, I wish I could still think like that, and not have the need to think like an adult. The price we pay for growing up, I guess."

      You don't; It's called detachment from the self; A lot of people acheive this when "enjoying" themselves in certain activities. I don't View any such movie with the approach of an over-analytical adult; I just enjoy it; That's probably the main reason I've not had any problems with the current crop of Star Wars.

    5. Re:To be fair... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      Crap! This is really throwing off parody ideas...

      Drug Wars
      ---------
      A New Dope
      The Empire Smokes Crack
      Burn of the Red-Eye
      The Fans of Morphine

      ...What are we supposed to do with Attack of the Clones!?

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    6. Re:To be fair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smack and the Jones

    7. Re:To be fair... by nyquil · · Score: 1

      woh woh woh, back up...

      the boat SINKS??

  493. At least they didn't use the working title... by whopis · · Score: 1

    Killer Clones From Outer Space

  494. Send in the clones by imranthegreat · · Score: 1

    Try to distance yourself from nostalgia and objectively look at the other titles in the Star Wars series. Are they really that much worse than "Attack of the Clones"? "The Empire Strikes Back" and "Return of the Jedi" sound just as much like crappy B-movies; the new title is on par with the rest of the series. Star Wars was always meant to be in the style of Saturday afternoon serials anyway.

  495. Appropriate by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1
    Interesting he should choose that title, given his movies are all clones...

    Honestly, has Lucas ever had an original idea? I mean Star Wars was "inspired" (AKA stolen) from a Kurasawa movie if I recall.

    Lucas is a hack. JMS is God.

    1. Re:Appropriate by tmhsiao · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Honestly, has Lucas ever had an original idea? I mean Star Wars was "inspired" (AKA stolen) from a Kurasawa movie if I recall.

      A New Hope is loosely (and admittedly) based on The Hidden Fortress. Given that Lucas was good friends with Joseph Campbell, the man who wrote The Hero With A Thousand Faces (and rumors I've seen around that Campbell actually consulted on the film), I certainly don't fault Lucas for using existing source material. Hell, Twelfth Night and Romeo and Juliet were both pre-existing stories when Shakespeare wrote his own versions...

      People have been borrowing stories from each other for a long, long time--I don't think The Magnificent Seven is any less of a movie simply because it's Seven Samurai set in the old west. And I always laugh my ass off at Strange Brew despite it's ties to Hamlet.

      In all honesty, anyone could apply a rehash of the Lancelot/Galahad tale (where a father falls and a son redeems) to practically any situation. It's all in the telling of it.

      Lucas is a hack. JMS is God.

      I can nary think of any piece of JMS dialogue that doesn't sound like it was written by a erudite speechwriter. The man has some plotting skills, but he can't compete with Joss Whedon, Kevin Smith, nor Quentin Tarantino (What's he been doing lately??) for realistic dialogue and character.

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    2. Re:Appropriate by Nightpaw · · Score: 1

      > Lucas is a hack. JMS is God.
      >I can nary think of any piece of JMS dialogue
      > that doesn't sound like it was written by a
      > erudite speechwriter. The man has some plotting
      > skills, but he can't compete with Joss Whedon,
      > Kevin Smith, nor Quentin Tarantino (What's he
      > been doing lately??) for realistic dialogue and
      > character. I wouldn't even go that far. I've been watching the fifth season of B5 and it's total crap. Then I think back to the other seasons, and the tension of the unknown hid his crap dialog writing skills.

    3. Re:Appropriate by Nightpaw · · Score: 1

      PREVIEW!

      *THWACK*THWACK*THWACK*

      notallcapsnotallcapsnotallcapsnotallcapsnotallcaps notallcaps

    4. Re:Appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's better to steal food than to write proprietary software

      Are you sure Stallman wrote that? :-)

    5. Re:Appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas was lucky he got Harrison Ford. He plays the good looking, american cowboy perfectly. How many good looking europeans are there? maybe a few?

    6. Re:Appropriate by biohazard99 · · Score: 1

      Tarantino was last seen playing the crazy man in Little Nicky, and writing the liner notes/mini-bio for Johnny Cash's Murder, God, Love, trillogy.

  496. Re:I can wait to download it off the web.... by donglekey · · Score: 1

    Come on, be optimistic, I think it will be out at least a week before it actually hits theatrs.

  497. ENOUGH already! by Rimbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many freaking "Send in the Clones" jokes do I have to read? IT'S BEEN DONE! READ THE THREAD BEFORE YOU POST! Gaaack!

    Of course, someone else has probably already posted this sentiment by now...

    1. Re:ENOUGH already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me make sure I understand you. Are you saying that Clone Time is Over?

    2. Re:ENOUGH already! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey man, watch it. Clones are people, two!

    3. Re:ENOUGH already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or time to quit cloning around?

    4. Re:ENOUGH already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps all those posts come from the Insane Clone Posse. (Jarjarlos?)

    5. Re:ENOUGH already! by SparkyMartin · · Score: 1
      Hey take it easy. They're just cloning around.

      Maybe SWEII will have a character called "Crusty the Clone"

  498. this is just disinformation by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    ok...ok, Lucus has long been known for his disinformation when it comes to SW. so this can't be the real title, it isn't a literaraly good choice, and he seems so into this seeming like a real story. naw "attck of the clones" is just to cheesy for me to belive it is realy real.....I Hope :-(.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  499. More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is just more bullshit by the media (and in particular, Hollywood) to portray cloning in a negative light.

    Has anyone ever seen a Sci-Fi movie about cloning that did not portray them as evil or used for evil purposes? How much do you want to bet the clones in this movie are absolute evil and are fighting versus a cast of lovable, fluffy, obnoxious absolute good characters. Of course the bet is moot since I for one will not be watching this tripe nor giving Lucas one more cent.

    1. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multiplicity http://us.imdb.com/Title?0117108

    2. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by Freedent · · Score: 1

      DS9 didn't portray cloning in a negative light. It was a plot device, no judgements made.

    3. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot my PW, so I can't sign in from home (username belgar):

      Um, respectfully I have to submit that, unless you've ready *anything* about the star wars universe, I'd keep your political-pro-cloning-crackwhore opinion to a topic that's relevant to the subject of which you speak. Watch Star Wars again and listen for the reference to "Clone Wars." It came up in 1977, long before you and your Dolly-loving ass...

      BTW, I think the title is stupid as hell, but I can't *wait* to find out about the clone wars -- regardless of how much Jar-Jar BS is in the movie.

    4. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Aliens series. Bishop (sortof a clone, but not really) rocked.

      E.P.S.

    5. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Belgar,

      Your password is 5xKzyQ

    6. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, Multiplicity

    7. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by dmatos · · Score: 2

      Nope. Bishop was simply an android. You may say clone because he looked like his creator (or did he? In the end that guy in III turned out to be an android as well - remember the ear).

      IIRC, Data (ST:TNG) also looks like his creator. They simply chose the easiest model to work with when deciding what the physical form of the outer skin would be.

      These two are very much not clones, who are supposed to be essentially human, but "my father was a test-tube, my mother was a knife" and complete DNA copies of the original. Both Data and Bishop have super-human abilities (strength, speed, calculational power, etc) that their "parents" most definitely did not, so they are certainly not DNA copies. Also, neither are organic.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    8. Re:More Anti-Cloning Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how'd you know????!?!?!?!?!?!?1??/??!!

  500. It seems we've done this before... by Kinetic+Kit · · Score: 2, Informative

    The slashdot article from 1997 reacting to "The Phantom Menace" http://slashdot.org/articles/98/09/27/127231.shtml Too bad /. wasn't around in 1979 or 1982, we would have flipped over Ep V and Ep VI too.

    --


    Can what is formed say to that who formed it, "Why have you made me thus?"
    1. Re:It seems we've done this before... by Judas96' · · Score: 1

      I deffinately would not have flipped over the name "The Empire Strikes Back", I don't know about anybody else.

    2. Re:It seems we've done this before... by Louis+Blue · · Score: 1

      No they would have flipped about starting at part 4 and not at part 1...

  501. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 Preemptively Redundant

  502. Re:waste of time by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 0
    How is that flamebait? If it deserves any mod, it's -1, troll.

    Lucas is a talentless jackoff who shot his load back in '77 and has desperately been trying to get it back ever since.

    Just because someone see's Lucas for what he really is they get modded down. This is exact reason that, today, I unticked the "Willing to moderate" box as I didn't like the company I had to keep.

  503. You can never go home. by Templar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, just remember... you can never go home again...

    The high will never be as good as the first time, no matter how much you do...

    and it'll never be 1977 again, with your easily impressioned pre-teen brain being permanently changed by every laser blast... feeling pure joy at every slash of a light saber...

    It's for your kids. Stop complaining and let them enjoy it.

    1. Re:You can never go home. by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you remember from the credits these titles are "Episode" titles... Sort of like chapters in a big book called star wars. So while "attack of the clones" is rather inane, the other titles are pretty much OK. And for the record, "The Empire Strikes Back" is hands down the best. It had the most drama and the least kiddie material. Too bad Lucas didn't learn from it.

    2. Re:You can never go home. by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      That's because Lucus didn't *do* most of The Empire Strikes Back.

    3. Re:You can never go home. by VE3THX · · Score: 1

      Well, just remember... you can never go home again...

      and it'll never be 1977 again, with your easily impressioned pre-teen brain being permanently changed by every laser blast... feeling pure joy at every slash of a light saber...


      Unlike many posters here, I was 17 when A New Hope opened, and the first trilogy helped shape my early-adulthood rather than my teenaged years. This film changed me in just about every way imaginable, for both better and worse. I becam a SF/Fantasy fan from it and I became so fascinated with movies that I worked in the industry as a projectionist and sound technician for over 19 years. Persuing and understanding THX standards turned me into somewhat of an audiophile. I gained a passion for technology that led me into IT and got me my ham radio license.

      What the original, Empire and about 2/3 of RotJ had was a fun story and characters that I could relate to, and in whose shoes I could and would gladly walk. Sure it told a classic good-versus-evil tale but it did so interestingly and without talking down to me.

      Starting with the Teddy-Bears-From-Hell-Saving-The-Galaxy and continuing with My-Favourite-Gungan, SW has been about nothing more than merchandising and target-marketing without going through the bother of film-making--or in this case, video making.

      When "A New Hope" opened, it was possible to go more than 5 feet and not get bombarded with really awful merchandising tie-ins (sure, they came later)--Yeah, I bought the book, the soundtrack (wore the vinyl out playing it--fostering my love for classical music today, may I add) and a couple of action figures, but that was it. Whole universes of "collectables" weren't yet lurking around every corner with the sole intent of separating me and my money. Toy stores still had more bikes and GI-Joes and dolls and footballs than Darth Vader masks and plastic lightsabres (I made mine from an old flashlight and a golf club protector tube).

      Episodes IV-VI were more about telling an interesting story than purely generating incredible amounts of money. Tell me a good story and I'll flock to see it, hear it, read it or absorb it through osmosis anyday.

      I don't particularly despise the new title, BTW, but it certainly does give parodists and critics something to twist into a headline if, as is widely expected, this turns into another execrable pre-packeged and sanitized kiddiefest.

      --
      Cheers, PJ Dougherty
  504. (-1 ree done dent) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SEND IN THE MUTHAFUCKIN CLONES!!! BWAGhAHAHAHGgahhahAHahahahAHAhahahAHahahAHahah... Jesus Christ, I am one mutha fuckin genius for thinking of that one.

    1. Re:(-1 ree done dent) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just noticed that this was the 69th post... wow... and I wasn't even trying... That just goes to show all of you 69th post master wannabes that you have to flow with the Tao to sucessfully get the 69th post, which is a special number, due to it being a slang term for oral sex being performed mutually.

  505. Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I said it when everyone whined about how 'childish' "The Phantom Menace" was, and I'll say it again: The target audience for these movies is 10-year-old boys.

    The problem here is, everyone (of my generation, anyways) remembers STAR WARS as this wonderful, epic, life-changing movie. It was *the* coolest thing ever. The thing is... at the time we saw it... we were 10 years old.

    Over the years we've romanticized it in our minds, and looked back with fond memories of what a wonderful movie it was. At the same time, we've been growing older, more sophisticated (more boring?) and more discriminating in our... cinematic preferences.

    So the new STAR WARS movies come out, and we're all expecting some wonderful, deep, meaningful epic saga... but guess what? All we get is cool monsters, lightsabres, blasters, spaceships and a cute little "good guys wear white, bad guys wear black" plot. And you know what? The 10-year-old boys loved it.

    Regress to your childhood and you'll enjoy Phantom Menace a lot more (and understand why "Attack of the Clones" is a perfectly acceptable title).

    1. Re:Okay... by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the difference is that the original movies were at least tolerable to adults. In Episode I, it was almost as if Lucas went out of his way to alienate the adult audience. JarJar's screeching babble was obnoxious and offensive. The ewoks were lame, but at least they were at part of the story, not a pure distraction from it.

      He also picked the world's worst child actor, who would be booted off the set of most Disney TV-films, for the starring role, and tried to make us believe that an 8-year-old boy can have romantic chemistry with a space-queen.

      But I'm not bitter! ;-) One thing I will admit is that I never caught on to how stupid and obvious the name Darth (in)Vader was, until I saw Ep.I and choked on the brilliance of Darth (in)Sidious and Darth Maul(you like a tiger/bear). Anyone know what Darth means, apart from a badly mispronounced Dark?

    2. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >JarJar's screeching babble was obnoxious and offensive.

      Touche.

      >He also picked the world's worst child actor

      Agreed.

      >Darth (in)Sidious and Darth Maul(you like a tiger/bear).

      Yup, but remember, it has to appeal to 10 year olds... even
      the rather dull ones.

      >Anyone know what Darth means, apart from a badly mispronounced Dark?

      Some sort of title, perhaps?

      >No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always boom tomorrow. -Ivanova, B5

      Ahh... speaking of mindless sci-fi for children... here the exact
      antithesis of it... B5 was a great series.

    3. Re:Okay... by unitron · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I didn't see any of them when I was 10. I saw Star Wars in 1977 when I was 26, and it was (in my opinion) good, even very good, but not quite the "life-changing experience" others seemed to find it. Saw the second and third movies when they came out as well. Read a couple of Alan Dean Foster Star Wars books, especially impressed by "Splinter in the Mind's Eye".

      Due to now being an uncle I saw the re-releases of the first 3 movies a few years ago, and they hold up pretty well, allowing for the shrinkage of theater screens and auditoriums in the interim. Then my nephew and I went to see Phantom Menace. He liked Jar-Jar just fine. I wanted to see Darth Maul grab his tongue and garrotte him with it. Slowly.

      Jar-Jar aside, Phantom Menace was the quality I'd expect from a movie made by the same person that made the 1977 movie, but if he'd made it 25 years earlier, not 25 years later.

      How old you were when you first saw any of the movies has nothing to do with the shortcomings of Phantom Menace.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    4. Re:Okay... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      > How old you were when you first saw any of the movies has nothing to do with the shortcomings of Phantom Menace.

      I second that, and everything else you said in your post. Star Wars wasn't a great movie, but it was a fun movie. And still is, if you rent it and watch it again. TPM, OTOH, is nothing but a pay-per-view commercial for kiddies' toys.

      I usually get very absorbed in movies, to the extent that I feel somewhat disoriented when I leave the theater. Not so with TPM; it's one of the handful of movies I've ever seen that didn't make me suspend disbelief for a while. My critical mind was awake and alert the whole time, asking when the cheesy fun was going to start.

      Unfortunately, the odor it let out wasn't from cutting the cheese. It was pure, unadulterated dogpoop.

      TPM : "That Pathetic Movie"

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  506. Dude,...seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know once upon a time, I had a childhood which was filled with wonderous dreams about lightsabers, X-wing fighters, and the force. George Lucas has taken what was probably the finest movie series ever made and turned it into a his own recreation. By using us for his feeble experiments with digital creations he is taking a sacred cow and serving it up as hotdogs. Star Wars movies actually meant something. They had what life really lacked, it reached out to a spiritualism that's inherant in people that modern religion is just too outdated to touch. It promoted great values such as wisdom and discipline. First Jar, Jar flippin' Binks and his Sushi insult to the Japanese people, and now his rip off of Steven Soundheim. I figure Star Wars fans have given the equivalent of the GDP of a medium sized country to George Lucas, doesn't he owe us something? Why is he destroying our memories??

    Send in the clones, don't bother, I'm not watching.

  507. You'll never see it. SW2 violates the DMCA! by SlushDot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Cloning is a "sexual circumvention device" which provides "access" to DNA outside of authorized methods provided by the Creator.

    Lucas will be sued by God with penalties of 10 years in jail, a $5,000,000 fine or both. However a plea bargain may be possible if Lucas agrees to please kill off Jar Jar.

    --

    1. Re:You'll never see it. SW2 violates the DMCA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However a plea bargain may be possible if Lucas agrees to please kill off Jar Jar.

      Unfortunately for all of us, Jar-Jar will be in SW2.

    2. Re:You'll never see it. SW2 violates the DMCA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      However a plea bargain may be possible if Lucas agrees to please kill off Jar Jar.

      Unfortunately for all of us, Jar-Jar will be in SW2.

      Well, Jar Jar being killed off wouldn't be of much solace if he wasn't killed IN THE MOVIE in a big CG splooey mess for the kids to see and cheer at!

      So of course he will be in it.

    3. Re:You'll never see it. SW2 violates the DMCA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn straight! And just because it happens in "a galaxy far far away" doesn't mean the cloners can't be busted for it. Look at Sklyarov! He wrote his code in Russia. Came (without the code) to the US, and merely spoke about it.

    4. Re:You'll never see it. SW2 violates the DMCA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe the whole point of the cloning thing is that Lucas thinks the only way SW2 can match up with the reputation of 'Empire' as the good middle bit of the trilogy, is to have us watch Jar Jar die again.

      And again.

      And again.

      ...

      Hmmm. That could be fun.

  508. Shrewed international marketing move by catseye_95051 · · Score: 2

    Haven't you heard?

    All the world loves a clone!

    (You may now throw things in my genreal direction.)

  509. When Jedi Attack by kreyg · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Well, other than making me think of "When Animals Attack" or "Attack of the &ltcheesy 50's sci-fi topic&gt," it's not too bad.

    The Phantom Menace
    Attack of the Clones
    ???
    A New Hope
    The Empire Strikes Back
    Return of the Jedi

    They're all silly unless you've been conditioned as a child to think they're all amazingly cool. Fortunately, I have. :-)

    --
    sig fault
    1. Re:When Jedi Attack by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      Episode III: Rise of the Empire

      That one actually doesn't sound too bad.

      Dancin Santa

    2. Re:When Jedi Attack by Trollificus · · Score: 0
      Attack of the Clones sounds like a silly Saturday morning cartoon or a really bad B-movie.
      No doubt it's just an excuse to roll out more action figures and lightsaber toys.

      What next, Jar-Jar with snap action tongue and mini rocketlauncher?

      --

      "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
      - Gov. Jesse Ventura

    3. Re:When Jedi Attack by bartok · · Score: 5, Funny
      What next, Jar-Jar with snap action tongue and mini rocketlauncher?

      Nope, sorry but Snap Action Tongue and Mini Rocketlauncher are patented and used exclusively on Monika and Bill action figures.

    4. Re:When Jedi Attack by softsign · · Score: 2
      OMG... only on slashdot does this not get modded up while some of the other dimwitted comments are glorified.

      Kudos from me, whatever it's worth...

    5. Re:When Jedi Attack by eric434 · · Score: 1

      And just when I used up my mod points. Someone send this up as +1, funny.

      --
      This .sig temporary until a better .sig can be constructed.
    6. Re:When Jedi Attack by kreyg · · Score: 2
      Star Wars: Clone Wars

      "Star Wars" by itself is already kind of an odd name. That just doesn't work for me, sorry.

      --
      sig fault
  510. Attack of the Clowns by ahollis · · Score: 1

    Can't sleep, clowns will eat me.

    --
    Ten years after the events of The Phantom Menace, not only has the galaxy undergone significant change, but so have our familiar heroes Obi-Wan McDonald, Padmé Amiclownia and Anakin [Bobo] Skywalker as they are thrown together again for the first time since the Clown Federation invasion of Naboo. Anakin has grown into the accomplished Clown apprentice of Obi-Wan, who himself has transitioned from student to Clown Master. The two Clowns are assigned to protect Padmé whose life is threatened by a faction of political separatists. As relationships form and powerful forces collide, these heroes face choices that will impact not only their own fates, but the destiny of the Republic.
    --

  511. Mesa Like! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mesa be likin the new Star Wars maxi-big-title! Mesa warrior! Mesa got a grand army! Mesa fight the killer clones! Mesa be lovin Georgie! mesa and Georgie bein friends!

  512. Oh my GOD! by vulg4r_m0nk · · Score: 1

    What if he's threatening to clone Jar-Jar ?!

  513. Average Consumers Will Once Again Be Confused by cmdrsed · · Score: 1

    Me: I'm going to see Attack of the Clones Average Consumer: Is that scary? I don't really like Wes Craven or John Carpenter. Me: No it's a Star Wars movie. Average Consumer: You mean Return of the Jedi? Me: No... attack of the clones. Average Consumer: Attack of the what??

  514. starwars sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so who really cares?

  515. suck. by deadpixel · · Score: 0

    suck.

    --
    All that begins in anger ends in shame.- Ben Franklin
  516. Why not just by jjr · · Score: 1

    "The Clone Wars" hell I think that sounds better "When clones Attack" all well

  517. Jar-Jar's Role by Myco · · Score: 1

    They can call it whatever they want, as long as Jar-Jar's role in this movie is as "expendable crewmember."

    1. Re:Jar-Jar's Role by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I wish I mod points, I almost fell out of my chair...

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  518. Gah by interiot · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From the official annonucement:
    • It [using chapter titles] harkens back to the sense of pure fun, imagination and excitement that characterized the classic movie serials and pulp space fantasy adventures that inspired the Star Wars saga.
    Gag me. Worse than merely being cheesy, it's an evil blend of marketing and cheese.
    1. Re:Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey I thought an evil blend of marketing and cheese known as velveda?

    2. Re:Gah by VE3THX · · Score: 1

      It [using chapter titles] harkens back to the sense of pure fun, imagination and excitement

      Let's make that "immolation and excrement" in this case.

      --
      Cheers, PJ Dougherty
  519. I think its going to be great by bsimonin · · Score: 1

    I read StarWars when I was in the sixth grade (after I saw the movie 11 times the summer it came out). I remember the book talking about the Clone Wars in which the Jedi Knights obliterated. But then the fall came when the dark side took control. My memory may have faded abit but weave this within the love story of Anikan and the Queen and it should be great.

    --
    Brian L. Simonin Email: brian.simonin@gmail.com Website: https://www.google.com/profiles/brian.simonin
    1. Re:I think its going to be great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, d00d, thanks for being, like, the only guy on this site who's actually looking forward to this movie! Me too! If it has the same dark edge that Empire had, it should totally rock.

      Let's face it, the rest of this trilogy is no picnic for the Jedi.

  520. Episode III leak... by StaticEngine · · Score: 4, Funny

    And in further news, Episode III will be named, "I Wipe my Ass With Your Money", and will consist entirely of 15 minutes of Hayden Christensen putting on the Darth Vader outfit, saying "This is heavy," and "Okay, I'm ready to be Evil now."

    1. Re:Episode III leak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is he going to have a Clone called minidarth?

    2. Re:Episode III leak... by RealSalmon · · Score: 1
      'And in further news, Episode III will be named, "I Wipe my Ass With Your Money" . . . '

      That is without a doubt the funniest thing I have read all day. Thanks for the laugh.

      --

      -B

    3. Re:Episode III leak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say MOD UP, but this one's already at +5. Well done, moderators! :)

    4. Re:Episode III leak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't laughed that hard in a long time.. I'm still laughing so hard it hurts.

  521. Playing the part of the young Chewbaca by SuperguyA1 · · Score: 1

    The original clone. Dolly the sheep.

    --
    "as plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee" - Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz. (One man's humorous is another mans flamebait)
    1. Re:Playing the part of the young Chewbaca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they do get Dolly, and for the next episode, they shoot it in New Zealand like LOTR, maybe it could be a sci-fi pr0n of kiwis shagging sheep... *Goes back to dreaming bout electric Dolly*

  522. Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the oven by jeko · · Score: 5, Funny
    Imagine if Captain Kangaroo had turned into an alcoholic lunatic, or Mr. Rogers had fallen to AIDS or if Kermit turned up as part of the Cajun dinner special...

    "Star Wars" was MY childhood. My middle-school friends and I argued endlessly about "Empire." Vader, Luke's father? No way. Who was this Boba Fett anyway? Why was he masked the entire film. Somethin's gotta be goin' on there.

    WE WAITED MORE THAN A DECADE FOR EPISODE 1! I grew up, I became an OLD MAN waiting for that bloody movie. When I heard it was coming, it was like the Return of Gandalf. The World would be OK. I dragged my wife to the theater, promising her it would be great, this would be epic, Strap In and Enjoy the Ride.

    Ten minutes in, I wanted to shoot myself. Twenty minutes in, and my wife was openly wondering if this constituted the sort of spousal abuse that would get her more than 50% in the divorce.

    To give you a contemporary example, I want you to go to your child and explain that in the next book, which we're all waiting for like it was Christmas, in the next book, Dumbledore turns out to be a child molester.

    Watch the look on the face of your little Harry-or-Hermione-wannabe.

    THAT's exactly how episode one made me feel.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  523. Very sad ... by taxman_10m · · Score: 4, Flamebait
    It is very sad that Lucas has chosen to go negative in his campaign against Senator Palpatine. The Senator only wants to use embryos, that will be discarded anyway, to harvest stem cells in an attempt to find a potential cure for such afflictions as Alzheimer's disease and certain neurological disorders.

    By poisiong the debate with such senseless propaganda as "Attack of the Clones" he does injury not only to an honorable public servant with only the public's best interests in mind, but he also places in jeopardy the lives of people needing a cure. To eliminate the hope of these people is a crime against humanity.

    For shame Lucas! For shame!

    1. Re:Very sad ... by msm1th · · Score: 1

      someone mod this up. funny.

  524. Horrible. Just horrible. by Big+Ryan · · Score: 1

    Oh, this is just horrific. First Lucas ruins Star Wars with the 'Greedo Shot' in the Special Edition, then he abuses us with Watto and Jar Jar, and now this crap.

    How am I supposed to camp out for something with this lame of a title?!

    What's next? "I Was A Teenage Jedi"?

    I guess it is time to change to Lord of the Rings...

  525. .... by multriha · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who was looking for link to an official star wars site, or any other confirmation than random slashdotter submissions?

    1. Re:.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read it and weep. Just like the rest of fans: http://www.starwars.com/episode-ii/news/2001/08/ne ws20010806.html

  526. Title suck, but keep in mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that it'll probably suck less than the movie itself.

  527. Clone wars - read Frank Herbert by legLess · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This issue will cause a war at some point in the future, I bet. For the old science fiction fans amongst us, check out Frank Herbert's Destination Void. Guaranteed to hurt your brain. Here's a very simple summary that doesn't give away much:
    X years in the future, human cloning is commonplace. Perhaps inevitably, clones are treated as far less than human, simply disposable lumps of flesh. A "Void Ship" (thus the name) is shot out into interstellar space with a crew of clones, and their task is to create artificial life (not intelligence - life), using the ship itself as the raw material. They use clones because the people on moon base are very afraid of creating life they can't control - they want the data, but not the actuality. With a crew of clones, they can blow up the ship before any artificial life is realized, but hopefully after they have a little more data. And it doesn't matter, because the crew are only clones. There are many layers of irony, and tragedy, here.
    If you read much Herbert, you may see the very beginnings of the "Butlerian Jihad" in this story. Remember all the "Mentats" in the Dune books? Human computers? They existed because of the one prohibition that came out of the Butlerian Jihad: "Thou shalt not make a machine in the image of a man's mind." They discovered, almost too late, that relying on machines to do your work turns you into a slave.

    Read more Herbert - he was one of the most important minds in fiction all last century.

    Parenthetically, Herbert followed this 20 years later with a trilogy: The Jesus Incident, The Lazarus Effect, and The Ascension Factor. It's really some of his best work, aside from the Dune books. Sadly, he died before he finished the last one, and his co-author for the series (Bill Ransom) finished it. Bill Ransom's a decent poet, but a lousy novelist, and The Ascension Factor was pretty weak. The first two are great though, and spend more time with the clone issue.

    --
    This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
    1. Re:Clone wars - read Frank Herbert by Tupper · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Perhaps inevitably, clones are treated as far less than human, simply disposable lumps of flesh.

      Oh, kinda like stem cell research.

    2. Re:Clone wars - read Frank Herbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that any different to any other type of autopsy?

    3. Re:Clone wars - read Frank Herbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, aside from the fact the subject isn't dead?

  528. Already been suggested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  529. That sounds like something. . . by cornette · · Score: 2, Funny

    That sounds like something that Joel and the Bots would watch.

    1. Re:That sounds like something. . . by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Sneak peek at an upcoming MST3000:

      "Oh My God! There's a bowl job on Anakin!"
      "I didn't know Gungans could grow a mullet."

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  530. Gonna happen by legLess · · Score: 2
    The above Frank Herbert post was serious and informative, but this is the first thing that popped into my head :-)

    The first headlines of the clone wars are already in the news: Italy announces plans to clone hundreds.

    Several iterations later: "US Nukes Italy: 'We did it for the children,' says righteous Bush, sipping a Margarita on day 1194 of his 'Permanent Vacation.'"

    --
    This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
    1. Re:Gonna happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, typical socialist western-european, leftist american bullshit. trash a conservative. GUESS WHAT MCFLY'S. it doesn't work. many of us are libertarian and don't buy your completely flawed and intellectually dishonest bullshit. come one people. if you have an iq of over 130, join the libertarian party. please. the sheep have been fooled for too long

    2. Re:Gonna happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So George Dubya Bush walks into a bar.

  531. you've got to be kidding me by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1
    You're kidding..."Attack of the Clones"??? I mean, at least "Phantom Menace" sounded like a real Star Wars title. "A New Hope", "The Empire Strikes Back", "Return of the Jedi", "Phantom Menace", and..."Attack of the Clones"?? Ug. Any and all hope that I had for this movie being any less sucky than Episode I has just been dashed.

    yrs,
    Ephemeriis

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  532. Wow.... by MrNixon · · Score: 1

    That title sucks. It should be "Star Wars: Episode II - The Clone Wars". Or something like that.

  533. Star Wars : the musical returns.... by decaying · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anakin: Quick, send in the clones
    Obi-Wan: Don't bother, they're here
    Lucas: Isn't it rich, isn't it queer, Losing my timing so late in my career
    SW Fans: There ought to be clones
    Lucas and Fox Studios:: Well maybe next year

    --
    ----- One piece short of Legoland
    1. Re:Star Wars : the musical returns.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brilliant post

  534. Thats funny.... by Restil · · Score: 2

    The script I've been reading.. there are no clones in the second movie. THey don't come about until the 3rd.. I must be missing something...

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
    1. Re:Thats funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Maybe you've been reading the wrong script?

      Retard.

      Next you'll be complaining about your warezed apps crashing on you.

    2. Re:Thats funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want to buy Brooklyn Bridge from me?

    3. Re:Thats funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a cocksucking liar.

  535. Star Wars Episode II: Clones Gone Wild! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first Rated R installment of the Star Wars series. Jar Jar is your video host for Spring Break on Tatooine. It's amazing what good Clones will do for the camera!

  536. Sifl by eimaj · · Score: 1

    What's this "Star Worlds" thing everyone keeps talking about?

  537. Better name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Your Clones are Belong to Us.

  538. Traditions by Glytch · · Score: 2

    We've secretly replaced George Lucas with Ed Wood. Let's see if anyone notices.

  539. Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all the posts - not one mention of Natalie Portman

  540. I guess the ironic thing is... by OakLEE · · Score: 1

    ..that Empire the only really good Star Wars movie was the only one not directed by Lucas.

    With this it is official, Lucas does indeed want this series to indeed be a fantastical world of wonder for ages 3-11(tm). I'm sorry, but that is the lamest title I have ever heard for a movie. Even Battlefield Earth, the worst sci-fi movie ever at least had a cool name. Name one sci-fi movie with a title like that that has suceeded. Lucasfilm has officially done it. I can tolerate Jar Jar, I can even put up with that whole Metachlorian bullshit, but when you name a movie Attack of the Clones... I absolutley refuse to watch this movie on the basis of that title, and I suggest you people follow. If this movie was meant for 11 year-olds, let them line Lucas' pockets

    _____________________________________

    --
    The sun beams down on a brand new day, No more welfare tax to pay, Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light...
    1. Re:I guess the ironic thing is... by Yorrike · · Score: 1
      I think the phrase "judging a book by it's cover" rings true in this case. Give it a chance before bashing it.

      "Super Mario Brothers" is a pretty crap title, but it's one of the best games ever.

      EPII doesn't really ecite me anyway, I want to play Rouge Squadron II on the Gamecube, that'll give me my Starwars fix for many years to come.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    2. Re:I guess the ironic thing is... by VE3THX · · Score: 1

      ..that Empire the only really good Star Wars movie was the only one not directed by Lucas.

      Wrong you so are, Hmmmm?. Return of the Jedi was directed by Lawrence Kasdan.

      Personally, I think Lucas listened too closely to Yoda and was seduced by the Dark Side. "Once you stride down the Dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny. Consume you it will."

      --
      Cheers, PJ Dougherty
  541. Speak for yourself by sharkey · · Score: 2

    I, for one, can't wait to hear John Williams rendition of the Attack of the Killer Tomatoes theme.

    Attack.....of the Killer Clo-oh-nes!
    Attack.....of the Killer Clo-oh-nes!
    They'll poke you, prod you,
    Kill you, grill you,
    Smash you up for Darth!
    Then use what's left,
    To paint their hearth!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:Speak for yourself by LUDO54 · · Score: 1
      Attack.....of the Killer Clo-oh-nes!

      Dude, try and sing (or say, if your singing voice ain't too good) Clones out loud as a 3 sylable word. I swear it sounds like cojones instead.

  542. All together now..."Worst Title Ever" by unitron · · Score: 2
    How about a cheesy title contest?

    "Night of the Living Clones"

    "Clones in Spaaaaaace"

    "The Clone Ranger Rides Again"

    "Hey Buddy, can you clone me a dime?"

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    1. Re:All together now..."Worst Title Ever" by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      Pigs in Space... Man, that brought some repressed memories.

      Dancin Santa

    2. Re:All together now..."Worst Title Ever" by Xpilot · · Score: 1
      Add a few more :
      • Dude, where's my clone?
      • Clone-a-home
      • E.T. Clones Home (He figures he isn't gonna make it back, so do what the borg do. Assimilate)
      • Clonefinger
      • Clone Away

      There's a poem by Asimov I can't get out of my head... "give me a clone, my very own clone, with its Y chromosome changed to X, and when it is grown, my own little clone it will be of the opposite sex"...
      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  543. Excerpt from leaked screenplay by jutus · · Score: 5, Funny
    This just in...

    Anakin looks up to see Queen Amidala and Obi-Wan dressed like clones, holding miniature billboards advertising the clone college and dancing to clone music. "Amidala...?" asks Anakin slowly. "Yes, Anakin?" answers the clone Amidala, starting to hum clone music.

    Anakin: That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clone college! [leaves]

    Obi-Wan: I don't think any of us expected him to say that.

    1. Re:Excerpt from leaked screenplay by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Do you think they'll have a cloning machine hooked up to a killing machine?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  544. title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't he just finish off his fan base by throwing a "killer" into the title?

    1. Re:title by philipm · · Score: 0

      just what I was thinking --- "Atack of the killer clones"

      Must be something about the phrase that causes people to think that (clones kill).

      Help, we've been brainwashed!

  545. The full story arc: by number+one+duck · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The Phantom Menace" "The Attack of the Clones" "My Wookie and Me" "A New Hope" "The Empire Strikes Back" "Return of the Jedi"

  546. An article already up at ign by quannump · · Score: 1

    http://scifi.ign.com/feature/7298.html

    Looks like /. has an attack of the redundant post

    --

  547. Presumed titles by csbruce · · Score: 2

    The Phantom Menace
    The Rise of the Empire
    The Fall of the Jedi

  548. I've got a better title by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dolly the Jedi Slayer

  549. Re:cloned army of jar jar by cruelworld · · Score: 5, Funny

    what do you think IS under those stormtrooper helmets?

  550. So does this mean... by cybersmith · · Score: 1

    it's going to be just as bad as episode I or twice as bad? ;-)

  551. It is you who are mistaken... by Kibo · · Score: 2
    about a great many things.

    There were probably greater Star Wars fans than I, I never got dressed up or anything. But it came at a time in my childhood where I couldn't help but love it. What was different about Star Wars from so many other artifacts of my youth, is that my appreciation of it, most significantly The Empire Strikes Back, and Star Wars, grew. How rare it must be for something from ones youth to retain its luster upon further examination. Certainly Buck Rogers, and Battlestar Galactica, while they evoke a certain feeling of nostalgia, don't have the same staying power. Maybe looney toons, MASH, and Robotech have a similar quality, but I doubt anything had the impact Star Wars and its successors had. An amazing feat, truly remarkable, even incredible.

    Which makes George Lucas' attempts to destroy and remove and in everyway obliterate all that was good and true so disturbing. Sure they're his creations, and he should be free to destroy them in anyway he sees fit, and even profit from it. But I'm not paying him or anyone anything to be insulted and assaulted by the insipid movies he feels compelled to make. For me the Star Wars saga will always be Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, and sometimes Return of the Jedi. Everything else, including the rereleases, is just the evidence of a man trying to recapture the past glory of his greatest triumph. So the torch is passed to other series, perhaps The Matrix, or Lord of the Ring.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    1. Re:It is you who are mistaken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe you. Like an abused lover, you return, lulled by the sweet siren's song back into the arms of your tormentor. "This time it'll be different. This time he's really changed," you tell yourself as you repeat the pathetic cycle again and again. Don't be ashamed, it is human nature to know better but also to succumb.

  552. The force clone war by ExCEPTION · · Score: 0

    Would that be the Force vs. OpenForce?

  553. Re:cloned army of jar jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Storm troopers speak English too well to be clones of Jar Jar. You'd think that even if they weren't raised in their own culture, they'd still retain the lisp.

    There's another thing I can hate about the movie. I hate Jar Jar and I hate Lisp.

  554. Soylent Green is made out of .... by dryguy · · Score: 1

    seeequels!! Soylent Green is made out of Seeeeeeequels!!!!

    --
    -- Stamp out entropy. ->dryguy@bellsloth.net
  555. Of course.... by Vermifax · · Score: 1

    ...the problem with your line of thought is that the clone wars has been in planning since at least the first movie.

    --

    Vermifax

    Logout
    1. Re:Of course.... by Scoob2134 · · Score: 1

      "Multiplicity". Cloning is not so negative in that movie.

  556. Potential Plot by triple_c · · Score: 1

    Personally I see this as being a great title and the plot would go down as follows:
    Anakin falls in love with the Space Queen. She disses him because he is desert ratboy. So what if he has Jedi powers that wont satisfy her, she's gonna have a crush on Obi. Anikan gets all pissed off and holds a grudge against Obi and thats why he kills him in the original trilogy. Anakin flips out and steals Amildala's blood and hair and clones her. Mates with the clone or inserts his own DNA and makes the twins.

    Sorry to have to spoil the next two films for you.

    --
    //----(triple c)-------//
  557. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Thorgal · · Score: 1

    Heh, this is exactly what I felt at the time. Cinemas in my city generally suck, so I've organized a trip for some 15 Star Wars addicts + 5 not-so-addicts to the closest city with multiplex, THX sound etc (3h by car) to fully enjoy something we were expecting to be a movie of the decade.

    10 minutes into the movie I was sitting in disbelief, waiting for something to change. Half an hour later I was starting to worry about my safety. Since then, I've only waited for the end. And when it finally came, all my friends were just sitting there, speechless in disgust. Oh my, how stupid I felt.

    Fortunately, we discovered that "The Matrix" was about to start on another screen and Neo saved the day (and my skin).

    --
    "Man in the Moon and other weird things" - wfmh.org.pl/thorgal/Moon/
  558. More than half way. by Vladinator · · Score: 2

    The books are, in fact, considered cannon. As such, perhaps after he croaks, we'll see something made from them. Not before however, if we are to believe what Lucas himself reportedly said during the making of Ep I, which was that he was stoping at 6 since he didn't want to do Star Wars for the rest of his life. He decided to make it a story about Vader from the time he was a boy until his death. Shrug They've all sucked ass after the second one, which is the only sequel ever to be as good and better than the first movie.

    --

    "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

    1. Re:More than half way. by soulsteal · · Score: 2

      They've all sucked ass after the second one, which is the only sequel ever to be as good and better than the first movie.

      Well, I'm personally waiting for someone to bankroll the sequel to Hudson Hawk.

    2. Re:More than half way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true. All of the Star Trek sequels were better than the first. Star Trek: The Movie sucked.

    3. Re:More than half way. by asmussen · · Score: 1

      Nah, Star Trek V was even worse than the original. (But you're right, the first one did suck...)

      --
      Shawn Asmussen
  559. I bet Taco's CGI isn't as Elite... by cybersmith · · Score: 1

    from the its-not-that-good dept And hamster havoc was a masterpiece?

  560. Its a joke right? ... very funny .. isn't it ? .. by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    Its a spoof. Right. Gotta be. Cmdr Taco thinks its April 1.

    What if its true ? Crap. Glad I didn't name it.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
  561. Possible Liberation From Jar-Jar Hell... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    If you look closely at the StarWars site, they have a pic with the scrolling opening text, presumably from pre-production movie footage:

    Episode II
    10 years after the Trade Federation invasion of Naboo, not only has the galaxy undergone significant change, but so have our familiar heroes Obi-WanKenobi, Padme Amidala and Anakin Skywalker as the [-cut-off-] thrown together again for the first...

    And that's all it shows, but it's continued on this page

    And as you may have noticed, Jar Jar was not mentioned...please let him not be in this movie!

    1. Re:Possible Liberation From Jar-Jar Hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      our familiar heroes Obi-WanKenobi, Padme Amidala and Anakin Skywalker as the

      leader of the Jar Jar Binks Clone Army are

      thrown together again for the first...

    2. Re:Possible Liberation From Jar-Jar Hell... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "leader of the Jar Jar Binks Clone Army are"

      I'm assuming that that's a joke...

    3. Re:Possible Liberation From Jar-Jar Hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pray that it is.

  562. taco tico by cybersmith · · Score: 1
    from the its-not-that-good dept

    And hamster havoc was a masterpiece? hmmm

  563. You have no idea... by oliverk · · Score: 1

    ...how many times I laughed, thinking this was a joke. What the fcuk is this name? What the fcuk have I been waiting for since I WAS TWELVE?!?

    Embarrassed? Shit, guys...I'm downright offended. I live in Marin and tonight I'm going for a bit of a drive over to the 'Ranch to tell George to shove this title back up his ass where it came from.

    I cannot believe its this bad. I also cannot believe I'm 32 and care this much :)

    --
    ---- Please be nice in case my Slashdot karma ~= my real life karma.
    1. Re:You have no idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Go TP George Lucas's ranch!!! I would!!!

  564. Official Clone Action Figures! by Bonker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Collect them all!

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Official Clone Action Figures! by Menoyoda · · Score: 1

      The clone action figures look exactly like the originals but with a mustache and goatee (ala South Park and Tad Ghostal).

  565. What I think is sad..... by Vermifax · · Score: 4, Flamebait
    ...is that if the title of the first movie back in '77 had been Star Wars: Attack of the Clones instead of just 'Star Wars' (Retroactively subtitled A new hope) and then the prequel, created in '99 was given a subtitle of 'A new hope' people would be whining and bitching about how lame the title was and how it couldn't compare to any of the titles in the first trilogy. If Jar Jar had been in the first movie, he would have been loved and had figures of him sold on the black market and been incorporated as a real character in fan fiction, while Ewoks would be universally hated and have fanfiction written about 1001 ways to kill them.

    The problem is most of the people bitching, IMO, were children when they saw the movie. They saw with a child's eyes and a child's viewpoint on life. The people complaining have lost the ability to view the series through that childish viewpoint and have attached a sense of reverance towards it that will certainly get me modded down for saying this.

    I think that the people who retain the ability (or a part of it) to view things as a child are probably the ones who loved ST:TPM as I did and yes, they will even like Jar Jar.

    --

    Vermifax

    Logout
    1. Re:What I think is sad..... by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      I agree. Who cares what the title is, if the movie sux make fun of it for that.

      Of course that does leave people without somthing to bitch about until *after* they've seen the movie.

    2. Re:What I think is sad..... by Woko · · Score: 1

      I think that the people who retain the ability (or a part of it) to view things as a child are probably the ones who loved ST:TPM as I did and yes, they will even like Jar Jar.

      Children's lack of ability to criticially filter information is one of the reasons to further despise TPM. The first three films had some plot, pretensiouns of grandeur, but were enjoyed by adults and children alike as something very different.

      TPM was nothing but a marketing device aimed straight at children.

      --
      ---
      Silence is consent.
    3. Re:What I think is sad..... by Gravey · · Score: 1

      The fundamental fact of the matter is, regardless of which movie they had appeared in, the ewoks would always be the more tolerable of the two because:

      THEY DON'T TALK!

      "If Jar Jar had been in the first movie, he would have been loved and had figures of him sold on the black market and been incorporated as a real character in fan fiction, while Ewoks would be universally hated and have fanfiction written about 1001 ways to kill them."

    4. Re:What I think is sad..... by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 1

      Agreed. How many people do you actually see getting killed in Episode 1? Uhh... there's a whole bunch of droids getting chopped up. And some Gungans getting hit with lasers at the end, but who gives a shit about gungans? At least Ewoks were cute and fuzzy and made you sad when they died. Who can forget the scene where one ewok gets blasted with a laser, and another other one tries to shake him, thinking he's just sleeping or something... so sad... =(

    5. Re:What I think is sad..... by dasunt · · Score: 2

      Agreed.

      Btw, remember the Ewok movies, cartoon, and other assorted crap? Ewoks were huge (do an ebay search for ewok), and hated by a lot of folk. But, since you don't remember this, I guess its time to strap you to a chair and force you to watch all of the ewok spinoffs until you puke.

      OTOH, you gave me a nice thought: Thank god for no full-length Jar Jar movies or cartoons. There was only one Episode One.

  566. Stop Cloning around! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody loves a clone, so why don't you?

    1. Re:Stop Cloning around! by unitron · · Score: 2

      A Gary Lewis and the Playboys reference on Slashdot. Now I have truly seen it all.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  567. The real problem... by chazzf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...is that George Lucas isn't fit to direct or be otherwise associated with any Star Wars film. Of the four that have been released, which one would most fans say had the best script, the best directing, the best overall tone, and the best all around story-telling? The Empire Strikes Back. Coincidentally, this is the film that Lucas had the least involvement with.

    Who else was disappointed by the last two films, ROTJ and TPM? Hands up, I know you were. Ewoks? Jar Jar? With the three prequels ROTJ just doesn't hold up as the finisher. It took the novels (i.e., Zahn), to to that. Fire Lucas and put some Sci-Fi folks in charge, someone who hasn't tackled Star Wars. I fear George simply doesn't have it.

    --
    No statement is true, not even this one.
    1. Re:The real problem... by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      Sci-fi folks: ie someone who will pander to you as opposed to someone who will pander to the other 90% of the people out there.

      Do you troll newsgroups and spout "Worst Episode Ever" alot?

  568. uh, link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't there supposed to be a link to a source, so that we can verify this is actually true? I mean, I wouldnt put it past Lucas, but still.. some proof please.

  569. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  570. Fox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the Fox people have gotten to Lucas:
    Star Wars Episode II: When Clones Attack!!!

  571. George Lucas is slowly losing his mind by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

    As if episode one wasn't ample evidence of the Big Guy's increasing inability to write a decent script, this title should leave no doubt.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:George Lucas is slowly losing his mind by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      Like episodes 4-6 were any good either. There's just less good movies these days so Lucas doesn't have as many places to plagiarize from.

  572. George "Tony Clifton" Lucas by Scryber · · Score: 1
    I am truly beginning to wonder if Lucas, in some Andy Kaufman-esque way, is trying to see how far he can trash this monolithic phenomenon he's created and still have people buy movie tickets, merchandise, fast-food tie-ins, et al.

    Alas, I doubt he has the creative imagination left to think up something so grand, so I guess he's just totally lost his marbles.

    1. Re:George "Tony Clifton" Lucas by snilloc · · Score: 1

      I see somebody else was watching the E! True Hollywood story tonight... Andy Kaufman.

  573. Why not... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
    ..."The Clone Wars"?

    Oh well.

    1. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree: "Starwars Episode II: The Clone Wars" has a much, _much_ better ring to it.

  574. what's under the helmets... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    > what do you think IS under those stormtrooper helmets?

    Daleks!

    1. Re:what's under the helmets... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      > what do you think IS under those stormtrooper helmets?

      Daleks!


      Don't you mean Kaleds?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  575. Sounds like... by pjdepasq · · Score: 1

    The title of a movie starring Jim Rome (radio, Fox Sports). OK, clones.... what's your take?

  576. Lucas funding real human clones? by dimensor · · Score: 1

    The front-page cnn.com story raises the possibility of real human clones in the near future. I think Lucas is teaming up with these guys for a new reality TV show, based on human clones taking over the galaxy. Of course, only one clone can become the Emperor - the others having been voted off in a battle of intrigue and deceit. This is just another cheap marketing gimmick, like Taco Bell in Demolition Man but bigger. Really, though - if you've ever seen an interview with Lucas, it's clear that the guy is a dolt. I loved them as a kid, but even the original 3 movies now seem simplistic good vs. evil fare.

  577. Another Lame Title . . . by jgaynor · · Score: 1

    n filming ROTJ, lucas leaked "Revenge of the Jedi" as the title to throw off merchandise counterfeiters. Whne I heard that the title of Episode I was going to be "Phantom Menace" I blew it off as another ploy because it was, quite possibly, the worst title ever. To my shock it wasn't.

    I can only hope that this isnt the final title of this film. Lucas & Co, Please work on these titles (as well as the movies themselves).

    P.S. make the movies better too. Youre dissapointing a whole generation of fans.

    1. Re:Another Lame Title . . . by unitron · · Score: 2
      "...because it was, quite possibly, the worst title ever. To my shock it wasn't."

      Attack of the Clones is.

      See, what you said even works out of context.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  578. here's mine: by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Star Wars: Dude, Where's My Clone?

    1. Re:here's mine: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars Episode II: The Legend of Curlie's Gold.

  579. Attack of the..... by wyteravyn · · Score: 1
    A quick search at movies.com turns up these high quality movies with similar titles....

    Attack of the 60-Foot Centerfold 1995

    National Lampoon's Attack of the 5'2" Women 1994

    Attack of the Killer Tomatoes 1978

    Attack of the 50 Foot Woman 1958

    Attack of the Crab Monsters 1957

    Attack of the Giant Leeches 1959

    Attack of the Mayan Mummy 1963

    Attack of the Mushroom People 1963

    Attack of the Puppet People 1958

    Attack of the Robots 1962

    Attack on the Iron Coast 1968

    What will Star Wars III be called?!?

    1. Re:Attack of the..... by Vladinator · · Score: 1

      What will Star Wars III be called?!?

      "Plan Mine from Outa yer wallet".

      --

      "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

  580. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  581. None of the names were really that good. by bigfrigginfrogman · · Score: 1

    When I first read about the name, I actually groaned. This is would be like "Jurassic Park 4: Attack of the Rapors". However none of the move titles are that good if you think about it, A new hope, Empire Strikes back, Return of the Jedi, would sound just as corny if we heard them for the first time today.

    1. Re:None of the names were really that good. by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      A new hope, Empire Strikes back, Return of the Jedi, would sound just as corny if we heard them for the first time today.

      <GEEZER> "A New Hope" did sound corny when I heard it for the first time. "Star Wars", which was simply the name of the movie when it was first released, was much better -- but you kids wouldn't remember that. "Episode IV" raised many hopes that were eventually presumed to be false, as everyone had pretty much discounted the possibility of a prequel when 5 years or so passed and Lucas had seemingly gone on to other things.

      Of course, when the prequel finally came out, many people wished it hadn't, or that it had been done much, much differently. Lucas could not possibly have made the Star Wars franchise into the success it is had he actually started with TPM. </GEEZER>

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
  582. Re:cloned army of jar jar by Kalani · · Score: 1

    What have you got against Lisp?

    --
    ___
    The ends are ape-chosen, only the means are man's. -- Aldous Huxley
  583. er, no by Scryber · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You may be right on the title part (even "Star Wars" is a really goofy name once you parse it out), but there is no way Jar Jar would have ever been accepted, children audiences or not.

    Recap:

    3PO: anthropomorphic robot, comical

    Chewbacca: unintelligible, cool alien, badass cool character

    Jar Jar: unintelligible, annoying as shit

  584. Why wasn't this posted earlier? by Julius+X · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This may seem like a flame--and it probably is, but why the reluctance to post this news bit?

    "was among the onslaught of readers who submitted"

    I know I submitted it nine hours ago, and it was almost immediately rejected. I figured someone else had already submitted it and that it would be up on the Frontpage almost immediately. Yet, hours go by, and still no news.

    If anything would qualify as "news for nerds"--I figure this would. Why the delay?

    --

    -Julius X
    remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
    1. Re:Why wasn't this posted earlier? by savi · · Score: 1

      I've submitted the same story from two different slashdot accounts before, and the story was rejected for both accounts. About 36 hours later, it was posted. *shrug*

    2. Re:Why wasn't this posted earlier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Why is this insightful?

      Boo hoo, my submission wasn't posted and now I can't brag to my moth^H^H^H^Hfriends about how my story was posted on slashdot.

    3. Re:Why wasn't this posted earlier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron.

      He wasn't whining--it seems like he didn't even care about getting his submission posted, he was just asking why it wasn't posted by SOMEONE earlier.

    4. Re:Why wasn't this posted earlier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Jackass.

      Don't bother pretending that you aren't the original poster...

  585. Fortunately, we now have The Matrix. by agutier · · Score: 1

    Epsiode one was nothing but heart break. It promises to get worse. I'm hoping that The Matrix trilogy will be as facinating as the original Star Wars trilogy was. (Although, Swordfish was a bad sign.)

  586. It could be much worse by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2
    Just remember, kids, it could be much much worse...

    Lucas could try to remake the Star Wars Christmas Special and toss wookies into the fray. :)

  587. bubba.kuro5hin.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stress test http://bubba.kuro5hin.org !!!

  588. Anyone else who think this might be a troll? by rahl · · Score: 1

    Because I sure haven't seen any confirming links..

    --
    Reality is indistinguishable from any sufficiently advanced fantasy.
    1. Re:Anyone else who think this might be a troll? by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      Yeah me.

      I just can't believe anyone would be stupid enought to use a title like that.

      Then again maybe it was an intelligence test by Lucas of the movie execs ... guess they failed.

      Pete

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
  589. My first thought... by icebeing · · Score: 1

    When I heard this title "Gawd, he musta been playing WAY too much Paranoia!". Oh wait! I get it...Star Wars 2, WILL be about Paranoia, with a Dark Jedi Sith Computer, on a nasty space station where everyone has five clones before they die... OK, Timmy, time to take that 60-lb pill...rectally! Seriously...I knew the clone wars were gonna show up, but I expected it in Ep. 3! Now, "Clone Wars" woulda been a better by-line! Ice.

  590. One more depressing sign... by presearch · · Score: 1

    ..the future is now. And it sucks.

  591. Is Lucas a Clone? by wyteravyn · · Score: 1

    What if Episode I and II are worse than the originals because Lucas is no longer working on them? What if it is a clone of Lucas?

    1. Re:Is Lucas a Clone? by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      What if it was actually the orignial lucas who did this, and that was why it suxed.

      What if they killed the clone because he came up with a good script?

  592. I'm so afraid!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it'll be about the private-owned science labs cloning people, then Dubya Bush sending in his riteous gang of conservatives to stop them. He'll have a red light saber like the one they used to cut off his skin lesions... George Lucas just isn't trying any more... Apparently Jar Jar influenced his decision.

  593. Waaaaa! /. won't let me post my comment. by Enigma2175 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    I think they are getting serious about redundant posts. This is the error I get:
    Easy does it! This comment has been submitted already, 276987 hours , 8 minutes ago. No need to try again.
    By my reckoning, this is ~31 years ago. I had no idea /. was storing articles for that long. They must have a machine that has the date wrong and has already hit the 1.0e9 seconnd since the epoch.

    --

    Enigma

    1. Re:Waaaaa! /. won't let me post my comment. by cvd6262 · · Score: 1
      I got this error a couple of times too.

      I think "31 years ago" was 0 Unix time.

      --

      I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

  594. In space, no one can hear clones scream. by rahl · · Score: 1

    See the subject ;)

    --
    Reality is indistinguishable from any sufficiently advanced fantasy.
  595. To George Lucas by motox · · Score: 1

    What about : Star Wars : attack of the teenage mutant clone turtles

  596. Wish List for Scenes in Episode II by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 1

    I'll be happy if Samuel Jackson gets in a light sabre battle with Samuel Jackson. Either that, or if Yoda whoops ass on a Yoda clone. If either of those things happen, I'll be content.

    1. Re:Wish List for Scenes in Episode II by snilloc · · Score: 1
      That sounds sweet, but I'll try to one-up you here:

      Mirror-match (Sam Jackson vs. Sam Jackson), but you really don't know who wins it... all the characters assume, with some suspicion, that the "good" guy won - and then it comes back to bite them in the collective ass later on.

  597. ... by SnapperHead · · Score: 1

    Star Wars(tm) 2 - "We are going to hipe up the media a whole bunch, make a lot of money, and disappoint many fans"

    Sorry, that was Terminator 3 ...

    --
    until (succeed) try { again(); }
  598. OT: Why Real Clone Wars Aren't Gonna Happen by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 1
    We aren't going to have a war over clone rights, because people will reguard clones as human. The trend has been to assign more rights to things we would have thought of as having no rights previously, pets, fetuses, the mentally handicapped, etc., not the other way around.

    People who assume clones will be considered less than human are assuming turn of the (20th)century attitudes are more prevailant than they currently are. They're predicting our past, not our future. (Don't tell me that those who don't remember the past are doomed to repeat it, that cliche doesn't mean that everything that happened once will happen again.) With possible Trilateral Commision maneuverings aside, the historical trend has always been that generally people don't lose rights, they gain them. (The exceptions are when the rights of one group [and I do mean rights, not privilages] conflict with the rights of another group. You could say that Roe v. Wade made fetuses lose rights, but you could also argue that it allowed women to gain them.)

    So if clones are already starting off being considered humans at this early stage of things, they probably won't ever fall into the inhuman category. That short circuits most clone wars scenarios right there. I would guess that most of those stories were written as a response to fears of racial wars (which were not so long ago considered a real threat)and not intended to be true predictions of the future.

    1. Re:OT: Why Real Clone Wars Aren't Gonna Happen by spongman · · Score: 2
      actually if you think about it, clones make the best soldiers. for a few reasons:
      • you don't have to recruit, they're born into slavery, err.. service.
      • you can breed the perfect soldier then just copy him, you don't have to weed out those that can't cop physically (or even psychologically).
      • spare parts are easily accessible, blood transfusions and transplants are guaranteed to take - you don't need dibilitating immune-system-draining drugs in your MASH units. the dead/injured can be repaired or frozen for spares.
      • the uniform's easy to make - one size fits all ;-)
    2. Re:OT: Why Real Clone Wars Aren't Gonna Happen by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right... society will accept that right after they accept that one identical twin has no rights and the other does. After all, one is just the clone of the other. I would hope they'd have the decency to at least let twin #1 be the master of slave twin #2. You'd hate to sepatate siblings. :)

  599. The best part? Even CNN readers think it sucks. by Vladinator · · Score: 2, Funny

    Check out the results from this poll over on CNN. Yep, even non geeks think it sucks ass, but about 2/3rds.

    --

    "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

  600. Bit off more than he can chew, maybe... by s390 · · Score: 2

    as Ridley Scott's "Blade Runner" is the defining "clones" (replicants) film, and it was both film noir and serious, with tech taken for granted. Lucas will have a hard time surpassing it with any space opera or FX tricks. And his film will be measured against it, and likely found very wanting. At the very best, he might get parity, but I don't think he's that good. He does fairy tales set in the far future with whizbang high tech. Even he know's he's not a serious auteur - his films are just so many not-so-cheap cheezy circuses.

  601. Isn't this a documentary? by Pedrito · · Score: 2

    I mean, I read the story on CNN today: here

    And I thought Lucas was on the cutting edge. He's just talking about today's news. Not to mention my opinon of Slashdot. At least you could reference a more respectable institution, like CNN instead of George Lucas. At least CNN doesn't do reports by Jar Jar.

  602. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    Ten minutes in, I wanted to shoot myself. Twenty minutes in, and my wife was openly wondering if this constituted the sort of spousal abuse that would get her more than 50% in the divorce.

    Heh, I played it smart. I waited for my friends to go first. As a result of their reports, I didn't even bother to see the movie until a couple of months ago ($1.99 rental). I watched it late at night after my wife went to bed.

    The next morning, I fast-forwarded to show her the stupidest parts and we shared a laugh.

  603. Oh, God... by bflong · · Score: 2, Funny

    Weird Al is going to have a ball with this one.

    --
    Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
  604. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man you put it exactly, I have been trying to explain this to people ever since Episode 1 came out how Jerry Lewis has no business being in Star Wars. It's bad enought that coporate americuh has destroyed almost every song or show from my childhood. Now it is being done by the origonal creator.

  605. marching clones. by spongman · · Score: 3, Funny
    singalong with lucas...

    oh when the clones!
    oh when the clones!
    oh when the clones come marching in,
    I want to be, in that number!
    oh when the clones come marching in.
  606. At least we'll have stormtroopers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least we'll have stormtroopers. :P to all those people who said I was full of @#%$ back in the early 90s when I said those troopers were cloned.

  607. Probably a fake by mattlmattlmattl · · Score: 4, Redundant

    "Attack of the Clones" is probably meant to mislead merchandise counterfeiters, as "Revenge of the Jedi" (remember that one?) was before they changed it at the last minute to "Return of the Jedi". This way, all the fake merchandise will be easily recognizable because it'll have the wrong name.

    My $.02.

  608. anti-science? by athagon · · Score: 2

    so are we to believe that the new Star Wars movie will be subliminally trying to convince us that cloning humans is bad? if so, this is one movie i'm going to avoid! =D

    --
    I think, therefore, I'm smarter than our president.
  609. Clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a Paranoia module.

  610. Give it a chance by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I'll find myself in the minority (it's OK, I'm used to that: I'm a leftist in Colorado). I thought that, Jar-Jar aside, Episode one was quite good. I saw the original when it came out many many many times in the theater, I was in the target audience for all the toys for Star Wars/Empire/Jedi. In spite of all that, I thought Episode one stood well as a prequel.

    --
    this is getting old and so are you

    blog

  611. Karma Suicide! by JBowz15 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It had to be done by someone...

    Natalie Portman stars in "Attack of the Hot Grits"
    (Rated R for nudity)

  612. Why on Earth wasn't in named by St3phen · · Score: 1

    Star Wars: Episode II: The Clone Wars ??!

  613. Re:... a ploy-You bet! It starts in Italy! Read! by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    Italian doctors plan to clone up to 200 human beings!

    My bet is that they try to make an entire TdF team of Marco Patanis or mix 'n match with Mario Cippolinis (good sprinters, but tend to drop out too soon.)

    Anyway, the Clone Wars will begin with a sereptitious scratching of Lance Armstrong by a mysterious french agent who will then attempt to build a team of TdF riders of their own. After that it's just a matter of time before Italy launches an attack on L'Alpe d'Huez, claiming some old boundary from Roman times and there you have it, Clones, War and a Star cyclists! (Yeah, I'm going though some serious TdF withdrawl here...)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  614. Wrong Half by bwoodring · · Score: 1

    You got the wrong half of RotJ. It was the first half with those stupid Ewoks that sucked. The space battle and the lightsaber duel were awesome.

    1. Re:Wrong Half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ewoks werent' bad. they were kindof cute, until the end

    2. Re:Wrong Half by osgeek · · Score: 2

      Well, I think of the first half as the part with the Jabba ship and the race through the forest on the bikes. After that, the Ewoks appear and I can't stop retching until the final credits. Yes, the lightsaber duel was cool.

      I can never get (what I think was) the Mad Magazine version of the space battle. There was a big sign within the super Death Star that said, "Don't Shoot Here." Seems like Lucas had run out of ideas by that point and had to rely on the same plot element as the first movie. Any other redeeming value in the space battle was bludgeoned to death by the delivery of Billy Dee Williams' lines.

  615. Dr. Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we left it up to Western European tech, we'd still be watching Dr. Who special effects. Suck my dick you socialists punks. American owns this planet!

  616. Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    After many years of watching bits and pieces of all the movies but TPM over the years, I've come to the conclusion that Star Wars sucked ass all along but is so constructed that it's difficult to notice.

    Lucas was a devotee of Joseph Campbell, the late comparative mythologist, and he used Campbell's work as a paint-by-number set for generating the plot of the first movie, by his own admission even if not in so many words. (By "first movie" I mean the first one that was actually made, now called Episode 4 but originally called just "Star Wars".) It's filled with motifs we expect to see in great stories, so our minds naturally associate it with being a great story. Aided by the admittedly competent cinematography, we are presented with the semblence or illusion of a good movie. This blinds us to the plot holes, the shallow characterization, the cliched dialog, and the shoddy acting that it typical of the series.

    Plot Holes: Try, for example, to reconcile the timeline of ANH with what is now known to be required for even the beginning of Jedi training. Luke can't have had time to learn much on Tattooine, and he only has the time during the trip to Aldaraan for serious instruction. How long does this take? There's nothing in the movie to suggest that more than a day or two passes in transit, possibly less. And Luke's starting out as a teenager, when even Anakin at 8 (or is it 10? I forget) is thought by Yoda to be too old to begin.

    Shallow Characterization: All the characters are very close to their archetypes. There are many assumptions we therefore automatically make about them, and Lucas doesn't have to do very much work at all to make them "pass" for deep ones. And he doesn't.

    Cliched Dialog:"I can't believe he's gone." (Luke about Obi-Wan. He'd known him, what, a week or less?) "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." (Han about the Jedi. Substitute the appropriate weaponry and it could have come from a spaghetti western.) "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers." (Leia to Tarkin. How many times has the plucky revolutionary said something similar to the dictator in numerous other settings?) Et cetera.

    Shoddy acting: Alec Guinness' opinions on this are well known, but even so he and the other few competent actors deliver even the most hideously bad lines in a credible manner. Unfortunately, they don't have enough screen time to make much of a difference. Seen Mark Hamill in anything lately? There's a reason for that. He was bad enough in ANH, but he really showed he didn't have it in RoJ. When he tries to sound mystical he sounds stoned. For serenity we get vacancy. Instead of firm resolve we get a sort of vague assurance. Man he was bad. Carrie Fisher wasn't much better in the first movie, but at least she improved in the craft after a few years. Harrison Ford might have been good enough, but he failed to rise to the level of genius it would have taken to break Han out of the "rogue with a good heart underneath it all" mold.

    If after thinking about it all in these terms I had any doubt about the quality of the story, I simply have to think about TPM. If Lucas ever had it, he's lost it. There just isn't any enthusiasm left any more. He should have been thinking of the people who'd been waiting almost 20 years for that film, not the 10 year olds the promotional tie-ins were designed for.

    Or maybe he was, and this was the best he could do. Oh well. It could have been a lot better.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
    1. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by Omerna · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Plot Holes: Yeah, but Luke is the "last of the Jedi" so he'd be eligible if he was 42 and bald.

      Shallow Characterization: Hence the wide-spread appeal! People know who to love and who to hate, and Lucas backs this up. (People's emotions about the characters make them seem "deep" like you said.)

      Cliched Dialog:"I can't believe he's gone." (Luke about Obi-Wan. He'd known him, what, a week or less?) "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." (Han about the Jedi. Substitute the appropriate weaponry and it could have come from a spaghetti western.) "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers." (Leia to Tarkin. How many times has the plucky revolutionary said something similar to the dictator in numerous other settings?) Et cetera.

      The lines might be cliches, but they're effective. To me, the movies weren't about romance. First and foremost they were action movies (with a smattering of several religions thrown in for flair and "depth").

      Shoddy acting:By my count, only two actors were "stars" (Guinness and Ford, and Ford not until later). What were you expecting? I agree with the sentiment, but wasn't the first movie made with very low budget (I could be wrong, if I am forgive me) so they had to deal with bad acting, and had to keep the same people through the series.

      Unfortunately the 10-year olds are where the money is. Not many people above 10 are going to get their Moms to buy figurines (of which Lucas gets a big cut). Nothing you can do...

      --


      No sig for you.
    2. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by dimator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I really never noticed any of the points you mentioned, after whatching all 3 movies umpteen times each. Could it be that the original 3 were movies that were more than the sum of their (bad) parts? I mean, the stories were simple to follow. The good/bad polarity of light/dark sides of the force was absolute, easy enough for all us 4 year olds to understand at the time. And IMO, the special effects played a HUGE part as well.

      All these attributes served to make the original series stand out in all our minds, not to mention our young, impressionable minds at the time. (E.g., in my mind, Transformers will always be the greatest cartoon of all time, even though I can barely sit through the non-sensical episodes now.)

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    3. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      No one says that Star Wars is a great movie in the respects of great dialogue, great plot, great acting, great cinematography, etc. Star Wars is considered a great movie because it was practically the first of it's kind and it was a complete surprise when it came out. When you're 10 - 15 years old, you don't need a lot to convince yourself that a movie is great, just a couple of explosions, and some cool characters/role models. I don't care how cliche Han Solos dialogue was or how archetypal his personality was, I want to be Han Solo! Blasting people away on the Death Star, running around with a huge man-dog, and completing kessel runs in less than 12 parsecs! I also want to be able to cut peoples arms off in bars with a lightsaber and use jedi mind tricks to get girls!

      Of course there are better movies out there in terms of pure filmmaking genious, but not many got into the hearts and minds of young people back in 77. Not many got kids picking up varous plastic tubes and recreating lightsaber fights in their kitchen. But that's what Star Wars did and that's why it's considered great.

      Lucas tried to recreate the experience for todays kids with TPM but it just didn't work. You can't recreate the mysticism and originality of Star Wars today because everything's been done already. Todays kids have their role models in the Power Rangers or Pokemon. Lucas shouldv'e just stayed true to the fans and made a sequel for the people that have been waiting 10 years for it.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    4. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by bored · · Score: 1
      Shoddy acting:By my count, only two actors were "stars" (Guinness and Ford, and Ford not until later). What were you expecting? I agree with the sentiment, but wasn't the first movie made with very low budget (I could be wrong, if I am forgive me) so they had to deal with bad acting, and had to keep the same people through the series.

      Didn't Carrie Fisher (SP?) say during one of the SCI-FI channel intervies that the actors playing Hans,Luke and Princess were grouped in threes because of some contract obligation and that Lucas ended up with Fisher and Hamilton because he wanted Ford so badly? Apparently, Ford had already done some pretty impressive stuff.

    5. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2

      Yes, I was thinking of Peter Cushing. I was thinking about horror film actors and got them confused.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    6. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
      And yet, strangely, we believe him. We feel it. Same for all the other cheesy dialogue, which fits the archetypes that you berate above so well that we can suspend our disbelief.

      Which was pretty much my point. The line seems le mot juste right at that moment. It's only when you stop to think about it that you realize why it seems so. It was exactly this moment in the film that made me realize Lucas had made a simulacrum of a great film and not an actual one.

      Re: Hollywood blockbusters. No, I haven't seen any lately except for "The Mummy II". Which I could also poke numerous holes in, especially in terms of historical accuracy, but why bother? Unlike Star Wars, The Mummy doesn't have legions of drooling fanboys that want to make it into much more than the fun bit of schlock it ever was. The fact is, the prevailing opinion among geeks is that Star Wars is much more than a thing "only as good as it needed to be, but made with flair and gusto." Does The Mummy rate its own category on Slashdot? This is exactly why I felt the need to write the original post in the first place, although I do wish I hadn't written it so hastily. There were a few points I could have expressed better.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    7. Re:Star Wars all sucks, but it's hard to notice by hyacinthus · · Score: 1

      "('Are you an Angel?' is bad dialogue made unbearable by bad performance)"

      In "Perceval" by Chretien de Troyes, when young Perceval first sees a group mounted knights riding in the forest, he takes them for angels, because he's never seen a knight before.

      "Are you an angel?" isn't bad dialogue; it's dialogue with special resonance, and I think it very likely that the resonance with "Perceval" is deliberate. (Another point of similarity: when Perceval leaves his mother and rides off to try to become a knight, he looks back to see his mother falling as if dead. Anakin's mother's advice to her son is, "Don't look back. Don't look back.")

      hyacinthus.

  617. cheesy by tankrshr77 · · Score: 0

    Leave it to Lucas to ruin his movie empire in just a few years

  618. Lame Name by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Attack of the Clones? How "B" movie is that? eh?

    Movies that usually have a title containing "attack of..," "weekend at...," or "bikini.." are usually failr bad movies. I guess Attack of the clones is better then "Weekend Attack of the Bikini Clones," but it's still bad.

    Why couldn't it just be called Episode II, The Clone Wars... or something to that degree. Ehh, who am I kiding, I'll still see it... I just hope Jar Jar doesn't get cloned... I'll walk out.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  619. What I wouldn't give... by NortonDC · · Score: 2, Funny

    What I wouldn't give for the ability to have a separate threshold for comments marked as funny...

  620. The CBG said it best... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Star Wars: Episode II: Worst Episode Ever"

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  621. Clones! by sandalwood · · Score: 1

    Oh no! Clones! Run for your lives! The clones are attacking! It's clones! Oh my god! What are we going to do about all these clones! Clones! They've been cloned! And they're attacking! Noooo! Make the clones stop! It's the attack of the clones! Help! Help!

  622. That's weak, try this... by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about "The Death Of Jar Jar?" Or maybe "Jar Jar's Slow, Painful, Torturous Demise?" Or en espanol, "La Dia De La Muerta De Jar Jar?" Anything with Jar Jar dying, I'll pay $15 bucks to see. Maybe "Jar Jar Gets Flung Into A Blender and C3P0 Sets It To Puree?"

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
  623. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Bird is a good analogy given number of Jim Henson creations in the third movie. When a Star Wars movie uses burping muppets for comic relief, you know it's all but over.

  624. "A New Hope" sucked worse by Pope · · Score: 1
    To me, it'll always be Star Wars, not this "A New Hope" crap.

    It's bad enough that Lucas feels the need to put "Episode One" and "Episode Two" in the new titles, like we all suddenly forgot. Ugh.

    PS. See you all opening weekend! :)

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:"A New Hope" sucked worse by tankrshr77 · · Score: 0

      I don't care about the titles, as long as the movie doesn't suck. (Like all but seven seconds of episode 1)

  625. If Truth-in-Advertising applied to movie titles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be called Episode II: The Emperor Mails It In

  626. Clones, War, Trauma, etc. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    if Lucas agrees to please kill off Jar Jar

    Well, if Lucas actually cloned a whole bunch of Jar-Jars that'd really start a war, y'know, fans vs. Lucas. Might^H^H^H^H^HWould be nasty.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  627. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I ever got 5 minutes with George Lucas -- I would spend the first minute letting him read this comment and then say -- "George this is how we all feel..." -- But anybody who remembers the Ewoks smashing Stormtroopers in ROTJ had to see this coming....I mean hell even Jar Jar aint so bad when you figure the Ewoks paved the way for him.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  628. Attack of the sheep ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a baaaaad feeling about this.

  629. Media smoke and mirrors by Nathdot · · Score: 1

    Can't you see George Lucas is just feeding the press misinformation to protect his precious baby?!

    If he came right out now and called it "Attack of the Pod Racers" we'd all know the basic plot long before it's release schedule

    :)

  630. Don't you get it?? by scrimmer · · Score: 1

    Hear me out; I'm not trolling. I think the biggest disappointment with Episode I, and I'm assuming what will happend with Episode II, is the fact that so many people had entered theaters with too many expectations. As an earlier poster mentioned, most of us saw the original movies when we were kids. Being young, we had fewer and different expectations of each movie. Now that we've aged, we've come to expect the new installments in Lucas's saga to be better than the last, and frankly, we've placed very _unreal_ expectations on these films. I am one of the very few people that I've discussed the issue with that actually enjoyed TPM for what it was. I entered the theater with absolutely no expectations whatsoever, and wasn't disappointed in the slightest. Everything (movies, pizza, happy meals, playgrounds, et. al.) was much larger, and much more grandiose when we were kids. Let's all be careful not to apply our current adult perspectives to a series of movies we've allowed to become hallowed and legendary in the youths of our minds.....

  631. The REAL trilogy is that everybody is waiting for. by efuseekay · · Score: 2

    ...is of course Lord of the Rings. It has such coooooool names : The Fellowship of the Rings, The Two Towers, The Return of the King (guess where Georgie ripped Jedi from...).

    Attack of the Clones?! Bwahahahahahahah! Wait, that sounds like such a cool sig....

    --
    Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
  632. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  633. "attack of the clones" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be every drag queen's nightmare.

  634. think of a better name for episode 2 by seann · · Score: 0

    honestly.

    --
    I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  635. Who cares about the title? by kypper · · Score: 2
    So long as Jar Jar dies, brutally, and Natalie Portman gets naked, we'll all be there with bells on.

    Oh yeah, and no more Anakin goin 'YIPPIE'!!!

    Orgasmic.

  636. What the hell is wrong with you George??!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    listen george, if you read this or any other posts i hope you know that you are screwing every fan boy over who ever lived to see your big screw ups (jar jar binks, ep2 name) i can not believe the name of your epic starwars is going to receive a name so far below the belt that it hurts everyone in the world who has seen it.. goodness, did u even try to read it out loud and see how it sounds first? did u even run it by some studio execs to see if they cared? oh my G, this man is insane i tell yall! you have pissed me off for the last and final time, screw you and ur f'ing star wars crap!

    1. Re:What the hell is wrong with you George??!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said it!!! The guy is an insane greedy asshole!!

  637. Surprise surprise.... by Vermifax · · Score: 1

    Contrary to slashdot conventional wisdom, both children and adults enjoyed TPM.

    --

    Vermifax

    Logout
  638. Wow by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

    They actually managed to come with a title dumber than 'The Phantom Menace'

  639. here's another: by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    Star Wars: Episode 2: The Secret of Clone Inish

  640. Batman: The Animated Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, can't say I have seen him in a good movie in quite some time, but he gets mad props for doing the voice of the Joker in BTAS.

  641. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by dimator · · Score: 2

    No matter how much Ep1 sucked my ass, I'll still go see Ep2. The entire star wars brand has so much damn momentum now, it doesn't matter if the next one was just footage of a bear taking a shit in the woods; it would still break box office records, morons would still buy stupid plastic toys like there was no tomorrow, and Lucas would hemorage even more money.

    You'll go see it, I'll go see it, we'll all try to get opening night tickets.

    (Note: I read the "scriptment" (which was a generalization and organization of all the ep2 story rumors and leakages) on theforce.net before it was taken down. Sounded like a bunch of crap to me, aside from maybe Yoda getting into a lightsaber duel.)

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  642. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

    > But anybody who remembers the Ewoks smashing Stormtroopers in ROTJ had to see this coming

    Yeah, I thought the scene where Leia came out of the Ewok's home wearing her nightgown would have made a much better meme for him to follow up on.

    At least we would know where Wookies come from.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  643. Am I the only one with a brain here....? by pudge_lightyear · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Star Wars movies are not movies as many of you morons are reducing them too. A minor bump on the road (menace) does not deter my faith in the series. A title that you geeks don't like does not deter my faith in the series. I just can't compare one of the most influential events of my generation to any other mere movie. I think that Lucas has earned the credit you should give him. Even in Menace, he displayed things that we've never before seen. And remember, he is responsible for us being jaded to the special effects. Wake up and realize. You can't criticize a star wars movie and you can't criticise a star wars title. A Star Wars movie is (before production even) above every other effort Hollywood can even try. That's why the minor thing of a title appeared as a headline here and has gotten more responses than anything here lately (and in very little time). And that's why it'll be here pretty steadily until it comes out in the theater.

  644. It's a joke by Hobobo · · Score: 1

    I'll bet my honor this is a joke pulled by some lame hacker. Wait for a few days and it will be pulled off probably. Lucas is not this stupid.

  645. god damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everybody knows that it should be Episode II: The Clone Wars

  646. documentary of IBM versus the Clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is a documentary of an event a number of years ago.

    IBM dominated the PC market. The clones came in and kicked some buttox. IBM was defeated but not destroyed. I'm still not sure how apple fit in the story.

  647. Top Ten Rejected Titles for Ep 2 by jbuhler · · Score: 3, Funny

    10. Plan 9 From a Galaxy Far, Far Away
    9. I Married a Dark Jedi
    8. It Came from Tatooine
    7. Die, Jedi, Die!
    6. Will Success Spoil George Lucas?
    5. Evil Sith 2: Army of Clones
    4. Urotsukijedi
    3. Pod Racer Summer
    2. Midichlorians: the Awakening

    And the number one rejected title for Star Wars Episode 2...

    1. Surf Gungans Must Die

  648. what's in a name ? by beanerspace · · Score: 2


    When I first heard the title would be "Attack of the Clones" ... I thought to myself ... hmmmm ... I guess Plan 9 from OuterSpace and BattleField Earth were already taken.

    Well, let's hope that the new Star Wars doesn't suck as bad as it's name suggests.

  649. The real SW test! by Ashcrow · · Score: 1

    If Chewy isn't in it ... it sucks!

  650. What about the Raelian Saga or Raelian Conflict? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cloning is the stupidest thing to come out of science that i can think of at this moment. cloning + humans = - evolution sheep + jesus's brother = cult :)

  651. Take it in a new direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call it "Star Wars: Episode II -- Labor Disputes of the Banta Farmers" and follow star Mandy Patinkin's life as an old, heart diseased union representative.

  652. I think we're all missing the big picture here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes the names of the old Starwars movies so great? Yes... if you look at them without having had the "Starwars experience" they are definatly packed with cheese. So, isn't the real thing we're all bitching about the fact that the real reason the old movie titles are viewed as being so great by most of us is that the movie made the title big not vice versa? Think about it, how many movies in the US sell tickets because of the title? "Pearl Harbor" "Planet of the Apes" "Lost in Space" have their own amount of cheese, but they have a HUGE story backing them. So I think what most of that big arsed run on sentance is trying to say is that we would all much rather see it named "Episode II:The Clone Wars" because it has a story behind it. Then again, I'm 21 so what the hell do I know. :-) Cheers :-)

  653. Specifically.... by Vermifax · · Score: 1
    ...I wasn't saying that SW was a childs movie, but that the majority of people who remember if fondly, were children when they saw it.

    Lots of things for children contained violence in any case. Saturday morning cartoons had more violence in them then some movies I wouldn't have been able to watch.

    --

    Vermifax

    Logout
  654. Poster for SWII: Atta-a-a-a-ck of the Clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy. http://www.sonic.net/~nbs/clones.gif

  655. It was dark. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TPM is essentially prologue. It's setting the stage for what will happen in the rest of the series. The atmosphere (one I think Lucas didn't do that good a job of portraying) is that of an idyllic Republic that's soon to fall apart. It makes no sense for such a movie to be dark,

    Except that it is dark. Thousands of people get killed in a war, with the only result being that Darth Sidious/Palpatine/The Emperor gets control of the Republic. The whole movie is, like the Republic, candy-coated on the outside, with a rotten core of hubris and arrogance on the part of the good guys (Qui-Jon and Kenobi) and evil triumphant (Palpatine-Sidious, Anakin starting on the path to becoming Vader).

    The problem is that Lucas overestimated his adult audience, expecting that they would pick up on those things. And so a bunch of half-wits scream and yell "it sucks!" because it went over their heads.

  656. Lucas Lost it by thornad · · Score: 1

    But it is important to remember those things that impressed us as children when the original trilogy came out and made us feel like life is wonderful and somwhere outthere there is an adventure waiting for us, that will transform boys into men and dream into reality. That feeling has nothing to do with Lucas though. It's all within you. Jut like the force. I don't think Lucas has ever been a genius of any kind. He exploited mithology motives to create a cartoon. It turned out much better than that and inspired a lot of people, because the symbolism of the movie actually talked more to those who saw the movie than to those who made it. Remeber, what you felt seing those movies was not Lucas's intetintion. He just wanted to make money and a cartoon. It's been proved with his last episode and the title of the one to come. So, if you feel disappointed with his last work, you're right, it sucks. I wish people boycott at least the first 3 days of "Attack of the clowns". that would be soo cool. :)

  657. Re:Clone wars - read Frank Herbert (The Jesus etc) by bored · · Score: 1
    Parenthetically, Herbert followed this 20 years later with a trilogy: The Jesus Incident, The Lazarus Effect, and The Ascension Factor. It's really some of his best work, aside from the Dune books.

    I'm often shocked how many 'Dune fans' haven't read those three books. Personally, I think they are better. They left a much greater lasting impression on me. Oh, and by the way... The Zerg in Startcraft are a lot more like the monsters in these three books than the Aliens in Alien. The Big Gas bags, the wormy larva things, the hydrolisk (sp?) etc.

  658. Re:The real face of scifi fandom & the geek commun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't feed the trolls.

  659. This whole thread is SO yesterday by anser · · Score: 1

    It's time for the real scoop. Which of these titles is NOT under consideration?

    Episode III: Jedi Kids
    Episode III: Darth Takes a Holiday
    Episode III: For A Few Clones More
    Episode III: A Tatooine Christmas
    Episode III: Click Here To Purchase Title

  660. StarWars: disgrace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An online petition has formed, maybe we can fix this.. http://www.petitiononline.com/Smith01/petition.htm l

  661. Re:Yeah, it's like watching Big Bird go into the o by rlowe69 · · Score: 2

    Get over it, man. Star Wars is a children's franchise. It was never good to begin with, so why expect it to be the pinnacle of film now?

    Obviously flamebait. But you expect it to be better because Lucas should be better after 20 years of great filmmaking. Don't you think?

    --
    ----- rL
  662. Bishop: Android or Human? by dmatos · · Score: 1

    Really? I could have sworn that when he gets whacked with the wrench, his ear almost comes off and he starts leaking white goo. I thought that was part of the point, how the company was still lying to Ripley. I don't have the movie with me now, so unfortunately, I can't check.

    I guess I can't explain the reaction to the suicide unless he's some sort of super-android, who has had an "emotion chip" installed.

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  663. Get Over it, Already!!! by rdean400 · · Score: 1

    Those who are complaining about "Attack of the Clones" should get a grip. 1) That title fits in with the others (it rates about the same on the lame-o-meter as "Empire Strikes Back" or "Revenge/Return of the Jedi") and 2) It's a MOVIE.

  664. Episode III by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    Attack of the Jedi Tomatoes!

  665. What Lucas really wanted but was too afraid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they do what they really want to and call it STAR WARS EPISODE II: IN COME THE CLONES. I mean really that is what they were really thinking wasn't it?

  666. Now At Blockbuster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Attack of the Clones" on DVD.... you can find it next to the always popular "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes."

  667. Re:The real face of scifi fandom & the geek commun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why in hell I should worry about what the so-called "average Joe" thinks about me? This sounds like facism. from a nerd who likes Matrix and PowerGirls, if it's important