Slashdot Mirror


User: mverrilli

mverrilli's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
33
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 33

  1. Re:This is stupid on Tom's Investigates Hard Drive Warranty Changes · · Score: 2, Insightful


    All 20 bad? Seems unlikely the batch was a good random sample of drives from Samsung.

    Sounds more like there were a box of drives that needed to be shipped back to Samsung because they were already determined to be bad drives... or maybe they all came from the same production line which should have been recalled.

    You took a gamble on drives of dubious origin (or dubious destination :p) and lost.

    Either way, you probably could have contacted Samsung directly and received an exchange.

  2. Re:slashdotted on Multi-Touch Keyboard Technology · · Score: 1

    In a surprise move, the two scientists began shoving the new keyboard up each others' asses simulatneously, while using the new keyboard technology to stimulate the colon and the G spot, respectively.

    Do moderators even read things before they brand them as Informative?

  3. Who's next? on Google sued as PetsWarehouse Lawsuit Continues. · · Score: 1

    Will Slashdot be sued next for posting this story?

  4. Truste? on Failed Dot-Coms Selling Private Info · · Score: 1
    These companies were Truste approved sites before their failure.

    Who here really believes Truste means anything?

  5. Re:Ask not for whom the bell tolls... on Copyrant · · Score: 1

    Inventing a new socket is one thing, pressuring other companies to drive competition out of business smells like antitrust to me.

  6. Just do what I did... on Best Way to Get Kids Started in Programming? · · Score: 1

    Give them an IBM PCjr with a 360k floppy, no programs and cartridge basic. ;)

  7. Poll on Gnutella's Wall Of Shame? · · Score: 1
    There's a poll on the main page:

    "Should the Wall of Shame Stay or Go?"

  8. Re: hmm... on Software And The Death of Privacy · · Score: 1

    the solution is simple - if you want privacy *learn* about the technology The right to privacy should not have any prerequisites.