Water doesn't line up in perfectly straight lines like that. It is lens flare, which is consistent with wearing goggles or glasses in real life as well.
It isn't really a problem as long as Facebook has nothing do do with the generation of the clicks, it just changes how much the clicks should be worth. If Facebook is running the bots or paying someone to run them, (which wouldn't really surprise me) then it is a problem.
The first post is in response to the summary, if it merely says something that's in the summary it would be correct to mod it redundant. Note that this is a hypothetical point, and in this case the moderation seems odd.
Adding one symbol, if it is not required or encouraged by the password policy, does increase the effective strength significantly since a brute force attack will generally leave out symbols to reduce the search space a the cost of missing out on the relatively small number of passwords that use them. However, if it is required, all of the passwords will use them resulting in an overall loss of strength since there are fewer symbols and most people will use exactly one.
Too bad there isn't a place where people can access the internet for free, regardless of economic standing. While we're at it, lets put a bunch of books there for people who can't or don't want to buy their own so they can educate themselves as well.
Science classes at pre-college levels rarely distinguish between things that are "known" to be true and things that are useful models that fit the evidence.
Well if they don't hide the fact that you can't get a signal in the screen and seats area, you'll probably know where you have to go to get signal. This would probably save them the liability of a lawsuit and they could even bill it as a feature of their theater.
Slashdot Mirror
Just assume that anyone that actually pays attention to the built-in spell checker is reasonably intelligent.
Water doesn't line up in perfectly straight lines like that. It is lens flare, which is consistent with wearing goggles or glasses in real life as well.
They aren't bothered by smart people being able to get guns. There aren't enough of them to make it worth worrying about.
It isn't really a problem as long as Facebook has nothing do do with the generation of the clicks, it just changes how much the clicks should be worth. If Facebook is running the bots or paying someone to run them, (which wouldn't really surprise me) then it is a problem.
Winning the bet now and then doesn't mean it isn't gambling.
Putting it into the ballot box doesn't mean you have to count the paper ballots, they're just there if anyone wants to verify the machine's results.
The first post is in response to the summary, if it merely says something that's in the summary it would be correct to mod it redundant. Note that this is a hypothetical point, and in this case the moderation seems odd.
More fun to leave it at work, convince the trackers you're secretly putting in 128 hours of overtime a week.
Written speech is frequently quite different from spoken speech even when spelled and pronounced "correctly."
Adding one symbol, if it is not required or encouraged by the password policy, does increase the effective strength significantly since a brute force attack will generally leave out symbols to reduce the search space a the cost of missing out on the relatively small number of passwords that use them. However, if it is required, all of the passwords will use them resulting in an overall loss of strength since there are fewer symbols and most people will use exactly one.
What makes you think people with no self control are the minority?
It has to be enabled by default or most people won't use it.
This is already the way it works, however this does not apply to things that are not intended to be consumed.
Too bad there isn't a place where people can access the internet for free, regardless of economic standing. While we're at it, lets put a bunch of books there for people who can't or don't want to buy their own so they can educate themselves as well.
That would actually be every 22 hours, or more likely, every 24 hours with the requests not being evenly distributed.
Actually he's not ignoring the "if," as that's what makes it a hypothetical question in the first place.
That improves the already good bandwidth but doesn't do anything for the latency.
They sue over things which were not produced by the government but for which the government holds the copyright.
To be able to learn when "a man is talking rot" you need both positive and negative examples.
Science classes at pre-college levels rarely distinguish between things that are "known" to be true and things that are useful models that fit the evidence.
Having the user participate somewhat all the time keeps them active and aware of current conditions in case of a crisis of some kind.
Oddly enough, helping more people survive tends to lower population growth.
The best part is you don't even have to pay for the expensive wallpaper, just get the regular stuff.
Well if they don't hide the fact that you can't get a signal in the screen and seats area, you'll probably know where you have to go to get signal. This would probably save them the liability of a lawsuit and they could even bill it as a feature of their theater.
That is generally what we mean when we use the phrase 'digging up dirt on someone.' Lies don't work nearly as well.