Slashdot Mirror


'Nuclear Free' Maryland City Grants Waiver For HP

dcblogs writes "The City of Takoma Park, Md. this week granted a waiver to its public library to allow it to use some new HP hardware, whose products are otherwise banned under its 'nuclear free zone' ordinance. That law, adopted in 1983 one month after the Cold War-era movie 'The Day After' was aired, prohibits the city from buying equipment from any company connected to U.S. nuclear weapons production. The library bought new Linux-based, x86 systems from a Canadian vendor and didn't realize the vendor was using HP hardware. The hardware arrived in April and was unused until the Takoma Park city council granted it a waiver this week. The city's list of banned contractors was developed in 2004 by a now inactive group, Nuclear Free America, and hasn't been updated since."

277 comments

  1. Movies by AkaKaryuu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Movies, not reason, dictates their city policy.

    1. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Welcome to "democracy".

    2. Re:Movies by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to mention -and has been since at least 1983.

      If I was in that town I'd be pushing for it's repeal. Just like I pushed for getting rid of the ban on selling alcohol to indians in my old town. Yes, the law called them Indians.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't give a damn. Anything that keeps money out of the military-industrial complex, no matter how insignificant, gets a wholehearted approval from me.

    4. Re:Movies by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Funny

      Movies, not reason, dictates their city policy.

      You should see the stockpile of shotguns and Patrick Swayze clones they have on hand just in case Red Dawn comes true...

    5. Re:Movies by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      >>>Movies, not reason, dictates their city policy.

      It all depends upon your viewpoint. The Greeks believed that plays (which is what a movie is: a film play) can not just entertain but also educate the audience. If I recall my AP english terms correctly, they called it "catharasis".

      I guess the Maryland Democrats who run this city experienced catharsis after viewing the destruction of a nuclear holocaust, and decided to no longer be part of any weapon manufacturing business.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    6. Re:Movies by bhcompy · · Score: 2

      At least they didn't base their policy on Threads

    7. Re:Movies by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Were you successfull?

    8. Re:Movies by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Funny

      So given that Indians are no longer called Indians, does that mean that people descended from the indigenous population can be served but not the guys from India?

    9. Re:Movies by BackwardPawn · · Score: 5, Funny

      In an ironic twist, they stockpiled plutonium in case someone's DeLorean got stuck 30 years in the past. They did get a waiver for it, though.

    10. Re:Movies by Ferzerp · · Score: 4, Informative

      That word (catharsis) doesn't mean what you think it means.

      Catharsis is a purging of built up emotion/tension. It has absolutely nothing to do with education of any sort.....

    11. Re:Movies by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess the Maryland Democrats who run this city experienced catharsis after viewing the destruction of a nuclear holocaust, and decided to no longer be part of any weapon manufacturing business.

      Hmm, so the cure to war is to make sure that your side won't win if one happens?

      I've always preferred the "If thou would have peace, prepare then for war" POV....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    12. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since they come from Asia, the aren't "Native Americans" either.

      "Indians" is actually less inaccurate.

    13. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Movies, not reason, dictates their city policy.

      Do you know of any government where reason dictates policy?

    14. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By not buying HP desktops? That'll show those defense contractors who's boss!

    15. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they didn't call them Injuns.

    16. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is great, except they kept running with it even after the world left them behind. Good luck really avoiding all the companies involved in weapons manufacturing, I doubt HP is the only company that produces a huge range of products.

    17. Re:Movies by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I guess the Maryland Democrats who run this city experienced catharsis after viewing the destruction of a nuclear holocaust, and decided to no longer be part of any weapon manufacturing business.

      Hmm, so the cure to war is to make sure that your side won't win if one happens?

      I've always preferred the "If thou would have peace, prepare then for war" POV....

      You don't need nukes for that; just look at Switzerland.

      Apparently arming the shit out of your populace (with automatic rifles) is a far greater deterrent to being attacked than stockpiling nuclear weapons.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    18. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. Basically, it's Greek for "going postal" or "emotional vomit".

    19. Re:Movies by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Movies, not reason, dictates their city policy.

      Sometimes we call these "campaign shots", but yeah, that's pretty much how the system works.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    20. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently arming the shit out of your populace (with automatic rifles) is a far greater deterrent to being attacked than stockpiling nuclear weapons.

      Cool. Then we (US Americans) are covered on both counts.

    21. Re:Movies by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      The Bureau of Indian Affairs calls them that too. Shocking.

    22. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Not to mention -and has been since at least 1983.

      If I was in that town I'd be pushing for it's repeal. Just like I pushed for getting rid of the ban on selling alcohol to indians in my old town. Yes, the law called them Indians.

      At least they didn't call them "prairie niggers".

    23. Re:Movies by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      The Vulcan High Council? Oh, you mean a real government. Then, uh, no.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    24. Re:Movies by cpu6502 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you were living during the Cold War, and seen this movie, that's pretty much what it did. I've always thought an emotional purging was educational. That movie certainly made me "wake up" and realize how dangerous it is to toy with war (especially if our victims have nuclear-equipped allies like Russia).

      >>>"Just rammed it through" def'n: any legislation that passes that you don't like.

      Actually the Maryland Democrats do pass some good laws. Like the recent decision to allow a student to attend any public school in the state they choose. But the reason I said "ram it through" is because the Republican legislators have no power. They could stay at home and it would make absolutely no difference.

      As for "majority rules" Democracy..... well ask the Executed Socrates how he feels about it. He was murdered by a simple democratic vote (they didn't like his speeches so they killed him). That's why Maryland and all the other States are REPUBLICS (rule of law & protection of basic human rights), not democracies.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    25. Re:Movies by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, the law called them Indians.

      Our largest local Indian confederation refers to itself as "Indians". The Indians I've known all call themselves Indians.

      The people I've known that get worked up about using "Native American" tend to be white and middle-to-upper class.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    26. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually the vast majority of Takoma Park residents are still retired hippies, as they were when the law passed. And considering the average home price in quite a few neighborhoods is up around half a million, I doub it's "full of ... poor people".

    27. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that has more to do with not being assholes and fucking with the rest of the world. Not to mention the fact that it's a tactical nightmare to invade.

    28. Re:Movies by lymang · · Score: 1

      I am with the other poster: I don't think catharsis was what that was all about at all. It was more about scaring the SHIT out of people (and kids like me.) I was in junior high at that time and the threat of nuclear war with the USSR felt very real to me. Maybe not to all kids, but definitely to me. The Day After was really scary IMO. It didn't make me think "war is a bad thing" it made me think "we're all going to die!!"

      --
      Meh.
    29. Re:Movies by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      My wife and son are enrolled members of the Seneca Nation of Indians. I don't think they have a problem with that term.

      http://www.sni.org/

    30. Re:Movies by Bootsy+Collins · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Huh? Is this a troll?

      The reason it isn't surprising that such a law was passed in Takoma Park is because since the early-60s, Takoma Park has been famous for being a very-left-leaning home for granola-munching ex-hippies who have become financially stable boomers. For decades it was referred to as the Berkeley of the East; people in DC still often call it "the People's Republic of Takoma Park." I can't think of a time when Takoma Park was a town of "dumb rednecks"; and even now, when it's less leftist than it used to be, it's still far more that way than any place else anywhere near DC.

    31. Re:Movies by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And before that from Africa, along with every other human on the planet. The term "native" has to have some cuttoff date or it's completely useless, usually a few (or few dozen) generations suffices. Or are we now classifying every single US citizen an "African American"?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    32. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apparently arming the shit out of your populace (with automatic rifles) is a far greater deterrent

      The guns don't really matter much, except that an invader would be forced to treat the populace as combatants and inflict a high civilian death toll. Switzerland avoids attack because it is vanishingly small, protected by mountain ranges and devoid of natural resources. Politically and militarily irrelevant, in other words.

      Switzerland and its guns are like an 5lb dog barking at a 200lb mailman from behind a fence. The dog is brilliantly proud of itself when the mailman leaves the property.

      This situation does not apply to nuclear armed states.

    33. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think there is something unreasonable about opposing nuclear weapons production?

    34. Re:Movies by ebuck · · Score: 1

      I don't give a damn. Anything that keeps money out of the military-industrial complex, no matter how insignificant, gets a wholehearted approval from me.

      Do you also approve of income tax evasion? Because, compared to what the military-industrical complex is likely to get from the money that HP is likely to get from you in a year, that's peanuts to what you probably already pay in income taxes.

    35. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. But at least you can bring popcorn to their city council meetings on movie night!

    36. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't give a damn. Anything that keeps money out of the military-industrial complex, no matter how insignificant, gets a wholehearted approval from me.

      Good for you for having principals. Now please stop forcing everyone else to live by your principals by having the government enforce them instead of just voting with your own wallet. Keep in mind--when you don't do what the government says you must do, it eventually comes to a point where someone (usually the police) shows up at your house with a gun and forced you to do what they say--or they lock you up. So repeal the law because either way it supports the military industrial complex, but one way gives people freedom.

    37. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The people I've known that get worked up about it tend to be Indians, as in people from India. It's also confusing to pretty much anyone outside of the Americas, as people from India are pretty common while indigenous Americans don't go abroad as much. It can even get confusing in some parts of the US west coast where there are a lot of Indian immigrants. I don't think it's offensive; it just gets confusing if you spend a lot of time in California and Europe.

    38. Re:Movies by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Every singe world citizen should be "African". In quotes.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    39. Re:Movies by ebuck · · Score: 1

      I've always thought an emotional purging was educational.

      That's where you are wrong. You don't have to learn anything from an emotional outpour. You just get a sense of relief after it is done.

      In fact, it would probably be safe to say you are less likely to learn something when experiencing an emotional outpur, but are more likely to do something about it. From my understanding, the only time that people are more likely to accept differing points of view are when they are personaly vulnerable; however, feeling vulnerable doesn't assure that the new point of view expressed is any better than the old one they had.

    40. Re:Movies by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Just like I pushed for getting rid of the ban on selling alcohol to indians in my old town. Yes, the law called them Indians.

      Well if they were Pakistanis they probably wouldn't want to buy it anyway, it's haram.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    41. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention -and has been since at least 1983.

      If I was in that town I'd be pushing for it's repeal. Just like I pushed for getting rid of the ban on selling alcohol to indians in my old town. Yes, the law called them Indians.

      At least they didn't call them "prairie niggers".

      Holy SHIT and I thought I posted some insensitive crap.

    42. Re:Movies by steelfood · · Score: 1

      You keep using that word (cartharsis). I do not think it means what you think it means.

      FTFY.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    43. Re:Movies by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I've known some folks from Mumbai who strive to make that distinction too :)

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    44. Re:Movies by gmanterry · · Score: 2

      The Bureau of Indian Affairs calls them that too. Shocking.

      In Arizona Native Americans call their gambling properties "Indian Casinos".

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    45. Re:Movies by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Socrates was given the opportunity to leave but chose to remain on principle. As was common at the time the sentence was in practice "GTFO or die", a fine example of Athenian democracy (the classic "elections" was for banishment rather than office, gave everyone incentive not to be the least-popular guy in town).

      As for the problems with majority rule, I'll grant you those freely, but the alternatives are minority rule (which rarely goes well for the majority) or consensus, which rarely gets anything done at all and in practice devolves to minority rule since the powerful are free to collaborate outside the system without fear of censure - all it takes is a few corrupt legislators to deadlock the government and prevent interference. If you've got an idea for an alternative I'd love to hear it.

      Our current system at least grants a voice to the larger minority positions, it can be ignored, but is still more than most systems allow. The real problem is that political parties promote an us-versus-them mentality which allow the leaders of even a small majority to exercise disproportionate power, and really we have no one to blame for that but ourselves - the founding fathers specifically warned us of the dangers and we didn't listen.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    46. Re:Movies by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      The Greeks believed that plays (which is what a movie is: a film play) can not just entertain but also educate the audience. If I recall my AP english terms correctly, they called it "catharasis".

      Nope, you don't recall your AP English terms at all, because that's not what catharsis (not "catharasis") is. Cartharsis is an emotional purging, not an educational experience.

    47. Re:Movies by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's not necessarily completely accurate. I'm pretty sure I saw an article (probably here on Slashdot) a couple weeks ago that there's now a new theory that modern humans all came from Asia first, then all migrated to Africa for some odd reason, then some of those migrated from there out to everywhere else (including back to Asia).

    48. Re:Movies by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Many of them probably did, they just didn't spell it that way (at least not the literate ones writing laws). Written speech is frequently quite different from colloquial spoken speech done by the same person.

    49. Re:Movies by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Apparently arming the shit out of your populace (with automatic rifles) is a far greater deterrent to being attacked than stockpiling nuclear weapons.

      That's an interesting correlation, but the real reason is that they are smack in the middle of a continent that is connected to the main likely source of nukes (Russia), and I believe that the prevailing weather systems go that way, too. If Russia nuked Switzerland, it would be about a week (or less) before the cloud reached Moskva, and even less before the rest of the neighbors were overrunning Russia in retaliation.

      And, of course, if someone else nuked the clock makers, Russia would have a vested interest in stopping it pronto because of its proximity.

      Here in the US, the likely nuke tossers are far away and in less danger of nuking themselves at the same time. Some of them are actually fundamentalist radicals who would choose to lob a nuke if they had one just because it's US here and they want the 72 raisins. Or virgins. I mean, just look at Achmed. He's scary (but not as scary as Walter).

      Now, that's not to say that arming the civilians en-masse isn't a good thing, but it's not why Switzerland hasn't been nuked. It may be why they haven't been overrun by conventional forces of their neighbors, though.

    50. Re:Movies by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good for you for having principals

      He's a school district?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    51. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My family can trace back 10 generations in America. I have a cousin who's great grandchild can now go back 13 generations. When does my family become native Americans?

      Technically I guess it wasn't called America when they sailed over in the early 1500s. meh...

    52. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wholeheartedly approve of Federal income tax evasion for exactly that reason. Paying your federal taxes amounts to supporting evil.

    53. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily, but saying "we will never buy anything from any manufacturer that ever has a piece of equipment remotely related to the production of nuclear weapons" is pretty overarching.

      "We can't buy door hinges from this company, because there's a bunker in Nevada that uses hinges made by the same company."

    54. Re:Movies by Khyber · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What's really shitty is that HP (not to defend them given my hatred of them) is mostly involved in a nuclear capacity with regards to medicine, not weaponry.

      This is an undeserved reputation.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    55. Re:Movies by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      It was more about scaring the SHIT out of people (and kids like me.) I was in junior high at that time and the threat of nuclear war with the USSR felt very real to me. Maybe not to all kids, but definitely to me. The Day After was really scary IMO. It didn't make me think "war is a bad thing" it made me think "we're all going to die!!"

      Agreed. It was scary has hell at the time. Although the one thing I look back on and laugh about is how one of the main characters survives by ducking down in the front seat of his Volvo and surviving the shock wave. Everyone else on the freeway was vaporized. I remember thinking we really needed to get a Volvo after that.

    56. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So the voice of the people isn't real democracy?

      Don't act like media influences are anything new. Go read Ben Franklin.

      Democracy doesn't mean sound, thought out logical ideologies. Which would often take literally forever for everyone to agree to. It's the current voice of the people.

    57. Re:Movies by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      I was basically told that they were no longer enforcing it. It was just in the book I got when I moved in along with some $10 fee for running a dance hall, rules on dog registration, etc...

      I'm not sure anybody fron India has actually been within 10 miles of the town, or that the guy running the single bar cares.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    58. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you for having principals

      He's a school district?

      Wow...all those years of government schooling and I never noticed (or was taught) there were two spellings. The solution is obviously to pay the teachers more--as long as the additional paper money has never been touched by anyone who may have been in the military-industrial complex.

    59. Re:Movies by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      You might object to the phrasing of that rule/law though. Too bad I no longer have the books.

      Paraphrasing a bit: 'No alcohol will be sold to those under 16, habitual drunks, or indians.'

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    60. Re:Movies by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      As the AC mentioned, it's a specificality thing. When all you have to go on is 'Indians aren't allowed to buy alcohol', is it refering to Natives(further explanation in the rules would make that obvious) or those from India, the country?

      When I was a kid, Indian = Native American. Now that I've traveled the world a bit, I use Indian to specify people from India enough that I have to use NA.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    61. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      White people tend to be the ones who are almost always overly politically correct despite any and all rationale and reason. Mostly because they have a need to feel like they are enlightened, educated, smart, savvy and have their finger on the pulse of modern society. Basically they just do it to satisfy a desire to feel good about themselves and show everyone just how PC they are. Its purely just a self righteous motivation and has aboslutely nothing to do with being PC, they just want to be seen by others being PC. They are usually white, well to do (or the college kids type), smug, arrogant and very pretentious.

      If they really cared they would just call them people instead of some made up title. They are usually the ones who will tell anyone who will listens that they have gay friends and will address them as such like "Oh I have a gay friend bob" or "My gay friend amy" or just out of the blue "I have gay friends so you better not have a problem with gay people because I love gay people and surround myself with people of lots of different backgrounds and ethinicities".

      To me those people are just as self righteous, ignorant and closed minded as racists are. They are just reverse racists.

    62. Re:Movies by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Although the one thing I look back on and laugh about is how one of the main characters survives by ducking down in the front seat of his Volvo and surviving the shock wave. Everyone else on the freeway was vaporized. I remember thinking we really needed to get a Volvo after that.

      Who says product placement doesn't work???

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    63. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was referring to a "catharasis". I'm not sure it means anything at all.

    64. Re:Movies by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Yes, the law called them Indians.

      Our largest local Indian confederation refers to itself as "Indians". The Indians I've known all call themselves Indians.

      The people I've known that get worked up about using "Native American" tend to be white and middle-to-upper class.

      Not always the case, either. I remember when I was in college about 10 years ago and was chatting with a classmate I didn't really know that well. He said that he and his family were going to a powwow that weekend. I said, "Oh, you're American Indian?" He gently corrected me, "Yes, Native American."

      (amusing sidenote: I checked dictionary.com to see if "powwow" was one word or two. The definition includes the phrase "North American Indian".)

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    65. Re:Movies by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      That article was not that modern humans originated in Asia, but that an ancestor to all the African humans and proto-humans was in Asia, so it's just setting the cutoff point out further still.

      You can keep going back and now you're in the oceans, and the oceans have a different shape than today.

    66. Re:Movies by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the US, but such a law would be blatantly unconstitutional in Canada due to violating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (which is enshrined in our constitution). Does the US not have any part of the US constitution that forbids laws from discriminating like that? Does the bill of rights cover that, and is it part of the constitution? Not trolling, I'm not very familiar with the US constitution, only copyright law, ironically.

    67. Re:Movies by PhrstBrn · · Score: 1

      The only problem comes from the ambiguity of the word "Indians" when referring to Native Americans. Seneca Indians is fine, because I know that Seneca Indians came from America. Using the word "Indian" can be ambiguous or wrong depending on the context, since Indian refers to a group of people from Asia. Using the word Indian to refer to Native Americans just leads to confusion and is a poor choice of words.

      Seneca Indians - A native tribe from America
      Native Americans - Collection of native tribes from America
      Indians - Group of people from Asia

    68. Re:Movies by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Just simplify it: Terran. We both originated there, and are still there.

    69. Re:Movies by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You don't need nukes for that; just look at Switzerland.

      Bollocks. Not worth invading. Not on the easiest route between anywhere that's worth invading and anywhere likely to be capable of invading anywhere that's worth invading.

      There's a reason the Schlieffen plan was designed as a right hook, and it wasn't a bunch of bankers, chocolate-makers and horologists armed with pop-guns.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    70. Re:Movies by Creepy · · Score: 2

      Personally, I didn't find The Day After all that scary, having seen Damnation Alley and other movies with similar themes already (Logan's Run, for instance, which I saw on broadcast television, so it was even sanitized), but I also didn't take the threat of nuclear war with the USSR all that seriously. I didn't buy that either side would actually go through with it, no matter how much posturing was done. What person really wants to be responsible for the termination of life on earth? Neither side had anything to gain and everything to lose. I also happened to see War Games before then, and they put it perfectly - the only winning move is to not play the game. I also saw the Soviets failure in Afghanistan as sapping their will to fight. America had that in Vietnam, though we honestly we should have learned from Korea when China joined in - we had superior technology, they had millions people of people with knives and grenades willing to die for their country, and all because MacArthur had to take the last 10 miles or so of Korea to make the victory complete (and in doing so, pissed off China enough that they declared war).

      I also think it is laughable that we said we were "fighting communism," when really we were fighting dictatorships using a communist economic system. No theoretical communism was ever implemented as it was imagined, so calling it communism is a lie - it was a (poorly) distributed resource dictatorship. Go find some Amish or Mennonite communes and see how it is properly done (strong central leader is God though...).

      And yeah, I am old enough to remember duck and cover drills, which were absurd when I got older and realized how big a blast radius a fusion bomb had. Unless the bomb missed its target, anyone caught in the blast was a goner (it was second ring, so just outside of "vaporized instantly").

    71. Re:Movies by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1
      Russia is not the only antagonist ever realized by Europe: Hitler abandoned plans to invade Switzerland years before nuclear weapons were even invented.

      So no, potential nuclear fallout has nothing (or at best, very little) to do with Switzerland's record of not being fucked with. I suppose it could be posited that Switzerland remains untouched because that's were the world's elite keep their wealth, but I would wager such a statement is putting the cart before the horse.

      I mean, just look at Achmed. He's scary (but not as scary as Walter).

      Tell me about it - I've got a Walter bobblehead staring me down as we speak... man, that dude is always pissed...

      Now, that's not to say that arming the civilians en-masse isn't a good thing, but it's not why Switzerland hasn't been nuked.

      I never said anything about why the Swiss have never been nuked (for the record, neither has anyone else save the Japanese, so that's kind of a moot point). I was merely pointing out that having nuclear weapons does not equate to national security, and provided the non-nuclear state of Switzerland as my example.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    72. Re:Movies by d3matt · · Score: 2

      equal rights amendment was not ratified by the states so no it's not in our constitution.

      --
      I am d3matt
    73. Re:Movies by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      That ban could be helping everyone. Our natives here in Canada could certainly benefit from it.

    74. Re:Movies by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You don't need nukes for that; just look at Switzerland.

      Bollocks. Not worth invading. Not on the easiest route between anywhere that's worth invading and anywhere likely to be capable of invading anywhere that's worth invading.

      There's a reason the Schlieffen plan was designed as a right hook, and it wasn't a bunch of bankers, chocolate-makers and horologists armed with pop-guns.

      Non sequitur.

      My point was, and still is, a nation does not need nuclear weapons to be secure. Switzerland is merely the example I used.

      Your post only serves to further prove my words.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    75. Re:Movies by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      The only people who are offended by the term "Indian" are rich white folks.

      Hell, I'm 1/8 Cherokee, and I'm not offended by the word indian.

      Of course, that might have to do with my kids college education being paid for, and apparently the Federal Govt, will also give me $25,000 for a house.

    76. Re:Movies by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Russia is not the only antagonist ever realized by Europe: Hitler abandoned plans to invade Switzerland years before nuclear weapons were even invented.

      How did arming Swiss people stop Hitler from staring a nuclear conflagration if Hitler had no nukes?

      The statement was that arming the Swiss people was how they defended themselves, and cpu6502 started by talking in a nuclear holocaust context. I was pretty clear in saying that arming them could be a reason that conventional forces from their neighbors (e.g., Hitler and Germany) hadn't overrun them. Read all the way to the end of what you reply to, please.

    77. Re:Movies by Zordak · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Section 1 of the 14th Amendment:

      All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

      The 14th Amendment was not part of the original Bill of Rights, which was only concerned with limiting the power of the federal government to infringe on people's rights. The states could do almost anything they wanted within the limits of their own state constitutions. The 13th (ending slavery), 14th (civil rights), and 15th (right to vote regardless of race) amendments were passed after the civil war, and the southern states were forced to ratify them as a condition of being re-admitted to the Union. Under the 14th Amendment, most of the Bill of Rights now applies to the individual states.

      This law is almost certianly unconstitutional under the current 14th Amendment jurisprudence, but somebody would have to challenge it first. Since it's apparently not being enforced, it's not likely that anybody is going to bother with challenging it.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    78. Re:Movies by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Why dont we start and end with "Classification: Human".

      --
      Good-bye
    79. Re:Movies by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Without sticking 'American' in there, how do I tell the difference from an Indian from India?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    80. Re:Movies by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      You can't.

      I'm just not offended by it.

    81. Re:Movies by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

      Our lawyers will be contacting you shortly. Prepare to be both legally and bodily violated. We will make you sorry you were ever born.

      XOXOXOX,
      The Church of Scientology

    82. Re:Movies by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      then all migrated to Africa for some odd reason,

      What "odd" reason? It's probably because it was arse-freezing cold and the only portable heating tended to kill people from smoke inhalation!

      Clearly, South Florida is the new Africa. _

    83. Re:Movies by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      What about Chicago's policy on all companies that operate there must disclose whether or not they made money from slavery?

      http://articles.latimes.com/2002/oct/06/nation/na-slavery6

    84. Re:Movies by fluffy99 · · Score: 2

      No more unconstitutional than all the other procurement regulations that steer business to black, women owned businesses (often at significantly higher prices too).
      As much as I'd rather see regulations that forced the govt to buy american made products, I know all too well how much paperwork and micromanagement such BS rules create. I'm tired of filling out the paperwork to prove that the monitor I'm buying is handicap accessible.

    85. Re:Movies by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I'm now in Alaska and there are a number of dry towns due to the problems associated with natives and drinking, and Alaska law supports them.

      However, in Alaska it's non-discriminatory - EVERYBODY in those towns have to be dry, be their heritage native, european, or other.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    86. Re:Movies by alexo · · Score: 1

      Just simplify it: Terran. We both originated there, and are still there.

      Are you sure?

    87. Re:Movies by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      No, the Vulcan High Council has proven time and again to be a self-serving political caucus that lives by what is "right and moral." Mind melding? Scary cultist shit. Time travel? Not logical, not possible.

    88. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how it worked when dogs were re-classified as wolves.

    89. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The Indians I've known all call themselves Indians.

      All the ones I know call themselves Hopi, Zuni, Pima, Apache, Acoma, Dine, etc. When they rarely tall about the tribes as a group, they call themselves native.

    90. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention -and has been since at least 1983.

      If I was in that town I'd be pushing for it's repeal. Just like I pushed for getting rid of the ban on selling alcohol to indians in my old town. Yes, the law called them Indians.

      At least they didn't call them "prairie niggers".

      Holy SHIT and I thought I posted some insensitive crap.

      Any adult person who gets offended by a word needs to learn to stop wetting their bed.

    91. Re:Movies by Dr.+Gamera · · Score: 1

      In other towns, cops carry radar guns. In nuclear-free Takoma Park, they carry Geiger counters!

      (Alas, not really.)

    92. Re:Movies by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Available evidence suggests we were well on our way to being human before we started harnessing fire - so not until long after we reached Africa.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    93. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also think it is laughable that we said we were "fighting communism," when really we were fighting dictatorships using a communist economic system. No theoretical communism was ever implemented as it was imagined, so calling it communism is a lie - it was a (poorly) distributed resource dictatorship.

      Haven't all the "communist" nations been like this?

    94. Re:Movies by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Works for me, but it severely hampers discussions of anything that involves genetic, geographic, or cultural distinctions, and there are a lot of perfectly legitimate reasons for doing so. And there will only be more as we begin to actually understand the true genetic differences between various branches of humanity.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    95. Re:Movies by wcrowe · · Score: 2

      I'm part Indian (the American variety) and I used to roll my eyes when people would say "Native American". However, as you pointed out, there is a sizable number of Asian Indian immigrants in the U.S. now, and it can get confusing. I don't know what the solution is. I still don't like "Native American", it just has too many damn syllables to be practical.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    96. Re:Movies by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      Yes, the law called them Indians.

      Why not?

      According to a 1995 US Census Bureau set of home interviews, most of the respondents with an expressed preference refer to themselves as American Indians or Indians

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    97. Re:Movies by Muad'Dave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Negative: I am a Meat Popsicle.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    98. Re:Movies by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Russia is not the only antagonist ever realized by Europe: Hitler abandoned plans to invade Switzerland years before nuclear weapons were even invented.

      How did arming Swiss people stop Hitler from staring a nuclear conflagration if Hitler had no nukes?

      Maybe because that wasn't the damn point.

      The statement was that arming the Swiss people was how they defended themselves, and cpu6502 started by talking in a nuclear holocaust context.

      Had I responded to cpu6502, you would have a good point.

      I did not, therefore you do not.

      I was pretty clear in saying that arming them could be a reason that conventional forces from their neighbors (e.g., Hitler and Germany) hadn't overrun them.

      And I was pretty clear in asserting that possession of offensive nuclear capabilities is not necessary for national defense.

      Read all the way to the end of what you reply to, please.

      That street runs both ways, mon frere. Had you read and understood my original post, and the post to which it was a direct response, you probably wouldn't be wasting time trying to argue a point that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    99. Re:Movies by dbkluck · · Score: 1

      That, and living at the top of some big, steep mountains that any attacker would have to climb up whilst being shot at. If thou wouldst have peace, move to Denver.

    100. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your solution for peace is to arm everyone with automatic rifles?

      I don't see how thats supposed to work.

    101. Re:Movies by jbburks · · Score: 1

      Because if the only classification were "human" then smaller subgroups could no longer claim discrimination or disadvantage for special privileges.

    102. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rules on dog registration

      Which I read as dog segregation. >.>

    103. Re:Movies by rossdee · · Score: 1

      But didn't the radiation get him in the end - he fainted in the hospital, and when he woke up he had a black tag tied onto his toe. (Or whatever they used for triage cases that weren't going to survive.I guess even a Volvo doesn't stop neutrons (remember that neutron bombs were designed to kill soviet tank crews.

      Say do I need to check my HP desktop with a Giger counter?

    104. Re:Movies by Angrywhiteshoes · · Score: 2

      Yes, the law called them Indians.

      Our largest local Indian confederation refers to itself as "Indians". The Indians I've known all call themselves Indians.

      The people I've known that get worked up about using "Native American" tend to be white and middle-to-upper class.

      I'm an Indian and I only make white people call me whatever the latest politically correct term is, I think there was something like "the people who lived her before the palefaces arrived."

      Get over your labels and don't be so afraid of history that you had nothing to do with.

      On the other hand, it would be hilarious if it also barred Indians from India from getting liquor.

    105. Re:Movies by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      He is insofar right as the catharsis in Greek Tragedy comes after an act of hubris, of self-overestimation and generally being full of it. After the hubris, the personality develops, enabling catharsis to purge the crap that made the hubris possible in the first place. Educational, indeed.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    106. Re:Movies by Zordak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I agree with you personally, the ladies and gentlemen in the black robes do not. (Or more precisely, at least five of them have disagreed with us enough times.) I am often disturbed by the logical contortions those judges go through to justify institutional racism. (And it's not even "reverse racism." It's just racism.) How they think we can cure racism with more racism is a mystery to me.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    107. Re:Movies by afidel · · Score: 1

      filling out the paperwork to prove that the monitor I'm buying is handicap accessible.

      But that's impossible under the ADA since blindness is a recognized disability.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    108. Re:Movies by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      I always make sure to say "east Indians" when referring to Indians from India if there's any chance of ambiguity.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    109. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the word "injun"? Short, sweet, and to the point.

    110. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without sticking 'American' in there, how do I tell the difference from an Indian from India?

      That's why I always qualify it when I use it in speech... "Enrique called tech support and got an Indian (dots, not feathers) on the other end of the line."

    111. Re:Movies by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      At least they didn't call them "prairie niggers".
      Well, if they were trying to be offensive to Indians, they would have failed because back then, the N-word was not offensive, it was just what they were called, just as they are called African Americans today,until such time as we decide that that is also offensive (as we have previously done with Negro, Colored, and Black).
      I guess people just feel good that every time we stop using an offensive term for a temporarily non-offensive one, it buys us 10 years of pretend racial harmony.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    112. Re:Movies by tompaulco · · Score: 0

      Savages?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    113. Re:Movies by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      When all you have to go on is 'Indians aren't allowed to buy alcohol', is it refering to Natives(further explanation in the rules would make that obvious) or those from India, the country?
      I'd guess India, the country. otherwise they would have said "fire water".

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    114. Re:Movies by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      filling out the paperwork to prove that the monitor I'm buying is handicap accessible.

      But that's impossible under the ADA since blindness is a recognized disability.

      Also deafness and buying computer speakers, but we have to look for products that have been formally evaluated per section 508 of the US Rehabilitation Act for things like whether the buttons have the braille dots, etc. So you recognize the stupidity of this yes? Even worse, the last Obama executive order to control IT spending has resulted in a process where we are spending $100 in labor to justify buying a $5 computer mouse. We're now spending 10% of our IT budget on approvals and paperwork.

    115. Re:Movies by Imrik · · Score: 1

      Written speech is frequently quite different from spoken speech even when spelled and pronounced "correctly."

    116. Re:Movies by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Without sticking 'American' in there, how do I tell the difference from an Indian from India?

      If you can't tell just by looking, then ask.

      If they answer "Native American", then they're Indians.

      Otherwise, they're Indian-Americans....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    117. Re:Movies by couchslug · · Score: 1

      It's a deterrent to being attacked by your own government, and embeds capability for revolution among the masses. Fitting since the US was founded by Revolutionaries, not the conformist fucks who pretend to be patriots today.

      Yes, Uncle Sam has lots of tech, but the US is huge and as Iraq points out, you can't be everywhere at once. Even an Assad can't contain little Syria, and the US has more firearms than people.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    118. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I hear "Indian", my first question is "dot or feather?".

    119. Re:Movies by kyrio · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. Recent discoveries put our origins farther in the east.

    120. Re:Movies by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      It seems to have worked out reasonably well for the Taliban in Afghanistan. A low-intensity "harassment" war against a vastly superior enemy can be surprisingly effective. It's not enough to take cities, an occupier must control the countryside and logistical channels in a country to have any chance at actually controlling it, and to do so requires such massive manpower, technology, and expenditure that eventually it becomes not worth it.

    121. Re:Movies by Denogh · · Score: 1

      equal rights amendment was not ratified by the states so no it's not in our constitution.

      What does this have to do with women's rights?

    122. Re:Movies by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Whether you call them Indians or not, you go anywhere official and they're called Indians. (I don't call them that, and I try and beat into people's heads that they're not from another country...)

      Good example... B.I.A. = bureau of Indian Affairs

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    123. Re:Movies by dissy · · Score: 1

      What's really shitty is that HP (not to defend them given my hatred of them) is mostly involved in a nuclear capacity with regards to medicine, not weaponry.

      That raises an excellent point. Is chemotherapy and radiation therapy both illegal in Takoma Park?
      Do they really let cancer patients die due to this ban? Or are they all just hypocrites who take advantage of a technology when it benefits them but deny it to others when it benefits someone other than them?

    124. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were in that town, you'd be living in northern VA.
      Go there, and you will know what I mean.

    125. Re:Movies by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Some people refer to them as Indian Americans (just to add to the confusion I guess)

    126. Re:Movies by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Isn't that exactly what they've done? At some point a majority of people (or at least their representatives) decided that they didn't want to support the M.I.C. with their wallets, and so officially instructed their employees (every government official) not to do so. Since then at worst not enough people have cared enough to repeal the policy.

      They're not forcing anyone else to abide by their principles, just their employees who are spending the money they gave them as taxes on their behalf. If the Board of Directors of a company issued a policy restricting spending in such a manner I doubt you'd have a problem with it, what's the difference here? I'll admit government can get pretty disconnected from the people at the federal level, but at the city level they're typically pretty accountable if their shareholders (the people) care enough to make an issue of it, especially in a smaller town.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    127. Re:Movies by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Nope; maybe if I'd been there for a few more years. As was I was the newest guy in the town by about a decade.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    128. Re:Movies by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I thought "Aboriginal" was the North American term for its native peoples (Australia's term is Aborigine). Two fewer syllables.

      But, it turns out Aboriginal is mostly used only in Canada. The term includes Inuit (formerly known as Eskimo) and Metis.

    129. Re:Movies by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Simple - the fact that the entire frakking population is a trained and armed militia really discourages invaders. Who wants to try to conquer a country where every single housewife and hipster street poet is ready and able to fight back? It's just not worth the trouble unless you intend to completely eradicate their population, and if they're not threatening you why would you waste the manpower?

      As for violence between citizens - well how many punks, irate drunks, etc. are going to threaten their neighbor knowing full well their neighbor is well armed and trained to use it?

      It's the same reason as for the 2nd amendment in the US

      A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

      We just sort of lost sight of the militia part when a large standing army was established and act like it's there for hunters and gun nuts. which is a damned shame. A militia is a powerful defensive force, and defends against domestic oppression as well as invaders. I seriously doubt the abuses of the Occupy protesters would have been nearly as excessive if the police knew that every person there had an assault rifle.

      Whether between nations or individuals, Mutually Assured Destruction is a strong promoter of civility.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    130. Re:Movies by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      The US misses on the "mandatory male military service" bit, though, which is *why* they're given rifles to keep and trained on them in the first place.

    131. Re:Movies by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 2

      ...That's why Maryland and all the other States are REPUBLICS (rule of law & protection of basic human rights), not democracies.

      REPUBLIC doesn't mean what you think, either. From Webster: Republic - a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.

      Our protection of basic human rights comes from the constitution, not from being a republic.

    132. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because niggers.

    133. Re:Movies by kcin · · Score: 0

      busy body

    134. Re:Movies by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

      I have never once heard that term used here in America, to refer to American Indians, so you are probably mistaken.

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    135. Re:Movies by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

      White people tend to be the ones who are almost always overly politically correct despite any and all rationale and reason. Mostly because they have a need to feel like they are enlightened, educated, smart, savvy and have their finger on the pulse of modern society. Basically they just do it to satisfy a desire to feel good about themselves and show everyone just how PC they are. Its purely just a self righteous motivation and has aboslutely nothing to do with being PC, they just want to be seen by others being PC. They are usually white, well to do (or the college kids type), smug, arrogant and very pretentious.

      If they really cared they would just call them people instead of some made up title. They are usually the ones who will tell anyone who will listens that they have gay friends and will address them as such like "Oh I have a gay friend bob" or "My gay friend amy" or just out of the blue "I have gay friends so you better not have a problem with gay people because I love gay people and surround myself with people of lots of different backgrounds and ethinicities".

      To me those people are just as self righteous, ignorant and closed minded as racists are. They are just reverse racists.

      My kingdom for a mod point.

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    136. Re:Movies by dasunt · · Score: 1

      If I was in that town I'd be pushing for it's repeal. Just like I pushed for getting rid of the ban on selling alcohol to indians in my old town. Yes, the law called them Indians.

      What's exception about calling the indigenous inhabitants of America "Indians"? Yes, it's based on an inaccuracy, but there are plenty of Natives who use the term "Indian" for themselves.

    137. Re:Movies by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Not to mention -and has been since at least 1983.

      If I was in that town I'd be pushing for it's repeal. Just like I pushed for getting rid of the ban on selling alcohol to indians in my old town. Yes, the law called them Indians.

      Some immigrants from the Asian subcontinent must be pretty confused that they are singled out for the ban when their Pakistani neighbors are not. Of course, maybe the lawmakers realized that most Pakistanis are Muslims and therefore not supposed to drink alcohol.

    138. Re:Movies by Jonner · · Score: 1

      I guess the Maryland Democrats who run this city experienced catharsis after viewing the destruction of a nuclear holocaust, and decided to no longer be part of any weapon manufacturing business.

      You might be insightful if the Maryland Democrats had actually decided to no longer be part of any weapon manufacturing business. However, they apparently had nothing against high explosives, chemical or even biological weapons. They made policy based on viewing a fictional account of a nuclear holocaust and completely ignored historical holocausts accomplished without nuclear weapons such as the vast majority of destruction during WWII.

    139. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's really shitty is that HP (not to defend them given my hatred of them) is mostly involved in a nuclear capacity with regards to medicine, not weaponry.

      This is an undeserved reputation.

      Ummm, no. HP equipment was heavily used for atomic weapon testing. Lots and lots and lots of oscilloscopes, lots of them.

    140. Re:Movies by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      How they think we can cure racism with more racism is a mystery to me.

      All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    141. Re:Movies by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      When someone says "American Indian" how do you know they're not talking about an American who moved to India?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    142. Re:Movies by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the bit where I said it was mostly used only in Canada. There are references to "American aboriginal" and similar in google results for aboriginal, so I couldn't flat out say it was exclusive to Canada.

      Anyway GP said he didn't know what the solution (alternative) to "Native American" might be. Aboriginal is at least an alternative to consider.

    143. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the law mentioned in the article or by the parent poster bring me to a recurring question of mine:
      being from Germany and always reading about laws in US cities, counties, or whatever, I always deeply wonder how such small entitites can have legislative powers which seem so far reaching. [I think the only things German cities can set are the fines for littering et cetera]
      What kind of laws can cities create? I guess it varies from state to state, how far reaching are those powers?
      For an extreme example, can some 5 person city declare driving on their roads a crime punishable by death?
      Isn't it in everyday live extremely complicate to not step over any of those laws? For example, while passing through foreign cities during travel and not knowing the exact wording of their law ...

      I think it's pretty complicated to have more than 50+1 different legal systems ;)
      I don't get why one would want such small entities self-governed to such an extent. Normally the smaller the amount of people is, who vote on something, the easier they stagger into enacting some cruel and unusual laws - at least that's my feeling when I read about what weirdnesses are codified in law at some places.

    144. Re:Movies by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      How did that law define Indians? If a person calls himself Apache and not Indian, then wouldn't that change things?

    145. Re:Movies by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      When you said bodily violated, I assumed that you were pretending to be an alien, that was intending to do an anal probe. Then I saw "The Church Of Scientology". I guess that I was right!

    146. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd push for the repeal of your useless apostrophe. It's means it is.

    147. Re:Movies by HArchH · · Score: 1

      Democracy at the lowest possible (aka smallest population size) is the only form that really works. But I bet this city is a republic which elects a city council that makes these kind of decisions and policies.

      I might think it is a stupid policy, but it doesn't affect me and it doesn't matter what I think. Or you. Unless you live there. And if you live there and you don't like the policy grow a pair and organize to do something about it.

      Apparently, based on this case, it's not a rule they feel too strongly about. If it was they would have a standard clause in their contracts jamming the requirement on their suppliers and they would have forced a refund via the courts.

      So maybe the time is ripe for some sanity to reign?

    148. Re:Movies by HArchH · · Score: 1

      I think it is likely that you are trying to mislead us.

    149. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not this PC shit again. Why don't you ask some "Native Americans" if "indian" is offensive? Maybe you'll figure out the joke after you've explained WTF a "Native American" is to them. (CAPTCHA is "amalgams")

    150. Re:Movies by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Equality is what matters. Cut the power cord off and it complies.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    151. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't segregate dogs. You segregate wogs.

    152. Re:Movies by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The only time I've ever heard "aboriginal" or "aborigine" used in the US is to refer to Australia's population. Many people here have heard the time, but I don't think they know the term can refer to something other than Australian bushmen.

    153. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'aborigine' is the noun, 'aboriginal' is the adjective here in Aus.

    154. Re:Movies by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      But look at how many bureaucrats you're keeping employed.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    155. Re:Movies by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      But look at how many bureaucrats you're keeping employed.

      I'm thinking more alon gthe lines of how many bureaucrats my tax dollars are keeping employed. They micromanage the hell out of little things, yet the gross problems like the GAO office throwing lavish conferences and major contracting fraud go unnoticed.

    156. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, this is slashdot - calm, sane sounding responses aren't allowed here.

      (No mod points... so thanks)

    157. Re:Movies by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Given the size and location of the town? I'm not sure they'd have been able to locate Pakistan on the map. Heck, given that it was conceived in 1930 and declared in 1933, I'm not sure it existed when they wrote the law.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    158. Re:Movies by kmoser · · Score: 1

      You mean Idiocracy.

  2. Restraint of trade by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    How much funding does the city have set aside to fight off 'illegal restraint of trade' lawsuits?

    1. Re:Restraint of trade by Akzo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably nothing, they can choose who they hire and purchase goods from legally.

      --
      Sig is for Signature, so you don't have to manually sign every post.
    2. Re:Restraint of trade by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      It's not banning sale of goods from those companies within the city, it's just the city government itself that can't buy them. A lot of government entities have whitelists of vendors... this city just happens to use an (outdated) blacklist instead.

    3. Re:Restraint of trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know that that's true. Most governments have rules in place about needing to accept bids and choose the supplier that provides the most service at the lowest cost. If you're allowed to ban a company because another arm of their operations also makes equipment in another field what would stop any place from just deciding who they want based on kickbacks and just writing the rules to ban every other offer because their logos are the wrong color or they don't use recycled paper.

    4. Re:Restraint of trade by beerdragoon · · Score: 1

      Governments who make purchases using public funds (i.e. tax dollars) are usually required to go through some purchasing process which generally makes them choose the vendor that meets their minimum requirements and has the lowest price. In this case I would say the whole "not affiliated with nuclear weapons development" rule is probably one of these minimum requirements.

  3. If you've ever visited Takoma Park... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ... then you'd realize that this was the least of their worries.

  4. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, if say, Intel and AMD. Both fund a bit of nuclear stuff, the city cant buy PC's?

    1. Re:LOL by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      PCs in Maryland function in much the same way their automobiles are driven.

      Hordes of monkeys fighting for control of an abacus.

  5. Of all the stupid laws.... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1, Troll

    Really? Can not buy anything from a company that is related to US nuclear weapons production? Really? What a stupid do nothing make everybody feel good while accomplishing nothing lets all hold hands and sing Kumbaya crap law!
    I guess they don't use any gasoline since the oil companies sell fuel used to move nuclear weapons. Or any Aluminum since they use Aluminum to build the missiles...
    Yeah this made such a difference....

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Of all the stupid laws.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really? Can not buy anything from a company that is related to US nuclear weapons production? Really? What a stupid do nothing make everybody feel good while accomplishing nothing lets all hold hands and sing Kumbaya crap law!

      No, wrong problem. The REAL problem is that HP is involved in US nuclear weapons production. And now Microsoft is making their computer manufacturing partners very very angry, and one of those manufacturers is HP...

      Stay away from the Redmond, WA area for the time being, is all I'm saying.

    2. Re:Of all the stupid laws.... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      At least they tried to use what little influence they had in a manner consistent with their values. I respect that. The boomers were still young enough at the time for America collectively to be tilted a bit towards idealism. Now everything is a sellout.

    3. Re:Of all the stupid laws.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might respect it. I find nothing but derision like the parent poster. Their values were based off of feelings and little else. Feelings by and of themselves have LITTLE connection to reality and can lead you down rather dark places. It's from feelings that you find the atrocities that the Nazis and the Stalinists committed. There's others and it's mankind's DARKEST hours that find Feelings as the sole source.

      When facts follow follow feelings, that is, when you adjust what you see as facts and values solely off fo feelings- only tears follow.

    4. Re:Of all the stupid laws.... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      You know, you right-wingers would be more bearable if you didn't snivel so much. Man up, man, and stop whining so much.

    5. Re:Of all the stupid laws.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah this made such a difference....

      It might, if more cities and businesses signed on to it.

      We have enough nuclear weapons now to annihilate every living thing on Earth multiple times over, and yet, realistically, we only need to do it once. So, why all the excess? Punctuation?

    6. Re:Of all the stupid laws.... by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      You won't go anywhere with that. Whining, keeping a martyr complex, feeling persecuted albeit being in a decidedly privileged position,and, also, whining is part of their modus operandi. It basically defines them. It's a quite educational experience to see a basically decent conservative movement getting overrun by the nutcase fringe during one's lifetime, isn't it?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    7. Re:Of all the stupid laws.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the only way to be sure.

    8. Re:Of all the stupid laws.... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Not at all. The fact the law is still around shows how dumb it is. The US and Russia are both reducing the number of weapons the US has about half the number from when the law was made.
      Even better the US has not made any more nuclear weapons for a while.
      Let me give you an example of this kind of stupid laws.
      A town had huge problems with hookers and drugs. You could drive down the main street and see them dealing right off the sidewalk. So they outlawed the topless bars.
      Did nothing but looked good. Same as this stupid law which is at best selectively enforced since I am sure that buy products fuel for their cars and software from microsoft.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  6. Just need a couple amendments by cellocgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe they should extend the ban to companies involved with biowarfare (agar, petri dishes, thermal control chambers), or to cyberwarfare (Microsoft, RedHat, and your son's best friend who became a script kiddy last night).

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    1. Re:Just need a couple amendments by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Can we add in support for fertilizers, chemical precursor agents too? Dupont, Firestone, and Daewoo just to name a few companies. Let's ban civilization while we're at it. Then the granola munchers can go back to living in caves and leave us alone.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  7. Try to keep up, people. by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Nuclear free" is sooo 1980s. It's all about "greenness" now. You need to update your pc checklists monthly.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Try to keep up, people. by kevkingofthesea · · Score: 2

      Why don't you quit shoving your PC-ness down my throat?

    2. Re:Try to keep up, people. by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Well, that's the issue, isn't it. Whether or not HP is PC.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Try to keep up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP has been selling PC-compatible computers for decades.

    4. Re:Try to keep up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I WANT THE TRUTH!

      EVEN IF IT'S ONE SIDED MILITARISTIC IGNORANCE!

      Free speech for the war mongers. The ones that say might makes right, so get the fuck out of my country if you don't love it exactly like I do.

    5. Re:Try to keep up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and whether or not they have Windows Automatic Updates enabled.

      They should keep an eye out for the Flame update though. Technically it's an attempt to hinder nuclear proliferation in Iran. They might want to get that one.

    6. Re:Try to keep up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only person who ever told me to move to another country was a liberal democrat who was upset I did not tow the line on Obamacare. I was told if I don't like it I should move to South Africa. So while you may be right and some Republicans may use this arguement, in my experience it is not as one-sided as you would have people believe.

    7. Re:Try to keep up, people. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      The green movement and the anti-nuke movement basically co-evolved. You would see the same people on both demonstrations in the 80s. Nothing to upgrade there - just a slight shift in priorities from the sane part of the population.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  8. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Hey, how did all these dead insects end up in the grill of my Prius?" exclaimed the militant vegan...

    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a homophobe?

  9. Maryland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole state is a subsidiary of the defense industry.

  10. Re:Ilegal alien vote by brokeninside · · Score: 0

    Because illegal aliens tend to be anti-nuke?

  11. Abandon principles once money's involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical posturing twits.

  12. ...And also allows what they fight over... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

    Umfortunately the city government still allows the worst nuclear offender of all -- people with penises.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  13. Seventh-day Adventist Church by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

    Takoma Park has long been a center for the Seventh Day Adventist Church, and 7DAs tend to be pacifists.

    1. Re:Seventh-day Adventist Church by jdavidb · · Score: 0

      I'm pacifist, too, but I also believe in letting people buy whatever computers they want! And I also believe in not pushing my beliefs on other people. After all, if you're pacifist, and other people don't want to believe that way, what are you going to do? Shoot them?

    2. Re:Seventh-day Adventist Church by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Takoma Park has long been a center for the Seventh Day Adventist Church, and 7DAs tend to be pacifists.

      If you're a pacifist, you're against all weapons of war, not just the ones that have only been used twice.

  14. like Steve Jobs security clearances to sell Pixars by peter303 · · Score: 2

    When Pixar was still a hardware company making graphics accelerators, Steve sold one to a DOD contractor. He had to get a security clearance to do so. Someone got the clearance data using FOI and posted a couple weeks ago. Both this and Nuclear Free Zones is some extreme government bureaucracy.

  15. If you lived in that town... by mekkab · · Score: 2

    ahhh, Takoma Park, MD! If you lived in that town, you'd be pretty pissed about the waiver, actually.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:If you lived in that town... by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      Depends on who you are. There is exactly one chain restaurant in Old Town (a Subway), and someone threw a brick through their front window the week it opened. Going to protests is a normal Friday social activity for a lot of people there, and rent control makes it possible for people to live there that couldn't afford anywhere nearby otherwise.

      That said, it's a great town in a lot of respects. (I lived there for a while.) It has kept a lot of small-town charm despite sharing a long border with the District of Columbia, and it has some of the best little shops and restaurants in the surrounding areas.

      But you're right, there are a few people who see the waiver as the beginning of a slippery slope.

  16. Mod Parent Up by mekkab · · Score: 0

    I can corroborate the above post. And when you add any precipitation to the mix, Marylanders lose their minds (both with respects to automobile driving and computer usage).

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can corroborate the above post. And when you add any precipitation to the mix, Marylanders lose their minds (both with respects to automobile driving and computer usage).

      Yeah around here it is like that. A light rain and people drive like there's 4 inches of ice on the roads. I think it's because my area has a very large percentage of old people so they tend to drive slow as fuck anyways.

      If you routinely drive slower than the (already too low) speed limit it is because you do not have the alertness and the reflexes to feel safe driving at a reasonable speed. This is a sign you should not have a license. If you can be 98 years old and keep up, cool, glad to see it. If you are 41 and can't handle it, then you can't handle it and are both a nuisance and a threat to everyone else. I want these selfish dicks off the road.

      My state loves to talk about how "driving is a privilege and not a right" so I don't see the problem here. Course they could start by actually training new drivers on how to handle the automobile, how to correct without overcorrecting, the importance of not panicking, the stupidity of behaviors like tailgating and drifting over the median, etc. All they seem to care about is that you memorize enough road signs. Pathetic.

      Maybe Google's automated cars will take care of the old people problem and the morons who do these stupid behaviors. And they are stupid. If you benefit from something at the expense of others, that's selfish. If others benefit at your expense, that's altruistic. If nobody benefits and everyone suffers from a behavior, it's just plain fucking stupid.

    2. Re:Mod Parent Up by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I've been in Maryland.

      Try Memphis. Despite the lower population density (across the metro area) we've got people that think it's NASCAR time when it rains, and most have no clue 'How to computer.'

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  17. Why is this News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many cities and other municipalities have ordinances like this. Why is this one instance news? If a municipality decides to operate under these constraints, it seems like something that only the citizens of the municipality would really care about.

    Unless maybe HP wants to apply external pressure, so they hire someone to post internet messages, create a disproportional external response to this internal rule to try to overwhelm them and force additional waivers or repeal?

    I should disclose that I live in a city that has several of these ordinances. We ban work with nuclear manufacturers, bio- and chemical weapon manufacturers, companies with investments in apartheid (that need to be reviewed and repealed), companies with investments in countries with human rights abuses, companies that invest heavily in tobacco and oil, and all sorts of other things. Our city council also vigorously weighs in on all sorts of US national policies, with all sorts of other symbolic gestures. Some other cities point at us and laugh, but heck, it makes the majority of our citizens feel better about ourselves and our community.

    And to correct the misleading statement in the summary, the city was deliberating on this ban BEFORE the movie "The Day After." While that absurd movie may have driven some furor, the issue was raised before the movie and at least some of the citizens still feel that acting locally against something that has global implications is worth their energies: "We feel it's important to make a stand against what we consider to be a potentially destructive force for the whole planet."

    1. Re:Why is this News? by magarity · · Score: 2

      Many cities and other municipalities have ordinances like this. Why is this one instance news?

      The real lesson has nothing to do with any particular city being "nuclear free" or "sanctuary" or anything else in particular. The lesson is that government passes laws and leaves them on the books ad infinitum without ever revisiting them to see if they need updating or outright repeal. In this case, the special interest group that pushed for the law's latest version of specifics no longer exists. I bet people in that community have bumper stickers saying "question authority" but won't ever think of bringing up statues from the 80's for review,

    2. Re:Why is this News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they bring up statues?

    3. Re:Why is this News? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      That's where they store the statutes. Carved in stone on the city's statuary. That's why it's so hard to get them repealed.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  18. It's run by hippies... by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    I've known several people that have lived in Tacoma Park. It's definitely got an ex-hippie vibe. Pretty nice place, though.

  19. Re:Ilegal alien vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because illegal aliens tend to be anti-nuke?

    No, because they almost exclusively vote Democrat.

    Regardless of any good reasons you might have to like the Democrats, it is they who stand to benefit from voter fraud and allowing illegal aliens to vote. That's why they raise such a huge stink whenever the requirement of photo ID to vote is mentioned. They use their old standby of how "racist" this would be, even though a photo ID is free in some states and very cheap in others. Not to mention it's racist of THEM to suggest that just because someone is Black or Hispanic they automatically can't afford a small fee.

    Anyway when it comes to illegals voting or standard voter fraud (dead people voting, etc), I wouldn't want the Republicans to get votes this way. Why should the Democrats get a pass? I don't think enough people appreciate just how critically important it is that we have honest elections. Rigged elections are a threat to our very way of life in this country.

  20. Re:Ilegal alien vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no. Someone might vote in the opposite party to you.

    How horrible. Or something.

    You might make a slightly less poor argument if you say it's unconstitutional for any non US citizen to vote for any level of government in the US. Rather than rant on.

  21. The subject was Takoma Park's anti-nuke policy by brokeninside · · Score: 2

    Plenty of Democrats are pro-nuke. So you're lacking a middle term for your syllogism. Even if it is true that most illegal immigrants that vote do so for Democrats, that doesn't explain why it's no surprise that the city council (and the voters at large in the city) are both anti-nuke and supportive of suffrage for non-citizens in local elections.

    Moreover, this is not about voter fraud. This is about a city that lawfully has broader criteria for who gets to vote in local elections. It's not about state or federal elections which have their criteria set by the state and federal government. So there is no fraud at hand.

    1. Re:The subject was Takoma Park's anti-nuke policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreover, this is not about voter fraud. This is about a city that lawfully has broader criteria for who gets to vote in local elections. It's not about state or federal elections which have their criteria set by the state and federal government. So there is no fraud at hand.

      That's why many Democrats on the state levels want it to be legal for illegal aliens to vote. Then it won't be illegal anymore!

      I mean c'mon man, your argument is like "well back when slavery was legal, that made it ok!" No, it didn't. There are bad laws. Allowing illegal aliens to vote is bad policy.

      You know who is most outraged at the red-carpet treatment illegals are starting to get? And rightfully so? Those legal immigrants who spend time, money, and effort to do things legitimately.

  22. Power Grid by A10Mechanic · · Score: 1

    Would someone be in a position to tell us how much of their electrical power comes from nuclear reactors? I'm thinking they should disconnect form the grid until we know for sure...

    1. Re:Power Grid by nomadic · · Score: 1

      What does this have to do with nuclear weapons?

    2. Re:Power Grid by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      For the USA on average, it's about 20%. If you live in a city serviced by a nuclear power plant, then it would be ~80-95%. Otherwise 0%.

    3. Re:Power Grid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because nuclear power plants are subsidized by DOE to produce tritium for refurbishing nuclear weapons (at least at Watts Bar 1 - Spring City, TN).

    4. Re:Power Grid by Dr.+Gamera · · Score: 1

      We have "energy choice" in Maryland; each customer can choose a different electricity supplier. So no, no one can tell you what percentage of Takoma Park's electricity comes from nuclear power. Certainly, I imagine they have a high percentage of customers (at least relative to other Maryland locales) choosing suppliers with 0% nuclear.

      If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice: Standard Offer Service from Pepco is from seven different suppliers. You are welcome to chase down the nuclear percentages if you like.

      http://www.pepco.com/business/choice/md/afterjune0607sos/default.aspx

    5. Re:Power Grid by magarity · · Score: 1

      These energy source choice offerings are the biggest con job on customers. At best all you can do is vote with your payment as to which you like best. The money goes into a general fund and the electricity is pooled into the grid. Your individual payment doesn't go to, and you don't get dedicated wires from your house to, the particular source.

  23. Takoma Park has an interesting history by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    It was settled predominantly by Seventh Day Adventists as a safe spot for Seventh Day Adventists. So the laws in place tend to reflect the morals of that faith. For a long time, the city was dry. (Although the liquor laws are being liberalized of late.) There is an emphasis on sustainability. In the sixties and seventies, this sort of policy attracted quite a few hippies, utopians and other individuals with pretty left wing ideas. Since the city is a democratic experiment in progress, over time, city policy came to also reflect these values in some ways. As the demographics continue to change, the city's laws and government will also continue to change.

    So it's not really a matter of pushing beliefs. It's a matter of people voting their conscience at the ballot box.

    1. Re:Takoma Park has an interesting history by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      So it's not really a matter of pushing beliefs. It's a matter of people voting their conscience at the ballot box.

      Those are synonymous. The ballot box is a means for forcing one's conscience onto other people.

      If it was just a matter of beliefs/conscience, no ballot box would be needed.

    2. Re:Takoma Park has an interesting history by brokeninside · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand how a ballot box works at the community level. Initially, everyone agrees to abide by the outcome of the election. There is no coercion at work. In the case of new comers, for the most part, they have ample opportunity to look at the local laws before deciding to settle down in a given municipality. By doing so, they implicitly agree to live by the rules that everyone has agreed upon. Kind of like if you come into my living room, if you don't respect the rules of my house, I can ask you to leave.

      Compare this to use of force at work, for example, tarring and feathering dissidents, running people off of their farms if they disagree, and so on.

    3. Re:Takoma Park has an interesting history by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Well of course on your own property, like your living room, you have the right to make people leave if they don't comply with how you want your house used. But I disagree that the group as a whole somehow "owns" the local municipality. This might be somebody's belief, but I think we are starting from the premise that we can't just force our beliefs on each other. You have a belief that people have implicitly agreed to this arrangement, but from my point of view the burden of proof would be on people holding that belief to prove it before forcing this belief on everyone else, too. And what about people who were born into the community? When did they agree? What about people who resided in a territory that was annexed, where often municipal annex votes do not only involve people inside the existing city territory, and not the actual people being annexed?

      It's not like these ideas are new to me and I've been missing them; it's that I have examined them and concluded that I do not agree. I think what our culture has is justifications like this, but they are justifying the use of force. Thankfully there is typically not tarring and feathering, but there is fining and jailtime and other such coercive measures for people who do not comply with an arrangement other people believe they have "implicitly" agreed to.

      If I'm born into democratic Ruritania, I have no more "implicitly agreed" to elections than being born into the Catholic Church means I've implicitly agreed to live by the Catholic hierarchy. And leaving the Catholic Church wouldn't mean giving up my property; it just means I quit doing what they say, because they have no authority to compel me.

  24. How about Taxes? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do they refuse to accept tax payments from any residents who are employed by any company with ties to the nuclear industry? Because that would be blood money, yanno?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:How about Taxes? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Do they refuse to accept tax payments from any residents who are employed by any company with ties to the nuclear industry? Because that would be blood money, yanno?

      Now let's not get crazy here (even though there used to be a funny farm in Takoma). Politicians not taking money? HA! The cost to show if money is clean or not is clearly way to high with all the other worrying they have to do with the silly outdated nuclear bit. They should update themselves as even some of the founders of Green Peace have admitted the nuclear scare was and is a load of crap. Even after the Japanese reactors, some of that old tired scare stuff came up again. They can be operated safely and we can recycle the waste like every other country. Get rid of Jimmy Carter's stupid decision to not recycle nuclear waste. Gojira lives, eh?

  25. Takoma Park Kid by sampson7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Takoma Park has long been a center for the Seventh Day Adventist Church, and 7DAs tend to be pacifists.

    Just FYI, Takoma Park's liberalness (which includes a bead store, vegan restaurants and the rest) has little to do with the Adventists, who aren't really a force in town. Instead, Takoma Park has a long hippy tradition and is filled with aging boomers who moved to the community because of its reputation as a liberal enclave. It's often referred to as the "Berkely of the East" and other such monickers.

    My favorite nuclear free story growing up was that the police department looked for a while like it was going to have to buy Volvo squad cars, because every other major manufacturer had some toe hold in nuclear weapons. Not sure how they managed to avoid that, but they did. Similarly, when the transit authority wanted to build a major highway right through the middle of Takoma Park (which at that point was a sleepy middle class suburb full of WWII bungallos), the local community rallied together and killed the massive highway plan on the Maryland side of Washington, DC. Those techies in Northern Virginia who enjoy the Mixed Bowl during their morning commute see what could have happened to Maryland. Of course, nothing's that simple -- but it's refreshing that there's still a place that combates global warming by banning gasoline-powered lawn mowers.....

    Takoma Park was a great place to grow up. Crazy as they are, it's refreshing to have such a community of idealists. Even though it seems like the whole community has gentrified over the last few years, I still love it, even as I've transitioned to the Dark Side (business! Eeek!)

    1. Re:Takoma Park Kid by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Banning gas-powered lawnmowers helps avoid the RRRRRHHRRHRHRHRRRGHRRRGRHRHRGRGRHRG

    2. Re:Takoma Park Kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough, the California Highway Patrol used Volvo in their fleet for a few years: http://www.flickr.com/photos/code20photog/2930313847/

    3. Re:Takoma Park Kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What on earth is wrong with Volvo squad cars? The motorway cops here in the UK are pretty widely equipped with V70 estates. They're roomy, powerful, pretty rugged. They seem entirely suitable.

  26. It's a Berkeley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't expect people on the East Coast not to have some Berkeleys? I think it's charming as long as there are just a handfull of them. I think there are some cities in New York like this. Isn't Chapaqua (sp.?) like that? Every once in a while, the town council makes the news. I used to drive through there all the time. They have little "Nuclear Free Zone" signs when you enter. Precious.

  27. So basically they watched a movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They watched a movie and made up a political agenda because of said movie. Good god Im glad not everyone is so stupid as to buy into movies that are made and skewed to view an opinion that was from like 25 years. Thats as stupid as not doing business with someone today because their great grandparents were slave owners. I hope they dont watch a michael moore film then if they are that guillible.

    1. Re:So basically they watched a movie? by nomadic · · Score: 2

      You have no clue what it was like back in the early 80's; nuclear war was a horrifying possibility, and if a town wanted to make a statement against the idiotic proliferation of nuclear weapons then good for them.

    2. Re:So basically they watched a movie? by gatfirls · · Score: 1

      I don't get why people have such an issue with this. So what if (and who knows if the movie actually had a hand in it) a movie inspired them to action. It's not like freaked and hid underground for the last 30 years, they simply made it a point to not do business with those who have a hand in the making of devices that if used would basically destroy the planet.

    3. Re:So basically they watched a movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's not a horrifying possibility 30 years on? We seem to have forgotten in this day and age how close to the brink we really still are, and act accordingly. Not that I believe you should not buy a screwdriver or a pencil from a company that sold one to something "nuclear", but we still have just as real a threat and danger of nuclear annihilation as we have had in the last 50 years.

    4. Re:So basically they watched a movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democrats get their knowledge from movies.

  28. Say what? by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Say what? ANY company "involved"?

    I suspect to make nuclear weapons, you need, like, EVERYTHING. Bricks, mortar, screwdrivers, voltmeters, paper, pencils, pens, pipes (lots of pipes), cars, gasoline, welding rods, drill presses, lathes, etc, etc, etc, etc..............

    I think you'd be blocking the buying of almost everything, except maybe nail salon services.

    1. Re:Say what? by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they have very nice looking nails in Takoma Park?

  29. The politicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That passed that law in response to a fucking movie should be beaten with a sack of door knobs.

  30. Nuclear free = intelligence free by drwho · · Score: 1

    nuclear power is NOT the bomb!

  31. What about smoke detectors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How do they handle smoke detection, since the radioactive americium detectors in them are all manufactured by defense contractors that also work with other nuclear materials, including bombs?

    1. Re:What about smoke detectors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why - they buy them from working class people that cant afford to live in takoma park, silly

    2. Re:What about smoke detectors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They practise their free speech right to yell fire in a crowded theatre

    3. Re:What about smoke detectors? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Easy -- they're well aware of the americium. They just don't inhale.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  32. Ideals v.s. Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ultimately it comes down to the city wasting the money on the HP equipment. I guess the pocket book was a bigger influence, than their ideals. Perhaps there is hope after all that reason will ultimately win over knee-jerk reactions.

  33. Government by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    It really is impossible for government (local, state, or federal) to kill a program, isn't it?

    Just for SOMEONE to say "you know, this may have been a good idea, but now it's just stupid, let's stop this"?

    Please note that the Rural Electrification Administration - a 1935 New Deal office set up to bring electricity to US farms - still exists.
    1935 11% of farms had electricity
    1949 mandate was expanded, to allow the REA to offer federal loans to local telephone co-ops
    1952 98% of farms had electricity...agency still not dead.
    1994 agency renamed the Rural Utilities Service

    The role of the current agency is hilariously described in Wiki:
    "The RUS administrator makes the primary policy and program decisions for the agency and is assisted by a borrower and program support staff that includes a financial services staff, an administrative liaison staff, and a program accounting services division. Because of the financial nature of the agency's work, the administrator and associated staff work closely with two other agencies that are not part of the USDA, the Federal Financing Bank (FFB)--and the former Rural Telephone Bank (RTB), which was dissolved in 2006. These banks provide the funds for many of the loan programs administered by the RUS.
    The program functions of the RUS are divided into three operating units: water and waste, electric, and telecommunications, each led by an assistant administrator. The administrator and staff concentrate on the financial details of individual RUS projects, and these three operating units provide the engineering and technical personnel to plan and execute projects."

    Which pretty much translates to a self-justifying rationale any Byzantine Emperor would have been proud to call his own.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Government by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure we're reading the same paragraphs. To summarize your comment:

      A federal agency established for a specific purpose over the course of 70+ years has out lived that initial purpose. It's mission has now broadend to encompases other utilities, which could theoretically keep it busy indefinitely. The primary services it provides is engineering and planning utilities projects as well as working with financial institutions specializing in funding these type of projects.

      I can see how one might argue that they might be over staffed or hopelessly incompetent at their job as an agency. But I'm not sure why you would think its not filling a needed role. Municipalities are frequently expanding, as they grow so to does their utility infrastructure. Having a Federal agency to assist in the various stages of that growth strikes me as a very good idea and worthy use of my tax dollars.

    2. Re:Government by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Don't forget upkeep - just because some backwater rural community has been connected to the grid doesn't mean the job is finished. Keeping everything working incurs ongoing expenses, and I'm willing to bet there are plenty of places where the expense is barely covered by profits and wouldn't be worth repairing if say a tornado destroys a good stretch of infrastructure.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  34. Old laws by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is why I like the idea of having ALL laws auto-sunset every 10 years(or so).
    1. Keep legislatures busy re-approving old laws rather than passing new
    2. Get a review of the old laws going.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  35. Why Canadian? by Skaperen · · Score: 1

    They should be using a local vendor ... local to them. There are plenty around there.

    1. Re:Why Canadian? by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      For the same reason Canadians buy from Maryland.

      "Maryland sells more goods to Canada than to any other country in the world"

      http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/washington/commerce_canada/fact_sheets-fiches_documentaires/md.aspx?view=d

      Do your research. It took all of two minutes.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  36. That's telling them by BobandMax · · Score: 1

    This is a bold, assertive policy that will have a major impact on world peace and stability. You go, Takoma Park, all 17,000 and 2.36 square miles of you.

    --

    "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
    -- Pablo Picasso
  37. Guess who else? by CaptainPuff · · Score: 1

    Guess who else is connected to nuclear weapons production? The federal government.

  38. This is why bicamerial houses are a good thing by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you have ONE legislative body or even two that are elected the same way.

    Ideally you want at LEAST two that are elected in a different enough way that there would be a culture difference between the two houses. The only legislation that gets passed is what can be agreed upon by BOTH bodies.

    Checks and balances.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  39. Sure, it's unconstitutional by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's blatently illegal even in the USA. Still, it's for a very small town with a population of like 50, which is all about as white as you can get in the midwest. It's also old. It's not on anybody's priority list, not even mine. I knew it was a non-enforceable law, but wanted to get rid of it to prevent it from being abused by some joker. Such abuse being unlikely unless things massively change there.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  40. Re:Ilegal alien vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no. Someone might vote in the opposite party to you.

    Yes, they might. And if they are a legal citizen and followed all the rules just like I did, I have no problem with that. May the better candidate win!

    This is hard to understand? Of course not. Just another standard tactic, conflating issues to deliberately miss the point.

    You might make a slightly less poor argument if you say it's unconstitutional for any non US citizen to vote for any level of government in the US. Rather than rant on.

    Is it wrong because it's unconstitutional, or is it unconstitutional because it's wrong? Either way it's both wrong AND unconstitutional. What other country even considers allowing illegal aliens to vote? Mexico? Hah. Tell you what, I propose we harmonize our immigration laws to match those of Mexico. That would mean making them MUCH stricter and more draconian.

    It's pure insanity that things like this are even a controversy.

  41. 14th Amendment by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Does the US not have any part of the US constitution that forbids laws from discriminating like that?

    Yes. The 14th Amendment is probably what you are looking for. It mandates equal protection under the law and was the basis for landmark civil rights decisions such as Brown vs Board of Education.

  42. Supply and Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the healthcare mandate says by not purchasing you are participating in the market for healthcare insurance, isn't Takoma's discrimination against nuclear-industry involved suppliers participation in the nuclear industry market?

    1. Re:Supply and Demand by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Now that's just disingenuous. You can disagree with the healthcare mandate, but the fact of the matter is that if you don't buy insurance and have a medical emergency you can't afford they're not going to just let you die - the hospital is legally required to patch you up anyway, and must then spread the cost around to everyone else. So yeah, you are participating whether you purchase insurance or not. Your expected medical costs are no lower than for the person who bought insurance, in fact they may well be much higher since you'll be unable to get treatment for a condition until it becomes immediately life-threatening and far more expensive.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  43. More research is in order.... by couchslug · · Score: 1

    ...for the Lulz.

    The nuclear contractor base includes MANY subcontractors and buys from MANY suppliers.

    "Torgerson said it is difficult to determine whether a company is connected to U.S. nuclear weapons production. "

    It's difficult to determine they are NOT.

    If a company does business with the General Services Administration their products are almost inevitably going to be used at nuclear production facilities. The ubiquitous Skilcraft blind-made products are used throughout government and military service. Their excellent green notebooks have been helping the US take lives for decades!

    Anyone with current Fed Log and GSA catalog access and knowledge of what a municipality buys could connect the dots easily.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  44. It almost happened by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I didn't buy that either side would actually go through with it, no matter how much posturing was done. What person really wants to be responsible for the termination of life on earth?

    Probably no one but there are numerous documented cases of the USA and USSR almost launching nukes at each other due to equipment malfunctions and other errors. The safes with the launch codes were kept with a combination of 0000000 (or something similar) to make it easier to launch. Solar effects caused monitoring satellites to falsely report launches and the only thing that stopped a retaliation was a level headed military officer.

    While the chances of a nuclear war were/are low, they weren't and aren't zero. People aren't always rational and all it takes is a small number of crazy people to cause a huge problem. Worse, it should be obvious by now that there are some people who are suicidal and would be perfectly content to take you and a million of your closest friends with them to the grave.

    1. Re:It almost happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People aren't always rational and all it takes is a small number of crazy people to cause a huge problem. Worse, it should be obvious by now that there are some people who are suicidal and would be perfectly content to take you and a million of your closest friends with them to the grave.

      Along with a lot of their own closest friends too, if they think it hurts you more than it hurts them.

    2. Re:It almost happened by drkstr1 · · Score: 0

      Any religion that promises you rewards in payment as sexual slavery (72 virgins), is fucking insane! I would be very scared if these people had a nuke.

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
  45. Most Lost by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    If anything, the term "Indian" is a big laugh at Columbus's expense. He was the most lost person ever -- as in, having made the largest navigational error in history. Even "Wrong-Way" Corrigan wasn't that far off.

  46. Re:like Steve Jobs security clearances to sell Pix by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

    That's nothing, I know of guys who listen to their iTunes libraries while designing stuff related to nuclear weapons and missiles, in complete violation of the iTunes EULA! (See section g).

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  47. Nuclear Free Enforcement by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    How much funding does the city have set aside to fight off 'illegal restraint of trade' lawsuits?

    Well if the law states anywhere that the city should be "nuclear free" an alternative tack might be to insist on enforcement. Given that all atoms contain a nucleus the only course of action would be to demolish the city and relocate the inhabitants. The only nuclear free city is one which does not exist...unless someone can figure out how to build a city using dark matter.

  48. herp derp derp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    penis whale goat anus vagina pancake squirrel midget.

  49. Wouldn't they have to ban all Federal money too? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Isn't the Federal govt involved in nuclear arms?

  50. What is HP's involvement here, anyway? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering if the current incarnation of "Hewlett Packard" is even the company they want to be boycotting. HP is now a maker of commodity PCs and printers.

    I'm thinking that back in 1983, HP's high end test and measurement gear was probably used for monitoring weapons tests at Los Alamos, etc. (along with similar products from Tektronix, LeCroy, GenRad, Fluke, and every other test and measurement vendor under the sun.), but that entire division was spun off into a completely separate company, Agilent Technologies.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  51. Methinks the Chicken Little doth cluck too much by Krigl · · Score: 1

    But since they're already at it, they should escalate the pressure, something along the lines of massive flyer campaign, perhaps even the T-shirts with catchy slogan. And of course, we have progressed since the times of shooting the Red Dwarf, so today the townsfolk could also collectively join some Facebook group that emphatically disagrees with nuclear weapons.

    Then they could have public viewing of Threads, it's better than The Day After.

    --
    Troll 2.0 Fear my asocial networking!
  52. No, its just stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " but it's refreshing that there's still a place that combates global warming by banning gasoline-powered lawn mowers..... "

    What's refreshing about it? Did you enjoy grand pointless gestures.

    Takoma Park is a joke, but at least they keep their stupidity to themselves.

    Unfortunately, the rest of the county is run be even stupider people, and frankly we have a governor Martin O'Malley who, no kidding, is a functionally retarded person. He can barely speak in complete sentences. He thinks he wants to be president.

  53. why attack the ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    valid then, valid now. i'm more worried about them buying stuff from a dying company.

  54. crazy laws by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    In my memory, it didn't. I'm not saying it was a well written law, even for the time.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right